Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2026 May 29;17:1782484. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1782484

Study on the species spectrum, drug resistance spectrum and molecular characteristics of clinical Mycobacterium isolates from three provinces in China

Xinyue He 1, Ruihuan Wang 1, Haijia Zou 1, Machao Li 1, Xiuqin Zhao 1, Yi Guo 1, Yue Li 2, Dongfang Xu 3, Haican Liu 1,*, Mingxiang Huang 4,*, Xundi Bao 3,*, Yunhong Tan 5,*
PMCID: PMC13260121  PMID: 42293569

Abstract

This study aimed to identify species identification, molecular typing, and drug resistance characterization of clinically isolated mycobacteria from Anhui, Fujian, and Hunan provinces, and to evaluate the value of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in predicting drug resistance. WGS and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) were performed on clinical Mycobacterium isolates from those provinces. Bioinformatics analysis and chi-square test were used to compare inter-provincial differences in drug resistance and lineages. Of the 1,383 isolates, 95.30% belonged to the MTBC and 3.40% were NTM. Lineage 2 (74.07%) and lineage 4 (24.94%) were dominant in MTBC. The overall drug resistance rate was 32.08%, while MDR rate was 11.14%. Hunan had significantly higher MDR and RIF resistance rates than the other provinces (p < 0.05). INH had the highest resistance rate (19.37%). Fluoroquinolones exhibited significant inter-provincial differences in resistance rates. WGS exhibited >85% sensitivity and >96% specificity for first-line drug resistance prediction, and >77% sensitivity and >97% specificity for second-line drug resistance. Additionally, 87.92% of isolates showed consistent genotypic and phenotypic DST results. MTBC isolates exhibited pronounced inter-provincial variation in lineage composition. Geographical differences existed in drug resistance, particularly for MDR and RIF resistance. WGS was reliable for predicting first-line drug resistance, but unknown resistance mechanisms were detected, requiring further exploration to optimize prediction.

Keywords: drug resistance, Mycobacterium, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, species identification, WGS

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major worldwide infectious disease threatening public health. According to the WHO Global Tuberculosis Report, an estimated 10.7 million people worldwide developed TB in 2024 (World Health Organization, 2025). Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), especially multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB), further exacerbates the burden of prevention and control. This is owing to its long treatment duration, high cost, and low treatment success rate. The TB epidemic in China is particularly severe. It is characterized by the so-called “three highs and one low (Ding et al., 2020)” pattern. This pattern includes high incidence (696,000 new cases in 2024, ranking fourth globally), high infection rate [approximately 250–300 million latent tuberculosis infections (LTIs)], high drug resistance (estimated 28,000 MDR/RR-TB patients), and low treatment coverage (the estimated TB treatment coverage among the 0–14 age group ranks fourth from the bottom among high-burden countries; World Health Organization, 2025).

Furthermore, the reported incidence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is gradually increasing. NTM shares similar clinical manifestations and culture conditions with the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC; Marras and Daley, 2002; Tortoli, 2009). Notably, rapidly growing NTM is naturally resistant to some antibiotics, particularly first- and second-line anti-TB drugs (Stout et al., 2016; Hosseinali et al., 2023; Kwon et al., 2019). Misdiagnosis of NTM disease as pulmonary tuberculosis not only compromises therapeutic efficacy but may also lead to erroneous classification as multidrug-resistant (MDR) or rifampicin-resistant (RR) TB.

Compared with phenotypic DST, which requires in vitro cultivation, WGS offers a faster, safer, and more comprehensive solution. It can be used for bacterial species identification, resistance profiling, lineage typing, and cluster analysis (Ghodousi et al., 2025; Castro-Rodriguez et al., 2024; Meehan et al., 2019; Kremer et al., 2005, 1999; Supply et al., 2006, 2001). WGS provides a powerful tool for accurate TB diagnosis, drug resistance analysis, molecular epidemiological surveillance, and formulation of TB prevention and control strategies (Kremer et al., 1999; Supply et al., 2006, 2001; Xu et al., 2025; Rajasekaran et al., 2024).

Based on a project of the National Key Research and Development Program of China, our research team aimed to conduct in-depth studies on acid-fast positive clinical isolates from Anhui, Fujian, and Hunan Provinces. We used existing advanced technologies (including WGS). The focus was on analyzing isolate species composition, genetic lineage distribution, and drug resistance characteristic profiles, while evaluating the efficacy of WGS in predicting drug resistance. By revealing the molecular characteristics of strains from different regions, this study intends to deepen the understanding of Mycobacterium and provide a scientific basis for formulating more precise regional TB prevention and control strategies.

Materials and methods

Strain source

This cross-sectional study investigated acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear-positive isolates collected in 2024 from tuberculosis (TB) designated medical institutions in Anhui, Hunan, and Fujian Provinces. The original strains were cultured to the second generation for WGS and DST. Meanwhile, detailed demographic and clinical data of the corresponding patients were systematically collected. These included but were not limited to age, gender, previous treatment history, and clinical manifestations.

DST

For strains identified as MTB via molecular biology, phenotypic DST against 12 anti-TB drugs (Table 1) was performed using the Sensititre™ MYCOTBI Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Plate (Trek Diagnostic Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA).

Table 1.

Composition and critical concentrations of 12 anti-TB drugs.

Anti-TB drug Concentration (ug/ml) Critical concentration (ug/ml)
Isoniazid (INH) 0.03–4 0.2
Rifampicin (RIF) 0.12–16 1
Ethambutol (EMB) 0.5–32 5
Amikacin (AMK) 0.12–16 4
Ethionamide (ETH) 0.3–40 5
Kanamycin (KAN) 0.6–40 5
Moxifloxacin (MXF) 0.06–8 0.5
Ofloxacin (OFLX) 0.25–32 2
Para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) 0.5–64 2
Rifabutin (RFB) 0.12–16 0.5
Streptomycin (STR) 0.25–32 2
Cycloserine (CSC) 2–256 25

DNA extraction and quality control

Genomic DNA of Mycobacterium was extracted via the Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB) method (Xu et al., 2025). Nanodrop ND-1000 Nucleic Acid Analyzer was used to detect DNA purity, 1% agarose gel verified DNA integrity. The Qubit system quantified DNA concentration.

WGS

DNA samples of strains passing library construction were sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq platform using the paired-end 150 (PE150) mode, with a planned sequencing depth of 500X.

Data QC

FastQC (v0.23.2; Rajasekaran et al., 2024) was used for quality control of raw sequencing data. Low-quality reads filtered out. The final analytical data required a base proportion of ≥99% at the Q30 level.

Drug resistance and lineage analysis

Kmerfinder (v1.4.18; Jensen et al., 2021) software was used for species identification. Drug resistance-associated mutations and strain lineages were identified using TB-Profiler (v6.6.0; Phelan et al., 2019). Genotypic resistance was determined according to the WHO Catalog of mutations in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (second edition, 2023; World Health Organization, 2026).

Phylogenetic analysis

Subsequently, software including Bowtie2 (v2.4.4-1; Langmead and Salzberg, 2012), SAMtools (v1.13-4; Li et al., 2009), and VarScan (v2.4.6; Koboldt et al., 2009) was used to align all MTB genomes with the reference genome (NC000962.3). After obtaining whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites, SNPs located in PE/PPE genes, drug resistance-related regions, and repetitive fragments were removed to acquire core genome SNPs. These were further filtered with the following parameters: min-coverage > 20, min-reads > 2, min-avg-qual > 20, min-var-freq > 0.75, and p > 0.01; finally, IQ-TREE (v3.0.1) software was used to construct a phylogenetic tree. ITOL software was applied for supplementary modification.

Statistical analysis

Microsoft Excel organized demographic/clinical data, analyzed phenotypic DST results, and calculated indicators [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV)] of WGS-based drug resistance prediction. SPSS (v20.0.0) performed statistical analysis. The chi-square test compared inter-group rate differences, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Strain collection and valid data

A total of 1,446 clinical acid-fast positive isolates were collected (400 from Anhui, 596 from Fujian, 450 from Hunan). Due to incomplete patient info for some strains, subculture failure, unqualified WGS data, or phenotypic DST contamination, 1,383valid WGS results and 884valid phenotypic DST results were finally obtained (Table 2). Discrepancies between WGS and DST datasets arose because second-line DST was not yet conducted on Hunan isolates (n=450), and some isolates lacked paired first-line DST due to contamination or insufficient culture growth.

Table 2.

Summary table of strain completion status.

Province Collected strains First-line DST Second-line DST WGS DST-WGS correspondence
Anhui 400 343 343 354 299
Hunan 450 391 0 450 289
Fujian 596 541 541 579 538
Total 1,446 1,275 884 1,383 1,126

Species identification results

Among 1,383 strains included in the statistical analysis, the vast majority were MTB (1,319/1,383, 95.30%). NTM accounted for 3.40% (47/1,383, Table 3). In addition, a small number of non-Mycobacterium microorganisms (17 strains in total) were detected, including acid-fast weakly positive strains such as Nocardia farcinica (3 strains) and Gordonia spp. (4 strains), as well as Bacillus subtilis (6 strains). Among NTM, 82.98% were slow-growing mycobacteria (SGM), and 17.02% were rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM).

Table 3.

Detected species of NTM and corresponding proportions.

Mycobacterium spp. Category Hunan Fujian Anhui Total Percentage (%)
intracellulare SGM 2 2 24 28 58.33
gordonae SGM 0 6 0 6 12.5
abscessus RGM 1 1 2 4 8.33
kansasii SGM 1 0 3 4 8.33
massiliense RGM 0 0 2 2 4.17
fortuitum RGM 0 1 0 1 2.08
vanbaalenii RGM 0 1 0 1 2.08
coryneforme SGM 0 1 0 1 2.08

Species spectrum

Among MTB strains, most (74.07%, 977/1,319) belonged to lineage 2, followed by lineage 4 (24.94%, 329/1,319) and lineage 1 (0.76%, 10/1,319). A small proportion (0.23%, 3/1,319) showed contamination or mixed infection, all of which were between lineage 2 and lineage 4. The dominant sublineage in lineage 2 was L2.2.1 (95.91%, 937/977). In lineage 4, the dominant sublineage was L4.5 (54.10%, 178/329), followed by L4.4.2 (27.05%, 89/329; Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Circular phylogenetic tree diagram displays Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates, with inner colored bands representing main lineages and outer colored bands indicating drug resistance profiles. Color-coded legend explains lineage and drug resistance categories, including sensitive, multidrug-resistant, and extensively drug-resistant forms.

Phylogenetic analysis of 1,319 Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. The innermost ring indicates lineage distribution, the middle ring categorizes resistance types, and the outermost ring displays detailed drug susceptibility profiles.

Significant inter-provincial differences were observed in the MTB lineage structure (Table 4). Lineage 2 was the dominant circulating strain in all three provinces, but its proportion showed a gradient. It was highest in Anhui Province (central China) at 90.68% (292/322), followed by Hunan Province at 73.76% (326/442), and lowest in Fujian Province (eastern China) at 66.24% (359/542). Conversely, the proportion of lineage 4 increased in the order of Anhui, Hunan, and Fujian, with proportions of 8.07%, 26.24%, and 33.76%, respectively. The overall distribution of lineage 2 and lineage 4 among the three provinces was significantly different (χ2 = 64.454, p < 0.001).

Table 4.

MTB lineage distribution in three provinces of China.

Province Lineage2 Lineage4 χ2 P
Anhui 292 30 64.454 p < 0.001
Hunan 326 116
Fujian 359 183

Phenotypic drug resistance

The overall drug resistance rate was 32.08% (409/1,275), and the MDR rate was 11.14% (142/1,275). While the total drug resistance rate did not differ significantly among provinces (p > 0.05), the MDR rate did (p < 0.05), with Hunan Province having a relatively higher rate. For first-line anti-TB drugs (Table 5), INH had the highest resistance rate (19.37%), followed by STR (17.10%), RIF (13.49%), and EMB (5.49%). Only the RIF resistance rate showed a statistically significant inter-provincial difference, being higher in Hunan Province.

Table 5.

Comparison of first-line anti-TB drug resistance among three provinces.

Drug Resistance Hunan Fujian Anhui Total χ2 P
INH Yes 87 106 54 247 4.983 0.083
No 304 435 289 1,028
STR Yes 79 92 47 218 5.455 0.065
No 312 449 296 1,057
RIF Yes 70 65 37 172 9.680 0.008
No 321 476 306 1,103
EMB Yes 25 31 14 70 1.987 0.370
No 366 510 329 1,205
MDR Yes 58 52 32 142 7.803 0.020
No 333 489 311 1,133

As phenotypic DST for isolates from Hunan Province has not yet been fully completed, the analysis of second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs was performed only on isolates from Anhui and Fujian Provinces. Analysis of second-line anti-TB drugs for 884 strains from Fujian and Anhui Provinces (Table 6) showed that fluoroquinolones (FQs) had the highest resistance rates (MXF, 11.99%; OFL, 11.65%), followed by RFB (9.95%), ETH (2.51%), PAS (1.81%), KAN (1.47%), and AMI (1.02%). Resistance rates for FQs and KAN showed statistically significant differences between the two provinces (p < 0.05).

Table 6.

Second-line anti-TB drug resistance comparison between two provinces.

Drug Resistance Fujian Anhui Total χ2 P
OFL Yes 50 53 103 7.863 0.005
No 491 290 781
MXF Yes 55 51 106 4.399 0.036
No 486 292 778
AMI Yes 4 5 9 1.075 0.300
No 537 338 875
RFB Yes 55 33 88 0.070 0.792
No 486 310 797
PAS Yes 8 8 16 0.861 0.354
No 533 335 869
ETH Yes 21 11 32 0.274 0.601
No 520 332 852
KAN Yes 4 9 13 5.514 0.023
No 537 334 871

WGS analysis

A total of 1,126 isolates with both WGS and DST results available were included in the analysis of WGS predictive performance (Table 7). For first-line drugs, WGS demonstrated sensitivities >85% and specificities >96%. Sensitivity was highest for RIF (95.48%) and INH (91.79%). Specificity was highest for RIF (98.70%). For second-line drugs, specificity for MXF and AMK reached 100%. Sensitivity was 100% for AMK, 95.74% for ETH, and 80.20% for MXF.

Table 7.

Accuracy of WGS-predicted drug resistance rates.

Drug Resistant phenotype Susceptible phenotype Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95%) PPV NPV
R S Total R S Total
INH 190 17 207 18 901 919 91.79 (86.96–95.00) 98.04 (96.86–98.80) 91.35 (86.46–94.65) 98.15 (96.99–98.88)
RIF 148 7 155 13 958 971 95.48 (90.56–98.01) 98.70 (97.72–99.27) 91.93 (86.30–95.45) 99.29 (98.48–99.69)
EMB 51 6 57 39 1,030 1,069 89.47 (77.81–95.65) 96.35 (95.00–97.36) 55.67 (45.82–66.94) 99.42 (98.68–99.76)
STR 159 26 185 19 922 941 85.95 (79.90–90.45) 97.98 (96.80–98.75) 89.33 (83.61–93.28) 97.26 (95.95–98.16)
MXF 81 20 101 0 736 736 80.20 (70.84–87.21) 100.00 (99.35–100.00) 100.00 (94.36–100.00) 97.35 (95.87–98.33)
AMI 7 0 7 0 830 830 100.00 (56.09–100.00) 100.00 (99.43–100.00) 100.00 (56.09–100.00) 100.00 (99.43–100.00)
ETH 45 2 47 18 772 790 95.74 (84.27–99.26) 97.72 (96.35–98.60) 71.43 (58.47–81.76) 99.74 (98.96–99.96)
KAN 7 2 9 1 827 828 77.78 (40.19–96.05) 99.88 (99.22–99.99) 87.50 (46.68–99.34) 99.76 (99.03–99.96)

Concordance analysis

For the eight anti-TB drugs, the overall concordance between genotypic prediction and phenotypic DST results was 86.86% (978/1,126). Discordance was observed in 148 strains (Table 8). Among these, two types of discordance were notable. First, 50 isolates were phenotypically resistant but genotypically susceptible (wild-type, WT), carried no known resistance-associated mutations. Second, for RIF specifically, 26 isolates were phenotypically susceptible but genotypically resistant. These carried rpoB mutations such as Leu430Pro, His445Asn, etc., which are classified as borderline mutations.

Table 8.

Discordance between genotypic and phenotypic drug susceptibility.

Drug Gene Mutation Phenotypic DST Genotypic WGS Isolates WHO_Group
INH
inhA −777C>T S R 11 Group1
−154G>A S R 5 Group1
katG Lle462Thr S R 1 –
inhA + katG −777C>T + Gly285Asp S R 1 Group1+ Group3
−154G>A + Trp191Arg S R 1 Group1+ Group3
ahpC −48G>A R S 2 Group3
−81C>T R S 1 Group3
ahpC+KatG −52C>T + Gly285Asp R S 4 Group3+ Group3
−81C>T + Thr275Pro R S 1 Group3+ Group3
WT – R S 8
RIF
rpoB Leu430Pro S R 8 Group1
His445Asn S R 8 Group1
Leu452Pro S R 7 Group1
His445Leu S R 1 Group1
Leu430Pro + Met434Leu S R 1 Group1+ Group2
WT – R S 3
EMB
embB Met306lle S R 16 Group1
Met306Val S R 13 Group1
Gly406Ala S R 6 Group1
Gly406Asp S R 4 Group1
GIy406Ser S R 1 Group1
GIn497Lys S R 2 Group1
Gln497Arg S R 2 Group1
Asp328Tyr S R 1 Group3
embA+embB −16C>T + Met306Ile S R 1 Group3+ Group1
embA −12C>T R S* 1 Group1
WT – R S 4
STR
rpsL Lys43Arg S R 7 Group1
Lys88Arg S R 1 Group1
gid 102delG S R 4 –
273dupA S R 2 –
115delC S R 1 –
rrs 514A>C S R 3 Group1
rpsL Lys43Thr R S 2 Group3
Lys88Thr R S 1 Group3
gid Pro75Arg R S* 1 Group3
Leu108Arg R S 1 Group3
Leu79Ser R S 1 Group3
Trp148* R S 1 Group3
rrs 514A>T R S 2 Group3
WT – R S 15
gyrB Asp461Asn S R* 1 Group2
gyrA Asp94Val R S* 2 Group3
WT – R S 18
KAN
eis −12C>T S R 1 Group1
−10G>A R S 1 Group3
−8C>A R S 1 Group3
ETH
inhA −777C>T S R 6 Group1
−154G>A S R 3 Group2
−770T>C S R 1 Group2
−779G>T S R 2 Group2
−154G>A + Ile194Thr S R 1 Group2+ Group3
−777C>T + Ser94Ala S R 2 Group1+ Group2
−777C>T + Ile21Thr S R 2 Group1+ Group3
ethA 11dupA S R 2 –
1353dupG S R 1 –
479delC S R 1 –
1047delT S R 1 –
Trp228* S R 1 Group2
Tyr382* S R 1 Group2
762_765dupGAAG S R 1 –
ethA + inhA 775dupC +−777C>T S R 1 –+ Group1
WT – R S 2

For INH, the most frequently observed resistance mutation was katG Ser315Thr (122 isolates). RIF resistance was predominantly conferred by rpoB Ser450Leu (84 isolates). STR resistance was most associated with rpsL Lys43Arg (104 isolates). All these substantially outnumbered other mutation types. Ethambutol resistance was primarily driven by mutations at codon 306 of embB, particularly Met306Val (21 isolates). For moxifloxacin, the predominant resistance mutation was gyrA A549Gly (31 isolates). Overall, the resistance-associated mutations identified for each drug showed strong concordance with the WHO mutation catalog grading system (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Composite of seven bar charts titled “Resistance Mutations by WHO Category” for INH, RIF, STR, EMB, MXF, ETH, and KAN, showing mutation types, number of resistant isolates, and color-coded WHO group categories.

Profiles of resistance-associated mutations for seven anti-tuberculosis drugs.

Discussion

Based on large-scale WGS, this study systematically revealed the species distribution, genetic lineage, and drug resistance characteristics of Mycobacterium in Anhui, Fujian, and Hunan Provinces, China. The results indicate that MTB accounted for 95.30% of acid-fast positive samples, while NTM accounted for 3.40%. This proportion is significantly lower than that reported in a national meta-analysis covering 27 provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions of China by Wang et al. (2021). That meta-analysis indicated that the pooled proportion of NTM among Mycobacterium was 12% (11.2%−12.7%), reaching 12.7% (11.3%−14.2%) in initial clinical samples. Even when compared with previous reports from East China and Central China (the regions where the three provinces are located), the proportion of NTM in this study remained at a relatively low level. For example, an early report (Bao et al., 2020) from Anhui Province showed an NTM isolation rate of approximately 4.0%. In some areas of Hunan Province, the NTM proportion once reached 10.2% (Chen et al., 2019).

This discrepancy may be attributed to multiple factors. From the perspective of detection technology, WGS has higher accuracy in species identification than traditional PNB/TCH differential media and single 16S rDNA sequencing. This reduces the misclassification between NTM and MTB. From the perspective of sample background, the samples in this study focused more on confirmed active TB cases rather than suspected cases. This may also lower the detection rate of NTM. These findings suggest that MTB—with well-defined pathogenicity—remains the dominant pathogen of Mycobacterium infection in Anhui, Fujian, and Hunan Provinces. However, due to the convenience sampling strategy and the focus on confirmed TB patients, the NTM proportion of 3.40% should be interpreted as a minimum estimate rather than a definitive regional prevalence rate. Among NTM, 82.98% were slow-growing mycobacteria (SGM), mainly Mycobacterium intracellulare, and 17.02% were RGM, mainly Mycobacterium abscessus—a distribution consistent with the epidemiological trend of NTM in China (Liu et al., 2021). Therefore, further efforts are needed to advance the etiological diagnosis of Mycobacterium species.

The genetic lineages of MTB were dominated by lineage 2 (74.07%) and lineage 4 (24.94%). This is consistent with the characteristics of the main circulating MTB strains in China. There were differences in lineage structure among the three provinces. This indicates that the genetic background of MTB in East to Central China is not fully homogeneous. Instead, it exhibits the characteristics of “conservative dominance of the core lineage (L2) and heterogeneous differentiation of inter-provincial structure.” The dominant status of L2 in the three provinces confirms the commonality in the genetic origin of MTB in China. Meanwhile, the gradient differences in lineage proportions among provinces reflect the specificity of MTB transmission dynamics and evolutionary directions in different provinces. The overall drug resistance rate was 32.08%, and the MDR rate was 11.14%. Both are higher than the national average (7.5%; Wang et al., 2012). This may be related to the sample source, leading to a certain degree of selection bias. For first-line anti-TB drugs, INH and STR had relatively high resistance rates. Their molecular mechanisms were highly consistent with the katG S315T mutation, inhA promoter mutation, and rpsL K43R mutation (Pinhata et al., 2021). For second-line drugs, the resistance rate to FQs was approximately 12%, with significant differences between Fujian and Anhui Provinces. Although China has achieved the TB control target set for 2025, the high drug resistance rates in these provinces suggest that the prevention and control efforts—especially for the drug-resistant TB—need to be further strengthened.

WGS showed excellent predictive sensitivity (>91%) and specificity (>98%) for RIF and INH. This confirms that mutations such as KatG S315T and rpoB S450L can serve as core drug resistance markers, suitable for rapid clinical screening. Two distinct types of discordance were observed. The first type involved 50 wild-type strains that were phenotypically resistant but lacked any known resistance mutations. Their resistance mechanisms remain completely unknown, highlighting a major gap in current mutation databases. The second type involved 26 RIF isolates that were phenotypically susceptible but carried borderline rpoB mutations (e.g., Leu430Pro, His445Asn). Borderline mutations are known to mediate only low-level or conditional resistance, frequently causing false-positive genotypic predictions (Van Deun et al., 2009, 2021). These two types of discordance should not be confused; the former suggests undiscovered mechanisms, while the latter reflects known limitations of phenotypic DST at low drug concentrations. For second-line drugs, the predictive accuracy of WGS for AMI resistance reached 100%. However, the sensitivity for MXF was relatively low (80.20%), and the PPV for EMB and ETH were relatively low. Additionally, some strains were phenotypically resistant but genotypically susceptible. This is consistent with previous findings (Pei et al., 2024) that 45.8% of such strains carry efflux pump gene mutations. Moreover, the insufficient coverage of insertion/deletion (indel) mutations in the WHO Mutation Catalog may also limit the prediction efficacy for some drugs. Nevertheless, WGS is more efficient than traditional DST. It can serve as a core tool for drug resistance screening and molecular epidemiological surveillance, despite the limitations of existing mutation catalogs in predicting resistance to certain drugs. This highlights that the application of resistance-associated mutations should be tailored to locally prevalent strains by prioritizing dominant mutation combinations.

This study had several limitations. First, the lack of phenotypic DST for second-line drugs in Hunan Province limited the comprehensiveness of comparative analysis. Second, some drugs were excluded from the evaluation due to low reliability of phenotypic results (e.g., CYC, PAS; Shi, 2021; Barrera et al., 2008) or incomplete mutation information (e.g., RFB, OFL). Third, the statistical power was limited by the low frequency of certain mutations (e.g., only 7 strains were resistant to AMI). Additionally, the isolates were collected from only three provinces (Anhui, Fujian, Hunan) using a convenience sampling strategy. While this provides valuable regional insights, the findings—particularly the observed drug resistance rates and lineage distributions—may not be fully representative of the broader Chinese population or generalizable to other regions with different socioeconomic and epidemiological backgrounds. This geographical limitation, combined with the limited demographic data available, raises a concern regarding potential sampling bias.

However, this study also had notable strengths. It covered three provinces (Anhui, Fujian, Hunan) and included 1,383 clinical isolates. The large sample size and wide geographical coverage ensured strong representativeness and statistical power to reflect the epidemiological characteristics of Mycobacterium in Central and East China. Compared with traditional identification methods, WGS significantly improved the accuracy and resolution of species identification. It showed particular advantages in the accurate identification of NTM. Furthermore, this study systematically evaluated the predictive sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of WGS for first- and second-line anti-TB drugs. This provides solid data support for the application of WGS in clinical drug resistance screening. The finding that Hunan Province had significantly higher MDR and RIF resistance rates than the other two provinces has important guiding significance for formulating regional TB prevention and control strategies. Additionally, the identification of 50 WT strains that were phenotypically resistant suggests the existence of undiscovered drug resistance mechanisms. These points out directions for subsequent mechanistic studies. Finally, full-process quality control and cross-validation using multiple software were implemented throughout the workflow (from DNA extraction, library construction, and sequencing to bioinformatics analysis). This ensured data reliability and the scientificity of the analysis results.

In conclusion, based on WGS technology, this study systematically revealed the species distribution, genetic lineage, and drug resistance characteristics of clinically isolated MTBC from Anhui, Fujian, and Hunan Provinces. The relatively low detection rate of NTM (3.40%) should be considered a minimum estimate. Continuous etiological surveillance is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Furthermore, the ongoing burden of drug-resistant TB highlights the need for strengthened prevention and control efforts. Particular emphasis should be placed on improving patient management and treatment adherence to curb transmission. Notably, the presence of 50 phenotypically resistant but genotypically susceptible strains suggests that additional resistance mechanisms remain to be elucidated. This warrants further investigation to expand current mutation databases. Collectively, these findings provide important molecular epidemiological evidence to inform precision prevention and control strategies as well as personalized treatment for TB in China. Future large-scale, prospective multicenter studies integrating genomic and clinical data are recommended to further advance these efforts.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Project no: 2023YFC2307201).

Footnotes

Edited by: Jean-Philippe Rasigade, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France

Reviewed by: Guoqin Zhang, Tianjin Center for Tuberculosis Control, China

Hua Chen, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, China

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, BioProject ID: PRJNA1397020.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (reference number: ICDC-LPJ-2024004). This study was conducted in strict accordance with local laws and institutional ethical requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants themselves, their legal guardians or entrusted agents.

Author contributions

XH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. RW: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. HZ: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. ML: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. YG: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YL: Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing. DX: Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing. HL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. MH: Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing. XB: Funding acquisition, Resources, Validation, Writing – review & editing. YT: Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Bao X. D., Jiang Y., Liang S., Cheng H., Xia G., Wang C., et al. (2020). Analysis of the clinical isolation rate, population distribution and drug resistance of non-tuberculosis mycobacteria in Anhui. Chin. J. Antituberculosis 42, 718–724. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2020.07.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrera L., Cooreman E., de Dieu Iragena J., Drobniewski F., Duda P., Havelkova M., et al. (2008). Policy Guidance on Drug-Susceptibility Testing (DST) of Second-Line Antituberculosis Drugs. Available online at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26290924/ (accessed July 31, 2025). [PubMed]
  3. Castro-Rodriguez B., Franco-Sotomayor G., Orlando S. A., Garcia-Bereguiain M. Á. (2024). Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ecuador: recent advances and future challenges. J. Clin. Tuberc. Mycobact. Dis. 37:100465. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen Z., Yi S., Tan Y. (2019). Epidemiological characteristics of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in Hunan Province, China, 2012-2017. Chin. J. Antituberculosis 41, 217–221. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2019.02.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ding C., Wang S., Shangguan Y., Feng X., Guo W., Shi P., et al. (2020). Epidemic trends of tuberculosis in China from 1990 to 2017: evidence from the global burden of disease study. Infect. Drug Resist. 13, 1663–1672. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S249698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ghodousi A., Cannas A., Tagliani E., Batignani V., Bisognin F., Borroni E., et al. (2025). Comprehensive whole genome sequencing dataset of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains collected across Italy. Sci. Data 12:624. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04966-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hosseinali Z., Mohammadshahi J., Teimourpour A., Habibzadeh S., Esmaelizad M., Arzanlou M., et al. (2023). Molecular identification of multiple drug resistance (MDR) strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 50, 10271–10275. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-08867-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jensen C. S., Iversen K. H., Dargis R., Shewmaker P., Rasmussen S., Christensen J. J., et al. (2021). Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae: use of whole-genome sequences to validate species identification methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 59, e02503–e02520. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02503-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koboldt D. C., Chen K., Wylie T., Larson D. E., McLellan M. D., Mardis E. R., et al. (2009). VarScan: variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples. Bioinforma Oxf. Engl. 25, 2283–2285. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kremer K., Au B. K., Yip P. C., Skuce R., Supply P., Kam K. M., et al. (2005). Use of variable-number tandem-repeat typing to differentiate Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing family isolates from Hong Kong and comparison with IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing and spoligotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 314–320. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.314-320.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kremer K., van Soolingen D., Frothingham R., Haas W. H., Hermans P. W., Martín C., et al. (1999). Comparison of methods based on different molecular epidemiological markers for typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: interlaboratory study of discriminatory power and reproducibility. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 2607–2618. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.8.2607-2618.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kwon Y. S., Daley C. L., Koh W. J. (2019). Managing antibiotic resistance in nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: challenges and new approaches. Expert. Rev. Respir. Med. 13, 851–861. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2019.1638765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Langmead B., Salzberg S. L. (2012). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., et al. (2009). The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinforma Oxf. Engl. 25, 2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu C. F., Song Y. M., He W. C., Liu D. X., He P., Bao J. J., et al. (2021). Nontuberculous mycobacteria in China: incidence and antimicrobial resistance spectrum from a nationwide survey. Infect. Dis. Poverty 10:59. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00844-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marras T. K., Daley C. L. (2002). Epidemiology of human pulmonary infection with nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin. Chest Med. 23, 553–567. doi: 10.1016/S0272-5231(02)00019-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meehan C. J., Goig G. A., Kohl T. A., Verboven L., Dippenaar A., Ezewudo M., et al. (2019). Whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: current standards and open issues. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 533–545. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0214-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pei S., Song Z., Yang W., He W., Ou X., Zhao B., et al. (2024). The catalogue of Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutations associated with drug resistance to 12 drugs in China from a nationwide survey: a genomic analysis. Lancet Microbe 5:100899. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00131-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Phelan J. E., O'Sullivan D. M., Machado D., Ramos J., Oppong Y. E. A., Campino S., et al. (2019). Integrating informatics tools and portable sequencing technology for rapid detection of resistance to anti-tuberculous drugs. Genome Med. 11:41. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0650-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pinhata J. M. W., Brandao A. P., Mendes F. F., Rabello M. C. D. S., Ferrazoli L., de Oliveira R. S. (2021). Correlating genetic mutations with isoniazid phenotypic levels of resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in a high burden setting. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 2551–2561. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04316-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rajasekaran S., Vasudevan G., Tangavel C., Ramachandran K., Nayagam S. M., Muthurajan R., et al. (2024). Does the gut microbiome influence disc health and disease? The interplay between dysbiosis, pathobionts, and disc inflammation: a pilot study. Spine J. Off. J. North Am. Spine Soc. 24, 1952–1963. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shi W. (2021). Activity of Pyrazinamide against Mycobacterium tuberculosis at neutral pH in PZA-S1 minimal medium. Antibiot. Basel Switz. 10:909. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10080909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stout J. E., Koh W. J., Yew W. W. (2016). Update on pulmonary disease due to non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Int. J. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Int. Soc. Infect. Dis. 45, 123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Supply P., Allix C., Lesjean S., Cardoso-Oelemann M., Rüsch-Gerdes S., Willery E., et al. (2006). Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 4498–4510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01392-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Supply P., Lesjean S., Savine E., Kremer K., Van Soolingen D., Locht C. (2001). Automated high-throughput genotyping for study of global epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39, 3563–3571. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3563-3571.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tortoli E. (2009). Clinical manifestations of nontuberculous mycobacteria infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15, 906–910. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03014.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Deun A., Barrera L., Bastian I., Fattorini L., Hoffmann H., Kam K. M., et al. (2009). Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with highly discordant rifampin susceptibility test results. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47, 3501–3506. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01209-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Deun A., Decroo T., Aung K. J. M., Hossain M. A., Gumusboga M., De Rijk W. B., et al. (2021). Mycobacterium tuberculosis borderline rpoB mutations: emerging from the unknown. Eur. Respir. J. 58:2100783. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00783-2021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang L. X., Cheng S. M., Chen M. T., Zhao Y.-L., Zhang H., Jiang S.-W., et al. (2012). The fifth national tuberculosis epidemiological survy in 2010. Chin. J. Antituberculosis 34, 485–508. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2019.02.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang R. B., Xu D., Zhao X. Q., Wang K. L. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of mixed infection of tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria in China. Chin. J. Zoonoses 37, 1147–1151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2021.00.161 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. World Health Organization (2025). Global Tuberculosis Report 2025. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240116924 (accessed November 23, 2025).
  32. World Health Organization (2026). Catalogue of Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex and their Association with Drug Resistance, 2nd Edn. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240082410 (accessed March 11, 2026).
  33. Xu D., Gu Y., Li G., Wang R., Xiao S., Duan H., et al. (2025). Evaluation of the cross-immunity between Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium abscessus in vitro. BMC Microbiol. 25:9. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03724-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, BioProject ID: PRJNA1397020.


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES