Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2025 Dec 26;26(12):4471–4475. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.12.4471

Evaluation of Inflammatory Biomarkers Gal-1 and IL-1β and Liver Enzyme Activities in Gastric Cancer Patients Pre- and Post-Chemotherapy: A Case-Control Study

ALaa K Haroon 1, Noor R Ali 2, Fadhil Abbas Alghanmi 3, MuslimM M Jassim 4,*
PMCID: PMC13242532  PMID: 41459861

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of the present study was to measure the serum levels of two inflammatory biomarkers, galectin-1 (Gal-1) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), as well as liver enzyme activities, in gastric cancer (GC) patients before and after chemotherapy, and to compare these findings with healthy controls.

Methods:

The study included 75 gastric cancer patients and 50 controls. Serum levels of IL-1β and Gal-1 were measured using the ELISA method, and liver enzyme activity was assessed using the kinetic chromogenic method with commercial kits.

Results:

Baseline levels of Gal-1 and IL-1β were significantly higher in patients compared to controls (38.1 ng/ml vs 16.1 ng/ml; p <0.001 for Gal-1, 86.3 pg/mL vs 18.8 pg/mL; p <0,001 for IL-1β). And also Baseline levels of ALT, AST and ALP was significantly higher in the patient group pages Following chemotherapy, levels of IL-1β significantly decreased to 67.9 pg/ml (P < 0.001) and Gal-1 showed a modest decrease to 37.2 ng/ml (not significant, P = 0.06). Although reduced by about 10%, both biomarkers remained significantly higher compared to controls (P < 0.001). In contrast, the activities of liver enzymes significantly increased after chemotherapy.

Conclusion:

Both Gal-1 and IL-1β play pivotal roles in causing inflammation during the development of GC, and their expression may represent an integrated systemic inflammatory process in GC patients regardless of gastrectomy as well as chemotherapy. In addition, the combination chemotherapy in treatment of GC led to hepatotoxicity as suggested by sera hepatic enzyme activities during and following therapy.

Key Words: Gastric cancer, Gal-1, IL-1β, liver enzymes, chemotherapy

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) remains the fifth frequent common cancer in incidence and mortality around the world, affecting 4.9% of total cases and 6.8% of all cancer-related deaths globally. The established high-risk factors include Helicobacter pylori infection, specific dietary habits and smoking, a positive correlation with obesity and older age as inherited genetic predispositions [1]. In Iraq, GC accounted for over 1,200 new cases and more than 1,000 deaths in 2022 [2]. Inflammation is a critical promoter of cancer progress since it operates the generation of tumor microenvironment (TME) with inflammatory elements like vasculature endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and immune cell. This environment presents high levels of immune checkpoints like programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) ligand 1 (PD-L1), which inhibit anti-tumoral immune responses and also pro-inflammatory secretions as, chemokines, cytokines and growth factors [3]. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) might have an effect on carcinogenesis although the current evidence suggested that IL-1β was associated with cancer, especially solid tumor and in particular with GC [4,5]. By binding to its receptors IL1R1 and IL1RAcP on both tumor and immune cells, this cytokine activates a range of transcription factors including NF-κB and AP-1 which in turn induces multiple inflammatory genes that foster tumor cell invasion, proliferation and angiogenesis [6]. Furthermore, IL-1β expression is related to tumor staging in breast cancer and esophageal carcinoma [7, 8].

They are able to linkage between intracellular organelles and from inside the nucleus or cytoplasm to the extracellular space that the presence of galectins, which refers to a family of galactoside-binding lectins found in various tissues that possibly affect immune functions through by involving microenvironmental cues [9]. Diabetes and pancreatitis patient commonly exhibit elevated peritoneal Gal-1, which counter-modulates Gal-1 as enhancement of the major membrane proteins CD45 (FIG. 2b ) and CD43 on T cells. This interaction leads to TAM-mediated T cell apoptosis and -migration, thereby inhibiting the local tumor-specific immune response [10, 11]. Gal-1 also contributes to the creation of an immunosuppressive microenvironment by activating regulatory T cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts, which enhances immune evasion by tumor cells [12, 13].

Serum levels of Gal-1 have been positively correlated with histopathological features in several cancers, including ovarian cancer and GC [14, 15]. However, only a few studies have examined changes in Gal-1 expression before and after chemotherapy. For example, a study by Zhu et al. [16], reported a significant decrease in Gal-1 expression in patients with squamous cervical cancer following chemotherapy. Conversely, Funkhouser et al. found that serum concentrations of Gal-1 increased after chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer [17].

Chemotherapy has made significant progress in lowering the risk of GC recurrence. The first-line treatment typically involves a combination of fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based drugs [18]. The mechanism of action of cytotoxic chemotherapy involves interfering with nucleic acid synthesis and cell division. As a result, liver toxicity is a common side effect of anti-tumor chemotherapy, often leading to elevated liver enzyme levels [19, 20].

Acknowledging the pro-inflammatory significance of IL-1β and Gal-1 in GC, our study aims to evaluate and compare the serum levels of IL-1β, Gal-1, and liver enzymes in GC patients versus healthy individuals.

Materials and Methods

Patients with GC from Imam Al-Hussein Medical City in Karbala, Iraq, were enrolled in the study, along with an age- and sex-matched healthy control group. Key patient characteristics including age, sex, histopathological findings, and chemotherapy details were obtained from medical records. Patients with metastases, liver disease, sepsis, autoimmune disorders, or a history of alcohol abuse were excluded from the study.

Blood samples were collected at baseline from both study groups and from post-chemotherapy patients. Samples were drawn into plain tubes to isolate serum, which was then used to measure the concentrations of inflammatory markers (IL-1β and Gal-1) and liver enzymes, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP).

Serum levels of IL-1β and Gal-1 were measured using the ELISA technique with commercial kits from ZellBio®, and readings were taken using the Biotek® Model 1800 ELISA reader. Liver enzyme activity was measured using the kinetic colorimetric method with commercial kits from BioSystems®, and analyzed using** a Mindray BS-380 clinical chemistry analyzer.

Ethic approval

The study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Imam Al-Hussein Medical City in Karbala, Iraq. All participants were informed about the study and gave written informed consent before enrollment. Confidentiality of patient information was strictly ensured throughout the research.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) were used to summarize age, sex, serum levels of Gal-1, IL-1β, and liver enzyme levels. Comparisons between patients and controls were conducted using the Chi-square test for categorical variables and the independent Student’s t-test for continuous variables. Changes in serum levels of Gal-1, IL-1β, and liver enzymes from baseline to post-chemotherapy in the patient group were analyzed using the paired Student’s t-test. All data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 24) for Windows.

Results

Our case-control study included 75 patients with GC and 50 healthy controls, with no significant differences in age or sex between the groups (Table 1). All patients underwent either total or partial gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy regimens consisting of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Histopathological data are shown in Table 2.

Table 1.

Main Characteristic Data

Patients Controls P. value
Number 75 50
Age (mean ± SD) 54.28 ± 12 56.12 ± 11.6 0.39*
Sex
Female 20 (26.7%) 15 (30%) 0.68**
Male 55 (73.3%) 35 (70%)

Statistical analysis was done using t-test and Chi-square test; P-values were 0.39 for age and 0.68 for sex.

Table 2.

Histopathological Data of GC Patients

Charecterestic
TNM Staging
I 2 (2.7%)
II 39 (52%)
III 34 (45.3%)
Grade
I 33 (44.0%)
II 28 (37.3%)
III 14 (18.7%)
T
T2 15 (20.0%)
T3 37 (49.3%)
T4 23 (30.7%)
N
N0 11 (14.7%)
N1 42 (56%)
N2 15 (20%)
N3 7 (9.3%)
Lauren classification
Intestinal 43 (57.3%)
Diffuse 23 (30.7%)
Mixed 9 (12.0%)

T, tumor invasion; N, regional lymph node metastasis. Statistical analysis for categorical variables like TNM staging, tumor grade, T and N classification, and Lauren classification was performed using the Chi-square test. Percentages were reported for each category.

Comparison of study variables between pre-chemotherapy and controls

At baseline, serum levels of Gal-1 and IL-1β in patients were significantly higher 38.1 ng/ml and 86.3 pg/ml, respectively compared with controls, who had levels of 16.1 ng/ml and 18.8 pg/ml (P < 0.001) (Table 3). Similarly, serum levels of ALT, AST, and ALP were significantly elevated in the patient group (73.9 IU/ml, 106.4 IU/ml, and 128.6 IU/ml, respectively) compared with the control subjects (41.4 IU/ml, 55.4 IU/ml, and 95.3 IU/ml, respectively) (P < 0.001) (Table 4).

Table 3.

Differences of IL-1β and Gal-1 Levels within Patient Group (Pre- vs Post-Chemotherapy) and between Groups (Patient Group vs Control Group).

Marker Patient group Within-patient Δ P. value (within)** Control group Between-group Δ P. value
(between)*
Pre Post Mean ± SD
(Mean ± SD) (Mean ± SD)
IL-1β (pg/ml) 86.3 ± 19.5  67.9 ± 20.4 -18.3 < 0.001 18.83 ± 3.00 67.4 (Pre) < 0.001
49.11 (Post) < 0.001
Gal-1 (ng/ml) 38.1 ± 10.4 37.2 ± 8.6  -0.89 0.063  16.13 ± 2.45  21.9 (Pre) < 0.001
21.10 (Post) < 0.001

**, paired sample t-test; *, independent sample t-test; Δ, mean difference (within patient or between group); pre, pre-chemotherapy; post, post-chemotherapy; Gal-1, galectin-1; IL-1β, interleukin-1beta

Table 4.

Differences of Liver Enzymes Activities within Patient Group (Pre- vs Post-Chemotherapy) and between Groups (Patient Group vs Control Group).

Marker Patient group Within-patient Δ P. value (within)** Control group
Mean ± SD
Between-group Δ P. value (between)*
Pre Post
(Mean ± SD) (Mean ± SD)
ALT (IU/ml) 73.89 ± 18.19 74.72 ± 18.14 0.84 < 0.001 41.44 ± 11.05 32.45 (Pre) < 0.001
AST (IU/ml) 106.36 ± 8.99 108.14 ± 9.23 1.78 0.002 55.4 ± 5.32 50.96 (Pre) < 0.001
ALP (IU/ml) 128.63 ± 16.56 131.51 ± 17.08 2.88 < 0.001 95.34 ± 19.54 33.29 (Pre) < 0.001

**, paired sample t-test; *, independent sample t-test; Δ, mean difference (within patient or between group); pre, pre-chemotherapy; post, post-chemotherapy; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase.

Comparison of study variables post-chemotherapy with their baseline levels

Post-chemotherapy, the serum level of IL-1β (67.9 pg/ml) was significantly lower than the baseline level (86.3 pg/ml) (P < 0.001). In contrast, Gal-1 levels showed a slight, non-significant decrease from 38.1 ng/ml at baseline to 37.2 ng/ml post-chemotherapy (P = 0.063) (Table 3). Additionally, serum levels of ALT, AST, and ALP increased slightly after chemotherapy (74.7 IU/ml, 108.1 IU/ml, and 131.5 IU/ml, respectively) compared to baseline levels (73.9 IU/ml, 106.4 IU/ml, and 128.6 IU/ml, respectively), with these changes reaching statistical significance (P < 0.001) (Table 4).

Comparison of Gal-1 and IL-1β levels between post-chemotherapy and controls

Serum levels of Gal-1 and IL-1β in post-chemotherapy patients (37.2 ng/ml and 67.9 pg/ml, respectively) were still significantly higher than those in the control group (16.1 ng/ml and 18.8 pg/ml, respectively) (P < 0.001) (Table 3).

Discussion

Inflammation is a key driver in the progression of gastric adenocarcinoma, with chronic inflammation caused by Helicobacter pylori induced gastritis widely recognized as a major contributing factor in its initiation [21]. Studies have shown that Helicobacter pylori colonization is associated with an increased expression of Gal-1 and IL-1β in gastric tissue [22, 23]. Moreover, several studies have reported that the expression of Gal-1 and IL-1β is significantly higher in gastric cancer (GC) tissue compared to normal gastric tissue [24, 25], these findings will likely account for the elevated serum levels of them in GC patients. We confirmed that both Gal-1 and IL-1β levels in sera of GC patients 38.1 ng/ml, 86.3 pg/ml, respectively were elevated significantly compared with control group (16.1 ng/ml,18.8 pg/ml; P <0.001). Both of these observations resonate vis-à-vis the Blair et al. An example of this can be found in Vila-Perelló [26], that reported increased serum levels of Gal-1 in breast and lung cancer patients compared to healthy controls. Similarly, Bosch et al. [27], demonstrated that serum GaI-1 in patients with pancreatic cancer was significantly higher than those of healthy controls. Furthermore, Deans et al. In addition, up-regulation of IL-1β both at mRNA and protein levels is described in patients with gastroesophageal cancer [28]. After completion of chemotherapy, at the time of serum collection, the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β declined from 86.3 pg/ml (baseline) to 67.9 pg/ml whereas that of Gal-1 exhibited a sub effective decrease from 38.1 ng/ml (baseline) to 37.2 ng/ml. These observations are supported by Masoodi et al. Ovarian cancer patients showed reduced serum Gal-1 levels upon chemotherapy in a report by Rubinstein et al. [29]. Although the ir-S-CRP level decreased after chemotherapy (37.2 ng/ml for Gal-1 and 67.9 pg/ml for IL-1β), serum levels of these inflammatory markers were still elevated when compared with control group values (Gal-1 = 16.1 ng/ml, P <0.001; IL-1β sat= 18.8 pg.ml, P <0.001). These results suggest that serum levels of Gal-1 and IL-1β could represent systemic inflammatory soluble biomarkers in GC [29].

At baseline, the activities of liver enzymes in patient group were beyond normal limits (73.9 IU/L for ALT, 106.4 IU/L for AST and 128.6 for ALP) (P <0.001), suggesting some hepatic complications related to gastrectomy [30]. There were the elevated liver enzyme activities after chemotherapy (ALT 74.7 IU/L, AST 108.1 IU/L and ALP131.5 IU/L). Similarly, hepatic steatosis has been described with irinotecan and 5-FU in the literature, as well as oxaliplatin-induced hepatic sinusoidal injury in other studies. Furthermore, it is well established that both 5-FU and oxaliplatin induce oxidative stress, which contributes to hepatic steatosis development. These results support the notion that this chemotherapy combination increases the risk of hepatotoxicity [31, 32].

In conclusion, Gal-1 and IL-1β play a significant role in inflammation during the progression of gastric cancer (GC), with their serum levels reflecting the overall systemic inflammatory status in these patients, even after gastrectomy and chemotherapy. Moreover, the combination chemotherapy used in GC treatment increases the risk of hepatotoxicity, as evidenced by persistently elevated liver enzyme activities following treatment.

Author Contribution Statement

Muslim Mohammed: Supervision, Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Validation, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Alaa khalaf, Noor R: Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Fadhil Abb: Investigation, Resources..

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge all individuals and institutions who extended their support and assistance in the completion of this research.

If any scientific Body approved it/ if it is part of an approved student thesis

This study is not part of a student thesis or academic dissertation and has not been submitted to any scientific body for prior approval. It is an independent clinical research conducted by the authors.

How the ethical issue was handled (name the ethical committee that approved the research)

The ethical aspects of this research were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of Imam Al-Hussein Medical City in Karbala, Iraq. All participants provided informed consent prior to enrollment, and the study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Was the study registered in any registration dataset (for clinical trials, guidelines, meta-analysis)

No, this study was not registered in any clinical trial registry or international database, as it was an observational study and not a clinical trial, guideline, or meta-analysis.

Conflict of interest

Authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–63. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ferlay J, Ervik M, Laversanne M, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. Lyon: International agency for research on cancer; 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barriga V, Kuol N, Nurgali K, Apostolopoulos V. The complex interaction between the tumor micro-environment and immune checkpoints in breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11:8. doi: 10.3390/cancers11081205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rébé C, Ghiringhelli F. Interleukin-1β and cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(7):1791. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baker KJ, Houston A, Brint E. Il-1 family members in cancer; two sides to every story. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1197. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tu S, Bhagat G, Cui G, Takaishi S, Kurt-Jones EA, Rickman B, et al. Overexpression of interleukin-1beta induces gastric inflammation and cancer and mobilizes myeloid-derived suppressor cells in mice. Cancer Cell. 2008;14(5):408–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen MF, Lu MS, Chen PT, Chen WC, Lin PY, Lee KD. Role of interleukin 1 beta in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Mol Med (Berl) 2012;90(1):89–100. doi: 10.1007/s00109-011-0809-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dinarello CA. An interleukin-1 signature in breast cancer treated with interleukin-1 receptor blockade: Implications for treating cytokine release syndrome of checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2018;78(18):5200–2. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-2225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mimura S, Morishita A, Oura K, Takuma K, Nakahara M, Tadokoro T, et al. Galectins and liver diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:2. doi: 10.3390/ijms26020790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.He J, Baum LG. Endothelial cell expression of galectin-1 induced by prostate cancer cells inhibits t-cell transendothelial migration. Lab Invest. 2006;86(6):578–90. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Earl LA, Bi S, Baum LG. N- and o-glycans modulate galectin-1 binding, cd45 signaling, and t cell death. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(4):2232–44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.066191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Orozco CA, Martinez-Bosch N, Guerrero PE, Vinaixa J, Dalotto-Moreno T, Iglesias M, et al. Targeting galectin-1 inhibits pancreatic cancer progression by modulating tumor-stroma crosstalk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(16):E3769–e78. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722434115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cagnoni AJ, Giribaldi ML, Blidner AG, Cutine AM, Gatto SG, Morales RM, et al. Galectin-1 fosters an immunosuppressive microenvironment in colorectal cancer by reprogramming cd8(+) regulatory t cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102950118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abdelwahab M, Ebian H, Ibrahim T, Badr M, Lashin M, Yassin M, et al. Clinical significance of serum galectin-1 and its tissue immunohistochemical expression in serous ovarian carcinoma patients. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;09:937–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pan Z, Xu G, Zhang Y, Wu M, Yu J, He X, et al. Galectin-1 promotes gastric carcinoma progression and cisplatin resistance through the nrp-1/c-jun/wee1 pathway. J Gastric Cancer. 2024;24(3):300–15. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2024.24.e25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhu H, Chen A, Li S, Tao X, Sheng B, Chetry M, et al. Predictive role of galectin-1 and integrin α5β1 in cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy of bulky squamous cervical cancer. Biosci Rep. 2017;37:5. doi: 10.1042/BSR20170958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Funkhouser A, Shuster H, Martin JC, Edenfield WJ, Blenda AV. Pattern analysis of serum galectins-1, -3, and -9 in breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:15. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sato Y, Okamoto K, Kida Y, Mitsui Y, Kawano Y, Sogabe M, et al. Overview of chemotherapy for gastric cancer. J Clin Med. 2023;12:4. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sharma A, Houshyar R, Bhosale P, Choi JI, Gulati R, Lall C. Chemotherapy induced liver abnormalities: An imaging perspective. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2014;20(3):317–26. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2014.20.3.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mudd TW, Guddati AK. Management of hepatotoxicity of chemotherapy and targeted agents. Am J Cancer Res. 2021;11(7):3461–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jaroenlapnopparat A, Bhatia K, Coban S. Inflammation and gastric cancer. Diseases. 2022;10:3. doi: 10.3390/diseases10030035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yuan XY, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Chen A, Liu P. IL-1β, an important cytokine affecting helicobacter pylori-mediated gastric carcinogenesis. Microb Pathog. 2023;174:105933. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nagata M, Ikuse T, Tokushima K, Arai N, Jimbo K, Kudo T, et al. High galectin expression in helicobacter pylori-infected gastric mucosa in childhood. Pediatr Neonatol. 2025;66(3):241–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2024.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yin S, Lan C, Pei H, Zhu Z. Expression of interleukin 1β in gastric cancer tissue and its effects on gastric cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:31–5. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S94277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chong Y, Tang D, Gao J, Jiang X, Xu C, Xiong Q, et al. Galectin-1 induces invasion and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human gastric cancer cells via non-canonical activation of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2016;7(50):83611–26. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Blair BB, Funkhouser AT, Goodwin JL, Strigenz AM, Chaballout BH, Martin JC, et al. Increased circulating levels of galectin proteins in patients with breast, colon, and lung cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:19. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Martinez-Bosch N, Barranco LE, Orozco CA, Moreno M, Visa L, Iglesias M, et al. Increased plasma levels of galectin-1 in pancreatic cancer: Potential use as biomarker. Oncotarget. 2018;9(68):32984–96. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Deans DA, Wigmore SJ, Gilmour H, Paterson-Brown S, Ross JA, Fearon KC. Elevated tumour interleukin-1beta is associated with systemic inflammation: A marker of reduced survival in gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(11):1568–75. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Masoodi M, Shah ZA, Beigh AH, Ahmad SZ, Mir AW, Yasin B, et al. Galectin-1 as a predictive biomarker in ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2021;14(1):123 . doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00874-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sumiyoshi S, Kubota T, Ohashi T, Nishibeppu K, Kiuchi J, Shimizu H, et al. Risk factors for liver dysfunction and their clinical importance after gastric cancer surgery. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):8076 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58644-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ramadori G, Cameron S. Effects of systemic chemotherapy on the liver. Ann Hepatol. 2010;9(2):133–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Izadpanahi P, Mohammadifard M, Tavakoli T, Abbasi N, Javadinia SA. Effect of chemotherapy on fatty liver occurrence in breast and gastrointestinal cancer patients: A case-controlled study. Hepat Mon. 2020;20:3. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES