Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1974 Aug;240(3):725–739. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010631

Differential reaction of fast and slow α-motoneurones to axotomy

M Kuno, Y Miyata, E J Muñoz-Martinez
PMCID: PMC1331003  PMID: 4412819

Abstract

1. The properties of medial gastrocnemius (m.g., fast α) and soleus (sol., slow α) motoneurones of the cat were examined with intracellular electrodes 8-119 days after section of the muscle nerves.

2. The axonal conduction velocity was significantly decreased in both m.g. and sol. motoneurones after chronic section of the muscle nerves.

3. The amplitude of overshoot of action potentials was significantly increased in both m.g. and sol. motoneurones following section of the muscle nerves.

4. No significant changes in the resting membrane potential or the input resistance were observed for sol. motoneurones, whereas m.g. motoneurones showed a slight decrease in the resting potential and a slight increase in the input resistance.

5. The duration of after-hyperpolarization was significantly decreased in sol. motoneurones, whereas that in m.g. motoneurones remained virtually unchanged or increased slightly following section of the muscle nerves.

6. The changes described above were not seen in the preparations examined 29-46 days after section of the lumbosacral dorsal roots, suggesting that alterations in the motoneurone properties observed after section of the muscle nerves resulted from axotomy of the motoneurones rather than from sensory deprivation.

7. The differences in electrophysiological properties between m.g. and sol. motoneurones were less prominent in axotomized animals than in control, unoperated cats.

8. It is concluded that fast (m.g.) and slow (sol.) α-motoneurones have qualitatively different properties. A possible `dedifferentiation' of fast and slow α-motoneurones by axotomy is discussed.

Full text

PDF
725

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BULLER A. J., ECCLES J. C., ECCLES R. M. Differentiation of fast and slow muscles in the cat hind limb. J Physiol. 1960 Feb;150:399–416. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BULLER A. J., ECCLES J. C., ECCLES R. M. Interactions between motoneurones and muscles in respect of the characteristic speeds of their responses. J Physiol. 1960 Feb;150:417–439. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BULLER A. J., LEWIS D. M. FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE DIFFERENTIATION OF SKELETAL MUSCLES IN THE KITTEN HIND LIMB. J Physiol. 1965 Feb;176:355–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke R. E., Jankowska E., ten Bruggencate G. A comparison of peripheral and rubrospinal synaptic input to slow and fast twitch motor units of triceps surae. J Physiol. 1970 May;207(3):709–732. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burke R. E. Motor unit types of cat triceps surae muscle. J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(1):141–160. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CLOSE R. DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF FAST AND SLOW SKELETAL MUSCLES OF THE RAT DURING DEVELOPMENT. J Physiol. 1964 Sep;173:74–95. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CRAGG B. G., THOMAS P. K. Changes in conduction velocity and fibre size proximal to peripheral nerve lesions. J Physiol. 1961 Jul;157:315–327. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ECCLES J. C., ECCLES R. M., LUNDBERG A. The action potentials of the alpha motoneurones supplying fast and slow muscles. J Physiol. 1958 Jul 14;142(2):275–291. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. ECCLES J. C., FATT P., KOKETSU K. Cholinergic and inhibitory synapses in a pathway from motor-axon collaterals to motoneurones. J Physiol. 1954 Dec 10;126(3):524–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ECCLES J. C., LIBET B., YOUNG R. R. The behaviour of chromatolysed motoneurones studied by intracellular recording. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 29;143(1):11–40. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. FRANK K., FUORTES M. G. Stimulation of spinal motoneurones with intracellular electrodes. J Physiol. 1956 Nov 28;134(2):451–470. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hodgkin A. L., Nakajima S. The effect of diameter on the electrical constants of frog skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;221(1):105–120. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hongo T., Jankowska E., Lundberg A. The rubrospinal tract. I. Effects on alpha-motoneurones innervating hindlimb muscles in cats. Exp Brain Res. 1969;7(4):344–364. doi: 10.1007/BF00237320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KIRALY J. K., KRNJEVIC K. Some retrograde changes in function of nerves after peripheral section. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1959 Jul;44:244–257. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1959.sp001397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. KUNO M. Excitability following antidromic activation in spinal motoneurones supplying red muscles. J Physiol. 1959 Dec;149:374–393. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kellerth J. O., Mellström A., Skoglund S. Postnatal excitability changes of kitten motoneurones. Acta Physiol Scand. 1971 Sep;83(1):31–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1971.tb05048.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kernell D. Input resistance, electrical excitability, and size of ventral horn cells in cat spinal cord. Science. 1966 Jun 17;152(3729):1637–1640. doi: 10.1126/science.152.3729.1637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuno M., Llinás R. Enhancement of synaptic transmission by dendritic potentials in chromatolysed motoneurones of the cat. J Physiol. 1970 Nov;210(4):807–821. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lieberman A. R. The axon reaction: a review of the principal features of perikaryal responses to axon injury. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1971;14:49–124. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60183-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. MCPHEDRAN A. M., WUERKER R. B., HENNEMAN E. PROPERTIES OF MOTOR UNITS IN A HETEROGENEOUS PALE MUSCLE (M. GASTROCNEMIUS) OF THE CAT. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Jan;28:85–99. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.1.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McINTYRE A. K., BRADLEY K., BROCK L. G. Responses of motoneurons undergoing chromatolysis. J Gen Physiol. 1959 May 20;42(5):931–958. doi: 10.1085/jgp.42.5.931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miledi R., Stefani E., Steinbach A. B. Induction of the action potential mechanism in slow muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1971 Sep;217(3):737–754. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. PRESTON J. B., WHITLOCK D. G. A comparison of motor cortex effects on slow and fast muscle innervations in the monkey. Exp Neurol. 1963 Apr;7:327–341. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(63)90079-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pitman R. M., Tweedle C. D., Cohen M. J. Electrical responses of insect central neurons: augmentation by nerve section or colchicine. Science. 1972 Nov 3;178(4060):507–509. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4060.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ridge R. M. The differentiation of conduction velocities of slow twitch and fast twitch muscle motor innervations in kittens and cats. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1967 Jul;52(3):293–304. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1967.sp001915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shapovalov A. I., Grantyn' A. A. Nadsegmentarnye sinapticheskie vliianiia na khromatolizirovannye motoneirony. Biofizika. 1968 Mar-Apr;13(2):260–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Watson W. E. Observations on the nucleolar and total cell body nucleic acid of injured nerve cells. J Physiol. 1968 Jun;196(3):655–676. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Watson W. E. Some quantitative observations upon the oxidation of substrates of the tricarboxylic acid cycle in injured neurons. J Neurochem. 1966 Sep;13(9):849–856. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1966.tb05880.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES