Abstract
Recently, our group showed that the dental pathogen Streptococcus mutans is inherently more tolerant to high zinc stress than other streptococci, a phenotype associated with the presence of a P-type ATPase exporter named ZccE, virtually unique to S. mutans. In addition to zccE, a previous transcriptome analysis revealed that S. mutans upregulates genes involved in glutathione uptake during initial exposure to zinc stress. Glutathione, a major supplier of organic sulfur that also plays key roles in antioxidant defense and xenobiotic detoxification, forms coordination complexes with a variety of metals, including zinc, thereby functioning as a buffer that protects cells from metal intoxication. To investigate the contribution of glutathione zinc tolerance in S. mutans, the gshT gene, which encodes the substrate-binding subunit of a glutathione transporter, was deleted in both the parent and ΔzccE strains and the ability of these mutants to overcome zinc stress through intracellular glutathione accumulation determined. Targeted metabolomics revealed that S. mutans accumulates glutathione in a GshT-dependent manner following zinc stress, a response that was strikingly amplified in the ΔzccE strain. Although glutathione supplementation had a minimal and non-significant impact on growth of either parent or mutant strains in sub-inhibitory zinc concentrations, the ΔgshT strain exhibited increased zinc sensitivity in a plate-based assay. However, the ΔzccEΔgshT mutant displayed enhanced zinc tolerance compared to the ΔzccE single mutant. While glutathione alone did not alter zinc levels in the UA159 or ΔzccE strains, the combination of zinc and glutathione nearly doubled intracellular zinc levels in ΔzccE compared to cells grown in zinc only. We conclude that while glutathione may play a minor role in S. mutans zinc tolerance, uncontrolled glutathione uptake observed in ΔzccE facilitates zinc entry, as glutathione:Zn2+ complexes inadvertently promote zinc intoxication via a Trojan horse mechanism.
Keywords: Streptococcus mutans, metal stress, glutathione, zinc mismetallation, ZccE
INTRODUCTION
The World Health Organization (WHO) describes dental caries as the most common human condition globally, affecting over 2.5 billion people annually and imposing an economic burden of nearly 250 billion USD (1). Although multifactorial, dental caries onset is strongly linked to increased Streptococcus mutans presence in the supragingival biofilm (2,3). While typically present at low levels or absent in healthy dental biofilms, S. mutans thrives in environments with high sucrose availability, which is utilized to produce large amounts of extracellular glucans that facilitate the formation of robust biofilms and concurrently lower the environmental pH (2,4). These abilities enable S. mutans to create an acidic biofilm environment that is unhospitable to oral commensals, decreasing microbial diversity while selecting for highly aciduric, caries-associated microorganisms (4,5).
As the second most abundant trace metal in the human body and both an essential and toxic mineral, zinc is deeply involved in host-pathogen interactions (6–8). Specifically, during infections, as part of the host innate immunity response, free zinc is actively sequestered by calprotectin, a heterodimer of the S100A8 and S100A9 proteins that is profusely secreted by neutrophils and other immune cells starving the invading pathogen of this essential trace metal (6). Simultaneously, zinc is mobilized within macrophages and other phagocytic cells, facilitating the killing of pathogens entrapped in phagosomes through disruption of critical metabolic processes (9,10). As a toxic agent, zinc’s high binding affinity for protein ligands, indicated by its placement just below copper in the Irving-Williams series of metal stability, enables it to inadvertently bind proteins that normally require other metal cofactors, forming stable interactions that disrupt their function, a process known as protein mismetallation (11,12). In an effort to maintain intracellular zinc homeostasis in the face of zinc starvation or excess, bacteria have evolved high-affinity import and export systems, as well as auxiliary mechanisms that help them adapt to fluctuating environmental zinc conditions (9).
For centuries, the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties of zinc combined with its relatively low toxicity to mammalian cells has led to the utilization of zinc as a therapeutic agent. Human conditions including the common cold and other respiratory infections, wound healing, and the reduction of duration and severity of pediatric diarrhea have all shown improvement with zinc supplementation (13–15). Moreover, in oral health, zinc salts have frequently been incorporated into oral care products to treat gingivitis and halitosis and, arguably, aid in the control of dental plaque build-up (16–18).
Given the strong presence of zinc in oral care formulations, we have recently begun to investigate the effects of supraphysiological zinc on S. mutans biology. We discovered that, despite lacking the canonical zinc exporter CzcD typically found in members of the Streptococcus genus, S. mutans is far more tolerant to zinc stress than all other oral streptococci tested (19,20). This unexpected observation was accompanied by the discovery of ZccE, a multi-metal exporter from the P1B -type ATPase family, unique to S. mutans, that was directly responsible for S. mutans’ high zinc tolerance (19). In addition to zccE, analysis of the zinc stress transcriptome of S. mutans revealed additional pathways that may contribute to zinc tolerance (19). Among the genes of interest upregulated during an early stage of high zinc stress were genes associated with glutathione transport, utilization, and regeneration (19). A multifunctional tripeptide of cysteine, glutamate, and glycine, glutathione is an abundant low molecular weight thiol, existing in the reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) forms. Recognized for its antioxidant properties and major role in redox homeostasis, glutathione fulfills multiple critical functions in oxidative stress defense, including direct scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS), serving as a cofactor for glutathione peroxidases, and preserving protein thiol groups to maintain proper structure and protein stability (21–26). Glutathione also mediates the detoxification of xenobiotics, including toxic heavy metals such as cadmium, lead and mercury, by forming GSH complexes that are more efficiently eliminated from the cell. Finally, GSH interacts with trace biometals such as copper and zinc serving as an intracellular buffer that protects cells from metal-induced oxidative stress and direct metal intoxication. In E. coli, glutathione was shown contribute to tolerance against the toxic metals cadmium and chromate, whereas cells that cannot synthesize or import glutathione display heightened sensitivity to copper and zinc, especially in the absence of the CopA and ZntA exporters, respectively (27). In streptococci, glutathione has been shown to mediates copper tolerance in S. pyogenes, and cadmium, copper, and zinc tolerance in S. pneumoniae (21,28).
Considering the established intracellular metal buffering capacity of glutathione and our recent finding that transcription of the S. mutans glutathione import genes (tcyABC and gshT) (29) is induced shortly after high zinc stress (19), here we investigated the role of glutathione in S. mutans zinc tolerance. We report that while increases in intracellular glutathione pools during stress play only a minor role in S. mutans zinc tolerance, dysregulated uptake causes glutathione to function as a 'Trojan horse' facilitating zinc entry and exacerbating zinc intoxication. Specifically, uncontrolled glutathione import, observed in the ΔzccE zinc export mutant as a potential compensatory mechanism, enhanced zinc intoxication by inadvertently promoting the uptake of GSH:Zn2+ complexes.
METHODS
Strains and growth-based experiments
The strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. All strains were routinely grown in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth or BHI agar plates at 37°C in 5% CO2. When appropriate, media was supplemented with 1 mg ml−1 spectinomycin, 1 mg ml−1 kanamycin, or 10 μg ml−1 erythromycin. To generate growth curves with S. mutans, overnight cultures of serotype c strain UA159 and derivatives were sub-cultured in fresh media, grown to mid-log phase (OD600 ~ 0.4), diluted 1:50 into the desired condition, and their growth monitored using an automated growth plate reader (Bioscreen C; Oy Growth Curves Ab) set to 37°C with each well overlayed with sterile mineral oil to minimize generation of reactive oxygen species.
Table 1.
Strains used in the study
| Species | Strain Name | Relevant Characteristics | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| S. mutans | UA159 | Wild-Type | Lab Collection |
| ΔzccE | zccE::SpecR | (19) | |
| ΔgshT | gshT::KanR | This Study | |
| ΔzccE ΔgshT | zccE::SpecR,gshT::KanR | This Study | |
| ΔgshTcomp | gshT+::ErmR | This Study | |
| ΔzccEΔgshTcomp | zccE::SpecRgshT+::ErmR | This Study | |
For plate titration assays, mid-log phase (OD600 ~0.4) cultures were serially diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 5 μL of 5- or 10-fold dilutions spotted on BHI agar with or without metal supplementation. Plates were incubated for 48 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2 before images were captured. To assess strain viability in the presence of zinc and/or glutathione, mid-log grown cultures were exposed to 1 mM ZnSO4, 100 μM glutathione, or both for 90 minutes, the cell pellets obtained by centrifugation, washed in sterile PBS, serially diluted and 10-fold dilutions spotted on BHI agar. Plates were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2 before images were captured.
Construction of mutant and complemented strains in S. mutans
Strains of S. mutans lacking gshT were constructed using a PCR ligation mutagenesis approach (30). Briefly, DNA fragments flanking the target gene were amplified by PCR using the primers listed in Table S1 and ligated to a non-polar kanamycin resistance cassette. The ligated fragment was used to transform the UA159 and ΔzccE strains using an established protocol (31). Mutant strains were isolated on BHI plates supplemented with kanamycin, and gshT deletion on each strain confirmed by sequencing amplicons containing the antibiotic cassette insertion site and flanking region. To generate complemented strains, the gshT coding sequence and flanking region was amplified from UA159 genomic DNA, and an erythromycin resistance cassette inserted upstream of the native gshT promoter using Gibson Assembly (32). This fragment was used to transform the ΔgshT and ΔzccEΔgshT strains in the presence of 1 mM competence stimulating peptide (CSP) (31). Strains were selected on BHI agar supplemented with erythromycin and gshT re-integration verified via Sanger sequencing.
Quantitative real time PCR
S. mutans UA159 and ΔzccE were grown in BHI to mid-log phase and treated with 1 mM ZnSO4 for 15 min. The cell pellets were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in RNA Protect reagent (Qiagen) and stored at −80°C prior to RNA extraction. Total RNA was isolated from homogenized S. mutans lysate using the acid-phenol-chloroform extraction methods as previously described (33). Total RNA was treated with Ambion DNase I (ThermoFisher) for 30 minutes at 37°C, followed by another purification step using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) and treatment with the Turbo DNA-free kit (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription and qRT-PCR reactions were carried out with the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) and the iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio Rad), using the primers listed in Table S1. Expression of gshT, tcyA, and gshAB was quantified via ΔΔCT, where CT represents the threshold cycle using gyrA as the housekeeping gene (34).
Inductively coupled mass spectrometry
Intracellular zinc and manganese concentrations of S. mutans strains before and after exposure to ZnSO4, glutathione, or both were determined via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) performed at the University of Florida Center of Environmental and Human Toxicology Analytical Toxicology core laboratory. Briefly, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C for 15 min at 4,000 rpm, the cell pellets resuspended in 1 ml of 50% (v/v) HNO3, and 0.2 ml 30% (v/v) H2O2 and heated at 100°C for 1 hour. Once cool, 0.2 ml of 30% (v/v) H2O2 were added to each sample, and samples were brought to a total volume of 16 ml with ultrapure water. Intracellular metal content determined using a 7900 ICP Mass Spectrometer (Agilent) in helium gas mode to minimize polyatomic interferences. Metal concentrations were normalized to total protein content determined by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Pierce).
Intracellular glutathione quantification
Glutathione levels were determined using a high-performance mass spectrometer approach developed in conjunction with the University of Florida Mass Spectrometry Research and Education Center (MSREC). Briefly, samples were grown in BHI to mid-log phase (OD600 ~0.4, control conditions) before being exposed to zinc (2 mM ZnSO4 for UA159 and ΔgshT strains and 1 mM ZnSO4 for ΔzccE), 100 μM glutathione, or both for 45 or 90 minutes. Cells were collected by centrifugation (7,000 rpm for 5 minutes at 4°C), washed twice in sterile PBS, dried in a SpeedVac, and stored at −20°C. Metabolite extraction was performed by resuspending cell pellets in 300 μl of cold 90% methanol containing 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), sonicated in ice water for 10 minutes and frozen at −20°C for 1 hr. Then, samples were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant stored at −20°C. This process was repeated with cold 100% methanol containing 5 mM DTT, and cold 90% acetonitrile containing 5 mM DTT. Supernatant from each extraction was pooled and dried using a Speed Vac before storage at −20°C until reconstitution in 100 μl H2O with 5 mM DTT. Mass spectrometry (MS) analysis was performed on a TIMS-TOF Pro II TIMS-qTOP MS with a ThermoScientific Hypersil GOLD PFP column under a 20 min gradient using water with ammonium formate and methanol as mobile phases, both containing formic acid. For data normalization, 1 ml culture aliquots were washed, serially diluted in PBS, and plated on BHI agar to determine colony forming units per ml.
Statistical analysis
Data obtained from this study were analyzed using R (version 4.5.0, http://www.r-project.org ) in RStudio (version 2026.1.0.392; Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.posit.co/) as described in figure legends. R packages used for visualization and data analysis are listed in Supplemental Table S2. Unless stated otherwise, only comparisons with significant differences (p-value < 0.05) indicated with its corresponding asterisks were noted in the figure legends.
RESULTS
Inactivation of gshT impairs S. mutans growth kinetics and metal tolerance
In the first set of experiments, we revisited the transcriptome results using quantitative real-time PCR to obtain the transcriptional profile of gshT and tcyA in response to zinc stress in both the UA159 (parent) and ΔzccE (zinc export mutant) strains. To adjust for the high zinc sensitivity and loss of viability of the ΔzccE strain (19), we exposed cultures to 1 mM ZnSO4 for 15 minutes instead of 4 mM ZnSO4 that was used in the original study. Zinc exposure in UA159 led to a moderate upregulation of gshT (∼2-fold) but no changes in tcyA expression. On the other hand, the upregulation of gshT (4-fold) was substantially greater in ΔzccE with tcyA (3-fold) also showing a significant increase. These results support that S. mutans upregulates glutathione import in response to high zinc stress while also indicating that increased glutathione uptake may act as a compensatory response to the loss of zinc export activity (Fig. 1). Upon confirming a potential association between glutathione import with zinc stress survival, we next asked whether supplementation of the growth medium with glutathione could improve growth of UA159 under a sub-inhibitory concentration of ZnSO4. While glutathione concentrations at or above 200 μM reduced final growth yields, 100 μM glutathione supplementation had no noticeable effect on growth in the absence of zinc stress (Fig. S1A). We then tested whether the addition of 100 μM glutathione to BHI improved growth in the presence of a sub-inhibitory concentration of zinc, observing a very modest increase in growth yield after media supplementation (Fig. S1B).
Fig. 1.
Glutathione import genes are induced by zinc stress. qRT PCR was performed using ΔΔCt normalization to gyrA. Strains (UA159 and ΔzccE) were grown to mid-log phase in BHI and exposed to 1 mM ZnSO4 for 15 minutes. Error bars represent standard deviation. Differing letters indicate significant difference (p<0.05) between groups according to Wilcox Rank Sum (p< 0.05) test that was used due to non-normality.
To further investigate the role of glutathione in zinc tolerance, we generated a gshT deletion mutant (ΔgshT) to assess its growth characteristics under zinc stress. Given that the ZccE exporter is primarily responsible for zinc tolerance (19), we also generated a ΔzccEΔgshT double mutant to probe for a potential epistatic effect. In plain BHI, that contains low (∼10 μM) zinc concentrations(35), inactivation of gshT in the UA159 parent or ΔzccE strain backgrounds greatly reduced final growth yields, a phenotype that was rescued by genetic complementation of the gshT gene (Fig. S2A-B). For unclear reasons, this growth defect became less pronounced in the presence of sub-inhibitory zinc concentration (Fig. S2C-D). Because the pronounced growth defect of ΔgshT strains in broth creates a confounding factor for interpretation of growth kinetic assays, we instead investigated the linkage between glutathione and zinc tolerance using a plate titration assay that assesses endpoint growth, with all strains showing comparable growth on BHI plates after 48 hours of incubation (Fig. 2A-B). On plates containing zinc, growth of the ΔgshT strain was slightly impaired when compared to the parent strain UA159, providing direct evidence of glutathione’s role in zinc stress mitigation (Fig. 2A). Unexpectedly, this phenotype was reversed in the ΔzccE background with the ΔzccEΔgshT double mutant growing better on zinc-containing plates than the single mutant (Fig. 2B). Because ZccE mediates tolerance to other trace metals in addition to zinc (19), we also evaluated the ability of the gshT mutants to grow in the presence of cadmium and cobalt. This time, inactivation of gshT increased cadmium sensitivity in UA159 and even more so in ΔzccE while increased cobalt sensitivity was observed in the ΔzccE background (Fig. 2A-B).
Fig. 2.
Inactivation of gshT impacts metal tolerance. Spot test of S. mutans UA159 and ΔgshT (A) or ΔzccE and ΔzccEΔgshT (B) on BHI plates with or without sub-inhibitory concentrations of zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd) or cobalt (Co). The different concentrations of each metal used for UA159 and ΔzccE background strains are indicated in the figure. Images were taken after 48 hours incubation at 37°C in a 5% CO2 and are representative of at least 3 independent experiments.
Glutathione uptake greatly increases under zinc stress
Next, we sought to determine intracellular glutathione levels in the UA159, ΔzccE, and ΔgshT strains before and after zinc stress. For this, strains were grown with or without supplementation of 100 μM glutathione and exposed to zinc stress (2 mM ZnSO4 for both UA159 and ΔgshT and 1 mM ZnSO4 for ΔzccE) for up to 90 minutes. Regardless of the growth condition, glutathione was not detected in the ΔgshT strain (Fig. 3A), indicating that S. mutans UA159 is completely dependent on GshT-mediated import to maintain detectable levels of glutathione and, most likely, cannot synthesize glutathione. However, intracellular glutathione levels nearly tripled in the parent strain after zinc stress, increasing even further (∼5-fold) when the medium was supplemented with glutathione and then subjected to zinc stress (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, zinc-induced import/accumulation of glutathione was much greater in the ΔzccE strain that displayed intrinsic higher levels of glutathione in the absence of zinc stress that tripled after zinc stress and increased by nearly 12-fold after glutathione supplementation (Fig. 3C). These findings validate the transcriptional data indicating that S. mutans imports glutathione to mitigate zinc stress while also supporting our initial hypothesis that the ΔzccE strain increases glutathione import as a compensatory mechanism to overcome zinc stress.
Fig. 3.
Zinc stress triggers glutathione uptake. Cultures of UA159, ΔgshT and ΔzccE were grown to mid-log phase and exposed to zinc stress (2 mM ZnSO4 for UA159 and ΔgshT strains and 1 mM ZnSO4 for ΔzccE), 100 μM glutathione (GSH), or both for 90 minutes. Intracellular glutathione was determined by mass spectrometry and the data normalized by CFUs. Error bars represent standard deviation. Differing letters indicate significant difference (p<0.05), while groups denoted with the same letter are not significantly different (p> 0.05) between groups according to two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons. (nd) Not detected.
Intracellular zinc quantification suggests a Trojan horse mechanism
Beyond the evidence that increased glutathione uptake helps S. mutans cope with metal stress, albeit playing a small role, our results also suggest that uncontrolled glutathione import is harmful to the bacterium under high zinc conditions. Because inactivation of gshT improved zinc tolerance of the ΔzccE strain (Fig. 2B), we suspected that glutathione may inadvertently function as a 'Trojan horse’ facilitating zinc entry through GshT-mediated import of GSH:Zn complexes. While less likely, another possibility is that the uncontrolled uptake and accumulation of glutathione alone is toxic given that supplementation of the growth medium with high concentrations of glutathione inhibited bacterial growth (Fig. S1A). To investigate the first possibility, we determined intracellular zinc concentrations in UA159, ΔgshT, ΔzccE, and ΔzccEΔgshT strains grown to mid-log phase in BHI (control) or exposed for 90 minutes to 1 mM ZnSO4, 100 μM glutathione, or both. Though glutathione alone did not affect intracellular zinc levels in either UA159 or ΔgshT, zinc treatment, with or without glutathione supplementation, resulted in a slight, non-significant increase in intracellular zinc (Fig. 4A). Glutathione supplementation alone also did not alter zinc levels in the ΔzccE or ΔzccEΔgshT strains but, as shown previously (19), zinc treatment led to a very substantial elevation (~12-fold) in ΔzccE that, remarkably, nearly doubled after glutathione supplementation (Fig. 4A). Finally, zinc accumulation was significantly less pronounced in the ΔzccEΔgshT strain when compared to the ΔzccE single mutant, with the addition of glutathione having no further impact. As expected based on the well-established inverse relationship between manganese and zinc (36–38), intracellular manganese levels were significantly reduced in the ΔzccE and ΔzccEΔgshT strains (Fig. 4B). While the reasons are unclear, glutathione supplementation, in the absence of zinc stress, significantly reduced intracellular manganese in ΔzccE and even more so in ΔzccEΔgshT (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4.
Uncontrolled glutathione import via GshT facilitates zinc entry. Mid-log grown BHI cultures of UA159, ΔzccE, ΔgshT, and ΔzccE ΔgshT were treated with 1 mM ZnSO4, 100 μM glutathione (GSH), or both, for 90 minutes and intracellular zinc (A) and manganese (B) quantified via ICP-MS. Error bars represent standard deviation. Differing letters indicate significant difference (p<0.05), while groups denoted with the same letter are not significantly different (p> 0.05) between groups according to two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
To support the proposed Trojan Horse mechanism, we sought additional evidence that the increased glutathione uptake observed in the ΔzccE strain triggers inadvertent cell death due to zinc intoxication by incorporation of GSH:Zn complexes. Here, we used the same experimental setup as with ICP-MS analysis, in which mid-log cultures were treated for 90 minutes with 1 mM ZnSO4, 100 μM glutathione, or both, followed by plating to determine cell viability. We found that while zinc exposure alone had no impact on the viability of any of the strains, co-treatment with glutathione and zinc diminished viability of ΔzccE, a phenotype that was rescued with inactivation of gshT (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
Uncontrolled uptake of GSH-Zn2+ complex is toxic to the ΔzccE strain. Mid-log grown BHI cultures of UA159, ΔzccE, ΔgshT, and ΔzccE ΔgshT were treated with 1 mM ZnSO4, 0.1 mM GSH, or both, for 90 minutes and cell viability determined by plating serial dilutions on BHI agar.
DISCUSSION
In S. mutans, zinc export is mediated by ZccE, a P-type ATPase virtually unique to the species, which grants a substantially greater zinc tolerance in comparison to other streptococci that utilize the widely distributed CDF-type exporter CzcD to cope with high zinc stress (19,39,40). In our previous work, we identified several genes, apart from zccE, that were upregulated during zinc stress, which included genes associated with glutathione uptake, utilization, and regeneration (19). As the major thiol species in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, glutathione serves a variety of roles including detoxification of metals by sequestration/buffering and efflux through export of metal:GSH complexes (41). In this report, we explored the potential of glutathione to function as an intracellular buffer potentially serving as an auxiliary mechanism to ZccE-mediated zinc export.
Prior studies have characterized the mechanisms of glutathione uptake in S. mutans revealing that GshT, a type 3 solute binding protein, partners with the TcyB permease and TcyC ATPase from the TcyABC L-cystine transporter to import exogenous glutathione (29,42). Here, inactivation of gshT resulted in no detectable intracellular glutathione indicating that S. mutans relies predominantly (if not solely) on import to maintain adequate supplies of glutathione, despite encoding gshAB, a dual functional enzyme with glutamate-cysteine ligase and glutathione synthetase domains (43). While most streptococci do not possess the capacity to synthesize glutathione and appear to strongly rely on GshT to acquire glutathione, S. agalactiae and S. mutans are among the few streptococcal species encoding GshAB (43,44). While GshAB is responsible for the bulk of intracellular glutathione in S. agalactiae and linked to virulence in a mouse model (44), the S. mutans GshAB has been poorly characterized other than one study showing that gshAB inactivation impacts the competitive fitness of S. mutans against peroxigenic S. sanguinis (43), and investigations that support our findings by showing that S. mutans cannot synthesize glutathione in a glutathione-free rich media (42,45). Although not a primary objective of this study, our findings underscore the importance of further elucidating the distinct contributions of GshAB and GshT to the maintenance of glutathione homeostasis and their respective roles in the pathophysiology of S. mutans and other streptococcal species.
Even though glutathione supplementation did not significantly improve S. mutans tolerance to zinc, plate titration assays revealed that the “glutathione-free” ΔgshT strain was slightly more sensitive to zinc stress when compared to the parent strain, supporting the idea that glutathione plays a minor role in zinc tolerance. This relatively minor role was within the expected as it has been previously show that the absence of intracellular glutathione had no effect on the zinc tolerance of E. coli unless both glutathione import and zinc export genes were simultaneously inactivated (27). Among the other metals tested, cadmium tolerance was also reduced in ΔgshT with differences in cobalt sensitivity being marginal but noticeable in the ΔzccEΔgshT strain. Cadmium sensitivity was greatly increased in ΔzccEΔgshT compared to ΔzccE, which is consistent with cadmium’s high affinity for thiol groups (28,46). In eukaryotes, the formation of GSH-metal complex for heavy metal efflux via ABC transporters has been documented, and at least one instance of this mechanism has been reported in bacteria (Novosphingobium aromaticivorans) with the formation of a Hg(GS)2 complex (41). While it does not appear to be the case in zinc tolerance, it is possible that that the role of glutathione in bacterial metal tolerance may extend beyond intracellular metal sequestration/buffering. Collectively, these results support the role of glutathione as an auxiliary mechanism for bacterial metal tolerance albeit the magnitude and specificity of this protective effect vary among bacteria as well as the affinity and stability of the GSH:metal complex that is formed.
The most unexpected outcome of this investigation was the observation that, contrary to glutathione’s generally beneficial role, upregulation of glutathione uptake genes in the ΔzccE strain led to massive accumulation of glutathione that was detrimental to the cell when combined to excess zinc. At this point, we considered two non-mutually exclusive explanations for this phenotype. First, it is conceivable that dysregulated glutathione uptake alone caused the growth inhibition, as supplementation of the medium with high concentrations of glutathione (200 μM or more) led to modest reductions in final growth yields. The second, and most plausible explanation is that rather than conferring protection against zinc intoxication, GshT-mediated uptake of glutathione functions as a “Trojan horse” facilitating zinc entry through the import of GSH:Zn complexes. While the negative effect of the excessive glutathione accumulation on ΔzccE growth should not be disregarded, quantification of intracellular glutathione and zinc pools strongly supported the later possibility.
In conclusion, here we provide supporting evidence that glutathione contributes to intracellular zinc homeostasis through formation of GSH:Zn2+ coordination complexes that protect cells from zinc-induced mismetallation. Accidentally, we also found that, to manage extremely high intracellular zinc levels caused by the loss of ZccE, S. mutans increases glutathione uptake, inadvertently promoting zinc influx through import of GSH:Zn complexes. This later observation also indicates that extracellular GSH:Zn complexes may serve as an alternative mechanism for zinc acquisition in bacteria, independent of the canonical zinc transporter AdcABC.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank the University of Florida Mass Spectrometry Research and Education Center for their assistance in glutathione quantification via Mass Spectometry, and the University of Florida Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology for ICP-MS analysis.
FUNDING INFORMATION
This study was supported by NIDCR R01 DE032555 to J.A.L. M.C.C. and A.M.P. were supported by NIDCR T90 DE021990. A.M.P was also partially supported by NIDCR F31 DE032899.
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Dunleavy G, Verma N, Raghupathy R, Jain S, Hofmeister J, Cook R, et al. Inequalities in oral health: Estimating the longitudinal economic burden of dental caries by deprivation status in six countries [Internet]. medRxiv; 2024. [cited 2024 Sep 1]. p. 2024.02.12.24302677. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.02.12.24302677v1 doi: 10.1101/2024.02.12.24302677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lemos J, Palmer S, Zeng L, Wen Z, Kajfasz J, Freires I, et al. The Biology of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol Spectr. 2019. Jan;7(1):10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0051-2018. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0051-2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clarke JK. On the Bacterial Factor in the Ætiology of Dental Caries. Br J Exp Pathol. 1924. Jun;5(3):141–7. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Spatafora G, Li Y, He X, Cowan A, Tanner ACR. The Evolving Microbiome of Dental Caries. Microorganisms. 2024. Jan;12(1):1. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12010121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baty JJ, Stoner SN, Scoffield JA. Oral Commensal Streptococci: Gatekeepers of the Oral Cavity. J Bacteriol. 2022. Nov 15;204(11):e0025722. doi: 10.1128/jb.00257-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hood MI, Skaar EP. Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012. Jul 16;10(8):525–37. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lonergan ZR, Skaar EP. Nutrient Zinc at the Host-Pathogen Interface. Trends Biochem Sci. 2019. Dec;44(12):1041–56. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2019.06.010 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chandrangsu P, Rensing C, Helmann JD. Metal homeostasis and resistance in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017. Jun;15(6):338–50. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Murdoch CC, Skaar EP. Nutritional immunity: the battle for nutrient metals at the host–pathogen interface. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022. Nov;20(11):657–70. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00745-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maares M, Haase H. Zinc and immunity: An essential interrelation. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2016. Dec 1;The Cutting Edge of Zinc Biology 611:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2016.03.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Irving H, Williams RJP. 637. The stability of transition-metal complexes. J Chem Soc. 1953. Jan 1;(0):3192–210. doi: 10.1039/JR9530003192 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chandrangsu P, Helmann JD. Intracellular Zn(II) Intoxication Leads to Dysregulation of the PerR Regulon Resulting in Heme Toxicity in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Genet. 2016. Dec 9;12(12):e1006515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006515 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lukacik M, Thomas RL, Aranda JV. A meta-analysis of the effects of oral zinc in the treatment of acute and persistent diarrhea. Pediatrics. 2008. Feb;121(2):326–36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lin PH, Sermersheim M, Li H, Lee PHU, Steinberg SM, Ma J. Zinc in Wound Healing Modulation. Nutrients. 2017. Dec 24;10(1):16. doi: 10.3390/nu10010016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dinardo G, Indolfi C, Klain A, Grella C, Tosca MA, Miraglia del Giudice M, et al. The Role of Zinc in Pediatric Respiratory Infections: Evidence from Clinical Trials and Real-World Studies. Nutrients. 2026. Jan;18(4):557. doi: 10.3390/nu18040557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Griauzdyte V, Jagelaviciene E. Antimicrobial Activity of Zinc against Periodontal Pathogens: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. Nov 28;59(12):2088. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sheng J, Nguyen PTM, Marquis RE. Multi-target antimicrobial actions of zinc against oral anaerobes. Archives of Oral Biology. 2005. Aug 1;50(8):747–57. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Compton FH, Beagrie GS. Inhibitory effect of benzethonium and zinc chloride mouthrinses on human dental plaque and gingivitis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1975;2(1):33–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1975.tb01724.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ganguly T, Peterson AM, Burkholder M, Kajfasz JK, Abranches J, Lemos JA. ZccE is a Novel P-type ATPase That Protects Streptococcus mutans Against Zinc Intoxication. PLOS Pathogens. 2022. Aug 8;18(8):e1010477. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kreth J, Zhang Y, Herzberg MC. Streptococcal Antagonism in Oral Biofilms: Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus gordonii Interference with Streptococcus mutans. Journal of Bacteriology. 2008. Jul;190(13):4632–40. doi: 10.1128/jb.00276-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stewart LJ, Ong C lynn Y, Zhang MM, Brouwer S, McIntyre L, Davies MR, et al. Role of Glutathione in Buffering Excess Intracellular Copper in Streptococcus pyogenes. mBio. 2020. Dec 1;11(6):e02804–20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02804-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Potter AJ, Trappetti C, Paton JC. Streptococcus pneumoniae Uses Glutathione To Defend against Oxidative Stress and Metal Ion Toxicity. J Bacteriol. 2012. Nov;194(22):6248–54. doi: 10.1128/JB.01393-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Forman HJ, Zhang H, Rinna A. Glutathione: Overview of its protective roles, measurement, and biosynthesis. Mol Aspects Med. 2009;30(1–2):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2008.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Krezel A, Bal W. Coordination chemistry of glutathione. Acta Biochim Pol. 1999;46(3):567–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Masip L, Veeravalli K, Georgiou G. The Many Faces of Glutathione in Bacteria. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2006. May;8(5–6):753–62. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chesney JA, Eaton JW, Mahoney JR. Bacterial glutathione: a sacrificial defense against chlorine compounds. J Bacteriol. 1996. Apr;178(7):2131–5. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.7.2131-2135.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Helbig K, Bleuel C, Krauss GJ, Nies DH. Glutathione and Transition-Metal Homeostasis in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2008. Aug;190(15):5431–8. doi: 10.1128/JB.00271-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Potter AJ, Trappetti C, Paton JC. Streptococcus pneumoniae Uses Glutathione To Defend against Oxidative Stress and Metal Ion Toxicity. J Bacteriol. 2012. Nov;194(22):6248–54. doi: 10.1128/JB.01393-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vergauwen B, Verstraete K, Senadheera DB, Dansercoer A, Cvitkovitch DG, Guédon E, et al. Molecular and structural basis of glutathione import in Gram-positive bacteria via GshT and the cystine ABC importer TcyBC of Streptococcus mutans. Molecular Microbiology. 2013;89(2):288–303. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lau PCY, Sung CK, Lee JH, Morrison DA, Cvitkovitch DG. PCR ligation mutagenesis in transformable streptococci: application and efficiency. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2002. Apr 1;49(2):193–205. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00369-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Morrison DA, Khan R, Junges R, Åmdal HA, Petersen FC. Genome editing by natural genetic transformation in Streptococcus mutans. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2015. Dec 1;119:134–41. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.09.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA, Smith HO. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods. 2009. May;6(5):343–5. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kajfasz JK, Zuber P, Ganguly T, Abranches J, Lemos JA. Increased Oxidative Stress Tolerance of a Spontaneously Occurring perR Gene Mutation in Streptococcus mutans UA159. Journal of Bacteriology. 2021. Mar 23;203(8):10.1128/jb.00535–20. doi: 10.1128/jb.00535-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001. Dec;25(4):402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kajfasz JK, Katrak C, Ganguly T, Vargas J, Wright L, Peters ZT, et al. Manganese Uptake, Mediated by SloABC and MntH, Is Essential for the Fitness of Streptococcus mutans. mSphere. 2020. Jan 8;5(1):10.1128/msphere.00764–19. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00764-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ganguly T, Peterson A m., Kajfasz J k., Abranches J, Lemos J a. Zinc import mediated by AdcABC is critical for colonization of the dental biofilm by Streptococcus mutans in an animal model. Molecular Oral Microbiology. 2021;36(3):214–24. doi: 10.1111/omi.12337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Eijkelkamp BA, Morey JR, Ween MP, Ong C lynn Y, McEwan AG, Paton JC, et al. Extracellular Zinc Competitively Inhibits Manganese Uptake and Compromises Oxidative Stress Management in Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLOS ONE. 2014. Feb 18;9(2):e89427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.McDevitt CA, Ogunniyi AD, Valkov E, Lawrence MC, Kobe B, McEwan AG, et al. A Molecular Mechanism for Bacterial Susceptibility to Zinc. PLOS Pathogens. 2011. Nov 3;7(11):e1002357. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pan Y, Zou J, Zhang K, Wang X, Ma Q, Mei L, et al. ZccE, a P-type ATPase contributing to biofilm formation and competitiveness in Streptococcus mutans. Molecular Oral Microbiology. 2023. Jan 9;omi.12405. doi: 10.1111/omi.12405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Anton A, Große C, Reißmann J, Pribyl T, Nies DH. CzcD Is a Heavy Metal Ion Transporter Involved in Regulation of Heavy Metal Resistance in Ralstonia sp. Strain CH34. Journal of Bacteriology. 1999. Nov 15;181(22):6876–81. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.22.6876-6881.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pearson SA, Cowan JA. Glutathione-coordinated metal complexes as substrates for cellular transporters. Metallomics. 2021. May 1;13(5):mfab015. doi: 10.1093/mtomcs/mfab015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sherrill C, Fahey RC. Import and Metabolism of Glutathione by Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol. 1998. Mar;180(6):1454–9. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zheng X, Zhang K, Zhou X, Liu C, Li M, Li Y, et al. Involvement of gshAB in the Interspecies Competition within Oral Biofilm. J Dent Res. 2013. Sep 1;92(9):819–24. doi: 10.1177/0022034513498598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Walker EA, Port GC, Caparon MG, Janowiak BE. Glutathione Synthesis Contributes to Virulence of Streptococcus agalactiae in a Murine Model of Sepsis. Journal of Bacteriology. 2019. Sep 20;201(20):10.1128/jb.00367–19. doi: 10.1128/jb.00367-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Newton GL, Arnold K, Price MS, Sherrill C, Delcardayre SB, Aharonowitz Y, et al. Distribution of thiols in microorganisms: mycothiol is a major thiol in most actinomycetes. J Bacteriol. 1996. Apr;178(7):1990–5. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.7.1990-1995.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Helbig K, Grosse C, Nies DH. Cadmium toxicity in glutathione mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2008. Aug;190(15):5439–54. doi: 10.1128/JB.00272-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





