Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1974 Jul;240(2):375–396. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010615

The effects of load and force on tremor at the normal human elbow joint

G C Joyce, Peter M H Rack
PMCID: PMC1331021  PMID: 4419584

Abstract

1. Spontaneous flexion-extension tremor of the elbow was recorded in normal human subjects while they exerted a flexing force against different loads.

2. Increases in the flexing force up to ½ or ¾ of the subject's maximum were accompanied by increases in the amplitude of the tremor. A further increase to very large forces was associated with a decrease in tremor.

3. When the subject flexed against a spring, the frequency of the tremor was related to the properties of the spring; with increasingly stiff springs the tremor frequency increased up to about 12 Hz. With the stiffest springs, however, the tremor became irregular and very small in amplitude.

4. Weights added to the limb at the wrist reduced the frequency of tremor.

5. By using appropriate combinations of spring and mass, the principal tremor frequency could be adjusted between 2 and 12 Hz, higher in some subjects. Within this range the frequency2 was approximately proportional to the spring stiffness/mass, just as it is in a spring-mass system, though the forearm provided some of this mass, and some of the spring-like resistance was in the flexor muscles.

6. When by suitable loading the tremor frequency was brought between 8 and 12 Hz, and the subject forcibly flexed his elbow, the tremor became regular and large in amplitude. This was a form of limited instability in the stretch reflex which arose because a powerful reflex response to extension of the elbow acted back on the flexor muscles after a delay.

7. When the limb was so loaded that its natural frequency was outside this 8-12 Hz range, it behaved as a filter, and in response to any disturbing noise it oscillated mainly at frequencies close to the natural frequencies of either the mechanical system or the stretch reflex.

8. This filtering function of the limb with its stretch reflex probably plays an important part in the control of normal movement and tremor.

9. The large flexing forces that were here associated with vigorous tremor normally occur when a limb supports a large mass. Such a mass would give the mechanical system within the limb a low natural frequency; inconveniently large oscillations in the 8-12 Hz range would therefore seldom occur.

Full text

PDF
375

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fox J. R., Randall J. E. Relationship between forearm tremor and the biceps electromyogram. J Appl Physiol. 1970 Jul;29(1):103–108. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1970.29.1.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HALLIDAY A. M., REDFEARN J. W. An analysis of the frequencies of finger tremor in healthy subjects. J Physiol. 1956 Dec 28;134(3):600–611. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HAMMOND P. H., MERTON P. A., SUTTON G. G. Nervous gradation of muscular contraction. Br Med Bull. 1956 Sep;12(3):214–218. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a069553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones G. M., Watt D. G. Observations on the control of stepping and hopping movements in man. J Physiol. 1971 Dec;219(3):709–727. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Joyce G. C., Rack P. M., Ross H. F. The forces generated at the human elbow joint in response to imposed sinusoidal movements of the forearm. J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):351–374. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Joyce G. C., Rack P. M. The effect of force on elbow tremor. J Physiol. 1971 Jul;216(1):29P–30P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lippold O. C. Oscillation in the stretch reflex arc and the origin of the rhythmical, 8-12 C-S component of physiological tremor. J Physiol. 1970 Feb;206(2):359–382. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MARSHALL J., WALSH E. G. Physiological tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1956 Nov;19(4):260–267. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.19.4.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marsden C. D., Meadows J. C., Lange G. W., Watson R. S. Effect of deafferentation on human physiological tremor. Lancet. 1967 Sep 30;2(7518):700–702. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90977-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marsden C. D., Meadows J. C., Lange G. W., Watson R. S. Variations in human physiological finger tremor, with particular reference to changes with age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1969 Aug;27(2):169–178. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(69)90170-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stiles R. N., Randall J. E. Mechanical factors in human tremor frequency. J Appl Physiol. 1967 Sep;23(3):324–330. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1967.23.3.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sutton G. G., Sykes K. The effect of withdrawal of visual presentation of errors upon the frequency spectrum of tremor in a manual task. J Physiol. 1967 May;190(2):281–293. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sutton G. G., Sykes K. The variation of hand tremor with force in healthy subjects. J Physiol. 1967 Aug;191(3):699–711. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. TAYLOR A. The significance of grouping of motor unit activity. J Physiol. 1962 Jul;162:259–269. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yap C. B., Boshes B. The frequency and pattern of normal tremor. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1967 Mar;22(3):197–203. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(67)90221-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES