Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1979 Aug;27(2):287–300. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85218-2

Structure of the replication fork in ultraviolet light-irradiated human cells.

M Cordeiro-Stone, R I Schumacher, R Meneghini
PMCID: PMC1328585  PMID: 233582

Abstract

The DNA extracted from xeroderma pigmentosum human fibroblasts previously irradiated with 12.5 J/m2 of UV light and pulse-labeled for 45 min with radioactive and (or) heavy precursors, was used to determine the structural characteristics of the replication fork. Density equilibrium centrifugation experiments showed that a fork moved 6 micrometer in 45 min and bypassed 3 pyrimidine dimers in both strands. The same length was covered in 15-20 min in control cells. The delay in irradiated cells was apparently due to pyrimidine dimers acting as temporary blocks to the fork movement. Evidence for this interpretation comes from kinetics of incorporation of [3H]thymidine into DNA, which show that the time necessary to attain a new stable level of DNA synthesis in irradiated cells is equivalent to that required for the replication fork to cover the interdimer distance in one strand. On the other hand, the action of S1 nuclease on DNA synthesized soon after irradiation gives rise to a bimodal distribution in neutral sucrose gradients, one peak corresponding to 43 X 10(6) daltons and the other to 3 X 10(6) daltons. These two DNA species are generated by the attack of the S1 nuclease on single-stranded regions associated with the replication fork. A possible explanation for these results is given by a model according to which there is a delayed bypass of the dimer in the leading strand and the appearance of gaps opposite pyrimidine dimers in the lagging strand, as a direct consequence of the discontinuous mode of DNA replication. In terms of the model, the DNA of 43 X 10(6) daltons corresponds to the leading strand, linked to the unreplicated branch of the forks, whereas the piece of 3 X 10(6) daltons is the intergap DNA coming from the lagging strand. Pulse and chase experiments reveal that the low molecular weight DNA grows in a pattern that suggests that more than one gap may be formed per replication fork.

Full text

PDF
287

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Caillet-Fauquet P., Defais M., Radman M. Molecular mechanisms of induced mutagenesis. Replication in vivo of bacteriophage phiX174 single-stranded, ultraviolet light-irradiated DNA in intact and irradiated host cells. J Mol Biol. 1977 Nov 25;117(1):95–110. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clayton D. A., Doda J. N., Friedberg E. C. The absence of a pyrimidine dimer repair mechanism in mammalian mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2777–2781. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.7.2777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cordeiro M., Meneghini R. The rate of DNA replication in the polytene chromosomes of Rhynchosciara angelae. J Mol Biol. 1973 Aug 5;78(2):261–274. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90115-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doniger J. DNA replication in ultraviolet light irradiated Chinese hamster cells: the nature of replicon inhibition and post-replication repair. J Mol Biol. 1978 Apr 15;120(3):433–446. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90429-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edenberg H. J., Huberman J. A. Eukaryotic chromosome replication. Annu Rev Genet. 1975;9:245–284. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.09.120175.001333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edenberg H. J. Inhibition of DNA replication by ultraviolet light. Biophys J. 1976 Aug;16(8):849–860. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85735-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fujiwara Y., Tatsumi M. Replicative bypass repair of ultraviolet damage to DNA of mammalian cells: caffeine sensitive and caffeine resistant mechanisms. Mutat Res. 1976 Oct;37(1):91–110. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(76)90058-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ganesan A. K. Persistence of pyrimidine dimers during post-replication repair in ultraviolet light-irradiated Escherichia coli K12. J Mol Biol. 1974 Jul 25;87(1):103–119. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90563-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Higgins N. P., Kato K., Strauss B. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J Mol Biol. 1976 Mar 5;101(3):417–425. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90156-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kato K., Strauss B. Accumulation of an intermediate in DNA synthesis by HEp.2 cells treated with methyl methanesulfonate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 May;71(5):1969–1973. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.5.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kriegstein H. J., Hogness D. S. Mechanism of DNA replication in Drosophila chromosomes: structure of replication forks and evidence for bidirectionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jan;71(1):135–139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.1.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lehmann A. R. Postreplication repair of DNA in ultraviolet-irradiated mammalian cells. J Mol Biol. 1972 May 28;66(3):319–337. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90418-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meneghini R. Gaps in DNA synthesized by ultraviolet light-irradiated WI38 human cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Apr 2;425(4):419–427. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(76)90006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meneghini R., Hanawalt P. C. Postreplication repair in human cells: on the presence of gaps opposite dimers and recombination. Basic Life Sci. 1975;5B:639–642. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-2898-8_36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meneghini R., Hanawalt P. T4-endonuclease V-sensitive sites in DNA from ultraviolet-irradiated human cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Apr 2;425(4):428–437. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(76)90007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Painter R. B., Schaefer A. W. Rate of synthesis along replicons of different kinds of mammalian cells. J Mol Biol. 1969 Nov 14;45(3):467–479. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90306-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Paterson M. C., Lohman P. H., Sluyter M. L. Use of UV endonuclease from Micrococcus luteus to monitor the progress of DNA repair in UV-irradiated human cells. Mutat Res. 1973 Aug;19(2):245–256. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(73)90083-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Povirk L. F., Painter R. B. Rate of DNA chain elongation in ultraviolet light-irradiated mammalian cells as estimated by a bromodeoxyuridine photolysis method. Biophys J. 1976 Aug;16(8):883–889. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85738-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rupp W. D., Howard-Flanders P. Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J Mol Biol. 1968 Jan 28;31(2):291–304. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90445-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. STUDIER F. W. SEDIMENTATION STUDIES OF THE SIZE AND SHAPE OF DNA. J Mol Biol. 1965 Feb;11:373–390. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80064-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vogt V. M. Purification and further properties of single-strand-specific nuclease from Aspergillus oryzae. Eur J Biochem. 1973 Feb 15;33(1):192–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1973.tb02669.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Witkin E. M. Ultraviolet-induced mutation and DNA repair. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1969;23:487–514. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.23.100169.002415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES