Abstract
In populations of many animal species, including humans, mortality rates increase exponentially with advancing age. The scale and rate of increase can be set by two parameters, α and β, respectively, of the Gompertz equation. Interventions that extend lifespan can reduce either or both parameters. A long-standing supposition is that β corresponds to biological ageing rate, and α to ageing-independent causes of mortality. Here, we investigate the biological basis of α and β using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, through the combined study in populations and individuals of effects of life-extending interventions on mortality and age-changes in health. We demonstrate that reductions in β arise not from slowed biological ageing, but rather from expansion of decrepitude (gerospan) in longer-lived population members. In contrast, reductions in α better reflect healthspan expansion, an indicator of slowed biological ageing. Thus, our investigation presents a new, empirical understanding of the Gompertz parameters that inverts their traditional interpretations.
Subject terms: Ageing, Population dynamics, Epidemiology
Zhang and Gems show that mortality rate acceleration in nematode populations reflects individual variation in the duration of late-life decline, not biological ageing rate, challenging long-standing views in the biodemography of ageing.
Introduction
Ageing (senescence) is the main cause of disease and death in the world today1. Studies of the biology of ageing often employ short-lived animal models such as the nematode C. elegans. Though biological ageing affects individuals, researchers investigating it frequently use demographic (population) ageing as a metric2,3. However, it is difficult to link demographic metrics (e.g. changes in mean lifespan) to determinative biological mechanisms.
This is true of a salient and enigmatic feature of demographic ageing: the exponential increase in all-cause mortality rate during adulthood, that is common (though not universal) among animal species4,5. This was described in human populations two centuries ago by Benjamin Gompertz, and his eponymous equation6,7
| 1 |
Here, mortality rate μ(x) at age x is a function of a scale parameter α and rate parameter β, with the latter specifying the mortality rate acceleration with age. Accordingly, α and β together determine survival, and mortality rate and frequency functions (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1. Effects of life-extending treatments on biological and demographic parameters.
a Effects of decreasing α and β on demographic measures. Control: α, β: 0.002, 0.2; ↓α: α, β: 0.0005, 0.2; ↓β: α, β: 0.002, 0.1. First panel, effect on mortality rate. Here, α and β respectively control the scale and rate of exponential mortality rate increase. Second panel, effect on ln-transformed mortality rate. This transforms the exponential into a straight line, where α and β respectively control its intercept and gradient. Though a simple means to visualise α and β effects, this practice can be misleading and lead to improper parameter estimation14,53–55. Third panel, effect on survival proportion. Here, α and β approximately shift and stretch, respectively, the survival curve along the x-axis. Fourth panel, effect on mortality frequency. Here, α and β approximately shift and stretch, respectively, the mortality frequency distribution along the x-axis. That is, inter-individual lifespan variation is increased more by reductions in β than α40. b–e Life-extending interventions disproportionately extend gerospan (G-span). Effects of b reduced temperature, c carbenicillin, and d daf-2(rf) on mean relative gerospan (G-spanrel). daf-2(e1368) was previously observed to increase G-spanrel at 20°C38; that we did not see this could reflect differences in how G-span was measured. N2, wild-type. Statistical significance of G-spanrel differences was assessed by two-tailed Student’s t-tests (p values annotated), showing 95% confidence intervals. e Mean G-spanrel is positively related to mean lifespan across the 24 cohorts, assessed by least-squares linear regression and F-test, showing 95% confidence regions. f–h Correspondence between reduced β and increased relative gerospan. Effects of f reduced temperature, g carbenicillin, and h daf-2(rf) on β and relative gerospan (G-spanrel). G-spanrel values, 95% confidence intervals and statistical significance symbols are replotted from b–d and β calculated by maximum likelihood estimation, and statistical significance of β differences assessed by likelihood ratio tests, showing 95% confidence intervals. Analyses in b–h were performed on the pool of 4 biological replicates (Trials 3–6, see Supplementary Table 1 for sample sizes), with censored individuals excluded in b–e and right censored in f–h. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
But to what do these demographic parameters correspond in terms of biological ageing, within individuals? Because α quantifies the initial mortality rate prior to ageing (x = 0, usually defined as in early adulthood), it is widely interpreted as relating to ageing-independent mortality, arising for example from extrinsic hazards or intrinsic vulnerabilities8,9. By contrast, β describes the rate of mortality rate increase, and because mortality rate increase has been traditionally defined as ageing, β has thus become widely interpreted as capturing the rate of ageing. Here, equivalence between demographic ageing (mortality rate increase) and biological ageing (rate of ageing) is assumed. However, these standard biological interpretations of α and β have been challenged10–17, and to our knowledge have yet to be empirically validated by direct comparison of demographic and biological ageing. While the relationship between lifespan and late-life health has been investigated previously, including in C. elegans18–27, the specific question of the biological basis of the Gompertz parameters has not been directly and empirically examined.
Here, we explore the biological meaning of α and β in terms of age changes in health at the individual level. To this end, we simultaneously quantified biological and demographic ageing by means of longitudinal analysis of individual C. elegans subjected to life-extending interventions. Specifically, we investigated: (1) how life-extension affects the duration of healthy versus decrepit life, (2) whether such changes in health/decrepitude correlate with changes in the Gompertz parameters, (3) whether these correlations can be explained causally, and (4) whether the Gompertz parameters can be causally related to specific ageing-related pathologies. We will present our results in the order of these aims. In brief, we find that β is a measure of inter-individual variability in gerospan (late-life decrepitude) rather than biological ageing rate, and α of biological ageing rate rather than ageing-independent processes.
Results
We examined the effects on biological and demographic ageing of three types of intervention that increase C. elegans lifespan: (i) reduction of ambient temperature from 25°C to 20°C and 15°C, which has both thermodynamic and gene-mediated effects upon nematode ageing2,28,29, (ii) prevention of late-life infection (by dietary E. coli) using antibiotics30, and (iii) reduction-of-function (rf) mutation of the daf-2 insulin/IGF-1 receptor3,31, specifically the class 1 alleles daf-2(m577) and daf-2(e1368), and the class 2 (more pleiotropic) allele daf-2(e1370).
Lifespan was measured for all 24 combinations of conditions (3 temperatures, ± carbenicillin, 4 genotypes) in 6 successive trials. To relate the Gompertz parameters to individual-level biological ageing features, in 4/6 trials, all animals were tracked individually and their locomotory health assessed every 2–3 days until death. Adapting an established protocol32,33, animals were scored as either youthful (healthy, sinusoidal locomotion) or decrepit (non-sinusoidal/uncoordinated locomotion or immotility) following controlled physical stimulation with a platinum wire; this induces an escape response that reveals true locomotory capacity rather than behavioural locomotory preference19. We will refer to absolute and relative healthspan (H-spanabs, H-spanrel) and gerospan (G-spanabs, G-spanrel) to describe, respectively, the total number of days or proportion of life spent in youthfulness or decrepitude. In other words, for every individual, H-spanabs + G-spanabs = lifespan, and H-spanrel + G-spanrel = 1. Necropsies23 were also performed to determine the mode of death of animals in these 4 trials.
Unless indicated otherwise, we will characterise the relationship between demographic and biological ageing using the combined pool of these 4 trials described above (n = 116–179/cohort), as they collected both lifespan and health data. Mean lifespan and the Gompertz parameters (calculated by maximum likelihood estimation34) were stable between these 4 trials (Supplementary Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table 1), and the Gompertz model provided an excellent fit to their combined pooling, predicting mean, median, and first and third quartile lifespans across the 24 cohorts with R2 = 0.98–1.00 (Supplementary Fig. 2a–b, e–h). To confirm that sample sizes are sufficient for model fitting, and that these Gompertz parameters are representative of these cohorts, we ran two additional larger trials (measuring lifespan only), increasing total pooled sample sizes by 2–3-fold to 326–396/cohort (Supplementary Table 1). Notably, the Gompertz fit still predicted the above lifespan measures, with R2 = 0.97–0.99 (Supplementary Fig. 2c–d, e–h), and the Gompertz parameters were near-identical to those from the pool of the 4 smaller trials (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Anderson-Darling goodness-of-fit tests also supported these Gompertzian fits in most cohorts (21–22/24) despite localised deviations within some (Supplementary Table 2).
These data are therefore consistent between trials and robustly fitted by the Gompertz model. Although other mortality models can better fit many C. elegans populations20,35–37, our aim is not to find the very-best-fitting model, but to understand the biological basis of the mathematically parsimonious and widely employed Gompertz model.
i) Three life-extending intervention classes disproportionately extend gerospan
From the 24 cohorts, we focused on a total of 46 treatments of interest: 16 lower temperature treatments (20°C and 15°C, vs 25°C, across antibiotic and genotype backgrounds) + 12 antibiotic treatments (carbenicillin vs no carbenicillin, across temperature and genotype backgrounds) + 18 daf-2(rf) treatments (3 daf-2(rf) alleles vs the N2 wild-type, across temperature and antibiotic backgrounds). As expected2,3,30, almost all (44/46) treatments increased mean lifespan (average class effects for lower temperature, antibiotic and daf-2(rf) treatments: +42.0%, +58.9%, +77.1%, respectively; Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 1).
To begin relating lifespan to the biological ageing process, we asked if these life-extending treatments affect G-spanrel (proportion of life in gerospan). All (12/12) carbenicillin treatments increased G-spanrel (Fig. 1c), in line with a prior report of antibiotic-mediated morbidity expansion38. Somewhat against expectation, 12/16 lower temperature treatments also increased G-spanrel (Fig. 1b). 9/18 daf-2(rf) treatments also increased G-spanrel while only 2/18 decreased it (Fig. 1d). This is broadly consistent with previous reports of morbidity expansion in daf-2(rf) mutants16,18,38, including the finding that this expansion results from greater resistance to life-limiting infection (by the E. coli food source) than wild-type animals26,38. Indeed, at the standard culture temperature of 20°C, daf-2(e1370) increased G-spanrel, and this increase was largely suppressed by carbenicillin (Fig. 1d). However, among other daf-2(rf) allele/temperature combinations, G-spanrel patterns varied markedly, revealing more complex allelic and environmental effects of daf-2(rf) on the relationship between health and lifespan. This condition-dependency may have contributed to disagreements in the literature about daf-2(rf) effects on relative morbidity19,26.
Overall, the longevity interventions tested here mostly increase the proportion of life in poor (aged) health. Indeed, direct regression of mean G-spanrel against mean lifespan for the 24 cohorts revealed a strong positive relationship (Fig. 1e). While gerospan here is necessarily simplified to a single portion of life, its definition (non-sinusoidal locomotion or immotility, despite stimulation) captures well-characterised stages in nematode ageing and is a physiologically integrative measure of overall health32,33. Accordingly, the age of this gerospan onset provides one measure of the overall rate of change in health, or equivalently, a simple estimate of an individual’s overall rate of ageing. Notably, the G-spanrel increases observed across these life-extending treatments argue against a simple deceleration of ageing, which would be expected to stretch H-spanabs and G-spanabs proportionally, leaving G-spanrel unchanged.
ii) Correspondence between reduced β and increased relative gerospan
Next, we considered the central question of this study: the relationship between biological and demographic ageing. To this end, we examined the relationship between effects on G-spanrel and the Gompertz parameters by the 46 life-extending treatments; we start with the rate parameter β, reduction of which is typically equated with decelerated biological ageing.
First, we considered effects of reducing temperature. On carbenicillin, lower temperature decreased β in all genotypes (Fig. 1f), which would be consistent with a general slowing of the rate of living. However, without carbenicillin, β was unchanged in wild-type and even increased in daf-2 mutants, suggesting complex effects of genotype and temperature on host-E. coli interactions. Surprisingly, β reduction by lowered temperature (on carbenicillin) consistently co-occurred with G-spanrel increase (Fig. 1f, right), suggesting that β reduction here reflects neither simply slowed ageing rate nor improved overall quality of life.
We similarly evaluated effects of the antibiotic treatments. Against the expectation that preventing infection (a largely extrinsic insult) might reduce α alone, carbenicillin decreased β in all genotypes at 15°C, and in wild-type and daf-2(e1370) at 20°C (Fig. 1g). In each case, G-spanrel was again increased. In the remaining carbenicillin treatments, both β and G-spanrel were increased, suggesting that β reduction may require G-spanrel increase, but not vice versa.
Finally, we assessed the daf-2(rf) mutations. daf-2(e1370), the severest (and longest-lived) allele, also lowered β while increasing G-spanrel, both off and on carbenicillin, at 15°C and 20°C (Fig. 1h). At 25°C, β was decreased without change in G-spanrel, as an exception to the pattern; similarly, only 3/7 class 1 daf-2(rf) treatments (daf-2(m577) and daf-2(e1368)) reducing β increased G-spanrel. Despite these exceptions, 21/27 (78%) of all treatments that significantly reduced β simultaneously increased G-spanrel. Thus, amongst these life-extending interventions, reduction of β largely reflects expanded decrepitude rather than a simple deceleration of biological ageing. Of course, this does not preclude occurrence of more complex forms of ageing deceleration, as demonstrated in “Results” section (iv).
iii) Reduced β reflects inter-individually variable gerospan expansion
A notable feature of the demography of ageing is the high degree of inter-individual variability in lifespan. This is true of C. elegans, despite their being isogenic and maintained under identical conditions39. An often-overlooked mathematical property of the Gompertz rate parameter β is its inverse relation to lifespan variation, which in comparison is only marginally affected by the α parameter40 (Fig. 1a, fourth panel). Indeed, amongst our 24 treatments, β showed a strong inverse correlation with lifespan standard deviation (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 2. Reduced β reflects inter-individually variable gerospan expansion.
a β is an inverse measure of lifespan standard deviation, across the 24 cohorts. b–g Effects of b low temperature, c–d, carbenicillin, and e–g daf-2(rf) on absolute healthspan and gerospan (upper panels) and relative gerospan (lower panels), plotted as linear regression fits over survival proportion (i.e. x-axis left: shorter-lived individuals, x-axis right: longer-lived individuals). In these plots, each individual is represented by two datapoints (not shown), one for H-span and one for G-span, and individuals are ordered along the x-axis by the survival proportion at their time of death (i.e. survival order). h Expansion of G-span is a more inter-individually variable process than expansion of H-span across all possible pairs of the 24 cohorts. In addition to a higher R2, the steeper G-span linear fit indicates that G-span variation increases faster than H-span variation under life-extending conditions. Consistent with this, the range of values for mean H-span and H-span standard deviation is less than that for G-span. All analyses in this figure are least-squares linear regressions assessed by F-tests and showing 95% confidence regions. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Given this, we wondered whether this increased lifespan variation in small-β cohorts could result from increased inter-individual variation in the ageing process. Interestingly, it was previously estimated that G-span differences account for most (~67%) of the inter-individual lifespan variation in C. elegans21. Thus, the correlation between reduced β and increased G-spanrel in our cohorts may arise from inter-individually variable G-span expansion. To investigate this, we assessed H-spanabs and G-spanabs for all individuals in the 21 treatments displaying an inverse β–G-spanrel relationship, as explained next.
To visualise the variation in H-spanabs and G-spanabs in each cohort population, we regressed individuals’ H-spanabs and G-spanabs values over their survival proportion (Fig. 2b–g, top panels in each); here, the x-axis orders individuals by survival order (left: shorter-lived individuals, right: longer-lived individuals), therefore allowing H-span and G-span of individuals from different cohorts to be compared, akin to the y-axis of survival curves, which allows comparison of lifespans between cohorts for a given survival proportion (e.g. 0.5 for median lifespan).
We first used these plots to assess the 8 reduced temperature treatments that decreased β and increased G-spanrel (Fig. 2b). Most (5/8: 20 °C & 15 °C in wild-type and daf-2(m577), and 20 °C in daf-2(e1370)) increased G-spanabs disproportionately more than H-spanabs in longer-lived population members (Fig. 2b top, Supplementary Fig. 4a top and middle). As a result, G-spanrel was increased in these longer-lived individuals (Fig. 2b bottom, Supplementary Fig. 4a bottom). This shows that life-extending interventions can act by introducing or amplifying the extended “twilight”21 (greater G-spanrel) of longer-lived individuals within a population, which we will refer to as extended twilight longevity (ETL). A critical implication of this ETL is that the β reduction and associated extension of the survival curve tail arise from the disproportionate expansion of decrepitude in longer-lived population members.
Similarly, in all 6 carbenicillin treatments yielding the inverse β–G-spanrel relationship, G-spanabs again increased disproportionately more than H-spanabs in longer-lived individuals, thus increasing their G-spanrel (Fig. 2c–d, Supplementary Fig. 4b). Therefore, carbenicillin too is an ETL treatment that lowers β via variable G-span expansion. Finally, 4/7 of the daf-2(rf) treatments that decreased β and increased G-spanrel also did so through ETL (Fig. 2e–g, Supplementary Fig. 4c). These 4 treatments were daf-2(e1370) at 20°C ± carbenicillin and at 15°C without carbenicillin, and daf-2(m577) at 25°C with carbenicillin.
Therefore, β reduction reflected ETL in 5/8 reduced temperature, 6/6 antibiotic, and 4/7 daf-2(rf) treatments (15/21 or 71%, in total), where β reduction co-occurred with G-spanrel increase. In the 6 non-ETL exceptions (Fig. 2b, e–g), G-spanabs still increased mostly in longer-lived population members (i.e. reducing β), in particular 15°C treatment in daf-2(e1368) and daf-2(e1370) (Fig. 2b) and daf-2(e1370) treatment at 15°C on carbenicillin (Fig. 2e). However, this was also largely true of H-spanabs; thus, in this minority of treatments, β reduction reflects inter-individually variable expansion of both G-span and H-span.
As a further test for whether β reduction arises from ETL, we compared contributions of H-spanabs and G-spanabs changes to β reduction, and to lifespan variation (standard deviation) increase (i.e. β reduction), in the 15 ETL treatments. Indeed, G-spanabs changes decreased β more than H-spanabs changes in 13/15 treatments (compared to 0/6 non-ETL exceptions) (Supplementary Table 3), and increased lifespan variation more in 14/15 interventions (compared to 3/6 non-ETL exceptions) (Supplementary Table 4). Consistent with these findings, across the 24 cohorts G-span variation increased more rapidly with mean G-span than H-span variation with mean H-span, while mean length and variability of G-span had wider ranges than that of H-span (Fig. 2h). This shows that across these cohorts, inter-individually variable expansion of G-span rather than H-span (i.e. ETL) is the primary mode of life extension.
These findings argue that expanded decrepitude not only correlates with a lower β, but causes it. That is, gerospan increase in longer-lived population members further increases their lifespan, thus extending the survival curve tail in the manner characteristic of a smaller β value (Fig. 1a, third panel). Therefore, β here is not a measure of intra-individual biological ageing rate as commonly understood, but rather of inter-individual heterogeneity in late-life decrepitude.
iv) Reduced α reflects slowed biological ageing rate
Because healthspan expansion may be considered a reliable indicator of slowed biological ageing (given more time to G-span onset), we wondered if β reduction could at least indirectly reflect decelerated ageing, should G-spanabs and H-spanabs expansions occur together. Indeed, mean H-spanabs was increased in 9/15 ETL treatments (Fig. 3a–c). We therefore examined the effect of population-wide H-spanabs expansion on the Gompertz parameters in these 9 treatments. H-spanabs expansion significantly decreased β in 4/9 treatments but, strikingly, significantly decreased α in 8/9 (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Table 5a–c). This suggests that α, though not traditionally equated with biological ageing, may here be a better measure of it than β.
Fig. 3. α outperforms β as a measure of absolute healthspan.
Effects of a low temperature, b carbenicillin and c daf-2(rf) on mean absolute healthspan (H-spanabs). N2, wild-type. ETL, extended twilight longevity. H-spanabs differences were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t-tests (p values annotated), showing 95% confidence intervals. This was performed on the pool of 4 biological replicates (Trials 3–6, see Supplementary Table 1 for sample sizes), with censored individuals excluded. d Table summarising fractions of ETL and non-ETL treatments in which H-spanabs increase causes the specified Gompertz parameter change, for each life-extending treatment class. e Least-squares linear regressions of the changes in H-spanabs between all possible pairs of the 24 cohorts, over the corresponding change in α or β for those pairs. The relationships were assessed by F-tests, showing the 95% confidence region. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
To assess if this unexpected finding is idiosyncratic to ETL, we also examined the non-ETL treatments, of which 27/31 significantly extended H-spanabs (Fig. 3a–c). However, again, H-spanabs expansion decreased α in 22/27 (81%) of these non-ETL treatments, but decreased β in only 13/27 (48%) (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Tables 5a–c). Additionally, H-spanabs expansion increased β in 9/27 treatments, including in all carbenicillin treatments; thus, slowing biological ageing can even increase β. Considering all treatments (ETL plus non-ETL), H-spanabs expansion decreased α in 30/36 (83%) cases, decreased β in 16/36 (44%), and increased β in 12/36 (33%). This suggests that α should better predict H-spanabs than β amongst the 24 cohorts, and this indeed proved to be the case (Fig. 3e).
In summary, healthspan expansion, a plausible metric of slowed biological ageing, more consistently reduces α than β, and even increases β. Therefore, overall, our empirically-based findings invert traditional interpretations of the biological meaning of the two Gompertz parameters.
v) α and β describe inter-individual heterogeneity in age-related infection
To further understand the biological mechanisms underpinning the Gompertz parameters, we performed necropsies on all corpses, building upon established mortality deconvolution methodology23. We scored for ageing-related bacterial colonisation of the pharynx and intestine (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 5a–b; in non-carbenicillin cohorts). We noted that almost all corpses with a swollen, infected pharynx (P or “big P”, as opposed to p or “small p” with an atrophied, uninfected pharynx)23 also had intestinal colonisation by E. coli, but not vice versa. Thus, P corpses are largely a subset of those with intestinal colonisation (Supplementary Fig. 5c). Death type was accordingly used to define three biologically-distinct subpopulations: P, pIC (p with intestinal colonisation), and pnIC (p with no intestinal colonisation) (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 5c). Consistent with prior findings23, lifespan was shorter for P than p (pIC and pnIC) subpopulations for most treatments (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Table 6). Lifespan was also shorter for pIC than pnIC populations (at 15°C and 25°C, but not 20°C). Thus, the three subpopulations exhibit distinct ageing trajectories.
Fig. 4. Life-extending interventions change lifespan and prevalence of pathological subpopulations.
a Images of representative P, pIC, and pnIC corpses, fed throughout life with RFP-expressing E. coli; overlay of brightfield and epifluorescence images. b Survival curves of P, pIC and pnIC subpopulations and whole population (“Combined”). c–d Effect of c low temperature and d daf-2(rf) treatments on subpopulation lifespan. Log-rank p values of depicted comparisons for (b–d) are presented in Supplementary Table 6. Survival proportions were obtained from Kaplan-Meier lifespan analysis using pseudofrequencies (in place of frequency) to account for censors (see Methods for details). e–f Effects of e low temperature and f daf-2(rf) on subpopulation prevalence. Differences in prevalence were assessed by Pearson’s chi-squared test (p values annotated). This was performed on the pool of 3–4 biological replicates (Trials 4–6 for N2 cohorts and Trials 3–6 for all other cohorts, see Supplementary Table 1 for sample sizes), with censored individuals excluded. At 25 °C no daf-2(e1370) P deaths were observed, as previously noted41. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
We then asked how this inter-subpopulation heterogeneity affects β. Notably, β was consistently smaller in whole populations than in subpopulations (Supplementary Table 7). This provides empirical evidence of how β can underestimate demographic ageing rate in the presence of hidden subpopulation heterogeneity11. Moreover, the traditional interpretation of β would paradoxically predict that subpopulations age biologically faster than their combination (whole population). This implies that even for isogenic individuals in identical conditions, β can be a measure of inter-individual heterogeneity in ageing, rather than of biological ageing rate itself.
We next examined how life-extending treatments (here, low temperature and daf-2(rf), without carbenicillin) affect subpopulation prevalence and lifespan. While both treatment classes increased lifespan of most subpopulations, increases were generally greater for P by low temperature, and pIC by daf-2(rf) (Fig. 4c–d; Supplementary Table 6). Lower temperature modestly decreased P prevalence in all genotypes except daf-2(e1370), suggesting reduced bacterial pathogenicity and/or enhanced host immunity, and allele-specific temperature sensitivity in daf-2(e1370)41 (Fig. 4e). Interestingly, however, low temperature strongly increased pIC prevalence (and thereby decreasing pnIC prevalence). Thus, reducing temperature acts antagonistically on terminal infection, respectively decreasing and increasing pharyngeal and intestinal colonisation by pathogenic E. coli. Meanwhile, daf-2(rf) treatment also decreased P prevalence as previously seen41 and affected pIC prevalence in an allele- and temperature-specific manner (Fig. 4f), largely consistent with known daf-2(rf) infection resistance38.
Finally, we determined the relative contribution of these changes in subpopulation lifespan and prevalence to the Gompertz parameters. Effects of low temperature on β proved to be determined mainly by changes in pnIC lifespan, followed closely by the increase in pIC to pnIC ratio in daf-2(m577) (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 6a). In daf-2(rf) treatment, changes in β were again primarily determined by changes in pnIC and/or pIC lifespan, rather than in P lifespan or subpopulation prevalence (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 6b). Thus, β is largely a function of p lifespan; specifically, increases and decreases in β typically result, respectively, from decreased and increased p (pIC and/or pnIC) longevity. This further demonstrates that β is less a measure of biological ageing rate than inter-individual heterogeneity, here as subpopulation-specific responses to longevity interventions.
Fig. 5. α and β reflect subpopulation-specific changes in lifespan and prevalence.
Relative contributions (sum to 100%) of changes in subpopulation prevalence and lifespan to overall change in population (a–b) β and (c–d) α in (a, c), low temperature and (b, d), daf-2(rf) treatments. Bar height indicates contribution magnitude (%) and bar direction (+ or –) indicates contribution direction (increase or decrease Gompertz parameter). The first two x-axis items are component contributions of changes in subpopulation prevalence (based on principles of parsimony, Fig. 4e–f), while the remaining x-axis items are contributions of changes in subpopulation lifespan. Overlaid angled labels reflect different subpopulation prevalence changes for those specific treatments. See Methods for full analysis details. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. e Summary schematic of the biological basis of the Gompertz parameters across our experimental cohorts, depicting a hypothetical intervention that reduces both α and β. Each panel depicts healthspan (H-span; blue bar segment) and gerospan (G-span, red bar segment) for four individuals representative of their depicted lifespan within the population (age at end of bar), as bordered by the survival curves (left y-axis, bold data lines). α reduction arises from H-span expansion (equally across individuals in this simplified depiction), causing the approximately parallel right-shift of the survival curve (middle panel, dashed blue) that occurs in α reduction. β reduction arises from inter-individually variable G-span expansion (greater in longer-lived individuals), causing the approximate horizontal stretch of the survival curve (middle panel, dashed red) that occurs in β reduction. Bottom panel: overall effect of this hypothetical intervention with H-span and G-span arranged in order. In all panels, probability distributions of death times corresponding to the survival curves are overlaid (right y-axis, thin data lines), showing that α reduction causes an approximate right-shift of death ages, whereas β reduction causes an additional stretch that increases lifespan variation more. The area under these probability distributions is shaded to reflect the variation in H-span/G-span between different population members: α reduction involves similar expansion of H-span in all individuals (solid blue shading), whereas β reduction involves greater G-span expansion in longer-lived individuals (red gradient shading). Therefore, β describes the degree of inter-individual variation in health and lifespan, and not biological ageing rate, which is better captured by α as H-span length.
We similarly deconvolved determinants of α. In low temperature treatment, determinants of α were genotype-specific: α was wholly determined by P lifespan in wild-type, mainly by pnIC lifespan in daf-2(m577) and daf-2(e1370), and by all determinants except pIC lifespan in daf-2(e1368) (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Fig. 6a). In daf-2(rf) treatment, α was primarily determined by P lifespan at 25 °C and 20 °C, while at 15 °C, several determinants were important; in common, the increase in pnIC to P ratio (Fig. 5d, Supplementary Fig. 6b). Therefore, unlike β, α is largely a function of P lifespan and subpopulation prevalence, but like β, reflects subpopulation-specific responses to life-extending interventions.
Taken together, these findings provide further evidence that being demographic measures, the Gompertz parameters can often reflect inter-individually variable biological changes whose complexity is unlikely to be captured by the traditional theoretical interpretations of the parameters.
Discussion
This study investigates the biological underpinnings of Gompertzian demographic ageing in C. elegans under 46 life-extending conditions. It demonstrates how the Gompertz rate parameter β better corresponds to inter-individual gerospan variation than biological ageing rate, while the Gompertz scale parameter α better reflects biological ageing rate than ageing-independent determinants of mortality (Fig. 5e). Additionally, both parameters are the product of subpopulation-specificity in patterns of late-life disease. These findings underscore the great tenuousness of the correspondence between parameters describing population ageing on the one hand, and the biological ageing process of component individuals on the other11.
We have shown how reduction of β, usually interpreted as slowed biological ageing, can reflect greater gerospan expansion in longer-lived individuals, which extends the survival curve tail and increases lifespan variation. Consequently, longer-lived population members experience extended twilights (i.e. longer relative gerospans), as previously described21,22,26. One study reported the opposite25: shorter relative gerospans in longer-lived population members; one explanation could be methodological differences, such as the automated measurement of spontaneous (rather than stimulated) movement and use of floxuridine to inhibit progeny production, which has known effects on nematode ageing and lifespan42–44.
In our study, we describe how the extended twilight occurs also between populations in response to life-extending treatments, which we termed extended twilight longevity (ETL). Thus, here β reflects not biological ageing rate in the usual sense, but gerospan variability in ETL (Fig. 5e). Such ETL could potentially contribute to the temporal scaling of survival curves previously described in C. elegans20. Notably, our reinterpretation of β differs from that of existing heterogeneity-based models, e.g., Vaupel et al.9, which assume that at least within subpopulations, β does reflect biological ageing rate. In contrast, our data suggest that β better reflects heterogeneity than biological ageing rate between and within subpopulations.
Given the gradual nature of ageing, any delineation of healthspan and gerospan is inevitably somewhat arbitrary21,24. It is after the highly coordinated stages of development and reproduction that ageing begins and consequent inter-individual variation in age decline emerges, in midlife in nematodes by one estimate45. Thus, it is likely that the contribution of gerospan variation to β has even been underestimated, given that gerospan, as we defined it, excluded earlier ages with subtler senescent changes.
Regarding the Gompertz scale parameter α, past attempts to define its biological meaning include intrinsic, ageing-independent “vulnerability” or “frailty”, and extrinsic, age-related hazards, but not biological ageing rate itself4,8,9,14. We have shown that α outperforms β as a predictor of healthspan length, arguing against the “not ageing” interpretation, and providing experimental support for earlier doubts about the above traditional views of α13,14,46 (Fig. 5e).
Intriguingly, a recent study27 described a mathematical model of the ageing process that predicts a compression of relative gerospan by life-extending treatments that increase the relative steepness of the survival curve, and proportional scaling (no change) or even expansion of relative G-span by treatments that maintain this relative steepness. Translating these survival curve effects into approximate Gompertz terms reveals a close concordance between our two studies: parallel shifts or rectangularisation of the survival curve (i.e. involving α reduction) involve healthspan expansion, while horizontal stretching of the survival curve (i.e. involving β reduction) involves more gerospan expansion. Furthermore, the authors supported their theoretical predictions with mined, population-average health and mortality data from nematodes, fruit flies and mice27. These data thus provide independent support for our findings and extend their potential relevance to other species. Our study further extends this through individual-level analyses of the relationship between health/gerospan and lifespan, which is required to explain survival curve shape in terms of the inter-individual distribution of biological ageing profiles.
Are our nematode-derived reinterpretations of α and β likely to be applicable to higher animals? The aforementioned study27 and the frequent occurrence of Gompertzian ageing throughout the animal kingdom4,5 at least suggests this possibility. Like interventions that extend lifespan in C. elegans, the evolution of longer-lived mammals from shorter-lived ones often involves coupled reductions in both α and β, where mortality is both postponed and spread out over greater lengths of time. For instance, α at puberty decreases from 0.03 in laboratory mice to 0.0002 in humans, and subsequent mortality rate doubling time (an inverse measure of β) respectively increases from 0.27 to 8 years4.
This raises the interesting question of whether evolution of greater longevity might also reduce α by extending healthspan and reduce β by ETL (Supplementary Fig. 8). In other words, the reduction of β in longer-lived mammals might only indirectly reflect reduced biological ageing rate, which is instead directly reflected in the reduction of α. This coupled evolution of healthspan and gerospan expansion, and therefore α and β, could emerge from biological constraints present between mechanisms of development and ageing47 that exhibit evolutionary conservation. This would be consistent with the proportional scaling between life stages across mammalian species, such as that between ontogenetic span and adult lifespan ( ~ 1:4)48. Additionally, the greater variability of gerospan than healthspan could arise from the late-life natural selection shadow, a key determinant of the evolution of ageing49,50 that predicts greater optimisation (thus, standardisation) of early than later-life traits (Supplementary Fig. 8b).
In summary, our findings invert traditional interpretations relating to Gompertzian population ageing, in demonstrating that the rate parameter β can reflect not biological ageing rate but inter-individual variation in gerospan, that the scale parameter α can reflect less ageing-independent mechanisms than ageing rate itself, and that both parameters reflect subpopulation-specific rather than population-wide traits. The approach used here, the combined analysis of individual and population ageing, should prove similarly informative for understanding the biology of mortality patterns in higher organisms.
Methods
C. elegans culture and strains
C. elegans were maintained at 20 °C using standard protocols51, on Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) plates seeded 2 days before use with a bacterial food source (Escherichia coli OP50). Floxuridine (5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine), sometimes used to block progeny production, was not used in this study. Nematode strains used were: N2 (wild-type, hermaphrodite stock52), GA1959 daf-2(m577) III, GA1960 daf-2(e1368) III, and GA1928 daf-2(e1370) III. All strains were raised from egg at 20 °C on live E. coli, and transferred at L4 stage to the appropriate experimental conditions (15 °C, 20 °C, or 25 °C; with or without carbenicillin). Carbenicillin solution was added topically to plates one day before adding animals (further details below).
Lifespan-only trials (Trials 1–2)
Nematodes were cultured throughout life in 60 mm Petri dishes (containing 10 mL of NGM) seeded with approximately 80 μL of E. coli, and where relevant, treated with 80 μL of 500 mM carbenicillin (Fisher Scientific Ltd, catalogue no. 12737149). At L4 stage (time 0 in all analyses), 30–40 animals were placed on each plate, with three plates per condition. Animals were transferred every 2 days during the reproductive period, and approximately every seven days thereafter. Scoring of survival was performed every two days. Animals showing no movement were gently touched with a platinum wire (worm pick) on the head and/or tail; those that showed no movement at all in response were scored as dead. Animals that died due to desiccation on the Petri dish wall, internal hatching of larvae, or rupture of internal tissues through the vulva, or that became contaminated by non-E. coli bacteria or fungi, or could not be found, were censored.
Lifespan and healthspan trials (Trials 3–6)
Prior to the end of egg laying, nematodes were handled as for the lifespan-only trials, but with two plates containing 25 animals each, per condition. Following the end of egg laying, animals were transferred to individual wells of 24-well tissue culture plates, containing 2 mL of NGM and seeded with 3.5 μL of E. coli OP50, and where relevant, treated with 16 μL of 500 mM carbenicillin. Animals were subsequently transferred to fresh plates monthly, before media desiccation (plates were sealed with parafilm to delay desiccation, and to prevent bacterial/fungal contamination). Scoring of survival and censors were performed as above every 2–3 days, alongside scoring of locomotory class, and necropsy at death.
Quantification of locomotory decline with age
Locomotory health class (belonging to H-span or G-span) was scored by classifying individuals into one of three classes, adapted from earlier systems32,33: A—sinusoidal locomotion; B—non-sinusoidal locomotion; C—no locomotion. To accurately determine locomotory class, animals were gently touched on the tail with a platinum wire worm pick for up to 20 s to induce an escape response that reveals movement capacity, and additionally on the head as a final check. The duration spent in A class was defined as H-span, and the summed duration spent in B and C classes as G-span. Here, B and C classes were summed to improve data tractability and to provide a definition of G-span that captures both early and late-stage functional declines.
Necropsy analysis
Necropsy to define patterns of E. coli-associated pathology was performed by examining fresh corpses under a Leica MZ8 stereomicroscope (50x magnification). Scoring of swollen, bacterially-infected pharynxes (P), and uninfected, atrophied pharynxes (p) was performed as previously described23. Intestinal colonisation (IC) with E. coli was scored, where severe bacterial accumulation was observed in the anterior and/or posterior intestine. Such colonisation presented as extreme lumenal distension by proliferating bacteria and/or colonisation of the intestine beyond the lumenal barrier, with concomitant intestinal tissue degeneration and atrophy. Consistent across pharyngeal and intestinal tissues, sites of bacterial colonisation exhibit a yellowish-brown colour (as that of the E. coli lawn and colocalising with RFP-labelled E. coli), translucent and uniform texture (loss of healthy tissue structures that otherwise appear dark, granular and opaque), and swollen/distended morphology (extensive proliferation of live E. coli). Images of representative examples of the three corpse subpopulations (P, pIC and pnIC) are presented in Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 5b.
Microscopy
Microscopy slides were prepared by placing individual nematode corpses in a small drop of M9 buffer on 2% agar pads, under glass coverslips. Brightfield images were captured using an ApoTome.2 Zeiss microscope with a Hamamatsu digital camera C13440 ORCA-Flash4.0 V3 and Zen software, at 100x total magnification, with 125 ms exposure time and 1.1 V illumination intensity. The presence of E. coli OP50-RFP in the pharynx was assayed using the mRF12 channel (excitation: 577–604 nm; emission: 612 nm) at the same magnification, with 750 ms exposure time and 75% LED intensity. Brightness and contrast were adjusted equally across the entire image, and where applicable, applied equally to controls. Brightfield and RFP epifluorescence necropsy images were overlaid in ImageJ and backgrounds removed with Adobe Express (online tool). The maximum intensity threshold of RFP channel images was adjusted in ImageJ from 255 to 70 for all images.
Mortality deconvolution (subpopulation) analyses
Age-specific survival proportions for full (not deconvolved into subpopulations) populations were obtained by conventional Kaplan-Meier analysis (including censors), from which age-specific mortality pseudofrequencies (which sum to 1) were calculated. For each age, these pseudofrequencies were partitioned into subpopulation pseudofrequencies, weighted by the proportion of total mortality at that age belonging to each subpopulation. Standard survival and mortality analyses of subpopulations were then performed utilising these pseudofrequencies (in place of conventional mortality frequency), to enable unbiased inclusion of censor data in subpopulation analyses. Survival analyses in Fig. 4b–d were performed in this manner. Contributions of subpopulation changes to the Gompertz parameters in Fig. 5a–d were similarly performed on simulated (mortality pseudofrequency-derived) survival data. Simulated survival data was generated for each component change (in subpopulation prevalence or lifespan), by accordingly combining simulated control and treatment subpopulations. Specifically, changes in subpopulation prevalence were simulated by combining treatment cohort subpopulation prevalence with control subpopulation lifespans (based on principles of parsimony, Fig. 4e–f), and changes in lifespan were simulated by combining treatment cohort subpopulation lifespan with control subpopulation prevalence, for each subpopulation at a time. The sum of these component changes closely predicts the true change between control and treatment cohorts (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Contributions of component changes to α and β were then estimated as the change in, respectively, lifespan of the 10% shortest-lived individuals and lifespan variance, which strongly predict α and β across these 12 non-antibiotic cohorts (Supplementary Fig. 7b–c) and whose component sum of these changes predicts their true change between control and treatment cohorts (Supplementary Fig. 7d–e).
Statistics, software and data handling
Statistical tests were performed using JMP Pro (SAS Institute, Inc.), except for Gompertz parameter estimation and assessment of statistical differences between them, which were performed using WinModest34. Right censors were included in all Kaplan-Meier and WinModest analyses. Specific statistical tests and associated methodological details are described in the respective figure/table captions. The statistical significance threshold used in this study is α = 0.05. Necropsy image capture, processing and editing were performed using Zen software and ImageJ.
Analyses of treatment effects on lifespan (Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 1) were performed on the pool of all 6 trials, while analyses relating to locomotory healthspan and gerospan (Fig. 1–3, Supplementary Fig. 4, Supplementary Tables 3–5) were performed on the pool of 4 trials (Trials 3–6; see Methods above), in which locomotory senescence was quantified. Subpopulation analyses utilising necropsy data (Figs. 4b–f, 5a–d, Supplementary Figs. 5a, 6–7, Supplementary Tables 6–7) were similarly performed on this pool of 4 trials (or 3 trials, Trials 4–6, for N2 cohorts), in which necropsy was performed. Further information and summary statistics for individual trials are provided in Supplementary Table 1, and analyses confirming the statistical suitability of these trial poolings and the Gompertz fit are provided in Supplementary Figs. 1–2 and Supplementary Table 2.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We thank H. Chapman, A. Vere-Hopegood, and A. Zhang for minor research contributions, J. Labbadia, J.P. de Magalhães, T. Niccoli, and S.D. Pletcher for useful discussion, and S.D. Pletcher and Y. Zhao for comments on the manuscript. Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Investigator Award (215574/Z/19/Z) to D.G.
Author contributions
D.G. supervised the project. B.Z. and D.G. conceived the project, designed the experiments and data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. B.Z. performed the experiments and analysed the data.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks James Carey, Yifan Yang, and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
Data generated in this study on the lifespan, locomotory healthspan and gerospan, and necropsy subpopulation type of all individuals from the 6 trials (n = 8830), where measured, are available in the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Bruce Zhang, Email: bruce.zhang@ucl.ac.uk.
David Gems, Email: david.gems@ucl.ac.uk.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-026-71780-7.
References
- 1.Guo, J. et al. Aging and aging-related diseases: from molecular mechanisms to interventions and treatments. Signal Transduct. Target Ther.7, 391 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Klass, M. R. Aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: major biological and environmental factors influencing life span. Mech. Ageing Dev.6, 413–429 (1977). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kenyon, C., Chang, J., Gensch, E., Rudener, A. & Tabtiang, R. A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature366, 461–464 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Finch, C. E., Pike, M. C. & Witten, M. Slow mortality rate accelerations during aging in some animals approximate that of humans. Science249, 902–905 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jones, O. R. et al. Diversity of ageing across the tree of life. Nature505, 169–173 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gompertz, B. Of the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A57, 513–585 (1825). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Greenwood, M. Laws of mortality from the biological point of view. J. Hyg.28, 267–294 (1928). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sacher, G. A. in Handbook of the Biology of Aging (eds C.E. Finch & L. Hayflick) 582-628 (Van Norstrand Reinhold, 1977).
- 9.Vaupel, J. W., Manton, K. G. & Stallard, E. The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography16, 439–454 (1979). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Driver, C. The Gompertz function does not measure ageing. Biogerontology2, 61–65 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yashin, A. I., Ukraintseva, S. V., Boiko, S. I. & Arbeev, K. G. Individual aging and mortality rate: how are they related? Soc. Biol.49, 206–217 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Driver, C. A further comment on why the Gompertz plot does not measure aging. Biogerontology4, 325–327 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Masoro, E. J. Caloric restriction and aging: controversial issues. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.61, 14–19 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rozing, M. P. & Westendorp, R. G. Parallel lines: nothing has changed? Aging Cell7, 924–927 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Koopman, J. J. et al. Senescence rates in patients with end-stage renal disease: a critical appraisal of the Gompertz model. Aging Cell10, 233–238 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bansal, A., Zhu, L. J., Yen, K. & Tissenbaum, H. A. Uncoupling lifespan and healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans longevity mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA112, E277–E286 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hughes, B. G. & Hekimi, S. Different mechanisms of longevity in long-lived mouse and Caenorhabditis elegans mutants revealed by statistical analysis of mortality rates. Genetics204, 905–920 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huang, C., Xiong, C. & Kornfeld, K. Measurements of age-related changes of physiological processes that predict lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Usa.101, 8084–8089 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hahm, J. et al. C. elegans maximum velocity correlates with healthspan and is maintained in worms with an insulin receptor mutation. Nat. Commun.6, 8919 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stroustrup, N. et al. The temporal scaling of Caenorhabditis elegans ageing. Nature530, 103–107 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang, W. et al. Extended twilight among isogenic C. elegans causes a disproportionate scaling between lifespan and health. Cell Syst.3, 333–345 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Churgin, M. A. et al. Longitudinal imaging of Caenorhabditis elegans in a microfabricated device reveals variation in behavioral decline during aging. eLife6, e26652 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Zhao, Y. et al. Two forms of death in aging Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Commun.8, 15458 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Newell Stamper, B. L. et al. Movement decline across lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans mutants in the insulin/insulin-like signaling pathway. Aging Cell17, e12704 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oswal, N. et al. A hierarchical process model links behavioral aging and lifespan in C. elegans. PLoS Comput. Biol.18, e1010415 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Statzer, C., Reichert, P., Dual, J. & Ewald, C. Y. Longevity interventions temporally scale healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans. iScience25, 103983 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yang, Y. et al. Compression of morbidity by interventions that steepen the survival curve. Nat. Commun.16, 3340 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Xiao, R. et al. A genetic program promotes C. elegans longevity at cold temperatures via a thermosensitive TRP channel. Cell152, 806–817 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vakkayil, K. & Hoppe, T. Temperature-dependent regulation of proteostasis and longevity. Front. Aging3, 853588 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Garigan, D. et al. Genetic analysis of tissue aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: a role for heat-shock factor and bacterial proliferation. Genetics161, 1101–1112 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gems, D. et al. Two pleiotropic classes of daf-2 mutation affect larval arrest, adult behavior, reproduction and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics150, 129–155 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hosono, R., Sato, Y., Aizawa, S. I. & Mitsui, Y. Age-dependent changes in mobility and separation of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp. Gerontol.15, 285–289 (1980). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Herndon, L. A. et al. Stochastic and genetic factors influence tissue-specific decline in ageing C. elegans. Nature419, 808–814 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pletcher, S. Model fitting and hypothesis testing for age-specific mortality data. J. Evol. Biol.12, 430–439 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vanfleteren, J. R., de Vreese, A. & Braeckman, B. P. Two-parameter logistic and Weibull equations provide better fits to survival data from isogenic populations of Caenorhabditis elegans in axenic culture than does the Gompertz model. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.53A, B393–B403 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Johnson, T. Age-specific demographic profiles of longevity mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans show segmental effects. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.56, B331–B339 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mulla, S. et al. A biphasic model of lifespan in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans worm. R. Soc. Open Sci.10, 220991 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Podshivalova, K., Kerr, R. & Kenyon, C. How a mutation that slows aging can also disproportionately extend end-of-life decrepitude. Cell Rep.19, 441–450 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kirkwood, T. B. et al. What accounts for the wide variation in life span of genetically identical organisms reared in a constant environment? Mech. Ageing Dev.126, 439–443 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tuljapurkar, S. & Edwards, R. Variance in death and its implications for modeling and forecasting mortality. Demograph. Res.24, 497–526 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhao, Y. et al. Mutation of daf-2 extends lifespan via tissue-specific effectors that suppress distinct life-limiting pathologies. Aging Cell20, e13324 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Angeli, S. et al. A DNA synthesis inhibitor is protective against proteotoxic stressors via modulation of fertility pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging5, 759–769 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Feldman, N., Kosolapov, L. & Ben-Zvi, A. Fluorodeoxyuridine improves Caenorhabditis elegans proteostasis independent of reproduction onset. PLoS One9, e85964 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang, H., Zhao, Y. & Zhang, Z. Age-dependent effects of floxuridine (FUdR) on senescent pathology and mortality in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.509, 694–699 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Uno, M. et al. A transition from interindividual uniformity to diversity in appearance and transcriptional features at midlife in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Cells30, e13187 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Blagosklonny, M. V. Why men age faster but reproduce longer than women: mTOR and evolutionary perspectives. Aging2, 265–273 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gems, D. & Kern, C. C. Biological constraint, evolutionary spandrels and antagonistic pleiotropy. Ageing Res. Rev.101, 102527 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Charnov, E. L. Life History Invariants: Some explorations of symmetry in evolutionary ecology. (Oxford University Press, 1993).
- 49.Medawar, P. B. An Unsolved Problem Of Biology. (H.K. Lewis, 1952).
- 50.Williams, G. C. Pleiotropy, natural selection and the evolution of senescence. Evolution11, 398–411 (1957). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics77, 71–94 (1974). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhao, Y., Wang, H., Poole, R. J. & Gems, D. A fln-2 mutation affects lethal pathology and lifespan in C. elegans. Nat. Commun.10, 5087 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Eakin, T., Shouman, R., Qi, Y., Liu, G. & Witten, M. Estimating parametric survival model parameters in gerontological aging studies: methodological problems and insights. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.50, B166–B176 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mueller, L. D., Nusbaum, T. J. & Rose, M. R. The Gompertz equation as a predictive tool in demography. Exp. Gerontol.30, 553–569 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shouman, R. & Witten, M. Survival estimates and sample size: what can we conclude? J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.50, B177–B185 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data generated in this study on the lifespan, locomotory healthspan and gerospan, and necropsy subpopulation type of all individuals from the 6 trials (n = 8830), where measured, are available in the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.





