Skip to main content
Frontiers in Medicine logoLink to Frontiers in Medicine
. 2026 May 29;13:1803506. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1803506

Association between dry eye and myopia in schoolchildren: current evidence and possible mechanisms

Hongsu Wang 1, Han Yu Zhang 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC13259685  PMID: 42292244

Abstract

The prevalence of myopia and dry eye disease (DED) has increased significantly in schoolchildren over the past few decades, particularly in East Asia, leading to intensive physical and emotional burdens on schoolchildren’s growth. Current studies reported associations between myopia and DED, where myopic individuals tend to have a higher prevalence of DED compared to non-myopic individuals among adults and children. The current review aims to summarize existing literature to investigate the relationship between DED and refractive error in schoolchildren. Possible mechanisms have been discussed, including mechanical and behavioral factors (ocular surface exposure, High-Order Aberrations, ethnicity, behavioral habits), parasympathetic dysregulation and neurovascular coupling.

Keywords: dry eye, dry eye disease (DED), myopia, ocular surface, schoolchildren

1. Introduction

The prevalence of myopia has increased significantly over the past few decades, affecting approximately one-third of schoolchildren worldwide (1). The pandemic is particularly prevalent in East Asia, more than half of 19-years-old males affected in Seoul (2) and 75%–95% schoolchildren affected in Japan (3). It poses an even greater challenge in China. The overall myopia rate among Chinese schoolchildren remained at approximately 51.9%–53.6% during 2018–2022, which means more than 150 million schoolchildren are affected by myopia and we need to pay close attention to this issue (4).

Dry eye disease (DED) is another major public health concern and it may have a causal relationship with myopia. DED significantly contributes to financial burden on society (5). Among schoolchildren, DED not only causes physical discomfort but also significantly negatively impacts learning abilities, quality of life, and social functioning (6–8). Therefore, prompt diagnosis and treatment of DED are crucial for improving overall well-being. Numerous factors have been indicated to have contributed to DED in schoolchildren, including prolonged screen time (9), contact lens use (10), age (11), education level, and outdoor activity time (12).

Studies have shown that myopic individuals tend to have a higher prevalence of DED compared to non-myopic individuals in adults (13–19). A similar trend has been observed in schoolchildren. Studies in East Asian schoolchildren aged between 6 and 18 found that myopia individuals were more likely to suffer from DED (3, 20–22), and the association between refractive errors and signs or symptoms was statistically significant (p < 0.05) (3, 20). A strong association between myopia and DED has been suggested (23), where myopia may be a significant risk factor for DED among schoolchildren. This review aims to summarize existing literature to discuss the possible factors contributing to the association between DED and refractive error in schoolchildren.

2. Methodology

A comprehensive literature retrieval was executed across PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase, covering the period from January 2000 to May 2025. The search utilized keywords including “dry eye disease” “DED” “myopia” “dry eye and myopia” and “dry eye and myopia in schoolchildren.” Studies were selected based on their relevance to the pathophysiological interplay between refractive errors and ocular surface stability in schoolchildren. As a narrative review, this work prioritizes a conceptual synthesis of emerging mechanisms rather than a statistical meta-analysis. Therefore, while the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines are primarily designed for systematic reviews, the core principles of search transparency and rigor were followed to ensure the quality of the literature selection process.

3. DED prevalence in adolescents with various refractive errors

In adolescents, the prevalence of DED demonstrates a positive correlation with the severity of myopia. Recent clinical studies consistently report a significant reduction in average tear break-up time (TBUT) and a higher incidence of symptomatic DED [diagnosed with Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score ≥13] in myopic adolescents compared to their emmetropic peers (3, 24, 25). A summary of recent clinical studies investigating the correlation between DED and myopia in schoolchildren populations is presented in Table 1. Specifically, high myopia serves as a pronounced risk factor, with prevalence rates reaching up to 1.5–2 times higher than in non-myopic individuals. This trend closely parallels the elongation of axial length (AL), suggesting an anatomical basis for the association (3, 24, 26).

TABLE 1.

Overview of recent studies investigating the association between myopia and dry eye disease (DED) in schoolchildren.

Study title Author (year) Sample size and age Key clinical findings Proposed mechanisms and conclusions
Current prevalence of myopia and association of myopia with environmental factors among schoolchildren in Japan Yotsukura et al. (3) n = 1,478
Age: 6–15 y
DED symptoms positively correlated with refractive error severity (elementary) and AL (junior high). Increased AL expands the exposed ocular surface area, accelerating tear film thinning and evaporation.
Questionnaire analysis on incidence and risk factors of dry eye in children from a myopia outpatient clinic Wang et al. (20) n = 214
Age: 10.1 ± 2.5 y
DED prevalence was 15.9%.
Moderate myopia (−0.5D∼−3.0D) was significantly correlated with shorter NIBUT (P = 0.043).
Ametropia-induced visual fatigue alters tear film morphology, leading to reduced tear film stability (NIBUT).
Relation between dry eye and myopia based on tear film breakup time, higher order aberration, choroidal thickness, and axial length Hazra et al. (25) n = 72
Age: 12.8 ± 2.7 y
AL is negatively correlated with TBUT and positively correlated with higher-order aberrations. A shared neuro-physiological link, possibly involving parasympathetic dysregulation, may underpin both conditions.
A possible reciprocal relationship between myopia and dry eye disease in Japanese teenagers Ibrahim et al. (24) n = 682
Age: 10–19 y
High myopes (≤−6.0D) showed the highest DED prevalence (34.9%) but reported lower pain sensitivity. High myopia may impair ipRGC function, resulting in a “symptom-sign discordance” where objective dryness is severe but pain is underreported.
Prevalence of symptomatic dry eye and influencing factors among Chinese adolescents: a cross-sectional study Chen et al. (26) n = 1,518
Age: 12–18 y
High myopia (≤−6.0D) is an independent risk factor for symptomatic DED (P = 0.025). The association may involve common autonomic nervous system pathways affecting both lacrimal secretion and choroidal thickness.
Relationship between myopia and diagnosis rates of dry eye disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wu et al. (28) 14,232 eyes
Mean age: 17.5 y
Myopes exhibit a 104% higher DED prevalence and significantly shorter TBUT vs. emmetropes. Myopia is a potential risk factor for DED due to both structural ocular changes (e.g., AL) and behavioral usage patterns (e.g., blink frequency).

It is worth noting that while the association between myopia and DED is highly consistent in adolescent populations, research involving adult cohorts has yielded more complex findings. In adult demographics, some studies report that while mild-to-moderate DED is predominantly linked to myopia, severe DED is more frequently observed in hyperopic individuals (14). Furthermore, certain adult-based studies indicate a positive association between DED prevalence and the severity of hyperopia, rather than myopia (13, 15, 16, 27). This discrepancy suggests that the pathophysiological drivers of DED may shift with age; for instance, age-related accommodative strain may play a larger role in hyperopic adults, whereas structural changes like axial elongation are the primary catalysts in myopic youths (14, 28, 29). In conclusion, despite the heterogeneous findings in adult populations, current epidemiological evidence strongly supports that myopia–particularly high myopia accompanied by significant axial elongation–is unequivocally and positively associated with DED prevalence and severity in adolescents.

4. Possible mechanisms between myopia and DED

Overall, among adolescents aged between 10 and 18, myopia has been suggested to be strongly associated with increased prevalence of DED (3, 24–26). Multiple mechanisms have been proposed, which can be broadly categorized into four main domains: structural and anatomical alterations driven by axial elongation, behavioral habits, the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), and retinal neurovascular coupling (NVC).

4.1. Structural and anatomical alterations: the axial elongation pathway

Increased ocular surface exposure and unstable tear film can increase the risk of DED (28). In adolescents with progressive axial myopia, where axial elongation occurs, there presents not only increased exposure area of ocular surface, resulting in a dry ocular surface environment, but also a changed corneal curve, leading to higher tension between the tear film and the cornea, thus leading to uneven distribution and hence accelerated evaporation of tear film (28, 30). Among patients with high myopia, the axial elongation of the eyeball may cause proptosis, which may contribute to DED symptoms following exposure keratopathy (31). Axial elongation leads to changes of the cornea, including flattening of the corneal curvature, reduced corneal thickness, and decreased endothelial density, which may contribute to reduced tear film stability and increased DED symptoms or clinical signs such as TBUT (17, 32). Additionally, because many myopic patients have prolonged use of electronic devices or near-distance reading, there is a significantly lower blink rate compared with that of the general population which may increase tear film evaporation and the risk of ocular surface dryness (28, 33, 34).

4.1.1. The role of High-Order Aberrations (HOAs)

High-Order Aberrations act as a catalyst within a vicious pathophysiological cycle of DED and myopia. A stable pre-corneal tear film is essential for minimizing optical scattering. In patients with DED, the rapid break-up of the tear film disrupts the smooth anterior optical interface. This disruption acutely elevates both corneal and total ocular HOAs, drastically reducing retinal image quality (35–38).

This optical degradation establishes a critical link to myopia via the visual experience mechanism. Prolonged exposure to degraded retinal images, induced by DED-related HOAs, acts as a form of visual form deprivation. Such continuous blurred sensory input drives axial elongation and myopic progression (39, 40), plays an important role in AL growth among young animals (41–43) including humans (43–46).

To address how these HOAs subsequently affect the severity of DED, one must consider the structural consequences of this myopic shift, which initiates a vicious pathophysiological cycle (Figure 1). As myopia progresses, the accompanied axial elongation enlarges the globe, which consequentially increases the palpebral fissure width and the exposed ocular surface area. A larger exposed ocular surface mechanically accelerates tear evaporation and thins the tear film, thereby exacerbating DED severity (3). Therefore, while DED-induced HOAs do not directly inflame the ocular surface, they indirectly worsen DED by driving structural axial elongation, forming a self-reinforcing loop between optical degradation and anatomical vulnerability (Figure 1). Previous studies focused mainly on adult populations (35–38) while fewer on adolescents (25, 26).

FIGURE 1.

Flowchart illustrating the bidirectional relationship between dry eye disease (DED) and myopia. The flowchart shows the causal pathway where DED leads to altered corneal optical characteristics, increased higher-order aberrations, and blurred visual input, ultimately promoting axial length growth and myopia. Furthermore, the progression of myopia in turn exacerbates DED through mechanisms of ocular surface exposure and tear film evaporation, creating a mutually reinforcing cycle.

A hypothesized pathway illustrating High-Order Aberrations (HOAs) playing a role in the relationship between dry eye disease (DED) and myopia. DED may lead to altered corneal optical characteristics and increased HOAs due to increased tear film instability, which in turn contributes to axial elongation via visual experience mechanism and larger exposed ocular surface. This mechanically accelerates tear evaporation and thins the tear film, thereby exacerbating DED severity, consequently establishing a pathological cycle between axial elongation and ocular surface instability.

4.1.2. The influence of ethnicity and genetic predisposition

Ethnicity serves as a critical background factor that modulates the axial elongation-mediated structural pathway described in Section “4.1 Structural and anatomical alterations: the axial elongation pathway.” TFOS DEWS III Report reported Asian ethnicity as a risk factor for DED development (47). Children as well as adults among studies conducted in Asia tend to have significantly shorter TBUT than those from other regions (48, 49). The genetic predisposition of East Asian schoolchildren to undergo early and rapid axial elongation (50) serves as a structural foundation that simultaneously drives myopic shift and accelerates the onset of exposure-related DED. Therefore, the high co-occurrence of these diseases in Asian populations is not merely coincidental but stems from a shared biomechanical vulnerability intrinsic to their ocular anatomy: the accelerated axial elongation inherently increases palpebral fissure width, thereby exacerbating the exposure-related tear evaporation mechanism introduced in Section “4.1 Structural and anatomical alterations: the axial elongation pathway.” Participants with Asian ethnicity have also been observed with meibomian gland shortening (51), incomplete blinking, lower lid epitheliopathy (52) and corneal astigmatism (53, 54), suggesting that ethnic variations significantly influence baseline AL and globe morphology, mirroring the anatomical mechanisms associated with axial elongation-induced surface exposure and subsequent tear evaporation with DED symptoms.

4.2. Behavioral habits and environmental factors

Behavioral habits may also play a role in the association between myopia and DED development. Sahai et al. proposed that individuals with refractive errors are more prone to eye rubbing, which can introduce foreign particles and destabilize the tear film, contributing to DED symptoms (15). Wang et al. (20) reported a significant relationship between eye rubbing, picky eating, and childhood DED in a cross-sectional study, attributing it to not only increased ocular surface inflammation following rubbing but also insufficient intake of omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin A, consistent with prior findings (55). Additionally, near work activity and screen time, as dominant risk factors of myopia (56), are significantly associated with a reduced blink rate, leading to increased tear evaporation and tear film instability. This may help explain the high prevalence of myopia and DED among school-aged children with prolonged screen time (9, 12, 23, 55, 57–60).

4.3. Parasympathetic nervous system

The parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) has been proposed as a potential upstream regulator for TBUT and choroidal thickness, which are respectively key objective measures for DED and myopia (25, 61, 62). Evidence suggested that preganglionic fibers from the superior salivatory nucleus project to the pterygopalatine ganglion (PPG), where postganglionic fibers simultaneously innervate the lacrimal gland and the choroid (63, 64). Ultrastructural studies have confirmed that fibers originating from the PPG utilize vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) as one of primary neurotransmitters to modulate these ocular structures (64).

As illustrated in Figure 2, VIP serves as a critical biochemical bridge between DED and myopia. On the one hand, among myopes, VIP can increase choroidal perfusion pressure by its potent vasodilatory effects (63) to increase oxygen supply of the choroid and retina. If the level of VIP decreases, it may lead to decreased choroidal blood flow, causing an insufficient supply of oxygen. Scleral fibroblasts then respond to the altered micro-environment through the accumulation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α (HIF-1α) and enhanced phosphorylation levels of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2α (eIF2α) and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR), which induces an increased fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation (FMT) and alterations in fiber diameter as well as a decrease in collagen production, resulting in a thinner and weaker sclera. Because the structural integrity of the sclera is compromised, it exhibits increased scleral creep and loses its resistance to normal intraocular pressure, leading to the passive expansion of the globe (65, 66). As a result, axial length increases, and myopia progresses (30, 67). On the other hand, for DED, VIP can exert potent anti-inflammatory effects by downregulating pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-1β and TNF-α) (68, 69), inhibiting the maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) and promoting apoptosis over necrosis of dying endothelial cells (70, 71), thereby preventing immune-mediated damage to the corneal endothelium (72–74) and reducing the risk of DED progression. Hence, when there is a reduction of VIP, the ocular surface immune homeostasis may be compromised. Through those two pathways, DED and myopia are associated and affected synchronously:

FIGURE 2.

Illustration depicting molecular pathways linking myopia and dry eye disease via vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) as a bridge factor, highlighting psychological impacts, immune responses, and cellular mechanisms involved in both conditions.

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) as a bridge factor between dry eye disease (DED) and myopia. VIP acts as a parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) neurotransmitter by dilating choroidal vessels to ensure oxygen supply and suppressing ocular surface inflammation. VIP reduction not only thins the sclera, but also breaks tear film homeostasis, which can respectively induce myopia and dry eye disease (DED), while anxiety-driven PNS inhibition further lowers VIP, exacerbating clinical signs and symptoms.

  1. Ocular Surface Impairment: Reduced VIP levels diminish the neuro-protective and anti-inflammatory capacity of the corneal environment, leading to tear film instability and the development of DED.

  2. Scleral Hypoxia and Remodeling: Lowered VIP activity leads to choroidal vasoconstriction and subsequent thinning. The resulting scleral hypoxia acts as a potent trigger for axial elongation, thereby accelerating myopic progression.

Additionally, psychological factors such as anxiety, which are more prevalent among myopic adolescents (75, 76), may be a factor of the vicious cycle of DED and myopia. Anxiety often disrupts sleep patterns, leading to elevated cortisol and adrenaline levels while suppressing PNS activity (77). From a mechanistic perspective, anxiety-driven PNS inhibition leads to a systemic reduction in VIP levels. This depletion results in a “dual-pathway” pathology mentioned above. Consequently, the PNS does not merely act as a passive regulator but functions as an integrated signaling hub, where reduced VIP signaling serves as a common denominator for both conditions.

4.4. Retinal neurovascular coupling (NVC) dysfunction and ipRGC-mediated reflex tearing in high myopia

Emerging evidence points to a shared neural reflex arc–specifically mediated by intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs)–that may bridge posterior neurovascular alterations with anterior surface homeostasis.

Studies revealed that the risk of DED increased with myopia severity, identifying high myopia as a risk factor of DED development (24, 26). Interestingly, while people with high myopia presented more dryness, significantly less pain and photophobia were reported compared to emmetropes and hyperopes (24). Progressive axial elongation in high myopia induces mechanical stretching and subsequent retinal neurovascular coupling (NVC) dysfunction, leading to localized metabolic imbalances in the posterior pole (24, 78, 79). This structural and vascular degradation has been shown to compromise the functional integrity of ipRGCs, as evidenced by diminished responses in chromatic pupillometry among highly myopic eyes (80).

Beyond their established role in non-image-forming vision, ipRGCs function as essential afferent sensors within the trigeminal-parasympathetic reflex arc, which regulates basal tear secretion and photophobia. We hypothesize that when retinal NVC dysfunction impairs ipRGC activity, this reflex loop is consequently blunted. Such an impairment may reduce neural-driven reflex tearing, exacerbating the objective signs of DED. Furthermore, this compromised neural pathway provides a mechanistic explanation for the clinical observation that highly myopic teenagers often report fewer DED symptoms–such as pain and photophobia–despite exhibiting severe tear film instability (24). Therefore, retinal NVC dysfunction in myopia may act not merely as an isolated posterior event, but as an upstream contributor to anterior ocular surface disruption via these compromised reflex arcs. The prevalence of high myopia in adolescents and schoolchildren is becoming higher (81). Thus, identifying this integrated neurovascular-immunological axis is essential for understanding the relationship between DED and myopia.

5. Discussion

A critical question remains whether myopia acts as an independent risk factor for DED or if both conditions represent co-manifestations of shared behavioral patterns. Undoubtedly, shared environmental catalysts–most notably the global surge in Digital Eye Strain (DES) and Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS)–play a significant role (82). As established in the TFOS DEWS II (83) and further emphasized in the TFOS DEWS III (47), prolonged screen exposure and intensive near-work activities serve as dual-drivers. Specifically, these habits trigger chronic accommodative stress, as explored in Section “4.2 Behavioral habits and environmental factors,” which may lead to PNS dysregulation (84). This neural shift simultaneously facilitates axial elongation and compromises the efferent signaling for lacrimation, characterizing the two conditions as co-manifestations of autonomic imbalance. However, the anatomical and neurological sequelae of myopia likely exert an independent risk effect. Physically, as discussed in section “4.1 Structural and anatomical alterations: the axial elongation pathway,” axial elongation increases the ocular surface exposure area and accelerates tear evaporation, a correlation evidenced by significantly lower NIBUT scores in children with higher myopic refractive power, as shown in Section “4.1 Structural and anatomical alterations: the axial elongation pathway.” Furthermore, as discussed in Section “4.3 Parasympathetic nervous system,” pathological stretching of the retina in high myopia may damage intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). Since these cells are essential mediators of the light-driven lacrimation reflex, their impairment suggests that myopia directly diminishes the eye’s homeostatic capacity for tear production. Therefore, while behavioral habits are undeniable catalysts, the anatomical and neurological sequelae of myopia likely exert an independent risk effect on schoolchildren DED development.

For the classification of myopia, most studies included in this review defined myopia by SE rather than axial length, which may limit our understanding of whether AL change solely contributes to DED pathogenesis like the mechanism in Section “4.1 Structural and anatomical alterations: the axial elongation pathway” or refractive error itself may influence DED in some unknown certain mechanism. Although axial myopia is more common in East Asian children, a substantial proportion of myopic children presented with minimal axial elongation (85). Additionally, even emmetropic eyes continue to grow longer during childhood, so a simple arithmetic conversion from axial elongation to myopic shift often misses the mark in individual children (86).

Contrasting findings have been reported regarding the relationship between axial elongation and corneal and total HOAs (3, 25, 87–90). Most studies considered total HOAs (3, 87–90) while a 2022 study (25) classified HOAs into corneal, internal, and total HOAs (91). It was identified that corneal HOAs may be the most associated risk factor for myopia progression and axial elongation in elementary school students, while Hazra et al. (25) found that it is internal HOAs but not corneal HOAs among children with DED (TBUT <10s). Future studies are required to investigate different groups of HOAs, in order to confirm a positive relationship with axial elongation and DED.

It is also important to note that varying criteria have been used for DED diagnosis among studies reported in this review. Some studies relied on subjective symptom questionnaires (e.g., OSDI, DEQ, SPEED), while others used objective clinical tests (e.g., TBUT, Schirmer’s test, and ocular staining). The use of the former offers the advantages of speed, simplicity, and high patient compliance; however, their results are strongly influenced by individual pain thresholds, cultural background, and psychological status. On the other hand, objective tests provide reproducible and quantifiable indices. The relationship between symptoms and signs of DED is not always linear and can vary among individuals with different DED subtypes (92, 93). For instance, due to retinal NVC dysfunction, individuals with high myopia, on the contrary, reported less pain and photophobia. The TFOS DEWS III report acknowledged the significance of both signs and symptoms in the diagnosis of DED and recommended a standardized diagnostic criteria for DED that is essential for research and clinical management (94).

A major limitation in the current literature is the heterogeneity of DED diagnostic criteria, which frequently rely on adult-centric standards that are poorly adapted for schoolchildren populations. As far as is known, few clinical guidelines provide distinct, validated diagnostic cut-off values specifically for children. Consequently, researchers and clinicians often extrapolate adult thresholds to pediatric cohorts, which raises significant concerns regarding validity and reliability. Subjective questionnaires, such as the OSDI, are of limited validity in children as they evaluate activities irrelevant to youth (e.g., driving) and depend heavily on the child’s cognitive comprehension to articulate ocular discomfort. Similarly, objective evaluations like Schirmer’s test often yield poor reliability and high inter-examiner variability due to limited patient cooperation and pronounced reflex tearing during invasive testing. This methodological gap frequently manifests as pronounced symptom-sign discordance; children may exhibit objective signs of severe ocular surface damage while underreporting symptoms, or conversely, present with frequent blinking and eye-rubbing without explicitly articulating “dryness” (84, 85). For instance, as discussed in Section “4.3 Parasympathetic nervous system” regarding neurovascular coupling, individuals with high myopia often report paradoxically less ocular pain despite severe clinical signs. To address these inconsistencies, the TFOS DEWS III report emphasizes the imperative need for standardized, age-appropriate diagnostic criteria for adolescents to ensure accurate clinical assessment (47).

Finally, as most of the current studies are cross-sectional, future prospective longitudinal studies are required to delineate the dynamic relationships among DED symptoms, nerve structure changes, and myopia progression.

Furthermore, understanding these shared mechanisms highlights the necessity for integrated clinical management. Interventions must be carefully individualized. For instance, while optical treatments such as orthokeratology (OK lenses) are highly effective for myopia control, they place additional mechanical stress on the ocular surface and may be contraindicated for schoolchildren with severe, concurrent DED. Conversely, targeting shared behavioral and environmental factors, such as strictly managing digital screen time, minimizing eye-rubbing and maintaining beneficial light signaling for myopia inhibition, offers beneficial and non-invasive strategies. Future longitudinal clinical trials evaluating these combined optical and behavioral interventions are warranted to determine their efficacy in restoring neuro-sensory homeostasis for both DED and myopia control.

This review highlights the relationship and possible causal mechanisms between myopia and DED among schoolchildren. Several assumed influence factors or mechanisms in this review include mechanical and behavioral factors (ocular surface exposure, High-Order Aberrations, ethnicity, behavioral habits), parasympathetic dysregulation and neurovascular coupling in high myopia. Limitations suggest that standardized research methodologies are needed to draw more objective definitive conclusions. Future longitudinal studies can focus on neurological mechanisms, environmental effects, and the role of HOAs to better understand how DED and myopia interact among adolescents and school-aged children.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the research funding: The Open Project of the Eye and Vision Science Research Institute of Nankai University: NKSGY202502, NKSGY202508, and NKSGP202305.

Footnotes

Edited by: Barbara Burgos-Blasco, San Carlos University Clinical Hospital, Spain

Reviewed by: Yan Zhang, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, China

Ana Maria Varosanec, University Hospital Holy Spirit, Croatia

Author contributions

HW: Investigation, Writing – original draft. HZ: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature. (2015) 519:276–8. 10.1038/519276a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gwon SH, Lee DC. Factors associated with myopia in 19-year-old adult men in Korea between 2014 and 2020. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:11581. 10.1038/s41598-023-38569-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yotsukura E, Torii H, Inokuchi M, Tokumura M, Uchino M, Nakamura K, et al. Current prevalence of myopia and association of myopia with environmental factors among schoolchildren in Japan. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2019) 137:1233–9. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pan W, Saw SM, Wong TY, Morgan I, Yang Z, Lan W. Prevalence and temporal trends in myopia and high myopia children in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis with projections from 2020 to 2050. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. (2025) 55:101484. 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yu J, Asche CV, Fairchild CJ. The economic burden of dry eye disease in the United States: a decision tree analysis. Cornea. (2011) 30:379–87. 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181f7f363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Temelturk RD, Kocer AM, Ozal E. An investigation of the psychosocial outcomes of dry eye disease treatment in children with computer vision syndrome. Turk J Ophthalmol. (2024) 54:183–9. 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.54359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kunboon A, Tananuvat N, Upaphong P, Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T. Prevalence of dry eye disease symptoms, associated factors and impact on quality of life among medical students during the pandemic. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:23986. 10.1038/s41598-024-75345-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ayaki M, Kawashima M, Uchino M, Tsubota K, Negishi K. Gender differences in adolescent dry eye disease: a health problem in girls. Int J Ophthalmol. (2018) 11:301–7. 10.18240/ijo.2018.02.20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cullen J, Muntz A, Marsh S, Simmonds L, Mayes J, O’Neill K, et al. Impacts of digital technologies on child and adolescent health: recommendations for safer screen use in educational settings. N Z Med J. (2024) 137:9–13. 10.26635/6965.6565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stapleton F, Velez FG, Lau C, Wolffsohn JS. Dry eye disease in the young: a narrative review. Ocular Surface. (2024) 31:11–20. 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dana R, Bradley JL, Guerin A, Pivneva I, Stillman IÖ, Evans AM, et al. Estimated prevalence and incidence of dry eye disease based on coding analysis of a large, all-age united states health care system. Am J Ophthalmol. (2019) 202:47–54. 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jadeja JN, Shroff KV, Shah A, Pandey A, Dubey S. Association of digital device usage and dry eye disease in school children. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2024) 72:1031–6. 10.4103/IJO.IJO_703_23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jaishree Singh PJ, Meena A. A clinical and analytical study of correlation between dry eye syndrome and refractive error in young adult patients attending ophthalmology department, MBS hospital kota. Glob J Res Anal. (2020) 9:8812. 10.36106/gjra/8308812 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fahmy R, Aldarwesh A. Correlation between dry eye and refractive error in Saudi young adults using noninvasive Keratograph 4. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2018) 66:653–6. 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1103_17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sahai A, Malik P. Dry eye: prevalence and attributable risk factors in a hospital-based population. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2005) 53:87–91. 10.4103/0301-4738.16170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fagehi R, El-Hiti GA, Alsubaie MH, Abusharha A, Alanazi MA, Masmali AM, et al. Measurements of tear evaporation rate in subjects with refractive errors using a portable evaporimeter. Healthcare. (2022) 10:405. 10.3390/healthcare10020405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ilhan N, Ilhan O, Ayhan Tuzcu E, Daglioglu MC, Coskun M, Parlakfikirer N, et al. Is there a relationship between pathologic myopia and dry eye syndrome? Cornea. (2014) 33:169–71. 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nichols JJ, Ziegler C, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK. Self-reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2005) 46:1911–4. 10.1167/iovs.04-1294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dhungel D, Shrestha GS. Visual symptoms associated with refractive errors among Thangka artists of Kathmandu valley. BMC Ophthalmol. (2017) 17:258. 10.1186/s12886-017-0659-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang N, Zhuang X, Zhong X, Zhang J, Li G, Li S. Questionnaire analysis on incidence and risk factors of dry eye in children from a myopia outpatient clinic. Front Med. (2022) 9:846709. 10.3389/fmed.2022.846709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Uchino M, Dogru M, Uchino Y, Fukagawa K, Shimmura S, Takebayashi T, et al. Japan Ministry of Health study on prevalence of dry eye disease among Japanese high school students. Am J Ophthalmol. (2008) 146:925–9 e2. 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang Y, Chen H, Wu X. Prevalence and risk factors associated with dry eye syndrome among senior high school students in a county of Shandong Province, China. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. (2012) 19:226–30. 10.3109/09286586.2012.670742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moon JH, Kim KW, Moon NJ. Smartphone use is a risk factor for pediatric dry eye disease according to region and age: a case control study. BMC Ophthalmol. (2016) 16:188. 10.1186/s12886-016-0364-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ibrahim OMA, Ayaki M, Yotsukura E, Torii H, Negishi K. A possible reciprocal relationship between myopia and dry eye disease in japanese teenagers. Clin Ophthalmol. (2024) 18:1991–8. 10.2147/OPTH.S444765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hazra D, Yotsukura E, Torii H, Mori K, Maruyama T, Ogawa M, et al. Relation between dry eye and myopia based on tear film breakup time, higher order aberration, choroidal thickness, and axial length. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:10891. 10.1038/s41598-022-15023-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen X, Zhou Y, Gao X, Zhu Y, Cai Q, Yin B, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic dry eye and influencing factors among Chinese adolescents: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. (2024) 19:e0312725. 10.1371/journal.pone.0312725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Abd Almajeed R, Elawad M. The effect of spherical refractive error on tear volume. Al-Basar Int J Ophthalmol. (2017) 4:104–8. 10.4103/bijo.bijo_14_18 42176046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wu K, Yu Y, Shi J, Chen H, Xie C, Tang Y, et al. Relationship between myopia and diagnosis rates of dry eye disease and related indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. (2025) 12:1541304. 10.3389/fmed.2025.1541304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zou X, Nagino K, Yee A, Midorikawa-Inomata A, Eguchi A, Nakao S, et al. Relationship between dry eye disease and myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e38674. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mutti DO, Hayes JR, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, Moeschberger ML, Cotter SA, et al. Refractive error, axial length, and relative peripheral refractive error before and after the onset of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2007) 48:2510–9. 10.1167/iovs.06-0562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Satchi K, McNab AA. Orbital decompression in the treatment of proptosis due to high axial myopia. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. (2010) 26:420–5. 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181cf9298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chang SW, Tsai IL, Hu FR, Lin LL, Shih YF. The cornea in young myopic adults. Br J Ophthalmol. (2001) 85:916–20. 10.1136/bjo.85.8.916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McMonnies CW. Incomplete blinking: exposure keratopathy, lid wiper epitheliopathy, dry eye, refractive surgery, and dry contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. (2007) 30:37–51. 10.1016/j.clae.2006.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gaton DD, Ehrenberg M, Lusky M, Wussuki-Lior O, Dotan G, Weinberger D, et al. Effect of repeated applanation tonometry on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements. Curr Eye Res. (2010) 35:475–9. 10.3109/02713681003678824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Koh S. Mechanisms of visual disturbance in dry eye. Cornea. (2016) 35(Suppl 1):S83–8. 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Montés-Micó R, Cáliz A, Alió JL. Wavefront analysis of higher order aberrations in dry eye patients. J Refract Surg. (2004) 20:243–7. 10.3928/1081-597X-20040501-08 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Koh S, Maeda N, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Bessho K, Hori Y, et al. Serial measurements of higher-order aberrations after blinking in patients with dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2008) 49:133–8. 10.1167/iovs.07-0762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Montes-Mico R, Alio JL, Munoz G, Perez-Santonja JJ, Charman WN. Postblink changes in total and corneal ocular aberrations. Ophthalmology. (2004) 111:758–67. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Crewther D, Riddell N, Crewther S. A theoretical mechanism for ocular emmetropization. bioRxiv [Preprint]. (2025). 10.1101/2025.06.01.657224 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smith EL, III, Hung LF, Huang J. Protective effects of high ambient lighting on the development of form-deprivation myopia in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2012) 53:421–8. 10.1167/iovs.11-8652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schaeffel F, Glasser A, Howland HC. Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens. Vision Res. (1988) 28:639–57. 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90113-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A, Gottlieb MD, Nickla DL, Marran L, et al. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res. (1995) 35:37–50. 10.1016/0042-6989(94)e0049-q [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rabin J, Van Sluyters RC, Malach R. Emmetropization: a vision-dependent phenomenon. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (1981) 20:561–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang D, Chun RK, Liu M, Lee RP, Sun Y, Zhang T, et al. Optical defocus rapidly changes choroidal thickness in schoolchildren. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0161535. 10.1371/journal.pone.0161535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Troilo D. Neonatal eye growth and emmetropisation–a literature review. Eye. (1992) 6(Pt 2):154–60. 10.1038/eye.1992.31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kusada N, Yokoi N, Sotozono C. Association between corneal higher-order aberrations evaluated with a videokeratographer and corneal surface abnormalities in dry eye. Diagnostics. (2023) 13:3319. 10.3390/diagnostics13213319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stapleton F, Argueso P, Asbell P, Azar D, Bosworth C, Chen W, et al. TFOS DEWS III digest report. Am J Ophthalmol. (2025) 279:451–553. 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chidi-Egboka NC, Briggs NE, Jalbert I, Golebiowski B. The ocular surface in children: a review of current knowledge and meta-analysis of tear film stability and tear secretion in children. Ocul Surf. (2019) 17:28–39. 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, Jalbert I, Lekhanont K, Malet F, et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul Surf. (2017) 15:334–65. 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ip JM, Huynh SC, Robaei D, Kifley A, Rose KA, Morgan IG, et al. Ethnic differences in refraction and ocular biometry in a population-based sample of 11-15-year-old Australian children. Eye. (2008) 22:649–56. 10.1038/sj.eye.6702701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kim JS, Wang MTM, Craig JP. Exploring the Asian ethnic predisposition to dry eye disease in a pediatric population. Ocul Surf. (2019) 17:70–7. 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Deo N, Nagrale P. Dry eye disease: an overview of its risk factors, diagnosis, and prevalence by age, sex, and race. Cureus. (2024) 16:e54028. 10.7759/cureus.54028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fan Q, Zhou X, Khor CC, Cheng CY, Goh LK, Sim X, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of five Asian cohorts identifies PDGFRA as a susceptibility locus for corneal astigmatism. PLoS Genet. (2011) 7:e1002402. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mohammadi SF, Khorrami-Nejad M, Hamidirad M. Posterior corneal astigmatism: a review article. Clin Optom. (2019) 11:85–96. 10.2147/OPTO.S210721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wolffsohn JS, Lingham G, Downie LE, Huntjens B, Inomata T, Jivraj S, et al. TFOS Lifestyle: impact of the digital environment on the ocular surface. Ocular Surf. (2023) 28:213–52. 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhu Z, Chen Y, Tan Z, Xiong R, McGuinness MB, Muller A. Interventions recommended for myopia prevention and control among children and adolescents in China: a systematic review. Br J Ophthalmol. (2023) 107:160–6. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ma J, Zhu H, Guo W, Li R, Shen S, Wang Y, et al. Association of different digital media experiences with paediatric dry eye in China: a population-based study. BMJ Open. (2022) 12:e062850. 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mineshita Y, Kim HK, Chijiki H, Nanba T, Shinto T, Furuhashi S, et al. Screen time duration and timing: effects on obesity, physical activity, dry eyes, and learning ability in elementary school children. BMC Public Health. (2021) 21:422. 10.1186/s12889-021-10484-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang MTM, Craig JP, Vidal-Rohr M, Menduni F, Dhallu S, Ipek T, et al. Impact of digital screen use and lifestyle factors on dry eye disease in the paediatric population. Ocul Surf. (2022) 24:64–6. 10.1016/j.jtos.2022.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Stapleton F, Abad JC, Barabino S, Burnett A, Iyer G, Lekhanont K, et al. TFOS lifestyle: impact of societal challenges on the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. (2023) 28:165–99. 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Flitcroft I, Lingham G, Kerin E, Nkansah EK, Mackey DA, Lee SS, et al. Clinical nomogram for determining expected choroidal thickness in children with myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. (2025) 278:346–55. 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D. Choroidal thickness in myopic and nonmyopic children assessed with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2013) 54:7578–86. 10.1167/iovs.13-12772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cuthbertson S, LeDoux MS, Jones S, Jones J, Zhou Q, Gong S, et al. Localization of preganglionic neurons that innervate choroidal neurons of pterygopalatine ganglion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2003) 44:3713–24. 10.1167/iovs.02-1207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Beckers HJ, Klooster J, Vrensen GF, Lamers WP. Facial parasympathetic innervation of the rat choroid, lacrimal glands and ciliary ganglion. An ultrastructural pterygopalatine tracing and immunohistochemical study. Ophthalmic Res. (1993) 25:319–30. 10.1159/000267332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.McBrien NA, Gentle A. Role of the sclera in the development and pathological complications of myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2003) 22:307–38. 10.1016/s1350-9462(02)00063-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Harper AR, Summers JA. The dynamic sclera: extracellular matrix remodeling in normal ocular growth and myopia development. Exp Eye Res. (2015) 133:100–11. 10.1016/j.exer.2014.07.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. (2012) 379:1739–48. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chen Y, Dana R. Autoimmunity in dry eye disease - An updated review of evidence on effector and memory Th17 cells in disease pathogenicity. Autoimmun Rev. (2021) 20:102933. 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sonkodi B, Marsovszky L, Csorba A, Balog A, Kopper B, Keller-Pintér A, et al. Disrupted neural regeneration in dry eye secondary to ankylosing spondylitis-with a theoretical link between piezo2 channelopathy and gateway reflex, WDR neurons, and flare-ups. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:15455. 10.3390/ijms242015455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Koh SW, Cheng J, Dodson RM, Ku CY, Abbondandolo CJ. VIP down-regulates the inflammatory potential and promotes survival of dying (neural crest-derived) corneal endothelial cells ex vivo: necrosis to apoptosis switch and up-regulation of Bcl-2 and N-cadherin. J Neurochem. (2009) 109:792–806. 10.1111/J.1471-4159.2009.06012.X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bencze D, Fekete T, Pázmándi K. Type I interferon production of plasmacytoid dendritic cells under control. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:4190. 10.3390/ijms22084190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Barabino S, Chen Y, Chauhan S, Dana R. Ocular surface immunity: homeostatic mechanisms and their disruption in dry eye disease. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2012) 31:271–85. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Worbs T, Hammerschmidt SI, Forster R. Dendritic cell migration in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. (2017) 17:30–48. 10.1038/nri.2016.116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Frutos-Rincón L, Gómez-Sánchez JA, Íñigo-Portugués A, Acosta MC, Gallar J. An experimental model of neuro-immune interactions in the eye: corneal sensory nerves and resident dendritic cells. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:2997. 10.3390/ijms23062997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nitzan I, Shmueli O, Safir M. Association of myopia with anxiety and mood disorders in adolescents. Eye. (2024) 38:3016–8. 10.1038/s41433-024-03170-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wan KH, Chen LJ, Young AL. Depression and anxiety in dry eye disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye. (2016) 30:1558–67. 10.1038/eye.2016.186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mather M, Joo Yoo H, Clewett DV, Lee TH, Greening SG, Ponzio A, et al. Higher locus coeruleus MRI contrast is associated with lower parasympathetic influence over heart rate variability. Neuroimage. (2017) 150:329–35. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zhang X, Liu L, Yang F, Liu Z, Jin X, Han S, et al. Neurovascular coupling dysfunction in high myopia patients: evidence from a multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging analysis. J Neuroradiol. (2024) 51:281–9. 10.1016/j.neurad.2023.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zhang X, Liu L, Li Y, Li X, Wang K, Han S, et al. Integrative neurovascular coupling and neurotransmitter analyses in anisometropic and visual deprivation amblyopia children. iScience. (2024) 27:109988. 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Finkelstein MT, Nongpiur ME, Husain R, Perera S, Baskaran M, Wong TT, et al. Handheld chromatic pupillometry can reliably detect functional glaucomatous damage in eyes with high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. (2022) 108:818–25. 10.1136/bjo-2023-323878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Liang J, Pu Y, Chen J, Liu M, Ouyang B, Jin Z, et al. Global prevalence, trend and projection of myopia in children and adolescents from 1990 to 2050: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. (2025) 109:362–71. 10.1136/bjo-2024-325427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kaur K, Gurnani B, Nayak S, Deori N, Kaur S, Jethani J, et al. Digital eye strain- a comprehensive review. Ophthalmol Ther. (2022) 11:1655–80. 10.1007/s40123-022-00540-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Craig JP, Alves M, Wolffsohn JS, Downie LE, Efron N, Galor A, et al. TFOS lifestyle report executive summary: a lifestyle epidemic - ocular surface disease. Ocul Surf. (2023) 30:240–53. 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Li M, Xu Q, Yan X, Wang J, Xiang Y. Relationship between autonomic nervous system activity and axial length in children. Med Sci Monit. (2023) 29:e939451. 10.12659/MSM.939451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Mak CY, Yam JC, Chen LJ, Lee SM, Young AL. Epidemiology of myopia and prevention of myopia progression in children in East Asia: a review. Hong Kong Med J. (2018) 24:602–9. 10.12809/hkmj187513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chen Y, Ding X, Xiong R, Zhang J, Song F, Zhao Z, et al. Physiological growth of ocular axial length among Chinese children and teenagers: a 6-year cohort study. PLoS One. (2025) 20:e0317756. 10.1371/journal.pone.0317756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Little JA, McCullough SJ, Breslin KM, Saunders KJ. Higher order ocular aberrations and their relation to refractive error and ocular biometry in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2014) 55:4791–800. 10.1167/iovs.13-13533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhang N, Yang XB, Zhang WQ, Liu LQ, Dong GJ, Chen TW, et al. Relationship between higher-order aberrations and myopia progression in schoolchildren: a retrospective study. Int J Ophthalmol. (2013) 6:295–9. 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.03.07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lau JK, Vincent SJ, Collins MJ, Cheung SW, Cho P. Ocular higher-order aberrations and axial eye growth in young Hong Kong children. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:6726. 10.1038/s41598-018-24906-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Philip K, Sankaridurg P, Holden B, Ho A, Mitchell P. Influence of higher order aberrations and retinal image quality in myopisation of emmetropic eyes. Vision Res. (2014) 105:233–43. 10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hiraoka T, Kotsuka J, Kakita T, Okamoto F, Oshika T. Relationship between higher-order wavefront aberrations and natural progression of myopia in schoolchildren. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:7876. 10.1038/s41598-017-08177-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Messmer EM, Foulks GN, Nichols KK, Baenninger P, et al. Correlations between commonly used objective signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of dry eye disease: clinical implications. Acta Ophthalmol. (2014) 92:161–6. 10.1111/aos.12012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Korb DR. Survey of preferred tests for diagnosis of the tear film and dry eye. Cornea. (2000) 19:483–6. 10.1097/00003226-200007000-00016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wolffsohn JS, Benitez-Del-Castillo J, Loya-Garcia D, Inomata T, Iyar G, Liang L, et al. TFOS DEWS III diagnostic methodology. Am J Ophthalmol. (2025) 279:387–450. 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES