Abstract
Introduction
Cervical cancer is a malignancy associated with human immunodeficiency virus, characterized by abnormal cervical cell mutations. Machine learning techniques offer valuable support for early detection and prediction of cervical cancer, potentially lowering screening and treatment costs. This study specifically targeted women living with human immunodeficiency virus, aiming to identify the most significant predictors of cervical cancer and to determine the most effective supervised machine learning model for its prediction within this population.
Methods
This study employed a multi-center, cross-sectional design using a secondary dataset from the smart care systems of four antiretroviral therapy clinics in central Debre Markos town. To determine the most relevant predictors, seven machine learning models, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and AdaBoost were implemented to identify the top-performing model. Model performance was assessed using the confusion matrix and the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve.
Results
The findings indicated that adherence at enrollment, screening visit type, and nutritional status, months on anti-retroviral therapy, follow-up status, and weight were highly important predictors of cervical cancer. Among the evaluated models, the K-Nearest Neighbors model outperformed the others, achieving the highest accuracy of 98% and an Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of 0.68.
Conclusion
As demonstrated in this study, the K-Nearest Neighbors model showed the best performance in effectively predicting cervical cancer among women living with human immunodeficiency virus. Strengthening nutritional support interventions, improving follow-up mechanisms, and enhancing anti-retroviral therapy adherence counseling programs may collectively contribute to reducing the risk of cervical cancer among women living with human immunodeficiency virus. Future research should focus on validating the predictive model across diverse geographic regions and healthcare contexts to enhance its generalizability, robustness, and practical applicability.
Keywords: Anti-retroviral therapy, Cervical cancer, Machine learning models, Predictors
Introduction
Cervical cancer is a malignancy linked to human immunodeficiency virus acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS), characterized by abnormal changes in cervical cells that grow uncontrollably, forming tumors. These cancerous cells can invade nearby tissues and metastasize to other parts of the body if not treated promptly [1]. Globally, cervical cancer is the most common cancer among women, affecting around 24.6 million individuals, and ranks as the second most prevalent cancer in Africa, with a prevalence of 25.2%, highest in Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa [2].
The two main types of cervical cancer are squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Women over 30 years old are at greater risk, and more than 70% of cases are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), which is preventable and treatable if detected early [3]. In Ethiopia, over 33.7 million women aged 15 and above are at risk. Regular screening through visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) or Pap tests is the most effective approach for early detection, improving treatment outcomes and reducing the risk of invasive cancer and mortality [4].
To combat cervical cancer, the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the 90-70-90 strategy in 2020, aiming to eliminate cervical cancer by 2030. This strategy targets 90% HPV vaccination coverage, screening 70% of women with high-performance tests at least twice, and ensuring treatment for 90% of diagnosed cases. Similarly, Ethiopia’s National Cancer Control Plan (2016–2020) aimed for at least 80% screening coverage using VIA and offered free services in all government health facilities [5].
Although cancer treatment has evolved, early detection remains critical, as cervical cancer is often asymptomatic in its initial stages. Screening and testing are essential for identifying precancerous changes, yet the lack of effective screening, HPV vaccination, and early detection programs results in most cases and deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries [6, 7]. Once diagnosed, cervical cancer can have severe physical, psychological, and financial impacts, including fatigue, pain, heavy bleeding, reduced sexual activity, anxiety, depression, and reduced life expectancy [8].
Cervical cancer is largely preventable through vaccination, screening, and timely treatment. Worldwide, it is the third most common cancer among women, with 604,000 new cases annually, causing approximately 342,000 deaths each year, 90% of which occur in low- and middle-income countries. By 2030, deaths are projected to rise to 443,000, a 67% increase [2, 9]. In Africa, around 119,284 new cases are diagnosed yearly, leading to 81,687 deaths among women aged 14–44. Sub-Saharan Africa has an incidence rate of 25.2%, a mortality rate of 23.2%, and a prevalence of 27.6%, with notable variations between countries. Malawi records the highest incidence and mortality globally, while Uganda has the second-highest incidence in East Africa [8–10].
In Ethiopia, about 7,000 new cases and 5,000 deaths occur annually, with incidence, mortality, and prevalence rates of 17.3%, 16.5%, and 18.2%, respectively [7]. The high prevalence is driven by a fragile healthcare system and high HIV/AIDS rates. Women living with HIV are six times more likely to develop cervical lesions, making Ethiopia’s 534,000 HIV-positive women especially vulnerable [11]. Key risk factors for cervical cancer include early sexual activity, age over 35, multiple sexual partners, history of sexually transmitted infections, long-term contraceptive use, multiple pregnancies, young age at childbirth, low education and income, advanced HIV, high viral load, low cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count, poor condom use, lack of vaccination, and certain marital statuses [12–14].
Despite preventive measures such as screening and HPV vaccination, cervical cancer remains a major public health concern, making early detection essential for reducing mortality. Accurately predicting cervical cancer in HIV-positive women on antiretroviral therapy (ART) is particularly challenging, as the absence of reliable predictive tools limits the identification of high-risk individuals, resulting in missed opportunities for timely intervention and preventable adverse outcomes [15]. Advances in artificial intelligence, especially machine learning, offer promising solutions by enabling more precise and efficient disease prediction, identifying high-risk patients, and supporting timely clinical decision-making [16–20]. These models are particularly valuable in resource-limited settings, where they facilitate personalized care, closer patient monitoring, targeted treatment adjustments, and optimized allocation of healthcare resources. Additionally, they can anticipate comorbidities such as tuberculosis, cardiovascular diseases, and opportunistic infections, thereby improving overall outcomes for HIV-positive women [21–24].
Previous studies on cervical cancer have overlooked HIV-positive women, relied on small samples, and lacked advanced analytical methods. This study addresses these gaps by developing a machine-learning model to predict cervical cancer among HIV-positive women on ART [10, 25]. The findings of this study are expected to inform public health strategies, strengthen cervical cancer screening programs, optimize ART and preventive interventions, and guide policymakers in resource-limited settings. Ultimately, integrating machine learning predictive tools into healthcare systems can enhance individualized patient care, reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality, and improve overall health system efficiency [26, 27].
Methods
Study area and period
A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in Debre Markos Town, located in the East Gojjam Zone of Northwest Ethiopia. Debre Markos has a total population of 262,497, comprising 129,921 males and 132,576 females. Data for this study were extracted between March and April 2025. To mitigate the burden of cervical cancer, the Debre Markos city administration has independently implemented a range of preventive and control measures. These include community-based health education, cervical cancer screening programs, and treatment services for diagnosed cases.
Dataset description
This study utilized secondary data from 2,337 records collected at four ART clinics in Debre Markos town between December 1, 2020 and December 1, 2024. The data were extracted from the clinics’ Smart Care system and include information on HIV-positive women since the initiation of ART. A retrospective chart review was conducted to collect relevant clinical and demographic data used to develop and evaluate a machine learning model for predicting cervical cancer in this population. Women living with HIV/AIDS aged 15–49 years who were enrolled in ART follow-up care were included, in accordance with standard treatment protocols. A minimum ART duration of six months was required to ensure the availability of adequate treatment response data. Women who were eligible for cervical cancer screening but had not been screened, as well as those with missing critical medical records (e.g., follow-up status), were excluded from the analysis.
Data collection tool and procedures
In this study, data collection from the smart care system was done in Excel format to retrieve relevant patient information from the electronic medical record ART database from different ART facilities. The extraction form captured essential demographic details, including age and sex. These factors were considered crucial for understanding the social context of the patients and assessing potential cancer risk contributors. Data quality control measures were implemented throughout the study to guarantee reliability and validity. This included performing consistency checks and addressing any missing entries. Experienced clerks supervised data entry, using predefined validation rules to flag any inconsistencies.
Data preprocessing
After data acquisition, the dataset underwent an initial data-cleaning phase. Missing numerical values were handled using mean imputation, while missing categorical values were addressed using mode imputation. Categorical variables were then encoded using one-hot encoding, with each category represented as a binary indicator (0 or 1). To address class imbalance, both Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN) were evaluated. Although both techniques demonstrated comparable predictive performance, SMOTE was selected due to its methodological simplicity, computational efficiency, and greater model stability. Unlike ADASYN, which emphasizes difficult-to-learn minority instances and may amplify noise, SMOTE generates synthetic samples more uniformly within minority class neighborhoods, resulting in more robust and generalizable decision boundaries. Given the absence of a significant performance advantage with ADASYN, SMOTE was retained as the preferred imbalance-handling method. To tackle multicollinearity and enhance predictive accuracy, correlation heat maps were utilized as needed. Feature importance was subsequently assessed using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm, which ranks relevant predictors, including age, marital status, occupation, educational status, residence, weight, religion, alcohol use, smoking, khat chewing, early age of the first sex, age of pregnancy, abortion, parity, condom use, sexually transmitted infection (STI), vaginal wall abnormality, multiple sexual partners, CD4 count, viral loads, WHO HIV staging, tuberculosis preventive therapy, and months on ART based on their contribution to model performance. Following preprocessing and feature selection, the dataset was split into training and testing sets, with 80% of the data used for model training and 20% reserved for evaluating performance on previously unseen data. This study used Python (version 3.11) for data management and analysis, primarily employing the Pandas library.
Model training
The training process began with RF feature selection to identify the most relevant predictors of cervical cancer in women living with HIV. Seven classifiers were then trained: Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and AdaBoost (ADB). These algorithms were chosen based on prior studies demonstrating their effectiveness in healthcare-related machine learning, including cervical cancer prediction [18, 28].
Model evaluation
After training, the models were systematically evaluated to determine the most effective classifier for predicting cervical cancer in women living with HIV. Performance metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) [29].
Results
Socio-demographic and reproductive health characteristics
The study included 2,337 participants aged 15 to 49 years. Among them, the majority (86.65%) were over 30 years old, and most (57.2%) had a body weight of 51–65 kg. Additionally, 63.63% of the participants were undergoing cervical cancer screening for the first time, with all tested using the VIA method. Furthermore, 92.5% reported using family planning methods, and nearly all (99.1%) received negative results for cervical cancer screening (Table 1).
Table 1.
Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants in Debre Markos town
| Feature | Category | Frequency (n) | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 15–30 | 312 | 13.4 |
| 31–49 | 2025 | 86.6 | |
| Weight | 38–50 | 672 | 28.8 |
| 51–65 | 1336 | 57.2 | |
| > 65 | 329 | 14.1 | |
| Screening Visit Type | 1st time | 1481 | 63.4 |
| Re-screening | 827 | 35.4 | |
| Post treatment | 29 | 1.2 | |
| Screening Accepted | Yes | 2317 | 99.1 |
| No | 20 | 0.9 | |
| Screening Mechanism | VIA | 2336 | 99.9 |
| HPV | 1 | 0.1 | |
| Family Planning | Yes | 2162 | 92.5 |
| No | 175 | 7.5 | |
| Screening result | Negative | 2315 | 99.1 |
| Positive | 22 | 0.9 |
Clinical characteristics of respondents
The majority of participants (96.5%) showed good adherence to ART, indicating generally positive treatment behavior. Furthermore, most participants (99.8%) fell within the range of Body Mass Index (BMI) 18–25. Additionally, 84.5% of participants had been on ART for more than 100 months, a duration associated with satisfactory immune function, life span, and viral suppression. Poor adherence over time, however, may make managing the viral infection more challenging and lead to drug resistance (Table 2).
Table 2.
Clinical characteristics of study participants in Debre Markos Town
| Features | Category | Frequency (n) | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART Follow-up status | Alive | 2330 | 99.7 |
| Restart | 7 | 0.3 | |
| ART Regimen at enrollment | 1a | 40 | 1.7 |
| 1b | 39 | 1.7 | |
| 1c | 2182 | 93.4 | |
| 1d | 19 | 0.8 | |
| 1e | 19 | 0.8 | |
| 1f | 38 | 1.6 | |
| Adherence at enrollment | Good | 2255 | 96.5 |
| Fair | 72 | 3.1 | |
| Poor | 10 | 0.4 | |
| Months on ART | 3-100 months | 1974 | 84.5 |
| 101–200 months | 339 | 14.5 | |
| > 200 months | 24 | 1.0 | |
| Nutritional Status | BMI < 18 | 2 | 0.1 |
| BMI18-25 | 2333 | 99.8 | |
| BMI > 25 | 2 | 0.1 |
Balancing dataset
Descriptive statistics showed that only 0.9% of women living with HIV in the dataset were diagnosed with cervical cancer, reflecting a pronounced class imbalance, with roughly 80% of cases belonging to the negative class. To address this, the SMOTE oversampling technique generated 1,853 synthetic samples for the minority (positive) class, creating a balanced dataset of 1,875 instances per class. This balanced dataset was then used to train the machine learning models with an 80:20 train-test split (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Class distribution before smote and after smote
Model evaluation
The evaluation results showed that the KNN model outperformed all other classifiers, achieving 98% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 Score in predicting cervical cancer, making it the most effective model in this study. Random Forest and XGB also performed well, each with 93% accuracy, while DT, LR, ADB, and SVM showed lower performance at 90% accuracy (Table 3).
Table 3.
Model Evaluation metrics and Auroc for this study
| Algorithm | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1_score (%) | AUROC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XGB | Unbalanced | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.94 |
| Balanced | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.78 | |
| LR | Unbalanced | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.92 |
| Balanced | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.65 | |
| RF | Unbalanced | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.94 |
| Balanced | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.79 | |
| DT | Unbalanced | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.88 |
| Balanced | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.79 | |
| SVM | Unbalanced | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.92 |
| Balanced | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.72 | |
| KNN | Unbalanced | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.88 |
| Balanced | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.68 | |
| ADB | Unbalanced | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.93 |
| Balanced | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.81 | |
Model performance comparison
The model comparison plot shows that KNN outperformed all other algorithms, achieving 98% across accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. RF and XGB performed moderately well, while SVM, AdaBoost, DT, and LR showed lower performance (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Model performance comparison using different metrics
The ROC curve analysis illustrates model performance before and after dataset balancing. Initially, all models showed perfect AUC scores of 1.00. After applying SMOTE, model performance became more realistic and generalizable. AdaBoost’s AUC dropped to 0.81, DT and SVM reached 0.72, while KNN scored 0.68. RF and XGB achieved AUCs of 0.71 and 0.75, respectively (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
ROC curve for machine learning models in predicting cervical cancer after smote
A confusion matrix is a powerful tool for assessing a model’s performance by comparing its predicted outputs with the actual labels. It offers valuable insights into how effectively the model distinguishes between negative (0) and positive classes (1) and shows a confusion matrix of KNN (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Confusion matrix of the KNN classifier cervical cancer prediction among women with HIV
The KNN model demonstrated excellent overall performance across all evaluation metrics. It achieved an accuracy of 98%, indicating that the vast majority of predictions, both cervical cancer and non-cancer cases, were correctly classified. The precision of 98% shows that when the model predicts cervical cancer, it is correct 98% of the time, reflecting a very low false-positive rate. Similarly, the recall of 98% indicates that the model successfully identifies 98% of all true cervical cancer cases, demonstrating a very low false-negative rate. The F1-score of 98% further confirms a strong balance between precision and recall, highlighting the model’s robustness and reliability in effectively detecting cervical cancer while minimizing misclassification.
Feature importance analysis using K-Nearest neighbors
This study utilized the KNN technique to determine the most significant predictors of cervical cancer in women living with HIV. The KNN model assessed the importance of each predictor in relation to the screening outcome. By calculating feature importance scores throughout the dataset, the study identified and ranked the top predictors in descending order according to their impact on the outcome. Notable variables included adherence at enrollment, nutritional status, months on ART, screening visit type, weight, regimen at enrollment, and follow-up status (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.

Feature importance ranking using K-Nearest neighbors
Discussion
The model comparison plot in this study showed that KNN outperformed all other algorithms, achieving 98% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, highlighting its strong ability to predict cervical cancer. RF and XGB showed moderate performance, whereas SVM, ADB, DT, and LR performed less effectively. KNN’s strength lies in its simplicity, flexibility, and non-parametric nature, making it well-suited for complex, non-linear data. Comparable studies reported lower performance. For instance, a study conducted in Uganda indicates that RF achieved 90% accuracy and 90.1% AUROC [30]. Similarly, another study done in Iran also shows that DT reached 95.55% accuracy, 90.48% precision, 100% recall, and 95.25% AUC [14]. Moreover, a study conducted in Bangladesh reports that DT and KNN models attained 96.41% accuracy [31]. Conversely, studies in Saudi Arabia reported that 100% accuracy using RF, DT, and ADB [18], and in the United States, XGB achieved 96.5% accuracy [32]. The differences observed between this study and others may be due to variations in participants’ demographics, including age, ethnicity, and health status. Dataset size also plays a key role, as smaller datasets can increase the risk of overfitting, whereas larger datasets enable more robust model training. Although the KNN model achieved high accuracy, the AUC values were relatively low, likely due to overlapping feature distributions and algorithm sensitivity to data characteristics. Preprocessing steps, including feature selection and class balancing, were applied, but residual limitations may have constrained discriminative performance [33, 34].
This study identified the most important predictors using KNN feature importance, including adherence at enrollment, months on ART, regimen at enrollment, nutritional status, and screening visit type. The top predictor was ART adherence, a critical factor influencing cancer risk. Early initiation of ART supports sustained viral suppression and immune recovery, thereby lowering the risk of opportunistic infections and related cancers [35]. Highlighting ART adherence as a key predictor underscores the importance of timely ART initiation and continuous adherence support programs in cancer prevention.
Duration of ART was also identified as a significant predictor of cervical cancer. Prolonged ART use often results in undetectable viral loads, reducing chronic immune activation and inflammation. Maintaining viral suppression is crucial for preventing disease progression and complications from co-infections such as HPV [36]. Longer ART exposure enhances the immune system’s ability to clear HPV infections, lowering the risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) and invasive cervical cancer. Nutritional status, another key predictor identified by KNN, also plays a critical role in cancer risk among women living with HIV. Proper nutrition reduces the risk of cervical cancer, aids disease management, and affects both CIN progression and HPV persistence [37].
The type of screening visit was also identified as an important predictor, as regular cervical cancer screening is vital for early detection, prevention, and effective management. This aligns with Ethiopian research showing that early detection and treatment can prevent up to 80% of cervical cancer cases [25]. Screening enhances vaccination efforts, is cost-effective, and significantly benefits public health, particularly in resource-limited settings. Similarly, the ART regimen plays a key role in reducing cervical cancer risk among women living with HIV by restoring immune function and limiting HPV progression. Studies indicate that women on ART have a lower risk of invasive cervical cancer compared to those not receiving treatment [38], highlighting the importance of early ART initiation and appropriate regimen selection.
Factors such as age, family planning, and screening practices contribute to the multifactorial risk of HIV-related cervical cancer. Risk increases with age, particularly in women aged 30 and older, who are more prone to persistent HPV infections. Long-term use of oral contraceptives has been associated with a slightly elevated risk, which decreases after discontinuation. Regular, cost-effective cervical cancer screening is essential for early detection of precancerous changes, enabling timely intervention to prevent cancer progression [39–41].
Conclusion
Early detection significantly improves the effectiveness of screening and treatment in both the pre-cancerous and cancer stages. Being aware of the signs and symptoms of cervical cancer can help reduce delays in diagnosis. This study found several key predictors of cervical cancer among women living with HIV, including adherence at enrollment, nutritional status, months on ART, the type of screening visit, and the regimen at enrollment. This study showed that the KNN model predicts cervical cancer effectively in women living with HIV. However, the generalizability of these models is limited, as they were developed using data exclusively from health facilities in Debre Markos city and may not perform comparably in settings with different health system characteristics, sociodemographic conditions, cervical cancer prevalence rates, testing protocols, or healthcare infrastructure. Future research should prioritize prospective validation and evaluation across diverse regions and healthcare settings to enhance generalizability and support practical implementation. Additionally, exploring further predictive features or alternative modeling approaches may help improve AUC and overall discriminative performance.
Acknowledgements
We extend our heartfelt gratitude to the Amhara Public Health Institute and Debre Markos Town Health Department for granting the necessary permissions to conduct data collection for this research. We also greatly appreciate the generous cooperation and support of ART service providers and data clerks of Debre Markos Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, Debre Markos Health Center, Hidassie Health Center, and Wuseta Health Center.
Abbreviations
- ADB
AdaBoost
- ADASYN
Adaptive synthetic sampling
- AIDS
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
- BMI
Body mass index
- CD4
Cluster of differentiation 4
- CIN
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
- HIV
Human immune virus
- HPV
Human papillomavirus
- KNN
K-Nearest neighbor
- LR
Logistic regression
- RF
Random forest
- SMOTE
Synthetic minority oversampling technique
- STI
Sexually transmitted infection
- SVM
Support vector machine
- VIA
Visual inspection acetic acid
- WHO
World Health Organization
- XGB
Extreme gradient boosting
Author contributions
MBM conceived of the study. MBM, SKM, AKM, AWS, GHT, MLA, and LME participated in the design of the study, conceptualization, and performed the data analysis. MKT, WLA, SBT, and ASG contributed to this study during data collection, and all worked to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The author declares that no funding was received for this research.
Data availability
All relevant data are available within the paper and from the corresponding author.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review committee of the College of Medicine and Health Sciences at Debre Markos University with reference number RCSTTD/441/01/17. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, ensuring that all ethical principles were adhered to throughout the research process. The Review Board of Debre Markos University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, waived the requirement for individual informed consent because the study used anonymized and de-identified data from existing records, making it impractical to obtain consent from each participant.
Consent for publication
The consent for publication is not applicable in this study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Gashinet K, et al. Co-morbidity of Cervical Cancer and Its associated factors among HIV-Positive Women on Antiretroviral Therapy in Awi zone, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2024. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4668028. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Megersa T, et al. Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus infections and associated factors among women living with HIV in Shashemene town public health facilities, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):125. 10.1186/s12905-023-02279-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Worku E, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions among HIV-infected women in University of Gondar specialized comprehensive referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: cross-sectional study design. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):322. 10.1186/s12905-024-03174-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mulugeta Y. Prevalance and Associated Factors of Pre-Cancerous Cervical Lesion Among Hiv-Infected and Hiv-Uninfected Women at Health Institutions in Bahir Dar City. Ethiopia/2022. North West; 2022.
- 5.Zegeye FR, et al. Uptake of cervical cancer screening and associated factors among HIV positive women attending adult art clinic at public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2022. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lilhore UK, et al. Hybrid model for detection of cervical cancer using causal analysis and machine learning techniques. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022(1):4688327. 10.1155/2022/4688327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ferede YA, Tassew WC. J.B.c. Zeleke, Precancerous cervical lesion and associated factors among HIV-infected women in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2024;24(1):678. 10.1186/s12885-024-12462-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stelzle D, et al. Estimates of the global burden of cervical cancer associated with HIV. Lancet Global Health. 2021;9(2):e161–9. 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30459-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dessie TM, Kassaw AT, D.J.B.W.s G. Determinants of precancerous cervical lesion among HIV infected women on ART in Woldia comprehensive specialized hospital NorthEast Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):458. 10.1186/s12905-023-02580-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mohamed ZK, et al. Cervical cancer screening service utilization and associated factors among women living with HIV receiving anti-retroviral therapy at Adama Hospital Medical College, Ethiopia. Sage Open Nurs. 2023;9:23779608231152072. 10.1177/23779608231152072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Delgado JR, et al. Cervical cancer screening practices, knowledge of screening and risk, and highly active antiretroviral therapy adherence among women living with human immunodeficiency virus in Lima, Peru. Int J STD AIDS. 2017;28(3):290–3. 10.1177/0956462416678121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kiros M, et al. Prevalence and determinants of pre-cancerous cervical lesion and human papillomavirus among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women in North-West Ethiopia: a comparative retrospective cross-sectional study. HIV/AIDS-Research Palliat Care. 2021;719–25. 10.2147/HIV.S310905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Mekuria M, et al. Prevalence of cervical cancer and associated factors among women attended cervical cancer screening center at Gahandi Memorial Hospital, Ethiopia. Cancer Inform. 2021;20:11769351211068431. 10.1177/11769351211068431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Asadi F, et al. Supervised algorithms of machine learning for the prediction of cervical cancer. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020;10(4):513. 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Trickey A, et al. Survival of HIV-positive patients starting antiretroviral therapy between 1996 and 2013: a collaborative analysis of cohort studies. lancet HIV. 2017;4(8):e349–56. 10.1016/ S2352-3018(17)30066-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Priyanka BJ, Raju MJTJoC, Education M. Machine learning approach for prediction of cervical cancer. Turkish J Comput Math Educ. 2021;12(8):3050–8. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Munshi RMJPo. Novel ensemble learning approach with SVM-imputed ADASYN features for enhanced cervical cancer prediction. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(1):e0296107. 10.1371/journal.pone.0296107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Al Mudawi N, Alazeb AJS. A model for predicting cervical cancer using machine learning algorithms. Sensors. 2022;22(11):4132. 10.3390/s22114132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jahan S, et al. Automated invasive cervical cancer disease detection at early stage through a suitable machine learning model. Discover Appl Sci. 2021;3(10):806. 10.1007/s42452-021-04786-z. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Abdoh SF, Rizka MA, A.J.I.A. F, Maghraby. Cervical cancer diagnosis using random forest classifier with SMOTE and feature reduction techniques. IEEE Access. 2018;6:59475–85. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2874063. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Swanson K, et al. From patterns to patients: Advances in clinical machine learning for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Cell. 2023;186(8):1772–91. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang B, Shi H. J.J.o.m.h. Wang, Machine learning and AI in cancer prognosis, prediction, and treatment selection: a critical approach. J Multidisciplinary Healthc. 2023. 10.2147/JMDH.S410301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Akter L, et al. Prediction of cervical cancer from behavior risk using machine learning techniques. SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(3):177. 10.1007/s42979-021-00551-6. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mekonnen GB, et al. Incidence of mortality and its predictors among HIV-infected children receiving antiretroviral therapy in Amhara region: a multicenter retrospective follow-up study. Ital J Pediatr. 2025;51(1):68. 10.1186/s13052-025-01872-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yirsaw AN, et al. Cervical cancer screening utilization and associated factors among women living with HIV in Ethiopia, 2024: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):521. 10.1186/s12905-024-03362-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yasin S, Ferede A, J.B.I.D. M, Tafa. Cervical cancer screening service utilisation and related factors among women on antiretroviral therapy in public health facilities of Asella town, Ethiopia, cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):1115. 10.1186/s12879-024-10003-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Melkamu MW, et al. Incidence of common opportunistic infections among HIV-infected children on ART at Debre Markos referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):50. 10.1186/s12879-020-4772-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yudha MAR, M.J.J.o.A I, Rahardi, Computing. Comparative Analysis of Random Forest and XGBoost Models for Cervical Cancer Risk Prediction using SHAP-based Explainable AI. J Appl Inf Comput. 2025;9(6):3198–211. 10.30871/jaic.v9i6.10357. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kuhn M, Johnson K. Factors that can affect model performance, in Applied predictive modeling. Appl Predictive Model. 2013;521–46. 10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3_20.
- 30.Namalinzi F, et al. Prediction of precancerous cervical cancer lesions among women living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy in Uganda: a comparison of supervised machine learning algorithms. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):393. 10.1186/s12905-024-03232-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shakil R, Islam S, B.J.J.o.P.I., Akter. A precise machine learning model: Detecting cervical cancer using feature selection and explainable AI. J Pathol Inf. 2024;15:p100398. 10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kaushik K, et al. A machine learning-based framework for the prediction of cervical cancer risk in women. Sustainability. 2022;14(19):11947. 10.3390/su141911947. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lanera C, et al. Screening PubMed abstracts: is class imbalance always a challenge to machine learning? BMC Open Access. 2019;8(1):317. 10.1186/s13643-019-1245-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Soltanzadeh P, Feizi-Derakhshi MR, Hashemzadeh MJPR. Addressing the class-imbalance and class-overlap problems by a metaheuristic-based under-sampling approach. Elsevier. 2023;143:109721. 10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109721. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bekalu YE, Wudu MA, A.J.S.O.M. Workie, Gashu. Uptake of cervical cancer screening and associated factors among human immune virus positive women attending antiretroviral therapy clinic in public health facilities, Northeast Ethiopia, 2022: A cross-sectional study. SAGE Open Med. 2024;12:20503121231225935. 10.1177/20503121231225935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wild CP, Weiderpass E, Stewart BW. Tobacco cessation: the WHO perspective, in World Cancer Report: Cancer research for cancer prevention. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. [PubMed]
- 37.Argefa TG, Roets LJN, Cancer. Malnutrition and the survival of cervical cancer patients: a prospective cohort study using the PG-SGA tool. Nutr Cancer. 2022;74(2):605–12. 10.1080/01635581.2021.1910320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rohner E, et al. Cervical cancer risk and impact of Pap-based screening in HIV‐positive women on antiretroviral therapy in Johannesburg, South Africa. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(3):488–96. 10.1002/ijc.30749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bovo AC et al. Combined oral contraceptive use and the risk of cervical cancer: Literature review. 2023. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023. 45(12): pp. e818-e824. 10.1055/s-0043-1776403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Yosef T, et al. Determinants of cervical cancer screening uptake among reproductive-age women in southwest Ethiopia: a case-control study. Frointeres Oncol. 2024;14:1424810. 10.3389/fonc.2024.1424810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lemma D et al. Determinants of utilization of cervical cancer screening among women in the age group of 30–49 years in Ambo Town, Central Ethiopia: A case-control study. 2022. Plos one. 2022. 17(7): p. e0270821. 10.1371/journal.pone.0270821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are available within the paper and from the corresponding author.




