Abstract
Background
Recurrence risk stratification system-guided radioiodine (131I) therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) has fallen into dilemma due to its poor feasibility and insufficient justification.
Methods
Subjects referred for 131I therapy were consecutively labeled with no evidence of disease, unexplained hyperthyroglobulinemia, or known disease based on stimulated serum thyroglobulin, radioiodine uptake, and medical imaging, and then assigned to radioiodine remnant ablation (RRA), radioiodine adjuvant treatment (RAT), or radioiodine oncolytic treatment (ROT) group, respectively. The primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) for the RRA and RAT cohorts and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the ROT cohort. Secondary endpoints included success rate in the RRA cohort, response classification in all cohorts, and biochemical and structural responses in the ROT cohort.
Results
In the RRA and RAT cohorts, the 5-year DFS rates were 93.28% and 76.02%, respectively. In the ROT cohort, the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 72.23% and 99.01%, respectively. In the RRA cohort, an 85.06% success rate was achieved, with excellent response (ER), indeterminate response (IR), biochemical incomplete response (BIR) and structural/functional incomplete response (S/FIR) rates of 77.92%, 15.58%, 3.9%, and 2.6%, respectively. In RAT cohort, ER, IR, BIR and S/FIR rates were 16.42%, 26.87%, 33.83%, and 22.89%, respectively. In the ROT cohort, ER, IR, BIR, and S/FIR rates were 2.5%, 3.33%, 8.33%, and 85.83%, respectively, with biochemical remission rate of 69.49% and structural disease control rate of 96.15%.
Conclusion
This prospective, multicenter, real-world study justified postoperative disease status stratification as a feasible guidance for individualizing 131I therapy of DTC.
Keywords: Differentiated thyroid cancer, Disease status stratification, Radioiodine, Thyroglobulin, Personalized care
Introduction
Thyroid cancer is among the most common malignancies with a steadily and rapidly increasing global incidence. In 2020, there were approximately 586,000 new cases worldwide, ranking it 9th place in cancer incidence [1]. Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) accounts for > 90% of all thyroid cancers, pathologically including papillary thyroid cancer, follicular thyroid cancer, and oncocytic cell cancer [2, 3]. Taking advantages of the nature of DTC and the properties of radioiodine (131I), 131I therapy combined with levothyroxine therapy following thyroidectomy has become a mainstay procedure to further reduce tumor-related recurrence and mortality in comparison with levothyroxine therapy alone [4].
As a broad term, 131I therapy for DTC encompasses three independent or cooperative primary approaches: (i) radioiodine remnant ablation (RRA) to facilitate response classification post initial treatment and dynamic recurrence risk stratification; (ii) radioiodine adjuvant treatment (RAT) of potential residual thyroid cancer to decrease recurrence and improve disease-free survival; (iii) radioiodine oncolytic treatment (ROT) of known disease with either curative or palliative intent to enhance progression-free survival and overall survival [2, 5–7]. In fact, 131I therapy evolves over time, moving from a standardized practice to a tailored approach. “One-size-fits-all” approach had been abandoned owing to either insufficiency or abuse of 131I therapy [8, 9]. In the year 2009, a postoperative recurrence risk stratification system was initially developed by the American Thyroid Association, which was revised with proposed modifications in the 2015 version [2, 10], striving for defining indications of 131I therapy by providing predictive and prognostic information. However, such retrospective data-derived recurrence risk stratification models, which were mainly based on static pathological findings, have been recognized subsequently as lack of theranostic value [11, 12]. This is probably due to their technical difficulties, insufficiently proven rationality and inability to explicitly assign appropriate candidates to RRA, RAT or ROT. Moreover, the systematic use of 131I therapy in patients with low-intermediate recurrence risk remains largely controversial, owing to the relatively heterogeneous population enrolled and conflicting data available [13–15]. Therefore, high-quality studies to establish a more viable stratification system to individualize 131I therapy for DTC and elucidate its efficacy are urgently needed, additionally considering the outcomes of 131I therapy based on the risk stratification systems remain unavailable to date.
Fortunately, several tools have been readily utilized to achieve reliable postoperative disease status stratification (DSS) in patients with DTC, such as stimulated serum thyroglobulin via levothyroxine withdrawal (Tgoff), neck ultrasound, and radioactive iodine uptake (RAIU) [16–18]. Besides, other medical imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, have made it possible to more precisely label postoperative patients with real-time disease status, paving the way to individualized 131I therapy in the era of precision medicine [7, 11, 19, 20].
We, therefore, conceived this prospective, multicenter, real-world study to assess the feasibility of a postoperative DSS system in guiding 131I therapy for DTC.
Patients and methods
Study populations
All patients with DTC aged 18–70 years, who were referred for 131I therapy after total or near-total thyroidectomy with or without lymphadenectomy, were consecutively and prospectively enrolled at five tertiary care institutions from 1 January 2012 to 1 January 2018, with follow-up until 1 January 2021. The exclusion criteria included anti-Tg antibody (TgAb) over 100 IU/mL, consent withdrawal, and concomitant malignancy [5, 17].
The study was approved by the Ethics Boards of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital and Ren Ji Hospital, Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, the Affiliated Suzhou Science & Technology Town Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, and Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University. All subjects provided written informed consent. The authors vouch for the completeness and accuracy of the data and analyses.
Study design
The primary endpoints included disease-free survival (time interval between 131I administration and structural recurrence of disease) in the RRA and RAT cohorts, progression-free survival (time interval between initial 131I administration and structural progression of disease) and disease specific survival (time interval between initial 131I administration and death from DTC) in the ROT cohort. Secondary endpoints included success rate in the RRA cohort, therapeutic response classification in all the three cohorts, and biochemical and structural responses in the ROT cohort.
Disease status stratification
Since recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone (rh-TSH) remained unavailable in China, postoperative DSS was performed at four weeks after levothyroxine withdrawal, a classic approach to increase internal TSH level for all candidates of 131I therapy, and a low-iodine diet, with routine consideration of medical history, Tgoff, RAIU (24 h post oral administration of 185 KBq of 131I), neck ultrasound, and chest planar CT findings. Magnetic resonance imaging or 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT was utilized in selected subjects with suspicious metastases beyond neck and chest.
Based on the above laboratory and imaging findings, subjects were deemed to have no evidence of disease, unexplained hyperthyroglobulinemia (Tgoff > 10 ng/mL without known disease), or known disease, and then received RRA, RAT, or ROT, respectively, regardless of postoperative risk stratification [21].
131I therapy
RRA was conducted utilizing RAIU&Tgoff-guided gradient dosimetry, and patients were given 1.1, 1.85, 3.7, or 5.55 GBq of 131I based on the higher result of either the radioiodine uptake (≤ 2%, 2–5%, 5–15%, and > 5%) or stimulated Tg (≤ 2 ng/mL, 2–5 ng/mL, 5–10 ng/mL , and > 10 ng/mL ) [17]. RAT for unexplained hyperthyroglobulinemia was performed using 5.55 GBq of 131I as previously reported [5]. In ROT, 5.55 GBq of 131I was given only if local diseases were identified; when distant metastases were identified, 7.4 GBq of 131I was prescribed.
At three days after oral administration of therapeutic 131I, a planar whole-body scan (RXWBS) was routinely performed alone or in combination with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT if the RxWBS provided inconclusive findings [22]. ROT was terminated if radioiodine-refractory DTC (RR-DTC) was confirmed as either of the follows: (i) all the foci did not concentrate 131I per RXWBS; (ii) despite evidence of 131I concentration, neither biochemical nor structural remission could be achieved [23, 24].
Biochemical evaluations
Serologic examinations, including serum TSH, Tg, and TgAb levels, were simultaneously performed just before and 1, 4, and 12 months after 131I administration, and then every 6–12 months, unless otherwise indicated, using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay on a Cobas analyzer (Roche Diagnostics Gmbh, Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) in all centers. The lower and upper detection limits of the TSH assay were 0.005 and 100 mIU/L, respectively, and TSH levels lower or higher than those were recorded as 0.005 and 100 mIU/L, respectively. Similarly, Tg levels lower or higher than their thresholds were recorded as 0.04 ng/mL and 25,000 ng/mL (50-fold dilution), respectively; TgAb levels lower or higher than thresholds were counted as 10 and 115 IU/mL, respectively.
For the ROT cohort, biochemical responses were categorized as follows as previously described: (i) biochemical remission: decrease of at least 25% in Tgon level; (ii) biochemical progression: increase in Tgon level of at least 25%; (iii) biochemical stabilization: changes in Tgon level < 25% [25].
Structural assessments
Radiographic assessments were performed by competent radiologists using CT, magnetic resonance imaging, or PET/CT. For patients with target lesions, radiographic examinations were conducted every 3–6 months. To calculate progression-free survival, structural response was defined according to RECIST 1.1 as follows: complete response, disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathologic lymph nodes (target or non-target) should demonstrate a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; partial response, ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of target lesions; progressive disease, ≥ 20% increase in the sum of diameter of target lesions or appearance of new lesions; stable disease, neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to be eligible for progressive disease [26].
Therapeutic response classification
At 4–12 months after the initial specified 131I therapy, success rate of RRA and response classification were assessed. A successful RRA was defined as serum Tg under levothyroxine administration at proper doses (Tgon) below 0.2 ng/mL [2]. Therapeutic response classification in all the three cohorts included excellent response (negative imaging and Tgon < 0.2 ng/mL), indeterminate response (negative imaging and Tgon level 0.2-1 ng/mL), biochemical incomplete response (negative imaging and Tgon ≥ 1 ng/mL), and structural/functional incomplete response (anatomic or metabolic evidence of disease with any Tgon level), in terms of 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines with minor modifications. Excellent response, indeterminate response, and biochemical incomplete response were collectively termed as non-structural/functional incomplete response [5].
Statistical analyses
All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 25.0. Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages, and continuous variables are presented as means and standard deviations or as medians with ranges. The Kruskal-Wallis test and variance analysis were used to compare median values between and among groups, respectively. The chi-square test and Fisher’s test were used for univariate analyses as needed. Disease-free survival, progression-free survival and disease specific survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier survival method. A log-rank test was used to test the differences between/among time-to-event curves. Two-tailed probabilities were reported. Values of p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Results
Patient features
A total of 900 patients were initially recruited; of them 271 were excluded (235 patients with TgAb over 100 mIU/L, 35 patients withdrew consents and 1 patient concomitantly carrying breast cancer). With regard to the postoperative DSS, 302, 207, and 120 eligible patients were explicitly assigned to RRA, RAT, and ROT group, respectively (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Enrollment, exclusion, disease status stratification, and radioiodine dosing strategy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. DTC, differentiated thyroid cancer; RAIU, radioactive iodine uptake; Tgoff, stimulated thyroglobulin via levothyroxine withdrawal
The baseline characteristics of the 629 eligible patients are summarized in Table 1. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.80, and 104 (16.53%) patients were older than 55 years at diagnosis. Papillary thyroid cancer accounted 96.18% of all subjects, and neck lymph node dissection was conducted in 89.34% of all patients. The median time interval between operation and initial 131I therapy was 4.30 months (range, 1.03-283.67 months). At the time of the data cut-off, the overall median duration of follow-up was 37.63 months (range, 6.53-102.67 months). In the ROT group, 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was performed in 27 (22.5%) patients.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of enrolled patients with differentiated thyroid cancer
| Patient characteristic | All patents, n (%) | Patients grouped by disease status stratification-based 131I treatment, n (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRA | RAT | ROT | P value | ||
| Age (mean ± SD, year) | 43.1 ± 11.8 | 42.2 ± 11.5 | 42.2 ± 10.8 | 45.7 ± 13.7 | 0.05 |
| Sex | 0.08 | ||||
| Female | 404 (64.23) | 206 (68.21) | 120 (58.97) | 77 (64.17) | |
| Male | 225 (35.77) | 96 (31.79) | 87 (42.03) | 43 (35.83) | |
| Operation type | |||||
| Total thyroidectomy | 591 (93.96) | 274 (90.73) | 205 (99.03) | 112 (93.33) | < 0.01 |
| Near-total thyroidectomy | 38 (6.04) | 28 (9.27) | 2 (0.97) | 8 (6.67) | < 0.01 |
| Neck lymph node dissection | 562 (89.34) | 264 (87.42) | 188 (90.82) | 110 (91.67) | |
| Histology | |||||
| PTC | 605 (96.18) | 281 (95.36) | 204 (98.55) | 113 (94.17) | 0.02 |
| FTC | 24 (3.82) | 14 (4.64) | 3 (1.45) | 7 (5.83) | |
| T stage | < 0.01 | ||||
| T1 | 439 (69.79) | 240 (79.47) | 154 (74.40) | 45 (37.50) | |
| T2 | 85 (13.51) | 27 (8.94) | 29 (14.01) | 29 (24.17) | |
| T3 | 83 (13.20) | 31 (10.26) | 15 (7.24) | 37 (30.83) | |
| T4 | 22 (3.50) | 4 (1.33) | 9 (4.35) | 9 (7.50) | |
| N stage | 0.01 | ||||
| N0 | 68 (10.81) | 41 (13.58) | 11 (5.31) | 16 (13.33) | |
| N1 | 544 (86.49) | 254 (84.11) | 187 (90.34) | 103 (85.84) | |
| Nx | 17 (2.70) | 7 (2.31) | 9 (4.35) | 1 (0.83) | |
| M stage | < 0.01 | ||||
| M0 | 562 (89.35) | 301 (99.67) | 206 (99.52) | 55 (45.83) | |
| M1 | 67 (10.65) | 1 (0.33) | 1 (0.48) | 65 (54.17) | |
| Initial AJCC stage | < 0.01 | ||||
| I - II | 608 (96.66) | 299 (99.01) | 199 (96.14) | 101 ((84.17) | |
| III - IV | 21 (3.34) | 3 (0.99) | 8 (3.86) | 19 (15.83) | |
| Metastases | |||||
| Lung | 59 (9.38) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.48) | 58 (48.33) | |
| Bone | 9 (1.43) | 1 (0.33) | 0 (0.00) | 8 (6.67) | |
| Lymph-node | 68 (10.81) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 68 (56.67) | |
| Soft tissue | 2 (0.32) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (1.67) | |
| Locally advanced | 1 (0.16) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.83) | |
| Recurrent risk stratification | < 0.01 | ||||
| Low | 86 (13.67) | 60 (19.87) | 26 (12.56) | 0 (0.00) | |
| Intermediate | 470 (74.72) | 241 (79.80) | 180 (86.96) | 49 (40.83) | |
| High | 73 (11.61) | 1 (0.33) | 1 (0.48) | 71 (59.17) | |
| Median TSH after THW (range, mIU/mL) |
100.00 (3.3–100) |
100.00 (4.32–100) | 100.00 (8.09–100) |
100.00 (3.3–100) |
0.872 |
| Median Tgoff (range, ng/mL) |
14.41 (0.04–17934.00) |
4.73 (0.04–56.90) |
31.57 (10.70-563.10) |
174.55 (1.98–17934.00) |
< 0.01 |
| Median 24-h RAIU (range, %) |
4.00 (0.20–47.2) |
3.60 (0.50–47.2) |
4.10 ( 0.20–14.8) |
5.0 (0.30–30.00) |
0.01 |
PTC Papillary thyroid cancer, FTC Follicular thyroid cancer, TSH Thyroid stimulating hormone, THW Thyroid hormone withdrawal, Tgoff Stimulated thyroglobulin, RAIU Radioactive iodine uptake, RRA Radioiodine remnant ablation, RAT Radioiodine adjuvant treatment, ROT Radioiodine oncolytic treatment
According to the recurrence risk stratification recommended by American Thyroid Association [2], no evidence of disease and unexplained hyperthyroglobulinemia were identified in 60 (69.77%) and 26 (30.23%) of the low-risk patients, respectively. In all 470 intermediate-risk patients, no evidence of disease, unexplained hyperthyroglobulinemia, or structural disease were identified in 241 (51.28%), 180 (38.30%), and 49 (10.43%), respectively. In a total of 73 high-risk patients, 71 (97.26%) patients were assigned to ROT owing to the identification of structural disease. Notably, one high-risk patient was assigned to RRA and another one was assigned to RAT, owing to postoperative DSS. Significant differences in the distribution of recurrence risk and median Tgoff level among the RRA, RAT, and ROT groups were noted (both p values < 0.01) (Table 1).
Outcomes of RRA
According to the RAIU&Tgoff-guided gradient dosimetry, 1.1, 1.85, 3.7, and 5.55 GBq of 131I were prescribed for 68, 59, 140 and 35 patients, respectively.
Eleven (3.64%) patients had recurrence, and all were alive at the end of a median follow-up of 33.90 months (range, 6.53-102.17 months). The median disease-free survival was not reached at data cut-off (Fig. 2A). Five-year disease-free survival and disease specific survival rates were 92.97% and 100%, respectively. The subgroup analysis showed significant difference in disease-free survival among subgroups regarding therapeutic response (Fig. 2B), but no significant difference among/between subgroups based on administered 131I activity (Fig. 2C), age (Fig. 2D), and sex (not shown).
Fig. 2.
Kaplan–Meier estimates of disease-free survival (DFS) in radioiodine remnant ablation. Total group analysis (Panel A) and subgroup analyses according to therapeutic response (Panel B), RAIU&Tgoff-guided gradient activity (Panel C), and age (Panel D). RAIU, radioactive iodine uptake; Tgoff, stimulated thyroglobulin via levothyroxine withdrawal; ER, excellent response; IR, indeterminate response; BIR, biochemical incomplete response; SIR, structural incomplete response; NR, not reached
The success rate of RRA in this group was 85.76%, with median Tgon level of 0.06 ng/mL (range, 0.04–24.21 ng/mL), which was evaluated at a median follow-up of 6.3 months (range, 4.03–12.43 months). The subgroup analysis revealed success rates of RRA of 100.00%, 93.22%, 75.71%, and 85.71% in the 1.1, 1.85, 3.7, and 5.55 GBq subgroups, respectively. Notably, a total of 15 (4.97%) patients were diagnosed with persistent disease by initial RxWBS ± SPECT/CT (Table 2).
Table 2.
Outcome analysis of subjects underwent radioiodine remnant ablation using RAIU&Tgoff-guided gradient dosimetry
| Characteristic | Patients grouped by RAIU&Tgoff-guided gradient dosimetry (GBq), n (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | 1.85 | 3.7 | 5.5 | P value | |
| Age (mean ± SD, years) | 41.84 ± 11.38 | 44.60 ± 12.85 | 42.74 ± 11.38 | 41.53 ± 10.43 | 0.66 |
| Sex | < 0.01 | ||||
| Female | 52 (76.47) | 36 (61.02) | 97 (69.29) | 22 (62.86) | |
| Male | 16 (23.59) | 23 (38.98) | 43 (30.71) | 13 (37.14) | |
| Pathology | 0.84 | ||||
| PTC | 66 (97.06) | 56 (94.92) | 132 (94.29) | 34 (97.14) | |
| FTC | 2 (2.94) | 3 (5.08) | 8 (5.71) | 1 (2.86) | |
| T stage | 0.06 | ||||
| T1-2 | 62 (91.18) | 51 (86.44) | 127 (90.71) | 26 (74.29) | |
| T3-4 | 6 (8.82) | 8 (13.56) | 13 (9.29) | 9 (25.71) | |
| N stage | 0.37 | ||||
| N0 | 9 (13.24) | 10 (16.95) | 17 (12.14) | 5 (14.29) | |
| N1 | 55 (80.88) | 49 (83.05) | 121 (86.43) | 29 (82.85) | |
| Nx | 4 (5.88) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (1.43) | 1 (2.86) | |
| M stage | 1.00 | ||||
| M0 | 68 (100.00) | 59 (100.00) | 139 (99.29) | 35 (100.00) | |
| M1 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.71) | 0 (0.00) | |
| Initial AJCC stage | 0.51 | ||||
| I - II | 68 (100.00) | 59 (100.00) | 138 (98.57) | 34 (97.14) | |
| III - IV | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (1.43) | 1 (2.86) | |
| Recurrent risk stratification | 0.60 | ||||
| Low | 14 (20.59) | 8 (13.56) | 33 (23.57) | 5 (14.29) | |
| Intermediate | 54 (79.41) | 51 (86.44) | 107 (76.43) | 30 (85.71) | |
| high | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.71) | 0 (0.00) | |
| Median TSH after THW (range, mIU/mL) |
100.00 (34.74–100.00) |
100.00 (40.40–100.00) |
100.00 (34.88–100.00) |
79.06 (4.32–100.00) |
< 0.01 |
| Median Tgoff (range, ng/mL) |
0.70 (0.04–2.23) |
3.04 (0.04–5.12) |
6.71 (0.27–14.63) |
27.34 (0.17–56.90) |
< 0.01 |
| Median 24-h RAIU (range, %) |
1.60 (0.50–1.30) |
3.00 (1.00-5.08) |
5.20 (0.50–14.90) |
21.90 (9.2–47.2) |
< 0.01 |
| Findings of RxWBS ± SPECT/CT | |||||
| No 131I uptake | 2 (2.94) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | |
| 131I uptake in thyroid bed | 66 (97.06) | 59 (100.00) | 140 (100.00) | 35 (100.00) | |
| 131I uptake in lymph node | 1 (1.47) | 3 (5.08) | 10 (7.14) | 0 (0.00) | |
| 131I uptake in lung | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.71) | 0 (0.00) | |
| Successful RRA | 68 (100.00) | 55 (93.22) | 106 (75.71) | 30 (85.71) | < 0.01 |
| Median Tgon after RRA (range, ng/mL) |
0.04 (0.04–0.63) |
0.04 (0.04–0.51) |
0.13 (0.04–6.25) |
0.15 (0.04–24.21) |
< 0.01 |
| Metastasis identified in follow-up | 1 (1.47) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (1.43) | 4 (9.76) | 0.01 |
| Retreatment with 131I | 1 (1.47) | 4 (6.78) | 13 (9.29) | 5 (14.29) | 0.06 |
PTC Papillary thyroid cancer, FTC Follicular thyroid cancer, TSH Thyroid stimulating hormone, THW Thyroid hormone withdrawal, Tgoff Stimulated thyroglobulin, Tgon Suppressed thyroglobulin, RAIU Radioactive iodine uptake, RxWBS Post therapeutic whole body scan, RRA Radioiodine remnant ablation
Moreover, excellent response, indeterminate response, biochemical incomplete response, and structural/functional incomplete response in the entire RRA group were achieved in 239 (79.14%), 47 (15.56%), 8 (2.65%), and 8 (2.65%) patients, respectively (Fig. 3A). In detail, an excellent response rate of 98.53% (67/68) was achieved in the 1.1 GBq subgroup, 93.22% (55/59) in the 1.85 GBq subgroup, 65.71% (92/140) in the 3.7 GBq subgroup, and 71.43% (25/35) in the 5.55 GBq subgroup. Indeterminate response rates of 1.47%, 6.78%, 26.43%, and 14.29% were obtained in the above subgroups, respectively. Biochemical incomplete response was only found in subgroups of 3.7 and 5.55 GBq, with rates of 3.57% and 14.29%, respectively. Of note, 4.29% (6/140) of patients in the 3.7 GBq subgroup and 5.71% (2/35) in the 5.55 GBq subgroup were assessed as structural/functional incomplete response (Fig. 3B).
Fig. 3.
Therapeutic response to radioiodine remnant ablation. Entire group (Panel A) and subgroups stratified by RAIU&Tgoff-guided gradient dosimetry (Panel B). RAIU, radioactive iodine uptake; Tgoff, stimulated thyroglobulin via levothyroxine withdrawal
Outcomes of RAT
During a median follow-up of 40.43 months (range, 6.93-100.53 months), 35 (16.91%) patients had disease recurrence, but none died. The median disease-free survival in RAT cohort was 85.00 months (95% CI, 77.71–92.29 months), with 5-year disease-free survival and disease specific survival rates of 77.01% and 100%, respectively (Fig. 4A). A median disease-free survival was obtained only in biochemical incomplete response subgroup (85.83 months) (Fig. 4B). Moreover, no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival was found between the subgroups in term of age (Fig. 4C) or sex (Fig. 4D).
Fig. 4.
Kaplan–Meier estimates of disease-free survival (DFS) in radioiodine adjuvant treatment. Total group analysis (Panel A) and subgroup analyses according to therapeutic response (Panel B), age (Panel C), and sex (Panel D). ER, excellent response; IR, indeterminate response; BIR, biochemical incomplete response; SIR, structural incomplete response; NR, not reached
After the initial administration of 131I in the RAT cohort, metastases in lymph nodes, bones, and lungs were revealed through RXWBS with or without SPECT/CT in 35, 3, and 1 patients, respectively. Subsequently, excellent response, indeterminate response, biochemical incomplete response, and structural/functional incomplete response in the RAT cohort were achieved in 34 (16.43%), 55 (26.57%), 72 (34.78%), and 46 (22.22%) patients, respectively.
Outcomes of ROT
Lymph nodes accounted for the majority (56.67%) of the organs affected by metastases, followed by lungs (48.33%) and bones (6.67%) (Table 1). After a median total course number of 2 (range, 1–7) with a median cumulative activity of 11.1 GBq (range, 5.55–51.8 GBq), a total of 83 (69.17%) patients were finally defined as having RR-DTC. In detail, no 131I-avid lesion was identified in 67 (80.72%) patients, and neither biochemical nor structural remission was obtained in the remaining 16 (19.28%) patients with 131I-avid lesions. During a median follow-up of 48.60 months (range, 6.53-102.67 months) for the 83 patients with RR-DTC, five (6.02%) patients underwent additional resections for neck lesions, and seven (8.43%) patients received tyrosine kinase inhibitors for symptomatic or progressive disease (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
A male patient with symptomatic and progressive metastatic radioiodine-refractory papillary thyroid cancer carrying NCOA4-RET rearrangement treated with pralsetinib. 18F-FDG PET/CT images before (Panel A, maximum intensity projection; Panel B, neck fusion image; Panel C, chest fusion image; Panel D, abdomen fusion image) and 4 months after (Panel E, maximum intensity projection; Panel F, neck fusion image; Panel G, chest fusion image; Panel H, abdomen fusion image) treatment illustrated robust therapeutic response, consistent with the relief of dysphagia, hemoptysis, and pain. Repeated pathological examinations recognized high mitotic activity (Panel I, arrows) and necrosis (Panel J, circle), reclassifying the disease as high grade differentiated thyroid cancer
During a median follow-up of 45.40 months (range, 6.53-102.67 months) for ROT cohort, 27 patients had disease progression, and two patients died. The median progression-free survival was 86.00 months (Fig. 6A), with a 5-year progression-free survival rate of 72.23% and a 5-year disease specific survival rate of 99.01%. Better progression-free survival was noted in 131I-responders (Fig. 6B), younger patients (Fig. 6C) and those with loco regional disease (Fig. 6D), compared to the counterparts. Nevertheless, no difference in progression-free survival was found between the male and female subgroups (Fig. 6E) or between the structural/functional incomplete response and non-structural/functional incomplete response subgroups (Fig. 6F).
Fig. 6.
Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) in radioiodine oncolytic treatment. Total group analysis (Panel A) and subgroup analyses according to 131I-avidity (Panel B), age (Panel C), location of metastasis (Panel D), sex (Panel E), and therapeutic response (Panel F). NR, not reached; S/FIR, structural/functional incomplete response
All patients in this group were eligible for analysis of the response to initial ROT. Excellent response, indeterminate response, biochemical incomplete response, and structural/functional incomplete response were achieved in three (2.50%), four (3.33%), 10 (8.33%), and 103 (85.83%) patients, respectively. The median serum Tgon level decreased significantly from 20.11 ng/mL (range, 0.22-4,711.00 ng/mL) to 2.19 ng/mL (range, 0.04-2,213.00 ng/mL), yielding biochemical remission and stabilization rates of 69.49% and 20.34%, respectively. After excluding 42 patients without target lesions, the remaining 78 (65.00%) patients were eligible for structural response assessment. Post final ROT, complete response, partial response, and stable disease were reported in one (1.28%), two (2.56%), and 72 (92.31%) patients, respectively, yielding a structural disease control rate of 96.15%.
Discussion
Integrating medical history, Tgoff, RAIU, and medical imaging findings, we creatively proposed a postoperative DSS system to explicitly label DTC patients with no evidence of disease, unexplained hyperthyroglobulinemia, or structural disease, who were subsequently assigned to RRA, RAT, or ROT, respectively. Successful RRA, favorable therapeutic response, and excellent survival outcomes conjunctively demonstrated that the postoperative DSS system feasibly individualizes 131I therapy of DTC, representing a reliable complementation for the recurrence risk stratification systems with broad application in a universal setting. The strengths of the study include the large cohort of over 600 patients, multi-center enrollment, greater than 3 year median duration of follow up, and novelty of approach.
It is worth noting that the purpose of RRA is to facilitate therapeutic response classification and dynamic recurrence risk stratification, rather than to improve survival or decrease recurrence [2, 17, 27]. In the current study, a median serum Tgon nadir as low as 0.06 ng/mL was reached post RRA, featuring an excellent response and definite response classification. Interestingly, the success rate of RRA (85.76%) seemed a little bit lower than that (94.7%) reported by our previous prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial [17]. This may be due to the interference by 4.97% patients who were finally revealed with persistent disease via initial RxWBS ± SPECT/CT. Of note, these patients were initially classified as low-intermediate recurrence risk, indicating a possible miss of timely treatment for occult disease if the decision-making had been merely guided by recurrence risk stratification systems [28, 29]. And only 4.97% of patients with persistent disease could potentially be partially attributed to the non-utilization of SPECT/CT in all patients [30]. Moreover, a success rate of 85.71% was achieved in patients with RAIU over 15% using a relatively high activity of 5.5 GBq (Table 2), indicating that RRA may act as an ideal alternative to completion thyroidectomy for patients with thyroid remnant if sufficient activities of 131I are prescribed [31]. Additionally, as expected, a meaningful 5-year disease-free survival rate of 92.97% and non-structural/functional incomplete response rate of 97.35% were reached in RRA group, which were in line with 95.6% of patients without recurrence at 3 years post RRA reported by Leboulleux S, et al [27]. Conversely, the remaining patients (2.65%) were revealed with structural/functional incomplete response, suggesting additional treatments and more intensive and frequent follow up, owing to a disease specific mortality as high as 11% [32, 33].
In the current study, the therapeutic response was analyzed in patients labeled as having unexplained hyperthyroglobulinemia who received RAT. The non-structural/functional incomplete response rate of 77.78% and structural/functional incomplete response rate of 22.22% seem comparable to those reported previously [5]. Further, we calculated a RAT-derived median disease-free survival of 85.00 months and a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 77.01% in this study. Thus, along with the findings of Piccado et al.. that RAT improved the progression-free survival and overall survival in DTC patients with Tgon > 1 ng/mL after thyroidectomy and lymphadenectomy, unexplained hyperthyroglobulinemia might be adopted as an appropriate indication of RAT [34]. And either Tgoff or Tgon should be regarded as a pivotal element of the postoperative DSS system. Notably, benefits in disease-free survival and disease specific survival strongly supported that RAT using 5.55 GBq of 131I for patients with unexplained hyperthyroglobulinemia is a reasonable scheme, bridging RRA and ROT.
ROT, the application of 131I to destroy persistent, recurrent, or metastatic DTC, has become a routine therapeutic strategy to improve progression-free survival and disease specific survival in patients with 131I-avid lesions [2, 6, 35]. As expected, after receiving a median cumulative activity of 11.1 GBq, biochemical remission rate of 69.49% and structural disease control rate of 96.15% were achieved. Meaningfully, the present study revealed a median progression-free survival of 86.00 months, a 5-year progression-free survival rate of 72.23%, and a 5-year disease specific survival rate of 99.01%, which are superior to those reported by previous studies [36, 37]. This may be partially explained by the higher proportion of patients with lymph node disease and younger age, who benefited more from ROT than the other groups of patients [36]. And 35% patients, who were labeled as having structural/functional disease, were identified without target lesions, indicating a lower tumor burden, which may be attributed to timely postoperative DSS and eventually contribute to the relatively higher 5-year disease specific survival rate.
Of note, 69.17% patients in the ROT cohort, who were initially labeled with structural disease by the DSS system, were finally defined as having RR-DTC, which seems a little bit higher than those reported by our team and others [17, 38]. This may be due to the modified definition of RR-DTC, which covered both patients with 131I-non-avid lesion and those with biochemically and structurally stable/progressive disease post ROT, considering the indolent nature of 131I-avid DTC. In addition, 18F-FDG PET/CT was extensively incorporated, manifesting an incremental value of nuclear molecular imaging in the management of DTC [7, 11, 19, 20]. Notably, the response to ROT seems a reliable predictor for progression-free survival, indicating that 131I-responders may have a significantly longer progression-free survival than 131I-nonresponders. On the contrary, high grade DTCs should be cautiously identified by pathological examinations and other assessments such as diagnostic and post-therapeutic 131I scans to avoid potentially ineffective ROT and timely switched to targeted therapy when indicated (Fig. 5) [3].
We admit that the current study has several limitations. Firstly, the incorporation of a diagnostic radioiodine scan and genetic profiling (BRAF, TERT, RET, etc.) prior to 131I therapy might be of value for improving this clinically practical DSS system, which merits further investigations [39, 40]. Secondly, considering the aggressive histology features (like hobnail variant of PTC) and extent of lymph node dissection might help develop appropriate RAI therapy activity. And neglecting pathological features also might reduce the number of patients receiving RAT [27]. Thirdly, due to the immaturity of non-immunometric assay and that an acceptable cut-off value of TgAb to alleviate the potential interference with Tg determination has not been well established, TgAb ≤ 100 IU/mL was adopted like before [5, 17, 41], needing further verification. Fourthly, since nearly a quarter of our patients were excluded from the current study for having TgAb > 100 IU/mL, the clinical outcomes in this entity are required to be investigated to reveal the whole landscape of 131I therapy.
Conclusions
This prospective, multicenter, real-world study demonstrated that the postoperative DSS system may act as a feasible guide to individualized 131I therapy for DTC, warranting head-to-head comparisons to other decision-making systems, such as TNM-stage, pathological subtype and recurrence risk stratification.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Hongjun Song, Renfei Wang, Jian Tan, Xvfu Wang, Weibin Wang, Zhuoying Wang, Wei Liu, Rui Huang, Zhiyu Chen, Shuhang Xv, and Ye Guo for helpful discussion.
Abbreviations
- DTC
Differentiated thyroid cancer
- RRA
Radioiodine remnant ablation
- RAT
Radioiodine adjuvant treatment
- ROT
Radioiodine oncolytic treatment
- DSS
Disease status stratification
- Tgoff
Stimulated serum thyroglobulin via levothyroxine withdrawal
- rh-TSH
Recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone
- TgAb
Anti-Tg antibody
- RAIU
Radioactive iodine uptake
- CT
Computed tomography
- PET/CT
Positron emission tomography/CT
- 18F-FDG
2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose
- RXWBS
Whole-body scan
- SPECT/CT
Single photon emission computed tomography/CT
- RR-DTC
Radioiodine-refractory DTC
Authors' contributions
All authors participated in the study’s conceptualization; data collections were by all the authors; Xian Qiu and Lin Cheng participated in data analysis; Xian Qiu, Yuchen Jin and Libo Chen participated in writing the original draft; All authors edited and reviewed draft.
Funding
This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81671711 and 82171981).
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study will be made available by the corresponding authors, upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Sixth People’ Hospital (Ethical Code is 2000-022) and Ren Ji Hospital, Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, the Affiliated Suzhou Science & Technology Town Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, and Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University. All patients read and signed the informed consent form.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Xian Qiu and Lin Cheng were co-first authors.
References
- 1.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, Pacini F, Randolph GW, Sawka AM, Schlumberger M, et al. 2015 American thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baloch ZW, Asa SL, Barletta JA, Ghossein RA, Juhlin CC, Jung CK, LiVolsi VA, Papotti MG, Sobrinho-Simões M, Tallini G, et al. Overview of the 2022 WHO classification of thyroid neoplasms. Endocr Pathol. 2022;33(1):27–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mazzaferri EL, Jhiang SM. Long-term impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. Am J Med. 1994;97(5):418–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cheng L, Sa R, Luo Q, Fu H, Jin Y, Tang L, Yang Y, Yu C, Chen L. Unexplained hyperthyroglobulinemia in differentiated thyroid cancer patients as an indication for radioiodine adjuvant therapy: a prospective multicenter study. J nuclear medicine: official publication Soc Nuclear Med. 2021;62(1):62–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kreissl MC, Janssen MJR, Nagarajah J. Current treatment strategies in metastasized differentiated thyroid cancer. J nuclear medicine: official publication Soc Nuclear Med. 2019;60(1):9–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tuttle RM, Ahuja S, Avram AM, Bernet VJ, Bourguet P, Daniels GH, Dillehay G, Draganescu C, Flux G, Führer D, et al. Controversies, consensus, and collaboration in the use of (131)I therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer: a joint statement from the American thyroid association, the European association of nuclear medicine, the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, and the European thyroid association. Thyroid. 2019;29(4):461–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Janiaud P, Serghiou S, Ioannidis JPA. New clinical trial designs in the era of precision medicine: an overview of definitions, strengths, weaknesses, and current use in oncology. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;73:20–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mayson SE, Chan CM, Haugen BR. Tailoring the approach to radioactive iodine treatment in thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2021;28(10):T125–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Pacini F, Schlumberger M, et al. Revised American thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1167–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gulec SA, Ahuja S, Avram AM, Bernet VJ, Bourguet P, Draganescu C, Elisei R, Giovanella L, Grant F, Greenspan B, et al. A joint statement from the American thyroid association, the European association of nuclear medicine, the European thyroid association, the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging on current diagnostic and theranostic approaches in the management of thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2021;31(7):1009–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Clerc J, Verburg FA, Avram AM, Giovanella L, Hindie E, Taieb D. Radioiodine treatment after surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer: a reasonable option. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(6):918–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ruel E, Thomas S, Dinan M, Perkins JM, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Adjuvant radioactive iodine therapy is associated with improved survival for patients with intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(4):1529–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim SK, Woo JW, Lee JH, Park I, Choe JH, Kim JH, Kim JS. Radioactive iodine ablation may not decrease the risk of recurrence in intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016;23(5):367–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rosario PW, Furtado Mde S, Mourão GF, Calsolari MR. Patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma at intermediate risk of recurrence according to American thyroid association criteria can be reclassified as low risk when the postoperative thyroglobulin is low. Thyroid. 2015;25(11):1243–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Filetti S, Durante C, Hartl D, Leboulleux S, Locati LD, Newbold K, Papotti MG, Berruti A. clinicalguidelines@esmo.org EGCEa: Thyroid cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-updagger. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(12):1856–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jin Y, Ruan M, Cheng L, Fu H, Liu M, Sheng S, Chen L. Radioiodine uptake and thyroglobulin-guided radioiodine remnant ablation in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial. Thyroid. 2019;29(1):101–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Torlontano M, Attard M, Crocetti U, Tumino S, Bruno R, Costante G, D’Azzò G, Meringolo D, Ferretti E, Sacco R, et al. Follow-up of low risk patients with papillary thyroid cancer: role of neck ultrasonography in detecting lymph node metastases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(7):3402–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fu H, Sa R, Cheng L, Jin Y, Qiu X, Liu M, Chen L. Updated review of nuclear molecular imaging of thyroid cancers. Endocr practice: official J Am Coll Endocrinol Am Association Clin Endocrinologists. 2021;27(5):494–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Seidlin SM, Marinelli LD, Oshry E. Radioactive iodine therapy; effect on functioning metastases of adenocarcinoma of the thyroid. JAMA. 1946;132(14):838–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tian T, Xu Y, Zhang X, Liu B. Prognostic implications of preablation stimulated Tg: a retrospective analysis of 2500 thyroid cancer patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(11):e4688–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen L, Luo Q, Shen Y, Yu Y, Yuan Z, Lu H, Zhu R. Incremental value of 131I SPECT/CT in the management of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(12):1952–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jin Y, Van Nostrand D, Cheng L, Liu M, Chen L. Radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol. 2018;125:111–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sa R, Cheng L, Jin Y, Fu H, Shen Y, Chen L. Distinguishing patients with distant metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer who biochemically benefit from next radioiodine treatment. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:587315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cheng L, Fu H, Jin Y, Sa R, Chen L. Clinicopathological features predict outcomes in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer treated with sorafenib: a real-world study. Oncologist. 2020;25(4):e668–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J cancer (Oxford England: 1990). 2009;45(2):228–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Leboulleux S, Bournaud C, Chougnet CN, Zerdoud S, Al Ghuzlan A, Catargi B, Do Cao C, Kelly A, Barge ML, Lacroix L, et al. Thyroidectomy without radioiodine in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(10):923–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Albano D, Bertagna F, Bonacina M, Durmo R, Cerudelli E, Gazzilli M, Panarotto MB, Formenti AM, Mazziotti G, Giustina A, et al. Possible delayed diagnosis and treatment of metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer by adopting the 2015 ATA guidelines. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;179(3):143–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.van Velsen EFS, Stegenga MT, van Kemenade FJ, Kam BLR, van Ginhoven TM, Visser WE, Peeters RP. Evaluation of the 2015 ATA guidelines in patients with distant metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(3):e457–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Campennì A, Giovanella L, Pignata SA, Vento A, Alibrandi A, Sturiale L, Laudicella R, Comis AD, Filice R, Giuffrida G, et al. Undetectable or low (< 1 ng/ml) postsurgical thyroglobulin values do not rule out metastases in early stage differentiated thyroid cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2018;9(25):17491–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Piccardo A, Trimboli P, Bottoni G, Giovanella L. Radioiodine ablation of remaining thyroid lobe in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer treated by lobectomy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(12):1730–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vaisman F, Momesso D, Bulzico DA, Pessoa CH, Dias F, Corbo R, Vaisman M, Tuttle RM. Spontaneous remission in thyroid cancer patients after biochemical incomplete response to initial therapy. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;77(1):132–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tuttle RM, Tala H, Shah J, Leboeuf R, Ghossein R, Gonen M, Brokhin M, Omry G, Fagin JA, Shaha A. Estimating risk of recurrence in differentiated thyroid cancer after total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine remnant ablation: using response to therapy variables to modify the initial risk estimates predicted by the new American Thyroid Association staging system. Thyroid. 2010;20(12):1341–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Piccardo A, Puntoni M, Bottoni G, Treglia G, Foppiani L, Bertoli M, Catrambone U, Arlandini A, Dib B, Altrinetti V, et al. Differentiated thyroid cancer lymph-node relapse. Role of adjuvant radioactive iodine therapy after lymphadenectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(6):926–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Haynie TP, Nofal MM, Beierwaltes WH. Treatment of thyroid carcinoma with I-131. Results at fourteen years. JAMA. 1963;183:303–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Deandreis D, Rubino C, Tala H, Leboulleux S, Terroir M, Baudin E, Larson S, Fagin JA, Schlumberger M, Tuttle RM. Comparison of empiric versus whole-body/-blood clearance dosimetry-based approach to radioactive iodine treatment in patients with metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(5):717–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nixon IJ, Whitcher MM, Palmer FL, Tuttle RM, Shaha AR, Shah JP, Patel SG, Ganly I. The impact of distant metastases at presentation on prognosis in patients with differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid gland. Thyroid: official J Am Thyroid Association. 2012;22(9):884–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wassermann J, Bernier MO, Spano JP, Lepoutre-Lussey C, Buffet C, Simon JM, Ménégaux F, Tissier F, Leban M, Leenhardt L. Outcomes and prognostic factors in radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid carcinomas. Oncologist. 2016;21(1):50–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu J, Liu R, Shen X, Zhu G, Li B, Xing M. The genetic duet of BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations robustly predicts loss of radioiodine avidity in recurrent papillary thyroid cancer. J nuclear medicine: official publication Soc Nuclear Med. 2020;61(2):177–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yang X, Li J, Li X, Liang Z, Gao W, Liang J, Cheng S, Lin Y. TERT promoter mutation predicts radioiodine-refractory character in distant metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. J nuclear medicine: official publication Soc Nuclear Med. 2017;58(2):258–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Spencer CA. Clinical review: clinical utility of thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) measurements for patients with differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(12):3615–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study will be made available by the corresponding authors, upon reasonable request.






