Abstract
Particulate 2-methyltetrols (2-MT), 2-methylglyceric acid (2-MG), and C5-alkene triols serve as critical tracers for identifying isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosols (SOAs). Field observations have identified significant concentrations of C5-alkene triols, yet no air quality models currently account for the formation pathways of these compounds. Simultaneously, the 2-MT concentrations are usually overestimated by 4–5 times compared to field observations due to the lack of the C5-alkene triols formation pathway. In this study, we expanded the isoprene-SOA scheme and implemented it into the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model with the latest Community Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Multiphase Mechanism version 2 (CRACMM2) mechanism. The missing formation of C5-alkene triols via the low isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX) pathway, the gas-particle partitioning of isoprene-derived SOA tracers, and the high NOx SOA formation pathway are comprehensively considered in this expanded isoprene-SOA scheme. Results indicate that the C5-alkene triols contribute to 68% of all isoprene-derived SOA tracers, with approximately 50% in the gas phase and the remaining in the particle phase. The 2-MT concentrations are better represented in the new scheme compared to the default CRACMM2 based on the field observations. The overall SOA is improved by in China with the expanded scheme. The isoprene-derived SOA is highly influenced by anthropogenic emissions, especially , and the reduction in reduces both isoprene aerosol tracers and organosulfates significantly, while a similar reduction in leads to small increases in these species for both particle and gas phases.
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
Isoprene is the most abundant biogenic volatile organic compound emitted into the atmosphere, with annual global emissions estimated to range from 500 to 750 Tg1.. Isoprene is highly reactive, as it can be oxidized by hydroxyl radical (HO·)2,3, ozone (O3)4, and nitrate radicals (NO3·)5. Isoprene oxidation products can undergo multiphase chemical reactions, leading to the generation of semi-volatile and low-volatility organic aerosol products6–8.
The chemical composition of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosols (SOA) has been extensively investigated in chamber experiments, field observations, and modeling studies. Among the identified isoprene-derived SOA species, IEPOX-derived compounds, including 2-MT and C5-alkene triols, have been used as molecular organic tracers to study isoprene-derived SOA composition and formation mechanisms9,10. Another widely recognized tracer, 2-MG, is derived from methacrylic acid epoxide (MAE)7 and hydroxymethyl-methyl--lactone (HMML)11, both of which are produced from MPAN species under later-generation organic peroxy (RO2) + NO conditions. This tracer is essential for improving the representation of isoprene oxidation pathways leading to SOA formation, even though its concentration is lower than 2-MT and C5-alkene triols. However, most chemical transport models and mechanisms (except SAPRC07TIC_ae7i) do not include this high pathway for isoprene-derived SOA formation.
3-Methylenebutane-1,2,4-triol and 3-methyltetrahydrofuran-2,4-diols, designated as “C5-alkene triols”, are notably high in field measurements. However, previous chamber and field studies using alternative analytical techniques suggest that observed C5-alkene triols reactive uptake products are mostly artifacts from the decomposition of methyltetrol sulfate esters and oligomeric sulfated compounds12,13. Recently, based on nondestructive hydrophilic-interaction liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization interfaced to high-resolution quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis of chamber-generated SOA, parts of C5-alkene triols are not analytical artifacts but arise from acid-driven particle-phase IEPOX isomerization14. These triols have been shown to partition substantially into the gas phase. This process has been demonstrated as an additional important and understudied reactive pathway14. The observation is consistent with field studies from the Southeastern United States (SE USA), Central Amazonia, and Eastern China, which indicate that isoprene-derived C5-polyols undergo gas-phase partitioning after being formed within particles through multiphase IEPOX chemistry15–18. This potential source of isoprene-derived SOA has been overlooked and as a result, variations in field measurements have not been adequately explained, and models of SOA formation and distribution likely require revision since none of the models involves this pathway.
To address these limitations, this study expands the regional isoprene-derived SOA scheme of CRACMM2 implemented in the CMAQ model to simulate the formation of the key isoprene-SOA molecular tracers, C5-alkene triols. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first modeling study to estimate the formation of C5-alkene triols and their partitioning. In order to provide a more comprehensive representation of the complete isoprene oxidation mechanism, we incorporates a high- pathway into the model based on previous studies that employed the SAPRC07TIC_aero7i7,19,20 mechanism. Given that C5-alkene triols are newly added to the model, sensitivity simulations are conducted to address uncertainties in the rates of particle-phase reactions and the Henry’s Law coefficients of their gas-phase precursor. 2-MT, 2-MG, and C5-alkene triols are treated as semi-volatile compounds with gas-particle partitioning. As the gas-particle phase partitioning equilibrium in the model is governed by of these tracers, the sensitivity to is assessed in this study as well. We evaluate the model results after constraining the parameters based on partitioning data and observations. Additionally, we explored the model’s response to reductions in and emissions. The results of this study will enhance our understanding of isoprene oxidation pathways and SOA formation.
Methods
Observational Data
Field observations of SOA organic tracers by our group were conducted at the super monitoring station of Zibo Ecological Environment Bureau (36°50′N, 118°7′E; 25 m a.s.l., shown in Figure S1 in Supporting Information), which is located in a suburban area surrounded by Lutai Avenue (100 m south), Lushan Avenue (500 m east), residential housing (1 km north), and a gas station (210 m west). This area is predominantly covered by deciduous broadleaf vegetation. High-time resolution measurements of PM2.5-bound organic molecular tracers were conducted during the summer period from 6 June to 10 July 2022 using an Aerodyne TAG stand-alone system combined with a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) (Agilent GC 7890B/MS 5977B, Agilent, CA, USA). In this field campaign, the major isoprene-derived SOA organic tracers, including 2-MT, 2-MG and C5-alkene triols were measured online. Isoprene was measured by an online GC-MS system (FID GC5800, Thermo Fisher Scientific). A detailed description of the analytical system and procedures are provided in Supporting Information “Online TAG-GC/MS Observation”. The on-line derivatization step was performed on C5-alkene triols and the derivatization thermal desorption GC-MS mass spectra associated with extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) traces of m/z 231 are shown in Figure S2. Hourly concentrations of PM2.5, NO2, SO2, and O3 from national monitoring sites were obtained from the platform released by China National Environmental Monitoring Centre (http://air.cnemc.cn:18007), which are used to perform model performance evaluation.
Model Development and Application
In this study, CMAQ version 5.5 was employed over the China domain at a horizontal resolution of 36 km × 36 km, with 35 vertical layers, from June 1 to June 30, 2022. Emissions were based on the 2019 Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (http://www.meicmodel.org). Biogenic emissions were generated using the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 3.2 (https://aqrp.ceer.utexas.edu/projects.cfm)21. Additionally, CMAQ-ready emission files were prepared using the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel (SMOKE) model22. Meteorological input files for CMAQ were generated offline by feeding the Weather Research and Forecasting model version 4.4 output files through the Meteorology-Chemistry Interface Processor (MCIP)23. CRACMM224 builds upon the framework of the Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Mechanism, Version 2 (RACM2), enhancing its capabilities by integrating gas- and particle-phase chemistry. It treats the entire pool of atmospheric reactive organic carbon relevant to current emissions, providing a more comprehensive representation of atmospheric processes24. In this work, the CRACMM2 mechanism has been expanded to include the formation of C5-alkene triols for the first time in atmospheric modeling. It also incorporates 4 gas-phase reactions, 6 heterogeneous reactions, and 16 new species, including MAE and HMML formation in the gas phase (Figure 1). The detailed reactions are described in the Supporting Information, equations S1–S10. Organonitrates from IEPOX and MPAN are less abundant19, primarily due to low nitrate aerosol concentrations during summer, and thus are not explicitly represented in this model20. Additionally, the model accounts for gas-particle phase partitioning, further enhancing its representation of atmospheric processes.
Figure 1:

Schematic of the isoprene-derived SOA tracers’ formation and partitioning, (a) current CRACMM2 approach, (b) expanded scheme, where the red dashed box shows MPAN-derived SOA formation pathways. Solid green lines indicate gas phase chemistry leading to IEPOX, MAE and HMML. Dashed green bidirectional arrows depict that SOA tracers partitioned to gas. Blue solid lines represent isoprene intermediate gases leading to SOA. The organosulfates derived from IEPOX and MPAN included in the model are not shown here.
Aerosol-Phase Chemistry
CRACMM2 includes 179 gas-phase species and 531 reactions spanning both gas-phase and heterogeneous pathways. It incorporates Automated Model Reduction (AMORE) version 1.2 (v1.2), upgraded from the previous version implemented in CMAQ (AMOREv1.0,25) and GEOS-Chem (AMOREv1.1,26). In contrast to previous AMORE representations25,26, AMOREv1.2 was specifically designed to enhance cycling and O3 predictions compared to previous versions. Additionally, it introduces new SOA precursors, including lumped isoprene tetrafunctional compounds (IPX) and lumped isoprene nitrates (INALD). These new precursors are expected to undergo heterogeneous uptake at rates 2× and 0.5× that of IEPOX, respectively24. The CRACMM2 mechanism only includes isoprene-derived SOA from heterogeneous pathways (no volatility-based pathways)24. Isoprene undergoes reactions with HO, NO, NO3· and O3, with epoxides forming exclusively through the HO· reaction. In this study, we define the case labeled as Case0, which incorporates the most optimal model parameters, as outlined in Table 1. This case also utilizes the updated isoprene-derived SOA formation pathways, as illustrated in Figure 1b.
Table 1:
New isoprene-derived SOA species considered in the CMAQ model along with their molecular weight, OM/OC ratio, parent hydrocarbon identity, nucleophile that adds to the parent, and the third-order rate constants 5, where refers to the nucleophile (e.g., H2O), and refers to the acid species involved in the reaction, such as H+ or , as well as parameters changed in the default CRACMM2 model (parameters used in Case0). IEPOX_OS means IEPOX-derived organosulfates, MPAN_OS means MPAN-derived organosulfates.
| Species | MW | OM:OC | Parent Hydrocarbon | Nucleophile | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-MT | 136 | 2.27 | IEPOX | water | 2.5 × 10−4a | 1.3 × 10−5 |
| C5-alkene triols | 118 | 2.97 | IEPOX | water | 7.0 × 10−4b | 3.6 × 10−5 |
| IEPOX_OS | 216 | 3.02 | IEPOX | sulfate | 8.8 × 10−3 | 2.9 × 10−6 |
| 2-MG | 120 | 2.50 | MPAN/MAE | water | 2.5 × 10−3 | 1.3 × 10−5 |
| MPAN_OS | 200 | 4.17 | MPAN/MAE | sulfate | 2.0 × 10−4 | 2.9 × 10−6 |
Sensitivity analysis indicated that the default for the particle-phase reactions () are too high, and a value of 2.0 × 10−4 M−2s−1 is more consistent with observation19. After taking partitioning into consideration, this value was changed to 2.5 × 10−4 M−2s−1.
Newly added to CRACMM2 based on partitioning of C5-alkene triols and observations. More details are given in the “Particle-phase rate constants” section.
Particle-phase rate constants
The optimized particle-phase rate constants are shown in Table 1, and in this section, we mainly focus on how the rate constants for 2-MT and C5-alkene triols are selected. of 2-MT is set to 9.0×10−4 M−2s−1 in CRACMM2, based on the work of Pye et al.19. In order to better represent the chemical processes, the was split into two components to better represent the chemical processes based on the observations of those two species ratios. The average ratios of 2-MT to C5-alkene triols were 0.97±1.17, 1.33±1.24, and 3.97±3.08 at 8, 120, and 260 m in altitude respectively27. Some studies also suggested that the loading of 2-MT increased with the enhancement of aerosol acidity28 and found that the relative humidity can affect the ratio of 2-MT to C5-alkene triols8. Recent studies suggested the ratio of 2-MT to C5-alkene triols decreased with aerosol acidity29. Since this is the first time C5-alkene triols have been considered in the modeling, the particle-phase rate constants were adjusted based on the ratio of 2-MT to C5-alkene triols observed in the China Zibo site (i.e., ~1:3). For 2-MT, the was set to 2.5 × 10−4 M−2s−1, while for C5-alkene triols, it was assigned a value of 7.0 × 10−4 M−2s−1, for the for C5-alkene triols we use the same method to determine its value..
IEPOX-derived organosulfates were determined based on the 3rd-order reaction rate parameters in Table 1 and implemented as a heterogeneous uptake process, just like in the case of 2-MT. To quantify the relative abundance of organosulfates versus tetrols (2-MT + C5-alkene triols), a beta parameter, defined as the ratio of organosulfates to tetrols, can be described by equation 130.
| (1) |
Gas-organic phase partitioning
In this study, 2-MT, 2-MG, and C5-alkene triols are treated as semi-volatile, so they will repartition between gas and organic phases, as shown in Figure 1. The fraction of tracers in the gas phase can be determined using equation 2, and the fraction of tracers in the particle phase is defined as the sum of the fractions in the organic phase and aqueous phase and calculated following equation 331.
| (2) |
| (3) |
Where represents the concentration of the absorbing organic matter (). The saturation mass concentration is calculated using equation 4:
| (4) |
where is the subcooled vapor pressure (Pa), is the activity coefficient of the compound in the absorbing OM phase (assumed to be unity), and is the mean molecular weight of the OM phase assumed to be 200 g/mol according to Williams et al.32. In this study, the of 2-MG (3.76 × 10−4 Pa), 2-MT and C5-alkene triols (1.81 × 10−4 Pa) were adopted based on the work of Zhang et al31, which gives values of 30.4 and , respectively. The enthalpy of vaporization () of the three species are 130.0 (2-MG) and 117.7 kJ mol−1 (2-MT and C5-alkene triols).
The gas-aqueous phase distribution factor is calculated by equation 5, where the gas-aqueous phase partitioning equilibrium is described by :
| (5) |
where is the tracer concentration in the aqueous phase () and is the tracer concentration in the gas phase ()31; is the Henry’s law constant (M atm−1); is the ideal gas constant (atm M−1K−1); is the ambient temperature (K); and is the aerosol water content (). estimated using SPARC online for 2-MT (3.38×1010 M atm−1), C5-alkene triols (8.14×1010 M atm−1), and 2-MG (5.25×108 M atm−1) at 298 K are applied in Case0 of this study. Their uncertainty in the model predictions is discussed in the “Sensitivity Simulations” section.
For 2-MG, accounts for the changes in its aqueous solubility due to aerosol acidity, as shown in equation 6:
| (6) |
where is the acid dissociation constant of 2-MG (pKa = 3.5, pKa values are not relevant for 2-MT and the C5-alkene triols),33 and is the concentration of hydrogen ions. The temperature dependence of for 2-MT and C5 is described by the Van ‘t Hoff equation (equation 7):
| (7) |
where is the enthalpy of dissolution; and the values of for 2-MT, C5-alkene triols, and 2-MG are 6×103 K, estimated by EPI Suite31.
Sensitivity Simulations
Sensitivity simulations are performed to examine the effects of changes in model parameters and emissions. We conduct three sensitivity studies for the purpose of investigating the behavior of C5-alkene triols compounds, examining phase partitioning dynamics and evaluating the impact of and emission reductions. The details of all the cases are shown in Table 2.
Table 2:
Simulations conducted in this study.
| Scenarios | Objectives | Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| Base case | Default CRACMM2 (with AMOREV1.2) | Default parameters |
| Case0 | Updated CRACMM2 (Shown in Figure 1b) | Parameters used in Table 1 |
| Case1 | Sensitivities of IEPOX for C5 production | of IEPOX × 10 |
| Case2 | of IEPOX × 0.1 | |
| Case3 | Sensitivities of for C5 production | of C5 × 10 |
| Case4 | of C5-alkene triols × 0.1 | |
| Case5 | Sensitivities of for three tracers partitioning | of three tracers × 0.2 |
| Case6 | of those three tracers × 5 | |
| Case7 | Isoprene-derived SOA changes to reduction | reduction 25% |
| Case8 | reduction 50% | |
| Case9 | Isoprene-derived SOA changes to reduction | reduction 25% |
| Case10 | reduction 50% | |
| Case11 | Drivers of organosulfates production | of organosulfates × 0.1 |
| Case12 | of organosulfates × 10 |
C5-alkene triols formation sensitivity to and
These sensitivity simulations address uncertainties in the rates of particle-phase reaction and the (equation 6). The model’s sensitivity to aerosol-phase diffusivity or gas-phase diffusivity (typically 10−5 m2/s under standard conditions) is minimal unless these values are significantly misestimated—by roughly a factor of 10019. Since C5-alkene triols are newly introduced to the model, we performed a sensitivity simulation to test the effect of for IEPOX by multiplying factors of 10 and 0.1 to assess its impact on subsequent C5-alkene triols formation (Case 1 and Case 2). The for MAE was not changed, as our focus is on C5-alkene triols formation. The second sensitivity simulation retains the same from Case 0 but alters of C5-alkene triols to investigate impacts on predictions of aerosol species. In this simulation, the values were multiplied by 10 and 0.1 (Case 3 and Case 4). This simulation influences the relative split between tetrols and organosulfates, thereby affecting particle-phase speciation. The sensitivity of parameters to organosulfates is shown in the Supporting Information ‘Driver of organosulfates‘ section.
Uncertainty of for tracer’s phase partitioning
The gas-aqueous phase partitioning equilibrium in the model is governed by according to equation 2–7. Estimates of for 2-MT, 2-MG, and C5-alkene triols can vary over several orders of magnitude, depending on the methods used34,35. Among these estimates, the SPARC online tool is considered to provide the most reliable values, predicting for 2-MT as 3.38 × 1010 M atm−1, for 2-MG as 5.25 × 108 M atm−1, and for C5-alkene triols as 8.14 × 1010 M atm−1 at 298 K. These values are used in Case 0 in this study.36 To evaluate the impact of the associated uncertainties, additional simulations were conducted in which was scaled by factors of 0.2 and 5 (Case 5 and Case 6). These two cases provide insights into the uncertainty of the fraction of these three tracer species in the gas and particle phase.
and reduction
To assess the impact of emission reductions on isoprene-derived SOA and the formation of SOA through different pathways, two additional sets of simulations were conducted. These scenarios included a 25% and 50% reduction in emissions (Case 7 and Case 8) and a 25% and 50% reduction in total emissions (Case 9 and Case 10). The simulations were performed for June 2022, using the Case 0 model parameterization for heterogeneous uptake processes.
Results and discussion
Comparisons with Observations
The evaluation of isoprene (Figure S3a), PM2.5 (Figure S3b), O3 (Figure S3c) and total organic carbon (OC) (Figure S4) at the Zibo site (Figure S1) is presented in the Supporting Information ‘Model Performance Evaluation‘ section. The spatial distributions of PM2.5, O3, SO2, and NO2 are illustrated in Figure S5. Additionally, a comparison of the evaluation results between the updated CRACMM2 and the default CRACMM2 mechanisms for PM2.5 (Figure S6) and O3 (Figure S7) across 500 monitoring sites in five regions of China is provided.
The 2-MT, C5-alkene triols, and 2-MG were collected every other hour in June 2022 at the Zibo site37, and the data were paired in time with the model results. Model evaluation of 2-MT, 2-MG, and C5-alkene triols at the Zibo site are shown in Figure 2a. The time series of the three organic molecular tracers are shown in Figure 2b–d. It can be seen that the model accurately captures the high values, with 2-MT and C5-alkene triols peaking from the 16th to the 20th, and 2-MG exhibiting high values from the 22nd to the 25th. Additionally, the model also successfully captures the low values observed from the 4th to the 15th. The newly added C5-alkene triols formation pathway achieves a pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) value of 0.71, with a normalized mean bias (NMB) value of −26%. An value of 0.4 and an NMB of −35% are achieved for 2-MT. Previously, the modeled 2-MT concentrations were several times higher than observations. After the model update, 2-MT concentrations align more closely with observations. After we added the formation of 2-MG pathway via high , the modeled concentration is lower than the observation, but the model was able to capture 2-MG concentrations relatively well, with a NMB of −18%.
Figure 2:

(a) Model evaluation of aerosol phase 2-MT, 2-MG and C5-alkene triols. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of daily concentrations, filled dots represent the average tracer concentrations. Time series of (b) 2-MG, (c) C5-alkene triols and (d) 2-MT during the modeling period.
With the updated CRACMM2, the isoprene-derived SOA concentration is 75.1 ng/m3, compared to 80.4 ng/m3 in the default CRACMM2. While the total amount remains relatively unchanged, the composition and formation pathways of isoprene-derived SOA have been further refined and made more scientifically robust. Additionally, the newly incorporated C5-alkene triols formation pathway and partitioning of tracers help bridge the gap between observations and simulations, further improving the representation of isoprene oxidation and SOA formation mechanisms. Since C5-alkene triols is newly added to the model, the uncertainty of precursor’s and of C5-alkene to all the tracers formation (Figure S8) is analyzed in Supporting Information “Uncertainty Analysis of isoprene-derived SOA” part.
Spatial Distribution of Isoprene-Derived SOA
The model predicted isoprene-derived SOA chemical compositions over China (Figure 3a–e) and precursors (Figure 3f) are shown in Figure 3. The overall spatial distribution of all the isoprene-derived SOA is consistent except the IEPOX-derived organosulfates. 2-MT and C5-alkene triols are major isoprene-SOA species in summer in China, especially in southern area. C5-alkene concentrations are much higher than other tracers, which is consistent with field observations37. Pseudo-first-order particle-phase rate constants (Figure S9a) range from 0.02 to 0.03 s−1 in forested regions, such as northern and western China, where H+ concentrations (Figure S9c) are also elevated during the modeling period. This leads to higher isoprene aerosol concentrations (Figure 3) in these areas. However, the highest concentrations of isoprene-derived aerosols are observed over the Sichuan Basin (SCB), where both isoprene (Figure 3f) and IEPOX + MAE gas-phase SOA precursor (Figure S9f) concentrations are high. Our model results indicate substantial formation of IEPOX-derived organosulfates (Figure 3b) with average concentrations ranging from 25 to 150 ng m−3 (100 ng m−3 on average at the surface and 84 ng m−3 on average aloft in the troposphere as reported in a previous study19). In contrast, the MPAN-derived organosulfates are predicted to have concentrations of less than 1 ng m−3 in the Base case simulation (Figure 3e). The average concentration is 10 ng m−3 in Yorkville, Georgia in a previous study38. The spatial distribution of MPAN-derived organosulfates is similar to that of sulfate (Figure S10c), with high values observed in the SCB region. However, it differs significantly from the spatial distribution of IEPOX-derived organosulfates. The “Drivers of Organosulfates formation” section in the Supporting Information discusses the formation mechanisms of organosulfates and it indicates that of organosulfates is the main driver of its concentration. Due to the limited duration of sampling campaigns, only a qualitative evaluation of the organosulfates concentrations is performed.
Figure 3:

Model mean concentrations for June 2022 of (a) 2-MT, (b) IEPOX-derived organosulfates, (c) C5-alkene triols, (d) 2-MG, (e) MPAN-derived organosulfates, and (f) Isoprene for Case0.
The IEPOX-derived species, 2-MT and C5-alkene triols, dominate primarily due to the relative abundance of aerosol water (Figure S9b) compared to other nucleophiles. The spatial distribution of C5-alkene triols is similar to that of 2-MT, but their concentrations are significantly higher, which is also consistent with the observations37. This may be attributed to the higher of C5-alkene triols. The is 0.47 closely aligns with previous laboratory findings, where was used in the simplified GAMMA model39. This value corresponds to the most concentrated bulk solution studied by Eddingsaas et al (0.1 M H2SO4 with 3.0 M Na2SO4)39.
Aerosol formation from IEPOX generally exceeds that from MAE, primarily due to the greater availability of gas-phase precursors (Figure S10a and b), the sum of gas-phase IEPOX+MAE and the higher uptake efficiency (Figure S9d and e). While both IEPOX and MAE have identical particle-phase reaction rates, the key difference lies in their uptake coefficients, which can be mostly attributed to their values. The much lower for MAE (1.2 × 105) compared to IEPOX (3.0 × 107) results in slower dissolution of precursor epoxides that is likely lowering the uptake coefficient for MAE.Research findings19,31,40,41 consistently indicate that IEPOX-derived 2-MT generally dominates over MPAN-derived 2-MG, particularly during the summer. The model reproduces this trend, with a higher abundance of 2-MT in southeastern China.
In the model, the dominance of 2-MT over 2-MG can be explained by the fate of RO2, which is governed by competitive pathways. The gas-phase formation of the precursors IEPOX and MAE/HMML is determined by the reaction of HO· and the fate of RO2. When is high, the reaction of RO2 with NO proceeds more rapidly than RO2 with hydroperoxy radicals (HO2·), favors the formation of MAE/HMML. Conversely, RO2 reacts preferentially with HO2·, leading to increased IEPOX formation. Differences in precursor production and their relative gas-phase abundances can also matter. IEPOX formation begins with isoprene reacting with HO·, followed by HO2· to form hydroxy hydroperoxides, and NO to form -hydroxy alkylnitrates. Subsequent reactions with HO· produce IEPOX with mass-based yields up to 44%. In contrast, MAE is formed through a pathway in which isoprene peroxy radicals react with NO to produce methacrolein, which then reacts to produce MPAN and eventually MAE7. However, carbon is lost through competing pathways. Only when the rate of RO2 + NO exceeds that of RO2 + HO2· are the precursors to 2-MG expected to surpass IEPOX, a condition likely to occur in -rich areas (e.g., urban areas) or during winter25.
Gas-Particle Partitioning
The gas-particle partitioning results at the Zibo observational site during June 2022 are shown in Figure 4. For 2-MT, 81.7% was present in the particle phase, which is consistent with previous studies31. In the case of 2-MG, the particle-to-gas phase ratio was 51.2%, exceeding the 31% reported by Zhang et al31, which can be attributed to the of 2-MG. For C5-alkene triols, we refer to Frauenheim’s chamber study, which estimated approximately 50% partitioning between the particle and gas phases14. The uncertainties associated with for three tracers in model predictions at the Zibo site are illustrated in Figure 4. Reducing the of the SOA species by 80% (Case 5) results in a 30% decrease in the particle-phase fraction of 2-MT, although its total concentration shows only a slight increase, while for C5-alkene triols, it reaches 60%. For 2-MG, the particle-phase concentration varies by approximately ±50% in response to fivefold changes in . In addition, increasing the of SOA species by a factor of 5 (Case 6) results in an approximately 30% increase in the fraction of C5-alkene triols partitioned into the particle phase, accompanied by a slight decrease in the total concentration of C5-alkene triols. For 2-MT, the change is smaller (17.9%). Previous study found that 2-MT has higher sensitivity to than 2-MG since 2-MT is primarily lost through gas-phase reaction and has a shorter lifetime against reaction with HO· than 2-MG31. Additional studies are needed to reduce this uncertainty.
Figure 4:

Gas-particle partitioning of (a) C5-alkene triols, (b) 2-MT, and (c) 2-MG in Base0 and with scaled by a factor of 5 and 0.2.
SOA Formation Pathway
The observed and modeled scatter plot is shown in Figure S4a, which demonstrates that OC in default CRACMM2 is generally underpredicted with a mean bias (MB) of without the heterogeneous uptake pathways for MAE + HMML and C5-alkene triols added. The inclusion of aerosol contributions to those pathways improves the model’s prediction of total OC (Figure S4b). In terms of diurnal profiles, observations from the Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization study show a relatively flat profile for OC19, while earlier versions of CMAQ36 tend to exhibit a pronounced nighttime peak driven by primary organic aerosols, monoterpene + nitrate radical aerosols, and additional influences from sesquiterpene-derived SOA. The new isoprene-derived SOA simulation in this study produces a diurnal profile with a nighttime peak (Figure 5a), which aligns more closely with earlier CMAQ versions36 and is mainly driven by low volatility, semi-volatile, and intermediate volatility organic compounds (L/S/IVOC) SOA (44.4%). For monoterpene SOA, the contribution to total SOA levels is 13.5% (Figure 5a) which is lower than 24% found by Ying et al42, as the sesquiterpene SOA in CRACMM2 is allocated to L/S/IVOC SOA. The contributions of AGLY and ASOAT to SOA are approximately 10%, with ASOAT showing a similar contribution to previous aromatic SOA estimates (13.2%). For AGLY, previous studies have also indicated that SOA formation from the reactive uptake of glyoxal on particles is notable, with AGLY accounting for more than 20% of isoprene-derived SOA42. The isoprene derived SOA, which includes C5-alkene triols and MAE + HMML pathways contributes to an overall SOA increase of 23.5%. The updated CRACMM2 leads to an overall SOA increase, as shown in the spatial distribution across China in Figure 5. SOA in eastern China is increased by . This finding is further supported by the PM2.5 evaluation with lower MB and NMB across five regions of China (Figure S6) by accounting for the enhanced SOA contribution from the updated mechanism, which indicates that the updated mechanism enhances isoprene-derived SOA. It highlights the importance of isoprene oxidation in atmospheric organic aerosol budgets.
Figure 5:

(a) Composition of SOA at the Zibo site as predicted by CMAQ, June 2022, as a function of local time. Aerosol includes secondary oxygenated L/S/IVOCs (L/S/IVOC SOA), a lumped category of nonvolatile SOA species which include SOA from HC3, HC5, SLOWROC, ROCIOXY and aromatics (ASOAT), SOA produced in clouds from glyoxal and methylglyoxal (AORGC), SOA from reactive uptake of glyoxal on particles (AGLY), monoterpene SOA (AHOM + AELHOM), semi-volatile organic peroxide reacting with HO· produced from aromatics (AOP3), and all isoprene IEPOX + MPAN SOA. The vertical dashed line marks 9 pm (local time). and (b) SOA between Base case - Case0.
Impacts of Emission Reductions on SOA Mitigation
reduction
For a 25% reduction in (Case7), the changes in 2-MG (Figure 6a) are minimal, remaining below 1 ng/m3. IEPOX-derived aerosol species increase (Figure 6b, c, d) as the isoprene RO2· fate is shifted away from the NO pathway to reaction with HO2·. HO2· (Figure S12b) is increased in BTH and YRD regions, HO· (Figure S12a) decreases across China following reduction (Figure S12c). The overall SOA changes are shown in Figure S13a. For anthropogenic SOA (ASOA), the reduction in leads to an increase in YRD, BTH, and SCB regions, as shown in Figure S13b. For biogenic SOA (BSOA), a general decreasing trend is observed, as illustrated in Figure S13c. Case7 results in a small increase in organosulfate (2.2%), followed by 2-MG (8%). At the Zibo site, 2-MT and C5-alkene triols increase by approximately 20%. When the reaches a 50% reduction, this change becomes nearly double as shown in Figure 10 for both particle and gas phase.
Figure 6:

Changes in (a) MPAN-derived 2-MG, (b) IEPOX-derived C5 tetrols, (c) IEPOX-derived 2-MT, and (d) IEPOX-derived organic sulfate due to a 25% reduction in emissions compared to Case0 simulation for June 2022.
Figure 10:

Predicted percent changes in concentrations of C5-alkene triols, 2-MT, 2-MG at the Zibo site due to and reductions for June 2022: (a) gas phase and (b) particle phase. IEPOX-derived organosulfates are considered only in Particle phase.
We also investigated the impact of reductions on the formation of different systems (Figure 7). The contribution of SOA formed in clouds from glyoxal and methylglyoxal (AORGC) is small (Figure 5), with minimal changes observed. SOA from reactive uptake of glyoxal on particles is also reduced (AGLY), which is consistent with the research of McNeill et al.30 and Pye et al.43. Similarly, SOA from aromatic, furan, as well as AHOM show a decline in concentration. SOA derived from AOP3 (primarily originated from aromatics and oxygenated L/S/IVOCs) and L/S/IVOC SOA (predominantly anthropogenic in origin) exhibits an increased trend in YRD, BTH, and SCB regions. Based on the changes in the four main isoprene-derived SOA components following 25% and 50% reductions (Case7) in , as shown in Figure S14, we concluded that the variations in IEPOX organosulfates and 2-MG are relatively minor. In contrast, the other two major isoprene-derived SOA components show a pronounced increase with decreasing levels.
Figure 7:

Changes in (a) AGLY, (b) AHOM, (c) AORGC, (d) L/S/IVOC SOA, (e) ASOAT, and (f) AOP3, due to a 25% reduction in emissions compared to Case0 for June 2022.
reduction
The majority of sulfate and nearly all SO2 emissions in China are of anthropogenic origin. The formation of epoxide-derived aerosols, including the dominant isoprene aerosol species (such as tetrols), strongly depends on aerosol acidity and is therefore largely controlled by emissions. Both IEPOX- and MPAN-derived aerosols are substantially reduced (Figure 8) due to lower sulfate concentrations (Figure S15a), which slows the rates of particle-phase reactions and reduces uptake efficiency. The conversion of epoxides to the aerosol phase is further hindered by a decrease in particle surface area19. In a sensitivity run with a 25% reduction in emissions (Case9), the decrease in tetrols at the Zibo site (Figure 10) is close to the 35% reduction reported by Pye et al.19, but significantly lower than the 70% reduction observed by Budisulistiorini et al.44. For IEPOX-derived organosulfates, in Budisulistiorini et al.’s study, a 25% reduction in emissions resulted in a similar 70% decrease in both IEPOX-derived organosulfates and tetrols. our findings indicate that organosulfates decreased by 5%. These differences may be attributed to variations in aerosol loadings across different study periods (2006 in Pye et al., 2013 in Budisulistiorini et al., and 2022 in our study) as well as the lower sulfate reaction rate constant used in Budisulistiorini et al.’s work. Additionally, spatial variations in SOA reduction across the domain warrant further investigation. With a 50% reduction in emissions, the SOA reduction rate is nearly twice as large as that observed with a 25% reduction, for both the gas and particle phases (Figure S17 and Figure 10).
Figure 8:

Changes in (a) MPAN-derived 2-MG, (b) IEPOX-derived C5 tetrols, (c) IEPOX-derived 2-MT, and (d) IEPOX-derived organic sulfate due to a 25% reduction in emissions compared to Case0 simulation for June 2022.
From Figure 9, AORGC and ASOAT show a minor increase due to the reduction in while all other SOA pathways exhibit a decrease. This is primarily attributed to the reduction of HO, as shown in Figure S15b for 25% reduction S15a and c. A 25% reduction in results in a noticeable decrease in isoprene-derived SOA, as shown in Figure 8, with C5-alkene triols showing the largest decrease, followed by 2-MT. The reductions in organosulfates and 2-MG are relatively smaller compared to those of C5-alkene triols and 2-MT. Consistent with these findings, Figure S16 shows that both ASOA and BSOA decrease following reduction. Based on the changes observed in the four primary isoprene-derived SOA pathways under 25% and 50% reductions in (Case9 and Case10, respectively) (Figure S17), we concluded that reduction has a stronger impact on isoprene-derived SOA formation than an equivalent reduction. This finding is consistent with previous studies19,44.
Figure 9:

Changes in (a) AGLY, (b) AHOM, (c) AORGC, (d) L/S/IVOC SOA, (e) ASOAT, and (f) AOP3, due to a 25% reduction in emissions compared to Case0 for June 2022.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgement
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42375102), and the Shanghai Pujiang Program (23PJ1403100). The modelling work is supported by the Shanghai Technical Service Center of Science and Engineering Computing, Shanghai University. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or the policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- (1).Guenther A; Karl T; Harley P; Wiedinmyer C; Palmer PI; Geron C Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmos. Chem. Phys 2006, 6, 3181–3210. [Google Scholar]
- (2).Kroll JH; Ng NL; Murphy SM; Flagan RC; Seinfeld JH Secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation under high-NO conditions. Geophys. Res. Lett 2005, 32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Kroll JH; Ng NL; Murphy SM; Flagan RC; Seinfeld JH Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Isoprene Photooxidation. Environ. Sci. Technol 2006, 40, 1869–1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Kleindienst TE; Lewandowski M; Offenberg JH; Jaoui M; Edney EO Ozone-isoprene reaction: Re-examination of the formation of secondary organic aerosol. Geophys. Res. Lett 2007, 34. [Google Scholar]
- (5).Ng NL; Kwan AJ; Surratt JD; Chan AWH; Chhabra PS; Sorooshian A; Pye HOT; Crounse JD; Wennberg PO; Flagan RC; Seinfeld JH Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from reaction of isoprene with nitrate radicals (NO3). Atmos. Chem. Phys 2008, 8, 4117–4140. [Google Scholar]
- (6).Brownwood B et al. Gas-Particle Partitioning and SOA Yields of Organonitrate Products from NO3-Initiated Oxidation of Isoprene under Varied Chemical Regimes. ACS. Earth. Space. Chem 2021, 5, 785–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Lin Y-H et al. Epoxide as a precursor to secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation in the presence of nitrogen oxides. PNAS. 2013, 110, 6718–6723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Surratt JD; Chan AWH; Eddingsaas NC; Chan M; Loza CL; Kwan AJ; Hersey SP; Flagan RC; Wennberg PO; Seinfeld JH Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene. PNAS. 2010, 107, 6640–6645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Kourtchev I; Ruuskanen T; Maenhaut W; Kulmala M; Claeys M Observation of 2-methyltetrols and related photo-oxidation products of isoprene in boreal forest aerosols from Hyytiälä, Finland. Atmos. Chem. Phys 2005, 5, 2761–2770. [Google Scholar]
- (10).Wang W; Kourtchev I; Graham B; Cafmeyer J; Maenhaut W; Claeys M Characterization of oxygenated derivatives of isoprene related to 2-methyltetrols in Amazonian aerosols using trimethylsilylation and gas chromatography/ion trap mass spectrometry. Rapid. Commun. Mass. Spectrom 2005, 19, 1343–1351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Kjaergaard HG; Knap HC; Ørnsø KB; Jørgensen S; Crounse JD; Paulot F; Wennberg PO Atmospheric Fate of Methacrolein. 2. Formation of Lactone and Implications for Organic Aerosol Production. J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 5763–5768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Lopez-Hilfiker FD et al. Molecular Composition and Volatility of Organic Aerosol in the Southeastern U.S.: Implications for IEPOX Derived SOA. Environ. Sci. Technol 2016, 50, 2200–2209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).D’Ambro EL et al. Chamber-based insights into the factors controlling epoxydiol (IEPOX) secondary organic aerosol (SOA) yield, composition, and volatility. Atmos. Chem. Phys 2019, 19, 11253–11265. [Google Scholar]
- (14).Frauenheim M; Offenberg J; Zhang Z; Surratt JD; Gold A The C5–Alkene Triol Conundrum: Structural Characterization and Quantitation of Isoprene-Derived C5H10O3 Reactive Uptake Products. Environ. Sci. Technol. Letters 2022, 9, 829–836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Xie M; Hannigan MP; Barsanti KC Gas/Particle Partitioning of 2-Methyltetrols and Levoglucosan at an Urban Site in Denver. Environ. Sci. Technol 2014, 48, 2835–2842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Isaacman-VanWertz G et al. Ambient Gas-Particle Partitioning of Tracers for Biogenic Oxidation. Environ. Sci. Technol 2016, 50, 9952–9962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Qin C; Gou Y; Wang Y; Mao Y; Liao H; Wang Q; Xie M Gas–particle partitioning of polyol tracers at a suburban site in Nanjing, east China: increased partitioning to the particle phase. Atmos. Chem. Phys 2021, 21, 12141–12153. [Google Scholar]
- (18).Liu Y; Kuwata M; McKinney KA; Martin ST Uptake and release of gaseous species accompanying the reactions of isoprene photo-oxidation products with sulfate particles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2016, 18, 1595–1600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Pye HOT et al. Epoxide Pathways Improve Model Predictions of Isoprene Markers and Reveal Key Role of Acidity in Aerosol Formation. Environ. Sci. Technol 2013, 47, 11056–11064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Xie Y; Paulot F; Carter WPL; Nolte CG; Luecken DJ; Hutzell WT; Wennberg PO; Cohen RC; Pinder RW Understanding the impact of recent advances in isoprene photooxidation on simulations of regional air quality. Atmos. Chem. Phys 2013, 13, 8439–8455. [Google Scholar]
- (21).Guenther AB; Jiang X; Heald CL; Sakulyanontvittaya T; Duhl T; Emmons LK; Wang X The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geosci. Model Dev 2012, 5, 1471–1492. [Google Scholar]
- (22).Woo J-H; Choi K-C; Kim HK; Baek BH; Jang M; Eum J-H; Song CH; Ma Y-I; Sunwoo Y; Chang L-S; Yoo SH Development of an anthropogenic emissions processing system for Asia using SMOKE. Atmos. Environ 2012, 58, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
- (23).Otte TL; Pleim JE The Meteorology-Chemistry Interface Processor (MCIP) for the CMAQ modeling system: updates through MCIPv3.4.1. Geosci. Model Dev 2010, 3, 243–256. [Google Scholar]
- (24).Skipper TN et al. Role of chemical production and depositional losses on formaldehyde in the Community Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Multiphase Mechanism (CRACMM). Atmos. Chem. Phys 2024, 24, 12903–12924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Wiser F; Place BK; Sen S; Pye HOT; Yang B; Westervelt DM; Henze DK; Fiore AM; McNeill VF AMORE-Isoprene v1.0: a new reduced mechanism for gas-phase isoprene oxidation. Geosci. Model Dev 2023, 16, 1801–1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Yang B; Wiser F; McNeill VF; Fiore A; Tao M; Henze D; Sen S; Westervelt D Implementation and Evaluation of the Automated Model Reduction (AMORE) Version 1.1 Isoprene Oxidation Mechanism in GEOS-Chem. Environ. Sci. Atmos 2023, 3. [Google Scholar]
- (27).Ren H et al. Measurement report: Vertical distribution of biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosols in the urban boundary layer over Beijing during late summer. Atmos. Chem. Phys 2021, 21, 12949–12963. [Google Scholar]
- (28).Surratt JD; Lewandowski M; Offenberg JH; Jaoui M; Kleindienst TE; Edney EO; Seinfeld JH Effect of Acidity on Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Isoprene. Environ. Sci. Technol 2007, 41, 5363–5369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Yee LD et al. Natural and Anthropogenically Influenced Isoprene Oxidation in Southeastern United States and Central Amazon. Environ. Sci. Technol 2020, 54, 5980–5991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).McNeill VF; Woo JL; Kim DD; Schwier AN; Wannell NJ; Sumner AJ; Barakat JM Aqueous-Phase Secondary Organic Aerosol and Organosulfate Formation in Atmospheric Aerosols: A Modeling Study. Environ. Sci. Technol 2012, 46, 8075–8081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Zhang J et al. New formation and fate of Isoprene SOA markers revealed by field data-constrained modeling. NPJ. Clim. Atmos. Sci 2023, 6, 69. [Google Scholar]
- (32).Williams BJ; Goldstein AH; Kreisberg NM; Hering SV In situ measurements of gas/particle-phase transitions for atmospheric semivolatile organic compounds. PNAS. 2010, 107, 6676–6681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Nguyen TB; Bates KH; Crounse JD; Schwantes RH; Zhang X; Kjaergaard HG; Surratt JD; Lin P; Laskin A; Seinfeld JH; Wennberg PO Mechanism of the hydroxyl radical oxidation of methacryloyl peroxynitrate (MPAN) and its pathway toward secondary organic aerosol formation in the atmosphere. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2015, 17, 17914–17926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Hilal SH; Ayyampalayam SN; Carreira LA AirLiquid Partition Coefficient for a Diverse Set of Organic Compounds: Henry’s Law Constant in Water and Hexadecane. Environ. Sci. Technol 2008, 42, 9231–9236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Meylan WM; Howard PH Bond contribution method for estimating henry’s law constants. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 1991, 10, 1283–1293. [Google Scholar]
- (36).Carlton AG; Bhave PV; Napelenok SL; Edney EO; Sarwar G; Pinder RW; Pouliot GA; Houyoux M Model Representation of Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7. Environ. Sci. Technol 2010, 44, 8553–8560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Yi Y; Li R; Zhang K; Yang X; Li Q; Geng C; Chen H; Yang W; Yu JZ; Li L Insights Into the Influence of Anthropogenic Emissions on the Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosols Based on Online Measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos 2024, 129, e2024JD041479. [Google Scholar]
- (38).Lin YH; Knipping EM; Edgerton ES; Shaw SL; Surratt JD Investigating the influences of SO2 and NH3 levels on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation using conditional sampling approaches. Atmos. Chem. Phys 2013, 13, 8457–8470. [Google Scholar]
- (39).Eddingsaas NC; VanderVelde DG; Wennberg PO Kinetics and products of the acid-catalyzed ring-opening of atmospherically relevant butyl epoxy alcohols. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 8106–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Stroud CA; Roberts JM; Williams EJ; Hereid D; Angevine WM; Fehsenfeld FC; Wisthaler A; Hansel A; Martinez-Harder M; Harder H; Brune WH; Hoenninger G; Stutz J; White AB Nighttime isoprene trends at an urban forested site during the 1999 Southern Oxidant Study. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos 2002, 107, ACH 7–1-ACH 7–14. [Google Scholar]
- (41).Zhang J; He X; Ding X; Yu JZ; Ying Q Modeling Secondary Organic Aerosol Tracers and Tracer-to-SOA Ratios for Monoterpenes and Sesquiterpenes Using a Chemical Transport Model. Environ. Sci. Technol 2022, 56, 804–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Ying Q; Li J; Kota SH Significant Contributions of Isoprene to Summertime Secondary Organic Aerosol in Eastern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol 2015, 49, 7834–7842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Pye HOT; Luecken DJ; Xu L; Boyd CM; Ng NL; Baker KR; Ayres BR; Bash JO; Baumann K; Carter WPL; Edgerton E; Fry JL; Hutzell WT; Schwede DB; Shepson PB Modeling the Current and Future Roles of Particulate Organic Nitrates in the Southeastern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol 2015, 49, 14195–14203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Budisulistiorini SH; Nenes A; Carlton AG; Surratt JD; McNeill VF; Pye HOT Simulating Aqueous-Phase Isoprene-Epoxydiol (IEPOX) Secondary Organic Aerosol Production During the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS). Environ. Sci. Technol 2017, 51, 5026–5034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Wang Q; Wang S; Cheng YY; Chen H; Zhang Z; Li J; Gu D; Wang Z; Yu JZ Chemical evolution of secondary organic aerosol tracers during high-PM2.5 episodes at a suburban site in Hong Kong over 4 months of continuous measurement. Atmos. Chem. Phys 2022, 22, 11239–11253. [Google Scholar]
- (46).Stone EA; Nguyen TT; Banmali PB; Man Dangol P Assessment of biogenic secondary organic aerosol in the Himalayas. Environ. Chem 2012, 9, 263–272. [Google Scholar]
- (47).Kleindienst TE; Jaoui M; Lewandowski M; Offenberg JH; Lewis CW; Bhave PV; Edney EO Estimates of the contributions of biogenic and anthropogenic hydrocarbons to secondary organic aerosol at a southeastern US location. Atmos. Environ 2007, 41, 8288–8300. [Google Scholar]
- (48).Lin Y-H et al. Epoxide as a precursor to secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation in the presence of nitrogen oxides. PNAS. 2013, 110, 6718–6723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Hanson DR; Ravishankara AR; Solomon S Heterogeneous reactions in sulfuric acid aerosols: A framework for model calculations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos 1994, 99, 3615–3629. [Google Scholar]
- (50).Chang X et al. Full-volatility emission framework corrects missing and underestimated secondary organic aerosol sources. One Earth 2022, 5, 403–412. [Google Scholar]
- (51).Huang L; Wu Z; Liu H; Yarwood G; Huang D; Wilson G; Chen H; Ji D; Tao J; Han Z; Wang Y; Wang H; Huang C; Li L An improved framework for efficiently modeling organic aerosol (OA) considering primary OA evaporation and secondary OA formation from VOCs, IVOCs, and SVOCs. Environ. Sci. Atmos 2024, 4, 1064–1078. [Google Scholar]
- (52).Pye HOT et al. Epoxide Pathways Improve Model Predictions of Isoprene Markers and Reveal Key Role of Acidity in Aerosol Formation. Environ. Sci. Technol 2013, 47, 11056–11064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Budisulistiorini SH; Nenes A; Carlton AG; Surratt JD; McNeill VF; Pye HOT Simulating Aqueous-Phase Isoprene-Epoxydiol (IEPOX) Secondary Organic Aerosol Production During the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS). Environ. Sci. Technol 2017, 51, 5026–5034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
