Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2002 Dec;46(12):4000–4003. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.4000-4003.2002

Phenotypic and Genotypic Analysis of Biologically Cloned Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates from Patients Treated with Zidovudine and Lamivudine

Thomas C Stoeckli 1,, Samantha MaWhinney 2, Jonathan Uy 1,, Chengying Duan 1, Jing Lu 1, David Shugarts 1, Daniel R Kuritzkes 1,*
PMCID: PMC132743  PMID: 12435711

Abstract

Mutations at reverse transcriptase codons 44, 118, 207, and 208 were significantly correlated with reduced zidovudine susceptibility in biologically cloned human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates. Sequences from the Stanford HIV RT and Protease Sequence Database showed that these mutations were more common in HIV-1 isolates from patients treated with zidovudine and lamivudine than in patients not treated with these drugs.


The combination of zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC) remains effective at inhibiting the replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) despite the rapid emergence of 3TC resistance. This effectiveness is based in part on the interaction between the 3TC resistance mutation at reverse transcriptase (RT) codon 184 and ZDV resistance mutations. Introduction of the M184V substitution into strains carrying ZDV resistance mutations results in reversal of ZDV resistance (18), whereas coadministration of ZDV and 3TC results in delayed emergence of ZDV resistance mutations (9, 11). However, dually resistant isolates have been recovered from patients failing ZDV-3TC therapy (3, 14).

Mutations at both the 5′ and 3′ ends of the RT gene modulate expression of dual resistance [15; S. D. Kemp and S. Bloor, Antivir. Ther. 2(Suppl. 5):21-22, abstr. 11, 1997]. In addition, a G333E substitution promotes dual resistance in some, but not all, strains that harbor the classical ZDV and 3TC resistance mutations (8). To investigate further the genetic basis of dual resistance to ZDV and 3TC, we conducted a comprehensive clonal analysis of the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of HIV-1 isolates from patients on prolonged treatment with these drugs.

Isolation and characterization of biological clones.

Primary HIV-1 isolates resistant to ZDV and 3TC were cultured on peripheral blood mononuclear cells at limiting dilutions to generate independent biological clones (3). Susceptibilities of the clonal isolates to ZDV and 3TC were determined as described previously (6, 7). Resistance to ZDV was defined as intermediate (ZDVi; 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] ≥ 0.1 μM and < 1.0 μM) or high level (ZDVr; IC50 ≥ 1.0 μM) (7); resistance to 3TC (3TCr) was defined as an IC50 of ≥1.0 μM (10). Thirty biological clones were generated from 10 ZDVr 3TCr and 4 ZDVi 3TCr primary HIV-1 isolates, which were originally obtained from nine patients (3). The following phenotypes were observed: ZDVr 3TCr (eight clones), ZDVi 3TCr (five clones), ZDV-sensitive (ZDVs) 3TCr (nine clones), ZDVr 3TC-sensitive (3TCs) (three clones), ZDVi 3TCs (three clones), and ZDVs 3TCs (two clones) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Genotype and phenotype of viral biological clones and plasma virus from patients with ZDV- and 3TC-resistant HIV-1

Patient Wk Isolate Sourcea RT codonb
IC50 (μM)c
M41 E44 D67 K70 V118 Q151 Y181 M184 G196 Q207 H208 L210 R211 T215 K219 ZDV 3TC
R001 15 654a bc Md K >5 31.7
654b bc Md K 2.61 1.90
654c bc Md K 2.29 0.901
654p pl Md K ND ND
27 556a bc Me V K 2.41 >437
556c bc Me K 0.162 0.031
556d bc Me K 3.67 3.50
556p pl Md V G/Ef K ND ND
R002 52 273a bc L V Y 0.250 417
273b bc L V Y 0.020 80.5
273c bc L V Y 0.070 405
273p pl L V Y ND ND
R003 20 221a bc L I V D W K Y 0.986 >437
221e bc L I V D W K Y 0.155 234
221p pl L N I V D W K Y ND ND
R004 23 699b bc L N V W K Y 0.011 280
699d bc L N V W K Y 0.106 75.9
699p pl L D N V W K Y ND ND
R005 16 26aa bc L D N R I C E D Y W K Y R >5 0.144
26ab bc L D N R I C D Y W Y R >5 0.284
26ac bc L D N R I C E D Y W K Y R >5 4.26
R010 25 256a bc L V S 0.002 402
256b bc L V S 0.037 >437
256c bc L V S 0.001 83.2
256p pl L V S ND ND
R011 22 281a bc Y 0.014 0.049
281b bc Y 0.155 0.478
281p pl V Y ND ND
49 751c bc Y 0.212 0.035
751p pl G Y ND ND
R014 16 768b bc L D N V E E Y W Y 0.909 258
768c bc L D N V E E Y W K Y 1.95 >437
768p pl L A N E E Y K Y ND ND
27 703b bc L D N V E E Y W K Y >5 >437
703d bc L D N V E E Y W K Y 2.11 >437
703p pl L A N V E E Y W Y ND ND
37 419a bc L D N V E E Y W Y 0.009 >437
419p pl L N V E E Y W Y ND ND
R026 28 758a bc L V E K Y 0.003 102
758c bc L V E K Y 0.016 0.549
758f bc L N R V E K Y 0.093 29.1
758p pl L N R V E K Y ND ND
a

bc, biological clone; pl, plasma.

b

Amino acid residues at the nucleotide positions are designated by single-letter abbreviations. −, no difference from the wild-type amino acid (shown in table boxheads).

c

Drug susceptibility data are geometric means of two or three determinations. ND, not determined.

d

The 75I, 77L, and 116Y mutations were also present.

e

The 62V, 75I, 77L, and 116Y mutations were also present.

f

A mixture of G and E was found at this position.

Although primary isolates were selected for biological cloning on the basis of dual resistance to ZDV and 3TC, a minority of clones showed the ZDV- and 3TC-resistant phenotype. This observation most likely is explained by the outgrowth of sensitive viruses that constituted a minority of the viral quasispecies and suggests that ZDV- and 3TC-resistant isolates have a growth disadvantage compared to singly resistant or wild-type viruses. The possibility that some of the observed heterogeneity was due to the appearance or reversion of mutations during virus culture cannot be excluded.

Genotypic analysis of biological clones.

The entire RT-coding sequence was amplified by a nested PCR from HIV-infected peripheral blood mononuclear cell DNA obtained at the end of culture and cloned into a PCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). For plasma samples, viral RNA was extracted using the QIAamp viral RNA kit (QIAGEN) and reverse transcribed using the avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase system (Gibco/BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) with primer TCSTRA1 (5′-CTAGTTGCCATATTCCTGGAC-3′, nucleotide [nt] 3965 corresponding to the HIV-1 Hxb2R sequence [http://hiv-web.lanl.gov]). First- and second-round PCR included the following steps: (i) incubation for 3 min at 95°C; (ii) 30 cycles, with 1 cycle consisting of 1 min at 94°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 2 min at 72°C; and (iii) 10-min extension phase at 72°C. For the first-round PCR, primer pair TCSRTS1 (5′-ATGATAGGGGGAATTGGAGG-3′, nt 1934) and TCSRTA1 was used. The product of the first round was then amplified with primers TCSRTS2 (5′-GCAAAAAGCTTAGTAGGACCTACACCTGTC-3′, nt position 2024) and TCSRTA2 (5′-CGTTTGTCGACCTTGGGCCTTATCTATTCC-3′, nt 3803). The full-length RT-coding sequence of three independent molecular clones from each biological clone was determined using an ABI 373A or ABI Prism 377 DNA automated sequencer (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, Calif.). Sequences were manually aligned using BioEdit (T. A. Hall, Department of Microbiology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh), and a consensus sequence for each biological clone was generated.

Various combinations of ZDV- and 3TC-associated resistance mutations were observed (Table 1). Many clones carried additional RT substitutions including 44D, 118I, 196E, 207D or 207E (207D/E), 208Y, and 211K. None of the clones had the G333E mutation. Six clones derived from patient R001 carried the 151M multinucleoside resistance mutation and were excluded from subsequent analyses. RT sequences of the biological clones generally showed close concordance with virus sequences from plasma samples obtained at the same time point.

Association of RT mutations with ZDV susceptibility.

To determine the association of specific RT mutations on ZDV susceptibility, the geometric mean IC50s of biological clones with and without those mutations were compared. Because the independence of multiple clones obtained from an individual patient could not be assumed, a mixed-effects model was applied using SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.). The antilog of the model-based mean and 95% confidence intervals were used to calculate the reported geometric mean IC50s and confidence intervals. Biological clones that carried mutations at codons 44, 118, 207, and 208 had geometric mean IC50s for ZDV that were 17- to 23-fold greater than clones that had the wild-type sequence at these positions (Table 2). The 196E mutation and the 211K polymorphism were each associated with twofold-higher geometric mean IC50s for ZDV, but these findings were marginally significant after the data were adjusted for multiple comparisons.

TABLE 2.

Effects of RT mutations on zidovudine susceptibility

Codon Geometric mean IC50 (μM) (95% CI)a
Pb
Wild-type Mutant
44 0.044 (0.009, 0.209) 0.747 (0.093, >5.000) 0.001
118 0.069 (0.015, 0.307) 1.459 (0.063, >5.000) 0.004
196 0.085 (0.014, 0.508) 0.197 (0.027, 1.465) 0.020
207 0.030 (0.007, 0.142) 0.674 (0.121, 3.736) <0.001
208 0.044 (0.009, 0.209) 0.747 (0.093, >5.000) 0.001
211c 0.121 (0.021, 0.710) 0.237 (0.042, 1.341) 0.051
a

For each codon, random-effect models were fit to the outcome: log10(zidovudine IC50). The antilog of the model-based mean and 95% confidence intervals were used to calculate the reported geometric means and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

b

P values comparing the geometric mean IC50s for the wild type and mutant were calculated from the random-effect model. P values of ≤ 0.008 were considered significant using a Bonferroni's correction (0.05/6).

c

Excludes clones with 211S mutation.

Although a large number of biological clones were analyzed in this study, they were derived from primary isolates obtained from only nine patients. Therefore, conclusions regarding possible associations of specific RT mutations with phenotype must be considered preliminary. To extend our findings, we sought to determine the frequency of these mutations in HIV-1 sequences from patients treated with ZDV and 3TC and patients not treated with nucleoside RT inhibitors. RT sequences from 218 unique ZDV- and 3TC-treated patients and 233 untreated patients were identified in the Stanford HIV RT and Protease Sequence Database (http://hivdb.stanford.edu/hiv/index.asp), and the occurrence of specific mutations was tabulated. Mutation frequencies in viral sequences from ZDV- and 3TC-treated and untreated patients were compared using mutation odds ratios that were programmed using Splus (MathSoft, Inc., Seattle, Wash.). The 44D, 118I, 207D/E, and 208Y mutations were significantly more likely to be present in RT sequences from patients treated with ZDV and 3TC than in sequences from patients not treated with these drugs (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Odds ratio for presence of RT mutations in HIV sequences from ZDV- and 3TC-treated patients

Mutationa Mutation frequency (%) in patientsb
Odds ratio (95% CI)c Pd
Untreated Treated
44D 0.9 14.1 18.11 (4.262, 76.91) 0.004
118I 2.2 24.2 14.48 (5.660, 37.06) <0.001
196E 10.9 16.2 1.576 (0.906, 2.744) 0.139
207D/E 9.6 24.0 2.972 (1.694, 5.212) <0.001
208Y 0.4 12.6 32.63 (4.393, 242.4) <0.001
211K 41.6 52.1 1.525 (1.031, 2.256) 0.044
a

Amino acid residues are designated by single-letter abbreviations.

b

Frequencies of mutations at the specified RT codons were compared by computing mutation odds ratios for HIV-1 sequences from ZDV- and 3TC-treated versus untreated patients.

c

95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

d

P values (comparing the mutation frequencies in untreated and treated patients) of ≤ 0.008 were considered significant, using Bonferroni's correction (0.05/6).

The results of several studies point to the potential significance of mutations at codons 44 and 118 in patients treated with nucleoside RT inhibitors (2, 5, 16, 17). Our finding that the 44D/E and 118I mutations were more common in viruses from ZDV- and 3TC-treated patients is consistent with these results. An earlier study analyzed the genotype and phenotype of molecularly cloned RT sequences derived from isolates from four patients receiving ZDV and 3TC combination therapy (15). In agreement with the data presented here, multiple ZDV resistance mutations were found to be required for a dual-resistance phenotype. Mutations at codons 44, 118, 196, 207, 208, and 211 were present in clones from two of four patients in that study, but the potential significance of those mutations was not discussed.

Biological clones that carried the 207D/E mutation had a geometric mean IC50 for ZDV that was 22.5-fold greater than clones that had the wild-type codon at this position (P < 0.001). The potential importance of mutations at this codon for viral adaptation to replication in the presence of ZDV is supported by our analysis of data from the Stanford HIV RT and Protease Sequence Database, which showed that the 207D/E mutations were significantly more likely to be present in HIV-1 sequences from ZDV- and 3TC-treated patients than in sequences from untreated control patients (Table 3). Similarly, the H208Y mutation was associated with a 17-fold-higher geometric mean IC50 for ZDV. Of note, the 208Y mutation was first reported in association with foscarnet resistance (12). Serial in vitro passage of HIV-1 in the presence of foscarnet led to emergence of the G161L and 208Y mutations, which together conferred approximately eight- to ninefold-higher resistance to foscarnet. When present together with 161L, the 208Y mutation enhanced susceptibility to ZDV, whereas the results of our study suggest the opposite effect when this mutation was present together with ZDV resistance mutations at codons 41, 67, 70, 210, 215, and 219.

Studies from several laboratories have shown that ZDV resistance mutations enhance the removal of the terminal ZDV monophosphate from the growing primer chain by pyrophosphate or ATP, thereby relieving the block to reverse transcription (1, 13). By contrast, the 184V mutation reduces the rate of pyrophosphorolysis and decreases primer unblocking (4). It will be important to determine the mechanism by which mutations described in this report alter ZDV susceptibility and to determine whether mutations that confer dual resistance to ZDV and 3TC restore primer unblocking activity despite the presence of 184V or alter the kinetics of ZDV-TP binding to the enzyme-primer/template complex.

In conclusion, results of this study suggest that substitutions at RT codons 44, 118, 207, and 208 modulate the expression of ZDV resistance in HIV-1 isolates that carry ZDV resistance mutations at codons 41, 67, 70, 210, 215, and/or 219 with or without the 3TC resistance mutation at codon 184. These findings may have practical importance in helping to refine the interpretation of genotypic resistance data regarding ZDV and 3TC in samples from patients who have received treatment with both drugs.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

Consensus RT sequences from biologically cloned HIV-1 isolates were deposited in GenBank data bank under accession numbers AY013828 to AY013868.

Acknowledgments

This work was sponsored in part by Public Health Service grants AI-42567, RR-16482, and CA-46934 from the National Institutes of Health and by a grant from the Schweizerische Stiftung für Medizinisch-Biologische Stipendien.

We thank Monique Givens, Julio Pazmino, Brian Nankervis, and Russell Young for technical assistance and Kristin Doherty for expert editorial assistance. We also thank Christopher Korch and Efang Li from the University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center DNA Sequencing Core for DNA sequencing. The plasmid pHIVΔRTBstEIII was a gift of Brendan Larder through the MRC AIDS Directed Reagent Program.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Arion, D., N. Kaushik, S. McCormick, G. Borkow, and M. Parniak. 1998. Phenotypic mechanism of HIV-1 resistance to 3′-azido-3′-deoxythymidine (AZT): increased polymerization processivity and enhanced sensitivity to pyrophosphate of the mutant viral reverse transcriptase. Biochemistry 37:15908-15917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cohen, C. J., M. Sension, C. Farthing, M. Conant, S. Jacobson, J. Nadler, W. Verbiest, K. Hertogs, M. Ames, A. Rinehart, N. M. Graham, and the VIRA 3001 Study Team. 2002. A randomized trial assessing the impact of phenotypic resistance testing on antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 16:1-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Delaugerre, C., M. Mouroux, A. Yvon-Groussin, A. Simon, F. Angleraud, J.-M. Huraux, H. Agut, C. Katlama, and V. Calvez. 2001. Prevalence and conditions of selection of E44D/A and V118I human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase mutations in clinical practice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:946-948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Götte, M., D. Arion, M. A. Parniak, and M. A. Wainberg. 2000. The M184V mutation in the reverse transcriptase of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 impairs rescue of chain-terminated DNA synthesis. J. Virol. 74:3579-3585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hertogs, K., S. Bloor, V. De Vroey, C. Van den Eynde, P. Dehertogh, A. Van Cauwenberge, M. Sturmer, T. M. Alcorn, S. Wegner, M. Van Houtte, V. Miller, and B. Larder. 2000. A novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase mutational pattern confers phenotypic lamivudine resistance in the absence of mutation 184V. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:568-573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hollinger, F. B., J. W. Bremer, L. E. Myers, J. W. M. Gold, L. McQuay, and The NIH/NIAID/DAIDS/ACTG Virology Laboratories. 1992. Standardization of sensitive human immunodeficiency virus coculture procedures and establishment of a multicenter quality assurance program for the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:1787-1794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Japour, A. J., D. L. Mayers, V. A. Johnson, D. R. Kuritzkes, L. A. Beckett, J. M. Arduino, J. Lane, R. J. Black, P. S. Reichelderfer, R.T. D'Aquila, C. S. Crumpacker, the RV-43 Study Group, and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Virology Committee Resistance Working Group. 1993. A standardized peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture assay for the determination of drug susceptibilities of clinical human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:1095-1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kemp, S., C. Shi, S. Bloor, P. R. Harrigan, J. Mellors, and B. Larder. 1998. A novel polymorphism at codon 333 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase can facilitate dual resistance to zidovudine and l-2′,3′-dideoxy-3′-thiacytidine. J. Virol. 72:5093-5098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kuritzkes, D., D. Shugarts, M. Bakhtiari, D. Poticha, J. Johnson, T. Gingeras, M. Kennedy, and J. Eron. 2000. Emergence of dual resistance to zidovudine and lamivudine after long-term treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection with zidovudine plus lamivudine. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 23:26-34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kuritzkes, D. R., J. B. Quinn, S. L. Benoit, D. L. Shugarts, A. Griffin, M. Bakhtiari, D. Poticha, J. J. Eron, M. A. Fallon, and M. Rubin. 1996. Drug resistance and virologic response in NUCA 3001, a randomized trial of lamivudine (3TC) versus zidovudine (ZDV) versus ZDV plus 3TC in previously untreated patients. AIDS 10:975-981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Larder, B. A., S. D. Kemp, and P. R. Harrigan. 1995. Potential mechanism for sustained antiretroviral efficacy of AZT-3TC combination therapy. Science 269:696-699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mellors, J. W., H. Z. Bazmi, R. Schinazi, B. M. Roy, Y. Hsiou, E. Arnold, J. Weir, and D. L. Mayers. 1995. Novel mutations in reverse transcriptase of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reduce susceptibility to foscarnet in laboratory and clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1087-1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Meyer, P. R., S. E. Matsuura, A. G. So, and W. A. Scott. 1998. Unblocking of chain-terminated primer by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase through a nucleotide-dependent mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:13471-13476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Miller, V., A. N. Phillips, C. Rottman, S. Staszewski, R. Pauwels, K. Hertogs, M. P. de Bethun, S. D. Kemp, S. Bloor, P. R. Harrigan, and B. Larder. 1998. Dual resistance to zidovudine and lamivudine in patients treated with zidovudine-lamivudine combination therapy: association with therapy failure. J. Infect. Dis. 177:1521-1532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nijhuis, M., R. Schuurman, D. deJong, R. VanLeeuwn, J. Lang, S. Danner, W. Keulen, T. deGroot, and C. A. B. Boucher. 1997. Lamivudine-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants (184V) require multiple amino acid changes to become co-resistant to zidovudine in vivo. J. Infect. Dis. 176:398-405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Precious, H., H. Gunthard, J. K. Wong, R. D'Aquila, V. A. Johnson, D. R. Kuritzkes, D. D. Richman, and A. Leigh-Brown. 2000. Multiple sites in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase associated with virological response to combination therapy. AIDS 14:31-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Romano, L., G. Venturi, S. Bloor, R. Harrigan, B. A. Larder, and M. Zazzi. 2002. Broad nucleoside analogue resistance implications for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse-transcriptase mutations at codons 44 and 118. J. Infect. Dis. 185:898-904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tisdale, M., S. D. Kemp, N. R. Parry, and B. A. Larder. 1993. Rapid in vitro selection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistant to 3′-thiacytidine inhibitors due to a mutation in the YMDD region of reverse transcriptase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5653-5656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES