Abstract
An initial comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences between Alkalispirochaeta alkalica Z-7491T and other members of the genus Alkalispirochaeta revealed ≥99.4% sequence similarity, suggesting their close relatedness and the possibility that some members are in fact the same species. The genus Alkalispirochaeta includes five species with validly published names. A. alkalica Z-7491T (=ATCC 700262T=DSM 8900T) and Alkalispirochaeta sphaeroplastigenens JC133T (=KCTC 15220T=NBRC 109056T) were both isolated from alkaline lakes (Lake Magadi in Kenya and Lonar Lake in India), respectively. The present study used whole-genome data to clarify the taxonomic assignment of these two closely related Alkalispirochaeta species. A. alkalica Z-7491T and A. sphaeroplastigenens JC133T share similar phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characteristics. They are Gram-stain-negative, motile, helical-shaped bacteria that require sodium for growth and grow optimally under alkaliphilic and mesophilic conditions, and their main cellular fatty acid is C18 : 1 ω7c. Overall genomic relatedness indices analyses indicated average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values >95.0% and >70.0%, respectively. These values exceed thresholds currently accepted for bacterial species delineation. Further, these taxa cluster together within the genus Alkalispirochaeta in both the 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic tree and the core-genome phylogenomic tree. Based on the combined evidence and the earliest validly published names, priority is given to Alkalispirochaeta alkalica (Zhilina et al. 1996) Sravanthi et al. 2016. Alkalispirochaeta sphaeroplastigenens (Vishnuvardhan Reddy et al. 2013) Sravanthi et al. 2016 is proposed to be a later heterotypic synonym of Alkalispirochaeta alkalica (Zhilina et al. 1996) Sravanthi et al. 2016.
Keywords: Alkalispirochaeta sphaeroplastigenens, Alkalispirochaeta alkalica, Heterotypic synonym
The genus Alkalispirochaeta was proposed in 2016 by Sravanthi et al. [1], and currently includes five species with validly published names (https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.518935, February 2026). Members of this genus have been isolated from alkaline lakes [2,4], the gut of cockroaches [1] and the termite gut [5]. Alkalispirochaeta alkalica, the type species of the genus Alkalispirochaeta, was isolated from an alkaline lake (Lake Magadi, Kenya) [2]. Another Alkalispirochaeta strain, Alkalispirochaeta sphaeroplastigenens was also isolated from an alkaline lake (Lonar Lake, India) [4]. Both strains are Gram-stain-negative, motile, helical-shaped bacteria that require sodium for growth and grow optimally under alkaliphilic and mesophilic conditions. Additionally, both strains are resistant to rifampicin and kanamycin, and negative for catalase, indole production and gelatinase [2,4]. Similar chemotaxonomic profiles are also observed between these strains, with the major polar lipids being an unidentified phospholipid, phosphatidylglycerol, a glycolipid and the unidentified lipids L1, L3 and L4 [4].
Upon comparison, the 16S rRNA gene sequences of A. alkalica Z-7491T (GenBank accession number X93927) and A. sphaeroplastigenens JC133T (GenBank accession number HE806187) were found to be 99.5% identical (Table 1). To further confirm the relationships within the genus, the EzBioCloud server [6] was subsequently used to retrieve 16S rRNA gene sequences from members of the genus Alkalispirochaeta and closely related genera with validly published names. The sequences were then aligned using clustalW [7], and a phylogenetic tree was constructed in mega 12 [8] using the maximum-likelihood (ML) algorithm [9]. The close relationship was supported by the 16S rRNA gene similarity values (Table 1) and the 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). This result indicated a very close relationship, as the similarity value exceeded the 98.7% threshold used to assign strains to a species [10]. The Kimura two-parameter model was used to calculate genetic distances [11]. Bootstrap values were calculated using 1,000 replications [12].
Table 1. Pairwise comparison of 16S rRNA gene similarity and overall genomic relatedness indices between A. alkalica Z-7491T and A. sphaeroplastigenens JC133T and their close relatives.
| 16S rRNA gene similarity (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Taxon | 16S rRNA gene accession | A. alkalica | A. sphaeroplastigenens |
| A. alkalica | X93927 | 100.0 | 99.5 |
| A. sphaeroplastigenens | HE806187 | 99.5 | 100.0 |
| Alkalispirochaetaamericana | FTMS01000039 | 99.3 | 99.0 |
| Alkalispirochaeta odontotermitis | HF968430 | 99.8 | 99.9 |
| Alkalispirochaeta cellulosivorans | HG531387 | 99.4 | 99.8 |
| dDDH (%) | |||
| Taxon | WGS accession | A. alkalica | A. sphaeroplastigenens |
| A. alkalica | GCA_000373545.1 | 100.0 | 86.1 |
| A. sphaeroplastigenens | GCA_002916695.1 | 86.1 | 100.0 |
| A. americana | GCA_900156105.1 | 24.1 | 24.3 |
| ANI (%) | |||
| Taxon | WGS accession | A. alkalica | A. sphaeroplastigenens |
| A. alkalica | GCA_000373545.1 | 100.0 | 98.6 |
| A. sphaeroplastigenens | GCA_002916695.1 | 98.6 | 100.0 |
| A. americana | GCA_900156105.1 | 81.2 | 81.0 |
Strains: A. sphaeroplastigenens JC133T; A. alkalica DSM 8900T; A. americana ASpG1T; A. odontotermitis JC202T; A. cellulosivorans JC227T.
The genome sequence of A. odontotermitis JC202T (GenBank accession number GCA_000768055.1) is available, but the quality is poor due to high contamination. A genome sequence of A. cellulosivorans JC227T is not available.
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA of A. alkalica Z-7491T and A. sphaeroplastigenens JC133T, and close relatives. The tree was constructed using the ML method. Bootstrap values, expressed as percentages of 1,000 replications, are given at branching points. Database accession numbers are given in parentheses. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Whole genome sequences are publicly available for A. alkalica Z-7491T and A. sphaeroplastigenens JC133T (GenBank accession numbers GCA_000373545.1 and GCA_002916695.1, respectively). To further explore the phylogenetic relationship between these strains, ortho average nucleotide identity (ANI) [13] and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) [14] were calculated between them and their close relatives (Table 1). An orthoANI [15] value of 98.6% was calculated between A. alkalica and A. sphaeroplastigenens, exceeding the accepted species cut-off boundary for ANI (95–96%). These high levels of relatedness were further supported using the Type (Strain) Genome Server [16], which determined that both genomes belonged to the same species based on a dDDH value of 86.1%, which exceeds the accepted species cut-off boundary (>70.0% [14]) (Table 1). Finally, to further confirm the close taxonomic relationship between both strains, a core gene phylogenomic tree was constructed using the Codon Tree method [17] (Fig. 2). This method selects single-copy PGFams [18]. These aligned proteins and coding DNA sequences from single-copy genes were analysed to build a consensus tree with RAxML [19], and support values were generated using the ‘rapid bootstrapping’ option in RAxML [20]. Also, in our study, A. alkalica Z-7491T and A. sphaeroplastigenens JC133T formed a monophyletic clade separate from other Alkalispirochaeta species and members of other genera (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. A phylogenetic tree based on the genomes of core-genome phylogenomic tree using a concatenated alignment of 100 single-copy genes showing the relationship among A. alkalica Z-7491T and A. sphaeroplastigenens JC133T and close relatives. The tree was constructed using Codon Tree. Database accession numbers are given in parentheses. Bar indicates the mean number of substitutions per site, 0.5.
Data regarding the biochemical and physiological comparisons between A. alkalica Z-7491T and A. sphaeroplastigenens JC133T were previously generated by Reddy et al. [4]. Upon comparison, a high level of similarity was observed, with only a few differences. For A. sphaeroplastigenens JC133T, the production of formate following glucose fermentation and the presence of the polar lipid L2 are observed. In contrast, for A. alkalica Z-7491T, the presence of polar lipid L5 and hopanoid BHD2 is observed [4]. Given the high level of genetic similarity (Table 1), the presence of near-identical biochemical and physiological characteristics is not unexpected.
Therefore, we argue that, considering the biochemical and physiological similarities, the high phylogenetic congruence observed using 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 1) and core-genome phylogenies (Fig. 2), and the high relatedness based on overall genomic relatedness indices analyses, A. alkalica Z-7491T and A. sphaeroplastigenens JC133T belong to the same species.
As per the priority of prokaryotic names governed by the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes [21], when species are united, the earliest validly published name is used for the union. Therefore, Alkalispirochaeta sphaeroplastigenens (Vishnuvardhan Reddy et al. 2013) Sravanthi et al. 2016 is proposed to be a later heterotypic synonym of Alkalispirochaeta alkalica (Zhilina et al. 1996) Sravanthi et al. 2016.
Emended description of Alkalispirochaeta alkalica
The description is as before [2,4] with the following modifications.
The type strain is Z-7491T (=ATCC 700262T=DSM 8900T) and JC133 (=KCTC 15220=NBRC 109056) is an additional strain. Cells of A. alkalica range in size from 0.1 to 0.3 µm in width and 10–20 µm in length. The bacterium grows between 15–40 °C, pH 8.0–10.0, 2.0–12.0% NaCl. The polar lipid L2 is found, but L5 is absent, as is the hopanoid BHD2. The production of formate from glucose by the two strains varies.
The emended DNA G+C content derived from genome sequences is 60.5–60.6 mol%.
Acknowledgements
This research was done as part of a High Honours project under the leadership of Matthew Janisin, Executive Vice President. We would like to thank Maxwell Banor, Nicole Dutton, and Donald Zakutansky for their enthusiastic support of this research.
Abbreviations
- ANI
average nucleotide identity
- dDDH
digital DNA–DNA hybridization
- ML
maximum likelihood
Footnotes
Funding: This work has been supported by NIH grant P20GM152333 to M.S.E.
Contributor Information
Michaela M. Scranton, Email: scrantom1@mail.gtc.edu.
Richard W. McLaughlin, Email: mclaughlinr@gtc.edu.
Mostafa S. Elshahed, Email: mostafa@okstate.edu.
Paul A. Lawson, Email: paul.lawson@ou.edu.
Samuel L. Miller, Email: sammiller@okstate.edu.
References
- 1.Sravanthi T, Tushar L, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Alkalispirochaeta cellulosivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a cellulose-hydrolysing, alkaliphilic, halotolerant bacterium isolated from the gut of a wood-eating cockroach (Cryptocercus punctulatus), and reclassification of four species of Spirochaeta as new combinations within Alkalispirochaeta gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:1612–1619. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhilina TN, Zavarzin GA, Rainey F, Kevbrin VV, Kostrikina NA, et al. Spirochaeta alkalica sp. nov., Spirochaeta africana sp. nov., and Spirochaeta asiatica sp. nov., alkaliphilic anaerobes from the Continental Soda Lakes in Central Asia and the East African Rift. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996;46:305–312. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-1-305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hoover RB, Pikuta EV, Bej AK, Marsic D, Whitman WB, et al. Spirochaeta americana sp. nov., a new haloalkaliphilic, obligately anaerobic spirochaete isolated from soda Mono Lake in California. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53:815–821. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02535-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vishnuvardhan Reddy S, Aspana S, Tushar DL, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Spirochaeta sphaeroplastigenens sp. nov., a halo-alkaliphilic, obligately anaerobic spirochaete isolated from soda lake Lonar. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:2223–2228. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.046292-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sravanthi T, Tushar L, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Spirochaeta odontotermitis sp. nov., an obligately anaerobic, cellulolytic, halotolerant, alkaliphilic spirochaete isolated from the termite Odontotermes obesus (Rambur) gut. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:4589–4594. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kumar S, Stecher G, Suleski M, Sanderford M, Sharma S, et al. MEGA12: molecular evolutionary genetic analysis version 12 for adaptive and green computing. Mol Biol Evol. 2024;41:msae263. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17:368–376. doi: 10.1007/BF01734359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stackebrandt E. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microb Today. 2006;33:152. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010;2:117–134. doi: 10.4056/sigs.531120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:1100–1103. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Davis JJ, Wattam AR, Aziz RK, Brettin T, Butler R, et al. The PATRIC bioinformatics resource center: expanding data and analysis capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019:gkz943. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Davis JJ, Gerdes S, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Pusch GD, et al. PATtyFams: protein families for the microbial genomes in the PATRIC database. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:118. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol. 2008;57:758–771. doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Oren A, Arahal DR, Christensen H, Göker M, Manaia CM, et al. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic code (2025 Revision) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2026;76:006979. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


