Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Jun 1;12(6):2088–2100. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.6c00149

Antifungal and Antivirulence Activity of Alizarin against Candida dubliniensis

Ganeshkumar Arumugam †,‡,*, Samuthirapandi Muniasamy §, Patricia Michelle Nagai de Lima †, Uilla Barcick ∥, André Zelanis ∥, Bianca Carla Silva Campitelli Barros ⊥, Lara Luise Castro Pedroso †, Bruno Montanari Borges ∥, Nycolas Willian Preite ∥, Flavio V Loures ∥, Juliana Campos Junqueira †,*
PMCID: PMC13270513  PMID: 42219890

Abstract

Candida dubliniensis is a relatively common yet understudied fungal species present in the oral cavity of both healthy and immunocompromised individuals. Despite its increasing clinical relevance, research addressing its pathogenesis and therapeutic targeting remains limited. In this context, the present study investigated the antifungal potential of alizarin against C. dubliniensis. Alizarin exhibited notable antifungal activity, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 16 μg/mL. Checkerboard analysis further demonstrated a significant enhancement of fluconazole activity when used in combination with alizarin, indicating a synergistic interaction. In vitro antibiofilm assays demonstrated that alizarin, at its MIC level, significantly reduces both biofilm formation and preformed biofilms of C. dubliniensis. Notably, administration of alizarin improved the survival of Galleria mellonella by decreasing the fungal burden; however, its immunomodulatory potential remained lower than that of standard antifungal treatments. Furthermore, alizarin effectively inhibited filamentation, a key virulence factor, at 16 μg/mL within 2 h of exposure. After 24 h, only 2.12% of cells retained the ability to undergo hyphal transition (p < 0.0001). Proteomic analysis revealed significant modulation of the protein expression profile, including downregulation of proteins associated with cell wall synthesis and integrity. Overall, these findings demonstrate that alizarin exerts antifungal effects against C. dubliniensis, primarily by inhibiting morphological transition and modulating virulence-associated pathways. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and to explore its potential as a therapeutic agent.

Keywords: alizarin, phytochemical, Candida dubliniensis, antifungal activity, shotgun proteomics, hyphae inhibition


graphic file with name id6c00149_0011.jpg


graphic file with name id6c00149_0009.jpg

Introduction

Candida is recognized as one of the most common etiological agents responsible for superficial and subcutaneous infections in immunologically impaired individuals. The genus Candida consists of more than 200 species; however, only a few of them are medically relevant. In particular, Candida albicans has been known for several decades due to its commensal behavior and colonization of different body sites in human. Colonization of Candida in human anatomical sites depends on several factors, including host immune response and environmental factors. Apart from the dominance of C. albicans, several other species have gained attention because of their medical relevance, such as Nakaseomyces glabratus (formerly known as C. glabrata), Pichia kudriavzevii (formerly known as Candida krusei), Candida parapsilosis, and Candida tropicalis. Recently, a multidrug-resistant species known as Candidozyma auris (formerly known as Candida auris) was included in this list as a critical priority fungal pathogen by the World Health Organization. Initially, C. auris was reported in Japanese patients presenting with otitis; however, more recently it has been detected in multiple parts of the human body, as well as in clinical and environmental samples and on various nonliving surfaces, including medical equipment and intensive care units. − In addition to the species listed, another Candida species has been reported in both healthy individuals and patients with several medical conditions.

Like other nonalbicans species, Candida dubliniensis is widely distributed among healthy individuals. , However, a higher prevalence has been observed in the oral microenvironment of HIV/AIDS patients. It has become an emerging opportunistic pathogen that causes superficial and systemic infections in immunocompromised individuals. C. dubliniensis shares most characteristic features with C. albicans, making differentiation difficult and leading to frequent misidentification as C. albicans, even with modern diagnostic pipelines. Indeed, C. dubliniensis was first isolated from the oral cavity of an HIV patient in 1995. Among HIV and AIDS patients with oral manifestations, C. dubliniensis had a recovery rate of 27% to 32% of cases. A high prevalence of this species has also been recorded in individuals presenting with other clinical manifestations, such as denture wearers, , vulvovaginal candidiasis, diabetes, , cystic fibrosis, − and cancer. Surprisingly, the prevalence rate in asymptomatic immunocompromised individuals did not vary significantly, standing at 19% in those with HIV and 25% in those individuals with AIDS. , Over the past decades, the distribution of C. dubliniensis in clinical settings has been continuously monitored. Recent reports provide evidence that C. dubliniensis can evade the immune system, causing meningitis in immunocompetent patients , and endophthalmitis. ,

Natural products such as eugenol, carvacrol, and thymol and chemically derived antiseptic agents including triclosan, chlorhexidine gluconate, and cetylpyridinium chloride have been reported to inhibit the growth of C. dubliniensis and other pathogenic organisms. Similarly, the plant Capsicum annuum and magnetic nanoparticles have demonstrated antifungal potential against C. dubliniensis. While considerable attention has been given to inhibiting fungal growth, the control of morphological transitions in C. dubliniensis remains largely unexplored. In other Candida species, several compounds have been reported to target virulence factors, including biofilm formation and hyphal transition: occidiofungin, tetrachlorohydroquinone, magnolol and honokiol, 7-benzyloxyindole, and purpurin.

Previous studies have shown that dihydroxyanthraquinones such as alizarin and chrysazin possess strong antifungal activity, significantly reducing hyphal formation and biofilm development in C. albicans. More recently, the tetrahydroxyanthraquinone derivative quinalizarin was reported to inhibit the growth of Candida species isolated from cancer patients. For instance, quinalizarin, an alizarin analogue with two additional hydroxyl groups, exhibits enhanced antifungal activity against common Candida species, including emerging pathogens like C. auris and other nonalbicans species that are highly resistant to fluconazole, a frontline antifungal agent used for clinical prophylaxis. Building on these findings, the present study aims to evaluate the ability of the anthraquinone derivative alizarin to control the growth and virulence properties of C. dubliniensis similar to those previously observed in C. albicans. Additionally, considering that certain phytochemicals are known to modulate host immune responses during infections, we also investigated the immunomodulatory potential of alizarin using a Galleria mellonella candidiasis model.

Results and Discussion

Alizarin Exerts Antifungal Activity through a Fungistatic Mode of Action

The antifungal activity of alizarin against C. dubliniensis was evaluated using the broth microdilution method. The MIC values of alizarin against clinical and ATCC strains of C. dubliniensis, along with C. albicans and other Candida and Aspergillus species, are summarized in Table . All tested Candida strains were susceptible to fluconazole (MIC = 0.5 μg/mL), except C. krusei, which exhibited reduced susceptibility (MIC = 32 μg/mL). In addition, all Candida isolates were susceptible to Amp B, with MIC values ranging from 0.25 to 0.5 μg/mL. Aspergillus species also demonstrated susceptibility to Amp B, with MIC values of 0.5–1.0 μg/mL. With the exception of C. parapsilosis and two Aspergillus strains (MIC > 128 μg/mL), the remaining Candida strains were susceptible to alizarin, exhibiting MIC values ranging from 1 to 16 μg/mL. However, alizarin displayed a MFC of 2048 μg/mL against C. dubliniensis. Subsequent analyses were restricted to C. dubliniensis, whereas other fungal species were evaluated solely to determine the broad-spectrum antifungal activity of alizarin.

1. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of Alizarin and antifungals on Different Strains.

S.no
organism
MIC (μg/mL)
   
    Alizarin Fluconazole Amp B Anidulafungin
1 C. dubliniensisATCC MYA-646 16 0.5 0.25 0.015
2 C. dubliniensisP3 clinical isolate 16 0.5 0.25 0.015
3 C. albicansATCC SC5314 16 0.5 - -
4 Candida krusei ATCC 6258 1 32 0.5 0.015
5 Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 >128 0.5 0.5 0.5
7 Aspergillus flavus ATCC 204304 >128 - 1 -
8 Aspergillus fumigatus ATCC 3626 >128 - 0.5 -

This fungistatic effect was further confirmed through time-kill kinetics studies (Figure ), where exposure to different concentrations of alizarin (MIC, MIC × 5, MIC × 10, and MFC) reduced the viability of C. dubliniensis. Notably, at 2048 μg/mL, alizarin significantly decreased cell viability after 24 h of incubation. In contrast, amphotericin B (positive control) completely eradicated viable cells within 2 h, consistent with its fungicidal properties.

1.

1

Time-kill curves were generated for Candida dubliniensis (CD) cells exposed to different concentrations of alizarin. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were recorded from samples collected at various time intervals for three independent samples (n = 3). (a) Growth pattern of the reference strain C. dubliniensis (ATCC MYA-646) (b) C. dubliniensis clinical isolate (P3). The differential responses observed in the time-kill curves confirmed that alizarin exhibited fungistatic activity, whereas amphotericin B (Amp B) demonstrated a fungicidal effect.

In the present study, we investigated the inhibitory effects of the phytochemical alizarin on the growth and key virulence traits of C. dubliniensis, a prevalent commensal fungus commonly detected in the oral cavity of immunocompromised patients. , To assess the fungistatic and fungicidal properties of alizarin, the ratio between MFC and MIC was determined, where a ratio exceeding 4 indicates fungistatic activity, while a ratio below 4 suggests fungicidal action. , Our findings demonstrated that alizarin exhibited fungistatic activity against tested Candida species, with an MFC value of 2048 μg/mL. This is consistent with previous reports describing the fungistatic properties of alizarin and its derivatives, such as quinalizarin, against C. albicans and non-albicans species. , Anthraquinones are already well-documented for their antifungal activity against medically important fungi, including Madurella mycetomatis, pathogenic trichomonads, and diverse yeast species. In agreement with these studies, alizarin also displayed antifungal effects against the oral pathogen C. dubliniensis.

In previous studies, alizarin not only inhibited C. albicans but also suppressed the growth and metabolism of other opportunistic fungi and bacteria. , However, in contrast to earlier investigations, we observed a strong antifungal effect of alizarin against C. dubliniensis, with MIC values several fold lower than those reported for C. albicans. For example, Manoharan et al. (2017) reported MIC values exceeding 2000 μg/mL for alizarin against C. albicans. In our study, however, alizarin exhibited MIC values of 16 μg/mL against C. dubliniensis (ATCC MYA-646) and C. albicans (ATCC SC5314). This variability may reflect differences in strain-specific susceptibility and resistance behavior. The strains we tested were highly sensitive to fluconazole (MIC = 0.5 μg/mL; Table ), whereas the strains used by Manoharan et al. (2017) may have been resistant, which could account for their elevated MIC values. Interestingly, this discrepancy was observed only for alizarin, while quinalizarin a structurally related derivative showed consistently lower MIC values across Candida strains, including those resistant to fluconazole, underscoring how minor structural modifications can enhance antifungal activity.

Effect of Alizarin on a C. dubliniensis Biofilm

The antibiofilm activity of alizarin was evaluated against both ATCC and P3 strains of C. dubliniensis and is presented in Figure . At 16 μg/mL (MIC), alizarin affected the biofilm-forming ability of both strains. At this concentration, biofilm formation was reduced by 22% and 33% in the ATCC and P3 strains, respectively. With increasing concentrations, a dose-dependent effect was observed. Notably, at MIC × 10 (160 μg/mL), biofilm biomass was reduced by 49.01% in the ATCC strain and 48.03% in the P3 strain. Further analysis demonstrated that alizarin also exhibited biofilm eradication potential. At MIC (16 μg/mL), only 16.77% and 24.23% of preformed biofilms were eradicated in the ATCC and P3 strains, respectively. However, higher concentrations significantly enhanced biofilm reduction, with biomass decreases of 35.70% (ATCC) and 39.89% (P3). These results indicate that alizarin has the potential to inhibit biofilm formation in both strains of C. dubliniensis. However, the concentration required to achieve approximately 50% reduction in biofilm biomass is relatively high compared to typical antifungal activity thresholds. Therefore, further toxicological studies are necessary to evaluate the pharmacological potential and safety profile of alizarin.

2.

2

Antibiofilm activity of alizarin against biofilm formation (a) and preformed biofilms (b) at different concentrations. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA. Significance levels are indicated as * (p = 0.01), ** (p = 0.001), *** (p = 0.0001), and **** (p < 0.0001).

In the present study, alizarin exerted a stronger inhibitory effect on biofilm formation (up to 49.90%) than on preformed biofilms (39.89%) of C. dubliniensis. This suggests that alizarin is more effective during the early stages of biofilm development rather than against mature biofilms, indicating a stage-specific activity. This observation is consistent with the well-established resistance mechanisms of mature biofilms, which are enriched with an extracellular matrix that restricts antifungal penetration and limits the direct interaction with fungal cells. The antibiofilm activity of alizarin has previously been reported in C. albicans, where it inhibits biofilm formation and downregulates key virulence-associated genes. Similarly, related anthraquinones, including chrysazin and purpurin, exhibit moderate antibiofilm effects, while quinalizarin demonstrates strain-dependent variability in its activity. Although gene expression analysis was not performed in the present study, the observed reduction in biofilm biomass suggests that alizarin may act through similar mechanisms in C. dubliniensis. Furthermore, alizarin has been reported to inhibit both mono- and multispecies biofilms, indicating a broader antimicrobial potential.

Most anthraquinone derivatives reported to date exhibit predominantly fungistatic rather than fungicidal activity against pathogenic fungi, suggesting their unique mode of action. Importantly, these compounds often display significant antivirulence properties, including inhibition of biofilm formation and morphological transition, frequently through modulation of the cellular energy metabolism in C. albicans. For instance, 2-chloromethyl anthraquinone has been shown to significantly inhibit biofilm formation in C. albicans by targeting the Ras1-cAMP-Efg1 signaling pathway without affecting planktonic growth. Similarly, parietin, a natural anthraquinone, disrupts C. tropicalis biofilms via photoinactivation. Photodynamic approaches using anthraquinones are also gaining attention; for example, aloe-emodin has been reported to effectively control biofilms of both azole-sensitive and resistant C. albicans under light irradiation. In line with this, previous studies have demonstrated that quinone derivatives can suppress virulence traits in C. albicans without markedly affecting fungal growth. Additionally, 2-ethylanthraquinone has been shown to primarily target the biofilm matrix rather than planktonic yeast cells. Moreover, these findings indicate that anthraquinones and their derivatives are characterized by strong antibiofilm and antivirulence activities, even in the absence of potent fungicidal effects. Such properties highlight their potential as alternative or adjunct therapeutic strategies for managing fungal infections, similar to those of clinically used fungistatic agents such as fluconazole.

Alizarin Can Modulate the Antifungal Activity of Fluconazole

The antifungal activity of alizarin, alone and in combination with standard antifungals such as fluconazole, amphotericin B, and anidulafungin, was evaluated using a checkerboard microdilution assay. Alizarin alone exhibited an MIC of 16 μg/mL; however, when combined with antifungal agents, a reduction in MIC values was observed. Combinations with amphotericin B or anidulafungin resulted in a onefold dilution decrease in MIC, although FICI analysis indicated an indifferent interaction. In contrast, the combination of alizarin with fluconazole demonstrated a pronounced synergistic effect. In both tested strains, the combination of 4 μg/mL alizarin and 0.004 μg/mL fluconazole yielded a FICI value ≤ 0.5, confirming synergy (Table ). These findings suggest that the alizarin-fluconazole combination may enhance antifungal efficacy against C. dubliniensis and represents a promising combinatorial strategy (see Table ).

2. Interaction between Alizarin (Drug A) and Fluconazole (Drug B) against C. dubliniensis Strains .

strain MIC of drug A MIC of drug B FIC A FIC B FICI effect
ATCC 16 0.5 1 0.008 1.008 additive
  16 0.5 0.5 0.008 0.508 additive
  16 0.5 0.25 0.008 0.258 synergistic
P3 16 0.5 1 0.008 1.008 additive
  16 0.5 0.25 0.008 0.258 synergistic
  16 0.5 1 0.004 1.004 additive
a

Only concentrations exhibiting inhibitory activity were included.

3. List Upregulated Proteins in the Untreated Group.

function of protein log fold change gene name protein name
energy metabolism 1.35 RGI1 CD36_22420 respiratory growth induced protein 1
  1.42 CD36_50250 glucosidase II subunit alpha
  1.07 PMI1 CD36_23720 mannose-6-phosphate isomerase (EC 5.3.1.8)
  1.23 NTC1 CD36_25660 trehalase (EC 3.2.1.28) (alpha-trehalose glucohydrolase)
  1.37 CD36_30070 UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (EC 2.7.7.9)
  1.64 CD36_42770 glycosidase (EC 3.2.-.-)
  1.13 CD36_87400 phosphoglucomutase, putative (EC 5.4.2.2)
  1.74 CD36_34550 HMG-CoA synthase (EC 2.3.3.10)
  1.42 CD36_09120 sphingolipid C(9)-methyltransferase (EC 2.1.1.317)
  2.52 CD36_16240 lysophospholipase (EC 3.1.1.5)
cell wall 4.77 CD36_08100 squalene monooxygenase (EC 1.14.14.17)
  1.39 CD36_81470 glucan endo-1,3-beta-d-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.39)
  2.44 CD36_72510 sterol 22-desaturase (EC 1.14.19.41)
  2.85 ERG6 CD36_82130 sterol 24-C-methyltransferase (EC 2.1.1.41)
  1.30 KRE9 CD36_84120 cell wall synthesis protein, putative
  3.78 CHT2 CD36_53830 chitinase (EC 3.2.1.14)
  2.09 CYB55 CD36_70650 cytochrome B5, putative
  3.29 CD36_52240 uncharacterized GPI-anchored cell wall protein, putative
  1.84 CD36_61820 integral membrane protein, putative
  4.74 ERG3 CD36_04520 (C-5 sterol desaturase)
  5.51 ERG11 CD36_50660 lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase
oxidative stress 1.92 CD36_00330 cell survival pathways effector, SVF-family, putative
  1.06 CD36_24320 calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, putative
filamentation 1.21 CD36_84850 SH3 domain-containing protein, putative
  2.24 HGT6 CD36_15940 hexose transporter, putative
  2.04 CSH3 CD36_43160 endoplasmic reticulum packaging chaperone, putative
  3.31 PHR1 CD36_44230 1,3-beta-glucanosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.-)
  1.17 PHR2 CD36_00220 1,3-beta-glucanosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.-)
  1.76 UTR4 CD36_16690 enolase-phosphatase E1 (EC 3.1.3.77)

Alizarin Is Nontoxic, Reduces the Fungal Burden in G. mellonella, and Improves Its Survival against C. dubliniensis

The toxicity of alizarin was assessed using the G. mellonella model. Larvae were administered different concentrations of alizarin (16 and 32 μg/larva), and survival rates were monitored over a period of 5 days. No significant mortality was observed at either concentration, indicating the nontoxic nature of alizarin, whereas DMSO showed 100% mortality at the first day postinjection (Figure a). Given the antifungal activity exhibited by alizarin in vitro, its in vivo efficacy was further evaluated using the G. mellonella candidiasis infection model. The survival curves for both the control and PBS groups showed 100% survival throughout the experimental period for both P3 and ATCC strains, confirming that handling procedures and vehicle administration did not contribute to larval mortality and thereby validating the infection model. In contrast, the disease control groups exhibited a progressive decline in survival, demonstrating that fungal infection caused significant mortality in G. mellonella. Mortality was more pronounced in the P3-infected larvae compared to the ATCC group, consistent with the greater virulence of the P3 strain, whereas Amp B treatment consistently improved survival in infected larvae. As shown in Figure b,c, immediate administration of alizarin conferred only partial protection, while treatment 2 h prior to infection provided limited benefit, with survival curves closely overlapping those of the disease control group. Notably, administration of alizarin 24 h prior to infection resulted in the greatest improvement in larval survival, indicating a time-dependent prophylactic effect. Consistent with these observations, Mantel-Cox (log-rank) analysis demonstrated significant differences among survival curves for both P3 (p = 0.0035) and ATCC (p = 0.0281) infections, supporting the conclusion that alizarin treatment significantly improves disease outcomes in the G. mellonella infection model.

3.

3

(a) Toxicity assessment of alizarin in vivo using the Galleria mellonella infection model. Differential doses of alizarin were administered to evaluate its antifungal potential in G. mellonella larvae infected with (b) C. dubliniensis ATCC MYA-646 and (c) the C. dubliniensis clinical isolate (P3). Survival analysis using the Mantel-Cox test revealed significant differences among the treatment groups (p = 0.028 for the ATCC strain and p = 0.0035 for the P3 clinical isolate). (PBSphosphate buffer saline; DCdisease control; Ali MICalizarin injected 30 min after infection; Ali_MIC_2 hinjected 2 h after infection; Ali_MIC_24 halizarin injected 24 h prior to infection).

After 5 days of treatment, the hemolymph was aseptically collected from larvae in each group using the sterile method described in the Materials and Methods section. Fungal burden analysis revealed no viable fungal colonies in control and PBS-administered larvae. However, a significant number of colonies were observed in the disease control group (9.16 CFU/10 μL for the ATCC strain and 11 CFU/10 μL for the P3 strain). The higher fungal burden in the P3-infected group suggests greater virulence of this strain compared to the ATCC strain (Figure ). Further analysis demonstrated that both alizarin and amphotericin B (Amp B) injections reduced fungal colony counts at 30 and 120 min post-treatment. Notably, larvae pretreated with alizarin 24 h prior to infection exhibited a significant reduction in viable fungal colonies compared with the disease control group (p = 0.008 for ATCC; p = 0.0038 for P3), highlighting its protective effect against Candida infection.

4.

4

Fungal burden analysis of G. mellonella larvae treated with varying concentrations of alizarin and amphotericin B. Compared to the disease control, both alizarin and amphotericin B significantly reduced fungal cell counts in larvae infected with C. dubliniensis ATCC MYA-646 and (b) the C. dubliniensis clinical isolate (P3). Mean values of three independent samples (n = 3) have been presented.

Anthraquinones, including alizarin, are generally associated with low toxic potential, although their safety can vary depending on functional group modifications. In our study, alizarin demonstrated no detectable toxicity in the G. mellonella model at concentrations up to 32 μg/larva. Similarly, quinalizarin exhibited minimal toxicity in human erythrocytes, causing only 2% hemolysis at MIC levels, though higher concentrations (40–160 μg/mL) resulted in ∼20% hemolysis. Another study reported that alizarin was well-tolerated by Caenorhabditis elegans at concentrations up to 1 mg/mL, further supporting its biocompatibility (Manoharan et al., 2017). These findings are consistent with our results and those of previous investigations.

Different disease models have been widely employed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of phytochemicals, with G. mellonella and C. elegans candidiasis models being particularly useful. , In our study, G. mellonella larvae infected with C. dubliniensis showed significantly reduced survival, while treatment with alizarin significantly improved survival rates, confirming its antifungal efficacy in vivo. These findings are in line with previous work showing that alizarin extended the lifespan of C. elegans infected with C. albicans, with 60% of nematodes surviving 4 days postinfection. Collectively, improved survival in infected host models correlates strongly with the antifungal effect of Alizarin.

Treatment with Alizarin Showed Significant Variations in Immune Cells of G. mellonella

Immunophenotyping of hemocytes from G. mellonella infected with Candida provides insights into the immune modulation induced by alizarin treatment. Following differential treatment with alizarin, hemocytes were aseptically collected and analyzed by flow cytometry on the basis of size and granularity. The comparative analysis of hemocyte populations revealed distinct immune responses among different treatment groups. Infection with C. dubliniensis (DC) significantly reduced the prohemocyte (P1) and plasmatocyte (P2) populations, while it increased granulocyte (P3), spherule cell (P5), and oenocytoid (P7) levels, reflecting an active but strained immune response (Figure ). Alizarin treatment partially restored P1 levels (1.18-fold) and moderately reduced P3 populations (0.68-fold) compared with the disease control, suggesting a partial immune activation and pathogen clearance. However, the P1 (1.81-fold) recovery and P3 reduction (0.37-fold) were not as pronounced as those observed with amphotericin B, which brought hemocyte distributions closer to baseline levels seen in healthy controls. Notably, spherule cells (P5) remained elevated with alizarin exposure (1.06-fold), indicating ongoing immune stimulation, whereas Amphotericin B more effectively normalized their levels (0.93-fold). These findings suggest that while alizarin can enhance immune responses against fungal infections, its efficacy remains lower than that of the standard antifungal treatment.

5.

5

FACS analysis of Galleria mellonella hemocytes based on size and granularity. Five distinct hemocyte populations were identified, with P5 being the most dominant, followed by P1 and P3. The proportion of P2 cells was comparatively lower than the other populations. Significant variations were observed in P1, P5, and P7 following alizarin exposure compared to control groups, suggesting that alizarin modulates the immune response of Galleria mellonella. However, this immune activation appears insufficient to achieve superior immune modulation. (**p = 0.001; ****p < 0.0001) (PBSphosphate buffer saline; DCdisease control; AliAlizarin).

Alizarin Potentiates Morphological Transition in C. dubliniensis

Given that alizarin is known to inhibit hyphal formation in C. albicans, we investigated its effect on the morphological transition of C. dubliniensis, a key virulence determinant. Prior to these experiments, both clinical and ATCC strains were assessed for their ability to undergo morphological transition. The clinical isolate exhibited a higher propensity for hyphal formation than the ATCC strain and was therefore selected for further analysis. In the presence of 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), cells initiated hyphal development. However, the addition of 16 μg/mL alizarin significantly inhibited hyphal formation from 2 h of incubation onward, with only 6.44% of cells exhibiting germ tubes (the structure that initiate the transition from yeast to hyphae in Candida species) (p < 0.0001), compared to 66.24% in the control group (Figure ). When alizarin concentration was reduced by onefold or 4-fold, the proportion of hyphae-positive cells increased to 30.74% (p < 0.0001) and 54.15% (p = 0.0651), respectively. After 24 h of exposure, only 2.12% of cells retained the ability to transition into hyphal forms (p < 0.0001), confirming that alizarin effectively modulates the morphological transition of C. dubliniensis, similar to its effect on C. albicans (Figure ).

6.

6

Hyphae inhibition by alizarin in Candida dubliniensis (P3 clinical isolate). Treatment with 16 μg/mL of alizarin for 2 h effectively suppressed the morphological transition to hyphal forms.

7.

7

Dose-dependent inhibition of hyphae formation by alizarin in the presence of 10% FBS. Experiments were performed at three independent time points (n = 3). As the concentration of alizarin decreased, the rate of hyphal formation gradually increased. (****p < 0.0001).

The antifungal properties of alizarin and related anthraquinones are well-established against C. albicans, where they inhibit morphological transition, disrupt biofilm formation, and downregulate virulence-related genes in a dose-dependent manner. In line with these observations, alizarin at its MIC (16 μg/mL) effectively blocked the yeast-to-hyphae transition in C. dubliniensis, a critical determinant of pathogenicity. However, at sub-MIC concentrations (1/2 MIC and 1/4 MIC), hyphae formation significantly increased compared with untreated controls. Notably, the hyphae-transition inhibitory concentration of alizarin in C. dubliniensis (16 μg/mL) was several folds higher than that required for C. albicans (2 μg/mL).

Alizarin Exposure Modulates the Proteomic Profile of C. dubliniensis

To identify proteins with differential abundance in C. dubliniensis in response to alizarin treatment, the proteomic profile of the fungal pathogen was evaluated by LC–MS/MS. Three biological replicates were performed, and proteins detected in at least two replicates were considered for further analysis. The data were highly reproducible, with an average Pearson correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.976 for alizarin-treated samples and 0.995 for controls. A total of 1695 proteins were identified, of which 1431 were common to both untreated and treated samples. Additionally, 115 proteins were exclusive to untreated samples, while 149 were unique to alizarin-treated samples (Figure a, Venn diagram). Volcano plot analysis was used to identify proteins with differential abundance (Figure b). On the basis of statistical significance, proteins with a fold change greater than 1 were considered for further evaluation by comparing alizarin-treated cells with unexposed Candida cells. Among 1461 proteins detected, 172 proteins were increased upon alizarin treatment, while 145 were increased in the control group. These proteins were functionally classified by using UniProt ID mapping and ShinyGO analysis. A subset of functionally relevant proteins is listed in Table .

8.

8

Proteomic profile analysis for alizarin-exposed and untreated C. dubliniensis cells. (a) The Venn diagram depicts the common and exclusive proteins associated with alizarin treatment, identifying 1431 shared proteins. (b) A volcano plot visualizes the differential abundance of these proteins upon alizarin exposure in comparison to untreated cells. Proteins with a minimum 1-fold change in expression, based on statistical significance, are highlighted in different colors, while proteins shown in black indicate no statistically significant change in relative abundance. (c,d) represent the gene ontology analysis for the control and alizarin-treated groups, respectively. Graphs are presented as the mean of three independent samples (n = 3).

4. List of Upregulated Proteins in the Alizarin-Treated Group.

function of protein log fold change gene names protein names
amino acid metabolism 1.05 CD36_04870 phospho-2-dehydro-3-deoxyheptonate aldolase (EC 2.5.1.54)
  2.70 HIS4 CD36_40210 histidine biosynthesis trifunctional protein
  1.10 CD36_41790 malate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.37)
  2.14 CD36_44080 homoaconitase, mitochondrial (EC 4.2.1.36)
  1.52 CaPDC11 CD36_46050 pyruvate decarboxylase, putative
  1.50 CD36_73220 arginosuccinase
  2.27 CD36_72980 serine hydroxymethyltransferase (EC 2.1.2.1)
  2.58 LEU1 CD36_25490 3-isopropylmalate dehydratase (EC 4.2.1.33)
  1.05 CD36_25650 malate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.37)
  3.90 INO1 CD36_35120 inositol-3-phosphate synthase (EC 5.5.1.4)
  2.77 CD36_11440 multifunctional tryptophan biosynthesis protein (EC 4.1.1.48)
energy production 5.11 CD36_04240 isocitrate lyase
  2.30 GFA1 CD36_82250 glutamine--fructose-6-phosphate transaminase
  1.30 CD36_50290 ribose-phosphate diphosphokinase (EC 2.7.6.1)
  2.21 PCK1 CD36_25230 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (ATP) (EC 4.1.1.49)
  2.73 CD36_31190 aconitate hydratase, mitochondrial (Aconitase) (EC 4.2.1.-)
  3.93 CD36_35150 NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit putative (EC 1.6.5.3)
protein production and processing 2.53 CD36_02320 60S ribosomal protein L10, putative
  1.06 CD36_05400 60S ribosomal protein L7, putative
  2.67 CD36_15190 ribosomal protein L38E, putative
  2.24 CD36_18490 40s ribosomal protein S9–B, putative
  2.55 CD36_81410 40S ribosomal protein S7
  2.30 CD36_84550 RNA-binding RNA annealing protein, putative
  1.02 CD36_85230 60S ribosomal protein L8
  2.21 CD36_86250 presequence protease
  1.21 CD36_71100 part of 40S ribosomal subunit, putative
  1.22 CD36_71620 large subunit ribosomal protein, putative
  2.72 CD36_33250 40S ribosomal protein S27
cellular respiration 1.99 CD36_00520 elongation factor Tu
  2.52 CD36_09080 adenylosuccinate synthetase (EC 6.3.4.4)
  1.20 CD36_19470 quinol-cytochrome-c reductase (EC 7.1.1.8)
  1.10 CD36_84370 cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit (EC 7.1.1.8)
  1.41 CD36_40330 ATP synthase subunit beta (EC 7.1.2.2)
  1.23 CD36_54830 ubiquinol-cytochrome-c reductase complex, putative
  1.03 CD36_63580 cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 7
oxidative stress 3.23 SOD3 CD36_70320 superoxide dismutase (EC 1.15.1.1)
  2.75 ACT1 CD36_12690 actin (EC 3.6.4.-)
  3.53 POX1 CD36_81950 acyl-coenzyme A oxidase

Most of the proteins that increased in alizarin-treated groups are primarily involved in energy production, cellular respiration, amino acid metabolism (HIS4, LEU1, and INO1), and protein production and processing. This observation is further supported by gene ontology (GO) analysis (Figure c,d). GO terms analysis revealed that in the control group, most identified GO terms were associated with sterol metabolism and cell wall-related components. Among these, the sterol and steroid biosynthetic processes were significantly enriched with the highest number of genes involved (Figure c). However, genes involved in endoplasmic reticulum membrane organization were less represented compared with other processes. Under alizarin treatment, the most enriched GO terms were related to small-molecule metabolic processes, followed by cellular amino acid and organic nitrogen compound biosynthetic processes (Figure d).

Suppression of hyphal development under hypha-transition inducing conditions in Candida activates the general amino acid control pathway, leading to the upregulation of genes involved in amino acid biosynthesis. Metabolomic analyses of C. albicans isolated from various human anatomical sites have shown significant variations in intra- and extracellular amino acid levels. Notably, fluctuations in amino acids such as tryptophan, methionine, leucine, and alanine are strongly correlated not only with the organism’s primary metabolism but also with its virulence behavior. Additionally, histidine and leucine concentrations were significantly elevated after 6 h of farnesol exposure. Similarly, the addition of amphotericin B to C. albicans growth medium increased leucine production by 1.78-fold. In the present study, after 24 h of exposure, Candida cells exhibited enhanced biosynthesis of histidine (2.69-fold upregulation) and leucine (2.58-fold upregulation). Furthermore, the protein (INO1) involved in the inositol biosynthetic process, showed increased abundance by 3.8-fold following alizarin treatment in C. dubliniensis and in C. albicans a 3.67-fold decrease when exposed to amphotericin B. These variations in the inositol biosynthetic pathway may be attributed to the distinct mechanisms of action of the compounds. Alizarin appears to inhibit the growth of C. dubliniensis indirectly, without exerting a noticeable effect on inositol metabolism. In contrast, amphotericin B directly targets the cell membrane of C. albicans, leading to disruptions in several essential metabolic pathways, including those involved in inositol biosynthesis. This disturbance may result from increased oxidative stress and subsequent collapse of cellular processes.

Proteins involved in energy metabolism and cellular respiration were significantly increased in the alizarin-treated group compared to the untreated control group. This result contrasts with Han et al.’s findings (2012), who reported that after 6 h of farnesol exposure, C. albicans exhibited upregulation of pathways related to central carbon and energy metabolism. Similarly, C. albicans cells exposed to amphotericin B showed increased levels of metabolites such as malate, citrate, and oxoglutarate, all of which involved in the TCA cycle. Since alizarin inhibits the morphological transition of C. dubliniensis, cellular respiration levels remained higher. Additionally, alizarin influenced the cellular phase regulation of Candida, as evidenced by the increased abundance of α-trehalose glycohydrolase in the control group (1.23-fold). Trehalose, a minimally reactive sugar, serves as both an energy reservoir and a protectant against oxidative stress in a biological system. It is catabolized by α-trehalose glycohydrolase, whose activity typically peaks during the exponential growth phase of metabolically normal Candida cells.

Most notably, proteins involved in energy metabolism and fermentation showed an increased abundance upon alizarin exposure. The increase of alcohol dehydrogenase confirms active fermentation in treated cells. Meanwhile, the elevated levels of glyoxylate cycle enzymes and formate dehydrogenase indicate enhanced respiratory metabolism. These findings suggest that under hypha transition inhibiting conditions, C. dubliniensis undergoes a significant metabolic shift, leading to an increase in fermentation- and respiration-related enzymes. This response may represent a stress adaptation or a survival strategy. In contrast, C. albicans exhibits higher alcohol dehydrogenase levels in hyphal cells compared to yeast cells, while proteins associated with respiration, such as Atp2 and Rib3, are decreased.

Superoxide dismutase 3 (SOD3) levels increased by 3.2-fold in the alizarin-treated group, indicating that C. dubliniensis cells adapt to counteract free radicals generated during the morphological transition. Unlike other SODs, SOD3 uniquely functions as a manganese-containing superoxide dismutase, playing a crucial role in protecting against oxidative stress, particularly during the stationary phase when nutrients are limited. Moreover, the elevated levels of SOD3 in the alizarin-treated group compared with the control suggest a protective cellular response to oxidative stress induced by alizarin exposure.

In contrast, proteins associated with cell wall synthesis and maintenance of cell wall integrity were increased in the control group. Specifically, these proteins are involved in sterol biosynthesis, sterol metabolism, ergosterol biosynthesis, β-glucan biosynthesis, lipid biosynthesis, and polysaccharide metabolism. Notably, four key genes ERG11 (lanosterol 14-alpha-demethylase), ERG3 (C-5 sterol desaturase), PHR1, and PHR2 (putative cell wall proteins) were consistently identified across gene ontology (GO) functional enrichment analysis. The formation and elongation of hyphae require continuous cell wall remodeling, which drives the increased production of sterols and various lipid classes to maintain structural integrity. Similarly, PHR1 and PHR2 are critical proteins in pathogenic Candida, whose abundance is modulated by environmental pH. These proteins play essential roles in both morphogenesis and virulence. , Furthermore, an SH3 domain-containing protein associated with filamentous growth (GO:0030447) was found to be more abundant in the control group compared to alizarin-treated cells.

Conclusion

The phytochemical alizarin showed antifungal effects against C. dubliniensis primarily by inhibiting the morphological transition and biofilm formation of the fungi. The G. mellonella model confirmed this antifungal effect, demonstrating efficacy with negligible modulation of the host’s immune system. Moreover, alizarin was nontoxic for larvae at 16 and 32 μg, highlighting its favorable safety profile as an antifungal agent. Proteomic analysis revealed that alizarin exposure alters the abundance of key proteins involved in cell wall synthesis and energy metabolism, supporting a multifaceted mechanism of action. Notably, alizarin also potentiated the antifungal activity of fluconazole against C. dubliniensis, suggesting its promise as an adjunct therapeutic agent. Future research is warranted to fully elucidate the molecular and physiological mechanisms underlying alizarin’s antifungal action. Advanced and integrated omics approaches, including transcriptomics and metabolomics, may provide insights into these complex biological effects. Furthermore, evaluating the potential synergistic effects of alizarin with existing antifungals, particularly in mammalian models of oral candidiasis, could unlock valuable therapeutic strategies for clinically relevant fungal infections. Finally, structural optimization and formulation studies will be essential to improve bioavailability and clinical efficacy, thereby advancing alizarin from a bioactive phytochemical to promising antifungal drug candidate.

Materials and Methods

Strains, Media, and Chemicals

All ATCC strains and the clinical isolate (P3) were obtained from the microbial culture collection of the Dental School at ICT-UNESP, São José dos Campos. The clinical isolate of C. dubliniensis (P3) was confirmed using the Bruker MALDI Biotyper system (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) with a confidence score of 2.3. Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA), Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB) and presterilized 96-well cell culture plates were purchased from Kasvi, Brazil. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), alizarin, RPMI-1640 medium, amphotericin B, and fluconazole were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck).

Determination of Minimal Inhibitory Concentration and Minimal Fungicidal Concentration

The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of alizarin, fluconazole, anidulafungin, and amphotericin B (Amp B) was determined using the broth microdilution method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Stock solutions of alizarin (10 mg/mL), Amp B (2 mg/mL), and anidulafungin (2 mg/mL) were prepared in DMSO (100%), while fluconazole (2 mg/mL) was dissolved in sterile distilled water. Given the initially unknown antifungal potential of alizarin, a broad concentration range (1024-1 μg/mL) was first evaluated. However, this approach resulted in solvent-related interference. Therefore, a narrower range of 128–0.25 μg/mL was subsequently selected to minimize solvent effects and ensure reliable results. All Candida species were enumerated using a hemocytometer and initially suspended in sterile 0.9% saline. The cell suspension was adjusted to a final density of 4 × 103 cells/mL in RPMI 1640 medium for Candida species and 4 × 104 cells/mL for Aspergillus species. Presterilized, flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates were used for the MIC assay. The test compounds were serially 2-fold diluted in RPMI medium to yield final concentrations ranging from 128 to 0.25 μg/mL. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Wells with no visible turbidity were considered to indicate inhibition of growth, and the MIC was recorded accordingly. To determine the minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC), a 10 μL aliquot from each well was plated onto Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) plates and incubated for 48 h. The MFC/MIC ratio was then calculated to characterize alizarin as fungicidal (MFC/MIC ≤ 4) or fungistatic (MFC/MIC > 4).

Growth Kinetics Assay

Following MIC and MFC determination, the growth kinetics of alizarin and Amp B against C. dubliniensis (ATCC) and the clinical isolate P3 were assessed based on the protocol described by Scorneaux et al. Drug solutions and cell suspensions were prepared as described above. In sterile 24-well plates, different concentrations of alizarin (MIC, MIC × 5, MIC × 10, and MFC) and the MIC concentration of Amp B were tested. The cell density was maintained at 4 × 103 cells/mL, consistent with MIC assays. Plates were incubated at 37 °C with constant shaking at 150 rpm. At designated time points (0, 2, 4, 6, 24, and 48 h), 10 μL aliquots of the culture were collected and plated onto SDA plates to determine colony-forming units (CFUs). Samples collected at 24 and 48 h were serially diluted in sterile saline prior to plating. After 48 h of incubation, CFUs were counted, and growth curves were constructed accordingly.

Antibiofilm Activity of Alizarin

The antibiofilm potential of alizarin against biofilm formation and eradication in C. dubliniensis was evaluated by quantifying fungal biomass using the crystal violet staining method (Manoharan et al., 2017). Briefly, overnight cultures grown in RPMI medium were adjusted to 1 × 106 cells/mL in sterile PBS. For the biofilm inhibition assay, 200 μL of the standardized cell suspension was dispensed into 96-well plates and incubated under constant shaking for 90 min to allow initial adhesion. Subsequently, nonadherent cells were removed by washing with sterile PBS, and 200 μL of RPMI medium containing different concentrations of alizarin (MIC, MIC × 5, and MIC × 10) was added. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. For the biofilm eradication assay, a separate plate was prepared by adding the standardized cell suspension and allowing biofilm formation for 24 h. After incubation, nonadherent cells were removed by washing with PBS, and 200 μL of RPMI medium supplemented with alizarin (MIC, MIC × 5 and MIC × 10) was added. The plates were further incubated for an additional 24 h at 37 °C. Following incubation, planktonic cells were removed from both assays by repeated washing with PBS, and the remaining biofilms were fixed with 100% ethanol for 10 min. The plates were then stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 40 min and subsequently destained using ethanol. Finally, 100 μL of the destaining solution was transferred to a new plate, and absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (BioTek Synergy). Biomass (%) = T/C*100 and Biomass reduction (%) = [1 – (T/C)] × 100, where C represents the absorbance of the control and T represents the absorbance of the treated samples. The data presented represent the mean of two independent experiments, each performed with four technical replicates.

Synergistic Effect of Alizarin with Antifungals

The antifungal synergistic activity of alizarin and common antifungals such as fluconazole, amphotericin B, and anidulafungin was evaluated using a checkerboard microdilution assay following the methodology described by Lima et al. Reference and clinical strains of C. dubliniensis were subcultured on SDA plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. 2-fold serial dilutions of fluconazole (0.5 μg/mL), amphotericin B (0.25 μg/mL), anidulafungin (0.015 μg/mL), and alizarin (16 μg/mL) were prepared in RPMI across eight concentrations, yielding final ranges of 0.5–0.0039 μg/mL, 0.25–0.0020 μg/mL, 0.015–0.00012 μg/mL, and 16–0.125 μg/mL, respectively. The checkerboard assay was performed in 96-well microtiter plates, with Alizarin serially diluted along the X-axis and antifungals along the Y-axis. Each well was inoculated with a standardized fungal suspension adjusted to a final concentration of 104 CFU/mL in a final volume of 100 μL per well. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Additionally, growth and sterility controls were included, along with single-agent controls to confirm the MIC of each treatment alone. Next, aliquots of 5 μL per well were transferred onto SDA plates agar and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The combined MIC was defined as the lowest concentration that completely inhibited microbial growth.

The synergistic effect between alizarin and antifungals was assessed by calculating the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) using the equation

FICI=MICincombinationMICalizarinalone+MICincombinationMICantifungalalone

Synergy was defined as a FICI ≤ 0.5; additive effect as 0.5 < FICI ≤ 1.0; indifference as 1.0 < FICI ≤ 4.0; and antagonism as FICI > 4.0. All experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated independently on two separate occasions.

Evaluation of In Vivo Antifungal Effects and Immune Modulatory Potential of Alizarin

The in vivo antifungal activity and immunomodulatory potential of alizarin against C. dubliniensis were assessed using the G. mellonella larvae infection model. Larvae were infected with the clinical isolate (P3) or ATCC strain of C. dubliniensis. The experimental protocol was adapted from De Barros et al. (2021). Healthy G. mellonella larvae (weighing 250–300 mg each) were obtained from the Invertebrate Model Research Laboratory, UNESP/ICT. Prior to experimentation, larvae were acclimatized for 24 h at room temperature. C. dubliniensis cells and alizarin were suspended in sterile saline. Injections of 10 μL were administered to each larva, with the following groupings: (Amp B: 10 μL of MIC × 1 amphotericin B (positive control), Ali: 10 μL of MIC × 1 alizarin (infected), 2 h Ali: 10 μL of MIC × 1 alizarin injected 2 h post C. dubliniensis infection, 24 h Ali: 10 μL of MIC × 1 alizarin injected 24 h prior to C. dubliniensis infection, PBS group: 10 μL of sterile saline (uninfected control), Disease control (DC): 10 μL of C. dubliniensis cell suspension followed by 10 μL of sterile saline). Larvae survival was monitored over a five-day period, and data were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves.

To evaluate the immunomodulatory effect of alizarin, a similar experimental setup was used with minor modifications. After 24 h of treatment, larvae were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol. A small incision was made in the lower abdomen using a sterile blade to collect hemolymph aseptically. The hemolymph was immediately mixed with ice-cold sterile insect physiological saline. The mixture was centrifuged at 1500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, and the pellet was resuspended in sterile PBS to obtain a final hemocyte concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL. Hemocyte subpopulations were characterized using a FACSLyric flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) based on forward and side scatter properties. A minimum of 10,000 events per sample were recorded and analyzed using BD FACSuite software. In parallel, 10 μL of hemolymph from each larva was plated onto SDA plates to determine the fungal burden by enumerating viable Candida colonies, following the protocol described by Rossoni et al.

Impacts of Alizarin Exposure on Morphological Transition and Proteomic Profile of C. dubliniensis

To analyze the relative abundance of proteins in response to alizarin treatment, a shotgun proteomics approach was employed following the protocol described by De Andrade et al. Briefly, C. dubliniensis cells were first cultivated on SDA agar plates, then transferred to YNB medium supplemented with 10% FBS, with or without 16 μg/mL alizarin and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The percent hyphal cell formation was determined by counting yeast and hyphal cells using a hemocytometer under light microscopy, and values were expressed as a percentage of hyphal cells relative to the total number of cells counted. Furthermore, cells were collected by centrifugation and lysed using glass bead disruption in a lysis buffer containing 2% CHAPS, 50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The supernatant was then collected, mixed with an equal volume of ice-cold acetone and methanol (4:1), and stored at −80 °C for 2 h to precipitate proteins. After centrifugation at 14,000g for 15 min at 4 °C, the resulting pellet was washed several times with ice-cold methanol. Proteins (100 μg) were denatured in 100 μL of 8 M urea, reduced with 5 mM DTT for 25 min at 56 °C, and alkylated with 14 mM IAA for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The samples were then digested with 0.2 μg of trypsin and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. Successful protein digestion was confirmed using 12% SDS-PAGE, and trypsin activity was terminated by adding 5% formic acid to a final concentration. Finally, the samples were desalted using C18 membranes (Octadecyl C18-bonded silica3 M Empore extraction disks) and dried using a vacuum system (miVac, Genevac Ltd.).

LC–MS/MS Analysis

LC–MS/MS analyses were performed on a Vanquish Neo UPLC system (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to an Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A total of 300 ng per sample was injected onto a PepMap Neo precolumn (Thermo Scientific) containing 5 mm of 5 μm C18 beads, and chromatographic separation of the peptides was performed on a PepMap Neo analytical column (Thermo Scientific) with 150 mm of 2 μm C18 beads, using an acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid gradient with steps of 2–45% over 55 min, 45–99% in 0.1 min, and 99% for 5 min, at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The mass spectrometer was set to operate at 2.1 kV in positive ion mode, with the transfer tube temperature set to 270 °C. It was operated in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode using high-energy collision-induced dissociation, with a resolution of 60,000 for MS1 precursors, a normalized AGC target of 300%, a maximum injection time set to auto, and a resolution of 30,000 for MS2 fragments. The scan range was set to a 400–1600 m/z window and positive charge states of 2–6.

Proteomics Data Processing

Raw LC–MS/MS data were analyzed using MaxQuant (version 2.0.3.1), with MS/MS spectra searched against the C. dubliniensis reference strain database downloaded from UniProt (accessed on October 01, 2024, containing 5829 entries). The search parameters included trypsin/P with up to two missed cleavages, carbamidomethylation of cysteines as a fixed modification, and oxidation of methionine, N-terminal acetylation of proteins, and deamidation as variable modifications. The initial tolerances for FTMS and ITMS MS/MS were set at 0.02 and 0.5 Da, respectively. The protein and peptide FDRs were set at 1% with a minimum peptide length of eight amino acids. The variability among biological replicates was assessed by using the Pearson correlation coefficient. A Venn diagram was generated using an online Web server (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/) to distinguish common and unique proteins between alizarin-treated and control groups. Differential protein expression was visualized using a volcano plot, created with the gplot package in the R environment. Finally, upregulated proteins in both the control and treatment groups were subjected to gene ontology (GO) analysis using ShinyGO 0.82 (https://bioinformatics.sdstate.edu/go/), with ontology terms specific to C. dubliniensis.

Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed independently in triplicate, and data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance among groups was evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparisons test. Survival analysis of G. mellonella was conducted using Kaplan–Meier survival curves. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 9.0 for Windows).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES88887.890668/2023-00) and the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq 310265/2022-3) for their financial support. The authors express gratitude to Dr. Ramalingam, Scientist at IICT, India, for his generosity. We thank FAPESP for supporting the mass spectrometry and proteomics facilities through the CEPID grant (2013/07467-1). We also thank the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for providing access to the BD FACS Lyric flow cytometry equipment (2019/10097-8; EMUMultiuser equipment FACS Lyric).

The Article Processing Charge for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Domer, J. E. ; Carrow, E. W. . Candidiasis. In Immunology of the Fungal Diseases; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2020; pp 57–92. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gómez-Gaviria M., Baruch-Martínez D., Mora-Montes H.. Exploring the Biology, Virulence, and General Aspects of Candida dubliniensis . Infect. Drug Resist. 2024;17:5755–5773. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S497862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Schille T. B., Sprague J. L., Naglik J. R., Brunke S., Hube B.. Commensalism and Pathogenesis of Candida albicans at the Mucosal Interface. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2025;23:525–540. doi: 10.1038/s41579-025-01174-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. World Health Organization WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens List to Guide Research, Development and Public Health Action; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nwachukwu K. C., Nwarunma E., Uchenna C. D., Ugbogu O. C.. Enablers of Candida auris Persistence on Medical Devices and Their Mode of Eradication. Curr. Med. Mycol. 2023;9(1):36. doi: 10.18502/CMM.2023.150673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cristina M. L., Spagnolo A. M., Sartini M., Carbone A., Oliva M., Schinca E., Boni S., Pontali E.. An Overview on Candida auris in Healthcare Settings. J. Fungi. 2023;9(9):913. doi: 10.3390/jof9090913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Satoh K., Makimura K., Hasumi Y., Nishiyama Y., Uchida K., Yamaguchi H.. Candida auris Sp. Nov., a Novel Ascomycetous Yeast Isolated from the External Ear Canal of an Inpatient in a Japanese Hospital. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009;53(1):41–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sullivan D. J., Moran G., Donnelly S., Gee S., Pinjon E., McCartan B., Shanley D. B., Coleman D. C.. Candida dubliniensis: An Update. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 1999;16:72–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sullivan D., Coleman D.. Candida dubliniensis: Characteristics and Identification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998;36(2):329–334. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.2.329-334.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Khan Z., Ahmad S., Joseph L., Chandy R.. Candida dubliniensis: An Appraisal of Its Clinical Significance as a Bloodstream Pathogen. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Satala D., Juszczak M., Wronowska E., Surowiec M., Kulig K., Kozik A., Rapala-Kozik M., Karkowska-Kuleta J.. Similarities and Differences among Species Closely Related to Candida albicans: C. tropicalis, C. dubliniensis, and C. auris. Cell. Microbiol. 2022;2022:1–25. doi: 10.1155/2022/2599136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haynes K. A., Sullivan D. J., Bennett D. E., Coleman D. C., Westerneng T. J.. Candida dubliniensis Sp. Nov.: Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of a Novel Species Associated with Oral Candidosis in HIV-Infected Individuals. Microbiology. 1995;141(7):1507–1521. doi: 10.1099/13500872-141-7-1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Loreto E. ´. S., Scheid L. A., Nogueira C. W., Zeni G., Santurio J. M., Alves S. H.. Candida dubliniensis: Epidemiology and Phenotypic Methods for Identification. Mycopathologia. 2010;169(6):431–443. doi: 10.1007/s11046-010-9286-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Patil A., Boparai N. K., Shankargouda S. B., Doddamani M. H., Vora A., Dave T.. Candida dubliniensis: The New Culprit on the Block Causing Denture Stomatitis? An In Vivo Study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2021;22:517–521. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gasparoto T. H., Dionísio T. J., De Oliveira C. E., Porto V. C., Gelani V., Santos C. F., Campanelli A. P., Lara V. S.. Isolation of Candida dubliniensis from Denture Wearers. J. Med. Microbiol. 2009;58(7):959–962. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.008391-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shokoohi G., Javidnia J., Mirhendi H., Rasekh-Jahromi A., Rezaei-Matehkolaei A., Ansari S., Maryami F., Goodarzi S., Romeo O.. Molecular Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles of Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana Isolated from Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Single-Centre Experience in Iran. Mycoses. 2021;64(7):771–779. doi: 10.1111/myc.13280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sardi J. C., Duque C., Camargo G. A., Hofling J. F., Gonçalves R. B.. Periodontal Conditions and Prevalence of Putative Periodontopathogens and Candida spp. in Insulin-Dependent Type 2 Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients with Chronic PeriodontitisA Pilot Study. Arch. Oral Biol. 2011;56(10):1098–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tekeli A., Dolapci I., Emral R., Cesur S.. Candida Carriage and Candida dubliniensis in Oropharyngeal Samples of Type-1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Mycoses. 2004;47(7):315–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2004.00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Al Shakirchi M., Klingspor L., Bergman P., Hjelte L., de Monestrol I.. A 16-Year Retrospective Study on Fungal Prevalence and Diversity in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: Candida dubliniensis Was Associated with a Decline in Lung Function. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;96:663–670. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. AbdulWahab A., Salah H., Chandra P., Taj-Aldeen S. J.. Persistence of Candida dubliniensis and Lung Function in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. BMC Res. Notes. 2017;10(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2656-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Peltroche-Llacsahuanga H., Döhmen H., Haase G.. Recovery of Candida dubliniensis from Sputum of Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Mycoses. 2002;45(1–2):15–18. doi: 10.1046/j.0933-7407.2001.00719.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mokaddas E., Khan Z. U., Ahmad S.. Prevalence of Candida dubliniensis among Cancer Patients in Kuwait: A 5-Year Retrospective Study. Mycoses. 2011;54(4):e29–e34. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01822.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schoofs A., Odds F. C., Colebunders R., Ieven M., Goossens H.. Use of Specialised Isolation Media for Recognition and Identification of Candida dubliniensis Isolates from HIV-Infected Patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1997;16(4):296–300. doi: 10.1007/BF01695634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Babici D., Mohamed A. A., Mattner O., Canosa J., Gan W., Patel P.. Candida dubliniensis Meningitis in an Immunocompetent Patient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Eneurologicalsci. 2024;36:100519. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2024.100519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Askari A., Benson J., Felipe Bastos Horta L., Daneshmand A., Dasenbrock H., Cervantes-Arslanian A. M.. Candida dublinensis Meningitis in an Immunocompetent Host: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Neurol. Clin. Pract. 2024;14(4):e200279. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Asao K., Hashida N., Maruyama K., Motooka D., Nakamura S., Nishida K.. Cases of Endophthalmitis Caused by Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis Identified via Internal Transcribed Spacer Deep Sequencing. BMC Ophthalmol. 2024;24(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03702-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kishore K., McGowan D. S., Chatterjee T., Hassanzadeh B.. A Case of Bilateral Endogenous Candida dubliniensis Endophthalmitis Treated with Aggressive Local and Systemic Therapy. Case Rep. Ophthalmol. 2021;11(3):561–573. doi: 10.1159/000510500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Reginato C. F., Bandeira L. A., Zanette R. A., Santurio J. M., Alves S. H., Danesi C. C.. Antifungal Activity of Synthetic Antiseptics and Natural Compounds against Candida dubliniensis before and after in Vitro Fluconazole Exposure. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2017;50(1):75–79. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0461-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Moghadam S., Azari B., Rashidi R., Bafghi M. H., Rakhshandeh H., Selman S. M., Zarrinfar H.. Antifungal Activity of Three Different Varieties of Capsicum annuum against Clinical Isolates of Candida Species. Trop. Dis. Travel Med. Vaccines. 2023;9(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40794-023-00194-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Azadi S., Azizipour E., Amani A. M., Vaez A., Zareshahrabadi Z., Abbaspour A., Firuzyar T., Dortaj H., Kamyab H., Chelliapan S.. et al. Antifungal Activity of Fe3O4@SiO2/Schiff-Base/Cu­(II) Magnetic Nanoparticles against Pathogenic Candida Species. Sci. Rep. 2024;14(1):5855. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56512-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kumpakha R., Gordon D. M.. Inhibition of Morphological Transition and Hyphae Extension in Candida spp. by Occidiofungin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022;132(4):3038–3048. doi: 10.1111/jam.15425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim Y.-G., Lee J.-H., Park S., Khadke S. K., Shim J.-J., Lee J.. Hydroquinones Including Tetrachlorohydroquinone Inhibit Candida albicans Biofilm Formation by Repressing Hyphae-Related Genes. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022;10(5):e02536. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02536-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sun L., Liao K., Wang D.. Effects of Magnolol and Honokiol on Adhesion, Yeast-Hyphal Transition, and Formation of Biofilm by Candida albicans . PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Manoharan R. K., Lee J., Lee J.. Efficacy of 7-Benzyloxyindole and Other Halogenated Indoles to Inhibit Candida albicans Biofilm and Hyphal Formation. Microb. Biotechnol. 2018;11(6):1060–1069. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tsang P. W.-K., Bandara H., Fong W.-P.. Purpurin Suppresses Candida albicans Biofilm Formation and Hyphal Development. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Manoharan R. K., Lee J.-H., Kim Y.-G., Lee J.. Alizarin and Chrysazin Inhibit Biofilm and Hyphal Formation by Candida albicans . Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7:447. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Janeczko M., Kochanowicz E., Górka K., Skrzypek T.. Quinalizarin as a Potential Antifungal Drug for the Treatment of Candida albicans Fungal Infection in Cancer Patients. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024;12(3):e03652. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03652-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ohshima T., Mukai Y., Watanabe H., Ohshima K., Makimura K., Komabayashi T., Ahn C., Meyer K., Maeda N.. Candida dubliniensis in Japanese Oral Microbiota: A Cross-Sectional Study of Six Geographic Regions in Japan. Microorganisms. 2024;12(3):525. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12030525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ellepola A. N., Khan Z. U., Joseph B., Chandy R., Philip L.. Prevalence of Candida dubliniensis among Oral Candida Isolates in Patients Attending the Kuwait University Dental Clinic. Med. Princ. Pract. 2011;20(3):271–276. doi: 10.1159/000323440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hazen K. C.. Fungicidal versus Fungistatic Activity of Terbinafine and Itraconazole: An in Vitro Comparison. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1998;38(5):S37–S41. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(98)70482-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ma J., Todd M., van de Sande W. W. J., Biersack B.. Antifungal Activity of Natural Naphthoquinones and Anthraquinones against Madurella mycetomatis . Chem. Biodiversity. 2023;20(5):e202300151. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.202300151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Friedman M., Xu A., Lee R., Nguyen D. N., Phan T. A., Hamada S. M., Panchel R., Tam C. C., Kim J. H., Cheng L. W.. et al. The Inhibitory Activity of Anthraquinones against Pathogenic Protozoa, Bacteria, and Fungi and the Relationship to Structure. Molecules. 2020;25(13):3101. doi: 10.3390/molecules25133101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lee J.-H., Kim Y.-G., Park S., Hu L., Lee J.. Phytopigment Alizarin Inhibits Multispecies Biofilm Development by Cutibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans . Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(5):1047. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14051047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang H., Zhang Q., Zuo T., Wang Z., Liao J., Lu Y.. 2-Chloromethyl Anthraquinone Inhibits Candida albicans Biofilm Formation by Inhibiting the Ras1-cAMP-Efg1 Pathway. Res. Microbiol. 2025;176(5):104280. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2025.104280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Marioni J., Romero B. C., Mugas M. L., Martinez F., Gómez T. I., Morales J. M. N., Konigheim B. S., Borsarelli C. D., Nuñez-Montoya S. C.. The Natural Anthraquinone Parietin Inactivates Candida tropicalis Biofilm by Photodynamic Mechanisms. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(5):548. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17050548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ma W., Liu C., Li J., Hao M., Ji Y., Zeng X.. The Effects of Aloe Emodin-Mediated Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy on Drug-Sensitive and Resistant Candida albicans . Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2020;19(4):485–494. doi: 10.1039/c9pp00352e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Meng L., Zhao H., Zhao S., Sun X., Zhang M., Deng Y.. Inhibition of Yeast-to-Hypha Transition and Virulence of Candida albicans by 2-Alkylaminoquinoline Derivatives. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63(4):e01891. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01891-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Song Y., Wang Z., Long Y., Mao Y., Jiang F., Lu Y.. 2-Alkyl-Anthraquinones Inhibit Candida albicans Biofilm via Inhibiting the Formation of Matrix and Hyphae. Res. Microbiol. 2022;173(6):103955. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2022.103955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Possamai Rossatto F. C., Tharmalingam N., Escobar I. E., d’Azevedo P. A., Zimmer K. R., Mylonakis E.. Antifungal Activity of the Phenolic Compounds Ellagic Acid (EA) and Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) against Drug-Resistant Candida auris . J. Fungi. 2021;7(9):763. doi: 10.3390/jof7090763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Santos R. B., Scorzoni L., Namba A. M., Rossoni R. D., Jorge A. O. C., Junqueira J. C.. Lactobacillus Species Increase the Survival of Galleria mellonella Infected with Candida albicans and Non-albicans Candida Clinical Isolates. Med. Mycol. 2019;57(3):391–394. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myy032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Oliver J. C., Laghi L., Parolin C., Foschi C., Marangoni A., Liberatore A., Dias A. L. T., Cricca M., Vitali B.. Metabolic Profiling of Candida Clinical Isolates of Different Species and Infection Sources. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):16716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73889-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Garbe E., Vylkova S.. Role of Amino Acid Metabolism in the Virulence of Human Pathogenic Fungi. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2019;6(3):108–119. doi: 10.1007/s40588-019-00124-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Han T.-L., Cannon R. D., Villas-Bôas S. G.. The Metabolic Response of Candida albicans to Farnesol under Hyphae-Inducing Conditions. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012;12(8):879–889. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00837.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Cao Y., Zhu Z., Chen X., Yao X., Zhao L., Wang H., Yan L., Wu H., Chai Y., Jiang Y.. Effect of Amphotericin B on the Metabolic Profiles of Candida albicans . J. Proteome Res. 2013;12(6):2921–2932. doi: 10.1021/pr4002178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Arguelles J. C., Gacto M.. Evidence for Regulatory Trehalase Activity in Candida utilis . Can. J. Microbiol. 1985;31(6):529–537. doi: 10.1139/m85-099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Monteoliva L., Martinez-Lopez R., Pitarch A., Hernaez M. L., Serna A., Nombela C., Albar J. P., Gil C.. Quantitative Proteome and Acidic Subproteome Profiling of Candida albicans Yeast-to-Hypha Transition. J. Proteome Res. 2011;10(2):502–517. doi: 10.1021/pr100710g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lamarre C., LeMay J.-D., Deslauriers N., Bourbonnais Y.. Candida albicans Expresses an Unusual Cytoplasmic Manganese-Containing Superoxide Dismutase (SOD3 Gene Product) upon the Entry and during the Stationary Phase. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276(47):43784–43791. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108095200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Calderon J., Zavrel M., Ragni E., Fonzi W. A., Rupp S., Popolo L.. PHR1, a pH-Regulated Gene of Candida albicans Encoding a Glucan-Remodelling Enzyme, Is Required for Adhesion and Invasion. Microbiology. 2010;156(8):2484–2494. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.038000-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Fonzi W. A.. PHR1 and PHR2 of Candida albicans Encode Putative Glycosidases Required for Proper Cross-Linking of β-1,3- and β-1,6-Glucans. J. Bacteriol. 1999;181(22):7070–7079. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.22.7070-7079.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. CLSI Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, Approved Standard, 4th ed.; CLSI standard M27, Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: 2017. [Google Scholar]
  61. Scorneaux B., Angulo D., Borroto-Esoda K., Ghannoum M., Peel M., Wring S.. SCY-078 Is Fungicidal against Candida Species in Time-Kill Studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017;61(3):e01961. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01961-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. de Lima P. M. N., Pereira T. C., de Carvalho L. S., Dos Santos L. F., Oliveira C. E. R., Ramos L. d. P., Marcucci M. C., Abu Hasna A., de Oliveira L. D.. Antimicrobial and Synergistic Effects of Lemongrass and Geranium Essential Oils against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida spp. World J. Crit. Care Med. 2024;13(3):92531. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.92531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. de Barros P. P., Rossoni R. D., Garcia M. T., Kaminski V. de L., Loures F. V., Fuchs B. B., Mylonakis E., Junqueira J. C.. The Anti-Biofilm Efficacy of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) in Vitro and in a Murine Model of Oral Candidiasis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;11:700305. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.700305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Rossoni R. D., Fuchs B. B., de Barros P. P., Velloso M., Jorge A. O. C., Junqueira J. C., Mylonakis E., Mylonakis E.. Lactobacillus paracasei Modulates the Immune System of Galleria mellonella and Protects against Candida albicans Infection. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. de Andrade V. M., de Oliveira V. D., Barcick U., Ramu V. G., Heras M., Bardají E. R., Castanho M. A., Zelanis A., Capella A., Junqueira J. C.. et al. Mechanistic Insights on the Antibacterial Action of the Kyotorphin Peptide Derivatives Revealed by in Vitro Studies and Galleria mellonella Proteomic Analysis. Microb. Pathog. 2024;189:106607. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2024.106607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES