Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1989 Mar;55(3):499–507. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82843-7

Sarcomere length dependence of the force-velocity relation in single frog muscle fibers.

H L Granzier 1, D H Burns 1, G H Pollack 1
PMCID: PMC1330503  PMID: 2784695

Abstract

The force-velocity relation of single frog fibers was measured at sarcomere lengths of 2.15, 2.65, and 3.15 microns. Sarcomere length was obtained on-line with a system that measures the distance between two markers attached to the surface of the fiber, approximately 800 microns apart. Maximal shortening velocity, determined by extrapolating the Hill equation, was similar at the three sarcomere lengths: 6.5, 6.0, and 5.7 microns/s at sarcomere lengths of 2.15, 2.65, and 3.15 microns, respectively. For loads not close to zero the shortening velocity decreased with increasing sarcomere length. This was the case when force was expressed as a percentage of the maximal force at optimal fiber length or as a percentage of the sarcomere-isometric force at the respective sarcomere lengths. The force-velocity relation was discontinuous around zero velocity: load clamps above the level that kept sarcomeres isometric resulted in stretch that was much slower than when the load was decreased below isometric by a similar amount. We fitted the force-velocity relation for slow shortening (less than 600 nm/s) and for slow stretch (less than 200 nm/s) with linear regression lines. At a sarcomere length of 2.15 microns the slopes of these lines was 8.6 times higher for shortening than for stretch. At 2.65 and 3.15 microns the values were 21.8 and 14.1, respectively. At a sarcomere length of 2.15 microm, the velocity of stretch abruptly increased at loads that were 160-170% of the sarcomere isometric load, i.e., the muscle yielded. However, at a sarcomere length of 2.65 and 3.15 microm yield was absent at such loads. Even the highest loads tested (260%) resulted in only slow stretch. It is concluded that properties of the force generators change with sarcomere length. This is not anticipated by the cross-bridge model of muscle contraction.

Full text

PDF
499

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altringham J. D., Bottinelli R. The descending limb of the sarcomere length-force relation in single muscle fibres of the frog. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1985 Oct;6(5):585–600. doi: 10.1007/BF00711916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. April E. W., Maughan D. W. Active force as a function of filament spacing in crayfish skinned muscle fibers. Pflugers Arch. 1986 Oct;407(4):456–460. doi: 10.1007/BF00652634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edman K. A. Double-hyperbolic nature of the force-velocity relation in frog skeletal muscle. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1988;226:643–652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edman K. A., Elzinga G., Noble M. I. Enhancement of mechanical performance by stretch during tetanic contractions of vertebrate skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:139–155. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edman K. A., Elzinga G., Noble M. I. Residual force enhancement after stretch of contracting frog single muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Nov;80(5):769–784. doi: 10.1085/jgp.80.5.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edman K. A., Elzinga G., Noble M. I. Stretch of contracting muscle fibres: evidence for regularly spaced active sites along the filaments and enhanced mechanical performance. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1984;170:739–751. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4703-3_71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edman K. A., Hwang J. C. The force-velocity relationship in vertebrate muscle fibres at varied tonicity of the extracellular medium. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(2):255–272. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edman K. A., Mulieri L. A., Scubon-Mulieri B. Non-hyperbolic force-velocity relationship in single muscle fibres. Acta Physiol Scand. 1976 Oct;98(2):143–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1976.tb00234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Edman K. A., Reggiani C. The sarcomere length-tension relation determined in short segments of intact muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1987 Apr;385:709–732. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edman K. A., Reggiani C., te Kronnie G. Differences in maximum velocity of shortening along single muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1985 Aug;365:147–163. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Edman K. A. The velocity of unloaded shortening and its relation to sarcomere length and isometric force in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1979 Jun;291:143–159. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferenczi M. A., Goldman Y. E., Simmons R. M. The dependence of force and shortening velocity on substrate concentration in skinned muscle fibres from Rana temporaria. J Physiol. 1984 May;350:519–543. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Flitney F. W., Hirst D. G. Cross-bridge detachment and sarcomere 'give' during stretch of active frog's muscle. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:449–465. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Granzier H. L., Myers J. A., Pollack G. H. Stepwise shortening of muscle fibre segments. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1987 Jun;8(3):242–251. doi: 10.1007/BF01574592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harrington W. F. A mechanochemical mechanism for muscle contraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Mar;68(3):685–689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.3.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huxley H. E. The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science. 1969 Jun 20;164(3886):1356–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3886.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Katz B. The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction. J Physiol. 1939 Jun 14;96(1):45–64. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kawai M., Schulman M. I. Crossbridge kinetics in chemically skinned rabbit psoas fibres when the actin-myosin lattice spacing is altered by dextran T-500. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1985 Jun;6(3):313–332. doi: 10.1007/BF00713172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lopez J. R., Wanek L. A., Taylor S. R. Skeletal muscle: length-dependent effects of potentiating agents. Science. 1981 Oct 2;214(4516):79–82. doi: 10.1126/science.6974399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Magid A., Reedy M. K. X-ray diffraction observations of chemically skinned frog skeletal muscle processed by an improved method. Biophys J. 1980 Apr;30(1):27–40. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(80)85074-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Metzger J. M., Moss R. L. Shortening velocity in skinned single muscle fibers. Influence of filament lattice spacing. Biophys J. 1987 Jul;52(1):127–131. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83197-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pollack G. H. The cross-bridge theory. Physiol Rev. 1983 Jul;63(3):1049–1113. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1983.63.3.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sugi H., Tsuchiya T. Enhancement of mechanical performance in frog muscle fibres after quick increases in load. J Physiol. 1981;319:239–252. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Taylor S. R., Lopez J. R., Griffiths P. J., Trube G., Cecchi G. Calcium in excitation--contraction coupling of frog skeletal muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1982 Apr;60(4):489–502. doi: 10.1139/y82-068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tsuchiya T. Passive interaction between sliding filaments in the osmotically compressed skinned muscle fibers of the frog. Biophys J. 1988 Mar;53(3):415–423. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83118-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES