Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Sch Health. 2024 Dec 25;95(3):227–234. doi: 10.1111/josh.13532

Description of School Outcomes Among Children With Traumatic Brain Injuries, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Concussion Surveillance System Pilot

Dana Waltzman 1, Alexis B Peterson 1, Daniel Chang 1, Jill Daugherty 1
PMCID: PMC13286124  NIHMSID: NIHMS2155356  PMID: 39721803

Abstract

Background:

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common injury in children. Though research on youth TBI has largely focused on high school students, this study describes selected school outcomes after TBI in the past 12 months among children aged 5–17 years.

Methods:

Data from parent-proxy respondents from the pilot administration of the National Concussion Surveillance System (a random-digit-dial telephone survey with over 10,000 adult respondents) were examined. Descriptive statistics of demographic and injury characteristics of children who sustained a TBI were calculated. The association between TBI signs/symptoms and selected school outcomes were determined by multinomial logistic regressions.

Results:

Among the 3557 children sampled via parent-proxy-reporting, 9.9% sustained a TBI in the past year. Changes in sleep or being more tired than usual, trouble concentrating, sensitivity to light or noise, and difficulty learning or remembering new things were associated with a greater risk of worse school outcomes following a TBI.

Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity:

To promote a positive return to learn (RTL) experience among children following TBI, school districts may prioritize accommodations (e.g., breaks in learning, extra time for assignments) and implement existing ascending levels of academic support where warranted.

Conclusion:

These findings may inform stakeholders seeking to enhance RTL and provide needed support or services for school-aged children who sustain a TBI.

Keywords: outcomes, school, TBI, traumatic brain injury


Traumatic brain injury (TBI), including concussion, is a common injury experienced by school-aged children [1]. A large, national self-report survey found that approximately 10% of children aged 5–17 sustained a TBI in the past year [2]. While all children are at risk for sustaining a TBI, boys [3] and children who play sports [4] display higher prevalence and incidence rates than other groups. Most children experience a complete recovery from a mild TBI or concussion within several weeks [5–7], and it is recommended that children return to school within days after their injury. However, some common symptoms, such as headache, fatigue, and sensitivity to light and noise, can interfere with a child’s ability to attend school and complete coursework.

Previous research has found that a student’s attendance and grades may suffer as a result of their injury. Russell and colleagues, using data collected as part of a large, longitudinal study of high school students conducted in Canada, reported that sustaining a concussion resulted in a small drop in GPA [8]. Students with a sports-related concussion have also been shown to miss more days of schools compared to students with a sports-related extremity fracture [9]. A recent systematic review examined the effect of concussion or mild TBI on a variety of school outcomes and found that these injuries are strongly associated with missed school [10].

Most of the previous research that examined school outcomes after concussion have focused on adolescents and high school students. For example, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) core survey includes a concussion question, but the question only assesses sports- and recreation-related concussion among high school students and a limited number of middle school students; information on concussions sustained through other mechanisms is not gathered [11]. Similar issues occur with other national data from other sources such as the High School Reporting Information Online (HS-RIO) system (https://datalyscenter.org/programs/rio/) or ask about the lifetime history of TBI (e.g., monitoring the future (https://monitoringthefuture.org/)) among adolescent and high school students. Less is known about how children in elementary or middle/junior high school fare after their brain injury. However, one such study, the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, helps address this gap by longitudinally examining child brain development and health (including lifetime TBI) of children between the ages of 9- and 10 years old across the United States over 10 years.

The aim of this paper is to describe selected school outcomes, including school absences, changes in grades, usage of school support services, and level of school functioning, after proxy-reported TBI (due to any cause) in the past 12 months among children aged 5–17 years.

1 |. Methods

1.1 |. Participants

Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) pilot administration of a National Concussion Surveillance System (NCSS) were examined. A detailed NCSS survey methodology has been previously described [12, 13], with the goal of developing a TBI-tiered case definition to use in self-report surveys. The NCSS pilot was a random-digit-dial (RDD) telephone survey that used a computer-assisted telephone interviewing to collect data, following a protocol designed to minimize bias (e.g., calling people both during the day and evening) while maximizing completeness (e.g., protocols designed to reach every eligible respondent). Over 10,000 adults participated in the survey, and data were collected from September 2018 to September 2019. Sampled adults were surveyed directly, and adult respondents with children aged 5–17 years in the household were asked about head injuries sustained by these children and hereafter are referred to as “parent-proxy respondents.”

1.2 |. Instrumentation

Parent-proxy respondents were asked two questions to determine whether their child had sustained a head injury in the past 12 months: “In the last year, that is since [date 1 year ago from interview date] was your child examined in a doctor’s office, clinic, hospital or elsewhere because of a head injury?” and “In the last year, that is since [date 1 year ago from interview date], did your child experience any other injuries to their head that they did not see a doctor about?” Following a “yes” response about whether the child sustained a head injury in the preceding 12 months, parent-proxy respondents were asked 12 yes/no questions regarding signs and symptoms that may have occurred as a result of the child’s head injury. If the parent-proxy respondent endorsed at least one sign or symptom for the child’s head injury, that child was considered to be a TBI case. There were multiple questions that assessed school outcomes, some of which were “Did your child miss any school due to the head injury?”, “Did your child receive extra help, support, or services at school due to the head injury?”, and “Have your child’s grades declined since the head injury?”. Please refer to Supporting Information 1 for a comprehensive list of the questions and responses used in this study.

1.3 |. Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) of parent-proxy-reported demographics and injury characteristics of school-aged children were calculated. Additionally, parent-proxy-reported injury circumstances and outcomes for each child’s most recent TBI were examined. Statistical significance was assessed via the Rao–Scott chi-square tests. To estimate independent associations between TBI signs/symptoms and selected school outcomes, separate multinomial logistic regression models were computed for each outcome of interest. Associations are presented as adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All models were adjusted by all other TBI signs/symptoms as well as demographics (i.e., sex, age, and race/ethnicity). All estimates met the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics data presentation standards for percentages and means [14]. Analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc.) and SUDAAN (version 11.0.4; Research Triangle Institute), taking the complex survey design into account. Although it was determined that IRB approval was not required because the project was deemed not research, the survey protocol was approved by ICF’s IRB (#FWA00000845). Weighted estimates from this pilot were not intended to produce nationally representative estimates of TBI.

2 |. Results

Data on 3557 children aged 5–17 years were included in the study via parent-proxy-reporting (Table 1). The data consisted of 51.0% males and 49.0% females, with about a third of the sample representing each age group (5–9 years old: 38.1%; 10–13 years old: 30.8%; 14–17 years old: 31.1%). The two highest race/ethnicity groups were non-Hispanic White (49.1%) and Hispanic (23.3%) children. An estimated 9.9% of children sustained a TBI during the preceding 12 months. Among males, 11.2% sustained a TBI, which was higher than the percentage of females who sustained a TBI (8.5%), p = 0.01. There were no overall statistical differences between age group or for race/ethnicity.

TABLE 1 |.

Parent-proxy-reported demographic and injury characteristics of school-aged children, National Concussion Surveillance System (NCSS) Pilot, 2018–2019.

Characteristic Total sample
TBIa
Yesb
No
Test statistic p-value
N Weighted % N Weighted % N Weighted %
Sex 7.0 0.01
Male 1824 51.0 208 11.2 1616 88.8
Female 1733 49.0 156 8.5 1577 91.5
Age (years) 2.2 0.33
5–9 1241 38.1 134 10.9 1107 89.1
10–13 1122 30.8 117 9.2 1005 90.8
14–17 1194 31.1 113 9.3 1081 90.7
Race/Ethnicity 5.8 0.22
White, non-Hispanic 2234 49.1 233 10.5 2001 89.5
Black, non-Hispanic 315 12.8 23 7.4 292 92.6
Asian, non-Hispanic 88 4.6 —c —c 79 91.3
Hispanic 471 23.3 43 8.7 428 91.3
Other, non-Hispanic 449 10.2 56 13.3 393 86.7
TBIa — —
Yesb 364 9.9 — — — —
No 3193 90.1 — — — —
a

For most recent injury.

b

This comprises parent-proxy-reported head injuries with at least one sign or symptom.

c

Suppressed estimate that did not meet the National Center for Health Statistics data presentation standards for percentages and means.

Approximately three-quarters (74.5%) of the most recent TBIs occurred during the school year or when school was in session. Among those children whose most recent TBI occurred during the school year or when school was in session, 29.4% missed school due to their injury (Table 2); 1 day of school was the only length of absence reported (data not shown). Among children’s most recent TBI, 9.9% received extra help, support, or services at school and 8.0% were reported to have declining grades since the injury. For approximately 10.0% of children’s most recent TBIs, their parent reported moderate to extreme effects on school functioning.

TABLE 2 |.

Parent-proxy-reported injury circumstances and outcomes of school-aged children for their most recent TBIa, National Concussion Surveillance System Pilot, 2018–2019.

TBIa (N = 339b)
Characteristic N Weighted percentage
Child injured during school
 Yes 252 74.5
 No 87 25.5
Child missing school due to the head injuryc
 Yes 78 29.4
 No 172 70.6
Child receiving extra help, support, or services at school
 Yes 36 9.9
 No 298 90.1
Child receiving letter or number grades
 Yes 181 51.5
 No 151 48.5
Decline in child’s grades since the head injuryd
 Yes 17 8.0
 No 160 90.6
 Too soon to tell/not evaluated yet —e —e
Impairment in school functioning
 Not at all/slightly 297 90.0
 Moderately/quite a bit/extremely 40 10.0
a

This comprises parent-proxy-reported head injuries with at least one sign or symptom.

b

Sample size is lower due to data either being missing or a respondent indicating do not know or refused for the school-related questions.

c

Only asked among parent-proxies that answered “yes” if the child was injured during school.

d

Only asked among parent-proxies that answered “yes” if the child received letter or number grades.

e

Suppressed estimate that did not meet the National Center for Health Statistics data presentation standards for percentages and means.

Among children’s most recent TBI (Table 3), sports- and recreation-related activities accounted for the majority of unintentional injuries (69.1%), followed by falls (18.4%). TBI caused by intentional (assault and self-harm) and other/unknown mechanisms of injury was too small and unstable to report and was thus not shown in the table. A little over half (56.1%) of children were medically evaluated for their most recent TBI, of which 34.4% were evaluated by a nurse, followed by a doctor (24.8%) and an athletic trainer (24.5%). The mean and median number of symptoms reported were 3.3 and 1.7, respectively (data not shown). Headache was the most common symptom reported (86.0%), followed by change in mood or temperament (38.4%) and sensitivity to light or noise (32.5%). Loss of consciousness (LOC) was reported by 8.3% of parent-proxy respondents for their child’s most recent TBI. About one in five (18.6%) of children had symptoms lasting more than 8 days or were yet to resolve at the time of the interview, and a little less than half (47.3%) had symptoms that resolved in 1 day. Among those injuries where symptoms had resolved by the time of the interview, the mean time to symptom resolution was 6 days. For approximately 10.0% of children’s most recent TBIs, their parent reported moderate to extreme effects on social functioning.

TABLE 3 |.

Parent-proxy-reported indicators of school outcomes for their school-aged child’s most recent TBI, National Concussion Surveillance System (NCSS) Pilot, 2018–2019.

Characteristic TBIa (N = 364)
N Weighted %
Mechanism of injury (unintentional)
 Sports- and recreation-related activities 248 69.1
 Motor vehicle crash —c —c
 Struck by or against an object 25 8.0
 Fall 59 18.4
Medically evaluated
 Yes 193 56.1
 No 147 43.9
Medical professional who did the evaluationb
 Nurse 58 34.4
 Doctor 49 24.8
 EMT or paramedic 18 9.6
 Athletic trainer 51 24.5
 Other medical professional —c —c
Location of care (where the first evaluation was sought)b
 In a doctor’s office, urgent care, or clinic 39 19.2
 At a hospital or emergency department 34 19.5
 At the time and place of head injury 119 61.3
TBI signs and symptoms
 Headache 318 86.0
 Change in mood or temperament 131 38.4
 Sensitivity to light or noise 115 32.5
 Changes in sleep or more tired than usual 106 30.0
 Dizziness, clumsiness, or balance problems 103 27.4
 Dazed, confused, or trouble thinking straight 99 25.2
 Trouble concentrating 83 22.7
 Nausea or vomiting 77 20.1
 Difficulty remembering what happened just before/after injury 51 15.1
 Difficulty learning or remembering new things 56 14.3
 Blurred or double vision 53 13.5
 Loss of consciousness 32 8.3
Symptoms not resolved or that occurred for 8+ days
 Yes 65 18.6
 No 261 81.4
One day of signs or symptoms
 Yes 154 47.3
 No 172 52.7
Social impairment
 Not at all/slightly 299 90.0
 Moderately/quite a bit/extremely 38 10.0
a

This comprises parent-proxy-reported head injuries with at least one sign or symptom.

b

Sample is only among those that were evaluated for TBI, N = 193.

c

Suppressed estimate that did not meet the National Center for Health Statistics data presentation standards for percentages and means.

Figure 1 displays the results of the multinomial logistic regressions, putting all TBI signs/symptoms and demographic variables into each model. After adjusting for all other signs and symptoms and demographics, children who had changes in sleep or were more tired than usual, who had trouble concentrating, who had nausea or vomiting, or who had LOC were more likely to miss school due to their injury (PR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.32–3.90; PR = 1.99, 95% CI= 1.16–3.44; PR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.04–2.13; PR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.11–3.65, respectively). After adjustment, children who had sensitivity to light or noise or who had difficulty learning or remembering new things were more likely to receive extra help, support, or services during school due to their TBI (PR = 3.61, 95% CI= 1.66–7.85; PR = 3.42, 95% CI = 1.46–8.01, respectively). The symptom of headache was independently associated with a lower prevalence of receiving extra help, support, or services during school (PR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.19–0.77). Children who had sensitivity to light or noise or who had trouble concentrating were more likely to have moderate to extreme effects on school functioning (PR= 2.46, 95% CI = 1.23–4.92, PR = 3.50, 95% CI = 1.37–8.94, respectively). The symptom of blurred or double vision was independently associated with a lower prevalence of having moderate to extreme effects on school functioning (PR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.25–0.90).

FIGURE 1 |.

FIGURE 1 |

Adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between parent-proxy-reported TBI signs and symptoms and indicators of school outcomes for their child’s most recent TBI*, National Concussion Surveillance System (NCSS) Pilot, 2018–2019.

*This comprises parent-proxy-reported head injuries with at least one sign or symptom.

3 |. Discussion

This study examined demographic characteristics, injury circumstances, and school outcomes of the most recent TBI reported in the preceding 12 months among children aged 5–17 years. Study findings indicate that about 9.9% of children, and more boys than girls (11.2% compared with 8.5%), were reported by their parent-proxy to have sustained a TBI in the preceding 12 months. Further, sports- and recreation-related activities were the most common mechanism of injury for the child’s most recent TBI.

Research [15, 16] suggests for most children who sustain a concussion or mild TBI that there is a positive recovery trajectory, with them feeling better within 2–4 weeks of their injury [2, 17, 18]. For a small proportion of children, concussion symptoms may persist months and sometimes years later [16], affecting them in school and as they develop into adulthood [10, 19, 20]. For example, a recent study [19] found that individuals with childhood TBI had lower rates of obtaining a high school degree or higher compared to those without TBI. While certain signs and symptoms of TBI are reported more often, the signs and symptoms that were independently associated with a greater prevalence of worse school outcomes in the NCSS pilot data included changes in sleep or being more tired than usual, trouble concentrating, sensitivity to light or noise, and difficulty learning or remembering new things. Educators and school administrators can support students who are experiencing such symptoms following a TBI by providing flexible and temporary academic support (e.g., limiting or restricting noisy environments/bright lights in the classroom/exposure to screens, allow frequent breaks, adjustment of academic task type and amount, providing extra time to complete assignments) [21] within the first month post-injury where warranted.

NCSS pilot data revealed that among children who sustained their most recent TBI during the school year, nearly a third missed at least some school. This finding corroborates previous research, which found that students with a concussion often missed school when assessed 3 days to 3 months after their brain injury [10, 22–25]. Additionally, previous research suggests that the type of injury sustained can affect the length of school absence among students. Two prospective cohort studies [9, 22] demonstrated that concussed high school and/or college students took nearly twice as long to return to school than students who sustained a musculoskeletal extremity injury (e.g., 5.4 days compared with 2.8 days). Returning to school following concussion is a multifactorial decision focused on the child’s severity of concussion and postconcussion symptoms, recommended cognitive rest, and/or school-based accommodations/academic supports provided following their injury. Concussion can negatively impact a child’s cognitive skills, affecting them in school, which is important to consider as our study estimated that 10% of children had moderate to extreme impairment on school functioning following their most recent TBI.

Current research [21, 26–28] on successful return to school following a concussion describes ascending levels of academic support (immediate and informal academic adjustments to formalized academic support outlined in an Individualized Education Plan or 504 Plan) provided by schools. In Pennsylvania, McAvoy et al. [28] described the effect of premature requests for formalized academic support, rather than utilizing immediate informal educational supports, for students following a concussion that can delay the provision of such support and due length of time to complete legal or policy-based processes, and this potentially lead to contentious relationships between parents and schools. Although this study did not assess the type of academic support provided following TBI, NCSS pilot data suggested that approximately 10% of children received extra help, support, or services at school following their most recent TBI. To promote a positive return to learn (RTL) experience among children following a concussion, school districts may prioritize the most feasible accommodations (e.g., breaks in learning, extra time to submit assignments) and implement existing ascending levels of academic support where warranted to help ensure that students have the appropriate supports in place according to their needs in order to return to their pre-injury abilities.

Additionally, this study showed that although only about half of children were evaluated for their most recent TBI, a large proportion of those (61.3%) were evaluated at the time and place of head injury. These findings suggest that the NCSS pilot likely captured TBIs where medical care was not sought, as well as those where medical care is sought outside of the emergency department (ED) (e.g., sideline of game or practice, urgent care, concussion clinic). This hypothesis is substantiated by previous research that found that only approximately 12% of pediatric concussions were initially treated in the ED when assessed in a large, urban, pediatric health care system [29]. Taken together, our study findings add to epidemiological research on TBIs among children that were historically limited to pediatric patients presenting in EDs or concussion clinics, and that estimates of TBI incidence based solely on ED visits underestimate the true burden of injury.

3.1 |. Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity

Most children who sustain a concussion or TBI will fully recover within 2–4 weeks of their injury [2, 17, 18]. However, some children may have symptoms that persist for longer [16] and can affect them in school. To promote a positive and robust RTL experience among children following TBI, school districts may prioritize the most feasible accommodations (e.g., breaks in learning, extra time to submit assignments) and implement existing ascending levels of academic support where warranted.

This study demonstrates that 9.9% of children sustained a TBI in the past 12 months via parent-proxy-reporting, providing evidence that TBI is not an uncommon condition among school-aged children. In order for children to get the appropriate support needed post-injury, training for school professionals is important to aid in the improved identification and facilitation of services and interventions for students with a TBI who may be struggling in school [30–32]. To fill this information gap and support schools with management of students with TBI, CDC offers a free online training for school professionals (https://www.cdc.gov/heads-up/training/school-professionals.html). Schools and school districts may consider offering this training to staff to help ensure that at least one person at each school is trained on TBI and to increase the awareness of evidence-based practices.

3.2 |. Limitations

There are several limitations to this study. First, there is potential for recall bias, telescoping, and social desirability given data collection was based on proxy-reporting. Second, there is potential of underreporting of TBIs by parent-proxies as in some cases parents may be unaware of their child’s injury or symptoms. For example, prior studies [33, 34] have shown that youth self-report estimates of TBI result in a 2- to 3-fold increase in TBI prevalence compared to parent-proxy-reporting. This suggests that the estimates of past year TBIs reported may be underestimated. Third, the TBI case definition in this study was originally developed using adult survey respondents and its applicability to children remains unknown. Nevertheless, the TBI case definition employed in this dataset aligns with those published elsewhere [35, 36].

4 |. Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate that 9.9% of children in this study sustained a TBI in the past 12 months. Changes in sleep or being more tired than usual, trouble concentrating, sensitivity to light or noise, and difficulty learning or remembering new things were independently associated with a greater prevalence of worse school outcomes (e.g., missing school; receiving extra help, support, or services during school; or moderate to extreme impact on school functioning). These findings may inform stakeholders seeking to enhance a smooth RTL process and provide insight into beneficial support or services for school-aged children who sustain a TBI.

Supplementary Material

Sup 1
Sup 2

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section.

Acknowledgments

This project did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Report to Congress: The Management of Traumatic Brain Injury in Children. (Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peterson A, Waltzman D, Daugherty J, Chen J, and Breiding M, “Sport and Recreation Related Concussion in Children, National Concussion Surveillance System,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 67, no. 3 (2024): 370–379, 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.QuickStats: Percentage of Children and Adolescents Aged ≤17 Years Who Had Ever Received a Diagnosis of Concussion or Brain Injury, by Sex and Age Group—National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2022. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 72 (2023): 889, 10.15585/mmwr.mm7233a5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Veliz P, Ryan J, and Eckner JT, “Head, Neck, and Traumatic Brain Injury Among Children Involved in Sports: Results From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study,” Journal of Adolescent Health : Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine 68, no. 2 (2021): 414–418, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barlow KM, Crawford S, Brooks BL, Turley B, and Mikrogianakis A, “The Incidence of Postconcussion Syndrome Remains Stable Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Children,” Pediatric Neurology 53, no. 6 (2015): 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barlow KM, Crawford S, Stevenson A, Sandhu SS, Belanger F, and Dewey D, “Epidemiology of Postconcussion Syndrome in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury,” Pediatrics 126, no. 2 (2010): e374–e381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Purcell L, Harvey J, and Seabrook JA, “Patterns of Recovery Following Sport-Related Concussion in Children and Adolescents,” Clinical Pediatrics 55, no. 5 (2016): 452–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Russell K, Hutchison MG, Selci E, Leiter J, Chateau D, and Ellis MJ, “Academic Outcomes in High-School Students After a Concussion: A Retrospective Population-Based Analysis,” PLoS One 11, no. 10 (2016): e0165116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Russell K, Selci E, Black B, Cochrane K, and Ellis M, “Academic Outcomes Following Adolescent Sport-Related Concussion or Fracture Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study,” PLoS One 14, no. 4 (2019): e0215900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rozbacher A, Selci E, Leiter J, Ellis M, and Russell K, “The Effect of Concussion or Mild Traumatic Brain Injury on School Grades, National Examination Scores, and School Attendance: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Neurotrauma 34, no. 14 (2017): 2195–2203, 10.1089/neu.2016.4765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) Accessed October 18, 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/yrbs/index.html.
  • 12.Daugherty J, Peterson A, Waltzman D, et al. “Rationale for the Development of a Traumatic Brain Injury Case Definition for the Pilot National Concussion Surveillance System,” Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 39, no. 2 (2023): 115–120, 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Daugherty J, Waltzman D, Breiding M, et al. “Refinement of a Preliminary Case Definition for Use in Traumatic Brain Injury Surveillance,” Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 39, no. 2 (2024): 121–139, 10.1097/htr.0000000000000901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Parker JD, Talih M, Malec DJ, et al. National Center for Health Statistics Data Presentation Standards for Proportions. Vol. 2. Vital and Health Statistics. (Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2017), https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/47786 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rose SC, Weber KD, Collen JB, and Heyer GL, “The Diagnosis and Management of Concussion in Children and Adolescents,” Pediatric Neurology 53, no. 2 (2015): 108–118, 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eisenberg MA, Meehan WP 3rd, and Mannix R, “Duration and Course of Post-Concussive Symptoms,” Pediatrics 133, no. 6 (2014): 999–1006, 10.1542/peds.2014-0158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kirkwood MW, Crossland MM, Howell DR, Wilson JC, and Peterson RL, “A Longitudinal Investigation of Symptom Recovery Following Concussion in Youth Soccer,” Journal of Pediatrics 220 (2020): 207–213.e2, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.01.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Patricios JS, Schneider KJ, Dvorak J, et al. “Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport: The 6th International Conference on Concussion in Sport–Amsterdam, October 2022,” British Journal of Sports Medicine 57, no. 11 (2023): 695–711, 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rytter HM, Hjorthøj C, Graff HJ, et al. “Traumatic Brain Injury and Long-Term Associations With Work, Divorce and Academic Achievement,” Preventive Medicine 185 (2024): 108062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Strazzer S, Pastore V, Frigerio S, et al. “Long-Term Vocational Outcome at 15 Years From Severe Traumatic and Non-Traumatic Brain Injury in Pediatric Age,” Brain Sciences 13, no. 7 (2023): 1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shepherd HA, Yeates KO, Reed N, et al. “Academic Accommodations for Middle and High School Students Following a Concussion: Perspectives of Teachers and School Administrators,” Journal of School Health 93, no. 12 (2023): 1099–1110, 10.1111/josh.13360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wasserman EB, Bazarian JJ, Mapstone M, Block R, and van Wijngaarden E, “Academic Dysfunction After a Concussion Among US High School and College Students,” American Journal of Public Health 106, no. 7 (2016): 1247–1253, 10.2105/ajph.2016.303154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Babcock L, Byczkowski T, Wade SL, Ho M, Mookerjee S, and Bazarian JJ, “Predicting Postconcussion Syndrome After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Children and Adolescents Who Present to the Emergency Department,” JAMA Pediatrics 167, no. 2 (2013): 156–161, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Grubenhoff JA, Deakyne SJ, Comstock RD, Kirkwood MW, and Bajaj L, “Outpatient Follow-Up and Return to School After Emergency Department Evaluation Among Children With Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms,” Brain Injury 29, no. 10 (2015): 1186–1191, 10.3109/02699052.2015.1035325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thomas DG, Collins MW, Saladino RA, Frank V, Raab J, and Zuckerbraun NS, “Identifying Neurocognitive Deficits in Adolescents Following Concussion,” Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 18, no. 3 (2011): 246–254, 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01015.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Purcell LK, Davis GA, and Gioia GA, “What Factors Must be Considered in ’Return to School’ Following Concussion and What Strategies or Accommodations Should be Followed? A Systematic Review,” British Journal of Sports Medicine 53, no. 4 (2019): 250, 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Thompson LL, Lyons VH, McCart M, Herring SA, Rivara FP, and Vavilala MS, “Variations in State Laws Governing School Reintegration Following Concussion,” Pediatrics 138, no. 6 (2016): e20162151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McAvoy K, Eagan-Johnson B, and Halstead M, “Return to Learn: Transitioning to School and Through Ascending Levels of Academic Support for Students Following a Concussion,” NeuroRehabilitation 42, no. 3 (2018): 325–330, 10.3233/nre-172381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Arbogast KB, Curry AE, Pfeiffer MR, et al. “Point of Health Care Entry for Youth With Concussion Within a Large Pediatric Care Network,” JAMA Pediatrics 170, no. 7 (2016): e160294, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Miller GF, Sarmiento K, Haarbauer-Krupa J, and Everett Jones S, “The Association Between School District-Based Policies Related to Concussions and Concussions Among High School Students,” Journal of School Health 92, no. 2 (2022): 140–147, 10.1111/josh.13113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McCart M, Glang AE, Slocumb J, Gau J, Beck L, and Gomez D, “A Quasi-Experimental Study Examining the Effects of Online Traumatic Brain Injury Professional Development on Educator Knowledge, Application, and Efficacy in a Practitioner Setting,” Disability and Rehabilitation 42, no. 17 (2020): 2430–2436, 10.1080/09638288.2019.1578423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Davies SC and Tedesco MF, “Efficacy of an Online Concussion Training Program for School Professionals,” Contemporary School Psychology 22 (2018): 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Black LI, Ng AE, Zablotsky B, et al. Concordance of Traumatic Brain Injury Symptoms, Evaluation, and Diagnosis Between Teens and Parents: Data From the National Health Interview Survey-Teen (Under Review); [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 34.Haarbauer-Krupa J, Lebrun-Harris LA, Black LI, et al. “Comparing Prevalence Estimates of Concussion/Head Injury in US Children and Adolescents in National Surveys,” Annals of Epidemiology 54, no. 21 (2021): 11–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mayo Clinic. Concussion in Children: What are the Symptoms. (Rochester, MN: Mayo ClinicPubYear, 2023). Accessed June 25, 2024, https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/concussion/expert-answers/concussion-in-children/faq-20058282. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Roby PR, McDonald CC, Corwin D, Grady MF, Master CL, and Arbogast KB, “Characteristics of Pediatric Concussion Across Different Mechanisms of Injury in 5 Through 12-Year-Olds,” Journal of Pediatrics (2024): 114157, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Sup 1
Sup 2

RESOURCES