Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2026 Jun 22;31(12):2191. doi: 10.3390/molecules31122191

Plant-Derived Foods and Medicines as Modulators of the Gut Microbiome: Molecular Interactions and Implications for Disease and Therapy

Gabriela Mitea 1, Verginica Schröder 2,*, Marius Daniel Radu 3,*, Horațiu Mireșan 4,, Irina Mihaela Iancu 4,
Editor: Ladislav Kokoska
PMCID: PMC13306152  PMID: 42357585

Abstract

The digestive system is one of the most complex systems in the body, integrating multiple functions, closely linked to and influenced by chemosensory mechanisms, as well as by the presence, composition, and dynamics of the microbiome. Increasing attention has been directed toward plant-derived foods and medicines, which interact with gut microbiota and modulate host physiological responses through microbial metabolism, leading to the formation of bioactive metabolites that influence host signaling pathways and therapeutic response. The review, based on relevant articles from major international databases using specific terms with a focus on microbiome-mediated interactions and molecular mechanisms, highlights the role of microbiome and diagnostic methods through the analysis of specific composition and changes in microbiota, as well as the importance of microbiomes in relation to the treatment of chronic diseases, given their complex influence on drug metabolism. The microbiome influences the response to medications and resistance to therapy, being also involved in the metabolism of plant-derived foods and medicines through complex microbial interactions, while the importance of modern diagnostic approaches supports the use of microbiome analysis to improve diagnosis, monitoring, and personalized medical strategies.

Keywords: gut microbiome, dysbiosis, pharmacomicrobiomics, plant-derived foods and compounds, drug–microbiome interactions, molecular pathways, diagnostic methods

1. Introduction

The gastrointestinal tract is a remarkable component of the body that performs multiple essential tasks, functioning in an integrated manner across various systems and over different time frames [1,2,3]. Recent advances have improved our understanding of how its specific cells, tissues, and organs collaborate to regulate digestion, absorption, and excretion of food, as well as to support immune, endocrine, and barrier functions [4,5]. All these processes depend on a highly integrated system, which includes the microbiota, a diverse community of bacteria, protozoa, viruses, archaea, and fungi, as well as myogenic, neural, humoral, and immune components that coordinate anatomical, endocrine, metabolic, and immunological processes [6,7].

The human gut is colonized by a considerable number of microorganisms that are deeply integrated into the host’s physiological functions [8,9,10]. Human microbiota consists of trillions of microorganisms that primarily colonize the gut, establish themselves after birth, and shape the development and maturation of the immune system [11,12]. Through its diversity, with over 100 bacterial phyla and approximately 150 times more genes than the human genome, it performs essential protective functions in a symbiotic relationship with the host [8,13]. In healthy individuals, the gut microbiota is dominated by the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, which together represent over 90% of the microbial community, followed by Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria [13,14]. In addition to alpha diversity, which reflects microbial diversity within an individual, there is also significant beta diversity, representing variations in microbiota composition among different individuals [15,16].

The gastrointestinal lumen contains compounds derived from the diet and the microbiota, with potentially beneficial or harmful effects, which, upon ingestion, are unconsciously detected through specialized chemosensory mechanisms of the gastrointestinal tract, triggering appropriate physiological responses. This emphasizes the fact that the gastrointestinal tract serves not only as a site for digestion and absorption, but also as a complex chemosensory organ [17,18].

Recent studies have highlighted the role of microbial metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acid derivatives, and tryptophan metabolites, in modulating host signaling pathways involved in inflammation, immunity, and the regulation of host energy metabolism, as well as in maintaining mucosal integrity. These metabolites are key mediators linking diet, the microbiota, and host physiology [19].

Recent developments in multi-omics technologies have significantly expanded the understanding of interactions between the host and the microbiome. This has allowed for the identification of functional microbial signatures associated with pathological conditions and therapeutic responses. These approaches provide a transition from descriptive analysis of microbiota to a mechanistic understanding of how microorganisms contribute to drug metabolism and efficacy [20].

At the same time, pharmacomicrobiomics has emerged as a distinct discipline that studies the bidirectional interactions between drugs and the microbiome. This discipline demonstrates that microbial enzymes can influence drug bioavailability, therapeutic outcomes, and toxicity, thereby contributing to interindividual variability in treatment response [21,22]. The gut microbiota can affect drug metabolism and toxicity indirectly through, for example, modulation of host drug metabolism and disposition and competition of bacterial-derived metabolites for xenobiotic metabolism pathways. In addition, therapeutic drugs themselves can exert both intended and unintended effects that impact the health and composition of the gut microbiota with potentially unforeseen consequences [23].

As therapeutic innovation continues to advance, there is a growing interest in microbiome-targeting interventions, including probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) [24,25], and strategies based on phytochemicals, which aim to restore microbial balance and improve therapeutic efficacy [26]. Phytochemicals are of relevance due to their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunomodulatory [27,28] and metabolic effects; however, the physiological chemosensory mechanisms underlying their action remain only partially elucidated [29].

Dysbiosis of normal gut microbiota is associated, among other things, with digestive, metabolic, cardiovascular, immune, and neurological diseases [30,31]. Overall, microbiome-based diagnostics is an emerging field that utilizes microbial communities and their functional profiles to support disease detection, monitoring, and personalized medical care [32]. Furthermore, progress made in next-generation sequencing and machine learning (ML) algorithms has facilitated the development of microbiome-based diagnostic tools capable of predicting disease susceptibility and treatment outcomes with increasing accuracy. These diagnostic platforms integrate microbial composition with functional and metabolic data, supporting precision medicine approaches [33,34].

The gut microbiota has become a key element in regulating host physiology, but the integrative mechanisms linking chemosensory pathways, microbial metabolism, and host signaling are not yet fully understood. At the same time, growing concerns regarding antibiotic resistance and variability in therapeutic response highlight the need for microbiome-based strategies.

This article focuses on information regarding the molecular mechanisms triggered by interactions between the microbiome and chemical compounds or micronutrients that enter the digestive tract. It accentuates recent discoveries regarding food, phytochemical composition, and signaling pathways that influence health. It also notes the importance of understanding microbiota in a therapeutic context and in personalized approaches to diagnosis and treatment planning.

The importance of biologically active substances, particularly phytochemicals, has become a subject of interest with the development of knowledge in nutrition and dietetics, an independent scientific field that has focused on the physiologically active properties of nutrients. Pharmacology and pharmacognosy contribute to the advancement of this field, considering the substantial increase in using pharmacologically active natural products in recent years. Consequently, the safe use of these natural products requires a comprehensive understanding of phytochemistry and molecular biology, as interactions with the microbiome are essential.

Therefore, a comprehensive approach that integrates microbial, molecular, and therapeutic data is essential for progress in this field.

2. Intestinal Microbiota, Dysbiosis and Pathological Implications

2.1. Microbiota—Normal Status and Changed Prospective

Intestinal microbial colonization begins at birth and evolves through a succession of taxonomic changes until a balanced diversity is reached, like that of adults [35,36]. After childhood, the proportion of different species remains relatively stable throughout life, although in the elderly, a shift in dominance from Firmicutes toward Proteobacteria and Alistipes has been observed [37,38].

The gastrointestinal tract possesses chemosensory pathways similar to those involved in taste and smell, which, through an integrated network of epithelial cells, receptors, and neural circuits, continuously monitor luminal contents to maintain energy homeostasis, interpret food signals, coordinate metabolic responses, and communicate with the brain via the enteric nervous system, being essential for assessing the biological value of ingested food [39,40]. Chemosensing in the gastrointestinal tract extends beyond a strictly digestive role, influencing appetite, energy metabolism, immunity, and brain activity via the gut–brain axis of the microbiota [41,42,43].

In this context, recent research has highlighted the varied roles of gut microbiota in energy metabolism, in regulating immune responses, and in protection against pathogens [44,45]. The microbiota acts as a competitive barrier against pathogenic microbes [46,47], contributing to the preservation of the intestinal mucosal barrier and the overall health [48,49], while also regulating the balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses [50,51]. The neutralization of pathogens is also supported by the release of antimicrobial metabolites [52,53].

Moreover, microbiota is involved in nutrient fermentation, vitamin synthesis, and drug metabolism, as well as in the supply of essential nutrients, including short-chain fatty acids, to colonic epithelial cells [54,55]. Products of microbial metabolism, identified in biological compartments such as feces, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid, reflect the close interaction between the host and the microbiome [56,57,58], while microbiota also play roles in brain development and function, highlighting the relevance of the gut–brain axis (Figure 1) [59,60].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Interactions between brain and gut signaling and microbiome diversity (created in https://BioRender.com).

In this context, dysbiosis is defined as an alteration in the composition and function of the microbiota [61,62] and is recognized as a feature associated with health, aging and disease, contributing to the concept of the host as a “meta-host” [63,64]. Experimental studies in animal models have demonstrated not only associations, but also a potential causal relationship between microbiome alterations and systemic diseases (Figure 2) [65,66].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Dysbiosis and associated pathologies (created in https://BioRender.com).

Dysbiosis has been associated with neurological, neuroinflammatory, and psychiatric disorders, including autism disorder, anxiety, depression, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, stress, and addiction [67,68], as well as with gastrointestinal disorders [69,70], particularly inflammatory bowel diseases and liver diseases [71,72]. In addition, microbiota alterations are linked to metabolic diseases (Figure 2), such as obesity and diabetes; cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure, atherosclerosis, and hypertension [73,74]; immune-related disorders such as allergies, eczema and asthma (Figure 2) [75,76]; and oncological diseases, including colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and gastric cancer [77,78].

Furthermore, several host factors influence the physiological state of the gut microbiota and contribute to disease development. In early life, gut microbiota play an essential role in immune system maturation, and early dysbiosis has been associated with allergies, asthma, and obesity [79], while dietary patterns such as a high-fat diet (HFD) are associated with metabolic diseases and specific alterations in microbiome composition and function [80,81].

In oncology, the mechanisms by which microbiota contribute to carcinogenesis are increasingly characterized. The Fusobacterium nucleatum adhesin A (FadA) antigen promotes colorectal cancer (CRC) by activating the E-cadherin-Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway; the genotoxin colibactin produced by PKS-positive strains of Escherichia coli amplifies colorectal tumorigenesis; and the toxin from Bacteroides fragilis generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), causing DNA damage in malignant gastrointestinal tumors [82,83,84]. Although these bacteria have direct effects on tumorigenesis, some microbes promote inflammation or weaken immune surveillance, indirectly facilitating cancer development—mechanisms conceptually integrated into the “immuno–oncology–microbiome axis” [85,86].

Several studies demonstrated that gut microbiomes can directly influence an individual’s response to a specific drug by enzymatically altering its structure (Table 1). As a result, the drug’s bioavailability, bioactivity, or toxicity may be modified, a phenomenon termed pharmacomicrobiomics [21,87].

Next-generation sequencing, particularly 16S rRNA gene analysis, has shown that antibiotics disrupt the composition of gut microbial communities, which has direct effects on microbiome–drug and microbiome–phytochemical interactions [88,89]. Combined microbiome–metabolomic analysis has identified correlations between microbial changes and the host’s metabolomic profile [90,91]. Several classes of drugs (proton pump inhibitors, metformin, and statins) show consistent associations with specific microbial signatures, reproducible in independent cohorts [92,93,94,95,96,97]. Antibiotic-induced dysbiosis, manifested by a decrease in microbial diversity and changes in dominant phyla, can disrupt the biotransformation of plant-derived compounds and thus reduce the therapeutic efficacy of phytomedicines [98,99,100].

2.2. Host–Microbiome Interactions and Major Mechanisms of Modulation

In gastrointestinal pathology, association studies have demonstrated specific dysbiotic profiles [101,102], highlighting the role of microbiota in colonization resistance and prevention of enteric infections [103,104]. In inflammatory bowel diseases, increases in adherent-invasive Escherichia coli strains [105,106] and reductions in butyrate-producing bacteria have been associated with inflammatory processes [107,108]. Similarly, in irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic diseases, alterations in microbiota diversity and composition have been reported, although the heterogeneity of results limits their use as robust diagnostic biomarkers [109,110,111,112,113].

In parallel, specific microbial signatures have been associated with cardiovascular [114,115] and allergic diseases, including correlations between Enterobacteriaceae and cardiovascular risk, as well as associations between early-life microbiota composition and allergic sensitization [116,117]. In addition, reductions in immunomodulatory [118,119] and butyrate-producing bacteria have been linked to increased allergic risk and impaired immune tolerance [120,121]. Furthermore, in neurodegenerative pathology, patients with Alzheimer’s disease have been shown to present reduced microbiota diversity and specific compositional changes [122,123], supporting the involvement of the gut–brain axis, although clinical applicability requires further validation [124].

Overall, microbiome-based diagnostics is an emerging field that utilizes microbial communities and their functional profiles to support disease detection, monitoring, and personalized medical care [32]. From a therapeutic perspective, the microbiota’s influence on host physiology is primarily mediated by microbial metabolites that activate specific receptors [125,126].

Several factors associated with the host organism (physiology, metabolic stress, host immunity) are involved in mechanisms that modulate the microbiome. Furthermore, recent studies highlight the interactions between microbiome and gene regulation in host cells, suggesting major and potentially irreversible effects. The physiology of microorganisms, the response mediated by the release of bacterial enzymes, and the genetic adaptability of the microbiome are significantly involved in host physiological processes such as steroid biosynthesis, bile production, and interactions with the metabolism of substances derived from the ingestion of drugs or xenobiotics (Table 1).

Table 1.

The host mechanisms and microbial activity after interactions with inductor factors.

Crt. No. Inductor Factors Major Mechanism and Microbial Modulation References
1. Stress-associated signaling molecules Synthesize and take up catecholamine and interference with glucocorticoid activity
Clostridium scindens, a reference model for studying bacterial steroid metabolism
Ruminococcus gnavus, correlating positively with cortisol concentrations, was identified as a cortisol metabolizer
[127]
2. Bacterial CYP450 enzymes steroid biosynthesis,
bile acid production,
drug-xenobiotic metabolism
[128]
3. Genetics of microbiome and host interactions Gut microbiome-associated genetic variant (MAV) disease and host gene regulation;
epigenetic and transcriptional changes
[129,130,131]
4. Host immune system Regulatory T cells and macrophage epigenetic regulation of cytokine expression and HDAC inhibition,
acetylation of FoxP3 CNS1 region, induction of proliferation, upregulation of Uhrf1
T helper 17 cell interaction with transcriptional reprogramming through epithelially produced SAA1 and SAA2;
Natural killer T-cell and mucosal recruitment via CXCL16
[131]
5. Specific drugs
Anti-inflammatory treatment Gram-negative bacteria increased and epithelial disequilibrium [132]
Cardiac glycosides Enzymatic interactions and drug metabolism suppressed [132]
Metformin Drug effects inhibitions [132]
Chemotherapeutics Multiple changed and negative drug effects [132]
Antibiotics Microbiome diversity affected [132,133,134]
6. Phytochemicals (alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, polysaccharides and betacyanins) Formation of bioactive metabolites through interaction with the microbiota → regulation of AMPK, NF-κB, mTOR, PPAR, cytokine, and SCFA pathways
Microbial transformation of polyphenols → alteration of microbiota composition
Flavonoids → phenolic metabolites + bidirectional effect on the microbiota (structure/diversity)
Polyphenols → antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, prebiotic effects + stimulation of beneficial bacteria (Bifidobacterium, Akkermansia)
Alkaloids → nonspecific antimicrobial effect → possible decrease in diversity
[26,84,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149]
7. Dietary supplements (with berberine, curcumin, spirulina, plant extracts rich in polyphenols) Variable microbiota–supplement interactions (beneficial effects/dysbiosis)
Berberine → ↑ SCFA-producing bacteria + ↑ GLP-1
Curcumin → ↑ Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium
Spirulina → antimicrobial effect + support for probiotic bacteria
Polyphenolic supplements → substrate for beneficial microbiota (prebiotic effect)
[140,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157]

HDAC—histone deacetylase; CYP450—enzymes catalyze the biotransformation and clearance of a wide array of xenobiotics and potentially toxic compounds; FoxP3 CNS1 (Conserved Non-coding Sequence 1)—protein (scurfin) involved in immune system responses, transcriptional regulator; SAA1, SAA2—the human protein family (circulating serum amyloid A) comprises the acute phase SAA1/SAA2, known to activate a large set of innate and adaptive immune cells; CXCL16—chemokine ligand 16; AMPK—AMP-activated Protein Kinase; NF-κB—nuclear factor kappa B pathway is a crucial signaling mechanism that regulates innate immunity, inflammation, cell survival, and differentiation; mTOR—the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is a central signaling hub that regulates cell growth, proliferation, metabolism, and survival in response to nutrients, energy levels, and growth factors; PPAR—Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) are nuclear receptor proteins that act as ligand-activated transcription factors to regulate gene expression involved in lipid/carbohydrate metabolism, cellular differentiation, and inflammation; SCFA—Short-chain fatty acids, primarily acetate, propionate, and butyrate are produced via anaerobic bacterial fermentation of dietary fibers, resistant starches, and amino acids in the gut; GLP-1—glucagon-like peptide-1.

Various chemical compounds derived from specific therapies for chronic diseases, as well as phytochemicals from diverse sources, whether through diet or alternative medicine, aromatherapy, or herbal medicine, have been closely studied in recent years to understand the links between composition, mechanisms, and induced chemical reactions with varied effects on the microbiota. Elucidating all cause-and-effect relationships within this research framework remains an ongoing goal.

In this context, based on the analysis conducted in this review, particular attention is drawn to the main classes of microbial metabolites implicated as therapeutic targets: short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acids, and tryptophan derivatives. These metabolites interact with G protein-coupled receptors, as well as taste and olfactory receptors, to modulate health status [158,159]. Acetate, propionate, and butyrate, produced by the fermentation of dietary fiber, act as ligands for G protein-coupled receptors (FFA2, FFA3, GPR109A) and for olfactory receptors (Olfr78, OR51E2) [160,161], leading to the activation of signaling pathways that regulate the secretion of intestinal peptide hormones, blood pressure, renin secretion, airway contraction, and the expression of antimicrobial peptides [162,163]. Overall, short-chain fatty acids increase satiety, thermogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, glucose metabolism regulation, and the secretion of intestinal hormones, thereby supporting their therapeutic potential in obesity and metabolic diseases [164,165].

3. Microbiome and Food Interactions

3.1. General Pathways and Molecular Signaling

Intestinal epithelial cells express taste, olfactory, and microbial metabolite-sensitive receptors, which enable the detection of food and microbial compounds and support the initiation of appropriate protective responses [125,166,167].

The gut microbiome is highly dependent on diet, particularly dietary fiber intake, which significantly influences the composition of this microbial community; it includes certain gut microbial groups equipped with a broad enzymatic repertoire capable of degrading complex dietary polysaccharides, such as pectins, xylans, fructans, starch, and arabinogalactans [168,169].

Species belonging to the genera Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides, recognized as the primary degraders of these polysaccharides, exhibit molecular mechanisms that have been partially elucidated [170,171], while the utilization of plant-derived oligosaccharides is common among gut microbes, reflecting molecular adaptations to exploit complex substrates [172,173]. By fermenting these substrates, the microbiota produces bioactive metabolites, establishing a link between diet, microbiome, and therapeutic response, particularly in metabolic syndrome and inflammatory bowel diseases.

In parallel, bile acids act as signaling molecules via the farnesoid X nuclear receptor (FXR) and the Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) [174,175], while microbial conversion of primary into secondary bile acids modifies receptor specificity and shapes metabolic and immune responses. Deoxycholic acid (DCA), a potent TGR5 agonist, stimulates GLP-1 secretion, improves insulin sensitivity, increases energy expenditure, and reduces inflammation [176,177].

Proteins from various sources (animals, plants, marine organisms) form diverse combinations and, together with other macronutrients, can have synergistic or antagonistic effects on the gut microbiota. Proteins undergo progressive biochemical changes throughout the digestive tract; following the action of proteolytic enzymes, any residual undigested proteins are subjected to bacterial hydrolysis, resulting in the release of amino acids. Amino acids can serve as building blocks for bacterial components or be converted into metabolites (SCFAs, polyamines, hydrogen sulfide, phenols, and indoles), and the resulting metabolites may be involved in various physiological functions related to the host’s health (Figure 3) [178].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The protein dietary, molecular pathways and typical effects; GLP 1—Glucagon-Like Peptide-1; AhR—Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor; GPCRs—G Protein-Coupled Receptors; 5 HT—5-Hydroxytryptamine (Serotonin). Created in https://BioRender.com.

Furthermore, dietary tryptophan (Trp) is metabolized by the gut microbiota into indoles (indolepropionic acid, indoleacetic acid, indolealdehyde), tryptamine, and other aromatic compounds [178,179], which act on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), the pregnane X receptor, GPCRs, GLP 1 and 5 HT (serotonin) receptors (Figure 3). Indole derivatives activate AhR to stimulate IL-22 production and tight junction expression [180,181].

Furthermore, microbiota-mediated regulation of serotonin synthesis links tryptophan metabolism to intestinal motility and systemic signaling [182,183]. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acids, and tryptophan derivatives exemplify how microbiota-derived metabolites act via chemoreceptors expressed by epithelial, immune, and neural cells [184,185], integrating metabolic, immune, and neuroendocrine functions and supporting therapeutic opportunities in disorders associated with dysbiosis [186,187].

Eating habits and dietary patterns vary greatly, with a preference for diets rich in animal protein in many modernized areas, often associated with the consumption of unhealthy, ultra-processed foods. Excess protein can promote the growth of pathogenic microorganisms and increase the production of toxic microbial metabolites (hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, indole compounds), which have harmful effects by increasing the risk of metabolic and kidney diseases [188]. A diet rich in animal protein is also associated with a selective decrease in fiber-fermenting Firmicutes such as Roseburia, Eubacterium rectale, and Ruminococcus bromii, alongside the expansion of bile-tolerant bacteria such as Alistipes, Bacteroides, and Bilophila, a microbial shift linked with inflammatory bowel conditions [189].

The main classes of lipids ingested by humans are metabolized and biotransformed by the gut microbiome. The subsequent impact on the host’s immune and metabolic pathways is driven by the presence of the metabolites generated, as well as by the activation of host cell signaling (Figure 4) through the activity of G protein-coupled receptors (GPR40, GPR120, GLP 1) and complex effect response pathways [190].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The high-fat diet, molecular activation pathways and their effects. PUFA—Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid; CLA—Conjugated Linoleic Acid; HYA—10-Hydroxy-cis-12-octadecenoic acid; HYB—10-Hydroxy-12(Z)-octadecenoic acid; HYC—10-Hydroxy-12(E)-octadecenoic acid; GPR40—G Protein-Coupled Receptor 40 (FFAR1); GPR120—G Protein-Coupled Receptor 120 (FFAR14); GLP-1—Glucagon-Like Peptide-1. Created in https://BioRender.com.

A high-fat diet has harmful effects on intestinal permeability and mucus layer integrity, while impairing metabolic functions. It is associated with changes in microbiota composition and increased production of endotoxins, which promote inflammation and metabolic disorders. Studies have reported an increase in Firmicutes and a decrease in Bacteroidetes in association with high-fat diets. Furthermore, high intake of fatty acids is linked to ulcerative colitis and an increased risk of colon cancer [191]. Campaniello D. et al. showed that high fat intake stimulates the gut microbiota to produce endotoxins (lipopolysaccharides), creating a favorable environment for the proliferation of Gram-negative bacteria, particularly Enterobacteriaceae, resulting in increased inflammation and intestinal permeability and contributing to obesity development [192].

Complex carbohydrates, particularly dietary fiber, undergo microbial fermentation in the colon, resulting in the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (Figure 5) [193].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Dietary carbohydrates and the implications of SCFA metabolite production. SCFAs—Short-Chain Fatty Acids; GPCR41—G Protein-Coupled Receptor 41 (FFAR3); GPCR43—G Protein-Coupled Receptor 43 (FFAR2); GPCR109A—G Protein-Coupled Receptor 109A (HCAR2); ATP—Adenosine Triphosphate; mTOR—the mammalian target of rapamycin; Fox p3—protein (scurfin) involved in immune system responses, transcriptional regulator; TGF β—transforming growth factor is a multifunctional cytokine expressed by almost every tissue and cell type. Created in https://BioRender.com.

SCFAs influence appetite regulation, modulate regulatory T-cell function and immune responses and affect lipid and glucose metabolism [194]. There is also the upregulation of the expression of certain factors (mTOR, FOX p3, TGF) for the regulation of cellular processes (Figure 5) in both the colon and other tissues [195].

These compounds impact the gastrointestinal microbiome by preventing pathogen adhesion to the intestinal mucosa [188]. A diet rich in dietary fiber reduces insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes [191] and decreases the incidence of gastrointestinal diseases, including irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal and gastric cancer, and constipation [194]. The Mediterranean diet promotes the increase in health-associated gut bacteria, including genera such as Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Faecalibacterium (e.g., F. prausnitzii), Roseburia, and members of the Lachnospiraceae family, alongside a reduction in potentially pathogenic taxa belonging to Proteobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and certain Clostridium and Blautia species [194,196,197,198,199,200,201].

Similarly, the vegetarian/vegan diet is characterized by the consumption of plant-based foods, with a high intake of fruits, vegetables, grains, wine, tea, and coffee, which are rich in carbohydrates, fiber, and phytochemicals. The microbiota associated with this diet is abundant in Prevotella and reduced in Bacteroides [199,202,203].

Moreover, high intake of fiber and polyphenols (flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, lignans) led to an increase in Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., Ruminococcus spp., Eubacterium rectale, and Roseburia spp., which provided cardiovascular, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory protection [194,202].

The ketogenic diet influences the gut microbiota through an increase in Firmicutes, Enterobacteria, Desulfovibrio spp., Parabacteroides, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Akkermansia, and a decrease in Bifidobacteria, Eubacterium rectale, Dialister, and Proteobacteria [194,199,200,204]. Research by Rew L. et al. (2022) [205] and Perler B. et al. (2023) [196] showed that adherence to a ketogenic diet alters microbial composition and metabolites, notably decreasing Bifidobacterium spp. and reducing fecal short-chain fatty acids, including butyric acid, propionic acid, and acetic acids, with negative effects on colon health.

The gluten-free diet is a therapeutic option for the management of celiac disease. The study by Campaniello et al. [192] highlighted that a gluten-free diet may also reduce beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Roseburia, while increasing Escherichia coli and Enterobacteriaceae, Victivallaceae, and Clostridiaceae, indicating potential negative effects on microbiota balance in healthy individuals. Work by Delmas et al. [206] demonstrated that a prolonged gluten restriction has been associated with reduced microbial diversity, decreased abundance of beneficial species such as Akkermansia muciniphila and Bifidobacterium spp., disruption of fiber-degrading and butyrate-producing communities, and functional shifts in microbial metabolism.

3.2. Plant-Derived Compounds and Microbiome Interactions

The consumption of foods, dietary supplements, or herbal medicines provides a supply of plant-based substances that interact with gut microorganisms. In this context, microbial consortia transform complex plant-based compounds into structurally diverse metabolites that differ in availability and bioactivity, while also influencing the gut ecosystem by modulating microbial composition [138,140].

Biologically active substances of plant origin belong to various classes of compounds based on their chemical composition and structure, including linear, aromatic, and heterocyclic structures; often containing one or more functional groups, frequently mixed, that facilitate diverse interactions.

A classification of phytochemicals is presented to support their further discussion; in this regard, seven classes of biologically active substances are mentioned, such as organic acids, alkaloids, phytoncides, heterosides, natural pigments, tannins, and essential oils.

The importance of these compounds for microbiota is also related to the fact that, in the intestinal tract, 95% of phytochemicals pass through the small intestine unabsorbed, meaning that their major influence is found in the colon. At this level, microbiota (Escherichia coli, Bifidobacterium sp., Lactobacillus sp., Bacteroides sp., and Eubacterium sp.) metabolize plant compounds into bioactive metabolites [207].

Maternal nutrition during gestation and lactation shapes both immediate and long-term offspring health by directing growth, metabolic phenotypes and gut microbiome development; in this context, maternal malic acid consumption remodeled the microbial community of piglets, increasing the abundance of Megasphaera, Romboutsia, Colidextribacter, and Cloacibacillus, while reducing Prevotella, Blautia, Faecalibacterium, Prevotellaceae, Collinsella, Butyricicoccaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Olsenella, a change that may influence skeletal muscle function and metabolic outcomes [208].

Berberine exerts anti-inflammatory effects in part by activating the TLR4/MyD88/NF-кB signaling axis and modulates gut microbiota, increasing Bacteroidetes, Clostridia, Lactobacillales, Prevotellaceae, Alloprevotella, Butyricimonas, Coprococcus, Ruminococcus, Lactobacillus, Akkermansia, Verrucomicrobia, while reducing Bacteroidales, Lachnospiraceae, Rikenellaceae, Desulfovibrio, Streptococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Prevotella, Proteus, Saccharibacteria, Deferribacteres, Actinobacteria, changes that are implicated in diabetes pathogenesis. Additionally, gut microbiota metabolizes berberine in dihydroberberine, which reduces intestinal disaccharide absorption, stimulates GLP-1 and GLP-2 secretion to preserve pancreatic islet function and lowers blood glucose levels [153].

Dietary factors may contribute to interindividual variability in digoxin reduction: arginine stimulates human gut bacteria Eggerthella lenta growth, while suppressing cgr operon expression, preventing digoxin in vitro conversion to dihydrodigoxin and in vivo studies on gnotobiotic mice reveal that high-protein diets diminish digoxin microbial metabolism, leading to changes in serum and urinary drug concentrations [209].

Carotenoids, especially astaxanthin and retinoic acid, help maintain gut immune balance by enhancing IgA production, limiting epithelial penetration and preventing dysbiosis. Also, supplementation of lycopene administered to obese adults revealed an increased abundance of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Bifidobacterium longum, and Lactobacilli in a dose-dependent manner, alongside a reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL-peroxidase, and malondialdehyde (MDA), thus indicating an improvement in oxidative stress levels [210].

The microbial biotransformation of condensed tannins by bacterial species such as Eubacterium cellulosolvens, Bacteroides distasonis, B. ovatus, B. uniformis, Enterococcus casseliflavus, Eubacterium ramulus, and members of the Lachnospiraceae family (CG191) results in the production of pharmacologically active metabolites. These compounds, through mechanisms such as the activation of CD4+ cells and natural killer cells, the inhibition of metalloproteinases MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-9, the suppression of nitric oxide production by blocking inducible NO synthase (iNOS), modulation of the inflammatory response by inhibiting TNF-α and the NF-κB–IKK–IκBα cascade, as well as by reducing the expression of the endothelial adhesion molecules such as vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), converge toward phenolic structure-dependent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-atherosclerotic effects [211].

Taken together, these examples and other phytochemicals synthesized in Table 2 highlight the diversity of molecular pathways through which plant-derived compounds shape the gut microbiota.

Table 2.

Plant-derived bioactive compounds, molecular targets and mechanisms of microbiome modulation.

Crt. No. Representative Compounds and Sources Dominant Bacterial Types Molecular Target/
Mechanisms of Modulation
1. Organic acids
Malic acid
  • -

    Immature hawthorns, Malus malus (L.) Voss (apples), and Vitis sp. (grapes).

Mandelic acid
  • -

    Prunus amygdalus Batsch (almonds), Prunus armeniaca L. (apricots), Prunus mume (Siebold) Siebold & Zucc. (peaches), Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton (cranberries), Rubus idaeus L. (raspberries).

Quinic acid
  • -

    Coffea L. (coffee beans), fruits such as Malus malus (L.) Voss (apples), Prunus mume (Siebold) Siebold & Zucc. (peaches), Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.) (kiwi).

Tartaric acid
  • -

    Citrus paradisi Macfad. (grapes), Vitis vinifera L. (raisins and wine).

Citric acid
  • -

    Citrus L. (lemons, limes, and grapefruits).

Acetobacter, Lactobacillus,
Saccharomyces, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Weissella, Lactococcus
Bacillus aceticum, Lactobacillus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Escherichia, Shigella, Proteus, Paeniclostridium, and Streptococcus
  • Malic acid—reducing the abundance of Prevotella, Blautia, Prevotellaceae_NK3B31 group, and Collinsella [208]

  • Quinic acid could improve the dysbiosis of gut microbiota, inhibit intestinal inflammation by suppressing the activation of the MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway in mice colon [212]

2. Alkaloids
Caffeine and Theophylline
  • -

    Coffea L. (coffee beans), Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze (tea), Theobroma cacao L. (chocolate), certain soft drinks.

Berberine
  • -

    Roots, bark, and other structures of plants used in traditional Chinese/East Asian medicines such as Coptis chinensis, Phellodendron amurense, Cercis chinensis—Chinese Redbud, Berberis aristata, B. petiolaris, B. vulgaris, B. aquifolium, and B. thunbergii.

Indoles
  • -

    Brassicaceae Burnett (cruciferous vegetables).

Bacteroides-Prevotella-Porphyromonas, Bifidobacterium, Clostridia cluster XIV-a group,
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
Cryptobacterium curtum, Eggerthella sp., and Firmicutes
  • Downregulation of the inflammatory cascade (COX-2, NF-κB, IL-6) [213]

  • Regulation of DNA synthesis and induction of luminal detoxifying enzymes (β-glucuronidase, β-glucosidase, β-galactosidase, mucinase and nitroreductase) [214]

  • Caffeine-related metabolites: theophylline, caffeine and paraxanthine; promoting the growth of SCFA-producing bacteria [215]

  • Berberine can activate TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway to play an anti-inflammatory role [153]

3. Organo-sulfur compounds
Allicin, Alliin, Dihydroalliin
  • -

    Vegetables such as Allium sativum L. (garlic) and Allium cepa L. (onions).

Lactobacillus
Bifidobacterium
  • NK cell receptors such as TIGIT, NKG2D, KIR2DL3, and LFA-1 [216]

  • A significant decrease in the percentage of T cells [216]

  • Phytoncide exposure as well as boosts in the levels of effector molecules granzymes A/B, perforin, and granulysin [216]

4. Polyphenols
Anthocyanin
  • -

    Camellia sinensis (tea);

  • -

    Vegetables such as Brassica oleracea var. italica (broccoli), Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. rubra (red cabbage), Daucus carota L. (purple carrots);

  • -

    Fruits such as Prunus virginiana L. (chokeberry), Vaccinium praestans Lamb. (Kamchatka berry), Vaccinium myrtillus L. (bilberry), Vaccinium corymbosum L. (blueberry), Rubus occidentalis L. (black raspberry), Citrus paradisi Macfad. (grapes) and Oryza sativa L. (black rice).

Flavones
Kaempferol: high levels in Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze (tea), Citrus paradisi Macfad. (grapes), Brassica oleracea var. italica (broccoli).
Apigenin, Luteolin, Myricetin, Rutin, Sibelin, Quercetin.
  • -

    Malus malus (L.) Voss (apple skins), Brassica oleracea var. italica (broccoli), Apium graveolens L (celery), ruit peels, Vaccinium corymbosum L. (bilberry), V. oxycoccus L. (cranberries), Citrus paradisi Macfad. (grapes), Lactuca sativa L. (lettuce), Olea europaea L. (olives), Allium cepa L. (onions).

Flavanones
  • -

    Citrus sp. (fruit and peel) [217].

Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp.
  • Anthocyanins—microbiome activity through SCFA-NLRP6, mTOR STAT3, and GRP43; decrease pH; decrease pathogenic bacteria [218]

  • Molecular approach: blocking c- Jun, ERK1/2 [219]

5. Glycosides
Cardiac glycosides
  • -

    Cardiac drug—digoxin

Amygdalin (Amy)
  • -

    Seeds of Rosaceae such as Prunus amygdalus Batsch (almonds) and Prunus persica (L.) Batsch (peach).

Eggerthella lenta
Enterobacter aerogenes, Streptococcus faecalis, Clostridium perfringens
  • Digoxin inactivation by reduction; two-gene cardiac glycoside reductase (cgr) operon that was induced by digoxin in low-arginine conditions; dietary protein reduces the in vivo microbial metabolism of digoxin [209]

  • Cyanogenesis of Amy; intestinal microbiota is involved in bidirectional regulation of toxicity and detoxification of Amy [220]

6. Tetraterpenoid pigments
Carotenoids (provitamin A carotenoids, lycopene, astaxanthin)
  • -

    Orange, red, yellow and dark green fruits and vegetables, Solanum sp. L (tomatoes), Cucurbita sp. (pumpkins), Mangifera indica L. (mango), Prunus armeniaca L. (apricots), Spinacia oleracea L. (spinach), etc.

Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Bifidobacterium longum
Lactobacilli
  • Enhancing or preserving intestinal barrier function; regulation of oxidative stress; stimulation of IgA [210]

7. Tannins
Hydrolysable tannins
(Ellagitannins such as pedunculagin, vescalagin, castalagin, sanguiin and Gallotannins such as pentagalloyl-glucoside, hexagalloyl-glucoside, octagalloyl-glucoside)
  • -

    Fruits Punica granatum L. (pommegranate), Fragaria ananassa Duchesne (strawberry);

  • -

    Quercus sp. L. (oak);

  • -

    Castanea sativa Mill. (chestnut);

  • -

    Rhus semialata Murray (sumac).

Condensed tannins (epicatechin, catechin, procyanidin C1, C2, cinnamtannin A2)
  • -

    Clausena lansium (Lour.) Skeels (bark);

  • -

    Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze (tea);

  • -

    Vitis vinifera L. (grapes);

  • -

    Persea americana Mill. (avocado);

  • -

    Cinnamomum sp. (cinnamon).

Eubacterium cellulosolvens, Bacteroides distasonis, Bacteroides ovatus, Bacteroides uniformis, Enterococcus casseliflavus, Eubacterium ramulus, Lachnospiraceae CG191
the hydrolysis of tannins [211]
  • The metalloproteinases MMP-1, MMP-2 and MMP-9; inhibition of inducible NO synthase; increase CD4+ T-cell activation; TNF-α

  • Urolithin A inhibited NF-κB and activator protein-1 (AP-1) activation as well as the phosphorylation of Akt and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK); Urolithin A interfered with Akt/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) [211]

  • Anti-α-glucosidase, antityrosinase, antiproliferative and apoptotic activities [221]

8. Essential oils
Linalool, Limonene, Citral
  • -

    Aurantii dulcis aetheroleum (orange essential oil);

  • -

    Limonis aetheroleum (lemon essential oil).

Lactobacillus
  • Decreased of pro-inflammatory taxa, such as Desulfovibrionaceae (known sulfate-reducing pathobionts), Peptostreptococcaceae and Erysipelotrichaceae [219]

MyD88/NF-κB signaling—MyD88 (myeloid differentiation primary response 88); NF-κB—nuclear factor-κB; COX-2—Cyclooxygenase-2, prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2; IL-6—interleukin 6, SCFA—Short-chain fatty acid; TLR4—toll-like receptor 4; NK—natural killer cell; TIGIT—T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains; NKG2D—is an activating receptor (transmembrane protein), NKG2 family of C-type lectin-like receptors, KIR2DL3—Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor 2DL3 is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by the natural killer cells; LFA-1—Lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1; NLRP6—short for NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 6; mTOR STAT3—a signaling axis where the mechanistic Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) acts as an activator of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3); GPR43—major host receptors for most SCFAs; c- Jun—Transcription factor Jun; ERK1/2—extracellular Signal-regulated kinases; MMP 1—Matrix metalloproteinase-1; MMP-2—Matrix metalloproteinase-2; MMP-9—Matrix metalloproteinase-9; NO—Nitric oxide; TNF-α—Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Akt/mTOR—the serine/threonine kinase Akt, Akt at Ser473 by mTORC2 stimulates full enzymatic activity.

Verediano et al. [218] conducted a systematic review that highlights how anthocyanin supplementation effectively modulates gut microbiota by increasing Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium populations and promotes short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. SCFAs can activate colon NLRP6 (nucleotide-oligomerization domain-like receptor 6), thereby enhancing intestinal barrier protection. SCFAs also promote colonic epithelial renewal and mucus secretion, activate the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex and the signal transducers and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), which upregulates antimicrobial peptides (e.g., β-defensin, RegIIIγ). Additionally, SCFAs exert immunomodulatory effects by stimulating mucosal regulatory T-cell (Treg) development through interaction with G protein-coupled receptor (GRP43) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) inhibition.

There are generally few systematic studies on the interaction between phytochemicals and colon cells, and there is also little data on the molecular mechanisms involved.

Phytoconstituents (alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, polysaccharides and betacyanins) undergo dynamic interactions within the gut microbiota (Table 2), forming diverse and bioactive metabolites [26] that significantly influence cellular signaling pathways (e.g., AMPK, PPARs, MAPK, cellular redox balance, sirtuins, TLR4, NF-κB, mTOR, SCFAs, IL-6, JNK and TNF), host metabolism and immune responses [27,135].

Flavonoids can have significant effects on microbiota composition under experimental conditions, influencing microbial structures and diversity as part of a bidirectional interaction, with modulatory effects that may be positive or negative rather than universally reducing diversity [141]. The colonic microbiota converts flavonoids into metabolites such as phenolic acids, and this selective processing may influence microbial community dynamics and host physiology [139]. Several studies suggest that compounds such as quercetin may inhibit the growth of certain bacteria under specific conditions and at higher concentrations, although this effect depends on chemical structure and dose [222]. In addition, flavonoids can alter microbial structure, including increasing certain bacteria (e.g., Proteobacteria) associated with dysbiosis, which may reduce functional diversity or disrupt the bacterial community under specific conditions [141,157].

Similarly, polyphenols exert antimicrobial activity and influence the composition and functionality of the gut microbiota [142], while also acting as antioxidants [223,224], with anti-inflammatory and prebiotic effects [143,225]. Their metabolism by gut bacteria leads to the production of microbial metabolites, such as organic acids, which can alter pH and influence microbial enzymes and microbiota composition [149]. Fermentation mediated by polyphenolic metabolites exerts selective pressures on the gut microbiota, as commensals and pathogens differ in their ability to utilize these metabolites or respond to their antimicrobial effects [144,145]. In this context, polyphenols and their metabolites can stimulate the growth of beneficial bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium and Akkermansia muciniphila, while inhibiting pathogenic species [146].

In contrast, alkaloids, although natural plant compounds, may have adverse effects on gut microbiota when consumed frequently or at high doses, due to their non-selective antimicrobial properties, which may also affect beneficial bacteria and reduce microbiota diversity over time [147,148].

The relationship between the microbiome and the biological effects of metabolites of tannins biotransformed in the intestine, as well as molecular signaling, remains largely unexplored. The link between their chemical structures and their potential mechanism of action is important, as it facilitates the discovery of specific molecular characteristics underlying the heterogeneous information associated with pharmacological effects [211].

Certain herbal supplements interact significantly with microbiota (Table 2), but their impact can be variable and is not fully understood, with potential microbial imbalances, as evidence suggests both beneficial effects and the possibility of dysbiosis [150,151].

In this context, berberine supplements modulate the composition of the gut microbiota, increasing the proportion of short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria (including Bacteroides, Blautia, Butyricicoccus and Phascolarctobacterium) and promoting the expression of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in intestinal L cells [152,153]. Similarly, turmeric (extracts of Curcuma longa and its curcuminoids) interacts with the microbiota, with clinical and experimental studies reporting changes in bacterial composition and increases in beneficial bacteria, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium [154]. In addition, supplements such as spirulina contain compounds with antimicrobial activity and can influence microbial populations by inhibiting undesirable bacteria and, under certain conditions, stimulating the growth of probiotic bacteria, while polysaccharides and other bioactive compounds contribute to microbiota modulation [155,156]. Furthermore, plants rich in polyphenols and flavonoids (e.g., green tea, rosemary, cinnamon) serve as substrates for beneficial gut bacteria and may stimulate microbial diversity or metabolic activity, acting as modulators of host–microbiome interactions [140,157].

3.3. Clinical Translational Challenges of Plant-Derived Medicines: From Animal Models to Human Therapy

Although preclinical evidence indicates that plant-based foods and medicines can favorably modulate the gut microbiota, the translation of these results into clinically validated therapeutic strategies remains, for now, limited [226]. In vivo studies report promising effects of phytochemicals and plant extracts on microbiota-associated disorders, but the ability of animal models to predict human responses remains limited, as differences between species in microbiome composition, host physiology, metabolism, and environmental exposures are too great to be ignored [227]. Microbiome-targeted therapies also face serious translational and regulatory hurdles: mechanisms of action remain difficult to define, quality control standards are insufficiently established, and clinical efficacy varies across populations [228].

A major limitation remains the compositional and functional differences between rodent and human microbiota. Murine models raised under germ-free or conventional conditions have clarified causal relationships between microbial taxa and host phenotypes, but the microbial ecology of laboratory mice differs markedly from that of humans in terms of the proportions of dominant phyla, metabolic capacity, and colonization history [229,230]. Bioactive metabolites produced from phytochemicals in the animal microbiota may differ considerably from those generated in the human colon, which limits the direct extrapolation of mechanistic data obtained in preclinical models to human physiology; in animal studies, two-week treatment with plant extracts was shown to change gut microbiota composition, caecum metabolome, and markers of lipid metabolism in ob/ob mice, a genetic model of leptin-deficient obesity and gut microbiota dysbiosis [231]. While in human interventional studies, the relationship between plant-based dietary interventions and gut microbiome composition has shown promising but variable results depending on baseline microbiota [232]. The conversion of polyphenols (ellagitannins to urolithins, isoflavones to equol) depends on the composition of the individual microbiome and varies greatly among humans. This variability is not captured in standardized animal experiments [233,234].

The variability of the human gut microbiome complicates the clinical translation of interactions between phytomedicine and the microbiome, as the response to plant compounds dependent on microbial biotransformation, such as the conversion of lignans by Clostridium scindens [235] or the deglycosylation of flavonoid glycosides by beta-glucosidase producing Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species, varies among individuals depending on microbiome composition, diet, age, and disease status [236].

Variability in the human gut microbiome can influence the biotransformation, bioavailability, and therapeutic efficacy of plant compounds [227], and this variability limits the generalizability of small-scale clinical studies, underscoring the need for stratification of participants according to microbiome enterotypes or functional profiles prior to phytochemical interventions [237].

Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics remain a serious translational barrier, as many phytochemicals active in cell cultures or animal studies have low oral bioavailability in humans due to rapid metabolism, low solubility, or first-pass clearance [238,239]. Curcumin, for example, has very low systemic bioavailability in humans, despite its well-documented anti-inflammatory and microbiome-modulating properties in preclinical models, except in specialized formulations: phospholipid complexes, nanoparticles, or co-administration with piperine [240,241], while therapeutic concentrations of berberine achieved in mice are difficult to replicate in humans due to rapid intestinal inactivation and hepatic extraction [242]. These limitations necessitate targeted delivery systems and dosing protocols adapted to human pharmacokinetics; preclinical evidence from animal models supports the role of plant-derived compounds in modulating gut microbiota and associated metabolic pathways, but these findings require validation in well-controlled human trials before causal claims can be made [243].

Methodological standardization remains a challenge in clinical studies of phytomedicine as well, as extraction methods, routes of administration, treatment duration, outcome measures, and microbiome assessment techniques (16S rRNA amplicon sequencing versus shotgun metagenomics) vary so widely across studies that data synthesis becomes difficult, and conflicting results are inevitable [244]. The lack of harmonized protocols for reporting microbiome changes following phytochemical interventions also hinders meta-analysis efforts; while initiatives such as the MIxS standard and the STORMS checklist are concrete steps toward standardization, their adoption in phytomedicine research remains limited [245].

Safety and regulation present their own obstacles. Phytomedicines are often perceived as inherently harmless [246], but many plant compounds can be hepatotoxic, nephrotoxic, or immunomodulatory at high doses or in vulnerable patients, particularly those with an intestinal barrier compromised by dysbiosis [193]. Phytochemicals can interact with concomitantly administered medications by modulating CYP450 or inhibiting P-glycoprotein, altering bioavailability and increasing the risk of adverse reactions, for example, Hypericum perforatum L. and curcumin [247,248]. Regulation of herbal products varies widely across jurisdictions, and the lack of standardized quality control for botanical preparations complicates dose–response assessments and comparisons across studies [249].

Several emerging strategies may bridge the translational gap. Humanized gnotobiotic mouse models (germ-free animals colonized with human fecal microbiota) offer better ecological validity for studying phytochemical–microbiome interactions under conditions closer to human physiology [250,251], while organoid and gut-on-a-chip technologies model human intestinal epithelium in contact with microbial communities, providing mechanistic data under conditions closer to human physiology than traditional cell lines [252]. Multi-omic approaches (metagenomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics) applied in well-stratified clinical studies are necessary for identifying response and non-response phenotypes and for discovering microbial metabolic pathways activated by plant compounds in the human gut [253,254].

To better understand the effects of phytomedicines on the microbiota, future studies should use metagenomics and/or culturomics to identify the bacterial species responsible for therapeutic effects, as current studies are usually limited to a single class of plant compounds; an analysis covering a wider range of chemical compositions would provide a more complete picture of how the gut microbiota processes phytomedicines [226].

Overall, recent research on the interaction between phytomedicines and gut microbiota in metabolic diseases is making promising progress. A deeper understanding of these interactions will clarify the therapeutic mechanisms of phytomedicines [226].

Preclinical research has accumulated robust mechanistic data, but translating microbiome-targeting herbal medicines into clinical practice requires improved bioavailability, standardized methodologies, consideration of microbiome heterogeneity, and evidence-based regulatory frameworks [255,256], while future clinical studies should be large-scale, well-controlled, and include personalized microbiome profiling, both as a stratification tool and as an outcome measure, in line with the principles of precision nutrition and microbiome-targeted medicine [257,258].

4. Microbiome-Targeted Interventions in Gastrointestinal Disorders

Microorganisms have been used in nutrition and medicine for millennia, long before their scientific identification [259,260]. Over the past two decades, the potential of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) [24,25] in the management of digestive diseases has been progressively uncovered, demonstrating effects on the regulation of the gut microbiome, improvement of epithelial integrity, and the exploitation of immunoregulatory mechanisms [261,262].

In this regard, prebiotics are non-viable substrates selectively utilized by resident microorganisms to confer a benefit to the host [263,264,265], while stimulation of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species leads to increased production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), with examples including inulin-type fructans (ITF), fructooligosaccharides (FOS), and galactooligosaccharides (GOS) [266,267]. Similarly, probiotics are live microorganisms with a genetically confirmed identity and demonstrate viability until the end of their shelf life, which confer health benefits to the host when administered in adequate amounts [268,269], including strains such as Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii [270,271].

Synbiotics are combinations of live microorganisms and substrates selectively used for growth [272], classified as complementary synbiotics and synergistic synbiotics [273,274], while postbiotics include non-viable microorganisms and/or their components, obtained through controlled inactivation processes, such as heat treatment or high pressure [275,276], with examples including heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75, and pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila [277,278]. In addition, FMT is a procedure involving the administration of fecal microbiota from a healthy human donor, with the aim of restoring microbial balance [279,280], and its mechanisms include increased microbial diversity, changes in microbial metabolites, altered intestinal permeability, and modulation of the gut–brain axis [281,282]. Furthermore, modifying the gut microbiota through probiotic and prebiotic fungi has been shown to reduce intestinal inflammatory burden, with implications for inflammatory bowel diseases and metabolic disorders, where a pro-inflammatory gut environment is associated with obesity and diabetes [266,283].

In this context, ex vivo experimental studies on inflamed mucosal tissue from patients with IBD have shown a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines and an increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines following administration of a nutraceutical compound consisting of Hericium erinaceus, berberine, quercetin, biotin, and niacin [282,284].

Advanced Technological Innovations for the Microbiome Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Disorders

The diagnosis of infectious diseases of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract using traditional methods has been significantly transformed by molecular methods, which enable the rapid and accurate identification of pathogens and their genetic variants (Figure 6) [285].

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The interaction between plant-based foods, intestinal microbiome dysbiosis, pathological outcomes and the role of molecular diagnostics. Created in https://BioRender.com.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized comprehensive genotyping through its ability to sequence entire microbial genomes or cancer-associated mutations, offering a broad diagnostic scope in GI diseases and cancer, but at a higher cost and with greater technical complexity [285].

Shotgun metagenomics has become the dominant method, as it allows for the random sequencing of the entire genetic content of a microbiome [286,287], providing access to the study of all genes present in a sample and enabling both taxonomic and functional profiling [288,289], which is relevant in the context of identifying microbial responses to plant-derived bioactive compounds. However, although these methods provide extensive insights into microbial composition, they primarily assess the presence of organisms or genes without determining their active role within the microbiome [290,291].

To address this limitation, microbiome studies increasingly incorporate metatranscriptomics, which allows [292,293] for the analysis of actively expressed genes and the evaluation of microbial response to environmental changes over time [294,295]. Advances in metagenomic analysis, supported by next-generation sequencing, have significantly expanded the understanding of microbial communities, providing an advanced approach for identifying uncultivable microorganisms based on genetic information extracted directly from the environment [286,296].

Artificial intelligence and machine learning methods play an essential role in analyzing complex data from microbiomic studies, due to their multidimensional nature [297,298]. Machine learning (ML) is particularly useful in the study of gut microbiota, offering insights into how this microbial community influences health and disease, as well as enabling biomarker identification [299], such as fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein (CRP) [300,301]. Furthermore, the integration of AI with large-scale metagenomic and multi-omics datasets has enhanced the understanding of microbiota functionality, allowing for the identification of functional genes, metabolic pathways, and potential biomarkers [302,303], which is relevant in the context of microbiome-mediated metabolism and response to bioactive compounds.

Despite these advances, the application of metagenomics, artificial intelligence, and molecular diagnostics in studies of plant-derived compounds remains limited by high interindividual variability, a lack of methodological standardization, and insufficient clinical validation. Furthermore, the correlation between microbiome profiles and phytochemical-influenced therapeutic outcomes has not yet been clearly established in human studies. These limitations highlight the need for integrative and standardized multi-omic frameworks to improve translational relevance [7].

5. Methods

The literature search was conducted between February and June 2026. A total of 587 articles were initially identified across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect, using free-text terms and combinations with Boolean operators: “gut microbiome,” “dysbiosis,” “pharmacomicrobiomics,” “plant-based foods and compounds,” “drug-microbiome interactions,” “molecular pathways,” “diagnostic methods,” “microbiome modulation,” “bioactive metabolites,” “polyphenols and microbiota,” “flavonoids and gut microbiome,” “herbal medicine and microbiome,” and “animal model and human therapy and phytochemicals.” Duplicate publications were identified and removed before the full text was produced. Deduplication consisted of combining publications obtained from multiple databases and manually checking them by comparing titles, authors, and years of publication, which resulted in the removal of 89 duplicate entries and reduced the initial set of 587 to 498 unique publications. Full-text articles were then assessed for eligibility based on the following criteria: Inclusion: (1) original articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and narrative reviews; (2) studies on microbiome-mediated interactions with plant foods, phytochemicals, or phytomedicines; (3) studies investigating the molecular mechanisms between phytochemicals, gut microbiota, and host signaling pathways; (4) studies with clinical or preclinical data on pharmacomicrobiomics, dysbiosis, and plant-based therapeutic strategies; (5) publications in English; Exclusion: (1) studies exclusively on synthetic drugs, without reference to plant compounds or interactions with the microbiome; (2) conference abstracts, editorials, and opinion pieces without original data.

After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 307 references were retained. The selection prioritized studies published after 2020, with an emphasis on translational clinical data, molecular mechanisms, and studies linking results from animal models to therapeutic applications in humans.

6. Conclusions

The gut microbiota is considered one of the key elements influencing health through microbiome–host interactions across life stages, being associated with IBD, IBS, cardiovascular risk, allergies, and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.

Within this context, plant-derived foods and medicines interact with the gut microbiome through microbial metabolism, generating bioactive metabolites that influence host signaling pathways and therapeutic response, highlighting the relevance of microbiome–phytochemical interactions in disease modulation.

Microbiome analysis can improve disease detection, monitoring, and personalized care. Advances in microbiome sequencing technologies are improving pathogen diagnosis and the understanding of microbiome functions, while meta-transcriptomics reveal active gene expression and microbial responses.

Future perspectives in microbiome research focus on integrating plant-derived compounds, multi-omics, artificial intelligence, and advanced diagnostics to improve personalized medicine and disease management. However, the clinical translation of microbiome–phytochemical interactions remains limited by interindividual variability and insufficient validation in human studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M., V.S. and I.M.I.; methodology, G.M., I.M.I. and V.S.; formal analysis and investigation, G.M.; resources, H.M., I.M.I. and M.D.R.; data curation, G.M., I.M.I. and V.S.; writing—original draft preparation, G.M., I.M.I. and V.S.; writing—review and editing, G.M., V.S., H.M., M.D.R. and I.M.I.; visualization, G.M., I.M.I., H.M. and V.S.; supervision V.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Basile E.J., Shukla K., Launico M.V., Sheer A.J. StatPearls [Internet] StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2025. Physiology, Nutrient Absorption. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yu L.-E., Yang W.-C., Liang Y.-C. Crosstalk Within the Intestinal Epithelium: Aspects of Intestinal Absorption, Homeostasis, and Immunity. Biomedicines. 2024;12:2771. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Saldana-Morales F.B., Kim D.V., Tsai M.-T., Diehl G.E. Healthy Intestinal Function Relies on Coordinated Enteric Nervous System, Immune System, and Epithelium Responses. Gut Microbes. 2021;13:1916376. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1916376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Neurath M.F., Artis D., Becker C. The Intestinal Barrier: A Pivotal Role in Health, Inflammation, and Cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2025;10:573–592. doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00390-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Skok K., Vihar B., Maver U., Gradišnik L., Bräutigam K., Trapecar M., Skok P. Gastrointestinal Tract, Its Pathophysiology and in-Vitro Models: A “Quick” Reference Guide to Translational Studies. World J. Gastroenterol. 2025;31:108297. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i28.108297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nwako J.G., McCauley H.A. Enteroendocrine Cells Regulate Intestinal Homeostasis and Epithelial Function. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2024;593:112339. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2024.112339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lindell A.E., Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M., Patil K.R. Multimodal Interactions of Drugs, Natural Compounds and Pollutants with the Gut Microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022;20:431–443. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00681-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khalil M., Di Ciaula A., Mahdi L., Jaber N., Di Palo D.M., Graziani A., Baffy G., Portincasa P. Unraveling the Role of the Human Gut Microbiome in Health and Diseases. Microorganisms. 2024;12:2333. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12112333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Valencia S., Zuluaga M., Florian Pérez M.C., Montoya-Quintero K.F., Candamil-Cortés M.S., Robledo S. Human Gut Microbiome: A Connecting Organ Between Nutrition, Metabolism, and Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:4112. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bajinka O., Darboe A., Tan Y., Abdelhalim K.A., Cham L.B. Gut Microbiota and the Human Gut Physiological Changes. Ann. Microbiol. 2020;70:65. doi: 10.1186/s13213-020-01608-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gomaa E.Z. Human Gut Microbiota/Microbiome in Health and Diseases: A Review. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 2020;113:2019–2040. doi: 10.1007/s10482-020-01474-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.de Groen P., Gouw S.C., Hanssen N.M.J., Nieuwdorp M., Rampanelli E. Early-Life Gut Microbiota: Education of the Immune System and Links to Autoimmune Diseases. Microorganisms. 2026;14:210. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms14010210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hou K., Wu Z.-X., Chen X.-Y., Wang J.-Q., Zhang D., Xiao C., Zhu D., Koya J.B., Wei L., Li J., et al. Microbiota in Health and Diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022;7:135. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fan Y., Pedersen O. Gut Microbiota in Human Metabolic Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021;19:55–71. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0433-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen H., Li L., Yu F., Ma Z. A Comprehensive Diversity Analysis on the Gut Microbiomes of ASD Patients: From Alpha, Beta to Gamma Diversities. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2024;371:fnae014. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnae014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cassol I., Ibañez M., Bustamante J.P. Key Features and Guidelines for the Application of Microbial Alpha Diversity Metrics. Sci. Rep. 2025;15:622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77864-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moran A.W., Daly K., Al-Rammahi M.A., Shirazi-Beechey S.P. Nutrient Sensing of Gut Luminal Environment. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2021;80:29–36. doi: 10.1017/S0029665120007120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Akiba Y., Hashimoto S., Kaunitz J.D. Duodenal Chemosensory System: Enterocytes, Enteroendocrine Cells, and Tuft Cells. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2020;36:501–508. doi: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lavelle A., Sokol H. Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites as Key Actors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;17:223–237. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0258-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Proctor L.M., Creasy H.H., Fettweis J.M., Lloyd-Price J., Mahurkar A., Zhou W., Buck G.A., Snyder M.P., Strauss J.F., Weinstock G.M., et al. The Integrative Human Microbiome Project. Nature. 2019;569:641–648. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1238-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Weersma R.K., Zhernakova A., Fu J. Interaction between Drugs and the Gut Microbiome. Gut. 2020;69:1510–1519. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zimmermann M., Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M., Wegmann R., Goodman A.L. Mapping Human Microbiome Drug Metabolism by Gut Bacteria and Their Genes. Nature. 2019;570:462–467. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1291-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilson I.D., Nicholson J.K. Gut Microbiome Interactions with Drug Metabolism, Efficacy, and Toxicity. Transl. Res. 2017;179:204–222. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vallianou N., Stratigou T., Christodoulatos G.S., Tsigalou C., Dalamaga M. Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, Postbiotics, and Obesity: Current Evidence, Controversies, and Perspectives. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2020;9:179–192. doi: 10.1007/s13679-020-00379-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zikou E., Dovrolis N., Dimosthenopoulos C., Gazouli M., Makrilakis K. The Effect of Probiotic Supplements on Metabolic Parameters of People with Type 2 Diabetes in Greece—A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Nutrients. 2023;15:4663. doi: 10.3390/nu15214663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lal S., Akhtar S., Khan M.F., Aldosari S.A., Mukherjee M., Sharma A.K. Molecular Basis of Phytochemical–Gut Microbiota Interactions. Drug Discov. Today. 2023;28:103824. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mitea G., Schröder V., Iancu I.M., Mireșan H., Iancu V., Bucur L.A., Badea F.C. Molecular Targets of Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers. 2024;16:3612. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Topor G., Nechita A., Strambu I.R., Bratu I.C., Stefan S., Campanu (Banu) M., Dumitriu-Buzia O., Agop Forna D., Parvu S. Analysis of the Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDS) in the Oral Cavity. Rom. J. Oral Rehabil. 2024;16:468–478. doi: 10.62610/rjor.2024.1.16.45. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xu B., Li Z., Zeng T., Zhan J., Wang S., Ho C.-T., Li S. Bioactives of Momordica charantia as Potential Anti-Diabetic/Hypoglycemic Agents. Molecules. 2022;27:2175. doi: 10.3390/molecules27072175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Morais L.H., Schreiber H.L., Mazmanian S.K. The Gut Microbiota–Brain Axis in Behaviour and Brain Disorders. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021;19:241–255. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00460-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Almeida C., Oliveira R., Soares R., Barata P. Influence of Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis on Brain Function: A Systematic Review. Porto Biomed. J. 2020;5:1. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Evasi W. Microbiome-Based Diagnostics: Current Progress. IDOSR J. Appl. Sci. 2025;10:81–92. doi: 10.59298/idosrjas/2025/103.8192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kacew A.J., Strohbehn G.W., Saulsberry L., Laiteerapong N., Cipriani N.A., Kather J.N., Pearson A.T. Artificial Intelligence Can Cut Costs While Maintaining Accuracy in Colorectal Cancer Genotyping. Front. Oncol. 2021;11:630953. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.630953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Singh A., Kesani H., Saleh T.M., Rai M. Emerging Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Early Detection of Gastrointestinal Cancers. Cureus. 2025;17:92296. doi: 10.7759/cureus.92296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Suárez-Martínez C., Santaella-Pascual M., Yagüe-Guirao G., Martínez-Graciá C. Infant Gut Microbiota Colonization: Influence of Prenatal and Postnatal Factors, Focusing on Diet. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14:1236254. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1236254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hickman B., Salonen A., Ponsero A.J., Jokela R., Kolho K.-L., de Vos W.M., Korpela K. Gut Microbiota Wellbeing Index Predicts Overall Health in a Cohort of 1000 Infants. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:8323. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52561-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ai X., Huang C., Liu Q., Duan R., Ma X., Li L., Shu Z., Miao Y., Shen H., Lv Y., et al. Gut Microbiome Dynamics and Functional Shifts in Healthy Aging: Insights from a Metagenomic Study. Front. Microbiol. 2025;16:1629811. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1629811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sena G., De Rango F., De Rose E., Perrotta A., Berardelli M., Scorza A., Cretella B., Passarino G., D’Aquila P., Bellizzi D. Composition of the Gut Microbiota in Older Adults Residing in a Nursing Home and Its Association with Dementia. Nutrients. 2026;18:505. doi: 10.3390/nu18030505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang Y., Geng R., Zhao Y., Fang J., Li M., Kang S.-G., Huang K., Tong T. The Gut Odorant Receptor and Taste Receptor Make Sense of Dietary Components: A Focus on Gut Hormone Secretion. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024;64:6975–6989. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2023.2177610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sternini C., Rozengurt E. Bitter Taste Receptors as Sensors of Gut Luminal Contents. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2025;22:39–53. doi: 10.1038/s41575-024-01005-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wachsmuth H.R., Weninger S.N., Duca F.A. Role of the Gut–Brain Axis in Energy and Glucose Metabolism. Exp. Mol. Med. 2022;54:377–392. doi: 10.1038/s12276-021-00677-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mohammad I., Ansari M.R., Khan M.S., Bari M.N., Kamal M.A., Poyil M.M. Beyond Digestion: The Gut Microbiota as an Immune–Metabolic Interface in Disease Modulation. Gastrointest. Disord. 2025;7:77. doi: 10.3390/gidisord7040077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chao J., Coleman R.A., Keating D.J., Martin A.M. Gut Microbiome Regulation of Gut Hormone Secretion. Endocrinology. 2025;166:bqaf004. doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqaf004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Diotaiuti P., Misiti F., Marotta G., Falese L., Calabrò G.E., Mancone S. The Gut Microbiome and Its Impact on Mood and Decision-Making: A Mechanistic and Therapeutic Review. Nutrients. 2025;17:3350. doi: 10.3390/nu17213350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ma Z.F., Lee Y.Y. The Role of the Gut Microbiota in Health, Diet, and Disease with a Focus on Obesity. Foods. 2025;14:492. doi: 10.3390/foods14030492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ding W., Cheng Y., Liu X., Zhu Z., Wu L., Gao J., Lei W., Li Y., Zhou X., Wu J., et al. Harnessing the Human Gut Microbiota: An Emerging Frontier in Combatting Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1563450. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1563450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tan C.Y., Ramirez Z.E., Surana N.K. A Modern-World View of Host–Microbiota–Pathogen Interactions. J. Immunol. 2021;207:1710–1718. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bron P.A., Kleerebezem M., Brummer R.-J., Cani P.D., Mercenier A., MacDonald T.T., Garcia-Ródenas C.L., Wells J.M. Can Probiotics Modulate Human Disease by Impacting Intestinal Barrier Function? Br. J. Nutr. 2017;117:93–107. doi: 10.1017/s0007114516004037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bretto E., Urpì-Ferreruela M., Casanova G.R., González-Suárez B. The Role of Gut Microbiota in Gastrointestinal Immune Homeostasis and Inflammation: Implications for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Biomedicines. 2025;13:1807. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13081807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cortés M., Olate P., Rodriguez R., Diaz R., Martínez A., Hernández G., Sepulveda N., Paz E.A., Quiñones J. Human Microbiome as an Immunoregulatory Axis: Mechanisms, Dysbiosis, and Therapeutic Modulation. Microorganisms. 2025;13:2147. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13092147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kim S., Ndwandwe C., Devotta H., Kareem L., Yao L., O’Mahony L. Role of the Microbiome in Regulation of the Immune System. Allergol. Int. 2025;74:187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2024.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yoon G., Puentes R., Tran J., Multani A., Cobo E.R. The Role of Cathelicidins in Neutrophil Biology. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2024;116:689–705. doi: 10.1093/jleuko/qiae112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shah T., Baloch Z., Shah Z., Cui X., Xia X. The Intestinal Microbiota: Impacts of Antibiotics Therapy, Colonization Resistance, and Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:6597. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sankarganesh P., Bhunia A., Ganesh Kumar A., Babu A.S., Gopukumar S.T., Lokesh E. Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs) in Gut Health: Implications for Drug Metabolism and Therapeutics. Med. Microecol. 2025;25:100139. doi: 10.1016/j.medmic.2025.100139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rzeczycki P., Pęciak O., Plust M., Droździk M. Gut Microbiota in the Regulation of Intestinal Drug Transporters: Molecular Mechanisms and Pharmacokinetic Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:11897. doi: 10.3390/ijms262411897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tanes C., Hu W., Friedman E., Hecht A., Daniel S., Clish C., Lewis J.D., Wu G.D., Bittinger K. Distinguishing Diet- and Microbe-Derived Metabolites in the Human Gut. Microbiome. 2025;13:206. doi: 10.1186/s40168-025-02258-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li F., You D., Li Y., Wang X., Lin Z., Shi X., Li Z., Wu J., Liu Z. Multi-Omics Integration Reveals Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Metabolic Alterations of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Children with Epilepsy. Front. Microbiol. 2025;16:1630062. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1630062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Martinelli F., Heinken A., Henning A.-K., Ulmer M.A., Hensen T., González A., Arnold M., Asthana S., Budde K., Engelman C.D., et al. Whole-Body Metabolic Modelling Reveals Microbiome and Genomic Interactions on Reduced Urine Formate Levels in Alzheimer’s Disease. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:6095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55960-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rykalo N., Riehl L., Kress M. The Gut Microbiome and the Brain. Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care. 2024;18:282–291. doi: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cryan J.F. Microbiome and Brain Development: A Tale of Two Systems. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2025;81:34–46. doi: 10.1159/000544950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zheng D., Liwinski T., Elinav E. Interaction between Microbiota and Immunity in Health and Disease. Cell Res. 2020;30:492–506. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sepich-Poore G.D., Zitvogel L., Straussman R., Hasty J., Wargo J.A., Knight R. The Microbiome and Human Cancer. Science. 2021;371:eabc4552. doi: 10.1126/science.abc4552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ma Z., Zuo T., Frey N., Rangrez A.Y. A Systematic Framework for Understanding the Microbiome in Human Health and Disease: From Basic Principles to Clinical Translation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024;9:237. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01946-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yadav M., Chauhan N.S. Role of Gut-Microbiota in Disease Severity and Clinical Outcomes. Brief. Funct. Genom. 2024;23:24–37. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elac037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhang Y., Zhang X., Chen D., Lu J., Gong Q., Fang J., Jiang J. Causal Associations between Gut Microbiome and Cardiovascular Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;9:971376. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.971376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lin L., Xiang S., Chen Y., Liu Y., Shen D., Yu X., Wu Z., Sun Y., Chen K., Luo J., et al. Gut Microbiota: Implications in Pathogenesis and Therapy to Cardiovascular Disease (Review) Exp. Ther. Med. 2024;28:427. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Socała K., Doboszewska U., Szopa A., Serefko A., Włodarczyk M., Zielińska A., Poleszak E., Fichna J., Wlaź P. The Role of Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Neuropsychiatric and Neurological Disorders. Pharmacol. Res. 2021;172:105840. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dziedziak M., Mytych A., Szyller H.P., Lasocka M., Augustynowicz G., Szydziak J., Hrapkowicz A., Dyda M., Braksator J., Pytrus T. Gut Microbiota in Psychiatric and Neurological Disorders: Current Insights and Therapeutic Implications. Biomedicines. 2025;13:2104. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13092104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wu K., Luo Q., Liu Y., Li A., Xia D., Sun X. Causal Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Diseases: A Mendelian Randomization Study. J. Transl. Med. 2024;22:92. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04894-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jiang L., Fan J.-G. Gut Microbiota in Gastrointestinal Diseases: Insights and Therapeutic Strategies. World J. Gastroenterol. 2024;30:4329–4332. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i39.4329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wu S., Yuan C., Yang Z., Liu S., Zhang Q., Zhang S., Zhu S. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Is Associated with Increased Risk of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study. BMC Med. 2022;20:262. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02460-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Núñez Figueroa P., Castro F., Mezzano G., Quera R., Diaz D., Castro L. Hepatobiliar Manifestations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Practical Approach. World J. Hepatol. 2022;14:319–337. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i2.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Verhaar B.J.H., Prodan A., Nieuwdorp M., Muller M. Gut Microbiota in Hypertension and Atherosclerosis: A Review. Nutrients. 2020;12:2982. doi: 10.3390/nu12102982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yafarova A.A., Dementeva E.V., Zlobovskaya O.A., Sheptulina A.F., Lopatukhina E.V., Timofeev Y.S., Glazunova E.V., Lyundup A.V., Doludin Y.V., Kiselev A.R., et al. Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Alterations Associated with Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:11295. doi: 10.3390/ijms252011295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Marbet L., Gujer E., Münger M.H., Killian M.P., Mauracher A.A., Soomann M., Trück J., Pachlopnik Schmid J. Allergic Manifestations in Inborn Errors of Immunity: A Systematic Scoping Review. Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1666600. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1666600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gohal G., Moni S.S., Bakkari M.A., Elmobark M.E. A Review on Asthma and Allergy: Current Understanding on Molecular Perspectives. J. Clin. Med. 2024;13:5775. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zhan T., Betge J., Schulte N., Dreikhausen L., Hirth M., Li M., Weidner P., Leipertz A., Teufel A., Ebert M.P. Digestive Cancers: Mechanisms, Therapeutics and Management. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2025;10:24. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-02097-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.McSween Z., Antoine-Pepeljugoski C., Komorowski A., King D., Tchelebi L. Advancing Gastrointestinal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: A Narrative Review of Circulating Tumor DNA in Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Transl. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2026;11:32. doi: 10.21037/tgh-25-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mogoş G.F.R., Manciulea (Profir) M., Enache R.-M., Pavelescu L.A., Popescu (Roşu) O.A., Cretoiu S.M., Marinescu I. Intestinal Microbiota in Early Life: Latest Findings Regarding the Role of Probiotics as a Treatment Approach for Dysbiosis. Nutrients. 2025;17:2071. doi: 10.3390/nu17132071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Al Mamun M.A., Rakib A., Mandal M., Singh U.P. Impact of a High-Fat Diet on the Gut Microbiome: A Comprehensive Study of Microbial and Metabolite Shifts During Obesity. Cells. 2025;14:463. doi: 10.3390/cells14060463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Neag M.A., Moacă L.-Ștefan, Deac A.-L., Măgureanu D.C., Vulturar D.-M., Todea D.A., Gherman D., Buzoianu A.D., Gherman C.D., Militaru F.C. The Role of the Gut Microbiota in Vascular Physiology and Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:11553. doi: 10.3390/ijms262311553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Galasso L., Termite F., Mignini I., Esposto G., Borriello R., Vitale F., Nicoletti A., Paratore M., Ainora M.E., Gasbarrini A., et al. Unraveling the Role of Fusobacterium nucleatum in Colorectal Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Pathogenic Insights. Cancers. 2025;17:368. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Clay S.L., Fonseca-Pereira D., Garrett W.S. Colorectal Cancer: The Facts in the Case of the Microbiota. J. Clin. Investig. 2022;132:e155101. doi: 10.1172/jci155101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mitea G., Iancu I.M., Schröder V., Roșca A.C., Iancu V., Crețu R.-M., Mireșan H. Therapeutic Potential of Prunus Species in Gastrointestinal Oncology. Cancers. 2025;17:938. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Chen Y., Fang Y., Lyu Z., Tian Y., Niu S., Li Y.-R., Yang L. Microbiome Modulation of Tumorigenesis and Immune Responses. J. Biomed. Sci. 2026;33:4. doi: 10.1186/s12929-025-01208-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Farhadi Rad H., Tahmasebi H., Javani S., Hemati M., Zakerhamidi D., Hosseini M., Alibabaei F., Banihashemian S.Z., Oksenych V., Eslami M. Microbiota and Cytokine Modulation: Innovations in Enhancing Anticancer Immunity and Personalized Cancer Therapies. Biomedicines. 2024;12:2776. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Dikeocha I.J., Al-Kabsi A.M., Miftahussurur M., Alshawsh M.A. Pharmacomicrobiomics: Influence of Gut Microbiota on Drug and Xenobiotic Metabolism. FASEB J. 2022;36:e22350. doi: 10.1096/fj.202101986r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Huang C., Feng S., Huo F., Liu H. Effects of Four Antibiotics on the Diversity of the Intestinal Microbiota. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022;10:e0190421. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01904-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Tan J., Gong J., Liu F., Li B., Li Z., You J., He J., Wu S. Evaluation of an Antibiotic Cocktail for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Mouse. Front. Nutr. 2022;9:918098. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.918098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Scarpellini E., Rinninella E. Gut Microbiota According to the Metabolome. Nutrients. 2023;15:4768. doi: 10.3390/nu15224768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Muller E., Algavi Y.M., Borenstein E. A Meta-Analysis Study of the Robustness and Universality of Gut Microbiome-Metabolome Associations. Microbiome. 2021;9:203. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01149-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Larsson A., Ericson U., Jönsson D., Miari M., Athanasiadis P., Baldanzi G., Brunkwall L., Hellstrand S., Klinge B., Melander O., et al. New Connections of Medication Use and Polypharmacy with the Gut Microbiota Composition and Functional Potential in a Large Population. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:23723. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71571-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Nagata N., Nishijima S., Miyoshi-Akiyama T., Kojima Y., Kimura M., Aoki R., Ohsugi M., Ueki K., Miki K., Iwata E., et al. Population-Level Metagenomics Uncovers Distinct Effects of Multiple Medications on the Human Gut Microbiome. Gastroenterology. 2022;163:1038–1052. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Jung C., Park S., Kim H. Concomitant Use of Metformin and Proton Pump Inhibitors Increases Vitamin B12 Deficiency Risk in Type 2 Diabetes. J. Diabetes Investig. 2025;16:1020–1027. doi: 10.1111/jdi.70037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Andrawes M., Andrawes W., Das A., Siau K. Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)—An Evidence-Based Review of Indications, Efficacy, Harms, and Deprescribing. Medicina. 2025;61:1569. doi: 10.3390/medicina61091569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Delanote J., Correa Rojo A., Wells P.M., Steves C.J., Ertaylan G. Systematic Identification of the Role of Gut Microbiota in Mental Disorders: A TwinsUK Cohort Study. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:3626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53929-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Vich Vila A., Collij V., Sanna S., Sinha T., Imhann F., Bourgonje A.R., Mujagic Z., Jonkers D.M.A.E., Masclee A.A.M., Fu J., et al. Impact of Commonly Used Drugs on the Composition and Metabolic Function of the Gut Microbiota. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:362. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14177-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Nel Van Zyl K., Matukane S.R., Hamman B.L., Whitelaw A.C., Newton-Foot M. Effect of Antibiotics on the Human Microbiome: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2022;59:106502. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Lathakumari R.H., Vajravelu L.K., Satheesan A., Ravi S., Thulukanam J. Antibiotics and the Gut Microbiome: Understanding the Impact on Human Health. Med. Microecol. 2024;20:100106. doi: 10.1016/j.medmic.2024.100106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Cusumano G., Flores G.A., Venanzoni R., Angelini P. The Impact of Antibiotic Therapy on Intestinal Microbiota: Dysbiosis, Antibiotic Resistance, and Restoration Strategies. Antibiotics. 2025;14:371. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14040371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Xie H., Yu S., Tang M., Xun Y., Shen Q., Wu G. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Interaction with Intestinal Barriers and Microbiota-Targeted Treatment Options. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2025;15:1608025. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1608025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Zhang C., Wang Y., Cheng L., Cao X., Liu C. Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Its Influence on Tumor Immune Surveillance and Therapeutic Response. Front. Oncol. 2025;15:1557959. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1557959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Seekatz A.M., Safdar N., Khanna S. The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Colonization Resistance and Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2022;15:17562848221134396. doi: 10.1177/17562848221134396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Chen Y., Xiao L., Zhou M., Zhang H. The Microbiota: A Crucial Mediator in Gut Homeostasis and Colonization Resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2024;15:1417864. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1417864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Elhenawy W., Tsai C.N., Coombes B.K. Host-Specific Adaptive Diversification of Crohn’s Disease-Associated Adherent-Invasive Escherichia coli. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:301–312.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Chervy M., Barnich N., Denizot J. Adherent-Invasive E. coli: Update on the Lifestyle of a Troublemaker in Crohn’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:3734. doi: 10.3390/ijms21103734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Vich Vila A., Imhann F., Collij V., Jankipersadsing S.A., Gurry T., Mujagic Z., Kurilshikov A., Bonder M.J., Jiang X., Tigchelaar E.F., et al. Gut Microbiota Composition and Functional Changes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018;10:eaap8914. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aap8914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Bajaj A., Markandey M., Kedia S., Ahuja V. Gut Bacteriome in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Update on Recent Advances. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 2024;43:103–111. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01541-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Li X., Yuan Q., Huang H., Wang L. Gut Microbiota in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Narrative Review of Mechanisms and Microbiome-Based Therapies. Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1695321. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1695321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Duan R., Zhu S., Wang B., Duan L. Alterations of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome Based on 16S RRNA-Targeted Sequencing: A Systematic Review. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2019;10:e00012. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Squillario M., Bonaretti C., La Valle A., Di Marco E., Piccolo G., Minuto N., Patti G., Napoli F., Bassi M., Maghnie M., et al. Gut-Microbiota in Children and Adolescents with Obesity: Inferred Functional Analysis and Machine-Learning Algorithms to Classify Microorganisms. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:11294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36533-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Magne F., Gotteland M., Gauthier L., Zazueta A., Pesoa S., Navarrete P., Balamurugan R. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio: A Relevant Marker of Gut Dysbiosis in Obese Patients? Nutrients. 2020;12:1474. doi: 10.3390/nu12051474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Borrego-Ruiz A., Borrego J.J. The Gut Microbiome in Human Obesity: A Comprehensive Review. Biomedicines. 2025;13:2173. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13092173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Jie Z., Xia H., Zhong S.-L., Feng Q., Li S., Liang S., Zhong H., Liu Z., Gao Y., Zhao H., et al. The Gut Microbiome in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:845. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00900-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.He J.H., Wang H., Qiu E., Qi Q., Wang Z. Gut Microbiota and Atherosclerosis: Integrative Multi-Omics and Mechanistic Insights. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2025;28:1. doi: 10.1007/s11883-025-01371-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Farnetano M., Carucci L., Coppola S., Oglio F., Masino A., Cozzolino M., Nocerino R., Berni Canani R. Gut Microbiome Features in Pediatric Food Allergy: A Scoping Review. Front. Allergy. 2024;5:1438252. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1438252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Tun H.M., Peng Y., Chen B., Konya T.B., Morales-Lizcano N., Chari R., Field C.J., Guttman D.S., Becker A.B., Mandhane P.J., et al. Ethnicity Associations with Food Sensitization Are Mediated by Gut Microbiota Development in the First Year of Life. Gastroenterology. 2021;161:94–106. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Melli L.C.F.L., do Carmo-Rodrigues M.S., Araújo-Filho H.B., Solé D., de Morais M.B. Intestinal Microbiota and Allergic Diseases: A Systematic Review. Allergol. Immunopathol. 2016;44:177–188. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2015.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Ke H., Yao H., Wei P. Advances in Research on Gut Microbiota and Allergic Diseases in Children. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2025;8:100362. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Hesser L.A., Puente A.A., Arnold J., Ionescu E., Mirmira A., Talasani N., Lopez J., Maccio-Maretto L., Mimee M., Nagler C.R. A Synbiotic of Anaerostipes caccae and Lactulose Prevents and Treats Food Allergy in Mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2024;32:1163–1176.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2024.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Mareș R.C., Săsăran M.O., Mărginean C.O. Gut Microbiota and Food Allergy: A Review of Mechanisms and Microbiota-Targeted Interventions. Nutrients. 2025;17:3009. doi: 10.3390/nu17183009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Jung J.H., Kim G., Byun M.S., Lee J.H., Yi D., Park H., Lee D.Y. Gut Microbiome Alterations in Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0278276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hu C., Shen H. Microbes in Health and Disease: Human Gut Microbiota. Appl. Sci. 2024;14:11354. doi: 10.3390/app142311354. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Caradonna E., Nemni R., Bifone A., Gandolfo P., Costantino L., Giordano L., Mormone E., Macula A., Cuomo M., Difruscolo R., et al. The Brain–Gut Axis, an Important Player in Alzheimer and Parkinson Disease: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024;13:4130. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Chang P.V. Microbial Metabolite-Receptor Interactions in the Gut Microbiome. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2024;83:102539. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2024.102539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Yu S., Zhang M., Dou Z., Tian B., Lu J. Gut Microbiota Metabolites in the Immunoregulation of Enteritis: Research Progress. Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1706472. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1706472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Sie C., Tropini C. Microbial Regulation of Stress-Associated Signaling Molecules and Its Role in Health and Disease. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2026;12:65. doi: 10.1038/s41522-026-00932-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Kelly S.L., Kelly D.E. Microbial Cytochromes P450: Biodiversity and Biotechnology. Where do Cytochromes P450 come from, what do they do and what can they do for us? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013;368:20120476. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Boccuto L., Tack J., Ianiro G., Abenavoli L., Scarpellini E. Human Genes Involved in the Interaction between Host and Gut Microbiome: Regulation and Pathogenic Mechanisms. Genes. 2023;14:857. doi: 10.3390/genes14040857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Obata Y., Furusawa Y., Hase K. Epigenetic Modifications of the Immune System in Health and Disease. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2015;93:226–232. doi: 10.1038/icb.2014.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Levy M., Thaiss C.A., Elinav E. Metagenomic Cross-Talk: The Regulatory Interplay between Immunogenomics and the Microbiome. Genome Med. 2015;7:120. doi: 10.1186/s13073-015-0249-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Vázquez-Baeza Y., Callewaert C., Debelius J., Hyde E., Marotz C., Morton J.T., Swafford A., Vrbanac A., Dorrestein P.C., Knight R. Impacts of the Human Gut Microbiome on Therapeutics. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2018;58:253–270. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-042017-031849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Bankole T., Li Y. The Early-Life Gut Microbiome in Common Pediatric Diseases: Roles and Therapeutic Implications. Front. Nutr. 2025;12:1597206. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1597206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.O’Riordan K.J., Moloney G.M., Keane L., Clarke G., Cryan J.F. The Gut Microbiota-Immune-Brain Axis: Therapeutic Implications. Cell Rep. Med. 2025;6:101982. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.101982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Stolfi C., Maresca C., Monteleone G., Laudisi F. Implication of Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction in Gut Dysbiosis and Diseases. Biomedicines. 2022;10:289. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10020289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.McCarville J.L., Chen G.Y., Cuevas V.D., Troha K., Ayres J.S. Microbiota Metabolites in Health and Disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2020;38:147–170. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-071219-125715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Ramaroson M.-L., Koutouan C., Helesbeux J.-J., Le Clerc V., Hamama L., Geoffriau E., Briard M. Role of Phenylpropanoids and Flavonoids in Plant Resistance to Pests and Diseases. Molecules. 2022;27:8371. doi: 10.3390/molecules27238371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Alharbi N.A. Polyphenol Metabolites in Fermented Foods: Biotransformation, Bioavailability, and Functional Roles. Front. Nutr. 2026;13:1767453. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1767453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Xiong H.-H., Lin S.-Y., Chen L.-L., Ouyang K.-H., Wang W.-J. The Interaction between Flavonoids and Intestinal Microbes: A Review. Foods. 2023;12:320. doi: 10.3390/foods12020320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Li Z., Kanwal R., Yue X., Li M., Xie A. Polyphenols and Intestinal Microorganisms: A Review of Their Interactions and Effects on Human Health. Food Biosci. 2024;62:105220. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.105220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Pan L., Ye H., Pi X., Liu W., Wang Z., Zhang Y., Zheng J. Effects of Several Flavonoids on Human Gut Microbiota and Its Metabolism by in Vitro Simulated Fermentation. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14:1092729. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1092729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Liu X., Alharbi A., Gibson R., Rodriguez-Mateos A. (Poly)Phenol-Gut Microbiota Interactions and Their Impact on Human Health. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2025;28:316–322. doi: 10.1097/mco.0000000000001132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Mao T., Zhang Y., Kaushik R., Mohan M.S. Effects of Polyphenols on Gut Microbiota and Inflammatory Markers in Individuals with Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025;65:6158–6175. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2024.2436644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Mahdi L., Graziani A., Baffy G., Mitten E.K., Portincasa P., Khalil M. Unlocking Polyphenol Efficacy: The Role of Gut Microbiota in Modulating Bioavailability and Health Effects. Nutrients. 2025;17:2793. doi: 10.3390/nu17172793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Catalkaya G., Venema K., Lucini L., Rocchetti G., Delmas D., Daglia M., De Filippis A., Xiao H., Quiles J.L., Xiao J., et al. Interaction of Dietary Polyphenols and Gut Microbiota: Microbial Metabolism of Polyphenols, Influence on the Gut Microbiota, and Implications on Host Health. Food Front. 2020;1:109–133. doi: 10.1002/fft2.25. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.González-Gómez Á., Cantone M., García-Muñoz A.M., Victoria-Montesinos D., Lucas-Abellán C., Serrano-Martínez A., Muñoz-Morillas A.M., Morillas-Ruiz J.M. Effect of Polyphenol-Rich Interventions on Gut Microbiota and Inflammatory or Oxidative Stress Markers in Adults Who Are Overweight or Obese: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2025;17:2468. doi: 10.3390/nu17152468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Qi Y., Li J., Tang Y., Cao R., Gao Y., Xu Q., Han Y. Total Alkaloids of Rhizoma Corydalis Regulates Gut Microbiota and Restores Gut Immune Barrier to Ameliorate Cognitive Dysfunction in Diabetic Rats. Front. Microbiol. 2024;15:1456406. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1456406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Duda-Madej A., Gagat P., Wiśniewski J., Viscardi S., Krzyżek P. Impact of Isoquinoline Alkaloids on the Intestinal Barrier in a Colonic Model of Campylobacter jejuni Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:10634. doi: 10.3390/ijms262110634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Cheng H., Zhang D., Wu J., Liu J., Zhou Y., Tan Y., Feng W., Peng C. Interactions between Gut Microbiota and Polyphenols: A Mechanistic and Metabolomic Review. Phytomedicine. 2023;119:154979. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Karim M.R., Iqbal S., Mohammad S., Lee J.H., Jung D., Mathiyalagan R., Yang D.-C., Yang D.U., Kang S.C. A Review on Impact of Dietary Interventions, Drugs, and Traditional Herbal Supplements on the Gut Microbiome. Microbiol. Res. 2023;271:127346. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2023.127346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Fan Y., Liu Y., Shao C., Jiang C., Wu L., Xiao J., Tang L. Gut Microbiota-Targeted Therapeutics for Metabolic Disorders: Mechanistic Insights into the Synergy of Probiotic-Fermented Herbal Bioactives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:5486. doi: 10.3390/ijms26125486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Cheng H., Liu J., Tan Y., Feng W., Peng C. Interactions between Gut Microbiota and Berberine, a Necessary Procedure to Understand the Mechanisms of Berberine. J. Pharm. Anal. 2022;12:541–555. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2021.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Zhang L., Wu X., Yang R., Chen F., Liao Y., Zhu Z., Wu Z., Sun X., Wang L. Effects of Berberine on the Gastrointestinal Microbiota. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;10:588517. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.588517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Zhu J., He L. The Modulatory Effects of Curcumin on the Gut Microbiota: A Potential Strategy for Disease Treatment and Health Promotion. Microorganisms. 2024;12:642. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12040642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Alshuniaber M.A., Krishnamoorthy R., AlQhtani W.H. Antimicrobial Activity of Polyphenolic Compounds from Spirulina against Food-Borne Bacterial Pathogens. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021;28:459–464. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Elwakil B.H., Eskandrani A., El-Kady H., Shahin Y.H., Awaad A.K. Spirulina platensis as a Super Prebiotic to Enhance the Antibacterial Effect of Lactobacillus casei. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2024;173:417–429. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2024.08.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Baky M.H., Elshahed M., Wessjohann L., Farag M.A. Interactions between Dietary Flavonoids and the Gut Microbiome: A Comprehensive Review. Br. J. Nutr. 2022;128:577–591. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521003627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Larabi A.B., Masson H.L.P., Bäumler A.J. Bile Acids as Modulators of Gut Microbiota Composition and Function. Gut Microbes. 2023;15:2172671. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2172671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Kuwahara A. Chemical Recognition of Phytochemicals and Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in the Gut and Implication for Physiological Function in the Body. Biomed. Res. 2025;46:233–241. doi: 10.2220/biomedres.46.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Martin-Gallausiaux C., Marinelli L., Blottière H.M., Larraufie P., Lapaque N. SCFA: Mechanisms and Functional Importance in the Gut. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2021;80:37–49. doi: 10.1017/S0029665120006916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Kotlo K., Anbazhagan A.N., Priyamvada S., Jayawardena D., Kumar A., Chen Y., Xia Y., Finn P.W., Perkins D.L., Dudeja P.K., et al. The Olfactory G Protein-Coupled Receptor (Olfr-78/OR51E2) Modulates the Intestinal Response to Colitis. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2020;318:C502–C513. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00454.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Anjom-Shoae J., Veedfald S., Conigrave A.D., Horowitz M., Feinle-Bisset C. Calcium-Sensing Receptor Regulation of Gastrointestinal Hormone Secretion. Endocr. Rev. 2025;47:264–279. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnaf040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Aleti G., Troyer E.A., Hong S. G Protein-Coupled Receptors: A Target for Microbial Metabolites and a Mechanistic Link to Microbiome-Immune-Brain Interactions. Brain Behav. Immun. Health. 2023;32:100671. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2023.100671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Anachad O., Taouil A., Taha W., Bennis F., Chegdani F. The Implication of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Obesity and Diabetes. Microbiol. Insights. 2023;16:11786361231162720. doi: 10.1177/11786361231162720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.May K.S., den Hartigh L.J. Gut Microbial-Derived Short Chain Fatty Acids: Impact on Adipose Tissue Physiology. Nutrients. 2023;15:272. doi: 10.3390/nu15020272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Eshleman E.M., Alenghat T. Epithelial Sensing of Microbiota-Derived Signals. Genes Immun. 2021;22:237–246. doi: 10.1038/s41435-021-00124-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Howitt M.R., Cao Y.G., Gologorsky M.B., Li J.A., Haber A.L., Biton M., Lang J., Michaud M., Regev A., Garrett W.S. The Taste Receptor TAS1R3 Regulates Small Intestinal Tuft Cell Homeostasis. Immunohorizons. 2020;4:23–32. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.1900099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Yüksel E., Voragen A.G.J., Kort R. The Pectin Metabolizing Capacity of the Human Gut Microbiota. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025;65:4823–4845. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2024.2400235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Zhou A., Zhang N., Dong H., Huang Y., Xie L. Fermented Food–Polysaccharides as Gut Health Regulators: Sources, Optimization, Structural Characteristics and Mechanism. Foods. 2025;14:4108. doi: 10.3390/foods14234108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Fernandez-Julia P., Commane D.M., van Sinderen D., Munoz-Munoz J. Cross-Feeding Interactions between Human Gut Commensals Belonging to the Bacteroides and Bifidobacterium Genera When Grown on Dietary Glycans. Microbiome Res. Rep. 2022;1:12. doi: 10.20517/mrr.2021.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Vega-Sagardía M., Delgado J., Ruiz-Moyano S., Garrido D. Proteomic Analyses of Bacteroides ovatus and Bifidobacterium longum in Xylan Bidirectional Culture Shows Sugar Cross-Feeding Interactions. Food Res. Int. 2023;170:113025. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Nogueira-Prieto N.-M., Ansín-Vallejo C., Becerra-Fernández M., González-Siso M.-I. A Review of the Capacity of Xylooligosaccharides to Modulate Gut Microbiota and Promote Health. Food Funct. 2025;16:4654–4672. doi: 10.1039/d5fo00169b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Sastre D.E., Sultana N., V. A. S. Navarro M., Huliciak M., Du J., Cifuente J.O., Flowers M., Liu X., Lollar P., Trastoy B., et al. Human Gut Microbes Express Functionally Distinct Endoglycosidases to Metabolize the same N-Glycan Substrate. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:5123. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48802-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Song G., Xie Y., Yi L., Cheng W., Jia H., Shi W., Liu Q., Fang L., Xue S., Liu D., et al. Bile Acids Affect Intestinal Barrier Function through FXR and TGR5. Front. Med. 2025;12:1607899. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1607899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Zangerolamo L., Carvalho M., Barbosa H.C.L. The Critical Role of the Bile Acid Receptor TGR5 in Energy Homeostasis: Insights into Physiology and Therapeutic Potential. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:6547. doi: 10.3390/ijms26146547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Kang S., Jeong D.-Y., Seo J., Daily J.W., Park S. Microbiota-Mediated Bile Acid Metabolism as a Mechanistic Framework for Precision Nutrition in Gastrointestinal and Metabolic Diseases. Cells. 2025;15:23. doi: 10.3390/cells15010023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Tuerhongjiang G., Li Y., Meng Z., Gao X., Wei Y., Muhetaer G., Li P., Zhang Y., Zhang J., Wu Y., et al. Deoxycholic Acid Ameliorates Obesity and Insulin Resistance by Enhancing Lipolysis and Thermogenesis. Lipids Health Dis. 2025;24:70. doi: 10.1186/s12944-025-02485-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Hou Y., Li J., Ying S. Tryptophan Metabolism and Gut Microbiota: A Novel Regulatory Axis Integrating the Microbiome, Immunity, and Cancer. Metabolites. 2023;13:1166. doi: 10.3390/metabo13111166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Sinha A.K., Laursen M.F., Brinck J.E., Rybtke M.L., Hjørne A.P., Procházková N., Pedersen M., Roager H.M., Licht T.R. Dietary Fibre Directs Microbial Tryptophan Metabolism via Metabolic Interactions in the Gut Microbiota. Nat. Microbiol. 2024;9:1964–1978. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01737-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Marafini I., Monteleone I., Laudisi F., Monteleone G. Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signalling in the Control of Gut Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:4527. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Kang H., Chen Z., Wang B., Chen Z. The AhR/IL-22 Axis in Chronic Gut Inflammation: Unraveling Mechanisms and Therapeutic Prospects. Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1668173. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1668173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Bhattarai Y., Williams B.B., Battaglioli E.J., Whitaker W.R., Till L., Grover M., Linden D.R., Akiba Y., Kandimalla K.K., Zachos N.C., et al. Gut Microbiota-Produced Tryptamine Activates an Epithelial G-Protein-Coupled Receptor to Increase Colonic Secretion. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:775–785.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Legan T.B., Lavoie B., Mawe G.M. Direct and Indirect Mechanisms by Which the Gut Microbiota Influence Host Serotonin Systems. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2022;34:e14346. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Mann E.R., Lam Y.K., Uhlig H.H. Short-Chain Fatty Acids: Linking Diet, the Microbiome and Immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2024;24:577–595. doi: 10.1038/s41577-024-01014-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Owe-Larsson M., Drobek D., Iwaniak P., Kloc R., Urbanska E.M., Chwil M. Microbiota-Derived Tryptophan Metabolite Indole-3-Propionic Acid-Emerging Role in Neuroprotection. Molecules. 2025;30:3628. doi: 10.3390/molecules30173628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Shen X., Li Y., Wang D., Sun K. The Gut Microbiota and Its Metabolites: Novel Therapeutic Targets for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1690279. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1690279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Romaní-Pérez M., Líebana-García R., Flor-Duro A., Bonillo-Jiménez D., Bullich-Vilarrubias C., Olivares M., Sanz Y. Obesity and the Gut Microbiota: Implications of Neuroendocrine and Immune Signaling. FEBS J. 2025;292:1397–1420. doi: 10.1111/febs.17249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Su Q., Liu Q. Factors Affecting Gut Microbiome in Daily Diet. Front. Nutr. 2021;8:218. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.644138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Mostafavi Abdolmaleky H., Zhou J.R. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis, Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Epigenetic Alterations in Metabolic Diseases. Antioxidants. 2024;13:985. doi: 10.3390/antiox13080985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Brown E.M., Clardy J., Xavier R.J. Gut Microbiome Lipid Metabolism and Its Impact on Host Physiology. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31:173–186. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Bajinka O., Tan Y., Abdelhalim K.A., Özdemir G., Qiu X. Extrinsic Factors Influencing Gut Microbes, the Immediate Consequences and Restoring Eubiosis. AMB Express. 2020;10:130. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01066-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Campaniello D., Corbo M.R., Sinigaglia M., Speranza B., Racioppo A., Altieri C., Bevilacqua A. How Diet and Physical Activity Modulate Gut Microbiota: Evidence, and Perspectives. Nutrients. 2022;14:2456. doi: 10.3390/nu14122456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Wang L., Gou X., Ding Y., Liu J., Wang Y., Wang Y., Zhang J., Du L., Peng W., Fan G. The Interplay between Herbal Medicines and Gut Microbiota in Metabolic Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2023;14:1105405. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1105405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Ross F.C., Patangia D., Grimaud G., Lavelle A., Dempsey E.M., Ross R.P., Stanton C. The Interplay between Diet and the Gut Microbiome: Implications for Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024;22:671–686. doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01068-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.van der Hee B., Wells J.M. Microbial Regulation of Host Physiology by Short-Chain Fatty Acids. Trends Microbiol. 2021;29:700–712. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Perler B.K., Friedman E.S., Wu G.D. The Role of the Gut Microbiota in the Relationship Between Diet and Human Health. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2023;85:449–468. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-031522-092054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Merra G., Noce A., Marrone G., Cintoni M., Tarsitano M.G., Capacci A., De Lorenzo A. Influence of Mediterranean Diet on Human Gut Microbiota. Nutrients. 2021;13:7. doi: 10.3390/nu13010007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Karahan F. Environmental Factors Affecting the Gut Microbiota and Their Consequences. Nat. Cell Sci. 2024;2:133–140. doi: 10.61474/ncs.2024.00009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Rinninella E., Tohumcu E., Raoul P., Fiorani M., Cintoni M., Mele M.C., Cammarota G., Gasbarrini A., Ianiro G. The Role of Diet in Shaping Human Gut Microbiota. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2023;62–63:101828. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Liang L., Saunders C., Sanossian N. Food, Gut Barrier Dysfunction, and Related Diseases: A New Target for Future Individualized Disease Prevention and Management. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023;11:1671–1704. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Gundogdu A., Nalbantoglu O.U. The Role of the Mediterranean Diet in Modulating the Gut Microbiome: A Review of Current Evidence. Nutrition. 2023;114:112118. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Sakkas H., Bozidis P., Touzios C., Kolios D., Athanasiou G., Athanasopoulou E., Gerou I., Gartzonika C. Nutritional Status and the Influence of the Vegan Diet on the Gut Microbiota and Human Health. Medicina. 2020;56:88. doi: 10.3390/medicina56020088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Martinez J.E., Kahana D.D., Ghuman S., Wilson H.P., Wilson J., Kim S.C.J., Lagishetty V., Jacobs J.P., Sinha-Hikim A.P., Friedman T.C. Unhealthy Lifestyle and Gut Dysbiosis: A Better Understanding of the Effects of Poor Diet and Nicotine on the Intestinal Microbiome. Front. Endocrinol. 2021;12:667066. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.667066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Santangelo A., Corsello A., Spolidoro G.C.I., Trovato C.M., Agostoni C., Orsini A., Milani G.P., Peroni D.G. The Influence of Ketogenic Diet on Gut Microbiota: Potential Benefits, Risks and Indications. Nutrients. 2023;15:3680. doi: 10.3390/nu15173680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Rew L., Harris M.D., Goldie J. The Ketogenic Diet: Its Impact on Human Gut Microbiota and Potential Consequent Health Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench. 2022;15:326–342. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v15i4.2600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Delmas E., Bingula R., Del’homme C., Meunier N., Caille A., Lyon-Belgy N., Richard R., Do Couto M.G., Wittrant Y., Bernalier-Donadille A. A Low-Gluten Diet Reduces the Abundance of Potentially Beneficial Bacteria in Healthy Adult Gut Microbiota. Nutrients. 2025;17:2389. doi: 10.3390/nu17152389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.O’Keefe S.J.D. Diet, Microorganisms and Their Metabolites, and Colon Cancer. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016;13:691–706. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Zhang P., Jiang G., Wang Y., Yan E., He L., Guo J., Yin J., Zhang X. Maternal Consumption of L-Malic Acid Enriched Diets Improves Antioxidant Capacity and Glucose Metabolism in Offspring by Regulating the Gut Microbiota. Redox Biol. 2023;67:102889. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Haiser H.J., Gootenberg D.B., Chatman K., Sirasani G., Balskus E.P., Turnbaugh P.J. Predicting and Manipulating Cardiac Drug Inactivation by the Human Gut Bacterium Eggerthella lenta. Science. 2013;341:295–298. doi: 10.1126/science.1235872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Eroglu A., Al’Abri I.S., Kopec R.E., Crook N., Bohn T. Carotenoids and Their Health Benefits as Derived via Their Interactions with Gut Microbiota. Adv. Nutr. 2023;14:238–255. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2022.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Sallam I.E., Abdelwareth A., Attia H., Aziz R.K., Homsi M.N., von Bergen M., Farag M.A. Effect of Gut Microbiota Biotransformation on Dietary Tannins and Human Health Implications. Microorganisms. 2021;9:965. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9050965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Li S., Zhang Z., Luo L., Zhang Y., Huang K., Guan X. Millet Quinic Acid Relieves Colitis by Regulating Gut Microbiota and Inhibiting MyD88/NF-ΚB Signaling Pathway. Foods. 2025;14:2267. doi: 10.3390/foods14132267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.González S., Salazar N., Ruiz-Saavedra S., Gómez-Martín M., de los Reyes-Gavilán C.G., Gueimonde M. Long-Term Coffee Consumption Is Associated with Fecal Microbial Composition in Humans. Nutrients. 2020;12:1287. doi: 10.3390/nu12051287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Boscaini S., Bastiaanssen T.F.S., Moloney G.M., Bergamo F., Zeraik L., O’Leary C., Ferri A., Irfan M., van der Rhee M., Lindemann T.I.F., et al. Habitual Coffee Intake Shapes the Gut Microbiome and Modifies Host Physiology and Cognition. Nat. Commun. 2026;17:3439. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-71264-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Cowan T.E., Palmnäs M.S.A., Yang J., Bomhof M.R., Ardell K.L., Reimer R.A., Vogel H.J., Shearer J. Chronic Coffee Consumption in the Diet-Induced Obese Rat: Impact on Gut Microbiota and Serum Metabolomics. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2014;25:489–495. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Lew T., Fleming K.J. Phytoncides and Immunity from Forest to Facility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pharmacol. Res.—Nat. Prod. 2024;4:100061. doi: 10.1016/j.prenap.2024.100061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Nijveldt R.J., van Nood E., van Hoorn D.E., Boelens P.G., van Norren K., van Leeuwen P.A. Flavonoids: A Review of Probable Mechanisms of Action and Potential Applications. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001;74:418–425. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/74.4.418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Verediano T.A., Stampini Duarte Martino H., Dias Paes M.C., Tako E. Effects of Anthocyanin on Intestinal Health: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2021;13:1331. doi: 10.3390/nu13041331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Wang L., Zhang Y., Fan G., Ren J., Zhang L., Pan S. Effects of Orange Essential Oil on Intestinal Microflora in Mice. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019;99:4019–4028. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Wen Q., Yu S., Wang S., Qin Y., Xia Q., Wang S., Chen G., Shen C., Song S. Impact of Intestinal Microbiota on Metabolic Toxicity and Potential Detoxification of Amygdalin. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:1030516. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1030516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Chai W., Ou-Yang C., Ma Z., Song S., Huang Q., Wei Q., Peng Y. Anti-α-Glucosidase and Antityrosinase Activity of Condensed Tannins from the Bark of Clausena lansium (Lour.) Skeels with Antiproliferative and Apoptotic Properties in B16 Mouse Melanoma Cells. Process Biochem. 2019;86:205–214. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2019.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Toderescu C.D., Parveen M., Trifunschi S., Oancea A., (Jurj) G.C.C., Cresneac I.G., Munteanu M.F., Ciopanoiu I., Boru C., Pogurschi E.N., et al. Dietary Polyphenols as Modulators of Bifidobacterium in the Human Gut Microbiota. Nutrients. 2026;18:782. doi: 10.3390/nu18050782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Gegiu G., Bucur L., Popescu A., Radu M.-D., Mihai S., Badea V. Studies on the Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of a Prunus spinosa L. Aqueous Extract. Rev. Chim. 2020;71:80–84. doi: 10.37358/rc.20.2.7896. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Iancu I.M., Schröder V., Apetroaei M.-R., Crețu R.M., Mireșan H., Honcea A., Iancu V., Bucur L.A., Mitea G., Atodiresei-Pavalache G. Biocompatibility of Membranes Based on a Mixture of Chitosan and Lythri herba Aqueous Extract. Appl. Sci. 2023;13:8023. doi: 10.3390/app13148023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Mitea G., Schröder V., Iancu I.M. Bioactive Plant-Derived Compounds as Novel Perspectives in Oral Cancer Alternative Therapy. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18:1098. doi: 10.3390/ph18081098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Lim D.-W., Wang J.-H. Gut Microbiome: The Interplay of an “Invisible Organ” with Herbal Medicine and Its Derived Compounds in Chronic Metabolic Disorders. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:13076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Gilbert J.A., Azad M.B., Bäckhed F., Blaser M.J., Byndloss M., Chiu C.Y., Chu H., Dugas L.R., Elinav E., Gibbons S.M., et al. Clinical Translation of Microbiome Research. Nat. Med. 2025;31:1099–1113. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03615-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.McCoubrey L.E., Elbadawi M., Basit A.W. Current Clinical Translation of Microbiome Medicines. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2022;43:281–292. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2022.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Arrieta M.-C., Walter J., Finlay B.B. Human Microbiota-Associated Mice: A Model with Challenges. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:575–578. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Walter J., Armet A.M., Finlay B.B., Shanahan F. Establishing or Exaggerating Causality for the Gut Microbiome: Lessons from Human Microbiota-Associated Rodents. Cell. 2020;180:221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Huang Z.-R., Deng J.-C., Li Q.-Y., Cao Y.-J., Lin Y.-C., Bai W.-D., Liu B., Rao P.-F., Ni L., Lv X.-C. Protective Mechanism of Common Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) against Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Associated with Dyslipidemia in Mice Fed a High-Fat and High-Cholesterol Diet. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020;68:6530–6543. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b08211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Huang Z.-R., Chen M., Guo W.-L., Li T.-T., Liu B., Bai W.-D., Ai L.-Z., Rao P.-F., Ni L., Lv X.-C. Monascus purpureus-Fermented Common Buckwheat Protects against Dyslipidemia and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease through the Regulation of Liver Metabolome and Intestinal Microbiome. Food Res. Int. 2020;136:109511. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Setchell K.D.R., Clerici C. Equol: Pharmacokinetics and Biological Actions. J. Nutr. 2010;140:1363S–1368S. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.119784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Selma M.V., Beltrán D., García-Villalba R., Espín J.C., Tomás-Barberán F.A. Description of Urolithin Production Capacity from Ellagic Acid of Two Human Intestinal Gordonibacter species. Food Funct. 2014;5:1779–1784. doi: 10.1039/c4fo00092g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Parvin N., Aslam M., Joo S.W., Mandal T.K. Nano-Phytomedicine: Harnessing Plant-Derived Phytochemicals in Nanocarriers for Targeted Human Health Applications. Molecules. 2025;30:3177. doi: 10.3390/molecules30153177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Sharif M., Ejaz M., Nawaz A., Saeeda U.H., Naeem S., Khan S. Role of Flavonoids in Chronic Metabolic Diseases. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2024. Impact of Dietary Flavonoid Metabolism on Gut Microbiome; pp. 189–225. [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Wastyk H.C., Fragiadakis G.K., Perelman D., Dahan D., Merrill B.D., Yu F.B., Topf M., Gonzalez C.G., Van Treuren W., Han S., et al. Gut-Microbiota-Targeted Diets Modulate Human Immune Status. Cell. 2021;184:4137–4153.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Lagoa R., Silva J., Rodrigues J.R., Bishayee A. Advances in Phytochemical Delivery Systems for Improved Anticancer Activity. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020;38:107382. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Mikropoulou E.V., Basdeki A., Halabalaki M. Metabolism and Bioavailability Aspects of Natural Products of Plant Origin Using Mass Spectrometry-Based and Metabolomic Approaches. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2026 doi: 10.1039/d5np00022j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Hewlings S., Kalman D. Curcumin: A Review of Its Effects on Human Health. Foods. 2017;6:92. doi: 10.3390/foods6100092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Akter K., Gul K., Mumtaz S. Revisiting Curcumin in Cancer Therapy: Recent Insights into Molecular Mechanisms, Nanoformulations, and Synergistic Combinations. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025;47:716. doi: 10.3390/cimb47090716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Neag M.A., Mocan A., Echeverría J., Pop R.M., Bocsan C.I., Crişan G., Buzoianu A.D. Berberine: Botanical Occurrence, Traditional Uses, Extraction Methods, and Relevance in Cardiovascular, Metabolic, Hepatic, and Renal Disorders. Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:557. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Huang J., Zhong Y., Wu Y., Cai S., Xiong W., Li T., Liu B., Huang Z. Probiotic Fermentation Enhances Anti-Diabetic Effects of Chlorella pyrenoidosa in Mice by Modulating Gut Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids. Foods. 2026;15:1739. doi: 10.3390/foods15101739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Mirzayi C., Renson A., Furlanello C., Sansone S.-A., Zohra F., Elsafoury S., Geistlinger L., Kasselman L.J., Eckenrode K., van de Wijgert J., et al. Reporting Guidelines for Human Microbiome Research: The STORMS Checklist. Nat. Med. 2021;27:1885–1892. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01552-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Ballway J.W., Song B.-J. Translational Approaches with Antioxidant Phytochemicals against Alcohol-Mediated Oxidative Stress, Gut Dysbiosis, Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction, and Fatty Liver Disease. Antioxidants. 2021;10:384. doi: 10.3390/antiox10030384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Shi J., Weng J.-H., Mitchison T.J. Immunomodulatory Drug Discovery from Herbal Medicines: Insights from Organ-Specific Activity and Xenobiotic Defenses. Elife. 2021;10:73673. doi: 10.7554/elife.73673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Navarro V.J., Khan I., Björnsson E., Seeff L.B., Serrano J., Hoofnagle J.H. Liver Injury from Herbal and Dietary Supplements. Hepatology. 2017;65:363–373. doi: 10.1002/hep.28813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Chen X.-W., Sneed K.B., Pan S.-Y., Cao C., Kanwar J.R., Chew H., Zhou S.F. Herb-Drug Interactions and Mechanistic and Clinical Considerations. Curr. Drug Metab. 2012;13:640–651. doi: 10.2174/1389200211209050640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Dwivedi S., Kushalan S., Paithankar J.G., D’Souza L.C., Hegde S., Sharma A. Environmental Toxicants, Oxidative Stress and Health Adversities: Interventions of Phytochemicals. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2022;74:516–536. doi: 10.1093/jpp/rgab044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Moreno-Indias I., Lundberg R., Krych L., Metzdorff S.B., Kot W., Sørensen D.B., Nielsen D.S., Hansen C.H.F., Hansen A.K. A Humanized Diet Profile May Facilitate Colonization and Immune Stimulation in Human Microbiota-Colonized Mice. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:1336. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Yang S., Tong L., Li X., Zhang Y., Chen H., Zhang W., Zhang H., Chen Y., Chen R. A Novel Clinically Relevant Human Fecal Microbial Transplantation Model in Humanized Mice. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024;12:e0043624. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00436-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Rahman S., Ghiboub M., Donkers J.M., van de Steeg E., van Tol E.A.F., Hakvoort T.B.M., de Jonge W.J. The Progress of Intestinal Epithelial Models from Cell Lines to Gut-On-Chip. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:13472. doi: 10.3390/ijms222413472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Wu J., Singleton S.S., Bhuiyan U., Krammer L., Mazumder R. Multi-Omics Approaches to Studying Gastrointestinal Microbiome in the Context of Precision Medicine and Machine Learning. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2024;10:1337373. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1337373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Yang S.-Y., Han S.M., Lee J.-Y., Kim K.S., Lee J.-E., Lee D.-W. Advancing Gut Microbiome Research: The Shift from Metagenomics to Multi-Omics and Future Perspectives. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025;35:e2412001. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2412.12001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Sonnenburg J.L., Bäckhed F. Diet–Microbiota Interactions as Moderators of Human Metabolism. Nature. 2016;535:56–64. doi: 10.1038/nature18846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Daliri E.B.-M., Ofosu F.K., Chelliah R., Lee B.H., Oh D.-H. Challenges and Perspective in Integrated Multi-Omics in Gut Microbiota Studies. Biomolecules. 2021;11:300. doi: 10.3390/biom11020300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Shahid U. Microbiome-Guided Precision Medicine: Mechanistic Insights, Multi-Omics Integration, and Translational Horizons. J. Precis. Med. Health Dis. 2025;3:100018. doi: 10.1016/j.premed.2025.100018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Go D., Yeon G.-H., Park S.J., Lee Y., Koh H.G., Koo H., Kim K.H., Jin Y.-S., Sung B.H., Kim J. Integration of Metabolomics and Other Omics: From Microbes to Microbiome. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024;108:538. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13384-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Mowat A.M. Historical Perspective: Metchnikoff and the Intestinal Microbiome. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2021;109:513–517. doi: 10.1002/jlb.4ri0920-599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Graham A.E., Ledesma-Amaro R. The Microbial Food Revolution. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:2231. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37891-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Wang G., Ding T., Ai L. Editorial: Effects and Mechanisms of Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics and Postbiotics on Intestinal Health and Disease. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024;14:1430312. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1430312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Ciernikova S., Sevcikova A., Drgona L., Mego M. Modulating the Gut Microbiota by Probiotics, Prebiotics, Postbiotics, and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: An Emerging Trend in Cancer Patient Care. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Rev. Cancer. 2023;1878:188990. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.188990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Kocot A.M., Jarocka-Cyrta E., Drabińska N. Overview of the Importance of Biotics in Gut Barrier Integrity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:2896. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Chandrasekaran P., Weiskirchen S., Weiskirchen R. Effects of Probiotics on Gut Microbiota: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:6022. doi: 10.3390/ijms25116022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Bratu I.C., Strambu I.R., Salcianu I.A., Carnaru M.V., Dumitriu-Buzia O., Sarbu N., Ciuca I., Calin A.M., Forna N., Parvu S. Innovations in the Treatment of Pediatric Conjunctivitis: Modern Solutions for Small Patients. Rom. J. Oral Rehabil. 2024;16:706–716. doi: 10.62610/rjor.2024.2.16.65. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Smolinska S., Popescu F.-D., Zemelka-Wiacek M. A Review of the Influence of Prebiotics, Probiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics on the Human Gut Microbiome and Intestinal Integrity. J. Clin. Med. 2025;14:3673. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Bevilacqua A., Campaniello D., Speranza B., Racioppo A., Sinigaglia M., Corbo M.R. An Update on Prebiotics and on Their Health Effects. Foods. 2024;13:446. doi: 10.3390/foods13030446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Aziz T., Naveed M., Shabbir M.A., Sarwar A., Naseeb J., Zhao L., Yang Z., Cui H., Lin L., Albekairi T.H. Unveiling the Whole Genomic Features and Potential Probiotic Characteristics of Novel Lactiplantibacillus plantarum HMX2. Front. Microbiol. 2024;15:1504625. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1504625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Wang K., Wang Y., Gu L., Yu J., Liu Q., Zhang R., Liang G., Chen H., Gu F., Liu H., et al. Characterization of Probiotic Properties and Whole-Genome Analysis of Lactobacillus johnsonii N5 and N7 Isolated from Swine. Microorganisms. 2024;12:672. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12040672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Yin Z., Wang Y., Feng X., Liu C., Guan X., Liu S., Long Z., Miao Z., He F., Cheng R., et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 Promote Infected Wound Healing via Regulation of the Wound Microenvironment. Microb. Biotechnol. 2024;17:e70031. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Kadja L., Dib A.L., Lakhdara N., Bouaziz A., Espigares E., Gagaoua M. Influence of Three Probiotics Strains, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 on the Biochemical and Haematological Profiles and Body Weight of Healthy Rabbits. Biology. 2021;10:1194. doi: 10.3390/biology10111194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Swanson K.S., Gibson G.R., Hutkins R., Reimer R.A., Reid G., Verbeke K., Scott K.P., Holscher H.D., Azad M.B., Delzenne N.M., et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) Consensus Statement on the Definition and Scope of Synbiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;17:687–701. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0344-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Son S.J., Koh J.H., Park M.R., Ryu S., Lee W.J., Yun B., Lee J.-H., Oh S., Kim Y. Effect of the Lactobacillus rhamnosus Strain GG and Tagatose as a Synbiotic Combination in a Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis Murine Model. J. Dairy Sci. 2019;102:2844–2853. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Nguyen T.-T., Nguyen P.-T., Pham M.-N., Razafindralambo H., Hoang Q.-K., Nguyen H.-T. Synbiotics: A New Route of Self-Production and Applications to Human and Animal Health. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2022;14:980–993. doi: 10.1007/s12602-022-09960-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Andresen V., Gschossmann J., Layer P. Heat-Inactivated Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75 (SYN-HI-001) in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;5:658–666. doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30056-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Depommier C., Everard A., Druart C., Plovier H., Van Hul M., Vieira-Silva S., Falony G., Raes J., Maiter D., Delzenne N.M., et al. Supplementation with Akkermansia muciniphila in Overweight and Obese Human Volunteers: A Proof-of-Concept Exploratory Study. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1096–1103. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0495-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Miao H., Liang J., Lan G., Wu Q., Huang Z. Heat-Killed Lactobacillus acidophilus Promotes Growth by Modulating the Gut Microbiota Composition and Fecal Metabolites of Piglets. Animals. 2024;14:2528. doi: 10.3390/ani14172528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.FakhriRavari A., Nguyen M.H.C. Akkermansia muciniphila in Cardiometabolic Medicine: Mechanisms, Clinical Studies, and Therapeutic Outlook. Gastrointest. Disord. 2025;7:72. doi: 10.3390/gidisord7040072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Zheng L., Ji Y.-Y., Wen X.-L., Duan S.-L. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Metabolic Diseases: Current Status and Perspectives. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022;28:2546–2560. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i23.2546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Wang K., Yu X., Li Y., Guo Y., Ge L., Pu F., Ma X., Cui W., Marrota F., He F., et al. Bifidobacterium bifidum TMC3115 Can Characteristically Influence Glucose and Lipid Profile and Intestinal Microbiota in the Middle-Aged and Elderly. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2019;11:1182–1194. doi: 10.1007/s12602-018-9441-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Zikou E., Koliaki C., Makrilakis K. The Role of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in the Management of Metabolic Diseases in Humans: A Narrative Review. Biomedicines. 2024;12:1871. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Hanssen N.M.J., de Vos W.M., Nieuwdorp M. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Human Metabolic Diseases: From a Murky Past to a Bright Future? Cell Metab. 2021;33:1098–1110. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Wang L., Zhang K., Zeng Y., Luo Y., Peng J., Zhang J., Kuang T., Fan G. Gut Mycobiome and Metabolic Diseases: The Known, the Unknown, and the Future. Pharmacol. Res. 2023;193:106807. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Gravina A.G., Pellegrino R., Palladino G., Coppola A., Brandimarte G., Tuccillo C., Ciardiello F., Romano M., Federico A. Hericium erinaceus, in Combination with Natural Flavonoid/Alkaloid and B3/B8 Vitamins, Can Improve Inflammatory Burden in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Tissue: An Ex Vivo Study. Front. Immunol. 2023;14:1215329. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1215329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Algrooni K.S., Alhaidan H.M., Hamzah H.A., Almarzouqi M.F., Hamad A.M. Innovative Approaches to Microbial Identification Enhancing Accuracy and Speed in Infectious Disease Diagnostics. Int. J. Community Med. Public Health. 2024;11:3231–3234. doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20241966. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Lema N.K., Gemeda M.T., Woldesemayat A.A. Recent Advances in Metagenomic Approaches, Applications, and Challenges. Curr. Microbiol. 2023;80:347. doi: 10.1007/s00284-023-03451-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Madison J.D., LaBumbard B.C., Woodhams D.C. Shotgun Metagenomics Captures More Microbial Diversity than Targeted 16S RRNA Gene Sequencing for Field Specimens and Preserved Museum Specimens. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0291540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Xie Z., Canalda-Baltrons A., d’Enfert C., Manichanh C. Shotgun Metagenomics Reveals Interkingdom Association between Intestinal Bacteria and Fungi Involving Competition for Nutrients. Microbiome. 2023;11:275. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01693-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.de Vries J., Saleem F., Li E., Chan A.W.Y., Naphtali J., Naphtali P., Paschos A., Schellhorn H.E. Comparative Analysis of Metagenomic (Amplicon and Shotgun) DNA Sequencing to Characterize Microbial Communities in Household On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems. Water. 2023;15:271. doi: 10.3390/w15020271. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Butowski C.F., Dixit Y., Reis M.M., Mu C. Metatranscriptomics for Understanding the Microbiome in Food and Nutrition Science. Metabolites. 2025;15:185. doi: 10.3390/metabo15030185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Tyagi S., Katara P. Metatranscriptomics: A Tool for Clinical Metagenomics. Omics J. Integr. Biol. 2024;28:394–407. doi: 10.1089/omi.2024.0130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Flores Ramos S., Siguenza N., Zhong W., Mohanty I., Lingaraju A., Richter R.A., Karthikeyan S., Lukowski A.L., Zhu Q., Nunes W.D.G., et al. Metatranscriptomics Uncovers Diurnal Functional Shifts in Bacterial Transgenes with Profound Metabolic Effects. Cell Host Microbe. 2025;33:1057–1072.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2025.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Dantas Machado A.C., Brown S.D., Lingaraju A., Sivaganesh V., Martino C., Chaix A., Zhao P., Pinto A.F.M., Chang M.W., Richter R.A., et al. Diet and Feeding Pattern Modulate Diurnal Dynamics of the Ileal Microbiome and Transcriptome. Cell Rep. 2022;40:111008. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Martinez-Varela A., Casas G., Berrojalbiz N., Lundin D., Piña B., Dachs J., Vila-Costa M. Metatranscriptomic Responses and Microbial Degradation of Background Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Coastal Mediterranean and Antarctica. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023;30:119988–119999. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30650-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Shakya M., Lo C.-C., Chain P.S.G. Advances and Challenges in Metatranscriptomic Analysis. Front. Genet. 2019;10:904. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Zhao Y., Zhang W., Zhang X. Application of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024;14:1458316. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1458316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Cheng X., Joe B. Metagenomic Data Analysis. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2023. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Microbiome-Based Machine Learning for Phenotypic Classification; pp. 281–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Rozera T., Pasolli E., Segata N., Ianiro G. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in the Multi-Omics Approach to Gut Microbiota. Gastroenterology. 2025;169:487–501. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.02.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Mitea G., Iancu I.M., Blebea N.M., Bucur L.A., Schroder V., Badea V., Badea C.F., Nuca C., Radu M.D., Iancu V. Cotinine and IL-6—Biomarkers for Estimating Pharmacological Processes in Various Forms of Periodontitis; Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on e-Health and Bioengineering (EHB); Iasi, Romania. 18–19 November 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Peterson C.B., Saha S., Do K.-A. Analysis of Microbiome Data. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 2024;11:483–504. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-040522-120734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Lu Y., Zhou G., Ewald J., Pang Z., Shiri T., Xia J. MicrobiomeAnalyst 2.0: Comprehensive Statistical, Functional and Integrative Analysis of Microbiome Data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:W310–W318. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Marcos-Zambrano L.J., Karaduzovic-Hadziabdic K., Loncar Turukalo T., Przymus P., Trajkovik V., Aasmets O., Berland M., Gruca A., Hasic J., Hron K., et al. Applications of Machine Learning in Human Microbiome Studies: A Review on Feature Selection, Biomarker Identification, Disease Prediction and Treatment. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:634511. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.634511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Jiménez-Arroyo C., Molinero N., del Campo R., Delgado S., Moreno-Arribas M.V. Human Gut Microbiome Study through Metagenomics: Recent Advances and Challenges for Clinical Implementation. Enfermedades Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. (Engl. Ed.) 2025;43:698–708. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.


Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES