Abstract
Ranges of distribution of some orthoflaviviruses, including the Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus (OHFV) and the Powassan virus (POWV), have been identified in the range endemic for the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV). In contrast to TBEV, no registered vaccine against OHFV and POWV is currently available. Nevertheless, recent studies have indicated that the anti-TBEV vaccine may offer partial protection against other orthoflaviviruses. The present study assesses OHFV and POWV infection in an experimental model on BALB/c mice one, three- and twelve-months post-immunization with inactivated TBE vaccine. The TBE vaccine was shown to provide long-term protection against OHFV and partial protection against POWV, even in the absence of specific antibodies, and without indications of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection. The neutralizing antibody titer for OHFV in vaccinated animals before and after the challenge with OHFV was similar to the titer of antibodies against the TBEV vaccine strain. Following immunization with anti-TBEV vaccine and subsequent inoculation of POWV, the levels of neutralizing antibodies against the TBEV vaccine strain was observed to be higher compared to those targeting POWV, especially during the initial phase of infection. Such cross-reactive antibodies have potential to pose a significant diagnostic challenge in cases where an infection is occurring simultaneously with an immune response to another virus.
Keywords: orthoflavivirus, TBEV, OHFV, POWV, TBE vaccine, cross-reactive antibodies
1. Introduction
Orthoflaviviruses are enveloped viruses belonging to the family Flaviviridae. The genome of orthoflaviviruses is represented by a positive single-stranded RNA with one open reading frame that encodes three structural proteins (C, capsid; prM, pre-membrane; E, envelope) and seven non-structural proteins (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5). Most orthoflaviviruses are arboviruses, encompassing a range of viruses that pose a significant risk to human health. These include the Orthoflavivirus denguei (dengue virus—DENV), Orthoflavivirus flavi (yellow fever virus—YFV), Orthoflavivirus zikaense (Zika virus—ZIKV), Orthoflavivirus japonicum (Japanese encephalitis virus—JEV), Orthoflavivirus nilense (West Nile virus—WNV), etc., transmitted by mosquitoes, and Orthoflavivirus encephalitidis (tick-borne encephalitis virus—TBEV), Orthoflavivirus omskense (Omsk haemorrhagic fever virus—OHFV), Orthoflavivirus powassanense (Powassan virus—POWV), Orthoflavivirus kyasanurense (Kyasanur Forest disease virus—KFDV), etc., transmitted by ticks [1].
TBEV is the most common tick-borne orthoflavivirus. Approximately 10,000–15,000 cases of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) are documented annually [2]. Serological prevalence studies demonstrate that inapparent infections account for 70% to 95% of all TBEV infections, depending on the region [3,4]. The incubation period of TBE is estimated to range from 7 to 21 days. The manifestations of the first phase of the disease include elevated body temperature, accompanied by headache, fatigue, nausea and vomiting. In most cases, complete recovery is achieved following the first phase. In approximately one-third of patients, the first phase is followed by the second phase. It is accompanied by fever and neurological symptoms as the virus affects the central nervous system (CNS), which can cause meningitis, meningoencephalitis, meningoencephalomyelitis, or meningoencephaloradiculitis [5,6]. Protracted convalescence is frequently observed for severe illness; in some instances the infection becomes chronic [7,8]. There is significant variation in the case fatality rate of TBE: it ranges from 2% to 20%, contingent on a multitude of factors associated with both the properties of the virus and the patient’s characteristics [9,10,11]. Five inactivated whole-virion vaccines for TBE prevention have been approved for use: two European, two Russian, and one Chinese vaccine [12,13,14]. All TBE vaccines are available in adult and pediatric versions. Approximately 3 million individuals in Russia receive vaccinations or revaccinations on an annual basis. This fact is indicative of the fairly high level of TBEV seropositivity among the population in Russia [15,16].
TBE infection in humans may confer lifelong immunity due to a high T- and B-cell response [10,17]. Immunization with an inactivated whole-virion vaccine against TBEV was also shown to activate both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. However, the profile of these cells and their activation degree vary compared to those observed for natural infection [17,18,19]. It is imperative to adhere to a regular revaccination schedule to ensure the maintenance of protective antibody (Ab) titers and the subsequent formation of long-lived B- and CD4+ memory T-cells [20].
Other orthoflaviviruses were found in regions endemic for TBE. They include OHFV in Western Siberia, POWV in the Russian Far East, JEV in the Russian Far East and China, and WNV in Europe and the European part of Russia [10,21,22,23]. There is therefore geographic overlap in the range of these different orthoflaviviruses. Furthermore, individuals vaccinated against TBEV or exposed to it may travel to regions endemic for other orthoflaviviruses. It means that simultaneous or sequential infection with several viruses, or infection with another orthoflavivirus while immunized with the TBE vaccine, may occur [10,24].
In addition to the Western Siberian regions of the Russian Federation, OHFV has been detected in Kazakhstan, where TBE cases have also been reported [25,26]. In 1988–1997, 165 cases of Omsk hemorrhagic fever (OHF) infection were reported in Russia, but this incidence might be incomplete, since asymptomatic cases or cases with a mild course have probably been unreported. Strength of the immunity to OHFV in endemic areas is also unknown because of the lack of appropriate test systems [27]. Hence, the current statistics on the incidence of OHF are unclear. The infection is known to be seasonal; along with ticks, the sources of infection include muskrats (people get infected when cutting their carcasses) [27].
OHF infection has a shorter incubation period (3–7 days) compared to TBE and is usually associated with internal organ and/or skin hemorrhages. Within one or two weeks, 50–70% of patients recover, while others enter the second phase of the disease. This phase also lasts one or two weeks and is characterized by prolonged fever, hemorrhages, and the emergence of encephalitic symptoms [27]. As a rule, patients usually recover completely, but there are cases of persistent long-term complications. The mortality of OHF was shown to vary between 0.4% and 2.5% [27].
POWV is distributed in Canada, the United States, and the Russian Far East [28]. POWV is a neurotropic virus, and the clinical picture of infection is very similar to that of TBE infection. The mortality rate of severe POWV infection is up to 10%, but these statistics are very approximate because of the lack of specific test systems to detect anti-POWV antibodies [29]. No vaccine against POWV is currently registered, but its development is underway [30,31].
TBEV has several subtypes. The most common ones are Far Eastern, Siberian, and European subtypes, which are named after the respective regions where they are distributed [10]. OHFV has three subtypes (1, 2, and 3) [32], and POWV has two lineages: lineage 1—POWV in Russia and North America; lineage 2—the deer tick virus circulating in Canada and the United States [28,33]. OHFV and POWV are members of the TBEV serocomplex [34,35]. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that, with allowance for the evolutionary characteristics of OHFV, it is closely related to TBEV. Therefore, it has been proposed that TBEV and OHFV should be classified as a single species [36]. Among them, POWV is most distinct antigenically and phylogenetically [37]. The similarity of the surface proteins of viruses belonging to the same serocomplex leads to cross-reactive Ab response. In experimental subcutaneous infection of non-human primates, TBE vaccination protected the animals against hemolytic syndrome during OHFV infection. However, it ensured no protection against viral entry into the brain or visceral organs [38]. Moreover, TBE vaccination protected the primates against viremia and the presence of viral RNA in organs during POWV infection [39]. In experiments on mice conducted two weeks after double-dose immunization with an inactivated lyophilized TBE vaccine, protection against mortality was demonstrated for OHFV infection, while no clear protection was observed in the cases of POWV infection [40,41]. A comparable outcome was attained in an in vitro experiment with sera from vaccinated mice. These sera exhibited elevated protective titers in the neutralization test against OHFV [40,41,42], but not POWV [40]. When studying the serum samples from people vaccinated with the European vaccine against TBE, as well as people after TBE infection, it was shown that the titers of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against TBEV and OHFV were approximately at the same level. However, only a subset of sera exhibited neutralizing activity against POWV, with generally low titers, particularly in samples obtained from vaccinated individuals [43].
For mosquito-borne orthoflaviviruses, both within the same serocomplex (DENV types 1, 2, 3 and 4) and between different serocomplexes (DENV and ZIKV), cross-reactive Abs may both play a protective role during infection with closely related orthoflaviviruses and cause antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (ADE) [44,45]. Infection is enhanced by secondary infection with DENV of a different subtype. Several mechanisms of ADE have been described in the literature [46,47,48], but the most widely studied one is the viral entry into the cell through the interaction between the Fc part of Ab and the Fcγ receptor on the cell surface [49]. This pathway of viral entry into the cell occurs in the presence of non-neutralizing Abs or Abs at sub-neutralizing concentrations. Therefore, the course of infection must be studied in the context of pre-existing antibodies specific to various orthoflaviviruses in order to gain a more profound understanding of the nature and mechanisms of ADE. It may also be useful in predicting disease severity.
There is a large body of research on ADE between mosquito orthoflaviviruses of different serocomplexes in vitro and in vivo, including experiments in rhesus macaques [44,50,51,52,53,54,55]. ADE has also been shown to be possible after vaccination with inactivated and recombinant vaccines [56,57]. However, the issue of ADE is poorly understood for tick-borne orthoflaviviruses. The level of post-vaccination anti-TBEV antibodies is known to decline with time after vaccination, and the Ab spectrum may also change [58,59]. It may affect both the effectiveness of protection in the case of infection with another orthoflavivirus and increase the probability of ADE.
The present study aims to provide analysis of the infection caused by OHFV and POWV in BALB/c mice that are both vaccinated and unvaccinated against TBEV, with a particular focus placed on the long-term post-vaccination immune response induced by the TBE vaccine.
2. Results
2.1. Characteristics of the Orthoflaviviruses Studied
Even virus strains belonging to the same subtype can vary significantly in pathogenicity, particularly in relation to their neurovirulence and neuroinvasiveness in vivo [14,60,61]. Some orthoflavivirus strains are characterized by nonlinear mortality during virus titration in mice [62,63,64], which introduces some complications in the use of Reed–Muench and Kärber methods for determining LD50. A similar trend was observed in our study for POWV. Even at high doses, it did not cause 100% mortality in BALB/c mice. Nevertheless, for comparative assessment of virus virulence, we calculated the conventional LD50 value using the Kärber method.
The neuroinvasiveness index is a parameter assessed in the study denoting the degree of pathogenicity, with a higher index corresponding to lower pathogenicity. The neuroinvasiveness index was defined as the difference between the logarithms of the viral plaque-formation units (PFUs) in PEK cell culture (log(PFU/mL)) and the virus titer calculated as 50% lethal dose (LD50) after subcutaneous infection of BALB/c mice (log(LD50/mL)): log(PFU/mL) − log(LD50/mL). As demonstrated in Table 1, the viruses used in the study exhibited divergent degrees of neuroinvasiveness. The highest neuroinvasiveness was observed for TBEV (1.0) and OHFV (1.6), while POWV was characterized by the lowest pathogenicity in experimental infection (2.8).
Table 1.
The neuroinvasiveness index and virus doses used in infection.
| Virus | Neuroinvasiveness Index (log(PFU/mL) − log(LD50/mL)) |
Doses for Infection | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LD50 | log(PFU) | ||
| TBEV | 1.0 ± 0.6 * | 100 | 3.4 |
| OHFV | 1.6 ± 0.6 * | 100 | 3.8 |
| POWV | 2.8 ± 0.6 * | 100 | 4.6 |
* 0.6—the method error determined in a separate experiment.
2.2. The Effect of the Age of BALB/c Mice on Infection Caused by TBEV, OHFV, and POWV
Patient age was found to be a contributing factor to the severity of diseases caused by orthoflaviviruses [65,66,67]. Our study examined the effect of age on the course of infection in an experimental mouse model. The study included three age groups of mice: young (14-week-old), mature (24-week-old), and old (64-week-old) [68]. The mice were subcutaneously infected with viruses at a dose of 100LD50. The assessment of mortality and morbidity was based on weight loss and clinical manifestations of the disease. The brains of surviving animals were examined by qRT-PCR to detect viral RNA.
The survival rate and the median lifespan of mature 24-week-old mice infected with TBEV (EK-328) were statistically higher than in young and old (14- and 64-week-old) mice (Figure 1, Table 2). As illustrated in Figure 1b, the infection of mice with OHFV resulted in 100% mortality within 13 days of infection, with no discernible impact on mortality based on age. Mortality and morbidity following POWV infection showed the greatest differences depending on the age of the mice compared to TBEV and OHFV. For young 14-week-old and mature 24-week-old mice infected with POWV, the mortality rate and the percentage of mice in whose CNS the virus had been detected in the late stages of infection (24–28 days post-infection) were approximately the same (60–70%). Meanwhile, the morbidity of young mice was 60%, while it rose to 90% for mature mice. In older mice, the mortality after POWV infection with the same virus dose fell to 12%, but the morbidity and presence of the virus in the CNS 24–28 days post-infection were observed in 94% and 82% of mice, respectively (Figure 1c, Table 2). The morbidity was found to be significantly higher in old mice compared to young mice. Hence, older mice died significantly less often when infected with POWV; despite this, the ability of the virus to penetrate the CNS and cause disease without fatal consequences increased, which may indicate that the infection became chronic.
Figure 1.
The survival rate of mice of different ages following subcutaneous infection with TBEV (a), OHFV (b), and POWV (c) at doses of 100LD50, n = 15–20. Statistical differences were determined using the log-rank test (* p < 0.05).
Table 2.
Characteristics of orthoflavivirus infections caused by TBEV, OHFV, and POWV at doses of 100LD50 * in experiments on BALB/c mice of different age.
| Challenge Virus |
Age of Animals, Weeks |
Number of Animals |
Median Life Expectancy, Day [Min; Max] |
Mortality, % |
Morbidity, % |
Number of Mice with Virus in the CNS, % ** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBEV (EK-328) |
14 | 15 | 14 [8; 16] | 87 | 100 | 87 |
| 24 | 20 | 17 [11; 25] ***a | 75 | 95 | 100 | |
| 64 | 19 | 14 [9; 17] | 89.5 | 100 | 100 | |
| OHFV | 14 | 15 | 10 [9; 13] | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 24 | 20 | 9 [7; 11] | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| 64 | 20 | 10 [8; 12] | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| POWV | 14 | 15 | 10 [7; 15] | 60 | 60 | 67 |
| 24 | 20 | 8 [7; 11] | 60 | 90 | 70 | |
| 64 | 17 | 9 [8; 10] | 12 | 94 ***b | 82 |
* A 100LD50 was determined in young 14-week-old mice. ** The virus in the CNS of dead and surviving animals by 24–28 days post-infection by RT-PCR. *** Statistically significant difference from 14-week-old mice according to (a) the Mann–Whitney test (p < 0.05) and (b) Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.05).
The dynamics and spectrum of induced antibodies are important characteristics of viral infection. We found that the titers of NAbs against the viruses under study changed with the age of the surviving mice by day 28 post-infection with TBEV (EK-328) and POWV, when the humoral response had already been formed. It was impossible to compile such statistics for mice infected with OHFV, since all the animals died by day 13 post-infection.
The presence of NAbs against the virus used for the experiment was detected at 28 days post-infection in all the mice infected with TBEV (EK-328) and POWV. Statistically significant differences in NAb titers were observed in neither young, adult, nor old mice (Figure 2a).
Figure 2.
Mean geometric NAbs titers on day 28 post-infection with TBEV (EK-328) (a) or POWV (b) against TBEV (EK-328) and POWV, respectively, of 14-, 24-, and 60-week-old mice. The number of samples is indicated at the bottom of each column. The dotted line indicates the estimated minimum protective titer of NAbs and the lower limit of NAb detection in PRNT50. The spread is represented by the mean value ± SD.
The results of the experiment suggest that the age of surviving BALB/c mice does not affect the NAb titers at 28 days post-infection with POWV or TBEV.
2.3. Post-Vaccination Immune Response Against TBEV, OHFV, and POWV at Different Time Points After Immunization with the TBE Vaccine
The NAb titers and seroconversion in the mouse sera were analyzed against TBEV vaccine strain Sofjin and the challenge viruses. The analyses were performed one month after a single vaccine dose, and one month, three months, and one year after the final dose in double-dose vaccination against TBEV (Figure 2).
As one might expect, the number of seropositive sera was found to be low (20–40%) one month after a single immunization, both against the TBEV vaccine strain and OHFV. This finding is consistent with the results of a previous study [58]. Among seropositive animals, NAb titers against OHFV were approximately at the same level as for the TBEV vaccine strain.
Following the double-dose vaccination of animals with a 14-day interval, a high number of seropositive sera was observed for both TBEV strain Sofjin (100%) and OHFV (100%) one month post-vaccination. The titers of cross-reactive NAbs against OHFV were found to be equivalent to those of the TBEV vaccine strain. The titers of cross-reactive NAbs against POWV were not detected one month after single or double vaccination (Figure 3a,b,e,f).
Figure 3.
The seropositivity rate and the geometric mean NAb titers in the sera of vaccinated against TBEV mice of different ages. The upper row of graphs (a–d) shows the number of seropositive sera (n = 15–21 sera for determining the NAb titer to TBEV (Sofjin) and n = 5–8 for determining the NAb titers to OHFV, POWV). The bottom row of graphs (e–h) shows the geometric mean NAb titers. The dotted line indicates the estimated minimum protective titer NAbs and the lower limit of NAb detection in PRNT50. The data are presented as mean ± SD.
Three months and one year after receiving two doses of the vaccine, the number of seropositive sera remained high against both TBEV and OHFV. Meanwhile, the NAb titers against TBEV (strain Sofjin) and OHFV remained higher than the putative protective titer of 1 log even one year after double-dose vaccination. The NAb titers against OHFV, as well as one month after double-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine, was equal to the NAb titer against the TBEV strain Sofjin. Three months and one year after receiving two doses of the TBE vaccine, no NAbs against POWV were detected in any of the study groups (Figure 3c,d,g,h).
2.4. Protective Efficacy of the TBE Vaccine Against the Orthoflaviviruses Under Study
The protective effect of the TBE vaccine was assessed based on the morbidity and mortality of mice, as well as the presence of the virus in the brains of surviving animals by 24–28 days post-infection of the mice. Subsequently, groups of mice infected with TBEV (EK-328), OHFV, and POWV will be considered based on the time of infection after the last vaccination.
2.4.1. The Survival Rate of Mice Infected with TBEV, OHFV, and POWV One Month After Single- and Double-Dose Immunization with the TBE Vaccine
The survival, absence of morbidity, and absence of virus in the CNS by 24–28 days post-infection were observed in 93% of animals in the group infected with the EK-328 virus one month following single-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine compared to the unvaccinated control group, where the survival rate was 13% and the percentage of healthy animals was 0 % (Figure 4a, Table 3). These findings are indicative of high vaccine protection even after single-dose immunization, despite the low seropositive rate (Figure 3a). One month after administration of two doses of the TBE vaccine, there was 100% survival, no incidence of the disease, and no virus in the CNS by 24–28 days post-infection.
Figure 4.
The survival curves of mice infected with TBEV (EK-328) (a), OHFV (b), and POWV (c) at doses of 100LD50 one month after single- or double-dose vaccination, n = 15. The statistical significance of the mortality data was determined using the log-rank test (** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001).
Table 3.
Characteristics of the infections caused by TBEV, OHFV, and POWV at doses of 100 LD50 * one month after single- and double-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine (Sofjin) in an experiment on BALB/c mice.
| Challenge Virus | Number of Mice | First Vaccination |
Second Vaccination |
Median Life Expectancy, Days [Min; Max] |
Survivors, % |
Healthy, % |
Number of Mice Without Virus in the CNS, % ** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBEV (EK-328) |
15 | − | − | 14 [8; 16] | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| 15 | − | + | 93 | 93 | 93 | ||
| 15 | + | + | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| OHFV | 15 | − | − | 10 [9; 13] | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | − | + | 10 [8; 13] | 53 | 53 | 53 | |
| 15 | + | + | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| POWV | 15 | − | − | 10 [7; 15] | 40 | 40 | 33 |
| 15 | − | + | 14 [8; 15] | 47 | 33 | 47 | |
| 15 | + | + | 100 | 100 | 100 |
* A 100LD50 was determined in young 14-week-old mice. ** It was assumed in this study that the virus had penetrated into the CNS of deceased mice. The virus identification was done in the CNS of surviving mice on 24–28 days post-infection. «+»—there is vaccination, «−»—no vaccination.
In OHFV-infected mice, one month after single-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine, the survival rate and the percentage of healthy animals was 53%. In the control group animals, which did not receive the vaccine, the mortality rate was 100%, indicating that the vaccine provides partial protection against OHFV even after a single dose (Figure 4b, Table 3). The administration of two doses of the TBE vaccine resulted in the complete protection of mice from the disease and death when infected with OHFV one month after the last immunization (Figure 4b). Concurrently, OHFV was not detected in the CNS of surviving animals by 24 days post-infection (Table 3).
One month after a single-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine in the group infected with POWV, the survival rate and the percentage of healthy mice were approximately equivalent to those in the control group animals that had not been vaccinated. This finding indicates that the single dose of the TBE vaccine does not ensure protection against POWV. In the event of infection with POWV occurring one month after administration of two doses of the TBE vaccine, 100% survival was observed, with no incidence of the disease and no virus detected in the CNS (Figure 4c, Table 3). This outcome was achieved despite the complete absence of antibodies against POWV after double-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine (Figure 3).
2.4.2. NAb Titers After Infection with TBEV, OHFV, and POWV, One Month After Single- and Double-Dose Vaccination Against TBEV
The booster antibody response, resulting in an increase in the NAb titer post-infection, is a significant characteristic of the immune response. A comparison was made of NAb titers before infection, on the second day, and 24–28 days post-infection against the TBEV vaccine strain (Sofjin) and the challenge viruses. In our experiment, the booster response was observed in none of the study groups.
The NAb dynamics after a single vaccination and subsequent infection were found to be comparable for all the viruses under study, both against the vaccine strain TBEV and the virus used for the infection (Figure 5a,c).
Figure 5.
Geometric mean titers of NAbs in sera of seropositive mice before and after infection with OHFV (a,b) and POWV (c,d) one month after single-dose (a,c) and double-dose (b,d) immunization with the TBE vaccine before and after infection with OHFV and POWV. Solid columns indicate vaccinated groups; shaded columns indicate unvaccinated control groups. Unvaccinated mice infected with OHFV do not have a point at 24–28 days post-infection because of the high mortality before the end of the experiment. The number of subjects in each group is as follows: n = 5–7 for vaccinated mice; n = 3 for unvaccinated mice before infection and at 2 dpi; n = 7 for unvaccinated mice infected with POWV. The number of seropositive sera out of the total number of sera tested is indicated above each column. The dotted line indicates the presumed minimum protective titer of NAbs and the lower limit of NAb detection in PRNT50. In sera with NAb titers below 1 log, the conditional titer is taken as 0.5 log. The data are presented as mean ± SD.
In the group infected with OHFV after two vaccinations, the titer of NAbs against the TBEV strain Sofjin and OHFV was approximately the same at all time points. A downward trend in NAbs against OHFV was observed on day 2 post-infection (Figure 5b).
In the group infected with POWV after receiving two vaccine doses, NAb titer to the vaccine TBEV strain remained at a high level across all time points. Only this group showed a slight increase in NAbs against the vaccine strain on day 2 post-infection with POWV. NAbs against POWV after two doses of the TBE vaccine were not detected at any time point, including day 28 (Figure 5d).
2.4.3. The Survival Rate of Mice Infected with TBEV, OHFV, and POWV Three Months After Vaccination Against TBE
Three months after receiving two doses of the TBE vaccine, the group infected with TBEV (EK-328) was characterized by significantly higher survival and lower morbidity rates than the unvaccinated control group. Simultaneously, the virus was detected in the CNS at 24–28 days post-infection in a mere 10% of the surviving vaccinated animals, whereas this figure was 100% in the control group (Figure 6a, Table 4).
Figure 6.
The survival curves of mice infected with TBEV (EK-328) (a), OHFV (b), and POWV (c) at doses of 100LD50 three months after double-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine, n = 19–20. The statistical significance of the mortality data was determined using the log-rank test (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001).
Table 4.
Characteristics of infections caused by TBEV, OHFV, and POWV at doses of 100LD50 * three months after double-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine (Sofjin) in an experiment on BALB/c mice.
| Challenge Virus | Number of Mice | Vaccination | Median Life Expectancy, Days [Min; Max] |
Survivors, % |
Healthy, % |
Number of Mice Without Virus in the CNS, % ** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBEV (EK-328) |
20 | − | 17 [11; 25] | 25 | 5 | 0 |
| 20 | + | [17] | 95 | 90 | 90 | |
| OHFV | 20 | − | 9 [7; 11] | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | + | [11; 13] | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
| POWV | 20 | − | 8 [7; 11] | 40 | 10 | 30 |
| 19 | + | 8 [7; 8] | 79 | 79 | 79 |
* A 100LD50 was determined in young 14-week-old mice. ** It was assumed in this study that the virus had penetrated into the CNS of deceased mice. The virus identification was done in the CNS of surviving mice on 24–28 days post-infection. «+»—there is vaccination, «−»—no vaccination.
Three months after two TBE vaccine doses, the survival rate in the group infected with OHFV was 90%, vs. 0% survivors in the unvaccinated control group (Figure 6b, Table 4). Consequently, even three months after the last immunization, the TBE vaccine exhibited a high efficacy against OHFV.
Three months after two doses of the TBE vaccine, the survival and health rates in the group of vaccinated mice infected with POWV were found to be significantly higher than those in the unvaccinated control group (79% vs. 40% and 10%, respectively) (Figure 6c, Table 4). This is indicative of partial protection by the vaccine against POWV, despite the absence of neutralizing antibodies against POWV.
2.4.4. NAb Titers After Infection with TBEV, OHFV, and POWV Three Months After Vaccination Against TBE
Three months after vaccination with two doses of TBE vaccine against infection by studied orthoflaviviruses did not display a booster antibody response, similar to the observations made one month post-vaccination.
In the cohort of mice that had received a double-dose vaccination and were subsequently infected with OHFV, NAb titers against the vaccine TBEV strain and OHFV exhibited comparable dynamics (Figure 7a).
Figure 7.
Mean geometric titers of NAbs in sera of seropositive mice against OHFV (a) and POWV (b) three months after double-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine before and after infection with OHFV and POWV. The vaccinated groups are indicated by solid columns; the unvaccinated control groups by shaded columns. Unvaccinated mice infected with OHFV do not have a point at 24–28 day post-infection because of the high mortality before the end of the experiment. The number of subjects in each group is as follows: n = 7 in the vaccinated group; n = 3 in the unvaccinated group before infection and at 2 days postinfection; n = 7 in the unvaccinated group at 24–28 day post-infection. The number of seropositive sera out of the total number of sera tested is indicated above each column. The dotted line indicates the presumed minimum protective titer of NAbs and the lower limit of NAb detection in PRNT50. In sera with NAb titers below 1 log, the conditional titer is taken as 0.5 log. The data are presented as mean ± SD.
In the group infected with POWV, NAbs were detected in vaccinated mice before infection and on day 2 post–infection only against the TBEV vaccine strain Sofjin. Furthermore, in one serum sample, NAbs against POWV were identified two days post-infection (Figure 7b). In contrast to the mice infected one month after two vaccinations with the TBE vaccine, the NAb titers to POWV in this group had increased by 24–28 days post–infection.
2.4.5. The Survival Rate of Mice Infected One Year After Vaccination Against TBE
One year after two of the TBE vaccine doses in the group of mice infected with TBEV (EK-328) showed that the vaccine was highly effective in preventing both mortality and morbidity, compared to the control group of unvaccinated mice. Concurrently, the virus was detected in the CNS at 24–28 dpi in 21% of the surviving vaccinated animals, while this figure was 100% in the control group (Figure 8a, Table 5).
Figure 8.
The survival curves of mice infected with TBEV(EK-328) (a), OHFV (b), and POWV (c) at doses of 100LD50 one year after double-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine, n = 16–20. The statistical significance of the mortality data was determined using the log-rank test (**** p < 0.0001).
Table 5.
The characteristics of the infections caused by a 100LD50 * of TBEV, OHFV, and POWV one year after the double-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine (strain Sofjin) in an experiment on BALB/c mice.
| Challenge Virus | Number of Mice | Vaccination | Median Life Expectancy |
Survivors, % |
Healthy, % |
Number of Mice Without Virus in the CNS, % ** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBEV (EK-328) |
19 | − | 14 [9; 17] | 10.5 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | + | [17] | 86 | 65 | 79 | |
| OHFV | 20 | − | 10 [8; 12] | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | + | 10.5 [9; 18] | 78 | 78 | 78 | |
| POWV | 17 | − | [12;14] | 88 | 6 | 18 |
| 18 | + | 100 | 71 | 71 |
* A 100LD50 was determined in young 14-week-old mice. ** It was assumed in this study that the virus had penetrated into the CNS of deceased mice. The virus identification was done in the CNS of surviving mice on 24–28 days post-infection. «+»—there is vaccination, «−»—no vaccination.
One year after double-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine, the survival rate and the absence of signs of the disease were observed in 78% of animals in the group infected with OHFV, vs. 0% in the control group that did not receive the vaccine. Hence, even one year after the last immunization, the vaccine showed high efficacy against OHFV infection (Figure 8b, Table 5).
Mice vaccinated and infected with POWV one year after immunization with two TBE vaccine doses did not die; the percentage of healthy animals was 71% compared to the control group, where the survival rate was 88% and the percentage of healthy animals was 6% (Figure 8c, Table 5). The virus was detected in the CNS at 24–28 days post-infection in only 29% of vaccinated animals, compared to 82% of unvaccinated animals. As noted above, this suggests that adult mice are less susceptible to lethal infection with POWV, although they do succumb to infection, with a potential transition to chronic disease. However, the TBE vaccine provided partial protection against the disease and prevented the virus from entering the CNS.
2.4.6. NAb Titers After Infection with TBEV, OHFV, and POWV One Year After Vaccination Against TBE
No booster antibody response was observed in the event of the infection occurring one year after double-dose vaccination, like it was in the case one month and three months after the last immunization with the TBE vaccine. In contrast, on day 2 post-infection, the titer of NAbs against the vaccine strain tended to decrease.
One year post-vaccination, we analyzed the dynamics of the titers of NAbs against TBEV (EK-328) and the vaccine TBEV strain (Sofjin). In twice-vaccinated mice infected with TBEV (EK-328), the geometric mean titers of NAbs against TBEV strain Sofjin were higher than those against TBEV (EK-328) at all time points. Unvaccinated mice tended to have higher NAb titers for both the vaccine strain and TBEV (EK-328) at 24–28 days post-vaccination compared to vaccinated mice (Figure 9a).
Figure 9.
Mean geometric titers of NAbs in sera of seropositive mice against TBEV (EK-328) (a), OHFV (b), and POWV (c) one year after double-dose immunization with the TBE vaccine before and after infection with TBEV (EK-328), OHFV, and POWV. Vaccinated groups are shown as solid columns; unvaccinated control groups are shown as shaded columns. Unvaccinated mice infected with OHFV do not have a point at 24–28 days post-infection because of high mortality before the end of the experiment. The number of subjects in each group is as follows: N = 7 in the vaccinated group; N = 3 in the unvaccinated group before infection and at 2 days post-infection; N = 7 in the unvaccinated group infected with POWV; N = 2 in the infected with TBEV group at 24–28 days post-infection. The number of seropositive sera out of the total number of sera tested is indicated above each column. The dotted line indicates the presumed minimum protective titer of NAbs and the lower limit of NAb detection in PRNT50. In sera with NAb titers below 1 log, the conditional titer is taken as 0.5 log. The data are presented as mean ± SD.
In the group infected with OHFV, the mean geometric titers of NAbs against OHFV and NAbs against the vaccine TBE strain Sofjin still showed similar dynamics in vaccinated mice as was observed in mice infected three months after the last vaccination (Figure 9b).
NAbs against POWV in the sera of vaccinated mice were detected neither before nor two days post-infection; however, NAb titers to POWV had increased by 28 days post-infection (Figure 9c). In the group of mice twice vaccinated against TBE one year before and infected with POWV, the titers of NAbs against the vaccine strain were increased at all points. On the other hand, in groups of mice infected three months and one year after the last immunization with the TBE vaccine and infected with POWV, preliminary vaccination against TBE stimulated greater production of NAbs against POWV by days 24–28 compared to the unvaccinated control group. Unvaccinated mice infected with POWV had NAbs against TBEV (Sofjin), indicating high cross-reactivity among the antibodies produced.
2.4.7. Prothrombin Time After Infection with TBEV, OHFV, and POWV
Since OHFV is characterized by hemorrhagic syndrome, this study aims to evaluate the blood coagulation system by measuring prothrombin time (PT), an indicator of the extrinsic blood coagulation pathway.
First, in order to ascertain how age and vaccination affect the blood coagulation system in BALB/c mice, the PT was evaluated in mice of all ages, with and without prior immunization with the TBE vaccine (Figure 10). No significant differences were observed before and after immunization with the TBE vaccine, indicating that vaccination does not affect the PT. However, the PT was found to differ between age groups. The highest PT value was detected in the group of mature 24-week-old mice.
Figure 10.
Prothrombin time at one month (green), three months (orange), and one year (blue) after immunization with TBE vaccine in vaccinated and unvaccinated mice. The spread is represented by the median value ± 95% CI, with statistical analysis using the Mann–Whitney U test (** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001).
In the absence of prior immunization, statistically significant changes in PT were observed only in the group of mature 24-week-old mice infected with each of the studied viruses (TBEV, OHFV, and POWV) three months after the start of the experiment and in the group of old mice infected with OHFV one year after the initiation of the experiment (Figure 11 b,c,e,h). A decline in PT one day post-infection with TBEV, OHFV, and POWV was observed. However, for OHFV-infected mice, the decline in PT persisted until seven days post-infection. In the group of older mice, PT increased on days one and seven post-infection. A downward trend in PT was also observed in the group of young POWV-infected mice seven days post-infection (Figure 11g). However, because of the limited sample size, the observed difference did not attain statistical significance.
Figure 11.
PT for mice infected with TBEV (EK-328) (a–c), OHFV (d–f), and POWV (g–i) one month (a,d,g)—young 14-week-old mice, three months (b,e,h)—mature 24-week-old mice, and one year (c,f,i)—old 64-week-old mice after vaccination against TBEV and without vaccination. Blood was taken from the same mice. “–” = median values, with statistical analysis using the Mann–Whitney U test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ns—not significant).
For vaccinated animals, the decrease in PT was observed in groups of infected mature 24-week-old mice, similar to groups without prior immunization (Figure 11b,e,h). Differences in PT dynamics between vaccinated and unvaccinated mice were revealed in the group of older mice infected with OHFV (Figure 11f). In unvaccinated mice, PT increased, while in vaccinated mice, PT tended to decrease on day 7 post-infection, and these mice survived to the end of the experiment. Furthermore, in young mice infected with OHFV (Figure 11d), PT decreased after two vaccinations but remained unchanged in non-immunized and single-dose vaccinated mice.
These results show that pre-vaccination can influence the PT dynamics in the early stages of infection, but it depends on the virus and animal age.
3. Discussion
Vast regions within Asia and Europe are characterized by a high prevalence of TBEV, accompanied by associated foci of various orthoflaviviruses that are transmitted by ticks, such OHFV and POWV. A significant proportion of the population residing in these areas has developed immunity to TBEV, either as a result of vaccination programs or through prior natural exposure to the virus. In this study, we conducted in vivo experiments with durations of post-vaccination immunity to examine how existing immunity to the TBE vaccine can affect subsequent infection with other orthoflaviviruses. Furthermore, the progression of tick-borne orthoflavivirus infections in young, mature, and old mice without prior immunization was examined. This approach has made it possible to assess the effectiveness of the TBE vaccine against OHFV and POWV and confirm the absence of ADE.
It seems that sex plays a significant role in the development of the immune response to infection, but this is a separate issue that needs to be addressed in future studies. There are studies that suggest that sex hormones influence the development of the immune response [69]. Although some studies have indicated the existence of sex disparities in the susceptibility of mice to infections caused by orthoflaviviruses [70], data concerning the role of sex as a predisposing factor for tick-borne encephalitis in mice remains extremely limited. In the present study, in order to standardize the experiment, mice of a single sex (females) were used. Moreover, our earlier research demonstrated that both male and female BALB/c mice are equally susceptible to infection with the tick-borne encephalitis virus [58].
It is well-known that the elderly population is predisposed to orthoflavivirus infection and exhibits a protracted recovery period [66]. Furthermore, a lower level of B- and CD4+ T-cell activation was observed in older recipients compared to younger ones following vaccination [65]. In the older population of the C57BL/6 mouse model, infection with POWV caused increased mortality and rate alterations in the profile of induced cytokines. [71].
In the present study, we examined how infection of BALB/c mice caused by TBEV, OHFV, and POWV changes with age. The 24-week-old mice infected with TBEV exhibited higher survival rates and increased median survival time compared to the 14-week-old (young) or 64-week-old (old) ones. Furthermore, the PT in groups of uninfected 24-week-old mice was longer than that in younger and older mice. Additional studies are needed to confirm this correlation.
The present study revealed no correlation between the age of mice infected with OHFV and their sensitivity to the virus. This is likely to have resulted from the high virulence of the virus, which caused 100% mortality by day 14 across all the age groups.
The impact of age on the severity of POWV infection in mice was found to be most significant. As the mice aged, the mortality following infection with POWV decreased, reaching 0% in 64-week-old mice. Concurrently, disease incidence increased with age, and viral RNA was detected in the CNS in a larger number of animals infected with POWV. One of the causes of mortality in orthoflavivirus infection is T-cell response as a pathogenetic factor [72]. In this case, we suppose that as the mice aged, the activation of the CD8+ T-cell immune response was insufficient, which is why some of the mice survived and the virus was not eliminated from the CNS. This fact may attest to the age-related decrease in sensitivity of BALB/c mice to POWV, or a possible transition of the infection to a chronic form [73]. Meanwhile, the titers of NAbs against POWV in mice by 28 days after infection do not change significantly with age.
The present study examined the duration of protection provided by the TBE vaccine against OHFV and POWV. According to the results of our experiments, single-dose vaccination with the TBE vaccine ensured protection against infection with TBEV EK-328, partial protection against infection with OHFV, and neither seroconversion nor protection against infection with POWV. Two doses of the TBE vaccine were highly effective against TBEV strain EK-328 and OHFV infection, both three months and one year after the last immunization with the Sofjin vaccine. There was no booster response for groups of mice infected with OHFV, but the dynamics of NAbs against OHFV and the vaccine strain were comparable and had no significant differences.
In mice vaccinated twice, there was no seropositive serum to POWV in any age group. However, double vaccinination exhibited partial protection against the death of animals after infection with POWV one month and three months after the second vaccination. Because of the low sensitivity of old mice to the virus, it was impossible to assess the effectiveness of the vaccine against mortality one year after the last vaccination. However, the TBE vaccine protected all mice against the disease and virus entering the CNS. The partial protection provided by the TBE vaccine against POWV may be attributable to two factors. Firstly, the activation of the T-cell immune response induced by immunization. Secondly, the presence of non-neutralizing antibodies capable of inducing a cytopathic effect. Alternatively, the presence of neutralizing antibodies to POWV that were below the detection limit in PRNT50 may be responsible. The dynamics of NAbs among vaccinated and POWV-infected mice exhibited age-related variations. Three months and one year after the last vaccination, titers of NAbs against POWV in the sera of infected mice were detected 28 days post-infection, in contrast to the mice infected one month after vaccination, where NAbs against POWV were undetectable.
Therefore, we can speak of the phenomenon of original antigenic sin (OAS). This phenomenon means that in response to secondary infection, the proliferation of cross-reactive memory B-cells induced by primary infection having lower affinity for secondary antigens dominate [74,75]. OAS promotes the production of antibodies and protection against closely related viruses, as can be seen in our case. The infection was stopped in the early stages due to antibodies against the vaccine strain TBEV. Cross-reactive antibodies against OHFV and POWV are produced more slowly or are not synthesized at all, as in the case of POWV infection one month after vaccination. This effect can significantly complicate differential serodiagnostics, since ambiguous results can be obtained not only in ELISA, but even in neutralization reactions.
In a group of mice twice immunized with the TBE vaccine and infected with TBEV (EK-328), the titers of NAbs against TBEV (EK-328) at 28 days post-infection were lower in young and old mice compared to mature mice, while the titers against TBEV (Sofjin) were lower only in old mice. This indicates a difference in the spectrum of NAbs in mice of different ages (Figure 12a).
Figure 12.
The mean geometric titers of NAbs on day 28 post-infection against TBEV strain EK-328 (green), TBEV vaccine strain Sofjin (red), OHFV (blue), and POWV (beige) for mice infected with TBEV (EK-328) (a), OHFV (b), and POWV (c) one month (14-week-old), three months (24-week-old), one year (64-week-old) after vaccination against TBEV. The dotted line indicates the estimated minimum protective titer of NAbs and the lower limit of NAb detection in PRNT50. The spread is represented by the mean value ± SD, with statistical analysis using the Mann–Whitney U test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
In the group of vaccinated animals infected with OHFV on day 28 post-infection, the titers of NAbs against the vaccine strain in young mice were lower than in the sera of mature and old mice (Figure 12b).
In the group of vaccinated mice infected with POWV, the titers of NAbs against POWV and the vaccine TBEV strain Sofjin on day 28 post-infection were statistically higher in mature mice infected three months after vaccination and older mice infected one year after vaccination than in young mice infected one month after vaccination (Figure 12c). It may indicate that with increasing time since vaccination, the spectrum of neutralizing antibodies induced by infection with a heterologous virus changes, as well as indicating age-related changes.
Laboratory mice are the most convenient and common model for studying orthoflaviviruses [76,77]. Nonetheless, there is a possibility that the spectrum of Abs in humans and mice differs, and experiments on monkeys are therefore needed to completely rule out ADE [78,79]. For instance, during orthoflavivirus infection in mice, antibodies directed against the dI+II domains of protein E, known to be cross-reactive and capable of being associated with ADE, are less abundant [80]. At the same time, during TBEV infection, antibodies to dIII and dI+II domains are detected in the serum of monkeys and humans [39,60].
Changes in the spectrum of antibodies depending on the time elapsed since vaccination or on age may be a cause of ADE. However, in none of our experiments did we observe signs of ADE, such as an increase in morbidity or mortality, or a reduction in life expectancy.
Since OHFV can cause a hemorrhagic effect even in a mouse model [76], we evaluated the changes in the coagulation system based on the PT. The PT test measures how long it takes for a fibrin clot to form. This test evaluates the extrinsic and common pathways of the blood coagulation system, focusing specifically on the activity of prothrombin complex factors (II, V, VII, and X). A prolonged PT may be associated with factor (II, V, VII, X) deficiency; the phase of hypocoagulation in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) syndrome; hypofibrinogenemia; and liver damage. Shortening of PT may be associated with activation of the extrinsic and common coagulation pathways and the phase of hypercoagulation in DIC syndrome [81,82]. Tissue factor, which activates the blood coagulation pathway, can be induced in endothelial cells under the influence of proinflammatory cytokines [83], or by the stage of hypercoagulation in DIC syndrome, but this requires further investigation. Studies investigating the coagulation mechanisms in patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever and severe clinical manifestations during in-hospital treatment have shown that PT often increases [84]. It is associated with liver damage and/or variable reduction in activation of factors (II, V, VII, and X), which are involved in the extrinsic or common coagulation pathway [81,85].
The mechanisms underlying the haemorrhagic syndrome in OHF remain to be investigated. However, the findings of the present experiment demonstrate that the hypocoagulation characteristic of haemorrhagic fevers, associated with viral replication, is compensated for in young animals and poorly compensated for in older unvaccinated ones in the early stages of infection; nevertheless, both groups ultimately succumb to the infection. Vaccination, by virtue of its capacity to restrict viral replication, offers protection against mortality and hypocoagulation. The mechanisms of protection and the link to hypercoagulation remain to be investigated.
According to the results, PT in the early stages of orthoflavivirus infection depends on the age of the mice and may depend on vaccination; at the same time, more pronounced changes were observed in mice infected with OHFV.
In the present study, experiments on mice demonstrated that the inactivated TBE vaccine provides long-term protection against OHFV and partial protection against POWV without signs of ADE. Furthermore, our results show that the spectrum of antibodies induced by the TBE vaccine, as well as the antibodies produced following infection with other orthoflaviviruses, depends on the time elapsed since immunization and the age of the animals. These findings suggest that the risk of ADE cannot be ruled out; further research is required. The presence of the OAS effect was demonstrated to significantly impede the diagnosis of orthoflavivirus infections when an immune response to another orthoflavivirus is present. According to the findings reported in this study, as outlined in the experiments conducted [39], the emergence of antibodies to the TBE vaccine at the onset of POWV and OHFV infection shows that even a neutralization reaction can give a false positive result for diagnosis. The presented data indicate that innovative methodologies are needed for developing diagnostic test systems for differential serodiagnostics, especially in regions where multiple viruses may be circulating.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Cells and Viruses
Porcine embryo kidney (PEK) cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in medium 199 with Hanks’ balanced salt solution and Earle’s balanced salt solution (2:1, v:v, (Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS (Institute of Poliomyelitis), Moscow, Russia)) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, New York, NY, USA). The viruses are listed in Table 6.
Table 6.
Viruses used in the experiment.
| Virus | Strain | Region and Year of Isolation | Isolate Source | Passage History * |
GenBank Accession Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBEV, Siberian subtype | EK-328 | Estonia, 1972 | I. persulcatus | M6C1M6C1 | DQ486861.1 |
| TBEV, Far Eastern subtype | SofjinKGG | Primorsky Krai, 1937 | Brain of deceased TBE patient | MxC1M3C1 | GU121963 |
| POWV | Pow-24 | Primorsky Krai, Russia, 1975 | I. persulcatus | M4V1C1 | MG652438.1 |
| OHFV, subtype 1 | Nikitina | Omsk Region, Russia, 1948 | Blood of a patient with OHF | MxM3V1C1 | GU290187 |
* M—passage in the brain of a suckling mouse (Mx—unidentified number of early passages before the virus was obtained by the laboratory), V—passage in Vero cell culture, C—passage in PEK cell culture.
4.2. Animals
Female susceptible inbred BALB/c mice (the Stolbovaya branch of the Scientific Center for Biomedicine Technologies of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of the Russian Federation) were used in this study. At the time of vaccination, the mice were 8 weeks old. Each group consisted of 15 to 20 animals, which is the optimal number for statistical analysis. Mice that were deemed to be unhealthy or had a weight of less than 12 g were excluded from the study. The mice were grouped according to their weight, with randomization employed to ensure an equitable distribution. The animals were maintained in accordance with the international guidelines for the handling of laboratory animals (CIOMS Recommendations, 1985, Directive 2010/63/EC and Annex A of the European Convention ETS No. 123). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS (Institute of Poliomyelitis), protocol No. 210121—4 January 2021.
4.3. Vaccination and Infection
Immunization was performed using the whole-virion formaldehyde inactivated Tick-E-Vac vaccine (Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS (Institute of Poliomyelitis), Moscow, Russia). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh, with 50 µL (vaccine antigen 0.1 μg per mouse [86]) either once or twice, with a two-week interval between each injection. One month, three months, and one year after vaccination, corresponding to 14 (15 mice to each group), 24 (20 mice to each group), and 64 weeks of age (20 mice to each group), mice were subcutaneously injected with 100 µL of virus prediluted in medium 199 in Earle’s salts (Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS (Institute of Poliomyelitis), Moscow, Russia) (Figure 13). The animals were infected with a dose of 100LD50 for each virus. Unvaccinated mice were also infected with the virus at the same time as the vaccinated mice. A total of 21 groups of mice were included in the study. Blood samples were taken from the submandibular vein of mice on days 5 and 3 before infection and on days 1, 2, and 7 post-infection to measure the prothrombin time (PT) and NAb titer (Figure 13). After infection, mice were weighed daily for 24–28 days and monitored for clinical manifestations of the disease. Disease was determined by weight loss, hair ruffling, hunched posture, as well as paresis and paralyzes of the fore and hind limbs. At the end of the experiment, surviving mice were decapitated; blood and brain were collected for examination.
Figure 13.
Experimental design. The syringe indicates vaccination; the red drop indicates blood sampling for PT (prothrombin time) and NAbs (neutralizing antibodies).
4.4. Plaque Assay and 50% Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT50)
Virus titration and neutralization assay were performed in 24-well plates using PEK cell culture according to the procedure described previously [58]. Briefly, serial tenfold dilutions of the virus were incubated with PEK cells for 1 h at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator, coated with 1.26% methylcellulose (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in medium 199 with Hanks’ and Earle’s salts (2:1, v:v) containing 2% FBS (Gibco, New York, NY, USA), and incubated in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 6 days. The cells were then fixed in 96% ethanol and stained with 0.4% solution of gentian violet dye (Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA). Virus titer was counted according to the Reed–Muench method and expressed as the logarithm of plaque-forming units per ml (logPFUs/mL) [87].
To determine the NAb titer in plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT50), dilutions of sera were made in medium 199 with Earle’s salt supplemented with 2% FBS (Gibco, New York, NY, USA) and incubated with TBEV, POWV, and OHFV in a 1:1 ratio for 1 h at 37 °C (the virus concentration being 30–40 PFUs per well). Next, 100 µL of the virus–serum mixture was added to the PEK cells in 24-well plates, following the same procedure as described for the plaque assay. The lower limit of NAT detection is 1 log in PRNT50. Each experiment included a negative and a positive serum with the known antibody titer as a control. NAb titers were calculated as log(NAb) according to the modified Reed–Muench method [87].
4.5. Titration on Mice
For determining the 50% lethal dose of infection, virus titration was performed in BALB/c mice prior to the first infection, when the mice weighed 14–16 g. Mice in each group (five mice per group) were subcutaneously injected with 100 µL of tenfold dilutions of the virus in medium 199 with Earle’s salt, and monitored for 21 days for clinical manifestations, symptoms, and mortality. The lethal dose of the virus resulting in 50% mortality was calculated using the Kärber method and expressed as logLD50/mL [88].
4.6. Virus RNA Quantification (qRT-PCR) in the Mouse Brain
Mouse brain samples were homogenized, and 10% brain suspensions in medium 199 with Earle’s salt were prepared. The samples were then stored at −70 °C. Viral RNA was isolated from 0.125 mL of 10% brain suspension using TRI Reagent LS (Sigma, USA) according to the instructions. Before RNA isolation, a fixed amount of attenuated vaccine strain of Sabin type 1 poliovirus was added to each sample as an internal control. Reverse transcription (RT) was performed using M-MLV revertase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the attached protocol. Primers for RT and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) are listed in Table 7. Standards for qRT-PCR on TBEV and POWV were prepared according to the procedure described earlier [89]. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed on a C1000 thermocycler with a Chromo4 detector (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) using the RT-PCR reagent kit (Synthol, Moscow, Russia). The limit of detection for qRT-PCR was determined by serial dilutions of the standards, and was 100 RNA copies for TBEV and POWV per sample. The presence of viral RNA for OHFV was detected by cycle; a sample was considered positive if it became detectable earlier than cycle 32 of PCR.
Table 7.
Primers for RT and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR).
| For RT | TBEV | TBE/Pow3′: 5′-AGCGGGTGTTTTTCCGAGTC-3′ |
| POWV | Pow_681r: 5′-AGACCTTTTCCCCCTAGAT-3′ | |
| OHFV | OHFV_Real_R: 5′-TGT-CGA-ACT-CGC-AAG-CTG-AT-3′ | |
| Polio | PVR1: 5′-CGAACGTGATCCTGAGTGTT-3′ | |
| For qRT-PCR (forward, reverse, probe) | TBEV | F-TBE1: 5′-GGGCGGTTCTTGTTCTCC-3′ R-TBE1: 5′-ACACATCACCTCCTTGTCAGACT -3′ TBE-Probe: 5′-(FAM)-TGAGCCACCATCACCCAGACACA-(BHQ1)-3′ |
| POWV | PowtestR2: 5′-CGTGACGCAAGAGTAGGTGA-3′ PowTestF: 5′-CCTTCACATGAGAGGGCGTC-3′ PowTestProbe: 5′-(R6G)GCGGGCCAGTGGAAGGGACGC(BHQ2)-3′ |
|
| OHFV | OHFV_Real_R: 5′-TGT-CGA-ACT-CGC-AAG-CTG-AT-3′ OHFV_Real_F: 5′-ATG-CTG-GTC-TTG-GGA-ACG-AG-3′ OHFV_probe: 5′-(FAM) GC-ACC-CAG-ACC-TGG-CCG-ATG (BHQ1)-3′ |
|
| Polio | PVR1: 5′-CGAACGTGATCCTGAGTGTT-3′ PVL1: 5′-GGCAGACGAGAAATACCCAT-3′ PVP1:5′-(R6G)-TTGATTCATGAATTTCCTTCATTGGCA-(BHQ1)-3′ |
4.7. Prothrombin Time
Blood was collected into tubes containing 3.8% trisodium citrate (Eco-Service, Saint Petersburg, Russia) at a ratio of 9:1 from the submandibular vein (3–5 mice in each group) before infection, on the day after infection, and on day 7 post-infection for determining PT. PT was counted by employing a non-automated method using the Diagem-P kit (Renam, Moscow, Russia), according to the instructions.
4.8. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism 9 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). For survival analysis, Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed and analyzed using the log-rank test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The neuroinvasiveness index was calculated using the formula (logPFU-logLD50). The titers of NAb, PT, and median life expectancy were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Abbreviations
| Ab | antibody |
| ADE | antibody-dependent enhancement of infection |
| CNS | central nervous system |
| DENV | dengue virus |
| dpi | days post infection |
| ELISA | enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay |
| JEV | Japanese encephalitis virus |
| KFDV | Kyasanur Forest disease virus |
| LD | lethal dose |
| NAb | neutralizing antibody |
| OAS | original antigenic sin |
| OHF | Omsk hemorrhagic fever |
| OHFV | Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus |
| POWV | Powassan virus |
| PT | prothrombin time |
| PFU | plaque-forming unit |
| TBE | tick-borne encephalitis |
| TBEV | tick-borne encephalit virus |
| WNV | West Nile virus |
| YFV | yellow fever virus |
| ZIKV | Zika virus |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.K., K.T. and V.K.; methodology, V.K. and K.T.; validation, V.K. and K.T.; formal analysis, V.K. and K.T.; investigation, V.K., A.R. and K.T.; data curation, G.K.; writing—original draft preparation, V.K.; writing—review and editing, K.T. and G.K.; visualization, V.K.; supervision, G.K.; project administration, G.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS (Institute of Poliomyelitis), protocol No. 210121—4 January 2021.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS (Institute of Poliomyelitis) fundamental research assignment No. FNZG-2024-0008. Maintenance of the virus collection used in the work (and sequencing of viral genomes, where applicable) was carried out as part of the State Assignment of the Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS (Institute of Poliomyelitis) under topic No. FNZG-2024-0004.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Virus Taxonomy: 2024 Release. [(accessed on 5 September 2025)]. Available online: https://ictv.global/taxonomy.
- 2.Chiffi G., Grandgirard D., Leib S.L., Chrdle A., Růžek D. Tick-borne encephalitis: A comprehensive review of the epidemiology, virology, and clinical picture. Rev. Med. Virol. 2023;33:e2470. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Maikova G.B., Chernokhaeva L.L., Vorovitch M.F., Rogova Y.V., Karganova G.G. Vaccines based on the Far-Eastern and European strains induce the neutralizing antibodies against all known tick-borne encephalitis virus subtypes. Probl. Virol. 2016;61:135–139. doi: 10.18821/0507-4088-2016-61-3-135-139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Růžek D., Dobler G., Mantke O.D. Tick-borne encephalitis: Pathogenesis and clinical implications. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2010;8:223–232. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2010.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shapoval A.N. Tick-Borne Encephalomyelitis. Medicine; Moscow, Russia: 1980. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Haglund M., Günther G. Tick-borne encephalitis—Pathogenesis, clinical course and long-term follow-up. Vaccine. 2003;21:S11–S18. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00811-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Demianovskaia E.G., Pogodina V.V., Bochkova N.G., Naumov E.I., Snitur T.A., Levina L.S., Szherbinina M., Vasiliev A. Chronic tick-borne encephalitis. Lechaschi Vrach. 2021;5:10–13. doi: 10.51793/OS.2021.69.42.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Volok V.P., Gmyl L.V., Belyaletdinova I.K., Karganova G.G., Dekonenko E.P. Progressive Course of Chronic Tick-Borne Encephalitis Manifesting as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-like Syndrome 35 Years after the Acute Disease. Brain Sci. 2022;12:1020. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fortova A., Barkhash A.V., Pychova M., Krbkova L., Palus M., Salat J., Ruzek D. Genetic polymorphisms in innate immunity genes influence predisposition to tick-borne encephalitis. J. Neurovirol. 2023;29:699–705. doi: 10.1007/s13365-023-01182-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ruzek D., Avšič Županc T., Borde J., Chrdle A., Eyer L., Karganova G., Kholodilov I., Knap N., Kozlovskaya L., Matveev A., et al. Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe and Russia: Review of pathogenesis, clinical features, therapy, and vaccines. Antivir. Res. 2019;164:23–51. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Barkhash A.V., Romaschenko A.G., Kozlova I.V., Pozdnyakova L.L., Yudin N.S., Voevoda M.I. New Genetic Marker of Human Predisposition to Severe Forms of Tick-Borne Encephalitis. Mol. Biol. 2019;53:388–392. doi: 10.1134/s0026893319020031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shi J., Shen A., Cheng Y., Zhang C., Yang X. 30-Year Development of Inactivated Virus Vaccine in China. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:2721. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15122721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Prymula R., Pöllabauer E.M., Pavlova B.G., Löw-Baselli A., Fritsch S., Angermayr R., Geisberger A., Barrett P.N., Ehrlich H.J. Antibody persistence after two vaccinations with either FSME-IMMUN® Junior or ENCEPUR® Children followed by third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN® Junior. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2012;8:736–742. doi: 10.4161/hv.20058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Morozova O.V., Bakhvalova V.N., Potapova O.F., Grishechkin A.E., Isaeva E.I., Aldarov K.V., Klinov D., Vorovich M. Evaluation of immune response and protective effect of four vaccines against the tick-borne encephalitis virus. Vaccine. 2014;32:3101–3106. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rospotrebnadzor Reported That More Than 2.3 Million Russians Have Been Vaccinated Against Tick-Borne Encephalitis. [(accessed on 10 May 2025)]. Available online: https://tass.ru/obschestvo/20729289.
- 16.Andaev E.I., Nikitin A.Y., Tolmacheva M.I., Zarva I.D., Yatsmenko E.V., Matveeva V.A., Sidorova E.A., Kolesnikova V.Y., Balakhonov S.V. Epidemiological Situation on Tick-Borne Viral Encephalitis in the Russian Federation in 2022 and Forecast of its Development for 2023. Probl. Part. Danger. Infect. 2023;1:6–16. doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2023-1-6-16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aberle J.H., Schwaiger J., Aberle S.W., Stiasny K., Scheinost O., Kundi M., Chmelik V., Heinz F.X. Human CD4+ T Helper Cell Responses after Tick-Borne Encephalitis Vaccination and Infection. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0140545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wullimann D., Ljunggren H. Human T Cell Responses to Flavivirus Vaccines. Eur. J. Immunol. 2025;55:e70027. doi: 10.1002/eji.70027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sycheva A.L., Komech E.A., Pogorelyy M.V., Minervina A.A., Urazbakhtin S.Z., Salnikova M.A., Vorovitch M.F., Kopantzev E.P., Zvyagin I.V., Komkov A.Y., et al. Inactivated tick-borne encephalitis vaccine elicits several overlapping waves of T cell response. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:970285. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.970285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tigeeva E.V., Nizolenko L.F., Karpenko L.I. The importance of the role of T-cell immunity in the development of modern tick-borne encephalitis vaccines. J. Microbiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol. 2024;101:546–559. doi: 10.36233/0372-9311-553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kovalev S.Y., Okulovskaya V.Y. The First Record of Omsk Hemorrhagic Fever Virus and Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus of Baltic Lineage from the Kemerovo Region of Russia. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2024;24:443–450. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2023.0156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Klimova E.A., Karetkina G.N., Shakaryan A.K., Sayfullin M.A., Karan L.S., Larichev V.F., Grigoreva Y.E., Morozkin E.S., Lyapeikova E.A., Abramova E.N. West Nile fever on the territory of the Moscow agglomeration. Infect. Dis. News Opin. Train. 2021;10:13–21. doi: 10.33029/2305-3496-2021-10-4-13-21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen H.-L., Chang J.-K., Tang R.-B. Current recommendations for the Japanese encephalitis vaccine. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2015;78:271–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Leonova G.N., Isachkova L.M., Baranov N.I., Krugliak S.P. Role of Powassan virus in the etiological structure of tick-borne encephalitis in the Primorsky Kray. [(accessed on 24 March 2022)];Vopr. Virusol. 1980 2:173–176. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6247844/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wagner E., Shin A., Tukhanova N., Turebekov N., Nurmakhanov T., Sutyagin V., Berdibekov A., Maikanov N., Lezdinsh I., Shapiyeva Z., et al. First Indications of Omsk Haemorrhagic Fever Virus beyond Russia. Viruses. 2022;14:754. doi: 10.3390/v14040754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shin A., Tukhanova N., Ndenkeh J., Shapiyeva Z., Yegemberdiyeva R., Yeraliyeva L., Nurmakhanov T., Froeschl G., Hoelscher M., Musralina L., et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus and West-Nile fever virus as causes of serous meningitis of unknown origin in Kazakhstan. Zoonoses Public Health. 2022;69:514–525. doi: 10.1111/zph.12941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Růžek D., Yakimenko V.V., Karan L.S., Tkachev S.E. Omsk haemorrhagic fever. Lancet. 2010;376:2104–2113. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61120-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Leonova G.N., Kondratov I.G., Ternovoi V.A., Romanova E.V., Protopopova E.V., Chausov E.V., Pavlenko E.V., Ryabchikova E.I., Belikov S.I., Loktev V.B. Characterization of Powassan viruses from Far Eastern Russia. Arch. Virol. 2009;154:811–820. doi: 10.1007/s00705-009-0376-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Piantadosi A., Solomon I.H. Powassan virus encephalitis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2023;36:671–688. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2022.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cimica V., Saleem S., Matuczinski E., Adams-Fish D., McMahon C., Rashid S., Stedman T.T. A Virus-Like Particle-Based Vaccine Candidate against the Tick-Borne Powassan Virus Induces Neutralizing Antibodies in a Mouse Model. Pathogens. 2021;10:680. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10060680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cheung A.M., Yip E.Z., Ashbrook A.W., Goonawardane N., Quirk C., Rice C.M., MacDonald M.R., Hoffmann H.H. Characterization of Live-Attenuated Powassan Virus Vaccine Candidates Identifies an Efficacious Prime-Boost Strategy for Mitigating Powassan Virus Disease in a Murine Model. Vaccines. 2023;11:612. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11030612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kovalev S.Y., Mazurina E.A., Yakimenko V.V. Molecular variability and genetic structure of Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus, based on analysis of the complete genome sequences. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2021;12:101627. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pesko K.N., Torres-Perez F., Hjelle B.L., Ebel G.D. Molecular epidemiology of Powassan virus in North America. J. Gen. Virol. 2010;91:2698–2705. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.024232-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Im J., Baek J.H., Durey A., Kwon H., Chung M.H., Lee J.S. Geographic distribution of Tick-borne encephalitis virus complex. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2020;57:14–22. doi: 10.4103/0972-9062.308794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hermance M.E., Thangamani S. Powassan Virus: An Emerging Arbovirus of Public Health Concern in North America. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017;17:453–462. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2017.2110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Deviatkin A.A., Aleshina Y.A., Karganova G.G., Lukashev A.N. Selection Pressure Profile Suggests Species Criteria among Tick-Borne Orthoflaviviruses. Viruses. 2024;16:1554. doi: 10.3390/v16101554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Grard G., Moureau G., Charrel R.N., Lemasson J.-J., Gonzalez J.-P., Gallian P., Gritsun T.S., Holmes E.C., Gould E.A., de Lamballerie X. Genetic characterization of tick-borne flaviviruses: New insights into evolution, pathogenetic determinants and taxonomy. Virology. 2007;361:80–92. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pripuzova N.S., Gmyl L.V., Romanova L.I., Tereshkina N.V., Rogova Y.V., Terekhina L.L., Kozlovskaya L.I., Vorovitch M.F., Grishina K.G., Timofeev A.V., et al. Exploring of Primate Models of Tick-Borne Flaviviruses Infection for Evaluation of Vaccines and Drugs Efficacy. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:61094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Illarionova V., Rogova A., Tuchynskaya K., Volok V., Rogova Y., Baryshnikova V., Turchenko Y., Litov A., Kalyanova A., Siniugina A., et al. Inapparent Tick-Borne Orthoflavivirus Infection in Macaca fascicularis: A Model for Antiviral Drug and Vaccine Research. Vaccines. 2023;11:1754. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11121754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chernokhaeva L.L., Rogova Y.V., Vorovitch M.F., Romanova L.I., Kozlovskaya L.I., Maikova G.B., Kholodilov I., Karganova G. Protective immunity spectrum induced by immunization with a vaccine from the TBEV strain Sofjin. Vaccine. 2016;34:2354–2361. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chidumayo N.N., Yoshii K., Kariwa H. Evaluation of the European tick-borne encephalitis vaccine against Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus. Microbiol. Immunol. 2014;58:112–118. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Orlinger K.K., Hofmeister Y., Fritz R., Holzer G.W., Falkner F.G., Unger B., Loew-Baselli A., Poellabauer E.-M., Ehrlich H.J., Barrett P.N., et al. A tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccine based on the European prototype strain induces broadly reactive cross-neutralizing antibodies in humans. J. Infect. Dis. 2011;203:1556–1564. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.McAuley A.J., Sawatsky B., Ksiazek T., Torres M., Korva M., Lotrič-Furlan S., Avšič-Županc T., von Messling V., Holbrook M.R., Freiberg A.N., et al. Cross-neutralisation of viruses of the tick-borne encephalitis complex following tick-borne encephalitis vaccination and/or infection. npj Vaccines. 2017;2:5. doi: 10.1038/s41541-017-0009-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Valiant W.G., Mattapallil J.J. A Simple Flow Cytometry Based Assay to Determine In Vitro Antibody Dependent Enhancement of Dengue Virus Using Zika Virus Convalescent Serum. J. Vis. Exp. 2018;134:57371. doi: 10.3791/57371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kliks S.C., Nimmanitya S., Nisalak A., Burke D.S. Evidence That Maternal Dengue Antibodies Are Important in the Development of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever in Infants. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1988;38:411–419. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1988.38.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Haslwanter D., Blaas D., Heinz F.X., Stiasny K. A novel mechanism of antibody-mediated enhancement of flavivirus infection. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006643. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sawant J., Patil A., Kurle S. A Review: Understanding Molecular Mechanisms of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement in Viral Infections. Vaccines. 2023;11:1240. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11071240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Thomas S., Smatti M.K., Ouhtit A., Cyprian F.S., Almaslamani M.A., Thani A.A., Yassine H.M. Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) and the role of complement system in disease pathogenesis. Mol. Immunol. 2022;152:172–182. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2022.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bournazos S., Gupta A., Ravetch J.V. The role of IgG Fc receptors in antibody-dependent enhancement. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:633–643. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00410-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rathore A.P.S., Saron W.A.A., Lim T., Jahan N., St. John A.L. Maternal immunity and antibodies to dengue virus promote infection and Zika virus-induced microcephaly in fetuses. Sci. Adv. 2020;5:eaav3208. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav3208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Paul L.M., Carlin E.R., Jenkins M.M., Tan A.L., Barcellona C.M., Nicholson C.O., Michael S.F., Isern S. Dengue virus antibodies enhance Zika virus infection. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2016;5:117. doi: 10.1038/cti.2016.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dejnirattisai W., Supasa P., Wongwiwat W., Rouvinski A., Barba-Spaeth G., Duangchinda T., Sakuntabhai A., Cao-Lormeau V.-M., Malasit P., Rey F.A., et al. Dengue virus sero-cross-reactivity drives antibody-dependent enhancement of infection with zika virus. Nat. Immunol. 2016;17:1102–1108. doi: 10.1038/ni.3515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Stettler K., Beltramello M., Espinosa D.A., Graham V., Cassotta A., Bianchi S., Vanzetta F., Minola A., Jaconi S., Mele F., et al. Specificity, cross-reactivity, and function of antibodies elicited by Zika virus infection. Science. 2016;353:823–826. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.George J., Valiant W.G., Mattapallil M.J., Walker M., Huang Y.J.S., Vanlandingham D.L., Misamore J., Greenhouse J., Weiss D.E., Verthelyi D., et al. Prior Exposure to Zika Virus Significantly Enhances Peak Dengue-2 Viremia in Rhesus Macaques. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:10498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10901-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bardina S.V., Bunduc P., Tripathi S., Duehr J., Frere J.J., Brown J.A., Nachbagauer R., Foster G.A., Krysztof D., Tortorella D., et al. Enhancement of Zika virus pathogenesis by preexisting antiflavivirus immunity. Science. 2017;356:175–180. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chan K.R., Wang X., Saron W.A.A., Gan E.S., Tan H.C., Mok D.Z.L., Zhang S.L.-X., Lee Y.H., Liang C., Wijaya L., et al. Cross-reactive antibodies enhance live attenuated virus infection for increased immunogenicity. Nat. Microbiol. 2016;1:16164. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Halstead S.B. Dengvaxia sensitizes seronegatives to vaccine enhanced disease regardless of age. Vaccine. 2017;35:6355–6358. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tuchynskaya K., Volok V., Illarionova V., Okhezin E., Polienko A., Belova O., Rogova A., Chernokhaeva L., Karganova G. Experimental assessment of possible factors associated with tick-borne encephalitis vaccine failure. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1172. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9061172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Remoli M.E., Marchi A., Fortuna C., Benedetti E., Minelli G., Fiorentini C., Mel R., Venturi G., Ciufolini M.G. Anti-tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus neutralizing antibodies dynamics in natural infections versus vaccination. Pathog. Dis. 2015;73:1–3. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftu002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jarmer J., Zlatkovic J., Tsouchnikas G., Vratskikh O., Strauß J., Aberle J.H., Chmelik V., Kundi M., Stiasny K., Heinz F.X. Variation of the Specificity of the Human Antibody Responses after Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Infection and Vaccination. J. Virol. 2014;88:13845–13857. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02086-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kentaro Y., Yamazaki S., Mottate K., Nagata N., Seto T., Sanada T., Sakai M., Kariwa H., Takashima I. Genetic and Biological Characterization of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Isolated from Wild Rodents in Southern Hokkaido, Japan in 2008. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013;13:406–414. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2012.1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hayasaka D., Nagata N., Fujii Y., Hasegawa H., Sata T., Suzuki R., Gould E.A., Takashima I., Koike S. Mortality following peripheral infection with Tick-borne encephalitis virus results from a combination of central nervous system pathology, systemic inflammatory and stress responses. Virology. 2009;390:139–150. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hayasaka D., Nagata N., Hasegawa H., Sata T., Takashima I., Koike S. Early Mortality Following Intracerebral Infection with the Oshima Strain of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in a Mouse Model. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2010;72:391–396. doi: 10.1292/jvms.09-0258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chernokhaeva L.L., Rogova Y.V., Kozlovskaya L.I., Romanova L.I., Osolodkin D.I., Vorovitch M.F., Karganova G.G. Experimental Evaluation of the Protective Efficacy of Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE) Vaccines Based on European and Far-Eastern TBEV Strains in Mice and in Vitro. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1487. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Aberle J.H., Stiasny K., Kundi M., Heinz F.X. Mechanistic insights into the impairment of memory B cells and antibody production in the elderly. AGE. 2013;35:371–381. doi: 10.1007/s11357-011-9371-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nygren T.M., Pilic A., Böhmer M.M., Wagner-Wiening C., Wichmann O., Hellenbrand W. Recovery and sequelae in 523 adults and children with tick-borne encephalitis in Germany. Infection. 2023;51:1503–1511. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02023-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Andersson C.R., Vene S., Insulander M., Lindquist L., Lundkvist Å., Günther G. Vaccine failures after active immunisation against tick-borne encephalitis. Vaccine. 2010;28:2827–2831. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Flurkey K., Mcurrer J., Harrison D. The Mouse in Biomedical Research. Volume III. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2007. Mouse Models in Aging Research; pp. 637–672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Foo Y.Z., Nakagawa S., Rhodes G., Simmons L.W. The effects of sex hormones on immune function: A meta-analysis: Sex hormones and immune function. Biol. Rev. 2017;92:551–571. doi: 10.1111/brv.12243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Andersen A.A., Hanson R.P. Influence of Sex and Age on Natural Resistance to St. Louis Encephalitis Virus Infection in Mice. Infect. Immun. 1974;9:1123–1125. doi: 10.1128/iai.9.6.1123-1125.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mladinich M.C., Himmler G.E., Conde J.N., Gorbunova E.E., Schutt W.R., Sarkar S., Tsirka S.-A.E., Kim H.K., Mackow E.R. Age-dependent Powassan virus lethality is linked to glial cell activation and divergent neuroinflammatory cytokine responses in a murine model. J. Virol. 2024;98:e00560-24. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00560-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Balint E., Feng E., Giles E.C., Ritchie T.M., Qian A.S., Vahedi F., Montemarano A., Portillo A.L., Monteiro J.K., Trigatti B.L., et al. Bystander activated CD8+ T cells mediate neuropathology during viral infection via antigen-independent cytotoxicity. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:896. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44667-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Scroggs S.L.P., Offerdahl D.K., Stewart P.E., Shaia C., Griffin A.J., Bloom M.E. Of Murines and Humans: Modeling Persistent Powassan Disease in C57BL/6 Mice. mBio. 2023;14:e03606-22. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03606-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhang A., Stacey H.D., Mullarkey C.E., Miller M.S. Original Antigenic Sin: How First Exposure Shapes Lifelong Anti–Influenza Virus Immune Responses. J. Immunol. 2019;202:335–340. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Francis T. On the doctrine of original antigenic sin. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 1960;104:572–578. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tigabu B., Juelich T., Bertrand J., Holbrook M.R. Clinical evaluation of highly pathogenic tick-borne flavivirus infection in the mouse model. J. Med. Virol. 2009;81:1261–1269. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Nagata N., Iwata-Yoshikawa N., Hayasaka D., Sato Y., Kojima A., Kariwa H., Takashima I., Takasaki T., Kurane I., Sata T., et al. The Pathogenesis of 3 Neurotropic Flaviviruses in a Mouse Model Depends on the Route of Neuroinvasion After Viremia. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2015;74:250–260. doi: 10.1097/nen.0000000000000166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wahala W.M.P.B., De Silva A.M. The Human Antibody Response to Dengue Virus Infection. Viruses. 2011;3:2374–2395. doi: 10.3390/v3122374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Rey F.A., Stiasny K., Vaney M., Dellarole M., Heinz F.X. The bright and the dark side of human antibody responses to flaviviruses: Lessons for vaccine design. EMBO Rep. 2018;19:206–224. doi: 10.15252/embr.201745302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Zlatkovic J., Tsouchnikas G., Jarmer J., Koessl C., Stiasny K., Heinz F.X. Aluminum Hydroxide Influences Not Only the Extent but Also the Fine Specificity and Functional Activity of Antibody Responses to Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in Mice. J. Virol. 2013;87:12187–12195. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01690-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Winter W.E., Flax S.D., Harris N.S. Coagulation Testing in the Core Laboratory. Lab. Med. 2017;48:295–313. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmx050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Papageorgiou C., Jourdi G., Adjambri E., Walborn A., Patel P., Fareed J., Elalamy I., Hoppensteadt D., Gerotziafas G.T. Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: An Update on Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Strategies. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2018;24:8S–28S. doi: 10.1177/1076029618806424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Witkowski M., Landmesser U., Rauch U. Tissue factor as a link between inflammation and coagulation. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2016;26:297–303. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2015.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Adane T., Getawa S. Coagulation abnormalities in Dengue fever infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021;15:e0009666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Chuansumrit A., Chaiyaratana W. Hemostatic derangement in dengue hemorrhagic fever. Thromb. Res. 2014;133:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Vorovitch M.F., Maikova G.B., Chernokhaeva L.L., Romanenko V.V., Karganova G.G., Ishmukhametov A.A. Comparison of the Immunogenicity and Safety of Two Pediatric TBE Vaccines Based on the Far Eastern and European Virus Subtypes. Adv. Virol. 2019;2019:5323428. doi: 10.1155/2019/5323428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Reed L.J., Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1938;27:493–497. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118408. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lorenz R., Bögel K. Laboratory techniques in rabies: Methods of calculation. Monogr. Ser. World Health Organ. 1973;23:321–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Romanova L.I., Gmyl A.P., Dzhivanian T.I., Bakhmutov D.V., Lukashev A.N., Gmyl L.V., Rumyantsev A.A., Burenkova L.A., Lashkevich V.A., Karganova G.G. Microevolution of tick-borne encephalitis virus in course of host alternation. Virology. 2007;362:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.













