Skip to main content
International Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to International Journal of Epidemiology
. 2026 Jun 16;55(3):dyag087. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyag087

Cohort Profile Update: The Young Lives study

Marta Favara 1,✉, Maria De Los Ángeles Molina 2, Alan Sánchez 3,4, Kauser Mohsini 5, Tassew Woldehanna 6, Alula Pankhurst 7, Ellanki Revathi 8, Antonio Campos 9, Katherine Curi-Quinto 10, Vanessa Rojas 11
PMCID: PMC13271239  PMID: 42302208

Key Features.

  • Young Lives is a longitudinal study that was set up in 2001, tracing a Younger Cohort born in 2000–1 and an Older Cohort born in 1994–5 through childhood, adolescence, and adulthood in four low- and middle-income countries: India, Ethiopia, Peru, and Vietnam.

  • More than two decades of follow-up provide opportunities to investigate the long-term effects of growing up in poverty on cognitive skills development, educational attainment, employment opportunities, and physical and mental health.

  • Five in-person survey rounds were completed by 2016. Round 6 was carried out over five phone calls during the COVID-19 pandemic. The latest in-person survey, Round 7, was conducted in 2023–4 in India, Ethiopia, and Peru, interviewing 7123 participants from the Younger Cohort and Older Cohort (81% of the original sample), aged 22 and 29 years, respectively.

  • Round 7 incorporates new measures of mental health, questions on exposure to violence, risky behaviours, sexual and reproductive health, foundational cognitive skills, and job attributes that young people value. Additionally, hair samples were collected to measure cortisol. Furthermore, qualitative data collection took place in Ethiopia and Peru, with particular emphasis on young people’s health and well-being.

  • Data from Round 7 of the Young Lives study are publicly available through the UK Data Service (https://datacatalogue.ukdataservice.ac.uk/series/series/2000060#access-data).

The original cohort

The Young Lives study is a multi-country, mixed-methods, longitudinal study that was established in 2001 with the aim of investigating the causes and consequences of growing up in poverty in the developing world and to inform policy to improve the lives of disadvantaged children and young people [1].

Since 2002, Young Lives has followed the lives of ∼12 000 children—now young adults—born into poverty in Ethiopia, India (states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana), Peru, and Vietnam. In each country, the baseline sample comprises two cohorts: the Younger Cohort of 8064 children born in 2000–1 and the Older Cohort of 3722 children born in 1994–5. More details about the original sampling design are available on our website.

Additionally, Young Lives has followed a subset of 200 participants as part of a qualitative study since 2007 (five rounds in Peru, six in Ethiopia, and four in India and Vietnam), which includes semi-structured interviews and participatory data collection with children, their families, and key informants from their communities [2].

The original Young Lives cohort profile was published in 2012. It describes the study participants, the data collected in Rounds 1–3 of both the quantitative and qualitative surveys, and the attrition rates [1]. An update was published in 2021. It describes Rounds 4 and 5 of the quantitative surveys and the data collected through three phone calls (Calls 1–3) in 2020, as part of Round 6 [3]. This paper describes the latest survey, Round 7, conducted in 2023 to capture participants’ transition into adulthood. Round 7 was administered through in-person interviews, except within two sites of the Amhara region of Ethiopia, where phone interviews were conducted due to armed conflict.

What is the reason for the new data collection?

From its initial focus on childhood poverty that characterized the first five survey rounds, the Young Lives study has shifted focus in Rounds 6 and 7 as participants transition into adulthood, to investigate the factors that promote and constrain the equality of opportunity and social mobility across the first three decades of life and between generations. Round 6 was carried out in 2020–1 during the COVID-19 pandemic and included five phone surveys: three calls conducted in 2020 [3] and two additional calls completed in 2021. The attrition rate of the 2020 calls is reported in Favara et al. (2021) [3] and the final Round 6 attrition rate is reported in Molina et al. (2025) [4].

In 2023, 7 years after the last face-to-face interview, a seventh round of in-person data collection was conducted in Ethiopia, India, and Peru. Unfortunately, Round 7 was not conducted in Vietnam due to changes in governmental procedures on the international transfer of personal data [5].

What will be the new areas of research?

Round 7 incorporates survey modules from previous rounds to enable cross-cohort comparisons and life-course analysis, and includes additional modules to reflect both the evolving life stages of Young Lives participants and significant disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic, armed conflict, and social and economic crises:

Education and skills: reading comprehension and foundational cognitive skills tests were administered to the Younger Cohort to trace the learning progression from adolescence to adulthood.

Employment: willingness-to-pay questions designed to understand the job attributes that young people value, to facilitate research on labour supply. Furthermore, an enhanced employment module was included to more precisely understand their employment situation. This is important in the context of widening labour-market inequalities and increased job insecurity, which have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic (especially in Peru and India), armed conflict in Ethiopia, increased internal and international migration, and climatic shocks.

Health and well-being: expanded mental health scales to assess the impact of multiple, intersecting crises on the well-being of our participants now that they are adults. The collection of hair samples to analyse cortisol levels will reveal how early age and recent stressful experiences impact mental and physical health, alongside other outcomes in adulthood.

Family lives: questions on exposure to violence, risky behaviours, and sexual health, to understand young people’s experiences and behaviours. Our research will also examine how global crises affect household gender dynamics, fertility, and family formation decisions.

Who is in the cohort?

Round 7 was conducted between mid-2023 and early-2024 when participants were approximately aged 22 years (Younger Cohort) and 29 years (Older Cohort). Of the original 2002 sample, counting 8784 participants in Ethiopia, India, and Peru, 7123 were surveyed in Round 7 (81.0% total retention rate). Table 1 describes the Round 7 sample according to the baseline characteristics measured in Round 1. Follow-up rates were highest in India and lowest in Ethiopia (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Follow-up rates for Round 7 sample according to baseline characteristics.

Ethiopia
India
Peru
Round 1 Round 7
Round 1 Round 7
Round 1 Round 7
2002 2023 % P value 2002 2023 % P value 2002 2023 % P value
Total 2999 2231 74.39 3019 2673 88.54 2766 2219 80.22
Cohort 2999 3019 2766
 Older Cohort 1000 696 69.60 .000 1008 847 84.03 .000 714 517 72.41 .000
 Younger Cohort 1999 1535 76.79 2011 1826 90.80 2052 1702 82.94
Sex 2999 3019 2766
 Male 1559 1162 74.53 .851 1572 1397 88.87 .555 1353 1123 83.00 .0003
 Female 1440 1069 74.24 1447 1276 88.18 1413 1096 77.57
Area of residence 2999 3019 2766
 Rural 1948 1525 78.29 .000 2260 2080 92.04 .000 830 657 79.16 .3562
 Urban 1051 706 67.17 759 593 78.13 1936 1562 80.68
Caregiver’s education 2756 3017 2764
 Incomplete primary 2174 1629 74.93 .203 1920 1735 90.36 .000 835 655 78.44 .1174
 At least complete primary 582 421 72.34 1097 936 85.32 1929 1563 81.03
Wealth tertile 2974 3014 2755
 Lowest wealth tertile 1004 773 76.99 .000 1012 931 92.00 .000 924 744 80.52 .53
 Middle wealth tertile 980 753 76.84 998 904 90.58 913 723 79.19
 Top wealth tertile 990 686 69.29 1004 833 82.97 918 744 81.05

Figure 1.

Longitudinal study timeline showing two cohorts followed over seven survey rounds (2002–23). The Younger Cohort is tracked from ages 1 to 22 years and the Older Cohort is tracked from ages 8 to 29 years. At each round, participant numbers, response rates, and cumulative deaths are displayed, showing graduate attrition over time. The figure also indicates the timing of the household surveys and qualitative sub-studies since Round 1.

Young Lives survey rounds with cohorts’ ages, sample sizes, and response rates.

What has been measured?

Education and skills

We readministered the reading comprehension test to the Younger Cohort, to trace the development of reading comprehension skills from age 12 years to age 22 years (Table 2). Furthermore, we administered part of the Rapid Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Regulation (RACER), completed by the Younger Cohort in Ethiopia and Peru in Round 5, to measure changes in inhibitory control and working memory between ages 12 and 22 years [6].

Table 2.

Information collected in Young Lives Round 7 by research stream.

Research stream Information collected
Education and skills Education history, current education, school/college characteristics, socio-emotional skills, foundational cognitive skills, digital skills
Health and well-being Household food security, dietary diversity, anthropometry, physical health, household access to health services, subjective well-being, mental health, hair samples for cortisol analysis to investigate stress, risky behaviours, healthy behaviours, violence, sexual health, health at birth of next generation
Employment Employment and job characteristics in week prior to the interview and in the past 12 months, job quality, work training and skills, work activities and household shocks, willingness to pay, impact of COVID-19 pandemic on work
Family lives Household composition and demographic characteristics, household socio-economic status, household shocks and coping strategies, household transfers and access to public programmes, marital and living arrangements, fertility, exposure to violence, time use, movement history

Health and well-being

For the first time in the Young Lives study, hair samples were collected for the analysis of cortisol levels, as a proxy for the preceding months of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activity, which is commonly implicated in the aetiology of stress and depression [7]. Laboratory analysis is currently underway [8]. Additionally, we incorporated a more comprehensive set of mental health and subjective well-being measures through internationally validated instruments—the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ-9), the latter in Ethiopia only [9]. The in-person interview also enabled us to collect anthropometric measures such as completed height for the Younger Cohort as adults, as they were only 15 years old during the last face-to-face interview.

Employment

For the first time, we asked detailed information about the attributes of the participants’ main job during the 7 days prior to the interview (including earnings, working hours, contract, benefits, and social protection) in addition to information on their main occupation over the last 12 months. We included a survey module on willingness to pay for job characteristics with the aim of understanding the non-wage attributes that young people value in the workplace [10]. Participants were presented with four hypothetical jobs, each described by three of four randomized job characteristics—working hours, job flexibility, type of contract, and workplace gender composition—along with wages. They were then asked to assign a score to each job and estimate the probability of obtaining each job within 1 year.

Family lives

We also made use of new technologies to administer a self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) in Peru and audio-computer assisted self-interviews (ACASIs) in Ethiopia and India, which involved participants interacting with a computer screen and either reading questions (SAQ) or hearing questions through headphone audio (ACASIs), the latter to facilitate the administration in low-literacy contexts. Using self-administrated tools enables us to ask sensitive questions on exposure to violence, risky behaviours, and sexual health [11]. In Ethiopia, in the context of the armed conflict in Tigray and Amhara, information on individual perceptions of security, violent and traumatic experiences, difficulties in access to services, education, employment, and healthcare due to conflict was collected through ACASIs, with less sensitive questions included as part of the main survey.

What has it found? Key findings and publications

The preliminary findings from Round 7 are summarized below. Table 3 presents findings stratified by cohort and Table 4 presents findings stratified by sex.

Table 3.

Selected characteristics of the study sample in Round 7, stratified by cohort.

Younger Cohort (%)
Older Cohort (%)
Research theme Ethiopia India Peru Ethiopia India Peru
Education and skills
Educational attainment
Currently enrolled in formal education 34.1 31.7 47.5 5.2 2.7 10.4
Completed upper-secondary education 26.3 66.4 91.4 20.6 56.9 86.6
Ever enrolled in post-secondary education 25.1 63.5 68.0 37.2 47.3 59.8
Completed post-secondary education 20.4 33.4 13.7 35.5 42.8 43.3
Health and well-being
Nutrition and food security
Underweight 22.9 24.0 2.0 17.6 11.6 1.0
Normal 72.6 55.0 56.2 68.8 49.5 32.4
Overweight or obese 4.5 21.0 41.8 13.6 38.9 66.6
At least mild food insecurity 74.1 80.2 59.1 74.5 76.4 54.7
Mental health
Symptoms of at least mild anxiety 21.6 8.9 33.2 25.9 14.0 33.0
Symptoms of at least mild depression 15.6 9.8 29.8 18.7 10.7 21.2
Symptoms of at least moderate stress 61.8 59.0 71.6 63.1 59.1 65.7
Gender gap for at least mild anxiety 0.5 4.2 18.5 1.5 12.3 16.5
Employment
Labour market and job quality
Employed in week before survey 55.1 54.4 67.6 61.2 76.5 84.7
Gender gap in employment week before survey 29.5 33.6 18.3 38.1 36.4 21.2
Has a written contract 9.7 6.7 22.2 28.6 8.2 36.3
Worked in week before survey with written contract 9.5 6.5 21.6 27.5 8.1 35.7
Education and employment
Studying only 18.2 16.2 11.3 2.1 0.8 1.0
Studying and working 14.2 13.1 33.7 2.6 1.7 9.2
Working only 51.4 49.8 49.1 69.7 78.5 82.2
Not in education, employment, or training (NEET) 16.2 20.9 5.8 25.5 19.0 7.5
Family lives
Family formation
Ever married/cohabited by Round 7 12.7 24.6 27.4 56.1 74.9 66.5
Gender gap for marriage/cohabitation before legal age 4.2 9.4 7.2 12.5 18.3 14.2
Being parent 9.4 16.1 22.0 47.4 59.9 56.3
Gender gap for parenthood before age 19 years, % 6.4 17.0 14.8 12.9 26.0 22.1
Experienced any form of intimate-partner violence 18.4 33.3 28.1 21.9 24.3 33.1
Risky behaviours
Ever smoked 7.8 10.0 47.0 13.3 9.9 11.3
Ever drank heavily 9.3 3.8 49.8 14.7 4.3 61.4
Ever consumed any illegal drugs 5.1 2.0 14.3 8.9 1.5 16.1

Table 4.

Selected characteristics of the study sample in Round 7, stratified by sex.

Women (%)
Men (%)
Research theme Ethiopia India Peru Ethiopia India Peru
Education and skills
Educational attainment
Currently enrolled in formal education 28.4 19.2 42.1 21.9 25.5 35.6
Completed upper-secondary education 22.7 49.3 78.6 18.9 50.7 81.9
Ever enrolled in post-secondary education 33.9 51.9 68.7 24.4 64.3 63.4
Completed post-secondary education 30.2 33.0 22.7 20.4 39.5 18.5
Health and well-being
Nutrition and food security
Underweight 23.4 24.5 2.4 19.5 16.3 1.5
Normal 68.2 51.0 53.1 74.3 55.2 59.4
Overweight or obese 8.4 24.6 44.6 6.1 28.6 39.0
At least mild food insecurity 74.6 75.6 62.4 73.9 82.1 53.6
Mental health
Symptoms of at least mild anxiety 22.9 14.2 42.1 22.9 7.1 24.1
Symptoms of at least mild depression 17.9 12.3 35.2 15.4 8.0 20.3
Symptoms of at least moderate stress 64.1 57.8 78.2 60.4 60.1 62.2
Employment
Labour market and job quality
Employed in week before survey 41.2 44.0 61.9 73.4 77.4 81.4
Has a written contract 22.9 8.0 25.3 12.8 7.0 26.9
Worked in week before survey with written contract 21.7 7.9 24.5 12.6 6.8 26.2
Education and employment
Studying only 18.4 13.3 9.9 8.5 9.4 7.9
Studying and working 8.6 3.7 30.0 12.3 14.9 26.0
Working only 43.0 46.9 48.9 70.1 69.9 65.0
Not in education, employment, or training (NEET) 30.0 36.1 11.1 9.0 5.8 1.1
Family lives
Family formation
Ever married/cohabited by Round 7 36.8 61.9 45.3 16.5 20.8 27.5
Marriage/cohabitation before legal age 7.3 16.8 11.1 0.5 4.2 2.4
Being parent 32.3 47.9 39.8 11.0 13.6 20.0
Parenthood before age 19 years 10.6 21.0 23.8 2.2 0.9 7.5
Experienced any form of intimate-partner violence 22.9 32.0 34.6 25.9 35.3 23.9
Risky behaviours
Ever smoked 6.0 3.5 31.6 12.7 15.9 63.6
Ever drank heavily 4.0 0.5 41.2 17.2 7.3 64.0
Ever consumed any illegal drugs 2.7 2.1 8.9 9.5 1.5 20.7

Education and skills

An increasing number of young people are completing upper-secondary education. In India, upper-secondary completion had improved over the last 7 years; at age 22 years, 66.4% of the Younger Cohort had completed upper secondary (Grade 12) compared with 56.9% of the Older Cohort at age 22 years [12]. In Peru, 91.4% of the Younger Cohort had completed upper secondary (Grade 11) by 2023 compared with 86.6% of the Older Cohort in 2016 [13]. In Ethiopia, around a quarter of the Younger Cohort had completed upper secondary (Grade 12) by age 22 years; university enrolment declined due to armed conflict and a change in the university entrance exam [14]. In Peru, Younger Cohort participants who scored highest in reading comprehension tests were more likely to be enrolled in or to have completed university; improvement in reading comprehension skills between ages 15 and 22 years corresponded to educational attainment during the same period [13]. By contrast, a stagnation was observed in India; more schooling years and higher secondary-school completion rates overall did not translate into an improvement in reading comprehension skills between ages 15 and 22 years [12]. Similarly, in Ethiopia, the reading comprehension test performance did not improve between ages 15 and 22 years for the Younger Cohort, even for those who had completed upper secondary and were enrolled in tertiary education [14].

Health and well-being

In India and Peru, mental health indicators have worsened for women since the COVID-19 pandemic compared with men, consistently with global trends. Indicators of mental health and subjective well-being tend to be lower among socio-economically disadvantaged groups in Ethiopia and India; the opposite is true in Peru [9]. All three countries show high rates of at least mild food insecurity, similarly to global trends; most households are moderately or severely food-insecure [15]. Early-life inequalities are associated with high food insecurity, but they could also be partially explained by economic and food system crises after COVID-19. In Peru, the prevalence of those overweight or obese is high and has increased over time [16].

Employment

There is a persistent gender gap in the distribution of work; women are less likely to be employed than men and spend more time on unpaid care work that relies upon and reinforces gender-based inequalities (Table 4) [17–19]. In Peru, the gender gap in employment has widened for the Younger Cohort since the COVID-19 pandemic [17]; in India, it has remained persistently high but unchanged [19]. The prevalence of those not in education, employment, or training (NEET) has increased in the Younger Cohort at age 22 years compared with the Older Cohort at age 22 years, particularly in Ethiopia [18]. In both Ethiopia and Peru, a higher proportion of the Older Cohort are classified as NEET compared with the Younger Cohort. Overall, women are much more likely to be classified as NEET than men, with the absolute difference ranging from 10.0% in Peru to 21.0% in Ethiopia and 30.3% in India.

Family lives

Across all three countries, women are more likely to experience early marriage and early parenthood than men, although the proportion of women who are married, cohabiting, or are parents before the legal age or by age 22 years has decreased in the Younger Cohort compared with the Older Cohort (Table 4) [17–19]. Young people from poorer, disadvantaged groups are more likely to experience early marriage and early parenthood. In Ethiopia, participants in conflict-affected regions of Tigray and Amhara reported higher exposure to shocks, such as the disruption of public services and utilities, interruption in access to the communication infrastructure, worse mental health, nutrition, and food security, and increasingly precarious labour and education conditions [14, 15, 18, 20]. This has caused a decline in upper-secondary completion and enrolment in tertiary education [14].

The emerging findings from >20 years of the study are summarized in our thematic legacy reports on education and skills, health and well-being, employment, and family lives, released in March 2026 (https://www.younglives.org.uk/publications). Notable findings since the publication of the last Cohort Profile Update include:

Education and skills: early-life exposure to rainfall shocks in Peru impedes the development of foundational cognitive skills, particularly during the in utero period, and negatively affects household food security and early nutritional status [21]. Public works programmes and social protection schemes can attenuate the adverse effects of early-childhood poverty and negative shocks on the development of foundational cognitive skills [22, 23]. Foundational cognitive skills at age 12 years predict educational attainment (secondary-school completion and university enrolment) through adolescence and into young adulthood [24].

Health and well-being: food insecurity increased during the COVID-19 pandemic [25], with food-insecure households reporting higher rates of symptoms consistent with depression and anxiety across all four Young Lives countries [26]. In Ethiopia, the outbreak of violent armed conflict in November 2020 worsened mental health problems. The rates of anxiety were three times higher than those pre-conflict. The rates of depression increased substantially from 16% to 25%; males reported greater increases in anxiety and females reported greater increases in depression [27]. Round 5 of the qualitative study in Peru, conducted in 2023, revealed that mental health problems were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown, particularly for women, who experienced higher levels of stress and anxiety, compounded by additional unpaid care work and domestic responsibilities, an increase in gender-based violence, and the loss of educational and employment opportunities [28, 29]. Younger participants tended to report greater emotional distress and uncertainty during and after the pandemic, whereas older participants often highlighted coping strategies linked to family support, employment stability, or personal goals. Furthermore, social stigma, lack of social protection, and barriers to accessible and high-quality mental health services deter young people from seeking help or treatment [9].

Employment: in Vietnam, job loss owing to the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to a 5.9% rise in the probability of experiencing symptoms of mild or severe anxiety [30]. By the end of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic had contributed to a widening of the gender employment gap by 18.0% in India, 17.5% in Peru, and 9.5% Vietnam. The unequal distribution of care work within households explained between 15.8% (Vietnam) and 21.1% (Peru) of this change [31].

What are the main strengths and weaknesses?

Strengths

The main strengths of the Young Lives study are related to the multinational sample and diversity of the populations included, which enhance the external validity of our findings to other contexts in the global south. The mixed-methods design, featuring qualitative, semi-structured interviews with a subset of participants in addition to the main survey, ensures a comprehensive, holistic approach to investigating the long-term effects of childhood poverty and supporting policy recommendations. This is evidenced by lived-experience accounts from Round 5 of the qualitative study in Peru, which complemented findings from the main survey to reveal how persisting gender and socio-economic inequalities were amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic [29]. Furthermore, the dual cohort design enables comparisons between two groups of participants born 7 years apart and hence comparisons of outcomes across years.

The Young Lives study has had low attrition rates over >20 years of data collection, with 81% of the original sample participating in Round 7. Another strength is the ability to adapt to the context and circumstances, enhancing the quality and cultural appropriateness of the data collected. For example, in Round 7, participants were offered different language options and questionnaires were translated into local languages. In Ethiopia, the survey could be conducted either in Amharic, Oromo, or Tigrinya, in English or Telugu in India, and in Spanish in Peru. Furthermore, ACASIs proved to be an effective tool for collecting sensitive information on participants’ exposure to violence by assuring privacy and confidentiality [11, 32]. The ACASIs were recorded in local languages with male/female voices matched to the sex of the participant [11].

Finally, Young Lives offers opportunities for data linkages, enabling research into how compounding crises shape the life course. We recently launched the new Young Lives Research Hub on Climate Change and Environmental Shocks, with the aim of delivering new research on how life-course exposure to climate shocks impact young people’s development and well-being in the global south (https://www.younglives.org.uk/news/global-climate-summit).

Weaknesses

The Young Lives study is not nationally representative, although it captures ethnically and linguistically diverse populations. The study does not follow participants who move across national borders, presenting a disadvantage when investigating migration, which tends to increase at our participants’ current life stage [4]. While the overall attrition rate between Rounds 1 and 7 is relatively low compared with those of other cohort studies, during Round 7, we observed a larger attrition rate in Ethiopia due to the ongoing armed conflict in Tigray and Amhara, and less severe conflict across all regions. However, we minimized conflict-related attrition by administering a phone survey, featuring a shortened form of the Round 7 survey instrument, in which 8.7% of observed participants from Ethiopia took part. Nonetheless, the attrition rate in Ethiopia is still larger than those in other countries. Additionally, due to changes in international data-transfer laws in Vietnam, we were unable to conduct Round 7 there.

Can I get hold of the data? Where can I find out more?

Data from Round 7 of the Young Lives study are publicly available through the UK Data Service (https://datacatalogue.ukdataservice.ac.uk/series/series/2000060#access-data) (4 May 2026, date last accessed). For further information, the Young Lives study team can be contacted at younglives@qeh.ox.ac.uk.

Ethics approval

Ethics approvals for the Young Lives study were obtained by the Social Sciences and Humanities Inter-Divisional Research Ethics Committee (SSH IDREC) at the University of Oxford: in October 2022 (Ref.: SSH/ODID_C1A_22_088); in April 2023 (Ref.: R85604/RE001); in February 2024 (Ref.: C1A_23_002). The study was also approved in each study country: in Ethiopia, approval was granted by the National Research Ethics Review Board of the Ethiopian Ministry of Education (Ref.:17/152/702/23) and the College of Education and Behavioural Studies Institutional Review Committee, Addis Ababa University (Ref.: CEBS_IRC/009/2023); in India by the Centre for Economic and Social Studies in Hyderabad and the Institutional Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research at the Institute of Genetics & Hospital for Genetics Diseases (Ref.:766/1/IG/IECBR/2023); and in Peru by the Instituto de Investigación Nutricional (Ref.:N°053–2023/CIEI-IIN). Study participants were asked for their informed consent to participate in the study and additional consent was required for additional survey components (reading comprehension test, self-administered questionnaire, hair samples, computerized cognitive tasks, and anthropometrics). All respondents received a consultation guide that included information about physical and mental health, and information and contact details of local public resources available to provide support if needed. Additionally, they received small economic compensation for their time, considering that the opportunity cost for our adult participants is higher now that they are of working age: ETB 300 (4.5 GBP) in Ethiopia; INR 1250 (10 GBP) in India; and PEN 50 (12 GBP) in Peru.

Acknowledgements

We particularly wish to thank the Young Lives respondents and their families for generously giving us their time and co-operation.

Contributor Information

Marta Favara, Oxford Department of International Development, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Maria De Los Ángeles Molina, Oxford Department of International Development, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Alan Sánchez, Oxford Department of International Development, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo (GRADE), Lima, Peru.

Kauser Mohsini, Oxford Department of International Development, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Tassew Woldehanna, Department of Economics, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Alula Pankhurst, Pankhurst Development Research and Consulting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Ellanki Revathi, Centre for Economic and Social Studies (CESS), Hyderabad, India.

Antonio Campos, Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo (GRADE), Lima, Peru.

Katherine Curi-Quinto, Instituto de Investigación Nutricional (IIN), Lima, Peru.

Vanessa Rojas, Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo (GRADE), Lima, Peru.

Author contributions

M.F., M.M., A.S., and K.M. conceptualized the Cohort Profile Update, M.M. and K.M. analysed the data, and K.M. drafted the manuscript. M.F., A.S., and M.M. led the design of the Round 7 survey with contributions from all investigators. T.W. and A.P. were the investigators on-site during Round 7 in Ethiopia, E.R. in India, and A.S., A.C., K.C.Q., and V.R. in Peru. M.M. led data curation. All authors revised the manuscript and approved its content.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Funding

This paper was supported by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), which has been funding the Young Lives flagship research program, Young Lives at Work (grant number: 200425), since 2019. Previously, Young Lives was core-funded by UK Department for International Development (DFID, grant number R 8503) until 2018. Additional funding from the Wellcome Trust and the Old Dart Foundation (Peru) is gratefully acknowledged.

Data availability

The data underlying this article are available in the UK Data Service, at http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-9538-1.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article are available in the UK Data Service, at http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-9538-1.


Articles from International Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES