Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1975 Feb;245(1):163–182. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010839

A dual effect of repetitive stimulation on post-tetanic potentiation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction.

K L Magleby, J E Zengel
PMCID: PMC1330849  PMID: 165285

Abstract

1. End-plate potentials (e.p.p.s) were recorded with a surface electrode from frog neuromuscular junctions blocked with high Mg and low Ca to study post-tetanic potentiation(potentiation). 2. Potentiation is found to decay exponentially over most of its time course. 3. The time constant tsu(H) characterizing this exponential decay is a function of the previous history (frequency and duration) of stimulation. For example, tsu(H) increased from about 20 sec following a few impulses to over 70 sec following more than 1000 impulses. 4. A new method is presented to obtain estimates of the rise of potentiation (uncontaminated by facilitation or an intermediate facilitatory process) during repetitive stimulation. It is found that potentiation is present following short trains of impulses and continually increases in magnitude with the duration of the conditioning stimulation. Potentiation was at a maximum immediately following the conditioning trains. 5. The relationship between P(T), the magnitude of potentiation immediately following repetitive stimulation, and tsu(H), the time constant for the decay of this potentiation, is given by tsu(H)=Ae-P(T)/B, where A=19-8 plus or minus 5-1 sec (mean plus or minus S.D. of an observation) and B increases from 2.2plus or minus 2-1 to 5-7 plus or minus 2-7 as the stimulation rate increases from 5 to 30/sec. 6. The value of A in the above equation can be considered to represent the minimal time constant for the decay of potentiation--that is, the time constant for decay after a simgle impulse. 7. Evidence is presented for a afacilitatory process with a time constant of decay of about 3 sec which is intermediate in duration between facilitation and potentiation. 8. It is suggested that repetitive stimulation has a dual effect on potentiation; each impulse (1) adds an increment of potentiation and (2) increases tsu(H), the time constant for the decay of potentiation.

Full text

PDF
163

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alnaes E., Rahamimoff R. Dual action of praseodymium (Pr3+) on transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular synapse. Nature. 1974 Feb 15;247(5441):478–479. doi: 10.1038/247478a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birks R. I., Cohen M. W. The influence of internal sodium on the behaviour of motor nerve endings. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1968 Jul 9;170(1021):401–421. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1968.0047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blaustein M. P., Wiesmann W. P. Effect of sodium ions on calcium movements in isolated synaptic terminals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Jul;66(3):664–671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.66.3.664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowen J. M., Merry E. H. Influence of d-tubocurarine, decamethonium and succinylcholine on repetitively evoked end-plate potentials. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1969 Jun;167(2):334–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Braun M., Schmidt R. F. Potential changes recorded from the frog motor nerve terminal during its activation. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1966;287(1):56–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00362454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Braun M., Schmidt R. F., Zimmermann M. Facilitation at the frog neuromuscular junction during and after repetitive stimulation. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1966;287(1):41–55. doi: 10.1007/BF00362453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooke J. D., Quastel D. M. Cumulative and persistent effects of nerve terminal depolarization on transmitter release. J Physiol. 1973 Jan;228(2):407–434. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):560–573. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Statistical factors involved in neuromuscular facilitation and depression. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):574–585. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gage P. W., Hubbard J. I. An investigation of the post-tetanic potentiation of end-plate potentials at a mammalian neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(2):353–375. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUBBARD J. I. REPETITIVE STIMULATION AT THE MAMMALIAN NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION, AND THE MOBILIZATION OF TRANSMITTER. J Physiol. 1963 Dec;169:641–662. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HUTTER O. F. Post-tetanic restoration of neuromuscular transmission blocked by D-tubocurarine. J Physiol. 1952 Oct;118(2):216–227. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hubbard J. I., Jones S. F., Landau E. M. The effect of temperature change upon transmitter release, facilitation and post-tetanic potentiation. J Physiol. 1971 Aug;216(3):591–609. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hurlbut W. P., Longenecker H. B., Jr, Mauro A. Effects of calcium and magnesium on the frequency of miniature end-plate potentials during prolonged tetanization. J Physiol. 1971 Dec;219(1):17–38. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LILEY A. W., NORTH K. A. An electrical investigation of effects of repetitive stimulation on mammalian neuromuscular junction. J Neurophysiol. 1953 Sep;16(5):509–527. doi: 10.1152/jn.1953.16.5.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. LILEY A. W. The quantal components of the mammalian end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):571–587. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. LLOYD D. P. C. Post-tetanic potentiation of response in monosynaptic reflex pathways of the spinal cord. J Gen Physiol. 1949 Nov;33(2):147–170. doi: 10.1085/jgp.33.2.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Landau E. M., Smolinsky A., Lass Y. Post-tetanic potentiation and facilitation do not share a common calcium-dependent mechanism. Nat New Biol. 1973 Aug 1;244(135):155–157. doi: 10.1038/newbio244155a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. MARTIN A. R. A further study of the statistical composition on the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1955 Oct 28;130(1):114–122. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maeno T. Analysis of mobilization and demobilization processes in neuromuscular transmission in the frog. J Neurophysiol. 1969 Sep;32(5):793–800. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.5.793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maeno T., Edwards C. Neuromuscular facilitation with low-frequency stimulation and effects of some drugs. J Neurophysiol. 1969 Sep;32(5):785–792. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.5.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Magleby K. L. The effect of repetitive stimulation on facilitation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Oct;234(2):327–352. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Magleby K. L. The effect of tetanic and post-tetanic potentiation on facilitation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Oct;234(2):353–371. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Magleby K. L., Zengel J. E. A quantitative description of tetanic and post-tetanic potentiation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1975 Feb;245(1):183–208. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mallart A., Martin A. R. An analysis of facilitation of transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1967 Dec;193(3):679–694. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Miledi R., Thies R. Tetanic and post-tetanic rise in frequency of miniature end-plate potentials in low-calcium solutions. J Physiol. 1971 Jan;212(1):245–257. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rosenthal J. Post-tetanic potentiation at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1969 Jul;203(1):121–133. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sherman R. G., Atwood H. L. Synaptic facilitation: long-term neuromuscular facilitation in crustaceans. Science. 1971 Mar 26;171(3977):1248–1250. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3977.1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. TAKEUCHI A. The long-lasting depression in neuromuscular transmission of frog. Jpn J Physiol. 1958 Jun 15;8(2):102–113. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.8.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. THIES R. E. NEUROMUSCULAR DEPRESSION AND THE APPARENT DEPLETION OF TRANSMITTER IN MAMMALIAN MUSCLE. J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28:428–442. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Weinreich D. Ionic mechanism of post-tetanic potentiation at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1971 Jan;212(2):431–446. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES