ABSTRACT
Bacteriophage OmaKarin was isolated on a restriction-deficient variant of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 laboratory strain. We sequenced its 37,543 bp genome and classified it within the Casadabanvirus genus of temperate phages. Interestingly, a transposon has disrupted the lysogeny control module of OmaKarin, possibly explaining its apparent lack of temperate behavior.
KEYWORDS: bacteriophage, Casadabanvirus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, IS element
ANNOUNCEMENT
Temperate phages are viruses infecting bacteria that can integrate into the host genome as a prophage to establish a transiently mutualistic relationship known as lysogeny (1). A dedicated genetic module of the virus controls the formation and maintenance of lysogeny by silencing most prophage genes (1). Temperate phages of the genus Casadabanvirus are common viruses infecting Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2), including model phage DMS3 (3). Here, we report the genome of a Casadabanvirus called OmaKarin that has been isolated in 2023 from Swiss wastewater (sewage treatment plant ARA Canius in Lenzerheide, 46°42′33.3″ N, 9°33′05.7″ E). Briefly, wastewater had been concentrated with ZnCl2 before plating onto a lawn of host bacteria using a double-agar overlay with LB agar at 37°C as described previously (4). As isolation host, we used a mutant of the P. aeruginosa PAO1 laboratory strain in which we had previously inactivated its type I restriction-modification system as a possible obstacle for restriction-sensitive phages (5). One clear plaque was randomly selected during the filming for a documentary (6), and the phage isolate was passaged three times through single plaques for clonal purification. We then generated a high-titer lysate in SM buffer from a fully lysed double-layer agar lawn of the isolation host (7). For genome sequencing, viral DNA was extracted from 1 mL of high-titer stock using the Norgen Biotek Phage DNA isolation kit. Sequencing libraries were prepared with a streamlined tagmentation protocol using smaller volumes, cost-effective reagents, and fewer steps (8) before sequencing paired-end reads on a NovaSeq X Plus platform. After sequencing, we removed adapter sequences using bcl2fastq (v2.20.0.422; Illumina Inc., San Diego, USA) and then assembled 62,366 reads (151 bp length) using the Geneious Assembler implemented in Geneious Prime 2024.0.2 with additional trimming of terminal read regions showing >1% error probability per base. This resulted in one linear contig with 202× read coverage that we tentatively identified as the genome of a Casadabanvirus phage using BLAST (v.2.16.0) based on high sequence similarity to other viruses of this genus (9, 10). Due to their replication by transposition across the host chromosome (11), the consensus assembly of OmaKarin showed characteristic sharp edges around the true viral genome with highly divergent read sequences from the host chromosome on the distal sides. After removing these, the genome of OmaKarin has a length of 37’543 bp with 64.3% GC content, in which we could annotate 57 genes with Pharokka v1.7.3 using standard settings (12). Phylogenetic analyses confirmed the classification of OmaKarin as a Casadabanvirus (Fig. 1A). This was surprising since OmaKarin grows in clear plaques while temperate phages typically form turbid plaques (13). However, the lysogeny control module of OmaKarin is disrupted by a transposon, which may compromise stable prophage formation and maintenance (Fig. 1B). This transposon could be identified as an ISPpu17 element (IS30 family) using TnCentral (14), and virtually identical elements are common among pseudomonads including the first described ISPpu17 linked to antibiotic resistance of P. putida (14, 15). OmaKarin thus does not only expand the known diversity of Casadabanvirus phages but could also be an interesting model for the evolution of lysogeny.
Fig 1.
Whole-genome phylogeny of phage OmaKarin and disruption of its lysogeny control (A) The genomes of diverse Casadabanvirus phages were aligned using MAFFT (v7.490) implemented in Geneious Prime 2024.0.2 with FFT-NS-1 algorithm, 200PAM/k = 2 scoring matrix, gap open penalty 1.53, and offset value 0.123 (default settings; alignment length 22,175 nt) (16). A maximum likelihood phylogeny was calculated based on this alignment using PhyML (version 3.3.20180621) (17) implemented in Geneious Prime 2024.0.2 with the HKY85 substitution model and 100 bootstrap replicates. The phylogeny was rooted using Muvirus phages Mu and D108 as outgroup. Bootstrap values are shown if >70/100, and phage OmaKarin is highlighted in bold. (B) Comparison of the lysogeny control region of phage OmaKarin with the corresponding locus of two close relatives. The genomes were aligned using MAFFT (v7.490) implemented in Geneious Prime 2024.0.2 with the FFT-NS-1 algorithm, 200PAM/k = 2 scoring matrix, gap open penalty 1.53, and offset value 0.123 (default settings; displayed alignment length 3,200 nt) (16). Each genome is indicated as a gray bar with genes highlighted as yellow arrows. The sequence identity graph shows the identity between the three loci at each base position with a sliding window of 9, but the three sequences are almost identical (green: 100% identity, yellow: 30–99% identity, and red: <30% identity). Across the whole genome, the pairwise sequence identities of OmaKarin to JBD24 and Meltemi are 93.5% and 87.1%, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
A.H. isolated and characterized OmaKarin, while J.R. and E.M. performed the genomic analyses. All authors wrote the manuscript together. We thank Thilo Mischke for selecting the plaque from which OmaKarin was isolated and for naming the phage after his grandmother. Library preparation and genome sequencing were done at SeqCenter (Pittsburgh, USA). The sewage treatment facility ARA Canius (Lenzerheide) is acknowledged for providing the wastewater sample. All authors declare no competing interests.
The work described in this manuscript has been supported by SNSF Starting Grant TMSGI3_211369 and a project of SNSF National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) AntiResist (grant number 180541; both to A.H.).
Contributor Information
Alexander Harms, Email: alexander.harms@hest.ethz.ch.
Kenneth M. Stedman, Portland State University, Portland, Orlando, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
The genome sequencing project for OmaKarin has been deposited under accession number PRJEB110275 in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) database with the genome version described in this paper as the original (BioSample accession SAMEA121983792, Assembly accession GCA_982319625, and Reads accession ERR16878753).
REFERENCES
- 1. Howard-Varona C, Hargreaves KR, Abedon ST, Sullivan MB. 2017. Lysogeny in nature: mechanisms, impact and ecology of temperate phages. ISME J 11:1511–1520. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bondy-Denomy J, Qian J, Westra ER, Buckling A, Guttman DS, Davidson AR, Maxwell KL. 2016. Prophages mediate defense against phage infection through diverse mechanisms. ISME J 10:2854–2866. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Budzik JM, Rosche WA, Rietsch A, O’Toole GA. 2004. Isolation and characterization of a generalized transducing phage for Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains PAO1 and PA14. J Bacteriol 186:3270–3273. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.10.3270-3273.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Humolli D, Piel D, Maffei E, Heyer Y, Agustoni E, Shaidullina A, Willi L, Imwinkelried P, Estermann F, Cuénod A, Buser DP, Alampi C, Chami M, Egli A, Hiller S, Dunne M, Harms A. 2025. Completing the BASEL phage collection to unlock hidden diversity for systematic exploration of phage-host interactions. PLoS Biol 23:e3003063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Maffei E, Woischnig A-K, Burkolter MR, Heyer Y, Humolli D, Thürkauf N, Bock T, Schmidt A, Manfredi P, Egli A, Khanna N, Jenal U, Harms A. 2024. Phage paride can kill dormant, antibiotic-tolerant cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by direct lytic replication. Nat Commun 15:175. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44157-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mischke T, Quatram BPTHEMA. 2023. ProSieben THEMA. Antibiotika vor dem Aus: Was tun, wenn nichts mehr hilft?
- 7. Maffei E, Shaidullina A, Burkolter M, Heyer Y, Estermann F, Druelle V, Sauer P, Willi L, Michaelis S, Hilbi H, Thaler DS, Harms A. 2021. Systematic exploration of Escherichia coli phage-host interactions with the BASEL phage collection. PLoS Biol 19:e3001424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Baym M, Kryazhimskiy S, Lieberman TD, Chung H, Desai MM, Kishony R. 2015. Inexpensive multiplexed library preparation for megabase-sized genomes. PLoS One 10:e0128036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sayers EW, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Pruitt KD, Schoch CL, Sherry ST, Karsch-Mizrachi I. 2021. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D92–D96. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. George M, Bukhari AI. 1981. Heterogeneous host DNA attached to the left end of mature bacteriophage Mu DNA. Nature 292:175–176. doi: 10.1038/292175a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Bouras G, Nepal R, Houtak G, Psaltis AJ, Wormald P-J, Vreugde S. 2023. Pharokka: a fast scalable bacteriophage annotation tool. Bioinformatics 39:btac776. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Valencia-Toxqui G, Ramsey J. 2024. How to introduce a new bacteriophage on the block: a short guide to phage classification. J Virol 98:e0182123. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01821-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ross K, Varani AM, Snesrud E, Huang H, Alvarenga DO, Zhang J, Wu C, McGann P, Chandler M. 2021. TnCentral: a prokaryotic transposable element database and web portal for transposon analysis. mBio 12:e0206021. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02060-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Poirel L, Cabanne L, Collet L, Nordmann P. 2006. Class II transposon-borne structure harboring metallo-beta-lactamase gene blaVIM-2 in Pseudomonas putida. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:2889–2891. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00398-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequencing project for OmaKarin has been deposited under accession number PRJEB110275 in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) database with the genome version described in this paper as the original (BioSample accession SAMEA121983792, Assembly accession GCA_982319625, and Reads accession ERR16878753).

