ABSTRACT
The genus Streptomyces is one of the largest prokaryotic taxa, including more than 800 species. Sequencing type strain genomes is essential to facilitate the identification of new isolates and the description of novel species. Here, we present the genome sequences of five Streptomyces type strains.
KEYWORDS: genomes, Streptomyces
ANNOUNCEMENT
The genus Streptomyces is one of the most important sources of antibiotics and therapeutic drugs (1, 2). It is also one of the largest prokaryotic genera, comprising more than 800 species with validly published and correct names (3, 4). Generating high-quality genomes for all type strains is critical, as it facilitates the identification of new isolates and the description of novel species within this large and important genus. In this context, we sequenced the genomes of five Streptomyces type strains (Streptomyces argenteolus, Streptomyces pratensis, Streptomyces puniceus, Streptomyces spiroverticillatus, and Streptomyces sundarbansensis) that belong to—or are closely related to—the Streptomyces griseus clade and for which high-quality genomes were previously unavailable. These type strains were isolated from diverse habitats, including grassy field soil and mangrove forest sediments (5, 6).
The strains were obtained from the Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures in freeze-dried form. They were revived in tryptic soy broth (BD Difco) at 28°C under agitation (150 rpm). Genomic DNA was extracted from 5-day-old cultures using the DNeasy PowerLyzer Microbial Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality and concentration were checked using a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV/Vis spectrophotometer. Library preparation and genome sequencing were performed at the Integrated Microbiome Resource (Halifax, NS, Canada). Genomic DNA was enzymatically fragmented and indexed using the LongPlex Long Fragment Multiplexing Kit (seqWell) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting DNA fragments (~8–10 kb) were cleaned up and pooled before undergoing library preparation using the SMRTbell Prep Kit 3.0 (Pacific Biosciences) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Genome sequencing was performed on a Vega sequencer (Pacific Biosciences) loaded with one Vega SMRT Cell (Vega chemistry). SMRT Link v25.3 (Pacific Biosciences) was used for demultiplexing and adaptor trimming. FastQC v0.11.9 (7) was used to check the quality of the HiFi reads. No read filtering or error correction was performed. Genome assembly was performed with Flye v2.9.5-b1801 using the command “--pacbio-hifi.” The genomes were annotated by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v6.10 (8). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. Sequencing, assembly metrics, and genome features are presented in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Genome sequencing/assembly metrics and genome featuresa
| Data | Type strains | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSM 40036T | DSM 40083T | DSM 40226T | DSM 42019T | DSM 105114T | |
| Species | Streptomyces spiroverticillatus | Streptomyces puniceus (syn. Streptomyces californicus) | Streptomyces argenteolus | Streptomyces sundarbansensis | Streptomyces pratensis |
| Isolation date | 1955 | Unknown | Unknown | 2001 | Unknown |
| Origin | Soil, Japan | Unknown | Soil | Mangrove forest sediments, India | Grassy field soil, Charlotte, NC, USA |
| No. of HiFi reads | 27,080 | 732,127 | 106,945 | 92,162 | 249,226 |
| HiFi read N50 (bp) | 5,410 | 8,187 | 5,641 | 5,423 | 6,226 |
| Coverage (x) | 13 | 259 | 75 | 59 | 175 |
| Genome size (bp) | 9,797,833 | 8,221,749 | 7,128,956 | 7,479,561 | 7,690,231 |
| G + C content (%) | 71.2 | 72.5 | 71.0 | 72.0 | 71.0 |
| No. of contigs | 20 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 12 |
| Contig N50 (bp) | 1,259,728 | 7,919,793 | 6,741,712 | 7,232,247 | 7,544,179 |
| No. of coding DNA sequences | 8,608 | 7,149 | 6,250 | 6,445 | 6,728 |
| No. of pseudogenes | 163 | 100 | 182 | 133 | 126 |
| No. of rRNAs | 23 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 |
| No. of tRNAs | 69 | 72 | 68 | 67 | 68 |
| Closest type strain from another species (accession no.) | Streptomyces finlayi JCM 4637T (NZ_BMVC00000000.1) | Streptomyces californicus NRRL B-2098T (CP070241.1- CP070243.1) | Kitasatospora cinereorecta JCM 6916T (JBHUET000000000.1) | Streptomyces rubiginosohelvolus JCM 4415T (BMTW00000000.1) | Kitasatospora papulosa NRRL B-16504T (JNYQ00000000.1) |
| Digital DNA-DNA hybridization value (%) | 99.8 | 87.5 | 96.5 | 50.6 | 94.8 |
| GenBank accession no. | JBVQTE000000000 | JBTRAP000000000 | JBTRAO000000000 | JBTRAN000000000 | JBVQTD000000000 |
| SRA accession no. | SRR36161494 | SRR36161493 | SRR36161492 | SRR36161491 | SRR36161490 |
The most closely related type strains were determined by TYGS, except for S. argenteolus DSM 40226T. For this strain, the most closely related type strain (Kitasatospora cinereorecta JCM 6916T) was identified by the taxonomy check performed by the NCBI.
The five genomes were assembled into 2–20 linear contigs, with total genome sizes ranging from 7.13 to 9.80 Mb and G + C content varying from 71.0% to 72.5%. To visualize the phylogenetic relationships of the five type strains with other Streptomyces species, a multilocus sequence analysis was performed (Fig. 1). Digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between the five type strains under study and closely related type strains were also calculated using the Type (Strain) Genome Server v408 (9, 10) and the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator software v4.0 (11). According to the dDDH values presented in Table 1, S. puniceus is a later heterotypic synonym of Streptomyces californicus, as previously suggested (12). S. spiroverticillatus, S. argenteolus, and S. pratensis are earlier heterotypic synonyms of Streptomyces finlayi, Kitasatospora cinereorecta, and Kitasatospora papulosa, respectively.
Fig 1.
Phylogenetic relationships between the five Streptomyces type strains under study and various Streptomyces type strains. Genomes of closely related Streptomyces type strains were downloaded from GenBank. The complete nucleotide sequences of five housekeeping genes (atpD, gyrB, recA, rpoB, and trpB) were extracted from each genome, aligned using Clustal Omega v1.2.2 (13), and subsequently concatenated. The resulting alignment was used to generate a phylogenetic tree using FastTree v2.1 (14) and the generalized time reversible model. The tree topology was verified by computing Shimodaira Hasegawa support values (15). Only support values above 0.5 are displayed at the nodes. Actinomyces bovis NCTC11535 T was used as an outgroup (not shown on the tree). The five strains whose genomes were sequenced in this study are highlighted in bold. The scale bar indicates sequence divergence.
Contributor Information
Martin Filion, Email: martin.filion@mcgill.ca.
Leighton Pritchard, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The genome sequences of the five Streptomyces type strains (BioProject PRJNA1368964) have been deposited in GenBank. The versions described in this paper are the first versions. The raw sequencing data have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive. Accession numbers are provided in Table 1.
REFERENCES
- 1. Gavriilidou A, Kautsar SA, Zaburannyi N, Krug D, Müller R, Medema MH, Ziemert N. 2022. Compendium of specialized metabolite biosynthetic diversity encoded in bacterial genomes. Nat Microbiol 7:726–735. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01110-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hopwood DA. 2007. Streptomyces in nature and medicine: the antibiotic makers. Oxford University Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Parte AC. 2014. LPSN--list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D613–6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. 2020. List of Prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:5607–5612. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rong X, Doroghazi JR, Cheng K, Zhang L, Buckley DH, Huang Y. 2013. Classification of streptomyces phylogroup pratensis (Doroghazi and Buckley, 2010) based on genetic and phenotypic evidence, and proposal of Streptomyces pratensis sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 36:401–407. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2013.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Arumugam M, Mitra A, Pramanik A, Saha M, Gachhui R, Mukherjee J. 2011. Streptomyces sundarbansensis sp. nov., an actinomycete that produces 2-allyloxyphenol. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:2664–2669. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.028258-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Andrews S. 2017. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data
- 8. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. 2019. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. 2022. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D801–D807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:1–14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Rong X, Huang Y. 2010. Taxonomic evaluation of the Streptomyces griseus clade using multilocus sequence analysis and DNA-DNA hybridization, with proposal to combine 29 species and three subspecies as 11 genomic species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:696–703. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.012419-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. 2011. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16:1114–1116. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026201 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequences of the five Streptomyces type strains (BioProject PRJNA1368964) have been deposited in GenBank. The versions described in this paper are the first versions. The raw sequencing data have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive. Accession numbers are provided in Table 1.

