Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2026 Jun 22;76(6):007209. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.007209

Luteococcus struthionis sp. nov. and Lacrimispora struthionigena sp. nov. isolated from ostrich faeces

Samuel L Miller 1, R Ty Young 1, Md Mehedi Hasan 1, Julia M Vinzelj 1, Noha H Youssef 1, Mostafa S Elshahed 1,*
PMCID: PMC13286285  PMID: 42329683

Abstract

Two mesophilic, Gram-stain-positive bacteria, OSA5T and AGF001T, were isolated anoxically from ostrich faecal material. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequences revealed that strains OSA5T and AGF001T formed distinct lineages within the genera Luteococcus and Lacrimispora, respectively. Strain OSA5T showed the closest relatedness to Luteococcus japonicus DSM 10546T and Luteococcus sediminum DSMZ 27277T with 96.6% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. Strain AGF001T was closely related to Lacrimispora aerotolerans DSM 5434T, with 97.4% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. Subsequent genomic analyses using overall genomic-based relatedness indices revealed that OSA5T and AGF001T shared average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values <95.0% and <70.0% with their close relatives, below the currently accepted thresholds for species-level delineation. The genomes of strains OSA5T and AGF001T were 3.2 Mbp and 5.4 Mbp, with G+C contents of 67.8 and 41.6 mol%, respectively. Based on phenotypic and genotypic data, strains OSA5T and AGF001T represent novel species in the genera Luteococcus and Lacrimispora, respectively; the names Luteococcus struthionis sp. nov. and Lacrimispora struthionigena sp. nov. are proposed. The type strains are OSA5T (=CCM 9469T=CCUG 78312T=CECT 31229T=DSM 119679T) and AGF001T (=CCM 9472T=CCUG 78314T=CECT 31227T=DSM 119664T), respectively.

Keywords: faeces, Lacrimispora, Luteococcus, ostrich, taxonomy, whole genome sequencing

Data Availability

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains OSA5T and AGF001T are PV166456.1 and PV166457.1. The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the whole-genome sequences of strains OSA5T and AGF001T are GCA_048595755.1 and GCA_048627165.1. The type strain OSA5T has been deposited in the Czech Collection of Microorganisms (accession number: CCM 9469T), the Culture Collection University of Gothenburg (accession number: CCUG 78312T), the Spanish Type Culture Collection (accession number: CECT 31229T) and the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (accession number: DSMZ 119679T). The type strain AGF001T has been deposited in the Czech Collection of Microorganisms (accession number: CCM 9472T), the Culture Collection University of Gothenburg (accession number: CCUG 78314T), the Spanish Type Culture Collection (accession number: CECT 31227T) and the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (accession number: DSMZ 119664T)

Introduction

The ostrich (Struthio camelus) is the largest extant herbivorous flightless member of the infraclass Palaeognathae, compared to the other members within Palaeognathae: rheas (Rhea), cassowaries (Casuarius), emus (Dromaius) and kiwis (Dromaius). Ostriches exhibit distinct physiological and anatomical adaptations. Their hindgut-fermenting digestive system [1], characterized by an enlarged cecum and colon [2], facilitates the breakdown of fibrous plant materials (primarily consumed grasses, shrubs and succulents [3,4]) through the enzymatic activities of lignocellulose-degrading micro-organisms [5,6]. This process is essential for extracting energy from otherwise indigestible plant material [7]. Resident microbial communities in the ostrich digestive system produce short-chain fatty acids such as acetate, propionate and butyrate, which serve as vital energy sources for the host [8,10]. Despite increasing interest in the gut microbiomes of avian species, research on the ostrich microbiota remains relatively limited. Studies employing culture-independent approaches have reported the predominance of specific bacterial taxa within the ostrich gut (mainly members of the phylum Verrucomicrobiota and class Clostridia in juveniles and adults [11,12]. Recently, a study on the anaerobic gut fungi (Neocallimastigomycota) communities in domestic ostriches revealed distinct anaerobic gut fungi populations compared to those previously studied in other herbivorous animals [13].

The genus Luteococcus (phylum Actinomycetota, class Actinomycetes, order Propionibacteriales, family Propionibacteriaceae) was formally described in 1994 [14] and currently comprises four validly published species (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/Luteococcus, October 2025). Collectively, Luteococcus species are Gram-stain-positive, facultatively anaerobic, coccus-shaped, non-endospore-forming bacteria with a high DNA G+C content [14] (67.8–70.5 mol%, Table 1). These taxa have been isolated from terrestrial [14] and aquatic [15] environments, as well as from humans [16,17]. However, one metagenomic study generated a metagenome-assembled genome ‘Candidatus Luteococcus avicola’ from chickens’ faecal samples [18].

Table 1. General genomic features of OSA5T (top panel), AGF001T (bottom panel) and their close relatives.

Characteristic OSA5T Luteococcus japonicus Luteococcus peritonei Luteococcus sanguinis
Genome accession GCA_048595755.1 GCF_003752415.1 GCF_039526385.1 GCF_039527675.1
DNA G+C (mol%) 67.8 67.8 70.5 68.2
Genome size (Mbps) 3.2 3.5 3.3 2.9
No. of contigs 1 1 50 92
No. of CDSs 3,021 3,344 3,109 2,752
Characteristic AGF001T Lacrimispora aerotolerans Lacrimispora xylanolytica Lacrimispora amygdalina
Genome accession GCA_048627165.1 GCF_000687555.1 GCF_002934545.1 GCF_003609635.1
DNA G+C (mol%) 41.5 42.4 41.9 40.2
Genome size (Mbps) 5.4 4.7 5.6 4.6
No. of contigs 3 50 33 35
No. of CDSs 5,045 4,397 5,340 4,311

Strains (top panel): OSA5T; Luteococcus japonicus DSM 10546T; Luteococcus peritonei CCUG 38120T; Luteococcus sanguinis CCUG 33897T; no whole-genome sequence was available for the type strain of Luteococcus sediminum.

Strains (bottom panel): AGF001T; Lacrimispora aerotolerans DSM 5434T; Lacrimispora xylanolytica ATCC 49623T; Lacrimispora amygdalina BR-10T.

CDSs, coding sequences.

The genus Lacrimispora (phylum Bacillota, class Clostridia, order Eubacteriales, family Lachnospiraceae) was given taxonomic standing in 2020 [19] and currently comprises 11 validly published species (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/Lacrimispora, October 2025). Members of this genus are structurally Gram-stain-positive, obligately anaerobic, rod-shaped, spore-forming bacteria, with a low DNA G+C content [19] (40.2–42.4 mol%, Table 1). Lacrimispora have been primarily isolated from non-host associated habitats, e.g. fermented cabbage, sewage sludge, pickled mustard, woodchips, freshwater sediments, although association with hosts has also been reported, e.g. Lacrimispora aerotolerans, which was isolated from the rumen of a sheep [20]. To date, neither of these genera contains a validly published species from an avian host.

This study describes two novel Luteococcus and Lacrimispora species isolated from ostrich faecal material. This work contributes to the broader effort to elucidate avian gut microbial diversity; additionally, it expands our current understanding of the diversity of Luteococcus and Lacrimispora, as this represents the first instance of novel bacterial taxa descriptions for these genera from avian hosts. This study employs a polyphasic taxonomic approach to describe two novel species obtained from ostrich faeces: Luteococcus strain OSA5T and Lacrimispora strain AGF001T. Strains OSA5T and AGF001T represent novel species within their respective genera, and the names Luteococcus struthious sp. nov. and Lacrimispora struthionigena sp. nov. are herein proposed.

Isolation of bacterial strains and culture conditions

Strains OSA5T and AGF001T were isolated from ostrich faecal material collected from a private farm near Catoosa, Oklahoma (34.486589, −98.226482) on 1 June 2022. The faecal material was placed in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products, Inc., Grass Lake, MI) and serially diluted in anoxic PBS (1 x). Isolation procedures were conducted using either an initial anoxic enrichment approach followed by plating, or a direct plating approach from the original samples. Anoxic enrichments were prepared by serially diluting faecal material, which was inoculated into rumen fluid (RF) media containing 0.5% (w/v) cellobiose, as previously described [21], and sub-cultured upon visually observing signs of visible growth (24–48 h). Subsequently, an aliquot of RF media was serially diluted in anoxic PBS (1 x) and plated onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates supplemented with 5% (v/v) defibrinated sheep’s blood (TSAB). For the direct plating approach, (0.1 ml) serially diluted faecal material (1 : 10) was spread onto Columbia Agar supplemented with 5% (v/v) defibrinated sheep’s blood (CAB), Reasoner’s 2A Agar (R2A), TSA and MacConkey agar. All plates were incubated under strictly anaerobic conditions for 2 weeks in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory) filled with 90% N2 and 10% H2 at 37 °C. Individual colonies with differing morphological profiles were further sub-cultured until pure isolates were obtained, as evidenced by phase-contrast microscopy (BX51, Olympus, Centre Valley, PA).

The Gram stain reaction was determined using the Gram Stain Kit (Becton Dickinson,

Franklin Lakes, NJ), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Phase-contrast microscopy (BX51, Olympus, Centre Valley, PA) was used to assess cell shape, motility and endospore production. Cell size for OSA5T and AGF001T was determined by scanning electron microscopy with a FEI Quanta 600 field-emission gun environmental scanning electron microscope (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA).

Strain OSA5T was isolated on a CAB by direct plating, whereas AGF001T was isolated on TSAB following an enrichment procedure. After primary isolation, OSA5T and AGF001T were maintained under anoxic conditions in anoxic tryptic soy broth (TSB) or TSAB at 37 °C. Isolates OSA5T and AGF001T were preserved in Microbank cryogenic beads (Prolab Diagnostics, Georgetown, TX) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at −80 °C. The cells of OSA5T are Gram-stain-positive cocci, measuring 0.8–0.9 µm in diameter and occurring in pairs, tetrads or clusters (Fig. S1a, b, available in the online Supplementary Material). Colonies of OSA5T on CAB medium were opaque, off-white, mucoid and circular on the agar surface after 48 h at 39 °C. The cells of AGF001T are Gram-stain-negative rods, measuring 3.5 µm in height × 0.5 µm in length (Fig. S1c, d). Colonies on TSAB medium were white, circular and convex after 48 h at 37 °C.

16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic analysis

Near full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained for OSA5T and AGF001T using Sanger sequencing [22] at the Oklahoma State University Biochemistry and Molecular Biology core sequencing facility. The 16S rRNA gene sequences were queried using a blast search against the sequences available on the EzBioCloud server (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/) [23,25]. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of OSA5T and AGF001T, as well as those of closely related species, were downloaded from the EzBioCloud server [24]. These sequences were then aligned using muscle [26], and phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using the maximum-likelihood method [27] and the Tamura-Nei substitution model [28]with 1,000 bootstrap replications. The trees were visualized using mega 12 [29].

The results of 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic analyses indicated that OSA5T was most closely related to Luteococcus japonicus and Luteococcus sediminum (96.6%), whereas AGF001T was most closely related to Lacrimispora aerotolerans (97.4%) and Lacrimispora xylanolytica (96.8%) (Table 2). These values are below the currently accepted threshold of 98.7%, which is now routinely used to demarcate this taxonomic rank [30]. Additionally, the topologies of the associated phylogenetic trees constructed using the maximum-likelihood method [27] support the proposals that OSA5T (Fig. 1) and AGF001T (Fig. 2) represent novel species within Luteococcus and Lacrimispora, respectively.

Table 2. Pairwise comparison of 16S rRNA gene similarity and overall genomic relatedness indices between OSA5T (top panel), AGF001T (bottom panel) and their close relatives.

Strains: (top panel) OSA5T; Luteococcus japonicus DSM 10546T; Luteococcus sediminum XH208T; Luteococcus peritonei CCUG 38120T; Luteococcus sanguinis CCUG 33897T; (bottom panel) AGF001T; Lacrimispora aerotolerans DSM 5434T; Lacrimispora xylanolytica ATCC 49623T; Lacrimispora amygdalina BR-10T

Strain OSA5T Luteococcus japonicus Luteococcus sediminum Luteococcus peritonei Luteococcus sanguinis
16S accession PV166456 D85487 KC986353 AJ132334 AJ416758
16S similarity (%) 100.0 96.6 96.6 96.4 96
Genome accession GCA_048595755.1 GCF_003752415.1 NR GCF_039526385.1 GCF_039527675.1
OrthoANIu (%) 100.0 80.2 NR 78.5 75.4
dDDH (%) 100.0 23.8 NR 22 21
– AGF001T Lacrimispora aerotolerans Lacrimispora xylanolytica Lacrimispora amygdalina –
16S accession PV166457 X76163 X71855 AY353957 –
16S similarity (%) 100.0 97.4 96.8 96.6 –
Genome accession GCA_048627165.1 GCF_000687555.1 GCF_002934545.1 GCF_003609635.1 –
OrthoANIu (%) 100.0 75.3 75.4 87.1 –
dDDH (%) 100.0 19.8 19.6 32.5 –

NR, not reported; no whole-genome sequence was available for Luteococcus sediminum XH208T .

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationship between OSA5T and other members of the family Propionibacteriaceae. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences placing Luteococcus struthionis OSA5 within Propionibacteriaceae, clustering closest to Luteococcus sediminum with bootstrap support of 87.

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationship between AGF001T and other members of the family Lachnospiraceae. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Phylogenetic tree showing evolutionary relationships of Lachnospiraceae family members based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Bootstrap values 75-100 indicate strong branch support. Lacrimispora struthionigena AGF001T clusters with other Lacrimispora species.

Whole-genome sequencing, phylogenomic analysis and in silico metabolic predictions

Cell biomass was harvested from an overnight culture and stored in DNA/RNA Shield (Zymo, Irvine, CA). Subsequent DNA extraction, sequencing and custom analysis and annotation were conducted using the services of a commercial provider (Plasmidsaurus, Eugene, OR) as previously described [31]. Completeness and contamination assessment of the obtained genomic assemblies were conducted using CheckM v1.2.2 [32]. Genome annotation was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v 6.7 [33]. Additional whole-genome-based phylogenetic analysis of OSA5T and AGF001T was performed with the Genome Taxonomy Database Toolkit (GTDB-Tk) [34], employing a concatenated alignment of 120 single-copy genes [34]. A phylogenomic tree was constructed using the maximum-likelihood approach [27] with RAxML, employing the PROTGAMMABLOSUM62 model and default parameters [35]. Trees were visualized using the Interactive Tree of Life v6 [36]. The taxonomic status of OSA5T and AGF001T was further confirmed by comparing overall genomic relatedness indices (OGRIs) according to the most recent proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes [37]. Specifically, average nucleotide identity (ANI) was calculated using EzBioCloud’s ANI Calculator, which uses the OrthoANIu algorithm [24,38]. The Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator [39,40] v3.0 was used to determine digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH). Carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) analysis was performed using the dbCAN3 meta-server [41,42] run through the Kbase [43] web server.

Strains OSA5T and AGF001T genome sizes were 3.2 and 5.4 Mbp, respectively. The DNA G+C content was determined to be 67.8 and 41.6 mol%, respectively. Genome quality metrics obtained from the NCBI PGAP CheckM analysis (v1.2.2) show high completeness (97.8%) and low contamination (3.2%) for OSA5T, as well as for AGF001T, with completeness and contamination levels of 98.7 and 3.7%, respectively. As such, both genomes were deemed acceptable for inclusion in taxonomic and phylogenomic studies [32]. Of the 3,021 total predicted genes for OSA5T, 2,926 were protein-coding sequences, 9 rRNA genes and 48 tRNAs. For AGF001T, a total of 5,045 genes were predicted, of which 4,913 were protein-coding sequences, 18 rRNA genes and 69 tRNAs were identified. The general genotypic characteristics of OSA5T and AGF001T and their close relatives are given in Table 2.

Phylogenomic analysis confirmed the affiliation of strain OSA5T with the genus Luteococcus, clustering most closely with Luteococcus japonicus (GCF_003752415.1) (Fig. 3), as well as the affiliation of strain AGF001T with the genus Lacrimispora, clustering most closely with Lacrimispora xylanolytica (GCF_002934545.1) (Fig. 4). Such topology was in concordance with the analyses of 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenies (Figs 1 and 2). OGRIs for species delineation revealed ANI values of <95.0% and dDDH values of <70.0% for OSA5T and AGF001T and their closest relatives (Table 1). These values are lower than the proposed thresholds for species-level delineation (95.0–96.0% and 70.0%, respectively) [30,39, 44]. Collectively, these results strongly indicate that both strains represent two novel, distinct species within the genera Luteococcus and Lacrimispora.

Fig. 3. Core-genome phylogenomic tree using a concatenated alignment of 120 single-copy gene sequences showing the relationship between OSA5T and other members of the family Propionibacteriaceae. Bar, 0.1 substitutions per site.

Phylogenomic tree of Propionibacteriaceae showing Luteococcus struthionis OSA5 nested within Luteococcus species, with bootstrap values up to 100 and Propionibacterium freudenreichii as outgroup.

Fig. 4. Core-genome phylogenomic tree using a concatenated alignment of 120 single-copy gene sequences showing the relationship between AGF001T and other members of the Lachnospiraceae. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per site.

Phylogenetic tree showing bacterial relationships with bootstrap values at nodes. AGF001T clusters with Lacrimispora species, while Enterocloster and Hungatella form separate clades with high statistical support.

In silico prediction of metabolic capacities and physiological preferences of the OSA5T genome revealed characteristics typical of members of the genus Luteococcus (Table S1). This included a facultative anaerobic heterotrophic lifestyle, including pathways indicative of aerobic growth (Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway, pyruvate-ferredoxin/flavodoxin oxidoreductase for pyruvate oxidative decarboxylation, a complete TCA cycle with a-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase and a complete electron transport system with NADH-quinone oxidoreductase [EC:7.1.1.2], succinate dehydrogenase [EC:1.3.5.1], cytochrome bc1 complex [EC:7.1.1.8] and cytochrome c oxidases [EC:7.1.1.9], in addition to the F-type ATPase for oxidative phosphorylation), as well as capacities for fermentation and substrate-level phosphorylation using the phosphate acetyltransferase-acetate kinase pathway, acetyl-CoA synthetase [EC:6.2.1.1], succinyl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferase [EC:2.8.3.18] and acetyl-CoA synthetase [EC:6.2.1.1] for acetyl-CoA conversion to acetate, pyruvate fermentation to formate via formate C-acetyltransferase [EC:2.3.1.54], pyruvate fermentation to l-lactate via l-lactate dehydrogenase [EC:1.1.1.27] and ethanol fermentation. On the other hand, analysis of the AGF001T genome revealed characteristics typical of members of the genus Lacrimispora (Table S1). This included obligate anaerobic growth (evidenced by absence of pyruvate dehydrogenase and alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, the oxidative branch of the PPP, as well as the complete absence of complexes I-IV of the electron transport chain). Energy production is expected to happen via fermentation and substrate-level phosphorylation as the genome encodes phosphate acetyltransferase-acetate kinase pathway and means for pyruvate fermentation to ethanol and l-lactate.

Analysis of the CAZyme repertoire in both genomes identified 248 glycoside hydrolases (GHs), 6 carbohydrate esterases and 1 polysaccharide lyase family in strain OSA5T, and 579 GHs, 23 carbohydrate esterases and 34 polysaccharide lyase families in strain AGF001T (Fig. S2). The majority of the CAZyome in OSA5T (77.9%) was comprised of amylases belonging to the GH13 family. When compared with two other Luteococcus species with sequenced genomes available in NCBI RefSeq [Luteococcus japonicus (GCF_003752415.1) and Luteococcus japonicus LSP Lj1 (GCF_900163845.1)], the same pattern was observed, with 78.3 and 80.8%of the total CAZyome belonging to GH13 family, respectively (Fig. S2). On the other hand, the majority of the CAZyome in AGF001T consisted of amylases in the GH13 family (34.0% of total GHs) and cellulose- and hemicellulose-degrading enzymes in the GH43 family GH1 and GH5 families (42.5%). When compared with two other Lacrimispora species with sequenced genomes available in NCBI RefSeq [Lacrimispora amygdalina (GCF_900205965.1), Lacrimispora celerecrescens (GCF_900185635.1), Lacrimispora saccharolytica (GCF_016906045.1) and Lacrimispora sphenoides (GCF_900105215.1)], a similar pattern was observed (Fig. S2).

Morphological and physiological characteristics

Aerotolerance was determined by placing cultures on CAB or TSAB under aerobic conditions for 1 week at 37 °C. A catalase test was performed as previously described [45]. Temperature ranges for growth were determined in TSB at 4 °C, 20 °C, 25 °C, 37 °C, 45 °C, 50 °C and 55 °C. Salt tolerance was determined in TSB at 0.5% (w/v) and between 1.0% (w/v) and 10.0% (w/v), in increments of 1.0% (w/v); pH ranges for growth were determined between 3.0 and 10.0, in increments of 1.0, and all tests were performed in duplicate. For the pH ranges, the Good’s buffers were prepared as previously described [46]. Optimal growth conditions were determined by optical density at 600 nm using a Multiskan Go Microplate Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) or a Spectronic 20D+ (Milton Roy, Ivyland, PA). An increase in optical density of 600 nm greater than 0.1 after 5 days of incubation was considered growth.

Additional physiological and biochemical characteristics, such as carbon substrate utilization and chemical susceptibility, were determined using the GENIII microplate system (BIOLOG, Hayward, CA), the Anaerobe Identification Test Panel AN MicroPlate (Biolog, Hayward, CA), ID 32 Staph (bioMérieux, Durham, NC), API CORYNE (bioMérieux, Durham, NC), API Rapid ID32 A (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) and the API ZYM kit (bioMérieux, Durham, NC), according to the manufacturers’ protocols.

OAS5T cells were negative for motility and endospore production. OSA5T was facultatively anaerobic, growing when the media were exposed to air. Cells were positive for catalase and amylase. OSA5T grew between 4 °C and 45 °C, with an optimum growth at 39 °C. OSA5T could grow at NaCl concentrations between 0.5 and 9.0 % (w/v), with optimal growth occurring at 3.0 % (w/v) NaCl. OSA5T grew at pH values between 5.0 and 7.0, with an optimum pH of 6.0.

Strain OSA5T utilized Glucose, Fructose, Ribose, Xylose, Maltose, Sucrose, Melibiose, Gentiobiose, Stachyose, Pectin, Inosine, Mannitol, Sorbitol, Arabitol, Myo-inositol, Glycerol, Esculin, Gelatin, β-methyl-d-glucoside, d-salicin, N-acetyl neuraminic acid, Glucuronamide, Acetic acid, Propionic acid, Sodium butyrate, Mucic acid, Bromo-succinic acid, α-hydroxybutyric acid, α-ketobutyric acid, l-lactic acid, l-malic acid and l-alanine for growth. No growth occurred with Galactose, Mannose, Rhamnose, Fucose, Lactose, Cellobiose, Trehalose, Turanose, Raffinose, Glycogen, Dextrin, 3-methyl glucose, N-acetyl-d-glucosamine, N-acetyl-d-galactosamine, N-acetyl-β-d-mannosamine, Glucose-6-phosphate, Fructose-6-phosphate, l-butyric acid, Formic acid, Citric acid, Quinic acid, Galacturonic acid, d-gluconic acid, d-saccharic acid, l-galactonic acid lactone, β-hydroxy-d, α-ketoglutaric acid, Acetoacetic acid, d-lactic acid methyl ester, d-malic acid, l-arginine, l-aspartic acid, d-aspartic acid, l-glutamic acid, l-histidine, l-pyroglutamic acid, γ-aminobutyric acid or Glycyl-l-proline (Table S2).

In the chemical sensitivity assays, strain OSA5T grew in the presence of 1.0% sodium lactate, lithium chloride, potassium tellurite, sodium bromate, Tween 40, nalidixic acid and aztreonam. No growth occurred in the presence of fusidic acid, troleandomycin, rifamycin SV, minocycline, lincomycin, guanidine HCl, niaproof 4, vancomycin, tetrazolium violet or tetrazolium blue.

Enzymatic assays for OSA5T detected positive reactions for Alkaline phosphatase, Esterase (C4), Esterase lipase (C8), Leucine arylamidase, Trypsin, α-Chymotrypsin, Acid phosphatase, β-Glucuronidase, β-Galactosidase, α-Glucosidase, Arginine arylamidase, Pyrazinamidase, Pyrrolidonyl arylamidase, β-N-acetylglucosaminidase and Catalase. In contrast, negative results were obtained for lipase (C14), valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, α-Galactosidase, β-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase, α-fucosidase and Pyrrolidonyl arylamidase.

Distinguishing phenotypic characteristics between strains OSA5T and their close relatives are listed in Table 3. Compared to other members of the genus Luteococcus, strain OSA5T exhibited some unique substrate utilization patterns as well as enzymatic activities profiles. Specifically, strain OSA5T was unique in its ability to utilize ribose and xylose for growth, as well as its lack of α-Galactosidase, β-Galactosidase and β-glucosidase activities.

Table 3. Morphological and physiological differential characteristics of OSA5T (top panel), AGF001T (bottom panel) and their close relatives.

Characteristic OSA5T Luteococcus japonicus Luteococcus sediminum Luteococcus peritonei Luteococcus sanguinis
Cell shape Cocci Cocci Cocci Pleomorphic
rod
Cocci
Cell size (µm) 0.8–0.9 0.7–1.0 0.2–0.4 NR NR
Temperature range (°C) 20–50 12–38 04–37 NR NR
Temperature optimum (°C) 39 26–28 28 NR NR
Salinity range % (w/v) 0.5–9.0 0.0–5.0 0.0–10.0 NR NR
Salinity optimum % (w/v) 3.0 NR 2.0–3.0 NR NR
pH range 5.0–7.0 NR 6.0–8.0 NR NR
pH optimum 6.0 NR 7.0 NR NR
α-Galactosidase − + + + +
β-Glucosidase − + + + +
Ribose + − − − −
Xylose + − − − −
Isolation source Ostrich faeces Soil Subseafloor sediment Human peritoneum Human blood
Characteristic AGF001T Lacrimispora aerotolerans Lacrimispora xylanolytica Lacrimispora amygdalina
Cell width (µm) 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.6
Cell shape Rod Rod Rod Rod
Motility + + + −
Temperature range (°C) 20–45 NR NR 17–43
Temperature optimum (°C) 37 38 35 37
Salinity range % (w/v) 0.5–2.0 NR NR NR
Salinity optimum % (w/v) 0.5 NR NR NR
pH range 6.0–8.0 NR NR 6.0–8.8
pH optimum 7.0 NR 7.2 7.4
Fructose – + + +
Mannose – + + +
Salicin – + + +
Raffinose – + + +
Isolation source Ostrich Faeces Sheep rumina Decayed wood chips sewage sludge

Strains (top panel): OSA5T (data from this study); Luteococcus japonicus DSM 10546T*; Luteococcus sediminum XH208T [15]; Luteococcus peritonei CCUG 38120T*; Luteococcus sanguinis CCUG 33897T*; NR, not reported. The following characteristics were shared among all isolates for which data were reported: Gram-stain-reaction (+), endospore production (-) and motility (-). *The α-Galactosidase and β-glucosidase data for Luteococcus japonicus DSM 10546T, Luteococcus peritonei CCUG 38120T and Luteococcus sanguinis CCUG 33897T were obtained from https://bacdive.dsmz.de/.

Strains (bottom panel): AGF001T (data from this study); Lacrimispora aerotolerans DSM 5434T [20]; Lacrimispora xylanolytica ATCC 49623T[47]; 4, Lacrimispora saccharolytica WM1T [48]; NR, not reported. The following characteristics were shared among all isolates for which data were reported: Gram-stain reaction (-) and endospore production (+).

Strain AGF001T was obligately anaerobic, failing to grow when the media was exposed to air. Cells were positive for motility and endospore production, with a subterminal visible in phase contrast microscopy. Strain AGF001T grew between 20 °C and 45 °C with an optimum growth at 37 °C. Strain AGF001T could grow at NaCl concentrations between 0.5 and 2.0 % (w/v), with an optimal growth occurring at 0.5 % (w/v) NaCl. AGF001T grew at pH values between 6.0 and 8.0 with an optimum pH of 7.0.

Strain AGF001T utilized 2′-Deoxy Adenosine, d-Cellobiose, d-Lactose, d-l-Lactic Acid, d-malic acid, d-Mannitol, d-Melezitose, d-Melibiose, d-Trehalose, Glycyl-l-Glutamine, Glycyl-l-Proline, Inosine, Lactulose, l-Lactic Acid, l-malic acid, l-Methionine, l-Rhamnose, l-Valine, l-Valine plus l-Aspartic Acid, Maltotriose, myo-Inositol, Pyruvic Acid, Pyruvic Acid Methyl Ester, Stachyose, Succinic Acid Mono-Methyl Ester, Sucrose, Thymidine, Thymidine-5′-Monophosphate, Uridine and Uridine-5′-Monophosphate for growth. No growth occurred with 3-Methyl-d-Glucose, Acetic Acid, Adonitol, Alaninamide, Alanine arylamidase, Alkaline phosphatase, Amygdalin, Arbutin, Arginine arylamidase, Arginine dihydrolase, d-Arabitol, Dextrin, d-Fructose, dRaffinose, d-Galactose, d-Galacturonic acid, d-Glucosaminic Acid, d-Glucose-6-Phosphate, d-Glucuronic Acid, d-Lactic Acid Methyl Ester, d-l-α-Glycerol Phosphate, d-Mannose, d-saccharic acid, d-Sorbitol, Dulcitol, Formic Acid, Fumaric Acid, Glutamic acid decarboxylase, Glutamyl-glutamic acid arylamidase, Glycerol, Glycine arylamidase, Glycyl-l-Aspartic Acid, Glycyl-l-Methionine, Glyoxylic Acid, Histidine arylamidase, i-Erythritol, Itaconic Acid, l-Alanine, l-Alanyl-l-Glutamine, l-Alanyl-l-Histidine, l-Alanyl-l-Threonine, l-Asparagine, Leucine arylamidase, Leucyl-glycine arylamidase, l-Fucose, l-Glutamic Acid, l-Phenylalanine, l-Serine, l-Threonine, Mannose fermentation, m-Tartaric Acid, N-Acetyl-d-Galactosamine, N-Acetyl-d-glucosamine, N-Acetyl-β-d-Mannosamine, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, Palatinose, Phenylalanine arylamidase, Proline arylamidase, Propionic Acid, Raffinose, Salicin, Serine arylamidase, Succinic Acid, Turanose, Tyrosine arylamidase and Urocanic Acid (Table S3).

Enzymatic assays for AGF001T yielded positive reactions for esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), Acid phosphatase, α-Galactosidase, β-Galactosidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase and β-glucosidase. In contrast, negative results were obtained for: N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, Glutamic acid decarboxylase, α-Fucosidase, Nitrate reduction, Indole production, Urease, Alkaline phosphatase, α-chymotrypsin, for lipase (C14), naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase, α-fucosidase, Arginine arylamidase, Proline arylamidase, Leucyl-glycine arylamidase, Phenylalanine arylamidase, Leucine arylamidase, Tyrosine arylamidase, Alanine arylamidase, Glycine arylamidase, Histidine arylamidase, Glutamyl-glutamic acid arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase and Serine arylamidase.

Distinguishing phenotypic characteristics between strain AGF001T and its closest relatives in the genus Lacrimispora (Table 3) revealed that, when compared to other members of the genus, strain AGF001T was unique in its ability to utilize Fructose, Mannose, Salicin and Raffinose.

Taxonomic conclusions

Based on polyphasic taxonomic criteria, OSA5T and AGF001T represent novel species within Luteococcus and Lacrimispora, respectively. It is proposed to name the novel strains OSA5T and AGF001T Luteococcus struthious sp. nov. and Lacrimispora struthionigena sp. nov.

Description of Luteococcus struthionis sp. nov.

Luteococcus struthionis (stru.thi.o´nis. L. gen. n. struthionis, of an ostrich, Struthio camelus)

Cells are Gram-stain-positive, facultatively anaerobic, non-motile cocci (0.8–0.9 µm in diameter) and occur in pairs, tetrads, or clusters. Colonies are yellow, circular, and convex, on TSA after 48 h at 39 °C. Growth occurs at 4–50 °C (optimum 39 °C). The salinity range for growth is 0.0–9.0 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum 3.0 %), and the pH range for growth is pH 5.0–7.0 (optimum 6.0). Cells are catalase-positive. Growth occurred with Glucose, Fructose, Ribose, Xylose, Maltose, Sucrose, Melibiose, Gentiobiose, Stachyose, Pectin, Inosine, Mannitol, Sorbitol, Arabitol, Myo-inositol, Glycerol, Esculin, Gelatin, β-methyl-d-glucoside, d-salicin, N-acetyl neuraminic acid, Glucuronamide, Acetic acid, Propionic acid, Sodium butyrate, Mucic acid, Bromo-succinic acid, α-hydroxybutyric acid, α-ketobutyric acid, l-lactic acid, l-malic acid, l-alanine. Cells grew in the presence of lithium chloride, potassium tellurite, sodium bromate, Tween 40, nalidixic acid and aztreonam. Cells were positive for Alkaline phosphatase, Esterase (C4), Esterase lipase (C8), Leucine arylamidase, Trypsin, α-Chymotrypsin, Acid phosphatase, β-Glucuronidase, β-Galactosidase, α-Glucosidase, Arginine arylamidase, Pyrazinamidase, Pyrrolidonyl arylamidase and β-N-acetylglucosaminidase.

The type strain, OSA5T (=CCM 9469T=CCUG 78312T=CECT 31229T=DSM 119679T), was isolated from ostrich faecal material collected from a private farm near Catoosa, Oklahoma (34.486589,–98.226482). The type strain’s DNA G+C content is 67.8 mol%. The GenBank accession numbers of the 16S rRNA gene and whole genome are PV166456.1 and GCA_048595755.1, respectively.

Description of Lacrimispora struthionigena sp. nov.

Lacrimispora struthionigena (stru.thi.o.ni’ge.na. L. masc. n, struthio, an ostrich; N.L. masc. adj. suff. -genus, born from (from L. v. gigno, to produce, give birth to, beget); N.L. fem. adj. struthionigena, born of an ostrich)

Cells are Gram-stain-positive, obligately anaerobic, spore-forming, motile rods 3.5 x× 0.5 µm, and occur in singles. Colonies are white, circular and convex on TSAB after 48 h at 37 °C. Growth occurs at 25–45 °C (optimum 37 °C). The salinity range for growth is 0.5–2.0 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum 0.5%), and the pH range for growth is pH 6.0–8.0 (optimum pH 7.0). Growth occurred with 2′-Deoxy Adenosine, Lactose, d-l-Lactic Acid, d-Malic Acid, d-Mannitol, d-Melezitose, d-Melibiose, d-Trehalose, Glycyl-l-Glutamine, Glycyl-l-Proline, Inosine, Lactulose, l-Lactic Acid, l-Malic Acid, l-Methionine, l-Rhamnose, l-Valine, l-Valine plus l-Aspartic Acid, Maltotriose, myo-Inositol, Pyruvic Acid, Pyruvic Acid Methyl Ester, Stachyose, Succinic Acid Mono-Methyl Ester, Sucrose, Thymidine, Thymidine-5′-Monophosphate, Uridine and Uridine-5′-Monophosphate for growth. Cells were positive for esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), acid phosphatase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase and β-glucosidase.

The type strain, and AGF001T (=CCM 9471T=CCUG 78314T=CECT 31227T=DSM 119664T), was isolated from ostrich faecal material collected from a private farm near Catoosa, Oklahoma (34.486589,–98.226482). The type strain’s DNA G+C content is 41.6 mol%. The GenBank accession numbers of the 16S rRNA gene and whole genome are PV166457.2 and GCA_048627165.1, respectively.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material 1.
ijsem-76-07209-s001.pdf (973.1KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.007209

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Aharon Oren (Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel) for helping coin and check the etymology of the proposed names. The authors would also like to thank the Boren Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital for providing rumen fluid.

Abbreviations

ANI

average nucleotide identity

CCM

Czech Collection of Microorganisms

CCUG

Culture Collection University of Gothenburg

CECT

Spanish Type Culture Collection

dDDH

digital DNA–DNA hybridization

DSMZ

German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures

GH

glycoside hydrolase

GTDB

Genome Taxonomy Database

OGRI

overall genomic-based relatedness indices

RF

rumen fluid

TSA

tryptic soy agar

TSB

tryptic soy broth

Footnotes

Funding: This work has been supported by NSF grant 2016423 to N.H.Y. and M.S.E. and NIH grant P20GM152333 to M.S.E. Scanning electron microscopy and confocal microscopy were carried out at the Oklahoma State University Electron Microscopy Core Facility, which received funds for purchasing the equipment from the NSF MRI award number 1919805.

Ethical statement: This article does not contain any studies with humans or animals performed by any of the authors.

Contributor Information

Samuel L. Miller, Email: sammiller@okstate.edu.

R. Ty Young, Email: ty.young12@okstate.edu.

Md. Mehedi Hasan, Email: mehedi.hasan10@okstate.edu.

Julia M. Vinzelj, Email: julia.vinzelj@okstate.edu.

Noha H. Youssef, Email: Noha@Okstate.edu.

Mostafa S. Elshahed, Email: mostafa@okstate.edu.

References

  • 1.Swart D, Mackie RI, Hayes JP. Fermentative digestion in the ostrich (Struthio camelus var. domesticus), a large avian species that utilizes cellulose1. South Afr J Anim Sci. 1993;23:127–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clench MH, Mathias JR. The avian cecum: a review. Wilson Bull. 1995;107:93–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Williams JB, Siegfried WR, Milton SJ, Adams NJ, Dean WRJ, et al. Field metabolism, water requirements, and foraging behavior of wild ostriches in the Namib. Ecology. 1993;74:390–404. doi: 10.2307/1939301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fritz J, Hammer S, Hebel C, Arif A, Michalke B, et al. Retention of solutes and different-sized particles in the digestive tract of the ostrich (Struthio camelus massaicus), and a comparison with mammals and reptiles. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2012;163:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.05.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ventorino V, Aliberti A, Faraco V, Robertiello A, Giacobbe S, et al. Exploring the microbiota dynamics related to vegetable biomasses degradation and study of lignocellulose-degrading bacteria for industrial biotechnological application. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8161. doi: 10.1038/srep08161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McCarthy AJ. Lignocellulose-degrading actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1987;46:145–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02456.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stevens CE, Hume ID. Contributions of microbes in vertebrate gastrointestinal tract to production and conservation of nutrients. Physiol Rev. 1998;78:393–427. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1998.78.2.393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. 2016;7:189–200. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1134082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Martin-Gallausiaux C, Marinelli L, Blottière HM, Larraufie P, Lapaque N. SCFA: mechanisms and functional importance in the gut. Proc Nutr Soc. 2021;80:37–49. doi: 10.1017/S0029665120006916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nagpal R, Wang S, Solberg Woods LC, Seshie O, Chung ST, et al. Comparative microbiome signatures and short-chain fatty acids in mouse, rat, non-human primate, and human feces. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2897. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Videvall E, Song SJ, Bensch HM, Strandh M, Engelbrecht A, et al. Major shifts in gut microbiota during development and its relationship to growth in ostriches. Mol Ecol. 2019;28:2653–2667. doi: 10.1111/mec.15087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Videvall E, Song SJ, Bensch HM, Strandh M, Engelbrecht A, et al. Early-life gut dysbiosis linked to juvenile mortality in ostriches. Microbiome. 2020;8:147. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00925-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vinzelj J, Nash K, Jones AL, Young RT, Meili CH, et al. Anaerobic gut fungal community in ostriches (Struthio camelus) ISME Commun . 2025;5:ycaf144. doi: 10.1093/ismeco/ycaf144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tamura T, Takeuchi M, Yokota A. Luteococcus japonicus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new gram-positive coccus with LL-diaminopimelic acid in the cell wall. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994;44:348–356. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-2-348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fan X, Zhang Z, Li Z, Zhang X-H. Luteococcus sediminum sp. nov., isolated from deep subseafloor sediment of the South Pacific Gyre. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:2522–2527. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.058529-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Collins MD, Hutson RA, Nikolaitchouk N, Nyberg A, Falsen E. Luteococcus sanguinis sp. nov., isolated from human blood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53:1889–1891. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02236-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Collins MD, Lawson PA, Nikolaitchouk N, Falsen E. Luteococcus peritonei sp. nov., isolated from the human peritoneum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:179–181. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-1-179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gilroy R, Ravi A, Getino M, Pursley I, Horton DL, et al. Extensive microbial diversity within the chicken gut microbiome revealed by metagenomics and culture. PeerJ. 9:e10941. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10941. n.d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Haas KN, Blanchard JL. Reclassification of the Clostridium clostridioforme and Clostridium sphenoides clades as Enterocloster gen. nov. and Lacrimispora gen. nov., including reclassification of 15 taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:23–34. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van Gylswyk NO, Van Der Toorn J. Clostridium aerotolerans sp. nov., a xylanolytic bacterium from corn stover and from the rumina of sheep fed corn stover. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1987;37:102–105. doi: 10.1099/00207713-37-2-102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Calkins S, Elledge NC, Hanafy RA, Elshahed MS, Youssef N. A fast and reliable procedure for spore collection from anaerobic fungi: Application for RNA uptake and long-term storage of isolates. Journal of microbiological methods. 2016;127:206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;74:5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D67–72. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic acids research. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17:368–376. doi: 10.1007/BF01734359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular biology and evolution. 1993;10:512–526. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kumar S, Stecher G, Suleski M, Sanderford M, Sharma S, et al. MEGA12: molecular evolutionary genetic analysis version 12 for adaptive and green computing. Mol Biol Evol. 2024;41:msae263. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:346–351. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.059774-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Miller SL, Youssef NH, Elshahed MS. Genome-based reclassification of Parabacteroides chartae as a later heterotypic synonym of Macellibacteroides fermentans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2025;75 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, et al. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:1079–1086. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0501-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:4453–4455. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:W78–W82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024;74:006300. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:1281–1286. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D801–D807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yin Y, Mao X, Yang J, Chen X, Mao F, et al. dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W445–51. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zheng J, Ge Q, Yan Y, Zhang X, Huang L, et al. dbCAN3: automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:W115–W121. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL, et al. KBase: The United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:566–569. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Aydin F, Karakaya E, Kayman T, Abay S, Saticioglu IB. Helicobacter turcicus sp. nov., a catalase-negative new member of the Helicobacter genus, isolated from Anatolian ground squirrel (Spermophilus xanthoprymnus) in Turkey. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72:5338. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liou J-C, Balkwill DL, Drake GR, Tanner RS. Clostridium carboxidivorans sp. nov., a solvent-producing Clostridium isolated from an agricultural settling lagoon, and reclassification of the acetogen Clostridium scatologenes strain SL1 as Clostridium drakei sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:2085–2091. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63482-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rogers GM, Baecker AAW. Clostridium xylanolyticum sp. nov., an anaerobic xylanolytic bacterium from decayed pinus patula wood chips. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1991;41:140143. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Murray WD, Khan AW, van den BERG L. Clostridium saccharolyticum sp. nov., a saccharolytic species from sewage sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1982;32:132–135. doi: 10.1099/00207713-32-1-132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1.
ijsem-76-07209-s001.pdf (973.1KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.007209

Data Availability Statement

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains OSA5T and AGF001T are PV166456.1 and PV166457.1. The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the whole-genome sequences of strains OSA5T and AGF001T are GCA_048595755.1 and GCA_048627165.1. The type strain OSA5T has been deposited in the Czech Collection of Microorganisms (accession number: CCM 9469T), the Culture Collection University of Gothenburg (accession number: CCUG 78312T), the Spanish Type Culture Collection (accession number: CECT 31229T) and the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (accession number: DSMZ 119679T). The type strain AGF001T has been deposited in the Czech Collection of Microorganisms (accession number: CCM 9472T), the Culture Collection University of Gothenburg (accession number: CCUG 78314T), the Spanish Type Culture Collection (accession number: CECT 31227T) and the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (accession number: DSMZ 119664T)


Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES