Skip to main content
Veterinary and Animal Science logoLink to Veterinary and Animal Science
. 2026 Jun 9;34:100731. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2026.100731

Dietary inclusion of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seed meal in broiler chickens: Effects on growth performance, cecal microbiota, and cost efficiency

Muhammed Tilahun a,b,⁎, Mengistu Urge b, Meseret Girma b, Negassi Ameha b, Sileshi Gadissa b, Kiros Welay b
PMCID: PMC13292539  PMID: 42358238

Highlights

  • •

    Inclusion of BCSM up to 4.5% maintained broiler growth performance.

  • •

    Improved feed conversion ratio observed at the highest level of inclusion.

  • •

    Dietary inclusion of BCSM significantly reduced broiler mortality.

  • •

    BCSM reduced cecal Escherichia coli and total coliforms, while increasing Lactobacillus.

  • •

    BCSM treatment groups offered higher net income and marginal rate of return.

Keywords: Black cumin seed meal, Broiler chickens, Cost efficiency, Gut microbiota, Feed utilization efficiency, Production efficiency

Abstract

The current study evaluated the effects of black cumin seed meal (BCSM) on growth performance, cecal microbiota, production efficiency, and cost efficiency in broiler chickens. A total of 144 one-day-old unsexed Cobb 500 broiler chicks were randomly assigned to four treatment groups, each with three replicates of 12 chicks using a completely randomized design. Broilers were fed isocaloric and isonitrogenous diets containing 0% (BCSM0, control), 1.5% (BCSM1.5), 3% (BCSM3), and 4.5% (BCSM4.5) BCSM over a 45-day feeding trial. The results showed no significant differences (P > 0.05) in feed intake, weight gain, or carcass characteristics among different treatments. However, feed conversion ratio (FCR) was significantly improved (P = 0.043 and P = 0.027) in BCSM4.5 during the finisher and entire periods, respectively compared with the control, which may be associated with slightly lower feed intake and the reported bioactive compounds in BCSM that may enhance digestion and feed utilization. Regarding the cecal microbiota, the inclusion of BCSM significantly reduced total coliform (P = 0.009) and Escherichia coli (P = 0.002) counts while significantly increased (P = 0.007) beneficial Lactobacillus populations, although the total bacterial load was not affected. Production efficiency factor and European broiler index were significantly better (P = 0.018 and P = 0.019, respectively) at the highest level of inclusion (4.5%) compared to the control. Partial budget analysis revealed that net income and the marginal rate of return were better for BCSM treatments groups. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that BCSM can be utilized as an alternative feed ingredient for broiler chickens. Inclusion of BCSM up to 4.5% beneficially modulated cecal microbiota, reduced mortality, and improved FCR, production efficiency, and cost efficiency, depending on the inclusion level, without adversely affecting growth performance.

1. Introduction

Poultry meat accounts about 40% of total global meat production, and feed expenses constitute >70% of the overall production cost (Bist et al., 2024). This has intensified interest in identifying cost-effective feed ingredients that can improve broiler performance and production efficiency. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 2023), poultry meat consumption in developing countries was predicted to rise by >16 million metric tons between 2015 and 2024. In a similar trend, broiler meat production in Ethiopia reached 13,000 tons by the year 2016, accounting for only 2% of the total production in East Africa (FAO, 2019).

Although commercial poultry production in Ethiopia is expected to grow due to its importance, level of consumption, and future prospects, it continues to face several challenges, including the inadequate availability and high cost of feed and feed ingredients, diseases, and shortages of other input supplies (Dugassa, 2022; Ayalew et al., 2023).

The cereal grains used in poultry feed formulation have direct food value for humans, creating competition between human and poultry nutrition; this competition, coupled with climate change–induced variability in grain yields, has increased demand and escalated the cost of these ingredients (Bediye et al., 2018; Katu et al., 2025). Consequently, poultry producers in Ethiopia consistently face challenges due to the high price and inconsistent quality of commercially available feeds. Thus, the future prospects of poultry production in Ethiopia may be constrained by the increasing price and decreasing supply of conventional feedstuffs (Asfaw & Etana, 2025). Therefore, identifying alternative, readily available feed resources could help to partially bridge the feed supply gap and improve profitability for poultry producers (Wagh et al., 2021).

Agro-industrial by-products have been widely highlighted as economically viable alternatives for poultry feed formulation (Sugiharto et al., 2018; Abd El-Hack et al., 2019; Sugiharto & Nuengjamnong, 2025), and black cumin seed meal (BCSM) may be considered among these alternative feed resources. BCSM is a by-product obtained after extracting the oil from black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seeds through different methods, which can influence its nutrient composition. This meal has a potential as an alternative feed for poultry due to its high nutrient content including crude protein, all essential amino acids, fat, energy, and minerals (Obeidat, 2021; Fathi et al., 2023 and Zaazaa et al., 2023). Additionally, the cost of BCSM is currently low, as it remains a waste by-product which is either discarded into the environment or unknowingly used in animal feed due to limited scientific research and lack of awareness (Navidshad et al., 2024).

The meal constitutes 60–75% of the original seed weight (Tekeli, 2014; Barkah et al., 2021), making it an abundant by-product. The residual bioactive compounds such as thymoquinone, thymohydroquinone, and dithymoquinone are known to have antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects which can enhance the performance, health and sustainability of broilers (Bajagai et al., 2020; Aydin, 2021; Fathi et al., 2023). The physiological and therapeutic properties of BCSM align with the growing interest in evaluating alternative botanical products in animal nutrition. Gul et al. (2024) reported that supplementation with Urtica dioica improved carcass yield, enhanced immunity, and provided protection against various bacterial and viral diseases in birds and animals. Furthermore, Mba et al. (2025) demonstrated that Phyllanthus amarus leaf extract enhanced growth performance across distinct broiler strains (Arbor Acres, Marshall, and Ross 308) without causing deleterious effects on growth indices. Similarly, Ike et al. (2025) suggested that this botanical extract could serve as a viable alternative to synthetic antibiotics by reducing the risk of antibiotic resistance and lowering overall poultry production costs. In general, phytogenic feed additives have been recognized as effective alternatives for improving gut health and overall poultry performance through enhancement of immune responses, nutrient utilization, and gut microbial balance due to their diverse bioactive compounds, thereby reducing dependence on antibiotic growth promoters (Ntsongota et al., 2025; Oni & Oke, 2025).These bioactive compounds can positively modulate the gut ecosystem by inhibiting pathogenic bacteria and promoting beneficial microflora, which is a critical mechanism for enhancing nutrient absorption and the viability of broilers (Fathi et al., 2023).

Despite these advantages, limited previous studies on the use of BCSM as a feed ingredient have reported inconsistent effects and variable optimal inclusion levels in broiler diets, which may be attributed to differences in bird performance, environmental conditions, the nutrient composition of BCSM, and diet formulation methods, including its use as an inclusion or supplementation. In addition, there is a diversity in the composition of essential oils among Ethiopian black cumin seed genotypes (Degu et al., 2025), which may affect the performance of broiler chickens. Furthermore, while there are large and small-scale oil refining factories in different towns and cities of Ethiopia that extract oil from black cumin seed, the by-product is an underutilized and wasted resource which could become a source of environmental pollution in the long term.

Currently there is no documented study in Ethiopia that has evaluated the effects of BCSM as an alternative feed resource in animal feeding. Hence, the present study aims to evaluate BCSM at different levels to improve the performance, health and profitability of broilers, while also insuring the efficient utilization of available industrial by-products. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary BCSM inclusion on growth performance, cecal microbiota, production efficiency and cost efficiency of broiler chickens.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Description of the experimental site

The study was conducted in Haramaya University poultry farm, which is about 500 km from the capital city, Addis Ababa to the eastern part of the country. The area is situated at 9° 26′ North latitude and 42° 3′ East longitude with an altitude of 1980 m It receives average annual rainfall of 790 mm with an average minimum and maximum temperatures of 14 and 23 °C, respectively (Sahle, 2008).

2.2. Measurements of feed ingredients, diet formulation, and dietary treatments

The proportion of feed ingredients used to prepare the diets for each treatment group are presented in Table 1. The BCSM was obtained from Getfarms Private Limited Company (PLC), a large-scale black cumin seed oil processing factory located in Sebeta, Ethiopia. The oil was extracted through a cold-press method, and the resulting dry pelleted meal was used for this study. Prior to formulation of the treatment diets, representative samples of the feed ingredients were analyzed for their chemical composition. Iso-caloric and isonitrogenous diets were then formulated for the starter and finisher phases using FeedWin software by adjusting ingredient inclusion levels. The starter diets contained about 3140 kcal ME/kg DM and 21% crude protein, whereas the finisher diets contained about 3210 kcal ME/kg DM and 19% crude protein. The BCSM was incorporated into the diets at levels of 0% (BCSM0, control), 1.5% (BCSM1.5), 3.0% (BCSM3), and 4.5% (BCSM4.5), then the diet components were thoroughly mixed and ground together to ensure dietary uniformity. The inclusion levels (1.5%, 3.0%, and 4.5%) were selected based on previous literature and varying findings. Jahan et al. (2015) reported beneficial effects of 1.5% BCSM on FCR and cost efficiency, while Ghannam (2022) suggested further evaluation following assessment up to 3.5%. In addition, Fathi et al. (2023) reported favorable responses at 4% and 6% supplementation levels compared with 2%. The variation in responses among studies may be associated with differences in environmental conditions and the nutrient composition of the meal.

Table 1.

Proportion of feed ingredients used in broiler diets during starter and finisher phases.

Phase Ingredients (%) Treatments
BCSM0 BCSM1.5 BCSM3 BCSM4.5
Starter Maize 45 45 44 43.5
Soybean meal 27 26.25 24 23
Noug seed meal 16.5 16 17.25 17
Wheat shorts 8.5 8.25 8.75 9
BCSM 0 1.5 3 4.5
Limestone 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Premix* 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
L-Lysine HCl 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
DL-methionine 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
DCP 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Salt 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Total (%) 100 100 100 100
Finisher Maize 55 54.5 54.5 53
Soybean meal 24 23.25 22 21
Noug seed cake 12.5 11.75 12 11.5
Wheat shorts 5.5 6 5.5 7
BCSM 0 1.5 3 4.5
Limestone 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Premix⁎ 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
L-Lysine HCl 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
DL-methionine 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
DCP 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Salt 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Total (%) 100 100 100 100

BCSM0, BCSM1.5, BCSM3 and BCSM4.5 are treatment diets at 0, 1.5, 3.0 and 4.5% inclusion levels of black cumin seed meal, respectively; BCSM = black cumin seed meal; DCP = dicalcium phosphate; ⁎Premix = Each 2.5 kg contains: Vitamin A (10,000,000 IU), Vitamin D3 (2,000,000 IU), Vitamin E (15,000 mg), Vitamin C (1,000 mg), Vitamin K3 (2,000 mg), Vitamin B1 (2,000 mg), Vitamin B2 (5,000 mg), Vitamin B6 (2,000 mg), Vitamin B12 (15 mg), Biotin (260 mg), Folic acid (500 mg), Nicotinic acid (10,000 mg), Pantothenic acid (4,000 mg), Iron (70,000 mg), Zinc (62,000 mg), Manganese (90,000 mg), Copper (6,000 mg), Iodine (1,500 mg), Selenium (350 mg), Cobalt (350 mg), and Magnesium (20,000 mg).

2.3. Feed chemical composition

The feed ingredients used in this experiment were analyzed for proximate composition, including dry matter (DM), ash, crude fiber (CF), crude protein (CP), and ether extract (EE) following the standard procedure of (AOAC, 2000). The CP content was determined indirectly through the Kjeldahl method of Nitrogen (N) determination and calculated as N × 6.25. The equation described by Wiseman (1987), was used to calculate the metabolizable energy (ME) of the feeds as follows: ME (kcal/kg DM) = 3951 + (54.4 × EE) − (88.7 × CF) − (40.8 × Ash). The calcium and phosphorus contents of the experimental feeds and major feed ingredients were also analyzed according to AOAC (2000) methods. Feed samples were burned in a muffle furnace at 550 °C for 6 h, then the resulting ash was used to analyze these minerals. Calcium (Ca) content was determined using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS; Model SL-194, ELICO Ltd., Hyderabad, India), and total phosphorus (P) content was determined by the ammonium vanadate–molybdate colorimetric method using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Model UV-9000S, Shanghai Metash Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

2.4. Management of chicks and experimental design

A total of 144 one-day-old unsexed (straight-run or as-hatched) Cobb 500 broiler chicks were bought from Alema Farm, in Bishoftu, Ethiopia and transported to the experimental site. On arrival the chicks were randomly assigned to four treatment groups (36 birds per treatment) in three replicates of 12 chicks each, with an average initial body weight of 42.33 ± 0.19 g (mean ± SD), in a completely randomized design (CRD). The experimental design was consistent with standard practice in broiler nutrition trials, in which the pen, rather than the individual bird, is considered the experimental unit for performance variables, cecal microbial load, and economic evaluation (Kinati et al., 2022; Bhowmik et al., 2026). Chicks were vaccinated against Newcastle Disease at the hatchery and again within the LaSota booster vaccine at 21 days of age on the farm, which was administered through spray and drinking water, respectively. The experiment was conducted for 45 days, comprising 21 days for the starter phase and 24 days for the finisher phase. The experimental house and pens were cleaned, washed and sprayed before the arrival of the chicks. The floor of each pen was covered with Teff straw to a depth of approximately 7 cm as deep litter material, which was sprayed again with disinfectant before the placement of the chicks.

Each pen was heated with 250-watt infrared bulb, and the ambient temperature was maintained at about 32 °C for the first week and subsequently reduced by 2 °C weekly until reaching 22 °C, using a dimmer switch. The house was oriented in an east–west direction, and natural ventilation was provided through wire mesh openings at the upper sections of the walls, equipped with adjustable external coverings to regulate airflow and help in maintaining suitable relative humidity within the house. A lighting schedule of 24 h of light and 0 hour of darkness was applied on the first day, followed by a stepwise reduction in light duration with a corresponding increase in darkness toward the end of the starter phase. Thereafter, darkness was gradually reduced to 1 hour toward the end of the experimental period. Mash feed was given ad libitum and replenished twice a day in feeders, with clean and fresh tap water available at all times. Drinkers were washed every morning to maintain hygiene, and a footbath was placed at the entrance to the house for disinfection before entry. These management practices were followed throughout the experiment.

2.5. Measurements of feed intake, body weight gain and feed conversion ratio

The feed given and refusals in each pen were measured and recorded daily. Daily feed intake was determined as the difference between the amounts of feed given and the refusals collected the next morning. Mean daily feed intake was calculated as total feed intake divided by the number of experimental days. Body weight the broilers was measured weekly using a sensitive balance and pen average body weight was calculated in each pen. Body weight gain (BWG) was calculated as the difference between final body weight (FBW) and initial body weight (IBW). Average daily gain (ADG) was determined by dividing BWG by the number of experimental days. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated as the ratio of average feed intake to average body weight gain in each pen. Sanitary and hygienic measures, as well as the health status of the birds, were monitored throughout the experimental period. Mortality was recorded to determine the mortality rate and was expressed as a percentage for each treatment group at the end of the experiment.

2.6. Measurements of carcass characteristics

At the end of the experiment, three broilers per replicate were selected for carcass evaluation having a body weight close to the pen average. The broilers were fasted overnight, then weighed just before slaughter to determine slaughter weight. Killing cones were used to restrain and humanely exsanguinate the broilers by severing the jugular veins and carotid arteries using a sharp knife. The procedure was performed by a trained professional to ensure rapid and complete bleeding, following the methods described by Moran (1999).

The feathers were removed mechanically, then the carcass eviscerated and processed to separate and measure the carcass cuts, edible offal, and non-edible offal according to the procedure described by Kekeocha (1985). After the removal of blood and feathers, dressed weight was recorded, and dressing percentage was calculated as the ratio of dressed weight to slaughter weight. Eviscerated carcass weight was measured including edible offal (heart, liver, and gizzard). Eviscerated percentage was calculated as the proportion of eviscerated carcass weight to slaughter weight. Carcass cuts (breast, thigh, drumstick, back, neck, and wing), edible offal, and non-edible offal were weighed separately using a sensitive balance and expressed as a percentage of slaughter weight. The lengths of the small intestine, large intestine, and ceca were measured using a measuring tape.

2.7. Measurements of cecal microbiota

Cecal microbiota was analyzed using culture-based methods. Cecal contents were collected from the same slaughtered broilers used for carcass trait evaluation. The cecum was selected because it is the primary site of microbial fermentation and harbors the highest microbial density and diversity in the avian gastrointestinal tract. The paired ceca were identified, ligated, and gently squeezed to transfer the content aseptically into a sterile zipper plastic bag, then transported to the laboratory within an icebox. Ten grams of each cecal sample were aseptically weighed into a sterile container, in duplicate for each replicate of the treatments, and diluted in 90 mL of 1% phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The mixture was thoroughly homogenized using a vortex mixer to prepare tenfold serial dilutions (10⁻² to 10⁻⁷). One milliliter of each serially diluted sample was transferred into a respective labeled petri dish to enumerate total bacterial count, E. coli, Lactobacillus, and total coliforms using respective selective media according to the method described by Ahsan et al. (2018). Briefly, Plate Count Agar (PCA; Micromaster Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Thane, India) was used for total bacterial counts, MRS Agar (de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe; HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India) for Lactobacillus, and MacConkey Agar (Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., New Mumbai, India; Ref: 76,875) for the enumeration of total coliforms and E. coli. The media were prepared according to the manufacturers’ instructions and used with the pour plate method, being poured into petri dishes containing serially diluted samples and allowed to solidify. The inoculated culture plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h for total bacteria, total coliforms, and E. coli, and anaerobically for 48 h for Lactobacillus (Ahsan et al., 2018; Abolfathi et al., 2019; Aziza et al., 2019). Plates showing well bacterial growth with 30–300 colonies were selected and counted using an automated colony counter to determine colony forming units per gram (CFU/g) of the cecal samples for each duplicate, which were then converted to log₁₀ for statistical analysis (Mahdavi et al., 2010; Manafi et al., 2017).

2.8. Production and cost efficiency of broilers

Production efficiency was evaluated by calculating the European Broiler Index (EBI) and Production Efficiency Factor (PEF) among treatment groups according to Marcu et al. (2013).

EBI=Viability(%)×ADG(g/chick/day)FCR(kgoffeed/kgofgain)×10
PEF=Viability(%)×BW(kg)Age(d)×FCR(kgoffeed/kgofgain)×100

Where; viability (%) = the percentage of chicks alive at the end of experimental period relative to the initial numbers; age (d) = the age of the chick at slaughter; d = day, BW = final body weight of the broilers in kilograms; ADG = average daily gain of the broilers in grams; FCR = feed conversion ratio.

Partial budget analysis was used to evaluate cost efficiency according to the method developed by Upton (1979) for each treatment group. The costs of day-old chicks, feed, labor, and veterinary services, were considered as total variable cost (TVC). Here the feed cost alone was used to represent TVC for cost-benefit comparison, as the costs of day-old chicks, labor, and veterinary services were constant across treatments. The revenue obtained from the sale of broiler carcasses was considered as total return (TR). Net income (NI) was calculated by subtracting total variable cost (TVC) from total return (TR). The change in net income (ΔNI) was determined as the difference between the change in total return (ΔTR) and the change in total variable cost (ΔTVC), i.e., ΔNI = ΔTR − ΔTVC. Marginal rate of return (MRR) measures the increase in net income (NI) per each extra unit of cost (ΔTVC) according to the following formula:MRR=ΔNIΔTVC×100.

2.9. Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with the general linear models (GLM) procedure of JMP Pro, Version 16.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc., 2021). Tukey test was used to the separate the mean indicating significance difference at P < 0.05.

The following model was used for analysis of the data. Yij=μ+Ti+eij.

Where Yij = an observation, µ= overall mean, Ti = Treatment effect, eij = error term.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical composition of feed ingredients and treatment diets

The chemical composition of the feed ingredients and treatment diets is presented in Table 2. The CP, EE, ME, Ca, and P contents of BCSM were within the ranges previously reported in the literature (Aydin, 2021; Obeidat, 2021; Ramdani et al., 2024). The energy content of BCSM was comparable to that of maize, whereas its protein content was comparable to noug seed meal. The chemical composition of the treatment diets was calculated from the analyzed composition and proportion of the feed ingredients used in formulation.

Table 2.

Chemical composition of feed ingredients (determined) and treatment diets (calculated).

Ingredients Chemical composition (% on DM basis)
DM CP EE CF Ash Ca P ME (kcal/kg DM)
 Maize 90.24 9.18 3.83 4.53 4.73 0.05 0.34 3565
 SBM 92.09 38.97 4.37 8.19 6.23 0.38 0.65 3208
 NSC 91.93 31.03 7.33 15.93 10.36 0.36 0.66 2514
 WS 91.03 15.16 3.57 9.05 5.53 0.18 0.64 3117
 BCSM 91.72 32.33 11.57 5.79 11.94 0.26 0.31 3580
Starter phase
 BCSM0 91.15 21.06 4.33 8.58 6.87 1 0.56 3145
 BCSM1.5 90.39 21.06 4.42 8.49 6.99 1 0.55 3153
 BCSM3 91.62 21.04 4.56 8.68 7.07 0.99 0.54 3141
 BCSM4.5 90.86 21.05 4.66 8.71 7.16 0.99 0.58 3140
Finisher phase
 BCSM0 91.22 19.11 4.18 7.95 6.43 0.98 0.53 3211
 BCSM1.5 90.21 19.1 4.26 7.92 6.57 0.97 0.51 3212
 BCSM3 91.45 19.1 4.38 8.1 6.63 0.97 0.52 3209
 BCSM4.5 90.69 19.13 4.47 8.04 6.76 0.96 0.57 3206

DM = dry matter; CP = crude protein; EE = ether extract; CF = crude fiber; Ca = calcium; P = phosphorous; ME = metabolizable energy; WS = wheat shorts; SBM = soybean meal; NSM = noug seed meal; BCSM = black cumin seed meal; BCSM0, BCSM1.5, BCSM3 and BCSM4.5 are treatment diets at 0, 1.5, 3.0 and 4.5% inclusion levels of black cumin seed meal, respectively.

3.2. Growth performance

The feed intake, body weight gain, feed conversion ratio, and mortality rate of broilers across all production phases are presented in Table 3. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in feed intake or body weight gain throughout the production phases among treatments. However, feed conversion ratio was significantly improved (P = 0.043 and P = 0.027) in BCSM4.5 compared with the control during the finisher phase and the entire experimental period, respectively. Mortality rate was significantly reduced (P = 0.006) in the BCSM treatment groups (BCSM1.5 and BCSM4.5) compared with the control during the entire experimental period. The BCSM treatment groups did not show significant differences (P > 0.05) in their FCR or mortality rates.

Table 3.

Effect of dietary BCSM inclusion on growth performance of Cobb 500 broilers during starter phase, finisher phase, and entire periods.

Production phases Treatments
Starter Phase BCSM0 BCSM1.5 BCSM3 BCSM4.5 SEM P - value
 Initial body weight (g/bird) 42.63 42.32 42.24 42.23 0.44 0.940
 Feed intake (g/bird) 1024 1006 979 972 29.5 0.595
 Average daily feed intake (g/bird/day) 48.76 47.90 46.60 46.29 1.41 0.595
 Final body weight (g/bird) 486 482 484 485 4.78 0.939
 Body weight gain (g/bird) 443.37 439.68 441.76 442.77 4.78 0.946
 Average daily gain (g/bird/day) 21.11 20.94 21.04 21.08 0.23 0.946
 Feed conversion ratio (intake/gain) 2.31 2.29 2.21 2.20 0.05 0.288
 Mortality rate (%) 2.78 0.00 2.78 0.00 1.96 0.596
Finisher Phase (22–45 days)
 Initial body weight (g/bird) 486 482 484 485 4.78 0.939
 Feed intake (g/bird) 3166 3059 3046 3038 69.1 0.553
 Average daily feed intake (g/bird/day) 131.92 127.46 126.92 126.58 2.88 0.553
 Final body weight (g/bird) 1855 1831 1840 1851 27.2 0.919
 Body weight gain (g/bird) 1369 1349 1356 1366 25.8 0.939
 Average daily gain (g/bird/day) 57.00 56.20 56.50 56.90 1.07 0.939
 Feed conversion ratio (intake/gain) 2.31a 2.27ab 2.25ab 2.22b 0.02 0.043
 Mortality rate (%) 5.56 0.00 2.78 0.00 1.96 0.219
Entire period (1–45 days)
 Initial body weight (g/bird) 42.63 42.32 42.24 42.23 0.44 0.940
 Feed intake (g/bird) 4190 4065 4025 4010 77.1 0.397
 Average daily feed intake (g/bird/day) 93.10 90.30 89.40 89.10 1.71 0.397
 Final body weight (g/bird) 1855 1831 1840 1851 27.2 0.919
 Body weight gain (g/bird) 1812 1788 1797 1809 27.2 0.920
 Average daily gain (g/bird/day) 40.30 39.70 39.90 40.20 0.60 0.920
 Feed conversion ratio (intake/gain) 2.31a 2.27ab 2.23ab 2.21b 0.02 0.027
 Mortality rate (%) 8.33a 0.00b 5.56ab 0.00b 1.39 0.006

a, b Means within a row bearing different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05); BCSM0, BCSM1.5, BCSM3 and BCSM4.5 are treatment diets at 0, 1.5, 3.0 and 4.5% inclusion levels of black cumin seed meal, respectively; SEM = standard error of the mean.

3.3. Carcass characteristics

The carcass parts and internal organs, expressed in relative to their slaughter weight are shown in Table 4, Table 5. The weight and percentage of carcass and offal (edible and nonedible) did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) among treatments. The edible offal components included the gizzard, heart, and liver.

Table 4.

Carcass characteristics of Cobb 500 broilers fed different levels of BCSM at 45 days of age.

Parameters Treatments
BCSM0 BCSM1.5 BCSM3 BCSM4.5 SEM P - value
Slaughter wt. (g) 1866 1873 1843 1887 56.2 0.954
Dressed wt. (g) 1683 1700 1678 1705 47.1 0.971
Dressed % 90.19 90.76 91.04 90.35 0.59 0.724
Eviscerated wt. (g) 1301 1305 1281 1326 36.7 0.861
Eviscerated % 69.72 69.67 69.51 70.27 0.49 0.719
Carcass wt. (g) 1222 1228 1204 1244 34.8 0.876
Carcass % 65.49 65.56 65.33 65.01 0.52 0.848
Drum stick % 9.40 9.59 9.40 9.51 0.12 0.580
Thigh % 10.53 10.42 10.58 10.57 0.18 0.912
Breast % 25.40 25.42 25.03 25.57 0.29 0.610
Wing % 3.80 3.70 3.81 3.82 0.07 0.985
Back % 7.71 7.62 7.73 7.64 0.21 0.993
Neck % 2.81 2.82 2.83 2.91 0.11 0.965
Gizzard % 1.50 1.51 1.60 1.61 0.05 0.339
Liver % 2.22 2.15 2.17 2.15 0.06 0.867
Heart % 0.49 0.48 0.49 0.47 0.02 0.801

SEM = Standard error of the mean; BCSM0, BCSM1.5, BCSM3 and BCSM4.5 are treatment diets at 0, 1.5, 3.0 and 4.5% inclusion levels of black cumin seed meal, respectively; wt. = weight; g = gram.

Table 5.

Non-edible offal components of Cobb 500 broilers fed different levels of BCSM at 45 days of age.

Parameters Treatments
BCSM0 BCSM1.5 BCSM3 BCSM4.5 SEM P - value
Slaughter weight (g) 1866 1873 1843 1887 56.2 0.954
Abdominal fat % 1.61 1.49 1.45 1.40 0.11 0.587
Kidney % 0.62 0.58 0.61 0.60 0.04 0.550
Spleen % 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.01 0.969
Large intestine % 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.01 0.858
Small intestine % 5.01 5.20 5.11 5.12 0.31 0.993
Ceca % 0.59 0.62 0.65 0.69 0.04 0.340
LI length (cm) 9.50 9.71 9.53 9.70 0.37 0.976
SI length (cm) 194 197 198 199 4.08 0.825
Ceca length (cm) 18 18 18 19 0.52 0.573

SI = Small intestine, LI = Large intestine, SEM = Standard error of the mean; BCSM0, BCSM1.5, BCSM3 and BCSM4.5 are treatment diets at 0, 1.5, 3.0 and 4.5% inclusion levels of black cumin seed meal, respectively; g = gram; cm = centimeter.

3.4. Cecal microbial population

The effects of dietary inclusion of black cumin seed meal on selected cecal bacterial populations are presented in Table 6. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in total bacterial counts among all treatment groups. The total bacterial count represents the aerobic portion of the bacterial populations. In contrary, BCSM inclusion significantly reduced (P = 0.009) the total coliform counts, which were lower in BCSM3 and BCSM4.5 compared to the control group. Similarly, E. coli counts were significantly decreased (P = 0.002) in all BCSM treatment groups relative to the control, whereas Lactobacillus counts were significantly higher (P = 0.007) in BCSM3 and BCSM4.5 compared to those of the control. However, the BCSM treatment groups did not show significant differences (P > 0.05) in counts of total coliform, E. coli and Lactobacillus among each other.

Table 6.

Cecal microbial populations of Cobb 500 broilers fed diets containing different levels of BCSM (log₁₀ CFU/g of cecal content) at 45 days of age.

Cecal microbiota Treatments
BCSM0 BCSM1.5 BCSM3 BCSM4.5 SEM P - value
Total bacterial count 7.70 7.62 7.53 7.58 0.16 0.893
Total coliforms 6.70a 6.43ab 5.93b 5.67b 0.17 0.009
E. coli 5.54a 4.77b 4.75b 4.38b 0.13 0.002
Lactobacillus 6.25b 6.59ab 7.02a 7.28a 0.15 0.007

a, b Means within a row bearing different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05); BCSM0, BCSM1.5, BCSM3 and BCSM4.5 are treatment diets at 0, 1.5, 3.0 and 4.5% inclusion levels of black cumin seed meal, respectively; CFU = colony forming unit; g = gram; SEM = standard error of the mean.

3.5. Production and cost efficiency of broilers

Production efficiency factor (PEF), European broiler index (EBI), and viability percentage during the starter and finisher phases were similar (P > 0.05) among treatments (Table 7). However, all BCSM treatment groups were numerically higher than the control. During the entire period, EBI and PEF differed significantly (P = 0.019 and P = 0.018, respectively), with the better value was observed in BCSM4.5 compared to the control. Additionally, the viability percentage was significantly higher (P = 0.006) in the BCSM treatment groups (BCSM1.5 and BCSM4.5) during the entire period than in the control group.

Table 7.

Production efficiency of Cobb 500 broilers fed different levels of BCSM at 45 days of age.

Parameters Treatments
Production Efficiency BCSM0 BCSM1.5 BCSM3 BCSM4.5 SEM P-value
Starter viability (%) 97.22 100 97.22 100 1.96 0.596
Starter EBI 88.74 91.3 92.62 95.87 2.56 0.327
Starter PEF 97.27 100.09 101.49 105.02 2.83 0.339
Finisher viability (%) 94.44 100 97.22 100 1.96 0.219
Finisher EBI 233.15 247.96 244.61 256.02 7.97 0.307
Finisher PEF 315.79 336.5 331.99 346.82 10.14 0.26
EP viability (%) 91.67b 100.00a 94.44ab 100.00a 1.39 0.006
Entire period EBI 159.93b 174.89ab 168.98ab 181.90a 3.74 0.019
Entire period PEF 163.59b 179.25ab 173.16ab 186.12a 3.81 0.018

a, b Means within a row bearing different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05); BCSM0, BCSM1.5, BCSM3 and BCSM4.5 are treatment diets at 0, 1.5, 3.0 and 4.5% inclusion levels of black cumin seed meal, respectively; SEM = Standard error of the mean; EBI = European broiler index; PEF= Production efficiency factor; EP = Entire period.

Partial budget analysis (Table 8) showed that total feed cost decreased with increasing inclusion level of BCSM compared to those of the control, offering a reduction in total variable cost. As a result, net income and marginal rate of return (MRR) were highest in broilers fed the diet with the highest BCSM inclusion level (BCSM4.5), followed by BCSM1.5 and then BCSM3, while the lowest values were observed in the control group (BCSM0). In general, the production and cost efficiency analysis indicated that BCSM inclusion improved both production efficiency and profitability of broilers, providing research-based evidence for the sector to use the BSCSM as alternative and viable feed resource for sustainable broiler production.

Table 8.

Partial budget analysis of Cobb 500 broilers fed different levels of BCSM at 45 days of age.

Cost (ETB) Treatments
BCSM0 BCSM1.5 BCSM3 BCSM4.5
DOC price (ETB) 83.00 83.00 83.00 83.00
Feed Consumed (kg) 4.19 4.07 4.02 4.01
Cost of feed/kg (ETB) 42.12 41.78 41.32 40.86
Total Feed Cost (ETB) 176.50 169.80 166.30 163.80
Revenue
Carcass weight (kg) 1.22 1.23 1.20 1.24
Carcass Price (ETB/kg) 400 400 400 400
Total Return (ETB) 488 492 480 496
Net Return (ETB) 311.55 322.18 313.71 332.16
MRR (%) 176.56 189.71 188.64 202.73

DOC = Day old chick; ETB = Ethiopian birr; kg = kilogram, MRR = Marginal rate of return.

4. Discussion

4.1. Growth performance

Dietary inclusion of black cumin seed meal (BCSM) in broiler diets did not result in significant differences in feed intake or body weight gain compared to the control group across all production phases. This finding indicates that BCSM inclusion at both levels does not adversely affect growth performance and provide highlights its potential as an alternative protein and energy source in broiler diets. These results are consistent with previous studies reporting no significant effects on feed intake or growth performance at inclusion levels ranging from 0.5% to 10% (Jahan et al., 2015; Ghannam, 2022; Zaazaa et al., 2023). Similarly, El-Deek (2009) and Elgandy (2024) reported that substituting soybean meal with BCSM up to 50% in the diets of broilers did not affect growth performance of broilers. In contrast, Fathi et al. (2023) reported that body weight gain was significantly increased in broilers fed BCSM at 4% and 6% supplementation levels compared to the control. In addition, Mba et al. (2025) demonstrated that Phyllanthus amarus leaf extract enhanced growth performance across distinct broiler strains (Arbor Acres, Marshall, and Ross 308). On the contrary, Ershadi et al. (2022) observed a significant reduction in feed intake and body weight gain in broilers at inclusion levels of 7.5% and 15% BCSM.

Although no significant differences were observed in feed intake or body weight gain between the BCSM and control groups, feed conversion ratio (FCR) was significantly improved in BCSM4.5 during the finisher phase and over the entire experimental period compared with the control. This improvement may be attributed to the slightly lower feed intake observed with increasing BCSM inclusion levels while maintaining comparable weight gain to the control group, as well as to the bioactive constituents previously reported in BCSM, which enhance digestion and feed utilization (Fathi et al., 2023; Cakir & Cayan, 2026). This finding is very similar to Amad et al. (2011), who observed improved FCR due to the reduced feed intake and similar weight gain in broilers fed phytogenic feed additives with increasing level of test ingredients. Windisch et al. (2008) also reported that reduced feed intake, with negligible differences in body weight gain during poultry feeding trials, resulted in improved FCR. Improved feed digestion and nutrient absorption have been reported in broilers fed diets supplemented with Nigella sativa seed, ultimately improving FCR (Abdollahi et al., 2024; Khan et al., 2025), similarly BCSM enhance feed efficiency, likely due to its bioactive constituents which are retained in BCSM during extraction (Fathi et al., 2023). According to Kumar and Petra (2017) and Cakir and Cayan (2026), these bioactive constituents, such as thymoquinone, carvone, anethole, carvacrol, and 4-terpineol, stimulate the secretion of digestive enzymes from the intestinal mucosa and pancreas, thereby improving digestion, absorption, and feed utilization efficiency. Similar findings were reported by El-Kashef (2020) and Fathi et al. (2023), who observed improved FCR in broilers fed diets containing different levels of BCSM compared with the control group. Likewise, Sapsuha et al. (2025) reported improved feed conversion in broilers supplemented with Lactobacillus plantarum and Tomi-Tomi fruit extract synbiotics, which was attributed to better feed utilization efficiency relative to the control group. In contrast, Ghannam (2022), Zaazaa et al. (2023), and Elgandy (2024) reported no significant differences in FCR among broilers fed BCSM compared to the control. The inconsistency among studies may be attributed to variations in the nutritional composition of BCSM arising from differences in seed origin, oil extraction methods, genetic diversity of black cumin seed, experimental diet formulation, and management and environmental conditions.

In the current study a lower mortality percentage was also observed in broilers fed BCSM treatment diets compared to the control group. This finding suggests that the potential health benefits of BCSM may be due to the residual bioactive compounds and essential oils left in the meal after extraction. A significant level of bioactive compounds and essential oils were retained, which were not completely extracted from the seeds during the process (Fathi et al., 2023). Reduced mortality in broilers has also been associated with the antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities of these compounds (Ermumcu & Şanlier, 2017; Aydin, 2021). Similarly, Azeem et al. (2014) reported that Nigella sativa seeds have strong potential as alternatives to antibiotics and vaccines for improving immunity and reducing mortality in poultry due to their bioactive constituents. Phenolic compounds in aromatic medicinal plants are known to act against bacteria by targeting multiple cellular structures, leading to microbial destruction; in addition, their antioxidant properties help to reduce oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species in poultry (Aljohani, 2024). A recent study also identified diversity in the essential oil composition of Ethiopian black cumin seeds, which may contribute to beneficial pharmacological effects (Degu et al., 2025). Similarly, Ike et al. (2025) demonstrated that Phyllanthus amarus leaf extract could serve as an effective feed additive capable of supporting broiler health and reducing reliance on synthetic antibiotics in commercial poultry production.

4.2. Carcass characteristics

Dietary inclusion of BCSM in broiler diets did not have a significant effect on slaughter weight, dressing percentage, carcass weight, or the relative weights of carcass cuts and internal organs. Although not statistically significant, the relative weight of abdominal fat numerical reduced as the levels of BCSM inclusion increased, suggesting potential beneficial effects of residual contents in the meal, which may divert energy from fat deposition toward physiological functions (Abaza et al., 2008). The non-significant differences observed in body weight gain and slaughter weight among broilers across all dietary treatments may have contributed to the comparable carcass characteristics, as these parameters are closely associated with the final body weight. Similarly, Ghannam (2022) reported no significant effects on slaughter weight, dressing percentage, carcass weight, or the weights of carcass cuts, giblets, and offal in broilers fed diets containing BCSM. In addition, Sogut et al. (2012) reported no significant effects of black cumin seed inclusion in broiler diets on carcass characteristics. In contrast, Saleh (2014) and Kumar et al. (2018) reported significant improvements in slaughter weight, dressing percentage, carcass yield, and the weights of the thigh, breast, and edible internal organs in broilers fed black cumin seed, which could be due to variations in weight gain across treatments.

4.3. Cecal microbiota

Dietary inclusion of BCSM resulted in a significant effect on cecal microbiota, evidenced by lower total coliform counts at the 3% and 4.5% inclusion levels, and E. coli counts at all levels of BCSM inclusion. Concurrently, Lactobacillus counts increased significantly at the 3% and 4.5% inclusion levels compared to the control. However, no significant difference was observed in total bacterial count, which represents the aerobic bacterial population. This could be due to the selective modulation effects of BCSM rather than suppression of the overall bacterial population. These findings are in agreement with previous studies reporting reductions in coliform and E. coli counts in the ceca of broilers fed Nigella sativa seed, Nigella sativa oil, and BCSM (Khan et al., 2012; Saied et al., 2022; Fathi et al., 2023). Similarly, Arif et al. (2018) and Elbaz et al. (2025) reported significant reductions in coliform and E. coli counts in meat-type quail and rabbits fed diets supplemented with Nigella sativa seed and BCSM. Elbaz et al. (2025) and Talayi-Anbaran et al. (2025) also reported increased Lactobacillus populations in the ceca of broilers following dietary inclusion of Nigella sativa nanoparticles and Nigella sativa seed, respectively. However, Khan et al. (2012) and Fathi et al. (2023) observed no significant differences in Lactobacillus counts among treatment groups fed Nigella sativa seed and BCSM, respectively.

This modulation of cecal microbiota due to BCSM inclusion is likely the selective antibacterial activity of Nigella sativa constituents against pathogenic bacteria (Hassanien et al., 2014; Khan, 2018). Furthermore, BCSM promotes the proliferation of beneficial bacteria (Samy et al., 2023) by modifying the intestinal environment in favor of Lactobacilli (Abdollahi et al., 2024),which contributing to improved gut health and feed utilization efficiency (Stanley et al., 2013; Diaz Carrasco et al., 2019). Likewise, Ike et al. (2025) reported significantly higher counts of lactic acid bacteria and significantly lower counts of coliform bacteria in the ileum and cecum of broilers supplemented with Lactobacillus plantarum and Tomi-Tomi fruit extract synbiotics. A high population of lactic acid bacteria produces lactic acid, thereby reducing digesta pH, which may suppress or eliminate pathogenic bacteria in the digestive tract and help maintain a healthy balance of intestinal microflora that may support digestion and nutrient absorption, as similarly reported following supplementation with encapsulated coconut shell liquid smoke (Ardilla et al., 2021). Additionally, Li et al. (2022) reported that bioactive compounds in phytogenics, particularly essential oils, can disrupt the cell membranes of pathogenic bacteria by increasing membrane permeability and causing leakage of cellular contents, ultimately leading to cell death. Similar compounds have also been reported in black cumin seed (Degu et al., 2025) and were retained in BCSM following oil extraction (Fathi et al., 2023). These compounds promote gut health by reducing harmful bacteria and beneficially modulating microbial populations, ultimately enhancing immune responses, decreasing mortality, and improving nutrient absorption (Talebi et al., 2021; Fathi et al., 2023).

4.4. Production and cost efficiency

Production efficiency of broilers was assessed using the European broiler index (EBI) and production efficiency factor (PEF), which can be influenced by final body weight, average daily gain, feed conversion ratio, and viability percentage, as shown in their respective formulas. Higher value of PEF indicated that the farm was well managed and the body weight gain was uniform, whereas a higher value of EBI suggested better health status of the broilers (Venkatramana et al., 2020). In this study, EBI and PEF were significantly higher in broilers fed the highest level of BCSM inclusion (BCSM4.5) compared to the control group, while viability percentage was significantly higher in both BCSM1.5 and BCSM4.5 compared to control during the entire period. The increased EBI and PEF observed in MCSM4.5 could be attributed to the combination effects of equivalent final body weight and ADG, improved FCR, and reduced mortality. Particularly, the improvements in FCR and reduced mortality contributed to the increased production efficiency parameters, highlighting the role of BCSM in supporting both performance and health.

Partial budget analysis was used to assess the cost efficiency by considering total production costs and total returns. Feed costs decreased as the level of BCSM inclusion increased compared to the control diet, resulting lower costs of production as the other expenses were similar across treatments. Concurrently, net income and marginal rate of return were higher in broilers fed BCSM, with the highest values observed in birds receiving the diet containing 4.5% BCSM (BCSM4.5). These results were primarily attributed to reduced feed costs with increasing BCSM inclusion, efficient feed utilization, and negligible differences in body weight gain. The partial budget analysis indicates that dietary inclusion of BCSM is a cost-effective alternative feed ingredient. Its inclusion reduces overall production costs while increasing the number of marketable broilers at the end of the trial.

5. Conclusion

Dietary inclusion of black cumin seed meal (BCSM), particularly at 4.5%, improved feed conversion ratio and reduced mortality in broiler chickens, while beneficially modulating cecal microbiota across inclusion levels. These responses improved feed utilization efficiency, production efficiency, and economic return without adversely affecting growth performance or carcass characteristics. Overall, BCSM appears to be a promising dietary ingredient for improving gut health, flock viability, and production and cost efficiency in broiler production.

Ethical statement

All animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of the School of Animal and Range Sciences, Haramaya University (Approval No SARS 053/24; May 25, 2024), and were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines.

Funding

This study received small competitive based funding from Haramaya University Research Grant with budget code of HURG-2023–01–01–45 which has been completely utilized in this study.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Muhammed Tilahun: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Mengistu Urge: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Resources, Methodology, Conceptualization. Meseret Girma: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Resources, Methodology, Conceptualization. Negassi Ameha: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Resources, Methodology, Conceptualization. Sileshi Gadissa: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Resources, Methodology, Conceptualization. Kiros Welay: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Resources, Methodology, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Minister of Education, Wollo, and Haramaya University. Laboratory technicians in different laboratories and poultry farm personnel of Haramaya University also highly acknowledged for their cooperation during the experiment.

Data availability

  • The data supporting the finding of this study are available from corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Abaza I.M., Shehata M.A., Shoieb M.S., Hassan I.I. Evaluation of some natural feed additive in growing chicks diets. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2008;7(9):872–879. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2008.872.879. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abd El-Hack M.E., Alagawany M., Patra A., Abdel-Latef M., Ashour E.A., Arif M., Farag M.R., Dhama K. Use of brewers dried grains as an unconventional feed ingredient in the diets of broiler chickens: A review. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 2019;7(3):218–224. doi: 10.17582/journal.aavs/2019/7.3.218.224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdollahi A., Karimi A., Sadeghi A. The effects of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seed on performance, intestinal morphology, ileum microbial count, and nutrient digestibility of broilers. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 2024;25(4):932–944. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/25.4.4292. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Abolfathi M.E., Tabeidian S.A., Foroozandeh Shahraki A.D., Tabatabaei S.N., Habibian M. Comparative effects of n-hexane and methanol extracts of elecampane (Inula helenium L.) rhizome on growth performance, carcass traits, feed digestibility, intestinal antioxidant status and ileal microbiota in broiler chickens. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 2019;73(2):88–110. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2019.1581027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahsan U., Kuter E., Raza I., Koksal B.H., Cengiz O., Yildiz M., Kizanlik P.K., Kaya M., Tatli O., Sevim O. Dietary supplementation of different levels of phytogenic feed additive in broiler diets: The dynamics of growth performance, caecal microbiota, and intestinal morphometry. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 2018;20(4):737–746. doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0698. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Aljohani A.S.M. Phenolics of botanical origin for the control of coccidiosis in poultry. Pakistan Veterinary Journal. 2024;44(2):222–228. doi: 10.29261/pakvetj/2024.179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amad A.A., Männer K., Wendler K.R., Neumann K., Zentek J. Effects of a phytogenic feed additive on growth performance and ileal nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2011;90(12):2811–2816. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. AOAC International. (2000). Official methods of analysis of AOAC International (17th ed.).
  9. Ardilla Y.N.N., Nuningtyas Y.F., Djunaidi I.H., Natsir M.H., Widodo E. Encapsulation affects concentration of liquid smoke active substances and intestinal microflora of broiler. EAS Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 2021;3(3):17–20. doi: 10.36349/easjvms.2021.v03i03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Arif M., Rehman A., Abd El-Hack M.E., Saeed M., Khan F., Akhtar M., Swelum A.A., Saadeldin I.M., Alowaimer A.N. Growth, carcass traits, cecal microbial counts, and blood chemistry of meat-type quail fed diets supplemented with humic acid and black cumin seeds. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2018;31(12):1930–1938. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Asfaw E., Etana D. Major constraints and opportunities of poultry production in Ethiopia: Review. American Journal of Zoology. 2025;8(2):22–27. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20250802.11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ayalew H., Yinnesu A., Misganaw G., Molla M., Birhan M., Chanie D., Kindie T., Amsalu D. Performance evaluation and sustainability challenges of tropically adopted exotic chicken breeds in Northwest Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2023;9(1) doi: 10.1080/23311932.2023.2202221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Aydin B. A preliminary assessment of the effects of dietary black cumin seed cake on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters and fatty acid composition of mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio var. specularis) fingerlings. Aquaculture Reports. 2021;21 doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100847. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Azeem T., Zaib-Ur-Rehman, Umar S., Asif M., Arif M., Rahman A. Effect of Nigella sativa on poultry health and production: A review. Science Letters. 2014;2(2):76–82. http://thesciencepublishers.com [Google Scholar]
  15. Aziza A.E., Abdelhamid F.M., Risha E.F., Elsayed M.M., Awadin W.F. Influence of Nigella sativa and rosemary oils on growth performance, biochemical, antioxidant and immunological parameters, and pathological changes in Japanese quail challenged with Escherichia coli. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 2019;28(4):354–366. doi: 10.22358/jafs/114239/2019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bist R.B., Bist K., Poudel S., Subedi D., Yang X., Paneru B., Mani S., Wang D., Chai L. Sustainable poultry farming practices: A critical review of current strategies and future prospects. Poultry Science. 2024;103(12) doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bajagai Y.S., Alsemgeest J., Moore R.J., Van T.T.H., Stanley D. Phytogenic products, used as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters, modify the intestinal microbiota derived from a range of production systems: An in vitro model. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2020;104(24):10631–10640. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10998-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Barkah N.N., Wiryawan K.G., Retnani Y., Wibawan W.T., Wina E. Proceedings of the IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science. Vol. 756. 2021. Physicochemical properties of products and waste of black seed produced by cold press method. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bediye S., Nemi G., Makkar H. Ethiopian feed industry: Current status, challenges and opportunities. Broadening Horizons. 2018;50:1–7. https://www.feedipedia.org/content/ethiopian-feed-industry-current-status-challenges-and-opportunities [Google Scholar]
  20. Bhowmik P., Khatun J., Islam M.M. Dietary supplementation of dried and microbially fermented ginger improves feed efficiency, digestibility and cecal Lactobacillus in broiler. Animal Open Space. 2026;5 doi: 10.1016/j.anopes.2026.100127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cakir K., Cayan H. Effects of dietary black cumin seed (Nigella sativa L.) meal on performance, gut health, and meat quality of Japanese quail. Veterinary Sciences. 2026;13 doi: 10.3390/vetsci13020188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Degu B., Tesfaye B., Abebe W., Assefa K. Diversity of Ethiopian black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) based on compositions of essential oil. Biochemistry Research International. 2025;2025 doi: 10.1155/bri/2065593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Diaz Carrasco J.M., Casanova N.A., Fernandez Miyakawa M.E. Microbiota, gut health and chicken productivity: What is the connection? Microorganisms. 2019;7(10) doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7100374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dugassa G. Current status of poultry meat production, processing and marketing in Ethiopia: A review. Journal of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science. 2022;6(1):6–11. doi: 10.22259/2637-5354.0601002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Elbaz A.M., Othman D.O., Abd El-Atty K., Marwan A.A., Khalfallah E.K.M., Thabet H.A., Hamed M.M. Dietary effect of Nigella sativa meal on growth performance, blood biochemistry, immunity, intestinal microbial, and muc-2 gene expression of growing rabbits under environmental heat stress. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds. 2025;28(2):167–176. doi: 10.21608/ejnf.2025.445839. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. El-Deek A.A., Hamdy S.M., Attia Y.A., Khalifah M.M. Nigella sativa seed oil meal as a source of plant protein in broiler diets. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal. 2009;29(1):39–52. [Google Scholar]
  27. Elgandy M.F. Using Nigella sativa seed meal as a substitute for soybean meal in broiler diets. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2024;54(3):387–396. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v54i3.08. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. El-Kashef M.M. Effect of different levels of Nigella sativa meal on growth performance, some blood biochemical and immune-responsiveness of broiler chicks. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal. 2020;40(3):729–741. doi: 10.21608/epsj.2020.115583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ermumcu M.Ş.K., Şanlıer N. Black cumin (Nigella sativa) and its active component of thymoquinone: Effects on health. Journal of Food and Health Science. 2017;3(4):170–183. doi: 10.3153/JFHS17020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ershadi D., Navidshad B., Moheboddini H., Mirzaei Aghjehgheshlagh F., Karamati Jobehdar S. Effect of Nigella sativa meal with multi enzyme on growth performance and blood biochemical parameters of broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research. 2022;14(1):65–81. doi: 10.22067/ijasr.2021.38312.0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fathi M., Hosayni M., Alizadeh S., Zandi R., Rahmati S., Rezaee V. Effects of black cumin (Nigella sativa) seed meal on growth performance, blood and biochemical indices, meat quality and cecal microbial load in broiler chickens. Livestock Science. 2023;274 doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2023.105272. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2019). Poultry sector Ethiopia: FAO animal production and health livestock country reviews (No. 11). https://www.fao.org/3/ca3716en/CA3716EN.pdf.
  33. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2023). The state of food and agriculture: Revealing the true cost of food to transform agrifood systems. 10.4060/cc7724en.
  34. Ghannam N.A.A.F.K. An-Najah National University; 2022. Performance and cost evaluation of broilers fed with varying levels of black cumin seed meal.https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11888/16915 [Master’s thesis. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gul S.T., Raza R., Hannan A., Khaliq S., Waheed N., Aderibigbe A. Potential of a medicinal plant Urtica dioica (stinging nettle) as a feed additive for animals and birds: A review. Agrobiological Records. 2024;17:110–118. doi: 10.47278/journal.abr/2024.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hassanien M.F.R., Mahgoub S.A., El-Zahar K.M. Soft cheese supplemented with black cumin oil: Impact on foodborne pathogens and quality during storage. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2014;21(3):280–288. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2013.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ike O.O., Ekugba C.U., Ezenyilimba B.N., Onwumelu I.J., Okonkwo A.P., Ejivade O.M., Ezejesi H.C., Okonkwo J.C., Nwankwo C.A. Strain effect on hematological indices of broiler chicks fed graded levels of Phyllanthus amarus leaf extract. Agrobiological Records. 2025;19:50–55. doi: 10.47278/journal.abr/2025.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jahan M., Khairunnesa M., Afrin S., Ali M. Dietary black cumin (Nigella sativa) seed meal on growth and meat yield performance of broilers. SAARC Journal of Agriculture. 2015;13(2):151–160. doi: 10.3329/sja.v13i2.26576. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Katu J.K., Toth T., Varga L. Enhancing the nutritional quality of low-grade poultry feed ingredients through fermentation: A review. Agriculture. 2025;15(5) doi: 10.3390/agriculture15050476. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kekeocha C.C. Pfizer Corporation; 1985. Poultry production handbook. [Google Scholar]
  41. Khan S.H., Ansari J., Haq A.U., Abbas G. Black cumin seeds as phytogenic product in broiler diets and its effects on performance, blood constituents, immunity and caecal microbial population. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2012;11(4) doi: 10.4081/ijas.2012.e77. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Khan M.T., Xu C., Khan S., Ali F., Abbas G., Bughio E., Li K. Dietary Nigella sativa supplementation enhances performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, immune response, and gut health in broilers. Poultry Science. 2025;104(10) doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Khan M.A. In: Molecular and therapeutic actions of thymoquinone. Younus H., editor. Springer; 2018. Antimicrobial action of thymoquinone; pp. 57–64. (Ed.) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kinati C., Ameha N., Girma M., Nurfeta A. Effective microorganisms, turmeric (Curcuma longa), and their combination on performance and economic benefits in broilers. Heliyon. 2022;8(6) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kumar P., Patra A.K. Beneficial uses of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seeds as a feed additive in poultry nutrition. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 2017;73(4):872–885. doi: 10.1017/S0043933917000848. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kumar P., Patra A.K., Mandal G.P., Debnath B.C. Carcass characteristics, chemical and fatty acid composition and oxidative stability of meat from broiler chickens fed black cumin (Nigella sativa) seeds. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2018;102(3):769–779. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Li C., Zhang C., Chen X., Cui H., Lin L. The interference mechanism of basil essential oil on the cell membrane barrier and respiratory metabolism of Listeria monocytogenes. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.855905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mahdavi A.H., Rahmani H.R., Nili N., Samie A.H., Soleimanian-Zad S., Jahanian R. Effects of dietary egg yolk antibody powder on growth performance, intestinal Escherichia coli colonization, and immunocompetence of challenged broiler chicks. Poultry Science. 2010;89(3):484–494. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Manafi M., Khalaji S., Hedayati M., Pirany N. Efficacy of Bacillus subtilis and bacitracin methylene disalicylate on growth performance, digestibility, blood metabolites, immunity, and intestinal microbiota after intramuscular inoculation with Escherichia coli in broilers. Poultry Science. 2017;96(5):1174–1183. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Marcu A., Vacaru-Opriş I., Dumitrescu G., Ciochină L.P., Marcu A., Nicula M., Peţ I., Dronca D., Kelciov B., Mariş C. The influence of genetics on economic efficiency of broiler chickens growth. Animal Science and Biotechnologies. 2013;46(2):339–346. [Google Scholar]
  51. Mba A.N., Onwumelu I.J., Emelugo B.N., Chiedo C.C., Ezejesi H.C., Ejivade O.M., Okonkwo J.C. Effect of different inclusion levels of Phyllanthus amarus leaf extract on growth performance of three strains of broiler. Trends in Animal and Plant Sciences. 2025;5:29–45. doi: 10.62324/TAPS/2025.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Moran E.T., Jr. In: Poultry meat science (Poultry science symposium series. Richardson R.I., Mead G.C., editors. Vol. 25. CAB International; 1999. Live production factors influencing yield and quality of poultry meat; pp. 179–195. (Poultry meat science (Poultry science symposium series). (Eds.) [Google Scholar]
  53. Navidshad B., Dadashi Orang A., Royan M. The potential of black cumin (Nigella sativa) as a natural feed additive for poultry: An update. World's Poultry Science Journal. 2025;81(1):289–303. doi: 10.1080/00439339.2024.2438352. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ntsongota Z., Ikusika O., Jaja I.F. The role of phytogenic feed additives in growth and immune response in livestock production: A global systematic review. Frontiers in Animal Science. 2025;6 doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1703112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Obeidat B.S. The inclusion of black cumin meal improves the carcass characteristics of growing Awassi lambs. Veterinary World. 2021;14(1):237–241. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.237-241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Oni A.I., Oke O.E. Gut health modulation through phytogenics in poultry: Mechanisms, benefits, and applications. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025;12 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1616734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ramdani D., Juandita K.N., Hernaman I., Alhuur K.R.G. Effects of dietary black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) meal on performance, blood metabolites, and digestibility in a rice straw-based diet of fattening Garut lambs. Veterinary World. 2024;17(9):2152–2158. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.2152-2158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sahile S. Haramaya University]; 2008. The epidemiology and management options of chocolate spot disease (Botrytis fabae sard.) on faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in northern Ethiopia [Doctoral dissertation. [Google Scholar]
  59. Saied A.M., Attia A.I., El-Kholy M.S., El-Nagar A.G., Reda F.M. Feeding Nigella sativa oil to broilers affects their performance, serum constituents and cecum microbiota. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2022;52(1):34–42. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v52i1.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Saleh A.A. Nigella seed oil as alternative to avilamycin antibiotic in broiler chicken diets. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2014;44(3):254. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v44i3.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Samy A., Hassan H.M.A., Kabary H., Elsherif H.M.R. The influence of Nigella sativa and curcumin extracts as phytogenic feed additives on broiler performance, blood parameters, antioxidants status and intestinal microbiota. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds. 2023;26(3):353–363. doi: 10.21608/ejnf.2023.332913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sapsuha Y., Sundari S., Nur A. Using Lactobacillus plantarum and Tomi-Tomi fruit extract synbiotics as a natural supplement in broiler chickens: Impact on blood profile, gut microbiota, and performance. International Journal of Veterinary Science. 2025;14(6):1130–1136. doi: 10.47278/journal.ijvs/2025.069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. SAS Institute Inc. (2021). JMP Pro (Version 16.0.0) [Computer software]. https://www.jmp.com.
  64. Sogut B., Inci H., Ozdemir G. Effect of supplemented black seed (Nigella sativa) on growth performance and carcass characteristics of broilers. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2012;11(14):2480–2484. doi: 10.3923/javaa.2012.2480.2484. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Stanley D., Geier M.S., Denman S.E., Haring V.R., Crowley T.M., Hughes R.J., Moore R.J. Identification of chicken intestinal microbiota correlated with the efficiency of energy extraction from feed. Veterinary Microbiology. 2013;164(1–2):85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sugiharto S., Yudiarti T., Isroli I., Widiastuti E. The potential of tropical agro-industrial by-products as a functional feed for poultry. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science. 2018;8(3):375–385. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sugiharto S., Nuengjamnong C. An update review on the use of agro-industrial byproducts on carcass and meat quality of broiler chickens. Discover Food. 2025;5 doi: 10.1007/s44187-025-00509-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Talayi-Anbaran A., Jáber J.R., Rasouli B., Seidavi A., Sanjuán E., Ramírez L.S., Espinosa J., Saavedra P., Ventura M.R. Compatible alternative to antibiotics in broilers: Evaluating Nigella sativa as a natural growth promoter. Organic Agriculture. 2025;15(4):651–668. doi: 10.1007/s13165-025-00521-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Talebi A., Maham M., Asri-Rezaei S., Pournaghi P., Khorrami M.S., Derakhshan A. Effects of Nigella sativa on performance, blood profiles, and antibody titer against Newcastle disease in broilers. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2021;2021:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2021/2070375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Tekeli A. Nutritional value of black cumin (Nigella sativa) meal as an alternative protein source in poultry nutrition. Journal of Animal Science Advances. 2014;4(4):797–806. [Google Scholar]
  71. Upton M. Oxford University Press; 1979. Farm management in Africa: The principles of production and planning. [Google Scholar]
  72. Venkatramana P., Senthil Murugan S., Chacko B., Patki H.S., Shyama K., Sunanda C. Effects of feeding cashew apple waste with or without supplementation of non-starch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broilers. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 2020;37(1):67. doi: 10.5958/2231-6744.2020.00012.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wagh H.A., Shinde R.M., Bangar S.S., Gaharwar A.M., Shingote P.R., Wasule D.L., Gade R.M., Shirsat K.D., Borker R.D., Madke M., Pimpalzare P., Patange V.V. Low cost feed formulation for economical rearing of rural poultry. International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies. 2021;8(2):28–31. doi: 10.22271/23940522.2021.v8.i3a.827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Windisch W., Schedle K., Plitzner C., Kroismayr A. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. Journal of Animal Science. 2008;86(Suppl. 14):E140–E148. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wiseman J. Butterworths; 1987. Feeding of non-ruminant livestock. [Google Scholar]
  76. Zaazaa A., Mudalal S., Sabbah M., Altamimi M., Dalab A., Samara M. Effects of black cumin seed (Nigella sativa) and coconut meals (Cocos nucifera) on broiler performance and cecal microbiota. Animals. 2023;13(3) doi: 10.3390/ani13030535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

  • The data supporting the finding of this study are available from corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Veterinary and Animal Science are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES