Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1972 Aug;225(1):33–56. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009928

Potassium conductance changes in skeletal muscle and the potassium concentration in the transverse tubules

W Almers
PMCID: PMC1331093  PMID: 4547276

Abstract

1. When one hyperpolarizes a muscle fibre by passing electric current, the K conductance declines with time. Voltage-clamp experiments on frog sartorius muscle fibres showed that two components contribute to this decline.

2. A rapid component operates when the fibre is hyperpolarized to potentials more negative than -120 mV. Decline by this mechanism is reversed completely within 200 msec. The large effect of temperature on the kinetics of this process indicates that it represents a time-dependent membrane permeability change.

3. A slow component operates also at less negative potentials. Recovery at -65 mV takes place with half-times of about 0·4 sec. The Q10 for the rate of recovery is 1·3, indicating that this process is diffusion limited.

4. After prolonged hyperpolarization to potentials positive to -120 mV, membrane current at the resting potential is outward and persists for several seconds. At that time, the potential measured in the absence of membrane current is shifted in the negative direction by 3-5 mV.

5. This shift and the time course of currents near the resting potential after hyperpolarization as well as the Q10 of 1·3 indicate that the slow process is due to changes in tubular K concentration and not to a time-dependent membrane permeability change.

6. At potentials less negative than -120 mV, tubular depletion can satisfactorily account for the decline of K conductance. At more negative potentials, the decline appears to be due to both depletion and a permeability change.

Full text

PDF
33

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADRIAN R. H., FREYGANG W. H. Potassium conductance of frog muscle membrane under controlled voltage. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;163:104–114. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. Slow changes in potassium permeability in skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;208(3):645–668. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. Voltage clamp experiments in striated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;208(3):607–644. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adrian R. H., Freygang W. H. The potassium and chloride conductance of frog muscle membrane. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;163(1):61–103. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Almers W. The decline of potassium permeability during extreme hyperpolarization in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;225(1):57–83. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown H. F., Noble S. J. Membrane currents underlying delayed rectification and pace-maker activity in frog atrial muscle. J Physiol. 1969 Oct;204(3):717–736. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisenberg R. S., Gage P. W. Ionic conductances of the surface and transverse tubular membranes of frog sartorius fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Mar;53(3):279–297. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.3.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FRANKENHAEUSER B., MOORE L. E. THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON THE SODIUM AND POTASSIUM PERMEABILITY CHANGES IN MYELINATED NERVE FIBRES OF XENOPUS LAEVIS. J Physiol. 1963 Nov;169:431–437. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FREYGANG W. H., Jr, GOLDSTEIN D. A., HELLAM D. C. THE AFTER-POTENTIAL THAT FOLLOWS TRAINS OF IMPULSES IN FROG MUSCLE FIBERS. J Gen Physiol. 1964 May;47:929–952. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.5.929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. The effect of sudden changes in ionic concentrations on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1960 Sep;153:370–385. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. The influence of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:127–160. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nakajima S., Nakajima Y., Peachey L. D. Speed of repolarization and morphology of glycerol-treated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(2):115P–116P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peachey L. D. The sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubules of the frog's sartorius. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3 Suppl):209–231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stanfield P. R. The differential effects of tetraethylammonium and zinc ions on the resting conductance of frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;209(1):231–256. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES