Abstract
Introduction
Although plantmicrobe systems have been studied for singlemetal contamination, little is known about their synergistic mechanisms under CdNi costress. Current studies often lack mechanistic explanations of microbial immobilization and plant physiological regulation, which this study aims to address.
Methods
To explore the remediation effect and intrinsic mechanism of the plant-microbe combined system on cadmium (Cd)-nickel (Ni) co-contaminated soil, Microbacterium algeriense (M. algeriense) C14 and Zinnia elegans (Z. elegans) were selected as the research objects. Through indoor culture and pot experiments, we investigated the CdNi resistance, mineralization mechanism, and effects of strain C14 on seed germination, seedling growth, mature plant growth, physiological metabolism, and heavy metal enrichment of Z. elegans under CdNi costress.
Results
M. algeriense C14 exhibited strong resistance to Ni2+ (within 800 mg·L−1) and Cd2+ (within 120 mg·L−1), and could form stable carboxylate precipitates through the coordination of carboxyl groups in amino acids of its metabolites with heavy metal ions. Inoculation with strain C14 significantly alleviated the inhibitory effect of Cd-Ni co-stress on Z. elegans, improved seed germination indexes, promoted the growth of seedlings and mature plants, increased the soluble protein content, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activities of plants, and reduced Cd and Ni enrichment in plants. Correlation and PCA analyses confirmed the coordinated regulation of growth, physiology, and heavy metal uptake by the strain.The core mechanism of their synergistic remediation was the comprehensive effect of heavy metal immobilization by the strain, plant growth promotion, and synergistic regulation of plant heavy metal uptake, enrichment and physiological metabolism.
Discussion
This study confirms that the M. algeriense C14 and Z. elegans system is a promising phytomicrobial remediation model. Unlike conventional biosorption or microbially induced carbonate precipitation, strain C14 achieves stable heavy metal immobilization via carboxylate‑mediated mineralization, which differs fundamentally from known mechanisms and offers superior long‑term stability. Meanwhile, M. algeriense C14 shows exceptional dual resistance to Cd and Ni, strong IAA‑producing and growth‑promoting traits, distinguishing it from most previously reported PGPR.
Keywords: cadmium-nickel co-contamination, Microbacterium algeriense, physiological regulation, plant–microbe combined remediation, remediation mechanism, Zinnia elegans
1. Introduction
With the intensification of industrial development and agricultural activities, heavy metal pollution by Cd and Ni has become a major issue in soil environments, posing serious threats to ecological security and safe production of crops (Gao et al., 2026; Mkhonza et al., 2026; Hayyat et al., 2020). Cd and Ni are highly toxic, non-degradable, and bioaccumulative, which can endanger human health through the food chain (Suhani et al., 2021; Jackson and Alloway, 2017; Hussain and Kabir, 2026). Long-term exposure to these metals can cause severe health problems including kidney damage, bone demineralization, neurological disorders, and carcinogenesis (Chețan et al., 2025). These toxic metals primarily originate from anthropogenic activities including mining operations, metal smelting, electroplating industries, application of contaminated fertilizers and pesticides, and improper disposal of industrial waste (Wan et al., 2024; Uddin et al., 2024). Global soil surveys have revealed that Cd and Ni contamination in agricultural soils has reached alarming levels, with concentrations frequently exceeding regulatory thresholds in major agricultural regions, particularly in areas with intensive industrial activities (Hou et al., 2025). Traditional remediation technologies such as soil excavation, chemical stabilization, and soil washing, although effective in certain scenarios, often suffer from limitations including high costs, secondary pollution, soil structure destruction, and long-term sustainability issues (Iqbal et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024). In contrast, microbe-plant synergistic remediation technology has emerged as a research hotspot for heavy metal-contaminated soil remediation due to its advantages of low cost, environmental friendliness, long-lasting remediation effect, and potential for simultaneous restoration of soil ecological functions (Umaru and Owuama, 2018; Supreeth, 2022; Patel et al., 2024; Chojnacka et al., 2023; Kaur and Saxena, 2024; Komire et al., 2024). This biotechnology-based approach not only facilitates the removal or immobilization of toxic metals but also enhances soil fertility and microbial diversity, making it an attractive option for sustainable land management (Kaushal and Pati, 2025).
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can alleviate the damage of heavy metal stress to plants and improve plant adaptability to polluted environments through multiple pathways, such as producing plant hormones, activating nutrients, secreting chelating agents, and inducing plant antioxidant systems (Oleńska et al., 2020; de Andrade et al., 2023). Key mechanisms include: (1) production of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, which reduces ethylene levels in plants under stress conditions and promotes root development (Qin et al., 2024; Alonazi et al., 2025); (2) synthesis of siderophores that enhance iron bioavailability while simultaneously chelating toxic metals, thereby reducing their phytotoxicity (Kaushal and Pati, 2025); (3) secretion of organic acids and exopolysaccharides that alter metal speciation and bioavailability in the rhizosphere (Sahoo et al., 2024); and (4) biofilm formation that facilitates efficient root colonization and metal sequestration (Iqbal et al., 2024). Specific PGPR genera including Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Azospirillum, and Rhizobium have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in promoting plant growth while mitigating heavy metal toxicity in contaminated soils (Naveed et al., 2020). Recent studies have shown that multi-strain PGPR consortia often exhibit synergistic effects superior to single-strain inoculations, providing enhanced protection against combined heavy metal stress (Kaushal and Pati, 2025). Screening strains with heavy metal resistance and growth-promoting functions, and clarifying their mechanisms of action, are crucial for achieving synergistic remediation. As a common ornamental plant, Zinnia elegans Jacq. has the characteristics of rapid growth, strong adaptability, large biomass production, and extensive fibrous root system, making it particularly suitable for phytoremediation applications (Ahsan et al., 2024; Singh et al., 2024; Mohammadi et al., 2024). The use of ornamental plants for remediation offers additional economic benefits through their esthetic value and potential for commercial cultivation, addressing one of the major limitations of traditional hyperaccumulator plants that often lack economic value (Khan et al., 2021). Recent physiological and molecular studies have revealed that Z. elegans possesses efficient metal uptake and translocation mechanisms, coupled with robust antioxidant defense systems that enable it to tolerate elevated metal concentrations in shoots while maintaining normal growth and flowering (Singh et al., 2024; Ahsan et al., 2024). Furthermore, the plant’s tolerance to various abiotic stresses, including salinity and osmotic stress, suggests underlying molecular mechanisms that may be harnessed for improved phytoremediation performance (Mohammadi et al., 2024). However, these studies predominantly address single-metal contamination, leaving a critical gap in understanding Cd-Ni co-stress responses. Furthermore, ornamental plants like Z. elegans have received little attention in this context, and the mechanistic links between PGPR colonization, plant physiology, and metal immobilization under dual-metal stress remain unclear.
Although previous studies have focused on single-metal contamination or traditional hyperaccumulator plants, little is known about the synergistic mechanisms of PGPR and ornamental plants under Cd-Ni co-stress. To address this gap, this study isolated a multifunctional PGPR strain C14 was isolated and screened from the rhizosphere soil of Z. elegans in the Cd-Ni contaminated area of Hongqiling Town, and identified as M. algeriense. By systematically studying the Cd-Ni resistance and mineralization mechanism of this strain, as well as its effects on the growth, development and physiological metabolism of Z. elegans under Cd-Ni co-stress and the intrinsic mechanisms, this study aims to provide theoretical support and technical reference for the microbe-plant synergistic remediation of Cd-Ni contaminated soil.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Experimental materials
2.1.1. Strain source
Strain C14 was isolated and screened from the rhizosphere soil of Asteraceae plants collected from 6 sampling sites around nickel factories and along major roads in Hongqiling Town, Jilin Province. The sampling areas included farmer greenhouses, farmland streams, agricultural fields, riverbanks of the town, urban green spaces, and nickel factories. A total of 18 types of rhizosphere soil of Asteraceae plants were collected. After isolation, purification, Cd-Ni resistance screening, and functional identification, strain C14 was determined as the target strain.
2.1.2. Test plant
Seeds of Z. elegans with a thousand-grain weight of 9.5473 g were purchased from a local flower market and surface-sterilized before sowing.
2.1.3. Experimental reagents and instruments
LB medium, Ashby solid medium, PKO medium, potassium-solubilizing medium, etc.; analytical grade reagents such as CdCl2·2.5H2O and NiCl2·6H2O; reagents for determining physiological indicators including Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250, thiobarbituric acid, and guaiacol. Main instruments included: constant temperature shaking incubator, artificial climate chamber, atomic absorption spectrophotometer, X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS), X-ray diffractometer (XRD), microplate reader, WinRHIZO 2016 root measurement and analysis software, and high-throughput sequencing platform.
2.2. Experimental design
2.2.1. Identification and functional characterization of strain C14
The taxonomic status of the strain was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing using the universal bacterial primer pair 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′)/1492R (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). The PCR amplification products were detected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis with DL2000 DNA Marker (Takara, Japan) as the molecular weight standard, to verify the size and specificity of the amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments. The target bands were excised and purified using a gel extraction kit, and then subjected to Sanger sequencing with the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, United States) on an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer. Raw sequences were assembled and corrected, and homologous sequences were searched using the BLAST program in the NCBI GenBank database. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using ClustalW, and a neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 11 software with 1,000 bootstrap replications to assess the confidence of the tree topology, which was used for the taxonomic identification of the strain.
The obtained sequences were assembled and analyzed for taxonomic identification. The growth curves of the strain under different concentrations of Ni2+, Cd2+, and pH conditions were measured by spectrophotometry to analyze its resistance and adaptability. The indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production capacity of the strain was determined by the Salkowski colorimetric method. XPS and XRD techniques were used to analyze the mineralization products and mechanisms of the strain for Cd2+ and Ni2+. The main components of the strain responsible for Cd-Ni removal were identified through heavy metal removal experiments with different fermentation broth fractions.
2.2.2. Effects of strain C14 on seed germination and seedling growth of Zinnia elegans under Cd-Ni stress
Cd stress concentrations were set as follows: 0 mg·L−1 (CK), 0.3 mg·L−1 (C1), 30 mg·L−1 (C2), 120 mg·L−1 (C3); Ni stress concentrations were: 0 mg·L−1 (CK), 50 mg·L−1 (N1), 200 mg·L−1 (N2), 600 mg·L−1 (N3); combined Cd-Ni stress concentrations included 4 levels of Cd2+ (0, 0.3, 30, 120 mg·L−1) and 4 levels of Ni2+ (0, 50, 200, 600 mg·L−1), resulting in 10 combined treatments. The above concentrations were selected based on relevant national environmental standards and preliminary toxicity tests to ensure environmental relevance and toxicity representativeness. For each treatment, two subgroups were set: with strain C14 inoculation (bacterial suspension OD600 = 0.8, addition amount 0.5 mL/Petri dish) and without strain inoculation, with three replicates per treatment (Table 1).
Table 1.
Addition of Microbacterium algeriense C14 in combination with Z. elegans under compound stress of cadmium-nickel at different mass concentrations.
| Microbacterium algeriense C14 | Ni Stress Concentration (mg·L−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −/+ | 0 | 50 | 200 | 600 | |
| Cd stress concentration (mg·L−1) | 0 | CK/CKJ | – | – | – |
| 0.3 | – | C1N1/C1N1J | C1N2/C1N2J | C1N3/C1N3J | |
| 30 | – | C2N1/C2N1J | C2N2/C2N2J | C2N3/C2N3J | |
| 120 | – | C3N1/C3N1J | C3N2/C3N2J | C3N3/C3N3J | |
The Petri dish filter paper method was used. Thirty plump seeds were placed in each Petri dish, 10 mL of heavy metal solution with corresponding concentration was added, and the Petri dishes were incubated in an artificial climate chamber (temperature 19 ± 4 °C, relative humidity 50–90%, 24 h dark treatment followed by 7 days of culture). Seed germination potential, germination rate, germination index, and vigor index were determined; seedling stem length, root length, root surface area, root projected area, and root volume were measured using WinRHIZO 2016 software.
2.2.3. Effects of strain C14 on growth and physiological metabolism of mature Zinnia elegans plants under Cd-Ni stress
Pot experiments were conducted. Soil was mixed with garden soil and sand at a ratio of 3:1, and different concentrations of heavy metal solutions were added for passivation for 30 days before use. Z. elegans seedlings with 2–4 true leaves were transplanted into flower pots (1.5 kg soil per pot). For the strain C14 inoculation group, 5 mL of bacterial suspension (OD600 = 0.8) was applied to the root zone at the time of transplanting and 25 days after transplanting, with 3 seedlings per pot. After 50 days of conventional management, indicators were determined.
Growth indicators: plant height, stem width, aboveground fresh weight, underground fresh weight, root-shoot ratio; physiological indicators: soluble protein content (Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 staining method), MDA content (thiobarbituric acid method), SOD activity (NBT photoreduction method), POD activity (guaiacol method); enrichment indicators: Cd and Ni contents in aboveground and underground parts of plants were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometer.
2.2.4. Correlation analysis of plant indicators
Correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation among physiological indicators, growth indicators and heavy metal content of Z. elegans at the seedling and mature stages under Cd-Ni co-stress, so as to clarify the intrinsic relationship between various indicators.
2.2.5. Principal component analysis of plant indicators
Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using R software (version 4.4.0) with the vegan package to evaluate multivariate relationships among growth, physiological, and heavy metal indicators. All data were standardized before analysis. PCA score plots were visualized using the ggplot2 package, and the variance interpretation rate of the first two principal components was recorded.
2.3. Data processing
SPSS 20.0 software was used for significance analysis by Duncan’s new multiple range test; MEGA 11.0 was used to construct the strain phylogenetic tree; R language (4.4.0) psych package was used for Spearman correlation analysis, and corrplot package was used for heatmap visualization; principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the vegan package, and PCA plots were visualized with the ggplot2 package; graphs were created using Word and Origin software.
3. Results and analysis
3.1. Identification and functional characteristics of strain C14
3.1.1. Strain identification
As shown in Figure 1, agarose gel electrophoresis with DL2000 DNA Marker revealed a clear and specific target band of approximately 1,361 bp, which was consistent with the expected size of the amplified fragment, confirming the reliability of the PCR amplification. The purified PCR product was sequenced with the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 kit, and the 16S rRNA gene sequence was used for strain identification.16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that strain C14 had a similarity of nearly 100% with Microbacterium algeriense (Genbank: NR 180420.1). To further confirm its taxonomic status, a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the 16S rRNA sequence of strain C14 and other similar type strains (Figure 2). The results showed that strain C14 clustered with the type strain of M. algeriense with high confidence, which further verified the taxonomic status of the strain. Combined with colony morphological characteristics (yellowish-white, neat edges, smooth surface, convex in the middle), it was identified as M. algeriense or its subtype. The colony morphology and core function verification results of strain C14 are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 1.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of the 16S rRNA gene PCR amplification product.
Figure 2.
Phylogenetic tree of strain C14 based on 16S rRNA gene sequence. This figure is also presented in another manuscript by the authors.
Figure 3.
Verification diagram of colony morphology and function of strain C14: (a) Colony morphology, (b) Cd precipitation product, (c) Ni precipitation product, (d) IAA assay. This figure is also presented in another manuscript by the authors.
3.1.2. Heavy metal resistance
Strain C14 could maintain certain cell activity at Ni2+ concentrations up to 800 mg·L−1 and Cd2+ concentrations up to 120 mg·L−1; the logarithmic growth phase was 0–6 h, and the growth peak was reached at 24 h (OD600 values were 1.134 and 1.137, respectively); when Ni2+ concentration reached 1,200 mg·L−1 and Cd2+ concentration reached 180 mg·L−1, the growth of the strain was significantly inhibited. The effects of different concentrations of Ni2+ and Cd2+ on the growth of strain C14 are shown in Figures 4a,b. The higher the heavy metal concentration and the longer the culture time, the higher the mortality rate of the strain. The mortality rate reached 98.67% after 12 h of treatment with 2,400 mg·L−1 Ni2+.
Figure 4.
Effects of different concentrations of Ni2+, Cd2+, and medium pH on the growth and IAA production of strain C14. (a) Effects of different concentrations of Cd2+ on strain growth, (b) Effects of different concentrations of Ni2+ on strain growth, (c) Effects of medium pH on strain growth, (d) Effects of medium pH on fermentation broth pH, (e) Effects of different concentrations of Ni2+ on IAA production of strain C14, (f) Effects of different concentrations of Cd2+ on IAA production of strain C14. This figure is also presented in another manuscript by the authors.
3.1.3. Environmental adaptability
As shown in Figure 4c, strain C14 could grow normally at pH 6–9, reaching the maximum growth at 24 h; growth was significantly slowed at pH 10. The strain could adjust the pH of the fermentation broth to an alkaline environment suitable for growth through its own regulation (Figure 4d). When the initial pH was 6–8, the pH of the fermentation broth increased slowly; when the initial pH was 9–10, it decreased slowly, and stabilized after 30–36 h.
3.1.4. Growth-promoting ability and mineralization mechanism
Strain C14 had the ability to produce IAA. Low concentrations of Cd2+ promoted IAA production, while high concentrations of Cd2+ and Ni2+ inhibited IAA production. However, a certain amount of IAA could still be produced under the stress of 800 mg·L−1 Ni2+ and 120 mg·L−1 Cd2+. The effects of different concentrations of Ni2+ and Cd2+ on the IAA production of strain C14 are shown in Figures 4e,f, respectively.
As shown in Figure 5, XPS and XRD analyses confirmed that carboxyl groups in amino acid metabolites act as active sites to coordinate with Cd2+ and Ni2+, forming stable amorphous carboxylate precipitates. This carboxylate-mediated mineralization is mechanistically distinct from typical biosorption, bioaccumulation, or carbonate/phosphate precipitation, and provides more stable immobilization with lower metal re-mobilization risk.
Figure 5.
Characterization of coordination precipitation products between metabolites of strain C14 and Cd2+, Ni2+. (a) XRD spectrum of Cd-Ni mineralization product, with an inset showing the digital photograph of the mineralization product. XPS spectra of Cd-Ni mineralization product: (b) C1s spectrum, (c) O1s spectrum, (d) N1s spectrum, (e) Cd3d spectrum, (f) Ni2p spectrum.
3.2. Effects of strain C14 on seed germination and seedling growth of Zinnia elegans under Cd-Ni stress
3.2.1. Seed germination indicators
Cd-Ni co-stress had a significant inhibitory effect on the seed germination and seedling growth of Z. elegans, and the higher the stress concentration, the stronger the inhibitory effect. Low-concentration co-stress (C1N1: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd2+ + 50 mg·L−1 Ni2+) had a weak inhibitory effect on seed germination, and even some germination indexes were slightly improved. However, under high-concentration co-stress (C3N3: 120 mg·L−1 Cd2+ + 600 mg·L−1 Ni2+), the germination potential, germination rate and vigor index of Z. elegans seeds were significantly decreased by 52.93, 59.01 and 85.17% compared with the control group, respectively. The growth indicators such as seedling stem length, root length and root surface area were all greatly reduced, and the root-shoot ratio was significantly decreased, indicating that the inhibitory effect of heavy metal co-stress on the root growth of Z. elegans was more obvious.
Low-concentration Cd-Ni stress (0.3 mg·L−1 Cd2+, 50 mg·L−1 Ni2+) had a certain promoting effect on the seed germination of Z. elegans, while high concentration significantly inhibited it. Inoculation with strain C14 significantly increased the germination potential, germination rate, germination index and vigor index of seeds under the same stress concentration. Under Cd-Ni co-stress, the C1N1 treatment (0.3 mg·L−1 Cd2+ + 50 mg·L−1 Ni2+) had the optimal germination indexes. After inoculation with strain C14, the germination indexes of all co-stress treatments were significantly higher than those of the non-inoculated group, with the germination potential and germination rate increased by 57.14 and 65.28%, respectively, under high-concentration co-stress (C3N3). The effects of inoculating strain C14 on the seed germination indexes of Z. elegans under Cd-Ni stress are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Effect of the addition of M. algeriense C14 on the germination indicators of Z. elegans seeds under compound stress of cadmium and nickel.
| Treatment | Germinative force | Germination percentage | Germination index | Vitality index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 56.67 ± 3.33BCDEcde | 67.78 ± 5.09CDc | 7.58 ± 0.93Gj | 76.96 ± 7.44De |
| C1N1 | 62.22 ± 5.09ABCabc | 80.00 ± 3.33ABab | 10.92 ± 0.68BCDbcde | 92.48 ± 5.15Cc |
| C1N2 | 53.33 ± 8.82CDEFdef | 74.44 ± 1.92BCb | 11.83 ± 0.25ABCab | 67.80 ± 4.33Ef |
| C1N3 | 47.78 ± 1.92EFGHfg | 54.44 ± 1.92EFGf | 10.17 ± 0.83CDEdefg | 26.30 ± 3.31HIJij |
| C2N1 | 48.89 ± 6.94DEFGefg | 61.11 ± 3.85DEde | 9.44 ± 0.64DEFfgh | 48.44 ± 1.75Fg |
| C2N2 | 45.56 ± 5.09FGHfgh | 52.22 ± 5.09FGfg | 9.33 ± 0.88DEFfgh | 35.99 ± 7.05Gh |
| C2N3 | 37.78 ± 1.92HIJijk | 46.67 ± 3.33GHgh | 8.89 ± 1.46EFGghi | 21.89 ± 4.5IJjk |
| C3N1 | 32.22 ± 1.92JKjkl | 42.22 ± 5.09HIhij | 8.05 ± 0.53FGij | 33.29 ± 3.99GHh |
| C3N2 | 30.00 ± 3.33JKkl | 36.67 ± 3.33IJjk | 8.06 ± 0.85FGij | 18.79 ± 2.88JKk |
| C3N3 | 26.67 ± 3.33Kl | 27.78 ± 1.92Kl | 7.46 ± 0.47Gj | 11.41 ± 1.55Kl |
| CKJ | 64.44 ± 1.92ABab | 80.00 ± 3.33ABab | 11.58 ± 0.16ABCabc | 125.40 ± 2.09Aa |
| C1N1J | 68.89 ± 3.85Aa | 83.33 ± 3.33Aa | 12.27 ± 0.74ABa | 112.24 ± 8.08Bb |
| C1N2J | 58.89 ± 8.39ABCDbcd | 78.89 ± 1.92ABab | 12.63 ± 0.49Aa | 83.89 ± 3.25CDd |
| C1N3J | 51.11 ± 1.92DEFdefg | 55.56 ± 3.85EFef | 10.97 ± 0.51ABCDbcd | 36.68 ± 2.49Gh |
| C2N1J | 53.33 ± 3.33CDEFdef | 65.56 ± 1.92Dcd | 10.36 ± 1.04CDEcdef | 63.34 ± 3.64Ef |
| C2N2J | 50 ± 3.33DEFGefg | 53.33 ± 3.33EFGf | 10.43 ± 0.38CDEcdef | 46.02 ± 1.76Fg |
| C2N3J | 40 ± 3.33GHIJhij | 52.22 ± 1.92FGfg | 9.75 ± 0.45DEFdefg | 30.22 ± 2.64GHIhi |
| C3N1J | 43.33 ± 3.33FGHIghi | 43.33 ± 3.33HIhi | 9.64 ± 0.41DEFefg | 48.05 ± 0.39Fg |
| C3N2J | 33.33 ± 3.33IJKjkl | 38.89 ± 5.09HIJij | 8.2 ± 0.43FGhij | 24.84 ± 1.5HIJijk |
| C3N3J | 32.22 ± 1.92JKjkl | 32.22 ± 1.92JKkl | 8.25 ± 0.08FGhij | 18.43 ± 0.84JKk |
Data in the table are mean ± standard deviation; different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), and different uppercase letters indicate extremely significant differences (P < 0.01).
3.2.2. Seedling growth and physiological indicators
As shown in Table 3, Cd-Ni co-stress had a significant inhibitory effect on the seedling growth of Z. elegans, and indicators such as stem length, root length and root surface area showed a significant downward trend with the increase of stress concentration. Only the root projected area was slightly increased (by 8.61%) under low-concentration co-stress (C1N1: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd2+ + 50 mg·L−1 Ni2+) compared with the control group. When the concentration of Cd or Ni was fixed alone, the increase of the concentration of the other heavy metal would aggravate the inhibitory effect. For example, compared with the C1N1 treatment, the stem length and root length in the C1N3 treatment (0.3 mg·L−1 Cd2+ + 600 mg·L−1 Ni2+) were reduced by 70.09 and 73.67%, respectively. After inoculation with strain C14, the seedling growth indicators under the same stress concentration were significantly improved. The root projected area in the C1N1J treatment was increased by 10.00% compared with the CKJ treatment, and the decrease range of indicators such as stem length and root length at each concentration gradient was smaller than that in the non-inoculated group, which effectively alleviated the inhibitory effect of co-stress.
Table 3.
Effect of the addition of M. algeriense C14 on the growth indicators of Z. elegans seeds under compound stress of cadmium and nickel.
| Treatment | Stem length | Root length | Root projection area | Root surface area | Root volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 5.252 ± 0.157Bb | 4.922 ± 0.382Aa | 0.267 ± 0.031CDcd | 0.663 ± 0.027ABb | 0.011 ± 0.001ABab |
| C1N1 | 4.296 ± 0.169Dd | 4.179 ± 0.110Bc | 0.290 ± 0.006BCbc | 0.622 ± 0.010Cc | 0.010 ± 0.001ABCbc |
| C1N2 | 2.606 ± 0.24GHgh | 3.119 ± 0.136De | 0.245 ± 0.011DEde | 0.464 ± 0.013Ee | 0.008 ± 0.001DEFdef |
| C1N3 | 1.285 ± 0.092JKl | 1.296 ± 0.13HIJlm | 0.147 ± 0.015IJhi | 0.264 ± 0.011IJi | 0.006 ± 0.001FGHgh |
| C2N1 | 2.570 ± 0.342GHgh | 2.577 ± 0.061Eg | 0.211 ± 0.006FGf | 0.414 ± 0.008Ff | 0.008 ± 0.001CDEFde |
| C2N2 | 2.325 ± 0.202Hh | 1.510 ± 0.303GHIjkl | 0.163 ± 0.015HIgh | 0.321 ± 0.022GHh | 0.006 ± 0.001FGHgh |
| C2N3 | 1.474 ± 0.172IJjkl | 0.991 ± 0.174JKno | 0.119 ± 0.017Jj | 0.234 ± 0.031Jj | 0.004 ± 0.001IJKjk |
| C3N1 | 2.522 ± 0.16GHh | 1.610 ± 0.158GHijk | 0.17 ± 0.007HIgh | 0.312 ± 0.015Hh | 0.006 ± 0.002GHIhi |
| C3N2 | 1.496 ± 0.091IJjkl | 0.828 ± 0.059KLo | 0.074 ± 0.006Kk | 0.140 ± 0.006Kkl | 0.003 ± 0.001JKLjk |
| C3N3 | 0.973 ± 0.109Km | 0.555 ± 0.081Lp | 0.057 ± 0.005Kk | 0.119 ± 0.006Kl | 0.001 ± 0.001Ll |
| CKJ | 5.686 ± 0.184Aa | 5.14 ± 0.287Aa | 0.300 ± 0.028ABb | 0.698 ± 0.033Aa | 0.012 ± 0.002Aa |
| C1N1J | 4.696 ± 0.151Cc | 4.455 ± 0.148Bb | 0.330 ± 0.017Aa | 0.647 ± 0.015BCbc | 0.012 ± 0.001Aab |
| C1N2J | 3.059 ± 0.081EFef | 3.584 ± 0.096Cd | 0.268 ± 0.009CDcd | 0.534 ± 0.011Dd | 0.009 ± 0.001BCDcd |
| C1N3J | 1.598 ± 0.121IJijk | 1.747 ± 0.096Gij | 0.160 ± 0.014HIgh | 0.327 ± 0.014GHh | 0.007 ± 0.001DEFGefg |
| C2N1J | 3.291 ± 0.24Ee | 2.843 ± 0.048DEf | 0.232 ± 0.006EFef | 0.441 ± 0.005EFef | 0.009 ± 0.001BCDEcd |
| C2N2J | 2.603 ± 0.053GHgh | 1.810 ± 0.132FGi | 0.176 ± 0.008HIg | 0.338 ± 0.016GHgh | 0.007 ± 0.001EFGefgh |
| C2N3J | 1.672 ± 0.106IJij | 1.423 ± 0.043GHIklm | 0.145 ± 0.011IJhi | 0.274 ± 0.013Ii | 0.005 ± 0.001HIJij |
| C3N1J | 2.851 ± 0.115FGfg | 2.140 ± 0.095Fh | 0.181 ± 0.006GHg | 0.360 ± 0.013Gg | 0.007 ± 0.001FGHfgh |
| C3N2J | 1.835 ± 0.034Ii | 1.195 ± 0.105IJKmn | 0.128 ± 0.006Jij | 0.250 ± 0.018IJij | 0.004 ± 0.001IJKj |
| C3N3J | 1.317 ± 0.083JKkl | 0.916 ± 0.028JKLno | 0.079 ± 0.005Kk | 0.157 ± 0.011Kk | 0.002 ± 0.001KLkl |
Data in the table are mean ± standard deviation; different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), and different uppercase letters indicate extremely significant differences (P < 0.01).
In terms of physiological indicators (Figure 6), without the inoculation of the strain, the soluble protein (SP) content showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase of Cd and Ni concentrations, while the activities of SOD, POD and the content of MDA all increased with the increase of stress concentration. The POD activity and MDA content in the C3N3 treatment reached 1225.33 U·g−1 and 0.0417 μmol·g−1, respectively. After inoculation with strain C14, the SP content and the activities of SOD and POD were significantly increased. The SP content and SOD activity in the C3N3J treatment were increased to 1.78 mg·g−1 and 1606.92 U·g−1, respectively. Although the MDA content still exhibited an upward trend under heavy metal stress, the inoculated group showed a slightly higher MDA accumulation than the non-inoculated group at the same stress concentration. This unexpected increase may be attributed to inappropriate concentration of IAA produced by the strain, or induced by unknown secondary metabolites produced by the strain, which disrupted the plant’s oxidative balance despite the strain’s potential to alleviate stress.
Figure 6.
Effects of cadmium and nickel combined stress on physiological indicators of Z. elegans Jacq. seedlings added with M. algeriense C14: (a) Soluble protein, (b) superoxide dismutase, (c) peroxidase, (d) malondialdehyde. In the figure, different lowercase letters in the same figure indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), while different uppercase letters in the same figure indicate extremely significant differences (p < 0.01). “−” indicates no application, “+” indicates application.
3.2.3. Enrichment indicators
As shown in Figure 7, under Cd-Ni co-stress, the Cd and Ni enrichment characteristics of Z. elegans seedlings were significantly affected by the interaction of heavy metal concentrations, and the heavy metal accumulation in plants was effectively regulated after inoculation with strain C14. Under low-concentration Cd stress (0.3 mg·L−1), the increase of Ni concentration would inhibit the Cd uptake by seedlings, while when the Cd concentration increased to 30 mg·L−1 and above, the promoting effect of Cd itself became dominant, and high-concentration Ni turned into a promoting effect. Without the inoculation of the strain, the Cd content in seedlings reached a peak of 95.8 mg·kg−1 in the C3N3 treatment (120 mg·L−1 Cd2+ + 600 mg·L−1 Ni2+). When the Ni concentration was fixed, the Cd content increased exponentially with the increase of Cd concentration; and the Cd content in the C3N3J treatment decreased to 59.23 mg·kg−1. The inhibitory effect of low-concentration Ni on Cd uptake was more significant.
Figure 7.
Effects of adding M. algeriense C14 on cadmium and nickel content in Z. elegans seedlings under combined cadmium and nickel stress (a). Cadmium content (b). Nickel content. In the figure, different lowercase letters in the same figure indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), while different uppercase letters in the same figure indicate extremely significant differences (p < 0.01). “–” indicates no application, “+” indicates application.
For Ni enrichment, when the Cd concentration was fixed, the Ni content in seedlings increased significantly with the increase of Ni concentration. Without the inoculation of the strain, the Ni content reached a peak of 350.93 mg·kg−1 in the C3N3 treatment. When the Ni concentration was low, the increase of Cd concentration would inhibit Ni uptake, while under high Ni concentration, high Cd concentration promoted Ni accumulation instead; after inoculation with strain C14, the Ni content in seedlings was significantly reduced, with the Ni content in the C3N3J treatment decreasing to 203.61 mg·kg−1, and the inhibitory effect of Cd on Ni uptake was enhanced at each Ni concentration gradient. On the whole, the Ni enrichment capacity of Z. elegans seedlings was stronger than the Cd enrichment capacity, and the heavy metal content in the underground parts was significantly higher than that in the aboveground parts. Inoculation with strain C14 significantly reduced the Cd and Ni accumulation in seedlings by reducing the content of available heavy metals and regulating the root uptake process of plants, with a better reduction effect on Ni than on Cd, which provided support for alleviating heavy metal toxicity and reducing the risk of the food chain.
3.3. Effects of strain C14 on growth and physiological metabolism of mature Zinnia elegans plants under Cd-Ni stress
3.3.1. Growth indicators
Cd-Ni co-stress had a significant inhibitory effect on the plant height, stem width, aboveground fresh weight, underground fresh weight and root-shoot ratio of mature Z. elegans plants, and the higher the stress concentration, the more obvious the inhibitory effect. Only the plant height, stem width and aboveground fresh weight were slightly increased (by 4.31, 0.88 and 4.02% respectively) under low-concentration co-stress (C1N1: 0.3 mg·L−1 Cd2+ + 50 mg·L−1 Ni2+) compared with the control group (CK), and the other indicators all showed a downward trend with the increase of Cd or Ni concentration. For example, the plant height and underground fresh weight in the C3N3 treatment (120 mg·L−1 Cd2+ + 600 mg·L−1 Ni2+) were significantly reduced by 65.45 and 87.57% compared with CK, respectively. After inoculation with strain C14, all growth indicators of mature Z. elegans plants under the same concentration of co-stress were significantly improved. The plant height, stem width and aboveground fresh weight in the C1N1J treatment (0.3 mg·L−1 Cd2+ + 50 mg·L−1 Ni2+ + strain C14) were increased by 5.6, 5.9 and 13.5% compared with the C1N1 treatment, respectively. Although the growth was still inhibited under high-concentration stress, the growth indicators were significantly better than those in the non-inoculated group. For example, the plant height and underground fresh weight in the C3N3J treatment were increased by 44.4 and 56.8% compared with the C3N3 treatment, respectively, which effectively alleviated the inhibitory effect of Cd-Ni co-stress on the growth of mature plants and reflected the promoting effect of strain C14 on the growth of mature Z. elegans plants. The effects of inoculating strain C14 on the growth indexes of mature Z. elegans plants under Cd-Ni stress are shown in Table 4.
Table 4.
Effects of cadmium and nickel stress on the growth indicators of Z. elegans mature plants under the application of M. algeriense C14.
| Treatment | Plant height | Stem width | Fresh weight above ground | Underground fresh weight | Root shoot ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 44.14 ± 2.06Bc | 4.53 ± 0.1Bb | 2.49 ± 0.04Cd | 3.54 ± 0.1Bb | 1.42 ± 0.03Aa |
| C1N1 | 46.04 ± 1.46ABbc | 4.57 ± 0.03Bb | 2.59 ± 0.07BCcd | 3.41 ± 0.07Cc | 1.31 ± 0.05ABCbc |
| C1N2 | 35.76 ± 1.13CDe | 3.51 ± 0.05DEd | 2.31 ± 0.03De | 2.32 ± 0.08Ff | 1.01 ± 0.03Ffg |
| C1N3 | 26.0 ± 1.62FGHgh | 2.5 ± 0.04GHf | 1.25 ± 0.11GHh | 1.08 ± 0.03JKl | 0.86 ± 0.05GHhi |
| C2N1 | 35.23 ± 0.34De | 3.39 ± 0.04Ed | 1.88 ± 0.05Ef | 2.22 ± 0.07FGg | 1.19 ± 0.02CDde |
| C2N2 | 31.53 ± 0.98Ef | 2.57 ± 0.08Gf | 1.56 ± 0.1Fg | 1.79 ± 0.06Hi | 1.16 ± 0.12De |
| C2N3 | 24.24 ± 1.71HIJhi | 2.32 ± 0.09HIg | 1.11 ± 0.04HIi | 0.8 ± 0.04MNn | 0.72 ± 0.04IJjk |
| C3N1 | 22.9 ± 1.75IJi | 2.22 ± 0.06Igh | 1.06 ± 0.06Ii | 0.97 ± 0.01KLm | 0.91 ± 0.05FGgh |
| C3N2 | 17.34 ± 1.41Kj | 1.83 ± 0.04Ji | 0.88 ± 0.05Jj | 0.68 ± 0.07No | 0.77 ± 0.06HIij |
| C3N3 | 15.27 ± 1.98Kj | 1.43 ± 0.04Kj | 0.63 ± 0.02Kk | 0.44 ± 0.05Op | 0.7 ± 0.1IJjk |
| CKJ | 46.71 ± 1.22ABab | 4.81 ± 0.04Aa | 2.75 ± 0.06Bb | 3.79 ± 0.07Aa | 1.38 ± 0.01ABab |
| C1N1J | 48.62 ± 0.93Aa | 4.84 ± 0.08Aa | 2.94 ± 0.08Aa | 3.74 ± 0.06Aa | 1.27 ± 0.04BCDcd |
| C1N2J | 38.91 ± 0.54Cd | 3.77 ± 0.11Cc | 2.65 ± 0.1BCbc | 2.72 ± 0.06Dd | 1.02 ± 0.06EFf |
| C1N3J | 27.32 ± 2.12FGg | 2.85 ± 0.08Fe | 1.61 ± 0.15Fg | 1.51 ± 0.06Ij | 0.95 ± 0.1FGfgh |
| C2N1J | 38.83 ± 0.55Cd | 3.67 ± 0.17CDc | 2.25 ± 0.09De | 2.57 ± 0.06Ee | 1.15 ± 0.03DEe |
| C2N2J | 36.14 ± 0.73CDe | 2.82 ± 0.07Fe | 1.82 ± 0.06Ef | 2.12 ± 0.03Gh | 1.17 ± 0.06De |
| C2N3J | 27.82 ± 2.01Fg | 2.63 ± 0.16Gf | 1.57 ± 0.08Fg | 0.99 ± 0.05Klm | 0.64 ± 0.01IJk |
| C3N1J | 26.0 ± 0.77FGHgh | 2.51 ± 0.04GHf | 1.55 ± 0.08Fg | 1.18 ± 0.02Jk | 0.77 ± 0.05HIij |
| C3N2J | 25.5 ± 1.18FGHgh | 2.13 ± 0.1Ih | 1.36 ± 0.08Gh | 0.85 ± 0.02LMn | 0.62 ± 0.05Jk |
| C3N3J | 22.05 ± 2.14Ji | 1.9 ± 0.11i | 1.04 ± 0.04IJi | 0.69 ± 0.05No | 0.66 ± 0.66IJk |
The data in the table are all moderately different; Different lowercase difference (P < 0.05). Different uppercase letters in the same column indicate difference (P < 0.01).
3.3.2. Physiological indicators
Under Cd-Ni co-stress, the soluble protein (SP) content, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, peroxidase (POD) activity and malondialdehyde (MDA) content of mature Z. elegans plants all showed specific change trends with the increase of stress concentration. Inoculation with strain C14 could significantly regulate these physiological indicators to enhance the stress resistance of plants (Figure 8): without the inoculation of the strain, the SP content showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase of Cd or Ni concentration. After inoculation with the strain, although it still decreased with the increase of Cd and Ni concentrations, the SP content under the same stress concentration was significantly increased, with the SP content in the C3N3J treatment reaching 4.98 mg·g−1, which was higher than 4.65 mg·g−1 in the non-inoculated group; the activities of SOD and POD showed an overall upward trend with the increase of stress concentration without the inoculation of the strain, with the SOD activity in the C3N2 treatment reaching 1028.3 U·g−1 and the POD activity in the C3N3 treatment reaching 950 U·g−1. After inoculation with the strain, both activities were further significantly increased, with the SOD and POD activities in the C3N3J treatment increasing to 1606.92 U·g−1 and 1,272 U·g−1, respectively; the MDA content increased continuously with the increase of stress concentration, reaching 0.0444 μmol·g−1 in the C3N3 treatment without the inoculation of the strain. After inoculation with the strain, the MDA content accumulation under the same concentration of stress was slightly higher than that in the non-inoculated group with no significant difference, with the MDA content in the C3N3J treatment being 0.0449 μmol·g−1. The results indicated that strain C14 and enhanced the physiological tolerance of plants to heavy metal stress by increasing the content of osmotic adjustment substances and the activity of antioxidant enzymes.
Figure 8.
Effects of cadmium and nickel combined stress on physiological indicators of Z. elegans mature plants added with M. algeriense C14. (a) Soluble protein; (b) superoxide dismutase; (c) peroxidase; (d) malondialdehyde. In the figure, different lowercase letters in the same figure indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), while different uppercase letters in the same figure indicate extremely significant differences (p < 0.01). “−” indicates no application, “+” indicates application.
3.3.3. Enrichment indicators
As shown in Figure 9, under Cd-Ni co-stress, the Cd and Ni contents in the aboveground and underground parts of mature Z. elegans plants increased significantly with the increase of stress concentration, and the content in the underground parts was always higher than that in the aboveground parts. Without the inoculation of the strain, the Cd and Ni contents in the aboveground parts in the C3N3 treatment (120 mg·L−1 Cd2+ + 600 mg·L−1 Ni2+) reached 140.3 mg·kg−1 and 473.19 mg·kg−1, respectively, and those in the underground parts reached 165.9 mg·kg−1 and 615.18 mg·kg−1, respectively; under low-concentration Cd stress, Ni would inhibit the Cd uptake by mature plants, while under high-concentration Cd stress, Ni turned into a promoting effect. When the Ni concentration was low, Cd would inhibit the Ni uptake by mature plants, while under high Ni concentration, high Cd concentration promoted Ni accumulation instead. Moreover, the promoting effect of Cd concentration on the Cd content and the inhibitory effect on the Ni content of mature plants were dominant. After inoculation with strain C14, the Cd and Ni contents in the aboveground and underground parts of mature plants under the same concentration of co-stress were significantly reduced, with a decrease range of 15.3–32.7%. The Cd and Ni contents in the aboveground parts in the C3N3J treatment decreased to 89.41 mg·kg−1 and 267.05 mg·kg−1, respectively, and those in the underground parts decreased to 89.41 mg·kg−1 and 360.32 mg·kg−1, respectively. At the same time, the inhibitory effect of Cd on Ni uptake was enhanced at each Ni concentration gradient, which effectively reduced the heavy metal accumulation in plants and the risk of heavy metal toxicity.
Figure 9.
Effects of adding M. algeriense C14 on cadmium (a: above ground, b: below ground) and nickel content (c: above ground, d: below ground) in Z. elegans mature plants under combined cadmium and nickel stress. In the figure, different lowercase letters in the same figure indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), and different uppercase letters indicate extremely significant differences (p < 0.01); “−” indicates no application, “+” indicates application.
3.4. Correlation analysis
Under Cd-Ni co-stress, there were significant intrinsic correlations among the growth indicators, physiological indicators and heavy metal enrichment indicators of Z. elegans seedlings and mature plants after inoculation with M. algeriense C14. After Spearman correlation analysis and heatmap visualization, the index clustering and correlation rules were as follows (Figure 10).
Figure 10.
Correlation analysis of the effects of strain C14 inoculation on Z. elegans seedlings, mature plant indicators under combined Cd-Ni stress: (a) Seedling indicators and (b) mature plant indicators.
At the seedling stage, the indicators under Cd-Ni co-stress could be clearly clustered into two categories with extremely significant negative correlation (p < 0.01): SOD, POD, MDA and plant Cd and Ni accumulation were clustered into the first category, and all indicators in this category were extremely significantly positively correlated (p < 0.01), indicating that under Cd-Ni co-stress, the heavy metal accumulation in seedlings increased with the increase of stress degree, which further induced the increase of antioxidant enzyme activities to resist oxidative damage, and at the same time, the degree of membrane lipid peroxidation aggravated and the MDA accumulation increased synchronously; seed germination indicators (germination potential, germination rate, germination index, vigor index), seedling morphological indicators (stem length, root length, root projected area, root surface area, root volume) and SP content were clustered into the second category, and all indicators in this category were also extremely significantly positively correlated (p < 0.01), reflecting the coordination between seedling germination potential, morphological formation and osmotic adjustment substance accumulation under co-stress. Among them, the vigor index was significantly positively correlated with germination-related indicators and POD activity, which could comprehensively reflect the germination ability and stress resistance of seedlings under Cd-Ni co-stress.
At the mature plant stage, the index clustering under Cd-Ni co-stress showed obvious differentiation, forming three categories with regular negative correlations: the first category included SOD, POD and Cd contents in aboveground/underground parts of plants; the second category included MDA and Ni contents in aboveground/underground parts of plants. Each category was extremely significantly positively correlated with the corresponding heavy metal content (p < 0.01), reflecting that under Cd-Ni co-stress, Cd mainly induced the increase of antioxidant enzyme activities in mature plants, while Ni mainly aggravated the membrane lipid peroxidation damage of mature plants, and the physiological damage targets of the two to mature plants were significantly different; the third category included growth indicators of mature plants (plant height, stem width, aboveground fresh weight, underground fresh weight, root-shoot ratio) and SP content, and the indicators were extremely significantly positively correlated (p < 0.01), and this category of indicators was extremely significantly negatively correlated with the first two categories of indicators (p < 0.01), indicating that the synergistic toxic effect of Cd and Ni would inhibit the growth and development of mature plants from multiple aspects such as oxidative damage and osmotic regulation. After inoculation with strain C14, the core correlation rules among various indicators did not change, only the correlation coefficients were adjusted, indicating that the strain mainly alleviated the damage of Cd-Ni co-stress by regulating the expression level of each indicator, rather than changing the intrinsic correlation mechanism among indicators.
3.5. Principal component analysis
To investigate the relationships among crop indicators under the seedling and mature plant conditions, all variables were first standardized. Principal component analysis (PCA) was then performed using the vegan package in R version 4.4.0, and the results were visualized with ggplot2 (as shown in Figures 11, 12). Under the mature plant condition, the first two principal components (PCs) explained 82.26% of the total variance, while under the seedling condition they explained 86.92% of the variance. These results indicate that the first two PCA axes captured the major variation patterns in the data and effectively reduced dimensionality.
Figure 11.

PCA score plot of growth, physiological, and heavy metal indicators of mature Z. elegans under Cd-Ni co-stress.
Figure 12.

PCA score plot of germination, growth, physiological, and heavy metal indicators of Z. elegans seedlings under Cd-Ni co-stress.
Under the mature plant condition, the treatment groups CK, C1N1, CKJ, C1N1J, and C1N2J were distributed on the negative side of the first axis. Along this direction, the indicators Root shoot ratio, Underground fresh weight, Stem width, Plant height, Soluble protein (SP), and Fresh weight above ground clustered together, suggesting that these treatments were strongly influenced by these variables. The groups C1N3J, C2N1J, C2N3J, C3N1J, C3N2J, and C3N3J were located in the fourth quadrant, coinciding with the distribution of Peroxidase (POD) and Superoxide dismutase (SOD), indicating that these treatments were mainly affected by POD and SOD. The groups C1N2, C1N3, C2N1, C2N3, C3N1, C3N2, and C3N3 were situated in the first quadrant and were closely associated with Nickel content of the aboveground part of the plant, Nickel content of the underground part of the plant, Cd content of the aboveground part, Cd content of the underground part, and Malondialdehyde (MDA). These results demonstrated that inoculation with strain C14 altered the overall distribution pattern of treatments, separating inoculated groups from uninoculated ones, and confirmed that strain C14 drove the coordinated regulation of growth, physiological metabolism, and heavy metal uptake in Z. elegans under Cd–Ni co-stress.
Under the seedling condition, the CK group was located alone in the third quadrant (negative direction of the second axis) and was strongly influenced by Stem length (SL) and Cd. The groups C1N1, C1N2, CKJ, C1N1J, C1N2J, and C1N3J were distributed on the negative side of the first axis, where Vitality index (VI), Germination potential (GP), Germination rate (GR), Soluble protein (SP), Projected area (PA), Germination index (GI), Volume (VOL), Surface area (SA), Length (LEN), and Stem length (SL) clustered together, indicating that these treatments were mainly affected by these germination and growth indicators. The groups C2N1J, C2N3J, C3N1J, C3N2J, and C3N3J were located in the fourth quadrant, which was dominated by Cd, suggesting a strong influence of Cd on these treatments. The groups C1N2, C1N3, C2N1, C2N3, C3N1, C3N2, and C3N3 were positioned in the first quadrant, where Ni, MDA, POD, and SOD clustered together, indicating that these treatments were primarily influenced by Ni, MDA, POD, and SOD. These results further verified that inoculation with strain C14 significantly changed the multivariate distribution pattern and effectively alleviated Cd–Ni co-stress by regulating growth and physiological performance of Z. elegans seedlings.
4. Discussion
Microbacterium algeriense C14 isolated from the rhizosphere soil of Z. elegans in the Cd-Ni contaminated area has strong Cd-Ni resistance, IAA production capacity and heavy metal mineralization capacity, which collectively distinguish it from conventional PGPR that often focus on single metal tolerance or general growth promotion. Mechanistically, strain C14 forms stable carboxylate precipitates through coordination between carboxyl groups in amino acid metabolites and heavy metal ions, thus reducing the bioavailability of heavy metals (Ahemad, 2019; Agarwal et al., 2024; Shehzad et al., 2023; Kumar et al., 2023). This mineralization mechanism is different from the traditional microbially induced carbonate or phosphate precipitation, providing a new approach for heavy metal pollution remediation (Chen et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2025; Ojha et al., 2025; Li et al., 2025).
Heavy metal stress can damage plant cell structure, inhibit photosynthesis and material metabolism, leading to decreased seed germination rate and growth retardation (Ghori et al., 2019; Emamverdian et al., 2015; Hafeez et al., 2023; Rai et al., 2016; Shah et al., 2010). In this study, low concentrations of Cd and Ni had a certain promoting effect on the seed germination of Z. elegans, which may be due to low-concentration heavy metals stimulating plants to produce stress responses and activating related metabolic pathways; high concentrations inhibited germination and growth by damaging cell membrane integrity and inhibiting enzyme activity. Inoculation with strain C14 significantly improved seed germination and growth through two key mechanisms: IAA-induced cell elongation and carboxylate-mediated heavy metal immobilization. On the one hand, it benefited from the IAA produced by the strain promoting cell division and elongation; on the other hand, the mineralization of the strain reduced the content of available heavy metals in the soil, alleviating the toxicity of heavy metals to plants.
Plants will produce a large amount of reactive oxygen species under heavy metal stress, leading to lipid peroxidation (MDA accumulation). SOD and POD, as key enzymes in the antioxidant system, can scavenge reactive oxygen species and protect cells from damage (Sharma et al., 2012; Zaid and Wani, 2019; Wang et al., 2019; Nawaz et al., 2021; Sahu et al., 2022). In this study, inoculation with strain C14 significantly increased the SOD and POD activities and soluble protein content of Z. elegans under Cd-Ni stress, maintained MDA content at a similar level. This indicates that strain C14 enhances stress tolerance by mechanistically regulating the antioxidant system and osmotic balance to reduce oxidative damage. It indicates that the strain can alleviate the oxidative damage of heavy metal stress to plants by activating the plant antioxidant system and enhancing the osmotic adjustment ability, which is consistent with the physiological regulation effect of PGPR on plants under heavy metal stress in existing studies.
The inhibitory effect of combined Cd-Ni stress on Z. elegans was greater than that of single stress, which was due to the synergistic effect of heavy metals aggravating the toxicity to plants. After inoculation with strain C14, the growth, physiology, and rhizosphere environment indicators of Z. elegans under combined stress were significantly improved, indicating that the strain also had a mitigation effect on combined heavy metal stress. This mitigation arises from the synergistic mechanism of microbial heavy metal immobilization and plant physiological regulation. However, its effect was affected by the stress concentration. The mitigation effect was weakened under high-concentration combined stress, which may be due to the saturation of the mineralization and growth-promoting capacity of the strain.
5. Conclusion
Microbacterium algeriense C14 possesses strong Cd–Ni co-resistance, IAA production, and unique carboxylate-mediated mineralization capability that sets it apart from previously reported PGPR. This carboxylate precipitation mechanism differs fundamentally from known immobilization pathways and enables stable long-term reduction of heavy metal bioavailability. The strain can significantly promote the seed germination and growth of Z. elegans under single and combined Cd-Ni stress, activate the plant antioxidant system, and reduce the uptake and enrichment of heavy metals; at the same time, it improves the physicochemical properties of the rhizosphere soil, regulates soil enzyme activities and microbial community structure, and alleviates the toxicity of heavy metals to plants. The results show that M. algeriense C14 is a high-quality strain for the microbe-plant synergistic remediation of Cd-Ni contaminated soils, providing important theoretical basis and technical support for the ecological remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils. This study was conducted under controlled laboratory and pot conditions. Due to the complexity of actual contaminated soil environments, the applicability of the results to field-scale remediation needs to be further verified. In the future, field experiments should be conducted to validate the remediation performance and stability of the M. algeriense C14–Z. elegans system in real heavy metal-contaminated sites, so as to support its practical engineering application.
6. Practical relevance and future scope
This study establishes a plant–microbe combined remediation system composed of Microbacterium algeriense C14 and Z. elegans, which shows high practical value for the in situ remediation of cadmium–nickel co-contaminated soil. As a widely cultivated ornamental plant with large biomass and strong adaptability, Z. elegans supports both ecological restoration and landscape improvement, avoiding the economic limitations of conventional hyperaccumulators. Strain C14 stabilizes heavy metals through a carboxylate-mediated mineralization mechanism with excellent long-term stability and low risk of metal re-mobilization, making it suitable for the safe utilization of lightly and moderately contaminated farmland and industrial abandoned land.
Future research should focus on field verification in real contaminated sites to evaluate the stability and remediation efficiency of the C14–Z. elegans system under complex environmental conditions, explore the combined application of strain C14 with organic amendments or biochar to further strengthen heavy metal immobilization and plant growth promotion, clarify the molecular regulatory network of strain C14 under Cd–Ni stress and its interaction mechanism with the Z. elegans rhizosphere, and develop low-cost microbial inoculants suitable for large-scale field application to support engineering popularization and practical application.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077137).
Footnotes
Edited by: Puneet Singh Chauhan, National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR), India
Reviewed by: Ritwik Sahoo, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India
Zobia Khatoon, Nankai University, China
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
HL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. SW: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Resources, Data curation. JW: Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. XM: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Data curation. CZ: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Visualization, Validation, Resources, Project administration. ML: Writing – original draft, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1831418/full#supplementary-material
References
- Agarwal P., Vibhandik R., Agrahari R., Rai G. K., Mukherjee A., Singh R. K., et al. (2024). Role of root exudates on the soil microbial diversity and biogeochemistry of heavy metals. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 196, 2673–2693. doi: 10.1007/s12010-023-04674-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ahemad M. (2019). Remediation of metalliferous soils through the heavy metal resistant plant growth promoting bacteria: paradigms and prospects. Arab. J. Chem. 12, 1365–1377. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.09.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ahsan M., Younis A., Raheel M., Khalid I., Abbas H. T., Ashraf W., et al. (2024). Morpho-physiological and enzymatic responses of zinnia (Zinnia elegans L.) to different metal hoarded wastewaters. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 24, 2910–2923. doi: 10.1007/s42729-024-01773-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alonazi M. A., Alwathnani H. A., Al-Barakah F. N. I., Alotaibi F. (2025). Native plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase promote plant growth and alleviate salinity and heat stress in maize (Zea mays L.) plants in Saudi Arabia. Plants 14:1107. doi: 10.3390/plants14071107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X., Zhang D., Larson S. L., Ballard J. H., Knotek-Smith H. M., Nie J., et al. (2021). Microbially induced carbonate precipitation techniques for the remediation of heavy metal and trace element–polluted soils and water. Water Air Soil Pollut. 232:268. doi: 10.1007/s11270-021-05206-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chețan F., Moraru P. I., Rusu T., Șimon A., Dinca L., Murariu G. (2025). From contamination to mitigation: Addressing cadmium pollution in agricultural soils. Agriculture 15:2179. doi: 10.3390/agriculture15202179 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chojnacka K., Moustakas K., Mikulewicz M. (2023). The combined rhizoremediation by a triad: plant-microorganism-functional materials. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 90500–90521. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28755-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Andrade L. A., Santos C. H. B., Frezarin E. T., Sales L. R., Rigobelo E. C. (2023). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable agricultural production. Microorganisms 11:1088. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11041088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emamverdian A., Ding Y., Mokhberdoran F., Xie Y. (2015). Heavy metal stress and some mechanisms of plant defense response. Sci. World J. 2015:756120. doi: 10.1155/2015/756120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao S., Liu Z., Wang Y., Chen J., Pang X., Liu Y., et al. (2026). Comprehensive effects of different restoration modes on the ecological environment of abandoned land in typical Qinling mining areas: a systematic study based on PTEs pollution-vegetation-soil conditions. Environ. Pollut. 396:127878. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2026.127878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghori N. H., Ghori T., Hayat M. Q., Imadi S. R., Gul A., Altay V., et al. (2019). Heavy metal stress and responses in plants. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 1807–1828. doi: 10.1007/s13762-019-02215-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hafeez A., Rasheed R., Ashraf M. A., Qureshi F. F., Hussain I., Iqbal M. (2023). “Effect of heavy metals on growth, physiological and biochemical responses of plants,” in Plant Stress Mitigators, eds. Husen A., Iqbal M. (Amsterdam: Elsevier; ), 139–159. [Google Scholar]
- Hayyat M. S., Adnan M., Khan M. A. B., Abd-Ur-Rahman H., Ahmed R., Rehman F.-u., et al. (2020). Effect of heavy metal (Ni) on plants and soil: A review. Int. J. Appl. Res. 6, 313–318. [Google Scholar]
- Hou D., Jia X., Wang L., McGrath S. P., Zhu Y., Hu Q., et al. (2025). Global soil pollution by toxic metals threatens agriculture and human health. Science 388, 316–321. doi: 10.1126/science.adr5214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hussain A., Kabir M. (2026). Synergistic nanobioremediation: exploring nanoparticle–plant–microbe interactions for sustainable soil decontamination. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 11:11. doi: 10.1007/s41204-025-00449-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Iqbal M. Z., Singh K., Chandra R. (2024). Recent advances of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for eco-restoration of polluted soil. Cleaner Eng. Technol. 23:100845. doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2024.100845 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jackson A. P., Alloway B. J. (2017). “The transfer of cadmium from agricultural soils to the human food chain,” in Biogeochemistry of Trace Metals, ed. Adriano D. C. (Boca Raton: CRC Press; ), 121–170. [Google Scholar]
- Kaur M., Saxena R. (2024). “Review on plant-microbe interactions, applications and future aspects,” in Microbial Technology for Agro-Ecosystems, eds. Kumar M., Kumar V. (Amsterdam: Elsevier; ), 133–151. [Google Scholar]
- Kaushal P., Pati A. M. (2025). Unleashing rhizobacteria for sustainable soil remediation: PGPR roles in heavy metal tolerance, detoxification, and plant productivity. Front. Microbiol. 16:1662000. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1662000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan A. H. A., Kiyani A., Mirza C. R., Butt T. A., Barros R., Ali B., et al. (2021). Ornamental plants for phytoremediation of heavy metals: Present knowledge and future perspectives. Environ. Res. 195:110780. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Komire K., Tiwari M., Gupta P. C., Bahorun T., Sharma N. (2024). “Harnessing Nanobiostimulants for sustainable agriculture: unraveling plant-microbe synergies,” in Nanobiostimulants, eds. Singh V., Bhat R. A., Dar G. H. (Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; ), 197–226. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar D., Malik S., Rani R., Kumar R., Duhan J. S. (2023). Behavior, risk, and bioremediation potential of heavy metals/metalloids in the soil system. Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat. 34, 809–831. doi: 10.1007/s12210-023-01166-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li L., Sun H., Ren C., Zhao Z., Song Y., Wang M., et al. (2025). Synchronous removal of heavy metals and ammonia-nitrogen by magnesium ammonium phosphate (MAP)-enhanced microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP). J. Hazard. Mater. 498:139994. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu D., Liu H., Ju F., Zhang A., Zhang Y., Ding Z., et al. (2025). Microbial mineralization for remediating heavy metal-contaminated groundwater: mechanisms, applications, advances, and perspectives. Environ. Geochem. Health 47:452. doi: 10.1007/s10653-025-02753-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mkhonza N. P., Zondo S., Vilakazi S. (2026). Toxic heavy metals distribution in urban soils of Africa: a systematic review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 198:205. doi: 10.1007/s10661-026-15030-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mohammadi M., Nezamdoost D., Khosravi F. F., Zulfiqar F., Eghlima G., Aghamir F. (2024). Exogenous putrescine application imparts salt stress-induced oxidative stress tolerance via regulating antioxidant activity, potassium uptake, and abscisic acid to gibberellin ratio in Zinnia flowers. BMC Plant Biol. 24:865. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05560-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naveed M., Bukhari S. S., Mustafa A., Ditta A., Alamri S., EI-Esawi M. A., et al. (2020). Mitigation of nickel toxicity and growth promotion in sesame through the application of a bacterial endophyte and zeolite in nickel contaminated soil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:8859. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nawaz M., Anjum S. A., Ashraf U., Azeem F., Wang Z. (2021). “Antioxidant defense system and reactive oxygen species (ROS) interplay in plants under drought condition,” in Handbook of Climate Change Management, eds. Filho W. L., Luetz J., Ayal D. (Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; ), 1–25. [Google Scholar]
- Ojha A., Bandyopadhyay T. K., Das D., Palash D. (2025). Microbial carbonate mineralization: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, applications, and recent advancements. Mol. Biotechnol. 68, 1079–1105. doi: 10.1007/s12033-025-01433-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oleńska E., Małek W., Wójcik M., Swiecicka I., Thijs S., Vangronsveld J. (2020). Beneficial features of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving plant growth and health in challenging conditions: A methodical review. Sci. Total Environ. 743:140682. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel V. P., Kherud R. R., Hajare N. R., Vavhal V. V., Sarode S. S., Baacchav K. R. (2024). “Recent developments in microbe–plant-based bioremediation,” in Microbiome-Assisted Bioremediation, eds. Parray J. A., Li W. (Amsterdam: Elsevier; ), 313–325. [Google Scholar]
- Qin H., Wang Z., Sha W., Song S., Qin F., Zhang W. (2024). Role of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria in plant machinery for soil heavy metal detoxification. Microorganisms 12:700. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12040700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rai R., Agrawal M., Agrawal S. B. (2016). “Impact of heavy metals on physiological processes of plants: with special reference to photosynthetic system,” in Plant Responses to Xenobiotics, eds. Singh A., Prasad S. M., Singh R. P. (Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; ), 127–140. [Google Scholar]
- Sahoo R., Sow S., Ranjan S., Dharminder, Kumar R., Roy D. K., et al. (2024). Unveiling the potential of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in phytoremediation of heavy metal. Discov. Appl. Sci. 6:324. doi: 10.1007/s42452-024-06024-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sahu P. K., Jayalakshmi K., Tilgam J., Gupta A., Nagaraju Y., Kumar A., et al. (2022). ROS generated from biotic stress: Effects on plants and alleviation by endophytic microbes. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1042936. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1042936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah F. U. R., Ahmad N., Masood K. R., Peralta-Videa J. R., Ahmad F. U. D. (2010). “Heavy metal toxicity in plants,” in Plant Adaptation and Phytoremediation, eds. Ashraf M., Ozturk M., Ahmad M. S. A. (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; ), 71–97. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma P., Jha A. B., Dubey R. S., Pessarakli M. (2012). Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J. Bot. 2012:217037. doi: 10.1155/2012/217037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shehzad J., Khan I., Zaheer S., Farooq A., Chaudhari S. K., Mustafa G. (2023). Insights into heavy metal tolerance mechanisms of Brassica species: physiological, biochemical, and molecular interventions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 108448–108476. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29979-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh Y., Tripathi S. N., Pandey P., Tripathi A., Arif N., Yadav V., et al. (2024). Comparative physiological and anatomical responses of Tagetes erecta L. and Zinnia elegans Jacq. seedlings to AgNO₃ and ZnSO₄ metals and their nanoparticles. Ind. Crop. Prod. 212:118378. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118378 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Suhani I., Sahab S., Srivastava V., Singh R. P. (2021). Impact of cadmium pollution on food safety and human health. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 27, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cotox.2021.04.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Supreeth M. (2022). Enhanced remediation of pollutants by microorganisms–plant combination. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 4587–4598. doi: 10.1007/s13762-021-03354-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uddin S., Khanom S., Islam M. R., Hossain M. (2024). “Cadmium contamination: Sources, behavior, and environmental implications,” in Cadmium Toxicity, ed. Kumar N. (Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; ), 67–101. [Google Scholar]
- Umaru F. F., Owuama C. I. (2018). “Application of plant-microbe interactions in contaminated agroecosystem management,” in Phytobiont and Ecosystem Restitution, eds. Kumar V., Kumar M., Prasad R. (Singapore: Springer Singapore; ), 63–100. [Google Scholar]
- Wan Y., Liu J., Zhuang Z., Wang Q., Li H. (2024). Heavy metals in agricultural soils: Sources, influencing factors, and remediation strategies. Toxics 12:63. doi: 10.3390/toxics12010063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X., Liu H., Yu F., Hu B., Jia Y., Sha H., et al. (2019). Differential activity of the antioxidant defence system and alterations in the accumulation of osmolyte and reactive oxygen species under drought stress and recovery in rice (Oryza sativa L.) tillering. Sci. Rep. 9:8543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44958-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zaid A., Wani S. H. (2019). “Reactive oxygen species generation, scavenging and signaling in plant defense responses,” in Bioactive Molecules in Plant Defense, eds. Jogaiah S., Abdelrahman M. (Cham: Springer International Publishing; ), 111–132. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Shen Z., Zhou W., Liu C., Li Y., Ding B., et al. (2024). Environmental problems of emerging toxic metals and treatment technology and methods. RSC Adv. 14, 37299–37310. doi: 10.1039/d4ra06085g [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.









