Simple Summary
Reducing dietary protein levels is an effective strategy to improve the sustainability of broiler production, but it may also affect intestinal health. Lysine is an essential amino acid in broilers, commonly used as a reference standard amino acid in broilers, and the amylose/amylopectin (AM/AP) ratio, which determines starch digestion rate, may interact to modulate intestinal barrier function, inflammatory responses, and cecal microbiota. This study investigated the combined effects of dietary lysine level and starch composition on intestinal health in broilers fed an 18.5% crude protein diet. The results showed that lysine level and starch type interacted to influence intestinal morphology, barrier-related gene expression, and cecal microbial composition. In particular, a moderate lysine level combined with a low AM/AP ratio supported better intestinal structure. These findings provide useful information for optimizing low-protein diets and maintaining intestinal health in broiler chickens.
Keywords: broiler, lysine, amylose/amylopectin ratio, intestinal health, low-protein diet
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of dietary standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine levels and amylose to amylopectin ratios on the intestinal health of broilers fed an 18.5% crude protein diet from 22 to 42 days of age. A total of 540 healthy male Ross 308 broilers were randomly assigned to nine treatments in a 3 × 3 factorial design consisting of three SID lysine levels (1.00%, 1.20%, and 1.40%) and three AM/AP ratios (0.19, 0.29, and 0.41), with six replicates of 10 birds each. Ileal morphology, intestinal barrier function and inflammation-related gene expression, and the composition of cecal microbiota were evaluated. Significant interactions between lysine level and AM/AP ratio were observed for Occludin, ZO-1, Claudin-1, and TNF-α expression, with the highest expression in the 1.40% lysine + 0.41 AM/AP group and the lowest in the 1.00% lysine + 0.19 AM/AP group. The VH/CD ratio showed a significant interaction, with the highest value in the 1.20% lysine + 0.19 AM/AP group and the lowest in the 1.40% lysine + 0.41 AM/AP group. IL-18 and IL-10 were primarily affected by the main effects of lysine and AM/AP ratio. The expression levels of both IL-10 and IL-18 increased with increasing lysine level and increasing starch AM/AP ratio. Dietary SID lysine level and AM/AP ratio interactively regulate the expression of barrier-related genes, inflammatory status, intestinal morphology, and cecal microbiota, potentially contributing to enhanced intestinal health in broilers. However, because microbial metabolites were not measured, the functional significance of the observed microbiota alterations remains speculative. In broilers fed an 18.5% CP diet, a combination of 1.20% SID lysine with an AM/AP ratio of 0.19 was identified as the optimal strategy for maintaining intestinal morphology from 22 to 42 days of age.
1. Introduction
With the decline in soybean imports in China, the development and promotion of low-protein diets have become a strategic priority in poultry nutrition. Because broilers have a high protein requirement, reducing dietary soybean meal while supplementing crystalline amino acids (AA) is a key approach to maintaining intestinal health and ensuring national feed security [1,2].
Lysine, an essential amino acid commonly used as a reference standard, not only participates in protein synthesis but also serves as an essential substrate for intestinal epithelial cell proliferation, tight junction protein expression, and immune function [3,4]. Dietary lysine deficiency impairs both cellular and humoral immunity, increases intestinal permeability, downregulates tight junction proteins, reduces the abundance of beneficial bacteria, and alters gut microbiota composition [5]. Supplementing lysine in low-protein diets significantly improves feed conversion ratio, restores growth and carcass performance to near-normal levels, and upregulates intestinal barrier gene expression [6,7,8,9,10]. However, excessive lysine reduces average daily gain and feed intake, leading to growth depression [11].
Starch is the primary energy source in broiler diets. A higher amylose/amylopectin (AM/AP) ratio slows starch digestion rate, allowing more starch to reach the hindgut for fermentation [12]. In particular, diets with higher amylose content are generally associated with increased resistant starch formation, which serves as an important substrate for cecal microbiota [13]. Resistant starch can selectively stimulate the growth of beneficial bacterial populations, including Lactobacillus and other saccharolytic microorganisms, thereby influencing microbial community structure and metabolic activity [14]. The fermentation of resistant starch by gut microbiota produces short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate, which contribute to intestinal epithelial energy supply, maintenance of barrier integrity, and modulation of immune responses [15,16]. Consequently, starch digestive characteristics may indirectly affect intestinal barrier gene expression, inflammatory balance, and microbial composition. Furthermore, previous studies suggested that a high AM/AP ratio enables slower glucose release, which better synchronizes with amino acid absorption, thereby reducing AA catabolism in the intestinal mucosa and promoting protein synthesis [17].
Although existing studies have investigated not only the individual effects of dietary lysine levels and AM/AP ratios [6,12,16], but also the interactions between amino acid nutrition and carbohydrate digestion kinetics on nutrient utilization and growth performance in broilers [9,10], research focusing on their combined effects on intestinal health remains limited. In particular, little information is available regarding how dietary SID lysine and AM/AP ratio interact to influence intestinal morphology, barrier function, immune responses, and cecal microbial communities in broilers fed low-protein diets. Therefore, further investigation is needed to elucidate the potential synergistic effects of amino acid and carbohydrate nutritional strategies on intestinal health.
This study employed a 3 × 3 factorial design to investigate the effects of different AM/AP ratios (0.19, 0.29, 0.41) and standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine levels (1.00%, 1.20%, 1.40%) on: ileal tight junction protein gene expression (Occludin, ZO-1, Claudin-1), inflammatory cytokine genes (IL-18, TNF-α, IL-10), ileal morphology, and cecal microbiota composition in broilers. The aim is to provide theoretical support for optimizing lysine and starch composition in low-protein broiler diets to enhance intestinal health.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animal Ethics Statement
All animal procedures were performed at the Zhuozhou Poultry Nutrition Research Base of China Agricultural University (Hebei, China). The experimental protocols were approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethical Committee of China Agricultural University (No: AW90504202-1-2, approved on 9 May 2024) and conducted in accordance with the Beijing Regulations of Laboratory Animals.
2.2. Experimental Design and Diet Formulation
A total of 540 healthy male Ross 308 broiler chicks (1 d of age) were fed a common starter diet until 21 d of age. At 21 d of age, birds were balanced by body weight (average 0.951 ± 0.003 kg) and randomly allotted to 9 treatment groups in a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement. The treatments consisted of 3 different AM/AP ratios (0.19, 0.29, and 0.41 (provided by waxy corn, corn, and pea starch, respectively) with 3 different SID lysine levels (1.00%, 1.20%, and 1.40%). Each treatment had 6 replicates with 10 birds per replicate. All diets were formulated to meet or exceed Ross 308 nutrient requirements (22–42 d). The basal SID lysine level was set at 1.20% based on preliminary data, with ±0.20% fluctuations. Other essential amino acids were balanced according to the ideal AA profile. Prior to diet formulation, feed ingredients were analyzed for nutrient composition using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) by Evonik Operations GmbH (Beijing, China). Ingredient composition and nutrient levels are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Ingredient composition and nutrient levels of the experimental diets for broilers from 22 to 42 d of age (%, as-fed basis).
| SID Lys level 1 | 1.00 | 1.20 | 1.40 | ||||||
| AM/AP ratio 2 | 0.19 | 0.29 | 0.41 | 0.19 | 0.29 | 0.41 | 0.19 | 0.29 | 0.41 |
| Corn, AM/AP ratio = 0.29 2 | 33.72 | 52.20 | 42.70 | 43.36 | 52.60 | 43.10 | 34.50 | 53.00 | 43.40 |
| Soybean meal | 18.75 | 19.56 | 10.90 | 17.03 | 17.44 | 8.80 | 14.55 | 15.34 | 6.69 |
| Soybean oil | 3.77 | 4.47 | 2.66 | 4.56 | 4.91 | 3.09 | 4.64 | 5.34 | 3.60 |
| Corn gluten meal | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.16 | 1.21 | 1.09 | 1.21 | 1.23 | 1.11 | 1.21 | 1.25 | 1.13 |
| Limestone | 1.01 | 0.98 | 1.07 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.08 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.10 |
| Sodium chloride | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Vitamins premix 3 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Mineral premix 4 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Choline chloride (50%) | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Phytase 10,000, U/g | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Antioxidant | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| L-Lysine hydrochloride (98%) | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 0.99 |
| DL-Methionine (98%) | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.51 |
| L-Threonine (98%) | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.44 |
| L-Valine (98%) | - | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.45 |
| L-Isoleucine (98%) | - | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.40 |
| L-Arginine (98%) | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.56 |
| Flour | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 |
| Pea, AM/AP ratio = 0.76 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 20.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 20.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 20.00 |
| Waxy corn, AM/AP ratio = 0.05 2 | 20.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 20.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Nutritional levels 1 | |||||||||
| AME, Mcal/kg | 3.20 | 3.20 | 3.20 | 3.20 | 3.20 | 3.20 | 3.20 | 3.20 | 3.20 |
| CP, % | 18.50 | 18.50 | 18.50 | 18.50 | 18.50 | 18.50 | 18.50 | 18.50 | 18.50 |
| Calcium, % | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
| NPP, % | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| SID Lys, % | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| SID Met, % | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| SID Met + Cys, % | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.96 |
| SID Thr, % | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.90 |
| SID Val, % | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.06 |
| SID Ile, % | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| SID Arg, % | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.46 |
| Total starch, % 2 | 45.57 | 40.71 | 40.52 | 45.83 | 37.03 | 35.74 | 39.24 | 37.52 | 37.12 |
AME, apparent metabolizable energy; CP, crude protein; NPP, non-phytate phosphorus; SID, standardized ileal digestibility. 1 Nutrient levels were calculated based on the ingredient compositions analyzed by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. 2 Actually measured values of nutrient components. 3 The vitamin premix provided (per kg of diets) the following: vitamin A, 15,000 IU, vitamin D3, 3600 IU; vitamin E, 30 IU; vitamin K3, 3.00 mg; vitamin B2, 9.60 mg; vitamin B12, 0.03 mg; biotin, 0.15 mg; folic acid, 1.50 mg; pantothenic acid, 13.80 mg; nicotinic acid, 45 mg. 4 The trace mineral premix provided (per kg of diets) the following: Cu, 16 mg; Zn, 110 mg; Fe, 80 mg; Mn, 120 mg; Se, 0.30 mg; I, 1.50 mg.
2.3. Bird Management
Management followed the Ross 308 Broiler Management Handbook. The ambient temperature was gradually decreased from 33 °C to 20 °C over 42 d. Photoperiod was 23L:1D (d 1–3 and d 32–42) and 20L:4D (d 4–31). Broilers had ad libitum access to feed and water.
2.4. Sample Collection
At 42 d of age, one bird per replicate with an average body weight was selected. Birds were electrically stunned and exsanguinated. Middle ileal segments (~3 cm) were collected, rinsed with ice-cold PBS, and stored at −80 °C for gene expression and morphology. Ileal digesta were also collected. Cecal digesta were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
2.5. Intestinal Morphology
Ileal segments were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, paraffin-embedded, sectioned at 5 μm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Villus height (VH) and crypt depth (CD) were measured using an optical microscope and Image-Pro Plus software 7.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). The villus height to crypt depth ratio (VH/CD) was calculated. Ten well-oriented villi and crypts per section were measured.
2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from ileal tissue using TRIzol reagent (Promaga company, Shanghai, China). cDNA was synthesized, and qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green II on an Applied Biosystems 7300 system (Waltham, MA, USA). Primer sequences were designed based on published chicken gene sequences obtained from GenBank and are listed in Table 2. Primer specificity was confirmed by the presence of a single amplification product. Melt-curve analysis was performed at the end of each qPCR run, and all reactions exhibited a single sharp peak, indicating specific amplification. Relative mRNA expression was normalized to β-actin and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.
Table 2.
Primer sequences for qRT-PCR.
| Gene | GenBank Accession | Forward Sequences (5′–3′) | Reverse Sequences (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
| β-actin | NM_205518.2 | CCACCGCAAATGCTTCTAAAC | AAGACTGCTGCTGACACCTTC |
| ZO-1 | NM_001301025.3 | CTTCAGGTGTTTCTCTTCCTCCTC | CTGTGGTTTCATGGCTGGATC |
| Occludin | NM_205128.1 | ACGGCAGCACCTACCTCAA | GGGCGAAGAAGCAGATGAG |
| Claudin-1 | NM_001013611.2 | TACAGCCCTTGGCCAATACA | CCAAGAAACAACCACCAGCA |
| IL-18 | NM_204608.3 | GTGTGTGCAGTACGGCTTAG | TCCACTGCCAGATTTCACCT |
| TNF-α | NM_204267.2 | CCCCTACCCTGTCCCACAA | TGAGTACTGCGGAGGGTTCAT |
| IL-10 | NM_001004414.4 | CAGACCAGCACCAGTCATCAG | ATCCCGTTCTCATCCATCTTCTCG |
2.7. 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
For microbiota analysis, four representative treatment groups were selected based on preliminary growth performance results obtained under the same experimental conditions (unpublished data). These groups comprised combinations of two SID lysine levels (1.20% and 1.40%) and two amylose/amylopectin (AM/AP) ratios (0.19 and 0.41). One bird from each replicate was sampled at 42 d of age, resulting in six biological replicates per treatment (n = 6). Therefore, a total of 24 cecal digesta samples were subjected to microbiota analysis.
Microbial DNA was extracted from cecal digesta using a commercial kit. The V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified. PCR products were purified and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform (San Diego, CA, USA). Raw sequencing reads were processed using QIIME2 (version 2019.4). Primer sequences were removed using the q2-cutadapt plugin, and reads without correctly matched primer sequences were discarded. Sequence filtering criteria included removal of low-quality reads, reads containing ambiguous bases (N), chimeric sequences, and sequences that failed the DADA2 quality-control procedure. Subsequently, denoising, paired-end merging, and chimera removal were performed using the DADA2 plugin to generate amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). Singleton ASVs were removed prior to downstream analyses. Taxonomic assignment was performed against the SILVA reference database using the QIIME2 classify-sklearn classifier with a confidence threshold of 0.7. Alpha and beta diversity analyses were performed. Taxonomic annotation used the Silva database.
The sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA1475828.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. Prior to statistical analysis, data were assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test and for homogeneity of variances using Levene’s test. A 3 × 3 factorial arrangement was analyzed by two-way ANOVA using the General Linear Model (GLM), including main effects of AM/AP ratio, SID lysine level, and their interaction. For intestinal morphology, gene expression, and cecal microbiota analyses, one bird was randomly selected from each replicate pen at the end of the experiment. Thus, each sampled bird represented a different replicate pen, and six observations per treatment were used in the statistical analyses. When a significant interaction was observed (p < 0.05), simple effects were analyzed using Duncan’s multiple range test. Significance was declared at (p < 0.05), and (0.05< p < 0.10) was considered a trend.
3. Results
3.1. Ileal Barrier and Inflammatory Factor Gene Expression
This study revealed significant interactions between dietary SID lysine level and AM/AP ratio on the mRNA expression of Occludin, ZO-1, and Claudin-1 (p < 0.05) (Table 3). The highest expression of all three tight junction genes was observed in the 1.40% lysine + 0.41 AM/AP group, and the lowest in the 1.00% lysine + 0.19 AM/AP group.
Table 3.
Ileal barrier and inflammatory factor mRNA expression (means ± SEM).
| Item | Occludin | ZO-1 | Claudin-1 | IL-18 | TNF-α | IL-10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.00% SID Lys | AM/AP: 0.19 | 0.162 c | 0.267 e | 0.119 d | 0.168 | 0.141 b | 0.329 |
| AM/AP: 0.29 | 0.186 c | 0.157 e | 0.246 cd | 0.168 | 0.179 b | 0.268 | |
| AM/AP: 0.41 | 0.868 b | 1.541 cd | 2.139 a | 1.247 | 0.952 a | 2.662 | |
| 1.20% SID Lys | AM/AP: 0.19 | 1.184 a | 1.898 bc | 0.983 bc | 1.197 | 0.960 a | 1.229 |
| AM/AP: 0.29 | 1.026 ab | 1.081 d | 1.081 b | 1.034 | 0.893 a | 1.468 | |
| AM/AP: 0.41 | 0.757 b | 1.586 c d | 0.951 bc | 1.520 | 1.060 a | 2.661 | |
| 1.40% SID Lys | AM/AP: 0.19 | 0.921 ab | 1.884 b c | 1.415 b | 1.618 | 0.844 a | 2.963 |
| AM/AP: 0.29 | 0.956 ab | 2.421 b | 0.786 bcd | 1.511 | 1.095 a | 2.049 | |
| AM/AP: 0.41 | 1.189 a | 3.505 a | 1.966 a | 2.147 | 1.103 a | 4.791 | |
| SEM | 0.058 | 0.150 | 0.117 | 0.097 | 0.059 | 0.258 | |
| SID Lys | 1.00% | 0.405 | 0.655 | 0.835 | 0.527 c | 0.844 | 1.086 b |
| 1.20% | 0.989 | 1.522 | 1.005 | 1.251 b | 1.095 | 1.786 b | |
| 1.40% | 1.022 | 2.603 | 1.389 | 1.759 a | 1.103 | 3.268 a | |
| AM/AP | 0.19 | 0.756 | 1.350 | 0.839 | 0.994 c | 0.424 | 1.507 b |
| 0.29 | 0.723 | 1.220 | 0.704 | 0.904 c | 0.971 | 1.262 b | |
| 0.41 | 0.938 | 2.211 | 1.686 | 1.638 b | 1.014 | 3.371 a | |
| p Value | |||||||
| SID Lys | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.14 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | |
| AM/AP | 0.273 | 0.011 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.014 | 0.001 | |
| AM/AP × SID Lys | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.147 | 0.004 | 0.675 | |
Different letters in shoulder markers indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), while the same letters indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05).
For TNF-α, a significant interaction was also observed (p < 0.05), with the highest expression in the 1.40% lysine + 0.41 AM/AP group and the lowest in the 1.00% lysine + 0.19 AM/AP group. IL-18 and IL-10 were primarily affected by the main effects of lysine level (p < 0.001) and AM/AP ratio (p < 0.05), with higher lysine and higher AM/AP increasing expression.
3.2. Ileal Morphology
A significant interaction between lysine level and AM/AP ratio was observed for the VH/CD ratio (p < 0.05) (Table 4). The highest VH/CD was in the 1.20% lysine + 0.19 AM/AP group, and the lowest was in the 1.40% lysine + 0.41 AM/AP group. VH was significantly affected by lysine level (p = 0.003) and AM/AP ratio (p = 0.043), with the highest VH at 1.20% lysine and 0.19 AM/AP. CD was not significantly affected by any factor (p > 0.05).
Table 4.
Ileal Intestinal Morphology.
| Item | Villus Height, μm | Crypt Depth, μm | VH/CD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.00% SID Lys | AM/AP: 0.19 | 658.61 | 138.5 | 4.84 bc |
| AM/AP: 0.29 | 601.88 | 129.2 | 4.73 bc | |
| AM/AP: 0.41 | 618.78 | 130.39 | 4.84 bc | |
| 1.20% SID Lys | AM/AP: 0.19 | 785.52 | 131.76 | 6.04 a |
| AM/AP: 0.29 | 678.5 | 135.82 | 5.10 b | |
| AM/AP: 0.41 | 619.16 | 139.34 | 4.69 bc | |
| 1.40% SID Lys | AM/AP: 0.19 | 594.21 | 134.18 | 4.46 cd |
| AM/AP: 0.29 | 578.14 | 141.78 | 4.13 de | |
| AM/AP: 0.41 | 550.46 | 144.2 | 3.91 e | |
| SID Lys | 1.00% | 626.42 b | 132.7 | 4.81 b |
| 1.20% | 694.40 a | 165.64 | 5.28 a | |
| 1.40% | 574.27 b | 140.05 | 4.17 c | |
| AM/AP | 0.19 | 679.45 a | 134.81 | 5.11 a |
| 0.29 | 619.51 ab | 135.6 | 4.65 b | |
| 0.41 | 596.13 b | 137.98 | 4.48 b | |
| p value | ||||
| SID Lys | 0.003 | 0.502 | <0.001 | |
| AM/AP | 0.043 | 0.871 | <0.001 | |
| AM/AP × SID Lys | 0.48 | 0.732 | 0.004 | |
Different letters in shoulder markers indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), while the same letters indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05).
3.3. Cecal Microbiota
Sequencing of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene yielded high-quality sequences (coverage > 99.8%) (Figure 1). High-throughput sequencing of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was performed on cecal digesta samples from the MWC (waxy corn + 1.20% SID lysine), MP (pea starch + 1.20% SID lysine), HWC (waxy corn + 1.40% SID lysine), and HP (pea starch + 1.40% SID lysine) groups. A total of 350,819 raw sequences were obtained. After quality filtering, denoising, sequence merging, and chimera removal, 325,255 valid sequences were retained, corresponding to an overall effective sequence rate of 92.71%. The numbers of raw sequences obtained from the MWC, MP, HWC, and HP groups were 83,630, 82,557, 88,898, and 95,734, respectively, while the corresponding numbers of valid sequences were 77,286, 76,906, 82,219, and 88,844 (Table 5). The effective sequence rates ranged from 92.41% to 93.16% across all groups (Table 5), indicating high sequencing quality and sufficient sequencing depth for subsequent analyses of microbial community composition and diversity. Alpha diversity analysis showed that the MWC group had significantly higher Faith’s PD index than the MP group (p = 0.013), with trends for higher Chao1 and observed species (p = 0.064 and 0.062, respectively) (Figure 2). Beta diversity (PCoA and ANOSIM) showed significant separation between MWC and MP (p = 0.021), MWC and HWC (p = 0.034), MWC and HP (p = 0.021), and HWC and HP (p = 0.036) (Figure 3) (Table 6). At the phylum level, Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, Verrucomicrobiota, and Proteobacteria dominated (>95% relative abundance) (Figure 4). LEfSe analysis further identified key discriminative taxa among the four groups (Figure 5).
Figure 1.
Rarefaction curves of cecal microbiota.
Table 5.
Sequencing Data Quality Assessment.
| Item | Raw Sequences | Valid Sequences | Effective Sequence Rates, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| MWC | 83,630 | 77,286 | 92.41 |
| MP | 82,557 | 76,906 | 93.16 |
| HWC | 88,898 | 82,219 | 92.49 |
| HP | 95,734 | 88,844 | 92.80 |
Figure 2.
Alpha diversity of cecal microbiota. ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3.
Beta Diversity of Gut Microbiota Across Different Starch Types and SID Lys Levels. (a) PCoA Analysis of Gut Microbiota. (b) Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of Gut Microbiota.
Table 6.
ANOSIM results for cecal microbiota beta diversity (unweighted unifrac).
| Group1 | Group2 | R | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| MWC | MP | 0.207407 | 0.021 |
| MWC | HWC | 0.196296 | 0.034 |
| MWC | HP | 0.211111 | 0.021 |
| MP | HWC | 0.090741 | 0.088 |
| MP | HP | 0.090741 | 0.065 |
| HWC | HP | 0.133333 | 0.036 |
Figure 4.
Phylum-level analysis of cecal microbial community structure.
Figure 5.
LEfSe analysis of cecal microbiota.
4. Discussion
The ileum is a key site for host-microbe interactions, and its physical, chemical, and microbial barriers are critical for intestinal health [18]. Tight junction proteins (Occludin, ZO-1, Claudin-1) maintain epithelial integrity; their increased expression generally reflects reduced permeability and enhanced barrier function [19]. Lysine is essential for intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and post-translational modification of tight junction proteins [4,6]. Starch with a higher AM/AP ratio resists rapid digestion, prolonging hindgut fermentation and increasing SCFA production, which can upregulate barrier genes [15]. In this study, the significant interactions between lysine and AM/AP ratio on Occludin, ZO-1, and Claudin-1 confirm that both factors synergistically regulate barrier function. The highest expression was in the 1.40% lysine + 0.41 AM/AP group, suggesting that higher lysine supply combined with a higher AM/AP ratio may stimulate the transcription of barrier-related genes. This aligns with Jiang et al. [20] in mice and Gao et al. [21] in piglets. This molecular response was not accompanied by improvements in intestinal morphology. It should be noted that tight-junction markers were evaluated only at the mRNA level in the present study, and transcriptional changes do not necessarily reflect protein abundance or functional barrier integrity. However, Yang et al. [22] found no effect of AM/AP ratio on barrier genes, possibly due to insufficient dose.
TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine, whereas IL-10 is generally regarded as an anti-inflammatory cytokine, and IL-18 participates in the regulation of immune responses through activation of Th1-associated pathways [23]. The significant interaction observed in TNF-α expression suggests that the dietary SID lysine level and the AM/AP ratio jointly influenced intestinal immune status. Because elevated TNF-α is commonly associated with inflammatory activation, the increased expression observed in the high lysine and high AM/AP treatment may indicate a degree of immune stimulation. However, the increased TNF-α at high lysine + high AM/AP differs from Mine et al. [24], possibly due to lysine-arginine antagonism at excess lysine levels [25]. The main effects of lysine and AM/AP on IL-18 and IL-10 align with Han [26] and Fan [27], supporting that these dietary factors may contribute to the regulation of intestinal immune homeostasis. However, the precise mechanisms underlying these responses remain to be further elucidated.
Ileal VH and VH/CD are positively correlated with nutrient absorption capacity [28,29]. The significant interaction on VH/CD, with the highest value at 1.20% lysine + 0.19 AM/AP, indicates that moderate lysine and rapid-fermenting starch optimize morphology. High lysine (1.40%) combined with high AM/AP (0.41) reduced VH/CD, possibly due to altered energy partitioning or excessive hindgut fermentation [30]. This is partially consistent with Gao et al. [21] but contrasts with studies showing high AM/AP improves morphology, suggesting species-specific and dose-dependent effects. Interestingly, the dietary treatment that produced the highest tight-junction gene expression was not the same as that yielding the most favorable intestinal morphology. Moreover, the treatment exhibiting the highest TNF-α expression also showed the lowest VH/CD ratio, suggesting that enhanced expression of certain barrier-related genes may not necessarily translate into improved intestinal health when accompanied by increased pro-inflammatory signaling. Tight junction-related gene expression represents a transcriptional response at the cellular level and may reflect adaptive or compensatory mechanisms triggered by dietary stimuli. Therefore, increased expression of Occludin, ZO-1, and Claudin-1 does not necessarily indicate improved intestinal function. In contrast, villus height and VH/CD ratio reflect structural adaptations of the intestinal mucosa and are more directly associated with absorptive surface area and nutrient utilization efficiency. The observation that the high lysine (1.40%) and high AM/AP (0.41) treatment induced the highest expression of barrier-related genes but the lowest VH/CD ratio suggests that transcriptional and morphological responses may not always occur in parallel. Given that villus height and VH/CD ratio are directly associated with absorptive surface area and nutrient utilization efficiency, intestinal morphology was considered a more biologically relevant parameter for evaluating overall intestinal function and formulating practical nutritional recommendations in the present study.
The cecal microbiota plays a pivotal role in broiler intestinal health. Previous studies have demonstrated that cecal microorganisms can ferment undigested carbohydrates into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which have been reported to serve as the primary energy source for colonocytes, upregulate tight junction protein expression, modulate inflammatory responses, and ultimately enhance nutrient absorption and overall gut barrier [31]. Cecal microbiota composition was dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, Verrucomicrobiota, and Proteobacteria, similar to previous reports [32]. The significant differences in beta diversity between starch types (MWC vs. MP) indicate that starch source and AM/AP ratio alter microbial community structure. These microbial changes may potentially be associated with differences in microbial metabolic activity, intestinal barrier function, and inflammatory status [32]; however, the underlying mechanisms, including the possible involvement of SCFAs, require further investigation. Under low dietary SID lysine levels, the genera g_RUG762 and g_BX12 were enriched in the cecal microbiota. G_RUG762 is reported to participate in protein and amino acid metabolism [33], while g_BX12 has been negatively associated with pro-inflammatory markers [34], suggesting these taxa may be linked to intestinal physiological status. A limitation of the present study was that cecal SCFA concentrations were not measured. Therefore, although changes in microbial composition were observed, the functional consequences of these alterations on microbial metabolite production could not be directly evaluated. Future studies integrating microbiome analysis with SCFA quantification and metabolomic approaches would help clarify the mechanisms linking dietary SID lysine levels, the AM/AP ratio, the gut microbiota, and intestinal health.
Furthermore, it should be noted that manipulating the dietary SID lysine level and AM/AP ratio required adjustments to ingredient composition to maintain similar dietary AME, CP, and amino acid balance. Consequently, variations in starch sources may have altered starch digestibility characteristics and resistant starch content, while minor differences in dietary fiber and non-starch polysaccharides may also have influenced intestinal morphology and microbial composition. Therefore, the observed responses should be interpreted as the combined outcome of practical dietary strategies used to achieve the target SID lysine levels and AM/AP ratios, rather than as effects entirely independent of ingredient composition.
5. Conclusions
In broilers fed an 18.5% CP low-protein diet, dietary SID lysine level and AM/AP ratio interact to regulate ileal barrier gene expression, inflammatory cytokines, and ileal morphology.
High lysine (1.40%) combined with a high AM/AP ratio (0.41) maximizes tight junction (Occludin, ZO-1, Claudin-1) and TNF-α expression but reduces VH/CD ratio. Moderate lysine (1.20%) with a low AM/AP ratio (0.19) optimizes ileal villus height and VH/CD.
Under the conditions of the present study, in which broilers were fed an 18.5% CP low-protein diet from 22 to 42 days of age, a combination of 1.20% SID lysine and an AM/AP ratio of 0.19 is recommended to support intestinal morphology, while 1.40% lysine with 0.41 AM/AP may enhance barrier gene expression at the cost of morphological integrity.
Abbreviations
SID: Standardized Ileal Digestible; AM/AP: Amylose/Amylopectin ratio; Ross 308: Ross 308 broiler; NIRS: Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy; VH: Villus Height; CD: Crypt Depth; VH/CD: Villus Height to Crypt Depth ratio; H&E: Hematoxylin and eosin; qRT-PCR: Quantitative real-time PCR; OTUs: Operational Taxonomic Units; PCoA: Principal Coordinate Analysis; ANOSIM: Analysis of Similarities; GLM: General Linear Model; ANOVA: Analysis of Variance; MWC: Waxy corn + 1.20% lysine; MP: Pea starch + 1.20% lysine; HWC: High waxy corn; HP: High pea starch; Faith’s PD: Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity; IL-18: Interleukin-18; TNF-α: Tumor Necrosis Factor-α; IL-10: Interleukin-10; Occludin: Occludin; ZO-1: Zonula Occludens-1; Claudin-1: Claudin-1; SCFA: Short-chain fatty acid; mTORC1: mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.Y.; methodology, J.Y.; formal analysis, M.Z.; investigation, M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.Z.; supervision, J.Y.; project administration, J.Y.; funding acquisition, J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
All animal procedures were performed at the Zhuozhou Poultry Nutrition Research Base of China Agricultural University (Hebei, China). The experimental protocols were approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethical Committee of China Agricultural University (No: AW90504202-1-2, approved on 9 May 2024) and conducted in accordance with the Beijing Regulations of Laboratory Animals.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to publish the results.
Funding Statement
This research was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1300502), and Eagle Club Development Fund.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Wang J., Wu Y., Zhou T., Feng Y., Li L.A. Common Factors and Nutrients Affecting Intestinal Villus Height—A Review. Anim. Biosci. 2025;38:1557–1569. doi: 10.5713/ab.25.0002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kiarie E., Romero L.F., Nyachoti C.M. The Role of Added Feed Enzymes in Promoting Gut Health in Swine and Poultry. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2013;26:71–88. doi: 10.1017/s0954422413000048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barekatain R., Chrystal P.V., Nowland T., Moss A.F., Howarth G.S., Hao Van T.T., Moore R.J. Negative consequences of reduced protein diets supplemented with synthetic amino acids for performance, intestinal barrier function, and caecal microbiota composition of broiler chickens. Anim. Nutr. 2023;13:216–228. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barekatain R., Chrystal P.V., Howarth G.S., McLaughlin C.J., Gilani S., Nattrass G.S. Performance, Intestinal Permeability, and Gene Expression of Selected Tight Junction Proteins in Broiler Chickens Fed Reduced Protein Diets Supplemented with Arginine, Glutamine, and Glycine Subjected to a Leaky Gut Model. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:6761–6771. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee C.Y., Song A.A.L., Loh T.C., Abdul Rahim R. Effects of Lysine and Methionine in a Low Crude Protein Diet on the Growth Performance and Gene Expression of Immunity Genes in Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2020;99:2916–2925. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ban Z., Chen S., Li L., Zhang Q., Zhao X., Liang H., Guo Y. Effects of Dietary Net Energy/Lysine Ratio and Sex on Growth Performance, Digestive Organ Development, and Cecal Microbiota of Broiler Chickens. Animals. 2025;15:1572. doi: 10.3390/ani15111572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Attia Y.A., Bovera F., Wang J., Al-Harthi M.A., Kim W.K. Multiple Amino Acid Supplementations to Low-Protein Diets: Effect on Performance, Carcass Yield, Meat Quality and Nitrogen Excretion of Finishing Broilers under Hot Climate Conditions. Animals. 2020;10:973. doi: 10.3390/ani10060973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Luo C., Ai C., Yu Y., Yuan J. Optimizing broiler growth performance through balanced net energy, standard ileal digestible lysine, and amylose/amylopectin ratios: A Box-Behnken response surface approach. Poult. Sci. 2025;104:105287. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Luo C., Wang J., Jiang W., Yin D., Meng G., Wang J., Xu J., Yuan J. Different starch sources and amino acid levels on growth performance, starch and amino acids digestion, absorption and metabolism of 0- to 3-week-old broilers fed low protein diet. Anim. Nutr. 2024;20:277–290. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Luo C., Yu Y., Meng G., Yuan J. Slowly digestible starch impairs growth performance of broiler chickens offered low-protein diet supplemental higher amino acid densities by inhibiting the utilization of intestinal amino acid. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2025;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s40104-024-01142-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tian D.L., Guo R.J., Li Y.M., Chen P.P., Zi B.B., Wang J.J., Liu R.F., Min Y.N., Wang Z.P., Niu Z.Y., et al. Effects of Lysine Deficiency or Excess on Growth and the Expression of Lipid Metabolism Genes in Slow-Growing Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:2927–2932. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ma J., Yang T., Yang M., Yan Z., Zhao L., Yao L., Chen J., Chen Q., Tan B., Li T., et al. Effects of dietary amylose/amylopectin ratio and amylase on growth performance, energy and starch digestibility, and digestive enzymes in broilers. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020;104:928–935. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang Y., Liu Y., Li J., Xing T., Jiang Y., Zhang L., Gao F. Dietary resistant starch modifies the composition and function of caecal microbiota of broilers. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020;100:1274–1284. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yoon J.H., Lourenco J., Olukosi O.A. Interactive effects of dietary crude protein reduction and resistant starch inclusion on growth performance and cecal microbial fermentation in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2026;105:106677. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2026.106677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ali Q., Ma S., La S., Guo Z., Liu B., Gao Z., Farooq U., Wang Z., Zhu X., Cui Y., et al. Microbial short-chain fatty acids: A bridge between dietary fibers and poultry gut health—A review. Anim. Biosci. 2022;35:1461–1478. doi: 10.5713/ab.21.0562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Adewole D., Akinyemi F. Gut Microbiota Dynamics, Growth Performance, and Gut Morphology in Broiler Chickens Fed Diets Varying in Energy Density with or without Bacitracin Methylene Disalicylate (BMD) Microorganisms. 2021;9:787. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Weurding R.E., Enting H., Verstegen M.W. The Relation between Starch Digestion Rate and Amino Acid Level for Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 2003;82:279–284. doi: 10.1093/ps/82.2.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Latorre J.D., Adhikari B., Park S.H., Teague K.D., Graham L.E., Mahaffey B.D., Baxter M.F.A., Hernandez-Velasco X., Kwon Y.M., Ricke S.C., et al. Evaluation of the Epithelial Barrier Function and Ileal Microbiome in an Established Necrotic Enteritis Challenge Model in Broiler Chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018;5:199. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mao H., Chen J., Zhang J., Zhang X., Xu S., Zhang L. High-Energy and High-Amino Acid Diet Enhances Production Performance and Antioxidant Capacity in Yellow-Feathered Broilers under Heat Stress. Poult. Sci. 2024;103:103790. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jiang C.H., Fang X., Huang W., Wang Y.H., Kang L., Wang P.Y., Xu C., Li Z.S., Zou W.B., Liao Z. A Reciprocal Interaction between L-Lysine and Holdemanella biformis Modulates Intestinal Barrier Function and Anxiety in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. iMetaOmics. 2025;2:e70042. doi: 10.1002/imo2.70042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gao X., Yu B., Yu J., Mao X., Huang Z., Luo Y., Luo J., Zheng P., He J., Chen D. Effects of Dietary Starch Structure on Growth Performance, Serum Glucose-Insulin Response, and Intestinal Health in Weaned Piglets. Animals. 2020;10:543. doi: 10.3390/ani10030543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang C., Wang M., Tang X., Yang H., Li F., Wang Y., Li J., Yin Y. Effect of Dietary Amylose/Amylopectin Ratio on Intestinal Health and Cecal Microbes’ Profiles of Weaned Pigs Undergoing Feed Transition or Challenged with Escherichia coli Lipopolysaccharide. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:693839. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.693839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rodríguez S.P., Herrera A.L., Parra J.E. Gene Expression of Pro-Inflammatory (IL-8, IL-18, TNF-α, and IFN-γ) and Anti-Inflammatory (IL-10) Cytokines in the Duodenum of Broiler Chickens Exposed to Lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Vet. World. 2023;16:564–570. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.564-570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mine Y., Zhang H. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Poly-L-Lysine in Intestinal Mucosal System Mediated by Calcium-Sensing Receptor Activation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015;63:10437–10447. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jankowski J., Ognik K., Konieczka P., Mikulski D. Effects of Different Levels of Arginine and Methionine in a High-Lysine Diet on the Immune Status, Performance, and Carcass Traits of Turkeys. Poult. Sci. 2020;99:4730–4740. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Han H., Yin J., Wang B., Huang X., Yao J., Zheng J., Fan W., Li T., Yin Y. Effects of Dietary Lysine Restriction on Inflammatory Responses in Piglets. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:2451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20689-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fan M.Z., Archbold T., Lackeyram D., Liu Q., Mine Y., Paliyath G. Consumption of Guar Gum and Retrograded High-Amylose Corn Resistant Starch Increases IL-10 Abundance without Affecting Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in the Colon of Pigs Fed a High-Fat Diet. J. Anim. Sci. 2012;90:278–280. doi: 10.2527/jas.54006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang Z., Shao D., Kang K., Wu S., Zhong G., Song Z., Shi S. Low Protein with High Amino Acid Diets Improves the Growth Performance of Yellow Feather Broilers by Improving Intestinal Health under Cyclic Heat Stress. J. Therm. Biol. 2022;105:103219. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Alagbe E.O., Sung J.Y., Pasternak J.A., Adeola O. Postnatal small intestinal morphological development in Cobb 500 broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2026;105:106412. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2026.106412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Oluseyifunmi I.W., Lourenco J., Olukosi O.A. The Interactivity of Sources and Dietary Levels of Resistant Starches: Impact on Growth Performance, Starch, and Nutrient Digestibility, Digesta Oligosaccharides Profile, Cecal Microbial Metabolites, and Indicators of Gut Health in Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 2024;103:104337. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Deryabin D., Lazebnik C., Vlasenko L., Karimov I., Kosyan D., Zatevalov A., Duskaev G. Broiler Chicken Cecal Microbiome and Poultry Farming Productivity: A Meta-Analysis. Microorganisms. 2024;12:747. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12040747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liao X., Shao Y., Sun G., Yang Y., Zhang L., Guo Y., Luo X., Lu L. Cecal Microbiota and SCFA Are Closely Related to Intestinal Morphology in Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2020;99:5883–58951. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kobel C.M., Leu A., Vera-Ponce de León A., Øyås O., Lai W., Altshuler I., Hagen L.H., Wollenberg R.D., Søndergaard M.T., Bakshani C.R., et al. Protozoal Populations Drive System-Wide Variation in the Rumen Microbiome. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:6238. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61302-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shen J., Fang L., Wu Y., Deng N., Peng X., Li D., Tan Z. Intestinal Microbiota Dysbiosis Disrupts the Mucosal Barrier, Triggering Inflammatory Responses in Gut-Kidney Interaction and Exacerbating Diarrhea. J. Inflamm. Res. 2025;18:9379–9399. doi: 10.2147/jir.s529493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.





