Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1974 Apr;238(1):145–158. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010515

Pancreatic acinar cells: membrane potential and resistance change evoked by acetylcholine

A Nishiyama, O H Petersen
PMCID: PMC1330867  PMID: 4838802

Abstract

1. Membrane potential and input resistance measurements were made on segments of pancreas from mice or rats, whereas potential measurements alone were made on pancreas from cats or rabbits placed in a tissue bath which was perfused with a Krebs—Henseleit solution.

2. The acinar cell membrane potential was about -40 mV and the input resistance 4-8 MΩ. Spontaneous miniature depolarization potentials were occasionally observed superimposed upon the resting potential. In these cases synchronous reductions in input resistance were observed.

3. The immediate effect of stimulation with ACh was always a depolarization and a concomitant reduction in input resistance and time constant. In some cases a secondary depolarization was observed accompanied by an increase in input resistance. The time constant, however, remained as short as in the first phase of depolarization.

4. In the rabbit pancreas ACh evoked biphasic potential changes: depolarization followed by hyperpolarization. A similar pattern could sometimes also be observed in the mouse pancreas following a brief pulse of ACh addition. In these cases the depolarization was followed by a small but relatively long lasting hyperpolarization. The depolarization was accompanied by a reduction in input resistance.

5. Pancreozymin caused depolarization of the acinar cell membrane and a marked reduction in input resistance and time constant.

6. In the presence of atropine (1·4 × 10-6 M) depolarization of the acinar cell membrane by an elevated K concentration (50 mM) in the bathing fluid did not reduce the input resistance.

7. It is concluded that the two physiological stimulants of pancreatic protein secretion, ACh and pancreozymin, act on the acinar cells by increasing the permeability of the plasma membrane.

Full text

PDF
145

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Argent B. E., Case R. M., Scratcherd T. Stimulation of amylase secretion from the perfused cat pancreas by potassium and other alkali metal ions. J Physiol. 1971 Aug;216(3):611–624. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benz L., Eckstein B., Matthews E. K., Williams J. A. Control of pancreatic amylase release in vitro: effects of ions, cyclic AMP, and colchicine. Br J Pharmacol. 1972 Sep;46(1):66–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1972.tb06849.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolton T. B. The depolarizing action of acetylcholine or carbachol in intestinal smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;220(3):647–671. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolton T. B. The role of electrogenic sodium pumping in the response of smooth muscle to acetylcholine. J Physiol. 1973 Feb;228(3):713–731. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Case R. M., Clausen T. The relationship between calcium exchange and enzyme secretion in the isolated rat pancreas. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;235(1):75–102. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. The membrane change produced by the neuromuscular transmitter. J Physiol. 1954 Sep 28;125(3):546–565. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dean P. M., Matthews E. K. Pancreatic acinar cells: measurement of membrane potential and miniature depolarization potentials. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;225(1):1–13. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Douglas W. W. Stimulus-secretion coupling: the concept and clues from chromaffin and other cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1968 Nov;34(3):451–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1968.tb08474.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fein H. Passing current through recording glass micro-pipette electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1966 Oct;13(4):211–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hidaka T., Kuriyama H. Responses of the smooth muscle membrane of guinea pig jejunum elicited by field stimulation. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Apr;53(4):471–486. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.4.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hokin L. E. Effects of calcium omission on acetylcholine-stimulated amylase secretion and phospholipid synthesis in pigeon pancreas slices. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Jan 25;115(1):219–221. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(66)90066-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Loewenstein W. R. Permeability of membrane junctions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jul 14;137(2):441–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Matthews E. K., Petersen O. H. Pancreatic acinar cells: ionic dependence of the membrane potential and acetycholine-induced depolarization. J Physiol. 1973 Jun;231(2):283–295. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Matthews E. K., Petersen O. H., Williams J. A. Pancreatic acinar cells: acetylcholine-induced membrane depolarization, calcium efflux and amylase release. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):689–701. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miledi R. Transmitter release induced by injection of calcium ions into nerve terminals. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1973 Jul 3;183(1073):421–425. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1973.0026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nielsen S. P., Petersen O. H. Transport of calcium in the perfused submandibular gland of the cat. J Physiol. 1972 Jun;223(3):685–697. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nishiyama A., Kagayama M. Biphasic secretory potentials in cat and rabbit submaxillary glands. Experientia. 1973 Feb 15;29(2):161–163. doi: 10.1007/BF01945449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Petersen O. H. Electrogenic sodium pump in pancreatic acinar cells. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1973 Aug 31;184(1074):115–119. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1973.0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Petersen O. H. Mechanism of action of pancreozymin and acetylcholine on pancreatic acinar cells. Nat New Biol. 1973 Jul 18;244(133):73–73. doi: 10.1038/newbio244073a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. Active phase of frog's end-plate potential. J Neurophysiol. 1959 Jul;22(4):395–411. doi: 10.1152/jn.1959.22.4.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES