Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1982 Apr;38(1):53–61. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84530-X

On the Origin and the Signal-Shaping Mechanism of the Fast Photosignal in the Vertebrate Retina

P Hochstrate, M Lindau, H Rüppel
PMCID: PMC1328813  PMID: 7200379

Abstract

Fast photosignals (FPS) with R1 and R2 components were measured in retinas of cattle, rat, and frog within a temperature range of 0° to 60°C. Except for temperatures near 0°C the signal rise of the R1 component was determined by the duration of the exciting flash. The kinetics of the R2 component and the meta transition of rhodopsin in the cattle and rat retina were compared. For the analysis of the FPS it is presupposed that the signal is produced by light-induced charges on the outer segment envelope membrane that spread onto the whole plasma membrane of the photoreceptor cell. To a good approximation, this mechanism can be described by a model circuit with two distinct capacitors. In this model, the charging capacitance of the pigmented outer segment envelope membrane and the capacitance of the receptor's nonpigmented plasma membrane are connected via the extra- and intracellular electrolyte resistances. The active charging is explained by two independent processes, both with exponential rise (R1 and R2), that are due to charge displacements within the pigmented envelope membrane. The time constant τ2 of the R2 membrane charging process shows a strong temperature dependence that of the charge redistribution, τr, a weak one. In frog and cattle retinas the active charging is much slower within a large temperature range than the passive charge redistribution. From the two-capacitor model it follows for τr « τ2 that the rise of the R2 component is determined by τr, whereas the decay is given by τ2. For the rat retina, however, τ2 approaches τr at physiological temperatures and becomes <τr above 45°C. In this temperature range where τ2 ≈ τr, both processes affect rise and decay of the photosignal. The absolute values of τr are in good accordance with the known electric parameters of the photoreceptors. At least in the cattle retina, the time constant τ2 is identical with that of the slow component of the meta II formation. The strong temperature dependence of the meta transition time gives rise to the marked decrease of the R2 amplitude with falling temperature. As the R1 rise could not be fully time resolved the signal analysis does not yield the time constant τ1 of the R1 generating process. It could be established, however, within the whole temperature range that the decay of the R1 component is determined by τr. Using an extended model that allows for membrane leakage, we show that in normal ringer solution the membrane time constant does not influence the signal time-course and amplitude.

Full text

PDF
53

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cone R. A. Early receptor potential: photoreversible charge displacement in rhodopsin. Science. 1967 Mar 3;155(3766):1128–1131. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3766.1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ebrey T. G. The thermal decay of the intermediates of rhodopsin in situ. Vision Res. 1968 Aug;8(8):965–982. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90071-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldstein E. B. Visual pigments and the early receptor potential of the isolated frog retina. Vision Res. 1968 Aug;8(8):953–963. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90070-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Govardovskii V. I. The sites of generation of early and late receptor potentials in rods. Vision Res. 1975 Aug-Sep;15:973–980. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(75)90239-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hagins W. A., Penn R. D., Yoshikami S. Dark current and photocurrent in retinal rods. Biophys J. 1970 May;10(5):380–412. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(70)86308-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hagins W. A., Rüppel H. Fast photoelectric effects and the properties of vertebrate photoreceptors as electric cables. Fed Proc. 1971 Jan-Feb;30(1):64–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hodgkin A. L., Obryan P. M. Internal recording of the early receptor potential in turtle cones. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;267(3):737–766. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoffmann W., Siebert F., Hofmann K. P., Kreutz W. Two distinct rhodopsin molecules within the disc membrane of vertebrate rod outer segments. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Sep 7;503(3):450–461. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(78)90144-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaupp U. B., Schnetkamp P. P., Junge W. Metarhodopsin I/metarhodopsin II transition triggers light-induced change in calcium binding at rod disk membranes. Nature. 1980 Aug 7;286(5773):638–640. doi: 10.1038/286638a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Murakami M., Pak W. L. Intracellularly recorded early receptor potential of the vertebrate photoreceptors. Vision Res. 1970 Oct;10(10):965–975. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(70)90074-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pak W. L. Some properties of the early electrical response in the vertebrate retina. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1965;30:493–499. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Spalink J. D., Stieve H. Direct correlation between the R2 component of the early receptor potential and the formation of metarhodopsin II in the excised bovine retina. Biophys Struct Mech. 1980;6(2):171–174. doi: 10.1007/BF00535753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stewart J. G., Baker B. N., Williams T. P. Evidence for conformeric states of rhodopsin. Biophys Struct Mech. 1977 Apr 21;3(1):19–29. doi: 10.1007/BF00536450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Taylor J. W. Cone and possible rod components of the fast photovoltage in the frog eye: a new method of measuring cone regeneration rates in vivo. Vision Res. 1969 Apr;9(4):443–452. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(69)90133-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Trissl H. W. Light-induced conformational changes in cattle rhodopsin as probed by measurements of the interface potential. Photochem Photobiol. 1979 Mar;29(3):579–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1979.tb07093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES