INTRODUCTION
Vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive procedure typically performed in patients with vertebral fractures. Given the brief duration of the percutaneous procedure involving high-risk geriatric patients with multiple comorbidities, monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) is usually preferred to general anaesthesia (GA). In addition, MAC has fewer side effects than GA in patients undergoing the vertebroplasty procedure.[1] Hence, an optimal sedation regimen is the one that ensures cardiorespiratory stability while providing sufficient analgosedation in the prone position. The use of dexmedetomidine target-controlled infusion (TCI) has gained importance for procedures under sedation in the operating room (OR).[2]
CASE REPORT
We report four high-risk geriatric patients with pathological vertebral fractures who underwent prone vertebroplasties using dexmedetomidine TCI and ketamine analgosedation regimen. All patients have provided written consent for the publication of this report.
The patients were categorised as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class 3. The perioperative patient details are provided in Table 1. Every subject had a baseline visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain score more than 5. Electrocardiogram, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and non-invasive blood pressure monitors were attached, and baseline parameters were recorded in the OR. To minimise the pain before proning, intravenous (IV) fentanyl (1 μg/kg) and ketamine (0.25 mg/kg) boluses were administered along with IV glycopyrrolate (0.2 mg). Dexmedetomidine TCI and a separate IV ketamine manual infusion (0.5 mg/kg/h) were started in the prone position. The dexmedetomidine TCI using the Dyck pharmacokinetic model (Arcomed pump, Zurich, Switzerland) was titrated (Cp = 0.5 to 1.2 ng/ml) to an Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale of 3. All patients received high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) at a flow rate of 20–30 L/min to prevent intraoperative desaturation [Figure 1]. The vertebroplasties were performed after skin infiltration with 8–10 ml of 2% plain lignocaine, and none of the patients moved throughout the procedure. All patients were haemodynamically stable with SpO2 >95%, and none of the patients had an adverse respiratory event. Both sedations were discontinued 10 minutes before completion of the procedure, and the patients were turned supine. All patients had an OAA/S scale of 4 to 5 and a VAS of 2 to 3 in the immediate postoperative period without any delirium. The patients were shifted out of the post-anaesthetic care unit within 1 hour. There were no significant changes in renal and liver function parameters postoperatively.
Table 1.
Patient demographics and medical comorbidities
| Case Details | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) and gender | 73/male | 69/female | 67/female | 75/female |
| Weight (kg) | 55 | 52 | 58 | 54 |
| Diagnosis | D12 osteoporotic fracture | L1, D10, D12 osteoporotic fracture | D11 osteoporotic fracture | L2, L3, D6 osteoporotic fracture |
| Comorbidities | Carcinoma prostate, Parkinson’s disease, COPD, hypertension ECHO – EF 55% Grade 1 LVDD |
Diabetes, CLD (INR-1.7) with portal hypertension, ascites ECHO– EF 60% Grade 1 LVDD |
CKD on dialysis (elevated creatinine), diabetes, hypertension, post-CABG surgery, ECHO-EF 50%, dilated left atrium) Grade 1 LVDD | Bronchial asthma, hypertension, CKD on dialysis (elevated creatinine), history of pneumonia (CXR—mild pulmonary edema) ECHO – EF 60% Grade 1 LVDD |
| ASA class | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Baseline vitals | ||||
| HR (bpm) | 80 | 80 | 76 | 90 |
| BP (mmHg) | 170/90 | 125/80 | 145/98 | 160/90 |
| SpO2 (%) | 97 | 98 | 98 | 95% |
| Intraoperative vitals | ||||
| HR (bpm) | 80-90 | 85-111 | 78-89 | 78-100 |
| BP (mmHg) | 140-160/80-90 | 111-143/70-90 | 105-145/52-98 | 105-165/60-90 |
| Lowest SpO2 (%) | 100% | 99% | 98% | 100% |
ASA=American Society of Anesthesiologists, COPD=Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CKD=Chronic kidney disease, CLD=Chronic liver disease, CXR=Chest X-ray, ECHO=Electrocardiogram, HR=Heart rate, BP=Blood pressure, SpO2=Oxygen saturation, EF=Ejection fraction, LVDD=Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, INR=International normalised ratio, bpm=Beats per minute, CABG=Coronary artery bypass grafting
Figure 1.

Geriatric patient undergoing prone vertebroplasty with dexmedetomidine target-controlled infusion and ketamine analgosedation with high-flow nasal oxygenation
DISCUSSION
Dexmedetomidine and ketamine analgosedation provide numerous benefits for high-risk geriatric patients. Firstly, both dexmedetomidine and ketamine exert minimal effects on respiration and upper airway tone, thereby decreasing the likelihood of adverse airway events in the prone position. Secondly, the combination offers significant analgesic effects, thereby limiting patient movement and enhancing the surgical process. Thirdly, the opposing haemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine (a sympatholytic agent) and ketamine (a sympathetic stimulant) contribute to haemodynamic stability in the prone position. The dexmedetomidine TCI and ketamine protocol combined with HFNO ensured cardiorespiratory stability in our patients. Also, no postoperative delirium was observed with ketamine that could be attributed to the counteractive effects of dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine TCI using the Dyck model was chosen due to its precision and predictability, with a concentration range of 0 to 2 ng/ml yielding effective sedation.[3] Dexmedetomidine demonstrates a favourable safety profile in patients with renal and hepatic impairments.[4,5] Renal dysfunction may impede ketamine clearance; however, there is no evidence contraindicating the use of short duration subanaesthetic doses of ketamine infusions in patients with renal failure.[6] Modest increases in liver enzymes may occur with subanaesthetic doses of ketamine; however, this does not result in clinical liver impairment.[6]
CONCLUSION
The counteractive effects of dexmedetomidine and ketamine are beneficial when combined. The dexmedetomidine TCI and ketamine analgosedation regimen can be a safer option to ensure cardiorespiratory stability and facilitate the prone vertebroplasties in high-risk elderly patients.
Presentation at conferences/CMEs and abstract publication
Nil.
Study data availability
De-identified data may be requested with reasonable justification from the authors (email to the corresponding author) and shall be shared after approval as per the authors’ institution’s policy.
Disclosure of use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assistive or generative tools
The AI tools or language models (LLM) have not been utilised in the manuscript, except that software has been used for grammar corrections and references.
Declaration of use of permitted tools
The figures and tables are self-prepared and not copyrighted.
Author contributions
BV: Concepts, design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, conduct of cases, data acquisition, data analyses, and manuscript preparation. SA: Conduct of cases, manuscript preparation, editing, review and approval, supervision. DM: Conduct of cases, manuscript editing, review and approval, supervision. RG, SR: Manuscript editing, review and approval, supervision.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ge C, Wu X, Gao Z, Xu Z, Hao D, Dong L. Comparison of different anesthesia modalities during percutaneous kyphoplasty of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Sci Rep. 2021;11:11102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90621-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shah SB, Chawla R, Kaur C, Bhasin N. Dexmedetomidine target-controlled infusion-based sedoanalgesic technique for awake craniotomy in brain neoplasms: A case series. Indian J Anaesth 2025. 69:1089–91. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_630_25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Al-Attar A, Back M, Sebastian J. Dexmedetomidine target controlled infusion for awake craniotomy† . Anaesth Rep. 2024;12:e12283. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Loomba RS, Villarreal EG, Dhargalkar J, Rausa J, Dorsey V, Farias JS, et al. The effect of dexmedetomidine on renal function after surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022;47:287–97. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang ZX, Huang CY, Hua YP, Huang WQ, Deng LH, Liu KX. Dexmedetomidine reduces intestinal and hepatic injury after hepatectomy with inflow occlusion under general anaesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:1055–64. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gorlin AW, Rosenfeld DM, Ramakrishna H. Intravenous sub-anesthetic ketamine for perioperative analgesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016;32:160–7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.182085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
De-identified data may be requested with reasonable justification from the authors (email to the corresponding author) and shall be shared after approval as per the authors’ institution’s policy.
