Abstract
Scaphoid fractures are common and often progress to nonunion due to the unique vascularity. When nonunion occurs, patients are at risk of developing carpal collapse and arthritis if not managed appropriately with traditional surgical management. However, open surgical management puts the fragile vascular supply and extrinsic soft tissue stabilizers of the carpus at risk, compromising healing and clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy allows for the preservation of these structures and improved visualization of fracture debridement, reduction, and alignment. We describe an arthroscopic‐assisted reduction and percutaneous fixation of scaphoid nonunion with distal radius bone graft.

The scaphoid is the most commonly fractured carpal bone, accounting for 60%‐70% of all carpal fractures. It has been described as the “keystone” of the wrist, as it is the only carpal bone that bridges the proximal and distal carpal rows. 1 This connection between the carpal rows is critical to maintain wrist biomechanics and prevent arthritic change. 2
The scaphoid's predominant blood supply is via the dorsal carpal branch of the radial artery. 3 The proximal pole also receives blood supply from the radioscapholunate ligament (ligament of Testut) and direct scapholunate branches from the palmar and dorsal transverse carpal arches. 4 , 5 Understanding and maintaining this vascular anatomy are critical to appropriately treating scaphoid fractures and nonunions.
Nonunion rates range from 5% to 15% with identifiable risk factors including smoking, interfragmental gap >1 mm, avascular necrosis of the proximal pole, and associated carpal instability. 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 In most cases, treatment consists of rigid internal fixation with vascularized or nonvascularized bone graft. 8 Percutaneous, mini‐open, dorsal, volar, and arthroscopic approaches can be utilized depending on fracture location and pattern, as well as surgeon preference. For humpback deformity, most authors recommend a volar approach to allow correction of the intrascaphoid angle. 10 Although open repair is an accepted treatment modality, arthroscopy has become more popular due to the preservation of vascular supply and extrinsic ligaments, for both waist and proximal pole nonunions. 11 , 12 , 13
We describe an arthroscopic‐assisted reduction and percutaneous fixation of a scaphoid nonunion with distal radius autograft (Video 1). This technique maintains the carpal soft tissues to promote adequate healing, achieves stability using cannulated screws, offers a nonvascularized strut in which osteogenesis can occur, and can be utilized for both proximal pole and waist nonunions with or without humpback deformity.
VIDEO 1.
Arthroscopic assisted reduction and percutaneous fixation of scaphoid nonunion with autologous distal radius bone graft. Video demonstrating the use of arthroscopy in a scaphoid nonunion reduction. The fracture site is visualized in its entirety and debrided to bleeding bone before reduction is achieved. Bone graft is harvested from the ipsilateral distal radius and delivered to the nonunion site before and after percutaneous fixation with cannulated screws. Copyright Eric Wagner, M.D. Video content can be viewed at https://doi.org/10.1002/atn2.70048.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Position, Marking, and Portals
We use standard wrist arthroscopy portals including the 3‐4, 6 radial (6R), midcarpal ulnar, and midcarpal radial portals and perform this technique as a dry arthroscopy in the supine position and standard wrist traction tower (Figure 1). The graft harvest site is 1 cm proximal and radial to Lister's tubercle on the distal radius “bare spot.”
FIGURE 1.

Arthroscopic portals for scaphoid nonunion reduction and percutaneous fixation. Illustration of dorsal wrist anatomy demonstrating the radiocarpal 3‐4, 6R, MCU, and MCR portals. The scope is in the 6R portal for viewing and the shaver is in the 3‐4 portal for debridement of the radiocarpal joint. For the midcarpal space, the MCU is the primary viewing portal and the MCR is the primary working portal. Copyright Eric Wagner, M.D. (6R, 6 radial; MCU, midcarpal ulnar; MCR, midcarpal radial.)
Fracture Reduction
A standard diagnostic wrist arthroscopy is performed. The index and ring finger are placed in finger traps in 25‐30 pounds of traction. We create a 3‐4 portal, and then under visualization through the arthroscope, we establish a 6R portal. At this point, we can assess the radiocarpal joint, the volar carpal ligaments, radial styloid and proximal scaphoid articular cartilage, dorsal scaphoid translation, and proximal scaphoid. A motorized shaver debrides areas of inflammation and dorsal synovitis to aid in visualization. Full visualization of the proximal pole is necessary for fracture reduction and accurate screw placement (Table 1). The MCU portal is established and used as the viewing portal for the midcarpal space. The MCR portal is created in line with the scaphoid nonunion site. A probe is introduced to evaluate the scapholunate ligament, the lunotriquetral ligament, and the scaphoid nonunion site (Figure 2). The scaphoid nonunion site is debrided using a 3.0 mm arthroscopic shaver, followed by a 3.0 mm arthroscopic burr, all working through the MCR portal (Figure 2). Once the nonunion site is debrided back to healthy bleeding bone and all fibrous tissue is removed, it is ready for reduction and fixation.
TABLE 1.
Pearls and Pitfalls
| Pearls | Pitfalls |
|---|---|
|
|
6R, 6 radial; DISI, dorsal intercalated segment instability; MCU, midcarpal ulnar; MCR, midcarpal radial; SC, scaphocapitate; SL, scapholunate.
FIGURE 2.

Visualization of the fracture nonunion site. (A,B) Two views of the scaphoid fracture nonunion site from the MCU portal. A probe examines the scapholunate ligament, lunotriquetral ligament, and nonunion site, and then a shaver and burr are sequentially introduced into the MCR portal to debride the nonunion site. (C) Viewing from the MCU portal, the nonunion site is debrided to bleeding bone using a shaver and burr. The fracture site is now ready for reduction. Copyright Eric Wagner, M.D. Left side; MCU viewing portal. (MCU, midcarpal ulnar; MCR, midcarpal radial.)
The reduction and guidewire placement depend on the location of the fracture and if a humpback deformity is present. If there is a humpback, the fracture is reduced via the “Linscheid maneuver,” extending the wrist in ulnar deviation over a stack of folded towels and inserting the guidewire via the volar approach in a center‐center position. In cases of proximal pole nonunions or stable waist nonunions without humpback malignment, a dorsal arthroscopic‐assisted approach is used (Figure 3). The wrist is flexed in the arthroscopy tower and reduction of the scaphoid is confirmed with fluoroscopy (Figure 3). The 6R portal is used for visualization, while the 3‐4 portal is extended ulnarly and proximally to enable guidewire insertion. Extensor tendons are carefully retracted away from the exposed capsule in the 3‐4 portal. Under arthroscopic visualization, a 0.045‐inch smooth derotation Kirshner wire is placed percutaneously through the 3‐4 portal into the proximal pole fragment, then across the nonunion site. A central guide pin is placed percutaneously through this dorsal approach, adjacent to the scapholunate ligament. If 2 screws are utilized, one Kirshner wire is placed in a more volar position and the other in a more dorsal position. Once the guidewire position and reduction are confirmed on multiplanar fluoroscopy, the bone graft is harvested. The guidewires are then advanced out volarly to allow the wrist to be placed back into traction.
FIGURE 3.

Reduction and percutaneous guide wire placement. (A) A derotational K‐wire is placed percutaneously into the proximal pole fragment, then across the nonunion site as seen in the top right corner of the arthroscopic image. The guide pin is then placed adjacent to the scapholunate ligament utilizing the derotational wire to reduce motion of the fragment as visualized through the 6R portal. (B) The wrist is flexed in the traction tower and the dorsal percutaneous pins are placed from an extended 3‐4 portal. The scope is in the 6R portal throughout the pin placement. (C) Intraoperative fluoroscopy of the wrist demonstrates the guide pin and derotational K‐wire traversing the 2 fracture segments of the scaphoid after reduction. Once fluoroscopy confirms the reduction and acceptable pin placement, the bone graft is harvested. Copyright Eric Wagner, M.D. Left side; 6R viewing portal. (6R, 6 radial; SLIL, scapholunate interosseous ligament.)
Bone Grafting and Percutaneous Fixation
A small longitudinal incision is made 1 cm proximal and radial to Lister's tubercle in the “bare spot” of the distal radius (Figure 4). Cancellous bone graft is harvested using the Acumed Bone Graft Harvesting System (Hillsboro, OR). A 3.5 mm cannula or drill sleeve is then used to deliver the bone graft through the MCR portal into the nonunion site. About half of the space is filled before the filling ratio is checked. A percutaneous depth gauge is then placed over the Kirshner wires to measure the appropriate length cannulated screw(s). We typically utilize either one Acutrack 2 Mini (Hillsboro, OR) 3.5 mm cannulated screw or two Acutrack 2 Micro (Hillsboro, OR) 2.5 mm cannulated screws. Fluoroscopy and direct arthroscopic visualization confirm final screw position and depth, ensuring that the screws are deep to the chondral surface (Figure 5). The remainder of the autograft is packed until the entire area of nonunion is filled (Figure 6). Fibrin glue is placed to seal the graft in place (Figure 7). Finally, biplanar fluoroscopy and midcarpal arthroscopy confirm the placement of the graft and hardware (Figure 7).
FIGURE 4.

Distal radius autologous bone graft harvest. Cancellous bone graft is harvested from the ipsilateral distal radius via a dorsal longitudinal incision in the bare area of the radius, 1 cm radial and proximal to Lister's tubercle using the Acumed Bone Graft Harvesting System (Hillsboro, OR) and a curette. The bone graft is saved until screw fixation. Copyright Eric Wagner, M.D.
FIGURE 5.

Fixation with 2.0 mm cannulated screws. (A) Viewing the scaphoid proximal pole from the 6R portal, the drill is advanced for placement of the cannulated screws. We utilized both the derotational K‐wire site and central K‐wire to place two 2.0 mm cannulated screws. If there is less proximal bone available, one 3.5 mm cannulated screw is adequate. (B) Intraoperative fluoroscopy of the wrist demonstrating 2 screws crossing the nonunion site. When 2 screws are utilized, one screw is placed more dorsal, and the other is more volar. Copyright Eric Wagner, M.D. Left side; 6R viewing portal. (6R, 6 radial.)
FIGURE 6.

Delivering distal radius bone graft. (A) Bone graft is delivered into the nonunion site via a 3.5 mm cannula or drill sleeve in the MCR portal on the dorsal aspect of the wrist. (B) Viewing through the MCU portal, the cannula in the MCR portal is positioned over the nonunion site and bone graft is delivered. Once half of the bone graft is delivered, the filling ratio is checked before proceeding. Copyright Eric Wagner, M.D. Left side; MCU viewing portal. (MCR, midcarpal ulnar; MCU, midcarpal radial.)
FIGURE 7.

Packing distal radius bone graft. (A) The remaining half of the distal radius bone graft is inserted through the MCR portal while viewing from the MCU portal. The graft is packed down to fill the remaining space after scaphoid fixation. (B) Fibrin glue is inserted through the MCR portal via a cannula to secure the autograft in place. (C) The final construct viewed through the MCU portal with distal radius autograft secured with fibrin glue and packed down between the fixed fragments of the scaphoid. Copyright Eric Wagner, M.D. Left side; MCU viewing portal. (MCR, midcarpal ulnar; MCU, midcarpal radial.)
Postoperative Management
Patients are immobilized in a thumb spica splint for 14 days, transitioning to a removable thumb spica for 6‐8 weeks. If >30% healing is seen on computed tomography at 6 weeks, the patient is transitioned out of the splint. Active/passive motion and strengthening begins, with full activity resumed at 16 weeks.
DISCUSSION
Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fracture and can have devastating outcomes if not adequately addressed. Even if treated appropriately, a significant percentage of fractures progress to nonunion. 6 , 7 , 8 The unique vascularization of the scaphoid contributes to the challenging pathology and is exacerbated by some nonmodifiable risk factors such as the fracture site location, displacement of the fragments, and the presence of ligamentous injury. 9
Our technique allows for the anatomic reduction of the scaphoid under direct visualization while maintaining critical soft tissue structures (Table 2). Malalignment of the fracture or disruption of the carpal ligaments can lead to negative functional outcomes. 14 , 15 , 16 Studies have shown that the use of arthroscopy and bone grafting can restore wrist function and reduce pain in these challenging cases. 13 , 17 , 18 , 19 A 2024 systematic review found that union rates ranged from 86% to 100% in a time frame of 2.3 to 7.8 months, clinical outcomes were satisfactory, and complication rates were low when scaphoid nonunions were treated with arthroscopy. 20 Oh et al. performed a comparative analysis of open versus arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunions and found no significant differences in union rates, clinical scores, or radiographic assessments at 2 years postoperatively. 21 Additionally, arthroscopy allows the surgeon to evaluate for other radiocarpal and midcarpal injuries, clearly visualize the presence of arthritis, assist with and visualize scaphoid reduction, precisely place screws in proximal fragments, and evaluate reduction and stability of the fragments after screw placement.
TABLE 2.
Advantages and Disadvantages
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
|
|
The use of bone graft in scaphoid nonunion is common, but there is not a clearly preferred choice of graft or method of harvest in the current literature. While some studies demonstrate superior union rates and faster time to union with vascularized bone grafts, vascularized bone grafts are typically reserved for cases of avascular necrosis due to the technical complexity and donor site morbidity. 22 , 23 Our technique is consistent with existing literature demonstrating no significant difference in union and functional outcomes with the use of nonvascularized bone graft. 24 Pinder et al. reported no significant differences between vascularized and nonvascularized grafts 8 and Lin et al. found that nonvascularized graft provided satisfactory results even for patients with avascular necrosis of the scaphoid. 19 Furthermore, the arthroscopic approach optimizes intrinsic vascularity, further supporting the choice of nonvascularized graft.
Scaphoid nonunion presents a considerable challenge and lacks a standard treatment. This arthroscopic technique with distal radius bone graft protects the fragile anatomy of the carpal soft tissue and offers better visualization while also providing satisfactory radiographic and clinical results.
DISCLOSURES
The author (E.R.W.) declares the following financial interests/personal relationships, which may be considered as potential competing interests: E.R.W. reports a relationship with Stryker and Acumed LLC that includes: consulting or advisory and travel reimbursement; reports a relationship with Smith & Nephew and DePuy Synthes that includes: consulting or advisory; reports a relationship with Konica Minolta that includes: funding grants; reports a relationship with Arthrex, Wright Medical Group, and Integra LifeSciences Corporation that includes: travel reimbursement. The other authors (A.L.G., T.J.W., K.M.B., K.N.C., N.S.) declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES
- 1. Heinzelmann AD, Archer G, Bindra RR. Anthropometry of the human scaphoid. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:1005‐1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Steve K, Lee GIB, Simon BM, MacLean, Lichtman DM, Higgins JP. Fractures of the carpal bones. In: Wolfe SW, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Cohen MS, eds. Green's operative hand surgery. Ed 8, Elsevier; 2022:677‐757. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Gelberman RH, Menon J. The vascularity of the scaphoid bone. J Hand Surg Am. 1980;5:508‐513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Buchler U, Nagy L. The issue of vascularity in fractures and non‐union of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Br. 1995;20:726‐735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Morsy M, Sabbagh MD, van Alphen NA, Laungani AT, Kadar A, Moran SL. The vascular anatomy of the scaphoid: New discoveries using micro‐computed tomography imaging. J Hand Surg Am. 2019;44:928‐938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Dias JJ, Brenkel IJ, Finlay DB. Patterns of union in fractures of the waist of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:307‐310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Leslie IJ, Dickson RA. The fractured carpal scaphoid. Natural history and factors influencing outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63‐B:225‐230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pinder RM, Brkljac M, Rix L, Muir L, Brewster M. Treatment of scaphoid nonunion: A systematic review of the existing evidence. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;1797‐1805:e1793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Schuind F, Moungondo F, El Kazzi W. Prognostic factors in the treatment of carpal scaphoid non‐unions. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27:3‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Samade R, Awan HM. Surgical treatment of scaphoid fractures: Recommendations for management. J Wrist Surg. 2024;13:194‐201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Liu B, Caloia M, Ho PC, Mathoulin C, Wolfe S. Round table discussion. The management of proximal scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2025;50:286‐291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lee YK, Choi KW, Woo SH, Ho PC, Lee M. The clinical result of arthroscopic bone grafting and percutaneous K‐wires fixation for management of scaphoid nonunions. Medicine Baltimore. 2018;97:e9987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Stein AM, Beauthier V, Schlur C, Juvenspan M, Dahan E. Arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunion with distal radius bone graft: A retrospective series of 31 cases. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2025;44:102163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kumta S, Warrier S, Jain L, Ummal R, Menezes M, Purohit S. Medial femoral condyle vascularised corticoperiosteal graft: A suitable choice for scaphoid non‐union. Indian J Plast Surg. 2017;50:138‐147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Roberts M, Lee S, Allen A, et al. A systematic scoping review of patient‐specific devices in operative management of scaphoid nonunion. JB JS Open Access. 2025;10:e25.00067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Karthik K, Ali Z, Colegate‐Stone T, Tavakkolizadeh A, Compson J. Role of wrist arthroscopy in the management of established scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Microsurg. 2020;12:100‐106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Bk DK, Lamichhane P, Pandit P, Thapa K. Treatment of non‐union scaphoid fractures by Kirschner wires and ipsilateral distal radius bone grafts: A case series. Ann Med Surg Lond. 2025;87:3076‐3081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Windhofer C, Ivusic P, Jakob P, Lill M, Schauer J. Arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunion, a new algorithm after six years practice. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025;145:166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lin TY, Fu CW, Tsai PS, Huang CH, Wei SH, Chuang MY. Outcomes after arthroscopic treatment for scaphoid nonunion using ipsilateral radius bone graft and a headless compression screw: A comparison between the patients with and without avascular necrosis. Int Orthop. 2023;47:1041‐1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Burnier M, Bouteille C, ReSurg, CM . High rates of union following arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid non‐union: A systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2024;2507‐2521:e2504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Oh WT, Kang HJ, Chun YM, Koh IH, Lee YJ, Choi YR. Retrospective comparative outcomes analysis of arthroscopic versus open bone graft and fixation for unstable scaphoid nonunions. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:2810‐2818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Karimnazhand R, Shams R, Behmanesh A, et al. Comparative efficacy of non‐vascularized and vascularized bone grafts, with emerging insights into bone biomaterial grafts, in scaphoid fracture nonunion treatment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Orthop Translat. 2025;53:231‐245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhang H, Gu J, Liu H, Yuan C. Pedicled vascularized versus non‐vascularized bone grafts in the treatment of scaphoid non‐union: A meta‐analysis of comparative studies. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91:E682‐E689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Duncumb JW, Robinson PG, Williamson TR, et al. Bone grafting for scaphoid nonunion surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Bone Joint J. 2022;104‐B:549‐558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
