Abstract
Background
The emergence of mobile colistin resistance determinants in clinically relevant Acinetobacter species poses a growing challenge to antimicrobial stewardship and One Health surveillance. Although mcr-4.3 has been reported in Acinetobacter, its occurrence in imported food animals and its broader phylogenomic context remain poorly defined.
Methods
We investigated fecal samples collected from 150 beef cattle imported from Australia to China. Acinetobacter isolates recovered by selective culture were subjected to whole-genome sequencing, and the mcr-4.3-positive isolate was further resolved by hybrid assembly using short- and long-read sequencing. Comparative plasmid analysis and global phylogenomic analysis were performed using publicly available A. nosocomialis genomes.
Results
Among 54 Acinetobacter isolates recovered from imported cattle, one A. nosocomialis isolate, NB148, carried mcr-4.3. Complete genome sequencing showed that mcr-4.3 was located on a 28,233-bp plasmid, designated pNB148_mcr-4.3, which harbored plasmid maintenance-associated toxin-antitoxin systems and shared substantial backbone similarity with previously reported mcr-4.3-bearing plasmids from Acinetobacter species. The mcr-4.3 region was positioned downstream of a putative recombinase and a Tn3-family transposase, suggesting a conserved genetic framework for this resistance determinant. Global phylogenomic analysis incorporating 574 publicly available A. nosocomialis genomes placed NB148 within a diverse international population characterized by mixing across animal, environmental, and human sources. Among the global collection, 11 genomes carried mcr-4.3, of which 10 belonged to ST279, indicating that this lineage may represent an important genomic background for the persistence and international distribution of mcr-4.3-positive A. nosocomialis.
Conclusions
This study documents plasmid-borne mcr-4.3 in A. nosocomialis recovered from imported beef cattle and places this finding within a broader international One Health context. Our data expand the known ecological range of mcr-4.3-positive A. nosocomialis and support strengthened genomic surveillance at animal–human–environment interfaces, particularly in importation and border inspection settings.
Keywords: Acinetobacter nosocomialis, Mcr-4.3, Plasmid-borne colistin resistance, Imported beef cattle, ST279, One health surveillance
1. Introduction
Acinetobacter nosocomialis has emerged as a significant opportunistic pathogen, especially in healthcare settings and among immunocompromised patients, due to its multidrug resistance [1]. Treatment options are limited, with colistin often serving as a ‘last-resort’ antibiotic. However, the global spread of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance genes (mcr) has severely complicated resistance management [2], [3]. Initially prevalent in Enterobacteriaceae, mcr genes are now also a rising concern in the Acinetobacter genus, which is healthcare-associated infections [1], [4].
The mcr-4 gene was first reported on a plasmid in Salmonella enterica from swine [5]. The mcr-4.3 variant is distinguished from mcr-4 by two specific amino acid substitutions (V179G and V236F) [6]. It was initially detected in 2014 in Enterobacter cloacae from human clinical specimens [7]. Notably, the mcr-4.3 gene was documented on a plasmid in a clinical isolate of A. nosocomialis from South Africa in 2017, marking its first report in Africa and in this bacterial species [8]. However, functional studies present a complex picture: while the presence of the mcr-4.3-carrying plasmid was linked to colistin resistance in the original A. nosocomialis isolate [8], recombinant expression of mcr-4.3 in Escherichia coli did not confer resistance in another study [7], suggesting its functionality may be context-dependent.
The mcr-4.3 gene has been identified in clinically significant pathogens including A. nosocomialis, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter kobei and Leclercia adecarboxylata [4], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Its detection in livestock-associated bacteria in China suggests that animals may serve as potential reservoirs, facilitating its environmental dissemination [12], [13]. The risk of cross-species transmission is underscored by the discovery of highly similar, large multidrug-resistant plasmids in different Acinetobacter species, indicating the potential for such plasmids to transfer across genus boundaries [1]. Critically, the dissemination of such resistance determinants is not confined to hospitals. The “One Health” paradigm recognizes that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) evolves and spreads at the human-animal-environment interface, driven by interconnected factors such as antimicrobial use in veterinary medicine and agriculture. Evidence of mcr genes in livestock, food products, and environmental samples confirms their circulation across these reservoirs, creating a pervasive risk of transmission back to humans [14]. Plasmids, especially those harboring complex transposons and stability systems like toxin-antitoxin modules, are key vectors in this cross-boundary gene flow, enabling resistance genes like mcr-4.3 to transfer between different bacterial species and genera [15]. Despite this understanding, specific data on the role of international live animal trade as a direct pathway for introducing mcr-4.3-harboring A. nosocomialis into new regions remains scarce.
Despite increasing recognition of the human–animal–environment interface in the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance, the occurrence and genomic features of mcr-4.3-positive A. nosocomialis in imported food animals remain poorly understood. In particular, it is unclear whether imported livestock may serve as a previously underrecognized reservoir for clinically relevant Acinetobacter lineages carrying mobile colistin resistance determinants. In this study, we screened Acinetobacter isolates recovered from beef cattle imported from Australia to China and identified an A. nosocomialis isolate carrying plasmid-borne mcr-4.3. We then combined complete genome sequencing, comparative plasmid analysis, and global phylogenomics to characterize its genetic context and to assess its placement within the international population structure of A. nosocomialis. Our findings provide genomic evidence that imported food animals should be considered in One Health surveillance frameworks aimed at tracking the transboundary movement of rare but clinically relevant resistance determinants.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Bacterial isolation and identification
In September 2019, fecal samples were collected from each of the 150 Australian beef cattle in a single batch upon arrival at Ningbo Port, China. Each sample was enriched in Brain Heart Infusion broth (OXOID, United Kingdom) and incubated with shaking at 200 rpm, 37 °C for 20 h. Cultures were then plated on MacConkey agar (OXOID, United Kingdom) with 2 ug/ml cefotaxime to identify cephalosporin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria [16]. The addition of 2 μg/ml cefotaxime was intended to selectively inhibit cephalosporin-susceptible commensal bacteria, thereby enriching for cephalosporin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including Acinetobacter species, as previously described. We screened multiple colonies per stool sample based on distinct colony morphologies. Selected colonies were purified and identified using MALDI-TOF MS (Vitek MS system, bioMérieux, France) [17]. All 54 Acinetobacter sp. isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing for further analysis.
2.2. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the following antimicrobial agents were determined for the isolate: piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and polymyxin B. All antibiotics were tested using the standard agar dilution method, except for polymyxin B, for which the broth microdilution method was employed in accordance with the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 guidelines. For each batch of tests, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control strain, and its MIC results consistently fell within the acceptable ranges defined by CLSI. The MICs were interpreted as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R) according to the CLSI breakpoints.
2.3. Genome sequencing and bioinformatic analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted from 54 Acinetobacter sp. isolates using the BeadPure Bacterial DNA Kit B (Zenpio, China). All isolates were subjected to short-read sequencing on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (San Diego, CA, USA). The isolate carrying the mcr-4.3 gene (NB148) was selected for complete genome reconstruction via additional long-read sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore MinION system (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom) [18]. Hybrid assembly of short and long reads was performed with Unicycler v0.5.1 to generate a circularized genome [19]. Species identification for all isolates was confirmed by Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) analysis using PyANI v1.33 [20], which classified 16 isolates as Acinetobacter nosocomialis. Antimicrobial resistance genes and plasmid replicons were identified using ABRicate v1.4.0 against the ResFinder [21] and PlasmidFinder databases [22], respectively. The genetic context of the mcr-4.3 gene was analyzed by BLASTn. Circular comparisons of plasmids (Fig. 1A) were visualized using BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) v0.95 [23] and linear comparisons of genetic structures (Fig. 1B) were visualized using Easyfig v2.2.2 [24].
Fig. 1.
Genomic features of the mcr-4.3-bearing plasmid in Acinetobacter nosocomialis NB148.
(A) Circular comparison of plasmid pNB148_mcr-4.3 identified in this study with representative mcr-4.3-bearing plasmids from Acinetobacter species based on BLASTn analysis. The outer circle represents pNB148_mcr-4.3, and the inner circles represent reference plasmids with GenBank accession numbers CP038265, MW413305, and CP076399. Shaded regions indicate homologous nucleotide similarity between plasmids.
(B) Linear comparison of the major structural features and mcr-4.3 genetic contexts of pNB148_mcr-4.3 and representative related plasmids. Open reading frames are shown as arrows indicating gene orientation, with selected genes labeled according to annotated function.
2.4. Comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis
To place the mcr-4.3-positive isolate in a global context, a total of 574 A. nosocomialis genome sequences were retrieved from the NCBI Assembly database (accessed on December 18, 2025) using the search term “Acinetobacter nosocomialis”. Core-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) phylogenetic analysis was performed using Snippy v4.6.0 (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy) with the Acinetobacter nosocomialis strain XH1679 as the reference. Recombination regions were filtered out using Gubbins v3.4.3 [25], and a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed with Fasttree v2.1.11 [26] and visualized in iTOL (https://itol.embl.de). Sequence types (STs) were determined via PubMLST according to the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme (https://pubmlst.org/organisms). A mutation in the fusA gene was identified by sequence alignment. Clonal relatedness was defined as isolates differing by ≤200 core-genome SNPs, a threshold used in similar studies of bacterial transmission,
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Recovery of Acinetobacter isolates from imported beef cattle and identification of an mcr-4.3-positive A. nosocomialis isolate
In September 2019, 150 fecal samples from Australian beef cattle imported via Ningbo Port were analyzed for bacteria. After enrichment and plating, 54 potential Acinetobacter sp. colonies were identified. MALDI-TOF MS, whole-genome sequencing, and ANI analysis confirmed 11 A. nosocomialis isolates and 5 subspecies highly similar to A. nosocomialis (Fig. S1). Whole genomic sequences showed one isolate, NB148, had the plasmid-borne colistin resistance gene mcr-4.3. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolate NB148 (Table 2) showed susceptibility to a range of antibiotics including ceftazidime, cefotaxime, carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem), aminoglycosides (amikacin and gentamicin), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. In contrast, it was resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam and, notably, exhibited resistance to polymyxin B with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 8 mg/l, which aligns with the presence of the acquired mcr-4.3 gene.
Table 2.
Antimicrobial drug susceptibility profiles of L3859.
| Antibiotic | MIC (mg/l) / antimicrobial susceptibility |
|---|---|
| Piperacillin/Tazobactam | >128/4//R |
| Ceftazidime | 4/S |
| Cefotaxime | 8/S |
| Imipenem | 0.5/S |
| Meropenem | 0.25/S |
| Amikacin | 4/S |
| Gentamicin | 2/S |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0.25/S |
| Levofloxacin | 0.125/S |
| Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole | 0.125/2.375/S |
| Polymixin B | 8/R |
S, susceptible; R, resistont.
3.2. Complete genomic characterization of NB148 and structural features of plasmid pNB148_mcr-4.3
Based on the genomic data from the mcr-4.3-positive A.nosocomialis strain NB148, hybrid assembly of Illumina and Nanopore sequencing reads produced a complete genome consisting of a single circular chromosome (3,898,347 bp) and three plasmids. The mcr-4.3 gene was identified on a 28,233 bp plasmid, designated pNB148_mcr-4.3. This plasmid could not be assigned to any known replicon type using the PlasmidFinder database. BLASTn analysis revealed that pNB148_mcr-4.3 shared greater than 62% coverage and 98.06% nucleotide identity with previously reported mcr-4.3-harboring plasmids from Acinetobacter species, such as pAb-MCR4.3 from a clinical A. baumannii isolate (Fig. 1A) [4]. The plasmid carries a RepM protein of the RepB family (Rep-3 superfamily), which is consistent with the type of mcr-4.3 plasmid pCAC13a found in the clinical A. nosocomialis isolate from South Africa [8]. It contains two type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems (PhD/YefM and RelE/ParE), which are associated with plasmid stability and persistence [2], this might clarify why the elimination of these plasmids can reinstate the strain's sensitivity to colistin [8]. Genetic context analysis showed the mcr-4.3 gene is located downstream of a putative recombinase and a Tn3 family transposase (ISPsy42), while no mobile genetic elements were identified immediately downstream of the gene, forming a structure consistent with other characterized mcr-4.3 genetic environments (Fig. 1B) [4], [8]. The conserved genetic context of mcr-4.3 across different Acinetobacter-associated plasmids suggests that this determinant may persist across multiple ecological settings, underscoring the need for continued public health surveillance [8], [27].
3.3. Global phylogenomic placement of NB148 within the international A. nosocomialis population
To assess the phylogenetic context of the imported mcr-4.3-positive strain, we analyzed 574 A. nosocomialis genome assemblies from NCBI and constructed a core-genome SNP-based maximum-likelihood tree with 16 strains from our study (Table 1, Fig. 2). The resulting phylogeny revealed extensive mixing of isolates from animals, the environment, and humans across countries, with no clear geographic clustering. This pattern suggests that the global spread of A. nosocomialis lineages is driven less by the expansion of specific geographic clones and more by the frequent horizontal transfer of mobile genetic elements (MGEs) across ecological boundaries, which aligns with the known role of broad-host-range plasmids in facilitating the cross-sectoral spread of resistance genes within the Acinetobacter genus [1]. Strain NB148, isolated from imported cattle in China, grouped closely with a human-derived strain from Malaysia (2015) and was phylogenetically distinct from most Chinese isolates. Its placement within a mixed clade containing isolates from multiple countries and source types is consistent with circulation across interconnected ecological settings indicating that related lineages or associated mobile genetic elements may circulate internationally. Although the precise transmission routes cannot be resolved from our data, this finding echoes previous reports where identical or highly similar plasmids carrying critical resistance genes (mcr-4.3) have been identified in both animal and human Acinetobacter isolates from disparate regions, underscoring a connected One Health transmission cycle [4], [8]. The observed phylogenetic mixing across sectors underscores that A. nosocomialis transmission is not confined to specific hosts or environments, but rather facilitated by mobile genetic elements like plasmids, which can rapidly disseminate resistance genes globally. This highlights an urgent need for coordinated surveillance across human, animal, and environmental sectors to track and mitigate the spread of high-risk resistance determinants. Therefore, the phylogenetic position of NB148 supports the view that imported livestock may intersect with the international circulation of resistance-associated Acinetobacter lineages, underscoring the value of enhanced genomic surveillance at ports of entry within integrated One Health strategies.
Fig. 2.
Global phylogenomic context of Acinetobacter nosocomialis, including NB148 recovered from imported beef cattle.
Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from core-genome SNPs of A. nosocomialis genomes included in this study together with publicly available genomes from the NCBI database. Metadata displayed alongside the tree include geographic origin, continent, isolation source, and number of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). The presence or absence of mcr genes is indicated in the annotation panel.
3.4. Global distribution of A. nosocomialis across source, geographic regions, and sequence types
A Sankey diagram analysis of 590 A. nosocomialis isolates (16 from this study, 574 from NCBI) highlighted intricate epidemiological links among geographic origin, sequence type (ST), and isolation source. The strains came from 23 countries, mainly the USA (184), China (179), and Japan (48). MLST analysis revealed diverse STs, including ST410, ST433, ST71, ST768, ST279, ST68, ST217, ST1264, ST395, and ST501, with 255 strains in other STs. Notably, ST279, prevalent among mcr-4.3-positive strains, was found in animal, environmental, and human sources, indicating a broad host range. Isolation sources were human (306), environmental (204), animal (37), and unknown (43). The diagram showed extensive cross-linking among all sources, STs, and regions, with no source-specific lineage segregation (Fig. 3). This interconnected distribution underscores the relevance of A. nosocomialis to the human-animal-environment interface and supports its inclusion in One Health surveillance frameworks. The clinical relevance of human-derived strains is well-documented, as A. nosocomialis is a recognized cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections [28], [29]. Recent studies corroborate these epidemiological links, showing that A. nosocomialis exhibits diverse sequence types (STs) across different reservoirs [30] and is a significant cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections [31]. Furthermore, environmental surveillance has detected Acinetobacter baumannii complex in healthcare facility wastewater [32], while genomic analysis of A. pittii demonstrates the transfer of carbapenem resistance via plasmids [33], underscoring the role of mobile genetic elements in cross-sectoral spread.
Fig. 3.
Global distribution of Acinetobacter nosocomialis across geographic regions, sequence types, and isolation sources.
Sankey diagram summarizing the relationships among geographic origin, multilocus sequence type (MLST), and isolation source for 590 A. nosocomialis genomes analyzed in this study, including strains generated here and genomes retrieved from public databases. Flows illustrate the distribution of major sequence types across different regions and ecological source categories.
3.5. International occurrence and close relatedness of mcr-4.3-positive A. nosocomialis isolates
Including the NB148 strain characterized in this study, a total of twelve mcr-4.3-positive A. nosocomialis genomes were identified among the 574 global genomes analyzed. These twelve strains originated from four geographic locations (South Korea, Thailand, South Africa and China) and three source types (environmental, animal, and human). The mcr-4.3-positive A. nosocomialis strain NB148, recovered from imported beef cattle in this study, was identified as sequence type ST279, consistent with the predominant lineage observed among global mcr-4.3-positive isolates. Eight of these strains originated from South Korea (seven environmental, one animal) (Fig. 4), while the remaining three were human-associated cases from Thailand, South Africa, and Taiwan area. This indicates that these mcr-4.3-positive A. nosocomialis have been detected across multiple continents. Notably, the presence of mcr-4.3 in a clinical A. nosocomialis isolate from South Africa has been independently confirmed, with the gene located on a RepB plasmid (pCAC13a) [8]. This finding documents the first detection of plasmid-mediated mcr-4.3 in Africa and underscores its establishment in clinical settings. Core-genome SNP analysis revealed that the three human-associated strains from Thailand, South Africa, and Taiwan area differed by ≤200 SNPs from the major Korean cluster (Table 1). This degree of genetic relatedness supports the presence of a closely related international cluster, although the timing and direction of spread cannot be resolved from the available data. Although NB148 belonged to the same sequence type (ST279) as the majority of mcr-4.3-positive isolates, core-genome SNP analysis revealed that NB148 was genetically more distant, differing by approximately 2000 SNPs from the major Korean environmental cluster and the human-associated strains (Table 1). This degree of divergence suggests that, while ST279 may represent a common genomic background for mcr-4.3 carriage across different reservoirs, the global dissemination of this determinant is not driven by a single highly clonal lineage but rather by the horizontal transfer of mcr-4.3-bearing plasmids across genetically diverse ST279 strains. The identification of mcr-4.3 on a plasmid in the South African isolate [8] provides a plausible genetic mechanism for the observed clonal spread, suggesting that South Korea is currently overrepresented among available genomes in this cluster, although this pattern may also reflect sampling bias. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) revealed that, among the eleven mcr-4.3-positive strains from Korea, Thailand, South Africa, and Taiwan, ten belonged to ST279 and one (from Korea) to ST322. Including the NB148 strain (also ST279) characterized in this study, a total of 11 out of 12 mcr-4.3-positive A. nosocomialis genomes belonged to ST279. The predominance of ST279 among currently available mcr-4.3-positive genomes suggests that this lineage may represent an important genomic background for the persistence or wider distribution of this determinant, although additional genomic and functional data are needed to define its clinical impact [8]. Further analysis identified a unique mutation in the fusA gene within the strain from Taiwan area. This mutation may represent a lineage-associated genomic feature, although its functional relevance to antibiotic resistance remains to be determined. Compared with prior reports focused mainly on mcr-4.3 carriage, this observation suggests that additional lineage-associated genomic variation may accompany the broader distribution of ST279-related isolates [8].
Fig. 4.
Phylogenomic relatedness of mcr-4.3-positive Acinetobacter nosocomialis isolates.
Phylogenetic tree of mcr-4.3-positive A. nosocomialis isolates identified from the NCBI database together with the isolate characterized in this study. Metadata shown alongside the tree include geographic origin, isolation source, collection date, and MLST type. Associated resistance gene profiles are displayed in the annotation panel.
Table 1.
A table of SNP differences, based on core genome alignment, between the 11 Acinetobacter nosocomialis strains carrying mcr-4.3 downloaded from the NCBI database and strain NB148 from this study.
| snp-dists | GCA_000802905.1 | GCA_014840195.1 | GCA_020113175.1 | GCA_028751665.1 | GCA_051547185.1 | GCA_051547205.1 | GCA_051547225.1 | GCA_051547245.1 | GCA_051547305.1 | GCA_051547445.1 | GCA_051547485.1 | NB148hy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCA_000802905.1 | 0 | 2018 | 2089 | 2180 | 69 | 55,720 | 138 | 2020 | 79 | 2094 | 137 | 1652 |
| GCA_014840195.1 | 2018 | 0 | 145 | 431 | 2081 | 56,307 | 2125 | 40 | 2091 | 150 | 2124 | 2757 |
| GCA_020113175.1 | 2089 | 145 | 0 | 506 | 2152 | 56,235 | 2196 | 147 | 2162 | 197 | 2195 | 2828 |
| GCA_028751665.1 | 2180 | 431 | 506 | 0 | 2238 | 52,574 | 2286 | 436 | 2249 | 441 | 2285 | 2761 |
| GCA_051547185.1 | 69 | 2081 | 2152 | 2238 | 0 | 55,939 | 132 | 2083 | 12 | 2156 | 131 | 1714 |
| GCA_051547205.1 | 55,720 | 56,307 | 56,235 | 52,574 | 55,939 | 0 | 56,007 | 56,286 | 55,976 | 56,136 | 55,927 | 56,444 |
| GCA_051547225.1 | 138 | 2125 | 2196 | 2286 | 132 | 56,007 | 0 | 2127 | 142 | 2200 | 1 | 1758 |
| GCA_051547245.1 | 2020 | 40 | 147 | 436 | 2083 | 56,286 | 2127 | 0 | 2093 | 151 | 2126 | 2758 |
| GCA_051547305.1 | 79 | 2091 | 2162 | 2249 | 12 | 55,976 | 142 | 2093 | 0 | 2166 | 141 | 1724 |
| GCA_051547445.1 | 2094 | 150 | 197 | 441 | 2156 | 56,136 | 2200 | 151 | 2166 | 0 | 2199 | 2779 |
| GCA_051547485.1 | 137 | 2124 | 2195 | 2285 | 131 | 55,927 | 1 | 2126 | 141 | 2199 | 0 | 1757 |
| NB148hy | 1652 | 2757 | 2828 | 2761 | 1714 | 56,444 | 1758 | 2758 | 1724 | 2779 | 1757 | 0 |
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, this study documents plasmid-borne mcr-4.3 in an A. nosocomialis isolate recovered from imported beef cattle in China and places this finding within a broader international genomic context. Complete genome sequencing showed that mcr-4.3 was located on a 28,233-bp plasmid carrying maintenance-associated toxin-antitoxin systems and a conserved transposition-linked genetic environment, supporting its persistence in Acinetobacter plasmid backgrounds. Comparative phylogenomics further indicated that mcr-4.3-positive A. nosocomialis remains uncommon but is distributed across multiple regions and source types, with most currently available genomes belonging to ST279. Although our data do not establish direct trade-mediated transmission, they expand the known ecological range of this resistance determinant and support the inclusion of imported food animals in border-associated One Health surveillance aimed at detecting the transboundary movement of clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance genes.
The following are the supplementary data related to this article.
Average nucleotide identity analysis of Acinetobacter isolates recovered from imported beef cattle. Heatmap of average nucleotide identity (ANI) values comparing the 54 Acinetobacter isolates recovered in this study with reference genomes downloaded from the NCBI database, including representative genomes of A. baumannii, A. calcoaceticus, A. junii, A. kookii, A. nosocomialis, A. pittii, and A. soli. The analysis was used to support species-level assignment of the recovered isolates.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Hao Xu: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. Yaling Li: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. Shaohua Hu: Visualization, Data curation. Ruishan Liu: Visualization, Data curation. Kun Wang: Visualization, Data curation. Beiwen Zheng: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Conceptualization. Yonghong Xiao: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Conceptualization.
Ethical approval
Not applicate.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (grant number LQ24H260001), Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (grant number 2023KY721), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2022ZFJH003), and Shandong Provincial Laboratory Project (SYS202202).
Contributor Information
Beiwen Zheng, Email: zhengbw@zju.edu.cn.
Yonghong Xiao, Email: xiaoyonghong@zju.edu.cn.
Data availability
Sequences mentioned in the present study were submitted to the GenBank nucleotide database with BioProject Accession Number: PRJNA1434333.
References
- 1.Alattraqchi A.G., Mohd Rani F., Ni A.R., Ismail S., Cleary D.W., Clarke S.C., Yeo C.C. Complete Genome Sequencing of Acinetobacter baumannii AC1633 and Acinetobacter nosocomialis AC1530 Unveils a Large Multidrug-Resistant Plasmid Encoding the NDM-1 and OXA-58 Carbapenemases. mSphere. 2021;6 doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01076-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee S., An J.U., Kim W.H., Yi S., Lee J., Cho S. Different threats posed by two major mobilized colistin resistance genes - mcr-1.1 and mcr-3.1 - revealed through comparative genomic analysis. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2023;32:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li Y., Dai X., Zeng J., Gao Y., Zhang Z., Zhang L. Characterization of the global distribution and diversified plasmid reservoirs of the colistin resistance gene mcr-9. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:8113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65106-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martins-Sorenson N., Snesrud E., Xavier D.E., Cacci L.C., Iavarone A.T., McGann P., Riley L.W., Moreira B.M. A novel plasmid-encoded mcr-4.3 gene in a colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical strain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020;75:60–64. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Carattoli A., Villa L., Feudi C., Curcio L., Orsini S., Luppi A., Pezzotti G., Magistrali C.F. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mcr-4 gene in Salmonella and Escherichia coli, Italy 2013, Spain and Belgium, 2015 to 2016. Euro Surveill. 2017;22 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.31.30589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Partridge S.R., Di Pilato V., Doi Y., Feldgarden M., Haft D.H., Klimke W., Kumar-Singh S., Liu J.H., Malhotra-Kumar S., Prasad A., Rossolini G.M., Schwarz S., Shen J., Walsh T., Wang Y., Xavier B.B. Proposal for assignment of allele numbers for mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018;73:2625–2630. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Teo J.W.P., Kalisvar M., Venkatachalam I., Ng O.T., Lin R.T.P., Octavia S. Mcr-3 and mcr-4 variants in Carbapenemase-producing clinical Enterobacteriaceae do not confer phenotypic Polymyxin resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018;56 doi: 10.1128/JCM.01562-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Snyman Y., Reuter S., Whitelaw A.C., Stein L., Maloba M.R.B., Newton-Foot M. Characterisation of mcr-4.3 in a colistin-resistant Acinetobacter nosocomialis clinical isolate from Cape Town, South Africa. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021;25:102–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bitar I., Medvecky M., Gelbicova T., Jakubu V., Hrabak J., Zemlickova H., Karpiskova R., Dolejska M. Complete nucleotide sequences of mcr-4.3-carrying plasmids in Acinetobacter baumannii sequence type 345 of human and food origin from the Czech Republic, the first case in Europe. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63 doi: 10.1128/AAC.01166-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Marchetti V.M., Bitar I., Sarti M., Fogato E., Scaltriti E., Bracchi C., Hrabak J., Pongolini S., Migliavacca R. Genomic characterization of VIM and MCR co-producers: the first two clinical cases, in Italy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11 doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sun Q., Wang H., Shu L., Dong N., Yang F., Zhou H., Chen S., Zhang R. Leclercia adecarboxylata from human gut Flora carries mcr-4.3 and Bla (IMP-4)-bearing plasmids. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:2805. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mei C.Y., Jiang Y., Ma Q.C., Lu M.J., Wu H., Wang Z.Y., Jiao X., Wang J. Chromosomally and plasmid-located mcr in Salmonella from animals and food products in China. Microbiol. Spectrum. 2022;10 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02773-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ma F., Shen C., Zheng X., Liu Y., Chen H., Zhong L., Liang Y., Liao K., Xia Y., Tian G.B., Yang Y. Identification of a novel plasmid carrying mcr-4.3 in an Acinetobacter baumannii strain in China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00133-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li J., Chang J., Ma J., Zhou W., Yang Y., Wu J., Guan C., Yuan X., Xu L., Yu B., Su F., Ye S., Chen Y., Zhao G., Tang B. Genome-based assessment of antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli recovered from diseased swine in eastern China for a 12-year period. mBio. 2025;16 doi: 10.1128/mbio.00651-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang R., van Dorp L., Shaw L.P., Bradley P., Wang Q., Wang X., Jin L., Zhang Q., Liu Y., Rieux A., Dorai-Schneiders T., Weinert L.A., Iqbal Z., Didelot X., Wang H., Balloux F. The global distribution and spread of the mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1179. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03205-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zheng B., Xu H., Huang C., Yu C., Guo L., Han H., Zhang J., Jiang X., Chen C., Xiao Y. Occurrence and genomic characterization of two MCR-1- producing Escherichia coli isolates from the same mink farmer. mSphere. 2019;4 doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00602-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jia H., Tong Q., Wang L., Wu Y., Li X., Li S., Kong Y., Zhang Y., Furlan J.P.R., Khine N.O., Butaye P., Zhang J., Yang Q., Ruan Z. Silent circulation of plasmid-borne tet(X6) and Bla(OXA-58) genes in a community-acquired Acinetobacter baumannii strain. Drug Resist. Updat. 2025;79 doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2024.101194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang Q., Salman S., Luo Y., Tong X. Coexistence of Bla(MIR-1) and Bla(NDM-1) resistance genes with a novel ST type in Enterobacter roggenkampii from a stool sample: a genome sequencing study. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2025;40:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2024.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wick R.R., Judd L.M., Gorrie C.L., Holt K.E. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Richter M., Rossello-Mora R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bortolaia V., Kaas R.S., Ruppe E., Roberts M.C., Schwarz S., Cattoir V., Philippon A., Allesoe R.L., Rebelo A.R., Florensa A.F., Fagelhauer L., Chakraborty T., Neumann B., Werner G., Bender J.K., Stingl K., Nguyen M., Coppens J., Xavier B.B., Malhotra-Kumar S., Westh H., Pinholt M., Anjum M.F., Duggett N.A., Kempf I., Nykasenoja S., Olkkola S., Wieczorek K., Amaro A., Clemente L., Mossong J., Losch S., Ragimbeau C., Lund O., Aarestrup F.M. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020;vol. 75:3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Carattoli A., Zankari E., Garcia-Fernandez A., Voldby Larsen M., Lund O., Villa L., Moller Aarestrup F., Hasman H. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alikhan N.F., Petty N.K., Ben Zakour N.L., Beatson S.A. BLAST ring image generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics. 2011;12 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sullivan M.J., Petty N.K., Beatson S.A. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Croucher N.J., Page A.J., Connor T.R., Delaney A.J., Keane J.A., Bentley S.D., Parkhill J., Harris S.R. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Price M.N., Dehal P.S., Arkin A.P. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009;26:1641–1650. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Memesh R., Yasir M., Ledder R.G., Zowawi H., McBain A.J., Azhar E.I. An update on the prevalence of colistin and carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria in aquaculture: an emerging threat to public health. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2024;135 doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxad288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pekkle Lam H.Y., Lai M.J., Wu W.J., Chin Y.H., Chao H.J., Chen L.K., Peng S.Y., Chang K.C. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages with activities against multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter nosocomialis causing bloodstream infection in vivo. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2023;56:1026–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2023.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Huang L., Chen T.L., Lee Y.T., Lee M.H., Kuo S.C., Yu K.W., Dou H.Y., Fung C.P. Risk factors for imipenem-nonsusceptible Acinetobacter nosocomialis bloodstream infection. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2014;47:311–317. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chew K.L., Tan K.X., Abu Bakar N.A.B., Lin R., Teo J.W.P. Genotypic diversity and antimicrobial resistance phenotype of carbapenem-resistant and carbapenem-susceptible Acinetobacter species isolates. Pathology. 2025;57:637–642. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2024.12.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aman M., Altaf I., Fomda B.A., Roohi S., Mir A., Tariq S., Qadri U. Uncommon non-fermentative gram-negative superbugs - a surge in bacteraemia patients at an apex super speciality hospital. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2026;60 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2026.101046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lenz S., Biswas S., Terry I., Tran-Basha L., Lyons A.K., Mazumdar T., Whitehill F., Halpin A.L., Franco L., Karlsson M., Williams M., Coulliette-Salmond A. Detection of Carbapenem-resistant Bacteria in skilled nursing facility wastewater. J. Infect. Dis. 2026;233:59–69. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaf534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rakovitsky N., Lurie-Weinberger M., Keren-Paz A., Carmeli Y. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of six multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter pittii isolates. Sci. Rep. 2025;15 doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15848-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Average nucleotide identity analysis of Acinetobacter isolates recovered from imported beef cattle. Heatmap of average nucleotide identity (ANI) values comparing the 54 Acinetobacter isolates recovered in this study with reference genomes downloaded from the NCBI database, including representative genomes of A. baumannii, A. calcoaceticus, A. junii, A. kookii, A. nosocomialis, A. pittii, and A. soli. The analysis was used to support species-level assignment of the recovered isolates.
Data Availability Statement
Sequences mentioned in the present study were submitted to the GenBank nucleotide database with BioProject Accession Number: PRJNA1434333.




