Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2026 Jun 2;31(11):1921. doi: 10.3390/molecules31111921

Iridium(III) Complexes Bearing Pyrene- and Anthracene-Functionalized Ligands—Photophysics and Application Potential in Photocatalysis, Triplet-Triplet Annihilation Upconversion, Photodynamic Therapy, and Photoactivated Chemotherapy

Anna Kryczka 1, Katarzyna Choroba 1,*, Joanna Palion-Gazda 1, Barbara Machura 1,*
Editor: Massimiliano F Peana1
PMCID: PMC13258693  PMID: 42280223

Abstract

Transition metal complexes that can serve as photosensitizers (PSs) have attracted considerable scientific interest owing to their potential applications in photodynamic therapy (PDT), triplet-triplet annihilation for energy upconversion (TTA UC), photocatalysis, and time-resolved bioimaging techniques. In many of these applications, the efficiency of intermolecular triplet-triplet energy transfer (TTET) between the photosensitizer and acceptor is largely determined by the triplet excited-state lifetime of the photosensitizer. One of the most efficient strategies for extending the triplet lifetimes of transition metal complexes is the incorporation of organic chromophores possessing long-lived intraligand (3IL) excited states into the coordination sphere of transition metal complexes. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, particularly anthracene- and pyrene-based chromophores, have emerged as especially attractive building blocks for this purpose. The current contribution highlights the role of pyrene and anthracene groups in controlling the photophysical properties of cyclometalated iridium(III) metal complexes, with an emphasis on their applications as photosensitizers. Particular attention is devoted to elucidating the relationships between molecular structure and excited-state properties. A detailed discussion of these relationships has been performed for three classes of cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes: (1) charge-neutral Ir(III) complexes including pyrene and anthracene motifs, (2) cationic bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing pyrene-functionalized ligands, and (3) cationic mono- and bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing anthracene-functionalized ligands.

Keywords: iridium(III), photosensitizers, photophysical properties, pyrene, anthracene, triplet-triplet energy transfer

1. Introduction

Since the pioneering work of Ford and Rodgers in 1992 [1], transition metal complexes bearing appended organic chromophores with long-lived triplet 3IL excited state have attracted significant scientific attention due to their outstanding photophysical behavior [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. The integration of an organic chromophore possessing a long-lived intraligand (3IL) excited state with a transition metal complex molecule featuring an emissive triplet metal-to-ligand charge transfer excited state (3MLCT), typically characterized by a shorter emission lifetime (generally <1 μs), offers promising opportunities for tuning the photophysical properties of materials. The variations in photobehavior of such systems arise from the interplay between 3MLCT and 3IL states localized on an organic chromophore. When 3MLCT and 3IL excited states are energetically matched, photoexcitation can induce a reversible intramolecular triplet energy transfer equilibrium. In this case, an organic chromophore repopulates the luminescent 3MLCT excited state, serving as an energy “reservoir”, resulting in bichromophoric systems that exhibit prolonged 3MLCT emission lifetimes. Functionalization of transition metal complexes with π-conjugated groups may also result in intramolecular energy transfer from 3MLCT to a significantly lower-energy triplet state localized on the organic chromophore, leading to emission quenching. Such systems are non-emissive, but their lowest triplet excited states possess very long lifetimes. In rare cases, a dual emission originating from 3MLCT and 3IL excited states has been observed [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38].

Elongated excited-state lifetimes and the ability to perform intermolecular triplet-triplet energy transfer (TTET) to other molecules make these systems appealing for employment in photocatalysis [39,40,41,42,43], triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion (TTA UC) [30,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57], photodynamic therapy (PDT) [58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70], and photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) [61,62,71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. The overall photosensitization efficiency depends on the absorption range and extinction ability of the photosensitizers, the intersystem crossing (ISC) efficiency, and the TTET process. The latter is determined by the triplet excited-state lifetime of the photosensitizer and the energy gap between triplet excited states of the photosensitizer and acceptor. The mechanism and efficiency of TTET have been comprehensively investigated both experimentally and theoretically [19,31,45,46,49,53,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].

Among the most recognizable organic chromophores employed in the bichromophoric approach are anthryl and pyrenyl groups, with triplet excited-state energies of approximately 2.06 and 1.8 eV, respectively [26,32,33,34]. Over the last four decades, numerous transition metal complexes incorporating anthryl- and pyrenyl-substituted ligands have been reported, and their photophysical properties have been extensively investigated, including the use of advanced experimental methods such as time-resolved infrared spectroscopy, fluorescence upconversion methods, time-resolved emission, and transient absorption spectroscopy. Several reviews have also summarized their photophysical characteristics and applications as photosensitizers [26,46,57,77,84,85,86,87,88].

To the best of our knowledge, a discernible gap in the current literature concerns the absence of a comprehensive review of cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing pyrene (pyr) and anthracene (ant) functionalized ligands. Importantly, such systems can be regarded as outstanding candidates for the design of photosensitizers. This is attributed to the large spin–orbit coupling constant of iridium (3909 cm−1), which enables rapid and efficient intersystem crossing to long-lived triplet excited states, together with their high chemical and photostability, large Stokes shifts, tunable photophysical properties and ability to participate in intermolecular triplet-triplet energy transfer [19,30,44,45,46,48,52,53,58,64,74,78,79,80,87,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100].

Therefore, a detailed discussion of the relationships between molecular structure and excited-state properties in these systems is highly desirable to advance the rational design of Ir(III)-based materials with pre-defined photophysical behavior.

The current contribution highlights the role of pyrene and anthracene groups in controlling the photophysical properties of cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes, with a view to their potential applications. To gain deeper insight into the structure–excited-state properties relationships, these systems have been generally classified into three categories: (i) charge-neutral Ir(III) complexes including pyrene and anthracene motifs, (ii) cationic bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing pyrene-functionalized ligands, and (iii) cationic mono- and bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing anthracene-functionalized ligands.

2. Neutral Ir(III) Complexes Including Pyrene and Anthracene Motifs

The molecular structures of Ir(III) complexes belonging to this class, which have been reported in the literature and investigated for their photophysical properties, are shown in Scheme 1. Regarding the types of structural modifications, this class comprises tris-cyclometalated complexes with tethered pyrene-based units, bis-cyclometalated complexes bearing pyrene-functionalized acetylacetonate-based ancillary ligands, bis-cyclometalated complexes bearing pyrene- or anthracene-functionalized β-ketoiminato-based ancillary ligands, complexes with pyrene-substituted cyclometalated ligands, complexes with pyrene coordinated to the metal center, and complexes with pyrene-fused cyclometalated ligands.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1

Neutral Ir(III) complexes including pyrene and anthracene motifs.

Among transition metal complexes, conventional tris-cyclometalated iridium(III) systems exhibit exceptionally high phosphorescence quantum yields, approaching the theoretical limit (Φ = 0.8–1.0). However, their weak visible-light absorptivity and short triplet radiative lifetimes, typically 1–5 µs, frequently preclude their effective use as photosensitizers [101,102]. A major contribution to understanding the role of pyrene units in modulating the photophysical properties of tris-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes was provided by Zhao and Ma [19,21,103,104], who conducted a comprehensive investigation of complexes 1–7 in comparison with their parent chromophores lacking tethered pyrene units (1a–7a). In this well-designed series, the energy gap between the triplet excited states localized on the {Ir(ppy)3}- and pyrene-based units, and consequently the photophysical behavior and capacity to undergo intra- and intermolecular energy transfer processes, were tuned by varying the spatial separation between the {Ir(ppy)3} and pyrene moieties, attaching the pyrene–fluorene unit to different parts of the cyclometalated ligand (ppy = 2-phenylpyridine), and varying the number of pyrene–fluorene units. The UV–Vis spectra of the bichromophoric complexes 1–7 show well-resolved vibronic structures of the pyrene, indicating that the {Ir(ppy)3}-based chromophore is electronically decoupled from the appended pyrene-based group in the ground state. The π-conjugated fluorenyl linker was incorporated to enhance the visible-light absorptivity of the sensitizers [21,104]. The emission band shapes of 1–7 were found to be nearly identical to those for appropriate unsubstituted model chromophores 1a–7a. However, the attachment of the pyrene-based motif (2,7-di-tert-butylpyrene (DBP) or pyrene) was found to markedly reduce phosphorescence quantum yields (ΦPL), as demonstrated in Table 1. The most pronounced reduction in ΦPL was evidenced for complexes 1, 2, and 6, for which the phosphorescence quantum yields were diminished to 2–7%. In contrast, the phosphorescence quantum yields of complexes 3, 4, and 7 decreased by approximately 30%, yet they remained relatively high at around 0.60.

Table 1.

Photoluminescence (PL) properties with upconversion data of complexes 1–7 and their parent chromophores 1a–7a recorded in toluene solution at room temperature under deoxygenated conditions (see also Tables S1 and S2 for other photophysical properties of 1–7 and 1a–7a).

Compound λPL [nm] Lifetimes Quantum Yield
ΦPL
Upconversion Quantum Yield ΦUC [%] Ref.
τ1 [µs] τ2 [µs]
1 510 0.0020 680 0.03 [104]
2 511 0.0024 2800 0.02 2.6
3 565 0.001 2200 0.66 2.4 [21]
4 562
563 *
0.012
0.0105 *
1000
1000 *
0.59
0.60 *
3.2 [103]
[19] *
5 553 *
552 *
0.0087
0.0079 *
2000
2000 *
0.19
0.31 *
4.1 [103]
[19] *
6 520 0.0074 3900 0.07 [19]
7 564 0.0040 1200 0.64
1a = 2a 510 1.3 0.97 [104]
3a 565 2.2 0.92 0.45 [21]
4a 561
560 *
2.3
2.2 *
0.92
0.92 *
0.54 [103]
[19] *
5a 550 3.8 0.78
0.81 *
0.26 [103]
6a 517 1.4 0.97 [19]
7a 563 2.9 0.90

*—show which results come from which work—they are marked with asterisks.

For all bichromophoric systems 1–7, time-resolved emission measurements revealed two dramatically distinct decay components, with nanosecond and millisecond lifetimes, respectively. The ultra-long lifetimes, spanning from 0.68 ms for 1 to 3.9 ms for 6, were assigned to the establishment of an energetically imbalanced reversible intramolecular triplet energy transfer. The excitation of the pyrene-based chromophore via intramolecular energy transfer was confirmed using transient absorption spectroscopy [21,103]. Remarkably, such prolonged excited-state lifetimes are exceedingly rare, even among transition metal complexes renowned for their so-called “energy reservoir” behavior.

In contrast to related bichromophoric Ru(II)−pyrene systems, which exhibit nearly isoenergetic 3MLCT and 3ILpyr states, the Ir(III) complexes 1–7 are characterized by a substantially enlarged 3MLCT–3ILpyr energy gap [19]. This energetic separation promotes forward energy transfer from the {Ir(ppy)3} core to the pyrene chromophore, while the back energy transfer is significantly hindered (kf > kb). As shown in Table 2, the forward and backward energy transfer rates are also influenced by the spatial separation between {Ir(ppy)3}- and pyrene-based units and the position of DBP or pyrene. The more strongly hindered back-energy transfer in complex 2 compared to 1 was rationalized by the reduced molecular mobility of DBP relative to pyrene, arising from steric hindrance imposed by the two bulky tert-butyl (t-Bu) groups in DBP.

Table 2.

The calculated parameters of intermolecular triplet-triplet energy transfer processes in complexes 1–7 with the singlet oxygen generation efficiencies of complexes 4–7.

graphic file with name molecules-31-01921-i001.jpg
Compound kmet [106 s−1] a kf [s−1] b kb [s−1] c kpyr [s−1] d K e ΔE [eV] f ΦΔ Ref.
1 0.76 5 × 108 3 × 104 1430 17,000 0.43 – [104]
2 0.76 4 × 108 4 × 103 350 114,000 0.39 –
3 0.45 9.1 × 108 8.1 × 105 128 1100 0.17 – [21]
4 0.45 0.95 × 108 1.48 × 105 350 640 0.17 ~0.8 [19]
5 0.26 1.27 × 108 4.70 × 104 320 2600 0.20
6 0.71 1.35 × 108 3.1 × 103 260 44,000 0.27
7 0.34 2.50 × 108 4.63 × 105 270 540 0.14

a kmet—the decay rate of the metal-complex chromophore; b kf—the forward energy transfer rate constant; c kb—the backenergy transfer rate constant; d kpyr—the decay rate of the pyrene chromophore; e K—the equilibrium constant of the reversible triplet energy transfer from the Ir complex to the attached pyrene; f ΔE—D–A energy gap determined using the lowest triplet energy levels of the Ir chromophores and DBP, estimated from their emission maxima at 77 K. The values of kmet, kpyr, and K were estimated using the following equations: 1τ1≈kf+kb; 1τ2=11+Kkmet+K1+Kkpyr; K=kfkb  [19].

In line with their ultra-long triplet lifetimes, complexes 1–7 were found to be promising photosensitizers. The singlet oxygen generation efficiencies of complexes 4–7 were evaluated using the direct method, with tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP, ΦΔ = 0.7) as the reference, and were found to be excellent. All four bichromophoric systems exhibit significantly enhanced ΦΔ values, surpassing those of the model chromophores and the widely used sensitizer TPP [19].

For complexes 1, 2, and 4, TTA UC studies were performed both in solution and in polyurethane (PU) thin films. In all experiments, the UV-emissive DBP chromophore was used as the annihilator. Notably, the development of photosensitizers capable of efficient TTA upconversion in nonfluid and nonvolatile media is highly desirable in view of potential applications. Such studies are, however, considerably more challenging than those in solution because of reduced molecular diffusion, resulting in substantially lower upconversion efficiencies in solid matrices relative to fluid systems [104].

As reported in [104], measurements in toluene revealed markedly enhanced upconversion efficiencies for 2 and 4, which were 19- and 7-fold higher, respectively, than the corresponding model chromophore (Figure 1). In contrast, the TTA efficiency of 1 was comparable to that of the model compound and significantly lower than those of 2 and 4.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Upconversion emission intensity of deaerated toluene solutions of DBP mixed with appropriate photosensitizers at 298 K (a); upconversion emission intensity of PU films doped with appropriate sensitizers and DBP (b). Adapted with permission from [104] © 2016 American Chemical Society.

In line with the solution-phase results, 2 showed the highest upconversion efficiency in PU thin films. In contrast to toluene, however, 1-sensitized films exhibited stronger TTA emission than those containing 4, highlighting the importance of the shorter separation between the {Ir(ppy)3} and pyrene moieties for efficient solid-state TTA upconversion [104]. Enhanced photosensitizing performance in solution-phase TTA UC using DBP as the annihilator was also demonstrated for bichromophoric compounds 3 [21], 4, and 5 [103].

Unlike complexes 1–7, a prolonged excited-state lifetime was not confirmed for 8, even though the energy gap between the triplet energy level localized on pyrene (2.13 eV) and that associated with the {Ir(tpy)3} unit (2.45 eV; tpy = 2-(4-tolyl)pyridine) was comparable to those of complexes 1 and 2 [24].

The relevant photoluminescence data for complex 8 and other neutral Ir(III) complexes incorporating pyrene and anthracene motifs are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Photoluminescence (PL) properties of complexes 8–30.

Compound Medium λexc [nm] λPL [nm] τ [µs] ΦPL Ref.
8 DMSO 366 388, 409, 505 1.0 <0.01 [24]
9 THF 430 390, 420, ~520 – – [10]
MeCN 460 – 0.0021 –
10 DCM 410 563 – <0.01 [105]
11 PMMA – 615 18.0 and 104 0.15 [15]
12 Chlorobenzene 485 ~570 – – [106]
13 ~570 – –
14 ~570 – –
15 DCM – 471,
440
0.00281 and 0.00715,
0.00188 and 0.00698
0.011 [107]
16 2-MeTHF – 673 1.13 0.136 [108]
17 2-MeTHF – 665 1.18 0.189
18 CH3Cl – 425 0.0027 – [109]
19 – 429 0.0028 –
20 – 425 0.0025 –
21 – 446 0.0030 –
22 DCM 400 680, 734 2.7 0.0056 [110]
Toluene 684, 734 2.5 0.0013
MeCN 680, 734 2.5 0.0088
EPA 680, 738 3.6 –
EPA 77 K 679, 745 5.1 –
23 DCM 430 626, 683 37.0 0.063
Toluene 626, 680 52.9 0.021
MeCN 623, 685 11.6 0.060
EPA 623, 685 67.1 –
EPA 77 K 622, 636, 676, 692 125.0 –
24 DCM – ~705 – – [111]
26 DCM 436 681 0.42 0.0031 [28]
Hexane – 680 – –
Toluene – 683 – –
MeCN – 676 – –
27 DCM 436 692 0.80 0.0033
Hexane – 692 – –
Toluene – 695 – –
MeCN – 689 – –
28 DCM 436 680 0.32 0.0026
Hexane – 682 – –
Toluene – 682 – –
MeCN – 676 – –
29 DCM 436 679 0.47 0.0024
Hexane – 679 – –
Toluene – 682 – –
MeCN – 677 – –
30 DCM 440 698, 792 sh 1.04 0.0225 [112]
DCM 77 K 693, 760 sh 4.82 –
31 DCM 699, 792 sh 1.41 0.007
DCM 77 K 702, 773 sh 5.05 –
32 DCM 700, 792 sh 1.42 0.0122
DCM 77 K 704, 778 sh 4.67 –
33 DCM 450 732 0.60 0.13 [113]
2-MeTHF 77 K 706, 776 – –
Toluene ~715 – –
THF ~715 – –
CHCl3 ~750 – –
34 DCM 600 789 0.22 0.14 [114]

Acetylacetonate-based ancillary ligands generally do not contribute to the frontier molecular orbitals and exert only a marginal impact on the photophysical properties of bis-cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes [115]. This generalization, however, does not apply to acetylacetonate ligands functionalized with polyaromatic chromophores [10,105]. In complex 9, the introduction of 1-ethynylpyrene into the ancillary acac-Ph ligand was found to induce substantial quenching of the 3MLCT emission relative to [Ir(ppy)2(acacPhI)] (ppy = 2-phenylpyridine), by factors of approximately 75 in THF and 250 in MeCN. Upon excitation at 280 nm, residual pyrene-centered fluorescence was observed, with maxima at 390 and 420 nm. For complex 10, only fluorescence was detected in solution at room temperature upon irradiation into the low-energy absorption band [10]. Femtosecond transient absorption (fs-TA) studies of 9 revealed that incorporation of the 1-ethynylpyrene group introduced an additional deactivation pathway. Following excitation at 360 nm, the populated S2 state of pyrene undergoes two competing processes: intersystem crossing to the 3ILpyrene state and the energy redistribution to the 3MLCT state. The population of the 3MLCT state is immediately followed by triplet-triplet energy transfer to the lower-lying 3ILpyrene state. When excited at 420 nm, intended to selectively populate the 1MLCT state, deactivation proceeds predominantly via the 1MLCT ⟶ 3MLCT ⟶ 3ILpyr pathway. The lowest triplet state of 9 is therefore localized on the pyrene chromophore, with ground state recovery occurring within 40 μs in THF and 20 μs in acetonitrile, as determined by nanosecond absorption spectroscopy. Although the intermolecular TTET was not investigated, the long-lived triplet excited state suggests that 9 can be regarded as a promising photosensitizer candidate [10].

Among the series of bis-cyclometalated complexes bearing pyrene- or anthracene-functionalized N,O-chelating ancillary ligands (11–15) [15,106,107], an extended triplet excited-state lifetime was confirmed only for complex 11, which incorporates a pyrene moiety appended to a salicylimine-based ancillary ligand. Notably, structured phosphorescence with biexponential decay lifetimes of 18.0 and 104 μs was detected when complex 11 was dispersed in poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) films. This biexponential decay behavior was attributed to dual 3MLCT and 3ILpyr emission. In contrast, in solution at room temperature, complex 11 was found to be non-emissive, which was ascribed to a dominant nonradiative decay pathway arising from distortions of the six-membered O∩N chelate ring out of the equatorial plane. Transient absorption spectra of 11 in PMMA confirmed an excited-state absorption characteristic of 3ILpyr, which decays to the ground state within 101 μs [15].

Introduction of the pyrene motif into the 2-methyl-3-phenylquinoxaline cyclometalated ligands of complexes 16 and 17 was found to exert only a marginal impact on their photophysical characteristics in solution. Relative to the parent chromophore, both complexes show only a modest bathochromic shift (from 660 nm for the model chromophore to 673 nm for 16 and 665 nm for 17), accompanied by a slight increase in excited-state lifetimes upon pyrene incorporation (from 1.11 μs to 1.13 μs for 16 and 1.18 μs for 17) [108].

Prolonged excited-state lifetimes were also reported for complex 23 [110], a member of the series bearing pyrene coordinated to the Ir(III) ion (complexes 18–32) [28,109,110,111,112]. Although these lifetimes (11.6–125 µs) do not reach the extreme values observed for complexes 1–7, they remain exceptional among pyrene-cyclometalated Ir(III) systems, with lifetimes falling in the range 0.32–5.1 µs (Table 3). Notably, this enhancement is observed even when compared with its structural isomer 22, highlighting that even subtle variations in ligand structure can induce dramatic changes in photophysical features [110]. It was suggested that unfavorable steric interactions in 22 promote nonradiative deactivation through an additional vibrational mode [108]. Remarkably, in contrast to 22, the excited-state lifetimes of 23 were found to be significantly impacted by solvent polarity, being almost five times longer in non-polar toluene than in polar acetonitrile.

Ir(III) complexes incorporating a pyrene-fused diazaacene core (33 and 34) were found to be a promising alternative for the development of efficient deep-red emitters. These complexes exhibit emission maxima beyond 700 nm, sub-microsecond excited-state lifetimes, and photoluminescence quantum yields of approximately 14% (Table 3). These highly π-extended and rigid ligands were proven to effectively suppress nonradiative decay pathways in Ir(III) systems, thereby enhancing their suitability for applications in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) [113,114].

3. Cationic Bis-Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Complexes Bearing Pyrene-Functionalized Ligands

The cationic bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes with pyrene-functionalized ligands reported in the literature are illustrated in Scheme 2. Their photophysical properties are summarized in Table 4 and provided in more detail in Table S3.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Scheme 2

Scheme 2

Cationic bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing pyrene-functionalized ligands.

Consistent with the larger π electron delocalization degree due to the introduction of π-conjugated pyrene, most of these systems exhibit red-shifted and enhanced absorption in the visible region relative to the corresponding unsubstituted complexes [43,109,116,117]. Furthermore, the visible-light absorption capacity increases (i) upon replacing a single bond with a triple bond, and subsequently with a conjugated double–triple bond linkage between the pyrenyl and Ir(III)-based chromophores (35, 36 and 37); (ii) upon increasing the number of pyrenyl units (45 and 46); and (iii) upon the introduction of additional electron-donating groups (such as triphenylamine in 49) and the use of strongly absorbing cyclometalating ligands (such as 3-(2-benzothiazolyl)-7-(diethylamino)coumarin in 50–52) [43,49,50,51]. The clear vibronic fine structure characteristic of pyrene between 300 and 350 nm, observed in the UV–Vis spectra of 38–42, 45–48, 50–52, 56 and 57, is indicative of weak electronic coupling between the Ir(III)-based and organic chromophores [14,15,16,49,51,118,119].

Apart from complex 54, whose photophysical properties were not investigated, and complexes 44, 56, 58, and 59, which are non-emissive in solution at room temperature, all other bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes incorporating pyrene-functionalized ligands exhibit photoluminescence (Table 4). In general, the functionalization of ancillary ligands with pyrene or the incorporation of cyclometalated pyrene generally increases nonradiative decay rates (knr), resulting in reduced emission quantum yields compared to the corresponding unsubstituted complexes (Tables S3 and S4).

Table 4.

Photoluminescence properties of cationic bis-cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes bearing pyrene-functionalized ligands.

Compound Medium λexc [nm] λPL [nm] τ [µs] τTA [µs] φPL Ref.
35 MeCN 420 648, ~710 – 53.3 – [43]
36 671, ~740 – 60.1 –
37 679, ~750 – 60.5 –
38 CHCl3 350 ~400, 425, 560 0.0018 (97%)
0.520 (3%)
– – [118]
39 DCM ~450 668, 740 (sh) 0.004 – 0.003 [14]
77 K – 663, 725 ~1 – –
40 DCM – 665, 740 (sh) 0.007 – 0.006
77 K – 663, 725 ~1 – –
41 MeCN 465 590, 625 225 225 0.095 [16]
77 K 413 ~600, 615, 650, 660 – – –
MeCN – 590, 625 225 – 0.095 [119]
BuCN 77 K 413 ~600, 615, 650, 660 – – –
42 MeCN – 590, 625 480 – 0.096
BuCN 77 K 413 ~600, 615, 650, 660 – – –
43 MeCN 420 683, ~750 – 56.7 – [43]
45 MeCN 667, ~740 – 92.4 –
DCM 440 672, 747 136.1 157.2 0.01 [49]
77 K ~670, 740 – – –
46 DCM 480 682, 757 73.1 85.8 0.013
77 K ~670, 760 – – –
47 DCM 440 678, 751 213.1 367.7 0.001
77 K ~660, 725 – – –
48 DCM 440 600 1.3 247.1 0.005
738 90.8
77 K ~580, 760 – – –
49 DCM 482 677, ~740 46.3 53.3 0.027 [50]
EtOH/MeOH (4:1, v/v) 77 K 482 ~670, 750 122.8 – –
50 DCM 440 680, ~760 (sh) 172.8 195.5 0.006 [51]
DCM 77 K – ~670, 750 586.4 – –
51 DCM 440 685, ~770 (sh) 77.5 72.8 0.009
DCM 77 K – ~670, 750 472.7 – –
52 DCM 440 690, ~770 (sh) 67.2 68.5 0.007
DCM 77 K – ~685 261.6 – –
53 MeCN 375 574 – 5.08 0.0011 [25]
55 MeCN – 548 0.60 – – [116]
2-MeTHF 77 K – 658, 721 – – –
Toluene – – – 28.5 0.68
Toluene/10% DCM 436 541, 664 – – –
THF 585, 665, 730 – – –
DCM 577, 664 – – –
Acetone 548, 659 – – –
MeCN 548 0.6 – –
56 PMMA – 631 0.329
2.4
0.378
2.9
0.004 [15]
57 DCM – 615 2.7 3.0 0.014
PMMA – 610 2.0
28.1
0.378
2.9
0.028
58 DCM/toluene (1:3) 77 K 280 626, 642, 679, 696, 716, 764, 824 – – – [29]
MeCN – – – 22 –
59 DCM/toluene (1:3) 77 K 450 626, 643, 658, 680, 697, 716, 763, 824 – – –
MeCN – – – 31 –
60 DCM/toluene (1:3) 77 K 330 615, 678, 750 sh – – –
MeCN 427 0.01 22 <0.001
61 DCM/toluene (1:3) 77 K 616, 670 – – –
MeCN 439 0.013 18 <0.001
62 DCM/toluene (1:3) 77 K 613, 676, 736 sh – – –
MeCN 403 0.011 2.4 <0.001
63 DCM 410 704, 771 sh – – – [117]
THF – 3.11 – 0.0014
64 CHCl3 – 435 0.0027 13.3 – [109]
65 CHCl3 – 407 0.0026 3.9 –
66 DCM – 651 0.185 – 0.036 [120]
MeCN – 655 0.12 0.119
0.110
0.108
0.014
THF – 649 0.17 – 0.026
Toluene
(10% DCM)
– 654 0.12 – 0.019
67 DCM – 710 0.07 – 0.0046
MeCN – 714 0.03 0.055
0.056
0.0014
THF – 705 0.04 – 0.0033
Toluene
(10% DCM)
– 712 0.05 – 0.0029
68 DCM – 810 0.38 – –
MeCN – 803 0.32 0.392
0.405
0.380
–
THF – 808 0.24 – –
Toluene
(10% DCM)
– 791 0.28 – –
69 DCM – 625 0.94 – 0.13 [121]
MeCN – 628 0.68 0.65
0.65
0.67
0.06
THF – 624 0.84 – 0.13
Toluene
(10% DCM)
– 622 0.47 – 0.08
70 DCM – 593 0.15 – 0.017
MeCN – 600 – 15.3
15.0
16.1
0.0089
THF – 600 – – 0.0097
Toluene
(10% DCM)
– 598 – – 0.0096
71 DCM – 657 0.93 – 0.12
MeCN – 663 0.45 0.56
0.46
0.47
0.049
THF – 657 0.58 – 0.057
Toluene
(10% DCM)
– 672 0.20 – 0.020
72 DCM – 645 1.34 – 0.085
MeCN – – – 13.1
14.9
13.9
–
THF – 645 1.29 – 0.041
Toluene
(10% DCM)
– 645 0.36 – 0.030
73 DCM – 740 2.21 – 0.0049
MeCN – 735 2.11 2.80
2.68
2.82
0.0028
THF – 739 1.95 – 0.0039
Toluene
(10% DCM)
– 731 2.01 – 0.0045
74 DCM – 766 0.86 – 0.0039
MeCN – 766 0.71 0.86
0.83
0.87
0.0024
THF – 765 0.87 – 0.0032
Toluene
(10% DCM)
– 765 0.37 – 0.0025
75 Toluene 404 569 56.1 0.076 [122]
EtOH/MeOH (4:1 v/v) 77 K ~560, 575, 625, 680 – – –
76 Toluene 460 607 73.9 0.034
EtOH/MeOH (4:1 v/v) 77 K ~600, 650, 720 – – –

Considering their photophysical behavior, bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing pyrene-functionalized ancillary ligands constitute a highly diverse group. Complexes 35–37, 39, 40, 43, 45–47, and 49–51 exhibit room-temperature emission in solution that originates from the 3ILpyr excited state. The emission appears in the red region, shows pronounced vibrational progression under an inert atmosphere (Ar or N2), and is efficiently quenched upon exposure to air [14,43,49]. In contrast, complexes 41, 42, 53, and 55 emit at higher energies relative to the aforementioned compounds. Their emission bands, attributed to 3MLLCT or mixed 3MLLCT/3IL character, are featureless or show very weak vibronic structure (Figure 2) [16,119]. In turn, 48 and 57 represent rare examples of dual-emissive Ir(III) systems. In the case of complex 48, radiative decay occurs from both 3MLCT (600 nm) and 3ILpyr (738 nm) excited states, while complexes 38 and 57 display emission from 1ILpyr (~400 nm) and 3MLCT (560–600 nm) [15,118]. Moreover, in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) films, dual emission 3MLCT and 3ILpyr was also confirmed for complexes 56 and 57 [15].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Emission spectral profiles of representative complexes belonging to this class (a–d). Adapted with permission from [43]. Copyright © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH, [25]; ©2020 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, [15] © 2014 American Chemical Society, [119] © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016.

The bis-cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes with 2,6-dimethyl-4-(1-pyrenyl)phenyl isocyanide ligands display only weak residual fluorescence from the 1ILpyr state in the 400–440 nm range (60–62). Notably, their analogues containing 1-pyrenyl isocyanides (55 and 56) show no luminescence at room temperature, highlighting the crucial role of steric effects in controlling the photobehavior of these systems [29]. A pyrene-localized fluorescent emissive state was also confirmed for complexes in which pyrene is coordinated to the metal center (64, 65), with the exception of 63, which shows phosphorescence originating from a 3ILpyr-dominated excited state [109,117]. The observation of fluorescence instead of phosphorescence is indicative of an ISC efficiency lower than 100% for this class of complexes [109]. In turn, iridium(III) complexes with pyreno [4,5-d]imidazole C∩N ligands (66–76) emit from 3MLCT/3LLCT or 3ILN-N excited states, depending on the degree of π-conjugation and structural modifications of the N∩N ligands [120,121,122].

The emissive states of 41 and 42 in solution at room temperature demonstrate extremely long-lived excited-state lifetimes of 225 and 480 μs, respectively. The prolonged emission lifetimes of these systems, relative to the model chromophores (Tables S3 and S4) arise from reversible electronic energy transfer 3MLCT ⟶ 3ILpyr, as demonstrated by transient absorption studies [16,119]. Table 5 presents the rate constants estimated for forward (kf) and backward (kb) electronic energy transfer processes in the excited-state equilibrium 3MLCT ↔ 3ILpyr along with the energy gap between the 3MLCT and 3ILpyr excited states for complexes 41 and 42.

Table 5.

Reversible electronic energy transfers in complexes 41 and 42.

graphic file with name molecules-31-01921-i002.jpg
Compound ΔE [eV] kf [s−1] kb [s−1] keq Ref.
41 0.08 19.3 × 107 0.7 × 107 27.8 [16]
42 0.09 55 × 107 0.9 × 107 61 [119]

Using transient absorption spectroscopy, intramolecular energy transfers and the nature of the lowest triplet state were also investigated for complexes 35–37, 41, 43, 45–53, 55–62, and 64–76. Triplet lifetimes determined using ns-TA spectroscopy (nanosecond transient absorption) are gathered in Table 4. For all investigated bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing pyrene-functionalized ancillary ligands, the lowest triplet state was found to be localized on the pyrene chromophore [15,16,25,29,43,49,50,51,109,116,120,121,122]. Noteworthy, for complex 44, which has sufficiently large two-photon absorption cross-sections in the NIR region, the energy transfer from the singlet excited state of the 4-(pyren-1-yl)-terpy (pyr-terpy) ligand to the Ir(III) moiety and subsequently back again to the triplet excited state of pyr-terpy (so-called ‘‘ping-pong’’ mechanism) was firstly confirmed upon two-photon excitation. For this complex, the lowest singlet excited state of pyr-terpy (3.31 eV) lies significantly higher in energy than the Ir(III)-centered 1MLCT state (2.64 eV), whereas the lowest triplet state of pyr-terpy (2.05 eV) is markedly lower in energy than 3MLCT (2.50 eV). Consequently, the fluorescence of pyr-terpy is efficiently quenched via singlet–singlet energy transfer to the 1MLCT state, which promptly undergoes intersystem crossing (ISC) to the 3MLCT. Subsequently, the 3MLCT state undergoes triplet-triplet energy transfer to the 3ILpyr, completing the ‘‘ping-pong’’ mechanism [123].

The studies of bis-cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes bearing pyrene-substituted isocyanide ligands revealed that the population of 3ILpyrene can be achieved by two pathways, 1ILpyrene ⟶ 3ILpyrene and 1MLCT ⟶ 3MLCT ⟶ 3ILpyrene [29], as illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Two possible pathways of population of 3ILpyr, proposed for complexes bearing pyrene-substituted isocyanide ligands [29].

TA (Transient Absorption) studies of iridium(III) complexes with pyreno [4,5-d]imidazole C∩N ligands demonstrated that the character of the lowest triplet excited states is predominantly determined by the nature of the ancillary ligands, resulting in 3MLCT/3LLCT character for 66, 67, 69, and 71 and 3ILN-N in the cases of 68, 70, 72–74, and 76 [120,121,122]. Notably, the lifetime (73.9 μs) of the lowest triplet excited state of 76 localized on the coumarin unit is among the longest lifetimes for Ir(III) complexes of this type (Table 4).

The long-lived triplet excited states and improved visible-light absorptivity make cationic bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes with pyrene-functionalized ligands promising candidates for further investigation as photosensitizers. The photosensitizing performance of 35–37, 43, and 45 was evaluated in the photoreduction of CO2 to CO, which is considered a highly attractive approach for mitigating environmental pollution and alleviating the global energy shortage. The catalytic process was demonstrated to proceed through the following stages: (i) photoexcitation to the singlet state upon visible-light irradiation of the Ir(III) complex; (ii) intersystem crossing and generation of the triplet state of the photosensitizer; (iii) formation of the reduced form of the Ir(III) complex upon electron transfer from 1,3-dimethyl-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[d]imidazole; and (iv) subsequent electron transfer to the catalyst [Fe(qpy)(OH2)2]2+ (qpy = 2,2′:6′,2″:6″,2′′′-quaterpyridine), which drives CO2 photoreduction. The CO yields follow the order 35 < 45 < 37 < 36 < 43 and correlate well with the increase in the visible-light absorption capacity of the Ir(III) complexes, indicating that enhanced absorption in the visible region is another crucial photosensitizing factor alongside extended excited-state lifetimes. The highest photocatalytic activity (Table 6) was evidenced for the dinuclear Ir(III) compound 43, which exhibits markedly increased visible-light absorptivity (ε: 57,300 M−1⋅cm−1 vs. 3720 M−1⋅cm−1) and a substantially prolonged triplet excited-state lifetime (56.7 μs vs. 0.30 μs) relative to[Ir(ppy)2(bpy)]+. The CO yield obtained with this dinuclear complex exceeded that of [Ir(ppy)2(bpy)]+ by more than a factor of 54 [43].

Table 6.

Summary of the factors that can affect the sensitizing ability of 35–37, 43, and 45.

Compound φCO [µmol] ε [M−1·cm−1] τ [µs] Ref.
35 23.5 9600 53.3 [43]
36 60.1 33,000 60.1
37 45.3 41,500 60.5
43 91.5 57,300 56.7
45 33.5 30,200 92.4

Energy transfer from photosensitizers 44, 50–53, 64, and 65 to the ground-state molecular oxygen (3O2), resulting in the formation of highly reactive singlet oxygen (1O2), was investigated by an indirect method with the employment of 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) and 1,5-dihydroxynaphthalene (1,5-DHN) as a 1O2 scavengers and [Ru(bipy)3]Cl2, methylene blue, or meso-tetraphenylporphyrin as standards. As demonstrated in Table 7, all investigated compounds show highly efficient 1O2 generation capabilities, with the highest singlet oxygen quantum yield observed for 44 [25,51,109,123].

Table 7.

Schematic presentation of singlet oxygen trapping by DPBF and 1,5-DHN, along with the singlet oxygen quantum yields for compounds 44, 50–53, 64, and 65.

Singlet oxygen trapping by DPBF and 1,5–DHN
Inline graphic
Compound ΦΔ Experimental Details Ref.
44 0.98 MeOH, λexc = 440 nm, DPBF
[Ru(bipy)3]Cl2 as standard
[123]
50 0.815 DCM, λexc = 410 nm, DPBF
[Ru(bipy)3]Cl2 as standard
[51]
51 0.845
52 0.823
53 0.73 Benzene, λexc = 355 nm, DPBF
TPP as standard
[25]
64 0.86 (97.8 *) DCM, λexc = 420 nm, 1,5-DHN
TPP as standard
[109]
65 0.80 (99.2 *)

* Yield of Juglone after reaction for 60 min [109]; DBB—1,2-dibenzoylbenzene.

The generation of 1O2 represents the type II photosensitization pathway in photodynamic therapy (PDT), offering several advantages over conventional chemotherapy, including higher efficacy, reduced invasiveness, fewer adverse side effects, and improved selectivity. Upon two-photon excitation, which utilizes a low-energy NIR laser as a light source and minimizes side effects due to reduced interaction between NIR light and the tissue, the singlet oxygen generation efficiency was evaluated only for complex 44. In addition, its highly efficient intracellular 1O2 generation capability was demonstrated in human cancer cell lines SKOV-3 and A549 (Table 8) [123].

Table 8.

IC50 values (µM) of complex 44. PI represents the phototoxicity index (PI = Dark IC50/Light IC50).

Dark SKOV–3 6.31 ± 0.48 A549 3.62 ± 0.27
Light 0.0027 ± 0.0002 0.0034 ± 0.0004
PI 2337 1065

The photosensitizing capability of 45–52, 75, and 76 was investigated in the triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion (TTA UC), where the photoexcited triplet-state energy of the PS is transferred to the acceptor/annihilator through intermolecular Dexter-type triplet-triplet energy transfer. Subsequent collision between two triplet-excited annihilator molecules, 3(annihilator)*, induces bimolecular triplet-triplet annihilation (TTA), in which one molecule relaxes to the ground state while the other is promoted to a higher-energy singlet excited state, 1(annihilator)*. This singlet state then undergoes radiative decay, giving rise to delayed fluorescence. TTA UC processes, which enable the conversion of low-energy photons into higher–energy emission, have attracted considerable attention for applications in renewable energy technologies, including solar energy conversion devices that rely on efficient light harvesting, photoexcitation, and charge separation. To determine the photosensitizing capability of these systems, 9,10-diphenylanthracene (DPA) was selected as a triplet annihilator due to its high fluorescence quantum yield and its appropriate T1 energy level (1.77 eV) relative to the triplet energy level of the pyrene-functionalized Ir(III) photosensitizer. The upconversion data, including the Stern–Volmer quenching constants, bimolecular quenching constants, upconversion quantum yields and overall upconversion capability (η) are given in Table 9. These data demonstrate that complexes 45, 46, 49, and 50 are among the most efficient PSs for TTA UC.

Table 9.

Upconversion data for complexes 45–52, 75, and 76.

Compound Medium τTA [µs] a KSV × 103
[M−1] b
kq × 109
[M−1 × s−1] c
ΦUC [%] d ε × 104
[M−1 × cm−1]
η × 106
[M−1 × cm−1] e
Ref.
45 DCM 157.2 629.9 5.03 30.2 3.07 0.93 [49]
46 85.8 227.9 3.34 31.6 5.24 1.66
47 367.7 847.4 4.68 20.9 2.86 0.59
48 247.1 30.7 0.15 7.9 2.45 0.19
49 53.3 474 9.67 28.1 5.09 1.43 [50]
50 195.5 388.1 2.4 27.5 13.1 3.60 [51]
51 72.8 133.1 1.9 18.2 12.9 2.35
52 68.5 126.1 2.2 10.6 13.4 1.42
75 toluene 56.1 130.6 – – 1.91 – [122]
76 73.9 146.7 – 23.7 5.15 1.22

a Triplet lifetimes; b Stern–Volmer quenching constant; c bimolecular quenching constants; d upconversion quantum yield; e upconversion capability (η = ε × ΦUC).

4. Cationic Mono- and Bis-Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Complexes Bearing Anthracene-Functionalized Ligands

The role of the anthracene group in controlling photophysical behavior has been investigated for mono- and bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes given in Scheme 3. The absorption and emission properties of these systems are summarized in Table S5. Mono-cyclometalated Ir(III) compounds with anthryl-substituted ancillary ligands remain largely unexplored compared with bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing anthryl-functionalized diimines. To date, all reported cationic mono-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes feature 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine derivatives, namely, 4′-(9-anthryl)-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine and 4-(2-anthryl)-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine, coordinated to the Ir(III) center in a tridentate fashion (77–80) [124,125,126,127].

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Scheme 3

Cationic mono- and bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing anthracene-functionalized ligands.

The UV–Vis spectra of complexes 81, 83–86, 88–91, and 93 display distinct anthracene vibrational features in the 340–390 nm region, followed by weak metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) absorption extending into the 450–500 nm range [128,129,130,131,132]. This spectral profile indicates relatively weak electronic coupling between the Ir(III)-centered chromophore and the anthracene unit. In contrast, compounds 77, 79, 80, 82, 87, 92, and 94 exhibit broad absorption in the 350–500 nm range, most likely attributable to mixed 1MLCT and 1IL/1ILCT transitions, rather than 1MLCT/1LLCT character [31,116,124,125,126,132,133]. By analogy with cationic bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing pyrene-functionalized ligands, the incorporation of strongly absorbing cyclometalating ligands (such as coumarin-based frameworks in complex 78) results in the appearance of an intense absorption 1IL/1MLCT band in the 400–550 nm range [125].

The photoluminescence properties of cationic mono- and bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing anthracene-functionalized ligands are gathered in Table 10. In general, mono- and bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing anthracene-functionalized ligands are weakly emissive. They typically display broad, featureless emission profiles consistent with 3MLLCT-type emission observed for related model chromophores, however, in contrast to the unsubstituted systems, they are characterized by low photoluminescence quantum yields (Table S6). This behavior arises from efficient 3MLCT excited-state quenching by the anthracene unit, which occurs via intramolecular energy transfer from the 3MLCT state to the substantially lower-lying triplet excited state localized on the organic chromophore (~1.85 eV). The excited-state lifetimes in solution at room temperature fall within the range of 0.037–3.41 µs. Complexes 88–91 were reported to be non-luminescent in solution at room temperature, while 85–87 represent rare examples that exhibit fluorescence–phosphorescence emission [31,130,131]. In turn, the green fluorescence of 78 may most likely attributed to emission from the coumarin-based cyclometalating ligand [125,134].

Table 10.

Photoluminescence properties of cationic mono- and bis-cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes bearing anthracene-functionalized ligands.

Compound Medium kr
(105 s−1)
knr
(105 s−1)
λexc [nm] λPL [nm] τ [µs] τTA
[µs]
φPL Ref.
77 MeCN 0.25 2.69 380 553 3.41 – 0.0844 [124]
78 DMSO:PBS (0.5:99.5 v/v) – – 460 512 – – – [125]
79 MeCN – – 330 545 0.0361 (3%)
0.23 (97%)
– 0.018 [126]
80 MeOH – – 730 * 565 – – 0.017 [127]
81 MeCN 17,400 26,000 – 440 0.23 – 0.40 [128]
82 1% DMSO/H2O – – 450 ~580 0.037 – – [133]
83 Carbonate buffer (0.1 M, pH = 10.5) containing Na2MoO4 (without addition of H2O2 for 83, 84 and after addition of H2O2 for 83 ep, 84 ep) – – – 625 – – <0.01 [129]
83 ep – – – 625, I/Io = 20 – –
84 – – – 640 – – <0.01
84 ep – – – 640, I/Io = 15 – – –
85 DMSO – – 437 486, 545, 551 0.186 – 0.083 [130]
86 DMSO – – 432 521, 551 0.242 – 0.064
87 MeCN 6.53 13.88 382 438, 572 0.049 – 0.32 [31]
88 MeCN – – – – – – – [131]
88 ep DCM – – – 578 0.122, 0.223 – 0.125
– – – +TFA: 582 0.067, 0.210 – –
89 – – – – – – –
89 ep – – – 519 0.138, 0.468 – 0.372
– – – +TFA: 528 0.271, 0.495 – –
90 DCM – – 397 – – – – [134]
90 ep – – ~525, 565, 615 – – –
91 – – – – – –
91ep – – ~525, 560, 615 – – –
92 MeOH – – 405 592 0.365 * – – [132]
92 ep – – 592 0.874 ** – –
93 – – 608 0.452 ** – –
93 ep 608 0.630 ** – –
94 MeCN 0.18 25 436 590 0.390 – 0.007 [116]
Toluene/10% DCM – – 588 0.390 – 0.004
THF – – 589 0.600 – 0.13
DCM – – 580 0.690 – 0.015
Acetone – – 590 0.390 – 0.008
2-MeTHF 77 K – – 555
600
4.62
3.89
– –
Toluene – – 355 – – 24.4
3.57, 25.0
–

* At the maximum of the two-photon absorption cross-section; ** The lifetime was recorded under hypoxia conditions; ep endoperoxide form; I/Io –emission enhancement factors.

Using TA spectroscopy, the lowest-energy anthryl-based triplet state was confirmed for 94. The TA lifetime of this complex was approximately one order of magnitude longer than its emission lifetime, indicating that the emitting and TA-detected states have different origins [116].

A remarkable feature observed for complexes 83, 84, 88, 89, and 90 is a gradual decrease in the intensity of the absorption bands characteristic of the anthracene unit upon prolonged irradiation. This behavior is rationalized by photooxidation of the anthracene moiety by 1O2, generated during photoexcitation of the Ir(III) complexes via intermolecular triplet-triplet energy transfer from the anthracene triplet state (3Ant) to molecular oxygen (3O2) [129,131,134].

Upon reaction with 1O2, anthracene forms an endoperoxide, in which the 9- and 10- carbon atoms are bridged by two oxygen atoms (Scheme 4). The formation of Ir(III) complexes bearing anthracene endoperoxide moieties was further confirmed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry as well as by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy [129,131,132,134].

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Schematic representation of endoperoxide forms of anthracene units in bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing diimine ligand.

The authors of [132,134] demonstrated that the photooxidation activity of Ir(III) complexes bearing imidazo [4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline ligands can be effectively tuned by the dihedral angle between the imidazo-phenanthroline framework and the anthracene moiety. This modulation can be achieved by employing different anthryl linking modes (2-anthryl versus 9-anthryl) and by introducing steric substituents at the N–H position of the imidazole ring. In general, an increase in the dihedral angle leads to a weakening of the photooxidation activity of Ir(III) complexes incorporating anthryl-functionalized imidazo [4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline ancillary ligands.

Notably, the capture of singlet oxygen by Ir(III) complexes 83, 84, 88, 89, 90, 92, and 93 was also evidenced to be responsible for the pronounced enhancement of their emission intensity, consistent with the inhibition of energy transfer from the Ir(III) fragment to the anthracene moiety (Figure 4b) [129,131,132,134]. This feature enables anthracene-based Ir(III) complexes to serve as efficient luminescent probes for imaging 1O2, including in biological systems. The suitability of 83 for detecting intracellular 1O2 was demonstrated using laser-scanning confocal microscopy and flow cytometry [129]. Furthermore, the endoperoxide form of 92 was identified as a very promising mitochondria-localized prodrug for synergistic photodynamic therapy and photoactivated chemotherapy. Upon two-photon near-infrared (NIR) irradiation, it was shown to release a highly cytotoxic Ir(III) complex 92, 1O2, and an alkoxy radical under hypoxic conditions, as illustrated in Scheme 5 [132].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) UV–Vis absorption spectral changes of 89 [131] in CH2Cl2 upon irradiation with 365 nm light; (b) luminescence spectral changes of 89 [131] in CH2Cl2 upon irradiation with 365 nm light (c = 10−4 M, λex = 380 nm). Adapted with permission from [131] Copyright © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Reaction upon two-photon irradiation of the endoperoxide form of 92.

Energy transfer from anthryl-functionalized Ir(III) complexes to ground-state molecular oxygen (3O2) and the formation of highly reactive singlet oxygen (1O2) were investigated for complexes 78, 79, and 87 using an indirect method based on monitoring changes in the absorbance of 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF). As demonstrated in Table 11, the substantial singlet oxygen quantum yield value via the type II mechanism was confirmed for complex 79 [31,125,126]. A high ability to generate singlet oxygen from molecular oxygen was also confirmed for the endoperoxide form of 92, determined under normoxic conditions using the nonfluorescent dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate probe [132].

Table 11.

Singlet oxygen quantum yields (Φ∆) along with experimental details.

Compound ΦΔ Experimental Details Ref.
78 0.05 DMSO:PBS (0.5:99.5, v/v) [125]
525 nm
[Ru(bipy)3]Cl2 as standard
79 0.77 MeCN [126]
465 nm
[Ru(bipy)3]Cl2 as standard
87 0.26 DMSO [31]
Visible light irridation (400–700 nm)
Rose Bengal
92 ep 0.79 Under normoxic conditions using the nonfluorescent dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate probe [132]
93 ep 0.16 405 nm

ep—endoperoxide forms.

Several anthryl-functionalized Ir(III) complexes were found to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) also via an electron-transfer pathway to biomolecules, consistent with a type I photochemical mechanism. Among the most promising biological targets is nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), an essential coenzyme involved in cellular metabolism, ATP production, and the maintenance of redox homeostasis. Since cancer cells require elevated levels of NADH compared with normal cells due to their rapid growth, NADH photooxidation, mediated by metal-based photocatalysts, has emerged as an effective anticancer strategy, referred to as photocatalytic cancer therapy [125]. The photocatalytic potential for the conversion of NADH to NAD+ was investigated for complexes 78, 79, and 87 [31,125,126], and the relevant parameters concerning NADH photooxidation activity of these systems are given in Table 12. Complex 78 represents the most effective photocatalyst for NADH oxidation among anthryl-functionalized Ir(III) complexes.

Table 12.

Photooxidation of NADH via singlet oxygen (1O2) generated by Ir(III)-based photocatalysts, along with experimental details and turnover number (TON) and turnover frequency (TOF) parameters for complexes 78, 79, and 87.

graphic file with name molecules-31-01921-i004.jpg
Compound Conditions TON TOF [h−1] Ref.
78 Complex conc. (1 μM) 108 1084.0 [125]
NADH (150 μM) in DMSO:PBS (0.5:99.5, v/v)
525 nm, 50.2 J·cm−2
79 Complex conc. (5 μM) 5.76 8.64 [126]
NADH (100 μM) in PBS:DMF (95:5)
465 nm, 4.6 mW·cm−2
87 Complex conc. (5 to 50 µM) 4.54 37.82 [31]
NADH (100 μM) in DMSO-PBS
400–700 nm, 10 J·cm−2

Additionally, complexes 78, 79, and 87 were found to be able to generate other radicals (•OH, O2•−) through a type I mechanism, as demonstrated by methylene blue [125], 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine [31], and non-fluorescent hydroxyphenyl fluorescein [126] assays.

The photochemotherapeutic effect was studied for complexes 78, 79, 80, 85, 86, 87, and 92 [31,125,126,127,130,132]. Their anticancer activity in the dark and upon exposure to visible light was summarized in Table 13.

Table 13.

IC50 values (µM) of complexes 78, 79, 80, 85, 86, 87, and 92. PI represents the phototoxicity index (PI = Dark IC50/Light IC50).

78 [125]
Dark MCF–7 0.6 ± 0.1 HeLa 7.0 ± 0.2 HEK–293 13.4 ± 1.3
Light 0.3 ± 0.1 a 1.0 ± 0.1 7.9 ± 0.4
PI 2.0 7.0 –
79 b [126]
Dark HeLa 10 ± 2 HCT116 3.5 ± 0.9 A375 2.7 ± 0.9 MRC5pd30 12 ± 2
Light 0.14 ± 0.04 0.026 ± 0.003 0.037 ± 0.005 –
PI 69 135 72 –
80 [127] 85 [130] 86 [130] 87 [31]
Dark A549 12.5 ± 1.3 13.6 ± 0.08 18.9 ± 0.12 MDA–MB–231 >300
Light 4.6 ± 1.3 c
3.3 ± 0.8 d
1.16 ± 0.06 e
0.18 ± 0.05 f
1.35 ± 0.08 e
0.40 ± 0.08 f
3.8 ± 0.34
PI 3.8 11.7 e
75.5 f
14.0 e
47.2 f
78.94
92 g [132] 92 h [132]
Dark A549 7.47 ± 1.92 88.1 ± 2.32
Light 5.01 ± 1.63 i 0.73 ± 1.74 i
PI 1.5 120.7

a Irradiated in the 400–700 nm range, 5 J·cm−2, for 10 min; b irradiated at 420 nm by an LED area light (50 ± 3 W·cm−2) for 1 h; c irradiated at 405 nm using an LED area light (20 mW·cm−2) for 10 min; d irradiated at 730 nm using a laser light (25 mW) for 10 min; e irradiated at 405 nm using an LED lamp (6.5 J·m2) for 10 min; f irradiated at 470 nm by an LED lamp (15.1 J·m2) for 10 min; g hypoxic conditions (1% O2); h normoxic conditions (21% O2); i irradiated using a two photon near-infrared (TP-NIR) laser at 750 nm (50 mW).

Finally, the beneficial impact of appended anthryl groups was also demonstrated in terms of the photocatalytic activity of Ir(III) complexes for the conversion of carbon dioxide. Mono-cyclometalated Ir(III) complex with 4′-(9-anthryl)-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine (77) has been shown to photoreduce CO2 to CO more efficiently relative to the unsubstituted model complex (77a), as illustrated in Table 14. The enhanced photocatalytic performance of 77 was assigned to the steric effect of the 9-anthryl substituent and the low-lying anthracene triplet state [124].

Table 14.

Photocatalytic activity of complexes 77 and 77a for the conversion of CO2 into CO [124].

Photocatalyst a Light Source CO, μmol
(TON bCO)
Rate, μmol⋅h−1
(TOF c, h−1)
77 white LED 310 ± 30
(155 ± 16)
6.4 ± 0.6
(3.2 ± 0.3)
(400 < λ < 750 nm)
(3.8 mW⋅cm−2)
77 blue LED 344 ± 30
(172 ± 15)
4.6 ± 0.4
(2.3 ± 0.2)
λ = 450 nm (fwhm 10 nm),
2 × 10−8 einstein⋅s−1
(1.07 mW⋅cm−2)
77 blue LED 530 ± 50
(265 ± 25)
3.0 ± 0.4
(1.5 ± 0.2)
λ = 450 nm (fwhm 10 nm),
7.9 × 10−9 einstein⋅s−1
(0.43 mW⋅cm−2)
77a white LED 178 ± 18
(89 ± 9)
16 ± 2
(8 ± 1)
(400 < λ < 750 nm)
(3.8 mW⋅cm−2)
77a blue LED 182 ± 18
(91 ± 9)
9 ± 1
(4.5 ± 0.5)
λ = 450 nm (fwhm 10 nm),
2 × 10−8 einstein⋅s−1
(1.07 mW⋅cm−2)

a Reactions performed in triethanolamine/CH3CN (1/5 v/v) mixture (4 mL), under CO2-saturated conditions and in the presence of the photocatalyst (2 μmol). b Turnover number (TONCO) calculated from the maximum CO yield, in concomitance at the kinetics plateau. c Turnover frequency (TOF), calculated from the maximum rate of CO production, determined from a linear fit of the kinetic traces in the region of maximum slope.

5. Conclusions

In summary, owing to their structural versatility, large spin–orbit coupling constants, and good chemical and photostability, cyclometalated iridium(III) metal complexes may be considered promising platforms for the development of efficient photosensitizers for applications in photocatalysis, TTA UC, PDT, and PACT. In general, further improvement in their photosensitizing performance requires increasing visible-light absorptivity and extending triplet-state lifetimes. We have clearly demonstrated the adaptability of the bichromophoric strategy in the design of iridium(III) complexes as PSs. The review addresses a discernible gap in the current literature by providing a detailed discussion of the role of pyrene and anthracene groups in controlling the photophysical properties of cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes, particularly in the context of their potential applications as photosensitizing agents.

Incorporation of pyrene-based motifs into tris-cyclometalated iridium(III) systems provides a powerful strategy for achieving exceptionally long triplet excited-state lifetimes, extending into the millisecond regime. These unusually prolonged lifetimes arise from an energetically imbalanced reversible intramolecular triplet energy-transfer process. Such compounds remain exceedingly rare among transition metal complexes and highlight the unique photophysical potential of this design approach. Notably, the visible-light absorptivity of these sensitizers may be substantially enhanced by the introduction of strongly absorbing linkers between the Ir(III)-based core and pyrene chromophore. Consistent with their ultra-long triplet lifetimes, these systems exhibit remarkable photosensitizing performance, efficiently generating singlet oxygen and enabling enhanced triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion. Although the introduction of pyrene-based motifs generally leads to a noticeable decrease in ΦPL, rational molecular design allows the development of tris-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes that retain high emissive efficiencies, with ΦPL values approaching 0.60.

Related photoinduced processes, including excitation of the pyrene-based chromophore via intramolecular energy transfer and formation of reversible electronic energy transfer 3MLCT → 3ILpyr, were also demonstrated for cationic bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes with pyrene-functionalized ligands. Although triplet excited-state lifetimes in these systems do not reach the extreme values observed for tris-cyclometalated iridium(III), they remain exceptionally long among Ir(III) coordination compounds. Numerous examples from this family have proven to be efficient PSs for photoreduction of CO2 to CO, 1O2 generation, and TTA UC processes. Particularly noteworthy is the complex [Ir(Phpy)2(pyr-terpy-κ2N)]PF6, in which pyrene-functionalization leads to an enhanced absorption cross-section in the NIR region, enabling its two-photon excitation. Remarkably, this compound exhibits an exceptional singlet oxygen quantum yield of 0.98, and its PS activity has been validated in human cancer cell lines SKOV-3 and A549.

Relative to bichromophoric Ir(III)−pyrene systems, mono- and bis-cyclometalated Ir(III) compounds with anthryl-substituted ancillary ligands are characterized by a substantially enlarged 3MLCT–3ILpyr energy gap, which promotes an efficient 3MLCT excited-state quenching through intramolecular energy transfer to the considerably lower-lying triplet excited state localized on the anthracene unit. For anthryl-functionalized Ir(III) complexes, photosensitizing abilities have been demonstrated in the photoreduction of CO2 to CO, the generation of singlet oxygen via a type II mechanism, and the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) via a type I photochemical mechanism. A particularly distinctive feature of some of these systems is their capacity to capture singlet oxygen, leading to the formation of Ir(III) complexes bearing anthracene endoperoxide moieties. These endoperoxide-containing systems have been identified as extremely promising mitochondria-targeted prodrugs capable of enabling synergistic photodynamic therapy combined with photoactivated chemotherapy.

Overall, the structure–activity relationships highlighted in this review underline both the potential and current limitations of pyrene- and anthracene-functionalized cyclometalated Ir(III) compounds as PSs, as well as providing useful guidelines for the rational development of next-generation Ir(III)-based systems for applications in photocatalysis, TTA UC, PDT, and PACT.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules31111921/s1, Table S1. The absorption and emission properties of neutral Ir(III) complexes including pyrene and anthracene motifs alongside with the HOMO–LUMO energy gaps; Table S2. The absorption and emission properties of unsubstituted model chromophores of neutral Ir(III) complexes including pyrene and anthracene motifs; Table S3. The absorption and emission properties of cationic bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing pyrene-functionalized ligands alongside with the HOMO–LUMO energy gaps; Table S4. The absorption and emission properties of unsubstituted model chromophores of cationic bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing pyrene-functionalized ligands alongside with the HOMO–LUMO energy gaps; Table S5. The absorption and emission properties of cationic mono- and bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing anthracene-functionalized ligands alongside with the HOMO–LUMO energy gaps; Table S6. The absorption and emission properties of unsubstituted model chromophores of cationic mono- and bis-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing anthracene-functionalized ligands alongside with the HOMO–LUMO energy gaps. References [135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.M., A.K., and K.C.; formal analysis, A.K., K.C., and J.P.-G.; data curation, A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, B.M., A.K., and K.C.; writing—review and editing, B.M. and A.K.; visualization, A.K. and J.P.-G.; supervision, B.M. and K.C.; project administration, B.M.; funding acquisition, B.M., A.K., K.C., and J.P.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available within the manuscript and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the National Science Centre of Poland, SONATA grant no. 2024/55/D/ST4/00339 (K.C.), the Research Excellence Initiative of the University of Silesia in Katowice (B.M., K.C., J.P.-G.), the National Agency for Academic Exchange under the STER program Internationalization of Doctoral Schools, project: International from the beginning—wsparcie umiędzynarodowienia (A.K.).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Ford W.E., Rodgers M.A.J. Reversible Triplet-Triplet Energy Transfer within a Covalently Linked Bichromophoric Molecule. J. Phys. Chem. 1992;96:2917–2920. doi: 10.1021/j100186a026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tyson D.S., Henbest K.B., Bialecki J., Castellano F.N. Excited State Processes in Ruthenium(II)/Pyrenyl Complexes Displaying Extended Lifetimes. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2001;105:8154–8161. doi: 10.1021/jp011770f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Simon J.A., Curry S.L., Schmehl R.H., Schatz T.R., Piotrowiak P., Jin X., Thummel R.P. Intramolecular Electronic Energy Transfer in Ruthenium(II) Diimine Donor/Pyrene Acceptor Complexes Linked by a Single C−C Bond. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:11012–11022. doi: 10.1021/ja970069f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Harriman A., Hissler M., Khatyr A., Ziessel R. A Ruthenium(II) Tris (2,2′-Bipyridine) Derivative Possessing a Triplet Lifetime of 42 Μs. Chem. Commun. 1999:735–736. doi: 10.1039/a900962k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tyson D.S., Castellano F.N. Intramolecular Singlet and Triplet Energy Transfer in a Ruthenium(II) Diimine Complex Containing Multiple Pyrenyl Chromophores. J. Phys. Chem. A. 1999;103:10955–10960. doi: 10.1021/jp992983w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tyson D.S., Bialecki J., Castellano F.N. Ruthenium(II) Complex with a Notably Longexcited State Lifetime. Chem. Commun. 2000:2355–2356. doi: 10.1039/b007336i. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Medlycott E.A., Hanan G.S. Designing Tridentate Ligands for Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Prolonged Room Temperature Luminescence Lifetimes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005;34:133–142. doi: 10.1039/b316486c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang J., Fang Y.-Q., Bourget-Merle L., Polson M.I.J., Hanan G.S., Juris A., Loiseau F., Campagna S. The Multichromophore Approach: Prolonged Room-Temperature Luminescence Lifetimes in RuII Complexes Based on Tridentate Polypyridine Ligands. Chem.–Eur. J. 2006;12:8539–8548. doi: 10.1002/chem.200600245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu W., Wu W., Ji S., Guo H., Song P., Han K., Chi L., Shao J., Zhao J. Tuning the Emission Properties of Cyclometalated Platinum(II) Complexes by Intramolecular Electron-Sink/Arylethynylated Ligands and Its Application for Enhanced Luminescent Oxygen Sensing. J. Mater. Chem. 2010;20:9775–9786. doi: 10.1039/c0jm01794a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Spaenig F., Olivier J.-H., Prusakova V., Retailleau P., Ziessel R., Castellano F.N. Excited-State Properties of Heteroleptic Iridium(III) Complexes Bearing Aromatic Hydrocarbons with Extended Cores. Inorg. Chem. 2011;50:10859–10871. doi: 10.1021/ic201397v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ji S., Wu W., Wu W., Song P., Han K., Wang Z., Liu S., Guo H., Zhao J. Tuning the Luminescence Lifetimes of Ruthenium(II) Polypyridine Complexes and Its Application in Luminescent Oxygen Sensing. J. Mater. Chem. 2010;20:1953–1963. doi: 10.1039/b916468e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ragazzon G., Verwilst P., Denisov S.A., Credi A., Jonusauskas G., McClenaghan N.D. Ruthenium(II) Complexes Based on Tridentate Polypyridine Ligands That Feature Long-Lived Room-Temperature Luminescence. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:9110–9112. doi: 10.1039/c3cc45387a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lincoln R., Kohler L., Monro S., Yin H., Stephenson M., Zong R., Chouai A., Dorsey C., Hennigar R., Thummel R.P., et al. Exploitation of Long-Lived 3IL Excited States for Metal–Organic Photodynamic Therapy: Verification in a Metastatic Melanoma Model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:17161–17175. doi: 10.1021/ja408426z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Constable E.C., Neuburger M., Rösel P., Schneider G.E., Zampese J.A., Housecroft C.E., Monti F., Armaroli N., Costa R.D., Ortí E. Ligand-Based Charge-Transfer Luminescence in Ionic Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Complexes Bearing a Pyrene-Functionalized Bipyridine Ligand: A Joint Theoretical and Experimental Study. Inorg. Chem. 2013;52:885–897. doi: 10.1021/ic302026f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Howarth A.J., Davies D.L., Lelj F., Wolf M.O., Patrick B.O. Tuning the Emission Lifetime in Bis-Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Complexes Bearing Iminopyrene Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2014;53:11882–11889. doi: 10.1021/ic501032t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Denisov S.A., Cudré Y., Verwilst P., Jonusauskas G., Marín-Suárez M., Fernández-Sánchez J.F., Baranoff E., McClenaghan N.D. Direct Observation of Reversible Electronic Energy Transfer Involving an Iridium Center. Inorg. Chem. 2014;53:2677–2682. doi: 10.1021/ic4030712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Reichardt C., Pinto M., Wächtler M., Stephenson M., Kupfer S., Sainuddin T., Guthmuller J., McFarland S.A., Dietzek B. Photophysics of Ru(II) Dyads Derived from Pyrenyl-Substitued Imidazo [4,5-f][1,10]Phenanthroline Ligands. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2015;119:3986–3994. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b01737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yarnell J.E., McCusker C.E., Leeds A.J., Breaux J.M., Castellano F.N. Exposing the Excited-State Equilibrium in an IrIII Bichromophore: A Combined Time Resolved Spectroscopy and Computational Study. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016;2016:1808–1818. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201600194. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jiang X., Peng J., Wang J., Guo X., Zhao D., Ma Y. Iridium-Based High-Sensitivity Oxygen Sensors and Photosensitizers with Ultralong Triplet Lifetimes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:3591–3600. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b07860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reichardt C., Schneider K.R.A., Sainuddin T., Wächtler M., McFarland S.A., Dietzek B. Excited State Dynamics of a Photobiologically Active Ru(II) Dyad Are Altered in Biologically Relevant Environments. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2017;121:5635–5644. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b04670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guo X., Chen Q., Tong Y., Li Y., Liu Y., Zhao D., Ma Y. Enhanced Triplet Sensitizing Ability of an Iridium Complex by Intramolecular Energy-Transfer Mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2018;122:6963–6969. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b04807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang L., Monro S., Cui P., Yin H., Liu B., Cameron C.G., Xu W., Hetu M., Fuller A., Kilina S., et al. Heteroleptic Ir(III)N6 Complexes with Long-Lived Triplet Excited States and in Vitro Photobiological Activities. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11:3629–3644. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b14744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wells K.A., Yarnell J.E., Palmer J.R., Lee T.S., Papa C.M., Castellano F.N. Energy Migration Processes in Re(I) MLCT Complexes Featuring a Chromophoric Ancillary Ligand. Inorg. Chem. 2020;59:8259–8271. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kazama A., Imai Y., Okayasu Y., Yamada Y., Yuasa J., Aoki S. Design and Synthesis of Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Complexes—Chromophore Hybrids That Exhibit Long-Emission Lifetimes Based on a Reversible Electronic Energy Transfer Mechanism. Inorg. Chem. 2020;59:6905–6922. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00363. Correction in Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 7591. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01109 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Seth S.K., Purkayastha P. Unusually Large Singlet Oxygen (1O2) Production by Very Weakly Emissive Pyrene-Functionalized Iridium(III) Complex: Interplay between Excited 3ILCT/3IL and 3MLCT States. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020;2020:2990–2997. doi: 10.1002/ejic.202000442. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang X., Hou Y., Xiao X., Chen X., Hu M., Geng X., Wang Z., Zhao J. Recent Development of the Transition Metal Complexes Showing Strong Absorption of Visible Light and Long-Lived Triplet Excited State: From Molecular Structure Design to Photophysical Properties and Applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020;417:213371. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213371. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Peng Y.-B., He W., Niu Q., Tao C., Zhong X.-L., Tan C.-P., Zhao P. Mitochondria-Targeted Cyclometalated Rhodium(III) Complexes: Synthesis, Characterization and Anticancer Research. Dalton Trans. 2021;50:9068–9075. doi: 10.1039/D1DT01053K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu S., Wang M., Wang Y., Hou T., Shen X. Novel Deep Red to Near-Infrared Phosphorescent Iridium(III) Complexes Bearing Pyrenyl: Syntheses, Structures and Modulation of the Photophysical Properties. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023;150:110460. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.110460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Olumba M.E., O’Donnell R.M., Rohrabaugh T.N.J., Teets T.S. Triplet–Triplet Energy Transfer in Bis-Cyclometalated Iridium Complexes with Pyrene-Substituted Isocyanides. Inorg. Chem. 2023;62:13702–13711. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li H., Wang C., Glaser F., Sinha N., Wenger O.S. Metal–Organic Bichromophore Lowers the Upconversion Excitation Power Threshold and Promotes UV Photoreactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:11402–11414. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c02609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ghosh S., Paira P. Instigating Visible Light Inspired DNA Impairment by ROS Harvesting Ir(III)-Cyclometallated Imidazophenanthroline Complexes Against MDA-MB-231 Cells. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2025;28:e202400769. doi: 10.1002/ejic.202400769. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Szlapa-Kula A., Małecka M., Maroń A.M., Janeczek H., Siwy M., Schab-Balcerzak E., Szalkowski M., Maćkowski S., Pedzinski T., Erfurt K., et al. In-Depth Studies of Ground- and Excited-State Properties of Re(I) Carbonyl Complexes Bearing 2,2′:6′,2″-Terpyridine and 2,6-Bis(Pyrazin-2-Yl)Pyridine Coupled with π-Conjugated Aryl Chromophores. Inorg. Chem. 2021;60:18726–18738. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Małecka M., Szlapa-Kula A., Maroń A.M., Ledwon P., Siwy M., Schab-Balcerzak E., Sulowska K., Maćkowski S., Erfurt K., Machura B. Impact of the Anthryl Linking Mode on the Photophysics and Excited-State Dynamics of Re(I) Complexes [ReCl(CO)3(4′-An-Terpy-κ2N)] Inorg. Chem. 2022;61:15070–15084. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Choroba K., Penkala M., Palion-Gazda J., Malicka E., Machura B. Pyrenyl-Substituted Imidazo [4,5-f][1,10]Phenanthroline Rhenium(I) Complexes with Record-High Triplet Excited-State Lifetimes at Room Temperature: Steric Control of Photoinduced Processes in Bichromophoric Systems. Inorg. Chem. 2023;62:19256–19269. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ruggeri D., Hoch M., Spataro D., Marchiò L., Protti S., Cauzzi D., Tegoni M., Lanzi M., Maestri G. Tuning the Efficiency of Iridium(III) Complexes for Energy Transfer (EnT) Catalysis through Ligand Design. Chem.–Eur. J. 2025;31:e202403309. doi: 10.1002/chem.202403309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schmitz L., Dabelstein S., Cordero M.A.A., Fritsch L., Bracht B., Schoch R., Egold H., Steube J., Fischer F., Lochbrunner S., et al. Reservoir Effect in Bichromophoric FeIII Complexes with a Methylene Bridge. Dalton Trans. 2026;55:4885–4895. doi: 10.1039/D5DT02915E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lange O., Doettinger F., Burmeister L.E., Zurwellen J.P., Maier T.M., Kleeberg C., Karnahl M., Jacob C.R., Tschierlei S. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Chromophores Tune Photo-Physical Properties in Bichromophoric Cu(I) Photosensitizers. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2026;13:2078–2090. doi: 10.1039/D5QI02274F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kodithuwakku P.S., Kim D., Teets T.S. Generalizing Reversible Triplet–Triplet Energy Transfer as a Strategy to Increase Excited-State Lifetime in Copper(I) Charge-Transfer Chromophores. Inorg. Chem. 2026;65:6960–6969. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c00533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liyanage N.P., Yang W., Guertin S., Roy S.S., Carpenter C.A., Adams R.E., Schmehl R.H., Delcamp J.H., Jurss J.W. Photochemical CO2 Reduction with Mononuclear and Dinuclear Rhenium Catalysts Bearing a Pendant Anthracene Chromophore. Chem. Commun. 2019;55:993–996. doi: 10.1039/C8CC09155B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Qiu L.-Q., Chen K.-H., Yang Z.-W., He L.-N. A Rhenium Catalyst with Bifunctional Pyrene Groups Boosts Natural Light-Driven CO2 Reduction. Green Chem. 2020;22:8614–8622. doi: 10.1039/D0GC03111A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Qiu L.-Q., Chen K.-H., Yang Z.-W., Ren F.-Y., He L.-N. Prolonging the Triplet State Lifetimes of Rhenium Complexes with Imidazole-Pyridine Framework for Efficient CO2 Photoreduction. Chem.–Eur. J. 2021;27:15536–15544. doi: 10.1002/chem.202102837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ma L., Wang P., Wang J.-Z., Guo S., Zhang Z.-M., Zeng X.-S., Lu T.-B. Bidirectional Sensitization in Ruthenium(II)-Antenna Dyad beyond Energy Flow of Biological Model for Efficient Photosynthesis. Dyes Pigments. 2021;196:109811. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109811. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang P., Guo S., Zhao Q.-P., Xu S.-Y., Lv H., Lu T.-B., Zhang Z.-M. Identification of Crucial Photosensitizing Factors to Promote CO2-to-CO Conversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024;63:e202312450. doi: 10.1002/anie.202312450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Singh-Rachford T.N., Castellano F.N. Photon Upconversion Based on Sensitized Triplet–Triplet Annihilation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010;254:2560–2573. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhao J., Ji S., Guo H. Triplet–Triplet Annihilation Based Upconversion: From Triplet Sensitizers and Triplet Acceptors to Upconversion Quantum Yields. RSC Adv. 2011;1:937–950. doi: 10.1039/c1ra00469g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Duan P., Yanai N., Kimizuka N. A Bis-Cyclometalated Iridium Complex as a Benchmark Sensitizer for Efficient Visible-to-UV Photon Upconversion. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:13111–13113. doi: 10.1039/C4CC05718J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhou J., Liu Q., Feng W., Sun Y., Li F. Upconversion Luminescent Materials: Advances and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:395–465. doi: 10.1021/cr400478f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Deng F., Lazorski M.S., Castellano F.N. Photon Upconversion Sensitized by a Ru(II)-Pyrenyl Chromophore. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2015;373:20140322. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lu Y., Wang J., McGoldrick N., Cui X., Zhao J., Caverly C., Twamley B., Ó Máille G.M., Irwin B., Conway-Kenny R., et al. Iridium(III) Complexes Bearing Pyrene-Functionalized 1,10-Phenanthroline Ligands as Highly Efficient Sensitizers for Triplet–Triplet Annihilation Upconversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:14688–14692. doi: 10.1002/anie.201608442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lu Y., McGoldrick N., Murphy F., Twamley B., Cui X., Delaney C., Máille G.M.Ó., Wang J., Zhao J., Draper S.M. Highly Efficient Triplet Photosensitizers: A Systematic Approach to the Application of IrIII Complexes Containing Extended Phenanthrolines. Chem.–Eur. J. 2016;22:11349–11356. doi: 10.1002/chem.201601534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lu Y., Conway-Kenny R., Wang J., Cui X., Zhao J., Draper S.M. Exploiting Coumarin-6 as Ancillary Ligands in 1,10-Phenanthroline Ir(III) Complexes: Generating Triplet Photosensitisers with High Upconversion Capabilities. Dalton Trans. 2018;47:8585–8589. doi: 10.1039/C8DT00231B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gray V., Moth-Poulsen K., Albinsson B., Abrahamsson M. Towards Efficient Solid-State Triplet–Triplet Annihilation Based Photon Upconversion: Supramolecular, Macromolecular and Self-Assembled Systems. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018;362:54–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.02.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Guo X., Liu Y., Chen Q., Zhao D., Ma Y. New Bichromophoric Triplet Photosensitizer Designs and Their Application in Triplet–Triplet Annihilation Upconversion. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018;6:1700981. doi: 10.1002/adom.201700981. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yudaev P., Aleksandrova Y., Chugunova E., Neganova M. The Current State of Research in the Field of Photosensitizers and Photoactivators for Photodynamic/Photothermal Cancer Therapy: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:10733. doi: 10.3390/ijms262110733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Owens R., Damrauer N.H. Unfiltered Broadband Probes Can Obscure Long Time Dynamics in Populations Engaged in Second-Order Processes Including Annihilation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025;16:2522–2528. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Higashi K., Okamoto T., Iwaya N., Sakuda E., Kay C.W.M., Ikoma T., Higashi M., Kobori Y. Vibronic Trimer Design Enhancing Intramolecular Triplet-Exciton Hopping to Accelerate Triplet-Triplet Annihilation for Photon Upconversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202503846. doi: 10.1002/anie.202503846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang Z., Wu M., Cui X., Ge F., Xiao P., Li M., Fu H. Triplet–Triplet Annihilation Upconversion with Large Anti-Stokes Shift. ACS Nano. 2025;19:25596–25616. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c07915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Monro S., Colón K.L., Yin H., Roque J.I., Konda P., Gujar S., Thummel R.P., Lilge L., Cameron C.G., McFarland S.A. Transition Metal Complexes and Photodynamic Therapy from a Tumor-Centered Approach: Challenges, Opportunities, and Highlights from the Development of TLD1433. Chem. Rev. 2019;119:797–828. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhao X., Liu J., Fan J., Chao H., Peng X. Recent Progress in Photosensitizers for Overcoming the Challenges of Photodynamic Therapy: From Molecular Design to Application. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50:4185–4219. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00173B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pham T.C., Nguyen V.-N., Choi Y., Lee S., Yoon J. Recent Strategies to Develop Innovative Photosensitizers for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:13454–13619. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lee L.C.-C., Lo K.K.-W. Luminescent and Photofunctional Transition Metal Complexes: From Molecular Design to Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:14420–14440. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c03437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kuznetsov K.M., Cariou K., Gasser G. Two in One: Merging Photoactivated Chemotherapy and Photodynamic Therapy to Fight Cancer. Chem. Sci. 2024;15:17760–17780. doi: 10.1039/D4SC04608K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li M., Xiong J., Zhang Y., Yu L., Yue L., Yoon C., Kim Y., Zhou Y., Chen X., Xu Y., et al. New Guidelines and Definitions for Type I Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025;54:7025–7057. doi: 10.1039/D1CS01079D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cai Y., Chai T., Nguyen W., Liu J., Xiao E., Ran X., Ran Y., Du D., Chen W., Chen X. Phototherapy in Cancer Treatment: Strategies and Challenges. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2025;10:115. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02140-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhang J., Chen Z., Shi P., Xu G., Zhao J. Self-Assembled Metal-Based Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Perspectives. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2026;549:217320. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2025.217320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sanz-Villafruela J., Carbayo A., Martínez-Alonso M., Espino G. Advanced Strategies in the Design of Ir(III) Biscyclometalated Complexes for PDT. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2025;534:216572. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2025.216572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chen Q., Zeng H., Wu J., Li Y., Li Y., Wu Y. Exploring the Singlet Oxygen Generation of Iridium(III) Complex Containing Phenothiazine for Photodynamic Therapy. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2026;275:113149. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2025.113149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mandal A.A., Kumar S., Mandal A., Dhar P., Banerjee S. Cyclopentadienyl Ir(III) Complexes as Photosensitizers for Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy: Experimental and Computational Insights. Inorganica Chim. Acta. 2026;591:123003. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2025.123003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ghosh S., Chakrabarty R., Paira P. Iridium and Rhenium Complexes in Photodynamic and Sonodynamic Therapy: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Potential. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2026;132:130479. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2025.130479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Barta A., Vanwonterghem L., Lavaud M., Molton F., Micouin G., Bulin A.-L., Banyasz A., Coll J.-L., Loiseau F., Hurbin A., et al. Monomer Versus Dimer of Cationic Ir(III) Complexes for Photodynamic Therapy by Two-Photon Activation: A Comparative Study. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2025;8:4272–4284. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.5c00393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Farrer N.J., Salassa L., Sadler P.J. Photoactivated Chemotherapy (PACT): The Potential of Excited-State d-Block Metals in Medicine. Dalton Trans. 2009;48:10690–10701. doi: 10.1039/b917753a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Reeßing F., Szymanski W. Beyond Photodynamic Therapy: Light-Activated Cancer Chemotherapy. Curr. Med. Chem. 2017;24:4905–4950. doi: 10.2174/0929867323666160906103223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Conti L., Macedi E., Giorgi C., Valtancoli B., Fusi V. Combination of Light and Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes: Recent Advances in the Development of New Anticancer Drugs. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022;469:214656. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214656. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Shi H., Marchi R.C., Sadler P.J. Advances in the Design of Photoactivatable Metallodrugs: Excited State Metallomics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202423335. doi: 10.1002/anie.202423335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Basu U., Paira P. Current Context of Designing Phototheranostic Cyclometalated Iridium (III) Complexes to Open a New Avenue in Cancer Therapy. ChemMedChem. 2025;20:e202400649. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202580502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liu X., Zhang Q., Li J., Deng Z., Zhu S., Ma B., Liu R., Zhu H. Microstructural Regulation of Ir(III) Complexes for Enhanced Photocytotoxicity in Photodynamic Cancer Therapy. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2025;264:113122. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2025.113122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Rong J., Jiang H., Li H., Wu X., Gao H., Zhang Q., Hu X. Oxygen-Independent Polycarbonate Iridium(III) Photosensitizer for Photoactivated Chemotherapy via Photoredox Catalysis Boosted by NADH. Nano Res. 2025;18:94907355. doi: 10.26599/NR.2025.94907355. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zhao X., Hou Y., Liu L., Zhao J. Triplet Photosensitizers Showing Strong Absorption of Visible Light and Long-Lived Triplet Excited States and Application in Photocatalysis: A Mini Review. Energy Fuels. 2021;35:18942–18956. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mohammed Mahmood S., Üngördü A. Theoretical Insight on Electronic and Optical Properties of Some Phosphorescent Iridium(III) Complexes for Organic Light-Emitting Diode Devices. J. Organomet. Chem. 2024;1021:123380. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2024.123380. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bain N.H.A.S., Mohd Ali N., Robinson D., Abdel-Aal A.-B.M. Theoretical Investigation of the Reaction Mechanism for Formation of Pyridinyl Formimidamide Ancillary Ligand in the Synthesis of a New Class of Iridium(III) Complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2026;1043:123903. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2025.123903. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Li S., Sheng L., Wang Z., Chen Y., Su Z. Iridium(III) Complex Donors for Triplet-Material-Based Organic Photovoltaics: A Theoretical Design Strategy for Enhanced Charge Separation. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2026;1257:115690. doi: 10.1016/j.comptc.2026.115690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Buglak A.A., Telegina T.A., Vorotelyak E.A., Kononov A.I. Theoretical Study of Photoreactions between Oxidized Pterins and Molecular Oxygen. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2019;372:254–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zang L., Wang H., Wang Z., Wang S., Yu M., Kang Q., Zou G., Zhao H. Competition and Regulation between Triplet Phosphorescence and Singlet Oxygen Generation Efficiency. J. Lumin. 2022;244:118723. doi: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2021.118723. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Fu T., Wei Y., Xu X. Mechanistic Insights into Intramolecular Energy Transfer Dynamics in Photosensitizers for Triplet-Triplet Annihilation Upconversion. Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 2024;37:701–720. doi: 10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2407087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Monos T.M., Stephenson C.R.J. Iridium(III) in Optoelectronic and Photonics Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2017. Photoredox Catalysis of Iridium(III)-Based Photosensitizers; pp. 541–581. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Wang X., Del Guerzo A., Schmehl R.H. Photophysical Behavior of Transition Metal Complexes Having Interacting Ligand Localized and Metal-to-Ligand Charge Transfer States. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2004;5:55–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2004.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.McClenaghan N.D., Leydet Y., Maubert B., Indelli M.T., Campagna S. Excited-State Equilibration: A Process Leading to Long-Lived Metal-to-Ligand Charge Transfer Luminescence in Supramolecular Systems. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005;249:1336–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.12.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhao J., Wu W., Sun J., Guo S. Triplet Photosensitizers: From Molecular Design to Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42:5323–5351. doi: 10.1039/c3cs35531d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cui X., Zhao J., Mohmood Z., Zhang C. Accessing the Long-Lived Triplet Excited States in Transition-Metal Complexes: Molecular Design Rationales and Applications. Chem. Rec. 2016;16:173–188. doi: 10.1002/tcr.201500237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Tso K.K.-S., Lo K.K.-W. Iridium(III) in Optoelectronic and Photonics Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2017. Strategic Applications of Luminescent Iridium(III) Complexes as Biomolecular Probes, Cellular Imaging Reagents, and Photodynamic Therapeutics; pp. 415–477. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Huang H., Banerjee S., Sadler P.J. Recent Advances in the Design of Targeted Iridium(III) Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy. ChemBioChem. 2018;19:1574–1589. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201800182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zamora A., Vigueras G., Rodríguez V., Santana M.D., Ruiz J. Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Luminescent Complexes in Therapy and Phototherapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018;360:34–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.01.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Li J., Chen T. Transition Metal Complexes as Photosensitizers for Integrated Cancer Theranostic Applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020;418:213355. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213355. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zhang L., Ding D. Recent Advances of Transition Ir(III) Complexes as Photosensitizers for Improved Photodynamic Therapy. VIEW. 2021;2:20200179. doi: 10.1002/VIW.20200179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wang L. Recent Advances in Metal-Based Molecular Photosensitizers for Artificial Photosynthesis. Catalysts. 2022;12:919. doi: 10.3390/catal12080919. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Tritton D.N., Tang F.-K., Bodedla G.B., Lee F.-W., Kwan C.-S., Leung K.C.-F., Zhu X., Wong W.-Y. Development and Advancement of Iridium(III)-Based Complexes for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022;459:214390. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Das R., Das U., Roy N., Mukherjee C., Paira P. A Glance on Target Specific PDT Active Cyclometalated Iridium Complexes. Dyes Pigments. 2024;226:112134. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2024.112134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Vigueras G., Gasser G., Ruiz J. Breaking the Deep-Red Light Absorption Barrier of Iridium(III)-Based Photosensitizers. Dalton Trans. 2025;54:1320–1328. doi: 10.1039/D4DT03014A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Tan Z., Feng J., Tang Z., Feng T., Liu T., Zhao Y., Chao H. Iridium(III) Complexes as Type I Photosensitizers for Hypoxic Two-Photon Photodynamic Therapy. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2025;272:113006. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2025.113006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Vigueras G., Marchán V., Ruiz J. Insights into Type I Photoreactivity of Cyclometalated Iridium(III) and Ruthenium(II) Photosensitizers. Chem. Commun. 2025;61:18302–18314. doi: 10.1039/D5CC05162B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zhao W., Castellano F.N. Upconverted Emission from Pyrene and Di-Tert-Butylpyrene Using Ir(Ppy)3 as Triplet Sensitizer. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2006;110:11440–11445. doi: 10.1021/jp064261s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Sajoto T., Djurovich P.I., Tamayo A.B., Oxgaard J., Goddard W.A.I., Thompson M.E. Temperature Dependence of Blue Phosphorescent Cyclometalated Ir(III) Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:9813–9822. doi: 10.1021/ja903317w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Peng J., Jiang X., Guo X., Zhao D., Ma Y. Sensitizer Design for Efficient Triplet–Triplet Annihilation Upconversion: Annihilator-Appended Tris-Cyclometalated Ir(III) Complexes. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:7828–7830. doi: 10.1039/c4cc01465k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Jiang X., Guo X., Peng J., Zhao D., Ma Y. Triplet–Triplet Annihilation Photon Upconversion in Polymer Thin Film: Sensitizer Design. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:11441–11449. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b01339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Dang T.T., Bonneau M., Gareth Williams J.A., Le Bozec H., Doucet H., Guerchais V. Pd-Catalyzed Functionalization of the Thenoyltrifluoroacetone Coligands by Aromatic Dyes in Bis(Cyclometallated) IrIII Complexes: From Phosphorescence to Fluorescence? Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015;2015:2956–2964. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201500227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Witkowska E., Orwat B., Oh M.J., Wiosna-Salyga G., Glowacki I., Kownacki I., Jankowska K., Kubicki M., Gierczyk B., Dutkiewicz M., et al. Effect of β-Ketoiminato Ancillary Ligand Modification on Emissive Properties of New Iridium Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2019;58:15671–15686. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Maity A., Sarkar R., Rajak K.K. Heteroleptic Iridium(III) Complexes Bearing a Coumarin Moiety: An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation. RSC Adv. 2015;5:78852–78863. doi: 10.1039/C5RA08349D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Hao Z., Zhang K., Wang P., Lu X., Lu Z., Zhu W., Liu Y. Deep Red Iridium(III) Complexes Based on Pyrene-Substituted Quinoxaline Ligands for Solution-Processed Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Inorg. Chem. 2020;59:332–342. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Hallett A.J., White N., Wu W., Cui X., Horton P.N., Coles S.J., Zhao J., Pope S.J.A. Enhanced Photooxidation Sensitizers: The First Examples of Cyclometalated Pyrene Complexes of Iridium(III) Chem. Commun. 2012;48:10838–10840. doi: 10.1039/c2cc35907c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Edkins R.M., Fucke K., Peach M.J.G., Crawford A.G., Marder T.B., Beeby A. Syntheses, Structures, and Comparison of the Photophysical Properties of Cyclometalated Iridium Complexes Containing the Isomeric 1- and 2-(2′-Pyridyl)Pyrene Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2013;52:9842–9860. doi: 10.1021/ic400819f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Williams E.L., Li J., Jabbour G.E. Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Having Exclusive near-Infrared Electrophosphorescence. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006;89:083506. doi: 10.1063/1.2335275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hao Z., Li M., Liu Y., Wang Y., Xie G., Liu Y. Near-Infrared Emission of Dinuclear Iridium Complexes with Hole/Electron Transporting Bridging and Their Monomer in Solution-Processed Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Dyes Pigments. 2018;149:315–322. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.09.061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.You C., Liu D., Meng F., Wang Y., Yu J., Wang S., Su S., Zhu W. Iridium(III) Phosphors with Rigid Fused-Heterocyclic Chelating Architectures for Efficient Deep-Red/near-Infrared Emissions in Polymer Light-Emitting Diodes. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2019;7:10961–10971. doi: 10.1039/C9TC03645H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Li M., Wang L., You C., Liu D., Zhang K., Zhu W. Azaacene Containing Iridium(III) Phosphors: Elaboration of the π-Conjugation Effect and Application in Highly Efficient Solution-Processed near-Infrared OLEDs. Dalton Trans. 2023;52:16276–16284. doi: 10.1039/D3DT02629A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Li T.-Y., Wu J., Wu Z.-G., Zheng Y.-X., Zuo J.-L., Pan Y. Rational Design of Phosphorescent Iridium(III) Complexes for Emission Color Tunability and Their Applications in OLEDs. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018;374:55–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.06.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Zhu X., Cui P., Kilina S., Sun W. Multifunctional Cationic Iridium(III) Complexes Bearing 2-Aryloxazolo [4,5-f][1,10]Phenanthroline (N^N) Ligand: Synthesis, Crystal Structure, Photophysics, Mechanochromic/Vapochromic Effects, and Reverse Saturable Absorption. Inorg. Chem. 2017;56:13715–13731. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Fan S., Zong X., Shaw P.E., Wang X., Geng Y., Smith A.R.G., Burn P.L., Wang L., Lo S.-C. Energetic Requirements of Iridium(III) Complex Based Photosensitisers in Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16:21577–21585. doi: 10.1039/C4CP02997F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Aboshi R., Takizawa S., Murata S. Visible-Light-Driven Electron Transport across Vesicle Membrane Sensitized by Cationic Iridium Complexes. Chem. Lett. 2015;44:563–565. doi: 10.1246/cl.141203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Medina-Rodríguez S., Denisov S.A., Cudré Y., Male L., Marín-Suárez M., Fernández-Gutiérrez A., Fernández-Sánchez J.F., Tron A., Jonusauskas G., McClenaghan N.D., et al. High Performance Optical Oxygen Sensors Based on Iridium Complexes Exhibiting Interchromophore Energy Shuttling. Analyst. 2016;141:3090–3097. doi: 10.1039/C6AN00497K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Liu B., Lystrom L., Cameron C.G., Kilina S., McFarland S.A., Sun W. Monocationic Iridium(III) Complexes with Far-Red Charge-Transfer Absorption and Near-IR Emission: Synthesis, Photophysics, and Reverse Saturable Absorption. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019;2019:2208–2215. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201900156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Liu B., Lystrom L., Kilina S., Sun W. Tuning the Ground State and Excited State Properties of Monocationic Iridium(III) Complexes by Varying the Site of Benzannulation on Diimine Ligand. Inorg. Chem. 2017;56:5361–5370. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Yi X., Yang P., Huang D., Zhao J. Visible Light-Harvesting Cyclometalated Ir(III) Complexes with Pyreno [4,5-d]Imidazole C^N Ligands as Triplet Photosensitizers for Triplet–Triplet Annihilation Upconversion. Dyes Pigments. 2013;96:104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.07.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Jin Z., Qi S., Guo X., Tian N., Hou Y., Li C., Wang X., Zhou Q. Smart Use of “Ping-Pong” Energy Transfer to Improve the Two-Photon Photodynamic Activity of an Ir(III) Complex. Chem. Commun. 2020;56:2845–2848. doi: 10.1039/C9CC09763E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Genoni A., Chirdon D.N., Boniolo M., Sartorel A., Bernhard S., Bonchio M. Tuning Iridium Photocatalysts and Light Irradiation for Enhanced CO2 Reduction. ACS Catal. 2017;7:154–160. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Yadav A.K., Singh V., Kushwaha R., Kunwar A., Koch B., Banerjee S. Anticancer Potential of Polypyridyl-Based Ir(III)-Coumarin 6 Conjugates under Visible Light and Dark. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2025;175:114184. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2025.114184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Romero-Castellón I., Markova L., Piernas-Muñoz M.J., Kostrhunova H., Kasparkova J., Janiak C., Alberto M.E., Francés-Monerris A., Ruiz J., Brabec V. Photocatalytic Arylterpyridine Iridium(III) Complexes Trigger Oncosis in 2D and 3D Cancer Cell Models via NADH Oxidation. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2026;13:2045–2063. doi: 10.1039/D5QI02205C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Kuang S., Sun L., Zhang X., Liao X., Rees T.W., Zeng L., Chen Y., Zhang X., Ji L., Chao H. A Mitochondrion-Localized Two-Photon Photosensitizer Generating Carbon Radicals Against Hypoxic Tumors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59:20697–20703. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Singh V.D., Paitandi R.P., Dwivedi B.K., Singh R.S., Pandey D.S. Cyclometalated Ir(III) Complexes Involving Functionalized Terpyridine-Based Ligands Exhibiting Aggregation-Induced Emission and Their Potential Applications in CO2 Detection. Organometallics. 2018;37:3827–3838. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.8b00520. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Liu X., Dai P., Gu T., Wu Q., Wei H., Liu S., Zhang K.Y., Zhao Q. Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Complexes Containing an Anthracene Unit for Sensing and Imaging Singlet Oxygen in Cellular Mitochondria. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2020;209:111106. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Redrado M., Benedi A., Marzo I., Gimeno M.C., Fernández-Moreira V. Dual Emissive Ir(III) Complexes for Photodynamic Therapy and Bioimaging. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1382. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Gao T.-B., Qu Z.-Z., Tang Z., Cao D.-K. Cyclometalated Ir(III) Complexes Incorporating a Photoactive Anthracene-Based Ligand: Syntheses, Crystal Structures and Luminescence Switching by Light Irradiation. Dalton Trans. 2017;46:15443–15450. doi: 10.1039/C7DT02967E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Kuang S., Wei F., Karges J., Ke L., Xiong K., Liao X., Gasser G., Ji L., Chao H. Photodecaging of a Mitochondria-Localized Iridium(III) Endoperoxide Complex for Two-Photon Photoactivated Therapy under Hypoxia. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:4091–4101. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c13137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Liu L., Chen J., Wang M.-M., Huang Y., Qian Y., Xue X., Su Z., Liu H.-K. The Cyclometalated Iridium (III) Complex Based on 9-Anthracenecarboxylic Acid as a Lysosomal-Targeted Anticancer Agent. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2022;235:111913. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2022.111913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Yuan Q.-Z., Fan Q., Lv H., Chen W.-W., Yang X.-X., Cao D.-K., Wen J. Two Anthracene-Based Ir(III) Complexes [Ir(Pbt)2(Aip)]Cl and [Ir(Pbt)2(Aipm)]Cl: Relationship between Substituent Group and Photo-Oxidation Activity as Well as Photo-Oxidation-Induced Luminescence. Inorg. Chem. 2020;59:17071–17076. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Lee W., Kwon T.-H., Kwon J., Kim J., Lee C., Hong J.-I. Effect of Main Ligands on Organic Photovoltaic Performance of Ir(III) Complexes. New J. Chem. 2011;35:2557–2563. doi: 10.1039/c1nj20446g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Shi C., Sun H., Jiang Q., Zhao Q., Wang J., Huang W., Yan H. Carborane Tuning of Photophysical Properties of Phosphorescent Iridium(III) Complexes. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:4746–4748. doi: 10.1039/c3cc40996a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Dragonetti C., Falciola L., Mussini P., Righetto S., Roberto D., Ugo R., Valore A., De Angelis F., Fantacci S., Sgamellotti A., et al. The Role of Substituents on Functionalized 1,10-Phenanthroline in Controlling the Emission Properties of Cationic Iridium(III) Complexes of Interest for Electroluminescent Devices. Inorg. Chem. 2007;46:8533–8547. doi: 10.1021/ic700414z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Takizawa S., Pérez-Bolívar C., Anzenbacher P., Jr., Murata S. Cationic Iridium Complexes Coordinated with Coumarin Dyes—Sensitizers for Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Generation. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012;2012:3975–3979. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201200474. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Zhao Q., Liu S., Shi M., Li F., Jing H., Yi T., Huang C. Tuning Photophysical and Electrochemical Properties of Cationic Iridium(III) Complex Salts with Imidazolyl Substituents by Proton and Anions. Organometallics. 2007;26:5922–5930. doi: 10.1021/om700623j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Olumba M.E., O’Donnell R.M., Rohrabaugh T.N., Jr., Teets T.S. Panchromatic Excited-State Absorption in Bis-Cyclometalated Iridium Isocyanide Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2022;61:19344–19353. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Choroba K., Palion-Gazda J., Penkala M., Rawicka P., Machura B. Tunability of Triplet Excited States and Photophysical Behaviour of Bis-Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Complexes with Imidazo [4,5-f][1,10]Phenanthroline. Dalton Trans. 2024;53:17934–17947. doi: 10.1039/D4DT01996B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Jin C., Liu J., Chen Y., Li G., Guan R., Zhang P., Ji L., Chao H. Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Complexes with Imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]Phenanthroline Derivatives for Mitochondrial Imaging in Living Cells. Dalton Trans. 2015;44:7538–7547. doi: 10.1039/C5DT00467E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available within the manuscript and Supplementary Materials.


Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES