Skip to main content
Frontiers in Immunology logoLink to Frontiers in Immunology
. 2026 May 26;17:1809838. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1809838

The interplay between epidermal cells and the cutaneous sensory nervous: a systematic review

Feifei Wang 1,2,3,, Xiaohong An 1,2,, Dongjie Fan 2,4,*, Jing Shang 1,*
PMCID: PMC13246397  PMID: 42273691

Abstract

The skin is the largest sensory organ in the human body. It has a neural structure that’s very complex and diverse. A neural network spreads through the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissues. This network generates an exceedingly complex structure. It shows the deep functional links between the cutaneous system and the nervous system. This review systematically delineates the distribution patterns of cutaneous sensory nerves, elaborates on their distinct functional properties, and explores in depth the bidirectional regulatory crosstalk between epidermal cells and the sensory nervous system. Direct communication between these cells and nerves is not the only focus. The review expands on the potential mechanisms underlying these interactions, including chemical signal transmission and the regulation of immune responses. The review further addresses the role of sensory nerves in dermatological pathology, encompassing their functions in processes like chronic inflammation, pain perception, wound healing, pigmentation, and other related ones.

Keywords: cutaneous sensory nervous, epidermal cells, interaction, langerhans cell, mechanical allodynia, mechanical itch

Introduction

The skin contains complex neural networks. It performs a variety of physiological activities, including barrier protection, sensory perception, immune defense, thermoregulation, endocrine activity, and excretion. Additionally, it shields the body from mechanical harm. It also fends off pathogenic infections, prevents dehydration, and copes with body temperature changes (1, 2). Think about the nice feeling of a soft breeze on your face. Or the sharp pain when you get close to something hot. All these experiences happen because of sensory signals transmitted through cutaneous nerves.

The skin contains a dense network of nerve endings composed of terminals from a variety of sensory neurons. For example, nociceptors pick up harmful stimuli and send pain signals. Thermoreceptors detect temperature changes. Low-threshold mechanoreceptors (LTMRs) sense light touches or non-painful physical pressure (3). The epidermis is the skin’s outermost layer. It not only acts as a barrier but also plays an active role in regulating nerve activity. Most epidermal cells express receptors for neuropeptides, which enable them to receive signaling molecules secreted by sensory neurons. Similarly, epidermal cells are capable of producing a variety of bioactive substances, including cytokines, growth factors, and neurotransmitters, which in turn can modulate the functional activity of sensory nerves. This bidirectional crosstalk creates a dynamic feedback loop between epidermal cells and sensory neurons, allowing for coordinated regulation of the body’s reactions to external stimuli (4).

Both the skin and the nervous system originate from the ectoderm during embryonic development. This shared developmental lineage provides a structural basis for close communication between certain epidermal cells and neurons (5). Epidermal cells and sensory neurons are in close anatomical proximity and share conserved signaling pathways, enabling tight bidirectional crosstalk (6). Such interactions provide a reasonable biological basis for the clinical comorbidity between cutaneous disorders and neurological diseases. For example, neurological dysfunctions may exacerbate inflammatory dermatoses such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD). Conversely, chronic cutaneous pathologies are associated with increased anxiety, sleep disturbances, and elevated susceptibility to neurodegenerative diseases. Although skin disorders are unlikely to serve as primary etiology of neurological diseases, they may act as contributing factors that accelerate and aggravate neuropathological progression.

This review examines the distribution of neural networks in the skin, explores and delineates the intricate regulatory mechanisms governing the crosstalk between epidermal cells and sensory neurons interact. By understanding these complex pathways, we might study potential mechanisms of action, thereby providing insights into the prevention and treatment of neurogenic skin diseases.

Skin structure

The skin is a multilayered organ that includes the epidermis, dermis, subcutaneous tissue, and appendages. As the outermost layer of the skin, the epidermis consists of stratified squamous epithelium, which undergoes continuous proliferation and self-renewal. Histologically, the epidermis can be divided into five distinct layers, including the stratum corneum, stratum lucidum, granular layer, spinous layer, and stratum basale (7). Keratinocytes are the most common cells in the epidermis. Undifferentiated keratinocytes are capable of rapid growth and renewal. They gradually change to form the suprabasal layers, which include the spinous layer, granular layer, and stratum corneum (8, 9). The epidermis also has other special cells, including melanocytes, langerhans cells (LCs), Merkel cells and free nerve endings (FNEs).

The epidermal rete ridges interdigitate with the dermal papillary projections, with both structures anchored to the basement membrane (10, 11). The dermis lies under the epidermis and consists of two distinct layers: the papillary and reticular dermis. The dermis serves as the supportive framework of the skin, providing it with mechanical strength, nutritional support, and immune regulatory functions (12). The papillary dermis is composed of papillary fibroblasts. It contains many capillaries, lymphatic channels, FNEs, and Meissner corpuscles (1, 11). Papillary fibroblasts produce important components of the extracellular matrix, including type VI collagen, fibronectin, and tenascin C (1315). The reticular layer is composed of reticular fibroblasts. It consists of densely packed collagen and elastic fibers, larger blood vessels, lymphatic vessels, nerves, and skin appendages, which collectively endow the skin with mechanical strength and elastic resilience (16, 17). The dermis also contains additional immune cells, including lymphocytes, macrophages, mast cells, and dendritic cells (7).

The reticular fibroblast progenitors can produce both adipocyte precursors and mature adipocytes, which collectively contribute to the formation of cutaneous adipose tissue (18, 19). Sweat glands, hair follicles, blood arteries, lymphatic vessels, and nerves are all dispersed throughout the dermal adipose tissue. They serve as a cushion against external injury, regulate body temperature, store energy, and contribute to the body’s natural immune defense against bacterial pathogens (20).

Skin appendages—such as hair follicles, sweat glands, and sebaceous glands —are embedded within the dermis and extend into the subcutaneous tissue (21). The hair follicle is a complex sheath-like structure that surrounds the hair root and consists of multiple components, which spans from the subcutaneous tissue to the epidermis (1). It includes the hair shaft, root sheath, hair matrix, and hair papilla, in which the hair matrix consists of clusters of epidermal cells, while the hair papilla is a connective tissue projection extending into the hair matrix and richly supplied with blood vessels and nerves (21). Sebaceous glands are typically composed of one or more secretory acini connected to a short common duct. Most are situated adjacent to hair follicles and the arrector pili muscle, although some exist independently in non-follicular regions of the skin, such as the meibomian glands of the eyelid (22). Sweat glands are the primary effectors of thermoregulation and perspiration (23). They consist of two main parts: a secretory segment located in the deep dermis or subcutaneous tissue, and an excretory duct that traverses the epidermis to open directly onto the skin surface.

Cutaneous nerves

One of the main functions of skin is to perceive and respond to external stimuli and protect our body, which is mediated by the neural network on skin (21). The skin is innervated by a dense array of nerve fibers that extend throughout all its layers and associated appendages. The distribution of sensory nerves in the skin is shown in Figure 1. This section provides a systematic overview of the anatomical distribution and functional organization of sensory nerves within the skin.

Figure 1.

Cross-sectional diagram of human skin displaying epidermal layers, basement membrane, dermis, and dermal adipose, with labeled sensory nerve endings and cell types, including Ruffini corpuscle, Merkel cell complex, Meissner and Pacinian corpuscles, Langerhans cell, melanocyte, and keratinocyte.

Diversity of somatosensenory neurons in the skin. Aβ-fibers in the dermis are mechanoreceptors implicated in tactile sensation. They form specialized nerve endings, as well as those innervating Merkel cells and the hair shaft. Aδ-fibers and C-fibers comprise thermoreceptors and nociceptors. Aδ-fibres terminate in the dermis, while peptidergic and non-peptidergic C-fibers terminate in different epidermal regions.

Nerves distribution and function

The nervous system is divided into the central nervous system and the peripheral nervous system (PNS). The PNS comprises ganglia and nerve fibers that transmit sensory information from peripheral receptors to the central nervous system, enabling the regulation of physiological functions and facilitating interaction with the external environment (24). Functionally, the PNS is categorized into somatic sensory nerves, somatic motor nerves, visceral sensory nerves, and autonomic nerves (25). The autonomic nervous system can be divided into three anatomically distinct divisions: the sympathetic nervous system, which mediates the “fight-or-flight” response; the parasympathetic nervous system, which modulates homeostatic “rest and digest” activities; and the enteric nervous system, which regulates gastrointestinal motility and secretion (21, 24, 25).

Cutaneous innervation is mainly composed of somatic sensory nerves and autonomic nerves (26). Cutaneous autonomic nerves are predominantly composed of dermal sympathetic cholinergic nerve fibers (27). These efferent fibers innervate blood vessels, lymphatic vessels, and cutaneous appendages, thereby modulating the homeostasis of cutaneous perfusion, lymphatic drainage, and appendageal activity (28, 29). However, they constitute only a minor proportion of cutaneous nerve fibers, in contrast to the dominant population of sensory nerve fibers (29).

Somatic sensory neurons derived from cranial and spinal nerves extend lengthy axons throughout the epidermal and dermal layers to detect and transmit peripheral sensory signals (6, 30). Of these, neurons with cell bodies housed within the spinal dorsal root ganglia (DRG) mediate sensory innervation to the skin of the trunk and extremities (31, 32). Additional sensory neuron cell bodies reside in the trigeminal ganglia, which provide innervation to the craniofacial skin (3033). Cutaneous sensory nerves are classified into three main types based on myelination status and conduction velocity of action potentials: Aβ, Aδ, and C fibers. Their distinct physiological characteristics are summarized in Table 1. FNEs in the skin are formed by the terminal branches of myelinated Aδ fibers and unmyelinated C fibers, whereas Aβ fiber terminals associate with specialized accessory structures to form mechanosensitive tactile receptors.

Table 1.

Main characteristics of primary sensory afferent nerves controlling human skin.

Skin position Nerve fibers Sensory receptor Functions
Epidermis C fiber
Unmyelinated,
0.5–2 m/s
Thermoreceptor Warmth
Nociceptor Pain
Itches receptors Pruritus
Mechanicoreceptor Stroke
Basement membrane Aβ fiber
Intermediate myelin,
35–75 m/s
Merkel cell-neurite complex Bruising
Perceiving object details
Itching
Pain
Dermis Aδ fiber
Thin myelin sheath,
5–30 m/s
Thermoreceptor Cold
Hot
Nociceptor Pain
Aβ fiber
Intermediate myelin,
35–75 m/s
Corpuscula tactus Light touch, Vibration
Corpuscula lamellosa Roughness, Texture
Ruffini corpuscles Flexibility

Distribution of sensory nerves in the epidermis

FNEs in the epidermis are composed of C-fibers, which extend from the subpapillary plexus, traverse the dermal papillae, and penetrate into the epidermis, forming numerous terminal branches that terminate at various epidermal levels (32, 34, 35). FNEs represent the most abundant type of sensory receptor in the skin (21). Through indirect transduction mechanisms—whereby keratinocytes or other epidermal cells detect stimuli and subsequently activate adjacent nerve terminals via paracrine signaling—these pathways mediate the perception of pain, itch, temperature changes, and certain forms of pleasant touch (3638), as summarized in Table 1.

C-fibers constitute over 90% of epidermal nerve fibers and can be subdivided into peptidergic and non-peptidergic populations. Peptidergic C-fibers predominantly terminate in the spinous layer and are regulated by nerve growth factor (NGF), releasing neuropeptides such as substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Non-peptidergic C-fibers extend into the superficial granular layer, are regulated by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF). These fibers also express unique markers such as the Mas-Related G protein-coupled receptor (MRGPR) and purinergic P2X receptors (39). Nociceptive neurons expressing MRGPRD exhibit close structural associations with hair follicles and epidermal keratinocytes, and their FNEs end at different depths inside the epidermis (32).

Upon entering the epidermis, a subset of Aβ fibers undergoes demyelination. Their exposed terminals are surrounded by special cells known as Merkel cells, which reside at the basement membrane. Together, these components form the “Merkel cell-neurite complex” (40). This complex functions as a slow-adapting mechanoreceptor, responsible for transmitting signals of sustained mechanical pressure to sensory nerve endings. Additionally, It is also highly sensitive to fine tactile characteristics such as an object’s shape, texture, and curvature (41). Furthermore, beyond the canonical architecture of Merkel cell-neurite complex, touch domes receive innervation from SA1 Aβ-LTMRs, Aδ-fibers, as well as peptidergic and non-peptidergic C-fibers across humans (42) and other mammals (4345), yet their functional roles remain largely elusive.

Distribution of sensory nerves in dermis

Myelinated sensory nerves extend from the superficial fascia to the dermal papillary layer, where they spread out into intricate nerve plexuses known as “nerve trees” (46). Aδ-fibers end in the superficial dermis, forming FNEs. Aβ nerve fibers exit the subpapillary plexus and penetrate into the deeper dermis. Within this region, they give rise to specialized tactile mechanoreceptors, including Meissner corpuscles, Pacinian corpuscles, and Ruffini corpuscles (47).

Each of these end-organs exhibits distinct sensitivity profiles toward different mechanical stimuli. Meissner corpuscles are rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors found mostly in the dermal papillary layer. They respond to low-frequency vibrations (below 50 Hz), rendering them highly sensitive to light touch and transient mechanical stimuli (48, 49). Pacinian corpuscles residing in the reticular dermis rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors. The Aβ nerve terminal is ensheathed by an onion-like lamellar capsule composed of S100-positive cells. These receptors are insensitive to sustained static pressure, yet generate transient action potentials upon abrupt mechanical deformation (40). They are extremely sensitive to high-frequency vibrations (1000 Hz), thereby underpinning the cutaneous perception of surface texture and tactile roughness (40, 49). Ruffini corpuscles located within the dermal connective tissue are slow-adapting mechanoreceptors with elongated spindle-shaped morphology. Their nerve terminals integrate with the surrounding dermal collagen matrix. Furthermore, these receptors are activated by sustained mechanical pressure and tissue compression, enabling them to demonstrate selective sensitivity to cutaneous stretch (41).

In hairy skin, the epidermal nerve plexus gives rise to a nerve network surrounding the funnel region of the hair follicle, while the dermal nerve plexus forms a circumferential innervation pattern around the isthmus portion of the hair follicle. In most mammals, including mice, hair follicles are densely innervated by lanceolate endings formed by LTMRs, which are primarily formed by Aβ, Aδ, and C fibers (50, 51). Moststudies have focused on Aβ lanceolate ends. These nerve terminals ensheath hair folliclesto form specialized lanceolate terminals, and are presumed to function as detectors of hair displacement and movement (40). In rodents such as rats and mice, Aβ slowly adapting type I (SAI)-LTMRs are only found in the face vibrissae. This enables animals to accurately perceive position, size, form, and texture of objects. However, in humans, Aβ SAI-LTMRs are connected to touch domes located between hair follicles (47, 50).

Keratinocytes and sensory nerves

Previously, FNEs in the epidermis were believed to be the only detectors of noxious stimuli (38). However, more and more evidence (39, 5258) has demonstrated two key findings: first, keratinocytes can modulate nociceptive signals in sensory neurons; second, they can communicate directly with these neurons via synaptic-like structures.

Indirect regulation

Keratinocytes release many different signaling molecules, including include neurotrophic factors, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), neurotransmitters, and cytokines, which regulate nociceptive transmission via FNEs. Indirect Regulation Between keratinocytes and Sensory Neurons is summarized in Figure 2. Keratinocytes synthesize and secrete neurotrophic factors such as NGF, GDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), and neurotrophin-4 (NT-4). Notably, NGF is secreted at the highest levels among these factors (59). Neurotrophic factors promote the survival, differentiation, and excitability of FNEs, thereby enhancing pain sensitivity (60). NGF synthesized by keratinocytes is retrogradely transported to the DRG, where it stimulates the release of neuropeptides, leading to neurogenic inflammation in the skin (61). Under conditions of stress or tissue injury, keratinocytes release cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-33 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), which can directly modulate sensory neurons. IL-33 activates a subset of DRG neurons by binding to its ST2 receptor, triggering Ca2+ influx and eliciting pruritic responses in mice (62, 63); it also directly activates FNEs to induce pain (64). TSLP activates sensory neurons expressing transient receptor potential (TRP) A1 and TSLP receptor, thereby inducing pruritus (63). Keratinocytes can release adenosine monophosphate, including antimicrobial peptides such as IL-37 and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, which have been shown to directly influence sensory neuron activity (8, 65).

Figure 2.

Two-panel scientific illustration. Panel a: Diagram of ion channels and receptors on a keratinocyte, including TRPV1, TRPV3, TRPV4, TRPA1, TRPM8, Piezo1, STIM1, Orail, VGCC, and VGSC, with indications of calcium or sodium ion flow. Panel b: Schematic depiction of molecular signaling between a keratinocyte and a sensory neuron, showing release of ATP, ET-1, beta-endorphin, SP, CGRP, cytokines, and neurotrophic factors, each connecting to corresponding receptors. Color-coded legend identifies P2, ETA, ETB, opioid, neuropeptide, cytokine, and neurotrophic factor receptors.

Indirect regulation between keratinocytes and free nerve endings. (a) External signaling molecules can activate a variety of receptors on keratinocytes, prompting them to secrete a range of chemicals. Notably, recent evidence has identified a novel mild-cold sensor protein in keratinocytes and demonstrated its localization in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum, which forms a Ca2+-permeable ion channel (66). (b) Keratinocytes produce neurotrophic factors (NGF, GDNF, BDNF, NT-3 and NT-4), ATP, neurotransmitters, and cytokines (IL 33, TSLP). These substances bind to specific receptors on FNEs, controlling nociceptive transmission.

Beyond secreting neuroactive mediators, keratinocytes express a wide range of sensory receptors (39, 53, 56, 60). Among these, TRP channels detect thermal, mechanical, and chemical stimuli. Human keratinocytes express multiple TRP channel subtypes, including TRPV1, TRPV3, TRPV4, TRPA1, and eTRPM8 (66, 67). Activation of these channels induces Ca2+ influx, which plays critical roles in pain perception, itch signaling, inflammation, cell proliferation, and hair follicle development (68).

The TRPV1 channel in keratinocytes not only contributes to nociceptive transduction but also participates in the pathogenesis of skin inflammation (52, 6972). When keratinocytes are exposed to heat (70), ultraviolet (UV) radiation (71), or blue light (72), TRPV1 is activated, which subsequently promotes the release of inflammatory mediators, including cyclooxygenase-2, prostaglandin E2, IL-8, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, and tumor necrosis factor-α (69).

Keratinocytes utilize TRPV3 and TRPV4 for the detection of thermal heat stimuli (34, 7378). When TRPV3 is activated, keratinocytes release ATP, which binds to the P2 receptors on sensory neurons, thereby mediating the perception of warm thermal sensations (57). TRPV3 also affects hair development in mice (79). UVB radiation activates TRPV4, thereby inducing keratinocytes produce more endothelin (ET)-1. While ET-1 can cause pain by acting on ETA receptors expressed on local nociceptors (80), it can also generate analgesia via ETB receptors. Additionally, ET-1 stimulates ETB receptors on keratinocytes, triggering the synthesis of β-endorphins, which bind to opioid receptors on nociceptors and relieve pain (81). TRPV4 can be activated by histaminergic pruritogens, which induces itch by increasing phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase in keratinocytes (ERK) (68).

TRPA1 responds to many different external stimuli. Tumor necrosis factor activates TRPA1 expression via the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and MAPK (82). which in turn increases the production of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, IL-1α, and IL-1β, thereby amplifying inflammatory responses. However, TRPA1 expression is low in keratinocytes that are not activated. Although functional TRPM8 is expressed on the plasma membrane, an epidermal isoform of TRPM8 (eTRPM8) has been identified (66). By fine-tuning ER–mitochondrial Ca2+ shuttling, eTRPM8 modulates mitochondrial ATP and superoxide production to sustain epidermal homeostasis upon mild cold exposure (66). In addition, eTRPM8 regulates cold-dependent keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation (67).

Besides TRP channels, keratinocytes express other sensory receptors that participate in the modulation of cutaneous sensation, including voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC), voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC), adrenergic receptors, acetylcholine receptors (AChRs), and glutamate (Glu) receptors. VGSC are involved in neuropathic pain through facilitation of ATP release (83). During tissue injury or stress, catecholamines released from the sympathetic nervous system and inflammatory mediators secreted by immune cells establish a positive feedback loop via adrenergic receptor, thereby exacerbating inflammation and promoting pain sensitization (84). AChRs are classified into muscarinic AChRs and nicotinic AChRs subtypes. Keratinocytes express all five mAChR subtypes (M1–M5) as well as multiple nAChR subunits, including α3, α5, α6, α7, α9, α10, β1, β2, and β4 (56). Additionally, they express fast-acting ionotropic Glu receptors, such as N-methyl-D-aspartate, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid, and kainate receptors (85). VGCC (86) and Orai1/STIM1 (8789) complexes play pivotal roles in maintaining skin homeostasis. Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms underlying their neuroregulatory functions and involvement in cutaneous sensory transduction remain largely uncharacterized and await further comprehensive exploration.

Recent studies have demonstrated that keratinocytes regulate skin mechanosensation through PIEZO1 (54). Intradermal injection of the PIEZO1 specific agonist-Yoda1 into mouse epidermis activates the PIEZO1 pathway in keratinocytes, leading to increased mechanical sensitivity of C-fibers and inducing behavioral mechanical hypersensitivity in mice (54). In contrast, a study by Rose Z. Hill et al. demonstrated that Yoda1 primarily induces acute pruritus through direct activation of somatosensory neurons, rather than indirectly via keratinocyte PIEZO1 (90). Moreover, the study revealed that PIEZO1 exerts its pruritogenic effects predominantly through the Sst+Nppb+ subset of pruriceptive neurons, contributing to both mechanical itch and itch hypersensitivity (90). Sonoko Takahashi’s in vivo imaging studies demonstrated that keratinocytes and FNEs interact to induce epidermal nerve pruning, and dysregulation of this process contributes to pathological pruritus—a condition defined as chronic, intractable itching that exceeds normal physiological protective functions and is closely associated with skin inflammation, nerve damage, or systemic disorders (91).

Direct regulation

FNEs and keratinocytes have similar anatomical properties and neurotransmitter receptors (53). The above evidence support the possibility of rapid, specific paracrine crosstalk between keratinocytes and FNEs. Recent evidence indicates that keratinocytes can communicate with FNEs via synapse-like contacts, resembling the Merkel cell-neurite complex (58). This depicts the direct regulatory interaction between keratinocytes and FNEs in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Illustration showing skin cross-section in panel a, highlighting nerve fibers interacting with keratinocytes. Panel b zooms in on a synaptic connection between a sensory neuron and a keratinocyte, depicting vesicle release of signaling molecules, with labels for syntaxin 1A, synaptotagmin 1, and synaptophysin proteins involved in vesicle fusion and neurotransmitter release.

(a) Epidermal keratinocytes can communicate directly with sensory neurons through en passant synaptic-like contacts. (b) Keratinocyte TRPV1 activation elevates cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ concentration, thereby triggering vesicle exocytosis. Neuromediators released into the synaptic cleft subsequently activate sensory neurons by binding to postsynaptic receptors.

Matthieu Talagas et al. (58) first reported the expression of three classic presynaptic proteins—synaptophysin, synaptotagmin-1, and syntaxin 1A—in human keratinocytes. The results from western blot and laser scanning confocal microscopy demonstrated that the key molecules essential for exocytosis—syntaxin 1A and synaptotagmin 1 (92)—are localized in transparent core vesicles as well as in components of the presynaptic active zone. Moreover, in vitro experiments and human skin biopsy analyses revealed pearl necklace-like clusters of presynaptic vesicle structures within the cytoplasm of keratinocytes adjacent to FNEs. Functional validation showed that when capsaicin was applied to co-cultures of human keratinocytes and rat DRG neurons, it activated the TRPV1 pathway in keratinocytes, significantly increasing neuronal currents and membrane conductance. This effect was abrogated following pretreatment of keratinocytes with botulinum toxin type C, which suppressed the capsaicin-induced enhancement in neuronal activity. These findings show that TRPV1 activation in differentiated keratinocytes of the spinous and granular layers causes vesicle exocytosis. Via this mechanism, keratinocytes release neurotransmitters that subsequently bind to postsynaptic receptors on sensory neurons.

Erbacher et al. (93) studied the ultrastructural and functional properties of the keratinocyte-nerve fiber interface in human skin. Their research revealed that epidermal nerve fiber segments are partially ensheathed by nearby keratinocytes, wherein connexin 43 may act as a molecular mediator of intercellular crosstalk. The researchers developed a co-culture setup with human sensory neurons and keratinocytes. In the human sensory neuron–keratinocyte co-culture model, neurites traverse keratinocytes intercellular grooves or are ensheathed by keratinocytes. However, no obvious SYP-positive puncta or synaptic vesicle clusters were detected in the keratinocyte cytoplasm. These results show that connexins mediate physical connection between keratinocytes and nerve fibers. Such contact constitutes a conduit for ATP-mediated signal transduction, and further modulates the transmission of sensory and pain information.

Chemogenetic and optogenetic techniques are effective tools for inducing nociceptive responses in vivo. By employing the keratin 5 promoter, TRPV1 was selectively express in keratinocytes of TRPV1-knockout mice, resulting in capsaicin-specific activation of keratinocytes (52). Using this approach, they discovered that keratinocyte stimulation was sufficient to cause acute paw-licking nocifensive responses, demonstrating that keratinocyte stimulation is sufficient to evoke nociception in mice. In transgenic mice with keratinocyte-expressed halorhodopsin, yellow light promotes chloride inflow, inhibiting nociceptor action potentials and reducing behavioral responses to mechanical stimuli (55, 94). Similarly, when the light-driven outward proton pump archaerhodopsin-3 is selectively expressed in keratin 14-expressing keratinocytes, optogenetic inhibition of these cells attenuates reflexive behavioral responses to both cold and heat stimuli (57).

Merkel cell and sensory nerves

In glabrous skin, Merkel cells reside in the basal layer of the epidermis, where they are anchored by desmosomes and closely associated with Aβ sensory nerve terminals (95). In hairy skin, these cells occupy specialized epidermal thickenings interspersed among hair follicles termed touch domes, where they establish synaptic junctions with sensory nerve fibers (47, 50). Merkel cells also present in hair follicle protrusions yet seldom connect adjacent nerve endings (96), and may regulate hair morphology through hair cycle-related paracrine signaling (97). Synapse-like junctions between Merkel cells and sensory afferents have been identified (98). Upon mechanical stimulation, neurotransmitters stored in dense-core vesicles are released via exocytosis, activating sensory nerve terminals to generate a SAI response (99). The structure of Merkel cell-neurite complex in the skin is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Illustration showing a cross-section of skin with hair follicles, Merkel cells, and sensory neurons. Panel a displays Merkel cells at the epidermal-dermal border, while panel b provides a magnified view, labeling Piezo2 channels, a Merkel cell with nucleus, and a sensory neuron. Inset shows neurotransmitter vesicle release from the Merkel cell to the neuron, emphasizing mechanotransduction signaling.

The structure of Merkel cell-neurite complex in the skin. (a) Merkel cells reside in the basal layer of the epidermis and are closely associated with Aβ sensory nerve. (b) Upon mechanical stimulation, Merkel cell releases neurotransmitters via exocytosis, activating sensory nerve terminals to trigger action potential.

Touch

The biophysical characteristics of the touch-activated current in Merkel cells match the mechanically sensitive ion channels encoded by the Piezos gene (100102). PIEZO1 and PIEZO2, the two PIEZO channel isoforms, mediate critical mechanotransduction processes (100). PIEZO2 is specifically expressed in mouse cutaneous Merkel cells but not in other epidermal cell types (101), and is also expressed in rat Merkel cells (102). Selective knockout of Piezo2 in murine epidermal Merkel cells markedly diminishes the sustained firing rate of SAI responses mediated by the Merkel cell-neurite complex (101). These observations show that Merkel cells mechanosensitivity is entirely dependent on PIEZO2. PIEZO2 activation induces Ca2+ influx and neurotransmitter release from Merkel cells. This pathway triggers action potentials in Aβ afferent neurons and enhances behavioral tactile responses in rodents (102).

Merkel cells may influence SAI afferent activity by releasing excitatory neurotransmitters such as Glu, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), and norepinephrine (NE) (98). As an intrinsic receptor, the Glu receptor in Merkel cells may modulate signal transduction within these cells through a feedback mechanism (103). However, Cahusac et al. questioned whether the Glu receptor antagonists employed in this study disrupt SAI signaling via off-target inhibition of mechanosensitive ion channels, rather than through specific ligand binding to Glu receptors (104). 5-HT is thought to be a primary neurotransmitter in the Merkel cell-neurite complex. When tactile stimulation happens, rat Merkel cells in whisker follicles release 5-HT, which activates 5-HT1 receptors on SAI afferent terminals, indicating that 5-HT regulates communication between Merkel cell-neurite complexes (105). Analogous observations have further been replicated in mouse model (106). However, another study found a different outcome. Mechanical stimulation causes Ca2+ to influx into Merkel cells via PIEZO2 channels. It causes cells to produce NE, which binds to β2-adrenergic receptors on SAI afferents (107). This provides an alternative paradigm for neurotransmission in the complex.

Besides these classical neurotransmitters, Merkel cells also release various neuropeptides, including vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), CGRP, SP, methionine-enkephalin, somatostatin, and others. But these neuropeptides don’t directly affect sensory transmission. Instead, they are most likely involved in neuroendocrine or paracrine regulatory roles (108). The specific kinds of neurotransmitters and synaptic components in Merkel cells, as well as their exact functions, still need to be clarified through further research.

Mechanical itch

Mechanical stimuli such as gentle stroking and light poking can induce cutaneous itch and trigger scratching urges. This phenomenon, termed mechanical itch, is a chronic pathological condition (109). Recent studies show that the Merkel cell-neurite complex is involved in mediating mechanical itch.

Targeted genetic ablation of Merkel cells, particularly their associated mechanosensitive Piezo2 channels mediating static Aβ-fiber activation, suffices to elicit alloknesis independent of chemical itch sensations such as histamine or chloroquine (99). Conversely, chemogenetic activation of Merkel cells enhances static firing of SA1 Aβ-LTMRs after light cutaneous mechanical stimuli and protects against alloknesis in dry skin models (110). Lu et al. explored the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying mechanical itch caused by traditional pruritogens (111). Intradermal injection of pruritogens triggers the phospholipase C–protein kinase C-δ signaling pathway. This increases the sensitivity of the PIEZO2 channel. Finally, it promotes hypersensitivity of MRGPRA3+ pruriceptors to mechanical stimulation while having no effect on acute chemical pruritus. Feng et al. proved that under pathological conditions, abnormal functional connections between Merkel cells and pruriceptive C-fibers drive a self-sustaining itch-scratching cycle (112). Optogenetic activation of Merkel cells, rather than evoking SAI afferent firing mediating tactile sensation, enhanced pruriceptive C-fiber activation and spontaneous scratching in dry skin (112). Moreover, structural alterations in MRGPRA3+ pruriceptor terminals projecting toward Merkel cells were detected, forming a pathological touch receptor–pruriceptor circuit that drives scratch-evoked itch in mice (112).

Under physiological conditions in mice, mechanical itch circuit is gated by other Aβ-LTMRs through activation of inhibitory NPY:Cre interneurons (INs), and is independent of GRP/GRPR chemical itch pathways (113, 114). However, under pathological conditions, this gating mechanism by NPY inhibitory INs is lost, leading to alloknesis (115). Reduced serum NPY levels in pruritic psoriatic patients also support this hypothesis (116). Mechanical itch in imiquimod-induced psoriatic mice is associated with the loss of epidermal Aβ-fiber terminals, while Merkel cells remain unaffected (117). All these findings show that the Merkel cell–neurite complex plays a key role in controlling how sensitive the body is to mechanical itch.

Neurotransmitters like 5-HT and NE also influence itch perception. In pathological situations, it is important to explore whether Merkel cells mediate mechanical itch by releasing neuromodulators including 5-HT and NE. Immunohistochemical analyses has found several neurotransmitters in Merkel cells, including CGRP, SP, enkephalin A, and Glu. However, their specific roles in Merkel cell-neuron communication and itch regulation remain unclear.

Mechanical allodynia

In cases of nerve damage or chronic inflammation, innocuous tactile stimuli can evoke pain sensations referred to as mechanical allodynia. Clinically, this phenomenon presents in three forms: dynamic mechanical allodynia elicited by light touch (e.g., fine brush), static mechanical allodynia induced by sustained pressure, and punctate mechanical allodynia triggered by localized pinprick-like stimuli using von Frey filaments. Similar to mechanical itch, mechanical allodynia is closely linked to PIEZO2. Mice that lack Piezo2 in caudal sensory neurons fail to exhibit punctate or dynamic allodynic responses following capsaicin administration or nerve injury (118). Optogenetic activation of all Piezo2-expressing neurons in mice induces nocifensive behaviors such as paw withdrawal, defensive movements, and licking (118). The Merkel cell-neurite complex contributes to mechanical allodynia after peripheral nerve injury in a sex-dependent manner, with such pain responses observed exclusively in male mice (119). PIEZO2 is expressed in both neuronal and non-neuronal cells within the PNS of rats. Inflammatory conditions and nerve injury enhance PIEZO2-mediated mechanical sensitivity, suggesting that PIEZO2 not only functions in the detection of external and internal mechanical cues but may also participate in additional intercellular or intracellular signaling pathways within pain circuits (120). Xie et al. discovered that endorphin A2 interacts with kinesin family member 5B, a molecular mechanism underlying mechanical hyperalgesia. This interaction mediate membrane trafficking of PIEZO2 in DRG neurons, thereby affecting tactile and mechanical allodynia (121). In the PNS, pro-inflammatory mediators such as bradykinin and the second messenger Epac1 enhance PIEZO2 channel function downstream, potentiating the sensitivity of sensory neurons (122, 123).

Szczot et al. conducted quantitative sensory tests on human patients with Piezo2 loss-of-function mutations. When local inflammation was produced, these patients shown no mechanical hypersensitivity to gentle stimuli such as a fine brush, air puff, or vibration (124). Findings from human studies and animal models complement one another, collectively demonstrating that neuronal PIEZO2 is necessary for the development of mechanical allodynia.

LCs and FNEs

LCs are immunological cells found in the epidermal spinous layer with a distinctive star-like appearance (125). LCs dynamically extend and retract dendrites between keratinocytes (126), enabling them to survey antigens across multiple epidermal layers without compromising skin barrier integrity (127). Furthermore, LCs can form close associations with peripheral sensory nerve endings (Figure 5a).

Figure 5.

Panel (a) shows a cross-section illustration of multiple skin cells with a Langerhans cell and nerve fibers highlighted. Panel (b) displays a diagram of cellular and molecular interactions in skin, featuring Langerhans cells, mast cells, keratinocytes, nerve endings, and arrows illustrating signaling molecules such as TNF-α, NGF, SP, IL-31, and their effects on pain and itch.

The interplay between langerhans cells and free nerve endings. (a) Langerhans cells in the epidermis can form close associations with free nerve endings. (b) Langerhans cells and free nerve endings engage in bidirectional communication through signaling molecules such as neuropeptides, neurotrophic factors, and cytokines.

Functional differentiation of LCs

LCs have obvious similarities with dendritic cells and macrophages (125, 128). Like tissue-resident macrophages, LCs in the epidermis are maintained by self-renewal through exhibiting a slow proliferation rate to replace dying and emigrating cells under homeostatic conditions. However, unlike most macrophages, LCs possess dendritic cell-like migratory capacity (128). During both steady-state conditions and inflammation, LCs can migrate across the epidermal basal layer to reach lymphatic vessels and subsequently travel to regional lymph nodes, where they present antigens to cells of the adaptive immune system. This migratory process is initiated by the downregulation of E-cadherin, enabling LCs to detach from neighboring keratinocytes (129). Upon reaching the basement membrane, LCs locally secrete collagen-degrading matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9, facilitating dermal remodeling and enabling transdermal migration of LCs (130). Once within the dermis, LCs can enter the lymphatics in order to migrate to regional lymph nodes, to initiate adaptive immune responses through antigen presentation.

Seré et al. identified two distinct subsets of LCs: long-term LCs, derived from myeloid precursors during steady-state conditions, and short-term LCs, arising from Gr-1hi monocytes during inflammation (131). The development of long-term LCs is dependent on the DNA-binding inhibitor 2, whereas short-term LCs do not require binding inhibitor 2 expression (131). Following UV irradiation, short-term LCs are initially recruited to the epidermis and are gradually replaced by long-term LCs, thereafter reside stably in the epidermis (131). Short-term and long-term LCs show distinct phenotypes and morphologies. Langerin, EpCAM, CD24, and CD205 are among the LC markers with distinct expression patterns, all of which are highly expressed in long-term LCs. However, short-term LCs express both CD11b and CX3CR1 (132). Skin immune homeostasis relies heavily on LCs, which engage in active crosstalk with other skin cells, including keratinocytes and T lymphocytes, thereby facilitating wound healing (127, 133140).

Communication between LCs and FNEs

FNEs modulate LC function by releasing neuropeptides such as VIP and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide. These neuropeptides directly interact with LCs and attenuate their antigen−presenting capacity within draining lymph nodes (141). Loss of epidermal innervation impairs LCs activation and inhibits their migration, leading to an accumulation of LCs in the epidermis (142). Similarly, spinal cord injury patients have permanently denervated skin, which compromises epidermal immune protection and results in aberrant accumulation of LCs (143). However, functional electrical stimulation was insufficient to reverse epidermal LC density and restore skin immunocompetence (143).

As shown in Figure 5b, Langerhans cells and free nerve endings engage in bidirectional communication via signaling molecules including neuropeptides, neurotrophic factors, and cytokines, which is critical for preserving cutaneous innervation and normal sensory function. Depletion of LCs leads to a reduction in the number of skin nerves; specifically, it results in the loss of MRGPRD-expressing FNEs, thereby causing mast cell hypersensitivity and skin inflammation (144, 147). LCs express cannabinoid receptor 2, and administration of cannabinoid receptor 2 receptor agonists has been shown to alleviate mechanical allodynia in models of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (145). Pain is a common complication of diabetes. NGF exerts its effects via tropomyosin receptorkinase A (Trk-A) receptors expressed on LCs; these receptors interact with neurons via the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), thereby contributing to mechanical allodynia in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes (146). LCs play an important part in causing itch by producing IL-31 (181).

Melanocytes and sensory nerves

Melanoblasts, which originate in neural crest cells, migrate into the epidermis and hair follicles during skin development. There, melanocytes turn into mature melanocytes. Possessing a dendritic morphology, mature melanocytes synthesize melanin within melanosomes, transfer pigment to adjacent keratinocytes, and then undergo apoptosis (148). Melanocytes and skin sensory neurons share a common embryonic origin: the neural crest. Both cell types are regulated by comparable signaling pathways, including ET and neurotrophic factor signaling, and utilize similar molecular cascades, such as protein kinase C and pro-opiomelanocortin-p53-dependent pathways (149). Furthermore, melanocytes and sensory neurons have direct physical contact owing to their close anatomical proximity (150). Collectively, these inherent shared developmental, molecular, and anatomical similarities underpin crucial functional crosstalk between the two cell types. These shared characteristics imply two key implications: first, skin sensory neurons can modulate melanocyte activity, which in turn regulates both skin and hair pigmentation; second, melanocytes could be employed as a biological model to investigate neurodegenerative processes.

Melanocytes make direct contact with FNEs in human senile lentigines. At the same time, sensory neurons show significant upregulation of repulsive guidance molecule B expression (150). Co-culture experiments show that sensory neurons secrete the repulsive guidance molecule B protein, which promotes melanocyte survival and melanin formation (150). Via this approach, sensory neurons actively govern skin pigmentation. Neurons also influence hair color by controlling melanocyte stem cells (McSCs). Upon stress-induced activation of the sympathetic nervous system, NE is released, which drives rapid proliferation, differentiation, and migration of McSCs. This process accelerates premature McSCs exhaustion, ultimately leading to hair graying (151).

Conclusions

The skin is the largest organ in the human body. Beyond serving as a barrier against external insults, it dynamically maintains systemic homeostatic balance. Here, cutaneous nerves play a crucial role in maintaining skin integrity and regulating systemic responses to diverse pathological conditions. Epidermal cells and sensory nerves share analogous developmental origins and anatomical proximity, which provides a structural foundation for intercellular communication. Sensory neurons and epidermal cells can communicate indirectly through soluble mediators, as epidermal cells express neural receptors and release a variety of neuroactive substances. Furthermore, some epidermal cells form synaptic connections with sensory nerve terminals, thereby facilitating direct communication between nerves and epidermal cells. This review describes the distribution and functional features of cutaneous sensory nerves, as well as their bidirectional crosstalk with epidermal cells and nerve cells. Key regulatory processes include mutual regulation of keratinocytes, Merkel cells, LCs, melanocytes, and sensory neurons.

Interactions between neuro-epidermal cells are closely associated with many skin diseases, including psoriasis (152155), atopic dermatitis (156163), and neurodermatitis. Additionally, emerging evidence shows that skin disorders may increase the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s (164172) and Parkinson’s (173180) disease. Current research confirms a bidirectional relationship between skin disorders and neurological conditions; however, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. More studies are needed to make these complex molecular and cellular pathways clear. So future research should keep focusing on two main areas. First, consider how epidermal nerves accurately govern immune surveillance, inflammation management, and anti-aging mechanisms. Second, examine how these regulatory relationships become dysregulated in disease settings, contributing to the start and progression of complex pathological diseases.

High-throughput technologies, including as genomics, proteomics, and single-cell sequencing, have opened up previously unexplored avenues for understanding neurocutaneous connections. These approaches enable researchers to precisely map the neural-epidermal crosstalk across immune regulation, inflammatory responses, and cutaneous aging processes. These technologies also lay the foundation for early diagnosis, personalized treatments, and novel drug development. Moving forward, interdisciplinary cooperation and open data sharing will be indispensable for resolving this scientific challenge. Integrating multidisciplinary expertise will facilitate comprehensive elucidation of fundamental physiological and pathological mechanisms in humans.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by a grant from the independent research fund of Yunnan Characteristic Plant Extraction Laboratory (2025YKZY001 and 2023YKZY001).

Edited by: Sara Marinelli, National Research Council (CNR), Italy

Reviewed by: Augusto Escalante, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Spain

Christelle Ianotto, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHU) de Brest, France

LTMRs, Low-threshold mechanoreceptors; AD, Atopic dermatitis; LCs, Langerhans cells; FNEs, Free nerve endings; PNS, Peripheral nervous system; DRG, Dorsal root ganglia; NGF, Nerve growth factor; SP, Substance P; CGRP, Calcitonin gene-related peptide; MRGPR, Mas-Related G protein-coupled receptor; SAI, Slowly adapting type I; ATP, Adenosine triphosphate; IL, Interleukin; TSLP, Thymic stromal lymphopoietin; TRP, Transient receptor potential; ET, Endothelin; AChRs, Acetylcholine receptors; Glu, Glutamate; 5-HT, 5-Hydroxytryptamine; NE, Norepinephrine; McSCs, Modulating melanocyte stem cells; GDNF, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor; NT, neurotrophin; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; VGSC, voltage-gated sodium channels; VGCC, voltage-gated calcium channel; VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide.

Author contributions

FW: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. XA: Writing – original draft. DF: Writing – original draft. JS: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

FW, XA, DF were employed by company Yunnan Characteristic Plant Extraction Laboratory Co., Ltd.

FW was employed by company Yunnan Botanee Bio-Technology Group Co., Ltd.

DF was employed by company Shanghai Jiyan Bio-pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1. Raja E, Clarin MTRDC, Yanagisawa H. Matricellular proteins in the homeostasis, regeneration, and aging of skin. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:14274. doi:  10.3390/ijms241814274. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hsu Y-C, Fuchs E. Building and maintaining the skin. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2022) 14:a040840. doi:  10.1101/cshperspect.a040840. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zimmerman A, Bai L, Ginty DD. The gentle touch receptors of mammalian skin. Science. (2014) 346:950–4. doi:  10.1126/science.1254229. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Choi JE, Di Nardo A. Skin neurogenic inflammation. Semin Immunopathol. (2018) 40:249–59. doi:  10.1007/s00281-018-0675-z. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ferreira BR, Aguirre CC, Rapoport‐Hubschman N, Adewuya AO, Canchy L, Morizet D, et al. The skin‐brain connection and pleasant touch as supportive care for psychocutaneous disorders. Skin Health Dis. (2023) 4:e310. doi:  10.1002/ski2.310. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Blake KJ, Jiang XR, Chiu IM. Neuronal regulation of immunity in the skin and lungs. Trends Neurosci. (2019) 42:537–51. doi:  10.1016/j.tins.2019.05.005. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Nguyen AV, Soulika AM. The dynamics of the skin’s immune system. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:1811. doi:  10.3390/ijms20081811. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Oleszycka E, Kwiecien K, Kwiecinska P, Morytko A, Pocalun N, Camacho M, et al. Soluble mediators in the function of the epidermal-immune-neuro unit in the skin. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1003970. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2022.1003970. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Raymond A-A, De Peredo AG, Stella A, Ishida-Yamamoto A, Bouyssie D, Serre G, et al. Lamellar bodies of human epidermis. Mol Cell Proteomics. (2008) 7:2151–75. doi:  10.1074/mcp.M700334-MCP200. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kwiecien K, Zegar A, Jung J, Brzoza P, Kwitniewski M, Godlewska U, et al. Architecture of antimicrobial skin defense. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2019) 49:70–84. doi:  10.1016/j.cytogfr.2019.08.001. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Shirshin EA, Gurfinkel YI, Priezzhev AV, Fadeev VV, Lademann J, Darvin ME. Two-photon autofluorescence lifetime imaging of human skin papillary dermis in vivo: assessment of blood capillaries and structural proteins localization. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:1171. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-01238-w. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Rodrigues M, Kosaric N, Bonham CA, Gurtner GC. Wound healing: a cellular perspective. Physiol Rev. (2019) 99:665–706. doi:  10.1152/physrev.00067.2017. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Woodley DT. Distinct fibroblasts in the papillary and reticular dermis. Dermatologic Clinics. (2017) 35:95–100. doi:  10.1016/j.det.2016.07.004. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sabatelli P, Gara SK, Grumati P, Urciuolo A, Gualandi F, Curci R, et al. Expression of the collagen VI α5 and α6 chains in normal human skin and in skin of patients with collagen VI-related myopathies. J Invest Dermatol. (2011) 131:99–107. doi:  10.1038/jid.2010.284. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ghetti M, Topouzi H, Theocharidis G, Papa V, Williams G, Bondioli E, et al. Subpopulations of dermal skin fibroblasts secrete distinct extracellular matrix: implications for using skin substitutes in the clinic. Br J Dermatol. (2018) 179:381–93. doi:  10.1111/bjd.16255. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nyström A, Bruckner-Tuderman L. Matrix molecules and skin biology. Semin Cell Dev Biol. (2019) 89:136–46. doi:  10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.07.025. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Rognoni E, Watt FM. Skin cell heterogeneity in development, wound healing, and cancer. Trends Cell Biol. (2018) 28:709–22. doi:  10.1016/j.tcb.2018.05.002. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ganier C, Rognoni E, Goss G, Lynch M, Watt FM. Fibroblast heterogeneity in healthy and wounded skin. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2022) 14:a041238. doi:  10.1101/cshperspect.a041238. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lynch MD, Watt FM. Fibroblast heterogeneity: implications for human disease. J Clin Invest. (2018) 128:26–35. doi:  10.1172/JCI93555. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Chen SX, Zhang L-J, Gallo RL. Dermal white adipose tissue: a newly recognized layer of skin innate defense. J Invest Dermatol. (2019) 139:1002–9. doi:  10.1016/j.jid.2018.12.031. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Weng T, Wu P, Zhang W, Zheng Y, Li Q, Jin R, et al. Regeneration of skin appendages and nerves: current status and further challenges. J Transl Med. (2020) 18:53. doi:  10.1186/s12967-020-02248-5. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Geueke A, Niemann C. Stem and progenitor cells in sebaceous gland development, homeostasis and pathologies. Exp Dermatol. (2021) 30:588–97. doi:  10.1111/exd.14303. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Shibasaki M, Wilson TE, Crandall CG. Neural control and mechanisms of eccrine sweating during heat stress and exercise. J Appl Physiol. (2006) 100:1692–701. doi:  10.1152/japplphysiol.01124.2005. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lanigan LG, Russell DS, Woolard KD, Pardo ID, Godfrey V, Jortner BS, et al. Comparative pathology of the peripheral nervous system. Vet Pathol. (2021) 58:10–33. doi:  10.1177/0300985820959231. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Boahen A, Hu D, Adams MJ, Nicholls PK, Greene WK, Ma B. Bidirectional crosstalk between the peripheral nervous system and lymphoid tissues/organs. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1254054. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2023.1254054. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Bjorklund H, Dalsgaard C-J, Jonsson C-E, Hermansson A. Sensory and autonomic innervation of non-hairy and hairy human skin: an immunohistochemical study. Cell Tissue Res. (1986) 243:51–7. doi:  10.1007/BF00221851. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Roosterman D, Goerge T, Schneider SW, Bunnett NW, Steinhoff M. Neuronal control of skin function: the skin as a neuroimmunoendocrine organ. Physiol Rev. (2006) 86:1309–79. doi:  10.1152/physrev.00026.2005. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Tay SS, Roediger B, Tong PL, Tikoo S, Weninger W. The skin-resident immune network. Curr Dermatol Rep. (2014) 3:13–22. doi:  10.1007/s13671-013-0063-9. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bove D, Lupoli A, Caccavale S, Piccolo V, Ruocco E. Dermatological and immunological conditions due to nerve lesions. Funct Neurol. (2013) 28:83–91. doi:  10.11138/fneur/2013.28.1.083. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Schwendinger-Schreck J, Wilson SR, Bautista DM. Interactions between keratinocytes and somatosensory neurons in itch. In: Cowan A, Yosipovitch G, editors.Pharmacology of Itch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: (2015). p. 177–90. doi:  10.1007/978-3-662-44605-8_10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Snider WD, McMahon SB. Tackling pain at the source: new ideas about nociceptors. Neuron. (1998) 20:629–32. doi:  10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81003-X. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Zylka MJ, Rice FL, Anderson DJ. Topographically distinct epidermal nociceptive circuits revealed by axonal tracers targeted to Mrgprd. Neuron. (2005) 45:17–25. doi:  10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.015. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Haberberger RV, Barry C, Dominguez N, Matusica D. Human dorsal root ganglia. Front Cell Neurosci. (2019) 13:271. doi:  10.3389/fncel.2019.00271. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lumpkin EA, Caterina MJ. Mechanisms of sensory transduction in the skin. Nature. (2007) 445:858–65. doi:  10.1038/nature05662. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Zhu Y, Duan S, Wang M, Deng Z, Li J. Neuroimmune interaction: a widespread mutual regulation and the weapons for barrier organs. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2022) 10:906755. doi:  10.3389/fcell.2022.906755. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Landowski LM, Dyck PJB, Engelstad J, Taylor BV. Axonopathy in peripheral neuropathies: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches for regeneration. J Chem Neuroanat. (2016) 76:19–27. doi:  10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.04.006. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Strand N, Wie C, Peck J, Maita M, Singh N, Dumbroff J, et al. Small fiber neuropathy. Curr Pain Headache Rep. (2022) 26:429–38. doi:  10.1007/s11916-022-01044-8. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Basbaum AI, Bautista DM, Scherrer G, Julius D. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell. (2009) 139:267–84. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.028. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Talagas M, Lebonvallet N, Berthod F, Misery L. Lifting the veil on the keratinocyte contribution to cutaneous nociception. Protein Cell. (2020) 11:239–50. doi:  10.1007/s13238-019-00683-9. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Fleming MS, Luo W. The anatomy, function, and development of mammalian Aβ low-threshold mechanoreceptors. Front Biol (Beijing). (2013) 8. doi:  10.1007/s11515-013-1271-1. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Johnson KO. The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr Opin Neurobiol. (2001) 11:455–61. doi:  10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00234-8. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Reinisch CM, Tschachler E. The touch dome in human skin is supplied by different types of nerve fibers. Ann Neurol. (2005) 58:88–95. doi:  10.1002/ana.20527. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Zhang J, Huang W, Tuckett RP. C-fiber modulation of the rat type I slowly adapting mechanoreceptor. Neuroscience. (2002) 115:797–804. doi:  10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00505-5. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Ebara S, Kumamoto K, Baumann KI, Halata Z. Three-dimensional analyses of touch domes in the hairy skin of the cat paw reveal morphological substrates for complex sensory processing. Neurosci Res. (2008) 61:159–71. doi:  10.1016/j.neures.2008.02.004. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Lesniak DR, Marshall KL, Wellnitz SA, Jenkins BA, Baba Y, Rasband MN, et al. Computation identifies structural features that govern neuronal firing properties in slowly adapting touch receptors. eLife. (2014) 3:e01488. doi:  10.7554/eLife.01488. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kelly EJ, Terenghi G, Hazari A, Wiberg M. Nerve fiber and sensory end organ density in the epidermis and papillary dermis of the human hand. Br J Plast Surg. (2005) 58:774–9. doi:  10.1016/j.bjps.2004.12.017. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Provitera V, Nolano M, Pagano A, Caporaso G, Stancanelli A, Santoro L. Myelinated nerve endings in human skin. Muscle Nerve. (2007) 35:767–75. doi:  10.1002/mus.20771. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Feito J, García-Suárez O, García-Piqueras J, García-Mesa Y, Pérez-Sánchez A, Suazo I, et al. The development of human digital Meissner’s and Pacinian corpuscles. Ann Anat - Anatomischer Anzeiger. (2018) 219:8–24. doi:  10.1016/j.aanat.2018.05.001. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kim SH, Lee YH. Re-evaluation of the distribution of Meissner’s corpuscles in human skin. Anat Cell Biol. (2020) 53:325–9. doi:  10.5115/acb.20.105. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Li L, Rutlin M, Abraira VE, Cassidy C, Kus L, Gong S, et al. The functional organization of cutaneous low-threshold mechanosensory neurons. Cell. (2011) 147:1615–27. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.027. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Siemionow M, Gharb BB, Rampazzo A. The face as a sensory organ: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstructive Surg. (2011) 127:652–62. doi:  10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed6fd. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Pang Z, Sakamoto T, Tiwari V, Kim Y-S, Yang F, Dong X, et al. Selective keratinocyte stimulation is sufficient to evoke nociception in mice. Pain. (2015) 156:656–65. doi:  10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000092. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Talagas M, Lebonvallet N, Berthod F, Misery L. Cutaneous nociception: Role of keratinocytes. Exp Dermatol. (2019) 28:1466–9. doi:  10.1111/exd.13975. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Mikesell AR, Isaeva O, Moehring F, Sadler KE, Menzel AD, Stucky CL. Keratinocyte PIEZO1 modulates cutaneous mechanosensation. eLife. (2022) 11:e65987. doi:  10.7554/eLife.65987. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Baumbauer KM, DeBerry JJ, Adelman PC, Miller RH, Hachisuka J, Lee KH, et al. Keratinocytes can modulate and directly initiate nociceptive responses. eLife. (2015) 4:e09674. doi:  10.7554/eLife.09674. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Xu X, Yu C, Xu L, Xu J. Emerging roles of keratinocytes in nociceptive transduction and regulation. Front Mol Neurosci. (2022) 15:982202. doi:  10.3389/fnmol.2022.982202. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Sadler KE, Moehring F, Stucky CL. Keratinocytes contribute to normal cold and heat sensation. eLife. (2020) 9:e58625. doi:  10.7554/eLife.58625. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Talagas M, Lebonvallet N, Leschiera R, Sinquin G, Elies P, Haftek M, et al. Keratinocytes communicate with sensory neurons via synaptic-like contacts. Ann Neurol. (2020) 88:1205–19. doi:  10.1002/ana.25912. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Truzzi F, Marconi A, Pincelli C. Neurotrophins in healthy and diseased skin. Dermato-Endocrinology. (2011) 3:32. doi:  10.4161/derm.3.1.14661. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Slominski AT, Slominski RM, Raman C, Chen JY, Athar M, Elmets C. Neuroendocrine signaling in the skin with a special focus on the epidermal neuropeptides. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. (2022) 323(6):C1757–76. doi:  10.1152/ajpcell.00147.2022. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Davis BM, Fundin BT, Albers KM, Goodness TP, Cronk KM, Rice FL. Overexpression of nerve growth factor in skin causes preferential increases among innervation to specific sensory targets. J Comp Neurol. (1997) 387:489–506. doi:  10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19971103)387:4<489::AID-CNE2>3.0.CO;2-Z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Liu B, Tai Y, Achanta S, Kaelberer MM, Caceres AI, Shao X, et al. IL-33/ST2 signaling excites sensory neurons and mediates itch response in a mouse model of poison ivy contact allergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2016) 113:E7572–9. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1606608113. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Wilson SR, Thé L, Batia LM, Beattie K, Katibah GE, McClain SP, et al. The epithelial cell-derived atopic dermatitis cytokine TSLP activates neurons to induce itch. Cell. (2013) 155:285–95. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.057. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Huang J, Gandini MA, Chen L, M’Dahoma S, Stemkowski PL, Chung H, et al. Hyperactivity of innate immunity triggers pain via TLR2-IL-33-mediated neuroimmune crosstalk. Cell Rep. (2020) 33(1):108233. doi:  10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108233. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Kwiecinska P, Grygier B, Morytko A, Sanecka‐Duin A, Majchrzak‐Gorecka M, Kwitniewski M, et al. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor regulates nerve reflex‐mediated skin barrier function in psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2022) 36:1266–74. doi:  10.1111/jdv.18065. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Bidaux G, Borowiec A, Gordienko D, Beck B, Shapovalov GG, Lemonnier L, et al. Epidermal TRPM8 channel isoform controls the balance between keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation in a cold-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2015) 112:E3345–54. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1423357112. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Bidaux G, Borowiec A-S, Prevarskaya N, Gordienko D. Fine-tuning of eTRPM8 expression and activity conditions keratinocyte fate. Channels (Austin). (2016) 10:320–31. doi:  10.1080/19336950.2016.1168551. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Shirolkar P, Mishra SK. Role of TRP ion channels in pruritus. Neurosci Lett. (2022) 768:136379. doi:  10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136379. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Southall MD, Li T, Gharibova LS, Pei Y, Nicol GD, Travers JB. Activation of epidermal vanilloid receptor-1 induces release of proinflammatory mediators in human keratinocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (2003) 304:217–22. doi:  10.1124/jpet.102.040675. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Lee YM, Li WH, Kim YK, Kim KH, Chung JH. Heat-induced MMP-1 expression is mediated by TRPV1 through PKCalpha signaling in HaCaT cells. Exp Dermatol. (2008) 17:864–70. doi:  10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00738.x. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Lee YM, Kang SM, Lee SR, Kong KH, Lee JY, Kim EJ, et al. Inhibitory effects of TRPV1 blocker on UV-induced responses in the hairless mice. Arch Dermatol Res. (2011) 303:727–36. doi:  10.1007/s00403-011-1153-9. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Yoo J, Yu E, Park S-H, Oh SW, Kwon K, Park SJ, et al. Blue light irradiation induces human keratinocyte cell damage via transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) regulation. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2020) 2020:8871745. doi:  10.1155/2020/8871745. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Peier AM, Reeve AJ, Andersson DA, Moqrich A, Earley TJ, Hergarden AC, et al. A heat-sensitive TRP channel expressed in keratinocytes. Science. (2002) 296:2046–9. doi:  10.1126/science.1073140. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Moqrich A, Hwang SW, Earley TJ, Petrus MJ, Murray AN, Spencer KSR, et al. Impaired thermosensation in mice lacking TRPV3, a heat and camphor sensor in the skin. Science. (2005) 307:1468–72. doi:  10.1126/science.1108609. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Grandl J, Hu H, Bandell M, Bursulaya B, Schmidt M, Petrus M, et al. Pore region of TRPV3 ion channel is specifically required for heat activation. Nat Neurosci. (2008) 11:1007–13. doi:  10.1038/nn.2169. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Xu H, Ramsey IS, Kotecha SA, Moran MM, Chong JA, Lawson D, et al. TRPV3 is a calcium-permeable temperature-sensitive cation channel. Nature. (2002) 418:181–6. doi:  10.1038/nature00882. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Smith GD, Gunthorpe MJ, Kelsell RE, Hayes PD, Reilly P, Facer P, et al. TRPV3 is a temperature-sensitive vanilloid receptor-like protein. Nature. (2002) 418:186–90. doi:  10.1038/nature00894. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Huang SM, Li X, Yu Y, Wang J, Caterina MJ. TRPV3 and TRPV4 ion channels are not major contributors to mouse heat sensation. Mol Pain. (2011) 7:37. doi:  10.1186/1744-8069-7-37. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Asakawa M, Yoshioka T, Matsutani T, Hikita I, Suzuki M, Oshima I, et al. Association of a mutation in TRPV3 with defective hair growth in rodents. J Invest Dermatol. (2006) 126:2664–72. doi:  10.1038/sj.jid.5700468. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Moore C, Cevikbas F, Pasolli HA, Chen Y, Kong W, Kempkes C, et al. UVB radiation generates sunburn pain and affects skin by activating epidermal TRPV4 ion channels and triggering endothelin-1 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2013) 110:E3225–34. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1312933110. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Khodorova A, Navarro B, Jouaville LS, Murphy J-E, Rice FL, Mazurkiewicz JE, et al. Endothelin-B receptor activation triggers an endogenous analgesic cascade at sites of peripheral injury. Nat Med. (2003) 9:1055–61. doi:  10.1038/nm885. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Luostarinen S, Hämäläinen M, Moilanen E. Transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1)—An inflammation-induced factor in human HaCaT keratinocytes. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:3322. doi:  10.3390/ijms22073322. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Karl F, Bischler T, Egenolf N, Evdokimov D, Heckel T, Üçeyler N. Fibromyalgia vs small fiber neuropathy: Diverse keratinocyte transcriptome signature. Pain. (2021) 162:2569–77. doi:  10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002249. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Wijaya LK, Stumbles PA, Drummond PD. A positive feedback loop between alpha1-adrenoceptors and inflammatory cytokines in keratinocytes. Exp Cell Res. (2020) 391:112008. doi:  10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112008. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Xu X, Tao X, Huang P, Lin F, Liu Q, Xu L, et al. N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunit 2B on keratinocyte mediates peripheral and central sensitization in chronic post-ischemic pain in male rats. Brain Behav Immun. (2020) 87:579–90. doi:  10.1016/j.bbi.2020.02.003. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Denda M, Fujiwara S, Hibino T. Expression of voltage-gated calcium channel subunit α1C in epidermal keratinocytes and effects of agonist and antagonists of the channel on skin barrier homeostasis. Exp Dermatol. (2006) 15:455–60. doi:  10.1111/j.0906-6705.2006.00430.x. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Vandenberghe M, Raphaël M, Lehen’kyi V, Gordienko D, Hastie R, Oddos T, et al. ORAI1 calcium channel orchestrates skin homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2013) 110:E4839–48. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1310394110. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Numaga-Tomita T, Putney JW. Role of STIM1- and Orai1-mediated Ca2+ entry in Ca2+-induced epidermal keratinocyte differentiation. J Cell Sci. (2013) 126:605–12. doi:  10.1242/jcs.115980. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Manning D, Barrett-Jolley R, Evans RL, Dart C. TRPC1 channel clustering during store-operated Ca2+ entry in keratinocytes. Front Physiol. (2023) 14:1141006. doi:  10.3389/fphys.2023.1141006. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Hill RZ, Loud MC, Dubin AE, Peet B, Patapoutian A. PIEZO1 transduces mechanical itch in mice. Nature. (2022) 607:104–10. doi:  10.1038/s41586-022-04860-5. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Takahashi S, Ishida A, Kubo A, Kawasaki H, Ochiai S, Nakayama M, et al. Homeostatic pruning and activity of epidermal nerves are dysregulated in barrier-impaired skin during chronic itch development. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:8625. doi:  10.1038/s41598-019-44866-0. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Abraira VE, Ginty DD. The sensory neurons of touch. Neuron. (2013) 79:618–39. doi:  10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.051. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Erbacher C, Britz S, Dinkel P, Klein T, Sauer M, Stigloher C, et al. Interaction of human keratinocytes and nerve fiber terminals at the neuro-cutaneous unit. eLife. (2024) 13:e77761. doi:  10.7554/eLife.77761. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Moehring F, Cowie AM, Menzel AD, Weyer AD, Grzybowski M, Arzua T, et al. Keratinocytes mediate innocuous and noxious touch via ATP-P2X4 signaling. eLife. (2018) 7:e31684. doi:  10.7554/eLife.31684. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Handler A, Ginty DD. The mechanosensory neurons of touch and their mechanisms of activation. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2021) 22:521. doi:  10.1038/s41583-021-00489-x. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Lucarz A, Brand G. Current considerations about Merkel cells. Eur J Cell Biol. (2007) 86:243–51. doi:  10.1016/j.ejcb.2007.02.001. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Irmak MK. Multifunctional Merkel cells: Their roles in electromagnetic reception, finger-print formation, Reiki, epigenetic inheritance and hair form. Med Hypotheses. (2010) 75:162–8. doi:  10.1016/j.mehy.2010.02.011. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Haeberle H, Fujiwara M, Chuang J, Medina MM, Panditrao MV, Bechstedt S, et al. Molecular profiling reveals synaptic release machinery in Merkel cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2004) 101:14503–8. doi:  10.1073/pnas.0406308101. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Maksimovic S, Nakatani M, Baba Y, Nelson AM, Marshall KL, Wellnitz SA, et al. Epidermal Merkel cells are mechanosensory cells that tune mammalian touch receptors. Nature. (2014) 509:617–21. doi:  10.1038/nature13250. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Coste B, Mathur J, Schmidt M, Earley TJ, Ranade S, Petrus MJ, et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically-activated cation channels. Science. (2010) 330:55–60. doi:  10.1126/science.1193270. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Woo S-H, Ranade S, Weyer AD, Dubin AE, Baba Y, Qiu Z, et al. Piezo2 is required for Merkel cell mechanotransduction. Nature. (2014) 509:622–6. doi:  10.1038/nature13251. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Ikeda R, Cha M, Ling J, Jia Z, Coyle D, Gu JG. Merkel cells transduce and encode tactile stimuli to drive Aβ-afferent impulses. Cell. (2014) 157:664–75. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.026. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Cahusac PMB, Senok SS. Metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists selectively enhance responses of slowly adapting type I mechanoreceptors. Synapse. (2006) 59:235–42. doi:  10.1002/syn.20236. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Cahusac PMB, Mavulati SC. Non-competitive metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor antagonists block activity of slowly adapting type I mechanoreceptor units in the rat sinus hair follicle. Neuroscience. (2009) 163:933–41. doi:  10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.07.015. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Tachibana T, Endoh M, Fujiwara N, Nawa T. Receptors and transporter for serotonin in Merkel cell-nerve endings in the rat sinus hair follicle. An immunohistochemical study. Arch Histol Cytol. (2005) 68:19–28. doi:  10.1679/aohc.68.19. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Chang W, Kanda H, Ikeda R, Ling J, DeBerry JJ, Gu JG. Merkel disc is a serotonergic synapse in the epidermis for transmitting tactile signals in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2016) 113:E5491–500. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1610176113. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Hoffman BU, Baba Y, Griffith TN, Mosharov EV, Woo S-H, Roybal DD, et al. Merkel cells activate sensory neural pathways through adrenergic synapses. Neuron. (2018) 100:1401–1413.e6. doi:  10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.034. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Maksimovic S, Baba Y, Lumpkin EA. Neurotransmitters and synaptic components in the Merkel cell-neurite complex, a gentle touch receptor. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2013) 1279:13–21. doi:  10.1111/nyas.12057. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Bataille A, Le Gall C, Misery L, Talagas M. Merkel cells are multimodal sensory cells: A review of study methods. Cells. (2022) 11:3827. doi:  10.3390/cells11233827. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Feng J, Luo J, Yang P, Du J, Kim BS, Hu H. Piezo2 channel-merkel cell signaling modulates the conversion of touch to itch. Science. (2018) 360:530–3. doi:  10.1126/science.aar5703. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Lu P, Zhao Y, Xie Z, Zhou H, Dong X, Wu GF, et al. MrgprA3-expressing pruriceptors drive pruritogen-induced alloknesis through mechanosensitive Piezo2 channel. Cell Rep. (2023) 42:112283. doi:  10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112283. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Feng J, Zhao Y, Xie Z, Zang K, Sviben S, Hu X, et al. Miswiring of Merkel cell and pruriceptive C fiber drives the itch-scratch cycle. Sci Transl Med. (2022) 14:eabn4819. doi:  10.1126/scitranslmed.abn4819. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Bourane S, Duan B, Koch SC, Dalet A, Britz O, Garcia-Campmany L, et al. Gate control of mechanical itch by a subpopulation of spinal cord interneurons. Science. (2015) 350:550–4. doi:  10.1126/science.aac8653. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Bourane S, Grossmann KS, Britz O, Dalet A, Del Barrio MG, Stam FJ, et al. Identification of a spinal circuit for light touch and fine motor control. Cell. (2015) 160:503–15. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.011. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Bataille-Savattier A, Le Gall-Ianotto C, Lebonvallet N, Misery L, Talagas M. Do merkel complexes initiate mechanical itch? Exp Dermatol. (2023) 32:226–34. doi:  10.1111/exd.14685. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Reich A, Orda A, Wiśnicka B, Szepietowski JC. Plasma neuropeptides and perception of pruritus in psoriasis. Acta Derm Venereol. (2007) 87:299–304. doi:  10.2340/00015555-0265. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Sakai K, Akiyama T. Disinhibition of touch-evoked itch in a mouse model of psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. (2019) 139:1407–10. doi:  10.1016/j.jid.2018.12.001. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Murthy SE, Loud MC, Daou I, Marshall KL, Schwaller F, Kühnemund J, et al. The mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo2 mediates sensitivity to mechanical pain in mice. Sci Transl Med. (2018) 10:eaat9897. doi:  10.1126/scitranslmed.aat9897. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Jeon S-M, Chang D, Geske A, Ginty DD, Caterina MJ. Sex-dependent reduction in mechanical allodynia in the sural-sparing nerve injury model in mice lacking Merkel cells. J Neurosci. (2021) 41:5595–619. doi:  10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1668-20.2021. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Shin SM, Moehring F, Itson-Zoske B, Fan F, Stucky CL, Hogan QH, et al. Piezo2 mechanosensitive ion channel is located to sensory neurons and non-neuronal cells in rat peripheral sensory pathway: Implications in pain. Pain. (2021) 162:2750–68. doi:  10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002356. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Xie M-X, Lai R-C, Xiao Y-B, Zhang X, Cao X-Y, Tian X-Y, et al. Endophilin A2 controls touch and mechanical allodynia via kinesin-mediated Piezo2 trafficking. Mil Med Res. (2024) 11:17. doi:  10.1186/s40779-024-00520-z. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Dubin AE, Schmidt M, Mathur J, Petrus MJ, Xiao B, Coste B, et al. Inflammatory signals enhance Piezo2-mediated mechanosensitive currents. Cell Rep. (2012) 2:511–7. doi:  10.1016/j.celrep.2012.07.014. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Eijkelkamp N, Linley JE, Torres JM, Bee L, Dickenson AH, Gringhuis M, et al. A role for Piezo2 in EPAC1-dependent mechanical allodynia. Nat Commun. (2013) 4:1682. doi:  10.1038/ncomms2673. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Szczot M, Liljencrantz J, Ghitani N, Barik A, Lam R, Thompson JH, et al. PIEZO2 mediates injury-induced tactile pain in mice and humans. Sci Transl Med. (2018) 10:eaat9892. doi:  10.1126/scitranslmed.aat9892. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Deckers J, Hammad H, Hoste E. Langerhans cells: Sensing the environment in health and disease. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:93. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2018.00093. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Nishibu A, Ward BR, Jester JV, Ploegh HL, Boes M, Takashima A. Behavioral responses of epidermal Langerhans cells in situ to local pathological stimuli. J Invest Dermatol. (2006) 126:787–96. doi:  10.1038/sj.jid.5700107. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. West HC, Bennett CL. Redefining the role of Langerhans cells as immune regulators within the skin. Front Immunol. (2018) 8:1941. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2017.01941. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Doebel T, Voisin B, Nagao K. Langerhans cells – the macrophage in dendritic cell clothing. Trends Immunol. (2017) 38:817–28. doi:  10.1016/j.it.2017.06.008. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Schuler G, Steinman RM. Murine epidermal Langerhans cells mature into potent immunostimulatory dendritic cells in vitro. J Exp Med. (1985) 161:526–46. doi:  10.1084/jem.161.3.526. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Ratzinger G, Stoitzner P, Ebner S, Lutz MB, Layton GT, Rainer C, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases 9 and 2 are necessary for the migration of Langerhans cells and dermal dendritic cells from human and murine skin1. J Immunol. (2002) 168:4361–71. doi:  10.4049/jimmunol.168.9.4361. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Seré K, Baek J-H, Ober-Blöbaum J, Müller-Newen G, Tacke F, Yokota Y, et al. Two distinct types of Langerhans cells populate the skin during steady state and inflammation. Immunity. (2012) 37:905–16. doi:  10.1016/j.immuni.2012.07.019. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Chorro L, Sarde A, Li M, Woollard KJ, Chambon P, Malissen B, et al. Langerhans cell (LC) proliferation mediates neonatal development, homeostasis, and inflammation-associated expansion of the epidermal LC network. J Exp Med. (2009) 206:3089–100. doi:  10.1084/jem.20091586. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Lowy DB, Makker PGS, Moalem-Taylor G. Cutaneous neuroimmune interactions in peripheral neuropathic pain states. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:660203. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2021.660203. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Su Q, Igyártó BZ. Keratinocytes share gene expression fingerprint with epidermal Langerhans cells via mRNA transfer. J Invest Dermatol. (2019) 139:2313–2323.e8. doi:  10.1016/j.jid.2019.05.006. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Santarlasci V, Cosmi L, Maggi L, Liotta F, Annunziato F. IL-1 and T helper immune responses. Front Immunol. (2013) 4:182. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2013.00182. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Jung H, Hsiung B, Pestal K, Procyk E, Raulet DH. RAE-1 ligands for the NKG2D receptor are regulated by E2F transcription factors, which control cell cycle entry. J Exp Med. (2012) 209:2409–22. doi:  10.1084/jem.20120565. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Strid J, Sobolev O, Zafirova B, Polic B, Hayday A. The intraepithelial T cell response to NKG2D-ligands links lymphoid stress surveillance to atopy. Science. (2011) 334:10.1126/science.1211250. doi:  10.1126/science.1211250. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Kubo A, Nagao K, Yokouchi M, Sasaki H, Amagai M. External antigen uptake by Langerhans cells with reorganization of epidermal tight junction barriers. J Exp Med. (2009) 206:2937–46. doi:  10.1084/jem.20091527. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Kimber I, Cumberbatch M, Dearman RJ, Bhushan M, Griffiths CE. Cytokines and chemokines in the initiation and regulation of epidermal Langerhans cell mobilization. Br J Dermatol. (2000) 142:401–12. doi:  10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03349.x. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Tesmer LA, Lundy SK, Sarkar S, Fox DA. Th17 cells in human disease. Immunol Rev. (2008) 223:87–113. doi:  10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00628.x. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Din W, Manni M, Stohl LL, Zhou XK, Wagner JA, Granstein RD. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide bias Langerhans cell Ag presentation towards Th17 cells. Eur J Immunol. (2012) 42:901–11. doi:  10.1002/eji.201141958. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Lauria G, Lombardi R, Borgna M, Penza P, Bianchi R, Savino C, et al. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density in rat foot pad: Neuropathologic–neurophysiologic correlation. J Peripheral Nervous System. (2005) 10:202–8. doi:  10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.0010210.x. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Albertin G, Ravara B, Kern H, Zampieri S, Loefler S, Hofer C, et al. Trauma of peripheral innervation impairs content of epidermal Langerhans cells. Diagnostics. Diagnostics. (2022) 12:567. doi:  10.3390/diagnostics12030567. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Doss ALN, Smith PG. Langerhans cells regulate cutaneous innervation density and mechanical sensitivity in mouse footpad. Neurosci Lett. (2014) 578:55–60. doi:  10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.036. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Lin X, Xu Z, Carey L, Romero J, Makriyannis A, Hillard CJ, et al. A peripheral CB2 cannabinoid receptor mechanism suppresses chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: Evidence from a CB2 reporter mouse. Pain. (2022) 163:834–51. doi:  10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002502. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Dauch JR, Bender DE, Luna-Wong LA, Hsieh W, Yanik BM, Kelly ZA, et al. Neurogenic factor-induced Langerhans cell activation in diabetic mice with mechanical allodynia. J Neuroinflamm. (2013) 10:838. doi:  10.1186/1742-2094-10-64. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Zhang S, Edwards TN, Chaudhri VK, Wu J, Cohen JA, Hirai T, et al. Nonpeptidergic neurons suppress mast cells via glutamate to maintain skin homeostasis. Cell. (2021) 184:2151–2166.e16. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.002. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Cichorek M, Wachulska M, Stasiewicz A, Tymińska A. Skin melanocytes: Biology and development. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. (2013) 30:30–41. doi:  10.5114/pdia.2013.33376. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Yaar M, Park H-Y. Melanocytes: A window into the nervous system. J Invest Dermatol. (2012) 132:835–45. doi:  10.1038/jid.2011.386. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Chow SYA, Nakayama K, Osaki T, Sugiyama M, Yamada M, Takeuchi H, et al. Human sensory neurons modulate melanocytes through secretion of RGMB. Cell Rep. (2022) 40(12):111366. doi:  10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111366. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Zhang B, Ma S, Rachmin I, He M, Baral P, Choi S, et al. Hyperactivation of sympathetic nerves drives melanocyte stem cell depletion. Nature. (2020) 577:676–81. doi:  10.1038/s41586-020-1935-3. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Luger TA, Loser K. Novel insights into the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Clin Immunol. (2018) 186:43–5. doi:  10.1016/j.clim.2017.07.014. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Schön MP. Adaptive and innate immunity in psoriasis and other inflammatory disorders. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:1764. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2019.01764. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Lande R, Botti E, Jandus C, Dojcinovic D, Fanelli G, Conrad C, et al. The antimicrobial peptide LL37 is a T-cell autoantigen in psoriasis. Nat Commun. (2014) 5:5621. doi:  10.1038/ncomms6621. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Albanesi C, Madonna S, Gisondi P, Girolomoni G. The interplay between keratinocytes and immune cells in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:1549. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2018.01549. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Steinhoff M, Ahmad F, Pandey A, Datsi A, AlHammadi A, Al-Khawaga S, et al. Neuroimmune communication regulating pruritus in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2022) 149:1875–98. doi:  10.1016/j.jaci.2022.03.010. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Datsi A, Steinhoff M, Ahmad F, Alam M, Buddenkotte J. Interleukin-31: The “itchy” cytokine in inflammation and therapy. Allergy. (2021) 76:2982–97. doi:  10.1111/all.14791. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Oetjen LK, Mack MR, Feng J, Whelan TM, Niu H, Guo CJ, et al. Sensory neurons co-opt classical immune signaling pathways to mediate chronic itch. Cell. (2017) 171:217–228.e13. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.006. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Klaeschen AS, Nümm TJ, Herrmann N, Leib N, Maintz L, Sakai T, et al. JAK1/2 inhibition impairs the development and function of inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2021) 147:2202–2212.e8. doi:  10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.041. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Xu J, Zanvit P, Hu L, Tseng P-Y, Liu N, Wang F, et al. The cytokine TGF-β induces interleukin-31 expression from dermal dendritic cells to activate sensory neurons and stimulate wound itching. Immunity. (2020) 53:371–383.e5. doi:  10.1016/j.immuni.2020.06.023. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Buhl T, Ikoma A, Kempkes C, Cevikbas F, Sulk M, Buddenkotte J, et al. Protease-activated receptor-2 regulates neuro-epidermal communication in atopic dermatitis. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:1740. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2020.01740. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Kwiek B, Leśniewska A, Kowalewski C, Woźniak K. Langerhans cells are predominant high affinity immunoglobulin E receptor bearing cells in the epidermis of bullous pemphigoid skin. J Dermatol Sci. (2017) 85:60–3. doi:  10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.09.012. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Bitton A, Avlas S, Reichman H, Itan M, Karo-Atar D, Azouz NP, et al. A key role for IL-13 signaling via the type 2 IL-4 receptor in experimental atopic dermatitis. Sci Immunol. (2020) 5:eaaw2938. doi:  10.1126/sciimmunol.aaw2938. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Montgomery SL, Bowers WJ. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and the roles it plays in homeostatic and degenerative processes within the central nervous system. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. (2012) 7:42–59. doi:  10.1007/s11481-011-9287-2. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Kim M, Park HE, Lee S-H, Han K, Lee JH. Increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease in patients with psoriasis: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:6454. doi:  10.1038/s41598-020-63550-2. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Liu L, Chen S, Li H, Qiang Y, Sun X, Zhou Y, et al. Association between psoriasis and dementia: current evidence. Front Aging Neurosci. (2020) 12:570992. doi:  10.3389/fnagi.2020.570992. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Zhou M, Xu R, Kaelber DC, Gurney ME. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocking agents are associated with lower risk for Alzheimer’s disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. PloS One. (2020) 15:e0229819. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0229819. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Decourt B, Lahiri DK, Sabbagh MN. Targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha for Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. (2017) 14:412–25. doi:  10.2174/1567205013666160930110551. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Rich P, Bourcier M, Sofen H, Fakharzadeh S, Wasfi Y, Wang Y, et al. Ustekinumab improves nail disease in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis: results from PHOENIX 1. Br J Dermatol. (2014) 170:398–407. doi:  10.1111/bjd.12632. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Belloy ME, Napolioni V, Greicius MD. A quarter century of APOE and Alzheimer’s disease: progress to date and the path forward. Neuron. (2019) 101:820–38. doi:  10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.056. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. vom Berg J, Prokop S, Miller KR, Obst J, Kälin RE, Lopategui-Cabezas I, et al. Inhibition of IL-12/IL-23 signaling reduces Alzheimer’s disease–like pathology and cognitive decline. Nat Med. (2012) 18:1812–9. doi:  10.1038/nm.2965. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Matafora V, Farris F, Restuccia U, Tamburri S, Martano G, Bernardelli C, et al. Amyloid aggregates accumulate in melanoma metastasis modulating YAP activity. EMBO Rep. (2020) 21:e50446. doi:  10.15252/embr.202050446. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Ryu HJ, Park J-H, Choi M, Jung J-H, Han K, Kwon D-Y, et al. Parkinson’s disease and skin cancer risk: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Korea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereology. (2020) 34:2775–80. doi:  10.1111/jdv.16462. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Zhang P, Liu B. Association between Parkinson’s disease and risk of cancer: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. ACS Chem Neurosci. (2019) 10:4430–9. doi:  10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00498. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Gao X, Simon KC, Han J, Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A. Family history of melanoma and Parkinson disease risk. Neurology. (2009) 73:1286–91. doi:  10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bd13a1. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Dube U, Ibanez L, Budde JP, Benitez BA, Davis AA, Harari O, et al. Overlapping genetic architecture between Parkinson disease and melanoma. Acta Neuropathol. (2020) 139:347–64. doi:  10.1007/s00401-019-02110-z. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Inzelberg R, Samuels Y, Azizi E, Qutob N, Inzelberg L, Domany E, et al. Parkinson disease (PARK) genes are somatically mutated in cutaneous melanoma. Neurol Genet. (2016) 2:e70. doi:  10.1212/NXG.0000000000000070. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Kuzkina A, Schulmeyer L, Monoranu C-M, Volkmann J, Sommer C, Doppler K. The aggregation state of α-synuclein deposits in dermal nerve fibers of patients with Parkinson’s disease resembles that in the brain. Parkinsonism Related Disord. (2019) 64:66–72. doi:  10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.03.003. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Dean DN, Lee JC. Linking Parkinson’s disease and melanoma: interplay between α-synuclein and Pmel17 amyloid formation. Mov Disord. (2021) 36:1489–98. doi:  10.1002/mds.28655. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Xu J, Kao S-Y, Lee FJS, Song W, Jin L-W, Yankner BA. Dopamine-dependent neurotoxicity of α-synuclein: a mechanism for selective neurodegeneration in Parkinson disease. Nat Med. (2002) 8:600–6. doi:  10.1038/nm0602-600. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Miake S, Tsuji G, Takemura M, Hashimoto-Hachiya A, Vu YH, Furue M, Nakahara T. IL-4 augments IL-31/IL-31 receptor alpha interaction leading to enhanced Ccl 17 and Ccl 22 production in dendritic cells: implications for atopic dermatitis. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20(16):4053. doi:  10.3390/ijms20164053. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Immunology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES