Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2025 Apr 8;178(6):898–900. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-03258

US Emergency Department Visits Clinicians Attributed to Semaglutide Adverse Events, 2022–2023

Maribeth C Lovegrove 1, Nimalie D Stone 2, Andrew I Geller 3, Nina J Weidle 4, Jennifer N Lind 5, Pieter A Cohen 6
PMCID: PMC13245651  NIHMSID: NIHMS2177395  PMID: 40194288

Introduction

Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. In randomized controlled trials, semaglutide was associated with increased rates of nausea, diarrhea, vomiting and constipation, and post-marketing studies of GLP-1 agonists prior to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of semaglutide for weight loss found an increased risk of gastroparesis, pancreatitis, and bowel obstruction.(13) The clinical manifestations that most commonly lead to emergency department (ED) visits for semaglutide adverse events in routine clinical practice, and the national burden of those visits, is unknown. We used ED-based nationally-representative surveillance data to characterize and quantify US ED visits clinicians attributed to semaglutide adverse events.

Methods

The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System–Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance (NEISS-CADES) project, an active public health surveillance system based on a nationally-representative size-stratified probability sample of US EDs, is a collaborative effort of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), and FDA designed to detect ED visits attributable to medication harms. NEISS-CADES data were used to identify cases of ED visits clinicians attributed to semaglutide adverse events by adults aged ≥18 years from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023, the 2 years following FDA approval for weight loss.

As described previously, trained abstractors at 82 hospitals that voluntarily participate in NEISS-CADES reviewed all ED records to identify adverse events that treating clinicians attributed to use of drugs.(4) To ensure the national representativeness of the data, each case is weighted based on the inverse probability of selection for hospitals in each stratum, and weights are adjusted for nonresponse and hospital nonparticipation and poststratified to adjust for the total number of hospital ED visits annually. National estimates and 95% CIs were calculated using the PROC SURVEYMEANS procedure in SAS version 9.4 to account for the weights and complex sample design. This activity was reviewed by CDC, deemed not research, and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.1

Results

Based on 551 cases, there were an estimated 24,499 ED visits (95% CI, 17,022–31,976) clinicians attributed to semaglutide adverse events in 2022–2023 (Table 1); 82.6% (20,226 visits; 95% CI, 13,607–26,846) were in 2023. Of ED visits clinicians attributed to semaglutide adverse events, mean patient age was 50.9 years, and 73.2% of patients were female. Semaglutide was often the only medication implicated (81.7%), and was nearly always in injectable form (94.0%); 9.0% of visits involved medication errors. Overall, ED visits most commonly involved gastrointestinal effects (69.3%), hypoglycemia (16.5%), and allergic reactions (5.5%)(Table 2). Of the gastrointestinal effects, nausea/vomiting(83.2%), abdominal pain(36.2%), and diarrhea (17.7%) were most commonly reported. Hospitalization was required in 37.6%(95% CI, 23.7%-51.4%) of ED visits for hypoglycemia and 15.0%(95% CI, 9.4%-20.6%) for gastrointestinal effects.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Emergency Department Visits that Clinicians Attributed to Semaglutide Adverse Events -- US, 2022–2023a

Patient and Case Characteristics Cases (Unweighted) Nationally-Weighted Estimateb
n n % (95% CI)
Age, y
 18–24 26 -- --
 25–34 75 3,472 14.2 (10.9 – 17.4)
 35–44 98 3,847 15.7 (12.0 – 19.4)
 45–54 113 5,513 22.5 (18.0 – 27.0)
 55–64 128 5,939 24.2 (20.1 – 28.4)
 65+ 111 4,719 19.3 (14.5 – 24.0)
Sex
 Female patient 405 17,937 73.2 (68.8 – 77.6)
 Male patient 146 6,562 26.8 (22.4 – 31.2)
Race
 White 317 14,870 60.7 (46.1 – 75.3)
 Black 113 3,831c 15.6 (7.2 – 24.1)
 Other 18 -- --
 Unspecified 103 5,164c 21.1 (5.8 – 36.4)c
Ethnicity
 Hispanic 73 2,071c 8.5 (4.0 – 12.9)
 Non-Hispanic 374 16,748 68.4 (53.8 – 82.9)
 Unspecified 104 5,679c 23.2 (7.2 – 39.2)c
Semaglutide dosage form
 Injectable 523 23,029 94.0 (90.9 – 97.1)
 Oral 28 1,470 6.0 (2.9 – 9.1)
No. of implicated medications d
 1 440 20,005 81.7 (77.0 – 86.4)
 >1 111 4,493 18.3 (13.6 – 23.0)
Error Documented
 Yes 55 2,216 9.0 (6.1 – 12.0)
 No 496 22,283 91.0 (88.0 – 93.9)
Total 551 24,499 100.0
a

National estimates and 2-sided 95% CIs were calculated from statistical weighting of 551 cases from 82 nationally representative hospitals participating in the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System–Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance Project for 2022–2023, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

b

National estimates may vary for similar numbers of cases because of statistical weighting. Estimates based on <20 cases or total estimates of <1200 visits are considered statistically unstable and are not shown (--). Estimates with a coefficient of variation >30% may be statistically unstable and are noted.

c

Coefficient of variation >30%.

d

Includes prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) medications, herbal/dietary supplements, homeopathic products, or vaccines.

Table 2.

Clinical Manifestations that Emergency Department Clinicians Attributed to Semaglutide Adverse Events -- US, 2022–2023a

Clinical Manifestation and Disposition Cases (Unweighted) Nationally-Weighted Estimatesb
n n % (95% CI)
Adverse Event Manifestation c
 Hypoglycemia 111 4,043 16.5 (10.6 – 22.4)
  with other diabetes agentsd 90 3,205 13.1 (7.8 – 18.3)
  without other diabetes agents 21 -- --
 Gastrointestinal effectse 363 16,979 69.3 (63.2 – 75.4)
  Nausea and/or vomiting 301 14,123 57.6 (52.3 – 63.0)
  Abdominal pain and/or discomfort 133 6,139 25.1 (18.9 – 31.2)
  Diarrhea 67 3,001 12.2 (9.2 – 15.3)
  Constipation 21 -- --
 Allergic reaction 29 1,338 5.5 (3.7 – 7.2)
 Dehydration 15 -- --
 Other effects 28 -- --
Disposition
 Not hospitalized 453 20,124 82.1 (77.4 – 86.9)
 Hospitalizedf 98 4,375 17.9 (13.1 – 22.6)
Total 551 24,499 100.0

Abbreviations: ED, emergency department

a

National estimates and 2-sided 95% CIs were calculated from statistical weighting of 551 cases from 82 nationally representative hospitals participating in the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System–Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance Project for 2022–2023, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

b

National estimates may vary for similar numbers of cases because of statistical weighting. Estimates based on <20 cases or total estimates of <1200 visits are considered statistically unstable and are not shown (--).

c

Adverse event manifestation categories are mutually exclusive and were assigned hierarchically as listed (from top to bottom). For example, an ED visit in which a patient experienced both hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal effects would be categorized only under hypoglycemia; an ED visit in which a patient experienced an allergic reaction and dehydration would be categorized under allergic reaction. Five cases in which the patient experienced a semaglutide medication error without any documented clinical manifestations are not shown.

d

Other diabetes agents included: insulins (70 cases), biguanides [metformin] (25 cases), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 [SGLT-2] inhibitors (15 cases), sulfonylureas (11 cases), thiazolidinediones (2 cases), oral combination products (2 cases), injectable combination products (1 case), and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 [DPP-4)] inhibitors (1 case).

e

National estimates of ED visits involving specified gastrointestinal effects are not mutually exclusive (i.e., ED visits involving nausea and constipation would be include in the estimates for both nausea and constipation).

f

Defined as hospital admission, observation status admission, or transfer to another facility.

Of 551 cases, 6 patients(1.1%) were diagnosed with pancreatitis and 4 patients(0.7%) were diagnosed with semaglutide-attributed biliary disease. Semaglutide was implicated alone, without other documented antidiabetic medications, in 21 of 111 cases(18.9%) involving hypoglycemia.

Discussion

With more than 5 million patients dispensed semaglutide in 2023, the estimated 20,226 ED visits in 2023 suggests a rate of less than 4 ED visits for adverse events per 1,000 patients dispensed semaglutide. The majority of ED visits were due to adverse effects previously observed during randomized controlled trials of semaglutide, including gastrointestinal adverse effects and hypoglycemia when combined with other diabetes agents.(1,2)

This study has limitations: implicated drugs are identified based on patient report; comorbid conditions and indication for semaglutide use are not systematically collected; and attribution of adverse events was based solely on ED clinicians’ documentation. These limitations might explain the unexpected finding that semaglutide alone contributed to serious hypoglycemic episodes, even without concurrent insulin or sulfonylureas. Severe hypoglycemia is unexpected given semaglutide’s mechanism of action and lack of hypoglycemic adverse events in randomized controlled trials of semaglutide for the treatment of obesity. However, a recent Poison Center study also raises the possibility that semaglutide alone might cause severe hypoglycemia.(5)

Given these findings, clinicians could counsel patients when initiating semaglutide about the potential of severe gastrointestinal adverse effects and adjust co-prescribed antidiabetic medications to decrease hypoglycemia risk. Additionally, when evaluating patients with new onset gastrointestinal symptoms or hypoglycemia, clinicians could consider recent semaglutide use.

Acknowledgements:

We thank Kathleen O Rose, RN, Sandra K Goring, RN, Veronica Smith, CPC, Arati Baral, MS, and Alex Tocitu, MBA from Chenega Enterprise Systems and Solutions (contractor to CDC) for medical abstraction and programming assistance, as well as Tom Schroeder, MS, Michelle White, Omar Stokes, and data abstractors from the US Consumer Product Safety Commission, for assistance with data acquisition. We also thank Kai McKeever Bullard, PhD, MPH and Stephen R. Benoit, MD, MPH from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for thoughtful review of the manuscript. No individuals named herein received compensation for their contributions.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures:

Dr. Cohen reported receiving grants from Consumers Union and The Pew Charitable Trusts and personal fees from UpToDate outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Footnotes

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

1

45C.F.R.part46,21C.F.R.part56;42U.S.C.§241(d);5 U.S.C.§552a;44U.S.C.§3501etseq.

Contributor Information

Maribeth C. Lovegrove, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Nimalie D. Stone, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Andrew I. Geller, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Nina J. Weidle, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA and Chenega Enterprise Systems and Solutions, Atlanta, GA.

Jennifer N. Lind, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Pieter A. Cohen, Department of Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Somerville, MA and Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

References

  • 1.Lincoff AM, Brown-Frandsen K, Colhoun HM, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221–2232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aroda VR, Bain SC, Cariou B, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine as add-on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(5):355–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sodhi M, Rezaeianzadeh R, Kezouh A, Etminan M. Risk of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Associated With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss. JAMA. 2023;330(18):1795–1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Budnitz DS, Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, Geller AI, Lind JN, Pollock DA. US Emergency Department Visits Attributed to Medication Harms, 2017–2019. JAMA. 2021;326(13):1299–1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Muschler K, Muschalek R, Hoyte C. Characterization of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist exposures reported to a single United States poison center. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2025;Jan 13:1–4. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2444642. Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES