Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1973 Feb;228(3):637–647. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010104

Periodic vernier acuity

C William Tyler
PMCID: PMC1331244  PMID: 4702150

Abstract

1. Sinusoidal curvature was produced in a vertical stimulus line generated on an oscilloscope screen. Sensitivity to sinusoidal curvature (periodic vernier acuity) was measured by the method of adjustment as a function of spatial frequency of the curvature.

2. Sensitivity was maximal at about 3 c/deg and reduced steeply for both higher and lower spatial frequencies of curvature.

3. Sensitivity at 10° in the periphery was greatly reduced but showed very little low frequency reduction.

4. The effect of number of cycles present was checked by reduction of the field size with spatial frequency such that a fixed number of cycles of the stimulus were visible. This procedure did not affect the decline in sensitivity at spatial frequencies below 0·3 c/deg but reduced sensitivity at higher spatial frequencies.

5. The results were interpreted in terms of cortical orientation detectors. It is suggested that the low frequency sensitivity is limited by a fixed value for the maximum difference in orientation in the stimulus (i.e. 20 and 30′ for the present subjects). The high frequency sensitivity was limited by grating acuity and required spatial integration of the stimulus information over about 2·5°.

Full text

PDF
637

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews D. P. Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. I: short lines. Vision Res. 1967 Nov;7(11):975–997. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(67)90014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews D. P. Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. II. Spatial integration. Vision Res. 1967 Nov;7(11):999–1013. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(67)90015-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BERRY R. N. Quantitative relations among vernier, real depth, and stereoscopic depth acuities. J Exp Psychol. 1948 Dec;38(6):708–721. doi: 10.1037/h0057362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blakemore C., Carpenter R. H., Georgeson M. A. Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system. Nature. 1970 Oct 3;228(5266):37–39. doi: 10.1038/228037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burns B. D., Pritchard R. Geometrical illusions and the response of neurones in the cat's visual cortex to angle patterns. J Physiol. 1971 Mar;213(3):599–616. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell F. W., Carpenter R. H., Levinson J. Z. Visibility of aperiodic patterns compared with that of sinusoidal gratings. J Physiol. 1969 Oct;204(2):283–298. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell F. W., Gubisch R. W. Optical quality of the human eye. J Physiol. 1966 Oct;186(3):558–578. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Campbell F. W., Kulikowski J. J. Orientational selectivity of the human visual system. J Physiol. 1966 Nov;187(2):437–445. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell F. W., Maffei L. The tilt after-effect: a fresh look. Vision Res. 1971 Aug;11(8):833–840. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(71)90005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell F. W., Robson J. G. Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J Physiol. 1968 Aug;197(3):551–566. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DE DZN H. L. Relationship between critical flicker-frequency and a set of low-frequency characteristics of the eye. J Opt Soc Am. 1954 May;44(5):380–389. doi: 10.1364/josa.44.000380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davidson M. Perturbation approach to spatial brightness interaction in human vision. J Opt Soc Am. 1968 Sep;58(9):1300–1308. doi: 10.1364/josa.58.001300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Enroth-Cugell C., Robson J. G. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol. 1966 Dec;187(3):517–552. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ganz L. Mechanism of the figural aftereffects. Psychol Rev. 1966 Mar;73(2):128–150. doi: 10.1037/h0022952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gilinsky A. S., Mayo T. H. Inhibitory effects of orientational adaptation. J Opt Soc Am. 1971 Dec;61(12):1710–1714. doi: 10.1364/josa.61.001710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Mar;28:229–289. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.2.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:574–591. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(1):215–243. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. KELLY D. H. Visual response to time-dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude sensitivity measurements. J Opt Soc Am. 1961 Apr;51:422–429. doi: 10.1364/josa.51.000422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nachmias J. Visual resolution of two-bar patterns and square-wave gratings. J Opt Soc Am. 1968 Jan;58(1):9–13. doi: 10.1364/josa.58.000009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Regan D., Tyler C. W. Some dynamic features of colour vision. Vision Res. 1971 Nov;11(11):1307–1324. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(71)90013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Regan D., Tyler C. W. Temporal summation and its limit for wavelength changes: an analog of Bloch's law for color vision. J Opt Soc Am. 1971 Oct;61(10):1414–1421. doi: 10.1364/josa.61.001414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Regan D., Tyler C. W. Wavelength-modulated light generator. Vision Res. 1971 Jan;11(1):43–56. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(71)90204-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. SCHADE O. H., Sr Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye. J Opt Soc Am. 1956 Sep;46(9):721–739. doi: 10.1364/josa.46.000721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tyler C. W. Stereoscopic depth movement: two eyes less sensitive than one. Science. 1971 Nov 26;174(4012):958–961. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4012.958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. WESTHEIMER G. Modulation thresholds for sinusoidal light distributions on the retina. J Physiol. 1960 Jun;152:67–74. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES