Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2026 May 7;125(11):2755–2773. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2026.04.037

Active deformation in the basal organ of Corti in gerbil

Kaitlyn H Wong 1, C Elliott Strimbu 2, Elizabeth S Olson 1,2,∗
PMCID: PMC13288669  NIHMSID: NIHMS2182427  PMID: 42104614

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography has allowed in vivo recording of sound-induced vibrations of different regions within the organ of Corti complex (OCC), including the basilar membrane (BM), outer hair cell/Deiters cell (OHC/DC) region, and reticular lamina (RL). In the hook region of the gerbil cochlea, where measurements can be made with a predominantly transverse optical axis, the three regions have different and characteristic motion responses: The OHC/DC region has greater motions than the other two regions at frequencies below the best frequency (sub-BF); the RL region typically has the greatest BF peak and smallest sub-BF motion. The phase of the OHC/DC-region motion increasingly lags BM motion phase as frequency increases; the RL-region motion phase leads BM, but with a relatively small value. All three regions are compressively nonlinear in the BF peak, but only the OHC/DC region shows sub-BF compressive nonlinearity. Here, we describe the strains that arise when the motion transitions between these regions. Large strains (deformations) were observed in the OHC body close to the RL. A region of large strain can be as short as a single 2.7-μm measurement pixel, or it can extend over several pixels, with extensive strains appearing more often at 70 than at 50 dB sound pressure level. Beyond this RL region of large strain, over a distance that can exceed 20 μm, the OHC/DC region displayed nearly spatially unvarying motion; this region vibrated as a relatively rigid body. And beyond this, at sub-BF frequencies, another region of high strain was present, indicating stretching/compressing or bowing/tilting of the DC microtubular stalk.

Keywords: outer hair cell, reticular lamina, cochlear amplifier, OCT, vibrometry, imaging

Significance

The sensory tissue of the cochlea responds actively to a sound stimulus: cell-based forces amplify and enhance the vibration of the sensory tissue. Measurements employing optical coherence tomography have identified major vibration patterns along a sensory-tissue-spanning line that includes the active outer hair cells (OHCs). The motion is nonuniform, and strains exist as vibration morphs from one region to the next. The largest strains were close to the apical, stereociliary side of the OHC, while the basal-OHC/Deiters cell region moved almost as a rigid body. The base of the Deiters cell, tethering OHCs to the basilar membrane, underwent substantial strain. Strain patterns were sound level dependent, echoing the nonlinearity of cochlear responses. These findings guide and constrain models of cochlear amplification.

Introduction

In the cochlea, a sound is represented in the pattern of vibration along the long, narrow strip of sensory tissue, the organ of Corti complex (OCC, which refers to cells of the organ of Corti and the acellular basilar membrane [BM] and tectorial membrane [TM] that bind it). To first order, the sound is sorted by frequency, with high frequencies represented in the cochlear base and low frequencies in the cochlear apex. In gerbil, the sensory tissue is ∼11 mm long, with width and thickness about 200 μm × 100 μm, but these vary longitudinally to produce the cochlea’s place-frequency map.1 Figure 1 shows a labeled schematic and a labeled brightness scan (B-scan) of a transverse/radial cross section of the OCC. The BM is a major structural element of the OCC, composed of radial collagen fibers and a ground substance.2 The TM is a gel-like, collagenous structure containing many specialized proteins.3,4 The inner and outer pillar cells (PCs) are microtubule-based structural cells that connect the BM to the apex of the OC, the reticular lamina (RL).5,6 OHCs are supported by Deiters cells (DCs), which cup the OHCs at their base; this region, containing the nuclei of both cells, is referred to as the OHC/DC region. The DCs contain microtubular structures that extend from the DC feet at the BM to form the DC cup and then extend further as the phalangeal processes, which run from the DC cup to the RL with a transverse/longitudinal slant.7 The RL comprises the apical surfaces of the PCs, the actin-rich termination of DC phalangeal processes, and the cuticular plates of the OHCs and inner hair cells.5 The cuticular plates are composed of a dense matrix of F-actin, one to a few micrometers in thickness. HC stereocilia are anchored into the cuticular plate by rootlets that penetrate deeply into the plate.8,9,10 In this paper, we describe the dynamic strains (strains produced due to the vibratory response to sound) that exist along a line that includes the OHCs due to the motion response to sound stimulation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Anatomy of the organ of Corti complex as visualized with OCT. (A) Cartoon diagram of a transverse-radial cross section of the OCC. The diagram includes anatomical axes, longitudinal, radial, and transverse (l, r, t). (B) OCT B-scan of G1047. (C) B-scan from (B) with the relevant regions from (A) approximately delineated. Scale bar represents 50 μm. The vertical axis is the optical z axis and is not generally aligned with the transverse anatomical axis, although it is shown here that way for simplicity. Because of this B-scan orientation, the radial-transverse cross section shown in OCT-based experiments is typically drawn “upside-down” (as it is here), from its historic orientation, and thus describing the basal and apical ends of the cells can seem upside-down. The base of the PCs and DCs is at the BM, the base of the OHC is held in the DC cup, and the apical end of the PCs, HCs, and DCs’ phalangeal processes is at the RL. In reality, the phalangeal processes slant transverse/longitudinal (which could not be indicated in this transverse/radial view, so here, they are shown running purely transverse); Figure 16 shows the slant.

In the classic description of the cochlear response to sound stimulation, transverse motion of the OCC creates shearing radial motion between the RL and TM, causing HC stereocilia to pivot back and forth, modulating the open probability of the mechanoelectrical transduction (MET) channels at the stereocilia tips, and thus the flow of cations through the HCs. This modulates the transmembrane voltage, and in OHCs, it activates a piezoelectric protein, prestin, that causes the OHCs to contract and expand and/or exert contracting/expanding forces.11,12,13,14 This OHC action, termed electromotility, is thought to be the fundamental process enhancing the motion of the OCC in a place- and frequency-dependent manner, which is known as cochlear amplification. Prestin is distributed throughout the OHC basolateral membrane, but not at the cuticular plate.10,15 The basal pole contains prestin at a reduced density compared with the lateral wall, and charge movement associated with electromotility was measured as greatest at the center of the OHC’s longitudinal extent, with a gradual tapering off toward the apical and basal ends.16 In measurements where the OHC was in a microchamber with one end depolarized and the other hyperpolarized by a voltage applied between the chamber and the bath, one side contracted and the other lengthened.17 Stimulating an OHC with a patch electrode produced a longitudinal strain of up to 1% for 20 mV of quasi-DC stimulation,18 while AC stimulation with a microchamber produced motions of ∼1 nm/mV for OHCs of length ∼50 μm, corresponding to strains of ∼2 × 10−5/mV.17,19 A primary goal of the present paper was to observe the quantitative and qualitative character of in vivo sound-induced strains in the OCC, particularly the OHC region.

In past decades, in vivo measurements of sound-evoked motion in the cochlear base were taken solely at the BM because optical techniques could not penetrate within the sensory tissue. BM motion was tuned at the local best frequency (BF) and was compressively nonlinear with input sound pressure level (SPL). Nonlinearity was limited to frequencies near the BF, serving to greatly enhance the BF peak at low-moderate SPL. This observation of tuned amplification was interesting with respect to OHC electromotility, because electromotility as measured in isolated OHCs was broadband.19 With the advent of optical coherence tomography (OCT) (and a related method developed by T. Ren20), sound-evoked motions of intra-OCC structures became measurable. One of the first important new findings was that in the OHC region, amplification was broadband, extending sub-BF.20,21 These boosted, nonlinear sub-BF responses were in keeping with the broadband action of electromotility and could be seen as in vivo evidence of electromotility.

OCT builds an image by measuring the reflectivity in a line along the optical axis. To form a two-dimensional (2D) B-scan image, the optical axis is swept perpendicular to the axial scan’s (A-scan) optical axis, and to form a familiar transverse-radial B-scan image (Figure 1B), the optical axis should be primarily transverse and the scanning radial. Measurements in the hook region of the gerbil cochlea (∼45 kHz BF) made with a primarily transverse view produced a familiar B-scan image, in which the RL region and faint TM could be identified.22,23,24 OCT can also measure vibrations along the direction of the optical axis. These measurements revealed three basic forms of regional motion: (1) BM displacement peaked and was compressively nonlinear at frequencies around the local BF. (2) The OHC/DC region peaked at the local BF at low/moderate SPL, was low pass at moderate/high SPL, and showed wideband compressive nonlinearity. An increasing phase lag with frequency relative to (re:) BM motion accumulated ∼0.75 cycle at frequencies close to the BF. (3) RL motion peaked and was compressively nonlinear at frequencies around the local BF. The peak displacement was larger at the RL than at the BM or OHC/DC region. Sub-BF, RL motion could be smaller than the motion at the BM and display expansive nonlinearity at the highest SPL measured (80 dB). At the RL, the phase typically led the BM by less than 0.25 cycle throughout the frequency range of measurement.

In this contribution, we explore the transitions between the BM, OHC/DC, and RL regions by displaying tuning curves and 1D strain maps from many points within an A-scan that spans the regions. The optical axis was primarily transverse with a smaller negative (basal-pointing) longitudinal component. To give a brief preview of findings, close to and within the RL region and extending into the OHC body, strains could be large due to the transition between RL-like and OHC-like motion that occurred over just one or two imaging pixels (2.7 μm/pixel). Close to the RL, at frequencies around the BF peak, the strain was in phase with RL displacement. About 15 μm from the RL surface of the OHC region, over an A-scan expanse that could exceed 30 μm, a region of nearly uniform, sub-BF amplified motion was observed. Considering previous studies,25,26 this was likely the OHC/DC region, swinging approximately perpendicular to the longitudinally slanting phalangeal processes.

Materials and methods

Animal preparation

Adult Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) of both sexes were used. The experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Columbia University. The gerbils were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injections of ketamine (40 mg/kg) and sodium pentobarbital (40 mg/kg). The gerbils were given the analgesic buprenorphine (0.2 mg/kg) at the start of the surgery and then between 6 and 8 h after the surgery. Lidocaine (2%) was administered subcutaneously at the start of the surgery as a local anesthetic. To maintain an even plane of anesthesia, supplemental doses of pentobarbital were administered throughout the experiment. A tracheotomy was performed to facilitate breathing, and oxygen was sometimes flowed over the tracheotomy. Temperature was maintained with a temperature-controlled warming blanket supplemented with warming lamps and disposable hand warmers. The head was attached to a two-dimensional (2D) goniometer using dental cement to allow for small adjustments to the head position. The pinna, most of the cartilaginous ear canal (EC), and tissue covering the tympanic bulla were removed. A drop of 38% phosphoric acid gel (Pulpdent, Waterford MA) was placed on the bulla for ∼5 min to weaken the bone, and the bulla was gently opened using forceps to view the round window (RW). The cochlear condition was assessed and monitored using 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in response to tones f1 and f2 with a ratio of f2/f1 = 1.2. The tones were presented at 50 and 70 dB SPL. The DPOAE responses were robust and indicative of healthy cochleae (Figure S1 in supplemental information). Once the experiment concluded, the gerbils were euthanized with pentobarbital.

Acoustic stimulation and recording

Acoustic stimuli were delivered closed field to the EC using a Radio Shack dynamic speaker. A Sokolich ultrasonic microphone was placed ∼1 mm away from the tympanic membrane and coupled to the speaker tube to measure DPOAEs and EC pressures. Multitone stimuli were generated by a Tucker Davis Technologies System 3, which operated at a 130-kHz sampling rate (130,208.33 Hz). The multitone stimuli used were zwuis tone complexes, comprising 35 approximately equally spaced frequencies chosen so that no harmonics or distortion products overlap with a primary frequency up to the third order.27,28 The zwuis stimuli were delivered for 1 s. Measurements were made at SPLs ranging from 40 to 80 dB SPL (for each individual tone in the complex) in 10-dB steps.

For OCT, a Thorlabs Telesto 320 spectral domain OCT system with a center wavelength of 1,300 nm and a 5X LSM03 objective lens was used to perform imaging and vibrometry. According to the manufacturer, the system has axial and lateral resolutions in water of ∼4 and 10 μm, respectively. The axial resolution is set by the light source bandwidth and the lateral resolution by the objective lens. The imaging acquisition process starts with a 1D reflectivity map (the A-scan noted above) along the depth of the preparation, the optical z axis. Adjacent pixels in an A-scan are ∼2.7 μm apart. The OCT system uses scanning mirrors to sweep the optical beam along the x or y axis, producing a 2D reflectivity image, the B-scan. If the OCT system sweeps the optical beam in the third orthogonal direction, it yields a 3D volumetric image.

At the beginning of each experiment, the ThorImage program was used to orient the preparation and identify the regions of interest within the OCC. All measurements were made through the RW to obtain a view of the OCC that was primarily transverse in the hook region, where the BF is ∼45 kHz. A series of A-scans recorded at 130 kHz at the same location with concurrent acoustic stimulation produces a motion scan (M-scan), which simultaneously captures sub-pixel displacements of structures along the A-scan. An objective of the current study was to find spatial displacement variations, and a finely spaced data set was desired. Along an A-scan, all of the pixels within the OCC were selected for vibration analysis. The vibrometry data of each pixel were deemed significant if the amplitude at the stimulus frequency was above the noise floor by at least 2.5 times the standard deviation of the noise. The noise floor was determined from a set of adjacent points in the time-frequency Fourier transform. In G986 from an earlier period of experiments, a subset of A-scan pixels was chosen to analyze for displacement. This resulted in a relatively sparse, but still useful, data set for this study. B-scans were acquired before and after each vibrometry measurement and evaluated to ensure that the position of the preparation had not shifted significantly during the recording. Custom C++ software developed using the Thorlabs Spectral Radar software development kit was used for data collection and initial processing of vibrometry data. Further analysis and post-processing were performed in MATLAB. A 3D volumetric image and the planar approximation algorithm29 were used to determine the anatomical longitudinal, radial, and transverse (l,r,t) components of the optical axis for each experiment; the results are included in the figure captions. (The (l,r,t) components form a unit vector; they add in quadrature to 1 [or close to 1 due to rounding]. For example, l,r,t values of −0.6, 0.1, 0.8 would indicate that the measured motion was the sum of −0.6 times the longitudinal component of motion, 0.1 times the radial component of motion, and 0.8 times the transverse component of motion.)

Calculations

Equation 1 was used to calculate strain (ε), where udeep and ushallow are the displacements measured at the deeper and shallower pixels, respectively. (Figure 1B clarifies the depth axis.) udeep-ushallow is a complex difference, and Δx is the distance between the centers of the deeper and the shallower pixels, as measured in the B-scan. Results taken with 70- and 50-dB SPL are shown. 70-dB SPL results are shown because that is the lowest SPL for which data were often available over the full frequency range; results at 50-dB SPL are shown mainly in the BF peak.

ε=udeep−ushallowΔx (1)

We present the frequency responses in three different color-coded regions (BM, OHC/DC, and RL). To defend the separation between groups, the degree of similarity between adjacent response curves was quantified using the “sim” calculation in Equation 2, described below. The sim calculation was performed on the 70-dB data so the full frequency range could be used in the calculation.

sim=1−(sumdiffsumorig) (2)

Sumdiff and sumorig are found as follows: sumdiff was found as the magnitude of the frequency-by-frequency complex difference between the two curves, which were then summed across frequency. Sumorig was found as the magnitude values of each of the two original curves summed across frequency, and these two values were averaged. If sim was greater than 0.7, by this metric, the two curves were greater than 70% similar and were considered to be within the same region (OHC/DC, RL, or BM) and were color-coded similarly—green, orange, or blue, respectively. If sim was less than 0.7, the two adjacent curves were considered to be in different groups. The fraction (sumdiff/sumorig) could be greater than 1 and sim would be negative; in those cases, the adjacent curves were clearly in different regional groups. Using sim <0.7 to separate regions was relaxed for a few curves; these are identified with an asterisk in Table S1, which is located in the supplemental information. Transitional curves, with sim slightly less than 0.7, are plotted with dashed lines. To our knowledge the “sim” metric is not a standard metric. It is based on the calculation for finding the area between two data sets (the sumdiff term). Dividing by the sumorig term makes the output dimensionless. The sim metric was useful for color-coding the responses into different regions for illustration. (The selection of the 0.7 cutoff was subjective; it did a reasonable job of grouping the 70-dB SPL frequency responses as one would sort them by eye. The metric-based color-coding was only used in the frequency response curves of displacement; it played no role in the heat maps of displacement and strain.)

We report from four gerbil cochleae, with a fifth in supplemental information. These preparations are used because responses were out of the noise at many pixels along an A-scan. The RL, BM, and OHC/DC-region responses observed here are consistent with those in previous studies from the gerbil hook region.22,23,24 What is new here is the observation and analysis of transitions between regions. Animal numbers are for laboratory record-keeping purposes.

Results

Introductory observations

Figure 2 shows displacements from the BM, RL region, and OHC/DC region from G1047. The OHC/DC-region and RL-region responses are plotted along with the BM responses to facilitate comparisons. The OHC/DC region (Figures 2C, 2E, and 2G) initially is in phase with the BM at the lowest measured frequencies and then lags the BM with a phase delay that increases with increasing frequency (Figure 2G). At 80 dB SPL, the phase of the OHC/DC region often shifts up to become in phase with the BM at higher frequencies, and a notch appears in the response magnitude, seen in Figures 2C and 2E at ∼37 kHz. At ∼46 kHz, the phase shift and notch are even seen at 70 dB SPL. This behavior has been attributed to cancellation between BM and internal OHC motion and subsequent dominance of BM motion.22 The OHC/DC-region gain displays sub-BF nonlinearity and boosting (increased responses relative to the BM responses). Sub-BF, the OHC/DC region has a larger magnitude response than the BM at all SPLs (Figure 2E). In the BF peak, at 50 dB SPL, the OHC/DC region has a larger amplitude than the BM, but at higher SPLs, the OHC/DC region has a low-pass character without a notable peak. The RL region (Figures 2D, 2F, 2H, and 2F) has the highest BF responses, higher than those at the BM at all SPLs. Sub-BF, the RL responses are below BM responses. The RL phase leads the BM phase slightly throughout the frequency range. As has been observed in previous studies,23,24 at frequencies below ∼20 kHz, the RL phase-lead re: BM was not present in all preparations; in phase and slightly lagging phase were sometimes observed sub-BF and will be discussed below (Figure 15).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Characteristic frequency responses of the different OCC regions. (A and B) BM (blue), (C) OHC/DC-region (green), and (D) RL-region (orange) displacement. (E and F) BM (blue), OHC/DC-region (green), and RL-region (orange) gain (displacement re: EC pressure [ECP]). The OHC/DC-region and RL-region gain is reported from 40 to 80 dB SPL, and the BM gain is reported from 50 to 80 dB SPL. (To enhance contrast in this figure, SPL-based color-coding for the OHC/DC region is bright for high SPL and dark for low SPL.) (G and H) BM, OHC/DC-region, and RL-region phase re: ECP. Gerbil 1047 Run 5. BF = 45 kHz. Associated B-scan is in Figure 3.

Figure 15.

Figure 15

Comparison of 70-dB SPL experimental and model-predicted frequency responses with various α values. (A and B) Measured BM (pixel 58, blue), OHC/DC-region (pixel 67, green), and RL-region (pixel 77, orange) displacement and phase from G1047 (Figure 3) along with model predictions of intra-RL motion (dotted pink) when (A) α = 0.15 and (B) α = 0.45. (C and D) Experimental results from G1041 (C) (also shown in Figures 11A and 11B) and G1047 (D) (also shown in Figures 4A and 4B) to compare to the model-predicted results shown in (A) and (B).

It is apparent from the regional displacements in Figure 2 that significant strains will exist in the transitions between the RL, OHC/DC, and BM regions of the OCC. In the remaining figures, we present displacement and strain results from four preparations, G1047, G1025, G1041, and G986 (and G1049 in supplemental information). Table S1 contains strain values at BF and BF/2. We begin with detailed sets of results from preparations G1047 and G1025.

The methods section described the l,r,t values that provide the longitudinal, radial, and transverse components of the optical axis. For G1047, the l,r,t values were ∼-0.62, −0.17, and 0.77, and those were typical for the basal region observed in this study. The radial component is relatively small, and transverse value is dominant, but there is a large enough longitudinal value so that, along one A-scan, different transverse/radial cross sections will be probed at the BM, OHC/DC, and RL regions. Based on these l,t values, the depth-distance spanning the OCC (∼90 μm, Figure 3I), and trigonometry, the longitudinal distance between the BM surface and RL surface measured in a single A-scan measurement would be ∼54 μm. The longitudinal distance between the BM surface and the OHC/DC region in a single A-scan would be about half that, 27 μm. The deeper, RL and OHC/DC, points were more basal than the BM points, so the measured traveling wave phase at these points would be biased to a phase lead relative to BM. Therefore, to find the phase at the OHC/DC and RL region in the same transverse section as the BM, a lag (a negative phase) must be added to the measured phase. A quantitative analysis of this problem was done in Frost et al.,29 and we can use those results to quantify the predicted correction here. In that paper, l,t values were ∼0.8, 0.6, signifying that the measurements were dominantly longitudinal, and in that case, the deeper points were more apical than the BM points. The depth distance from the BM to the OHC/DC region was ∼58 μm, and using trigonometry, the longitudinal distance between the BM surface and OHC/DC would be ∼46 μm. The phase needed to correct for the longitudinal shift was found to be ∼0° at low frequencies, increasing to about +75° at the BF; the corrected phase curve tilted up from the original phase curve (see Figure 6D of Frost et al.29). In the present data sets, the corrected phase curves of RL and OHC/DC regions will tilt down, starting at 0 at low frequencies. Following from the Frost results and the longitudinal distances noted above (in the current set, 54 μm at the RL, 27 μm at the OHC/DC, and in Frost 46 μm at the OHC/DC) for the data of Figure 2 at BF, the phase correction would have a value of about −80° at the RL and about −40° that at the OHC/DC. Considering Figures 2D and 2H, this correction would bring the RL phase values more in line with BM phase values at frequencies close to BF. This correction would make the OHC/DC phase lag the BM slightly more than it does in the uncorrected phases. These corrections can be kept in mind but are not central to the findings emphasized in this work.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Frequency responses from eight locations along a single A-scan. (A–H) Gain responses are color-coded as follows: BM (blue), OHC-region (green), intra-RL-region (dashed orange), and RL-region (orange). The respective phase responses re: ECP are plotted below the gains. (I) B-scan with BM, OHC-region, intra-RL-region, and RL-region locations of measurements in (A)–(H) are denoted with colored markers. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (J) A-scan from 60-dB response (A-scans varied slightly during the course of a several-SPL run, so we specify the SPL of the example A-scan). Optical axis components were (l, r, t) = (−0.62, −0.17, 0.77). Gerbil 1047 Run 5. BF = 45 kHz.

G1047

Figure 3 shows a set of tuning curves from G1047, with BF ∼45 kHz. The l,r,t values were −0.62, −0.17, and 0.77, so vertical distances in the B-scan are elongated from what they would be with a purely transverse view by a factor of ∼1.3 (figured using trigonometry as 1/[cos(arctan(0.62/0.77))], with the smaller radial component neglected in the calculation.) Figure 3A and B (pixels 49 and 58) are in the BM region, which also includes pixels 47 and 48 (consulting Table S1 and/or Figure 5, which includes additional pixels). This is a 32-μm extent (figured as 11 pixels x 2.7 μm/pixel), corresponding to a 25-μm transverse extent (by dividing 32 by 1.3 to account for the elongation). Figure 3 C-F, pixels 63 to 73, are in the OHC/DC region of responses, which also includes pixel 62 (consulting Table S1 and/or Figure 5). The spanned distance in the A-scan is 32 μm (corresponding to 25 μm transverse). Figure 3 H (pixel 77) and pixel 78 are RL-region responses, and G (pixel 75) is termed intra-RL: the BF peak amplitude is like pixel 77, but sub-BF the amplitude is boosted and nonlinear, and the phase responses show increasing delay re: BM; these are characteristics like pixel 73 of the OHC/DC region (Figure 3F).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Displacement amplitude and phase and strain values along one A-scan, plotted as a 1D heatmap onto the B-scan. (A′–C′) Heatmaps from (A) to (C) with the key structures of the OCC labeled (using the same color scheme as Figure 1C). (A, D, and G) Displacement phase re BM: BF phase re: BM at 70 (A) and 50 dB (G); (D) BF/2 phase re: BM at 70 dB. (A) and (D) used pixel 47, and (G) used pixel 48 for BM reference. (B, E, and H) Displacement at BF at 70 (B) and 50 dB (H) and at BF/2 at 70 dB (E). (C, F, and I) Displacement strain at BF at 70 (C) and 50 dB (I) and at BF/2 at 70 dB (F). The white rectangle in (I) denotes a region where the strain was calculated over more than 3 pixels. Vertical scale bars represent 20 μm, and horizontal scale bars represent 50 μm. Gerbil 1047 Run 5. BF = 45 kHz.

From these observations, steep yet graded variations occur between pixels 77, 75, and 73 in the RL and OHC/DC regions—an inclusive distance of 13.5 μm (10 μm transverse). The OHC/DC and BM regions both have relatively large spans of quite uniform motion. From pixel 78 (at the RL surface) to pixel 62 (the OHC/DC-region point closest to the BM region) is a distance of 46 μm (35 μm transverse). However, the OHC length at this BF location is expected to be only ∼20 μm30; this underscores the need for the designation “OHC/DC” as a region that extends beyond the OHC’s basal end (Figure 1C).

Figure 4 shows a subset of the data in SPL-based groups at 50- and 70-dB SPL. These two SPLs are emphasized because 70 dB has many full-frequency data sets but still has features of activity that are less observable at 80 dB; 50-dB responses are useful to observe BF-peak responses at a low-moderate SPL. The purpose of this figure is to clearly show regional differences in the frequency responses and to illustrate how the transition between regions differs at the two SPLs. Contrary to 70 dB, 50-dB OHC/DC-region responses retained a BF peak (Figures 4A and 4C). At 50 dB, the RL-region peak and phase responses were nearly unchanged from pixels 77 to 75 (Figures 4C and 4D), whereas at 70-dB SPL, pixel 75 has the “intra-RL” character described above (Figures 4A and 4B). Thus, the “RL region” was spatially wider at 50- than at 70-dB SPL (pixels 78 through 75 at 50 dB, pixels 78 and 77 at 70 dB).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Displacement frequency responses from different OCC regions plotted together at two SPLs. (A and C) BM (blue), OHC-region (green), intra-RL-region (dashed orange), and RL-region (orange) displacements at 70 dB SPL (A) and 50 dB SPL (C). (B and D) The respective phase responses re: ECP. (E) B-scan with BM, OHC-region, intra-RL-region, and RL-region locations of measurements reported in (A)–(D) identified. Scale bar represents 50 μm. Gerbil 1047 Run 5. BF = 45 kHz.

Figure 5 shows 1D heat maps of (column 1) displacement phase re: BM, with values between 0 and −1 cycle, (column 2) displacement amplitude, and (column 3) strain amplitude. The top row provides anatomical labeling, the next two rows are 70-dB data at BF and BF/2 respectively (Figures 5A–5F), and the bottom row is 50-dB data at BF (Figures 5G–5I). The strain values are calculated from displacement values separated by 1–3 pixels. If the distance between available pixels was greater than 3, the strain value is considered an average strain, and these cases are delineated by a white frame, as in Figure 5I. When adjacent displacement values were close to the noise level and/or almost identical in magnitude and phase, the resulting strain was sometimes in the noise (as determined by randomness in the strain phase) and excluded from the strain plot. After considering the displacement values, these gaps in the strain plots can often be taken as very low strain, even though numerical values (and thus colors) are missing. For numerical displacement values, Figures 3 and 4 are most useful. The heatmaps of Figure 5 are most usefully observed for regions of similar and different displacement and strain, coded by color, and we describe them in these terms. The significance of the numerical strain value is considered in the discussion.

In all rows, the BM region is clear in the relatively extensive region of bright red phases in column 1, coupled to a similar extent of mid-blue displacement amplitude in column 2. Many of the strain values in the BM region were in the noise—the BM region moved together, with little displacement strain.

At 70 dB and BF/2 (third row), an extensive region of purple phases deeper than the red phases of the BM indicates a ∼0.23 cycle delay of the OHC/DC region (Figure 5D). This is aligned with an extensive region of yellow (high) displacement amplitude in column 2 (Figure 5E). This is aligned, in column 3, to cobalt blue, indicating relatively low strain; the OHC/DC region appears to be moving almost as a rigid body (Figure 5F). Close to the RL, a two-pixel-wide (78 and 77) region of orange phase (Figure 5D) indicating an ∼0.9 cycle lag (better interpreted as a 0.1 cycle lead) is coupled to blue (low) amplitude values in column 2 (Figure 5E); adjacent to these (shallower pixels 76 and 75) the phase changes to a purple lag (Figure 5D), and the displacement amplitude goes briefly to blue-green (pixel 75) and then to the yellow (higher) values of the OHC/DC region (Figure 5E). Through this RL-to-OHC/DC transition, the strain has two blue bands (low strain) separated by two magenta bands (high strain) (Figure 5F). The deepest blue strain band, from the difference of pixels 78 and 77, indicates that these two positions closest to the RL boundary moved together—a distance of ∼5 μm (4 μm transverse). The deepest magenta high-strain band occurs due to changes in both the phase and amplitude of the displacement, the second (shallower) high-strain band is due to a spatial variation in displacement amplitude. A third (shallowest) magenta high-strain band, around pixel 60, appears at the transition between the large sub-BF OHC-region displacement and small sub-BF BM displacement (Figures 5E and 5F).

At 70 dB and BF (second row), deeper than the BM, the green displacement phase indicates an ∼0.75 cycle delay of the OHC/DC region relative to the BM (Figure 5A). The displacement amplitude in this region codes dark blue; displacement is smaller than at the BM (Figure 5B). With increasing depth the blue-green-yellow shift in displacement amplitude shows the transition to the high displacement amplitude of the RL. The yellow phase in this region (Figure 5A), upon consideration of Figure 4B, is best considered a small phase lead re: BM, not a large lag. Close to the RL, the strain is high in two magenta bands (Figure 5C), similar to the bands at BF/2 (Figure 5F). Shallower than these magenta bands, the strain remains low (blue) (Figure 5C); there is not a third magenta band around pixel 60 as there was at BF/2 (Figure 5F); the transition between OHC/DC and BM was evident in Figure 4A, but the displacement values are relatively small and the phase difference is nearly a full cycle, leading to relatively small strain (Figure 5C).

At 50 dB and BF (bottom row), the displacement phase transitions red-blue-green with increasing depth (Figure 5G). Here, the blue indicates OHC/DC-region phase is delayed from the BM by only ∼0.35 cycle, less than it was delayed at BF and 70 dB (consult Figures 4 and 5A). At 50 dB, the OHC/DC region retains a prominent BF peak, slightly larger than the BM peak (Figure 4C); color-wise, the OHC/DC displacement values are blue-green, versus the cobalt blue of the BM (Figure 5H). The blue phase (Figure 5G) and blue-green displacement of the OHC/DC region (Figure 5H) span pixels 66 to 70; there was little spatial variation in displacement, and the spatial differences were in the noise, accounting for the gap in the strain map (Figure 5I). The RL-region displacement was relatively high (yellow) (Figure 5H), and the green phase indicates a lead re: BM of ∼0.3 cycle over pixels 78 to 75, about 11 μm (8 μm transverse) (Figure 5G). A band of high (magenta) strain appears between pixels 73 and 75 (Figure 5I).

Strain has both amplitude and phase, and Figure 6 shows strain frequency responses found from displacement at pixels close to the RL. 70-dB data are shown, with displacement in Figure 6A and 6B and strain in Figure 6C and 6D. The strain amplitude versus frequency (Figure 6C) has a gentle bimodal shape with the peak in the BF region due to the transition between large RL and small OHC/DC displacement amplitudes (Figure 6A), and a peak at frequencies around 20 kHz due to the transition between small RL and large OHC/DC displacement amplitudes. The strain phase (Figure 6D) is similar for the three calculated strains. The phase of the strain found with pixels 77 and 76, when copied to Figure 6B, aligns with the displacement phase of pixel 77 (close to the RL surface) from 25 to 50 kHz. Below ∼20 kHz, the strain leads the displacement of pixel 77 by ∼0.2 cycle and is ∼1/2 cycle off from the phase of displacement pixels 73, 75, and 76.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Strain and displacement responses close to the RL at 70 dB. (A and B) The displacement amplitude and phase re: ECP at four pixels close to the RL. (C and D) The strain amplitude and strain phase calculated between the pixels in (A) and (B). The strain phase found with pixels 77 and 76 is plotted in (B) as a blue dashed line for comparison. Gerbil 1047 Run 5. BF = 45 kHz. In (B), note that at frequencies near the BF the phase of pixel 77 is close to in phase with the other positions.

G1025

The BF was ∼45.5 kHz, and l,r,t values were −0.64, −0.1, and 0.76, and similar to G1047, the B-scan is elongated from what it would be with a purely transverse view by a factor of ∼1.3. Figure 7 shows a set of gain tuning curves from G1025, and Figure 8 shows displacement tuning curves sorted to 50- and 70-dB SPL.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Responses from seven locations along a single A-scan. (A–G) Gain responses color-coded as BM (blue), OHC-region (green), intra-RL-region (dashed orange), and RL-region (orange). The respective phase responses re: ECP are plotted below the gain responses. (H) A-scan of 70-dB response. (I) B-scan with BM, OHC-region, intra-RL-region, and RL-region locations of measurements reported in (A)–(G) denoted with colored markers. Scale bar represents 50 μm. Optical axis components were (l, r, t) = (−.64, −0.1, 0.76). Gerbil 1025 Run 13. BF = 45.5 kHz.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Displacement frequency responses at 50 and 70 dB from seven locations along a single A-scan. (A and C) BM (blue), OHC-region (green), intra-RL-region (dashed orange), and RL-region (orange) displacements at 70 dB SPL (A) and 50 dB SPL (C). (B and D) The respective phase responses re: ECP. (E) B-scan with BM, OHC-region, intra-RL-region, and RL-region locations of measurements reported in (A–D) identified. Scale bar = 50 μm. Gerbil 1025 Run 13. BF = 45.5 kHz.

Pixel 89 is close to the RL surface, and pixel 86, 8.1 μm shallower, appears as an “intra-RL” point, at 70 dB retaining a small BF peak but also showing OHC/DC-like sub-BF boosting (Figure 8A). Pixel 85 has the form of the OHC/DC-region pixels 82 and 79 (Figure 8A), but at a reduced amplitude. Considering Figure 8, at 50 dB, pixel 86 is more closely aligned with the RL than it was at 70 dB; a similar observation was made in Figure 4. The heatmaps in Figure 9 echo those from G1047 (Figure 5), with minor color shifts. The wide purple OHC/DC-region phases at 70 dB, BF/2 in Figure 5D are slightly bluer in Figure 9D, indicating a phase lag re: BM of ∼0.25 cycle. In Figure 5H (50-dB displacement amplitude), a green-yellow color of relatively high displacement at pixel 86 was obscured against the gray B-scan, so the region is enlarged in an inset. This panel (Figure 5H) seems to differ most between G1025 and G1047, with the region of high (yellow) displacement extending from the RL edge through the OHC/DC region in G1025. Comparing Figures 8 and 4, the OHC/DC 50-dB BF displacement amplitude in G1025 (Figure 8C) is close to that of the RL, whereas in G1047 (Figure 4C), it was lower, close to that of the BM. Despite the similar RL and OHC/DC displacement amplitudes in Figure 8H, the strain in Figure 8I shows a magenta band, due to the substantial phase change between “intra-RL” (pixel 86) and OHC/DC (pixel 85) (green, ∼0.25 cycle lead re: BM at pixel 86 and blue, ∼0.4 cycle lag at pixel 85). At 70 dB, the region of strain close to the RL is similar at BF and BF/2 (Figures 9C and 9F) and wider than at 50 dB (Figure 9I), observations that are similar to G1047. At BF/2, there is a region of low strain from pixels 82 to 78 (Figure 9F). This is within the OHC/DC region, with yellow displacement amplitude (Figure 9E) and purple displacement phase (Figure 9D). Pixel 78, the shallowest pixel in the OHC/DC region, is 30 μm (23 μm transverse) from pixel 89 close to the RL surface; as noted above, this distance is larger than the ∼20 μm OHC length, so includes part of the DC. At 70 dB and BF/2 (Figure 9F), a region where the average strain is relatively high (purple), it is set in a box from pixel 78 to 71 (due to lacking intermediate data). This is where high sub-BF OHC/DC-region displacement transitioned to BM-region displacement. At BF and 70 dB, the strain is relatively low at pixels shallower than 82 (Figure 9C).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Displacement amplitude and phase at all pixels deemed out of the noise along one A-scan, plotted as a 1D heatmap onto the B-scan

(A, D, and G) Displacement phase re: BM: BF phase re: BM at 70 (A) and 50 dB (G); (D) BF/2 phase re: BM at 70 dB. (Pixel 64 was used for BM reference.) (B, E, and H) Displacement at BF at 70 (B) and 50 dB (H) and at BF/2 at 70 dB (E). (C, F, and I) Displacement strain at BF at 70 (C) and 50 dB (I) and at BF/2 at 70 dB (F). Gerbil 1025 Run 13. BF = 45.5 kHz. A strain frequency response plot for G1025 (like that of Figure 6) is included in the supplemental information.

G1041

Figures 10, 11, and 12 show frequency response curves and heat maps for G1041, with BF 43.6 kHz. L,r,t values were −0.57, −0.39, 0.72, so vertical distances in the B-scan are elongated from what they would be with a purely transverse view by a factor of ∼1.4. Overall, the trends noted from G1047 and G1025 above are maintained. Pixel 88 appears to be deeper than the main structure of the RL (Figure 10I) and might be the edge of the TM. From Figures 11B and 11D, at both 70 and 50 dB, the RL-region phase-lead re: BM is slightly smaller than in G1047 (Figures 4B and 4D) and G1025 (Figures 8B and 8D).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Responses from seven locations along a single A-scan. (A–G) BM (blue), intra-OHC-region (dashed green), OHC-region (green), intra-RL-region (dashed orange), and RL-region (orange) gain. The respective phase responses of (A)–(G) re: ECP are plotted below the gain responses. (H) A-scan of 50-dB response. (I) B-scan with BM, intra-OHC-region, OHC-region, intra-RL-region, and RL-region locations of measurements reported in (A)–(G) are denoted with colored markers. Scale bar represents 50 μm. Optical axis components were (l, r, t) = (−0.57, −0.39, 0.72). Gerbil 1041 Run 6. BF = 43.6 kHz.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Displacement frequency responses at 50 and 70 dB from eight locations along a single A-scan. (A and C) BM (blue), intra-OHC-region (dashed green), OHC-region (green), intra-RL-region (dashed orange), and RL-region (orange) displacements at 70 dB SPL (A) and 50 dB SPL (C). (B&D) The respective phase responses re: ECP. (E) B-scan with BM, intra-OHC-region, OHC-region, intra-RL-region, and RL-region locations of measurements reported in (A–D) identified. Scale bar = 50 μm. Gerbil 1041 Run 6. BF = 43.6 kHz.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Displacement amplitude and phase at all pixels deemed out of the noise along one A-scan, plotted as a 1D heatmap onto the B-scan.

(A, D, and G) Displacement phase re BM: BF phase re: BM at 70 (A) and 50 dB (G); (D) BF/2 phase re: BM at 70 dB. (A) and (D) used pixel 59, and (G) used pixel 66 for BM reference. (B, E, and H) Displacement at BF at 70 (B) and 50 dB (H) and at BF/2 at 70 dB (E). (C, F, and I) Displacement strain at BF at 70 (C) and 50 dB (I) and at BF/2 at 70 dB (F). Gerbil 1041 Run 6. BF = 43.6 kHz.

In Figures 10 and 11, the transition from RL to OHC/DC proceeds through pixels 88, 85, 83, 80, and 77. Pixel 88 displays characteristic RL motion, with a high magnitude at the BF peak and generally a small phase lead re: BM. Pixel 85 is similar to 88 at 50 dB (Figures 11C and 11D) and reasonably similar at 70 dB (Figures 11A and 11B), but it begins to show intra-RL behavior, displaying an amplitude notch at ∼24 kHz (Figures 10F and 11A), below which the phase lags the BM slightly (Figure 11B). Intra-RL pixel 83 has notch and phase transition at around 28 kHz (Figures 10E and 11A), and compared with pixels 85 and 88, 83 has a slightly greater sub-BF amplitude and a slightly lower response at the BF peak at 50 and 70 dB (Figures 11A and 11C). In pixel 83, the phase transitions to greater delay compared with pixel 85, and at frequencies near BF is a full cycle beneath the pixel 85 phase (thus, these two pixels are approximately in phase at BF) (Figures 11B and 11D). At frequencies below the notch, pixel 83 phase lags BM (Figure 11B). Pixel 80 is another intermediate position, with sub-BF responses smaller than OHC/DC responses (for example, pixel 77), but greater than the intra-RL responses at pixel 83 (Figure 11A). At 70 dB, pixel 80 has a more prominent BF peak than OHC/DC-region pixel 77 (Figure 11A), but the peak is smaller than the intra-RL and RL regions at pixels 83 and 85. Pixel 80 phase is like the RL region in the BF peak and like the OHC/DC sub-BF (70 dB) (Figure 11B).

Considering the 1D heatmaps of Figure 12 at 70 dB (top two rows), pixels 85 to 80 are part of the transitional region between RL and OHC/DC. At BF, there are moderate (purple) strains close to the RL, and over several pixels, strain increases with distance from the RL (Figure 12C). At 70 dB the largest (magenta) strain occurred between the “intra-OHC” pixel 80 and OHC/DC region at pixel 76 (BF, Figure 12C) or 77 (BF/2, Figure 12F). Between RL-region pixels 88 and 85, at 70 dB, there is little change in displacement phase (Figures 12A and 12D) but a small reduction in amplitude (Figures 12B and 12E), leading to moderate (purple) strain at BF (Figure 12C) and smaller (blue) strain at BF/2 (Figure 12F). At 50 dB and BF (bottom row), between pixels 88 and 85, there was little change in amplitude or phase (Figures 12G and 12H), leading to a small strain value that was indiscernible from noise, so it was not color-coded (Figure 12I). A relatively large (magenta) strain exists between pixels 85 and 84.

G986

Figures 13 and 14 are the final group of data figures, from G986, with BF 44.5. L,r,t values were −0.48, −0.35, 0.8, so vertical distances in the B-scan are elongated from what they would be with a purely transverse view by a factor of ∼1.25. This experiment was performed as part of a previous set, in which we selected a series of local maxima in the A-scan as the pixels to be analyzed for displacement. This results in a relatively sparse data set, which was nevertheless a useful, supportive set. (Some of these data were presented in a different format in Strimbu et al.22). The displacement frequency responses sorted to 50 and 70 dB are not included here but can be found in the supplemental information. The trends observed above are apparent. For example, in the heatmaps of Figure 14, at 70 dB and BF/2, there is a wide region of yellow (relatively high) displacement amplitude (Figure 14E) and purple phase (∼0.23 cycle lag) (Figure 14D), corresponding to the OHC/DC region, here spanning at least pixels 74 to 65, a distance of 30 μm (24 μm transverse). RL-region pixel 76 is slightly within the surface of the RL, and it has some “intra-RL” characteristics. For example, there is a notch in the 70-dB amplitude at ∼23 kHz (Figure 13F); the phase leads the BM only above this frequency. There is a sudden transition between RL-region and OHC/DC-region behavior between pixels 76 and 74, giving rise to the bright magenta strain value in the third column of all rows (Figures 14C–14F and 14I). At BF, the only region of magenta strain is between pixels 76 and 74 (Figures 14C and 14I); at BF/2 a second purple band appears between the BM and OHC/DC regions (Figure 14F), with the transition from the large (yellow) OHC/DC displacement to the smaller (blue) displacement of the BM (Figure 14E).

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Responses from six locations along a single A-scan. (A–F) BM (blue), OHC-region (green), and RL-region (orange) gain. The respective phase responses of (A)–(F) re: ECP are plotted below the gain responses. (G) B-scan with BM, OHC-region, and RL-region locations of measurements reported in (A)–(F) are denoted with colored markers. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (H) A-scan of 50-dB response. Optical axis components were (l, r, t) = (−0.48, −0.35, 0.8). Gerbil 986 Run 4. BF = 44.5 kHz.

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Displacement amplitude and phase at all pixels deemed out of the noise along one A-scan, plotted as a 1D heatmap onto the B-scan. (A, D, and G) Displacement phase re BM: BF phase re: BM at 70 (A) and 50 dB (G); (D) BF/2 phase re: BM at 70 dB. (Pixel 51 was used for BM reference.) (B, E, and H) Displacement at BF at 70 (B) and 50 dB (H) and at BF/2 at 70 dB (E). (C, F, and I) Displacement strain at BF at 70 (C) and 50 dB (I) and at BF/2 at 70 dB (F). Gerbil 986 Run 4. BF = 44.5 kHz.

Summary of results

The key observations of the phases, displacements, and strains were consistent among the preparations, with small differences reflected in slightly different colors in the heat maps. At BF/2 the greatest displacement was in the OHC/DC region, which comprised a relatively large region that moved similarly, with low strain. The RL region displayed the greatest displacement amplitude at BF and the smallest at BF/2. Many of the strain values in the BM were low or in the noise, indicating that the points within the BM moved together. There were generally two regions of high strain. At 50 and 70 dB and BF, there was a region of high strain in the transition between the OHC mid-body to the RL. A second region of high strain occurred at the transition between the relatively small sub-BF displacement of the BM and the large sub-BF displacement of the OHC/DC region. The OHC/DC region exhibited a substantial frequency-dependent phase delay relative to RL and BM, and this phase difference augmented the strains due to amplitude differences alone.

Discussion

Summary of observations related to OCC anatomy

The mechanics of the cochlea produce place- and frequency-dependent amplification of a sound-induced nanometer-scale fluid-mechanical wave, traveling from the base of the cochlea toward its apex. Amplification is due to the electromotile OHCs that are embedded within the OCC, but how OHC-based electromotility and other cellular processes collectively operate to achieve amplification remains a fascinating, open question. OCC motion, until recently observable only at the BM in the high-frequency cochlear base, has now been observed deeply within the OCC, revealing lively intra-OCC motion, as described above. These intra-OCC motions, and the resulting intra-OCC strains, provide clues to the workings of cochlear amplification and the cellular mechanics that govern functional amplification. In this section, we relate the observations above to the OCC anatomy and to previous findings from the literature.

The RL is the deepest region of the OC, adjacent to the stereocilia, the site of MET. Unlike the OHC/DC region, the RL displayed little/no sub-BF boosting, and the phase-frequency slope was relatively similar to that of the BM.23 The similarity of BM and RL motion is likely related to their connection via the structural, microtubule-rich supporting cells, PCs and DCs. The BM is a primary structural component of the OCC, but in point-stiffness measurements, the cells of the OC increased the stiffness measured at the BM by a factor of about two generally, and of about 10 at the outer PC.31,32,33 In measurements and analysis in excised gerbil cochleae, the DCs were found to have a stiffness ∼2.5 times that of the OHCs.34 The RL is a tiled structure formed by the apices of HCs, PCs, and the phalangeal processes of DCs. The apices of all these cells are rich in the structural protein actin. In HCs, the cuticular plate anchors the stereocilia and has been characterized as a dense actin gel.35 Actin gels can have significant stiffness, depending on the actin density and cross-linking molecules,8,36 and the RL is considered to be stiff,34 although in recent observations, it was not completely rigid.24

OHCs are the pumping heart of cochlear amplification. Voltage-induced stresses in the OHC lateral membrane produce electromotility: contraction and elongation along the OHC length in response to depolarization and hyperpolarization. In excised OHCs, the electromotile amplitude for an AC stimulus up to 50 kHz was ∼1 nm/mV for an OHC of length ∼50 μm, corresponding to a strain of ∼2 × 10−5 per mV.17,19 The largest strains measured in the current study were generally ∼1 × 10−4 at 50 dB SPL, at the BF. To compare the excised OHC strains to in vivo strains, we estimate OHC transmembrane voltage at 50-dB SPL using results from the literature: Starting with extracellular voltage measured close to the BM in gerbil, OHC transmembrane voltage was estimated as ∼2 mV at ∼30- to 40-dB SPL at the 20-kHz BF.37 In in vivo intracellular measurements in guinea pig, OHC AC receptor potentials were ∼1 mV at 30 dB at the cell’s 1-kHz BF38 and ∼5 mV at 50 dB at the cell’s 16-kHz BF.39 Based on those quantities, at 50-dB SPL, we expect OHC transmembrane voltage at the BF to be ∼5 mV. Then, our measured strains per mV at 50 dB were ∼2 × 10−5/mV, which agrees with the excised OHC strain values. However, at 50 dB, the relatively high strains in vivo were present over short distances compared with the ∼20-μm length of an OHC.30 In vivo OHC-based force is mechanically loaded by surrounding cells and structures, and the character and size of electromotility would reflect those loads. These results reinforce the benefit of high spatial resolution of imaging systems to measure the strains present over small distances within the OCC.

In vivo, voltage-induced OHC strains and stresses work within the structural framework of the OCC, overpowering forces dissipating the traveling wave to permit it to travel further and attain a greatly increased BF peak. In the observations here, the region of largest strain was close to the RL (Figure 16). At 70 dB, it could occupy a length that would include much of the OHC body; this strain is likely due to active electromotile contraction and elongation of the OHC. Beyond that (shallower in the B-scan), the OHC/DC region moved nearly as a rigid body. Between the OHC/DC and BM regions, especially sub-BF, there was a second region of large strain. Based on the distance, this occurred well beyond the OHC body, corresponding to strain within the base of the DC. A microtubule stalk runs through the DC from the RL to the BM.7 The microtubular structure within DCs and PCs likely is critical to productively directing electromotile forces; in this vein, a mouse mutant lacking the microtubule binding protein GAS2 had reduced DC stiffness and diminished cochlear function.40

Figure 16.

Figure 16

Cartoon diagram of the strains and motions in the OC (BM and TM are not shown). The longitudinal view is slanted to depict the angle of the optical axis in this work. The DCs are gray; the OHCs are yellow. The microtubular stalk of the DCs and the circular nuclei of DCs and OHCs are sketched. The OHC/DC region is relatively rigid, indicated in the green oval in the leftmost OHC/DC pair. The regions of high strains are in the OHC close to the RL and in the DC base (orange rectangles).

Two primary observations of this study are the substantial electromotile strain extending into the OHC body from RL, and the low-strain, nearly rigid-body OHC/DC-region motion, which is likely driven by electromotility. Either or both of these motions could be critical for the operation of the cochlear amplifier. The OHC/DC-region motion has been observed and discussed in previous studies of the gerbil base.22,25,26,41 Below, we will consider these two observations in turn.

Transition from RL to OHC/DC

The motions in the RL and OHC/DC regions differ in both amplitude and phase. The transition between these regions was relatively abrupt at 50 dB compared with 70 dB, signifying that strain was more localized at the lower SPL. For example, in G1047, pixels 78 and 77 at/close to the RL moved similarly at 70 dB (an inclusive distance of 5.4 μm, 4.2 μm transverse), and adjacent pixel 76 was an “intra-RL” point (Figures 5D–5F). At 50 dB, pixels 78 to 75 moved similarly, an inclusive distance of 10.8 μm, 8.3 μm transverse (Figures 5G–5I); the next measurable pixel, 73, was in the OHC/DC region. “RL-region” motion also extended through more pixels at 50 than at 70 dB in G1047 (Figure 4), G1025 (Figure 8), and G1041 (Figure 11). (In G986, due to relatively sparse sampling, the extent of the RL-region motion could not be evaluated. In G1049 in the supplemental information, the observation was not supported because at both 70- and 50-dB SPL, a transition from RL-like to intra-RL occurred between the same two pixels [Figures S4 and S5].) The observed SPL dependence of the pattern of electromotile strain is likely related to the saturation of MET, which is thought to be the fundamental basis for cochlear nonlinearity.14 Thus, level-dependent motion patterns, well known within the OCC, are also present within the OHC body. The RL region of the OHC includes the cuticular plate, which anchors the stereocilia rootlets, and it is an important site of the calcium pumps that maintain endolymphatic calcium10,42,43; possibly, the nonlinear SPL dependence of current flow through the OHC affects mechanics that then affect the spatial pattern of electromotility. Alternatively, the shifting of the balance of active to passive forces as SPL increases would alter the external constraints on OHCs and could alter electromotile patterns.

At 70 dB, the transition between RL and OHC/DC motion could proceed relatively smoothly, with intra-region points having characteristics intermediate between RL and OHC/DC regions. In the following, we show that the motion of intermediate positions can be approximately predicted by assuming a frequency-independent weighting of RL and OHC/DC motion, expressed in Equation 3, where u is a complex displacement containing both magnitude and phase (represented as real and imaginary parts for the calculation). α = 0 corresponds to motion at the RL, α = 1 corresponds to OHC/DC region motion, and 0 < α < 1 is motion between the RL and OHC/DC regions.

u(α)=uRL+α∗(uOHC/DC−uRL) (3)

Figures 15A and 15B show examples of the output of Equation 3, using the RL-region and OHC/DC-region motions from G1047. Pixel 77 (which was more reflective, with cleaner data than pixel 78) and pixel 67 were used for the RL and OHC/DC regions, respectively. (Supplemental information contains examples using the RL and OHC/DC-region motions from G1041.) With α = 0.15 an amplitude notch, and phase re: BM crossover occurs, similar to pixel 85 from G1041 at 70 dB (Figure 15C). α = 0.45 generates a two-peaked response (Figure 15B), with the intra-region phase beginning like OHC/DC and ending like RL (minus one full cycle). This behavior was observed at pixel 83 from G1041 (Figure 11B), pixel 75 from G1047 (Figure 15D), and pixel 86 from G1025 (Figure 8B). In G1047, the RL surface was at pixel 78, and pixel 75 was ∼8 μm shallower (transverse distance, figured as 4 pixels × 2.7/1.3 μm). If the OHCs were expanding/contracting uniformly and were 20 μm long, we would expect α at this location to be ∼8/20 = 0.4, which is similar to 0.45; so in this case, α could be considered as a distance-based scaling parameter. However, α could not always be considered a distance-based scaling parameter. For example, the pixel 85 response in Figure 15C was modeled with α = 0.15, but this location was ∼8 μm shallower than the RL surface, and with a distance-based scaling at this pixel, we would expect an α value of 0.4 (as in Figure 15D). In our initial concept of α, it represented mechanical entrainment of RL motion by the OHC/DC motion. The concept grew out of an attempt to understand the variety of intra-RL motions observed; we did not expect it to be a distance-based scaling parameter. With the various anatomical features at the RL (phalangeal processes, tiling of adjacent cells, PCs), nonuniform deformation between RL and OHC/DC regions is not unexpected. Because of the large sub-BF motions of the OHC/DC region, even small α values can shift the low-frequency phase from leading BM to slightly lagging, as observed in Figure 15A, and the entraining effect of OHC/DC motion on RL motion could give rise to some of the variation in RL-region sub-BF phases observed in this study and in previous observations.22,24

To distill this section, OHC electromotile strains were large in the transition between the RL and OHC/DC regions. In the BF peak, the region of strain generally extended through a wider distance at 70- than at 50-dB SPL. Thus, the OHC/DC and RL region motions were less coupled at 50 than at 70 dB, and since lower SPL motions show relatively more BF-peak amplification, this uncoupling might be advantageous to functional cochlear amplification.

OHC/DC region

In measurements made through the RW at the 25-kHz BF location, Cooper et al.25 observed an abrupt increase in motion from the BM to the OHC/DC region (their Figure 6). They surmised that the OHC/DC motion was elliptical, with a long axis running approximately perpendicular to the long axis of the DC phalangeal processes. Frost et al.26 decomposed the motion with measurements from two angles (at 70 and 80 dB SPL) and found the motion to be a high-aspect-ratio ellipse (nearly lineal motion) with nearly equal longitudinal and transverse components (drawn as lineal motion in the green arrows in Figure 16). From the l,r,t values noted in the figure captions, when viewing through the RW to the 45-kHz place, our optical axis was primarily transverse but with a substantial negative longitudinal component (Figure 16). With this angle of observation, a motion perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the phalangeal processes will be approximately in line with the optical axis, and thus, we are well positioned to detect that motion. As noted above, the OHC/DC-region motion we observed extended to positions within the DCs, beyond the OHCs. The extensive and uniform OHC/DC motion we observed likely includes the nuclear region of OHCs and DCs, swinging perpendicular to the phalangeal processes. The nearly rigid-body motion observed in the OHC/DC region is in keeping with the high stiffness of cell nuclei.44

Another noteworthy aspect of the OHC/DC motion is the phase, which, from low frequency to the BF, smoothly accumulated about 0.75 cycle phase lag relative to the BM.45 This is most clearly presented in Figures 2G, 4B, 8B, and 11B, where OHC/DC and BM phases are plotted together. The steeper phase-versus-frequency slope could be interpreted as traveling wave motion that is slower in the OHC/DC region than on the BM and the RL. The concept of coupled traveling waves has a long history in models of cochlear operation.46,47,48 However, the physical mechanism for the phase delay is not divulged by these data, and other mechanisms could be responsible for the accumulating phase of the OHC/DC region. Notably, because the RL leads the BM motion by close to 0.25 cycle in the BF peak, the OHC/DC and RL regions are nearly in phase there, and close to the BF, the OHC/DC phase-frequency slope is no longer steeper than the BM phase. Regardless of what the physical mechanism is, the phase difference between OHC/DC, BM, and RL motion could be critical to cochlear amplification, and phase differences have been employed in essentially every model of cochlear amplification. It is worth reinforcing that the phase relations depend on viewing angle; for example, in Frost et al. and Van Der Heijden,29,45 measurements were made with an apically pointing longitudinal/transverse viewing angle, and then the OHC/DC region led BM motion. In measurements in the second turn of the gerbil cochlea, the OHC/DC region moved primarily longitudinally, and pronounced viewing-angle dependence could be observed within a single experiment (repeated in several preparations).49

It is possible that the OHC/DC motion is a by-product of cochlear amplification, not central to its operation50; it is distant from the RL (where MET occurs) and distant from the BM (supporting the cochlear traveling wave). The anatomically promoted, diagonally swinging motion sketched in Figure 16 might represent uncoupling of the electromotile motion of the OHC base from the RL, allowing strains at the RL side of the OHC to provide the essential active force of the cochlear amplifier. Recent cochlear models51 and concepts52 employ active forcing at the RL and do not employ the OHC/DC motion for amplification, although they may predict it. For example, in Samaras and Meaud,51 while the model does predict sub-BF OHC motion boosting, force generation by the OHCs is transmitted to the OCC through the RL and PC joint rather than via the OHC base and DCs. These findings were made under the conditions that the stiffness of the OHCs and DCs is comparable, and the stiffness of the RL and PC joint is relatively stiff.51

On the other hand, in several conceptual models of cochlear operation, the longitudinal/transverse OHC/DC motion has been proposed to be central to cochlear amplification.41,53,54,55 In these models, the OHC/DC motion is the source of force generation, and motion within the fluid tunnels has functional importance. Guinan (2025) introduced a two-wave system in which OHC electromotility generates longitudinal fluid flow, which changes the OCC cross-sectional area in a wavelength-dependent manner, producing narrow-band traveling wave amplification.54,55 A diagram in Figure 3 from Guinan et al.55 illustrates the mechanism. He et al., (2022) propose that the OHC/DC force produces differences in BM and RL motion (both magnitude and phase), causing pressure gradients and longitudinal fluid flow in the cochlear partition, which power a global hydrodynamical mechanism for cochlear amplification.53 This was illustrated in Figure 5 from He et al.53 While these conceptual models are detailed, physics-based models are needed to fortify these emerging theories.

Conclusion

Active deformations within the OCC are nonuniform. The pattern of active electromotile strain within the OHC body varied with stimulus level, with strains at 50 dB more spatially contained than they were at 70 dB. The RL and OHC/DC body move with different amplitudes and phases, and positions between them took intermediate motion values, including amplitude dips and phase shifts. With the limited optical resolution of OCT, it can be difficult to identify thin anatomical features such as the RL, and the spatial variations in motion we observe underscore the benefit of future improvements in resolution. Measurements that can be analyzed into more than one direction are also of high priority since they would allow for computation of strain along the anatomical directions, using methods such as those described in Frost et al.26

The nuclear region where OHCs and DCs are coupled (OHC/DC region) moved as a nearly rigid body; based on previous studies, the motion is likely longitudinally/transversely slanting. This motion has been invoked in conceptual models of cochlear mechanics, and its inertial effect might be useful to consider in the development of future models. To accommodate the motion of the OHC/DC region, which can be much larger than and out of phase with BM motion, the DC base must stretch and compress, and a second region of large strain was observed there. Thus, the microtubular stalk of the DC experiences strain, and this supportive structure is likely needed to constrain and control OCC motion.

Data availability

All data and analysis code used to generate figures are available through the “figshare” repository at the following: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31955931.

Acknowledgments

We thank Lauren A. Chiriboga for commenting on the manuscript. This work was funded by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders grant DC015362.

Author contributions

K.H.W. gathered and analyzed the data and co-wrote the manuscript. E.S.O. designed the research and co-wrote the manuscript. C.E.S. gathered the data, coded the initial analysis steps, and edited the manuscript.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Editor: Jianping Fu.

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2026.04.037.

Supplemental information

Document S1. Figures S1–S7 and Table S1
mmc1.pdf (2.9MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (34.9MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Plassmann W., Peetz W., Schmidt M. The Cochlea in Gerbilline Rodents. Brain Behav. Evol. 1987;30:82–101. doi: 10.1159/000118639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dreiling F.J., Henson M.M., Henson O.W. The presence and arrangement of type II collagen in the basilar membrane. Hear. Res. 2002;166:166–180. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00314-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De Sousa Lobo Ferreira Querido R., Ji X., et al. Olson E.S. Visualizing Collagen Fibrils in the Cochlea’s Tectorial and Basilar Membranes Using a Fluorescently Labeled Collagen-Binding Protein Fragment. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2023;24:147–157. doi: 10.1007/s10162-023-00889-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goodyear R.J., Richardson G.P. Current Topics in Developmental Biology. Elsevier; 2018. Structure, Function, and Development of the Tectorial Membrane: An Extracellular Matrix Essential for Hearing; pp. 217–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leonova E.V., Raphael Y. Organization of cell junctions and cytoskeleton in the reticular lamina in normal and ototoxically damaged organ of Corti. Hear. Res. 1997;113:14–28. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00130-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bieniussa L., Jain I., et al. Rak K. Microtubule and auditory function – an underestimated connection. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023;137:74–86. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parsa A., Webster P., Kalinec F. Deiters cells tread a narrow path—The Deiters cells-basilar membrane junction. Hear. Res. 2012;290:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pollock L.M., McDermott B.M. The cuticular plate: A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside a hair cell. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today. 2015;105:126–139. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.21098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Belyantseva I.A., Liu C., et al. Zhao B. Taperin bundles F-actin at stereocilia pivot points enabling optimal lifelong mechanosensitivity. J. Cell Biol. 2025;224 doi: 10.1083/jcb.202408026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Furness D.N., Mahendrasingam S., et al. Hackney C.M. The Dimensions and Composition of Stereociliary Rootlets in Mammalian Cochlear Hair Cells: Comparison between High- and Low-Frequency Cells and Evidence for a Connection to the Lateral Membrane. J. Neurosci. 2008;28:6342–6353. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1154-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zheng J., Shen W., et al. Dallos P. Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature. 2000;405:149–155. doi: 10.1038/35012009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rabbitt R.D. Analysis of outer hair cell electromechanics reveals power delivery at the upper-frequency limits of hearing. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2022;19 doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cai W., Grosh K. Rate-dependent cochlear outer hair cell force generation: Models and parameter estimation. Biophys. J. 2024;123:3421–3432. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Olson E.S. The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. Elsevier; 2020. Mechanics of the Cochlea; pp. 392–418. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yu N., Zhu M.-L., Zhao H.-B. Prestin is expressed on the whole outer hair cell basolateral surface. Brain Res. 2006;1095:51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Takahashi S., Santos-Sacchi J. Non-uniform mapping of stress-induced, motility-related charge movement in the outer hair cell plasma membrane. Pfl gers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2001;441:506–513. doi: 10.1007/s004240000455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dallos P., Evans B.N., Hallworth R. Nature of the motor element in electrokinetic shape changes of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature. 1991;350:155–157. doi: 10.1038/350155a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Adachi M., Sugawara M., Iwasa K.H. Effect of turgor pressure on outer hair cell motility. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000;108:2299–2306. doi: 10.1121/1.1314396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Frank G., Hemmert W., Gummer A.W. Limiting dynamics of high-frequency electromechanical transduction of outer hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:4420–4425. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ren T., He W., Barr-Gillespie P.G. Reverse transduction measured in the living cochlea by low-coherence heterodyne interferometry. Nat. Commun. 2016;7 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee H.Y., Raphael P.D., et al. Oghalai J.S. Two-Dimensional Cochlear Micromechanics Measured In Vivo Demonstrate Radial Tuning within the Mouse Organ of Corti. J. Neurosci. 2016;36:8160–8173. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1157-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Strimbu C.E., Chiriboga L.A., et al. Olson E.S. Regional differences in cochlear nonlinearity across the basal organ of Corti of gerbil. Hear. Res. 2024;443 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.108951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Strimbu C.E., Olson E.S. Low-side and multitone suppression in the base of the gerbil cochlea. Biophys. J. 2025;124:297–315. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cho N.H., Puria S. Cochlear motion across the reticular lamina implies that it is not a stiff plate. Sci. Rep. 2022;12 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23525-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cooper N.P., Vavakou A., Van Der Heijden M. Vibration hotspots reveal longitudinal funneling of sound-evoked motion in the mammalian cochlea. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3054. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05483-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Frost B.L., Strimbu C.E., Olson E.S. Narrow elliptical motion at the outer hair cell-Deiters’ cell junction explains disparate features of uniaxial displacement measurements. Hear. Res. 2025;458 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2025.109189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Van Der Heijden M., Joris P.X. Cochlear Phase and Amplitude Retrieved from the Auditory Nerve at Arbitrary Frequencies. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:9194–9198. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09194.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Versteegh C.P.C., Van Der Heijden M. Basilar Membrane Responses to Tones and Tone Complexes: Nonlinear Effects of Stimulus Intensity. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2012;13:785–798. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0345-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Frost B.L., Strimbu C.E., Olson E.S. Using volumetric optical coherence tomography to achieve spatially resolved organ of Corti vibration measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2022;151:1115–1124. doi: 10.1121/10.0009576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Edge R.M., Evans B.N., et al. Dallos P. Morphology of the unfixed cochlea. Hear. Res. 1998;124:1–16. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00090-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Olson E.S., Mountain D.C. Mapping the cochlear partition’s stiffness to its cellular architecture. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1994;95:395–400. doi: 10.1121/1.408331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Naidu R.C., Mountain D.C. Measurements of the stiffness map challenge a basic tenet of cochlear theories. Hear. Res. 1998;124:124–131. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00133-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Eze N., Olson E.S. Basilar Membrane Velocity in a Cochlea with a Modified Organ of Corti. Biophys. J. 2011;100:858–867. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhou W., Jabeen T., et al. Nam J.-H. Deiters Cells Act as Mechanical Equalizers for Outer Hair Cells. J. Neurosci. 2022;42:8361–8372. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2417-21.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.DeRosier D.J., Tilney L.G. The structure of the cuticular plate, an in vivo actin gel. J. Cell Biol. 1989;109:2853–2867. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.2853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kasza K.E., Broedersz C.P., et al. Weitz D.A. Actin Filament Length Tunes Elasticity of Flexibly Cross-Linked Actin Networks. Biophys. J. 2010;99:1091–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dong W., Olson E.S. Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation. Biophys. J. 2013;105:1067–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.06.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dallos P. Neurobiology of cochlear inner and outer hair cells: intracellular recordings. Hear. Res. 1986;22:185–198. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90095-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kössl M., Russell I.J. The phase and magnitude of hair cell receptor potentials and frequency tuning in the guinea pig cochlea. J. Neurosci. 1992;12:1575–1586. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-05-01575.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen T., Rohacek A.M., et al. Epstein D.J. Cochlear supporting cells require GAS2 for cytoskeletal architecture and hearing. Dev. Cell. 2021;56:1526–1540.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.He W., Kemp D., Ren T. Timing of the reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibration in living gerbil cochleae. eLife. 2018;7 doi: 10.7554/eLife.37625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wood J.D., Muchinsky S.J., et al. Tempel B.L. Low Endolymph Calcium Concentrations in deafwaddler2J Mice Suggest that PMCA2 Contributes to Endolymph Calcium Maintenance. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2004;5:99–110. doi: 10.1007/s10162-003-4022-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fettiplace R., Nam J.-H. Tonotopy in calcium homeostasis and vulnerability of cochlear hair cells. Hear. Res. 2019;376:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chojowski R., Schwarz U.S., Ziebert F. The role of the nucleus for cell mechanics: an elastic phase field approach. Soft Matter. 2024;20:4488–4503. doi: 10.1039/D4SM00345D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.He W., Burwood G., et al. Ren T. The reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations in the transverse direction in the basal turn of the living gerbil cochlea. Sci. Rep. 2022;12 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24394-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hubbard A. A Traveling-Wave Amplifier Model of the Cochlea. Science. 1993;259:68–71. doi: 10.1126/science.8418496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Van Der Heijden M. Frequency selectivity without resonance in a fluid waveguide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014;111:14548–14552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412412111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lamb J.S., Chadwick R.S. Dual Traveling Waves in an Inner Ear Model with Two Degrees of Freedom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;107 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.088101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Meenderink S.W.F., Van Der Heijden M., Dong W. Longitudinal Vibrations in the Organ of Corti are Limited to Its Core. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2025;26:641–653. doi: 10.1007/s10162-025-01017-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chiriboga L.A., Strimbu C.E., et al. Olson E.S. Study of organ of Corti motion in the guinea pig base including differential analysis of internal motion. Hear. Res. 2025;468 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2025.109449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Samaras G., Meaud J. An alternative pathway for delivery of power by outer hair cells to cochlear traveling waves. Hear. Res. 2026;474 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2026.109618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Altoè A., Dewey J.B., et al. Shera C.A. Overturning the mechanisms of cochlear amplification via area deformations of the organ of Corti. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2022;152:2227–2239. doi: 10.1121/10.0014794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.He W., Burwood G., et al. Ren T. An outer hair cell-powered global hydromechanical mechanism for cochlear amplification. Hear. Res. 2022;423 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guinan J.J. The cortilymph wave: Its relation to the traveling wave, auditory-nerve responses, and low-frequency downward glides. Hear. Res. 2025;462 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2025.109279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Guinan J.J., Cho N.H., Puria S. The reduced cortilymph flow path in the short-wave region allows outer hair cells to produce focused traveling-wave amplification. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2025;26:49–61. doi: 10.1007/s10162-025-00976-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Figures S1–S7 and Table S1
mmc1.pdf (2.9MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (34.9MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data and analysis code used to generate figures are available through the “figshare” repository at the following: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31955931.


Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES