Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: Talanta. 2026 Jan 9;302:129380. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2026.129380

Amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrodes for bioanalytical sensing and imaging

Jiyeon Kim a, Shigeru Amemiya b,*
PMCID: PMC13312331  NIHMSID: NIHMS2189624  PMID: 41546886

Abstract

This review is focused on the recent applications of amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrodes as emerging electrochemical methods for bioanalytical sensing and imaging. The amperometric nanoelectrodes offer advantages over the potentiometric counterparts toward unprecedented in-vitro and in-vivo ion analysis of biological systems. The amperometric nanoelectrodes serve not only as electrochemical ion sensors based on highly selective ionophores but also as the tips of scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) to enable ion imaging with a spatial resolution of down to 30 nm. Moreover, the high biocompatibility and simple fabrication of ion-selective nanopipets and micropipets are attractive for in vivo bioanalysis. Specifically, we will introduce the principle of amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrodes as well as nanoscale SECM for bioanalytical sensing and imaging, respectively. Applications of amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrodes are exemplified by nanoscale SECM imaging of molecular transport at the single nuclear pore complex and chemical interactions among single bacterial cells. The powerful sensing applications of amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrodes are illustrated for the detection of carbonate generated by bacterial cells as well as both in-vitro and in-vivo detection of neurotransmitter acetylcholine.

Keywords: Ion-selective nanoelectrode, Nanoscale scanning electrochemical, microscopy, In-vivo neuroanalysis, Ionophore, Bacteria, Nuclear pore complex

1. Introduction

Amperometric ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) based on liquid or polymeric membranes [1–3] have emerged as advanced electrochemical sensors by employing the powerful ion-recognition chemistry of the traditional potentiometric counterparts [4,5]. In potentiometry (Fig. 1A), an analyte ion is present in both the aqueous sample and hydrophobic membrane to measure an equilibrium nernstian potential across the phase boundary. The resultant ion selectivity is controlled by the thermodynamics of ion transfer and ion–ionophore complexation. The potentiometric membrane is doped with an anionic (or cationic) site to accommodate an analyte cation (or anion) as an ionophore complex. By contrast, an amperometric membrane is doped with a pair of cationic and anionic sites as supporting electrolytes to polarize the phase boundary with the minimal membrane resistance (Fig. 1B). An analyte ion is initially present only in the sample and transferred into the membrane when an appropriate potential is externally applied across the phase boundary to measure the current response controlled by the ion-transfer rate. The resultant ion selectivity is determined not only by the same thermodynamics as potentiometry but also by the ion-transfer kinetics.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Initial compositions of (A) potentiometric and (B) amperometric ion-selective membranes in contact with an aqueous sample solution of a target analyte cation, I+. L, ionophore; LI+, ionophore–ion complex; R−, anionic site; R+, cationic site; X−, aqueous anion.

Potentiometric ISEs [4,5] have been developed for several decades not only to find a variety of important practical applications [6–8] but also to manifest the limitations of the equilibrium principle [4,9]. Potentiometric ISEs can detect more than 60 analyte ions [10–13] without the need for redox activity to enable clinical [14,15] and environmental [16,17] analysis and more recently wireless [18,19] and wearable [20,21] sensing [22]. An ionophore is added to a membrane to recognize an analyte ion with high selectivity, which is also required to reach a detection limit of down to low nanomolar [23]. An ion-selective membrane can be supported by a metal or carbon electrode with an ion-to-electron transducer to constitute all-solid-state ISEs [24,25]. Simple equilibrium potentiometry, however, limits the application of highly selective ion–ionophore recognition by allowing the detection of only one analyte ion with a single ISE and following the Nernst equation with lower sensitivity to an analyte ion with a higher charge [4,9].

Advantageously, the amperometric and voltammetric operation of liquid or polymeric membrane ISEs can overcome the limitations of the potentiometric counterpart in selectivity, sensitivity, and detection limit. Traditionally, a bulk organic electrolyte was employed as an ion-selective phase for amperometric and voltammetric ISEs to require an unconventional four-electrode cell and a large amount of ionophores [26]. These practical limitations can be overcome by operating solid-state ISEs in amperometric and voltammetric modes [27,28]. The current response varies with the charge of an analyte ion to yield high sensitivity to polyions [27,29]. Moreover, ion selectivity can be controlled voltammetrically to detect multiple ions at different potentials by using a single ISE [30,31]. Furthermore, an analyte ion can be preconcentrated into the thin membrane and then transferred reversely by stripping voltammetry to achieve a detection limit of down to picomolars [27,32–36]. The low detection limits can be achieved by eliminating adventitious contaminant ions, which were detectable voltammetrically but not potentiometrically to unknowingly compromise the detection limits at nanomolar levels.

This article features the recent advancement of amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrodes as a powerful alternative to the potentiometric counterparts [37] for bioanalytical sensing and imaging. Potentiometric ISEs have been miniaturized to the nanometer scale and applied for the in-vitro and in-vivo analysis of physiological ions for many years [38]. The synergy between the high biocompatibility and powerful amperometric operation of nanoscale ISEs has enabled unprecedented bioanalytical applications of the emerging electrochemical method [39]. Specifically, we will introduce the principle, fabrication, and characterization of amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrodes based on glass or quartz nanopipets. Amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrodes can be used as a tip of nanoscale scanning electrochemical microscopy [40,41] for high-resolution imaging of biological events as represented by molecular transport through single nuclear pore complexes [42] and chemical interactions among single bacterial cells [43,44]. Advantageously, an amperometric response is sensitive to the tip–substrate distance in contrast to the potentiometric counterpart, thereby facilitating the precise distance control required for high-resolution SECM measurements [45]. Moreover, the highly selective ionohores developed for potentiometric ISEs are compatible with amperometric nanoelectrodes as exemplified for the detection of carbonante in bacterial suspensions [46]. Furthermore, ionophore-based amperometric nanoelectrodes [47,48] and microelectrodes [49,50] enabled the in vitro and in vivo detection of acetylcholine, respectively, as an imperative neurotransmitter without redox activity.

Fundamentally, amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrodes are built upon electrochemistry at liquid/liquid interfaces also known as the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES) [1–3]. This important topic of electrochemistry has been introduced and discussed in a number of seminal [26,51,52] and recent [2,53] reviews, which are complementary to this review. Both thermodynamics and kinetics of ion transfer across liquid/liquid interfaces have been well established theoretically [54] and verified experimentally even at the nanoscale [46,55–58]. Heterogeneous electron transfer across the liquid/liquid interfaces can be described within the framework of Marcus theory [59–61] and examined experimentally by using SECM [62]. The structure and thickness of liquid/liquid interfaces have also been assessed both theoretically and experimentally [63]. Practically, electrochemistry at liquid/liquid interfaces has been useful for various interdisciplinary areas of nanoscience and nanotechnology including ion sensing at an array of nanoscale liquid/liquid interfaces [64], interfacial assembly and characterization of nanomaterials [65], and electrochemical detection of single nanoparticles [66,67] including nanoemulsions as nanoscale liquid/liquid interfaces [68–71]. Furthermore, nanoscale liquid/liquid interfaces are naturally formed by phase separation in biological cells [72] and can be studied or relevant electrochemically [73].

2. Amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrode

A glass or quartz nanopipet is filled with a water-immiscible organic solution of highly lipophilic electrolytes and immersed in an aqueous electrolyte solution to serve as an amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrode [2] (Fig. 2A). The organic phase may contain only hydrophobic electrolytes to drive the simple transfer of an analyte ion across the nanoscale liquid/liquid interface

Iz(aq)⇌Iz(org) (1)

where Iz is an analyte ion with a charge of z in the aqueous or organic phase. The mechanism of simple ion transfer has been described by Marcus theory [54], which is based on the water fingers predicted by molecular dynamics simulation [74] and was assessed voltammetrically by using ion-selective nanoelectrodes [55,56]. Simple ion transfer may be facilitated by an ionophore, L, in the organic phase through the non-concerted mechanism

Iz(org)+L(org)⇌LIz(org) (2)

where LIz is an ionophore–ion complex. Alternatively, facilitated ion transfer may be driven through the concerted mechanism

Iz(aq)+L(org)⇌LIz(org) (3)

Both mechanisms are equivalent thermodynamically as represented by the identical formal potential but not equivalent kinetically [77] and can be discriminated from each other electrochemically as demonstrated by using ion-selective micropipets [57] and nanopipets [46,58].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

(A) Amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrode based on ion transfer across the liquid/liquid interface supported by a nanopipet. Reproduced from Ref. [1] with permission from Elsevier. (B) SEM image of a quartz nanopipet coated with a thin Au film. Reproduced from Ref. [75] with permission from the American Chemical Society. (C) TEM image of an as-pulled quartz nanopipet. Reproduced from Ref. [76] with permission from the American Chemical Society.

Experimentally, a metal electrode is inserted into the organic phase to externally control the potential across the nanoscale liquid/liquid interface against an aqueous reference electrode and measure the current based on interfacial ion transfer. The interfacial potential must be more negative (or positive) with respect to the formal potential of cation (or anion) transfer to accelerate the ion-transfer rate. The interfacial potential can be controlled accurately without a substantial Ohmic potential drop in the organic phase, which contains a high concentration of electrolytes and carries only low current. With sufficient potentials, the resultant ionic current can be limited by the steady-state diffusion of the transferred ions from the aqueous solution to the interface as given by

iT,∞=4xzFDc0a (4)

where x is a function of RG [78] (=rg/a≈1.4 typically; a and rg are the inner and outer radii of a pipet tip), F is the Faraday constant, and D and c0 are the diffusion coefficient and concentration of the transferred ions in the bulk aqueous solution. Eq (4) is valid for facilitated ion transfer when an excess amount of an ionophore is present in the organic phase to deplete an analyte ion near the interface [79]. The transferred ions efficiently diffuse away into the organic phase through the tapered region of the nanopipet to yield a steady-state cyclic voltammogram. By contrast, a reverse peak current is expected at the micropipet-supported interface [79].

An experimental protocol has been well established and detailed [46] to obtain the reproducible current response of ion-selective electrodes based on the organic-filled nanopipets. A glass or quartz capillary is heat-pulled by using a computer-controlled CO2-laser puller to reproducibly obtain a nanopipet with a tip diameter of down to 10 nm [80]. The tip size can be imaged by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of a nanopipet coated with a ~3 nm-thick metal layer (Fig. 2B [75]) or directly by transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Fig. 2C [76]). In TEM, the electron-beam intensity must be optimized to prevent the melting of the insulating nanopipet tip. The size of the nanoscale liquid/liquid interface is determined electrochemically from the diffusion-limited steady-state current (eq (4)) or more strictly from the approach curve of SECM. The liquid/liquid interface is spontaneously and reproducibly formed at the very tip of a nanopipet to minimize the contact area between the mutually immiscible solutions when the inner wall of the organic-filled pipet is tapered and sufficiently hydrophobic. The wall of a nanopipet can be reproducibly rendered hydrophobic by reacting under a dry atmosphere with N,N-dimethyltrimethylsilylamine as a silanization reagent with moderate reactivity [81]. The tip end can be blocked by a polymeric material when the tip is treated with a highly reactive silanization reagent, e.g., trimethylchlorosilane, under a wet atmosphere [55]. Reproducible current responses are obtained by preventing the adventitious contamination of a silanized nanopipet in a clean hood when the pipet is filled with an organic electrolyte solution, equipped with a clean and corrosion-resistant Cu/Ni wire, and inspected by light microscopy [46].

3. Nanoscale scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM)

Amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrodes were employed as tips of nanoscale SECM [40,41] to achieve a spatial resolution of less than 100 nm for imaging a substrate fully immersed in the solution for the first time [82]. By contrast, an unconventional setup was used to achieve a higher spatial resolution of ~1 nm for SECM imaging of biological macromolecules, which were placed on a mica substrate covered with a thin layer of condensed water (a few nanometers or less) [83]. Specifically, reproducible nanoscale SECM imaging was enabled by the precise positioning of an amperometric nanoelectrode tip to image ion transport through single solid-state nanopores with a spatial resolution of 30 nm [76,82] (Fig. 3A). An ~30 nm-diameter ion-selective nanopipet was moved vertically by monitoring the amperometric tip current response to tetrabutylammonium (TBA+). The tip current was lowered as the tip was positioned near the insulating part of the membrane, which hindered the diffusion of TBA+ to the tip (Fig. 3B). The tip current was peaked over a nanopore as the tip was scanned laterally over a nanoporous membrane by maintaining a short tip–substrate distance of ~1 nm. The precise control of the tip position was enabled by a nanoscale SECM instrument equipped with an isothermal chamber and closed-loop piezo actuators based on capacitive feedback [84,85]. The finite element analysis of SECM images confirmed that the high spatial resolution of ~30 nm was limited by the tip diameter of a nanopipet. More quantitatively, the pore diameter in the SECM image was larger than the actual pore diameter owing to the lateral diffusion of TBA+ in the gap between the tip and the pore. The diffusion effect on the pore size in the SECM image was ensured by employing a periodic array of solid-state nanopores with uniform pore diameters of 100 nm as determined by TEM [76]. In addition, the tip diameter of a nanopipet was determined by TEM (Fig. 1C) to ensure the reliability of quantitative finite element analysis.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

(A) TEM image of a nanoporous Si membrane, (B) SECM imaging of the membrane by an amperometric ion-selective nanopipet with a 30 nm diameter, and (C) the resultant image of thirteen nanopores in 10 mM TBACl and 0.3 M KCl. The nanopipet was filled with the 1,2-dichloroethane solution of tetradodecylammonium (TDDA) tetrakis (pentafluorophenyl)borate (TFAB). Reproduced from Ref. [82] with permission from the American Chemical Society.

The application of amperometric ion-selective nanopipets for SECM imaging of single nanopore permeability is significant. The nanoporous membranes are molecularly thin (~10 nm in thickness) to yield much higher permeability than traditional nanoporous membranes. The ultrathin membranes are robust enough to self-stand in the solution [86], thereby serving as superior alternatives for hemodialysis [87] and cell co-culture [88] as well as enabling nanomaterials for wearable artificial kidney [89] and tissue-on-chips [90]. Moreover, the ultrathin nanoporous membranes can be the solid-state morphological mimic of the nuclear envelope perforated by nuclear pore complexes with a pore radius of 24 nm and a pore length of 35 nm [91].

An amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrode offers important advantages for high-resolution SECM imaging of biological samples. An ion-selective nanoelectrode is robust in comparison with a solid nanoelectrode based on an electronic conductor, e.g., platinum [92] and carbon [93], which is readily damaged by electrostatic charge. Electrostatic charges may be injected from an operator to the contact wire of a nanoelectrode or the operational amplifier of a potentiostat. The respective sources of electrostatic charges can be eliminated by grounding the operator under high humidity and by maintaining the connection between the potentiostat and the electrochemical cell [84, 92]. The absence of tip damage can be confirmed by SEM or TEM after the use of the nanotip [84]. In addition, the use of an ion-transfer reaction at the tip and the substrate is advantageous for high-resolution SECM imaging. When an electron-transfer reaction is employed, an electron may tunnel across the solution between the nanotip and the substrate to operate in the mode of scanning tunneling microscopy. Without special care [94], it is hard to distinguish between the tunneling current and the faradaic current at the tip, thereby leaving ambiguity in the interpretation of the resultant image [95].

4. Molecular transport through the nuclear pore complex (NPC)

Recently, we employed amperometric ion-selective nanoppipets as SECM tips to image TBA+ transport through single NPCs with a spatial resolution of ~30 nm, which was high enough to distinguish between plugged and unplugged NPCs [42]. The NPC solely transports small molecules, proteins, and RNAs between the nucleus and cytoplasm of a eukaryotic cell to play imperative biological [96,97] and biomedical [98,99] roles. The NPC is crucial to the regulation of gene expression [100,101] and is linked to many diseases [102,103] including cancers [104], neuronal diseases [105,106], and infectious diseases [107,108]. Single NPC imaging represents the unprecedented power and significance of nanoscale SECM, which determined the impermeability of plugged NPCs to support the hypothesis that the central plugs are not permeable transporters intrinsic to the NPC [109] but are impermeable cargos, e.g., ribonucleoproteins (RNPs), captured during translocation through the central pathway [110]. These two origins have been debated for decades [109–111] but cannot be distinguished by structural imaging of plugged NPCs using cryo-electron tomography [111–116] or AFM [117,118].

We employed AFM to image the cytoplasmic side of plugged and unplugged NPCs (Fig. 4A and B, respectively) at the NE isolated from the large nucleus of a Xenopus laevis oocyte and incubated in buffer solutions containing physiological sub-micromolar or low millimolar concentrations of Ca2+, respectively [119]. The NE was fixed with glutaraldehyde to maintain the plugged and unplugged states of the NPCs [118] without altering the permeability to a small probe ion, TBA+, as confirmed by microscale SECM. We employed ~30 nm-diameter ion-selective pipets to distinguish between plugged and unplugged NPCs by SECM imaging. The tip current response to TBA+ stayed low over the center of a plugged NPC (Fig. 4C) but increased detectably over the center of an unplugged NPC (Fig. 4D). The size of the plug is equivalent to that of RNP [110] and is large enough to detectably prevent the flux of TBA+ driven through the NPC by the nanopipet. The central location of the impermeable plug supports our hypothesis that the NPC is divided into the central pathway for RNA/RNP export [42] and the peripheral pathway for protein import [120,121]. Technologically, the detection of the macromolecular plug is a crucial step toward SECM-based Coulter counting [122,123] to resolve the translocation of single macromolecules through the single NPC.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

(A) and (B) AFM images of multiple NPCs and (C) and (D) amperometric SECM images of TBA+ transport through single NPCs with ~30-nm diameter ion-selective nanopipets. NPCs were plugged in (A) and (C) and unplugged in (B) and (D). The nanopipet was filled with the 1,2-dichloroethane solution of TDDATFAB. Reproduced from Ref. [42] with permission from the American Chemical Society.

It should be noted that the limitation of nanoscale electrodes is the difficulty in performing transient measurements, which are feasible [124]. Alternatively, amperometric ion-selective microelectrodes were employed for the transient SECM studies of interactions between NPCs and arginine-containing dipeptide repeats (DPRs) [125,126] as NPC-blocking neurotoxines [127]. Arginine-containing DPRs of proteins resulting from the disordered C9orf72 gene have been suspected as a potential cause of serious neurological diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, also known as Lou Gehrig’s and Pick’s diseases, respectively [128]. Experimentally, an ion-selective microelectrode was doped with dinonylnaphthalene sulfonate as a negatively charged ionophore for polycations [129,130] to measure a chronoamperometric response to twenty repeats of neurotoxic glycine–arginine, GR20, and proline–arginine, PR20, as well as protamine [131,132]. The tip was positioned near the nuclear envelope of the Xenopus oocyte nucleus supported by a microporous membrane [119] and equilibrated with DPRs in the aqueous solution. The equilibrium was disturbed instantaneously by stepping the tip potential to amperometrically transfer the polycationic DPRs from the aqueous solution [131,132]. The tip current was enhanced by the desorption of DPRs from the NPCs and analyzed numerically to demonstrate that the DPRs are bound to the NPC nanopore for much longer than the physiological nuclear transport receptors, thereby clogging the nanopore to express neurotoxicity.

5. Chemical interactions among bacteria

In this section, we introduce the application of amperometric ion-selective nanpipets for the detection of lactate [43], CO32- [46], and antimicrobial drugs [75] to understand chemical interactions among bacteria. Real-time sensing and monitoring of the interaction between bacteria and molecules, e.g., exogenous chemicals or metabolites, are critical to chemically understand bacterial physiology especially for clinical and energy applications. We recently employed nanoscale SECM with ion-selective nanopipets to address the real-time commensal metabolic interaction in the oral microbiome [43,44]. The human oral microbiome heavily influences the status of not only oral but also systemic disease development through different microbial compositions and complex signaling between microbes [133]. Despite the recent discovery of the unique biogeography among oral microbes by optical microscopy [134,135], it has not been well understood how stable communities are maintained and how they may preserve health with ex-situ and ensemble measurements. Direct probing of metabolites in real-time near single bacterial cells at high spatial resolution is highly demanded to elucidate the metabolic interaction between oral microbes, and to mechanistically understand bacterial performance. We investigated the coculture of two highly abundant species in the human supragingival plaque, Streptococcus mitis (S. mitis) and Corynebacterium matruchotii (C. matruchotii) by applying nanoscale SECM and a submicropipet-supported ITIES as an SECM probe tip not only to image the permeability of S. mitis and C. matruchotii membranes to tetraethylammonium (TEA+) probe for a topographic map but also to real-time visualize the metabolic interaction between these microbes via lactate production/consumption at a single cell level (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

(A) Scheme of a submicropipet-supported ITIES to directly probe TEA+ transfer or lactate transfer. (B) SEM image of a pipet tip, (C) Scheme of constant-height SECM imaging (lateral scanning along x and y axis) over S. mitis and C. matruchotii coculture during in situ production/consumption of lactate, respectively, (D) Optical microscopic image of C. matruchotii (blue arrow) and S. mitis (white arrows) coculture. The nanopipet was filled with the 1,2-dichloroethane solution of 0.1 M TDDATFAB. Constant-height SECM images based on (E) TEA+ transfer and (F) lactate transfer, tip scan rate at 100 nm/100 ms. Reproduced from Ref. [43] with permission from the American Chemical Society.

The tip current response to TEA+ transfer decreased detectably over bacteria due to the hindered diffusion of TEA+ to a pipet tip, where a lump appeared without discrimination of the two microbes because of their similar height and similar membrane permeability in the topographical SECM image (Fig. 5E). Dramatic contrast was observed with tip current responses to lactate transfer in the same scanned area, where the tip current over a spherical S. mitis increased c.a., 167 % of diffusion-limited steady-state current, iT,∞, whereas the tip current over a long filamentous C. matruchotii decreased by up to 47 % of iT,∞ (Fig. 5F). High tip currents above S. mitis are mainly due to the steady excretion of lactate as a fermentation product. Meanwhile, low tip currents above C. matruchotii are attributed to swift in situ consumption of lactate by C. matruchotii, where the competitive consumption of lactate by a pipet tip and C. matruchotii leads to lower tip currents than currents from the hindered diffusional flux of lactate by the C. matruchotii bacterial membrane. Notably, nanoscale SECM with an ion-selective pipet tip visualized real-time chemical exchanges between S. mitis and C. matruchotii through simultaneous lactate production/consumption, thereby for the first time proving their commensal relationship at a single cell level. Quantitative assessment of currents in SECM images enabled to determine the passive permeability of both bacterial membranes to the free diffusion of TEA+, the lactate concentration and its production rate by a single S. mitis, and a lactate oxidation rate by an individual C. matruchotii, thereby demonstrating a mechanism of in situ metabolic interaction between oral commensals at the single cell level and supporting the observed in vivo spatial arrangements of these microbes.

Also, we applied steady-state voltammetry using nanopipet-supported ITIES to directly sense pristine antimicrobial drug-ions under physiological conditions, and quantitatively study their transport-kinetics at the water/oil interface [75]. Effective delivery and accumulation of antimicrobial agents into the microbial organism are essential for the treatment of bacterial infections [136]. The transport of hydrophilic drug molecules often encounters a robust barrier of the hydrophobic double membrane cell envelope, thus leading to drug-resistance in Gram-negative bacteria [137]. Accordingly, a deeper understanding of the transport of charged molecules through the bacterial membrane is needed to remediate the antibacterial resistance. ITIES can serve as an artificial cellular membrane system to provide insightful surrogates for kinetic study of drug entry through bacterial cytoplasmic membranes. Markedly slow kinetics of drug-ion transfer with quinolones and sulfonamides were observed by nanopipet voltammetry, where drug-ion transfer is ~3 orders of magnitude slower than TBA transfer [75]. Further, the effective hydrophilicity of drug ions was quantitatively estimated from half-wave potentials of the obtained voltammograms compared to ClO4- [138]

PiPClO4-=exp-zFEi-EClO4-RT (5)

where Pi and PClO4- are partition coefficients of drug ion, i and ClO4- between the aqueous buffer and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCE) phases, z is a net charge (z=1) of the ions, and Ei and EClO4- are the half-wave potentials of the corresponding ions as determined from experimental voltammograms (Fig. 6B [75]).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

(A) Scheme of drug-ion transfer at a water/1,2-DCE interface measured by nanopipet voltammetry. (B) Normalized voltammograms of various drug ions, TBA+, and ClO4- transferred across a water/1,2-DCE interface supported at a nanopipet. The nanopipet was filled with the 1,2-dichloroethane solution of 0.1 M TDDATFAB. Parts (A) and (B) were reproduced from Ref. [75] with permission from the American Chemical Society. (C) Scheme of facilitated CO32- transfer at a water/1,2-DCE interface measured by nanopipet voltammetry. (D) Steady-state voltammograms with and without CO32- ionophore VII for facilitated CO32- transfer across the 1,2-DCE/water interface obtained with a nanopipet filled with the solution of premade 30 mM ionophore and 0.1 M TDDATFAB. A simulated voltammogram is based on the E mechanism. Parts (C) and (D) were reproduced from Ref. [46] with permission from the American Chemical Society.

Remarkably, the effective hydrophilicity of drug ions was 2–6 orders of magnitude higher than ClO4-, exclusively attributed to strong interaction between water molecules and localized negative charges on carboxylate or amide group of deprotonated quinolone or sulfonamide during interfacial IT, thereby increasing energy barriers upon the water-finger formation and breaking with drug ions near the interface [139] and leading to sluggish kinetics. By employing nanoscale SECM and ion-selective pipets as SECM probes, real-time drug permeation will be monitored at a single bacterial cell to elucidate the relationship between pristine drug structures and their membrane permeation, a critical clue to solving bacterial drug resistance.

For the broader applicability of nanoscale SECM to various biological/microbiological systems, we recently demonstrated an ion-selective amperometric/voltammetric nanopipet electrode based on facilitated ion transfer (FIT) with an ion-selective ionophore, i.e., carbonate (CO32-) selective amperometric/voltammetric nanoprobes [46]. This electrochemical study, for the first time, revealed critical factors to govern nanoscale CO32--selective electrodes using broadly available Simon-type ionophores forming a covalent bond with CO32-, such as slow dissolution of lipophilic ionophores in 1,2-DCE organic phase, activation for hydrated ionophores, peculiar solubility of hydrated ion–ionophore complex near the interface, and cleanness at the nanoscale interface, thereby achieving reproducible performance of nanoscale-ISE. These factors were experimentally confirmed by nanopipet voltammetry, where facilitated CO32- transfer was studied with a nanopipet filled with organic phase containing a trifluoroacetophenone derivative as CO32- ionophore VII by voltammetric and amperometric sensing of CO32- in water (Fig. 6C). Notably, reproducible voltammetric responses enabled us to explicitly evaluate the mechanism of FIT, where the dynamics of complexation between CO32- and ionophore VII follows the one-step electrochemical (E) mechanism controlled by both water-finger formation/dissociation and ion-ionophore complexation/dissociation in a concerted manner at the interface (Fig. 6D). Amperometric CO32--selective nanopipets were successfully applied to measure a CO32- concentration produced by metal-reducing bacteria, Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, as a result of organic fuel oxidation in bacterial growth media. Therefore, amperometric nano-CO32- ISEs will be useful as nanoscale SECM probes to study microbial respiration and electrosynthesis by metal-reducing bacteria at a single cell level.

6. Acetylcholine-selective amperometry at neurons

Applications of nanoscale ion-selective amperometry to biological systems were demonstrated for the first time by the Shen group, who detected acetylcholine (ACh) at single live neurons [47,48]. The electrochemical detection of ACh is a highly demanded but challenging task because this important neurotransmitter is redox-inactive. An ion-selective electrode does not require the redox reaction of an analyte ion and was reported previously for both voltammetric and potentiometric detection of ACh without in-vitro or in-vivo applications to biological systems [140,141]. Specifically, an amperometric ACh-selective nanopipt was employed as an SECM tip to sensitively probe the in-vitro dynamic concentration of ACh released from living neuronal soma with high spatial and temporal resolutions [48]. The amperometric nanoelectrode was doped with dibenzo-18-crown-6 as an ionophore to demonstrate ACh selectivity against background ions in the cellular medium of the neuronal model, artificial seawater (ASW). The ACh selectivity was attributed to the binding of ACh to dibenzo-18-crown-6 as well as the relatively high hydrophobicity of ACh. The amperometric nanoelectrode was positioned at ~140 nm from the release sites of Aplysia californica by using SECM. An experimental approach curve was fitted with the simulated curve to determine not only the tip–neuron distance but also the permeability of the Aplysia californica neuron membrane to ASW ions within a range of 5 × 10−2 cm/s and 1 × 10−1 cm/s. Moreover, the amperometric tip detected the release of ACh in response to high-concentration K+ stimulation with a time resolution on the order of millisecond. The concentration of 2.7±1.0μM ACh released from the single cell was calculated from the maximum amperometric peak current measured in situ. The number of ACh molecules for each peak event was 80 (±20) × 10−18 mol, which corresponds to 4.8 (±1.3) × 107 molecules.

Recently, the Shen group developed the dual-channel nanopipet electrodes to enable simultaneous amperometric detection of ACh and dopamine [142]. The novel electroanalytical method is crucial for understanding the interplay between the two neurotransmitters involved in various neurological events as well as relevant disorders and diseases [143]. A dual-channel nanopipet was prepared from a theta capillary by a laser-based puller to fill one channel with carbon for the oxidation of dopamine and the other channel with an organic electrolyte solution for the transfer of ACh. The advanced electrochemical nanosensors were fabricated and thoroughly characterized. Specifically, carbon was deposited by pyrolysis in one channel of the dual-channel nanopipet, which was milled by focused ion-beam technology to obtain a flat tip end. The single-channel deposition of carbon was confirmed by TEM (Fig. 7A) while the flat tip of the milled carbon-filled channel was confirmed by SEM (Fig. 7B). The open channel was silanized with N, N-dimethyltrimethylsilylamine and filled with the ionophore-free 1, 2-DCE solution of hydrophobic electrolytes, where a selective amperometric response was obtained for ACh with relatively high hydrophobicity. Each channel was characterized by steady-state voltammetry, which yielded the linear dependence of a diffusion-limited current response on either dopamine or ACh concentration as expected from eq (5). The potential of each channel was set for the diffusion-limited detection of the corresponding analyte to obtain simultaneous responses to both analytes (Fig. 7C).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

(A) TEM and (B) SEM images of the dual-channel nanopipet with carbon-deposited channel and FIB-milled open channel. (C) Amperometric responses of a dual-channel nanopipet to the injection of a mixture of dopamine (DA) and ACh as indicated by black arrows. The ACh channel was filled with the 1,2-DCE solution of 5 mM TDDATFAB. Reproduced from Ref. [142] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

More recently, in vivo amperometry of ACh was enabled by using ion-selective micropipet electrodes [49,50]. The in-vivo electrochemical detection of ACh has been highly challenging owing to the intrinsic presence of choline as the interfering species produced by the hydrolysis of ACh. The selective in-vivo detection of ACh against choline, ascorbic acid, and other neurotransmitters was accomplished by using heptakis (2,6-di-O-methyl)-β-cyclodextrin [144] as an ACh ionophore in o-nitrophenyl octyl ether as the organic phase. The high ACh selectivity of the amperometric micropipet electrode with a tip diameter of 1–3μm was confirmed in vitro by both voltammetry and amperometry (Fig. 8A) [50]. A negligible current response was observed for several interferents including choline. An amperometric ACh-selective microelectrode was implanted in the cortex of a live mouse brain to detect ACh released from an injection needle (Fig. 8B) [49]. An in vivo current response to ACh was confirmed by injecting 2μL of 5 mM ACh solution into the brain as indicated by the noise of the microelectrode response around t=100 s after a stable background response was observed (Fig. 8C) [50]. The ACh solution was injected near the microelectrode to observe a gradual increase in the tip current. The tip current peaked at t=600 s and decreased gradually, which was not due to the loss of sensitivity because the electrode taken out from the brain demonstrated an amperometric ACh response to construct a post-surgery calibration curve. The calibration curve was used to convert the current response of the microelectrode to the ACh concentration. The concentration–time curve demonstrates the capability of the amperometric ion-selective microelectrode to quantitatively monitor the real-time ACh dynamics in vivo.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

(A) In vitro amperometric responses of an ACh-selective micropipet to 50μM ACh and common interferents, i.e., choline (Ch), glutamate (Glu), gamma-aminobutyric acid (GA), dopamine (DA), serotonin (HT), norepinephrine (NE), ascorbic acid (AA), l-cysteine (Cys), and l-tyrosine (Tyr), in the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). (B) A photo of the live mouse under the stereotaxic surgery with an amperometric ACh-selective microelectrode and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode as implanted in the brain. A glass pipet guides the injection needle near the micropipet electrode. (C) In vivo amperometric ACh response of an ACh-selective micropipet implanted in the cortex of a live mouse brain. Micropipets were filled with (A) and (C) the 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether solution of 0.1 M TDDATFAB and 5 mM heptakis(2,6-di-O-methyl)-β-cyclodextrin or (B) the 1,2-DCE solution of 5 mM TDDATFAB. Parts (A) and (C) were reproduced from Ref. [50] with permission from the American Chemical Society. Part (B) was reproduced from Ref. [49] with permission from Elsevier.

7. Perspectives

Remarkable progress has been made in the development and application of amperometric ion-selective nanoelectrodes to envision the future advancement of the already powerful method in selectivity and sensitivity. High selectivity is required for a wider range of applications to detect target ions in complex samples [145,146] including Cl− [147] and K+ [148] in brains. Highly selective ionophores have been developed for potentiometry [10,149] and successfully applied to amperometry/voltammetry at micropipet electrodes [45,57,150] but to the nanoscale counterpart only recently [46]. Moreover, the highly selective detection of multiple ions is achieved by dynamic voltammetry [28,30, 31] in contrast to equilibrium potentiometry. Furthermore, a redox-inactive zwitterionic neurotransmitter, gamma-aminobutyric acid, was detected by amperometric ISEs [151,152]. A high sensitivity will enable us not only to detect lower concentrations of analyte ions but also to improve spatial resolution by employing a smaller nanopipet, which can be as small as ~10 nm [80]. The amperometric response of a smaller SECM tip is less affected by convection to achieve a steady state more quickly, thereby enabling faster imaging with higher temporal resolution [94]. Moreover, faster SECM imaging can be coupled with a more advanced algorithm than the standard constant-height imaging to simultaneously resolve the topography and reactivity of a complex substrate [153].

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (CHE-2304922 for S.A. and Career Award CHE-2046363 for J.K.) and National Institutes of Health (R01GM112656 for S.A., R01DE027958 for J.K., and NIGMS/RI-INBRE Early Career Development Award P20GM103430 for J.K.).

Footnotes

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jiyeon Kim: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Shigeru Amemiya: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability

No data was used for the research described in the article.

References

  • [1].Amemiya S, Kim J, Izadyar A, Kabagambe B, Shen M, Ishimatsu R, Electrochemical sensing and imaging based on ion transfer at liquid/liquid interfaces, Electrochim. Acta 110 (2013) 836–845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Huang S-H, Parandhaman M, Farnia S, Kim J, Amemiya S, Nanoelectrochemistry at liquid/liquid interfaces for analytical, biological, and material applications, Chem. Commun 59 (63) (2023) 9575–9590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Ribeiro JA, Silva AF, Girault HH, Pereira CM, Electroanalytical applications of ITIES – a review, Talanta 280 (2024) 126729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Amemiya S, Potentiometric ion-selective electrodes, in: Zoski CG (Ed.), Handbook of Electrochemistry, Elsevier, New York, 2007, pp. 261–294. [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Bakker E, Pretsch E, Advances in potentiometry, in: Bard AJ, Zoski CG (Eds.), Electroanalytical Chemistry: a Series of Advances, vol. 24, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2012, pp. 1–73. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Light TS, Industrial use and applications of ion selective electrodes, J. Chem. Edu 74 (2) (1997) 171–177. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Young CC, Evolution of blood chemistry analyzers based on ion selective electrodes, J. Chem. Edu 74 (2) (1997) 177–182. [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Zuliani C, Diamond D, Opportunities and challenges of using ion-selective electrodes in environmental monitoring and wearable sensors, Electrochim. Acta 84 (2012) 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Bakker E, Bühlmann P, Pretsch E, Carrier-based ion-selective electrodes and bulk optodes. 1. General characteristics, Chem. Rev 97 (8) (1997) 3083–3132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Bühlmann P, Pretsch E, Bakker E, Carrier-based ion-selective electrodes and bulk optodes. 2, Chem. Rev 98 (1998) 1593–1688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Umezawa Y, Bühlmann P, Umezawa K, Tohda K, Amemiya S, Potentiometric selectivity coefficients of ion-selective electrodes part I. Inorganic cations - (IUPAC technical report), Pure Appl. Chem 72 (10) (2000) 1851–2082. [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Umezawa Y, Umezawa K, Bühlmann P, Hamada N, Aoki H, Nakanishi J, Sato M, Xiao KP, Nishimura Y, Potentiometric selectivity coefficients of ion-selective electrodes part II. Inorganic anions - (IUPAC technical report), Pure Appl. Chem 74 (6) (2002) 923–994. [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Umezawa Y, Bühlmann P, Umezawa K, Hamada N, Potentiometric selectivity coefficients of ion-selective electrodes part III. Organic ions - (IUPAC technical report), Pure Appl. Chem 74 (6) (2002) 995–1099. [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Meyerhoff ME, Electrochemistry and chemical sensors, in: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE (Eds.), Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 2011. Saunders. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Dimeski G, Badrick T, John AS, Ion selective electrodes (ISEs) and interferences—A review, Clin. Chim. Acta 411 (5) (2010) 309–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Bakker E, Pretsch E, Potentiometry at trace levels, Trends Anal. Chem 20 (1) (2001) 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Crespo GA, Recent advances in ion-selective membrane electrodes for in situ environmental water analysis, Electrochim. Acta 245 (2017) 1023–1034. [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Richa A, Fizir M, Touil S, Advanced monitoring of hydroponic solutions using ion-selective electrodes and the internet of things: a review, Environ. Chem. Lett 19 (4) (2021) 3445–3463. [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Jadon N, Hosseinzadeh B, Kaya SI, Ozcelikay-Akyildiz G, Cetinkaya A, Ozkan SA, Emerging trends of ion-selective electrodes in pharmaceutical applications, Electrochim. Acta 488 (2024) 144204. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Min J, Tu J, Xu C, Lukas H, Shin S, Yang Y, Solomon SA, Mukasa D, Gao W, Skin-interfaced wearable sweat sensors for precision medicine, Chem. Rev 123 (8) (2023) 5049–5138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Fathy MA, Bühlmann P, Next-generation potentiometric sensors: a review of flexible and wearable technologies, Biosensors 15 (1) (2025) 51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Diamond D, Coyle S, Scarmagnani S, Hayes J, Wireless sensor networks and Chemo-/Biosensing, Chem. Rev 108 (2) (2008) 652–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Sokalski T, Ceresa A, Zwickl T, Pretsch E, Large improvement of the lower detection limit of ion-selective polymer membrane electrodes, J. Am. Chem. Soc 119 (46) (1997) 11347–11348. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Hu J, Stein A, Bühlmann P, Rational design of all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes and reference electrodes, TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem 76 (2016) 102–114. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Criscuolo F, Hanitra MIN, Taurino I, Carrara S, Micheli GD, All-solid-state ion-selective electrodes: a tutorial for correct practice, IEEE Sens. J 21 (20) (2021) 22143–22154. [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Samec Z, Electrochemistry at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions, Pure Appl. Chem 76 (12) (2004) 2147–2180. [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Guo J, Amemiya S, Voltammetric heparin-selective electrode based on thin liquid membrane with conducting polymer-modified solid support, Anal. Chem 78 (19) (2006) 6893–6902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Greenawalt PJ, Garada MB, Amemiya S, Voltammetric characterization of ion-ionophore complexation using thin polymeric membranes: asymmetric thin-layer responses, Anal. Chem 87 (2015) 8564–8572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Garada MB, Kabagambe B, Amemiya S, Extraction or adsorption? Voltammetric assessment of protamine transfer at ionophore-doped polymeric membranes, Anal. Chem (2015) 5348–5355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Greenawalt PJ, Amemiya S, Voltammetric mechanism of multiion detection with thin ionophore-based polymeric membrane, Anal. Chem 88 (2016) 5827–5834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Amemiya S, Voltammetric ion selectivity of thin ionophore-based polymeric membranes: kinetic effect of ion hydrophilicity, Anal. Chem 88 (17) (2016) 8893–8901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Kim Y, Amemiya S, Stripping analysis of nanomolar perchlorate in drinking water with a voltammetric ion-selective electrode based on thin-layer liquid membrane, Anal. Chem 80 (2008) 6056–6065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Kim Y, Rodgers PJ, Ishimatsu R, Amemiya S, Subnanomolar ion detection by stripping voltammetry with solid-supported thin liquid membrane, Anal. Chem 81 (2009) 7262–7270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Kabagambe B, Izadyar A, Amemiya S, Stripping voltammetry of nanomolar potassium and ammonium ions using a valinomycin-doped double-polymer electrode, Anal. Chem 84 (2012) 7979–7986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Garada MB, Kabagambe B, Kim Y, Amemiya S, Ion-transfer voltammetry of perfluoroalkyl sulfonates and carboxylates: picomolar detection limit and high, Lipophilicity Anal. Chem (2014) 11230–11237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Kabagambe B, Garada MB, Ishimatsu R, Amemiya S, Subnanomolar detection limit of stripping voltammetric Ca2+-Selective electrode: effects of analyte charge and sample contamination, Anal. Chem 86 (2014) 7939–7946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Bakker E, Pretsch E, Nanoscale potentiometry, TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem 27 (7) (2008) 612–618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Ammann D, Ion-Selective Microelectrodes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Shen M, Amemiya S, Molecular transport in membranes, in: Bard AJ, Mirkin MV (Eds.), Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2022, pp. 181–205. [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Amemiya S, Nanoscale scanning electrochemical microscopy, in: Bard AJ, Zoski CG (Eds.), Electroanalytical Chemistry, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015, pp. 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Kai T, Zoski CG, Bard AJ, Scanning electrochemical microscopy at the nanometer level, Chem. Commun 54 (16) (2018) 1934–1947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Chen R, Pathirathna P, Balla RJ, Kim J, Amemiya S, Nanoscale quantitative imaging of single nuclear pore complexes by scanning electrochemical microscopy, Anal. Chem 96 (26) (2024) 10765–10771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Puri SR, Almeida E, Elangovan S, Labossiere A, Collins C, Ramsey M, Kim J, Mechanistic assessment of metabolic interaction between single oral commensal cells by scanning electrochemical microscopy, Anal. Chem 95 (22) (2023) 8711–8719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Almeida E, Puri S, Labossiere A, Elangovan S, Kim J, Ramsey M, Bacterial multispecies interaction mechanisms dictate biogeographic arrangement between the oral commensals Corynebacterium Matruchotii and Streptococcus Mitis, mSystems 8 (5) (2023) e00115–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Amemiya S, Bard AJ, Scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). 40. Voltammetric ion-selective micropipet electrodes for probing ion transfer at bilayer lipid membranes, Anal. Chem 72 (2000) 4940–4948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Elangovan S, Puri SR, Madawala H, Pantano J, Pellock B, Kiesewetter MK, Kim J, Nanoscale carbonate ion-selective amperometric/voltammetric probes based on ion–ionophore recognition at the organic/water interface: hidden pieces of the puzzle in the nanoscale phase, Anal. Chem 95 (9) (2023) 4271–4281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Shen M, Qu Z, DesLaurier J, Welle TM, Sweedler JV, Chen R, Single synaptic observation of cholinergic neurotransmission on living neurons: concentration and dynamics, J. Am. Chem. Soc 140 (25) (2018) 7764–7768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Welle Theresa M., Alanis K, Colombo ML, Sweedler JV, Shen M, A high spatiotemporal study of somatic exocytosis with scanning electrochemical microscopy and NanoITIES electrodes, Chem. Sci 9 (22) (2018) 4937–4941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Xu P, Shen M, Liquid/liquid junction microelectrodes for monitoring cholinergic transmitter in live mice brain in vivo, Biosens. Bioelectron 278 (2025) 117315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Xu P, Shen M, Selective detection of acetylcholine against choline and in vivo measurement in the mouse brain using the micropipet-supported liquid/liquid interface electrode, ACS Meas. Sci. Au 5 (6) (2025) 963–971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Girault HH, Schiffrin DJ, Electrochemistry of liquid-liquid interfaces, in: Bard AJ (Ed.), Electroanalytical Chemistry, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1989, pp. 1–141. [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Girault HH, Electrochemistry at liquid-liquid interfaces, in: Bard AJ, Zoski CG (Eds.), Electroanalytical Chemistry, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2010, pp. 1–104. [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Milton CB, Xu K, Shen M, Recent advances in nanoelectrochemistry at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions, Curr. Opin. Electrochem 34 (2022) 101005. [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Marcus RA, On the theory of ion transfer rates across the interface of two immiscible liquids, J. Chem. Phys 113 (4) (2000) 1618–1629. [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Wang Y, Velmurugan J, Mirkin MV, Rodgers PJ, Kim J, Amemiya S, Kinetic study of rapid transfer of tetraethylammonium at the 1,2-Dichloroethane/Water interface by nanopipet voltammetry of common ions, Anal. Chem 82 (1) (2010) 77–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Rodgers PJ, Amemiya S, Wang Y, Mirkin MV, Nanopipet voltammetry of common ions across the liquid‚àíliquid interface. Theory and limitations in kinetic analysis of nanoelectrode voltammograms, Anal. Chem 82 (1) (2010) 84–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Ishimatsu R, Izadyar A, Kabagambe B, Kim Y, Kim J, Amemiya S, Electrochemical mechanism of ion–ionophore recognition at plasticized polymer membrane/water interfaces, J. Am. Chem. Soc 133 (40) (2011) 16300–16308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].D’Antona N, Kelly J, Barnard N, Ardo S, Wang Y, Surendranath Y, Markland TE, Kempler PA, Boettcher SW, Proton-transfer kinetics at liquid–liquid interfaces, J. Am. Chem. Soc 147 (25) (2025) 21408–21418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Marcus RA, Reorganization free energy for electron transfers at liquid–liquid and dielectric semiconductor–liquid interfaces, J. Phys. Chem 94 (1990) 1050–1055. [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Marcus RA, Theory of electron-transfer rates across liquid–liquid interfaces, J. Phys. Chem 94 (1990) 4152–4155. [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Marcus RA, Theory of electron-transfer rates across liquid–liquid interfaces. 2. Relationships and application, J. Phys. Chem 94 (1991) 2010–2013. [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Barker AL, Unwin PR, Amemiya S, Zhou JF, Bard AJ, Scanning electrochemistry microscopy (SECM) in the study of electron transfer kinetics at liquid/liquid interfaces: beyond the constant composition approximation, J. Phys. Chem. B 103 (34) (1999) 7260–7269. [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Voci S, Dick JE, An electrochemical perspective on the interfacial width between two immiscible liquid phases, Curr. Opin. Electrochem 39 (2023) 101244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Arrigan DWM, Liu Y, Electroanalytical ventures at nanoscale interfaces between immiscible liquids, Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem 9 (1) (2016) 145–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Booth SG, Dryfe RAW, Assembly of nanoscale objects at the liquid/liquid interface, J. Phys. Chem. C 119 (41) (2015) 23295–23309. [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Baker LA, Perspective and prospectus on single-entity electrochemistry, J. Am. Chem. Soc 140 (46) (2018) 15549–15559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Bard AJ, Faulkner LR, White HS, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, third ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2022, pp. 851–883. [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Sabaragamuwe SG, Conti D, Puri SR, Andreu I, Kim J, Single-entity electrochemistry of nanoemulsion: the nanostructural effect on its electrochemical behavior, Anal. Chem 91 (15) (2019) 9599–9607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Madawala H, Sabaragamuwe SG, Elangovan S, Kim J, In situ measuring partition coefficient at intact nanoemulsions: a new application of single-entity electrochemistry, Anal. Chem 93 (2) (2021) 1154–1160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Sabaragamuwe SG, Madawala H, Puri SR, Kim J, Towards ultralow detection limits of aromatic toxicants in water using pluronic nanoemulsions and single-entity electrochemistry, Anal. Chim. Acta 1139 (2020) 129–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Madawala H, Puri SR, Weaver D, Kim J, Pb2+-Selective nanoemulsion-integrated single-entity electrochemistry for ultrasensitive sensing of blood lead, Langmuir 40 (6) (2024) 3004–3014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Shin Y, Brangwynne CP, Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease, Science 357 (6357) (2017) eaaf4382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Huang S-H, Parandhaman M, Jyothi Ravi M, Janda DC, Amemiya S, Nanoscale hydrophobicity of transport barriers in the nuclear pore complex as compared with the liquid/liquid interface by scanning electrochemical microscopy, Anal. Chem 97 (5) (2025) 2745–2753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Benjamin I, Mechanism and dynamics of ion transfer across a liquid-liquid interface, Science 261 (5128) (1993) 1558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Puri SR, Kim J, Kinetics of antimicrobial drug ion transfer at a water/oil interface studied by nanopipet voltammetry, Anal. Chem 91 (3) (2019) 1873–1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Chen R, Balla RJ, Lima A, Amemiya S, Characterization of nanopipet-supported ITIES tips for scanning electrochemical microscopy of single solid-state nanopores, Anal. Chem 89 (18) (2017) 9946–9952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Alanis K, Alden SE, Baker LA, Anupriya ES, Jetmore HD, Shen M, Micro and nanopipettes for electrochemical imaging and measurement, in: Bard AJ, Mirkin MV (Eds.), Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2022, pp. 419–479. [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Lefrou C, A unified new analytical approximation for positive feedback currents with a microdisk SECM tip, J. Electroanal. Chem 592 (1) (2006) 103–112. [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Rodgers PJ, Amemiya S, Cyclic voltammetry at micropipet electrodes for the study of ion-transfer kinetics at liquid/liquid interfaces, Anal. Chem 79 (24) (2007) 9276–9285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Shigyou K, Sun L, Yajima R, Takigaura S, Tajima M, Furusho H, Kikuchi Y, Miyazawa K, Fukuma T, Taoka A, Ando T, Watanabe S, Geometrical characterization of glass nanopipettes with Sub-10 nm pore diameter by transmission electron microscopy, Anal. Chem 92 (23) (2020) 15388–15393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Anupriya ES, Shen M, New method in surface treatment of nanopipette for interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES) experiment, J. Electrochem. Soc 169 (4) (2022) 046501. [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Shen M, Ishimatsu R, Kim J, Amemiya S, Quantitative imaging of ion transport through single nanopores by high-resolution scanning electrochemical microscopy, J. Am. Chem. Soc 134 (24) (2012) 9856–9859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Fan F-RF, Bard AJ, Imaging biological macromolecules on mica in humid air by scanning electrochemical microscopy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 96 (25) (1999) 14222–14227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Kim J, Renault C, Nioradze N, Arroyo-Currás N, Leonard KC, Bard AJ, Nanometer scale scanning electrochemical microscopy instrumentation, Anal. Chem 88 (20) (2016) 10284–10289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Kim J, Shen M, Nioradze N, Amemiya S, Stabilizing nanometer scale tip-to-substrate gaps in scanning electrochemical microscopy using an isothermal chamber for thermal drift suppression, Anal. Chem 84 (8) (2012) 3489–3492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Striemer CC, Gaborski TR, McGrath JL, Fauchet PM, Charge- and size-based separation of macromolecules using ultrathin silicon membranes, Nature 445 (7129) (2007) 749–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Hill K, Walker SN, Salminen A, Chung HL, Li XZ, Ezzat B, Miller JJ, DesOrmeaux JPS, Zhang JK, Hayden A, Burgin T, Piraino L, May MN, Gaborski TR, Roussie JA, Taylor J, DiVincenti L, Shestopalov AA, McGrath JL, Johnson DG, Second generation nanoporous silicon nitride membranes for high toxin clearance and small format hemodialysis, Adv. Healthcare Mater 9 (4) (2020) 1900750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Agrawal AA, Nehilla BJ, Reisig KV, Gaborski TR, Fang DZ, Striemer CC, Fauchet PM, McGrath JL, Porous nanocrystalline silicon membranes as highly permeable and molecularly thin substrates for cell culture, Biomaterials 31 (20) (2010) 5408–5417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Johnson DG, Khire TS, Lyubarskaya YL, Smith KJP, DesOrmeaux JPS, Taylor JG, Gaborski TR, Shestopalov AA, Striemer CC, McGrath JL, Ultrathin silicon membranes for wearable dialysis, Adv. Chron. Kidney Dis 20 (6) (2013) 508–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Chung HH, Mireles M, Kwarta BJ, Gaborski TR, Use of porous membranes in tissue barrier and Co-Culture models, Lab Chip 18 (12) (2018) 1671–1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Kim E, Xiong H, Striemer CC, Fang DZ, Fauchet PM, McGrath JL, Amemiya S, A structure-permeability relationship of ultrathin nanoporous silicon membrane: a comparison with the nuclear envelope, J. Am. Chem. Soc 130 (13) (2008) 4230–4231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Nioradze N, Chen R, Kim J, Shen M, Santhosh P, Amemiya S, Origins of nanoscale damage to glass-sealed platinum electrodes with submicrometer and nanometer size, Anal. Chem 85 (2013) 6198–6202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Chen R, Hu K, Yu Y, Mirkin MV, Amemiya S, Focused-ion-beam-milled carbon nanoelectrodes for scanning electrochemical microscopy, J. Electrochem. Soc 163 (4) (2016) H3032–H3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Jantz DT, Balla RJ, Huang S-H, Kurapati N, Amemiya S, Leonard KC, Simultaneous intelligent imaging of nanoscale reactivity and topography by scanning electrochemical microscopy, Anal. Chem 93 (25) (2021) 8906–8914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Blanchard P-Y, Sun T, Yu Y, Wei Z, Matsui H, Mirkin MV, Scanning electrochemical microscopy study of permeability of a thiolated aryl multilayer and imaging of single nanocubes anchored to it, Langmuir 32 (10) (2016) 2500–2508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Beck M, Hurt E, The nuclear pore complex: understanding its function through structural insight, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 18 (2) (2017) 73–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Buchwalter A, Kaneshiro JM, Hetzer MW, Coaching from the sidelines: the nuclear periphery in genome regulation, Nat. Rev. Genet 20 (1) (2019) 39–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Lostalé-Seijo I, Montenegro J, Synthetic materials at the forefront of gene delivery, Nat. Rev. Chem 2 (10) (2018) 258–277. [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Skowicki M, Tarvirdipour S, Kraus M, Schoenenberger C-A, Palivan CG, Nanoassemblies designed for efficient nuclear targeting, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 211 (2024) 115354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Strambio-De-Castillia C, Niepel M, Rout MP, The nuclear pore complex: bridging nuclear transport and gene regulation, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 11 (7) (2010) 490–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Sun J, Shi Y, Yildirim E, The nuclear pore complex in cell type-specific chromatin structure and gene regulation, Trends Genet. 35 (8) (2019) 579–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Dickmanns A, Kehlenbach RH, Fahrenkrog B, Nuclear pore complexes and nucleocytoplasmic transport: from structure to function to disease, in: Jeon KW (Ed.), International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, vol 320, Elsevier Academic Press Inc, San Diego, 2015, pp. 171–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Sakuma S, D’Angelo MA, The roles of the nuclear pore complex in cellular dysfunction, aging and disease, Semin. Cell Dev. Biol 68 (2017) 72–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Simon DN, Rout MP, Cancer and the nuclear pore complex, in: Schirmer EC, DeLasHeras JI (Eds.), Cancer Biology and the Nuclear Envelope: Recent Advances May Elucidate past Paradoxes, 2014, pp. 285–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Coyne AN, Rothstein JD, Nuclear pore complexes — a doorway to neural injury in neurodegeneration, Nat. Rev. Neurol 18 (6) (2022) 348–362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Mathieu C, Pappu RV, Taylor JP, Beyond aggregation: pathological phase transitions in neurodegenerative disease, Science 370 (6512) (2020) 56–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].Shen Q, Wang YE, Palazzo AF, Crosstalk between nucleocytoplasmic trafficking and the innate immune response to viral infection, J. Biol. Chem 297 (1) (2021) 100856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Sajidah ES, Lim K, Hazawa M, Wong RW, Nanoimaging of SARS-CoV-2 viral invasion toward the nucleus and genome, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci 5 (9) (2024) 102111. [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Akey CW, The NPC-Transporter, A ghost in the machine, Structure 18 (10) (2010) 1230–1232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Fahrenkrog B, Aebi U, The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 4 (10) (2003) 757–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Jarnik M, Aebi U, Toward a more complete 3-D structure of the nuclear pore complex, J. Struct. Biol 107 (3) (1991) 291–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Stoffler D, Feja B, Fahrenkrog B, Walz J, Typke D, Aebi U, Cryo-electron tomography provides novel insights into nuclear pore architecture: implications for nucleocytoplasmic transport, J. Mol. Biol 328 (1) (2003) 119–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Beck M, Forster F, Ecke M, Plitzko JM, Melchior F, Gerisch G, Baumeister W, Medalia O, Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography, Science 306 (5700) (2004) 1387–1390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Beck M, Lucic V, Forster F, Baumeister W, Medalia O, Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action captured by cryo-electron tomography, Nature 449 (7162) (2007) 611–615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Frenkiel-Krispin D, Maco B, Aebi U, Medalia O, Structural analysis of a metazoan nuclear pore complex reveals a fused concentric ring architecture, J. Mol. Biol 395 (3) (2010) 578–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].Eibauer M, Pellanda M, Turgay Y, Dubrovsky A, Wild A, Medalia O, Structure and gating of the nuclear pore complex, Nat. Commun 6 (2015) 7532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Stoffler D, Goldie KN, Feja B, Aebi U, Calcium-mediated structural changes of native nuclear pore complexes monitored by time-lapse atomic force microscopy, J. Mol. Biol 287 (1999) 741–752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [118].Sakiyama Y, Mazur A, Kapinos LE, Lim RYH, Spatiotemporal dynamics of the nuclear pore complex transport barrier resolved by high-speed atomic force microscopy, Nat. Nanotechnol 11 (2016) 719–723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Pathirathna P, Balla RJ, Jantz DT, Kurapati N, Gramm ER, Leonard KC, Amemiya S, Probing high permeability of nuclear pore complexes by scanning electrochemical microscopy: Ca2+ effects on transport barriers, Anal. Chem 91 (2019) 5446–5454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Kim J, Izadyar A, Nioradze N, Amemiya S, Nanoscale mechanism of molecular transport through the nuclear pore complex as studied by scanning electrochemical microscopy, J. Am. Chem. Soc 135 (6) (2013) 2321–2329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Kim J, Izadyar A, Shen M, Ishimatsu R, Amemiya S, Ion permeability of the nuclear pore complex and ion-induced macromolecular permeation as studied by scanning electrochemical and fluorescence microscopy, Anal. Chem 86 (2014) 2090–2098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Lee S, Zhang Y, White HS, Harrell CC, Martin CR, Electrophoretic capture and detection of nanoparticles at the opening of a membrane pore using scanning electrochemical microscopy, Anal. Chem 76 (15) (2004) 6108–6115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].White RJ, White HS, Influence of electrophoresis waveforms in determining stochastic nanoparticle capture rates and detection sensitivity, Anal. Chem 79 (16) (2007) 6334–6340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Kurapati N, Janda DC, Balla RJ, Huang S-H, Leonard KC, Amemiya S, Nanogap-resolved adsorption-coupled electron transfer by scanning electrochemical microscopy: implications for electrocatalysis, Anal. Chem 94 (51) (2022) 17956–17963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [125].Huang S-H, Parandhaman M, Jyothi Ravi M, Janda DC, Amemiya S, Nanoscale interactions of arginine-containing dipeptide repeats with nuclear pore complexes as measured by transient scanning electrochemical microscopy, Chem. Sci 15 (38) (2024) 15639–15646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].Huang S-H, Parandhaman M, Jyothi Ravi M, Janda DC, Amemiya S, Nanoscale hydrophobicity of transport barriers in nuclear pore complex as compared with liquid/liquid interface by scanning electrochemical microscopy, Anal. Chem 97 (5) (2025) 2745–2753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [127].Shi KY, Mori E, Nizami ZF, Lin Y, Kato M, Xiang S, Wu LC, Ding M, Yu Y, Gall JG, McKnight SL, Toxic PRn poly-dipeptides encoded by the C9orf72 repeat expansion block nuclear import and export, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 114 (7) (2017) E1111–E1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [128].Kim HJ, Taylor JP, Lost in transportation: nucleocytoplasmic transport defects in ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases, Neuron 96 (2) (2017) 285–297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [129].Meyerhoff ME, Fu B, Bakker E, Yun J-H, Yang VC, Polyion-sensitive membrane electrodes for biomedical analysis, Anal. Chem 68 (1996) 168A–175A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [130].Wang X, Sun M, Ferguson SA, Hoff JD, Qin Y, Bailey RC, Meyerhoff ME, Ionophore-based biphasic chemical sensing in droplet microfluidics, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 58 (24) (2019) 8092–8096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [131].Yuan Y, Amemiya S, Facilitated protamine transfer at polarized Water/1,2-Dichloroethane interfaces studied by cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry at micropipet electrodes, Anal. Chem 76 (23) (2004) 6877–6886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [132].Pathirathna P, Balla RJ, Meng G, Wei Z, Amemiya S, Nanoscale electrostatic gating of molecular transport through nuclear pore complexes as probed by scanning electrochemical microscopy, Chem. Sci 10 (34) (2019) 7929–7936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [133].Gao L, Xu T, Huang G, Jiang S, Gu Y, Chen F, Oral microbiomes: more and more importance in oral cavity and whole body, Protein Cell 9 (5) (2018) 488–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [134].Mark Welch JL, Rossetti BJ, Rieken CW, Dewhirst FE, Borisy GG, Biogeography of a human oral microbiome at the micron scale, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 113 (6) (2016) E791–E800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [135].Morillo-Lopez V, Sjaarda A, Islam I, Borisy GG, Mark Welch JL, Corncob structures in dental plaque reveal microhabitat taxon specificity, Microbiome 10 (1) (2022) 145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [136].Cinquin B, Maigre L, Pinet E, Chevalier J, Stavenger RA, Mills S, Réfrégiers M, Pagès J-M, Microspectrometric insights on the uptake of antibiotics at the single bacterial cell level, Sci. Rep 5 (1) (2015) 17968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [137].Delcour AH, Outer membrane permeability and antibiotic resistance, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1794 (5) (2009) 808–816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [138].Jing P, Rodgers PJ, Amemiya S, High lipophilicity of perfluoroalkyl carboxylate and sulfonate: implications for their membrane permeability, J. Am. Chem. Soc 131 (6) (2009) 2290–2296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [139].Kikkawa N, Wang L, Morita A, Microscopic barrier mechanism of ion transport through liquid–liquid interface, J. Am. Chem. Soc 137 (25) (2015) 8022–8025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [140].Kakutani T, Ohkouchi T, Osakai T, Kakiuchi T, Senda M, Ion-transfer voltammetry and potentiometry of acetylcholine with the interface between polymer-nitrobenzene gel and water, Anal. Sci 1 (3) (1985) 219–225. [Google Scholar]
  • [141].Ohkouchi T, Kakutani T, Osakai T, Senda M, Voltammetry with an ion-selective microelectrode based on polarizable oil/water interface, Anal. Sci 7 (1991) 371–376. [Google Scholar]
  • [142].Anupriya ES, Chen R, Kalski D, Palmer J, Shen M, Dual-channel nano-carbon-liquid/liquid junction electrodes for multi-modal analysis: redox-active (dopamine) and non-redox-active (acetylcholine), Analyst 150 (2) (2025) 414–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [143].Chantranupong L, Beron CC, Zimmer JA, Wen MJ, Wang W, Sabatini BL, Dopamine and glutamate regulate striatal acetylcholine in decision-making, Nature 621 (7979) (2023) 577–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [144].Xu P, Muhamad Rapidi HI, Ahmed S, Abel DK, Garcia KJ, Chen R, Iwai NT, Shen M, PEDOT/PVC-Modified amperometric carbon electrodes for acetylcholine detection, Chem. Commun 58 (95) (2022) 13218–13221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [145].Ahmed MMN, Bodowara FS, Zhou W, Penteado JF, Smeltz JL, Pathirathna P, Electrochemical detection of Cd(II) ions in complex matrices with nanopipets, RSC Adv. 12 (2) (2022) 1077–1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [146].Page RJ, Koifman G, Manring N, Smeltz JL, Pathirathna P, Non-redox-based electrochemical detection of adrenaline: a simple and reliable approach using glass nanopipets, Appl. Sci 15 (2) (2025) 869. [Google Scholar]
  • [147].Gu C, Kong F, Liang S, Zhao X, Kong B, Jiang T, Yu J, Li Q, Lin Y, Bai S, Shao Y, In vivo dynamic tracking of cerebral chloride regulation using molecularly tailored liquid/liquid interfacial ultramicro iontronics, Sci. Adv 10(49) eadr7218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [148].Zhang Z, Chen Z, Liu T, Zhang L, An implantable ionic liquid-gel microelectrode for in vivo monitoring of K+ levels in the living rat brain, Chem. Sci 16 (18) (2025) 7963–7970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [149].Cuartero M, Colozza N, Fernández-Pérez BM, Crespo GA, Why ammonium detection is particularly challenging but insightful with ionophore-based potentiometric sensors – an overview of the progress in the last 20 years, Analyst 145 (9) (2020) 3188–3210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [150].Zhan DP, Fan FRF, Bard AJ, The K-v channel blocker 4-Aminopyridine enhances Ag+ uptake: a scanning electrochemical microscopy study of single living cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 105 (34) (2008) 12118–12122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [151].Iwai NT, Kramaric M, Crabbe D, Wei Y, Chen R, Shen M, GABA detection with Nano-ITIES pipet electrode: a new mechanism, Water/DCE–Octanoic acid interface, Anal. Chem 90 (5) (2018) 3067–3072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [152].Chen R, McAllister AB, Shen M, Detection of zwitterion at an electrified liquid-liquid interface: a chemical equilibrium perspective, J. Electroanal. Chem 873 (2020) 114303. [Google Scholar]
  • [153].Balla RJ, Jantz DT, Kurapati N, Chen R, Leonard KC, Amemiya S, Nanoscale intelligent imaging based on real-time analysis of approach curve by scanning electrochemical microscopy, Anal. Chem 91 (15) (2019) 10227–10235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.

RESOURCES