ABSTRACT
The assembly of functional nanomaterials at liquid–liquid interfaces offers a promising approach to address mass transfer and catalyst‐recovery limitations in conventional biphasic catalytic systems. This strategy exploits engineered colloidal particles serving dual roles as emulsion stabilizers and catalytic sites, creating platforms with high interfacial area‐to‐volume ratios. These systems can exhibit improved reaction kinetics with efficient phase separation and catalyst recyclability while potentially operating under milder conditions that reduce energy consumption and waste generation. This review analyzes recent developments in the design, synthesis, and surface engineering of interfacially active nanocatalysts. It is examined structure‐performance relationships governing catalytic efficiency and emulsion stability, assess industrial implementation challenges including scalability and economic viability, and evaluate prospects of Pickering emulsion‐based microreactor platforms as enabling technologies for sustainable chemical processes aligned with green chemistry principles and circular economy frameworks.
Keywords: biphasic reactions, emulsion microreactors, interfacial assembly, recoverable catalysts, Pickering emulsions
Functional nanomaterials assembled at liquid–liquid interfaces create dual‐role platforms serving as emulsion stabilizers and catalytic sites, offering enhanced reaction kinetics with improved catalyst recovery and recyclability. This review examines design strategies, structure‐performance relationships, and industrial implementation prospects of Pickering emulsion‐based microreactors as enabling technologies for sustainable chemical processes.

1. Introduction
The indispensable transition toward sustainable chemical processes became one of the defining challenges of modern society, driven by mounting concerns over environmental degradation, resource depletion, and climate change [1]. Catalysis is in the center of this transformation, with over 90% of industrial chemical processes relying on catalytic reactions to achieve the selectivity, efficiency, and atom economy demanded by contemporary manufacturing [2, 3]. However, traditional homogeneous catalytic systems, while offering high activity and selectivity, face persistent challenges in catalyst recovery, product separation, and the extensive use of organic solvents [4, 5]. These limitations become particularly acute when dealing with reactants and products of differing solubility, necessitating energy‐intensive separation processes and generating substantial waste streams [6]. Consequently, the quest for more sustainable catalytic platforms has driven researchers to explore alternative reaction environments that can reconcile catalytic performance with the principles of green chemistry [7].
Reactions occurring at liquid–liquid (L–L) interfaces have been recognized as a groundbreaking approach to overcome the limitations of conventional homogeneous catalytic systems [8, 9]. Particularly for reactions where reactants and products exhibit different water solubilities, L–L systems provide an efficient platform for selective product separation and catalyst recovery [10, 11]. The most prominent reaction in biphasic bulk systems involves phase‐transfer catalyst (PTC) [12]. PTCs enable reactions between species residing in immiscible phases by transporting reactive ions or molecules across the phase boundary, thereby allowing otherwise inaccessible reactants to come into contact and undergo reaction [13]. Crown‐ethers is one of the example of them [14, 15]. Crown‐ethers are cyclic polyethers composed of repeating –CH2–CH2–O– units arranged to form a macrocyclic ring with a central cavity line by electron‐rich oxygen atoms [16]. The macrocycle adopts a conformationally flexible, toroidal structure whose interior provides a highly Lewis‐basic coordination environment capable of strongly chelating metal cations [17]. Using this cavity, crown‐ethers can deliver the cation to the organic phase for condensation reaction (Figure 1a). Ionic liquids (ILs) systems is another example that are operated in biphasic bulk systems but offer two distinct mechanistic pathways: direct catalytic action by the ILs itself, or utilization of the IL layer as a byproduct scavenger to shift equilibrium toward product formation and enhance reaction efficiency [18, 19]. The BASF‐developed Biphasic Acid Scavenging utilizing Ionic Liquids (BASIL) process utilized the latter approach [20]. Conventional methods required addition of tertiary amines or similar reagents for acid neutralization. The BASIL process eliminates this requirement, enabling facile separation of ILs catalyst from products while achieving high recyclability and economic viability (Figure 1b) [21]. Despite their advantages, both biphasic bulk and ILs systems exhibit a fundamental limitation: reactions occur exclusively at the interface between simply segregated aqueous and organic layers, constraining the available reaction area [22]. Interfacial catalysis are primarily governed by the mass transfer rate of chemical species between two immiscible liquid phases [23]. This recognition has driven to increase interfacial surface area and enhance mass transfer efficiency. Polymeric membrane catalysts address this challenge by positioning catalyst‐embedded membranes at the interface, where reactants encounter each other and subsequently transfer into the adjacent phase [24, 25, 26]. This configuration leverages the inherently high surface area of polymeric membranes to substantially improve reaction efficiency compared to conventional biphasic approaches (Figure 1c) [27].
FIGURE 1.

Schematic illustrations of diverse interfacial catalytic platforms. (a) Biphasic bulk, (b) ionic liquid, (c) molecular surfactant, (d) polymeric membrane, and (e) Pickering microreactors.
Most L–L heterogenous phase catalyses are conducted in mechanically stirred tank reactors, with packed columns, agitated columns, spray columns, and static mixers serving as alternative configurations. Stirred tank reactors accommodate batch, semi‐batch, or continuous operation modes [28]. While interfacial areas depend on reactor volume and operating conditions (10–102 m2 mL−1) [29]. Despite their widespread adoption, batch reactors suffer from two critical drawbacks: inhomogeneous mixing profiles and substantial energy consumption associated with continuous mechanical agitation [30, 31]. To achieve homogeneous L–L reactors with nonconsecutive stirring, researchers have pursued systems that maintain the mixing of both phases. This concept has led to the development of molecular surfactant and micellar catalyst systems [32, 33, 34]. The self‐assembly of ionic, non‐ionic, or designer surfactants in aqueous solutions enables the formation of micro‐heterogeneous environments [35]. These nanostructures act as nanoreactors, efficiently solubilizing both polar and non‐polar reactants that would otherwise be immiscible in water, thereby overcoming major mass transfer limitations [36, 37]. The enhanced efficiency stems from the unique organization at the interface. The confined space within or at the surface of micelles leads to high local concentrations of reactants and catalysts, significantly accelerating reaction rates. The confined micellar interior leads to high local concentrations, significantly accelerating various transformations including C‐H activations [38], cross‐couplings [39], oxidative coupling [40], cycloadditions [41], among others. Micellar catalysis also can be proceeded under organic solvent‐free conditions. Upon reaction completion, micelle disassembly releases the product by simple filtration and aqueous washing to remove surfactant residue [42]. The principal advantage lies in utilizing water as the primary reaction medium, substantially reducing both environmental impact and operational costs [43]. This economic and ecological benefit has driven widespread adoption in pharmaceutical companies including Novartis, AbbVie, and Takeda (Figure 1d). Enhanced selectivity arises from the tailored interfacial microenvironment that stabilizes specific transition states [33, 34].
An advanced approach that combines homogeneous biphasic mixing with reusuability is the Pickering emulsion microreactors (PEMs) [44]. Pickering emulsions are stabilized by solid particles which are retreievable and recylclable. This advantage of Pickering stabilizers fulfilled the requirements for the interfacial green catalysts [45]. Furthermore, PEMs dramatically enhanced the surface‐to‐volume ratio to the range of 104–105 m2 mL−1, which translates to superior reaction kinetics [46]. Dr. Pierre‐Gilles de Gennes introduced the concept of “Janus grains” and noted that “skin can breathe” in his 1991 Nobel lecture [47]. That metaphor described how solid particles adsorbed at interfaces create interestitial voids through which small molecules can permeate, while larger or sterically hindererd species are excluded [48]. This structural selectivity allows substrates and intermediates to reach catalytic sites efficiently without requiring solubility‐enhancing protecting groups [49]. PEMs prove particularly advantageous for phase shifting reactions involving solubility transitions between hydrophilic and hydrophobic states or hydrophobic to hydrophilic states, accommodating reversible changes in molecular polarity throughout the reaction pathway [50, 51]. Especially, PEMs are highly versatile for various reaction compared to the other interfacial catalysis by decorating the Pickering interfacial catalysts (PICs). PICs act both as the emulsion stabilizer and recyclable catalysts (Figure 1e) [45, 52]. Decorating elaborately PICs make them particularly attractive for future catalytic manufacturing [53]. PICs enable compartmentalization and spatial isolation of catalytic species, which is highly beneficial for one‐pot cascade transformations involving incompatible catalysts or reaction environments [54]. Collectively, PEMs should be studied not merely as high‐area biphasic reactors, but as promising modular platforms for process intensification, catalyst integration, and future continuous catalytic manufacturing (Table 1) [55].
TABLE 1.
Overview of liquid–liquid biphasic interfacial catalysts.
| Biphasic catalysis | Size of droplet (nm) | Reusability | Energy requirement | Catalyst/Reaction | Industrial application | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biphasic bulk | n/a | n/a | Mid | Quaternary ammonium compounds (QAC)/phase‐transfer catalysis | Ruhr Chemie‐Rhone Poulenc (RRP) | [56] |
| Ionic liquid | n/a | Low; trace IL | High | Chloroaluminate IL/Alkylation | BASF's BASIL process | [20] |
| Polymeric membrane | n/a | Mid; pore blockage | Low | Polyethersulfone membrane‐metal/Aromatic removal | Nafion/DuraMem | [57, 58] |
| Molecular Surfactant | 102–105 | Low; | Low | Imidazolium salts/Suzuki coupling | Pharma‐grade micellar catalysis | [33, 34] |
| Pickering microreactor | 103–106 | High | Low | PIC/phase shifting catalysis |
Pilot / Lab scale |
[59] |
Low: Only initial agitation is required to form the emulsion.
Mid: Gentle stirring is required during the reaction.
High: Continuous stirring should be applied to the batch reactor throughout the reaction.
In this review, we examine the advantages of PEMs from a green catalytic perspective and survey the PEM design as governed by PIC decoration strategies. First, we elucidate how PICs with diverse dimensional morphologies can simultaneously stabilize the liquid–liquid interface while exploiting their unique structural features to facilitate catalytic transformations. Subsequently, we discuss surface‐functionalized strategies including organic, inorganic, and chemo‐bio catalytic variants. This is followed by an examination of stimuli‐responsive PEMs engineered for facile catalyst recovery and recycling. Finally, we discuss classification of advanced PEM which can procced the cascade reaction including Janus particle, Pickering interfacial biocatalyst, continous flow microreactor (CFM), double emulsion templated microreactor, and artificial biomimetic enzymes.
2. Interfacial Catalysis in Green Chemistry Framework
Conventional catalytic processes struggle with excessive energy consumption, heavy solvent use, poor catalyst recovery, and dependence on finite fossil feedstocks [60]. These limitations directly conflict with global carbon regulations and environmental standards that increasingly penalize carbon‐intensive operations [61, 62]. In response, Anastas and Warner developed the 12 principles of green chemistry as a framework for designing sustainable processes, now widely across academia and the chemical industry (Figure 2a) [63, 64]. PEMs offers a compelling solution by integrating multiple green chemistry principles into their fundamental architecture, fulfilling both the technical demands of next‐generation catalysis and the regulatory pressures of a carbon‐constrained future [65].
FIGURE 2.

Alignment of PEMs with green chemistry. (a) The 12 principles of green chemistry. Reproduced with permission [66]. Copyright 2000, Oxford Academic. (b) Theoretical comparison of activation energy at the biphasic interfaces and in the homogenous system and (c) comparison of interfacial area to volume ratio in various biphasic catalytic systems. Reproduced with permission [60]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (d) Sustainability advantages of PEMs over conventional biphasic catalytic systems, (e) versatile designs of interfacial catalysts, and (f) recycling pathways.
The microcompartment structure of these systems fundamentally reshapes reaction thermodynamics in ways unattainable in bulk media. Enhanced equilibrium constant (K eq) stem from a unique reaction‐adsorption phenomenon: reactants within emulsion microdroplets adsorbs to boundaries at lower energy states, reducing the Gibbs free energies (ΔG0 ) of transition states inversely proportional to the droplet radius (Figure 2b) [46, 67, 68]. This process intensification enables reactions under significantly milder conditions, directly aligning with “design for energy efficiency.”
Bulk reactions are transformed into countless microscopic reactors, each droplet providing confined reaction space with extraordinary surface area (Figure 2c) [46]. The total L–L interfacial area (A) in an emulsion can be estimated from the dispersed phase volume fraction (φ) and the Sauter mean droplet diameter (d32 ) as:
| (1) |
where droplet miniaturization increases the total accessible liquid–liquid interfacial area at a fixed disperse phase fraction [69]. The characteristic diffusion time (τ) for molecular transport within a spherical emulsion droplet with the droplet radius (r0 ), the molecular diffusion coefficient (D), and the interfacial exchange rate constant (α) can be expressed as:
| (2) |
Accordingly, the characteristic transport time decreases with the square of the droplet size, demonstrating accelerated mass transfer in compartmentalized emulsion microreactors [70, 71]. Therefore, smaller droplets simultaneously maximize interfacial area and minimize transport resistance, allowing concentrated catalysts and reactants to operate across drastically shortened mass‐transfer pathways. Such acceleration of reaction rates and conversion efficiency embodies the principle of “reduced derivatives.”. This distincitve interfacial archtecture excels at implementing “use of renewable feedstocks” and “safer solvents and auxiliaries.” Catalyst‐functionalized particles jam irreversibly at L–L boundaries, eliminating surfactants and toxic solvents while creating highly active catalytic surfaces [72]. Hazardous solvent consumption and auxiliary chemical use are markedly reduced, permitting water‐rich or benign solvent sytems (Figure 2d).
PEMs offer remarkable versatility in “catalysis.” Diverse catalytic moieties, ranging from metal nanoparticles and organocatalytic moieties to polymer‐bound enzymes, can be anchored onto the stabilizing particles at the interface, enabling highly customizable and reaction‐specific platforms (Figure 2e) [45, 73, 74]. When these stabilizers incorporate biodegradable or bio‐based materials, they fulfill “design for degradation,” multiplying sustainability benefits [75]. Effortless catalyst recycling represents another key advantage. Post‐reaction, simple centrifugation or controlled demulsification cleanly separates phases without downstream purification steps commonly needed in bulk systems [76, 77]. The recovered catalyst particles immediately reassemble into fresh emulsions, regenerating the microreactor architecture for successive cycles (Figure 2f) [78]. This circular workflow exemplifies both “waste prevention” and “atom economy,” maximizing material efficiency across repeated operations. Collectively, these systems unify reaction intensification, safer chemistry, renewable materials, and circular catalyst use within a single interfacial platform. This interfacial engineering translates the abstract principles of green chemistry into practical, high‐performance catalytic systems ready for industrial depolyment.
3. Engineering Colloidal Morphology for Spatially Controlled PEM Interfaces
In PEMs, solid particles play dual roles as droplet stabilizers and catalyst supports. The resulting microreactor properties are governed not only by surface chemistry but also by colloidal morphology at L–L boundaries. Although all particles are physically three‐dimensional objects, the notations, zero‐dimensional (0D), one‐dimensional (1D) with extended axis, and two‐dimensional (2D) extended lateral dimensions, used here refers to the dominant geometrical anisotropy that controls interfacial adsorption and assembly [9]. Increasing anisotropy systemically alters interfacial packing, contact‐line length, mechanical stress distribution, and transport pathways across the colloidal film (Figure 3a) [79, 80].
FIGURE 3.

Schematic illustration of the effect of particle shape on interfacial wetting and catalytic function at oil/water interfaces.
3.1. Zero‐Dimensional Particles for Wettability‐Driven Stabilization
The key physical parameter governing Pickering emulsion formation is the three‐phase contact angle (θ) of the particle at the oil‐water interface (Figure 3b). The adsorption energy (△Eads ) scales with particle radius (r), interfacial tension (γ), and θ according to:
| (3) |
which becomes maximal when θ ≈ 90°, where the particle wetted equally by both oil and water phases [81]. Hydrophilic particles (θ < 90°) preferentially stabilize oil‐in‐water (O/W) emulsions, while hydrophobic particles (θ > 90°) favor water‐in‐oil (O/W) configuration (Figure 4a–c). From a catalytic standpoint, the emulsion type determines substrate localization and active site exposure. These wettability rules have been established most clearly for 0D spherical particles, which provide a geometrically simple platform where θ and particle size can be varied independently [82]. This makes 0D particles the natural standing point for understanding how wettability translates into micrereactor structure and funcion before advancing more complex 1D and 2D morphologies. Spherical particles assemble into densely packed, often hexagonally ordered monolayers at the droplet surface (Figure 4d) [83].
FIGURE 4.

0D colloidal particles assembly for PEM fabrication. (a) Three‐phase contact angle (θ) at the oil water interface. (b,c) Preferential emulsion stabilization according to the wettability: (b) hydrophilic particles and (c) hydrophobic particles. (d) Electron microscopic image of spherical particle‐stabilized colloidosomes. Adapted with permission [84]. Copyright 2015, Wiley‐VCH. (e) Electron microscopic image of Janus 0D colloids. Reproduced with permission [85]. Copyright 2016, Wiley‐VCH. (f) Schematic illustration of rotational fluctutation at the oil‐water interface. Adapted with permission [86]. Copyright 202, American Chemical Society. (g) Interfacial orientation based on Janus balance of Janus 0D colloids. (h) Retrievable PEMs designing using Janus particles. Reproduced with permission [87]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.
Wettability‐controlled assembly of isotropic particles provides a conceptual basis for solution‐phase Janus colloid design (Figure 4e). The spherical Janus particles are not completely static after adsorption at L–L interfaces, but can undergo interfacial reorientation as they relax toward the preferred configuration. The rotational adjustment toward equilibrium continuously restores phase‐matched exposure of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic faces, preventing the catalytic patch from remaining buried in a poorly wetted state (Figure 4f) [88]. This can facilitate reactant‐product partitioning from the three‐phase reaction zone. At L–L boundaries, particles whose surface energy lies between that of two heterogenous liquids spontaneously adsorb on the interface and adopt an immersion depth set by θ [89]. The immersion geometry defines how much of each hemisphere is exposed to each phase. This sets “Janus balance,” analogous to the relative hydrophilic‐lyphophilic balance (HLB) of molecular surfactants that control emulsion type and stability (Figure 4g) [90, 91, 92, 93]. Janus modification at L–L boundaries enables precise spatial localization of catalytic active site with well‐controlled patch size and wettability contrast. Using this architecture, Fe2O3 nanoparticles were select ively deposited on the hydrophilic hemisphere of spherical particles, while Pd or Ag nanoparticles were distributed over the particle surface [94]. This produces amphiphilic Janus colloid surfactants that combine catalyltic and magnetic funcions driven by their built‐in wettability contrast [87]. Assembled at the oil‐water interface, they catalyze aerobic oxidation of 4‐methoxybenzylalcohol to 4‐methoxybenzaldehyde with high yield turn over, while the Fe2O3 patch enables magnetic recovery and recycling (Figure 4h).
3.2. One‐Dimensional Particles for Hierarchical Assembly
The elongated geometry of 1D particles increases the length of the three‐phase contact line along the anisotropic axis, favoring configuration in which the long axis lies parallel to the L–L boundary (Figure 5a) [95]. Above the critical aspect ratio, the side‐on orientation always outcompetes end‐on adsorption, allowing the extended axis to displace a larger area of L–L contact [96]. This preferential positioning is directly reflected in ΔEads , which for rod‐like particles scales with length (l), width (d), and θ as:
| (4) |
becoming linearly proportional to particle extension at fixed width [97]. Extending the rod axis deepens the adsorption well and enlarges the lateral capture radius over which rods are trapped (Figure 5b) [98]. This generates substantially higher adsorption energies and larger capture distance than for isotropic particles of comparable volume, making 1D colloids more likely to resist desorption under physicochemical stress [99, 100]. For instance, halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) adsorb side‐on at the oil‐water interfaces, where their cylindrical geometry and moderately hydrophilic character give an ≈104 kBT attachment energy per tube [101]. This value exceeds thermal energy by four orders of magnitude, rendering adsorption effectively irreversible. HNT‐stabilized PEMs therefore exhibit high yield stress and tolerate high internal oil fractions, favorable for repeated operation and easy phase separation [102]. In practice, HNT‐stabilized emulsions have been used as Rh‐catalyzed hydroformylation of long‐chain olefins, converting dodecene to tridecanal [103, 104].
FIGURE 5.

Colloidal dimensionality engineering for PEM fabrication. (a‐d) 1D particle assembly: (a) parallel positioning of a nanorod at L–L boundary and (b) attractive force as function of particle extension. Adapted with permission [98]. Copyright 2025, Wiley‐VCH. (c) Illustration of different aspect ratios of 1D particles‐stabilized Pickering droplets. Reproduced with permission [97]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (d) Electron microscopic image of nanomesh‐based Pickering particles. Adapted with permission [98]. Copyright 2025, Wiley‐VCH. (e‐g) 2D particle assembly: (e) thermodynamics and molecular barrier properties. Reproduced with permission [105]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. (f) Janus nanoplatelets for PEM stabilization. Adapted with permission [106]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. (g) Spatially‐controlled catalyst incorporation. Adapted with permission [49]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society.
Beyond wettability, anisotropic particle adsorption provides steric hindrance that inhibits Ostwald ripening and coalescence by creating a physical barrier at the L–L boundaries [107]. Rod‐like geometries achieve higher coverage than spherical particles through their ability to reorient and maximize exposed area [108]. Capillary interactions drive end‐to‐end chaining into aggregates that organize into 2D smectic and columnar packed phases. At higher aspect ratios, the assemblies form fibrillar or tubular scaffolds with nanosized voids wrapping around droplets (Figure 5c) [109, 110]. The resulting nanomesh distributes mechanical stress and creates semi‐permeable pathways for selective mass transport across. High‐aspect‐ratio nanocellulose embodies these advantages, generating attractive force two orders of magnitude stronger than spherical particle [98]. The favorable geometric energy configuration overcomes image‐charge repulsion between the pemittivity‐mismatched liquids, driving spontaneous nanofiber assembly into a robust nanomesh with sub‐50‐nm pores (Figure 5d). The nanopores successfully shuttle reactants and products across the semi‐permeable network, leading to accelerated catalysis with high conversion.
3.3. Two‐Dimensional Particles for High Atom Economy Engineering
2D colloidal particles position nearly all of their atoms directly at the L–L boundary, allowing the entire solid surface to participate in droplet stabilization. For thin plates with negligible edge area, the minimum free‐energy state orients them parallel to the boundary plane [111]. Unlike spheres, thin plates cannot shift their position to take an upright configuration, as due to the presence of a high‐energy barrier between the two in‐plane position (orientation angle ≈ 0 and 180°) [111]. The occupied area thereby equals the plate surface area, and ΔEads for a flat‐lying nanoplate with radius (R), oil‐particle interfacial tension (σo ), and water‐particle interfacial tension (σw ) is given by:
| (5) |
which scales with the projected face area [105]. This geometry provides greater stabilization per particle than spheres, thus a small amount of 2D suffices to cover large interfacial areas and passivate droplets against coalescence (Figure 5e) [112, 113]. Graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets exemplify enhanced durability through interfacial multilayer formation. Initial sheets adsorb parallel to emulsion boundaries, forming imperfectly tilted monolayer that leaves nanoscale bare interface. Successive layer continues to occupy residual area, yielding irreversely attached multilayer films [114, 115]. Such co‐continuous shells act as molecular barriers that retard inner‐phase evaporation and solute transport compared with surfactant‐ and isotropic particle‐stabilized systems [116, 117, 118]. The 2D multilayers simultaneously function as mechanical stabilizers through steric passivation of exposed interfacial area.
Amphiphilic 2D particles enable controlled monolayer assembly through wettability contrast across the thickness of nanoplatelets [119]. When one face prefers water and the opposite face prefers oil, the particles adopt a well‐defined orientation and become effectively locked into a lateral, face‐on configurations. In PEMs, this produces thin, elastic interfacial monolayers, in which catalytic sites can be selectively positioned toward either the aqueous or organic side (Figure 5f) [105]. Such price spatial placement within a flat 2D film shortens diffusion paths, maximizes density of active sites per unit area, and more preferentially drives the reaction forward [73]. Pd‐catalyzed Janus silica nanosheets have exploited this strategy to achieve enhanced chemoselectivity in the hydrogenation of p‐chloronitrobenzene to p‐chloroaniline, maintaining high activity over repeated emulsification‐separation cycles (Figure 5g) [49].
4. Surface Functionalization of PICs for Enhanced Catalysis
Functionalization is central to PIC design because catalytic performance in PEMs depends not only on catalyst identity, but on how reactivity is organized at the liquid–liquid boundary. In PEMs, functionalization is valuable only when it actively governs interfacial reactivity rather than merely immobilizing a catalyst. In this context, organic functionalization acts primarily through molecular programming, whereas inorganic functionalization operates through scaffold engineering. Together, they define how catalytic sites are accessed, sustained, and translated into interfacial reaction efficiency (Figure 6).
FIGURE 6.

Schematic illustration of organic and inorganic catalysts functionalized PICs and their representative catalytic advantages at liquid–liquid interfaces.
4.1. Organic Functionalization of PICs for Catalytic Transport and Reactivity
Conventional organocatalysts are typically designed to operate in homogeneous media, where molecular dispersion maximizes catalyst‐substrate contact but makes catalyst separation and recovery intrinsically difficult after reaction [120]. This limitation becomes more pronounced in biphasic systems, where catalytic efficiency is governed by whether reactive species can be recruited and concentrated at L–L boundary. The most fundamental role of organic functionalization is to overcome the transport barrier inherent to biphasic catalysis. Quaternary ammonium compound (QAC)‐modified cellulose exemplifies this strategy by converting the stabilizing particle into an ion‐shuttling phase‐transfer catalyst at the oil–water boundary (Figure 7a) [98]. In oxidative desulfurization, cationic cellulose extracts anionic performic acid (PFA), which otherwise cannot migrate spontaneously into the oil phase where oxidation proceeds. The transported PFA then oxidizes thiophene to thiophene oxide, which subsequently returns to the aqueous phase [121]. When cationic and anionic celluloses were compared directly, catalytic activity was observed only for the cationic component, confirming that the interfacial transport function, rather than particle adsorption alone, governs the reaction outcome (Figure 7b). Compared with the corresponding free QAC in bulk biphasic system, the PEM architecture enhance reaction constant from 0.309 to 0.574 h−1, showing that organic PICs can couple phase transfer and interfacial area amplification in a single design (Figure 7c).
FIGURE 7.

Organically functionalized PICs. (a,b) Molecule‐shuttling strategy: (a) cationic cellulose modified with GTAC as phase‐transfer catalysts at oil‐water interfaces for oxidative desulfurization. (b) Comparative catalytic activity of cationic versus anionic cellulose and (c) reaction kinetics comparing biphasic bulk and PEM systems. Adapted with permission [98]. Copyright 2025, Wiley‐VCH. (d,e) Local density‐enhancing strategy: (d) fabrication of proline‐functionalized polymer‐grafted silica particles and (e) aldol reaction between cyclohexanone and p‐nitrobenzaldehyde at the PE interface. Reproduced with permission [122]. Copyright 2022, Royal Society of Chemistry. (f,g) IL‐integration: (f) light‐responsive ionic liquid‐modified PEs featuring TMG basic catalysts with terminal azo groups for photo‐responsive nanoparticles. (g) Schematic illustration of PEM stabilized by poly(IL)s‐functionalized microspheres for transesterification reactions in biodiesel production. Adapted with permission [123]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier B.V.
Once reactant delivery is enabled, the next limitation becomes the local density of catalytic sites at the interface. This is especially relevant for organocatalysts, which often require substantial loading to achieve practical activity [124]. In PEMs, however, the total amount of PIC added does not directly translate into catalytic efficiency, because only the fraction adsorbed at the interface actively participates in reaction [51, 125]. One solution is to raise catalyst density per interfacially active particle [126]. Proline‐functionalized polymer‐grafted silica particles illustrate this concept. After brominating silica nanoparticles to initiate atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), proline‐bearing monomers were polymerized from the surface to generate a densely functionalized organocatalytic shell (Figure 7d,e) [127]. In the aldol reaction between cyclohexanone and p‐nitrobenzaldehyde, these proline‐decorated PICs delivered approximately 15‐fold higher conversion than the same amount of free proline, demonstrating that interfacial catalyst crowding can convert molecular organocatalysts into much more efficient heterogeneous PEM catalysts [122]. Moreover, even catalysts that are intrinsically efficient at low loading can benefit when immobilized at the liquid–liquid boundary. This is well illustrated by 2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidine‐1‐oxyl (TEMPO), a widely used catalyst for Anelli–Montanari oxidation that normally operates with comparatively low catalyst quantities [128, 129, 130, 131]. TEMPO‐functionalized snowman‐shaped Janus particles showed higher conversion in the oxidation of cinnamyl alcohol to cinnamaldehyde than bare TEMPO under comparable conditions [132]. Because TEMPO is already catalytically efficient in homogeneous operation, this enhancement is unlikely to arise simply from catalyst loading. Rather, it indicates that positioning TEMPO at the immiscible boundary improves access to reactants from both phases and strengthens phase‐transfer‐assisted catalysis. In other words, the PEM interface acts not merely as a support, but as a reaction field that intensifies catalysis even for intrinsically active organocatalysts.
A further level of sophistication is reached when the organic functionality no longer serves only as a tethered catalyst, but also reshapes the physicochemical behavior of the interface itself. IL‐modified PICs represent this more integrated strategy. As discussed in the Introduction, ILs can promote biphasic catalysis either by directly participating in catalysis or by shifting equilibrium through byproduct removal. When grafted onto Pickering particles, these features can be combined with interfacial stabilization and stimulus responsiveness. In one example, polystyrene microspheres were functionalized with alkaline tetramethylguanidine (TMG)‐based ILs and terminated with azo groups, producing light‐responsive PEM stabilizers for biodiesel transesterification (Figure 7f,g) [123]. IL moieties act as basic catalytic sites, while the modified particle surface simultaneously governs emulsion formation and photoresponsive behavior. This design marks a conceptual transition from catalyst immobilization to interfacial reaction programming, where catalytic function, emulsification, and external control are integrated within a single organic PIC platform.
4.2. Inorganic Functionalization of PICs for Scaffolded Interfacial Catalysis
Inorganic catalysts are attractive components for PIC design because they offer high intrinsic activity, thermal robustness, and chemical durability. However, their performance at L–L interfaces depends on how efficiently active sites are exposed, electrically or structurally connected, and stabilized against aggregation or deactivation [133, 134, 135]. Thus, inorganic functionalization in PEMS should address key bottlenecks:1) directional exposure of catalytic sites to the reactive phase, 2) efficient charge or mass transport across the interface, and 3) high‐density integration of stable catalytic motifs within a robust scaffold.
Directional exposure is most clearly achieved with anisotropic inorganic substrates. Two‐dimensional supports are particularly advantageous because their high surface area‐to‐volume ratio and mechanical robustness allow catalytic species to be deposited selectively on one face while preserving a well‐defined interfacial orientation. Janus zirconium hydrogen phosphate platelets (ANPLs) exemplify this concept (Figure 8a,b) [73]. Once adsorbed at the oil–water boundary, the metal‐decorated face is directed almost entirely toward the reactive phase, as visualized by microscopy of the PEM structure (Figure 8c). In the reduction of 4‐nitrophenol by sodium borohydride, this face‐selective catalyst presentation translated into reaction rates 7.5‐fold higher than those of conventional 4‐NP reduction systems, underscoring how atom efficiency in PEMs depends on whether catalytic sites are exposed rather than buried within the interfacial layer.
FIGURE 8.

Inoganically functionalized PICs. (a–c) Anisotropic substrates: (a) synthesis of ANPL through selective metal deposition (Ag, Pd, Au) on one face for 4‐NP reduction, (b) electron microscopic images of ANPLs, and (c) confocal laser scanning microscopic images of ANPLs at the oil‐water interface. Adapted with permission [73]. Copyright 2022, Wiley‐VCH. (d, e) Electron‐transferring susbstrates: (d) synthetic pathways of GQDs and (e) schematic illustration of GQD‐stabilized PEMs for benzylamine electroxidation. Reproduced with permission [136]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier B.V.
A different advantage emerges when the inorganic scaffold is used to mediate transport, especially in reactions coupled to electron transfer. Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) are well suited to this role because they combine high surface area, good conductivity, and resistance to harsh reaction environments [137, 138]. When palladium nanoparticles were grown uniformly on the GQD surface, the resulting composite PIC provided both abundant anchoring sites and an electronically conductive framework (Figure 8d) [136]. In this architecture, the GQD support suppresses Pd aggregation while facilitating charge transfer during catalysis. As a result, benzylamine electrooxidation proceeded efficiently in the Pickering microreactor, illustrating that conductive inorganic supports can do more than immobilize catalysts: they actively couple interfacial catalysis with transport across the reaction field (Figure 8e).
This logic reaches its most integrated form in porous crystalline scaffolds, where the support itself becomes part of the catalytic microenvironment.Metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) are crystalline porous solids constructed from metal nodes and organic linkers, offering exceptionally high surface areas and precisely tunable chemical environments [139, 140, 141]. In PEMs, this modularity allows MOF nanoparticles to function not merely as catalyst carriers, but as interfacially active catalytic solids capable of supporting reactions from simple condensations to multicomponent tandem transformations [142, 143]. A representative example is zeolitic imidazole framework‐90 (ZIF‐90) moduified with 1,4‐diaminobutane and N,N‐dimethylacetamide dimethylacetal, which introduces strongly basic amidine groups that serve both as emulsifier and catalytic sites. n these ZIF‐90‐stabilized PEMs, Knoevenagel condensation proceeds efficiently because the amidine sites deprotonate malononitrile and promote nucleophilic addition to aldehydes at the interface, affording α,β‐unsaturated dicyano products under mild conditions over 98% conversion efficiency within a hour [144]. Taken together, the organic and inorganic functionalization strategies demostrate that the superior performance of PEMs over bulk catalysis is governed not only by catalyst identity, but by how precisely active sites are organized, accessed and sustained at the L–L interfaces (Table 2).
TABLE 2.
Comparative catalytic performance of PEMs and their conventional bulk counterparts.
| Organic reaction | PEM system discussed here | Bulk counterpart | Relative improvement | Refs. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilizers | Kinetics index | Catalysts | Kinetics index | |||
| Oxidative desulfurization | Cationic nanocellulose | Rate constant, k = 0.574 h−1 | QAC in biphasic bulk | Rate constant, k = 0.309 h−1 | 1.86 | [98] |
| Aldol reaction | Proline‐functionalized nanoparticles | Conversion efficiency, 93.2% | Free proline |
Conversion efficiency, 6% |
15.5 | [122] |
| Aneli oxidation | TEMPO‐anchored nanohybrid particles | Reaction time, 62.5 min (>90%) | Cu‐nitroxyl‐TEMPO | Reaction time, 600 min (>90%) | 9.6 | [145] |
| Oil transesterification | Poly(IL)s‐functionalized microspheres | Rate constant, k = 0.00429 min−1 | Zr/CaO | *Rate constant, k = 0.00378 min−1 | 1.13 | [146] |
| 4‐NP reduction | Metal nanoparticles‐anchored nanoplatelets | Turnover frequency, 0.032 mol·h−1·g−1 | Free CuO nanoparticles | Turnover frequency, 0.0084 mol·h−1·g−1 | 3.81 | [147] |
| Benzylamine electrooxidation | Pd/GQDs | Conversion efficiency, 45%; selectivity, 81% |
Free Pd nanoparticles |
Conversion efficiency, 6.6%; selectivity, 21% | Conversion efficiency, 6.81; selectivity, 3.85 | [136] |
| Knoevenagel condensation | Amine‐modified ZIFs | Reaction time, 1 h (>98%) | Free ZIFs | Reaction time, 3 h (>98%) | 3 | [144] |
Calculate from Arrhenius parameters: activation energy (E a) = 42.5 kJ mol−1, (A) = 2.2 × 104 min−1, and the rate constant (k) at 75°C = 0.0123 min−1. Reproduced with permission [146].
4.3. Biological Functionalization of Pickering Stabilizers as PIC
Enzymes lose their catalytic activity in organic solvents primarily because the solvents disrupt the crucial hydration shell of the protein, leading to conformational denaturation [148, 149]. This structural change deforms the enzyme's active site, preventing effective substrate binding and reaction [150]. Therefore, recent studies are using porous structures, covalent organic framework (COF) to immobilize the enzymes to sustain their activation [151, 152, 153]. When enzyme‐immobilized COFs are positioned at the interface, they can directly contact hydrophobic moieties while being protected from deactivation caused by organic solvent exposure, achieving high substrate concentration in the vicinity of the active sites [154, 155]. Particularly, lipases and esterases undergo “interfacial activation” at the interface which induces conformational changes such as opening of the lid domain, exposing the catalytic site and increasing turnover rates by 19‐fold higher than free lipase [156]. This study synthesized Candida Antarctica lipase B (CALB) containing PIC by cross‐linking covalent organic frameworks and employed them as emulsifiers for esterification of 1‐hexanol and hexanoic acid (Figure 9a) [157, 158, 159]. Similarly, microgels have been widely explored as versatile platforms for enzyme immobilization in Pickering emulsions [160]. A key advantage of microgels is that they can confine enzymes without the need for covalent bonding, which helps preserve enzymatic activity for prolonged periods. In addition, their slight permeability may allow gradual retention and release behavior that contributes to sustained catalytic function and repeated reusability. Because this strategy is not limited to a specific enzyme type, microgels can be regarded as a broadly applicable template and a promising material platform for the construction of multicatalyst systems, as discussed in later sections.
FIGURE 9.

Biologically‐derived and ‐modified PICs. (a) CALB immobilized COF. Adapted with permission [157]. Copyright 2023, Wiley VCH. (b) Enzyme‐immobilized proteinosome. Adapted with permission [161]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. (c) Wettability‐controlled bacteria. Reproduced with permission [162]. Copyright 2015, Wiley VCH. (d) Surface‐displayed esterase (Est7) on Escherichia coli for biodiesel reactions. Adapted with permission [163]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.
Protein based biocatalysts, proteinosomes, shows mechanically robust and chemically stable compartments that outperform liposomes under harsh conditions [164]. Their tunable semipermeable membranes allow selective transport of small substrates while retaining enzymes or biomolecules, enabling efficient and controlled biocatalysis [165, 166]. Also, interior compartmentalization can be achieved by the gelation of inner phase, which are used for mimicking artificial cells and programmable biochemical systems [167]. They can be fabricated by using amphiphilic protein‐polymer nanoconjugates prepared by grafting poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) onto bovine serum albumin (BSA). The enzyme‐mediated amino acid dephosphorylations form the proteinsome gel, not only regulating the release of the drugs from the proteninosomes but also self‐healing the outer membrane under heat condition (Figure 9b) [161].
Whole‐cell catalysis employs entire bacterial cells as catalysts, wherein all intracellular enzymes function as active sites [168]. Leveraging this concept, one study applied E. coli cells to degrade polycarbonate plastic into bisphenol A within PEMs [169, 170]. Green catalytic degradation of polycarbonate in PEMs offers an atom‐economical alternative to landfilling or incineration, converting plastic waste into high‐value chemicals while reducing carbon footprint and promoting resource sustainability. Another example involved the amphiphilic modification of Alcaligenes faecalis ATCC 8750 for use as a PIC in the bioconversion of oil‐phase mandelonitrile to hydrophilic mandelic acid. They mineralized the single bacterium instead of immobilizing microbes in supports to improve microbial performance, prevent diffusional limitation blocked by the support (Figure 9c) [162]. Beyond single bacterium, baceteria‐enzyme complexes based PIC was conducted using cell surface‐displayed catalytic approaches. The Est7 enzyme exposed on the outer membrane of E. coli cells through genetic engineering. These biocomplexes positioned at the interface for esterification reactions between Eicosapentaenoic acid monoglyceride and glycerol (Figure 8d) [163].
5. Catalysts Recovery and Recycle Engineering
5.1. Stimuli‐Responsive Demulsification for Controlled Phase Separation
In multiphase catalysis, the way in which catalytsts are recovered and reused is a primary determinant of overall process efficiency [59]. Every cycle where catalyst is lost to the product stream, waste phase, or auxiliary separation directly increases non‐productive material consumption and requires additional energy input. The exceptionally high adsorption energy of solid colloids at L–L boundaries means that once assembled, these interfacial layers resist to disruption [171, 172, 173]. Whether a PEM system ultimately reduces waste generation therefore depends on how intgelligently its recovery step is engineered. Stimuli‐responsive systems address this challenge by merging the concepts for catalytic reaction and separation. External triggers temporarily alter particle wettability or inter‐particles interactions, collapsing the emulsion or extracting particles from the PEMs without additional mechanical treatment (Figure 10a).
FIGURE 10.

Stimuli‐driven demulsification strategies for catalyst recovery. (a) Overview of external stimuli for in‐situ phase separation. Responsive mechanisms: (b) pH‐switchable coacervate systems. Reproduced with permission [174]. Copyright 2023, Wiley VCH. (c) Photochemical spiropyron isomerization. Reproduced with permission [175]. Copyright 2025, Wiley VCH. (d) CO2‐responsive protonation with magnetic retrievability. Adapted with permission [176]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
pH‐responsive PEMs exploit the protonation‐deprotonation of ionizable surface groups to modulate electrostatic interactions and wettability at the oil‐water boundaries [177, 178]. At the pH exhibiting the strongest attractive ionic strength, enhanced binding form dense interfacial layers and stable emulsions. Shifting the pH to weaken binding affinity lowers surface coverage and induces demulsification. A representative design employs sulfated cellulose nanocrystals (CNC‐OSO3 −) that co‐assemble with cationic species into nanoparticle surfactants [174]. CNC‐OSO3 − electrostatically coacervates with ferrocenium‐terminated polystyrene (Ps‐Fc+) at the toluene‐water interface. At pH ≈ 3, strong coacervate ion pairing lowers interfacial tension, producing dense layers that stabillize long‐lived emulsions. Rasing pH toward 9 partially neutralize the sulfate and perturbs the ion pairing, ultimately triggering demulsification as surface coverage falls below the percolation threshold (Figure 10b) [179]. Recent work with Pd‐loaded carboxylated CNCs demonstrates precisely this strategy for catalytic hydrogenation, enabling efficient recovery of both and catalyst across multiple cycles [180].
Thermally switchable platforms rely on polymers with a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) tethered to particle surfaces [181]. Below LCST, the polymer remains hydrated and hydrophilic, it is changed to hydrophobic above LCST. The objective is to conduct catalysis at temperatures where emulsions are highly stable, then cross the LCST to demulsify and separate phases rapidly without chemical additives [182, 183, 184, 185]. For this, thermo‐resposive Janus silica nanosheets (JSNs) are designed in which one face is grafted by thermo‐responsive polymer brushes while the opposite face carries a chiral Ti(salen) complex for asymmetric sulfoxidation [186]. At room temperatue (T < cloud point ≈ 39°C), hydrogen bonding between polymers and water renders the polymeric face hydrophilic, while the Ti(salen) face remains hydrophobic. The resulting anisotropy locks the nanosheets at the oil‐water interface and yields extremely stable emulsions that enhance sulfoxidation rates and conversions. Upon heating above the cloud point, polymer chains collapse and form intra‐brush hydrogen bonding, swithcing the face to a more hydrophobic state. This loss of amphiphilicity causes rapid demulsifiation, and the nanosheets migrate to the organic phase for separation and reuse.
Photo‐switchable Pickering emulsions translate photochemical isomerization of surface ligands into changes in interfacial activity [187, 188, 189, 190]. Spiropyran (SP) becomes hydrophobic and neutral under UV irradiation, while visible lights make SP in reverse form [175]. A spiropyran‐based ionic liquid (SPIL) employed within UiO‐66‐NH2‐stabilized PEMs system illustrates this mechanism. Under UV lights, SPIL converts to its merocyanine form, increasing its charge density and affinity for both the UiO‐66 catalyst surface and the oil‐water boundary. This lowers interfacial tension and stabilizes fine emulsions suitable for aqueous CuAAC click reactions yielding hydrophilic products. Subsequent visible light exposure drives back‐isomerization, reducing interfacial acitivity (Figure 10c).
Gas‐switchable systems use Brønsted bases (e.g., tertiary amines) or amidines‐achored particles. Exposure to CO2 gas in the prescence of water generates bicarbonate and protonates basic groups, converting hydrophobic surfaces into hydrophilic zwitterionic or cationic ones. This approach employ an inexpensive, abundant and benign trigger that can be fully removed by purging with an inert gas, leaving no persistent additives [191, 192]. This concept is exmplified by Fe3O4‐incorporated silica nanospheres bearing tertiary amino groups (diethylamine, DEA) on a polymer shell and TEMPO as an immobilized oxidant catalyst [176]. In their native state, the particles are moderately hydrophobic (θ ≈ 90°–97°) and stabilize Pickering emulsions for Anelli oxidations. Post‐reaction, bubbling CO2 protonates surface of DEA, dramatically increasing hydrophilicity and destabilizing the emulsions. Subsequent N2 purging for reverse protonation, it restored the original wettability and enabled reuse over at least five cycles with negligible activity loss (Figure 10d). This system also incorporates superparamagnetic domains for magnetic retrieval. An external magnetic field extracts the catalyst without filtration or centrifugation. Magnetically recyclable Pickering catalysts have been further engineered or density‐matched emulsification, where controlled magnetic content modulates emulsion stability and separation kinetics [193, 194]. Catalysts with optimized density achieved high conversions with rapid phase separation and retain activity across multiple cycles.
5.2. Biodegradable Colloids for Sustainable Catalyst Scaffolds
The transition from inorganic or petroleum‐derived solid stabilizers to biodegradable and bio‐derived colloids is central to making PEMs compatible with long‐term environmental expectations. In conventional configurations, the colloidal scaffold is often persistent mineral waste or microplastic particulates [195, 196, 197]. Bio‐derived colloids built from renewable carbon and degradable backbones directly address this end‐of‐life gap (Figure 11a) [198]. They reduce cumulative toxicity and enable carbon recycling into short biogenic cycles. Recent examples show that these soft supports do not trade off catalytic performance. Instead, their high surface area, rich surface chemistry, and intrinsic bio‐functionality often provide unique advantages [199]. Polysaccharide‐based colloids are among the most promising candidates. CNCs and nanofibrils combine abundant, low‐cost feedstock with rod‐like geometry and dense surface hydroxyl groups [200, 201]. They offer excellent water dispersibility and tunablilty, making them ideal carriers for interfacial immobilization of enzymes or organocatalysts. Lipase‐immobilized CNC represents a system where a fully bio‐based colloidal scaffold achieves both high catalytic throughput and facile recovery [202]. Rod‐like CNCs were coated with a thin polydopamine (PDA) layer and immobilized lipase enzymes. The resulting particles exhibit partial wettability toward both aqueous and oil phases and reduced absolute surface potential compared with pristine CNCs. This translates into smaller, more stable emulsions and nearly complete particle adsorption at the L–L boundary. For recovery, the particles form relatively weakly charged large aggregates separable by simple centrifugation. After multiple cycles, immobilized enzymes retain high activity, demonstrating nanocellulose scaffold enables relevant reuse (Figure 11b).
FIGURE 11.

Bio‐friendly degradable stabilizers for enhanced sustainability. (a) Classification of bio‐derived polymers. Polysaccharide‐based colloidal engineering: (b) enzyme‐immobilized CNCs for biocatalysts. Reproduced with permission [202]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (c) LNPs as aromatic radical scavenging interfacial catalysts. Adapted with permission [203]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature.
Lignin nanoparticles (LNPs) represent a complementary class that valorize kraft lignin, an underutilized aromatic side stream of pulping, into colloidal stabilizers with inherent redox activity and UV‐shielding properties [204, 205]. Their aromatic structure affords strong interfacial adsorption and additional functionaliity such as radical scavenging, which can be directly exploited in catalytic processes and final products properties [206, 207]. LNPs extend bio‐derived PEMs into aromatic polymerization chemistry. LNPs coated with chitosan and glucose oxidase (GOx‐chi‐LNPs) simultaneously act as Pickering emulsifiers and enzymatic oxygen scavengers in single electron transfer living radical polymerization (SET‐LRP) of hydrophobic vinyl monomers [203]. After polymerization, the LNPs remain uniformly embedded in polymer films, allowing direct melt‐processing of lignin polymer composites without extra compatibilization steps (Figure 11c). This design converts an otherwise waste stream into a multifunctional, bio‐based stabilizer and performance additives, improving both carbon utilization and process sustainability.
6. Advanced Microreactor Designs
6.1. Finely Architectured Membrane for Enhanced Interfacial Transport
3D structured particles transcend simple geometries by introducing additional structural features, including internal porosity, complex topology, and enhanced surface area. In these systems, the stabilizer becomes a sophisticated colloidal architecture that shapes how liquids, solutes, and catalysts access the L–L boundary [208, 209]. Mesoporous colloids introduce an internal length scale, with the porous framework controlling transport across the boundary (Figure 12a,b) [210]. They present a high density of pore entrances at the oil‐water contacts, so each adsorbed particle behaves as a cluster of nanochannels connecting the two immiscible liquids. In amphiphilic mesoporous silica nanospheres (MSNs)‐stabilized emulsions, the pore network permits rapid reactant and product diffusion alongside uniform Rh‐TPPTS catalyst distribution (Figure 12c) [211]. Furthermore, inorganic crystalline microporous 3D particles can sustain their structures in harsh conditions with the advantage of porosities [212]. Zeolite affords molecular sieving by screening reactants and products according to their size as they diffuse through the crystalline channels [213]. Octadecyltrichlorosilane‐functionlized zeolites with enhanced thermal stability enable PEM‐mediated phase‐selective acid catalysis for biomass oil refining under elevated temperature without framework collapse (Figure 12d) [214].
FIGURE 12.

Multi‐dimensional architectures for advanced PEMs. (a‐d) Particle porosity engineering: (a) electron microcsopic images of MSNs. Adapted with permission [215]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier B.V. (b) Enhanced surface interactions and (c) mass transfer pathways of MSNs‐stabilized PEMs. Reproduced with permission [211]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier B.V. (d) Zeolite‐stabilized PEMs for biofuel upgrading reactions. Reproduced with permission [214]. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society. (e–g) Particle marginal engineering: (e) electron microscopic images of toroidal silica particles at emulsion interfaces, (f) schematic illustration of bidirectional diffusion at the L–L boundary, and (g) PEMs for pyrogallol oxidation and surface‐enhanced Raman spectrocopic sensoring. Adapted with permission [51]. Copyright 2025, Springer Nature. (h–j) Boundary structural engineering: (h) electron microscopic images of bigels, (i) 3D microchannel network in bicontinuous interfacially jammed emulsion gels (bijels), and (j) bijel microreactors for lipase‐catalyzed triglyceride. Adapted with permission [216]. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature.
Ring‐shaped colloids exploit topology to engineer the interfacial architecture. Toroidal silica particles assemble as dense annular belts around each droplet (Figure 12e). The resulting ring‐based PEMs maintain mechanical stability while exposing most of the bare L–L boundary (>80%). The colloidal torus pins robust contact lines and prevent drop coalescence, yet its low areal coverage minimizes steric blocking and permits rapid bidirectional diffusion (Figure 12f) [51]. This opened interface can then be decorated with catalytic or plasmonic nanoparticles without competition for space with emulsion stabilizers [217]. Ring‐stabilized emulsions demonstrate higher catalytic efficiency than conventional nanosphere‐covered droplets and provide sensitive surface‐enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) microreactors [51]. This design enables dual localization of catalysis and spectroscopic readout within the accessible regions (Figure 12g) [218].
Bicontinuous interfacial jammed emulsion gel (bijel) systems represent the multi‐dimensional limit where the entire L–L boundary converts into a continous, tortuous catalytic membrane (Figure 12h) [219, 220]. Bijel is a structually stable bicontinuous emulsion fabricated by the interfacial jamming of nanoparticles between two immiscible fluids with spinodal decomposition [221]. In contrast to conventional emulsions, neither phase is confined to isolated droplets; rather, both phases form continuous, interpenetrating domains. The intrinsic bicontinuous phase separation generates an exceptionally large interfacial area, while the interconnected architecture enables unimpeded molecular diffusion throughout each phase domain [222]. Consequently, the intertwined oil and water channels establish a three‐dimensional microchannel network with exceptionally high accessible interfacial area. (Figure 12i). In lipase‐catalyzed triglyceride hydrolysis, bijels provide substantially faster mass transfer of the oil‐soluble substrate to the water‐soluble enzyme than a stirred biphasic mixture, yielding significantly enhanced reaction kinetics (Figure 12j) [216]. Nevertheless, bijel fabrication remains technically demanding, and existing studies have been largely confined to template‐mediated approaches wherein polymerization yields solidified architectures for catalytic purposes, rather than leveraging the native liquid–liquid interface [223]. Substantial further investigation is warranted to realize the industrial and academic potential of Bijel systems.
6.2. Multicatalyst Microreactor Stabilized by Janus Particles
Executing consecutive or cascade reactions in PEMs fundamentally requires either multiphase systems or multicatalyst configurations. Janus particles which possess chemically or physically compartmentalized sections within single particle represent the most prevalent strategy for achieving multicatalyst systems [224]. The most basic spherical Janus PICs can be synthesized readily via emulsion seeding polymerization followed by catalyst incorporation [225, 226, 227]. Platelet‐shaped Janus particles offer particularly advantageous geometries, providing optimal bilateral separation of catalysts that are conjugated in distinct planes [228, 229, 230]. For instance, PEMs stabilized by 2D Janus particles with CALB and glucose oxidase (GOx) functionalized on opposite sides demonstrated interactive cascade reactions (Figure 13a) [231]. Glucose was oxidized to gluconic acid in the aqueous phase, generating hydrogen peroxide that transferred through the pores to participate in CALB‐catalyzed esterification reactions in the oil phase (Figure 13b,c).
FIGURE 13.

Advanced microreactor designs. (a–c) bifunctional PICs: (a) schematic illustration of Janus particles at the oil‐water interface for multistep catalysis microreactors, (b) reaction pathways, and (c) confocal laser scanning microscopic images of bicatalyst‐immobilized Janus nanoplatelet particles and the schematic illustration of reactions. Adapted with permission [232]. Copyright 2023, Wiley VCH. (d,e) Continuous flow microreactors: (d) Conventional PEMs‐based flow reactor. Adapted with permission [233]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (e) Solid microspheres‐PEM‐integrated CFMs for cascade reaction. Adapted with permission [234]. Copyright 2024, Springer Nature. (f,g) Double emulsion templated microreactors: (f) mass transfer of reactant between fluorocarbon and hydrocarbon oil. Adapted with permission [235]. Copyright 2024, Wiley VCH. (g) Multi‐compartmental MOF microreactors. Adapted with permission [236] Copyright 2023, Springer Nature.
6.3. Multiphase Cascade Reaction with Continuous Flow Microreactors
Multiphase microreactors for cascade reaction must be meticulously designed considering the following conditions: 1) high reaction selectivity and solvent affinity of intermediates for next reaction [232, 237], 2) strategic spatial arrangement of catalysts for achieving orthogonality and preventing cross‐interference [238, 239], 3) non‐disruptive byproduct formation from each reaction step [240, 241]. Especially, the spatial arrangement of catalysts in a single phase is the most difficult part for designing. Continuous Flow Microreactors (CFMs) which is packed with diverse types of PEMs in the flow reactors can prevent the inteference of catalysts inevitably coexist in the same phase, whether aqueous or oil. For instance, due to the extremely rapid kinetics of acid‐base neutralization, acid and base catalysts cannot be co‐located in the same phase [242, 243]. By preparing two distinct Pickering emulsions, with acid incorporated in one and base in the other, inter‐catalysts interference was significantly diminished when introduces both into the CFM system (Figure 13d) [244]. Recent studies have integrated solid microspheres (SMs) with Pickering droplets in CFM systems for preventing coalesence‐induced efficiency losses. The closely packed SMs physically separate adjacent emulsion droplets facing where droplet‐droplet contact leads to merging over time [233]. Ti(Salen) complexes immobilized on SMs catalyze the initial step, while CALB within liquid droplets catalyzes the subsequent transformation, converting aldehydes with acetyl cyanide to chiral O‐acylated cyanohydrins (Figure 13e).
6.4. Double Emulsion Templated Microreactors
Double emulsion microreactors can address both the solvent affinity requirements of reactants and the spatial compartmentalization of catalysts [234]. A three‐phase microreactor system for addition reaction of stilbene and n‐bromosuccinimide which contains fluorocarbon oil (F‐oil), water, and hydrocarbon oil (H‐oil) was investigated [245]. The differential solubility of stilbene between F‐oil and H‐oil critically influences conversion rates, with H/F/W systems outperforming F/H/W system. Low stilbene solubility in F‐oil enables steady mass transfer from the innermost H‐oil phase through the F‐oil layer to the reaction interface (Figure 13f) [246]. Double emulsion templated‐enzyme compartmentalization system for cascade reaction was also studied [235, 247, 248, 249]. They fabricated the O/W emulsion where the ligand and molecular catalysts are in oil together. The emulsions are centrifugated to get a high intenal phase emulsion (HIPE) layer for using the highest surface area. And then, the HIPE in water with metal ion and excess oil was used for fabricating double emulsions.
Simultaneously, multi‐compartmental MOF cascade reactors was synthesized through coordination bonding between ligands in the inner and outer phases with metal ions in the middle phase. This approach achieves facile anchoring of enzyme and molecular catalyst in different layers for chemo‐enzymatic cascade reactions employing Grubbs catalyst and CALB (Figure 13g) [250]. They isolated the MOF particles and carried out the monophasic cascade reaction. The microgel system that can swell and shrink in a solvent and spontaneously adsorb at the oil‐water interface is also studied in double emulsion microreactors [236]. They prepared O/W/O double emulsions by the synergistic combination of hydrophobic microgels and hydrophilic lipase in twoimmiscible liquids. The concentration of polar additives could control the wettability of PNIPAM‐co‐4VP microgels, the double emulsion was spontaneously demulsified after the catalytic reaction. Subsequently, theproducts could be simply collected, and the double emul‐sions could be recycled multiple times for catalysis without the loss of enzymatic activity. Although there have been attempts to apply double emulsion microreactors to phase‐shifting reactions, most studies have focused on interior separation approaches, such as template‐based single‐phase cascade reactions or simultaneous independent reactions occurring in both phases, as described above [251, 252, 253, 254, 255]. Further research on phase‐shifting cascade reactions is therefore warranted.
6.5. Biomimetic Microcells based Cascade Microreactors
The comparmentalization of catalysts by constructing artifical wall between the phases enable the monophasic cascade reaction effectively, preventing the interference and aggregation between catalysts [182, 256]. Likewise, there are several studies about multi‐single emulsions templated biomimetic microcells [257]. One is combining stepwise Pickering emulsification with interface‐confined cross‐linking (Figure 14a) [258]. They co‐emulsified the palladium/silica nanocomposite with the crosslinked ionic liquid droplet to make multicompartmentalized liquid‐containing microreactors, whose interior architectures can be exquisitely tuned by regulating the number and size of subcompartments. They provided a bottom‐up route to construct biomimetic microcells for use in cascade catalysis. The other one is using two different types of mesoporous silica nanoparticles which loaded distinct catalyst in their holes [259]. They co‐emulsified in inner ionic liquid phase to construct a kind of “cell‐like” microreactor which is demonstrated to be capable of practical efficient cascade reactions. They regulated the amount of each catalyst ball and confirmed that the compartmentalization and enriching reactant properties of the microreactor were found to be crucial to the high catalysis efficiency (Figure 14b) [253].
FIGURE 14.

Advanced biomimetic microreactor systems. (a,b) Multi single emulsion‐templated microcells. Reproduced with permissions [253, 258]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society; Copyright 2022, Springer Nature. (c,d) Artificial enzymes. Reproduced with permissions [260, 261], Copyright 2025, Springer Nature; Copyright 2018, Springer Nature.
6.6. Artificial Enzymes Based Microreactor
Artificial enzymes are rationally engineered to function as microreactors by integrating synthetic catalytic moieties into protein scaffold [262, 263]. They extended the concept of L–L interfacial catalysis by engineering a 3D protein‐confined pocket that can precisely control substrate binding and orientation. They mimic and even surpass the compartmentalized reactivity of L–L interfaces, enabling green catalysis with exceptional selectivity and efficiency under mild conditions. Artificial metalloenzymes (ArMs) are constructed by anchoring synthetic metal complexes within protein cavities. A seminal example is the development of a human serum albumin‐based ArM containing a ruthenium Hoveyda–Grubbs catalyst, designed for olefin metathesis in biological environments [264]. The deep hydrophobic binding pocket of albumin not only positions the substrate near the metal center but also crucially shields the ruthenium cofactor from deactivation by biological metabolites like glutathione (GSH) at physiologically relevant concentrations (up to 20 mM). This “protected activity” highlights the microreactor's dual function: enhancing catalysis through proximity effects while providing a biocompatible compartment that isolates the synthetic catalyst from hostile surroundings.
The concept extends to therapeutic applications, where glycosylated ArMs achieve targeted prodrug activation in cancer cells via ring‐closing metathesis, showcasing the potential for spatially controlled catalysis in complex biological settings (Figure 14c) [265]. The concept advances with artificial photoenzymes, where genetically encoded photosensitizers (e.g., 4‐benzoyl phenyl alanine, BpA) are installed within chiral protein cavities (Figure 14d) [260, 266]. The engineered pocket acts as a stereoselective micro‐interface, pre‐organizing substrates via multiple non‐covalent interactions before photoexcitation [261, 267]. This spatial arrangement is crucial for enantioselective triplet energy transfer, enabling previously elusive reactions like intramolecular [2+2]‐photocycloadditions with high enantioselectivity [268, 269]. Taking spatial control further, enzyme compartmentalization strategies intentionally segregate the catalytic cycle from the bulk solution to suppress competing pathways. By engineering the protein's surface charge and cavity access, tailored triplet quenchers can be excluded from the active site but remain active in the bulk phase. This creates a spatially resolved system where the desired enantioselective energy transfer occurs inside the protein microreactor, while background racemic reactions are quenched at the external “interface” with the solution [265]. This approach effectively solves a fundamental challenge in asymmetric photocatalysis and underscores the power of designing hierarchical micro‐environments to achieve orthogonal reaction control.
7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
7.1. Key Insights: Interfacial Nanocatalyst Based Microreactors as Sustainable Platforms
In this review, we have comprehensively overviewed various types of L–L interfacial catalysis, ranging from conventional biphasic bulk systems to advanced continuous biphasic gel systems. We compared the respective advantages and limitations of each approach, with particular emphasis on PEMs, demonstrating their widespread applicability across diverse catalytic processes depending on the morphology and surface decoration strategies of PICs. By fragmenting two immiscible phases into small droplets, PEMs achieve significantly enhanced interfacial surface area and superior reactant selectivity, thereby delivering exceptional catalytic efficiency. Notably, we highlighted the substantial potential of PICs as green catalysts through their facile recovery and recyclability, further augmented by the incorporation of biodegradable polymers in catalyst design.
A critical advancement addressed in this review is the evolution beyond traditional PIC recovery methods, which conventionally required high‐energy physical desorption from the interface. We presented innovative strategies that enable straightforward catalyst recovery and recycling, significantly reducing energy consumption and operational complexity. Furthermore, we showcased the progression from simple PEMs to sophisticated cascade reaction microreactors employing Janus particles or multi‐compartment single emulsions. This strategic advancement transforms PEMs from limited reaction scope into versatile platforms capable of accommodating complex, multistep catalytic processes, thereby expanding their practical applicability in sustainable chemical synthesis.
7.2. Challenges in Industrial Translation and Future Perspectives
Despite the remarkable advantages demonstrated by rationally designed PICs which have superior catalytic efficiency, enhanced recyclability, and selective product recovery compared to conventional catalysts, several challenges remain for their industrial implementation [45, 59]. The primary obstacles are manufacturing cost and batch‐to‐batch homogeneity [44]. While PICs offer superior reusability, alternative catalysts with lower manufacturing costs often provide greater economic advantages despite their limited recyclability [270]. Moreover, from a thermodynamic perspective, achieving reaction rates in biphasic systems that substantially exceed those in homogeneous single‐phase reactions remains exceptionally challenging [72]. Nevertheless, for “phase‐shifting reactions” where the product phase differs from the reactant phase, PEMs represent a compelling solution by maximizing interfacial area between immiscible phases, thereby enhancing mass transfer efficiency. While PTCs currently dominates industrial applications for reactions where a new phase emerges from a single initial phase, we anticipate that introducing PEMs for phase‐shifting reactions could significantly enhance industrial competitiveness [271, 272, 273]. The facilitated mass transfer inherent to PEM systems could deliver reaction efficiencies surpassing those of conventional PTC approaches.
To realize this potential, simplification of PIC modification processes is imperative. Future research should prioritize bottom‐up synthetic strategies that maintain high batch consistency while streamlining surface functionalization procedures to reduce production costs. One of the most realistic solutions to these limitations is to replace conventional batch‐wise preparation with scale‐ready microfluidic or mesostructured continuous manufacturing. These platforms offer precise control over key structural and process parameters, including droplet size, interfacial particle coverage, catalyst loading, and residence time, which are essential for minimizing batch‐to‐batch variations and ensuring product consistency. Importantly, practical scale‐up may be better realized through numbering‐up, rather than by simply increasing reactor dimensions, as parallelization of identical production units can preserve the interfacial precision and reproducibility required for PIC fabrication. Accordingly, the integration of PIC synthesis with continuous manufacturing represents a promising pathway toward industrially relevant and standardized catalytic processes.
Additionally, machine learning‐assisted catalyst design can be promising strategy for identifying suitable catalysts. Two representative approaches can be highlighted: the first involves drastically narrowing the search space to reduce the experimental and developmental costs associated with catalyst screening, while the second employs simulations to evaluate catalytic efficiency in single‐atom alloy catalyst (SAAC) systems, thereby minimizing the use of expensive precious metals. A notable example of the former is that active learning was applied to the development of higher alcohol synthesis catalysts. By exploring compositional and reaction condition spaces, this approach compressed approximately 5 × 109 possible combinations into just ≈86 experiments, reducing both the environmental footprint and associated costs by approximately 90% compared to conventional screening programs [274].
Regarding the reduction of catalyst raw material costs, one study demonstrated the power of DFT combined with AI‐driven data analysis to propose over 200 previously unreported promising SAAC [275]. In that work, they extremely diluted costly precious platinum to single‐atom level by dispersing onto host metals such as Cu, Ag, and Au, enabling a substantial reduction in noble metal loading. More recently, Bayesian optimization has been applied to investigate efficient iridium utilization, with a focus on identifying the optimal surface composition and chemical ordering of Ir‐TiO2 sytems [276]. Furthermore, there are efforts to discover high‐performance candidates entirely free of precious metals [277]. This study employed machine learning interatomic potentials to screen approximately 4000 candidate materials, leading to the identification of W‐NiFeOOH, which demonstrated remarkable stability over 5000 h at 2 V and 13.A cm− 2. Taken together, these advances underscore that the integration of AI and catalysis represents a highly valuable approach for saving both cost and time in the context of future PIC fabrication and catalyst selection. Only through such cost‐effective and reproducible manufacturing approaches can PICs transition from promising laboratory‐scale systems to viable industrial catalytic platforms.
Author Contributions
B. Seo and J. Shin contributed to conceptualization, data curation, methodology, writing – original draft; M. Jang, K. Choi, and T. Pang contributed to data curation and methodology; F. Zhong and J. W. Kim contributed to conceptualization, supervision, and writing – review and editing.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by National Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS‐2024‐00351236, RS‐2025‐25422994, and RS‐2024‐00405818).
Biographies
Bokgi Seo earned his B.S. in Chemical Molecular Engineering from Hanyang University (2020) and M.S. in Chemical Engineering from Sungkyunkwan University (2022). He is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Chemical Engineering at Sungkyunkwan University. His research focuses on interface engineering, particularly the design and assembly of colloidal and nanostructured materials for functional interfaces including Pickering emulsions, coacervate systems, and phase‐transfer catalysis, aiming to establish sustainable interfacial platforms for advanced catalytic and materials applications.

Jaewon Shin earned her B.S. in Applied Chemistry and Cosmetic Science from Dongduk Women's University (2022) and is currently a Ph.D. candidate in Chemical Engineering at Sungkyunkwan University. Her research focuses on nanomaterial engineering at liquid‐liquid interfaces, particularly high‐aspect‐ratio nanomaterials for robust interfacial membrane formation. Her work bridges microdroplet stabilization with green biphasic catalyst platforms, offering high efficiency and recyclability for applications including oxidative desulfurization.

Minkyoung Jang earned her B.S. in Chemistry (2024) and is currently a M.S. candidate in Chemical Engineering at Sungkyunkwan University. Her research focuses on interface and colloid engineering, particularly the surface modification of functional colloidal particles for organocatalysis. Her work aims to develop multifunctional colloidal systems for biphasic reaction platforms, contributing to recyclable catalyst design and sustainable chemical oxidation processes.

Kyoungho Choi earned his B.S. (2025) and is currently a M.S. candidate in Chemical Engineering at Sungkyunkwan University. His research focuses on interfacial colloidal engineering and sustainable microreactor platforms based on plate‐like particles and metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs), with an emphasis on design efficient Pickering emulsion‐based green catalytic systems that enable high performance and facile recovery.

Tengfei Pang obtained his PhD from Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2025). Afterward, he continued his research as a postdoctoral scholar at Shenzhen Technology University, working under the guidance of Professor Fangrui Zhong. He is interested in the development of new reagents and methodologies with active intermediates for sustainable synthetic chemistry.

Fangrui Zhong graduated from the Department of Chemistry at Zhejiang University (2008) and obtained his PhD from the National University of Singapore (2012). From 2013 to 2015, he worked as a postdoctoral researcher at the Technical University of Munich (Humboldt Fellowship) and the University of Ulm in Germany. He became a professor at Huazhong University of Science and Technology in December 2015. His research focuses on the development of artificial photoenzymes and sustainablebiocatalysis.

Jin Woong Kim earned his B.S. (1994), M.S. (1996), and Ph.D. (2000) in Industrial Chemistry from Hanyang University. He served as chief researcher at Amorepacific R&D Center for 10.5 years, which included a 2.5‐year postdoctoral fellowship at Harvard University. He began his academic career at Hanyang University in 2011 before joining School of Chemical Engineering at Sungkyunkwan University in 2019. His research centers on fabricating soft materials for biohealth applications, with particular emphasis on the morphological, structural, and mechanical properties of nanobiomaterial systems.

Contributor Information
Fangrui Zhong, Email: chemzfr@hust.edu.cn.
Jin Woong Kim, Email: jinwoongkim@skku.edu.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Horváth I. T., “Introduction: Sustainable Chemistry,” Chemical Reviews 118 (2018): 369–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lim K. R. G., Kaiser S. K., Wu H., et al., “Nanoparticle Proximity Controls Selectivity in Benzaldehyde Hydrogenation,” Nature Catalysis 7 (2024): 172–184. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lange J.‐P., “Performance Metrics for Sustainable Catalysis in Industry,” Nature Catalysis 4 (2021): 186–192. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Weckhuysen B. M., “Preface: Recent Advances in the In‐Situ Characterization of Heterogeneous Catalysts,” Chemical Society Reviews 39 (2010): 4557–4559. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Pei C., Chen S., Fu D., Zhao Z.‐J., and Gong J., “Structured Catalysts and Catalytic Processes: Transport and Reaction Perspectives,” Chemical Reviews 124 (2024): 2955–3012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sheldon R. A., “The E factor 25 Years on: The Rise of Green Chemistry and Sustainability,” Green Chemistry 19 (2017): 18–43. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Yenare P. P., Patare R. D., Sonawane B. P., and Sanap K. K., “Green Chemistry Innovation: A Systematic Review on Sustainable Catalysis and Its Strategic Future Directions,” Catalysis Science & Technology 15 (2025): 7295–7323. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Phan‐Quang G. C., Lee H. K., and Ling X. Y., “Isolating Reactions at the Picoliter Scale: Parallel Control of Reaction Kinetics at the Liquid–Liquid Interface,” Angewandte Chemie 128 (2016): 8444–8448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Shi S. and Russell T. P., “Nanoparticle Assembly at Liquid–Liquid Interfaces: From the Nanoscale to Mesoscale,” Advanced Materials 30 (2018): 1800714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Piradashvili K., Alexandrino E. M., Wurm F. R., and Landfester K., “Reactions and Polymerizations at the Liquid–Liquid Interface,” Chemical reviews 116 (2016): 2141–2169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tundo P. and Perosa A., “Multiphasic Heterogeneous Catalysis Mediated by Catalyst‐Philic Liquid Phases,” Chemical Society Reviews 36 (2007): 532–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Shirakawa S. and Maruoka K., “Recent Developments in Asymmetric Phase‐Transfer Reactions,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 52 (2013): 4312–4348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gordon J. E. and Kutina R. E., “Theory of Phase‐Transfer Catalysis,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 99 (1977): 3903–3909. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Yang X., Zhang Q., and Liu Y., “Metal‐Organic Framework Nanoparticles with Universal Dispersibility through Crown Ether Surface Coordination for Phase‐Transfer Catalysis and Separation Membranes,” Angewandte Chemie 135 (2023): 202303280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kim J., Kim S., Park J., et al., “Covalent‐Frameworked 2D Crown Ether with Chemical Multifunctionality,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 4532–4541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Djalali S., Simón Marqués P., Frank B. D., and Zeininger L., “Crown Ether‐Functionalized Complex Emulsions as an Artificial Adaptive Material Platform,” Advanced Functional Materials 32 (2022): 2107688. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jeong J. G., Oh Y.‐H., Park T. H., Lee S.‐S., Kim D. W., and Lee S., “Contact Ion‐Pair SN2 Reactions Activated by Lewis Base Phase Transfer Catalysts,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lei Z., Chen B., Koo Y.‐M., and MacFarlane D. R., “Introduction: Ionic Liquids,” Chemical Reviews 117 (2017): 6633–6635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kunz W. and Häckl K., “The Hype with Ionic Liquids as Solvents,” Chemical Physics Letters 661 (2016): 6–12. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gutowski K. E., “Industrial Uses and Applications of Ionic Liquids,” Physical Sciences Reviews 3 (2018): 20170191. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhou J., Sui H., Jia Z., Yang Z., He L., and Li X., “Recovery and Purification of Ionic Liquids From Solutions: A Review,” RSC Advances 8 (2018): 32832–32864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Schrimpf M., Graefe P. A., Holl A., Vorholt A. J., and Leitner W., “Effect of Liquid–Liquid Interfacial Area on Biphasic Catalysis Exemplified by Hydroformylation,” ACS Catalysis 12 (2022): 7850–7861. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Cao J. and Tao S., “Liquid‐Liquid Reactions Performed by Cellular Reactors,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 5579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Vankelecom I. F., “Polymeric Membranes in Catalytic Reactors,” Chemical reviews 102 (2002): 3779–3810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Tang J., Liao Y., Pan Z., et al., “Interface‐Confined Catalytic Synthesis of Anisotropic Covalent Organic Framework Nanofilm for Ultrafast Molecular Sieving,” Advanced Science 12 (2025): 2415520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Rao L., You X., Chen B., et al., “A Novel Composite Membrane for Simultaneous Separation and Catalytic Degradation of Oil/Water Emulsion with High Performance,” Chemosphere 288 (2022): 132490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Jiang H., Liu Y., Xing W., and Chen R., “Porous Membrane Reactors for Liquid‐Phase Heterogeneous Catalysis,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 60 (2021): 8969–8990. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nienow A. W., “Stirring and Stirred‐Tank Reactors,” Chemie Ingenieur Technik 86 (2014): 2063–2074. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Sang L., Feng X., Tu J., Xie B., Luo G., and Zhang J., “Investigation of External Mass Transfer in Micropacked Bed Reactors,” Chemical Engineering Journal 393 (2020): 124793. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Aziz N. and Mujtaba I. M., “Optimal Operation Policies in Batch Reactors,” Chemical Engineering Journal 85 (2002): 313–325. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hayes R. E., Afacan A., Boulanger B., and Tanguy P. A., “Experimental Study of Reactive Mixing in a Laminar Flow Batch Reactor,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 76 (1998): 73–81. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Gallou F., Gröger H., and Lipshutz B. H., “Status Check: Biocatalysis; Its Use With and Without Chemocatalysis. How Does the Fine Chemicals Industry View This Area?,” Green Chemistry 25 (2023): 6092–6107. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sharma S., Gallou F., and Handa S., “Towards a Sustainable Tomorrow: Advancing Green Practices in Organic Chemistry,” Green Chemistry 26 (2024): 6289–6317. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Ansari T. N., Xu G., Preston A., and Gao P., “Recent Highlights in Micellar Catalysis: An Industrial Outlook,” Organic Process Research & Development 28 (2024): 816–830. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kincaid J. R. A., Wong M. J., Akporji N., Gallou F., Fialho D. M., and Lipshutz B. H., “Introducing Savie: A Biodegradable Surfactant Enabling Chemo‐ and Biocatalysis and Related Reactions in Recyclable Water,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 4266–4278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Swisher J. H., Jibril L., Petrosko S. H., and Mirkin C. A., “Nanoreactors for Particle Synthesis,” Nature Reviews Materials 7 (2022): 428–448. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Vippala K., Wagle S. S., Rathee P., et al., “Micellar “Click” Nanoreactors: Spiking Pluronic‐Based Micelles With Polymeric Ligands,” Macromolecules 57 (2024): 10557–10566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Borrego E., Caballero A., and Pérez P. J., “Micellar Catalysis as a Tool for C–H Bond Functionalization Toward C–C Bond Formation,” Organometallics 41 (2022): 3084–3098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Uner A. and Ball L. T., “Cross‐Coupling Reactions in Aqueous Micellar Media,” European Journal of Organic Chemistry 28 (2025): 202500499. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Jia L., Liu H., Shi W., et al., “A Bifunctional Recyclable Gemini Surfactant Catalyst for Oxidative Nitroso Diels–Alder Reactions in Water,” Green Chemistry 27 (2025): 13885–13892. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sharma S., Parmar S., Ibrahim F., et al., “Sustainable and Bench‐Stable Photoactive Aqueous Nanoaggregates of Cu(II) for ppm Level Cu(I) Catalysis in Water,” Advanced Functional Materials 32 (2022): 2204459. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Cortes‐Clerget M., Akporji N., Zhou J., et al., “Bridging the Gap Between Transition Metal‐ and Bio‐Catalysis via Aqueous Micellar Catalysis,” Nature Communications 10 (2019): 2169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Mattiello S., Ghiglietti E., Zucchi A., and Beverina L., “Selectivity in Micellar Catalysed Reactions: The Role of Interfacial Dipole, Compartmentalisation, and Specific Interactions with the Surfactants,” Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 64 (2023): 101681. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Rodriguez A. M. B. and Binks B. P., “Catalysis in Pickering Emulsions,” Soft Matter 16 (2020): 10221–10243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ni L., Yu C., Wei Q., Liu D., and Qiu J., “Pickering Emulsion Catalysis: Interfacial Chemistry, Catalyst Design, Challenges, and Perspectives,” Angewandte Chemie 134 (2022): 202115885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Tang J., Zhang B., Zhang M., and Yang H., “Interfacial Effects of Catalysis in Pickering Emulsions,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 15 (2024): 8973–8983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. de Gennes P. G., “Soft Matter (Nobel Lecture),” Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English 31 (1992): 842–845. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Dinsmore A., Hsu M. F., Nikolaides M., Marquez M., Bausch A., and Weitz D., “Colloidosomes: Selectively Permeable Capsules Composed of Colloidal Particles,” Science 298 (2002): 1006–1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Zou H., Shi H., Hao S., et al., “Boosting Catalytic Selectivity Through a Precise Spatial Control of Catalysts at Pickering Droplet Interfaces,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 2511–2522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Zhang F., Fan Q.‐Y., Huang Y.‐C., et al., “A Pickering‐Emulsion‐Droplet‐Integrated Electrode for the Continuous‐Flow Electrosynthesis of Oximes,” Nature Synthesis 4 (2025): 479–487. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Li M., Song Q., Wang Y., and Liu B., “Pickering Emulsions with Low Interface Coverage but Enhanced Stability for Emulsion Interface Catalysis and SERS‐Based Detection,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 2490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Ayaz S., Guo W., Wang K., Hedar M., Zhao L., and Xi Z., “Enhanced Biodiesel Synthesis via Interfacial Mass Transfer Intensification in Pickering Emulsions Using an Amphiphilicity‐Engineered β‐Zeolite Catalyst,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 13 (2025): 21633–21647. [Google Scholar]
- 53. Svec P., Lusiani N., and Sedlacek O., “Stimuli‐Responsive Pickering Emulsions: From Interfacial Design to Catalytic Opportunities,” Catalysis Today 462 (2026): 115534. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Zhang X., Qu Y., Lou B., Yan R., Sun D., and Yu Y., “Boosting Stabilized Pickering Emulsion via Janus Materials for Efficient Interfacial Photoreforming Hydrogen Evolution,” ACS Omega 11 (2026): 21135–21148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Dechézelles J.‐F., Feng Y., Wang K., Pera‐Titus M., and Nardello‐Rataj V., “Hybrid Pickering Emulsifiers (HYPIEs) via Synergistic Water/Oil Interfacial Interactions: Enhanced Properties and Applications,” National Science Review (2026): nwag149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kohlpaintner C. W., Fischer R. W., and Cornils B., “Aqueous Biphasic Catalysis: Ruhrchemie/Rhône‐Poulenc Oxo Process,” Applied Catalysis A: General 221 (2001): 219–225. [Google Scholar]
- 57. Tomé L. C., Santos D. M. F., Velizarov S., et al., “Overview of Membrane Science and Technology in Portugal,” Membranes 12 (2022): 197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Siddique H., Rundquist E., Bhole Y., Peeva L. G., and Livingston A. G., “Mixed Matrix Membranes for Organic Solvent Nanofiltration,” Journal of Membrane Science 452 (2014): 354–366. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Abbas A., Zhang X., Hussain S., et al., “Stimulus‐Responsive Pickering Emulsion Droplet‐Based Microreactors for Green Biphasic Catalysis,” Communications Chemistry 8 (2025): 322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Editorial , “Chemical Processes and the Energy System,” Nature Energy 10 (2025): 1391. [Google Scholar]
- 61. Kümmerer K., “Sustainable Chemistry: A Future Guiding Principle,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56 (2017): 16420–16421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Meng F., Wagner A., Kremer A. B., et al., “Planet‐Compatible Pathways for Transitioning the Chemical Industry,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 (2023): 2218294120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Anastas P. T. and Warner J. C., Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice (Oxford University Press, 1998). [Google Scholar]
- 64. Anastas P. T. and Kirchhoff M. M., “Origins, Current Status, and Future Challenges of Green Chemistry,” Accounts of Chemical Research 35 (2002): 686–694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Yue J., “Green Process Intensification using Microreactor Technology for the Synthesis of Biobased Chemicals and Fuels,” Chemical Engineering and Processing—Process Intensification 177 (2022): 109002. [Google Scholar]
- 66. Anastas P. T. and Warner J. C., Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2000). [Google Scholar]
- 67. Jung Y. and Marcus R. A., “On the Theory of Organic Catalysis on Water,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 129 (2007): 5492–5502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Fallah‐Araghi A., Meguellati K., Baret J.‐C., et al., “Enhanced Chemical Synthesis at Soft Interfaces: A Universal Reaction‐Adsorption Mechanism in Microcompartments,” Physical Review Letters 112 (2014): 028301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Tadros T. F., “Chapter 1‐Emulsion Formation, stability, and Rheology”in Emulsion Formation and Stability, Edited by T.F. Tadros, Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. ISBN 978‐3‐527‐31991‐6 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 70. Gava R., Ballestín P., Prieto A., Caballero A., and Pérez P. J., “Methane Functionalization in Water with Micellar Catalysis,” Chemical Communications 55 (2019): 11243–11246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Würschum R., “Mean Time of Diffusion‐ and Reaction‐Limited Loading and Unloading,” Applied Physics A 129 (2022): 53. [Google Scholar]
- 72. Pera‐Titus M., Leclercq L., Clacens J.‐M., De Campo F., and Nardello‐Rataj V., “Pickering Interfacial Catalysis for Biphasic Systems: From Emulsion Design to Green Reactions,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54 (2015): 2006–2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Seo B., Sung M., Park B. J., and Kim J. W., “Recyclable 2D Colloid Surfactants With High Catalytic Activities at Pickering Emulsion Interfaces,” Advanced Functional Materials 32 (2022): 2110439. [Google Scholar]
- 74. Lu H., Ouyang J., Liu W.‐Q., Wu C., and Li J., “Enzyme‐Polymer‐Conjugate‐Based Pickering Emulsions for Cell‐Free Expression and Cascade Biotransformation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): 202312906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Hu Y., Cao Y., Nguyen F. M., et al., “Antibody‐Targeted Phytohormone Delivery Using Foliar Sprayed Silk Fibroin Pickering Emulsions,” Advanced Functional Materials 34 (2024): 2402618. [Google Scholar]
- 76. Guzmán E., “Pickering Emulsions in Catalytic Processes,” ChemCatChem 16 (2024): 202400856. [Google Scholar]
- 77. Wan C., Wu Y., Cheng Q., et al., “Reversible Emulsions From Polyoxometalate–Polymer: A Robust Strategy to Cyclic Emulsion Catalysis and High‐Internal‐Phase Emulsion Materials,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 25431–25439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Yang H., Zhou T., and Zhang W., “A Strategy for Separating and Recycling Solid Catalysts Based on the pH‐Triggered Pickering‐Emulsion Inversion,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 52 (2013): 7455–7459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Subramaniam A. B., Abkarian M., and Stone H. A., “Controlled Assembly of Jammed Colloidal Shells on Fluid Droplets,” Nature Materials 4 (2005): 553–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Zhang Y., Zhu G., Dong B., et al., “Interfacial Jamming Reinforced Pickering Emulgel for Arbitrary Architected Nanocomposite with Connected Nanomaterial Matrix,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Binks B. P., “Particles as Surfactants—Similarities and Differences,” Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 7 (2002): 21–41. [Google Scholar]
- 82. Binks B. P. and Lumsdon S. O., “Influence of Particle Wettability on the Type and Stability of Surfactant‐Free Emulsions,” Langmuir 16 (2000): 8622–8631. [Google Scholar]
- 83. Shen X., Chen C., van der Meer B., et al., “Understanding the Stability of Poorly Covered Pickering Emulsions Using on‐Chip Microfluidics,” Advanced Science 12 (2025): 2409903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Liu D., Zhou F., Li C., et al., “Black Gold: Plasmonic Colloidosomes With Broadband Absorption Self‐Assembled From Monodispersed Gold Nanospheres by Using a Reverse Emulsion System,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54 (2015): 9596–9600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Kim J. W., Cho J., Cho J., et al., “Synthesis of Monodisperse Bi‐Compartmentalized Amphiphilic Janus Microparticles for Tailored Assembly at the Oil–Water Interface,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55 (2016): 4509–4513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Lee H. M., Jeong H. W., Revadekar C., et al., “Nondeterministic Wetting of Janus Microspheres at the Oil/Water Interface,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 15 (2024): 11815–11822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Kim H., Cho J., Cho J., Park B. J., and Kim J. W., “Magnetic‐Patchy Janus Colloid Surfactants for Reversible Recovery of Pickering Emulsions,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 10 (2018): 1408–1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Sun Q., Chen J. F., and Routh A. F., “Coated Colloidosomes as Novel Drug Delivery Carriers,” Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 16 (2019): 903–906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Jiang S. and Granick S., “Controlling the Geometry (Janus Balance) of Amphiphilic Colloidal Particles,” Langmuir 24 (2008): 2438–2445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Hong L., Cacciuto A., Luijten E., and Granick S., “Clusters of Charged Janus Spheres,” Nano Letters 6 (2006): 2510–2514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Jiang S. and Granick S., “Janus Balance of Amphiphilic Colloidal Particles,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 127 (2007): 161102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Jiang S., Chen Q., Tripathy M., Luijten E., Schweizer K. S., and Granick S., “Janus Particle Synthesis and Assembly,” Advanced Materials 22 (2010): 1060–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Liu B., Wei W., Qu X., and Yang Z., “Janus Colloids Formed by Biphasic Grafting at a Pickering Emulsion Interface,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 47 (2008): 3973–3975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Cho J., Cho J., Kim H., et al., “Janus Colloid Surfactant Catalysts for In Situ Organic Reactions in Pickering Emulsion Microreactors,” Green Chemistry 20 (2018): 2840–2844. [Google Scholar]
- 95. Cavallaro M., Botto L., Lewandowski E. P., Wang M., and Stebe K. J., “Curvature‐Driven Capillary Migration and Assembly of Rod‐Like Particles,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (2011): 20923–20928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Davies G. B., Krüger T., Coveney P. V., Harting J., and Bresme F., “Assembling Ellipsoidal Particles at Fluid Interfaces Using Switchable Dipolar Capillary Interactions,” Advanced Materials 26 (2014): 6715–6719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Peddireddy K. R., Nicolai T., Benyahia L., and Capron I., “Stabilization of Water‐in‐Water Emulsions by Nanorods,” ACS Macro Letters 5 (2016): 283–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Shin J., Seo B., Choi K., et al., “Charge‐Directed Nanocellulose Assembly for Interfacial Phase‐Transfer Catalysis,” Advanced Materials 37 (2025): 2418325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Saha A., Nikova A., Venkataraman P., John V. T., and Bose A., “Oil Emulsification Using Surface‐Tunable Carbon Black Particles,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 5 (2013): 3094–3100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Wang J., Deng H., Sun Y., and Yang C., “Montmorillonite and Alginate Co‐Stabilized Biocompatible Pickering Emulsions with Multiple‐Stimulus Tunable Rheology,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 562 (2020): 529–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Lisuzzo L., Cavallaro G., Milioto S., and Lazzara G., “Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Halloysite Nanotubes: From General Aspects to Technological Applications,” Advanced Materials Interfaces 9 (2022): 2102346. [Google Scholar]
- 102. Guan W., Zhang Y., Wei Y., et al., “Pickering HIPEs Derived Hierarchical Porous Nitrogen‐Doped Carbon Supported Bimetallic AuPd Catalyst for Base‐Free Aerobic Oxidation of HMF to FDCA in Water,” Fuel 278 (2020): 118362. [Google Scholar]
- 103. Hentschel B., Kiedorf G., Gerlach M., et al., “Model‐Based Identification and Experimental Validation of the Optimal Reaction Route for the Hydroformylation of 1‐Dodecene,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 54 (2015): 1755–1765. [Google Scholar]
- 104. von Klitzing R., Stehl D., Pogrzeba T., et al., “Halloysites Stabilized Emulsions for Hydroformylation of Long Chain Olefins,” Advanced Materials Interfaces 4 (2017): 1600435. [Google Scholar]
- 105. Creighton M. A., Ohata Y., Miyawaki J., Bose A., and Hurt R. H., “Two‐Dimensional Materials as Emulsion Stabilizers: Interfacial Thermodynamics and Molecular Barrier Properties,” Langmuir 30 (2014): 3687–3696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Kirillova A., Stoychev G., Ionov L., Eichhorn K.‐J., Malanin M., and Synytska A., “Platelet Janus Particles with Hairy Polymer Shells for Multifunctional Materials,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 6 (2014): 13106–13114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Seo H. M., Seo M., Shin K., Choi S., and Kim J. W., “Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibrils‐Armored Pickering Emulsions with Limited Influx of Metal Ions,” Carbohydrate Polymers 258 (2021): 117730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Ballard N., Law A. D., and Bon S. A. F., “Colloidal Particles at Fluid Interfaces: Behaviour of Isolated Particles,” Soft Matter 15 (2019): 1186–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Lewandowski E. P., Searson P. C., and Stebe K. J., “Orientation of a Nanocylinder at a Fluid Interface,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110 (2006): 4283–4290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Owoseni O., Nyankson E., Zhang Y., et al., “Release of Surfactant Cargo From Interfacially‐Active Halloysite Clay Nanotubes for Oil Spill Remediation,” Langmuir 30 (2014): 13533–13541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Lee J. Y., Choi K. H., Hwang J., et al., “Janus Amphiphilic Nanoplatelets as Smart Colloid Surfactants with Complementary Face‐to‐Face Interactions,” Chemical Communications 56 (2020): 6031–6034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Kim J., Cote L. J., Kim F., Yuan W., Shull K. R., and Huang J., “Graphene Oxide Sheets at Interfaces,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 132 (2010): 8180–8186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Teng F., Xiang B., Liu L., Varlas S., and Tong Z., “Precise Control of Two‐Dimensional Hexagonal Platelets via Scalable, One‐Pot Assembly Pathways Using Block Copolymers with Crystalline Side Chains,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 28049–28060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. He Y., Wu F., Sun X., et al., “Factors that Affect Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Graphene Oxide,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 5 (2013): 4843–4855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Cote L. J., Kim F., and Huang J., “Langmuir−Blodgett Assembly of Graphite Oxide Single Layers,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 131 (2009): 1043–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Binks B. P., Fletcher P. D. I., Holt B. L., Beaussoubre P., and Wong K., “Selective Retardation of Perfume Oil Evaporation From Oil‐in‐Water Emulsions Stabilized by Either Surfactant or Nanoparticles,” Langmuir 26 (2010): 18024–18030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Celebi K., Buchheim J., Wyss R. M., et al., “Ultimate Permeation Across Atomically Thin Porous Graphene,” Science 344 (2014): 289–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Guo F., Silverberg G., Bowers S., et al., “Graphene‐Based Environmental Barriers,” Environmental Science & Technology 46 (2012): 7717–7724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Liang F., Shen K., Qu X., et al., “Inorganic Janus Nanosheets,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 50 (2011): 2379–2382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Cole‐Hamilton D. J., “Homogeneous Catalysis–New Approaches to Catalyst Separation, Recovery, and Recycling,” Science 299 (2003): 1702–1706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Zhao D., Ren H., Wang J., Yang Y., and Zhao Y., “Kinetics and Mechanism of Quaternary Ammonium Salts as Phase‐Transfer Catalysts in the Liquid−Liquid Phase for Oxidation of Thiophene,” Energy & Fuels 21 (2007): 2543–2547. [Google Scholar]
- 122. Sun Z., Jurica J., Hübner R., and Wu C., “Pickering Interfacial Catalysts for Asymmetric Organocatalysis,” Catalysis Science & Technology 12 (2022): 4811–4816. [Google Scholar]
- 123. Ying A., Li M., Lu X., et al., “Sandwich Like Poly(Ionic Liquid)s Functionalized Microspheres: Efficient Interfacial Catalysts for Preparation of Biodiesel,” Chemical Engineering Journal 473 (2023): 145361. [Google Scholar]
- 124. Chi Y., Guo L., Kopf N. A., and Gellman S. H., “Enantioselective Organocatalytic Michael Addition of Aldehydes to Nitroethylene: Efficient Access to γ 2 ‐Amino Acids,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 130 (2008): 5608–5609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Bago Rodriguez A. M., Schober L., Hinzmann A., Gröger H., and Binks B. P., “Effect of Particle Wettability and Particle Concentration on the Enzymatic Dehydration of n ‐Octanaloxime in Pickering Emulsions,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60 (2021): 1450–1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Powell A. B., Suzuki Y., Ueda M., Bielawski C. W., and Cowley A. H., “A Recyclable, Self‐Supported Organocatalyst Based on a Poly(N‐Heterocyclic Carbene),” Journal of the American Chemical Society 133 (2011): 5218–5220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Kristensen T. E., Vestli K., Fredriksen K. A., Hansen F. K., and Hansen T., “Synthesis of Acrylic Polymer Beads for Solid‐Supported Proline‐Derived Organocatalysts,” Organic Letters 11 (2009): 2968–2971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Beejapur H. A., Zhang Q., Hu K., Zhu L., Wang J., and Ye Z., “TEMPO in Chemical Transformations: From Homogeneous to Heterogeneous,” ACS Catalysis 9 (2019): 2777–2830. [Google Scholar]
- 129. Hoover J. M., Ryland B. L., and Stahl S. S., “Copper/TEMPO‐Catalyzed Aerobic Alcohol Oxidation: Mechanistic Assessment of Different Catalyst Systems,” ACS Catalysis 3 (2013): 2599–2605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Liu F., Wang L., Sun Q., Zhu L., Meng X., and Xiao F.‐S., “Transesterification Catalyzed by Ionic Liquids on Superhydrophobic Mesoporous Polymers: Heterogeneous Catalysts That Are Faster Than Homogeneous Catalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 134 (2012): 16948–16950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Zhang X., Hou Y., Ettelaie R., et al., “Pickering Emulsion‐Derived Liquid–Solid Hybrid Catalyst for Bridging Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysis,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 (2019): 5220–5230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Ali B. M., Yu Z., Tao Z., et al., “TEMPO‐Grafted Polystyrene/Polymethacrylate Organosiloxane Janus Nanohybrids as Efficient Pickering Interfacial Catalyst for Selective Aerobic Oxidation of Cinnamyl Alcohol,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 16 (2024): 20409–20418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Oh H.‐S., Nong H. N., Reier T., et al., “Electrochemical Catalyst–Support Effects and Their Stabilizing Role for IrOx Nanoparticle Catalysts During the Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 138 (2016): 12552–12563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Van Deelen T. W., Hernández Mejía C., and de Jong K. P., “Control of Metal‐Support Interactions in Heterogeneous Catalysts to Enhance Activity and Selectivity,” Nature Catalysis 2 (2019): 955–970. [Google Scholar]
- 135. Wang T., Hu J., Ouyang R., et al., “Nature of Metal‐Support Interaction for Metal Catalysts on Oxide Supports,” Science 386 (2024): 915–920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Huang H., Zhang W., Yu K., et al., “Palladium/Graphene Quantum Dots Stabilizing Pickering Emulsions for Enhanced Electrooxidation of Benzylamine,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 699 (2025): 138300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Yi D., Jeong G., Seo J.‐H., Yoo M. J., and Yang H., “Carbon Dots with Tailored Surface Wettability as Pickering Emulsifiers,” ACS Applied Nano Materials 5 (2022): 10258–10267. [Google Scholar]
- 138. Ma R., Zeng M., Huang D., Wang J., Cheng Z., and Wang Q., “Amphiphilicity‐Adaptable Graphene Quantum Dots to Stabilize pH‐Responsive Pickering Emulsions at a Very Low Concentration,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 601 (2021): 106–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Baumann A. E., Burns D. A., Liu B., and Thoi V. S., “Metal‐Organic Framework Functionalization and Design Strategies for Advanced Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices,” Communications Chemistry 2 (2019): 86, 10.1038/s42004-019-0184-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Couck S., Denayer J. F. M., Baron G. V., Rémy T., Gascon J., and Kapteijn F., “An Amine‐Functionalized MIL‐53 Metal−Organic Framework with Large Separation Power for CO2 and CH4 ,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 131 (2009): 6326–6327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Yaghi O. M., “Reticular Chemistry—Construction, Properties, and Precision Reactions of Frameworks,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, 138 48, (2016): 15507–15509, 10.1021/jacs.6b11821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Yuyang Z., Yuqing Z., Zixuan C., et al., “Constructing a Highly Active Pickering Interfacial Microenvironment for One‐Pot Tandem Reactions: Toward Synergistic Catalysis Between Nanoparticles and MOF@COF,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 734 (2026): 139362. [Google Scholar]
- 143. Li Z., Shi Y., Ding Y., et al., “Zr‐Based MOF‐Stabilized CO2 ‐Responsive Pickering Emulsions for Efficient Reduction of Nitroarenes,” Langmuir 40 (2024): 3133–3141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Pei X., Song W., Zhao Y., and Li Z., “CO2 ‐Switchable Amidine‐Modified ZIF‐90‐Stabilized Pickering Emulsions for Controllable Knoevenagel Condensation Reactions,” Molecular Systems Design & Engineering 9 (2024): 278–285. [Google Scholar]
- 145. Al‐Hunaiti A., Abu‐Radaha B., Wraith D., and Repo T., “Catalytic Behaviour of the Cu(i)/L/TEMPO System for Aerobic Oxidation of Alcohols—A Kinetic and Predictive Model,” RSC Advances 12 (2022): 7864–7871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Kaur N. and Ali A., “Kinetics and Reusability of Zr/CaO as Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Ethanolysis and Methanolysis of Jatropha Crucas Oil,” Fuel Processing Technology 119 (2014): 173–184. [Google Scholar]
- 147. Asmare Z. G., Aragaw B. A., and Atlabachew M., “Facile Synthesis of Natural Kaolin‐Based CuO Catalyst: An Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Catalytic Reduction of 4‐Nitrophenol,” ACS Omega 9 (2024): 48014–48031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Prier C. K. and Arnold F. H., “Chemomimetic Biocatalysis: Exploiting the Synthetic Potential of Cofactor‐Dependent Enzymes To Create New Catalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 137 (2015): 13992–14006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Rodrigues R. C., Ortiz C., Berenguer‐Murcia Á., Torres R., and Fernández‐Lafuente R., “Modifying Enzyme Activity and Selectivity by Immobilization,” Chemical Society Reviews 42 (2013): 6290–6307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Chen K. and Arnold F. H., “Engineering New Catalytic Activities in Enzymes,” Nature Catalysis 3 (2020): 203–213. [Google Scholar]
- 151. Zhu Q., Zheng Y., Zhang Z., and Chen Y., “Enzyme Immobilization on Covalent Organic Framework Supports,” Nature Protocols 18 (2023): 3080–3125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Zou H., Li Q., Zhang R., et al., “Amphiphilic Covalent Organic Framework Nanoparticles for Pickering Emulsion Catalysis With Size Selectivity,” Angewandte Chemie 136 (2024): 202314650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Qi L., Luo Z., and Lu X., “Biomimetic Mineralization Inducing Lipase–Metal–Organic Framework Nanocomposite for Pickering Interfacial Biocatalytic System,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 7 (2019): 7127–7139. [Google Scholar]
- 154. Sun Z., Glebe U., Charan H., Böker A., and Wu C., “Enzyme–Polymer Conjugates as Robust Pickering Interfacial Biocatalysts for Efficient Biotransformations and One‐Pot Cascade Reactions,” Angewandte Chemie 130 (2018): 14006–14010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Wang S., Xia X., and Chen F.‐E., “Engineering of Covalent Organic Framework‐Based Advanced Platforms for Enzyme Immobilization: Strategies, Research Progress, and Prospects,” Advanced Materials Interfaces 9 (2022): 2200874. [Google Scholar]
- 156. Dong Z., Jin J., Wei W., Wu G., Wang X., and Jin Q., “Hyperactivation of Lipase by Oil‐Water Interface in Interfacial Immobilization on Hierarchical Porous Hollow Silica Microsphere: Dynamics, Mechanism and Application,” Food Bioscience 58 (2024): 103706. [Google Scholar]
- 157. Feng M., Niu Z., Xing C., et al., “Covalent Organic Framework Based Crosslinked Porous Microcapsules for Enzymatic Catalysis,” Angewandte Chemie 135 (2023): 202306621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Jiang H., Hu X. F., Li Y. X., Yang C., and Ngai T., “Engineering Proteinaceous Colloidosomes as Enzyme Carriers for Efficient and Recyclable Pickering Interfacial Biocatalysis,” Chemical Science 12 (2021): 12463–12467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Xi Y., Liu B., Wang S., et al., “CO2 ‐Responsive Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Soft Protein Particles for Interfacial Biocatalysis,” Chemical Science 13 (2022): 2884–2890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Jiang H., Liu L., Li Y., Yin S., and Ngai T., “Inverse Pickering Emulsion Stabilized by Binary Particles With Contrasting Characteristics and Functionality for Interfacial Biocatalysis,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 12 (2020): 4989–4997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Huang X., Patil A. J., Li M., and Mann S., “Design and Construction of Higher‐Order Structure and Function in Proteinosome‐Based Protocells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 136 (2014): 9225–9234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Chen Z., Ji H., Zhao C., Ju E., Ren J., and Qu X., “Individual Surface‐Engineered Microorganisms as Robust Pickering Interfacial Biocatalysts for Resistance‐Minimized Phase‐Transfer Bioconversion,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54 (2015): 4904–4908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Gao K., Huang W.‐C., Dong H., Sun J., Jiang H., and Mao X., “Engineering Pickering Emulsion With Cell Surface‐Displayed Esterase Est7 for Specific and Efficient Synthesis of EPA Monoglyceride,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 12 (2024): 8061–8069. [Google Scholar]
- 164. Huang X., Li M., Green D. C., Williams D. S., Patil A. J., and Mann S., “Interfacial Assembly of Protein–Polymer Nano‐Conjugates Into Stimulus‐Responsive Biomimetic Protocells,” Nature communications 4 (2013): 2239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Liu X., Zhou P., Huang Y., Li M., Huang X., and Mann S., “Hierarchical Proteinosomes for Programmed Release of Multiple Components,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55 (2016): 7095–7100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Wen P., Wang X., Moreno S., et al., “Construction of Eukaryotic Cell Biomimetics: Hierarchical Polymersomes‐in‐Proteinosome Multicompartment with Enzymatic Reactions Modulated Protein Transportation,” Small 17 (2021): 2005749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Wang X., Liu X., and Huang X., “Bioinspired Protein‐Based Assembling: Toward Advanced Life‐Like Behaviors,” Advanced Materials 32 (2020): 2001436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Röllig R., Plikat C., and Ansorge‐Schumacher M. B., “Efficient and Selective Carboligation with Whole‐Cell Biocatalysts in Pickering Emulsion,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58 (2019): 12960–12963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Wang S., Gong Z., Hübner R., Karring H., and Wu C., “Pickering Emulsion Biocatalysis with Engineered Living Cells for Degrading Polycarbonate Plastics,” Small 21 (2025): 2504376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Wei H. and Wang E., “Nanomaterials with Enzyme‐Like Characteristics (Nanozymes): Next‐Generation Artificial Enzymes,” Chemical Society Reviews 42 (2013): 6060–6093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Poulichet V. and Garbin V., “Ultrafast Desorption of Colloidal Particles From Fluid Interfaces,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (2015): 5932–5937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Wu J. and Ma G.‐H., “Recent Studies of Pickering Emulsions: Particles Make the Difference,” Small 12 (2016): 4633–4648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Sacanna S., Kegel W. K., and Philipse A. P., “Thermodynamically Stable Pickering Emulsions,” Physical Review Letters 98 (2007): 158301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Yang Y., Sun H., Wang M., et al., “pH‐and Redox‐Responsive Pickering Emulsions Based on Cellulose Nanocrystal Surfactants,” Angewandte Chemie 135 (2023): 202218440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Li Z., Niu L., Zhao L., et al., “Light‐Switchable Pickering Emulsions Emulsified by Spiropyran‐Based Ionic Liquid Surfactants and UiO‐66‐NH2 ,” ChemSusChem 18 (2025): 202501618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Tang J., Zhou X., Cao S., Zhu L., Xi L., and Wang J., “Pickering Interfacial Catalysts with CO2 and Magnetic Dual Response for Fast Recovering in Biphasic Reaction,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 11 (2019): 16156–16163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Anjali T. G. and Basavaraj M. G., “General Destabilization Mechanism of pH‐Responsive Pickering Emulsions,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 19 (2017): 30790–30797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Jiang J., Yu S., Zhang W., et al., “Charge‐Reversible Surfactant‐Induced Transformation Between Oil‐in‐Dispersion Emulsions and Pickering Emulsions,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60 (2021): 11793–11798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Pang K., Ding B., Liu X., Wu H., Duan Y., and Zhang J., “High‐Yield Preparation of a Zwitterionically Charged Chitin Nanofiber and Its Application in a Doubly pH‐Responsive Pickering Emulsion,” Green Chemistry 19 (2017): 3665–3670. [Google Scholar]
- 180. Jiang W.‐L., Fu Q.‐J., Yao B.‐J., Ding L.‐G., Liu C.‐X., and Dong Y.‐B., “Smart pH‐Responsive Polymer‐Tethered and Pd NP‐Loaded NMOF as the Pickering Interfacial Catalyst for One‐Pot Cascade Biphasic Reaction,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 9 (2017): 36438–36446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Rey M., Kolker J., Richards J. A., et al., “Interactions Between Interfaces Dictate Stimuli‐Responsive Emulsion Behaviour,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 6723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Cui H., Zhang Y., Liu S., et al., “Thermo‐Responsive Aqueous Two‐Phase System for Two‐Level Compartmentalization,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 6771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Zhang J., Wang S., and Wu C., “Responsive Emulsions Enabled by Supramolecular Polymers for Recyclable Biocatalysis,” Small 22 (2026): 11147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Dong Y., Chen J., Ma Q., et al., “Thermoresponsive Polymeric Nanoparticles as Efficient Pickering Interfacial Catalysts for Selective Oxidation of Sulfides,” ACS Applied Polymer Materials 6 (2024): 2266–2273. [Google Scholar]
- 185. Lavrador P., Esteves M. R., Gaspar V. M., and Mano J. F., “Stimuli‐Responsive Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications,” Advanced Functional Materials 31 (2021): 2005941. [Google Scholar]
- 186. Li C., Hu J., Tang C., et al., “Thermo‐Switchable Pickering Emulsion Stabilized by Smart Janus Nanosheets for Controllable Interfacial Catalysis,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 11 (2023): 14144–14157. [Google Scholar]
- 187. Li Z., Shi Y., Zhu A., et al., “Light‐Responsive, Reversible Emulsification and Demulsification of Oil‐in‐Water Pickering Emulsions for Catalysis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60 (2021): 3928–3933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Zhong H., Zhang Y., Gong Y., Wan C., Zhang Y., and Zheng M., “Ultraviolet/Visible Light‐Responsive Pickering Interfacial Biocatalysis: Efficient and Robust Platform for Bioconversions,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 12 (2023): 1857–1867. [Google Scholar]
- 189. Song Z., Liu J., Luo J., Ngai T., Kwok M.‐H., and Sun G., “Photo‐Responsive Pickering Emulsions Triggered by In‐Situ pH Modulation using a Photoacid Generator,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 679 (2025): 1150–1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Liu Z.‐Q., Guo J.‐L., Liang R.‐H., et al., “Two Birds with One Stone: A Magneto‐Optical Dual‐Stimuli‐Responsive Intelligent Pickering Emulsion for Efficient Conversion of Glucose to 5‐Hydroxymethylfurfural,” Chemical Engineering Journal 479 (2024): 147757. [Google Scholar]
- 191. Zhang R., Li M., Liu Z., Liu Y., You J., and Ying A., “Lipase Grafted on Magnetic and CO2 Dual‐Responsive Janus Nanoparticles for Interfacial Catalyzed Transesterification,” Applied Catalysis A: General 685 (2024): 119891. [Google Scholar]
- 192. Chen A., Wang D., Chen J., Xu J., and Zeng H., “A CO2/N2‐Responsive Pickering Emulsion Stabilized by Novel Switchable Surface‐Active Alumina Nanoparticles,” Engineering 12 (2022): 48–54. [Google Scholar]
- 193. Liu C., Ma R., Pan X., Liu C., and Tian Y., “Magnetic‐Responsive Starch‐Based Particles as an Interfacial Stabilizer and Enzyme Carrier for Sustainable Pickering Interfacial Catalysis,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 13 (2025): 6142–6152. [Google Scholar]
- 194. Zhao R., Han T., Sun D., Huang L., Liang F., and Liu Z., “Poly(ionic liquid)‐Modified Magnetic Janus Particles for Dye Degradation,” Langmuir 35 (2019): 11435–11442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Thompson R. C., Courtene‐Jones W., Boucher J., Pahl S., Raubenheimer K., and Koelmans A. A., “Twenty Years of Microplastic Pollution Research—What Have We Learned?,” Science 386 (2024): adl2746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Ward C. P. and Reddy C. M., “We Need Better Data About the Environmental Persistence of Plastic Goods,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (2020): 14618–14621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Mitrano D. M. and Wohlleben W., “Microplastic Regulation Should be More Precise to Incentivize Both Innovation and Environmental Safety,” Nature Communications 11 (2020): 5324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Wu L., Shi X., and Wu Z.‐S., “Recent Advancements and Perspectives of Biodegradable Polymers for Supercapacitors,” Advanced Functional Materials 33 (2023): 2211454. [Google Scholar]
- 199. Yu X.‐H., Zhou F.‐Z., Xi Y.‐K., Huang X.‐N., Yin S.‐W., and Yang X.‐Q., “Ethyl Cellulose‐Chitosan Complex Particles Stabilized W/O Pickering Emulsion as a Recyclable Bio‐Catalytic Microreactor,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 639 (2022): 128375. [Google Scholar]
- 200. Martin‐Martinez F. J., “Designing Nanocellulose Materials From the Molecular Scale,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (2018): 7174–7175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Nishiyama Y., Sugiyama J., Chanzy H., and Langan P., “Crystal Structure and Hydrogen Bonding System in Cellulose I α From Synchrotron X‐ray and Neutron Fiber Diffraction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 125 (2003): 14300–14306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Li L., Wang X., Hu Y., et al., “Cellulose Nanocrystal‐Immobilized Lipase for Pickering Interface Biocatalysis,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 12 (2024): 17566–17577. [Google Scholar]
- 203. Moreno A. and Sipponen M. H., “Biocatalytic Nanoparticles for the Stabilization of Degassed Single Electron Transfer‐Living Radical Pickering Emulsion Polymerizations,” Nature Communications 11 (2020): 5599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Goliszek‐Chabros M., Smyk N., Xu T., Matwijczuk A., Podkościelna B., and Sevastyanova O., “Lignin Nanoparticle‐Enhanced PVA Foils for UVB/UVC Protection,” Scientific Reports 15 (2025): 35735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Sulis D. B., Lavoine N., Sederoff H., et al., “Advances in Lignocellulosic Feedstocks for Bioenergy and Bioproducts,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Chang K. L. B., Tai M.‐C., and Cheng F.‐H., “Kinetics and Products of the Degradation of Chitosan by Hydrogen Peroxide,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49 (2001): 4845–4851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. He W., Gao W., and Fatehi P., “Oxidation of Kraft Lignin with Hydrogen Peroxide and its Application as a Dispersant for Kaolin Suspensions,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 5 (2017): 10597–10605. [Google Scholar]
- 208. Zou H., Dai J., Suo J., et al., “Dual Metal Nanoparticles within Multicompartmentalized Mesoporous Organosilicas for Efficient Sequential Hydrogenation,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 4968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. Wang A., Ma Y., and Zhao D., “Pore Engineering of Porous Materials: Effects and Applications,” ACS nano 18 (2024): 22829–22854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Ma Y., Zhang H., Lin R., et al., “Remodeling Nanodroplets Into Hierarchical Mesoporous Silica Nanoreactors with Multiple Chambers,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 6136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. Zhao Y., Zhang X., Sanjeevi J., and Yang Q., “Hydroformylation of 1‐Octene in Pickering Emulsion Constructed by Amphiphilic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles,” Journal of Catalysis 334 (2016): 52–59. [Google Scholar]
- 212. Ravenelle R. M., Schüβler F., D'Amico A., et al., “Stability of Zeolites in Hot Liquid Water,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 114 (2010): 19582–19595. [Google Scholar]
- 213. Kärger J. and Valiullin R., “Mass Transfer in Mesoporous Materials: The Benefit of Microscopic Diffusion Measurement,” Chemical Society Reviews 42 (2013): 4172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Zapata P. A., Faria J., Ruiz M. P., Jentoft R. E., and Resasco D. E., “Hydrophobic Zeolites for Biofuel Upgrading Reactions at the Liquid–Liquid Interface in Water/Oil Emulsions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 134 (2012): 8570–8578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Gustafsson H., Isaksson S., Altskär A., and Holmberg K., “Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with Controllable Morphology Prepared From Oil‐in‐Water Emulsions,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 467 (2016): 253–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Cha S., Lim H. G., Haase M. F., Stebe K. J., Jung G. Y., and Lee D., “Bicontinuous Interfacially Jammed Emulsion Gels (bijels) as Media for Enabling Enzymatic Reactive Separation of a Highly Water Insoluble Substrate,” Scientific Reports 9 (2019): 6363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Zhang Y., Ye Z., Li C., et al., “General Approach to Surface‐Accessible Plasmonic Pickering Emulsions for SERS Sensing and Interfacial Catalysis,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Phan‐Quang G. C., Lee H. K., Phang I. Y., and Ling X. Y., “Plasmonic Colloidosomes as Three‐Dimensional SERS Platforms With Enhanced Surface Area for Multiphase Sub‐Microliter Toxin Sensing,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54 (2015): 9691–9695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Cates M. E. and Clegg P. S., “Bijels: A New Class of Soft Materials,” Soft Matter 4 (2008): 2132. [Google Scholar]
- 220. Stratford K., Adhikari R., Pagonabarraga I., Desplat J.‐C., and Cates M. E., “Colloidal Jamming at Interfaces: A Route to Fluid‐Bicontinuous Gels,” Science 309 (2005): 2198–2201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Haase M. F., Stebe K. J., and Lee D., “Continuous Fabrication of Hierarchical and Asymmetric Bijel Microparticles, Fibers, and Membranes by Solvent Transfer‐Induced Phase Separation (STRIPS),” Advanced Materials 27 (2015): 7065–7071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222. Thorson T. J., Gurlin R. E., Botvinick E. L., and Mohraz A., “Bijel‐Templated Implantable Biomaterials for Enhancing Tissue Integration and Vascularization,” Acta Biomaterialia 94 (2019): 173–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223. Park T., Choi G. H., Lee D., and Yoo P. J., “Metal‐Phenolic Network‐Coated Hollow Fiber Catalytic Membranes via Solvent Transfer Induced Phase Separation (STRIPS) for Suzuki Coupling Reaction,” Journal of Membrane Science 634 (2021): 119386. [Google Scholar]
- 224. Cole‐Hamilton D. J., “Janus Catalysts Direct Nanoparticle Reactivity,” Science 327 (2010): 41–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225. Yu Y., Lin R., Yu H., et al., “Versatile Synthesis of Metal‐Compound based Mesoporous Janus Nanoparticles,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 4249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226. Greydanus B., Schwartz D. K., and Medlin J. W., “Controlling Catalyst‐Phase Selectivity in Complex Mixtures with Amphiphilic Janus Particles,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 12 (2020): 2338–2345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227. Chang F., Vis C. M., Bergmeijer M., Howes S. C., and Bruijnincx P. C. A., “Bifunctional Janus Silica Spheres for Pickering Interfacial Tandem Catalysis,” ChemSusChem 14 (2021): 5328–5335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228. Tang S., Zhang F., Gong H., et al., “Enzyme‐Powered Janus Platelet Cell Robots for Active and Targeted Drug Delivery,” Science Robotics 5 (2020): aba6137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Li S., Jiang X., Wang Z., et al., “Free‐Standing Janus Nanosheets: Ultrafast Self‐Assembly and Versatile Biphase‐Application,” Advanced Functional Materials 34 (2024): 2309966. [Google Scholar]
- 230. de Leon A. C., Rodier B. J., Luo Q., et al., “Distinct Chemical and Physical Properties of Janus Nanosheets,” ACS Nano 11 (2017): 7485–7493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231. Li K., Zou H., Ettelaie R., Zhang J., and Yang H., “Spatial Localization of Two Enzymes at Pickering Emulsion Droplet Interfaces for Cascade Reactions,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): 202300794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232. Peeva L., Da Silva Burgal J., Heckenast Z., Brazy F., Cazenave F., and Livingston A., “Continuous Consecutive Reactions with Inter‐Reaction Solvent Exchange by Membrane Separation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55 (2016): 13576–13579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233. Zhang M., Ettelaie R., Li T., et al., “Pickering Emulsion Droplets and Solid Microspheres Acting Synergistically for Continuous‐Flow Cascade Reactions,” Nature Catalysis 7 (2024): 295–306. [Google Scholar]
- 234. Shum H. C., Bandyopadhyay A., Bose S., and Weitz D. A., “Double Emulsion Droplets as Microreactors for Synthesis of Mesoporous Hydroxyapatite,” Chemistry of Materials 21 (2009): 5548–5555. [Google Scholar]
- 235. Patil P. D., Gargate N., Tiwari M. S., and Nadar S. S., “Compartmentalization of Multi‐Enzymes within Designable Metal‐Organic Frameworks (MOF): A Review of Systematic Approaches,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 328 (2025): 147317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236. Guan X., Wan Z., Ngai T., et al., “Reaction‐Controlled Microgel‐Lipase Co‐Stabilized Compartmentalized Emulsion for Recyclable Biodiesel Production,” Aggregate 4 (2023): 300. [Google Scholar]
- 237. Li F. and Li H., “Spatial Compartmentalisation Effects for Multifunctionality Catalysis: From Dual Sites to Cascade Reactions,” Innovation & Technology Advances 2 (2024): 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 238. Ding S., Fernandez Ainaga D. L., Hu M., et al., “Spatial Segregation of Catalytic Sites within Pd Doped H‐ZSM‐5 for Fatty Acid Hydrodeoxygenation to Alkanes,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 7718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239. Parlett C. M. A., Isaacs M. A., Beaumont S. K., et al., “Spatially Orthogonal Chemical Functionalization of a Hierarchical Pore Network for Catalytic Cascade Reactions,” Nature Materials 15 (2016): 178–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240. Chen T., Liu D., Zhang M., et al., “Cascade Catalysis on Dual‐Atom Iridium‐Tungsten Catalysts for Enhanced Ammonia Selective Oxidation,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 11179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241. Gómez Baraibar Á., Reichert D., Mügge C., Seger S., Gröger H., and Kourist R., “A One‐Pot Cascade Reaction Combining An Encapsulated Decarboxylase with a Metathesis Catalyst for the Synthesis of Bio‐Based Antioxidants,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55 (2016): 14823–14827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242. Yang H., Fu L., Wei L., Liang J., and Binks B. P., “Compartmentalization of Incompatible Reagents Within Pickering Emulsion Droplets for One‐Pot Cascade Reactions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 137 (2015): 1362–1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243. Wu H., Du X., Meng X., Qiu D., and Qiao Y., “A Three‐Tiered Colloidosomal Microreactor for Continuous Flow Catalysis,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 6113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244. Zhang M., Wei L., Chen H., Du Z., Binks B. P., and Yang H., “Compartmentalized Droplets for Continuous Flow Liquid–Liquid Interface Catalysis,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 138 (2016): 10173–10183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245. Wei D., Yin N., Xu D., Ge L., and Guo R., “Dynamically Reconfigurable Complex Emulsion Droplets as Intelligent Microreactors,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 12 (2024): 5129–5138. [Google Scholar]
- 246. Wei D., Yin N., Xu D., et al., “Complex Droplet Microreactor for Highly Efficient and Controllable Esterification and Cascade Reactions,” ChemSusChem 17 (2024): 202400279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247. Ji Y., Lin Y., and Qiao Y., “Interfacial Assembly of Biomimetic MOF‐Based Porous Membranes on Coacervates to Build Complex Protocells and Prototissues,” Nature Chemistry 17 (2025): 986–996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248. Luo Z., Qiao L., Chen H., et al., “Precision Engineering of the Co‐Immobilization of Enzymes for Cascade Biocatalysis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63 (2024): 202403539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249. Yuan K., Zhang Y., Yan Z., et al., “MOF‐Based Dual‐Layer Pickering Emulsion: Molecular‐Level Gating of Water Delivery at Water‐Oil Interface for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogenation Using H2O as a Hydrogen Source,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): 202421341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250. Tian D., Hao R., Zhang X., et al., “Multi‐Compartmental MOF Microreactors Derived From Pickering Double Emulsions for Chemo‐Enzymatic Cascade Catalysis,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 3226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251. Hou L., Ren Y., Jia Y., et al., “Continuously Electrotriggered Core Coalescence of Double‐Emulsion Drops for Microreactions,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 9 (2017): 12282–12289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252. Zhang M., Wang M., Mi Y., et al., “Enhanced Enzyme Stability at the Interphase of Water‐Oil for Continuous‐Flow Olefin Epoxidation,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 8087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253. Zhang M., Ettelaie R., Dong L., et al., “Pickering Emulsion Droplet‐Based Biomimetic Microreactors for Continuous Flow Cascade Reactions,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254. Jiang W., Guan X., Liu W., Li Y., Jiang H., and Ngai T., “Rotating Liquid Marble Microreactors for Enhanced Enzymatic Reactions,” Advanced Functional Materials 35 (2025): 2504193. [Google Scholar]
- 255. Agapakis C. M., Boyle P. M., and Silver P. A., “Natural Strategies for the Spatial Optimization of Metabolism in Synthetic Biology,” Nature Chemical Biology 8 (2012): 527–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256. Wei W., Ettelaie R., Zhang X., et al., “Co‐compartmentalization of Enzymes and Cofactors Within Pickering Emulsion Droplets for Continuous‐Flow Catalysis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61 (2022): 202211912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257. Hao X., Li J., Zhang B., et al., “Transforming Crowded Coacervates Into Multi‐Compartmental Hybrid Microreactors for Practical Enzymatic Catalysis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): 202502479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258. Hao R., Zhang M., Tian D., et al., “Bottom‐Up Synthesis of Multicompartmentalized Microreactors for Continuous Flow Catalysis,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 20319–20327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259. Martin N., Douliez J.‐P., Qiao Y., Booth R., Li M., and Mann S., “Antagonistic Chemical Coupling in Self‐Reconfigurable Host–Guest Protocells,” Nature communications 9 (2018): 3652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260. Liu X., Kang F., Hu C., et al., “A Genetically Encoded Photosensitizer Protein Facilitates the Rational Design of a Miniature Photocatalytic CO2‐Reducing Enzyme,” Nature Chemistry 10 (2018): 1201–1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261. Yang X. J., Huang J. J., Guo J., et al., “Bridging Chemistry and Biology for Light‐Driven New‐to‐Nature Enantioselective Photoenzymatic Catalysis,” Chemical Society Reviews 54 (2025): 5157–5188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262. Rumo C., Stein A., Klehr J., et al., “An Artificial Metalloenzyme Based on a Copper Heteroscorpionate Enables sp 3 C–H Functionalization via Intramolecular Carbene Insertion,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144 (2022): 11676–11684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263. Large B., Baranska N. G., Booth R. L., Wilson K. S., and Duhme‐Klair A.‐K., “Artificial Metalloenzymes: The Powerful Alliance Between Protein Scaffolds and Organometallic Catalysts,” Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 28 (2021): 100420. [Google Scholar]
- 264. Jeschek M., Reuter R., Heinisch T., et al., “Directed Evolution of Artificial Metalloenzymes for In Vivo Metathesis,” Nature 537 (2016): 661–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265. Yang X., Guo J., Qian J., et al., “Enantioselective Energy Transfer Catalysis Compartmentalized by Triplet Photoenzymes,” Nature Catalysis 8 (2025): 1178–1187. [Google Scholar]
- 266. Fu Y., Liu X., Xia Y., et al., “Whole‐Cell‐Catalyzed Hydrogenation/Deuteration of Aryl Halides with a Genetically Repurposed Photodehalogenase,” Chemistry 9 (2023): 1897–1909. [Google Scholar]
- 267. Emmanuel M. A., Bender S. G., Bilodeau C., et al., “Photobiocatalytic Strategies for Organic Synthesis,” Chemical Reviews 123 (2023): 5459–5520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268. Sun N., Huang J., Qian J., et al., “Enantioselective [2+2]‐Cycloadditions with Triplet Photoenzymes,” Nature 611 (2022): 715–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269. Trimble J. S., Crawshaw R., Hardy F. J., et al., “A Designed Photoenzyme for Enantioselective [2+2] Cycloadditions,” Nature 611 (2022): 709–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270. Pinto R. T., Feu K. S., Dalmaschio C. J., Nascimento A., and Lacerda V. Jr, “Oil Recovery Improvements Based on Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Cellulose Nanoparticles and Their Underlying Mechanisms: A Review,” ACS Omega 10 (2025): 3262–3281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271. Ooi T. and Maruoka K., “Recent Advances in Asymmetric Phase‐Transfer Catalysis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 46 (2007): 4222–4266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272. Zuwei X., Ning Z., Yu S., and Kunlan L., “Reaction‐Controlled Phase‐Transfer Catalysis for Propylene Epoxidation to Propylene Oxide,” Science 292 (2001): 1139–1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273. Boddy A. J., Sahay A. K., Rivers E. L., White A. J. P. B., Spivey A. C., and Bull J. A., “Enantioselective Phase‐Transfer‐Catalyzed Synthesis of Spirocyclic Azetidine Oxindoles,” Organic Letters 26 (2024): 2079–2084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274. Suvarna M., Zou T., Chong S. H., Ge Y., Martín A. J., and Pérez‐Ramírez J., “Active Learning Streamlines Development of High Performance Catalysts for Higher Alcohol Synthesis,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 5844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275. Han Z.‐K., Sarker D., Ouyang R., Mazheika A., Gao Y., and Levchenko S. V., “Single‐Atom Alloy Catalysts Designed by First‐Principles Calculations and Artificial Intelligence,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 1833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276. Niu X., Chen Y., Sun M., et al., “Bayesian Learning‐Assisted Catalyst Discovery for Efficient Iridium Utilization in Electrochemical Water Splitting,” Science Advances 11 (2025): adw0894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277. Kim J., Kwon I. S., Lim J., et al., “Machine‐Learning‐Guided Tungsten Single Atoms Promote Oxyhydroxides for noble‐Metal‐Free Water Electrolysis,” Nature Communications 17 (2026): 2344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
