Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2026 May 26;27(11):4806. doi: 10.3390/ijms27114806

Phase-Dependent MoS2 Nanosheets-Embedded Urinary Catheter for Advanced Photothermal Sterilization

Muhammad Saukani 1,†, Chien-Hung Lai 2,3,4,5,†, Dyah Ika Krisnawati 6,7, Hsiu-Yi Chu 8, Andy C Huang 9,10,*, Tsung-Rong Kuo 11,12,*
Editors: Andrea Salis, Abbas Amini
PMCID: PMC13256306  PMID: 42278336

Abstract

The high prevalence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) has become a significant concern in the healthcare system, prompting the development of antibacterial urinary catheters to effectively prevent these infections in clinical settings. In this work, metallic phase and semiconducting phase molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) embedded polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) were developed as antibacterial urinary catheters with photothermal sterilization. The metallic phase MoS2 (1T-MoS2) was synthesized using a facile hydrothermal method, and an annealing process transformed it into the semiconducting phase (2H-MoS2). The optical and structural characterizations confirmed the successful preparations of 1T-MoS2 nanosheets (1T-MoS2 NSs) and 2H-MoS2 NSs. The increase in the contents of 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs in PDMS resulted in enhanced photothermal conversion, a slight decrease in the water contact angle, and no significant changes in the mechanical properties of the samples. The bacterial growth curves demonstrated the remarkable ability of phase-dependent 1T- and 2H-MoS2 NSs-embedded PDMS urinary catheters to inhibit the growth of E. coli and S. aureus with near-infrared (NIR) laser irradiation. In the agar plate test, exposing PDMS with 0.3% 1T-MoS2 or 2H-MoS2 to NIR for 10 min demonstrated excellent antibacterial effects, completely eradicating E. coli and eliminating over 99.9% of S. aureus. The SEM image results highlighted the significant photothermal antibacterial effect of 1T-MoS2 PDMS and 2H-MoS2 PDMS urinary catheters, effectively damaging and eradicating both E. coli and S. aureus. The 1T-MoS2 PDMS and 2H-MoS2 PDMS urinary catheters, with excellent photothermal effects, good hydrophobicity, and superior mechanical properties, demonstrated their potential as photothermal antibacterial catheters for clinical applications.

Keywords: 1T-MoS2, 2H-MoS2, antibacterial, urinary catheter, photothermal therapy, hydrophobicity

1. Introduction

The Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are bacterial infections in the urinary tract that occur in patients who have been catheterized within the previous 48 h [1]. The infection rates are 3 to 5 times higher than those in other hospital patient care areas, with the incidence of CAUTI being 7.78 per 1000 catheter days [2]. CAUTIs are the most common nosocomial infection, accounting for approximately 9% of all healthcare-associated infections, and they can also lead to secondary bloodstream infections [3]. CAUTIs are associated with extended durations of hospitalization and increased mortality. The financial burden of CAUTIs is estimated to vary from USD 603 to 1189 for non-intensive care unit inpatients and up to USD 1764 for intensive care unit patients [4]. Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a common uropathogen responsible for approximately 75% of CAUTIs, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae [5]. Furthermore, the abiotic surfaces of catheters, which are made of latex, silicone, and polyurethane, are prone to the development of biofilms composed of extracellular polymeric substances, leading to frequent resistance to the penetration of antibiotics [6,7,8]. Successful treatment of biofilms with antibiotics requires concentrations that are 1500 times higher than standard doses, which can result in bacterial resistance and toxicity [9]. Therefore, numerous strategies to reduce the risk of CAUTIs have been developed through clinical and technological approaches, including aseptic catheter insertion techniques, optimal catheter exchange timing, antibiotic prophylaxis, and modifications of catheter materials and coatings [10].

Modifications of catheter materials and coatings have the potential to provide complete protection against CAUTIs by creating catheters with antimicrobial and antifouling properties [11]. Generally, antifouling catheters utilize material coatings, including hydrophilic polymers, amphiphilic polymers, superhydrophobic polymers, hydrogels, polymer brushes, and polyzwitterions [12]. This strategy aims not to kill bacteria but to prevent bacterial biofilms from attaching to susceptible surfaces of catheters through steric repulsion, electrostatic repulsion, and low surface energy. Another approach to combat bacterial biofilms on catheter surfaces involves coating them with biocidal materials. Various mechanisms to counter bacterial biofilms include the release of antimicrobial compounds (such as antiseptics, antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides, and metal nanoparticle (NP)-based materials), contact killing (using antibiotics, metal-based NPs, antimicrobial peptides, carbon materials, and biopolymers), and the disruption of biofilm architecture by quorum-sensing inhibitors [13,14,15,16,17]. Metal-based NPs are popular antibacterial agents for combating resistant bacteria, including bacterial biofilms. The ability to control their size and shape enhances their antibacterial performance by inducing membrane disruption, direct contact, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [18,19,20,21,22]. Among NPs, silver NPs are one of the few microbial agents approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [23]. However, due to challenges with controlling ion release kinetics and low selectivity, silver NPs exhibit low biocompatibility with mammalian cells. Therefore, replacing them with biocompatible nanomaterials would be the best option for developing an antibacterial catheter.

Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is a biocompatible material that can be synthesized via a top-down approach, like plasma exfoliation and alkali metal intercalation, or a bottom-up approach using chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and hydrothermal methods [24,25,26,27]. MoS2 has two main phases: a metallic phase (1T-MoS2) and a semiconducting phase (2H-MoS2), with the 2H-phase being thermodynamically stable in bulk [28,29,30]. Through plasma exfoliation and the Li intercalation method, 1T-MoS2 can be synthesized from bulk MoS2 and revert to the initial phase after annealing at 200 °C in an Ar atmosphere. In our previous work, 1T-MoS2 nanosheets (NSs) were synthesized using a simple hydrothermal method, and the resulting 1T-MoS2 NSs were then annealed at 300 °C to obtain 2H-MoS2 NSs [30,31]. This method is more efficient compared to CVD methods, which require a growth temperature range of 780 °C to 800 °C to synthesize 1T-MoS2.

Due to its excellent properties, MoS2 has a wide range of potential applications, including as an antibacterial agent, an energy storage material, and a photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reactions, organic pollutant degradation, and CO2 reduction [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. As an antibacterial agent, the bacterial eradication mechanism of MoS2 involves not only ion release that generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) or direct contact with bacterial cell walls, causing membrane disruption, but also the use of external triggers to enhance antibacterial activity [40,41,42,43,44]. External stimuli applied to MoS2 have been shown to accelerate bacterial eradication. Visible light can enhance ROS generation, while near-infrared (NIR) light can enhance heat generation, leading to bacterial death through a hyperthermic mechanism [45,46,47,48,49]. Although pristine MoS2 exhibits a broad ability to combat both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains, to our knowledge, none of the reports have explored the use of these materials for antibacterial catheters, whether by coating or material modification.

In this work, two main phases of MoS2, 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs, were synthesized as antibacterial agents using a simple hydrothermal method. 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Raman spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). The catheters were developed by the use of silicon-based polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) embedding with 1T-MoS2 NSs (1T-MoS2@PDMS) and 2H-MoS2 NSs (2H-MoS2@PDMS). The antibacterial performances of the 1T-MoS2@PDMS and the 2H-MoS2@PDMS were investigated through a photothermal effect using near-infrared (NIR) irradiation. Numerous characterizations of the 1T-MoS2@PDMS and the 2H-MoS2@PDMS were examined in this paper, including photothermal property, water contact angle, mechanical property, antibacterial performance, and biocompatibility.

2. Results

2.1. Material Characterizations of 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs

The MoS2 polymorph depends on the coordination of the sulfur atoms and the stacking order of the layers, which changes the symmetry of the sulfur atoms in the structure [50]. XRD data were used to analyze the crystalline structures of 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs. The diffractogram of the hydrothermally synthesized material is exhibited in Figure 1a with crystalline planes (002), (004), (100), and (110), appearing at 9.3°, 18°, 33°, and 57.5°, respectively. The peaks of the crystalline plane represent 1T-MoS2 NSs, the metastable phase with an octahedral structure [30]. This led to the orientation of the crystal structure. The annealing process at 300 °C for 2 h caused a 2θ shift in Figure 1b, indicating the crystal structure’s reorientation. The 2θ positions changed to become 14.38°, 28.79°, 33.73°, 39.69°, and 59.63°, which respectively reflect the (002), (004), (101), (103), and (008) crystalline planes. This indicated that a structural transformation had occurred from 1T-MoS2 NSs to 2H-MoS2 NSs [51,52,53]. The quantitative analysis by Highscore Plus yielded a single phase of 2H MoS2 NSs with a hexagonal structure (JCPDS 37-1492). Raman spectroscopic features were used to confirm the distinct crystalline structure and the successful transformation of 1T-MoS2 NSs to 2H-MoS2 NSs after the annealing process. Low-energy Raman spectra of the samples synthesized by a hydrothermal method are shown in Figure 1c. Peaks of Raman shifts existed at 146, 234, 277, 329, and 372 cm−1, which were associated with phonon modes J1, J2, E1g, J3, and A1g, respectively. The peak position refers to the successful synthesis of the 1T-MoS2 phase [28]. After the annealing process, the Raman spectrum in Figure 1d only shows two prominent peaks of Raman shifts at 379 cm−1 (E2g) attributed to the longitudinal acoustic phonon mode S–Mo–S and at 405 cm−1 (Ag) corresponding to out-of-lane vibration S atoms [46]. The disappearance of the J1, J2, and J3 peaks, which are phonon modes, after the annealing process indicates the conversion of the metal phase (1T-MoS2) to a semiconductor phase (2H-MoS2). XPS characterization was used to distinguish the phase of MoS2 NSs, confirming the successful synthesis of 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs. The survey spectra of the overall electronic states of the 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs samples are presented in Figure S1a,b, while the high-resolution Mo 3d and S 2p spectra are demonstrated in Figure 1e,f, respectively. The XPS data supported the prior characterization, with Mo 3d spectra at binding energies of ~228.8 and ~232.0 eV corresponding to Mo4+ 3d5/2 and Mo4+ 3d3/2, respectively. This result is consistent with the previous reports [54,55]. After annealing, these peaks shift toward higher binding energy (~229.1 and ~232.0 eV), indicating a phase transformation from 1T to 2H-MoS2. Further evidence is provided by the S 2p spectra, which reveal binding energies of ~161.4 and ~162.5 eV corresponding to S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2. Following annealing, these peaks shift to ~162.3 and ~163.4 eV. This phenomenon is attributed to the decreased electron density around the Mo and S atoms, consistent with the structural transition from the metallic 1T phase to the semiconducting 2H phase.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) 1T-MoS2 NSs and (b) 2H-MoS2 NSs. Raman spectra of (c) 1T-MoS2 NSs and (d) 2H-MoS2 NSs. (e) XPS spectra of Mo 3d for 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs. (f) XPS spectra of S 2p for 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs.

The XRD, Raman, and XPS spectral data confirmed that 1T-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2 were successfully synthesized by a straightforward technique. The morphologies of both samples were characterized by SEM, TEM, and HR-TEM images. The flower-like morphology consisted of an MoS2 NSs, as shown in Figure 2a,d by SEM images. TEM images in Figure 2b,e confirm the multi-sheet constructed flower-like morphology of MoS2. The average sizes of the 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs flower-like particles were calculated to be approximately 400–800 nm. In addition, EDX data (spectra and mapping) are presented in Figure S2 (1T-MoS2 NS) and Figure S3 (2H-MoS2 NSs), and the elemental quantitative analysis calculated by EDX is demonstrated in Table S1 (1T-MoS2 NS) and Table S2 (2H-MoS2 NSs). EDX data show the percentages of sulfur (S) at 62.69% and of molybdenum (Mo) at 37.31% for 1T-MoS2 NSs, while 2H-MoS2 NSs contained 61.25% S and 38.75%. Moreover, HR-TEM was performed to obtain structural information. The measured interplanar spacing of ~0.97 nm in Figure 2c can be assigned to the (002) plane of 1T-MoS2, which is consistent with previously reported values for 1T-MoS2 nanosheets (~0.95 nm) [30,56]. The slightly larger spacing observed in this work is attributed to the loosely stacked nanosheet structure, which may lead to interlayer expansion, as commonly observed in hydrothermally synthesized MoS2. After annealing, the interplanar spacing decreases to ~0.65 nm, indicating more ordered, compact stacking in the 2H-MoS2 phase and confirming the structural transformation from trigonal (P3m1) to the hexagonal (P63/MMC) [30,56].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Morphology of 1T-MoS2 NSs under (a) SEM, (b) TEM, and (c) HR-TEM. Morphology of 2H-MoS2 NSs under (d) SEM, (e) TEM, and (f) HR-TEM.

UV-Vis spectra of 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs dispersed in acetone are shown in Figure 3. 1T-MoS2 spectra in Figure 3a exhibit a broad absorption profile without distinct excitonic features, which indicates the absence of stable exciton formation. This characteristic is attributed to the metallic nature of the 1T phase, in which a high density of free electrons induces Coulombic screening, thereby suppressing electron-hole and excitonic transitions [31]. In contrast with the UV-Vis spectra in Figure 3b, which exhibited an absorption peak at ~645 nm, corresponding to an A excitonic transition, along with a shoulder feature at ~524 nm that may be associated with the B excitonic transition, which originates from a direct interband transition at the K point of the Brillouin zone due to spin-orbit splitting in the valence band. The presence of an excitonic feature indicates a well-defined band structure characteristic of a semiconductor [57].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

UV-Vis spectra of (a) 1T-MoS2 NSs and (b) 2H-MoS2 NSs.

2.2. Characterizations of MoS2 Nanosheets-Embedded Urinary Catheters

Embedding 1T-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2 NSs in PDMS as a bulk material offers several advantages over surface coating. Bulk embedding ensures a uniform distribution of nanosheets throughout the catheter, providing consistent photothermal and antibacterial properties across the entire structure, even if the surface layer is damaged or worn over time. Additionally, it enhances the mechanical stability and durability of the catheter, as the active materials are integrated into the matrix rather than relying on surface adhesion. This approach also minimizes the risk of nanosheet detachment, ensuring long-term functionality and safety, which are critical for biomedical applications. Therefore, the catheter model was produced by embedding 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs in PDMS as the raw material. Images of a pristine PDMS urinary catheter and PDMS with different MoS2 contents were taken, as shown in Figure 4a. Hexane can induce swelling of PDMS; therefore, its presence was effective in assisting the dispersion of nanomaterials into PDMS [58,59]. It can be seen from those figures that pristine PDMS exhibited a transparent color, and PDMS samples with increasing MoS2 contents turned darker. The 2H-MoS2 NSs provided a darker effect than the 1T MoS2 NSs content. 1T-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2 have different phases, namely metal and semiconductor, respectively. The biocompatibility assessment using Vero cells confirmed that PDMS, 1T-MoS2@PDMS, and 2H-MoS2@PDMS support normal cell proliferation and exhibit excellent biocompatibility (Figure S4). Both materials were used as photothermal agents by combining them with PDMS. The relationship between time exposure of the NIR laser (1.5 W/cm2) and heat generation by the sample with different contents of MoS2 in 1.5 mL of the TSB solution is shown in Figure 4b. The temperature needed to kill bacteria ranged from 55–60 °C for E. coli and 60–65 °C for S. aureus [60,61]. The smallest concentration (0.1%) of either 1T-MoS2 NSs or 2H-MoS2 NSs was embedded in PDMS and then exposed to the NIR laser for 10 min, generating respective final temperatures of 53.2 ± 0.2 and 57.4 ± 0.1 °C. The other samples (1T0.3, 2H0.3, 1T0.5, and 2H0.5) reached the eradication temperature after being irradiated by NIR for less than 5 min. After 10 min of NIR laser irradiation, the respective final temperatures of the 1T0.3, 2H0.3, 1T0.5, and 2H0.5 samples were 63.2 ± 0.2, 63.9 ± 0.5, 68.4 ± 0.6, and 68.9 ± 0.5 °C. The photothermal performance of the 2H0.5 urinary catheter in artificial urine and TSB showed similar results in both conditions, demonstrating its efficacy under relevant simulated environments (Figure S5). Moreover, the photothermal conversion efficiencies of 1T01, 1T03, 1T05, 2H01, 2H03, and 2H05 were respectively calculated to be 40.24, 45.38, 41.32, 45.35, 43.49, and 42.98% [62,63,64]. (see Figure S6 in Supporting Information) Water contact angles of PDMS and PDMS embedded with 1T-MoS2 NSs or 2H-MoS2 NSs are depicted in Figure 4c. The contact angle of PDMS decreased after MoS2 NSs incorporation. Pristine PDMS displayed hydrophobic properties with a contact angle of 112.4° ± 0.3°, leading to the undesired adsorption of proteins [65]. These phenomena affect the transportation of analytes and reduce the performance of separation techniques and the sensitivity of detection methods [66,67]. The effect of embedding MoS2 NSs in PDMS to improve the surface quality was to decrease the water contact angle, becoming 101.8° ± 0.7° for 1T and 100.9° ± 0.5°. The impact of MoS2 NSs addition to PDMS validated that its incorporation could improve the hydrophilicity of PDMS, which would ease intubation in the body [66]. The mechanical properties are represented by the stress–strain curves in Figure 4d. Catheters require materials with adequate flexibility and mechanical strength to ensure safe and reliable performance during use. The addition of 1T-MoS2 NSs or 2H-MoS2 NSs to PDMS urinary catheters did not significantly affect the Young’s modulus, indicating that the 1T-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2 PDMS urinary catheters retain the inherent elasticity of the original PDMS material. The maximum elongation of approximately 21% and the maximum load upon rupture of around 7.8 MPa demonstrate the ability of the 1T-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2 PDMS urinary catheters to withstand mechanical deformation and stress during catheter insertion and operation. These stress–strain curve results confirm the suitability of 1T-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2 PDMS composites for catheter applications, providing a balance of flexibility and strength under physiological conditions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Optical images, (b) photothermal characteristics, (c) contact angles, and (d) stress–strain curve characteristics of PDMS, 1T0.1, 1T0.3, 1T0.5, 2H0.1, 2H0.3, and 2H0.5 samples.

2.3. Antibacterial Performance of Phase-Dependent MoS2 Nanosheets-Embedded Urinary Catheters

Based on photothermal data in Figure 4b, after NIR laser irradiation of PDMS, 1T0.1, 2H0.1, 1T0.3, 2H0.3, 1T0.5, and 2H0.5 samples for 10 min, respective final temperatures were 33.4 ± 0.6, 53.2 ± 0.2, 57.4 ± 0.1, 63.2 ± 0.2, 63.9 ± 0.5, 68.4 ± 0.6, and 68.9 ± 0.5 °C. Those data were used for reference to observe growth curves of a Gram-positive bacterium (S. aureus) and a Gram-negative bacterium (E. coli). Samples were put into 1.5 mL of a bacterial suspension (OD600 = 0.2) after being exposed to 808-nm NIR for 10 min, and then growth curves of bacteria at 37 °C were recorded (Figure 5). Growth curves of bacteria of the control (TSB) and PDMS samples showed a gradual increase for both bacteria. The growth of S. aureus was faster than that of E. coli because S. aureus is a mesophilic bacterium that grows best at moderate temperatures in the human body at 37 °C, while E. coli is a thermophilic bacterium that grows best at higher temperatures (37–40 °C) [68]. The growth curves of bacteria in Figure 5a show a remarkable ability of 1T0.5 and 2H0.5 to inhibit E. coli growth until 240 min, while S. aureus (Figure 5b) demonstrated bacterial growth starting after 180 min. These results indicate that S. aureus had a faster reproductive ability than E. coli, even though some bacteria died. The outer membrane of E. coli becomes reversibly disrupted at a temperature of >46 °C [69]. Higher temperatures can inhibit the proliferation and mobility of bacteria through membrane damage and autolysis. As reported, temperatures higher than 60 °C cause bacterial death [61]. After 10 min, NIR irradiation could not restrain the growth of bacteria due to the final temperature being less than 55 °C, with both bacteria beginning to grow in less than 30 min.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Growth curves of (a) E. coli and (b) S. aureus after irradiation with NIR laser for 10 min.

Based on the photothermal properties, water contact angle, stress–strain curve, and growth curve of bacteria, 0.3% MoS2 in PDMS was sufficient for further examination. Figure 6a (E. coli) and Figure 6b (S. aureus) show colonies of bacteria on the agar plate after 24 h with different irradiation times. To clearly define the antibacterial performance, bacterial survival was determined by Equation (1), and results are displayed in Figure 6c (E. coli) and Figure 6d (S. aureus). In Figure 6c, for control (TSB) and PDMS, there is no significant bacterial eradication with 5 and 10 min of NIR laser irradiation. The 1T0.3 exhibited excellent performance; after 5 min of irradiation, 0.007% of E. coli remained, and after 10 min, no colony could grow. The 2H0.3 shows the complete eradication of E. coli after exposure for both 5 and 10 min. Figure 6d displays bacterial survival of S. aureus after being treated for different irradiation times. Exposure times to the NIR laser of 5 and 10 min with either 1T0.3 or 2H0.3 were insufficient to kill all S. aureus; however, they were effective in inhibiting bacterial division. From those data, 10 min of irradiation resulted in 0.032% (1T0.3) and 0.025% (2H0.3) bacterial survival. The killing rate of S. aureus was lower than that of E. coli because the thicker cell walls of the Gram-positive bacterium S. aureus provide better defense against external treatment compared to E. coli [70].

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Colonies of bacteria after incubation with the catheter model and treatment with different irradiation times for (a) E. coli and (b) S. aureus. Bacterial survival values with laser irradiation times of 0, 5, and 10 min were measured for various samples of (c) E. coli and (d) S. aureus.

Bacterial morphologies of E. coli and S. aureus after being incubated with PDMS, 1T0.3, and 2H0.3 for 4 h were observed by SEM, as shown in Figure 7. Without laser irradiation treatment, the morphology of E. coli exhibited a smoother surface with an integral membrane structure (Figure 7a–c). These results confirmed that PDMS, 1T0.3, and 2H0.3 exhibited no significant antibacterial effect without laser irradiation. Although NIR was applied to PDMS, a different morphology was not seen in untreated samples. In contrast, the morphology of E. coli in the 1T0.3 and 2H0.3 samples showed differences compared to the untreated samples, as shown in Figure 7e,f. A hyperthermic effect was shown to have a severe damaging effect in Figure 7e,f, with bacterial cell wall damage (black arrow) and complete bacterial destruction (yellow arrows). Interestingly, the photothermal treatment of PDMS containing MoS2 for an antibacterial catheter was shown to be an effective way to eradicate bacteria, where all the developed steps and states effectively killed the bacteria. S. aureus is a Gram-positive strain of bacteria with a thicker peptidoglycan than E. coli, which is more challenging to obtain total eradication [71]. In addition, morphologies of S. aureus with and without laser irradiation are shown in Figure 7g–l. A similar condition with E. coli, without laser irradiation with 2H0.3 and 1T0.3, showed a smooth surface and good membrane integrity. After applying laser irradiation for 5 min, the photothermal effect was destructive to S. aureus. As seen in the apparent destruction of S. aureus, membrane leakage and rupture of the structural integrity of S. aureus caused bacterial death. Nevertheless, bacterial structure without defects still existed, even though it was subjected to the photothermal effect, because of the thick peptidoglycan layer, which protected against external stress. Overall, these findings demonstrate the significant photothermal antibacterial effect of urinary catheter PDMS containing different phases of MoS2, which effectively damages and eradicates both E. coli and S. aureus. However, the thicker peptidoglycan layer of S. aureus presents greater resistance, highlighting the challenge of achieving complete bacterial eradication in Gram-positive strains.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Bacterial morphologies of E.coli without laser irradiation treatment of (a) PDMS, (b) 2H0.3, and (c) 1T0.3 samples. Bacterial morphologies of E. coli under laser treatment irradiation for 5 min of (d) PDMS, (e) 2H0.3, and (f) 1T0.3 samples. Bacterial morphologies of S. aureus without laser irradiation treatment of (g) PDMS, (h) 2H0.3, and (i) 1T0.3 samples. Bacterial morphologies after laser irradiation for 5 min of (j) PDMS, (k) 2H0.3, and (l) 1T0.3 samples. Black arrow: bacterial cell wall damage. Yellow arrow: complete bacterial destruction.

3. Discussion

This study demonstrates the successful synthesis and structural transformation of MoS2 NSs from the 1T to the 2H phase through hydrothermal synthesis and subsequent annealing. Structural characterization using XRD, Raman spectroscopy, and XPS confirmed this transition, highlighting the distinct crystalline and electronic properties of the two phases. The XRD data revealed a shift in 2θ positions after annealing, indicating a reorientation of the crystal structure from the metastable 1T phase (octahedral structure) to the stable 2H phase (hexagonal structure). Raman spectra further corroborated this transformation, with the disappearance of phonon modes (J1, J2, and J3) specific to the metallic 1T phase and the emergence of peaks corresponding to the semiconducting 2H phase (E2g and A1g modes). Additionally, XPS analysis showed a binding energy shift of ~0.8 eV, reflecting reduced electron density, consistent with the phase transition. Morphological analysis using SEM and TEM revealed a flower-like structure for both 1T and 2H MoS2 NSs, with particle sizes ranging from 400 to 800 nm. The HR-TEM analysis showed a reduction in d-spacing from 0.97 nm (1T phase) to 0.65 nm (2H phase), confirming the structural transformation. Elemental analysis using EDX revealed a consistent sulfur-to-molybdenum ratio, demonstrating the chemical stability of MoS2 during the phase change. UV-Vis spectroscopy further highlighted the optical properties of the two phases. The 1T phase exhibited excitonic peaks within the NIR region, while the 2H phase showed characteristic absorption peaks at 524 and 645 nm. These results indicate that both phases exhibit tunable optical properties, making them suitable for applications such as antibacterial treatments, where UV and NIR stimulation can enhance performance. Overall, the systematic synthesis and characterization of 1T and 2H MoS2 NSs provide a promising foundation for their application in various fields, particularly in optoelectronics and biomedicine.

Furthermore, this study highlights the integration of 1T-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2 NSs into PDMS to fabricate urinary catheters with enhanced photothermal, hydrophilic, and mechanical properties. Both 1T-MoS2 (metallic phase) and 2H-MoS2 (semiconducting phase) were embedded into PDMS, resulting in visually darker samples with increasing MoS2 content, with 2H-MoS2 producing a more pronounced darkening effect. As photothermal agents, both 1T-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2 demonstrated efficient heat generation under NIR laser exposure, achieving bacterial eradication temperatures within 5–10 min. Notably, 2H-MoS2 exhibited superior photothermal performance, with the 2H0.5 sample reaching a maximum temperature of 68.9 ± 0.5 °C, making it more effective for antibacterial applications. While photothermal conversion efficiency calculations were performed and discussed, it is critical to note that these calculations are not equivalent to conducting a direct biological thermal-only control experiment. Future studies should aim to include a dedicated thermal-only control experiment to assess the biological effects of heat in isolation. This would allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the contributions of thermal effects versus those mediated by the photothermal agent. Despite this limitation, the results presented here provide valuable insights into the photothermal properties and their potential applications, laying the groundwork for further exploration.

The incorporation of MoS2 NSs also improved the hydrophilicity of PDMS, as evidenced by a reduction in the water contact angle from 112.4° to approximately 100°. This enhanced hydrophilicity is beneficial for reducing protein adsorption and improving ease of intubation. Furthermore, mechanical testing demonstrated that the addition of MoS2 NSs did not compromise the flexibility or strength of PDMS catheters. The stress–strain curves confirmed sufficient elongation (21%) and rupture strength (7.8 MPa), ensuring reliable performance during catheter use. The results validate the potential of MoS2-embedded PDMS catheters for biomedical applications, offering a combination of effective antibacterial properties, improved surface quality, and mechanical durability.

The photothermal antibacterial performance of PDMS combined with 1T-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2 NSs has been explored for its potential application in urinary catheter materials. The photothermal data revealed that samples with 0.3% (1T0.3 and 2H0.3) and 0.5% (1T0.5 and 2H0.5) MoS2 NSs achieved temperatures above 60 °C under 808-nm NIR laser irradiation for 10 min, sufficient to eradicate bacteria. The clinical use of photothermal antibacterial systems like PDMS@MoS2 urinary catheters relies on practical strategies, with external NIR irradiation being the most effective and feasible due to its non-invasive activation of MoS2 NSs to kill bacteria, ease of application during routine care, and minimal risk of complications. However, samples with 0.1% MoS2 content (1T0.1 and 2H0.1) reached temperatures below 55 °C and were less effective in inhibiting bacterial growth. These findings suggest that 0.3% MoS2 in PDMS is optimal for antibacterial applications due to its balance of efficacy and material efficiency. Growth curve analyses showed that 1T0.5 and 2H0.5 effectively inhibited E. coli growth for up to 240 min, while S. aureus growth resumed after 180 min due to its faster reproductive ability. The thicker peptidoglycan layer in S. aureus provides greater resistance compared to the thinner outer membrane of Gram-negative E. coli. This was further supported by bacterial survival data, where 1T0.3 and 2H0.3 eradicated E. coli colonies after 10 min of irradiation, while only 0.032% (1T0.3) and 0.025% (2H0.3) of S. aureus survived. The lower killing rate of S. aureus highlights the challenge of eradicating Gram-positive bacteria due to their structural defenses.

While this study successfully demonstrates the antibacterial efficacy of the MoS2 PDMS urinary catheters under NIR irradiation, it does not evaluate the potential impact of NIR irradiation on healthy cells and tissues in the surrounding area. The absence of such data makes it difficult to fully assess the safety and clinical applicability of this approach. Addressing this limitation will require future studies to systematically investigate cell compatibility under clinically relevant NIR irradiation conditions. Moreover, the evaluation of temperature distribution around the catheter and surrounding tissues during NIR irradiation is crucial for ensuring tissue safety and minimizing potential thermal damage. Future studies should focus on mapping thermal gradients to confirm that heat generation remains localized to the target area. Additionally, the use of dosimetry and real-time temperature monitoring will be essential for optimizing irradiation parameters, enabling precise thermal control, and ensuring the safety of surrounding healthy tissues. These measures are vital for facilitating the safe and effective clinical translation of the MoS2 PDMS urinary catheters.

SEM images confirmed that photothermal treatment caused severe damage to bacterial cells. Without NIR irradiation, the bacterial morphology remained intact, indicating that PDMS without photothermal activation had no significant antibacterial effect. After NIR exposure, E. coli cells treated with 1T0.3 and 2H0.3 exhibited disrupted membranes and complete structural destruction. Similarly, S. aureus cells showed membrane leakage and damage, although some intact structures persisted due to their thicker cell walls. Overall, the addition of MoS2 NSs to PDMS improves its ability to generate heat under NIR irradiation, effectively eliminating bacteria in the process. The 2H-MoS2 phase exhibited slightly better antibacterial performance than the 1T-MoS2 phase. These findings demonstrate the potential of MoS2-embedded PDMS as an effective material for urinary catheters, with promising applications in antibacterial treatments. However, the resistance of S. aureus highlights the need for further optimization to ensure the complete eradication of Gram-positive bacteria.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

Molybdic acid (H2MoO4, ≥85%) and thiourea (SC(NH2)2, 99%) were purchased from Acros Organic (Morris, NJ, USA). Trypticasein soy broth (TSB) was purchased from Condalab (Madrid, Spain). Bacteriological-grade agar and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were purchased from Bioman Scientific (Taipei, Taiwan). LB broth Miller was purchased from BioShop (Burlington, ON, Canada). The Sylgard 184 silicon elastomer, including a base and curing agent, was obtained from Dow Silicones (Midland, MI, USA). Ethanol and n-hexane were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), and Invitrogen calcein AM solution were obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific (Carlsbad, CA, USA).

4.2. Preparations of 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs

The metallic phase of 1T-MoS2 NSs and the semiconducting phase of 2H-MoS2 NSs were synthesized using a hydrothermal method, based on previous literature, with certain modifications [30]. To prepare 1T-MoS2 NSs, 0.005 M molybdic acid and 0.0125 M thiourea were mixed together in a Teflon container, and 40 mL of deionized (DI) water was added. The mixture was stirred at 500 rpm at room temperature for 40 min, and the complete reaction was marked by a change in the color of the solution from white to transparent. Afterward, the Teflon container was placed into a hydrothermal reactor and heated to 180 °C for 24 h. The solution was poured into a 50-mL centrifuge tube and then centrifuged at 7500 rpm for 10 min to segregate the supernatant and precipitate. The precipitate was washed (with DI water and ethanol) and then dried at 65 °C for 24 h. 1T-MoS2 NSs powder (dry precipitate product) was kept in a dry box for further investigation. To acquire 2H-MoS2 NSs, 1T-MoS2 NSs powder was annealed in an inert gas (N2) atmosphere at 300 °C for 2 h. The resulting 2H-MoS2 NSs were kept in a dry box for the following experiment.

4.3. Characterizations of 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs

To confirm the successful syntheses of 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs, several characterizations were conducted by XRD, XPS, Raman spectroscopy, UV-Vis spectroscopy, SEM, SEM-energy dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX), TEM, and HR-TEM. The phase and crystal structure of MoS2 were identified with a X-ray diffractometer (D2 Phaser, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). The chemical composition and oxidation state of MoS2 were determined by XPS (ESCALAB Xi, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The morphology of MoS2 was recorded by SEM (SU3500, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), SEM-EDX (Quantax EDS, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), TEM (HT7700, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and HR-TEM (JEM-2100, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The optical properties were recorded by UV-Vis (V-770, Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) and Raman spectroscopy (UniDRON, CLT, New Taipei City, Taiwan).

4.4. Preparation of 1T-MoS2@PDMS and 2H-MoS2@PDMS Urinary Catheters

A urinary catheter was created by combining PDMS (Sylgard 184 silicon elastomer, Midland, MI, USA) and MoS2 (1T and 2H phases). Pristine PDMS was prepared as a control sample. To prepare the 1T-MoS2@PDMS urinary catheter, PDMS was doped with various weight percentages of 1T-MoS2, including 0.1% (1T0.1), 0.3% (1T0.3), and 0.5% (1T0.5). The PDMS was also doped with various weight percentages of 2H-MoS2, including 0.1% (2H0.1), 0.3% (2H0.3), and 0.5% (2H0.5). For the experiments, various weights of MoS2 powders (1T-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2) were mixed with 0.72 mL of n-hexane and sonicated for 10 min at 25 °C to disperse the powder in the solution. Sylgard base (10 g) and 1 g of curing agent were then added to the solution and stirred at room temperature for 1.5 h until homogeneous. The solution was cast into a glass Petri dish (10 cm in diameter) and then degassed for 1 h to remove bubbles in a furnace vacuum oven at 40 °C. Afterward, the temperature was increased to 70 °C for 12 h. The final thickness of 1T-MoS2@PDMS and 2H-MoS2@PDMS catheters was around 2 mm.

4.5. Photothermal Characteristics of MoS2@PDMS Urinary Catheter

Photothermal characteristics of PDMS, 1T0.1, 1T0.3, 1T0.5, 2H0.1, 2H0.3, and 2H0.5 samples with a 5.08-cm diameter were determined. The photothermal effect was triggered by a near-infrared (NIR) 808-nm laser with different power densities, of 0.5, 1, and 1.5 W/cm2 in a TSB solution. The TSB solution was prepared by mixing 6 g of TSB powder in 200 mL of DI water and sterilizing it in the autoclave for 2 h under 1.5 kg/cm2 of pressure. Each sample was added to 1.5 mL of the TSB solution in a culture tube and then irradiated for 10 min. The temperature was recorded every 60 min by a thermal imaging camera (TG267, FLIR, Wilsonville, OR, USA), which was connected to a thermocouple cable.

4.6. Mechanical Properties of MoS2@PDMS Urinary Catheter

Circular-shaped samples of PDMS, 1T0.1, 1T0.3, 1T0.5, 2H0.1, 2H0.3, and 2H0.5 with a diameter of 25 mm were prepared for deformation characterization (shear stress vs. shear strain). A rotational rheometer (MRC302, Anton Paar, Graz, Austria) was equipped with PP25 SN64416 parallel plate geometries. The water bath temperature was 25 °C, and the working temperature was set to 37 °C.

4.7. Contact Angle Characterization of MoS2@PDMS Urinary Catheter

The water contact angle was used to determine the hydrophobicity of the PDMS, 1T0.1, 1T0.3, 1T0.5, 2H0.1, 2H0.3, and 2H0.5 samples. A sample was placed on a flat surface. A DIGIDROP instrument (GBX Scientific Instrument, Dublin, Ireland) was used to observe the surface tension of the samples. After water was dropped and reached the surface, the contact angle was calculated using WinDrop++ software (GBX Scientific Instrument, Dublin, Ireland, version 4.1).

4.8. Bacterial Growth Curve

Twenty microliters of Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli) and Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus) were each cultured in 3 mL of a TSB solution for 18 h. Bacterial solutions were placed in an incubator shaker at 170 rpm and 37 °C to acquire an optical density (OD)600 of >1.2. Samples were cut in a circular shape with a 1.9-cm diameter, which was put into a bacterial solution with an OD600 of 0.2 and then treated with NIR exposure for 10 min. Afterward, the bacterial solution was returned to a shaker incubator (LM-80D, Bioman Scientific, Taipei, Taiwan) at 170 rpm and 37 °C. The OD600 value was recorded every 30 min for 4 h to obtain the growth curve characterization. Three replicates (n = 3) were conducted for each antibacterial experiment to ensure reliability and reproducibility of the results. Standard deviation was used to represent the variability in the data as part of the statistical analysis.

4.9. Bacterial Colonies in Agar Plates

Agar plates were prepared by mixing LB powder and agar powder in sterilized distilled water and autoclaved for 1.5 h at a pressure of 1.5 kg/cm2. The hot agar solution was poured into a Petri dish and then left until it cooled down to form a gel. The PDMS, 1T0.3, and 2H0.3 (5.1-cm diameter) samples were immersed in 1.5 mL of a bacterial solution (E. coli and S. aureus) with an OD600 of 0.2 and then exposed to 1.5 W/cm2 of NIR light. The bacterial solution (20 µL) was taken out after irradiation for 0, 5, and 10 min, seeded onto an agar plate, and spread by glass beads for 3 min. The disk was put in an incubator at 37 °C for 24 h. ImageJ software (ImageJ.JS 1.54s) was used to count colonies of bacteria, and the percentage bacterial survival was calculated using Equation (1):

Percent Bacterial Survival (%)= ODvalue(sample)ODvalue(control)×100% (1)

4.10. Bacterial Morphology Before and After Irradiation

Bacterial morphologies of the PDMS, 1T0.3, and 2H0.3 samples were monitored by examination with SEM before and after NIR light treatment. In brief, 1.9-cm-diameter circular samples were sterilized for 10 min in 70% ethanol. Two milliliters of a bacterial solution with an OD600 value of 0.2 was incubated with a sample for 4 h. Samples were divided into two groups: untreated and laser-treated. In the laser-treated group, an NIR laser source was applied to the samples in the bacterial solutions for 5 min after the incubation process. The bacterial solution (1 mL) was transferred to a microcentrifuge for washing twice with DI water, and was then mixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. Afterward, it was washed twice with DI water and then mixed with 70% ethanol. Twenty microliters of the bacterial and ethanol solution was spread on silicon glass, then dried for 30 min at 60 °C. Finally, to avoid charging during SEM observation, samples were coated with gold in an ion sputter coater (E-1010, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

4.11. Biocompatibility of the PDMS@MoS2 Urinary Catheter

To ensure safe interactions between the material and normal cells (Vero cells), an in vitro assay was used to test the biocompatibility of the PDMS, 1T0.3, and 2H0.3 samples. Fresh DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic was prepared as the culture medium. Vero cells (8000 cells) were seeded into six-well plates, cultured with sterilized samples of 15 mm in diameter, and then maintained in an incubator at 37 °C for 24 h under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Subsequently, cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The growth medium was extracted, followed by two washes of the cells with a 1× PBS solution. Subsequently, 1 mL of 1× PBS was introduced. Vero cell proliferation was observed with fluorescence microscopy. Cells were stained with 1.5 µL of a 1 mM calcein AM solution in the culture medium to detect living cells.

5. Conclusions

1T-MoS2 NSs were successfully synthesized using a hydrothermal method, and their transformation into semiconductor-phase 2H-MoS2 NSs through annealing was confirmed by XRD, XPS, UV-Vis, and Raman spectra. A urinary catheter was developed with varying contents of 1T-MoS2 NSs and 2H-MoS2 NSs embedded in PDMS. Increasing the MoS2 content in PDMS enhanced the photothermal ability and slightly decreased the water contact angle, without altering the mechanical properties. Both 1T-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2 PDMS urinary catheters effectively achieve bacterial eradication temperatures with 10 min NIR laser irradiation, with higher MoS2 concentrations reaching sterilization thresholds more rapidly. For the agar plate test, exposure of 1T0.3 and 2H0.3 to NIR for 10 min provided an excellent antibacterial effect, completely eradicating E. coli and killing over 99.9% of S. aureus. The hyperthermic effect caused bacterial membrane leakage and even bacterial destruction. The heat generated through photothermal conversion on the metallic and semiconducting phases of the MoS2@PDMS urinary catheters shows great promise for the rapid sterilization of bacteria. By integrating phase-controlled 1T/2H MoS2 NSs into PDMS, this system advances clinical translation by ensuring durable antibacterial efficacy through bulk embedding and employing a photothermal mechanism to effectively combat Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, while addressing key practical and material requirements for urinary catheter applications.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate Chi-Ming Lee for his excellent technical support at the TMU Core Facility Center.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms27114806/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., C.-H.L., D.I.K., H.-Y.C., A.C.H. and T.-R.K.; methodology, M.S., C.-H.L., D.I.K., H.-Y.C., A.C.H. and T.-R.K.; investigation, M.S., C.-H.L. and H.-Y.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S. and T.-R.K.; writing—review and editing, M.S., C.-H.L., A.C.H. and T.-R.K.; funding acquisition, T.-R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (NSTC 114-2113-M-038-001), Taipei Medical University Hospital (112TMU-TMUH-01-1), and Taipei Medical University.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Haque M., Sartelli M., McKimm J., Bakar M.A. Health care-associated infections—An overview. Infect. Drug Resist. 2018;11:2321–2333. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S177247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hollenbeak C.S., Schilling A.L. The attributable cost of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the United States: A systematic review. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2018;46:751–757. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Feneley R.C., Hopley I.B., Wells P.N. Urinary catheters: History, current status, adverse events and research agenda. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2015;39:459–470. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Patel P.K., Advani S.D., Kofman A.D., Lo E., Maragakis L.L., Pegues D.A., Pettis A.M., Saint S., Trautner B., Yokoe D.S., et al. Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2023;44:1209–1231. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jacobsen S.M., Stickler D.J., Mobley H.L.T., Shirtliff M.E. Complicated Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections Due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008;21:26–59. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00019-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Amankwah S., Abdella K., Kassa T. Bacterial biofilm destruction: A focused review on the recent use of phage-based strategies with other antibiofilm agents. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2021;14:161. doi: 10.2147/NSA.S325594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schaffer S.D., Hutchison C.A., Rouchon C.N., Mdluli N.V., Weinstein A.J., McDaniel D., Frank K.L. Diverse Enterococcus faecalis strains show heterogeneity in biofilm properties. Res. Microbiol. 2023;174:103986. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2022.103986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Souza C.M., da Silva Á.P., Júnior N.G.O., Martínez O.F., Franco O.L. Peptides as a therapeutic strategy against Klebsiella pneumoniae. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2022;43:335. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2021.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Park J., Seo E., Kim Y.-H., Ahn J.-Y., Choi D.H., Lee K.E., Park Y.S. Oleamide–PDMS copolymer for coating urinary catheters with anti-adhesive and anti-biofilm properties. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2023;20:661–669. doi: 10.1007/s13273-023-00380-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Van Decker S.G., Bosch N., Murphy J. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection reduction in critical care units: A bundled care model. BMJ Open Qual. 2021;10:e001534. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Singha P., Locklin J., Handa H. A review of the recent advances in antimicrobial coatings for urinary catheters. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:20–40. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zander Z.K., Becker M.L. Antimicrobial and Antifouling Strategies for Polymeric Medical Devices. ACS Macro Lett. 2018;7:16–25. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Low J.L., Kao P.H.-N., Tambyah P.A., Koh G.L.E., Ling H., Kline K.A., Cheow W.S., Leong S.S.J. Development of a polymer-based antimicrobial coating for efficacious urinary catheter protection. Biotechnol. Notes. 2021;2:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.biotno.2020.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cheng T.-Y., Chang L.-C., Yang L.-X., Wu S.-S., Chin Y.-C., Chen Y.-J., Chia Z.-C., Su W.-P., Huang C.-C. Bioactive Light-Responsive Au Nanohybrids for Reactive Oxygen Species-Driven Macrophage Reprogramming. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2025;17:54453–54465. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c10407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hsu F.-T., Chen Y.-T., Chin Y.-C., Chang L.-C., Chiang S.-C., Yang L.-X., Liu H.-S., Yueh P.-F., Tu H.-L., He R.-Y., et al. Harnessing the Power of Sugar-Based Nanoparticles: A Drug-Free Approach to Enhance Immune Checkpoint Inhibition against Glioblastoma and Pancreatic Cancer. ACS Nano. 2024;18:28764–28781. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c07903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chin Y.-C., Chen Y.-T., Chiu Y.-C., Wu S.R., Chang L.-C., Yang L.-X., Liu H.-S., Wu G.-C., Yu C.-C., Dong D.-C., et al. Galactosylated iron oxide nanoplatforms for targeted imaging and ferroptosis-enhanced glioblastoma therapy via immune modulation. Mater. Horiz. 2025;12:9697–9714. doi: 10.1039/D5MH01108F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang B.-W., Ou Y.-C., Yuan C.-Z., Liao M.-Y., Chien H.-W. Dual-layer coatings combining biomimetic surface with chlorophyll/Fe modified water chestnut-shell biochar for antibacterial and protective applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 2025;209:109626. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2025.109626. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Draviana H.T., Fitriannisa I., Khafid M., Krisnawati D.I., Lai C.H., Fan Y.J., Kuo T.R. Size and charge effects of metal nanoclusters on antibacterial mechanisms. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023;21:428. doi: 10.1186/s12951-023-02208-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang W.-Y., Kang J.-H., Chen Y.-T., Liang J.-W., Hoai Hoang L.P., Nguyen H.T., Chuang A.E.Y. Wireless, self-powered phototrophic algaerobot-infused nanotherapeutic hydrogels for enhanced diabetic wound healing. Chem. Eng. J. 2025;515:163469. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.163469. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chuang S.-C., Yu S.-A., Hung P.-C., Hsiao C.-Y., Rethi L., Fang H.-W., Nguyen H.T., Tsui K.H., Chuang A.E.Y. Obesity healthcare via carrageenan-calcium peroxide-generated photothermal micro-polypyrrole carriers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2026;343:150096. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.150096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tao Y.-K., Tseng Y.-W., Tzou K.-Y., Kuo C.-Y., Nguyen H.T., Lu H.-T., Chuang A.E.Y. Advancing teeth whitening efficacy via dual-phototherapeutic strategy incorporating molybdenum disulfide embedded in carrageenan hydrogel for dental healthcare. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;276:133647. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hsiao C.-H., Lin Y.-W., Liu C.-H., Chen Y.-T., Nguyen H.T., Chuang A.E.Y. Nano-orchestrated magnetotactic-like navigation for electromagnetic theranostics and immune enhancement via photoautotrophic oxygenation, mild hyperthermia, and ferroptosis. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23:442. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03488-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kaiser K.G., Delattre V., Frost V.J., Buck G.W., Phu J.V., Fernandez T.G., Pavel I.E. Nanosilver: An Old Antibacterial Agent with Great Promise in the Fight against Antibiotic Resistance. Antibiotics. 2023;12:1264. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rahmatinejad J., Ye Z. Advanced MoS2 nanocomposites for post-lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;500:156872. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.156872. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shen P.C., Su C., Lin Y., Chou A.S., Cheng C.C., Park J.H., Chiu M.H., Lu A.Y., Tang H.L., Tavakoli M.M., et al. Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors. Nature. 2021;593:211–217. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03472-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wu F., Tian H., Shen Y., Hou Z., Ren J., Gou G., Sun Y., Yang Y., Ren T.L. Vertical MoS2 transistors with sub-1-nm gate lengths. Nature. 2022;603:259–264. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04323-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kiran P.S., Kumar K.V., Pandit N., Indupuri S., Kumar R., Wagh V.V., Islam A., Keshri A.K. Scaling up Simultaneous Exfoliation and 2H to 1T Phase Transformation of MoS2. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024;34:2316266. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202316266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yu Y., Nam G.-H., He Q., Wu X.-J., Zhang K., Yang Z., Chen J., Ma Q., Zhao M., Liu Z. High phase-purity 1T′-MoS2-and 1T′-MoSe2-layered crystals. Nat. Chem. 2018;10:638–643. doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0035-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jayabal S., Wu J., Chen J., Geng D., Meng X. Metallic 1T-MoS2 nanosheets and their composite materials: Preparation, properties and emerging applications. Mater. Today Energy. 2018;10:264–279. doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.10.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mutalik C., Okoro G., Chou H.-L., Lin I.H., Yougbaré S., Chang C.-C., Kuo T.-R. Phase-Dependent 1T/2H-MoS2 Nanosheets for Effective Photothermal Killing of Bacteria. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022;10:8949–8957. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c02457. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mutalik C., Krisnawati D.I., Patil S.B., Khafid M., Atmojo D.S., Santoso P., Lu S.-C., Wang D.-Y., Kuo T.-R. Phase-dependent MoS2 nanoflowers for light-driven antibacterial application. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021;9:7904–7912. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01868. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Patil S.B., An J.-Y., Li Z.-J., Wu Y.-C., Gowdru S.M., Hsieh H.-H., Chen Z., Wang D.-Y. Cost-Effective 1T-MoS2 Grown on Graphite Cathode Materials for High-Temperature Rechargeable Aluminum Ion Batteries and Hydrogen Evolution in Water Splitting. Catalysts. 2021;11:1547. doi: 10.3390/catal11121547. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li S., Liu Y., Zhao X., Shen Q., Zhao W., Tan Q., Zhang N., Li P., Jiao L., Qu X. Sandwich-Like Heterostructures of MoS2/Graphene with Enlarged Interlayer Spacing and Enhanced Hydrophilicity as High-Performance Cathodes for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2021;33:2007480. doi: 10.1002/adma.202007480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yan Q., Lian C., Huang K., Liang L., Yu H., Yin P., Zhang J., Xing M. Constructing an Acidic Microenvironment by MoS2 in Heterogeneous Fenton Reaction for Pollutant Control. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60:17155–17163. doi: 10.1002/anie.202105736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li W., Gong X., Yu Z., Ma L., Sun W., Gao S., Köroğlu Ç., Wang W., Liu L., Li T., et al. Approaching the quantum limit in two-dimensional semiconductor contacts. Nature. 2023;613:274–279. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05431-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Qin J., Zhang J., Jin G., Xu R., Wang C., Pan B. Cobalt-doped MoS2 catalysts for enhanced peroxymonosulfate activation: Efficient degradation of micropollutants via superoxide radical-dominated pathways. Mol. Catal. 2025;586:115417. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2025.115417. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Du Y., Lin Y., Bao X., Zha F., Li Y., Wang C. Bi/2 H-MoS2−x composite for efficient photo-thermal synergistic catalytic CO2 reduction. Colloids Surf. A. 2024;680:132648. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.132648. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhao Y., Wu X., Wang H., Ma M., Tian J., Wang X. Phosphorus Regulates Coordination Number and Electronegativity of Cobalt Atomic Sites Triggering Efficient Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Nano Lett. 2024;24:16175–16183. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c05201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xing C., Ren J., Fan L., Zhang J., Ma M., Wu S., Liu Z., Tian J. π-d Conjugated Copper Chloranilate with Distorted Cu-O4 Site for Efficient Electrocatalytic Ammonia Production. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024;34:2409064. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202409064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mutalik C., Okoro G., Krisnawati D.I., Jazidie A., Rahmawati E.Q., Rahayu D., Hsu W.T., Kuo T.R. Copper sulfide with morphology-dependent photodynamic and photothermal antibacterial activities. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;607:1825–1835. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li Y., Fu R., Duan Z., Zhu C., Fan D. Artificial Nonenzymatic Antioxidant MXene Nanosheet-Anchored Injectable Hydrogel as a Mild Photothermal-Controlled Oxygen Release Platform for Diabetic Wound Healing. ACS Nano. 2022;16:7486–7502. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c10575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huo J., Jia Q., Huang H., Zhang J., Li P., Dong X., Huang W. Emerging photothermal-derived multimodal synergistic therapy in combating bacterial infections. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50:8762–8789. doi: 10.1039/D1CS00074H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Thomas N., Dionysiou D.D., Pillai S.C. Heterogeneous Fenton catalysts: A review of recent advances. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021;404:124082. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jia C., Guo Y., Wu F.G. Chemodynamic Therapy via Fenton and Fenton-Like Nanomaterials: Strategies and Recent Advances. Small. 2022;18:2103868. doi: 10.1002/smll.202103868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wu G., Wu Z., Liu L., Cui W., Du D., Xue Y. NIR light responsive MoS2 nanomaterials for rapid sterilization: Optimum photothermal effect via sulfur vacancy modulation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;427:132007. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang M., Wang K., Zeng S., Xu Y., Nie W., Chen P., Zhou Y. Visible light-induced antibacterial effect of MoS2: Effect of the synthesis methods. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;411:128517. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128517. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chen Y., Gao Y., Chen Y., Liu L., Mo A., Peng Q. Nanomaterials-based photothermal therapy and its potentials in antibacterial treatment. J. Control. Release. 2020;328:251–262. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.08.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chou S.S., Kaehr B., Kim J., Foley B.M., De M., Hopkins P.E., Huang J., Brinker C.J., Dravid V.P. Chemically exfoliated MoS2 as near-infrared photothermal agents. Angew. Chem. 2013;125:4254–4258. doi: 10.1002/ange.201209229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Huang Y.L., Chen W., Wee A.T. Two-dimensional magnetic transition metal chalcogenides. SmartMat. 2021;2:139–153. doi: 10.1002/smm2.1031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhao X., Ning S., Fu W., Pennycook S.J., Loh K.P. Differentiating polymorphs in molybdenum disulfide via electron microscopy. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1802397. doi: 10.1002/adma.201802397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Okoro G., Husain S., Saukani M., Mutalik C., Yougbaré S., Hsiao Y.-C., Kuo T.-R. Emerging trends in nanomaterials for photosynthetic biohybrid systems. ACS Mater. Lett. 2022;5:95–115. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c00752. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jung Y., Zhou Y., Cha J.J. Intercalation in two-dimensional transition metal chalcogenides. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016;3:452–463. doi: 10.1039/C5QI00242G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tian X., Sun Y., Fan S., Boudreau M.D., Chen C., Ge C., Yin J.-J. Photogenerated charge carriers in molybdenum disulfide quantum dots with enhanced antibacterial activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11:4858–4866. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b19958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Huang Y., Sun Y., Zheng X., Aoki T., Pattengale B., Huang J., He X., Bian W., Younan S., Williams N. Atomically engineering activation sites onto metallic 1T-MoS2 catalysts for enhanced electrochemical hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:982. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08877-9. Correction in Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhou Z., Li B., Shen C., Wu D., Fan H., Zhao J., Li H., Zeng Z., Luo Z., Ma L. Metallic 1T phase enabling MoS2 nanodots as an efficient agent for photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy in the near-infrared-ii window. Small. 2020;16:2004173. doi: 10.1002/smll.202004173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ghosh D., Devi P., Kumar P. Intercalation in two-dimensional transition metal chalcogenides: Interlayer engineering and applications. Prog. Energy. 2022;4:022001. doi: 10.1088/2516-1083/ac3c3d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Heine T. Transition metal chalcogenides: Ultrathin inorganic materials with tunable electronic properties. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015;48:65–72. doi: 10.1021/ar500277z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ogieglo W., van der Werf H., Tempelman K., Wormeester H., Wessling M., Nijmeijer A., Benes N.E. n-Hexane induced swelling of thin PDMS films under non-equilibrium nanofiltration permeation conditions, resolved by spectroscopic ellipsometry. J. Membr. Sci. 2013;437:313–323. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yang Y., Liu X., Lyu Y., Liu Y., Zhan W., Yu Z., Fan L., Yan Z. Enhanced dispersion of nickel nanoparticles on SAPO-5 for boosting hydroisomerization of n-hexane. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;604:727–736. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Overdevest I., Haverkate M., Veenemans J., Hendriks Y., Verhulst C., Mulders A., Couprie W., Bootsma M., Johnson J., Kluytmans J. Prolonged colonisation with Escherichia coli O25: ST131 versus other extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli in a long-term care facility with high endemic level of rectal colonisation, the Netherlands, 2013 to 2014. Eurosurveillance. 2016;21:30376. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.42.30376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ibelli T., Templeton S., Levi-Polyachenko N. Progress on utilizing hyperthermia for mitigating bacterial infections. Int. J. Hyperth. 2018;34:144–156. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1369173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cui X., Ruan Q., Zhuo X., Xia X., Hu J., Fu R., Li Y., Wang J., Xu H. Photothermal Nanomaterials: A Powerful Light-to-Heat Converter. Chem. Rev. 2023;123:6891–6952. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chen H., Shao L., Ming T., Sun Z., Zhao C., Yang B., Wang J. Understanding the Photothermal Conversion Efficiency of Gold Nanocrystals. Small. 2010;6:2272–2280. doi: 10.1002/smll.201001109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Marin R., Skripka A., Besteiro L.V., Benayas A., Wang Z., Govorov A.O., Canton P., Vetrone F. Highly Efficient Copper Sulfide-Based Near-Infrared Photothermal Agents: Exploring the Limits of Macroscopic Heat Conversion. Small. 2018;14:1803282. doi: 10.1002/smll.201803282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dardouri M., Aljnadi I.M., Deuermeier J., Santos C., Costa F., Martin V., Fernandes M.H., Gonçalves L., Bettencourt A., Gomes P.S. Bonding antimicrobial rhamnolipids onto medical grade PDMS: A strategy to overcome multispecies vascular catheter-related infections. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2022;217:112679. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gökaltun A., Kang Y.B., Yarmush M.L., Usta O.B., Asatekin A. Simple surface modification of poly (dimethylsiloxane) via surface segregating smart polymers for biomicrofluidics. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:7377. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43625-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Belder D., Ludwig M. Surface modification in microchip electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2003;24:3595–3606. doi: 10.1002/elps.200305648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Puspita I.D., Ratnawati S.E., Setiawan H., Murwantoko M., Ustadi U., Ratkowsky D., Tamplin M. Bioproduction of Chitin Hydrolysate Containing N-Acetylglucosamine by Serratia marcescens PT6 Crude Chitinase and Its Effects on Bacterial Growth Inhibition in Various Temperature. ASEAN J. Chem. Eng. 2023;23:1–13. doi: 10.22146/ajche.69794. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Menezes S., Teixeira P. Lethal interaction between heat and methylene blue in Escherichia coli. Int. J. Hyperth. 1992;8:689–699. doi: 10.3109/02656739209038004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wei H., Yang L., Pang C., Lian L., Hong L. Bacteria-targeted photothermal therapy for combating drug-resistant bacterial infections. Biomater. Sci. 2023;11:5634–5640. doi: 10.1039/D3BM00841J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Mei L., Xu Z., Shi Y., Lin C., Jiao S., Zhang L., Li P. Multivalent and synergistic chitosan oligosaccharide-Ag nanocomposites for therapy of bacterial infection. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:10011. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67139-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding authors.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES