Skip to main content
Annals of Thoracic Surgery Short Reports logoLink to Annals of Thoracic Surgery Short Reports
. 2025 Nov 4;4(2):607–612. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2025.09.035

Preoperative MELD-XI Score and Risk of Heart Failure After Mitral Valve Surgery for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Yuki Nakamura 1, Tomoki Sakata 1, Scott H Koeneman 2, Keshava Rajagopal 1, Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili 1, Konstadinos A Plestis 1, John W Entwistle III 1, Joseph E Bavaria 1, Rakesh M Suri 3,∗∗
PMCID: PMC13245306  PMID: 42267041

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to assess the association between the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease excluding international normalized ratio (MELD-XI) score and heart failure (HF) after isolated mitral valve surgery for degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (dMR).

Methods

Patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for dMR were divided into groups of high MELD-XI score (>11, n = 28) and low MELD-XI score (≤11, n = 144). The primary end point was early HF events, defined as operative mortality, use of mechanical circulatory support, and prolonged use of inotropic agents after the surgery. The secondary end point was a composite outcome consisting of all-cause mortality and HF admission. The median follow-up period was 338 (70-789) days.

Results

Thirty-day mortality rate was 0.7% in the low MELD-XI score group and 3.6% in the high MELD-XI score group (P = .737). The prolonged use of inotropic agents was significantly higher in the high MELD-XI score group than in the low MELD-XI score group (25.0% vs 6.9%; P = .015). Freedom from composite outcomes was significantly lower in the high MELD-XI score group than in the low MELD-XI score group (log-rank, P < .001). MELD-XI score (odds ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.01-1.19]; P = .023) was identified as a significant risk factor of the early HF events. Multivariate Cox regression analysis found the MELD-XI score (hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.14]; P = .027) to be a significant risk factor for the composite outcome after surgery.

Conclusions

In patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery for dMR, elevated preoperative MELD-XI score was associated with an increased risk of early HF events and the composite outcome.


In Short.

  • ▪

    Preoperative elevated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease excluding international normalized ratio (MELD-XI) score was related to heart failure events early after mitral valve surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation.

  • ▪

    Preoperative elevated MELD-XI score was associated with a composite outcome consisting of mortality and heart failure admission after mitral valve surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation.

Whereas mitral valve surgery (MVS) for degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (dMR) is generally effective in improving symptoms and survival, heart failure (HF) may develop in a subset of patients postoperatively.1 Identifying patients at higher risk for development of HF after MVS is crucial for optimizing perioperative management and postsurgical surveillance. Several risk factors have been proposed, including preoperative New York Heart Association grade, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, and impaired left ventricular function.2 However, there is a need for more comprehensive risk stratification tools that integrate multiple clinical and biochemical parameters.

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease excluding international normalized ratio (INR) score (MELD-XI) is one of the scoring models that have been widely used for assessment of renal and hepatic function.3 This score is calculated by bilirubin and creatinine levels; the INR is also required for calculating the traditional MELD score in addition to bilirubin and creatinine. Previous reports showed the prognostic value of the MELD-XI score in patients with HF.4 However, the utility of the preoperative MELD-XI score in predicting HF after MVS for dMR has not been examined. This study aimed to assess the association between the MELD-XI score and HF outcomes after isolated MVS for dMR.

Patients and Methods

Study Population

We identified 279 patients who underwent isolated MVS between January 2018 and December 2023; 90 with non-dMR causes and 17 (9.0%) without preoperative MELD-XI scores because of missing laboratory values were excluded. The final cohort comprised 172 patients with dMR and available MELD-XI scores (Supplemental Figure). Median follow-up was 338 days (interquartile range, 70-789 days).

Assessment of Hepatorenal Failure

Hepatorenal function was assessed by MELD-XI:

MELD−XI=5.11×ln(bilirubin[mg/dL])+11.76×ln(creatinine[mg/dL])+9.44

Based on prior reports,4,5 a score >11 defined high MELD-XI. There were 28 patients with high MELD-XI scores and 144 patients with low MELD-XI scores.

End Points

Primary end points were early HF events (30-day mortality, mechanical circulatory support, or use of inotropic agents ≥48 hours) and late composite outcomes of all-cause mortality and HF readmission after MVS.

Statistical Analysis

Normally distributed variables were expressed as mean ± SD and compared with the t-test. Nonnormally distributed variables were reported as median (interquartile range) and compared with the Wilcoxon test. Categorical variables were presented as counts (percentage) and compared with the χ2 test. Logistic regression identified factors for early outcomes and Cox regression for late composite outcomes. Variables with P < .05 in univariable analysis entered multivariable models. Kaplan-Meier curves for survival, freedom from HF admission, and composite outcomes were stratified by high or low MELD-XI score and compared with the log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Analyses were performed with EZR version 1.52 (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University), a graphical interface for R version 4.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Results

Patient Characteristics and Surgical Variables

Patients with high MELD-XI score were significantly more likely to be older (age, 68 ± 11 years vs 63 ± 10 years; P = .012) and to have moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5 [17.9%] vs 9 [6.3%]; P = .013), preoperative atrial fibrillation (14 [50.0%] vs 41 [28.5%]; P = .044), and larger preoperative left atrium diameter on echocardiography (49 [45-57] mm vs 43 [39-49] mm; P = .002; Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline Patient Characteristics

Characteristic Low MELD-XI Score Group (n = 144) High MELD-XI Score Group (n = 28) P Value
Age, y 63 ± 10 68 ± 11 .012
Male 82 (56.9) 21 (75.0) .116
Body mass index, kg/m2 26.9 (23.3-29.7) 26.2 (23.1-29.7) .477
Smoking 64 (44.4) 11 (39.3) .885
Diabetes mellitus 16 (11.1) 2 (7.1) .741
Hypertension 98 (68.1) 22 (78.6) .377
COPD ≥ moderate 9 (6.3) 5 (17.9) .013
Cerebrovascular disease 13 (9.0) 4 (14.3) .612
Heart failure 29 (20.1) 10 (35.7) .120
Atrial fibrillation 41 (28.5) 14 (50.0) .044
Laboratory data
 White blood cell count, ×103/μL 6.7 (5.7-7.7) 6.7 (5.7-7.6) .970
 Hemoglobin, g/dL 13.8 (12.9-14.7) 13.8 (11.2-15.1) .674
 Hematocrit, % 41.7 (38.9-44.2) 41.0 (35.9-46.4) .876
 Platelet, ×104/μL 21.1 (18.1-25.0) 18.3 (16.0-22.8) .027
 Albumin, mg/dL 4.5 (4.2-4.6) 4.1 (3.9-4.5) .010
 Creatinine, mg/dL 0.91 (0.80-1.04) 1.35 (1.16-1.70) <.001
 Total bilirubin, mg/dL 0.50 (0.40-0.70) 1.15 (0.58-1.60) <.001
Echocardiogram
 LVDd, mm 53 (48-57) 54 (49-57) .433
 LVDs, mm 34 (30-37) 35 (30-37) .816
 LVEF, % 63 (60-65) 64 (58-65) .474
 IVSD, mm 10 (9-12) 10 (9-11) .612
 PWD, mm 10 (9-11) 11 (10-11) .342
 Left atrium diameter, mm 43 (39-49) 49 (45-57) .002
 Right atrium pressure, mm Hg 3 (3-5) 3 (3-6) .520
 Estimated sPAP, mm Hg 32 (25-42) 36 (28-44) .506
 TR grade ≥ moderate 17 (11.8) 6 (21.4) .287
 Right ventricular dysfunction 7 (4.9) 0 (0.0) NA
 STS score, % 0.57 (0.29-0.91) 1.89 (0.71-2.88) <.001
Operative factors
 Operation time, min 274 (247-315) 278 (239-302) .762
 Cardiopulmonary bypass time, min 121 (101-139) 114 (98-126) .247
 Aortic cross-clamping time, min 76 (62-91) 71 (60-82) .201
 Mitral valve repair 119 (82.6) 20 (71.4) .191
 Mitral valve replacement 25 (17.4) 8 (28.6)

Data are presented as mean ± SD or median with interquartile ranges for continuous variables and counts (percentages) for categorical variables.

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IVSD, interventricular septum diameter; LVDd, left ventricular diameter at end-diastole; LVDs, left ventricular diameter at end-systole; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MELD-XI, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease excluding international normalized ratio; NA, not applicable; PWD, posterior left ventricular wall diameter; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure; STS, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons; TR, tricuspid regurgitation.

Postoperative Outcomes

Early outcomes are summarized in the Supplemental Table. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.7% in the low MELD-XI score group and 3.6% in the high MELD-XI score group (P = .737). The frequencies of prolonged dependence on inotropic support were significantly higher in the high MELD-XI score group than in the low MELD-XI score group (7 [25.0%] vs 10 [6.9%]; P = .015). Freedom from the composite outcomes of all-cause mortality and HF readmission were significantly lower in the high MELD-XI score group than in the low MELD-XI score group (log-rank, P = .002; Figure).

Figure.

Figure

Kaplan-Meier curve showing (A) overall survival, (B) freedom from heart failure admission, and (C) freedom from all-cause mortality and heart failure admission. (MELD-XI, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease excluding international normalized ratio; MVS, mitral valve surgery.)

Association Between MELD-XI Score and Clinical Outcomes

Logistic regression analysis revealed elevated MELD-XI score (odds ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.01-1.19]; P = .023) to be a significant factor for the early HF event after MVS. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated elevated MELD-XI score (hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.14]; P = .027) to be a significant risk factor for the late composite outcomes after MVS (Table 2).

Table 2.

Risk Factors for Early and Late Heart Failure–Related Outcomes

Logistic regression analysis for postoperative early heart failure events
Factors Univariable
Multivariable
OR (95% CI) P Value OR (95% CI) P Value
Age 1.01 (0.96-1.05) .784
Male 1.05 (0.43-2.58) .917
Diabetes mellitus 2.91 (0.93-9.11) .067
Hypertension 3.27 (0.93-11.50) .066
COPD ≥ moderate 1.41 (0.79-2.52) .245
Cerebrovascular disease 2.20 (0.65-7.45) .204
Preoperative heart failure 2.55 (1.01-6.45) .048 1.68 (0.60-4.65) .322
Preoperative atrial fibrillation 2.19 (0.90-5.33) .085
LVDd 1.01 (0.95-1.07) .833
LVDs 1.03 (0.97-1.09) .364
LVEF 0.96 (0.91-1.02) .158
Left atrium diameter 1.04 (1.00-1.09) .075
Right atrium pressure 0.97 (0.83-1.13) .676
Estimated sPAP 1.02 (0.99-1.06) .127
Preoperative TR grade 1.33 (0.77-2.32) .307
Right ventricular dysfunction 1.08 (0.12-9.43) .942
MELD.XI score 1.11 (1.03-1.20) .009 1.10 (1.01-1.19) .0232
CPB time 1.01 (0.99-1.02) .430
AXC time 1.01 (1.00-1.03) .103
MVR 2.65 (1.01-6.91) .047 2.38 (0.86-6.63) .0959
Cox regression analysis for survival and heart failure
Factors Univariable
Multivariable
HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P Value
Age 1.04 (0.99-1.09) .090
Male 1.06 (0.4-2.79) .902
Body mass index 1.03 (0.96-1.1) .423
Smoking 1.02 (0.39-2.66) .963
Diabetes mellitus 1.20 (0.16-9.08) .862
Hypertension 1.74 (0.5-6.06) .387
COPD ≥ moderate 1.33 (0.72-2.47) .362
Cerebrovascular disease 1.29 (0.37-4.53) .693
Preoperative heart failure 1.91 (0.7-5.16) .204
Preoperative atrial fibrillation 1.06 (0.39-2.88) .903
LVDd 1.04 (0.96-1.12) .342
LVDs 1.04 (0.98-1.1) .225
LVEF 0.96 (0.91-1.02) .211
Left atrium diameter 1.03 (0.98-1.08) .214
Right atrium pressure 1.00 (0.86-1.17) .961
Estimated sPAP 1.02 (1-1.05) .091
Preoperative TR grade 1.88 (1.1-3.19) .020 1.73 (0.99-3.02) .053
Right ventricular dysfunction 2.07 (0.47-9.11) .338
MELD-XI score 1.09 (1.02-1.16) .008 1.07 (1.01-1.14) .0265
CPB time 0.99 (0.98-1.01) .41
AXC time 0.98 (0.95-1) .097
MVR 1.41 (0.46-4.34) .550

AXC, aortic cross-clamping; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; HR, hazard ratio; LVDd, left ventricular diameter at end-diastole; LVDs, left ventricular diameter at end-systole; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MELD-XI, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease excluding international normalized ratio; MVR, mitral valve replacement; OR, odds ratio; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure; TR, tricuspid regurgitation.

Comment

The main findings of this study were that elevated preoperative MELD-XI score is significantly associated with both the early combined HF events and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and HF admission after MVS.

Originally developed for cirrhotic patients with anticoagulant therapy waiting for liver transplant, the MELD-XI score is commonly used for assessing hepatorenal function, particularly in patients with advanced liver dysfunction. Its prognostic value is also reported in patients with HF.4,6 The pathologic relationship between hepatorenal function and HF can be explained by reduced cardiac output and elevated cardiac filling pressures that cause the low renal and hepatic blood flow and the venous hypertension and may lead to worsening renal and hepatic function.7 It has been reported that a greater preoperative MELD-XI score is associated with higher early mortality in patients undergoing tricuspid valve surgery.8 The MELD-XI score was also reported to be a useful risk stratification tool for clinical outcomes including HF hospitalization after transcatheter mitral valve repair.9 Our study revealed increased preoperative MELD-XI score in patients with dMR to be associated with both early and late HF events after MVS. These findings may suggest that the hemodynamic effects of dMR associated with an elevated MELD-XI score affect clinical outcomes after MVS. The relationship between hemodynamic and physiologic factors warrants further investigation.

In this study, we hypothesized that preoperative hepatorenal assessment with the MELD-XI score could identify patients at risk for early and late HF events after MVS for dMR. Although The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and EuroSCORE II scores have been established for predicting mortality and morbidity early after cardiac surgery, they do not account for liver function, a well-known surgical risk factor influenced by hemodynamic abnormalities. The traditional MELD score, incorporating bilirubin, creatinine, and INR, has been reported to be a predictor of early outcomes after cardiac surgery.10 Given the frequent coexistence of atrial arrhythmias in patients with dMR, we posit that the traditional MELD score may be overestimated because of higher INR caused by preoperative anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists and may not be the ideal score to evaluate the hepatorenal function in such a cohort. In contrast, the MELD-XI score, calculated only with bilirubin and creatinine levels, is unaffected by preoperative anticoagulation and might serve as a precise and simple tool for hepatorenal assessment and risk stratification focused on postoperative HF in patients undergoing surgical correction of dMR, complementing The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and EuroSCORE II scores. The Child-Pugh classification has long been used to assess liver cirrhosis; however, its value in predicting postoperative HF is uncertain. It incorporates qualitative factors such as encephalopathy and ascites, making it less objective than MELD scores. HF risk assessment may benefit from evaluating multiple organ systems that are not fully captured by the Child-Pugh classification. Moreover, evidence for Child-Pugh classification is limited, whereas the association between MELD scores and HF outcomes has been reported.4,6,9 The MELD-XI score may provide a more objective and precise tool for perioperative HF risk assessment. Further studies are needed to validate this and to develop a comprehensive risk model in this cohort.

Our study has limitations. First, it was a single-center retrospective analysis. Second, 17 patients (9.0%) without preoperative MELD-XI scores because of missing laboratory values were excluded. In conclusion, an elevated preoperative MELD-XI score was associated with early HF events and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and HF admission after MVS. The MELD-XI score may have potential value in identifying patients who could benefit from more intensive perioperative HF management and late HF surveillance; however, larger prospective studies are warranted to clarify its clinical relevance and practical implications.

Acknowledgments

The Supplemental Material can be viewed in the online version of this article [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atssr.2025.09.035] on https://www.annalsthoracicsurgeryshortrep.org.

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board (iRISID-2023-2511; 01/25/2024). Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Funding Sources

The authors have no funding sources to disclose.

Disclosures

Joseph E. Bavaria reports a relationship with Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Medtronic that includes: consulting or advisory. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1 legend
mmc1.docx (15.2KB, docx)

Supplementary Figure 1.

Supplementary Figure 1

References

  • 1.Enriquez-Sarano M., Schaff H.V., Orszulak T.A., Bailey K.R., Tajik A.J., Frye R.L. Congestive heart failure after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. A long-term study. Circulation. 1995;92:2496–2503. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.9.2496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Suri R.M., Schaff H.V., Dearani J.A., et al. Determinants of early decline in ejection fraction after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:442–447. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Malinchoc M., Kamath P.S., Gordon F.D., Peine C.J., Rank J., ter Borg P.C. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000;31:864–871. doi: 10.1053/he.2000.5852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kawahira M., Tamaki S., Yamada T., et al. Prognostic value of impaired hepato-renal function and liver fibrosis in patients admitted for acute heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8:1274–1283. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Egbe A.C., Miranda W.R., Dearani J., Kamath P.S., Connolly H.M. Prognostic role of hepatorenal function indexes in patients with Ebstein anomaly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2968–2976. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim M.S., Kato T.S., Farr M., et al. Hepatic dysfunction in ambulatory patients with heart failure: application of the MELD scoring system for outcome prediction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2253–2261. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Verbrugge F.H., Guazzi M., Testani J.M., Borlaug B.A. Altered hemodynamics and end-organ damage in heart failure: impact on the lung and kidney. Circulation. 2020;142:998–1012. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tsuda K., Koide M., Kunii Y., et al. Simplified model for end-stage liver disease score predicts mortality for tricuspid valve surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;16:630–635. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tanaka T., Kavsur R., Spieker M., et al. Prognostic value of hepatorenal function following transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021;110:1947–1956. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01908-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hawkins R.B., Young B.A., Mehaffey J.H., et al. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score independently predicts mortality in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:1713–1719. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1 legend
mmc1.docx (15.2KB, docx)

Articles from Annals of Thoracic Surgery Short Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES