Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1979 Jul;27(1):145–164. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85208-X

Numerical reconstruction of the quantal event at nicotinic synapses.

J C Wathey, M M Nass, H A Lester
PMCID: PMC1328553  PMID: 262376

Abstract

To test our present quantitative knowledge of nicotinic transmission, we reconstruct the postsynaptic conductance change that results after a presynaptic nerve terminal liberates a quantum of acetylcholine (ACh) into the synaptic cleft. The theory assumes that ACh appears suddenly in the cleft and that is subsequent fate is determined by radial diffusion, by enzymatic hydrolysis, and by binding to receptors. Each receptor has one channel and two ACh binding sites; the channel opens when both sites are occupied and the rate-limiting step id the binding and dissociation of the second ACh molecule. The calculations reproduce the experimentally measured growth phase (200 microseconds), peak number of open channels (2,000), and exponential decay phase. The time constant of the decay phase exceeds the channel duration by approximately equal to 20%. The normal event is highly localized: at the peak, two-thirds of the open channels are within an area of 0.15 micrometer 2. This represents 75% of the available channels within this area. The model also simulates voltage and temperature dependence and effects of inactivating esterase and receptors. The calculations show that in the absence of esterase, transmitter is buffered by binding to receptors and the postsynaptic response can be potentiated.

Full text

PDF
145

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Colquhoun D. Mechanisms of drug action at the voluntary muscle endplate. Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1975;15:307–325. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.15.040175.001515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dionne V. E. Characterization of drug iontophoresis with a fast microassay technique. Biophys J. 1976 Jul;16(7):705–717. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85723-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dreyer F., Peper K. The acetylcholine sensitivity in the vicinity of the neuromuscular junction of the frog. Pflugers Arch. 1974 May 6;348(4):273–286. doi: 10.1007/BF00589217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dudai Y., Herzberg M., Silman I. Molecular structures of acetylcholinesterase from electric organ tissue of the electric eel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Sep;70(9):2473–2476. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.9.2473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ECCLES J. C., JAEGER J. C. The relationship between the mode of operation and the dimensions of the junctional regions at synapses and motor end-organs. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1958 Jan 1;148(930):38–56. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1958.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fertuck H. C., Salpeter M. M. Quantitation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by electron microscope autoradiography after 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin binding at mouse neuromuscular junctions. J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):144–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fletcher P., Forrester T. The effect of curare on the release of acetylcholine from mammalian motor nerve terminals and an estimate of quantum content. J Physiol. 1975 Sep;251(1):131–144. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gage P. W. Generation of end-plate potentials. Physiol Rev. 1976 Jan;56(1):177–247. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1976.56.1.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gage P. W., McBurney R. N. Effects of membrane potential, temperature and neostigmine on the conductance change caused by a quantum or acetylcholine at the toad neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(2):385–407. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartzell H. C., Kuffler S. W., Yoshikami D. Post-synaptic potentiation: interaction between quanta of acetylcholine at the skeletal neuromuscular synapse. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):427–463. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Heuser J. E., Reese T. S. Evidence for recycling of synaptic vesicle membrane during transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Cell Biol. 1973 May;57(2):315–344. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Katz B., Miledi R. The binding of acetylcholine to receptors and its removal from the synaptic cleft. J Physiol. 1973 Jun;231(3):549–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kordas M. An attempt at an analysis of the factors determining the time course of the end-plate current. I. The effects of prostigmine and of the ratio of Mg 2+ to Ca 2+ . J Physiol. 1972 Jul;224(2):317–332. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kordas M. An attempt at an analysis of the factors determining the time course of the end-plate current. II. Temperature. J Physiol. 1972 Jul;224(2):333–348. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kordas M. On the role of junctional cholinesterase in determining the time course of the end-plate current. J Physiol. 1977 Aug;270(1):133–150. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lester H. A. Blockade of acetylcholine receptors by cobra toxin: electrophysiological studies. Mol Pharmacol. 1972 Nov;8(6):623–631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lester H. A., Koblin D. D., Sheridan R. E. Role of voltage-sensitive receptors in nicotinic transmission. Biophys J. 1978 Mar;21(3):181–194. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85518-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lester H. A. Postsynaptic action of cobra toxin at the myoneural junction. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):727–728. doi: 10.1038/227727a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. A quantitative description of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):173–197. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Magleby K. L., Terrar D. A. Factors affecting the time course of decay of end-plate currents: a possible cooperative action of acetylcholine on receptors at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(2):467–495. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Massoulié J., Rieger F. L'acétylcholinestérase des organes électriques de poissons (torpille et gymnote); complexes membranaires. Eur J Biochem. 1969 Dec;11(3):441–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1969.tb00794.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Matthews-Bellinger J., Salpeter M. M. Distribution of acetylcholine receptors at frog neuromuscular junctions with a discussion of some physiological implications. J Physiol. 1978 Jun;279:197–213. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Negrete J., Del Castillo J., Escobar I., Yankelevich G. Correlation between amplitudes and rise times of the miniature endplate potentials in frog muscle. Int J Neurosci. 1972 Jul;4(1):1–10. doi: 10.3109/00207457209147158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Neher E., Sakmann B. Voltage-dependence of drug-induced conductance in frog neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jun;72(6):2140–2144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Patrick J., Heinemann S. F., Lindstrom J., Schubert D., Steinbach J. H. Appearance of acetylcholine receptors during differentiation of a myogenic cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Oct;69(10):2762–2766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.10.2762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Peper K., Dreyer F., Sandri C., Akert K., Moor H. Structure and ultrastructure of the frog motor endplate. A freeze-etching study. Cell Tissue Res. 1974 Jun 24;149(4):437–455. doi: 10.1007/BF00223024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rieger F., Bon S., Massoulié J. Observation par microscopie électronique des formes allongées et globulaires de l'acétylcholinestérase de gymnote (Electrophorus electricus. Eur J Biochem. 1973 May 2;34(3):539–547. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1973.tb02792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rosenberry T. L. Acetylcholinesterase. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1975;43:103–218. doi: 10.1002/9780470122884.ch3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosenberry T. L. Quantitative simulation of endplate currents at neuromuscular junctions based on the reaction of acetylcholine with acetylcholine receptor and acetylcholinesterase. Biophys J. 1979 May;26(2):263–289. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85249-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sheridan R. E., Lester H. A. Rates and equilibria at the acetylcholine receptor of Electrophorus electroplaques: a study of neurally evoked postsynaptic currents and of voltage-jump relaxations. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Aug;70(2):187–219. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stevens C. F. Interactions between intrinsic membrane protein and electric field. An approach to studying nerve excitability. Biophys J. 1978 May;22(2):295–306. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85490-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES