ABSTRACT
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with a complex aetiology involving genetic, environmental (such as diet/lifestyle), and microbiota factors. The exact pathogenesis of IBD remains unclear, and current therapies show limited effectiveness. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a novel class of noncoding RNAs that have been implicated in the regulation of various biological processes. Many circRNAs show specific expression profiles in IBD patients and play important roles in IBD pathogenesis through different signalling pathways, such as the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathways. Although research on circRNAs in IBD is still in its early stages, many circRNAs have emerged as potential diagnostic, prognostic biomarkers, and therapeutic targets for IBD. Here, we summarize the molecular functions and underlying mechanisms of circRNAs in IBD and discuss current challenges and future perspectives for clinical applications.
KEYWORDS: Inflammatory bowel disease, Circular RNA, pathway, intestinal epithelial homoeostasis, biomarker
Introduction
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract that is associated with poor quality of life and economic burden of patients worldwide. Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are the main types of IBD [1]. The global burden of IBD is projected to increase over the next two decades, driven by rising incidence and prevalence [2]. It is hypothesized that the rapid increase in the number of IBD patients is associated with the Western dietary pattern and modern lifestyle [3]. The exact aetiology of IBD remains complex and multifactorial, involving interactions between genetics, environmental exposures, and the gut microbiota [4;5]. The main therapeutic goal for IBD patients is to induce and maintain disease remission. With the approval of the first biological drug, infliximab, deep remission has been pursued, including endoscopic mucosal healing, histological, and transmural healing [6–8]. The pharmacotherapy of IBD includes traditional drugs (5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators, etc.), biologics (anti-TNF: Infliximab, Adalimumab; anti-α4β7 integrin: Vedolizumab; anti-IL-12/IL-23: Ustekinumab; anti-IL-23: Risankizumab), and small molecules (JAK inhibitors: Tofacitinib, Filgotinib, Upadacitinib; S1P: Ozanimod, Etrasimod) [9–13]. The selection of IBD treatment should be individually determined by various factors, including disease severity, location, complications, patients’ choice, and drug-related factors (medical history, therapeutic drug monitoring, cost, safety, administration, etc.). However, only 40–60% of IBD patients achieve clinical remission after individual treatments [14,15]. Therefore, many studies have reported some reasonable alternatives for refractory and severe IBD patients, including dose optimization, combination therapy with a thiopurine or methotrexate and anti-TNF, and the combination of two biological therapies, such as anti-TNF plus vedolizumab and vedolizumab plus ustekinumab [16,17]. The improvements and breakthroughs in IBD treatment still require more exploration.
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a novel class of noncoding RNAs that have attracted significant attention in recent years [18,19]. Unlike their linear counterparts, circRNAs have no 5’ caps or 3’ polarity and are characterized by the covalently closed-loop structure, which results from the back-splicing of pre-mRNAs. Due to the unique structure, circRNAs are more resistant to degradation and more stable than linear RNAs. In addition, circRNAs are highly conserved across different species and display cell-type and tissue-specific patterns [20,21]. At first, circRNAs are considered to be byproducts of splicing errors [22]. With the development of sequencing technology and bioinformatics, an increasing number of circRNAs are validated and have abundant expression [23,24]. Recent studies have demonstrated that circRNAs participate in various diseases, such as cancer, infection, cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, and autoimmune disease [25–30]. CircRNAs can act as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) to sponge miRNAs and regulate target gene expression [31,32]. The most classic circRNA, CDR1as/ciRS-7, contains 74 miR-7 seed matches and functions as a miR-7 sponge to regulate the expression of miR-7 targets. Furthermore, circRNAs can interact with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) at the post-transcriptional level to alter the location or modifications of proteins [33–35]. It is reported that upregulation of circ0006646 is associated with poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and promotes the metastasis of HCC in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, circ0006646 directly interacts with nucleolin and stabilizes nucleolin expression by hindering the binding of nucleolin and the E3 ligase tripartite motif-containing 21 (TRIM21). Moreover, the therapeutic value of circ0006646 is confirmed through patient-derived tumour xenograft models [36]. Due to the specific expression pattern and high stability, circRNAs are considered as diagnostic biomarkers, therapeutic targets, prognostic markers, and even vaccines for diseases [37–39].
Recent studies have demonstrated the association between circRNAs and IBD [40,41]. Qiao YQ et al. have reported the differential expression of circRNAs in the colon tissue of CD patients compared with healthy controls through circRNA microarrays [42]. In total, 163 upregulated circRNAs and 55 downregulated circRNAs were identified in CD patients. It is predicted that has_circRNA_102685 might regulate the pathways associated with IBD, including apoptosis, TLR, and p53 signalling pathways via sponging miR-146. In another study, 155 upregulated and 229 downregulated circRNAs were detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from CD patients compared with healthy controls [43]. Further receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis reveals that the area under the curve (AUC) of has_circRNA_004662 is 0.85, indicating that it can serve as a potential biomarker for CD diagnosis. While the expression of has_circRNA_004662 in CD is higher than that in UC (p < 0.001), there is no difference between UC and healthy controls (p = 1.00). So, circRNA_004662 might be a potential biomarker for distinguishing CD from UC. Yuan et al. reported the differentially expressed circRNAs in UC from the Gene Expression Omnibus dataset (GEO) [44]. A new, predictive nomogram constructed using hsa_circ_0085323 and hsa_circ_0036906 has been proven effective for UC diagnosis [44]. These studies preliminarily confirm that circRNAs participate in the regulation of various IBD-related signalling pathways and may contribute to IBD pathogenesis. In this review, the IBD-related signalling pathways, including the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT), Wnt, phosphatidylinositol 3‑kinase/AKT (PI3K/AKT), nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and Hippo pathways, are discussed, as well as their roles in the pathogenesis of IBD. We also summarize the current research on the role and molecular functions of circRNAs in IBD-related pathways and discuss the potential application in clinical practice (Table 1 and Figure 1). This review will give a new insight into IBD diagnosis and treatment targeting circRNAs and the related pathways.
Table 1.
CircRNAs involved in IBD.
| circRNA | circBase ID | Gene symbol | Disease | Source | Change | Pathway | Function and mechanism | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| circRNA_102610 | hsa_circ_0000972 | MBOAT2 | CD | PBMCs | Upregulate | TGF-β | Promotes proliferation and epithelial mesenchymal transition of IECs via sponging hsa-miR-130a-3p | Diagnostic marker, therapeutic target | [43;45] |
| circRNA_103765 | hsa_circ_0071375 | KLHL2 | CD | PBMCs | Upregulate | Notch | Promotes IECs proliferation and apoptosis via miR-30/DLL4 axis | Diagnostic marker, therapeutic target | [46] |
| circSMAD4 | hsa_circ_0006952 | SMAD4 | CD | Colon tissues | Upregulate | JAK/STAT | Impairs epithelial barrier integrity via miR-135a-5p/JAK2 axis | Therapeutic target | [47] |
| circRNA_102685 | hsa_circ_0003578 | CRIM1 | CD | Colon tissues | Upregulate | Toll-like receptor, p53 | Sponges miR-146 | Diagnostic marker, therapeutic target | [42] |
| circPRKAR1B | hsa_circ_0008039 | PRKAR1B | CD | Colon tissues | Upregulate | Promotes NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis and inhibits autophagy to aggravate colitis via interacting with SPTBN1 | Therapeutic target | [48] | |
| hsa_circ_0001666 | hsa_circ_0001666 | FAM120B | CD | Colon tissues | Upregulate | Unclear | Diagnostic marker | [49] | |
| hsa_circ_0062142 | hsa_circ_0062142 | TPTEP1 | CD | Colon tissues | Upregulate | Unclear | Diagnostic marker | [49] | |
| circRNA_092520 | hsa_circ_0001240 | NFAM1 | CD | PBMCs | Upregulate | Unclear | Diagnostic marker | [43] | |
| circGMCL1 | hsa_circ_0055097 | GMCL1 | CD | Colon tissues | Downregulate | Promotes autophagy and alleviates pyroptosis via miR-124-3p/Annexin 7 | Therapeutic target | [40] | |
| circRNA_103124 | hsa_circ_0001187 | DOPEY2 | CD, UC | PBMCs | Upregulate | PI3K/AKT, NF-κB | Promotes cell proliferation and macrophage M1 polarization and inhibits autophagy via hsa-miR-650/AKT2 pathway, and aggravates TNF-α-induced cell apoptosis, inflammation and oxidative stress through the miR-1236-3p/MYD88 axis | Diagnostic marker, therapeutic target | [50–52] |
| circRNA_103516 | hsa_circ_0003692 | FNDC3B | CD, UC | PBMCs | Upregulate | Sponges hsa-miR-19b-1-5p | Diagnostic marker | [53] | |
| circSOD2 | hsa_circ_0004662 | SOD2 | CD, UC | Colon tissues, PBMCs | Upregulate | Destroys the intestinal mucosal barrier via miR-378 g/Snail1 axis | Diagnostic marker, therapeutic target | [43,54] | |
| Cdr1as | hsa_circ_0001946 | CDR1 | CD, UC | Colon tissues | Upregulate | Suppresses renewal and defence of the intestinal epithelium via miR-195 | Therapeutic target | [55] | |
| circHIPK2 | hsa_circ_0001756 | HIPK2 | CD, UC | Colon tissues | Upregulate | Hippo | CircHIPK2 enhances the translational efficiency of TAZ and increases the transcription of target genes, namely cellular communication network factor 1 (CCN1) and CCN2, leading to intestinal epithelial growth in colitis | Therapeutic target | [56] |
| circHIPK3 | hsa_circ_0000284 | HIPK3 | CD, UC | Colon tissues | Downregulate | Promotes intestinal epithelial repair and renewal through sponging miR-29b | Therapeutic target | [57] | |
| circRNA CCND1 | hsa_circ_0023303 | CCND1 | UC | Colon tissues | Downregulate | Suppresses cell apoptosis and inflammatory responses via miR-142-5p/NCOA3 pathway | Therapeutic target | [41] | |
| circHECTD1 | hsa_circ_0101590 | HECTD1 | UC | Colon tissues | Downregulate | AMPK/mTOR | Promotes autophagy to mitigate DSS-induced colitis via miR-182-5p/HuR axis | Therapeutic target | [58] |
| hsa_circ_0001021 | hsa_circ_0001021 | AFTPH | UC | Colon tissues | Downregulate | TGF-β | Protects intestinal epithelial barrier via miR-224-5p/smad4 | Therapeutic target | [59] |
| hsa_circ_0007919 | hsa_circ_0007919 | ABR | UC | Colon tissues | Downregulate | Regulates intestinal epithelial barrier via hsa-let-7a/EPC1 and hsa-miR-138/VIPR1 axis | Diagnostic marker, therapeutic target | [60] | |
| circCDKN2B-AS1 | hsa_circ_0008574 | CDKN2B-AS1 | UC | Colon tissues | Downregulate | Inhibits cell proliferation and epithelial barrier through upregulating Claudin-2 | Therapeutic target | [61] | |
| circ_0085323 | hsa_circ_0085323 | EIF3E | UC | Colon tissues | Upregulate | Aggravates TNFα-induced inflammation and cell apoptosis via miR-495-3p/TRAF3 | Diagnostic marker, therapeutic target | [62] | |
| circPABPN1 | hsa_circ_0031288 | PABPN1 | UC | Colon tissues | Upregulate | Suppresses cell autophagy through blocking the bind of HuR to Atg16l1 mRNA and reducing ATG16L1 protein levels | Unclear | [63] | |
| mmu_circ_0001109 | mmu_circ_0001109 | RTEL1 | Colitis model | Colon tissues | Upregulate | JAK/STAT, NF-κB | upregulates the p-STAT3 and p-P65 levels, which further aggravate colitis through JAK/STAT and NF-κB pathways | Unclear | [64] |
| circAtp9b | – | ATP9B | UC | Plasma | Upregulate | PI3K/AKT/PTEN | Promotes LPS-induced apoptosis via PTEN | Diagnostic marker, therapeutic target | [65] |
| circZbtb20 | mmu_circ_0006298 | ZBTB20 | Colitis model | ILC3 | Upregulate | Notch | Maintains ILC3 homoeostasis via the m6A demethylation of Nr4a1 mRNA | Unclear | [66] |
| circKcnt2 | mmu_circ_0000084 | KCNT2 | Colitis model | ILC3 | Upregulate | Induces ILC3 inactivation and colitis resolution through suppressing IL-17 expression | Unclear | [67] |
Figure 1.

CircRNAs in IBD-related pathways.
JAK/STAT pathway
The JAK/STAT pathway is essential in regulating immune processes, intestinal epithelial homoeostasis, inflammation, cell growth, and differentiation [68–70]. Genetic mutations and dysregulation of the JAK/STAT pathway are associated with various diseases, such as cancer, immune disorders (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, atopic dermatitis and IBD), and virus infections including COVID-19 [71,72]. JAK proteins are non-transmembrane tyrosine kinases, including JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase (TYK2), of which JAK3 exhibits a predominantly restricted expression pattern in haematopoietic cells. There are seven members of STAT proteins, including STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6. When cytokines specifically bind to receptors, the receptors get close to each other and form dimers. Then the JAK proteins are activated, and the activating JAKs phosphorylate the intracellular domain of the receptors, which form docking sites for the recruitment of STATs. Subsequently, STATs are phosphorylated by JAKs, resulting in the homodimerization or heterodimerization of phosphorylated STATs. The STAT dimers dissociate from receptors, translocate to the nucleus, and bind to the DNA regulatory elements to regulate the transcription of target genes. For given cytokines, the corresponding JAKs and STATs are specifically activated and regulate different biological processes [73]. In human memory CD4+ T cells, IL-23 induces STAT1, STAT3 and STAT4 phosphorylation, whereas IL-12 predominantly activates STAT4 alone [74]. In mouse Th17 cells, IL-23 signalling via STAT3 and STAT4 promotes Th17 cell survival, expansion, and pathogenic conversion to Th1-like cells [75]. Both IL-12 and IL-23 cytokines also act on human and mouse innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), NK cells, and intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) to regulate antibacterial responses and cytokine secretion [76]. IL-6 activates STAT3 via JAK1, JAK2, and TYK2, promoting cell survival, proliferation, and wound healing in IECs and regulating apoptosis, differentiation, and cancer progression in cancer cells, across human and mouse models [77,78]. In response to Interferon-α (IFN-α) and IFN-β, STAT1 and STAT2 are activated via JAK1 and TYK2. These pathways have been confirmed in human and mouse immune cells, including dendritic cells, macrophages, and T cells, as well as non-immune cells such as fibroblasts and epithelial cells, where they mediate antiviral responses and immune regulation [79]. IFN-γ activates STAT1 and STAT3 through JAK1 and JAK2. This pathway, well characterized in human and mouse macrophages, T cells, and NK cells, participates in antitumor and immune regulation [79]. It has been well studied that cytokines play crucial roles in the immune dysfunction, intestinal inflammation, clinical manifestations, and complications of IBD patients [80]. Cytokines associated with IBD, such as IL-12, IL-23, IL-6, and IFN-γ, exert their effects through JAK/STAT pathway [81]. Anti-IL-12/IL-23 (Ustekinumab) and anti-IL-23 (Risankizumab) antibodies, which target upstream cytokines that activate the JAK-STAT pathway, have been successively approved for the treatment of IBD. Unlike biologics targeting individual cytokines, the small-molecule JAK inhibitors block multiple cytokines and show efficacy in the induction and maintenance therapy for UC and CD. Tofacitinib, preferentially targeting JAK1 and JAK3, was the first approved JAK inhibitor for the moderately to severely active UC, but had no significant efficacy in CD [82,83]. Upadacitinib, the JAK1 selective inhibitor, was approved for the treatment of both UC and CD [84,85].
Many studies have validated that circRNAs may participate in IBD via the JAK/STAT signalling pathway. The differential expression profiles of mouse circRNAs were identified by RNA-seq in dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis and colitis-associated cancer (CAC), of which mmu_circ_0001109 is highly expressed in DSS-induced colitis tissues compared to the normal tissues [64]. The expression of mmu_circ_0001109 was positively associated with p-STAT3 and p-P65 expression. Moreover, mmu_circ_0001109 overexpression upregulated the p-STAT3 and p-P65 levels, which further validated that mmu_circ_0001109 aggravated colitis through JAK/STAT and NF-κB signalling pathways. However, the human homologue of mouse mmu_circ_0001109 showed no similar expression in the tissues mentioned above, possibly owing to low sequence similarities. Zhao et al. demonstrated that circSMAD4 was upregulated in CD patients’ tissues compared with controls and was positively correlated with inflammatory indexes, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin [47]. Meanwhile, poly lactic-co-glycolic acid microspheres (PLGA MSs) carrying si-circSMAD4 were constructed and gavage administered to IL-10 KO mice. The inflammatory infiltration and the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-17, were reduced after PLGA MSs carrying si-circSMAD4 treatment. The si-circSMAD4 treatment promoted the differentiation of CD4+T cells into Treg cells instead of Th1 and Th17 cells. Furthermore, circSMAD4 upregulated JAK2 expression and subsequent p-STAT3 level by sponging miR-135a-5p to impair intestinal barrier function and promote colitis progression, which was consistent with the function mediated by JAK2/STAT3 signalling pathway. Overall, circSMAD4 impaired intestinal barrier integrity and promoted colitis progression via the miR-135a-5p/JAK2 axis in experimental colitis. PLGA MSs carrying si-circSMAD4 treatment alleviated intestinal inflammation in the colitis mice model. Notably, this study utilized siRNA-mediated knockdown rather than genetic knockout of circSMAD4. To date, no circSMAD4 knockout mouse models have been reported to definitively establish its physiological roles. The development of circSMAD4-deficient mice, such as using CRISPR/Cas9 to delete circularization-specific exons, would provide conclusive validation of its functional necessity and cell-type-specific mechanisms. Such genetic models represent a critical future direction to validate circSMAD4 as a therapeutic target. CircSMAD4 might be a promising therapeutic target for IBD, but further research is needed to explore its clinical application. While therapies targeting circSMAD4 show promise for IBD, numerous questions remain to be addressed, including the roles of circSMAD4 in other cell types, optimal dosage and delivery strategies, long-term safety of genetic or pharmacological circSMAD4 inhibition, and the efficacy and safety of circSMAD4 in human clinical trials.
The JAK/STAT pathway serves as a critical nexus linking circRNA-mediated regulatory networks to the pathogenesis of IBD. CircRNAs such as mmu_circ_0001109 and circSMAD4 modulate intestinal inflammation and epithelial barrier integrity through diverse mechanisms, including miRNA sponging and interaction with RBPs, ultimately influencing immune cell differentiation, cytokine production, and disease progression. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting circRNA-JAK/STAT axes, as evidenced by siRNA-based interventions in preclinical models. However, clinical translation requires further investigation into species-specific circRNA functions, cell-type-specific roles, optimal delivery systems, and safety profiles in human trials.
Wnt pathway
The Wnt pathway is a key signalling pathway in developmental processes, such as cell proliferation and differentiation, and it is highly conserved in evolution [86]. Wnt pathway includes canonical pathway (Wnt/β-catenin) and non-canonical pathways (Wnt/planar cell polarity (PCP) and Wnt/Ca2+) [87,88]. In canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway, Wnt proteins, including Wnt1, Wnt2b, Wnt3, Wnt3a and Wnt8a, bind to Frizzled (FZD) and lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) receptors, leading to the prevention of β-catenin degradation mediated by the destruction complex (comprising the scaffold protein Axin, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), glycogen synthase kinase (GSK3), and casein kinase 1 (CK1)) [89]. Subsequently, β-catenin is accumulated and translocated to the nucleus, then binds to T cell factor (TCF) to initiate the transcription of target genes. When Wnt signalling is off, β-catenin is phosphorylated and degraded by the destruction complex. In non-canonical Wnt signalling, Wnt4, Wnt5a, Wnt5b, Wnt6, Wnt7a and Wnt11 bind with FZD to regulate cell polarity, migration, cytoskeleton organization, and intracellular calcium release [90].
The Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway is a highly conserved regulator of tissue homoeostasis and stem cell maintenance across multiple organ systems. Beyond its well-characterized role in embryonic development, canonical Wnt signalling governs the self-renewal of various adult stem cell populations, including intestinal stem cells (ISCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and embryonic stem cells [91,[89]]. Aberrant activation of this pathway disrupts tissue homoeostasis, leading to unchecked proliferation and the accumulation of stem-like cells that can serve as precursors to malignant transformation [92]. Emerging evidence indicates that Wnt signalling intimately links cell identity with immunological function. In the immune system, Wnt/β-catenin signalling regulates T cell development, differentiation, and memory formation. Recent studies have revealed that WNT signalling components, particularly Wnt5a and β-catenin, play pivotal roles in antigen processing, presentation, and subsequent T cell activation [93–95].
Studies have demonstrated that Wnt signalling is involved in a wide range of biological processes and regulates multiple cellular functions, including those of Paneth cells, MSCs, ISCs, and immune cells in patients with IBD [96–98]. In general, inactivation or suppression of Wnt pathway in IBD patients results in Paneth cell dysfunction and finally destroys the intestinal mucosal barrier. Wnt pathway-related genes showed differential expression patterns in IBD patients compared with healthy controls [99]. In CD, the expression of TCF1 and TCF4 was reduced, and the defensin secretion was subsequently inhibited, which hindered the repair of the intestinal barrier. TCF1 and TCF4 regulated the production of defensins in Paneth cells [100]. The accumulation of β-catenin was detected in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of colon tissues from UC patients, but not in CD samples [101]. However, many studies found that β-catenin protein and mRNA expression and nuclear translocation of β-catenin were decreased after DSS treatment in mouse models [102,103]. The DSS-induced colitis model is one of the most widely used preclinical models for studying IBD pathogenesis. In this model, administration of DSS in drinking water induces epithelial barrier disruption, innate immune activation, and subsequent development of colitis characterized by symptoms resembling human IBD [104]. Nevertheless, DSS-induced colitis differs from human IBD in several fundamental aspects. Notably, its aetiology is characterized by direct chemical epithelial injury rather than the complex, multifactorial aetiology of human IBD, which might explain the differences in β-catenin expression profiles between human IBD and DSS-induced colitis models. Interestingly, the role of Wnt5a in inflammation is controversial [105,106]. Akira Sato and colleagues demonstrated that conditional knockout of Wnt5a in mice reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and alleviated DSS-induced inflammation [107]. However, another research in 2022 found that Wnt5a peptide suppressed the colitis induced by DSS in mice and downregulated the mRNA level of TNFα and IL-8 [108]. Interestingly, UC patients with subsequent relapses showed lower expression of Wnt5a mRNA than patients who remained in the remission stage [108].
CircRNAs have been validated to regulate intestinal homoeostasis through the Wnt pathway. CircRNA_Maml2 expression was significantly decreased in the intestinal tissues of severe burn mice and patients compared with normal controls [109]. Ectopic expression of circRNA_Maml2 promoted the proliferation and migration of murine colon carcinoma CT26 cells in vitro and alleviated intestinal mucosal inflammation after severe burns in mice. Interestingly, circRNA_maml2 level was positively correlated with FZD7, but negatively correlated with miR-93-3p. CircRNA_Maml2 upregulated FZD7 by sponging miR-93-3p and subsequently activated the Wnt/β-catenin pathway to promote the repair of the damaged intestinal mucosa in mice. However, the function and mechanism of circRNA_Maml2 need further exploration in humans. Wan D et al.also found that mmu_circ_0001845 was highly expressed in CAC tissues compared to the normal and colitis tissues [64]. Mmu_circ_0001845 expression paralleled with β-catenin and forced expression of mmu_circ_0001845 increased the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin and promoted the TOP/FOP luciferase activity. Interestingly, the human homologue of mouse mmu_circ_0001845, including hsa_circ_0124022, hsa_circ_0124028 and hsa_circ_0124029, exhibited higher expression levels in CAC patients than in UC and healthy ones. The expression of hsa_circ_0124022, hsa_circ_0124028 and hsa_circ_0124029 in CAC patients was associated with the duration from the UC onset to carcinoma, TNM stage, and clinical prognosis, which suggested that these circRNAs might be novel biomarkers for distinguishing CAC patients from UC and healthy ones, prognostic markers, and even promising therapeutic targets for CAC. Furthermore, these three circRNAs also promoted the colitis-to-carcinoma transformation through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
ISCs localize at the base of intestinal crypts and have the ability to self-renew and differentiate into multiple lineages [110]. There are two types of ISCs: active crypt base columnar cells marked by Lgr5 and quiescent +4 cells marked by Bmi1. The regulation of ISC homoeostasis plays a vital role in intestinal regeneration [111]. It has been proven that circRNAs play a critical role in regulating self-renewal maintenance of ISCs [112]. High expression of circPan3 was detected in both mouse and human Lgr5+ ISCs, and circPan3 knockdown impeded the self-renewal of Lgr5+ ISCs and epithelial regeneration depending on immune cells [113]. CircPan3 binds to and stabilizes IL-13ra1 mRNA, which encodes and expresses IL-13Rα1 (the IL-13 receptor subunit) in Lgr5+ ISCs. Upon receiving IL-13 secreted by group 2 innate lymphoid cells in the niche, STAT6 is activated, subsequently initiating Foxp1 expression. Finally, Foxp1 binds to and facilitates the nuclear translocation of β-catenin, activating Wnt/β-catenin signalling in Lgr5+ ISCs. Yu et al. reported that the intestinal barrier was disrupted and the number of Lgr5+ ISCs was decreased in the DSS-induced IBD mouse model [114]. Intravenous injections of human ASCs-derived exosomes into the above model reduced proinflammatory cytokines, promoted the regeneration of Lgr5+ ISCs, and protected the integrity of the gut barrier. Furthermore, ASCs-derived exosomes promoted the growth and regeneration of colon organoids and alleviated TNF-α-induced inflammation in colon organoids. Considering the function and mechanism of circPan3 in ISCs, it can be postulated that circPan3 may play a role in the pathophysiology of IBD, but further research is needed.
MSCs repair tissues and suppress inflammation via regulating immune homoeostasis and regeneration function [115,116]. MSCs increased the infiltration of T-reg cells in the intestine, inhibited dendritic cell maturation, and promoted the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines. MSCs might be isolated from many sources, including adipose, bone marrow, umbilical cord and so on, which were named respectively as follows: adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs), and umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs). Many clinical trials of allogeneic or autologous ASCs, BM-MSCs, UC-MSCs, or haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) therapy for CD-associated perianal fistula, refractory CD, or UC have been conducted and shown clinical response or even complete healing [117–121]. The delivery methods of MSCs included intralesional injection and intravenous administration. There were no severe adverse events in the follow-up study. The MSCs therapy might be a safe and effective option for refractory UC, CD, and CD-related fistula [122]. MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs), such as exosomes (MSC-Exos), not only possess immunomodulatory characteristics similar to MSCs but also have the advantages of high stability and low immunogenicity [123,124]. In addition, circRNAs are enriched and stably expressed within exosomes, and can mediate intercellular signalling regulation via exosomal transport. Moreover, MSC-EVs have been validated to be a promising delivery system for both drugs and circRNA. The phase I clinical trial of MSC-Exos for the treatment of refractory perianal fistula in CD showed that three of the five patients who received MSC-Exos injection achieved complete healing of fistula, and all patients had no adverse events [125]. The efficacy of MSC-EVs for DSS-induced colitis in mice was also confirmed in mice [126–128]. A larger sample, multi-centre randomized controlled study and long-term follow-up are needed to further validate the efficacy and safety of MSC-EVs therapy in IBD.
Wnt signalling has been identified as a key factor in the fate decision and differentiation of MSCs [129]. Many studies have shown that circRNAs are closely associated with the regulation and function of MSCs. Interestingly, hsa_circ_0001320 (circFOXP1) expression was increased in MSCs and decreased during differentiation [130]. Knockdown of circFOXP1 reduced the expression of MSCs markers including CD164, PDPN, CD146 and GLI1, and decreased MSC differentiation capacity. Mechanistically, circFOXP1 maintained MSC differentiation capacity depending on miR-17-3p/miR-127-5p through EGFR and non-canonical Wnt signalling, which were associated with MSC capacity maintenance. Moreover, circFOXP1 and non-canonical Wnt5a were highly expressed in MSCs, while canonical Wnt3a was downregulated. Reprogramming MSCs towards pluripotency decreased circFOXP1 and non-canonical Wnt5a, but upregulated canonical Wnt3a. Overall, circFOXP1 was necessary for MSC identity and differentiation, while whether circFOXP1 is involved in the pathological process of IBD is worth exploring and may broaden our understanding of MSCs.
In addition, Wnt pathway mutations, such as APC mutations, GSK3 deletions, and β-catenin mutations, are often found in various cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC) [,86,131]. Most sporadic CRC cases result from APC allele deletion, especially in the family of adenomatous polyposis. Loss of APC alleles inhibits the formation of the destruction complex, which leads to excessive accumulation of β-catenin and finally results in CRC. However, the pathophysiology of CRC and CAC shows different patterns. In contrast to sporadic CRC, β-catenin mutations are rarer, and APC mutations are less frequent and occur later in CAC, whereas p53 and K-ras mutations occur earlier. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and intestinal microbiome also play important roles in the pathogenesis of CAC [132].
Overall, the Wnt pathway might be a potential target for the treatment of IBD and IBD-related fibrosis. However, targeting the Wnt pathway may represent a double-edged sword, requiring a precise balancing, given its pivotal roles in stemness maintenance and tissue homoeostasis [133]. Although inhibitors or agonists of the Wnt pathway have been applied in experimental or cellular models, they have not yet been approved for clinical application [[89]].
Other pathways
In addition to the JAK/STAT and Wnt pathways, circRNAs are also associated with other signalling pathways, including the PI3K/AKT, NF-κB, and Hippo pathways. The PI3K/AKT pathway is important in cell proliferation, apoptosis, metabolism, and inflammation regulation [134]. Generally, this pathway is initiated by various factors, such as cytokines, growth factors, and insulin. Subsequently, PI3K is activated and phosphorylates its substrates, which in turn phosphorylate and activate serine kinase AKT (also known as protein kinase B). Activated AKT then phosphorylates and inhibits the downstream substrates, including GSK3, forkhead box O (FOXO) transcription factors, and tuberous sclerosis complex 1/2 (TSC1/2). For instance, AKT activation inhibits GSK3, which is responsible for the degradation of β-catenin, thereby activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Activated AKT activates the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) by inhibiting TSC1/2, to regulate cell survival, autophagy, and protein synthesis. The hyperactivation of epithelial mTOR can result in the necroptosis of IECs and the dysfunction of Paneth cells, which in turn predisposes to severe colitis. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), a well-known negative regulator of PI3K, inhibits AKT activation. LY294002, wortmannin, and rapamycin are well-characterized inhibitors of the PI3K/AKT pathway. The PI3K/AKT pathway may regulate the ROS homoeostasis, IECs apoptosis, and immune cells activation and polarization, which are closely related to the pathogenesis of IBD [135–138]. Moreover, NF-κB is a critical transcriptional regulator in modulating inflammation and immune responses. AKT can activate the NF-κB pathway by phosphorylating the IκB kinase to promote the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-12, which are also crucial in IBD [139]. Although inhibitors of the PI3K/AKT pathway, including alpelisib, inavolisib, and capivasertib, have been approved for advanced breast cancer [140], therapeutic targeting of this pathway remains unexplored in the context of IBD, with no approved agents currently available for IBD treatment.
Many circRNAs have been demonstrated to exert their functions in various diseases through the pathways mentioned above, including cancer and IBD [141,142]. In CD patients’ PBMCs, hsa_circRNA_103124 expression was upregulated and had a positive correlation with the white blood cell (WBC) count, faecal calprotectin level, TNF-α, and Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) [51]. Hsa_circRNA_103124 promoted intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and inhibited autophagy through sponging hsa-miR-650 and subsequently targeting the AKT2/CDK2 and AKT2/TSC1 pathways. On the other hand, hsa_circRNA_103124 promoted macrophage M1 polarization by activating AKT2 and the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/NF-κB pathways, which increased the permeability of the intestinal epithelium [50]. TLR4 is a transmembrane protein that is crucial in pathogen recognition and innate immune activation. Upon activation by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), TLR4 recruits myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MYD88) and subsequently activates NF-κB. The expression of TLR4 is high in IBD, leading to the over-activation of downstream signalling and overgeneration of inflammatory cytokines [143–145]. Moreover, hsa_circRNA_103124 was also found to be highly expressed in colonic tissues and serum exosomes of UC patients [52]. Knockdown of hsa_circRNA_103124 suppressed TNF-α-induced cell apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress through the miR-1236-3p/MYD88 axis. Thereby, hsa_circRNA_103124 might be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of IBD.
The Hippo pathway is evolutionally conserved and has been implicated in IBD through regulating the immune response, inflammation, angiogenesis, intestinal epithelial regeneration, and gut microbiota [146,147]. When the Hippo pathway is off, the downstream transcriptional coregulators Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) translocate to the nucleus, where they initiate the transcription of target genes to modulate cell proliferation, stemness, and proliferation. Once the Hippo pathway is activated, YAP/TAZ is phosphorylated and inhibited by the upstream kinases, which in turn suppresses the transcription of downstream genes.
The upregulation of hsa_circRNA_104507 (circHIPK2) was detected in colon tissues of the patients with IBD and CRC, and DSS-treated colon tissues in mice model [56]. Knockdown of circHIPK2 aggravated DSS-induced colitis but suppressed the proliferation of CRC cells. CircHIPK2 enhanced the translational efficiency of TAZ and increased the transcription of target genes, namely cellular communication network factor 1 (CCN1) and CCN2, leading to intestinal epithelial growth in colitis and CRC. Considering the bidirectional effects of circHIPK2 on colitis and CRC, the application of circHIPK2 in IBD treatment may result in adverse events, and further exploration is required. In the septic rats model, circ_0001105 expression was decreased, while the levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β were elevated [148]. The forced expression of circ_0001105 reduced intestinal mucosal permeability, oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines and YAP1 expression. In addition, circRNAs also participate in CRC progression via the Hippo pathway, including circPPP1R12A, circ0106714, and hsa_circ_0128846 [149–151].
In addition, emerging evidence has highlighted the critical roles of autophagy and inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis in IBD pathogenesis, with circRNAs identified as key regulators of these processes (Figure 2) [40,48,51,58,63,152]. CircGMCL1 was significantly downregulated in colon tissues of CD patients and negatively correlated with CDAI [40]. CircGMCL1 protected against colitis by alleviating NLRP3 inflammasome-induced pyroptosis through promoting autophagy via the miR-124-3p/Annexin 7 axis in epithelial cells. Moreover, PLGA MSs carrying oe-circGMCL1 demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in IL-10 knock-out mice. Conversely, circPRKAR1B, upregulated in CD colon tissues, exacerbated colitis by suppressing autophagy and aggravating NLRP3 inflammasome-induced pyroptosis in both epithelial cells and IL-10-deficient mice [48]. Collectively, these findings show that circRNAs serve as crucial modulators of autophagy and NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis in IBD. The successful delivery of oe-circGMCL1 via PLGA MSs further highlights the therapeutic potential of circRNA-based strategies for IBD.
Figure 2.

The roles of circRNAs in IBD. CircRNAs regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, and pyroptosis in IBD.
Discussion
This review systematically integrates the crosstalk between circRNAs and classic signalling cascades, including JAK/STAT, Wnt, PI3K/AKT, NF-κB, and Hippo, in IBD. These pathways collectively govern intestinal inflammation, epithelial barrier integrity, mucosal repair, stem-cell regulation, fibrosis, and CAC. Accumulating evidence indicates that circRNAs, rather than being non-functional splicing byproducts, function as dynamic regulators in IBD biology, exerting either protective or pathogenic effects depending on the cellular and temporal contexts of the disease. We have not only elucidated the functional diversity of circRNAs but also highlighted their potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
CircRNAs are involved in several key aspects of IBD pathology, including intestinal inflammation, epithelial barrier dysfunction, mucosal repair, stem-cell regulation, fibrosis, and CAC. CircSMAD4 promoted intestinal inflammation and IEC apoptosis, and impaired the intestinal barrier through the miR-135a-5p/JAK2/STAT3 axis [47]. Other circRNAs such as circPRKAR1B, circGMCL1, circRNA_103124, circRNA_103516, circHIPK2, circRNA CCND1, circHECTD1, and circ_0085323 regulate intestinal inflammation, whereas circGMCL1, circSOD2, circHIPK3, hsa_circ_0001021, hsa_circ_0007919, circCDKN2B-AS1, and circPABPN1 are involved in maintaining epithelial barrier integrity. CircPan3 promoted the self-renewal of Lgr5+ ISCs and epithelial regeneration through Wnt/β-catenin signalling [113]. In contrast, circBtnl1, highly expressed in ISCs, suppressed the self-renewal of ISCs through interacting with Ddx3y to destabilize Atf4 mRNA and inhibit Sox9 transcription [112]. CircFOXP1 maintained MSC differentiation capacity via sponging miR-17-3p/miR-127-5p, thereby regulating EGFR and non-canonical Wnt pathways [130]. For fibrosis, circRNA_102610, upregulated in PBMCs from CD patients, promoted proliferation of IECs and TGF-β1-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process contributing to CD-related fibrosis, via sponging hsa-miR-130a-3p [45]. Mmu_circ_0001845 promoted colitis-to-carcinoma transformation through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [64]. Moreover, circRNAs serve as central nodes that coordinate multiple pathways simultaneously. For example, circRNA_103124 promoted macrophage M1 polarization and intestinal inflammation through both the AKT2 and TLR4/NF-κB pathways, linking inflammatory signalling to immune cell modulation [50]. Mmu_circ_0001109 aggravated colitis through JAK/STAT and NF-κB pathways, illustrating crosstalk between two major inflammatory cascades [64].
The most classic mechanism of circRNAs is functioning as ceRNAs to sponge miRNAs and upregulate the target genes. Many studies have preliminarily explored the characteristics and functions of synthetic circRNAs containing multiple miRNA binding sites. For example, artificial circRNAs incorporating miR-21 or both miR-21 and miR-93 binding sites have shown suppressive effects on cancer cell proliferation and migration, with greater stability than linear counterparts [153,154]. Given that certain miRNAs are dysregulated in IBD and regulate intestinal homoeostasis, we propose exploring artificial circRNAs containing target miRNA binding sites as a potential therapeutic strategy for IBD [155]. CircRNAs function through multiple mechanisms beyond miRNA sponging, including mRNA stabilization, translational regulation, and RBPs interactions. For example, circPan3 promoted the self-renewal of Lgr5+ ISCs and epithelial regeneration through binding to and stabilizing IL-13ra1 mRNA [113]. CircHIPK2 promoted the translational efficiency of TAZ and increased the transcription of target genes to increase intestinal epithelial growth in colitis and alleviate colitis [56]. CircPABPN1, upregulated in colon tissues of UC patients, regulated autophagy through blocking the binding of the RBP HuR to Atg16l1 mRNA and suppressing ATG16L1 translation in the intestinal epithelium [63]. Similarly, circPRKAR1B interacted with the RBP spectrin beta, non-erythrocytic 1 (SPTBN1), leading to inhibition of autophagy and aggravation of pyroptosis in epithelial cells [48].
Their structural stability and tissue-specific expression pattern position circRNAs as promising diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for IBD. CircRNA_092520, circRNA_102610, circRNA_004662, and circRNA_103124 were significantly upregulated in PBMCs of CD patients, with AUC values of 0.66, 0.78, 0.85, and 0.74, respectively. Notably, circRNA_004662 may be a preferable diagnostic biomarker for CD and for distinguishing CD from UC [43]. CircRNA_103765, which was upregulated in CD patients’ PBMCs, promoted IECs proliferation and apoptosis via the miR-30/DLL4 pathway, serving as a potential diagnostic marker and therapeutic target [46]. In addition, circRNA_102685, hsa_circ_0001666, hsa_circ_0062142, circRNA_103516, hsa_circ_0007919, hsa_circ_0085323, and circAtp9b have also been identified as valuable diagnostic markers for IBD [42,49,53,60,62,65]. Moreover, circSMAD4, circPRKAR1B, circGMCL1, Cdr1as, circHIPK2, circHIPK3, circRNA CCND1, circHECTD1, hsa_circ_0001021, and circCDKN2B-AS1 may represent promising therapeutic targets for IBD [40,41,47,48,55–59,61].
The high stability and long half-life of circRNAs make them attractive candidates for vaccine and drug development. Engineered circRNAs encoding relevant antigens have demonstrated prophylactic and therapeutic effects in animal models of melanoma and COVID-19, with advantages in stability and durability over mRNA vaccines [156,157]. However, the circularization efficiency, nucleotide modifications, purification, and delivery of circRNA vaccines need to be further investigated. The efficacy and safety of circRNA vaccines await further exploration in clinical trials.
The emerging recognition of circular RNAs (circRNAs) as pivotal regulators of intestinal homoeostasis and inflammatory responses has positioned them as promising therapeutic targets for IBD. Nevertheless, the journey of circRNAs from bench to bedside remains impeded by several obstacles (Table 2). First, current circRNA research in the context of IBD remains predominantly restricted to single cell lines and preclinical animal models, lacking comprehensive validation across diverse cellular contexts and systemic physiological effects. The transition from monocellular systems to multicellular organoids and organ-on-chip platforms may offer a promising intermediate step towards clinical fidelity, facilitating the precise identification of disease-relevant circRNA candidates. Second, although PLGA microspheres enable colon-targeted delivery, optimizing lipid nanoparticle formulations for circRNA encapsulation, minimizing off-target effects and enhancing biosafety remain critical challenges. Third, although the structural stability of circRNAs may confer prolonged pharmacodynamic duration, whether this attribute translates into more persistent or irreversible adverse effects remains poorly characterized. A concerted effort to resolve these technical and translational obstacles will be pivotal in accelerating the clinical translation of circRNA-based strategies for IBD management.
Table 2.
CircRNAs in IBD pathways: from current evidence to clinical application.
| Pathway | Representative circRNA | Evidence source | Main limitation | Future direction | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAK/STAT | circSMAD4 | CircSMAD4, highly expressed in colon tissues of CD patients, impaired intestinal barrier integrity and promoted colitis progression via the miR-135a-5p/JAK2 axis in epithelial cells. PLGA MSs carrying si-circSMAD4 treatment alleviated intestinal inflammation in IL-10 knockout mice. | 1. Best circRNA target not confirmed 2. Single Chinese CD cohort 3. Only JAK2/STAT3 examined 4. Delivery method not yet optimized for humans 5. Only two cell lines tested |
1. Screen more circRNAs in larger cohorts 2.Validate in multi-ethnic, multi-centre cohorts 3. Explore additional mechanisms 4. Explore appropriate dosages and local delivery approaches 5. Validate in patient-derived intestinal organoids and and other intestinal cell types |
[47] |
| Wnt | circPan3 | CircPan3 promoted the self-renewal of mouse Lgr5+ ISCs and epithelial regeneration through Wnt/β-catenin signalling, which was further validated in circPan3-deficient mice. | 1. Function and mechanism validated only for mouse circPan3, human circPAN3 lacks data (expression only) 2. Role and mechanism of circPAN3 in IBD pathogenesis unexplored |
Validate the function and mechanism of human circPAN3 in IBD | [113] |
| PI3K/AKT | circAtp9b | CircAtp9b, upregulated in the plasma samples of UC patients, promoted LPS-induced apoptosis via PTEN in human colonic epithelial cells. | 1. Small sample size; single-centre; no disease activity correlation; only plasma, not colonic tissue 2. No animal model validation |
1. Validate in larger, multi-centre cohorts; measure expression in colonic biopsies; correlate with clinical parameters 2. Validate in circAtp9b-knockdown or knockout mouse model |
[65] |
| NF-κB | circRNA_103124 | CircRNA_103124 promoted macrophage M1 polarization and intestinal inflammation through both the AKT2 and TLR4/NF-κB pathways in THP1 cells. | Lack of in vivo animal model validation | Construct a circRNA-overexpressing or knockdown mouse model | [50] |
| Hippo | circHIPK2 | CircHIPK2, upregulated in colon tissues of both IBD and CRC, alleviated colitis but promoted colitis-associated tumorigenesis through enhancing TAZ translation in vitro, in the colitis mice model, and the colitis-associated tumour mice model. | 1. Small human cohort 2. Role of circHIPK2 in other cell types unexplored |
1. Validate in larger, multi-centre cohorts 2. Explore the function of circHIPK2 in other cell types, such as immune cells |
[56] |
In summary, circRNAs play important roles in IBD pathogenesis and may serve as promising diagnostic markers, prognostic predictors, and therapeutic targets of IBD. Further research on circRNAs is needed to pioneer new directions for IBD treatment.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [No.82003133] and Xinqiao Hospital “Incubation of Young Doctoral Talents” Project [No.2022YQB032], and the Talent Project of the Army Medical University [JMMHYMP].
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study. All information synthesized in this review was obtained from published articles, which are cited in the reference list. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author (chenghistory@tmmu.edu.cn).
References
- [1].Loftus EV. Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(6):1504–1517. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.01.063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Hracs L, Windsor JW, Gorospe J, et al. Global evolution of inflammatory bowel disease across epidemiologic stages. Nature. 2025;642(8067):458–466. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08940-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Christensen C, Knudsen A, Arnesen EK, et al. Diet, food, and nutritional exposures and inflammatory bowel disease or progression of disease: an umbrella review. Adv Nutr. 2024;15(5):100219. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Yan J, Wang L, Gu Y, et al. Dietary patterns and gut microbiota changes in inflammatory bowel disease: current insights and future challenges. Nutrients. 2022;14(19):4003. doi: 10.3390/nu14194003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Lavelle A, Sokol H. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key actors in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(4):223–237. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0258-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Targan SR, Hanauer SB, van Deventer SJ, et al. A short-term study of chimeric monoclonal antibody cA2 to tumor necrosis factor alpha for Crohn’s disease. Crohn’s disease cA2 study group. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(15):1029–1035. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710093371502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Buda A, Pessarelli T, Aldinio G, et al. Endoscopic healing in IBD: still the target to achieve? Dig Liver Dis. 2025;57(5):969–976. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2025.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Geyl S, Guillo L, Laurent V, et al. Transmural healing as a therapeutic goal in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(8):659–667. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00096-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Cai Z, Wang S, Li J. Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a comprehensive review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:765474. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Xu YH, Zhu WM, Guo Z. Current status of novel biologics and small molecule drugs in the individualized treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(48):6888–6899. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i48.6888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Luo H, Cao G, Luo C, et al. Emerging pharmacotherapy for inflammatory bowel diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2022;178:106146. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Neurath MF. Strategies for targeting cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2024;24(8):559–576. doi: 10.1038/s41577-024-01008-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Kumar A, Smith PJ. Horizon scanning: new and future therapies in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. eGastroenterology. 2023;1(2):e100012. doi: 10.1136/egastro-2023-100012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Kayal M, Ungaro RC, Bader G, et al. Net remission rates with biologic treatment in Crohn’s disease: a reappraisal of the clinical trial data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21(5):1348–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Vasudevan A, Gibson PR, van Langenberg DR. Time to clinical response and remission for therapeutics in inflammatory bowel diseases: what should the clinician expect, what should patients be told? World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(35):6385–6402. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Balderramo D. Role of the combination of biologics and/or small molecules in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(47):6743–6751. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Mas EB, Calvo XC. Selecting the best combined biological therapy for refractory inflammatory bowel disease patients. J Clin Med. 2022;11(4):1076. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495(7441):333–338. doi: 10.1038/nature11928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Liu CX, Chen LL. Circular RNAs: characterization, cellular roles, and applications. Cell. 2022;185(13):2390. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Li S, Wang J, Ren G. CircRNA: an emerging star in plant research: a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;272:132800. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Patop IL, Wust S, Kadener S. Past, present, and future of circRNAs. Embo J. 2019;38(16):e100836. doi: 10.15252/embj.2018100836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Cocquerelle C, Mascrez B, Hetuin D, et al. Mis-splicing yields circular RNA molecules. Faseb J. 1993;7(1):155–160. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.7.1.7678559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Misir S, Wu N, Yang BB. Specific expression and functions of circular RNAs. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(3):481–491. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-00948-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Szabo L, Salzman J. Detecting circular RNAs: bioinformatic and experimental challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17(11):679–692. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Meng S, Zhou H, Feng Z, et al. CircRNA: functions and properties of a novel potential biomarker for cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0663-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Conn VM, Chinnaiyan AM, Conn SJ. Circular RNA in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2024;24(9):597–613. doi: 10.1038/s41568-024-00721-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Amaya L, Grigoryan L, Li Z, et al. Circular RNA vaccine induces potent T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(20):e2302191120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2302191120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Altesha MA, Ni T, Khan A, et al. Circular RNA in cardiovascular disease. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(5):5588–5600. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Yuan Q, Sun Y, Yang F, et al. CircRNA DICAR as a novel endogenous regulator for diabetic cardiomyopathy and diabetic pyroptosis of cardiomyocytes. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):99. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01306-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Xia X, Tang X, Wang S. Roles of circRNAs in autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:639. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, et al. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495(7441):384–388. doi: 10.1038/nature11993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Zeng Z, Xia L, Fan S, et al. Circular RNA circMAP3K5 acts as a microRNA-22-3p sponge to promote resolution of intimal hyperplasia via TET2-mediated smooth muscle cell differentiation. Circulation. 2021;143(4):354–371. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Huang A, Zheng H, Wu Z, et al. Circular RNA-protein interactions: functions, mechanisms, and identification. Theranostics. 2020;10(8):3503–3517. doi: 10.7150/thno.42174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Du WW, Yang W, Liu E, et al. Foxo3 circular RNA retards cell cycle progression via forming ternary complexes with p21 and CDK2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(6):2846–2858. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Zeng Y, Du WW, Wu Y, et al. A circular RNA binds to and activates AKT phosphorylation and nuclear localization reducing apoptosis and enhancing cardiac repair. Theranostics. 2017;7(16):3842–3855. doi: 10.7150/thno.19764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Hu X, Chen G, Huang Y, et al. Integrated multiomics reveals silencing of has_circ_0006646 promotes TRIM21-mediated NCL ubiquitination to inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024;11(16):e2306915. doi: 10.1002/advs.202306915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Li S, Weng J, Song F, et al. Circular RNA circznf566 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by sponging miR-4738-3p and regulating TDO2 expression. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(6):452. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2616-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Zheng R, Zhang K, Tan S, et al. Exosomal circlpar1 functions in colorectal cancer diagnosis and tumorigenesis through suppressing BRD4 via METTL3-eIF3H interaction. Mol Cancer. 2022;21(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01471-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Niu D, Wu Y, Lian J. Circular RNA vaccine in disease prevention and treatment. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):341. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01561-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Zhao J, Sun Y, Yang H, et al. Plga-microspheres-carried circGMCL1 protects against Crohn’s colitis through alleviating NLRP3 inflammasome-induced pyroptosis by promoting autophagy. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(9):782. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05226-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Xiang P, Ge T, Zhou J, et al. Protective role of circRNA CCND1 in ulcerative colitis via miR-142-5p/NCOA3 axis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02641-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Qiao YQ, Cai CW, Shen J, et al. Circular RNA expression alterations in colon tissues of Crohn’s disease patients. Mol Med Rep. 2019;19(5):4500–4506. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Yin J, Hu T, Xu L, et al. Circular RNA expression profile in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from Crohn disease patients. Med (Baltim). 2019;98(26):e16072. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Yuan Y-Y, Wu H, Chen Q-Y, et al. Construction of the underlying circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network and a new diagnostic model in ulcerative colitis by bioinformatics analysis. World J Clin Cases. 2024;12(9):1606–1621. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i9.1606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Yin J, Ye YL, Hu T, et al. Hsa_circRNA_102610 upregulation in Crohn’s disease promotes transforming growth factor-beta1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition via sponging of hsa-miR-130a-3p. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(22):3034–3055. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i22.3034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Ye Y, Zhang L, Hu T, et al. CircRNA_103765 acts as a proinflammatory factor via sponging miR-30 family in Crohn’s disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):565. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80663-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Zhao J, Lin Z, Ying P, et al. CircSMAD4 promotes experimental colitis and impairs intestinal barrier functions by targeting Janus kinase 2 through sponging miR-135a-5p. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2023;17(4):593–613. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Zhao J, Zhao Z, Ying P, et al. Mettl3-mediated m(6) a modification of circprkar1b promotes Crohn’s colitis by inducing pyroptosis via autophagy inhibition. Clin Transl Med. 2023;13(9):e1405. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Hu YA, Zhu Y, Liu G, et al. Expression profiles of circular RNAs in colon biopsies from Crohn’s disease patients by microarray analysis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021;35(6):e23788. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Yin J, Hu T, Xu L, et al. Hsa_circRNA_103124 upregulation in Crohn’s disease promoted macrophage M1 polarization to maintain an inflammatory microenvironment via activation of the AKT2 and TLR4/NF-kappaB pathways. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;123:110763. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Yin J, Tong F, Ye Y, et al. Hsa_circRNA_103124 upregulation in Crohn’s disease promotes cell proliferation and inhibits autophagy by regulating the hsa-miR-650/AKT2 signaling pathway. Front Genet. 2021;12:753161. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.753161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Ouyang W, Wu M, Wu A, et al. Circular rna_0001187 participates in the regulation of ulcerative colitis development via upregulating myeloid differentiation factor 88. Bioengineered. 2022;13(5):12863–12875. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2077572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Ye YL, Yin J, Hu T, et al. Increased circulating circular RNA_103516 is a novel biomarker for inflammatory bowel disease in adult patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(41):6273–6288. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i41.6273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Ye G, Zhang J, Peng J, et al. CircSOD2: disruption of intestinal mucosal barrier function in ulcerative colitis by regulating the miR-378g/Snail1 axis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;39(7):1299–1309. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Chung HK, Xiao L, Han N, et al. Circular RNA cdr1as inhibits proliferation and delays injury-induced regeneration of the intestinal epithelium. JCI Insight. 2024;9(4):e169716. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.169716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Zeng X, Tang J, Zhang Q, et al. CircHIPK2 contributes cell growth in intestinal epithelial of colitis and colorectal cancer through promoting TAZ translation. Adv Sci. 2024;11(34):e2401588. doi: 10.1002/advs.202401588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Xiao L, Ma X-X, Luo J, et al. Circular RNA CircHIPK3 promotes homeostasis of the intestinal epithelium by reducing microRNA 29b function. Gastroenterology. 2021;161(4):1303–1317.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Xu Y, Tian Y, Li F, et al. Circular RNA HECTD1 mitigates ulcerative colitis by promoting enterocyte autophagy via miR-182-5p/HuR axis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022;28(2):273–288. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izab188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Li B, Li Y, Li L, et al. Hsa_circ_0001021 regulates intestinal epithelial barrier function via sponging miR-224-5p in ulcerative colitis. Epigenomics. 2021;13(17):1385–1401. doi: 10.2217/epi-2021-0230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Wang T, Chen N, Ren W, et al. Integrated analysis of circRnas and mRNAs expression profile revealed the involvement of hsa_circ_0007919 in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54(9):804–818. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01585-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Rankin CR, Lokhandwala ZA, Huang R, et al. Linear and circular CDKN2B-AS1 expression is associated with inflammatory bowel disease and participates in intestinal barrier formation. Life Sci. 2019;231:116571. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].An Q, Yang S, Tao J, et al. Circ_0085323 silencing inhibits TNF-alpha-induced normal human colonic epithelial cell inflammation and apoptosis through the miR-495-3p/TRAF3 axis. Shock. 2023;60(2):298–305. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Li XX, Xiao L, Chung HK, et al. Interaction between Hur and circPABPN1 modulates autophagy in the intestinal epithelium by altering ATG16L1 translation. Mol Cell Biol. 2020;40(6):e00492–19. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00492-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Wan D, Wang S, Xu Z, et al. Prkar2a-derived circular RNAs promote the malignant transformation of colitis and distinguish patients with colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Clin Transl Med. 2022;12(2):e683. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Li F, Fu J, Fan L, et al. Overexpression of circAtp9b in ulcerative colitis is induced by lipopolysaccharides and upregulates PTEN to promote the apoptosis of colonic epithelial cells. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(6):1404. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Liu B, Liu N, Zhu X, et al. Circular RNA circZbtb20 maintains ILC3 homeostasis and function via Alkbh5-dependent m(6)A demethylation of Nr4a1 mRNA. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(6):1412–1424. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00680-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Liu B, Ye B, Zhu X, et al. An inducible circular RNA circkcnt2 inhibits ilc3 activation to facilitate colitis resolution. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4076. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17944-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Hu Q, Bian Q, Rong D, et al. Jak/stat pathway: extracellular signals, diseases, immunity, and therapeutic regimens. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1110765. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1110765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Xin P, Xu X, Deng C, et al. The role of JAK/STAT signaling pathway and its inhibitors in diseases. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;80:106210. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Philips RL, Wang Y, Cheon H, et al. The JAK-STAT pathway at 30: much learned, much more to do. Cell. 2022;185(21):3857–3876. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Tzeng HT, Chyuan IT, Lai JH. Targeting the JAK-STAT pathway in autoimmune diseases and cancers: a focus on molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Biochem Pharmacol. 2021;193:114760. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Satarker S, Tom AA, Shaji RA, et al. Jak-Stat pathway inhibition and their implications in COVID-19 therapy. Postgrad Med. 2021;133(5):489–507. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1855921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Hu X, Li J, Fu M, et al. The Jak/Stat signaling pathway: from bench to clinic. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):402. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00791-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Oppmann B, Lesley R, Blom B, et al. Novel p19 protein engages IL-12p40 to form a cytokine, IL-23, with biological activities similar as well as distinct from IL-12. Immunity. 2000;13(5):715–725. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00070-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].McGeachy MJ, Chen Y, Tato CM, et al. The interleukin 23 receptor is essential for the terminal differentiation of interleukin 17-producing effector T helper cells in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(3):314–324. doi: 10.1038/ni.1698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Verstockt B, Salas A, Sands BE, et al. Il-12 and il-23 pathway inhibition in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;20(7):433–446. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00768-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Grivennikov S, Karin E, Terzic J, et al. Il-6 and Stat3 are required for survival of intestinal epithelial cells and development of colitis-associated cancer. Cancer Cell. 2009;15(2):103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Johnson DE, O’Keefe RA, Grandis JR. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(4):234–248. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Darnell JE, Kerr IM, Stark GR. Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins. Science. 1994;264(5164):1415–1421. doi: 10.1126/science.8197455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(5):329–342. doi: 10.1038/nri3661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Salas A, Hernandez-Rocha C, Duijvestein M, et al. Jak-STAT pathway targeting for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(6):323–337. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0273-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Panes J, Sandborn WJ, Schreiber S, et al. Tofacitinib for induction and maintenance therapy of Crohn’s disease: results of two phase IIb randomised placebo-controlled trials. Gut. 2017;66(6):1049–1059. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Sandborn WJ, Su C, Sands BE, et al. Tofacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1723–1736. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Danese S, Vermeire S, Zhou W, et al. Upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results from three phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised trials. Lancet. 2022;399(10341):2113–2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00581-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Loftus EV, Panes J, Lacerda AP, et al. Upadacitinib induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(21):1966–1980. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Liu J, Xiao Q, Xiao J, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signalling: function, biological mechanisms, and therapeutic opportunities. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00762-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].VanderVorst K, Dreyer CA, Konopelski SE, et al. Wnt/PCP signaling contribution to carcinoma collective cell migration and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2019;79(8):1719–1729. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-2757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Vargas JY, Loria F, Wu YJ, et al. The wnt/ca(2+) pathway is involved in interneuronal communication mediated by tunneling nanotubes. Embo J. 2019;38(23):e101230. doi: 10.15252/embj.2018101230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell. 2017;169(6):985–999. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Chae W-J, Bothwell ALM. Canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling in immune cells. Trends Immunol. 2018;39(10):830–847. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Zhou Y, Xu J, Luo H, et al. Wnt signaling pathway in cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2022;525:84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.10.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Reya T, Clevers H. Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer. Nature. 2005;434(7035):843–850. doi: 10.1038/nature03319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Sarraf TR, Sen M. Wnt5a signaling supports antigen processing and CD8 T cell activation. Front Immunol. 2022;13:960060. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.960060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].de Galarreta M R, Bresnahan E, Molina-Sanchez P, et al. Beta-catenin activation promotes immune escape and resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(8):1124–1141. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Suryawanshi A, Hussein MS, Prasad PD, et al. Wnt signaling cascade in dendritic cells and regulation of anti-tumor immunity. Front Immunol. 2020;11:122. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Zhou Y, Jin J, Feng M, et al. Wnt signaling in inflammation in tissue repair and regeneration. Curr Protein Peptide Sci. 2019;20(8):829–843. doi: 10.2174/1389203720666190507094441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Moparthi L, Koch S. Wnt signaling in intestinal inflammation. Differentiation. 2019;108:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2019.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Yang E, Shen J. The roles and functions of Paneth cells in Crohn’s disease: a critical review. Cell Prolif. 2021;54(1):e12958. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].You J, Nguyen AV, Albers CG, et al. Wnt pathway-related gene expression in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;53(4):1013–1019. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-9973-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].Fu J, Zong X, Jin M, et al. Mechanisms and regulation of defensins in host defense. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):300. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01553-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Soletti RC, Rodrigues NA, Biasoli D, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of retinoblastoma and beta-catenin as an assistant tool in the differential diagnosis between Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(8):e70786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Du B, Luo S, Zhu X, et al. Way-262611 ameliorates the inflammatory bowel disease by activating Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2024;60(2):128–138. doi: 10.1007/s11626-023-00809-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Zhu F, Li H, Liu Y, et al. MiR-155 antagomir protect against DSS-induced colitis in mice through regulating Th17/Treg cell balance by Jarid2/Wnt/beta-catenin. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;126:109909. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Chassaing B, Aitken JD, Malleshappa M, et al. Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2014;104:15.25.1–15.25.14. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1525s104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Zhang M, Xie Z, Zhou G, et al. Conflicting effects of Wnt-5a in ulcerative colitis: you Wnt some, you lose some. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67(10):4599–4601. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07542-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Chen X, Liu HL, Li DH, et al. Dual role of Wnt5a in the progression of inflammatory diseases. Chin Med Sci J. 2022;37(3):265–274. doi: 10.24920/003994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Sato A, Kayama H, Shojima K, et al. The wnt5a-ror2 axis promotes the signaling circuit between interleukin-12 and interferon-gamma in colitis. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):10536. doi: 10.1038/srep10536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Uchiyama K, Takagi T, Mizushima K, et al. Investigation on the inhibitory effect of Wnt-5a on colonic mucosal inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67(10):4760–4769. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07537-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [109].Zhang W, Liao Y, Lou J, et al. CircRNA_Maml2 promotes the proliferation and migration of intestinal epithelial cells after severe burns by regulating the miR-93-3p/FZD7/Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Burns Trauma. 2022;10:tkac009. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkac009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [110].Gehart H, Clevers H. Tales from the crypt: new insights into intestinal stem cells. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(1):19–34. doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0081-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [111].Yu H, Yang X, Xiao X, et al. Human adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes protect mice from DSS-induced inflammatory bowel disease by promoting intestinal-stem-cell and epithelial regeneration. Aging Dis. 2021;12(6):1423–1437. doi: 10.14336/AD.2021.0601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [112].Guo H, Zhang J, Jiang Z, et al. Noncoding RNA circBtnl1 suppresses self-renewal of intestinal stem cells via disruption of ATF4 mRNA stability. Embo J. 2023;42(6):e112039. doi: 10.15252/embj.2022112039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [113].Zhu P, Zhu X, Wu J, et al. Il-13 secreted by ILC2s promotes the self-renewal of intestinal stem cells through circular RNA circPan3. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(2):183–194. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0297-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [114].Yu ZL, Gao RY, Lv C, et al. Notoginsenoside R1 promotes Lgr5(+) stem cell and epithelium renovation in colitis mice via activating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2024;45(7):1451–1465. doi: 10.1038/s41401-024-01250-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [115].Koliaraki V, Prados A, Armaka M, et al. The mesenchymal context in inflammation, immunity and cancer. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(9):974–982. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0741-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [116].Zhou J, Shi Y. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs): origin, immune regulation, and clinical applications. Cell Mol Immunol. 2023;20(6):555–557. doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-01034-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Cho YB, Park KJ, Yoon SN, et al. Long-term results of adipose-derived stem cell therapy for the treatment of Crohn’s fistula. STEM Cells Transl Med. 2015;4(5):532–537. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2014-0199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [118].de la Portilla F, Alba F, Garcia-Olmo D, et al. Expanded allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells (eASCs) for the treatment of complex perianal fistula in Crohn’s disease: results from a multicenter phase I/IIa clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(3):313–323. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1581-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [119].Panes J, Garcia-Olmo D, Van Assche G, et al. Expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Cx601) for complex perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: a phase 3 randomised, double-blind controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1281–1290. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31203-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [120].Hu J, Zhao G, Zhang L, et al. Safety and therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cell infusion on moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(5):2983–2989. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [121].Lightner AL, Dadgar N, Matyas C, et al. A phase IB/IIA study of remestemcel-L, an allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell product, for the treatment of medically refractory ulcerative colitis: an interim analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2022;24(11):1358–1370. doi: 10.1111/codi.16239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [122].Markovic BS, Kanjevac T, Harrell CR, et al. Molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy of inflammatory bowel diseases. STEM Cell Rev Rep. 2018;14(2):153–165. doi: 10.1007/s12015-017-9789-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [123].Fujii S, Miura Y, Fujishiro A, et al. Graft-versus-host disease amelioration by human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal/stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles is associated with peripheral preservation of naive T cell populations. STEM Cells. 2018;36(3):434–445. doi: 10.1002/stem.2759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [124].Wang S, Lei B, Zhang E, et al. Targeted therapy for inflammatory diseases with mesenchymal stem cells and their derived exosomes: from basic to clinics. Int J Nanomed. 2022;17:1757–1781. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S355366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [125].Nazari H, Alborzi F, Heirani-Tabasi A, et al. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes for treatment of refractory perianal fistula in IBD patients: clinical trial phase I. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2022;10:goac075. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goac075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [126].Lee JH, Lotvall J, Cho BS. The anti-inflammatory effects of adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cell exosomes in a mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(23):16877. doi: 10.3390/ijms242316877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [127].Deng C, Zhang H, Li Y, et al. Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells containing berberine for ulcerative colitis therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2024;671:354–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.05.162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [128].Yu T, Chu S, Liu X, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from EphB2-overexpressing bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate DSS-induced colitis by modulating immune balance. STEM Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02232-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [129].Xu C, Wang J, Zhu T, et al. Cross-talking between PPAR and WNT signaling and its regulation in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Curr STEM Cell Res Ther. 2016;11(3):247–254. doi: 10.2174/1574888X10666150723145707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [130].Cherubini A, Barilani M, Rossi RL, et al. Foxp1 circular RNA sustains mesenchymal stem cell identity via microRNA inhibition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(10):5325–5340. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [131].Rogler G. Chronic ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;345(2):235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.07.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [132].Mostafavi Abdolmaleky H, Zhou JR. Gut microbiota dysbiosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and epigenetic alterations in metabolic diseases. Antioxid (Basel). 2024;13(8):985. doi: 10.3390/antiox13080985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [133].Kahn M. Can we safely target the WNT pathway? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13(7):513–532. doi: 10.1038/nrd4233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [134].Burke JE, Triscott J, Emerling BM, et al. Beyond PI3Ks: targeting phosphoinositide kinases in disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22(5):357–386. doi: 10.1038/s41573-022-00582-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [135].Xie Y, Zhao Y, Shi L, et al. Gut epithelial TSC1/mTOR controls RIPK3-dependent necroptosis in intestinal inflammation and cancer. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(4):2111–2128. doi: 10.1172/JCI133264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [136].Kma L, Baruah TJ. The interplay of ROS and the PI3K/Akt pathway in autophagy regulation. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2022;69(1):248–264. doi: 10.1002/bab.2104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [137].Zhang J, Cen L, Zhang X, et al. Mpst deficiency promotes intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis and aggravates inflammatory bowel disease via AKT. Redox Biol. 2022;56:102469. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [138].Tokuhira N, Kitagishi Y, Suzuki M, et al. Pi3k/akt/pten pathway as a target for Crohn’s disease therapy (review). Int J Mol Med. 2015;35(1):10–16. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [139].Zarneshan SN, Fakhri S, Farzaei MH, et al. Astaxanthin targets PI3K/Akt signaling pathway toward potential therapeutic applications. Food Chem Toxicol. 2020;145:111714. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [140].Tyrakis PA, Kampjut D, Steele GF, et al. Multi-node inhibition targeting mTORC1, mTORC2 and PI3Kalpha potently inhibits the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in endometrial and breast cancer models. Br J Cancer. 2025;133(2):144–154. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03035-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [141].Xue C, Li G, Lu J, et al. Crosstalk between circRNAs and the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in cancer progression. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):400. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00788-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [142].Sun K, Luo J, Guo J, et al. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in osteoarthritis: a narrative review. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2020;28(4):400–409. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.02.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [143].Wei J, Feng J. Signaling pathways associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2010;4(2):105–117. doi: 10.2174/187221310791163071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [144].Dejban P, Nikravangolsefid N, Chamanara M, et al. The role of medicinal products in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) through inhibition of TLR4/NF-kappaB pathway. Phytother Res. 2021;35(2):835–845. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [145].Yu C, Wang D, Yang Z, et al. Pharmacological effects of polyphenol phytochemicals on the intestinal inflammation via targeting TLR4/NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(13):6939. doi: 10.3390/ijms23136939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [146].Mo JS, Park HW, Guan KL. The hippo signaling pathway in stem cell biology and cancer. EMBO Rep. 2014;15(6):642–656. doi: 10.15252/embr.201438638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [147].Ma S, Meng Z, Chen R, et al. The hippo pathway: biology and pathophysiology. Annu Rev Biochem. 2019;88:577–604. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [148].Liu S, Zhang D, Liu Y, et al. Circular RNA circ_0001105 protects the intestinal barrier of septic rats by inhibiting inflammation and oxidative damage and YAP1 expression. Gene. 2020;755:144897. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [149].Zheng X, Chen L, Zhou Y, et al. A novel protein encoded by a circular RNA circPPP1R12A promotes tumor pathogenesis and metastasis of colon cancer via Hippo-YAP signaling. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1010-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [150].Li S, Yan G, Liu W, et al. Circ0106714 inhibits tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer by sponging miR-942-5p and releasing DLG2 via Hippo-YAP signaling. Mol Carcinog. 2020;59(12):1323–1342. doi: 10.1002/mc.23259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [151].Wang X, Chen Y, Liu W, et al. Hsa_circ_0128846 promotes tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer by sponging hsa-miR-1184 and releasing AJUBA and inactivating Hippo/YAP signalling. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(17):9908–9924. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [152].Zhou P, Zhang S, Wang M, et al. The induction mechanism of ferroptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis in inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer, and intestinal injury. Biomolecules. 2023;13(5):820. doi: 10.3390/biom13050820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [153].Liu X, Abraham JM, Cheng Y, et al. Synthetic circular RNA functions as a miR-21 sponge to suppress gastric carcinoma cell proliferation. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;13:312–321. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.09.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [154].Wang Z, Ma K, Cheng Y, et al. Synthetic circular multi-miR sponge simultaneously inhibits miR-21 and miR-93 in esophageal carcinoma. Lab Invest. 2019;99(10):1442–1453. doi: 10.1038/s41374-019-0273-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [155].Dhuppar S, Murugaiyan G. MiRNA effects on gut homeostasis: therapeutic implications for inflammatory bowel disease. Trends Immunol. 2022;43(11):917–931. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2022.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [156].Li H, Peng K, Yang K, et al. Circular RNA cancer vaccines drive immunity in hard-to-treat malignancies. Theranostics. 2022;12(14):6422–6436. doi: 10.7150/thno.77350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [157].Qu L, Yi Z, Shen Y, et al. Circular RNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants. Cell. 2022;185(10):1728–1744 e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study. All information synthesized in this review was obtained from published articles, which are cited in the reference list. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author (chenghistory@tmmu.edu.cn).
