Skip to main content
Current Cardiology Reviews logoLink to Current Cardiology Reviews
. 2025 Jul 31;22(3):E1573403X354415. doi: 10.2174/011573403X354415250727070214

Assessing ECG Findings in Pediatric COVID-19 Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis

Mohammadreza Naghibi 1, Shirin Sadat Ghiasi 2, Rasoul Raesi 3,4, Feisal Rahimpour 5,*
PMCID: PMC13273752  PMID: 40755108

Abstract

Introduction

COVID-19 can be associated with varying degrees of cardiac involvement in children, such that myocardial damage can be caused directly by the COVID-19 virus itself or systemic inflammation caused by the infection. The present study was conducted with the aim of evaluating ECG findings in children with COVID-19.

Methods

This is a prospective cross-sectional study that was conducted by census method on 764 children with COVID-19 in hospitals related to Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2022. The data were extracted using a checklist including clinical information and medical records of the patients and analyzed using descriptive and statistical tests.

Results

764 children with COVID-19 were examined, of which 385 (51%) were male. The studied patients included MISC (25.9%), Kawasaki-like disease (0.3%), pulmonary (12.7%), and gastrointestinal (2%) involvements. More than half of the patients (58%, 444 patients) showed changes in echocardiography findings, including mitral valve insufficiency, dilation of one or more cardiac chambers, and pericardial effusion. 98.8% of patients had NAX. AVB grade I was found in 26 patients (3.4%). Abnormal ST-T segments were observed in 25 patients (3.3%). The prevalence rate of S wave fragmentation was 2.8% (21), and fragmented R waves were found in 13 patients (1.7%).

Discussion

Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) had a higher amount of disorder for each parameter change. Additionally, a significant association was found between the higher occurrence of AV node block and arrhythmia with clinical status (p<0.05), with the same higher rate in patients kept in the ICU.

Conclusion

ECG findings can be used to predict the presence or absence of myocardial involvement as well as its severity. Furthermore, patients with changes in ST-T fQRS and PR interval are more likely to experience cardiac involvement, which could result in a poorer prognosis.

Keywords: Electrocardiogram, pediatric, COVID-19, myocardium, heart failure, S wave fragmentation

1. INTRODUCTION

During the COVID-19 pandemic, varying degrees of cardiac involvement have been observed in children, ranging from mild pericardial inflammation to more severe conditions such as coronary artery aneurysms, cardiomyopathy, and even death [1-3]. While echocardiography is the preferred diagnostic method for evaluating the heart, it may not be readily available in all healthcare settings and can impose a significant socioeconomic burden on the healthcare system [4, 5]. As a result, electrocardiograms (ECGs) have emerged as a simple and accessible screening tool for COVID-19 patients [6, 7]. The novel coronavirus, which was first reported in China in December 2019, has rapidly spread across the globe and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization [5, 8]. It has been well-documented that COVID-19 impacts the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts, and also has negative effects on the cardiovascular system [8-10]. Previous reports suggest that myocardial damage can be caused directly by the virus itself or systemic inflammation [10, 11]. Moreover, people with a history of cardiovascular disease are more susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Several studies have shown that COVID-19 is more lethal in individuals who have had heart damage during the time of infection or who have a previous history of heart disease [12, 13]. Therefore, it is crucial to predict the negative effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the cardiovascular system and detect myocardial damage early on [14, 15].

Several studies have demonstrated a link between myocardial scarring caused by coronary artery disease (CAD) and the presence of fQRS. The presence of fragmented waves (fQRS) within the QRS complex on a standard electrocardiogram (ECG) indicates a ventricular conduction disorder and suggests heart damage caused by other diseases [16-18]. The location of fQRS on the ECG is strongly correlated with the location of the scar in the left ventricle [19, 20]. Compared to other ECG ischemia markers, fQRS is more sensitive in detecting myocardial fibrosis by SPECT imaging in patients with CAD. ECG is an inexpensive and user-friendly diagnostic tool that poses a lower risk of infection transmission compared to other methods like transesophageal echocardiography and MRI, especially during a pandemic [21, 22]. Detection of fQRS on ECG can facilitate early, practical, and safe diagnosis of myocardial damage during the COVID-19 period [19, 23, 24]. Early detection of cardiac involvement in children can significantly improve clinical outcomes for this patient group. While echocardiography remains the preferred method for heart assessment, its limited availability and high costs make ECG a crucial tool for rapid, accessible, and cost-effective screening. Given the current lack of sufficient data regarding ECG features in children with COVID-19 and their link to clinical outcomes, coupled with the fact that children may not always present with obvious clinical signs of cardiac involvement, utilizing ECG can help identify hidden cases and prevent more serious complications. Furthermore, most existing studies have focused on small cohorts or lacked correlation with clinical outcomes and echocardiographic findings. This gap is critical because children often present with subtle or atypical cardiac symptoms, increasing the risk of underdiagnosis and delayed intervention. Through a comprehensive examination of ECG changes in children with COVID-19, this study aims to pinpoint specific patterns indicative of cardiac involvement, facilitating early diagnosis and timely intervention. This study aimed to investigate ECG findings in children with COVID-19.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Study Design

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted using the census method on 764 children under the age of 18 diagnosed with COVID-19. The study took place in hospitals affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2022. The decision to include pediatric patients under 18 years of age was based on two key considerations: the age range aligns with previous relevant studies [25], and in our institution and regional practice, conventional pediatric services are typically provided to patients up to the age of 18.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria for this study comprised pediatric patients under 18 years of age diagnosed with COVID-19, confirmed via RT-PCR and imaging. Patients with negative COVID-19 results were excluded due to the small sample size, and those with incomplete or invalid data were also excluded to ensure the reliability of the findings.

2.3. Data Collection

COVID-19 testing was performed according to WHO protocol, with nasopharyngeal swabs collected from all patients. RNA SARS-CoV-2 was detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and confirmed by chest X-ray and computed tomography. Demographic variables (age and sex), clinical data, and laboratory tests were recorded in hospital files. The presence of any ECG abnormality was defined as the presence of one or more of the following abnormalities: non-sinus rhythm, atrioventricular block, QRS ≥ 90 ms, ST changes, negative T wave, cQT ≥ 440, pathologic Q/QS, or the presence of PAC or PVCs. Prognosis, mortality rate, number of hospitalization days, and clinical condition at the time of discharge were recorded. In this study, QT intervals were measured manually from the onset of the QRS complex to the end of the T wave. The corrected QT (QTc) interval was calculated using Bazett’s formula (QTc = QT / √RR), a widely accepted method for QT [26]. In this study, all ECGs were performed using standardized 12-lead ECG machines with pediatric-specific settings, in accordance with the guidelines recommended by the American Heart Association (AHA), which emphasize the importance of high sampling frequency, appropriate filter settings, and accurate interpretation of ECGs in children. These standards are outlined in international guidelines for recording and interpreting ECGs in pediatric populations. Additionally, all ECG interpretations in this study were conducted by a pediatric cardiologist and arrhythmia specialist.

2.4. Data Analysis

Mean and standard deviation were reported for continuous variables, while numbers and ratios were reported for discrete variables. Continuous variables were compared using analysis of variance, while ratios were compared using Fisher's exact test or chi-square test. Multivariate regression was used for discrete variables, and a generalized linear model was used for continuous variables. ECG variables were adjusted for clinical and laboratory variables that showed a statistically significant or borderline difference (p ≤ 0.1) between the two groups.

The analysis consisted of two parts: descriptive and analytical. Prevalence and median quartiles for numerical variables were reported, with all variables having a normal distribution. Analytically, variables were first compared between the positive and negative groups.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients

A total of 764 pediatric patients with COVID-19, with a median BMI of 18.3 ± 18.07, were referred for cardiovascular evaluation. Among these, 385 (51%) were male, and 379 (49%) were female. The majority of patients (94.4%) were admitted to the general ward, while 3.7% were in the ICU, and 1.9% were outpatients. Based on clinical criteria, patients were classified into the following categories: Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MISC) (25.9%), Kawasaki-like disease (0.3%), pulmonary involvement (12.7%), and gastrointestinal involvement (2%). Additionally, 59.1% of patients with positive COVID-19 PCR results were clinically asymptomatic (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics.

Characteristic Value/Percentage Description
Total Patients 764 Pediatric Patients with COVID-19
Gender
Male 385 (51%) -
Female 379 (49%) -
BMI
Median BMI 18.3 ± 18.07 -
Admission Location
General Ward 721 (94.4%) -
ICU 28 (3.7%) -
Outpatient 15 (1.9%) -
Clinical Classification
MISC 198 (25.9%) -
Kawasaki-like Disease 2 (0.3%) -
Pulmonary Involvement 97 (12.7%) -
Gastrointestinal Involvement 15 (2%) -
Clinical Status
Asymptomatic 451 (59.1%) Patients with positive PCR but no clinical symptoms

3.2. Laboratory and ECG Findings

Laboratory findings revealed that CKMB levels were greater than 24 u/liter in 10 patients (1.3%), and TPi was positive in 11 patients (1.5%). High D-dimer levels (>500) were observed in 63 patients (78.8%). ECG abnormalities included normal axis (NAX) in 98.8% of patients, right axis deviation (RAD) in 0.7%, left axis deviation (LAD) in 0.1%, right conduction delay in 0.1%, and left conduction delay in 0.3%. First-degree AV block (AVB) was found in 26 patients (3.4%), while second-degree AVB and complete heart block (CHB) were observed in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. Abnormal ST-T segments were noted in 25 patients (3.3%). Fragmented S waves were observed in 21 patients (2.8%), and fragmented R waves were found in 13 patients (1.7%) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Laboratory and ECG findings.

Parameter Value/Percentage
CKMB > 24 u/liter 10 (1.3%)
TPi Positive 11 (1.5%)
High D-dimer (>500) 63 (78.8%)
ECG Abnormalities -
Normal Axis (NAX) 755 (98.8%)
Right Axis Deviation (RAD) 5 (0.7%)
Left Axis Deviation (LAD) 1 (0.1%)
Right Conduction Delay 1 (0.1%)
Left Conduction Delay 2 (0.3%)
First-degree AV Block 26 (3.4%)
Second-degree AV Block 1 (0.1%)
Complete Heart Block (CHB) 2 (0.3%)
ST-T Changes 25 (3.3%)
Fragmented S Waves 21 (2.8%)
Fragmented R Waves 13 (1.7%)

3.3. Echocardiography Findings

More than half of the patients (58%, 444 patients) showed changes in echocardiography findings, including mitral valve insufficiency, dilation of one or more cardiac chambers, and pericardial effusion. These changes were more prevalent in patients admitted to the ICU (Table 3).

Table 3.

Echocardiography findings.

Echocardiography Findings Number/Percentage
Echocardiographic Changes 444 (58%)
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Dilation of Cardiac Chambers
Pericardial Effusion

3.4. Association of Findings with Disease Severity and Clinical Status

No significant correlation was found between age or gender and disease severity. However, a significant relationship was observed between general health condition and prolonged PR interval, as well as increased QRS duration (p < 0.05). Patients hospitalized in the ICU had a higher prevalence of ECG abnormalities, including AV node block, arrhythmias, ST-T changes, and fragmented S and R waves (p < 0.05). Echocardiographic changes were also significantly associated with ICU admission (P = 0.02) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Association of findings with disease severity.

Finding Association with Severity
Prolonged PR Interval (p < 0.05)
Increased QRS Duration (p < 0.05)
AV Node Block and Arrhythmias (p < 0.05)
ST-T Changes (p < 0.05)
Fragmented S and R Waves (p < 0.05)
Echocardiographic Changes (p = 0.02)

Table 5 presents the distribution of various arrhythmias observed in pediatric COVID-19 patients. Sinus tachycardia was the most common arrhythmia, occurring in 96 patients (12.7%), likely reflecting the body's stress response to infection or inflammation. Atrioventricular block (AVB) was observed in 29 patients (4.2%), suggesting potential conduction system abnormalities due to myocardial inflammation or ischemia. Sinus bradycardia, though less common, was noted in 10 patients (1.3%), possibly indicating autonomic dysfunction or direct effects on the sinoatrial node. Premature atrial contractions (PAC) and premature ventricular contractions (PVC) were rare, each occurring in 3 patients (0.4%), which may point to minor myocardial irritation or electrolyte imbalances. Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and atrial tachycardia (AT) were very rare, with SVT observed in 1 patient (0.1%) and AT in 2 patients (0.3%), indicating occasional severe electrical instability in the atria. Early repolarization, sinus arrhythmia, atrial rhythm, and atrial parasystole were also rare (≤0.3%), with early repolarization and sinus arrhythmia typically being benign findings.

Table 5.

Dysrhythmia distribution on electrocardiogram in studied patients.

Arrhythymia Frequency Percent
AVB 29 4.2
Sinus tachycardia 96 12.7
Premature Atrial Contractions (PAC) 3 0.4
Premature ventricular contractions (PVC) 3 0.4
Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) 1 0.1
Atrial tachycardia (AT) 2 0.3
Sinus bradycardia 10 1.3
Early repolarization 1 0.1
Sinus arrhythmia 1 0.1
Atrial rhythm 2 0.3
Atrial parasystol 1 0.1

Table 6 presents the distribution of S-wave and R-wave fragmentations observed on electrocardiograms (ECGs) in pediatric COVID-19 patients. For S-wave fragmentation, the majority of patients (724, 97.2%) had normal findings, while minor fragmentation was observed in specific leads: lead I (2 patients, 0.3%), lead III (1 patient, 0.1%), lead V (5 patients, 0.7%), and combinations of leads such as I/II (1 patient, 0.1%), II/III (6 patients, 0.8%), I/II/III (2 patients, 0.3%), and others (each ≤0.1%). Similarly, for R-wave fragmentation, 735 patients (97%) had normal findings, with minor fragmentation observed in lead II (2 patients, 0.3%), lead III (1 patient, 0.1%), lead V (3 patients, 0.4%), and combinations of leads such as III/IVL (2 patients, 0.3%), aVL/IVF (1 patient, 0.1%), III/LVF (1 patient, 0.1%), and II/III/I/AVF (3 patients, 0.4%).

Table 6.

The distribution of fragmentations on cardiac electrocardiogram.

Fragmentations on
Cardiac Electrocardiogram
Frequency Percent
S wave
Fragmentation
Normal 724 97.2
I 2 0.3
III 1 0.1
V 5 0.7
I/II 1 0.1
II/III 6 0.8
I/ll/lll 2 0.3
I/II/avl 1 0.1
Fragmented S in V2-4 1 0.1
II,III,AVF,V3-6 1 0.1
I,II,III,AVF 1 0.1
R wave
Fragmentation
Normal 735 97
II 2 0.3
III 1 0.1
V 3 0.4
III/IVL 2 0.3
aVL/IVF 1 0.1
III/LVF 1 0.1
II/III/I/AVF 3 0.4

4. DISCUSSION

This study aimed to investigate ECG findings in children with COVID-19. Electrocardiography is a widely used non-invasive diagnostic procedure that provides rapid results for evaluating cardiovascular health, particularly for diagnosing myocardial ischemia and cardiac arrhythmia. A basic ECG was conducted before treatment and during follow-up to assess the impact of COVID-19 severity on ECG parameters, including arrhythmia, blocks, ST-T changes, and the presence of fQRS. Upon examining changes in ECG waveforms in our COVID-19 patients, we noted that the PR interval, which refers to increased conduction time, indicated a first-degree AV block. We observed that AV block, a disorder of the conduction pathway from the SA node to the ventricle, was most commonly seen in cases of atrial myocardial inflammation, while changes in other ECG parameters were similar to those observed in the general population. Our study revealed a significant correlation between an increased PR interval and disease severity in our population, the majority of whom were hospitalized in the ICU. Hassan et al. reported a lower prevalence of PR changes (2%) than ours and no significant relationship with COVID-19 severity. However, our higher sample population may improve the final result [27]. Similar to recent literature, sinus tachycardia was the most common arrhythmia following viral infections. Additionally, a complete AV block required special cardiac care and a transient pacemaker, changing to 2nd degree wenckebach block and then sinus rhythm [27, 28]. An increase in S and R waves' fragmentation was significantly related to clinical status, with a substantial change in our patients, similar to the literature, who were hospitalized in an ICU [27]. The observed AV blocks—some progressing to complete heart block requiring transient pacing—suggest direct viral injury to conduction pathways or ischemia from systemic inflammation. This finding underscores ECG’s utility in stratifying high-risk pediatric cases, as PR interval abnormalities may precede overt cardiac dysfunction.

The fQRS is either a predictor of various cardiovascular events reflecting non-specific depolarization of the myocardium or an electrocardiographic indicator for myocardial fibrosis. The prognostic importance of fQRS has been studied in patients with myocardial infarction, ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies [28, 29]. In pediatric COVID-19, fQRS may signal subclinical myocardial scar formation due to microangiopathy or cytokine storm-induced damage. Its association with ICU admission reinforces its prognostic value, advocating for fQRS screening to identify children at risk of progressive cardiac involvement, even in the absence of symptoms.

The ST segment is the interval between ventricular depolarization and repolarization. The most significant cause of ST segment abnormalities, whether it is elevation or depression, is myocardial ischemia/infarction. ST depression caused by subendocardial ischemia is most prominent in left precordial leads V4-6, as well as leads I, II, and aVL. According to the Framingham study, the prevalence of ST-T changes was 8.5% in men and 7.7% in women. Additionally, morbidity and mortality of CAD were reported to be two-fold increased in these cases. ST changes indicate heart damage and can be used as a prognostic indicator in these patients. The exact cause of ECG changes in patients with COVID-19 remains unknown. However, several possible mechanisms have been proposed for cardiac involvement associated with COVID-19. Firstly, the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE-II), which is detected in high concentrations in the heart and lungs, has been defined as a functional receptor for coronaviruses. Myocardial damage caused by hypoxemia, myocarditis, microangiopathy, MI, and cardiac involvement and damage associated with cytokine storm may have occurred due to a systemic inflammatory response. COVID-19 patients with ischemic parameters (ST-T changes, arrhythmia, and fQRS) should be monitored for the risk of sudden death. In our study, arrhythmia predictors such as fQRS and repolarization changes (e.g., ST-T changes) were independent predictors of cardiac involvement in COVID-19 patients [29, 30]. Sinus tachycardia-the most common arrhythmia-likely reflects systemic inflammation or compensatory mechanisms. These findings suggest that ischemic ECG patterns in pediatric COVID-19 warrant close monitoring for sudden cardiac events, akin to adult populations. ECG changes can be related to multifactorial pathways, including damage from direct viral invasion through ACE2 receptors that disrupt cardiomyocytes and conduction systems, ischemia from hypoxemia from respiratory failure, and microvascular dysfunction from cytokine storm. Early detection of fQRS or ST-T changes could trigger timely interventions (e.g., anti-inflammatory therapies, cardiac monitoring), potentially mitigating long-term sequelae.

CONCLUSION

The ECG findings, which include ST-T changes, fQRS, and PR interval, are closely linked to the severity of COVID-19. Our study has demonstrated that these ECG findings can be used to predict the presence or absence of myocardial involvement as well as its severity. Furthermore, we have discovered that patients with changes in ST-T and fQRS and PR interval are more likely to experience cardiac involvement, which could result in a poorer prognosis. The study underscores the multifaceted cardiovascular impact of COVID-19 on young patients, emphasizing the need for ongoing cardiovascular evaluations and monitoring. The findings advocate for heightened awareness among healthcare providers regarding the potential for cardiac complications in this demographic, even among asymptomatic individuals. Future research should focus on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in pediatric populations post COVID-19, aiming to establish guidelines for screening and management to mitigate the risk of enduring cardiac issues.

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

This study was conducted only in hospitals affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations or geographic regions. Despite examining 764 children, this number may not be sufficient to identify rare patterns or small differences in diverse populations. The study did not explore other causes of heart disease and rhythm disorders, which may affect the interpretation of the results. This is a cross-sectional study, and long-term follow-up of patients to assess long-term cardiac complications was not conducted. Data were extracted from hospital records, which may include recording errors or incomplete information. The study did not investigate the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on ECG findings, which could influence the results. Patients with varying clinical conditions were included in the study, which may affect ECG findings. Patients with varying disease severity were included, which may lead to differences in ECG findings. Although the study found no significant association between age or gender and disease severity, these factors could still act as confounders. Variability in diagnostic methods: COVID-19 diagnosis was based on RT-PCR and imaging, but there may be differences in the accuracy and sensitivity of these methods. ECG interpretation was performed by a trained physician, but subjective differences in interpretation may exist. Patients may have received various medications that could influence ECG findings, but this was not addressed in the study. Differences in nutritional status and general health among patients may affect ECG findings, but these factors were not controlled for in the study. Pediatric patients may have been treated with medications used in COVID-19 treatment, which could potentially affect the QT interval. This is a limitation of the study, and future research should document and account for the use of such medications when analyzing QT intervals.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES

Conducting studies across multiple centers to enhance the generalizability of results. Investigating long-term cardiac complications in children recovering from COVID-19. Examining the impact of other causes of heart disease and rhythm disorders on ECG findings. Assessing the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on ECG findings and cardiac complications. Better control of confounding factors such as nutritional status, general health, and medications used by patients. Future studies should focus on validating fQRS in children, particularly in the context of COVID-19, to confirm its diagnostic and prognostic utility in this age group.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The study highlights the utility of ECG as a simple, non-invasive, and cost-effective tool for early detection of cardiac involvement in pediatric COVID-19 patients. This can help clinicians identify myocardial damage or inflammation early, even in asymptomatic cases, allowing for timely intervention and potentially improving clinical outcomes.

ECG findings such as ST-T changes, fragmented QRS (fQRS), and prolonged PR interval can serve as markers for risk stratification. Patients with these abnormalities, especially those requiring ICU admission, may need closer monitoring and more aggressive management to prevent severe cardiac complications.

The presence of ECG abnormalities, particularly fQRS and ST-T changes, may indicate a poorer prognosis in pediatric COVID-19 patients. These findings can help clinicians predict the likelihood of cardiac complications and tailor treatment plans accordingly.

ECG can be used as a screening tool for high-risk pediatric patients, such as those with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) or Kawasaki-like disease, to identify hidden cardiac involvement that may not be clinically apparent.

The study suggests that patients admitted to the ICU have a higher prevalence of ECG abnormalities, such as AV node block, arrhythmias, and ST-T changes. This underscores the importance of continuous cardiac monitoring in critically ill pediatric COVID-19 patients to detect and manage life-threatening arrhythmias or conduction disorders promptly.

Given the limited availability and high cost of echocardiography, ECG can serve as a practical alternative for initial cardiac assessment in resource-limited settings. This can reduce the socioeconomic burden on healthcare systems while still providing valuable diagnostic information.

Serial ECG monitoring can help track disease progression and the effectiveness of treatment in pediatric COVID-19 patients with cardiac involvement. Changes in ECG parameters over time can provide insights into the resolution or worsening of myocardial injury.

A significant proportion of pediatric COVID-19 patients in the study were asymptomatic but showed ECG abnormalities. This emphasizes the need for routine ECG screening in children with COVID-19, even in the absence of clinical symptoms, to identify silent myocardial injury.

The findings highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to managing pediatric COVID-19 patients, involving pediatricians, cardiologists, and critical care specialists. Collaboration among these teams can ensure comprehensive care for patients with cardiac complications.

The study provides evidence that can inform the development of clinical guidelines for cardiac monitoring and management in pediatric COVID-19 patients. This is particularly important given the limited data currently available on ECG findings in this population.

The study underscores the need for clinicians to be aware of atypical presentations of cardiac involvement in pediatric COVID-19 patients, such as isolated ECG changes without overt clinical symptoms. This can help prevent missed diagnoses and delayed treatment.

Early identification and management of cardiac involvement in pediatric COVID-19 patients may help prevent long-term complications, such as chronic cardiomyopathy or arrhythmias, improving the overall quality of life for these children.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the honorable Vice-chancellery for Research of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, the honorable officials of hospitals related to Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, the participants, and all the people who helped us in conducting this research.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ACE-II

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2

AVB

Atrioventricular Block

BMI

Body Mass Index

CAD

Coronary Artery Disease

CHB

Complete Heart Block

CKMB

Creatine Kinase-MB

ECG

Electrocardiogram

fQRS

Fragmented QRS

ICU

Intensive Care Unit

LAD

Left Axis Deviation

MISC

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children

NAX

Normal Axis

PAC

Premature Atrial Contraction

PVC

Premature Ventricular Contraction

RAD

Right Axis Deviation

RT-PCR

Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction

SARS-CoV-2

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

SPECT

Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography

SVT

Supraventricular Tachycardia

TPi

Troponin I

WHO

World Health Organization

AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTIONS

The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: MRN; data collection: SSG; data analysis or interpretation: RR; draft manuscript: FR. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

The Institutional Ethics Committee of the Research Deputy at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran approved this research project (IR.MUMS.MEDICAL.REC. 1400.842).

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

First, informed consent was obtained from the parents of children and infants who entered the study. Secondly, considering the principles of secrecy and confidentiality, the parents of the patients were assured that all information would remain confidential and the results will be reported in general.

STANDARDS OF REPORTING

STROBE guidelines were followed.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

FUNDING

This research was done with the financial support of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Grant no. 1400.842).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

DISCLOSURE

During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT in order to check the grammar and improve readability. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and took full responsibility for the content of the publication.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sanna G., Serrau G., Bassareo P.P., Neroni P., Fanos V., Marcialis M.A. Children’s heart and COVID-19: Up-to-date evidence in the form of a systematic review. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2020;179(7):1079–1087. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03699-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sperotto F., Friedman K.G., Son M.B.F., VanderPluym C.J., Newburger J.W., Dionne A. Cardiac manifestations in SARS-CoV-2-associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: A comprehensive review and proposed clinical approach. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2021;180(2):307–322. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03766-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Naghibi M., Raesi R. Understanding the necessity to recognize multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) in emerging infectious diseases based on the lessons learned from COVID-19: A letter to the editor. Open Public Health J. 2024;17(1):e18749445346904. doi: 10.2174/0118749445346904241014093301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodriguez-Gonzalez M., Castellano-Martinez A., Cascales-Poyatos H.M., Perez-Reviriego A.A. Cardiovascular impact of COVID-19 with a focus on children: A systematic review. World J. Clin. Cases. 2020;8(21):5250–5283. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vasichkina E., Alekseeva D., Karev V., et al. Cardiac involvement in children affected by COVID-19: Clinical features and diagnosis. Diagnostics. 2022;13(1):120. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Soleimani A., Soleimani Z. Presentation and outcome of congenital heart disease during COVID-19 pandemic: A review. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2022;47(1):100905. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saed Aldien A., Ganesan G.S., Wahbeh F., et al. Systemic inflammation may induce cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients including children and adolescents without underlying cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review. Cardiovasc. Revasc. Med. 2022;35:169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Raesi R., Khalesi N., Safavi M., Mirzaei A., Alimohammadzadeh K. Identifying the outcomes of healthy lifestyles in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Arch Adv Biosci. 2023;14(1):1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Raesi R., Abbasi Z., Raei M., Hushmandi K. The relationship between the incidence of COVID-19 with the underlying diseases in hospitalized patients. EBNESINA. 2022;24(3):75–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vasichkina E., Alekseeva D., Kudryavtsev I., et al. COVID-19 heart lesions in children: Clinical, diagnostic and immunological changes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(2):1147. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Campanello C., Mercuri C., Derchi M., et al. Cardiovascular manifestations in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19 according to age. Children. 2022;9(5):583. doi: 10.3390/children9050583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abi Nassif T., Fakhri G., Younis N.K., et al. Cardiac manifestations in COVID‐19 patients: A focus on the pediatric population. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2021;2021(1):1–12. doi: 10.1155/2021/5518979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guo T., Fan Y., Chen M., et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):811–818. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cpere N. The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41(2):145–151. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2020.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yildirim A., Karaca I.O., Yilmaz F.K., Gunes H.M., Cakal B. Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiography as a predictor of cardiac mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Electrocardiol. 2021;66:108–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2021.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Michael M.A., El Masry H., Khan B.R., Das M.K. Electrocardiographic signs of remote myocardial infarction. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2007;50(3):198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2007.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pietrasik G., Goldenberg I., Zdzienicka J., Moss A.J., Zareba W. Prognostic significance of fragmented QRS complex for predicting the risk of recurrent cardiac events in patients with Q-wave myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 2007;100(4):583–586. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Das M.K., Saha C., El Masry H., et al. Fragmented QRS on a 12-lead ECG: A predictor of mortality and cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(11):1385–1392. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ratheendran A.C., Subramanian M., Bhanu D.K., et al. Fragmented QRS on electrocardiography as a predictor of myocardial scar in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Acta Cardiol. 2020;75(1):42–46. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1547355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Das M.K., Khan B., Jacob S., Kumar A., Mahenthiran J. Significance of a fragmented QRS complex versus a Q wave in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2006;113(21):2495–2501. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nicoara A., Maldonado Y., Kort S., Swaminathan M., Mackensen G.B. Specific considerations for the protection of patients and echocardiography service providers when performing perioperative or periprocedural transesophageal echocardiography during the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak: Council on perioperative echocardiography supplement to the statement of the american society of echocardiography endorsed by the society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2020;33(6):666–669. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sonaglioni A., Lombardo M., Nicolosi G.L., Gensini G.F., Ambrosio G. Mechanical concordance between left atrium and left atrial appendage in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Can it be exploited to avoid transesophageal echocardiography prior to electrical cardioversion during COVID-19 pandemic? Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2022;38(2):351–362. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02414-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bendary A., Saad Abdelmaged I., Mohamed A., Abdelmoneum M. The predictive value of fragmented QRS complex in diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. Benha Med. J. 2025;42(2):35–47. doi: 10.21608/bmfj.2023.252371.1967. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tobing A. Significance of fragmented QRS as A valuable marker of myocardial damage on SPECT Myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur. Heart J. Suppl. 2018 [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dong Y., Mo X., Hu Y., et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 among children in China. Pediatrics. 2020;145(6):e20200702. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Postema P.G., De Jong J.S.S.G., Van der Bilt I.A.C., Wilde A.A.M. Accurate electrocardiographic assessment of the QT interval: Teach the tangent. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(7):1015–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Barman H.A., Atici A., Alici G., et al. The effect of the severity COVID-19 infection on electrocardiography. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2021;46:317–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rahimpour F., Yaghubi M., Ghasemi R., Maleki M.H. Complete atrioventricular block complicated with cardiogenic shock as primary manifestation of a novel coronavirus infection in a child: A rare case report. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2021;23(6):e672. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Güngör B., Özcan K.S., Karataş M.B., Şahin İ., Öztürk R., Bolca O. Prognostic value of QRS fragmentation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta‐analysis. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016;21(6):604–612. doi: 10.1111/anec.12357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Turner A.J., Hiscox J.A., Hooper N.M. ACE2: From vasopeptidase to SARS virus receptor. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2004;25(6):291–294. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2004.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Current Cardiology Reviews are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES