Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

Research Square logoLink to Research Square
[Preprint]. 2026 Jun 12:rs.3.rs-9941634. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9941634/v1

Climate-induced patterns of activity and nest conditions select for genes associated with growth and maturation in a widespread lizard species

Christopher Parkinson 1, Michael Sears 2, Matthew McTernan 3
PMCID: PMC13278313  PMID: 42326504

Abstract

How species adapt to local climates across their ranges remains a central question in ecology and evolutionary biology. Though phenotypic responses to climate are well documented, the genetic basis for these adaptive responses remains largely unresolved. Here, we integrate biophysical and genomic methods to identify genomic variants associated with climate-induced patterns of activity and nest conditions across the range of the Eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus). We first use a biophysical model to estimate potential annual activity and incubation temperatures for nests across the species’ range. The biophysical parameters were then used in gene-environmental association models to identify candidate genes underlying adaptation to climate. The biological functions of candidate genes were assessed through enrichment analyses. Lastly, we use genome-wide linkage disequilibrium to identify evidence of co-selection or epistatic interactions on candidate genes. In general, activity time decreased with latitude, while the range of nest temperatures increased with latitude. However, mean nest temperatures do not correlate with latitude, longitude, or elevation. Genomic analyses identified 2040 candidate genes, of which 48 enriched for two KEGG pathways: the calcium signaling pathway and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone pathway. Calcium signaling dictates cell proliferation and migration through the effects of growth factors (e.g., growth and development), while gonadotropin-releasing hormone dictates the development of sexual traits and the timing of sexual maturity. Phenotypic evidence from previous studies indicates that selection on life history traits, such as body size and age at maturation, underlie adaptation to climate in ectotherms, and our results provide genetic support for this notion.

Keywords: Climate, Biophysics, Genomics, Selection, Life History

INTRODUCTION:

Understanding how species adapt to local climates throughout their distribution remains a primary goal of ecological and evolutionary biology, particularly as the global climate continues to shift (Franks and Hoffmann, 2012; Stein et al., 2013; Sears et al., 2019). Species occupy a realized climatic niche, where their physiology has evolved to suit the environment and enable population persistence (Vandermeer, 1972). However, many species encounter a variety of climates, either due to expansion into new areas or changes in local climate conditions. Studies investigating the adaptive responses of animals to climate have documented putatively adaptive responses in phenology, life history, behavior, and physiology (Crozier and Hutchings, 2014; Urban et al., 2014). However, while phenotypic responses to climate have been well documented, the genetic basis of these adaptive responses remains largely unresolved (Urban et al., 2024). A better understanding of the genetics that facilitate adaptation to climate may prove critical, as many species globally are experiencing population declines due to rapid climate change (Urban, 2015, 2024) and may rely on evolutionary rescue to avoid extinction (Hoffmann and Sgró, 2011; Carlson et al., 2014). Further, genomic studies investigating climate adaptation can reveal insights into less easily observed phenotypic adaptations, providing a better understanding of how life adapts to climate and improving predictions and conservational applications of adaptive responses to climate change (Meek et al., 2022; Urban et al., 2024).

A key aspect of climate adaptation involves animals' ability to meet their living costs (Wild et al., 2025). These costs can be described as an energy budget that must be allocated to growth, maintenance, reproduction, activity, and storage (Sousa et al., 2010). Within a given environment, selection should dictate how energy is allocated across costs to maximize fitness (Stearns, 1992). To fund the cost of living, animals must navigate spatiotemporal heterogeneity in environmental temperatures to 1) avoid dangerous temperature extremes (Sunday et al., 2014), and 2) maintain sufficient activity such that food acquisition and processing rates can fund energetic demands (Congdon, 1989; Kearney, 2012). For ectotherms in particular, this relationship is paramount, as they rely directly on environmental heat sources to modulate body temperature (Tb), and the capacity to be active and acquire food is temperature-dependent (Adolph and Porter, 1993; Sinervo et al., 2010). Consequently, species that span climate gradients often show concordant variation in life history traits: cooler climates that restrict activity produce slower-growing individuals that mature at larger body sizes, whereas warmer climates produce faster-growing individuals that mature at smaller body sizes (Morrison and Hero, 2003; Angilletta et al., 2004). Larger body sizes often increase fitness by increasing fecundity, while earlier maturation at smaller body sizes trades off fecundity for a higher probability of survival to first reproduction (Healy et al., 2019). If this “slow-fast continuum” of life history traits is adaptive, then activity time provides a direct estimate of a major selective pressure imposed by climate.

Selection by climate is further complicated in species with complex life cycles (Kingsolver et al., 2011; Levy et al., 2015). While activity results from mobile individuals selectively moving through their environment, early life stages that are immobile (such as embryos in eggs) passively experience environmental conditions. Developmental processes are temperature-dependent in ectotherms, with higher temperatures increasing the rate of development but reducing developmental efficiency, whereas cooler temperatures either slow or arrest development entirely (Andrews et al., 1997; Shine et al., 1997; Carlo et al., 2018). As a result, hotter incubation conditions result in earlier hatching times but smaller individuals. Conversely, cooler conditions result in delayed hatching but larger hatchlings. Mothers can choose nest conditions and thus select nest sites that optimize the development and survival of their offspring (Kolbe and Janzen, 2002; Warner and Andrews, 2002a). However, nest conditions can nonetheless vary across different climates despite maternal choice of nest site (Angilletta et al., 2009; Carlo et al., 2018). As a result, selection may adapt embryos across climates to optimize growth and development within their specific nest conditions. Further, the date of oviposition and length of incubation dictate the amount of potential activity hatchlings have to acquire energy and grow prior to the onset of winter conditions (Sniegula et al., 2024). Thus, incubation conditions and the knock-on effects on hatchling and adult phenotypes (Jonsson et al., 2022) likely pose a strong selection pressure that can be used to understand adaptation to climate in species with complex life cycles.

The Eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus) provides a model system for studying genetic adaptation to climate. The species inhabits a wide range of climates across the eastern United States (Fig. 1), and a wealth of research has identified phenotypic variation that putatively adapts populations to local climates. Adaptive responses in S. undulatus seem to center on life-history traits, with individuals in cooler climates growing more slowly, reaching sexual maturity later, and having larger body sizes than those in warmer climates (Tinkle and Ballinger, 1972; Angilletta et al., 2004; Kearney, 2012). Nest conditions vary across climates (Angilletta et al., 2009; Carlo et al., 2018), and survival rates are generally low (Tinkle and Ballinger, 1972; Andrews et al., 2000). Thus, there is potential for strong selection on developmental and growth processes during early life stages such that the emergent pattern of life histories is adaptive across climates. Additionally, life histories appear fixed across populations, indicating a genetic basis for these traits (Niewiarowski and Roosenburg, 1993; Niewiarowski, 1995). The recent publication of a S. undulatus reference genome (Westfall et al., 2021) now allows for a ‘genome up’ view through which we can identify adaptive traits and/or support previous studies aimed at understanding phenotypic adaptation to climate in this species.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A) Map of the locations for the fourteen populations of Sceloporus undulatus used in this study. a) Mean annual temperatures and b) annual temperature range were plotted to illustrate climatic patterns across the species’ range. Names and locations of each site are shown as points on the map. The data used for these maps were obtained from the WorldClim2 (Fick and Hijmans, 2017) database for illustrative purposes. Photo credit for the S. undulatus specimen goes to Diego R. Quirola.

In this study, we integrate biophysical and genomic methods to identify genetic variants and associated genes under selection in climates across the species distribution of the S. undulatus. We first use a biophysical model to estimate potential annual activity and nest conditions for populations across the full species’ range. We then use these estimates of activity and nest conditions as predictors to identify genetic variants putatively under selection across populations using two genome-environment association (GEA) models. Genes harboring adaptive variants are input into gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses to identify biological functions that may underlie adaptation to climate. Lastly, we use genome-wide linkage disequilibrium to identify evidence of co-selection or epistatic interactions acting on candidate genes across the genome. Altogether, our study leverages an integrative approach to identify the genetic basis of adaptation to climate in a widespread ectothermic species.

METHODS:

Sample Collection and Variant Calling

We sampled 189 S. undulatus across 14 sites spanning the full range of climates experienced across the species distribution (Fig. 1)(Table S1). Of these, we sequenced 130 samples de novo, while we downloaded an additional 59 whole-genome sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (accession code PRJNA656311)(Assis et al., 2025). We extracted genomic DNA from tail tips for wild-caught individuals and muscle from museum specimens using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (#69506, Qiagen, Inc.). We prepared whole-genome DNA libraries using the NEBNext Ultra II for DNA Library Prep kit (E6177L, NEBLabs, Inc.), with indexes provided by the NEBNext Oligos for Illumina kit (E7600S, NEBLabs, Inc.). We sequenced the 130 total S. undulatus genomic libraries on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 S4 flow cell and an Illumina NextSeq P3 flow cell, with sequencing done to a target depth of 20x coverage.

We assessed read quality off the sequencers using FastQC v0.12.1 (Andrews, 2010). Both adapter sequences and low-quality reads (Phred score < 20) were trimmed using Trim Galore v0.6.10 (Krueger, 2015). We then aligned trimmed reads to the SceUnd_v1.1 reference genome for S. undulatus (Westfall et al., 2021) using BWA-MEM v0.7.17 (Li, 2013). We called variants from the aligned reads using the GATK best-practices pipeline (Van der Auwera et al., 2013), which reduces potential bias due to batch effects through joint variant calling. VCF files produced by the GATK pipeline (GATK v4.6.1.0, Picard v3.3.0) were then filtered using VCFtools v0.1.17 (Danecek et al., 2011). We removed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with minor allele frequency <5%, minimum sequencing depth <10x, maximum sequencing depth >50x (to account for alignment errors or PCR artifacts), and with missing data in more than 5% of individuals. We additionally pruned the dataset for physically linked SNPs using the software BCFtools v1.21with the +prune plugin (Danecek et al., 2021). Variants with an r2 > 0.50 were removed within a 10kb sliding window. The resulting filtered VCF file contained 1,409,447 high-quality SNPs for use in downstream analyses. We then annotated the VCF using SNPEff (Cingolani et al., 2012).

Nest Condition Estimates:

To account for potential selection imposed by geographic variation in nest incubation temperatures across the species’ range, we estimated 20-year averages of nest conditions for two time periods: 1941-1960 and 2001-2020. Nest temperature was assumed to be equal to soil temperature, which we estimated using the NicheMapR R package (Kearney and Porter, 2017). We downloaded climate data from the ERA5 climate dataset (Hersbach et al., 2020) and calculated soil temperatures using the “micro_era5()” function in NicheMapR. We used temperatures at a soil depth of 6cm, which is the typical nest depth for S. undulatus (Warner and Andrews, 2002a; Angilletta et al., 2009; Carlo et al., 2018). To determine suitable nest conditions at each site, we first calculated nest temperatures across a range of shade conditions: 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 100%. For each shade condition, we calculated the average temperature for each hour of the year across the 20 years for each period.

To determine potential oviposition dates, we assumed mothers do not oviposit until minimum nest temperatures are equal to or greater than 18°C, based on measurements of nest temperatures from the literature (Warner and Andrews, 2002a; Angilletta et al., 2009; Carlo et al., 2018), and knowledge that developmental rates slow down or cease at temperatures less than 18°C (Christian et al., 1986; Andrews et al., 1997). We then parameterized potential nest conditions using estimated developmental time and expected survival rates across shade conditions, based on nest temperatures. We used a previously published developmental time model to estimate rates of development (Levy et al., 2015):

E=(0.00081+0.00067⋅tsoil24)

where E is the hourly developmental rate, and tsoil refers to the soil temperatures for a given shade value at 6 cm depth for each time point in the nest temperature data. If development was not completed before the nest conditions became too cold to continue, we categorized the nest as unsuitable. Further, we binned embryo survivorship based on data from the literature: nests that reached maximum temperatures of 42°C and above resulted in 0% embryonic survival, nests that reached maximum temperatures of 38-42°C resulted in 60% embryonic survival, and maximum temperatures below 38°C resulted in 80% survival (Levy et al., 2015; Carlo et al., 2018). Shade values that maximized embryonic survival and allowed for complete development of embryos were considered optimal nests. We averaged optimal nest temperatures across shade conditions to obtain a single representative annual optimal nest temperature for each site within each time period. From these optimal nests, we calculated mean nest temperatures in the 1900s and 2000s, the change in mean nest temperatures between the 1900s and 2000s, the range of nest temperatures in the 1900s and 2000s, and the change in range of nest temperatures from the 1900s to 2000s. Further, we used degree-day calculations to estimate changes in the total heat received by embryos in suitable nests between 1941-1960 and 2001-2020 (Zalom et al., 1983). Degree days (°D) for 2000s nests relative to 1900s nests were calculated relative to mean and maximum nest temperatures using the following equation:

D=(∑day=1,hour=0day=i,hour=j(th−t0)i,j)24

where D = sum of °D, th = mean or maximum nest temperatures (°C) at time i on day j for nests in the 2000s, and t0 = mean or maximum nest temperatures at time i on day j for nests in the 1900s.

Activity Time Estimates:

We modeled annual activity time for both adult lizards and hatchlings at each site using standard biophysical models applied to site-specific climate data (Campbell and Norman, 1998; Sears et al., 2011). We used NicheMapR to calculate surface soil temperatures, 2-cm air temperatures, and 2-m air temperatures from the ERA5 climate data downloaded for 1941-1960 and 2001-2020. We calculated air and soil temperatures in full sun and shade to capture the maximum and minimum temperature profiles at each site. From these temperatures, we extracted monthly maximum and minimum temperatures and averaged across the two 20-year time periods for input into our biophysical model. We calculated radiation using standard equations (Gates, 1980).

We estimated annual activity time using the approach outlined in Sears et al. (2011). We calculated annual activity as the duration an individual could remain active within its preferred Tb range on a representative day of each month, and used spline interpolation to estimate activity for all days of the year. We calculated body temperature for each representative day by solving the following equation every minute over 24 hours:

Tb2=Te+e(−tτ)(Tb1−Te)

where Te is the operative temperature of the individual, t is the elapsed time in minutes, τ is the time constant of the individual, Tb1 is the initial body temperature, and Tb2 is the final body temperature. We calculated operative temperatures as follows:

Te=Ta+Rabs−ϵsσ(Ta+273.15)4cp(gr+gHa)

where Rabs is the total radiation absorbed, es is the surface emissivity, σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, cp is the specific heat of air at constant pressure, gr is the radiative conductance, and gHa is the boundary layer conductance for heat. We used 2 cm air temperature (i.e., the approximate mid-body height of lizards off the substrate) for Ta. We calculated longwave radiation from the ground and sky using ground surface temperatures and 2 m air temperatures, respectively. We modeled wind at 0.1 m/s.

For adult activity, we parameterized the model for a representative 10 g Eastern fence lizard with a snout-vent length (SVL) of 65 mm and venter height of 1 cm above the substrate (Tinkle and Ballinger, 1972). We modeled hatchlings with a body mass of 0.5 g, SVL of 25 mm, and a venter height of 0.5 cm (Tinkle and Ballinger, 1972; Warner and Andrews, 2002b; Carlo et al., 2018). After 30 days of activity, we assumed that hatchlings had grown and we modeled them as having a body mass of 2.5 g, an SVL of 41 mm, and a venter height of 0.75 cm (Tinkle and Ballinger, 1972; Warner and Andrews, 2002b). We assumed lizards at each site to be active at a given time if the calculated range of possible Tb values encompassed part of the Tb range of active lizards (29-35°C)(Andrews, 1998). We estimated adult activity for the entire year, whereas hatchling activity began only upon completion of development, as determined by the developmental time model for the nest conditions at each site. We summed potential activity time to calculate the average potential annual activity for each site over the two 20-year periods. As S. undulatus is heliothermic, we limited potential activity to only times when the sun was above the horizon (e.g., cosine of the zenith angle > 1). We estimated potential adult and hatchling activity in the 1900s and 2000s, and changes in potential adult and hatchling activity from 1900s to 2000s.

Further, we calculated time above CTmax (TACTmax) as a metric of potential heat stress at each site. Using Te estimates for an individual in full sun, we summed the minutes for which Te > CTmax for this species. We set CTmax at 42°C (Crowley, 1985; Claunch et al., 2021) and estimated TACTmax for adults and hatchlings in the 1900s and 2000s, and the change in TACTmax for adults and hatchlings between 1900s and 2000s.

Assessment of Biophysical Variables

We first looked for patterns of activity and nest variables across the species’ range using geographic predictors. We used linear mixed models to test whether latitude, longitude, or elevation predicted patterns or changes over time in activity or nest conditions. Interactive effects for latitude, longitude, and elevation were included in the models. We then assessed the degree of covariation among biophysical predictor variables using the corrplot R package (Wei and Simko, 2024). Due to the high degree of covariation between the activity and nest variables (Fig. S1), we performed a principal component analysis (PCA) to generate PC axes for use in our genomic analyses. The PCA was centered and scaled to account for unit differences among variables. Further, we included latitude, longitude, and elevation in the PCA to account for geographic variation among populations. We determined the number of PC axes to include as predictors for our genomic analyses by assessing a scree plot (Fig. S2). We then visualized variable loadings on the PC axes using the ggbiplot R package (Vu and Friendly, 2024).

Gene-Environmental Association Modeling

We used two gene-environmental association (GEA) approaches to detect directional selection on SNPs in response to the biophysical predictors: BayeScEnv (Villemereuil and Gaggiotti, 2015) and latent-factor mixed models (LFMM2)(Caye et al., 2019). We chose these models due to their ability to account for deviations from neutrality caused by confounding variables, specifically population structure. Following the approach implemented by (Salloum et al., 2022), we combined results across models using the geometric mean of q-values to identify candidate SNPs. Significance was assessed based on a mean q-value less than 0.05. Genes that harbored candidate SNPs within 5kb were considered candidate genes putatively adapting populations to differences in activity and nest conditions across the species’ range.

BayeSceEnv is an FST-based genome scan program that leverages genetic and environmental differences among populations to identify genetic variants putatively under selection. The program uses a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm to compare three competing models: a neutral model, and two locus-specific models. The neutral model acts as the null against which the locus-specific models are tested. The two locus-specific models then account for deviations from neutrality due to: 1) divergent selection driven by the predictor variable, or 2) other process different from local adaptation, such as allele surfing or background selection. We ran the BayeScEnv program with the following parameters: 10 pilot runs with 2,000 iterations each; a thinning interval of 10; 5,000 output iterations; and a burn-in length of 10,000. We used default priors for the MCMC chain. We used the coda package in R to ensure the chain reached convergence with low autocorrelation (Plummer et al., 2006). Convergence was tested using the Heidelberg and Welch’s convergence diagnostic procedure, and autocorrelation was tested using the “autocorr.diag” function.

The LFMM2 model uses a latent variable regression to model allele frequencies as a function of the environmental variable of interest across populations, while accounting for a latent factor—in this case, population structure. All analyses were implemented using the LEA package in R (Frichot and François, 2015). We first assessed population structure in our data using sparse non-negative matrix factorization, implemented by the “snmf” function. We ran the “snmf” function for K values 1 through 20, with 10 repetitions each. Because the LFMM2 model does not tolerate missing data, we used the resulting snmfProject to impute missing values in our genotype matrix with the “impute” function. The imputed SNP dataset was then regressed over the biophysical predictors using the “lfmm2” function, and significant SNPs were identified using the “lfmm2_test” function. Resulting p-values were converted to q-values to correct for multiple comparisons using the R package qvalue (Storey et al., 2023).

Gene Ontology and KEGG Enrichment Analyses

We used gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment to determine whether biological processes or pathways are enriched among candidate genes identified in the GEA analysis. We input the full list of candidate genes into ShinyGO (Xijin Ge et al., 2020), an online resource for GO and KEGG enrichment analyses and graphing. We used the S. undulatus genome as the background reference. A false discovery rate (FDR) threshold of 0.05 was used to assess the significance of assigned GO terms and KEGG pathways.

Genome-wide Linkage Disequilibrium

Selection on complex phenotypic traits or traits under pleiotropic control may result in covariance in allele frequencies across the genome. Therefore, we tested for patterns of interchromosomal linkage disequilibrium (LD) among candidate SNPs identified by the GEA analyses. Since linkage analyses increase exponentially with each additional SNP, we downsampled to one SNP per candidate gene for this analysis. We used the R package GWLD (Zhang et al., 2023) to calculate LD among all pairs of SNPs, using the standard r2 metric. SNPs found in the top 99.5th percentile in the resulting r2 distribution were designated as in significant disequilibrium. Further, we compared the r2 distribution generated from the candidate SNPs with 100 randomly generated SNP datasets to assess whether rates of LD in the candidate SNPs differed from background levels. We randomly sampled SNPs from the full SNP dataset using BCFtools within a custom bash script, and then entered them into the GWLD pipeline. The resulting r2 distributions were compared with the candidate SNP distribution using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the Fisher-Pitman permutation test, implemented in base R and the R package coin (Hothorn et al., 2008), respectively.

RESULTS:

Estimates of activity time and nest conditions

Latitude strongly predicted activity time estimates across both adult and hatchling life stages (Table 1). Within each time and life stage, our model predicted that populations at lower latitudes had greater potential annual activity than those at higher latitudes (Fig. 2a-b). For adults, our model estimated activity times ranging from ~2280 hrs for the lowest potential activity at the Indiana site to ~3170 hrs of potential activity at the eastern Florida site. However, an interaction between longitude and elevation predicted a change in potential activity for adults between the 1900s and 2000s (Table 1), with the largest increase in potential activity between centuries occurring in the Tennessee site (149 hrs, a 5.8% increase from 1900s to 2000s) (Fig. 2e). Likewise, an interaction between latitude, longitude, and elevation predicted a change in potential activity. Our model predicted that hatchlings at mid-latitude sites west of the Appalachian Mountains would experience the largest increase in potential activity time, with increases of up to 313 hrs (a 25% increase) in western Kentucky (Fig. 2f).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Multiple biophysical variables describing activity patterns and nest conditions were estimated to use as predictors for gene-environmental association analyses. The maps show patterns of these variables across populations, with some exemplars shown here: a) patterns of annual adult activity averaged from 2001-2020, b) patterns of annual hatchling activity averaged from 2001-2020, c) mean nest temperatures averaged from 2001-2020, d) range of nest temperatures averaged from 2001-2020, e) change in patterns of adult activity from 1941-1960 to 2001-2020, f) change in patterns of hatchling activity from 1941-1960 to 2001-2020, g) degree days (C°/day) above mean nest temperature from 1941-1960 to 2001-2020, and h) change in range of nest temperatures from 1941-1960 to 2001-2020.

Time above CTmax (TACTmax) also varied with latitude for both adult and hatchling life stages and across both time periods. Populations at lower latitudes had higher potential TACTmax than those at higher latitudes, with TACTmax ranging from 1286-2091 hrs in adults and from 209-1107 hrs in hatchlings. Change in TACTmax also varied with latitude for adults, with sites at low latitudes showing an increase in potential TACTmax from the last century to this century, the largest increase being 281 hrs in western Florida. However, for hatchlings, an interaction between latitude, longitude, and elevation predicted the change in TACTmax. In general, TACTmax increased more at lower latitudes and elevations than at higher ones, with Arkansas showing the largest increase (223 hrs).

The relationship between nest conditions and geographic predictors was more complicated than with aspects of activity or TACTmax. Latitude and elevation predicted degree days above mean nest temperatures between the 1900s and 2000s. While all nests were predicted to experience warming (i.e., more degree days)(Fig. 2g), the degree of warming was predicted to be higher at lower latitudes and lower elevations than at higher latitudes or elevations (e.g., ~52 degree days in western Florida versus 9.3 degree days in Indiana). Concordantly, a change in mean nest temperatures between centuries was predicted by interactions between both latitude and longitude with elevation. Generally, sites at lower latitudes or lower elevations were predicted to have warmed more than those at higher latitudes or elevations (e.g., a 0.34°C increase in western Florida versus a 0.11°C increase in Indiana). The range of nest temperatures also varied predictably with latitude within both centuries, with higher ranges of nest temperatures experienced at higher latitudes (e.g., 8.2°C range in Indiana versus 5.1°C range in western Florida) (Fig. 2d). However, the change in the range of nest temperatures between centuries was not predicted by any geographic predictor (Fig. 2h). Mean nest temperatures (Fig. 2c) and degree days above maximum temperatures also did not vary with any geographic predictor variable.

All biophysical model outputs are available in supplemental materials as a table (Table S2). Maps of variables not shown in Fig. 2 are also available (Fig. S3).

PCA of activity time and nest conditions

There was a high degree of correlation between latitude, longitude, elevation, and our estimated variables for activity, TACTmax, and nest conditions (Fig. S1). As such, we conducted a PCA to reduce collinearity in our predictor variables. After assessing the scree plot (Fig. S2), we selected the first two PC axes as predictors for genome-environmental association models. The first PC axis (PC1) accounted for 58.5% of the variance and primarily loaded latitude, elevation, and variables associated with activity time, TACTmax, nest temperature range, and change in mean nest temperature (Fig. 3). PC2 accounted for 14.2% of the variation and primarily loaded longitude and variables associated with nests and hatchling activity, including mean nest temperatures, change in mean nest temperatures, nest temperature range, change in range nest temperatures, change in hatchling activity, change in TACTmax, and degree days above maximum nest temperatures.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce multidimensionality among the correlated biophysical predictor variables. The locations of each site in PC spaces are shown in the biplot on the left. The loadings for each variable onto the PC axes are shown by the bar plots on the right. Variables that correlate with latitude mostly loaded onto PC1, while multiple variables associated with nest conditions and hatchling activity loaded onto PC2.

Genome-Environmental Association Analyses

The number of candidate SNPs varied considerably between PC1 and PC2. Using the geometric mean of the q-values from the BayeScEnv and LFMM2 models, we identified 41 candidate SNPs associated with PC1 and 4,974 candidate SNPs associated with PC2 (Fig. 4). However, there was overlap between SNPs identified by PC1 and PC2, as 40 of the 41 candidate SNPs associated with PC1 were also identified by PC2. Of the 41 candidate SNPs identified by PC1, 28 were associated with genes, hereafter referred to as “candidate genes”. Likewise, of the 4,974 candidate SNPs identified by PC2, 3,341 were associated with 2039 candidate genes. These candidate gene sets represent 0.13% and 9.3% of the 21,891 genes found on the chromosomes of the SceUnd_v1.1 S. undulatus reference genome, respectively. The overlap in candidate SNPs between PC1 and PC2 led to a concordant overlap in candidate genes, with 27 of the 28 candidate genes identified by PC1 also identified by PC2 (Fig. 4). Genes identified by both PC axes were dispersed relatively evenly across the genome, indicating the potential for polygenic selection across multiple loci (Fig. S4), though relatively few were found on chromosome 10, the putative X chromosome for this species. Due to the high overlap between PC1 and PC2 candidate genes, these datasets were combined for enrichment and genome-wide linkage analyses, yielding 2040 candidate genes for the GO enrichment and genome-wide linkage analysis.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The output of the GEA analyses identified 41 candidate SNPs associated with PC1 and 4,974 candidate SNPs associated with PC2. There were 27 candidate genes identified across both PC1 and PC2, and their locations and names are shown. Q-values were calculated using the geometric mean of the outputs from both LFMM2 and BayeScEnv, and a significance threshold of 0.05 was employed to identify candidate SNPs significantly associated with PC1 or PC2 (candidates shown in red).

The analyses of the MCMC chain produced by the BayeScEnv model showed both convergence (Cramer-von-Mises statistic, all p>0.05) and low autocorrelation (all R < 0.05). For the LFMM2 model, the sNMF analysis identified K=10 as the most supported K value (Fig. S5). The run with the lowest cross-entropy value for K=10 from the snmfProject was used to impute missing data before input into the LFMM2 model.

Gene Ontology and KEGG Enrichment Results

Using the 2040 candidate genes identified across PC1and PC2, we identified 48 genes that significantly enriched for two KEGG pathways: Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Signaling Pathway (GnRH pathway, Path:sund04912), and Calcium Signaling Pathway (Ca2+ pathway, Path:sund04020)(Table 2). For the GnRH pathway, 22 of the 106 pathway genes were identified in our candidate gene dataset, whereas for the Ca2+ pathway, 39 out of 260 genes were identified. Of the 48 candidate genes, 13 were associated with both KEGG pathways, whereas 9 were associated with the GnRH pathway and 26 were associated with only the Ca2+ pathway. These genes include five calcium voltage-gated channel subunits (CACN), four mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), three calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CAMK), and three phospholipase C proteins (PLC). No significantly enriched GO terms were found in our analysis.

Genome-Wide Linkage Analysis

One SNP per candidate gene was used to assess interchromosomal linkage between candidate genes (see Methods). Of the 1,206,681 linkage calculations across the 2040 candidate SNPs used for this analysis, an overwhelming majority were found to not be in linkage disequilibrium (r2 < 0.10)(Fig. 5A). The resulting r2 distribution was heavily right-skewed, with a mean of ~0.017 and a 99th percentile of 0.44. These values were consistently greater than those obtained from linkage analyses using randomly selected SNPs (Table S3). On average, the random SNP datasets had a mean r2 of ~0.008 and a 99th percentile of 0.17. Fisher-Pitman Permutation and Wilcoxon rank sum tests supported the notion that the candidate SNPs were in higher linkage than random, with 100/100 permutation tests and 97/100 Wilcox tests showing significant differences between the candidate SNP r2 distribution and the r2 distribution generated from random SNPs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

We used genome-wide linkage disequilibrium to identify correlations between candidate genes identified using LFMM2 and BayeScEnv. A) Histogram of the distribution of linkage values (r2) for the 1,206,681comparisons between the 2040 candidate SNPs. A large majority of the SNPs showed no evidence of linkage disequilibrium (mean r2 = ~0.017). B) Candidate genes that harbor SNPs in significant linkage (r2 > 0.48, the 99.5th percentile) are plotted with linkage values shown by the color-coded connections. The locations of 18 genes that significantly enrich for calcium signaling and gonadotropin-releasing hormone pathways are shown (LOC121933610 “ADCY1-like”, LOC121936315 “CACNA1B-like”, CACNA1C, CACNA1D, CACNA1H, GDNF, GNRH1, ITPR2, MAP2K3, MAP3K3, MAPK13, NOS3, PHKB, LOC121926791 “PLA2G4D-like”, LOC121926840 “PLA2G4E-like”, PLCE1, PTK2B, and RYR2). Additionally, the location of six candidate genes identified across both PC1 and PC2 are plotted (CDH5, CR1, AQP11, ST6GAL2, WNT2B, ASXL3).

High interchromosomal linkage among candidate genes can indicate co-selection in response to environmental selection or selection on epistatic interactions among genes (Zhang, 2017). To identify candidate genes with high linkage, we used a linkage threshold at the 99.5th percentile, corresponding to an r2 threshold of 0.48. Above this threshold, we found a total of 639 SNPs in linkage disequilibrium with at least one other candidate gene, constituting 31.3% of the 2040 genes identified by our GEA analyses. Of the 639 candidate genes found to be in high linkage, 18 were previously identified to significantly enrich for KEGG pathways, while 6 were common genes identified across both PC1 and PC2 predictors in the GEA analyses. These represent 37.5% of the genes identified as enriching for KEGG pathways and 22.2% of the common genes identified by both PC1 and PC2 in the GEA analyses, respectively. In total there were 111 genes in significant linkage with either one of the KEGG enriching genes or one of the genes common to both PC1 and PC2 (Fig. 5b). Of the KEGG-enriching genes, 11 were involved in linkage groups with four or more candidate genes (Table S4): CACNA1C, CACNA1D, CACNA1H, LOC121936315 (CACNA1B-like protein), GNRH1, ITPR2, LOC121933610 (ADCY1-like protein), MAP3K3, MAPK13, NOS3, and PLCE1. Of these, the highest number of significant linkages to other candidate genes were found in CACNA1C (n=10), CACNA1H (n=10), MAP3K3 (n=13), MAPK13 (n=33), and PLCE1 (n=30). Further, MAPK13 and PLCE1 were in significant linkage with each other, and were linked to the same 29 candidate genes. A table of all the KEGG enriching genes and the genes to which they are linked is available in Supplemental Materials (Table S4).

DISCUSSION:

Selection imposed by climate induces local adaptation, but the genetics underlying these adaptations remains poorly understood. Knowledge of the adaptive traits and underlying genetics may prove critical to conservation efforts, as many species will likely rely on adaptive evolution to persist in rapidly changing climates (Hoffmann and Sgró, 2011; Urban et al., 2024). Here, we used biophysical estimates of activity time and nest conditions across the Eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus) species’ range to identify genomic signatures of selection. Activity time dictates rates of energy intake and expenditure and thus represents a fundamental control over the ability of organisms to fund the cost of living (Congdon, 1989; Wild et al., 2025), whereas nest conditions affect rates of growth and development, with downstream consequences to survival rates and life histories (Andrews et al., 2000; Carlo et al., 2018; Jonsson et al., 2022). Our biophysical approaches identified a general pattern that potential activity time decreases with latitude, while the range of nest temperatures increases with latitude, and mean nest temperatures do not correlate with latitude, longitude, or elevation. When input into GEA analyses, the suite of biophysical variables identified a large number of candidate genes, with 48 that enriched for two KEGG pathways: the calcium signaling pathway and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone pathway. Calcium signaling is associated with cell proliferation and migration through the effects of growth factors (e.g., growth and development)(Berridge, 1995; Whitaker, 2006), while gonadotropin-releasing hormone dictates the development of sexual traits and the timing of sexual maturity (Licht, 1979). Phenotypic evidence from previous studies suggests that selection on life history traits such as body size and age at maturation underlies adaptation to climate in ectotherms; thus, our results provide genetic support for this notion (Crozier and Hutchings, 2014; Urban et al., 2014).

Life history theory focuses on the tradeoffs in resources allocated to survival, growth, and reproduction (Stearns, 1992). When resources are limited, selection should act to optimize the allocation of resources across these costs, thereby maximizing fitness within a given environment (Stearns, 1992). Optimization of resource allocation appears to have led to the co-evolution of life history traits, producing axes of variation in survival to maturity, size at maturity, timing of reproduction, and reproductive investment (Healy et al., 2019). The results of our study suggest that selection on growth processes and age at maturation underlie adaptation to climates across the range of S. undulatus. Specifically, we identified 48 genes significantly enriched in two KEGG pathways: the calcium signaling pathway and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pathway. An important role of calcium signaling is to regulate cell proliferation and migration (Berridge, 1995). This may be particularly important during embryogenesis and early development, as calcium signaling has been implicated in regulating cell proliferation, migration, axis formation, and organogenesis in animal embryos (Whitaker, 2006). Selection on aspects of the calcium signaling pathway may therefore represent adaptations to nest conditions across the range of S. undulatus. Our biophysical models identified variation in both mean and range of nest temperatures experienced across sites, with changes in nest temperatures occurring over the last 60-80 years. As nest temperatures directly affect incubation time and size at hatching (Andrews et al., 1997; Shine et al., 1997; Carlo et al., 2018), selection may be acting on processes that control growth and development pathways to optimize these processes within the range of temperatures the embryo experiences. Indeed, a previous common garden study using populations of S. undulatus from across the species’ range identified differences among populations in incubation time and embryonic growth efficiency (Oufiero and Agilletta, Jr., 2006). The knock-on effects of these early developmental processes may, at least in part, affect post-hatching growth rates and adult body size patterns observed across the species’ range (Jonsson et al., 2022).

Age at maturation post-hatching appears to be another adaptive life history trait in S. undulatus. Warmer climates at lower latitudes facilitate more activity time, which in turn increases opportunities for food acquisition and reproductive output (Adolph and Porter, 1993). However, greater activity comes with a trade-off: more active populations in southern latitudes experience lower survival rates (likely due to greater exposure to predators)(Adolph and Porter, 1993; Angilletta et al., 2004). Survival to maturation has been directly linked to age at maturation, such that populations with lower survival rates mature earlier (Adolph and Porter, 1996), increasing the likelihood of reproducing before death (Stearns and Crandall, 1981). As such, populations of S. undulatus in warmer climates have evolved rapid post-hatching growth rates and earlier maturation at a smaller body size relative to cooler-climate populations (Tinkle and Ballinger, 1972; Adolph and Porter, 1996). Our study identified genes in the GnRH pathway as under selection across our study populations, providing genomic evidence supporting the view that age at maturation is an adaptive trait selected by climate. The GnRH pathway regulates aspects of maturation in animals by stimulating gonadotropins, specifically follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone (Counis et al., 2005). These hormones then affect sexual traits, including gonadal maturation, gamete formation, and the production of sex-specific hormones such as testosterone and progesterone (Licht, 1979). Therefore, selection on genes within the GnRH pathway may act to control the timing of maturation across populations of S. undulatus. Further, signal transmission of GnRH acts through calcium signaling (Catt and Stojilković, 1989), linking the GnRH pathway to the calcium-signaling pathway genes identified in our study. Indeed, many of the genes we identified act in both the calcium signaling and GnRH pathways (Table 2). Therefore, while we postulate that calcium signaling genes control adaptive responses underlying embryonic growth and development under different nest conditions, it is possible that the signatures of selection we detect in calcium-signaling genes may also act in conjunction with the GnRH pathway to control age at maturation.

Some gene families identified in this study have previously been implicated in controlling aspects of growth, development, and sexual maturation. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) gene family mediates intercellular signal transduction (Seger and Krebs, 1995). Activation of a single kinase by an upstream mitogen or growth factor triggers a cascade of downstream kinases that ultimately alter gene expression, inducing multiple responses, including cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and cell death (Krens et al., 2006). The MAPK signaling pathway has been identified as controlling multiple aspects of vertebrate development (Krens et al., 2006; Craig et al., 2008), as well as maturation of oocytes in animals (Meinecke and Krischek, 2003; Ni et al., 2015), due to the interaction of MAPK activity and maturation-promoting factor (MPF)(Kotani and Yamashita, 2002). Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CAMK) has also been implicated in controlling aspects of organismal growth (Braun and Schulman, 1995; Kahl and Means, 2003). This family of kinases functions as a critical component of the calcium signaling pathway, acting as effectors that translate calcium influx into changes in cellular function through interactions with a wide range of substrates (Braun and Schulman, 1995). The action of calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinases has been directly implicated in controlling aspects of muscle growth (Al-Shanti and Stewart, 2009) and neurological development (Wayman et al., 2008). Further, CAMK genes have been implicated in control aspects of oocyte maturation in yaks (Yang et al., 2024) and pigs (Xu et al., 2009), providing a means by which they can potentially influence the age of maturation. Lastly, phospholipase C (PLC) genes link the effects of extracellular messengers, such as growth factors and hormones, to intracellular activities by generating inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol as secondary messengers (Nakamura and Fukami, 2017). The phenotypic effects of PLC activity putatively include effects on body size (Zhang et al., 2024) and embryonic development (Zhou and Hildebrandt, 2009). Due to the fundamental roles the above gene families play as components of the calcium signaling and GnRH pathways, as well as their influence on aspects of embryonic development, organismal growth, and gamete maturation, these genes are strong candidates for underpinning the adaptive phenotypic responses of life histories to climate in S. undulatus.

The evolution of whole-organism phenotypes, such as those described by life-history traits, can involve complex interactions among a large number of genes (Whiting et al., 2022). To that end, selection can act on epistatic interactions between genes within networks or pathways, resulting in patterns of interchromosomal linkage (Zhang, 2017). We investigated this possibility and found elevated linkage in candidate genes, exceeding background levels across the genome. Among the candidate genes exhibiting elevated linkage were multiple MAPK genes and the PLCE1 gene, which were previously discussed as candidates underlying patterns of life-history variation across populations of S. undulatus. In particular, MAPK13 (found on chromosome four) and PLCE1 (found on chromosome three) were found to form a linkage group with 29 other candidate genes, including those critical for embryonic development (HOXB1, STAT3, DMXL1, HDAC9, MED12)(Levy and Lee, 2002; McGraw et al., 2003; Shin et al., 2008; Hubert and Wellik, 2023; Vontell et al., 2025). Among these genes, a well-known interaction has been described between KMT and HOX genes, in which KMT (lysine N-methyltransferases) directly regulates HOX gene expression during embryonic development (Milne et al., 2002). While it may be difficult to definitively link the effects of mutations across all candidate genes, the overall evidence points to processes that control patterns of embryonic development. Thus, it seems likely that selection via nest conditions on processes of growth and development may underlie adaptive patterns of growth and development as life histories become optimized across climates.

Our study investigated the genetics that underlie adaptation to climate in the S. undulatus, a well-studied model species in ecology and evolution. Life history varies predictably across climate in S. undulatus (Tinkle and Ballinger, 1972; Adolph and Porter, 1993), and other studies have identified various life history traits as putatively under selection by climate in other ectothermic species (Crozier and Hutchings, 2014; Urban et al., 2014). By integrating biophysical and genomic approaches, we identified a suite of genes putatively under selection by climate-induced patterns in activity and nest incubation conditions. Many of the candidate genes identified in this study have known effects on processes of growth and development in vertebrates. In particular, we identified candidate genes associated with the calcium signaling and gonadotropin-releasing hormone pathways, which have known effects on cell proliferation, embryonic development, and sexual maturation. Our results ultimately suggest that selection acting on early life stages (e.g., from embryonic development to sexual maturity) drives patterns of life history in response to climate in a wide-spread lizard species.

Supplementary Material

This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.

Acknowledgments:

We thank Dr. Donald Miles, Dr. Lance McBrayer, Dr. Sharon Bewick, Dr. Henry John-Alder, Robert Chamberlin, and Tara Cronin for assistance with field collections. Funding for this work was provided to MRM by the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Grant from by The American Museum of Natural History, the EE Williams Grant from by the Herpetologists’ League, the Biological Sciences Professional Development Course-Grant in Aid of Research, a “R” initiative seed grant to MWS & CLP from Clemson University and the US National Science Foundation to CLP (DEB 1822417). We thank the Clemson University Genomics and Bioinformatics Facility for support and help with data generation, which receives support from the College of Science and two Institutional Development Awards (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institute of Health under grant numbers P20GM146584 and P20GM139769. Scientific specimens were collected with permissions from the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, the New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, the South Carolina Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources, and the United States Department of Agriculture. Additionally, Greg Colwell provided Sceloporus undulatus samples from the KY population via the Yale-Peabody Museum.

Footnotes

Competing Interests:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Data Archiving:

The raw genomic sequences used in this study have been uploaded to NCBI under BioProject PRJNA1433456 and is set to be released within the next year.

Ethics Approval Statement:

All work conducted herein was approved by the Clemson University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee under Animal Use Protocol #2022-0264.

Contributor Information

Christopher Parkinson, Clemson University.

Michael Sears, Arizona State University.

Matthew McTernan, Clemson University.

LITERATURE CITED:

  1. Adolph SC, Porter WP (1993). Temperature, Activity, and Lizard Life Histories. The American Naturalist 142: 273–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adolph SC, Porter WP (1996). Growth, Seasonality, and Lizard Life Histories: Age and Size at Maturity. Oikos 77: 267–278. [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Shanti N, Stewart CE (2009). Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent transcriptional pathways: potential mediators of skeletal muscle growth and development. Biological Reviews 84: 637–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrews RM (1998). Geographic variation in field body temperature of Sceloporus lizards. Journal of Thermal Biology 23: 329–334. [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrews S (2010). FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Available online at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. [Google Scholar]
  6. Andrews RM, Mathies T, Warner D (2000). Effect of Incubation Temperature on Morphology, Growth, and Survival of Juvenile Sceloporus undulatus. Herpetological Monographs 14: 420–431. [Google Scholar]
  7. Andrews RM, Qualls CP, Rose BR (1997). Effects of Low Temperature on Embryonic Development of Sceloporus Lizards. [Google Scholar]
  8. Angilletta MJ, Niewiarowski PH, Dunham AE, Leaché AD, Porter WP (2004). Bergmann’s Clines in Ectotherms: Illustrating a Life-History Perspective with Sceloporine Lizards. The American Naturalist 164: 168–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Angilletta MJ, Sears MW, Pringle RM (2009). Spatial Dynamics of Nesting Behavior: Lizards Shift Microhabitats to Construct Nests with Beneficial Thermal Properties. Ecology 90: 2933–2939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Assis BA, Sullivan AP, Marciniak S, Bergey CM, Garcia V, Szpiech ZA, et al. (2025). Genomic signatures of adaptation in native lizards exposed to human-introduced fire ants. Nature Communications 16: 89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Berridge MJ (1995). Calcium signalling and cell proliferation. BioEssays 17: 491–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Braun AP, Schulman H (1995). The Multifunctional Calcium/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase: From Form to Function. Annual Review of Physiology: 417–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Campbell GS, Norman JM (1998). An introduction to environmental biophysics. Springer-Verlag: New York. [Google Scholar]
  14. Carlo MA, Riddell EA, Levy O, Sears MW (2018). Recurrent sublethal warming reduces embryonic survival, inhibits juvenile growth, and alters species distribution projections under climate change. Ecology Letters 22: 104–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Carlson SM, Cunningham CJ, Westley PAH (2014). Evolutionary rescue in a changing world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 29: 521–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Catt KJ, Stojilković SS (1989). Calcium Signaling and Gonadotropin Secretion. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism: 15–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Caye K, Jumentier B, Lepeule J, François O (2019). LFMM 2: Fast and accurate inference of gene-environment associations in genome-wide studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 36: 852–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Christian KA, Tracy CR, Porter WP (1986). The Effect of Cold Exposure during Incubation of Sceloporus undulatus Eggs. Copeia 1986: 1012–1014. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, et al. (2012). A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. Fly 6: 80–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Claunch NM, Nix E, Royal AE, Burgos LP, Corn M, DuBois PM, et al. (2021). Body size impacts critical thermal maximum measurements in lizards. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology 335: 96–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Congdon JD (1989). Proximate and Evolutionary Constraints on Energy Relations of Reptiles. Physiological Zoology 62: 356–373. [Google Scholar]
  22. Counis R, Laverrière J-N, Garrel G, Bleux C, Cohen-Tannoudji J, Lerrant Y, et al. (2005). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and the control of gonadotrope function. Reprod Nutr Dev 45: 243–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Craig EA, Stevens MV, Vaillancourt RR, Camenisch TD (2008). MAP3Ks as central regulators of cell fate during development. Developmental Dynamics 237: 3102–3114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Crowley SR (1985). Thermal sensitivity of sprint-running in the lizard Sceloporus undulatus: support for a conservative view of thermal physiology. Oecologia 66: 219–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Crozier LG, Hutchings JA (2014). Plastic and evolutionary responses to climate change in fish. Evolutionary Applications 7: 68–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, et al. (2011). The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27: 2156–2158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, et al. (2021). Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fick SE, Hijmans RJ (2017). WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37: 4302–4315. [Google Scholar]
  29. Franks SJ, Hoffmann AA (2012). Genetics of Climate Change Adaptation. Annual Review of Genetics 46: 185–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Frichot E, François O (2015). LEA: An R package for landscape and ecological association studies. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 925–929. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gates DM (1980). Biophysical Ecology. Springer-Verlag: New York. [Google Scholar]
  32. Healy K, Ezard THG, Jones OR, Salguero-Gómez R, Buckley YM (2019). Animal life history is shaped by the pace of life and the distribution of age-specific mortality and reproduction. Nature Ecology and Evolution 3: 1217–1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Hirahara S, Horányi A, Munoz-Sabater J, et al. (2020). The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society: 1999–2049. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hoffmann AA, Sgró CM (2011). Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470: 479–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hothorn T, Hornik K, van deWiel MA, Zeileis A (2008). Implementing a Class of Permutation Tests: The coin Package. Journal of Statistical Software 28: 1–23.27774042 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hubert KA, Wellik DM (2023). Hox genes in development and beyond. Development 150: dev192476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jonsson B, Jonsson N, Hansen MM (2022). Knock-on effects of environmental influences during embryonic development of ectothermic vertebrates. The Quarterly Review of Biology 97: 95–139. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kahl CR, Means AR (2003). Regulation of Cell Cycle Progression by Calcium/Calmodulin-Dependent Pathways. Endocr Rev 24: 719–736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kearney M (2012). Metabolic theory, life history and the distribution of a terrestrial ectotherm. Functional Ecology 36: 167–179. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kearney MR, Porter WP (2017). NicheMapR – an R package for biophysical modelling: the microclimate model. Ecography: 664–674. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kingsolver JG, Woods HA, Buckley LB, Potter KA, Maclean HJ, Higgins JK (2011). Complex Life Cycles and the Responses of Insects to Climate Change. Integrative and Comparative Biology 51: 719–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kolbe JJ, Janzen FJ (2002). Impact of Nest-Site Selection on Nest Success and Nest Temperature in Natural and Disturbed Habitats. Ecology 83: 269–281. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kotani T, Yamashita M (2002). Discrimination of the Roles of MPF and MAP Kinase in Morphological Changes That Occur during Oocyte Maturation. Developmental Biology 252: 271–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Krens SFG, Spaink HP, Snaar-Jagalska BE (2006). Functions of the MAPK family in vertebrate-development. FEBS Letters 580: 4984–4990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Krueger F (2015). Trim Galore!: wrapper script for automated quality and adapter trimming and quality control. Available online at: https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore. [Google Scholar]
  46. Levy O, Buckley LB, Keitt TH, Smith CD, Boateng KO, Kumar DS, et al. (2015). Resolving the life cycle alters expected impacts of climate change. Proceeding of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Levy DE, Lee C (2002). What does Stat3 do? J Clin Invest 109: 1143–1148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Li H (2013). Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv:13033997 [q-bioGN]. [Google Scholar]
  49. Licht P (1979). Reproductive Endocrinology of Reptiles and Amphibians: Gonadotropins. Annu Rev Physiol 41: 337–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. McGraw S, Robert C, Massicotte L, Sirard M-A (2003). Quantification of Histone Acetyltransferase and Histone Deacetylase Transcripts During Early Bovine Embryo Development. Biol Reprod 68: 383–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Meek MH, Beever EA, Barbosa S, Fitzpatrick SW, Fletcher NK, Hellmann JJ (2022). Understanding Local Adaptation to Prepare Populations for Climate Change. BioScience: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  52. Meinecke B, Krischek C (2003). MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK) signalling is required for resumption of meiosis in cultured cumulus-enclosed pig oocytes. Zygote 11: 7–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Milne TA, Briggs SD, Brock HW, Martin ME, Gibbs D, Allis CD, et al. (2002). MLL Targets SET Domain Methyltransferase Activity to Hox Gene Promoters. Molecular Cell 10: 1107–1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Morrison C, Hero J-M (2003). Geographic variation in life-history characteristics of amphibians: a review. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 270–279. [Google Scholar]
  55. Nakamura Y, Fukami K (2017). Regulation and physiological functions of mammalian phospholipase C. J Biochem 161: 315–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ni H, Sheng X, Cui X, Gu M, Liu Y, Qi X, et al. (2015). Epidermal Growth Factor-Mediated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase3/1 Pathway Is Conducive to In Vitro Maturation of Sheep Oocytes. PLOS ONE 10: e0120418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Niewiarowski PH (1995). Effects of Supplemental Feeding and Thermal Environment on Growth Rates of Eastern Fence Lizards, Sceloporus undulatus. Herpetologica 51: 487–496. [Google Scholar]
  58. Niewiarowski PH, Roosenburg W (1993). Reciprocal Transplant Reveals Sources of Variation in Growth Rates of the Lizard Sceloporus Undulatus. Ecology 74: 1992–2002. [Google Scholar]
  59. Oufiero CE, Agilletta MJ Jr. (2006). Convergent evolution of embryonic growth and development in the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus). Evolution 60: 1066–1075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K (2006). CODA: Convergence Diagnosis and Output Analysis for MCMC. R News 6: 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  61. Salloum PM, Santure AW, Lavery SD, de Villemereuil P (2022). Finding the adaptive needles in a population-structured haystack: A case study in a New Zealand mollusc. Journal of Animal Ecology 91: 1209–1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sears MW, Raskin E, Angilletta M Jr. (2011). The World Is not Flat: Defining Relevant Thermal Landscapes in the Context of Climate Change. Integrative and Comparative Biology 51: 666–675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sears MW, Riddell EA, Rusch TW, Angilletta MJ (2019). The World Still Is Not Flat: Lessons Learned from Organismal Interactions with Environmental Heterogeneity in Terrestrial Environments. Integrative and Comparative Biology 59: 1049–1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Seger R, Krebs EG (1995). The MAPK signaling cascade. The FASEB Journal 9: 726–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Shin CH, Chung W-S, Hong S-K, Ober EA, Verkade H, Field HA, et al. (2008). Multiple roles for Med12 in vertebrate endoderm development. Developmental Biology 317: 467–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Shine R, Elphick MJ, Harlow PS (1997). The Influence of Natural Incubation Environments on the Phenotypic Traits of Hatchling Lizards. Ecology 78: 2559–2568. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sinervo B, Méndez-de-la-Cruz F, Miles DB, Heulin B, Bastiaans E, Villagrán-Santa Cruz M, et al. (2010). Erosion of lizard diversity by climate change and altered thermal niches. Science 328: 894–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sniegula S, Stoks R, Golab MJ (2024). Insect responses to seasonal time constraints under global change are facilitated by warming and counteracted by invasive alien predators. Scientific Reports 14: 24565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sousa T, Domingos T, Poggiale JC, Kooijman SALM (2010). Dynamic energy budget theory restores coherence in biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365: 3413–3428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Stearns SC (1992). The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  71. Stearns SC, Crandall RE (1981). Quantitative predictions of delayed maturity. Evolution 35: 455–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Stein BA, Staudt A, Cross MS, Dubois NS, Enquist C, Griffis R, et al. (2013). Preparing for and managing change: Climate adaptation for biodiversity and ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 502–510. [Google Scholar]
  73. Storey J, Bass A, Dabney A, Robinson D (2023). qvalue: Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control. [Google Scholar]
  74. Sunday JM, Bates AE, Kearney MR, Colwell RK, Dulvy NK, Longino JT, et al. (2014). Thermal-safety margins and the necessity of thermoregulatory behavior across latitude and elevation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 5610–5615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Tinkle DW, Ballinger RE (1972). Sceloporus Undulatus: A Study of the Intraspecific Comparative Demography of a Lizard. Ecology 53: 570–584. [Google Scholar]
  76. Urban MC (2015). Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348: 571–573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Urban MC (2024). Climate change extinctions. Science: 1123–1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Urban MC, Richardson JL, Freidenfelds NA (2014). Plasticity and genetic adaptation mediate amphibian and reptile responses to climate change. Evolutionary Applications 7: 88–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Urban MC, Swaegers J, Stoks R, Snook RR, Otto SP, Noble DWA, et al. (2024). When and how can we predict adaptive responses to climate change? Evolution Letters 8: 172–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, Poplin R, del Angel G, Levy-Moonshine A, et al. (2013). From fastQ data to high-confidence variant calls: The genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics: 1–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Vandermeer JH (1972). Niche theory. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 3: 107–132. [Google Scholar]
  82. Villemereuil P, Gaggiotti OE (2015). A new FST-based method to uncover local adaptation using environmental variables (O’Hara RB, Ed.). Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 1248–1258. [Google Scholar]
  83. Vontell AM, Willeke L, Iyyanar PPR, Stottmann RW (2025). Dmxl1 is required for survival in the mouse to organogenesis stages of development. Differentiation 146: 100917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Vu V, Friendly M (2024). _ggbiplot: A Grammar of Graphics Implementation of Biplots_. [Google Scholar]
  85. Warner D, Andrews RM (2002a). Nest-site selection in relation to temperature and moisture by the lizard. Herpetologica 58: 399–407. [Google Scholar]
  86. Warner D, Andrews RM (2002b). Laboratory and field experiments identify sources of variation in phenotypes and survival of hatchling lizards. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76: 105–124. [Google Scholar]
  87. Wayman GA, Lee Y-S, Tokumitsu H, Silva A, Soderling TR (2008). Calmodulin-Kinases: Modulators of Neuronal Development and Plasticity. Neuron 59: 914–931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wei T, Simko V (2024). ‘corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. [Google Scholar]
  89. Westfall AK, Telemeco RS, Grizante MB, Waits DS, Clark AD, Simpson DY, et al. (2021). A chromosome-level genome assembly for the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus), a reptile model for physiological and evolutionary ecology. GigaScience 10: 1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Whitaker M (2006). Calcium at Fertilization and in Early Development. Physiological Reviews 86: 25–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Whiting JR, Paris JR, Parsons PJ, Matthews S, Reynoso Y, Hughes KA, et al. (2022). On the genetic architecture of rapidly adapting and convergent life history traits in guppies. Heredity 128: 250–260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Wild KH, Huey RB, Pianka ER, Clusella-Trullas S, Gilbert AL, Miles DB, et al. (2025). Climate change and the cost-of-living squeeze in desert lizards. Science 387: 303–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Xijin Ge S, Jung D, Yao R (2020). ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics 36: 2628–2629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Xu B-Z, Li M, Xiong B, Lin S-L, Zhu J-Q, Hou Y, et al. (2009). Involvement of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase in meiotic maturation of pig oocytes. Animal Reproduction Science 111: 17–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Yang Y, Chen Z, Yang C, Chen H, Song X, Li Y, et al. (2024). Calcium promoting maturity of oocytes through calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II of yak (Bos grunniens). Italian Journal of Animal Science 23: 895–906. [Google Scholar]
  96. Zalom FG, Goodell P, Wilson LT, Bentley WJ (1983). Degree-days: the calculation and use of heat units in pest management. Univeresity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources: Davis, California. [Google Scholar]
  97. Zhang J (2017). Epistasis Analysis Goes Genome-Wide. PLOS Genetics 13: e1006558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhang R, Wu H, Li Y, Huang Z, Yin Z, Yang CX, et al. (2023). GWLD: an R package for genome-wide linkage disequilibrium analysis. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Zhang J, Zha X, Yang G, Ma X, La Y, Wu X, et al. (2024). Polymorphisms of TXK and PLCE1 Genes and Their Correlation Analysis with Growth Traits in Ashidan Yaks. Animals 14: 3506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhou W, Hildebrandt F (2009). Molecular cloning and expression of phospholipase C epsilon 1 in zebrafish. Gene Expression Patterns 9: 282–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Research Square are provided here courtesy of American Journal Experts

RESOURCES