Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

Research Square logoLink to Research Square
[Preprint]. 2026 Jun 3:rs.3.rs-9898550. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9898550/v1

Microbiota-dependent interferon-λ controls immunity of the uterus and maternal-fetal interface

Elisha Segrist 1, Anne Roman 2, Eduard Ansaldo 3, P Juliana Perez-Chaparro 4, Colton McNinch 5, Derron Alves 6, Kevin Bock 7, Irini Sereti 8, Yasmine Belkaid 9
PMCID: PMC13252549  PMID: 42282012

Abstract

Precise regulation of uterine immunity is required to support fundamental processes including reproduction and pathogen protection. How the local milieu and constitutive stressors, including the cervicovaginal microbiota, shape the delicate balance underlying uterine immunity is poorly understood. Here, we found that the cervicovaginal microbiota promotes both local immunity and the immunoregulatory activity of interferon lambdas (IFN-λ) in the uterus. Using murine models, we found a keystone role for IFN-λ in constraining the immune tone of this compartment, more specifically of innate lymphoid cells and Th17 cells. Conversely, in the context of pregnancy, IFN-λ promotes antibacterial responses at maternal-fetal barriers, and as a result controlling fetal and neonatal transmission. Collectively, this work demonstrates how IFN-λ integrates microbial signals under both steady state and pregnancy conditions thereby orchestrating key functions of the uterine immune system, namely immunoregulation and antibacterial protection.

Keywords: Interferon-lambda, uterus, immunology, microbiota, pregnancy, bacteria

Introduction

In the female reproductive tract (FRT), the immune system must balance the dynamic and sometimes conflicting requirements for protection against pathogens and fetal tolerance. For instance, FRT immunity is altered by fluctuating levels of sex hormones throughout the menstrual cycle in humans and estrous cycle in mice, a phenomenon that influences vital processes including antimicrobial responses or tissue remodeling and repair1. Additionally, local FRT and systemic immunity are profoundly altered throughout gestation2. Inflammatory immune processes are required for blastocyst implantation to initiate pregnancy and for the onset of labor to end pregnancy2,3. However, throughout pregnancy, an anti-inflammatory environment characterized by an expansion of regulatory T cells and suppression of the effector activity of T cells is maintained to allow for fetal tolerance and growth2,3.

The immune system tunes tissue homeostasis through recognition of and response to the endogenous and exogenous environment. Work from us and others revealed that all barrier sites are extensively influenced by local tissue factors, including the trillions of bacteria that make up the microbiota4. For example, the cervicovaginal microbiota (CVM) has profound effects on women’s health ranging from risk of infection to poor reproductive outcomes5–7. The interaction between vaginal microbes and epithelial transcriptional responses has been probed in depth in vitro8–12, but the mechanisms by which the immune system, particularly the uterine immune system, detects the CVM and the downstream processes that this recognition leads to are largely uncharacterized. The existence of an intrauterine microbiota is debated13–15, but CVM derived products can shape birth outcomes16,17 suggesting their potential to regulate uterine immunity.

Evolutionarily, protection of the FRT is critically important in maintaining the reproductive capacity of the organism. During pregnancy, sufficient antimicrobial protection is vital to ensure that the substantial maternal investment in supporting fetal development results in healthy offspring. If maternal immunity is either insufficient or too inflammatory then maternal and fetal death or poor birth outcomes can occur18. In addition, the inability of the immune system to clear pathogens can result in in utero, intrapartum, or perinatal transmission which can cause congenital diseases in offspring18,19.

Type III interferons, which in mice include interferon lambda 2 and 3 (IFN-λ-2, IFN-λ-3), are uniquely active at barrier sites20–22. IFN-λ can regulate the nasal microbiota, influence tissue immunity, and protect against viral infection23–30. In the gut, homeostatic IFN-λ activity is controlled by endogenous stimulation from the microbiota and virome31,32. In the FRT, IFN-λ is antiviral in the placenta during pregnancy without inducing pathogenic inflammation leading to fetal death, like type I IFNs28,33–41. Bacteria can induce IFN-λ expression, including in the placenta42, but the role of IFN-λ on bacterial control in pregnancy is unknown. Some bacteria, like Streptococcus agalactiae, can cause ascending infection of maternal-fetal membranes (chorioamnionitis) which can result in preterm or stillbirth43–45. Chorioamnionitis occurs in 1–10% of term births and ~ 40% of preterm births and rates of chorioamnionitis are increasing46–48. Additionally, offspring are at risk of in utero or intrapartum infection which can lead to sepsis, meningitis, or pneumonia47,49. Antibiotics and expedited delivery are performed after chorioamnionitis is detected, but exposed infants can experience long-term health consequences50. While transmission and infection risk are multifactorial, the maternal and neonatal immune parameters that shape transmission events remain largely unknown51.

Here, we show that, consistent with the need to tightly regulate uterine immunity, the CVM promoted both local immunity and immune regulation within the uterus. Indeed, IFN-λ constrained type 17 uterine immune abundance in a microbiota-dependent manner, at least partially through suppression of cytokine signaling which promotes type 17 immunity. Further, IFN-λ played an important antibacterial role during pregnancy which influenced in utero transmission and intrapartum infection of offspring. Collectively, these data uncovered a new role for the CVM and IFN-λ in the control of a fundamental reproductive organ.

Results

The uterine environment is skewed towards type 1 and type 17 immunity

Sex hormone levels fluctuate throughout the murine estrous cycle, with a peak of estrogen during proestrus and a peak of progesterone during diestrus (Supplementary Fig. 1A)52. To model how these hormone changes impact uterine immunity, we used spectral flow cytometry to characterize immune cell abundance and activation in the uterine compartment of progesterone or estrogen treated mice (Supplementary Fig. 2A, 2B). The frequency and number of lymphoid cells was higher in the uteri of progesterone treated mice compared with estrogen treated mice (Supplementary Fig. 1B, 1C). Lymphoid cells represented ~ 36% or ~ 21% of hematopoietic cells in progesterone or estrogen treated mice, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1C).

As previously shown53, the tone of the uterine compartment throughout the estrous cycle was skewed toward type 1 immunity with Tbet+ group 1 innate lymphoid cells (ILCs; primarily composed of tissue resident NK cells) representing the majority of the lymphoid compartment (Supplementary Fig. 1D, 1E). Type 17 immune cells were the next most abundant type, comprising about ~ 8–11% of the lymphoid compartment, with type 2 immune cells being the least abundant (Supplementary Fig. 1D). Group 1 ILCs abundance was higher in progesterone treated mice compared to estrogen treated mice (Supplementary Fig. 1E). The frequency of IL-17+ γδ T cells (TCRγδ17) was higher in progesterone treated animals relative to estrogen treated animals, whereas the frequency of ILC3, Th17 and Tc17 cells was unchanged by sex hormone treatment (Supplementary Fig. 1E). Sex hormones had no effect on the abundance of type 2 immune cells (Supplementary Fig. 1E).

Overall, the uterine environment is dominated by type 1 and type 17 immune programs, which are also regulated by sex hormone treatment.

Bacterial colonization promotes type 1 and type 17 immune responses in the uterus

To understand how the microbiota could influence uterine immunity, we first compared the number and activity of lymphoid and myeloid cells in specific pathogen free (SPF) or germ-free (GF) mice using flow cytometry. Since estrogen and progesterone can alter local immunity in distinct ways (Supplementary Fig. 1E)1,52,54, we treated animals with either 17β-estradiol (estrogen) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (progesterone) to stabilize the uterine environment throughout the course of an experiment by maintaining animals in either the proestrus or diestrus stage of the estrous cycle. We focused on type 1 and type 17 immune programs as they are highly abundant in the uterus and have been shown, at other body sites, to be controlled by the microbiota4,55–60.

During estrogen treatment, we found that SPF mice exhibited higher frequencies of uterine Th17, TCRγδ17, and ILC3 cells relative to GF animals (Fig. 1A, 1B). Additionally, there was a higher number of uterine Th17 cells in SPF mice relative to GF mice (Supplementary Fig. 3A). SPF mice had a higher frequency of Tc1 cells and a trend toward increased Th1 cells relative to GF mice, but there was no effect on the frequency of Group 1 ILCs or IFNγ+ γδ T cells (TCRγδ1) (Fig. 1A, 1B). Conversely, we found no significant differences in absolute cell number or frequency of uterine myeloid populations that we assessed between SPF and GF uteri (Supplementary Fig. 3B).

Figure 1. The local microbiota regulates type 1 and type 17 immunity in the uterus.

Figure 1

(A) Quantification of type 1 and type 17 immune cells shown as fold change cell frequency (of CD45+CD90.2+ cells) in SPF animals compared to GF animals treated with estrogen. (B) Representative FACS plots displaying frequency of uterine Th1, Th17, Tc1, and ILC3 cells in estrogen treated SPF and GF animals. (C) Quantification of type 1 and type 17 immune cells shown as fold change of cell frequency (of CD45+CD90.2+ cells) in SPF animals compared to GF animals during progesterone treatment. (D) Representative FACS plots displaying frequency of uterine ILC3 cells in SPF and GF animals following progesterone treatment. (E) Experimental schematic showing intravaginal association with GBS A909 after estrogen treatment of nulliparous mice. (F) Top, quantification of GBS bacterial burden in the vagina, uterus, stool, and lumbar lymph nodes (LN) over the 21 dpa time course. Bottom, GBS colonization rate in the vagina, uterus, stool, and lumbar lymph nodes over the 21 dpa time course. (G) Quantification of uterine (left), type 1 and (right) type 17 immune cells shown as fold change of absolute cell number and cell frequency (of CD45+CD90.2+ cells) in GBS associated animals compared to mock treated animals. (H) Quantification of Th17 absolute cell number and cell frequency (of CD45+CD90.2+ cells). (A, C, H) Each dot represents an individual tissue with mean ± SEM from at least (H) two or (A,C) three biological replicates. (F,G) Group mean with ± SEM from at least two biological replicates. (A, C, G,H) Significance was determined by an unpaired Student’s t-test. * denote p-val<0.05 ** denote p-val<0.01 **** denote p-val<0.0001.

In progesterone treated mice, the impact of the microbiota on the lymphoid compartment was less pronounced with a significantly higher frequency and number of ILC3s in SPF mice relative to GF mice (Fig. 1C, 1D, Supplementary Fig. 3C). GF mice also had increased frequencies of neutrophils relative to SPF mice (Supplementary Fig. 3D, 3E) suggesting a potential role for the microbiota in the control of the inflammatory tone of the tissue within this specific hormonal state.

As GF mice lack a microbiota at all barrier sites, these results could not distinguish whether the observed effect was due to local versus systemic action of the microbiota. The CVM and its associated products can alter reproductive outcomes, suggesting the ability to influence the uterine environment5,10,16,17. To test the possibility that the CVM could directly control uterine immunity, we colonized SPF mice with S. agalactiae (GBS), commonly found in the human CVM61,62 (Fig. 1E). We used GBS as a model as it readily colonizes the murine FRT63 unlike other gram-positive commensals64–67 and has been used to identify bacterial factors that promote colonization and ascending infection68,69. Mice in diestrus are not stably colonized with GBS, so continuous treatment with estrogen is required to establish and maintain GBS colonization in the murine vagina63,70. By 3 days post-association (dpa), GBS strain A909 robustly colonized the vagina and uterus with up to 108 CFU/mL found in nearly all animals and colonization was maintained throughout the 21 day experiment (Fig. 1F). Since GBS is also found in the gastrointestinal tract71,72, we also monitored the stool for GBS and found varying levels of bacteria in about 50% of all animals (Fig. 1F). Unlike the FRT, GBS colonization of the intestinal tract was not universal allowing us to disentangle local and systemic effects of the microbiota. Intermittent and minute levels of bacteria were found in the lumbar lymph nodes that drain from the uterus confirming that this model of association did not cause infection (Fig. 1F).

Evaluation of lymphoid changes between mock and GBS associated animals revealed alterations in the activation and frequency of subsets of ILCs, γδ T cells, and αβ T cells at 21 dpa. These immune changes were found in all GBS associated animals, indicating that microbiota mediated alterations of uterine immunity cannot be due to systemic changes. Specifically, exposure to a new commensal within the FRT (vagina and uterus) resulted in a significant increase in type 17 immune cell numbers (Th17, Tc17, ILC3) when represented as fold change relative to mock treated animals at 21 dpa (Fig. 1G, 1H, Supplementary Fig. 3F). There was also an increase in type 1 immune cells by 21 dpa, with a significant fold increase in Th1 cell number (Fig. 1G, Supplementary Fig. 3F).

We next assessed if the impact of GBS association on type 1 and type 17 immune cells was mediated by live bacteria as opposed to bacterially derived products. To mimic the persistent antigen exposure associated with robust GBS colonization, mice were treated daily with 108 CFU heat killed GBS (HK GBS) or GBS spent media (1x or 10X) (Supplementary Fig. 3G). A single administration of PBS, GBS, or daily administration of Todd Hewitt bacterial growth media (THB) were also included as controls. GBS supernatant promoted IL-17 production from CD4+ T helper cells similarly to live GBS (Supplementary Fig. 3H, 3I, 3L) which supported the idea that microbial derived products are sufficient to promote local immune responses. On the other hand, only live bacteria promoted an increase in the number of IFNγ+ CD4+ T helper cells (Supplementary Fig. 3J-3L). Thus, bacterial products were sufficient to promote uterine type 17 immunity, while type 1 immunity was only induced by live CVM.

Thus, using two complementary murine models to probe the effects of the microbiota on the uterine immune environment, we found that the CVM promoted type 1 and type 17 immune cell accumulation and cytokine expression.

IFN-λ constrains uterine immune abundance in a microbiota-dependent manner

We and others have previously shown that the microbiota promoted type I IFN signaling that in turn influenced T cell responses57,73–77. Therefore, we investigated whether type I IFNs alter homeostatic uterine type 17 immunity. To this end, we temporally depleted type I IFN signaling by treating SPF female mice with a blocking antibody against the type I IFN receptor (IFNAR) (Supplementary Fig. 4A). Temporal blockade of type I IFN signaling had no effect on the abundance or function of type 17 lymphocytes (Supplementary Fig. 4B). These data suggest that a distinct innate immune pathway bridges microbiota detection and uterine immune regulation.

As IFN-λs are induced by the microbiota and promote immune recruitment during infection20,22,31,32, we next considered a potential role for IFN-λ in regulating uterine immunity. Since estrogens dampen IFN signaling78–80, we focused on the effect of IFN-λ in progesterone treated animals. IFN-λ signaling was temporally blocked using a neutralizing antibody against IFN-λ-2/3 (a-IFN-λ)79,81,82 in SPF or GF adult female mice (Fig. 2A). Loss of IFN-λ signaling in SPF animals resulted in a significant increase in the abundance of type 17 immune cells, including Th17, RORγT+ γδ T cells, and ILC3s relative to isotype control (Iso) treated animals (Fig. 2B–2D, Supplementary Fig. 4C). Furthermore, we found that IFN-λ’s regulation of immunity was dependent on the microbiota, as loss of IFN-λ signaling in GF mice had no effect on the abundance of Th17, RORγT+ γδ T cells, and ILC3s (Fig. 2C, 2D, Supplementary Fig. 4C). Thus, these data show that IFN-λ constrains type 17 uterine immunity in a microbiota-dependent manner.

Figure 2. IFN-λ constrains uterine homeostatic immunity in a microbiota-dependent manner.

Figure 2

(A) Experimental schematic depicting isotype control (Iso) and IFN-λ neutralizing antibody (a-IFN-λ) treatment following progesterone administration in SPF or GF mice. (B) Quantification of type 17 lymphoid cells as fold change of absolute cell number in progesterone treated SPF animals treated with a-IFN-λ relative to Iso treated animals. (C, D) Quantification of absolute cell number of uterine (C) RORγT+ γδT cells and (D) Th17 cells in SPF and GF mice. (B-D) Each dot represents a uterus taken from an individual mouse from three biological replicates with mean with ± SEM. Significance determined by an unpaired Student’s t-test. * denote p-val <0.05 ** denote p-val <0.01. (E) Experimental schematic showing progesterone treatment of wild type (WT) littermate control or IFN-λ receptor (IFNLR) knock out mice, followed by sorting of EpCam+ and CD45+ cells for single cell RNA sequencing. (F) UMAP projection showing uterine cells sorted using an EpCam gate. (G) Expression of the ISGs Ifi27l2a, Irf7, Isg15, Oas2, Oasl2 across EpCam+ clusters from WT and IFNLR KO mice. (H) Volcano plot displaying differentially expressed genes from uterine luminal epithelial cells. (I) Top enriched GO term pathways for genes downregulated in uterine luminal epithelial cells from IFNLR KO mice, with Log2 fold change values shown for differentially expressed genes in each highlighted pathway. (J) Working model.

IFN-λ controls interferon stimulated gene (ISG) expression in luminal epithelial cells and fibroblasts

As we found that systemic depletion of IFN-λ constrains uterine type 17 immunity in a microbiota-dependent manner, we next wished to identify the IFN-λ responsive cells that may mediate accumulation of type 17 immune cells. Further, we assessed the gene expression programs controlled by IFN-λ signaling in order to understand the functional role that IFN-λ may play in the uterus. To this end, we performed single cell RNA sequencing on sorted EpCam+ and CD45+ cells to assay epithelial and immune gene expression in littermate control wild type (WT) and IFNLR KO adult female mice (Fig. 2E, 2F, Supplementary Fig. 4D 4F, 4G). As expected, IFNLR expression (Ifnlr1) was limited compared with the ubiquitous type I IFN receptor (Ifnar1) (Supplementary Fig. 4E)83. Notably, IFNLR was primarily expressed by uterine luminal and glandular epithelial cells (Supplementary Fig. 4E). IFNLR expression was also detected in DCs and macrophages but was absent from other CD45+ cells.

We observed reduced ISG expression only in uterine luminal epithelial cells (Irf7, Isg15, Oas2, and Oasl2) and in fibroblasts (Ifi27l2a) from IFNLR KO mice relative to WT mice (Fig. 2G, 2H). These data suggest that while several cell types express IFNLR, only luminal epithelial cells and fibroblasts tonically respond to IFN-λs (Supplementary Fig. 4E, Fig. 2G, 2H). In the absence of IFNLR, luminal epithelial cells also had reduced expression of genes related to antigen presentation (Fig. 2H), a common feature of IFN signaling84. GO term analysis of genes downregulated in uterine luminal epithelial cells from IFNLR KO mice revealed that IFN-λ signaling promoted expression of genes involved in pathways like innate immune responses, defense responses to bacteria and viruses, regulation of natural killer cell activation, and regulation of T cell proliferation (Fig. 2I). These data indicate that luminal epithelial cells express high levels of IFNLR and that loss of homeostatic IFNL signaling results in reduced expression of ISGs and genes involved in antimicrobial defense.

These data support the idea that the microbiota both enhances local uterine immunity and regulates IFN-λ activity, which constrains uterine type 17 immunity (Fig. 2J). Furthermore, our transcriptional analyses propose a potential role for IFN-λ in antibacterial defense responses.

Loss of IFN-λ signaling increased the expression of gene programs that promote type 17 immunity

To understand how loss of IFN-λ signaling led to an accumulation of type 17 immune cells in the uterus, we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) on all CD45 + cells. We found enrichment of pathways related to production of IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF family cytokines which induce type 17 immunity in IFNLR KO mice relative to littermate WT mice (Supplementary Fig. 5A)85. Next, we investigated which immune cells are involved in expression of these cytokines and found that IL-1β expression was enriched in the primary DC2 cluster from IFNLR KO mice relative to WT mice (Supplementary Fig. 5B). CellChat was used to examine interactions between CD45 + cells and found an increase in the number of DC2-T cell interactions in IFNLR KO mice relative to WT mice (Supplementary Fig. 5C)86. These data indicate that in the absence of IFN-λ signaling there is increased IL-1β expression in DC2 cells and enhanced DC2-T cell interactions leading to enhanced type 17 immunity.

IFN-λ signaling has no impact on bacterial burden in nulliparous animals

Next, we wanted to probe IFN-λ’s function in the uterus. While IFNs are primarily investigated in the context of viral infection, growing evidence implicates IFNs in immune responses to bacteria as well22,87. For instance, IFN-λ regulates the nasal microbiota community structure and can either promote lung infection with pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus and Bordetella pertussis or protect against bacterially induced pneumonia23,88–90. The role of IFN-λ in bacterial defense within the FRT is unknown. Since IFN-λ controls expression of genes related to bacterial defense in uterine luminal epithelial cells (Fig. 2I), we investigated IFN-λ’s role in controlling bacterial burden of the vaginal bacteria GBS following intravaginal association in nulliparous animals (Fig. 3A). There was no difference in GBS burden in the vaginal lavage of animals treated with a-IFN-λ relative to those treated with Iso at any time point assay after vaginal colonization (Fig. 3B). Additionally, there was no difference in GBS burden in vaginal or uterine tissues between a-IFN-λ or Iso treated mice at 6 dpa, indicating that IFN-λ did not regulate bacterial abundance in the uterus and vagina (Fig. 3C, 3D). These data are in agreement with previous findings that basal IFN-λ signaling was not antiviral against Zika virus in the nulliparous WT murine uterus33,34 and did not protect against herpes simplex virus or murine papillomavirus infection of the vagina83,91. Overall, these data reinforce the idea that, unlike other barrier sites, homeostatic IFN-λ is not involved in microbial defense in the nulliparous uterus.

Figure 3. IFN-λ is antibacterial specifically during pregnancy.

Figure 3

(A) Experimental schematic showing Iso or a-IFN-λ treatment before and throughout intravaginal GBS colonization of nulliparous animals. (B-D) Quantification of GBS counts in (B) vaginal lavages from 1 – 6 dpa, (C) vaginal and (D) uterine tissue at 6 dpa. (E) Experimental schematic showing Iso or a-IFN-λ treatment before and throughout intravaginal GBS infection of timed pregnant dams. (F) Number of implantation sites. (G) Quantification of the fetus-to-placenta weight ratio in Iso or a-IFN-λ treated GBS-infected pregnant dams at gd16.5. (H) Quantification of GBS bacterial burden in indicated tissues at 3 dpi. (I) Incidence of decidual necrosis. (J) Quantification of GBS counts in fetal liver at 3 dpi. (K) Fetal outcomes in mock or GBS-infected Iso or a-IFN-λ treated pregnant dams at gestation day (gd) 16.5. (B) Each dot represents mean ± SEM from three biological replicates. (C, D, G, H, J) Each dot represents an individual tissue from at least three biological replicates with mean ± SEM. (F) Each dot represents the total number of implantation sites per individual dam from at least three biological replicates with mean ± SEM. (B-D, F-K) Significance was determined by a (B) two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, (C, D, F-H, J) an unpaired Student’s t-test, and (I,K) a one-way ANOVA. (B-D, F-K) *** denote p-val<0.001, **** denote p-val<0.0001. (L) Working model.

IFN-λ controls GBS infection and in utero transmission during pregnancy

Previous studies revealed that IFN-λ is antiviral during mid to late pregnancy in both mice and humans33,36,39. While bacterial infection induced IFN-λ expression in the murine placenta42, whether IFN-λ controls bacterial infection of maternal-fetal barriers has not been explored. GBS is present in the CVM of ~ 30% of women with no negative health effects61,62. However, during pregnancy this bacterium can become pathogenic, causing ascending infection of maternal-fetal membranes43,45,47. To define the role of IFN-λ during bacterial infection in pregnancy, we used an ascending model of GBS infection during mid-gestation that results in chorioamnionitis92,93. Timed pregnancies were established to ensure synchronized gestations and mice were treated with an a-IFN-λ or Iso blocking antibody before and throughout GBS infection (Fig. 3E). Treatment with a-IFN-λ during GBS infection had no effect on litter size or the fetal-to-placenta weight ratio (Fig. 3F, 3G). At 3 days post infection (dpi), GBS burden was quantified in vaginal swabs and uterine, decidual, placental, and amnion tissues. We found that neutralization of IFN-λ signaling resulted in increased GBS burden in the decidua and amniotic sac with no effect on GBS burden in the vagina, uterus or placenta (Fig. 3H).

Since we saw enhanced GBS infection of the decidua in a-IFN-λ treated GBS infected dams relative to infected Iso control dams, we examined the placenta for pathology. In mock infected animals we detected low baseline levels of decidual inflammation and necrosis, likely due to the late time point in gestation (Fig. 3I, Supplementary Fig. 6A, 6B). Focal decidual-necrosis may be observed in the decidua as a normal physiologic change during murine pregnancy94. Consistent with previous findings, there was a trend for increased decidual inflammation and necrosis during GBS infection (Fig. 3I)95,96. Loss of IFN-λ signaling during GBS infection resulted in a trend towards a slight increase in the frequency of decidual inflammation and necrosis.

GBS infection of maternal-fetal barriers in control dams rarely resulted in in utero transmission to the fetuses (Fig. 3J). In contrast, fetuses of dams treated with a-IFN-λ during GBS infection had significantly higher levels of GBS in the fetal liver (Fig. 3J). Enhanced transmission was not associated with early resorption or fetal death (Fig. 3K). Thus, during pregnancy, IFN-λ protected the decidua and fetus from ascending bacterial infection and bacterial associated pathology (Fig. 3L).

IFN-λ-dependent antibacterial activity in utero influences offspring infection

We found that loss of IFN-λ activity during bacterial infection enhanced in utero GBS transmission without increasing fetal demise (Fig. 3J, 3K), so we next investigated the potential impact on birth outcomes and neonatal health. To do this, we established timed pregnancies, treated dams with Iso or a-IFN-λ blocking antibody throughout pregnancy and infected dams with GBS (Fig. 4A). In these experiments, we allowed dams to give birth and monitored maternal survival, GBS carrier status and neonatal weight and infection. There was minimal maternal mortality before or after delivery in Iso or a-IFN-λ treated GBS infected dams and all dams cleared GBS from the vagina by postnatal day 11 (Fig. 4B, 4C). GBS infection and treatment with Iso or a-IFN-λ had no significant effect on litter size, consistent with the lack of fetal death caused by GBS infection (Fig. 4D, 3K). We monitored neonatal weight after birth and found no significant differences among offspring born to mock infected dams, GBS infected dams or GBS infected dams with deficient IFN-λ signaling (Fig. 4E).

Figure 4. Loss of in utero IFN-λ signaling enhanced GBS infection of neonates.

Figure 4

(A) Experimental schematic showing Iso or a-IFN-λ neutralizing antibody treatment before and throughout intravaginal GBS infection of timed pregnant dams. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were monitored through perinatal day 11. (B) Survival curve displaying maternal survival following GBS infection during pregnancy and through the first 11 days of the perinatal period. (C) Quantification of vaginal GBS burden in dams at perinatal day 11. (D) Quantification of litter size per individual dam at postnatal day 5. (E) Quantification of neonatal weight at postnatal day 5, 9 and 11. (F) Quantification of GBS CFU/mL in the neonatal liver, lung, brain, and intestine at postnatal day 11. Each dot represents a tissue from an individual mouse with mean ± SEM. (G) Proportion of neonatal livers, lungs, brains, and intestines positive for GBS at postnatal day 11. (B-G) Three independent replicates were performed and statistical significance was determined by (B) a log-rank test, (C, F, G) an unpaired Student’s t-test, (D) one-way ANOVA, and (E) two-way ANOVA. *denote p-val <0.05. **denote p-val <0.01.

Previous work demonstrated that neonates born from GBS infected dams had bacteria present in their livers, intestines and brains and infection-associated lung and brain damage97. Thus, we assessed how IFN-λ’s antibacterial activity in utero influences neonatal infection and colonization. Neonates born to GBS infected dams treated with Iso or a-IFN-λ had similar colonization rates and GBS burdens in the gastrointestinal tract, indicating that IFN-λ signaling does not influence early life intestinal colonization. In contrast, neonates born to GBS infected and a-IFN-λ treated dams had higher infection levels in the lungs and liver compared with neonates born to GBS infected Iso treated dams (Fig. 4F). Furthermore, there was a higher proportion of GBS-positive livers in neonates born from GBS infected a-IFN-λ treated dams compared with neonates born from GBS infected Iso treated dams (Fig. 4G). These data are consistent with our observation that loss of IFN-λ during GBS infection in pregnancy resulted in increased in utero transmission to fetuses (Fig. 3J). Together, these results indicate that loss of IFN-λ signaling throughout GBS infection in pregnancy enhanced perinatal GBS infection of the lungs and livers in offspring. Enhanced early life infection of the liver and lungs associated with loss of IFN-λ signaling likely worsens tissue damage potentially leading to long term negative consequences on the offspring.

Discussion

Here, we described a role for the CVM in mediating uterine immune homeostasis by promoting local uterine immunity while simultaneously engaging IFN-λ-mediated immunoregulatory mechanisms. Specifically, we found that loss of IFN-λ signaling promoted type 17 immune abundance, likely by restraining expression of cytokines, like IL1β, in DC2 cells. We also identified a previously unknown role for IFN-λ in antibacterial defense in pregnancy which shaped in utero transmission and intrapartum infection of offspring.

Recent findings in humans have revealed that CVMs dominated by Gram-negative commensals have increased activation of cervical type 17 immune cells compared to women with low diversity CVMs dominated by Gram-positive commensals98,99. We find that the cervicovaginal Gram-positive commensal GBS which is found in women with either low or high diversity CVMs62, induces type 17 and type 1 immune accumulation in the uterus. Furthermore, we find that mice without any microbiota have reduced type 17 and type 1 uterine immune responses compared to mice with an endogenous microbiota. These data suggest that cervicovaginal bacteria promote type 17 immune responses, while specific commensals or CVM communities may drive excessive type 17 immune activation in the FRT.

Dysregulation of type 17 immunity is associated with endometriosis100–102 and pregnancy complications103–106 underscoring the necessity of precise regulation of this pathway in the FRT. Endometriosis and pregnancy complications, like pre-term birth, are linked to vaginal dysbiosis or to specific vaginal commensals, like GBS5,10,43,107–109. We find that while the microbiota promotes type 17 immune accumulation in the uterus, it also engages a second IFN-λ-dependent mechanism that constrains type 17 immune responses. Therefore, a potential connection between the microbiota and pathogenic type 17 immune responses in these pathologies should be further explored.

As loss of IFN-λ resulted in enhanced type 17 immune responses in a microbiota-dependent manner, we propose that IFN-λ is a regulator of type 17 immune responses. We recognize that an alternative hypothesis is that loss of IFN-λ may cause an outgrowth of bacteria which then induce uterine type 17 immune responses. However, when we evaluated whether IFN-λ influences GBS burden in nulliparous mice, we found that mice deficient in IFN-λ signaling had similar GBS bacterial burden relative to mice with intact IFN-λ signaling. Thus, our data suggest that IFN-λ regulates uterine type 17 immune responses independently of CVM bacterial burden, consistent with a model in which IFN-λ acts on host pathways rather than indirectly influencing immunity through CVM alterations.

The incidence of ascending GBS infection in pregnancy is low despite a relatively high GBS carrier rate in pregnant women43,45,47,49,61,72,110. While the basis of this discrepancy is likely multifactorial, our data revealed a previously unrecognized role for IFN-λ in protecting against chorioamnionitis and in utero GBS transmission. Genetic polymorphisms in human IFNL genes are associated with HCV clearance and Zika virus outcomes in pregnancy40,111. Given our findings, it will be important to determine whether IFN-λ genetic polymorphisms influence susceptibility to ascending GBS infection during pregnancy.

Whether IFN-λ’s antibacterial activity in pregnancy extends to bacterial pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes which causes severe infection in pregnancy through a hematogenous route of infection remains to be determined112. Furthermore, the breadth of the antibacterial activity against other ascending bacteria, which are often Gram-negative like Escherichia coli is an important future avenue of investigation.

Our data indicate that IFN-λ’s antibacterial action in utero influences GBS infection of neonates. Children born to GBS positive women are more likely to develop asthma which has been attributed to prophylactic antibiotic treatment of the mother during delivery50. We find that neonates born from dams deficient in IFN-λ signaling during GBS infection in pregnancy have increased GBS burden in organs including the lungs relative to neonates born from dams with no defect in IFN-λ signaling during GBS infection. These data raise the possibility that IFN-λ influences GBS transmission and neonatal lung health even in the absence of early life antibiotic exposure.

Overall, our findings reveal that IFN-λ orchestrates uterine homeostasis and extends the known antiviral role of IFN-λ in pregnancy to include protection against bacterial infection. This work provides new insight into the optimal control of uterine immunity, highlighting the necessity of balancing microbiota-dependent cellular immune accumulation and IFN-λ-mediated immune regulation.

Methods

Mice

Conventional SPF C57BL/6J WT mice were bred, maintained, and obtained by the NIAID Taconic Exchange Program. Germ free C57Bl/6 mice were bred and maintained in the National Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Microbiome Program gnotobiotic animal facility and in the National Cancer Institute’s Frederick National Laboratory gnotobiotic animal facility. Ifnlr−/− mice were obtained from the Sergei Kotenko Laboratory113 and were bred and maintained under SPF conditions. Mice were provided a standard pelleted rodent diet; in experiments with SPF and GF mice, SPF mice were maintained on the standard pelleted rodent diet used in the gnotobiotic facility. All mice were bred and maintained at an American Association for the Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC)–accredited animal facility at NIAID and housed in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Age-matched SPF mice between 8–12 weeks of age were used for each experiment. All experiments were performed at NIAID under an Animal Study Proposal (LHIM2E and LIRID4E) approved by the NIAID Animal Care and Use Committee.

Streptococcus agalactiae culture

S. agalactiae A909 (ATCC BAA-1138) was grown for 16 hours on selective CHROMagar StepB (DRG International, Inc.) agar plates. A909 was then subcultured in Todd-Hewitt broth (NutriSelect® Plus) and incubated at 37°C until mid-logarithmic phase (OD600 = 0.4–0.6). Bacterial cultures were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 minutes, washed in sterile PBS, and resuspended in sterile PBS at 109 CFU/mL (nulliparous mice) or 1010 CFU/mL (pregnant mice).

Sex hormone treatment

Mice were injected subcutaneously in the neck scruff with 100 μL of a 20 mg/mL solution of medroxyprogestrone acetate (Prasco Laboratories) in PBS and referred to as progesterone treated throughout the manuscript. Mice were injected subcutaneously in the neck scruff with 100 μL of a 1 ng/μL solution of beta-estradiol (Sigma Aldrich #E2758) in corn oil and referred to as estrogen treated throughout the manuscript. Mice were maintained on estrogen treatment every four days for the length of the experiment. For S. agalactiae association experiments, nulliparous mice were treated with 100 μL of a 5 mg/mL solution of beta-estradiol a day before bacterial administration as previously described63. S. agalactiae associated mice were maintained on estrogen treatment every seven days for the length of the experiment.

S. agalactiae intravaginal association in nulliparous mice

One day after estrogen treatment, animals were intravaginally administered 109 CFU/mL of S. agalactiae A909 in 10 μL of sterile PBS using a gel-loading pipette63. Mice were walked for approximately 60 seconds to prevent spilling of the inoculum.

To determine colonization rates and S. agalactiae abundance after intravaginal inoculation, we collected vaginal swabs or vaginal lavages, uteri, and stool at 3, 7, 14, and 21 dpa. To evaluate the ability of A909 to disseminate from the FRT we also collected the lumbar draining lymph nodes at each time point.

For antibody neutralization experiments, mice were treated with a neutralizing antibody or isotype control antibody one day before S. agalactiae association. Treatment with a neutralizing antibody was maintained every other day throughout the experiment. S. agalactiae CFU/mL was quantified in the vaginal lavage at 1–6 dpa and in vaginal and uterine tissue at 6 dpa.

Timed pregnancies

WT mice were single housed for 1–2 weeks to accumulate dirty bedding and to allow for sperm recuperation. WT females were exposed to dirty bedding from males for 2–3 days to induce estrus. They were then housed with male mice overnight and the presence of a vaginal plug was checked the next morning54. If a vaginal plug was found, then mice were considered to be at gestation day (gd) 0.5 and separated from the male mice. Mice found without a plug were allowed to mate another day so the gestation day in all experiments has a range of (±) 1 day of gestation.

S. agalactiae intravaginal infection of pregnant mice

On gd13.5, mice were intravaginally inoculated with 1010 CFU/mL of S. agalactiae in 10 μL of sterile PBS93. For bacterial quantification experiments, vaginal swabs, uteri, deciduas and metrial glands (n = 2–4/dam), placentas (n = 2–4/dam) amniotic sacs (n = 2–4/dam), and fetal livers (2–4/dam) were collected at 3 dpi. Corresponding organs from mock infected animals were also collected as a negative control.

For antibody neutralization experiments during pregnancy, mice were treated with blocking or isotope control antibodies at gestation day 12.5 and every other day for the course of the experiment.

The impact of infection on fetuses was evaluated at 3 dpi. The presence of fetal death or early resorptions was recorded and quantified. No pre-term births were detected before the 3-day post infection time point.

The impact of infection on neonatal offspring health was evaluated through neonatal day 11. The impact on offspring weight was evaluated at neonatal day 5, 9, and 11. The impact on offspring infection was evaluated at neonatal day 11. The livers, lungs, brains, and gastrointestinal tracts were collected from 2–4 offspring per dam.

Quantification of S. agalactiae counts

Quantification of S. agalactiae bacterial burden was performed as previously described63. A sterile calcium alginate swab (Puritan™) was dipped in sterile PBS and inserted in the vagina of mock infected or GBS associated or infected mice. The swab was turned 5 times clockwise and 5 times counterclockwise with the swab continuously maintaining contact with the walls of the vagina. The swab was then placed in sterile PBS and vortexed at high speeds for 15 seconds to dislodge bacteria from the swab. For vaginal lavages, 100 μL of sterile PBS was added to the vaginal canal and the volume was pipetted up and down 10 times. The nulliparous uterus, vagina, stool and lumbar lymph nodes were homogenized using a bead-based homogenization system (Precellys). Serial tenfold dilutions were performed to quantify bacterial burden using selective CHROMagar StepB (DRG International, Inc.) plates. For the lymph nodes, the entire 100 μL sample of undiluted homogenate was plated on CHROMagar Strep B plates.

During and after pregnancy, the vagina was swabbed and S. agalactiae was quantified as above. The uterine horns were homogenized using a probe-based tissue homogenizer. All other tissues were homogenized using a bead-based homogenization system (Precellys). Tenfold serial dilutions were plated on CHROMagar Strep B plates. For tissues with low bacterial burden, 100 μL of undiluted homogenate were plated on CHROMagar Strep B plates. For the neonatal lung and brain, plates with bacterial lawns were recorded as having the upper limit of detection. All CFU/mL values are graphed as CFU/mL + 1 to enable visualization of all data on a log-scale.

In vivo treatment with blocking antibodies

Mice were treated with sex hormones and then injected intraperitoneally with 0.5 mg of anti-mouse IFNAR1 antibody (clone MAR1–5A3, BioXcell) or mouse IgG1 isotype control (clone MOPC-21, BioXcell) and then 0.25mg every two days for the duration of the experiment114. Mice were also injected intraperitoneally with 2.25 mg/kg of anti-mouse IFN-λ-2/3 antibody (MAB17892, R&D Systems) or rat IgG2b isotype control antibody (clone MAB0061, R&D systems) as previously published79,81,82.

Murine tissue processing for single cell suspensions

Uterine horns were excised and minced into 2 mm pieces and digested in digestion media (RPMI media supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and nonessential amino acids, 55 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 20 mM HEPES, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 30 μg/mL DNase I, and 0.5 mg/mL Liberase TL purified enzyme blend, Roche). Tissue isolated from mice treated with medroxyprogestrone acetate or low dose beta-estradiol were incubated for 25 minutes at 37°C and 5% CO2 and tissue isolated from mice treated with high dose beta-estradiol were incubated for 45 minutes at 37°C and 5% CO2. The digested tissue was then filtered through a 70 μM cell strainer, and the pellet was treated with ACK lysis buffer.

In vitro stimulation of lymphocytes

To evaluate basal cytokine production, single-cell suspensions from uterine horns were cultured ex vivo for 2.5 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2 in complete medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1 mM nonessential amino acids, 20 mM HEPES, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol) containing 50 ng/mL of phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich) and 5 μg/mL of ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich), and a 1:1000 dilution of brefeldin A (GolgiPlug, BD Biosciences).

Flow Cytometry

Single-cell suspensions were incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C in Hank’s buffered salt solution (HBSS) with combinations of fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against the following surface markers for a lymphoid panel: CD45 (clone − 30-F11, BD), NK1.1 (clone - PK136, BD), TCRβ (clone - H57–597, BD), CD90.2 (clone − 30-H12, BD), CD4 (clone - RM4/5, Biolegend), NKp46 (clone − 29A1.4, Biolegend), CD49a (clone - Ha31/8, BD), TCRγδ (clone - GL3, Invitrogen), CD8β (clone - H35–17.2, Invitrogen). Single-cell were incubated for 30 minutes at 4° in HBSS with combinations of fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against the following surface markers for a myeloid panel: CD45 (clone − 30-F11, BD), CD103 (clone - M290, BD), MHC-II (clone − 2G9, BD), CD11b (clone - M1/70, BD), CD64 (clone - X54–5/7.1, Biolegend), F4/80 (clone - BM8, Invitrogen), Ly6C (clone - HK1.4, Biolegend), CD90.2 (clone − 30-H12, BD), Ly6G (clone − 1A8, Biolegend), CD11c (clone - N418, Biolegend), B220 (clone - RA3–6B2, Biolegend).

To exclude dead cells, single cell suspensions were incubated with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to kit instructions. Cells were then fixed and permeabilized with the Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience) and cells were incubated with intracellular antibodies at 4°C for 1 hour at room temperature. Combinations of fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against the following intracellular markers for a lymphoid panel include: Eomes (clone - Dan11mag, Invitrogen), Ki67 (clone - SolA15, Invitrogen), RORγT (clone - Q31–378, BD), T-bet (clone − 4B10, Biolegend), Foxp3 (clone - FJK-16s, Invitrogen), GATA3 (clone - TWAJ, Invitrogen), IL-17 (clone - TC11–18H10.1, Biolegend) and IFNγ (clone -XMG1.2, Invitrogen). Each staining was performed in the presence of purified anti-mouse CD16/32 (clone 93) and the extracellular staining was performed in the presence of BD Horizon™ Brilliant Stain Buffer. Cell acquisition was performed on a spectral flow cytometer (Cytek Aurora) using SpectroFlo software (Cytek v.1.1) and analyzed using FlowJo Software (BD).

Single Cell RNA sequencing

Littermate WT (n = 4) or IFNLR KO (n = 3) mice were treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate, and the uteri were collected and digested as described above. Isolated cells were stained with antibodies against surface markers and TotalSeq-A hashtag oligonucleotide (HTO) antibodies (Biolegend) (Supplementary Table 1). Hashtags with not enough reads (due to insufficient staining) were excluded from the downstream analysis. Cells were sorted and pooled together on a Sony MA900 sorter as live (DAPI−) EpCam+CD45− or as live (DAPI−) and CD45+. The Chromium Single Cell Controller (10X Genomics) was overloaded with one lane containing ~ 10,000 EpCam+ cells (~ 1250 cells per sample) and another lane containing ~ 22,000 CD45+ cells (~ 2750 cells per sample) per lane. Libraries were prepared using a Chromium Single Cell 5’ Reagent kit following the manufacturer’s guidelines. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Nextseq2000 (Next Seq 1000/2000 P2 XLEAP-SBS 200 cycle kit, Illumina), with the EpCam+ library run on two flow cells and the CD45+ library run on four flow cells. Illumina files were converted to the FASTQ format using bcl-convert v4.2.7 command. 10x Genomics Cell Ranger v8.0.1 was used to process gene expression and hashtag oligonucleotide (HTO) data. First, the “cellranger mkref” command was used to generate a custom reference based on the mm10 (GRCm39) mouse genome primary assembly and the Ensembl release 113 protein-coding gene annotations. Next, “cellranger multi” was employed to generate gene expression and HTO count matrices.

The sequencing quality was high in the EpCam+ library, with > 95.6% of bases in the barcode and UMI regions having a Q30 quality score and > 93% of bases in the RNA reads having a Q30 quality score. The median gene count was 2,441 with a sequencing saturation of 61% for the EpCam+ library and about 85.5% of EpCam+ reads mapped confidently to the transcriptome. The mean read count per cell was ~ 21,517 in the EpCam+ library. For the EpCam+ library only singlet cells with less than 5% mitochondrial contamination were used for downstream analysis, leaving 6,038 cells. The sequencing quality was high in the CD45+ library with > 95.6% of bases in the barcode and UMI regions having a Q30 quality score and > 90.3% of bases in the RNA reads having a Q30 quality score. The median gene count per cell was 1,293 with a sequencing saturation of 86.13% for the CD45+ library and about 67.86% of CD45+ reads mapped confidently to the transcriptome. The mean read count per cell was ~ 36,627 in the CD45+ library. For the CD45+ library only singlet cells with less than five percent mitochondrial contamination were used for downstream analysis, leaving 6,945 cells.

scRNAseq data analysis

Downstream scRNAseq analyses were conducted using Seurat v5.1.0115. HTO demultiplexing was performed on centered log-ratio (CLR)-transformed HTO counts using the “HTODemux” function, with “positive.quantile = 0.99” and “nsamples = total number of cells”. Cells classified as “Singlet” in the “HTO_classification.global” output of “HTODemux” were retained for further analysis. Quality control filtering excluded cells with > 5% mitochondrial gene expression, < 500 detected genes, or > 5000 detected genes. Remaining cells were normalized on a per-sample basis using the “SCTransform” function with default parameters. Dimensionality reduction was performed using “RunPCA”, followed by “RunUMAP” based on the top 30 principal components. Cell clustering was performed using “FindNeighbors” and “FindClusters”, with a resolution parameter of 0.3 for EPCAM+ cell sorts and 0.35 for CD45+ cell sorts. Cluster marker genes were identified using “FindAllMarkers” with the following parameters: “min.pct = 0.25”, “logfc.threshold = 0.5”, and “test.use = wilcox.” Cell type annotations of clusters were guided by the results of identified marker genes. Specifically, cluster identities were assigned by comparing these marker genes to known cell type specific markers as previously described and outlined in Supplementary Table 2. Differential gene expression was assessed using the ‘FindMarkers’ function with ‘min.cells.group’ = 3, ‘min.pct’ = 0.01, ‘logfc.threshold’ = 0.1, and ‘test.use’ = 'wilcox'. Genes were considered differentially expressed if they exhibited a Bonferroni-adjusted p-value < 0.05 and an absolute log2 fold change greater than 1. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed on downregulated genes, defined as those with a log2 normalized fold change less than − 2, using clusterProfiler v4.12.6116, while focusing on Biological Process ontology terms. Gene Set Enrichment Analyses (GSEA) were performed using the fgsea v1.30.0 R package, based on average log2-fold changes obtained from the “FindMarkers” function with its “test.use” parameter set to “wilcox” on each cell type.

Cell–cell communication inference was performed using CellChat v2.2.0117 and the included CellChatDB.mouse database of curated mouse ligand–receptor interactions. The standard CellChat workflow for comparing multiple single-cell datasets was applied to WT and IFNLR KO samples independently. Specifically, the following functions were executed using default parameters: “identifyOverExpressedGenes”, “identifyOverExpressedInteractions”, “computeCommunProb”, “filterCommunication”, “computeCommunProbPathway”, “aggregateNet”, and “netAnalysis_computeCentrality”. Differences in intercellular communication networks between IFNLR KO and WT samples were then assessed using the “compareInteractions” function.

Histopathology staining and pathology scoring

Placentas were harvested and formalin fixed. Samples were processed per a standard protocol. Briefly, the tissues were processed with the Histocore Pegasus tissue processor (Leica Biosystems), embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 5 μm for histological analysis. Tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for routine histopathology on the Lecia ST5010 Autostainer XL (Leica Biosystems). Sections were examined by light microscopy using an Olympus BX51 microscope and photomicrographs were taken using an Olympus DP28 camera. Pathology scoring for severity of decidual necrosis and inflammation was performed on a scale from 0 to 4. 0 indicated an absence of observed necrosis; 1 (minimal) indicated the presence of 1 well defined focal area of necrosis; 2 (mild) indicated a focally extensive area or more than one foci of necrosis; 3 (mild to moderate) multiple or coalescing foci of necrosis with vascular necrosis or vasculitis; and 4 (moderate to severe) extensive severe necrosis with inflammation, hemorrhage, and congestion.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Groups were compared with Prism V10.5 software (GraphPad) using the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Holm-Šidák multiple-comparison test, or two-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák multiple-comparison test where appropriate. Outliers were identified and censored using the ROUT method (Supplementary Fig. 3H, 3J). Differences were considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Files

This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.

Acknowledgments:

We thank K. Beacht, E. Lewis, the NIAID animal facility, and the NIAID Microbiome Program’s gnotobiotic animal facility for technical support. Finally, we thank all the Belkaid and Sereti laboratory members for their generous support and providing feedback on this project and manuscript. Some figures were created with BioRender.com.

Funding:

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The contributions of the NIH authors are considered Works of the United States Government. The findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ES, AR, EAG, CM, and IS are supported by the Division of Intramural Research of NIAID (NIAID; 1ZIA-AI001132, 1ZIA-AI001121, and 1ZIC-AI001233). ES is in part supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Postdoctoral Research Associate Fellowship (1FI-2GM150424).

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The contributions of the NIH authors are considered Works of the United States Government. The findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ES, AR, EAG, CM, and IS are supported by the Division of Intramural Research of NIAID (NIAID; 1ZIA-AI001132, 1ZIA-AI001121, and 1ZIC-AI001233). ES is in part supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Postdoctoral Research Associate Fellowship (1FI-2GM150424).

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Contributor Information

Elisha Segrist, NIGMS.

Anne Roman, NIGMS.

Eduard Ansaldo, NIAID.

P. Juliana Perez-Chaparro, NIH.

Colton McNinch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Derron Alves, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Kevin Bock, National Institutes of Health.

Irini Sereti, NIAID.

Yasmine Belkaid, Immunology Department/Pasteur Institute.

Data and materials availability:

scRNAseq data were deposited into the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data repository (GSE314086). All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.

References

  • 1.Wira C. R., Rodriguez-Garcia M. & Patel M. V. The role of sex hormones in immune protection of the female reproductive tract. Nat Rev Immunol 15, 217–230 (2015). 10.1038/nri3819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Robinson D. P. & Klein S. L. Pregnancy and pregnancy-associated hormones alter immune responses and disease pathogenesis. Horm Behav 62, 263–271 (2012). 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.02.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Förger F. & Villiger P. M. Immunological adaptations in pregnancy that modulate rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Nature Reviews Rheumatology 16, 113–122 (2020). 10.1038/s41584-019-0351-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Belkaid Y. & Harrison O. J. Homeostatic Immunity and the Microbiota. Immunity 46, 562–576 (2017). 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anahtar M. N., Gootenberg D. B., Mitchell C. M. & Kwon D. S. Cervicovaginal Microbiota and Reproductive Health: The Virtue of Simplicity. Cell Host Microbe 23, 159–168 (2018). 10.1016/j.chom.2018.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Byrne E. H. et al. Antigen Presenting Cells Link the Female Genital Tract Microbiome to Mucosal Inflammation, With Hormonal Contraception as an Additional Modulator of Inflammatory Signatures. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11, 733619 (2021). 10.3389/fcimb.2021.733619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gosmann C. et al. Lactobacillus-Deficient Cervicovaginal Bacterial Communities Are Associated with Increased HIV Acquisition in Young South African Women. Immunity 46, 29–37 (2017). 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.12.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Anton L., Cristancho A. G., Ferguson B., Ravel J. & Elovitz M. A. Cervicovaginal microbiome alters transcriptomic and epigenomic signatures across cervicovaginal epithelial barriers. Res Sq (2025). 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6171614/v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Anton L. et al. Gardnerella vaginalis alters cervicovaginal epithelial cell function through microbe-specific immune responses. Microbiome 10, 119 (2022). 10.1186/s40168-022-01317-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elovitz M. A. et al. Cervicovaginal microbiota and local immune response modulate the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Nat Commun 10, 1305 (2019). 10.1038/s41467-019-09285-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hasegawa Y. et al. Mobiluncus mulieris alters the transcriptomic profile of cervicovaginal epithelial cells, shedding light on molecular drivers of adverse reproductive outcomes. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 11, 154 (2025). 10.1038/s41522-025-00784-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Joseph A. et al. Extracellular vesicles from vaginal Gardnerella vaginalis and Mobiluncus mulieris contain distinct proteomic cargo and induce inflammatory pathways. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 10, 28 (2024). 10.1038/s41522-024-00502-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baker J. M., Chase D. M. & Herbst-Kralovetz M. M. Uterine Microbiota: Residents, Tourists, or Invaders? Front Immunol 9, 208 (2018). 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Winters A. D. et al. Does the endometrial cavity have a molecular microbial signature? Scientific Reports 9, 9905 (2019). 10.1038/s41598-019-46173-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen H. J. & Gur T. L. Intrauterine Microbiota: Missing, or the Missing Link? Trends Neurosci 42, 402–413 (2019). 10.1016/j.tins.2019.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Surve M. V. et al. Membrane Vesicles of Group B Streptococcus Disrupt Feto-Maternal Barrier Leading to Preterm Birth. PLoS Pathog 12, e1005816 (2016). 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gonzalez J. M., Franzke C. W., Yang F., Romero R. & Girardi G. Complement activation triggers metalloproteinases release inducing cervical remodeling and preterm birth in mice. Am J Pathol 179, 838–849 (2011). 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.04.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Megli C. J. & Coyne C. B. Infections at the maternal–fetal interface: an overview of pathogenesis and defence. Nature Reviews Microbiology 20, 67–82 (2022). 10.1038/s41579-021-00610-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moore C. A. et al. Characterizing the Pattern of Anomalies in Congenital Zika Syndrome for Pediatric Clinicians. JAMA Pediatrics 171, 288–295 (2017). 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lazear H. M., Schoggins J. W. & Diamond M. S. Shared and Distinct Functions of Type I and Type III Interferons. Immunity 50, 907–923 (2019). 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wells A. I. & Coyne C. B. Type III Interferons in Antiviral Defenses at Barrier Surfaces. Trends Immunol 39, 848–858 (2018). 10.1016/j.it.2018.08.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Boehmer D. & Zanoni I. Interferons in health and disease. Cell 188, 4480–4504 (2025). 10.1016/j.cell.2025.06.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Planet P. J. et al. Lambda Interferon Restructures the Nasal Microbiome and Increases Susceptibility to Staphylococcus aureus Superinfection. mBio 7, e01939–01915 (2016). 10.1128/mBio.01939-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Philip D. T. et al. Interferon lambda restricts herpes simplex virus skin disease by suppressing neutrophil-mediated pathology. bioRxiv (2023). 10.1101/2023.09.11.557277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Broggi A. et al. Type III interferons disrupt the lung epithelial barrier upon viral recognition. Science 369, 706–712 (2020). doi: 10.1126/science.abc3545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lazear H. M. et al. Interferon-lambda restricts West Nile virus neuroinvasion by tightening the blood-brain barrier. Sci Transl Med 7, 284ra259 (2015). 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa4304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Galani I. E. et al. Interferon-λ Mediates Non-redundant Front-Line Antiviral Protection against Influenza Virus Infection without Compromising Host Fitness. Immunity 46, 875–890.e876 (2017). 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bayer A. et al. Type III Interferons Produced by Human Placental Trophoblasts Confer Protection against Zika Virus Infection. Cell Host Microbe 19, 705–712 (2016). 10.1016/j.chom.2016.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Baldridge M. T. et al. Commensal microbes and interferon-λ determine persistence of enteric murine norovirus infection. Science 347, 266–269 (2015). 10.1126/science.1258025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nice T. J. et al. Interferon-λ cures persistent murine norovirus infection in the absence of adaptive immunity. Science 347, 269–273 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.1258100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ingle H. et al. Viral complementation of immunodeficiency confers protection against enteric pathogens via interferon-λ. Nature Microbiology 4, 1120–1128 (2019). 10.1038/s41564-019-0416-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Van Winkle J. A. et al. Homeostatic interferon-lambda response to bacterial microbiota stimulates preemptive antiviral defense within discrete pockets of intestinal epithelium. eLife 11, e74072 (2022). 10.7554/eLife.74072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Casazza R. L., Philip D. T. & Lazear H. M. Interferon Lambda Signals in Maternal Tissues to Exert Protective and Pathogenic Effects in a Gestational Stage-Dependent Manner. mBio 13, e0385721 (2022). 10.1128/mbio.03857-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Caine E. A. et al. Interferon lambda protects the female reproductive tract against Zika virus infection. Nat Commun 10, 280 (2019). 10.1038/s41467-018-07993-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yockey L. J. et al. Type I interferons instigate fetal demise after Zika virus infection. Sci Immunol 3 (2018). 10.1126/sciimmunol.aao1680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jagger B. W. et al. Gestational Stage and IFN-λ Signaling Regulate ZIKV Infection In Utero. Cell Host & Microbe 22, 366–376.e363 (2017). 10.1016/j.chom.2017.08.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yang L., Liang P., Yang H. & Coyne C. B. Trophoblast organoids with physiological polarity model placental structure and function. Journal of Cell Science 137 (2023). 10.1242/jcs.261528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yang L. et al. Innate immune signaling in trophoblast and decidua organoids defines differential antiviral defenses at the maternal-fetal interface. Elife 11 (2022). 10.7554/eLife.79794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Azamor T. et al. Decidual production of interferon lambda in response to ZIKV persistence: Clinical evidence and in vitro modelling. Heliyon 10 (2024). 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rossi Á D. et al. Association between Maternal Non-Coding Interferon-λ Polymorphisms and Congenital Zika Syndrome in a Cohort from Brazilian Northeast. Viruses 13 (2021). 10.3390/v13112253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Miner Jonathan J. et al. Zika Virus Infection during Pregnancy in Mice Causes Placental Damage and Fetal Demise. Cell 165, 1081–1091 (2016). 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bierne H. et al. Activation of type III interferon genes by pathogenic bacteria in infected epithelial cells and mouse placenta. PLoS One 7, e39080 (2012). 10.1371/journal.pone.0039080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bianchi-Jassir F. et al. Preterm Birth Associated With Group B Streptococcus Maternal Colonization Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Clin Infect Dis 65, S133–S142 (2017). 10.1093/cid/cix661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gibbs R. S. & Duff P. Progress in pathogenesis and management of clinical intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164, 1317–1326 (1991). 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90707-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Morgan J. A., Zafar N. & Cooper D. B. in StatPearls (2024). [PubMed]
  • 46.Jain V. G., Willis K. A., Jobe A. & Ambalavanan N. Chorioamnionitis and neonatal outcomes. Pediatr Res 91, 289–296 (2022). 10.1038/s41390-021-01633-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Newton E. R. Chorioamnionitis and intraamniotic infection. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36, 795–808 (1993). 10.1097/00003081-199312000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fassett M. J., Wing D. A. & Getahun D. Temporal trends in chorioamnionitis by maternal race/ethnicity and gestational age (1995–2010). Int J Reprod Med 2013, 906467 (2013). 10.1155/2013/906467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gonçalves B. P. et al. Group B streptococcus infection during pregnancy and infancy: estimates of regional and global burden. The Lancet Global Health 10, e807–e819 (2022). 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00093-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kristal E., Shitrit I. B., Faitelson Y., Hazan G. & Beigelman A. Postnatal antibiotic exposure due to maternal group B streptococcus is associated with childhood asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 36, e70167 (2025). 10.1111/pai.70167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vornhagen J., Adams Waldorf K. M. & Rajagopal L. Perinatal Group B Streptococcal Infections: Virulence Factors, Immunity, and Prevention Strategies. Trends in Microbiology 25, 919–931 (2017). 10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Walmer D. K., Wrona M. A., Hughes C. L. & Nelson K. G. Lactoferrin expression in the mouse reproductive tract during the natural estrous cycle: correlation with circulating estradiol and progesterone. Endocrinology 131, 1458–1466 (1992). 10.1210/endo.131.3.1505477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sojka D. K. et al. Cutting Edge: Local Proliferation of Uterine Tissue-Resident NK Cells during Decidualization in Mice. J Immunol 201, 2551–2556 (2018). 10.4049/jimmunol.1800651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Byers S. L., Wiles M. V., Dunn S. L. & Taft R. A. Mouse Estrous Cycle Identification Tool and Images. PLOS ONE 7, e35538 (2012). 10.1371/journal.pone.0035538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Constantinides M. G. et al. MAIT cells are imprinted by the microbiota in early life and promote tissue repair. Science 366 (2019). 10.1126/science.aax6624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Enamorado M. et al. Immunity to the microbiota promotes sensory neuron regeneration. Cell 186, 607–620.e617 (2023). 10.1016/j.cell.2022.12.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lima-Junior D. S. et al. Endogenous retroviruses promote homeostatic and inflammatory responses to the microbiota. Cell 184, 3794–3811 e3719 (2021). 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Linehan J. L. et al. Non-classical Immunity Controls Microbiota Impact on Skin Immunity and Tissue Repair. Cell 172, 784–796.e718 (2018). 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Naik S. et al. Commensal-dendritic-cell interaction specifies a unique protective skin immune signature. Nature 520, 104–108 (2015). 10.1038/nature14052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Naik S. et al. Compartmentalized control of skin immunity by resident commensals. Science 337, 1115–1119 (2012). 10.1126/science.1225152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.McCoy J. A. et al. Cervicovaginal Microbial-Immune State and Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 41, e2539–e2546 (2024). 10.1055/s-0043-1772226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rosen G. H. et al. Group B Streptococcus and the Vaginal Microbiota. J Infect Dis 216, 744–751 (2017). 10.1093/infdis/jix395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Patras K. A. & Doran K. S. A Murine Model of Group B Streptococcus Vaginal Colonization. J Vis Exp (2016). 10.3791/54708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rahman N., Mian M. F., Nazli A. & Kaushic C. Human vaginal microbiota colonization is regulated by female sex hormones in a mouse model. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology Volume 13 - 2023 (2023). 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1307451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Minooei F. et al. Rapid-dissolving electrospun nanofibers for intra-vaginal antibiotic or probiotic delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 190, 81–93 (2023). 10.1016/j.ejpb.2023.07.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wolfarth A. A. et al. A Human Microbiota-Associated Murine Model for Assessing the Impact of the Vaginal Microbiota on Pregnancy Outcomes. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology Volume 10 - 2020 (2020). 10.3389/fcimb.2020.570025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mejia M. E. et al. Vaginal microbial dynamics and pathogen colonization in a humanized microbiota mouse model. npj Biofilms and Microbiomes 9, 87 (2023). 10.1038/s41522-023-00454-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Brokaw A., Furuta A., Dacanay M., Rajagopal L. & Adams Waldorf K. M. Bacterial and Host Determinants of Group B Streptococcal Vaginal Colonization and Ascending Infection in Pregnancy. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11, 720789 (2021). 10.3389/fcimb.2021.720789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Armistead B., Oler E., Adams Waldorf K. & Rajagopal L. The Double Life of Group B Streptococcus: Asymptomatic Colonizer and Potent Pathogen. Journal of Molecular Biology 431, 2914–2931 (2019). 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Carey A. J. et al. Infection and Cellular Defense Dynamics in a Novel 17β-Estradiol Murine Model of Chronic Human Group B Streptococcus Genital Tract Colonization Reveal a Role for Hemolysin in Persistence and Neutrophil Accumulation. The Journal of Immunology 192, 1718–1731 (2014). 10.4049/jimmunol.1202811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Meyn L. A., Krohn M. A. & Hillier S. L. Rectal colonization by group B Streptococcus as a predictor of vaginal colonization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201, 76.e71–77 (2009). 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Brigtsen A. K. et al. Group B Streptococcus colonization at delivery is associated with maternal peripartum infection. PLoS One 17, e0264309 (2022). 10.1371/journal.pone.0264309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Abt Michael C. et al. Commensal Bacteria Calibrate the Activation Threshold of Innate Antiviral Immunity. Immunity 37, 158–170 (2012). 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Vasquez Ayala A. et al. Commensal bacteria promote type I interferon signaling to maintain immune tolerance in mice. J Exp Med 221 (2024). 10.1084/jem.20230063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Erttmann S. F. et al. The gut microbiota prime systemic antiviral immunity via the cGAS-STING-IFN-I axis. Immunity 55, 847–861.e810 (2022). 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Schaupp L. et al. Microbiota-Induced Type I Interferons Instruct a Poised Basal State of Dendritic Cells. Cell 181, 1080–1096.e1019 (2020). 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Stefan K. L., Kim M. V., Iwasaki A. & Kasper D. L. Commensal Microbiota Modulation of Natural Resistance to Virus Infection. Cell 183, 1312–1324.e1310 (2020). 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Patel M. V., Hopkins D. C., Barr F. D. & Wira C. R. Sex Hormones and Aging Modulate Interferon Lambda 1 Production and Signaling by Human Uterine Epithelial Cells and Fibroblasts. Front Immunol 12, 718380 (2021). 10.3389/fimmu.2021.718380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Harding A. T. & Heaton N. S. The Impact of Estrogens and Their Receptors on Immunity and Inflammation during Infection. Cancers 14, 909 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Vermillion M. S., Ursin R. L., Attreed S. E. & Klein S. L. Estriol Reduces Pulmonary Immune Cell Recruitment and Inflammation to Protect Female Mice From Severe Influenza. Endocrinology 159, 3306–3320 (2018). 10.1210/en.2018-00486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Broggi A., Tan Y., Granucci F. & Zanoni I. IFN-lambda suppresses intestinal inflammation by non-translational regulation of neutrophil function. Nat Immunol 18, 1084–1093 (2017). 10.1038/ni.3821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Gibson A. R. et al. A genetic screen identifies a protective type III interferon response to Cryptosporidium that requires TLR3 dependent recognition. PLoS Pathog 18, e1010003 (2022). 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Jacobs S., Zeippen C., Wavreil F., Gillet L. & Michiels T. IFN-lambda Decreases Murid Herpesvirus-4 Infection of the Olfactory Epithelium but Fails to Prevent Virus Reactivation in the Vaginal Mucosa. Viruses 11 (2019). 10.3390/v11080757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Parlato S. et al. LOX-1 as a natural IFN-α–mediated signal for apoptotic cell uptake and antigen presentation in dendritic cells. Blood 115, 1554–1563 (2010). 10.1182/blood-2009-07-234468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Korn T., Bettelli E., Oukka M. & Kuchroo V. K. IL-17 and Th17 Cells. Annu Rev Immunol 27, 485–517 (2009). 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Jin S. et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nature Communications 12, 1088 (2021). 10.1038/s41467-021-21246-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Boxx G. M. & Cheng G. The Roles of Type I Interferon in Bacterial Infection. Cell Host Microbe 19, 760–769 (2016). 10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pires S., Kaiser K. & Parker D. Type III interferon drives pathogenicity to Staphylococcus aureus via the airway epithelium. mBio 15, e0113024 (2024). 10.1128/mbio.01130-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ahn D., Wickersham M., Riquelme S. & Prince A. The Effects of IFN-λ on Epithelial Barrier Function Contribute to Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 Pneumonia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 60, 158–166 (2019). 10.1165/rcmb.2018-0021OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kumar A., Johnson D., Bukowski A., Noto M. J. & Carbonetti N. H. Interferon lambda signaling in neutrophils enhances the pathogenesis of Bordetella pertussis infection. J Leukoc Biol 117 (2025). 10.1093/jleuko/qiae202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ank N. et al. Lambda interferon (IFN-lambda), a type III IFN, is induced by viruses and IFNs and displays potent antiviral activity against select virus infections in vivo. J Virol 80, 4501–4509 (2006). 10.1128/jvi.80.9.4501-4509.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Mercado-Evans V. et al. Gestational diabetes augments group B Streptococcus infection by disrupting maternal immunity and the vaginal microbiota. Nat Commun 15, 1035 (2024). 10.1038/s41467-024-45336-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Coleman M. et al. GBS hyaluronidase mediates immune suppression in a TLR2/4- and IL-10-dependent manner during pregnancy-associated infection. mBio 14, e0204923 (2023). 10.1128/mbio.02049-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ward J. M., Elmore S. A. & Foley J. F. Pathology Methods for the Evaluation of Embryonic and Perinatal Developmental Defects and Lethality in Genetically Engineered Mice. Veterinary Pathology 49, 71–84 (2012). 10.1177/0300985811429811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Randis T. M. et al. Group B Streptococcus beta-hemolysin/cytolysin breaches maternal-fetal barriers to cause preterm birth and intrauterine fetal demise in vivo. J Infect Dis 210, 265–273 (2014). 10.1093/infdis/jiu067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Flaherty R. A. et al. Modulation of Death and Inflammatory Signaling in Decidual Stromal Cells following Exposure to Group B Streptococcus. Infect Immun 87 (2019). 10.1128/iai.00729-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Andrade E. B. et al. A mouse model reproducing the pathophysiology of neonatal group B streptococcal infection. Nature Communications 9, 3138 (2018). 10.1038/s41467-018-05492-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.MacLean F. et al. Bacterial vaginosis-driven changes in cervicovaginal immunity that expand the immunological hypothesis for increased HIV susceptibility. bioRxiv (2025). 10.1101/2024.07.03.601916 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Sabo M. C. et al. Bacterial Vaginosis Is Associated With Transcriptomic Changes but Not Higher Concentrations of Cervical Leukocytes in a Study of Women at High Risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Acquisition. J Infect Dis 231, 1407–1424 (2025). 10.1093/infdis/jiaf049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Gogacz M. et al. Increased percentage of Th17 cells in peritoneal fluid is associated with severity of endometriosis. Journal of Reproductive Immunology 117, 39–44 (2016). 10.1016/j.jri.2016.04.289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ahn S. H. et al. IL-17A Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis by Triggering Proinflammatory Cytokines and Angiogenic Growth Factors. The Journal of Immunology 195, 2591–2600 (2015). 10.4049/jimmunol.1501138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hirata T. et al. Interleukin-17F increases the secretion of interleukin-8 and the expression of cyclooxygenase 2 in endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility 96, 113–117 (2011). 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Xu Y. et al. Innate lymphoid cells at the human maternal-fetal interface in spontaneous preterm labor. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 79, e12820 (2018). 10.1111/aji.12820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Gomez-Lopez N. et al. The immunobiology of preterm labor and birth: intra-amniotic inflammation or breakdown of maternal–fetal homeostasis. Reproduction 164, R11–R45 (2022). 10.1530/rep-22-0046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Santner-Nanan B. et al. Systemic increase in the ratio between Foxp3+ and IL-17-producing CD4+ T cells in healthy pregnancy but not in preeclampsia. J Immunol 183, 7023–7030 (2009). 10.4049/jimmunol.0901154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Wang W. J. et al. Increased prevalence of T helper 17 (Th17) cells in peripheral blood and decidua in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion patients. J Reprod Immunol 84, 164–170 (2010). 10.1016/j.jri.2009.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.DiGiulio D. B. et al. Temporal and spatial variation of the human microbiota during pregnancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112, 11060–11065 (2015). 10.1073/pnas.1502875112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Fettweis J. M. et al. The vaginal microbiome and preterm birth. Nat Med 25, 1012–1021 (2019). 10.1038/s41591-019-0450-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Leonardi M., Hicks C., El-Assaad F., El-Omar E. & Condous G. Endometriosis and the microbiome: a systematic review. Bjog 127, 239–249 (2020). 10.1111/1471-0528.15916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Seale A. C. et al. Maternal colonization with Streptococcus agalactiae and associated stillbirth and neonatal disease in coastal Kenya. Nat Microbiol 1, 16067 (2016). 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ge D. et al. Genetic variation in IL28B predicts hepatitis C treatment-induced viral clearance. Nature 461, 399–401 (2009). 10.1038/nature08309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Janakiraman V. Listeriosis in pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Rev Obstet Gynecol 1, 179–185 (2008). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lin J. D. et al. Distinct Roles of Type I and Type III Interferons in Intestinal Immunity to Homologous and Heterologous Rotavirus Infections. PLoS Pathog 12, e1005600 (2016). 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sheehan K. C. F. et al. Blocking Monoclonal Antibodies Specific for Mouse IFN-α/β Receptor Subunit 1 (IFNAR-1) from Mice Immunized by In Vivo Hydrodynamic Transfection. Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research 26, 804–819 (2006). 10.1089/jir.2006.26.804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hao Y. et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nature Biotechnology 42, 293–304 (2024). 10.1038/s41587-023-01767-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Wu T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb) 2, 100141 (2021). 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Jin S., Plikus M. V. & Nie Q. CellChat for systematic analysis of cell–cell communication from single-cell transcriptomics. Nature Protocols 20, 180–219 (2025). 10.1038/s41596-024-01045-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

scRNAseq data were deposited into the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data repository (GSE314086). All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.


Articles from Research Square are provided here courtesy of American Journal Experts

RESOURCES