Abstract
The selective oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde on Cu surfaces is an important and well-studied reaction. However, a systematic analysis of product selectivity as a function of oxygen coverage on Cu(111) and Cu-based single-atom alloys (SAAs) has not been previously reported. In this work, we present a comprehensive investigation of deuterated methanol (CD3OH) partial oxidation on Cu(111) and 1% PtCu(111) SAA surfaces as a function of preadsorbed oxygen coverage. Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) reveal that isolated Pt atoms inhibit the initial surface oxidation of Cu(111) under low oxygen exposures. Despite this difference in oxidation kinetics, the product selectivity remains largely unaffected: on both Cu(111) and PtCu(111), formaldehyde (CD2O) is the predominant partial oxidation product over a broad range of oxygen coverages. The selectivity toward formaldehyde peaks at intermediate oxygen coverages (∼0.3 monolayers, ML), indicating the existence of an optimal oxygen loading for partial oxidation. Notably, the similar product selectivities on Cu(111) and PtCu(111) over a range of surface oxygen coverage indicate that Pt single atoms do not significantly alter the reaction pathway or shift the optimal oxygen coverage for formaldehyde formation. Control experiments confirm that Cu(111) is unreactive toward methanol in the absence of oxygen, while PtCu(111) surfaces produce a small amount of formaldehyde even when oxygen is not preadsorbed, indicating that isolated Pt atoms facilitate O–H activation at below 150 K, leading to H2 desorption, followed by C–D activation at higher temperatures (∼350 K). Density functional theory (DFT)-based calculations show that Pt atoms increase the O2 dissociation barrier relative to Cu(111), consistent with the observed inhibition of oxidation at low exposures. Overall, this work provides the first detailed selectivity map for methanol oxidation on oxidized Cu(111) and PtCu(111) SAA surfaces. By linking classical mechanistic insightssuch as methoxy- and formate-mediated pathwayswith single-atom alloy catalyst design, this work demonstrates that while Pt substitution modulates the oxidation kinetics and oxygen binding, the overall selectivity toward formaldehyde is governed primarily by oxygen coverage. These findings underscore the potential of isolated dopants to tune surface oxidation behavior without compromising the intrinsic partial oxidation selectivity of copper-based catalysts.


Introduction
Methanol oxidation to formaldehyde is an important model reaction in heterogeneous catalysis that has been extensively studied on copper surfaces. − Early ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) studies established that on Cu single crystals, methanol interacts weakly with clean metal surfaces but readily dissociates in the presence of preadsorbed oxygen to form the methoxy (CH3O) intermediate, which subsequently decomposes to release formaldehyde (CH2O). − In this process, oxygen acts as a hydrogen abstractor, removing the hydroxyl hydrogen from methanol to produce methoxy and water, thereby initiating the selective partial oxidation pathway. While methoxy formation is negligible on flat Cu(111) under UHV conditions, more open facets such as Cu(110) and Cu(100), as well as defect or step sites, can promote limited methanol dissociation even in the absence of oxygen, although the presence of oxygen markedly enhances overall reactivity. Pioneering work by Russell et al. on Cu(111) with preadsorbed oxygen demonstrated that the primary reaction pathway produces formaldehyde via surface methoxy, while a minor decomposition pathway yields CO2, likely through a formate (HCOO) intermediate. This total oxidation channel is promoted by higher oxygen coverages and is fundamentally limited by the high thermal stability of the formate intermediate, which only undergoes decarboxylation to CO2 and H2 at temperatures significantly higher than those required for selective formaldehyde production (∼470–490 K). ,− ,, Excessive oxygen coverages tend to promote methoxy to formate and further conversion to CO2 but can also passivate the surface by blocking adjacent Cu sites required for methoxy formation and decomposition, thereby suppressing both products. Conversely, if the oxygen coverage is too low, methanol cannot activate and desorbs molecularly. Consequently, an intermediate oxygen coverage maximizes formaldehyde yielda concept that has been demonstrated and discussed extensively on the Cu(111) surface in earlier UHV studies. ,,
Despite decades of mechanistic insight, the quantitative relationship between surface oxygen coverage and product selectivity remains incomplete. Prior studies have mapped formaldehyde yields as a function of oxygen coverage on Cu(111), yet no studies have systematically determined how the CO2 selectivity evolves with oxygen coverage. Such an understanding is crucial for bridging surface science and applied catalysis, since industrial methanol-to-formaldehyde processes on Ag or Cu operate under variable oxygen partial pressures where the surface exists in a dynamic, partially oxidized state. Moreover, the effect of dilute alloying or single-atom modification on the selectivity for partial or total oxidation is largely unexplored. Understanding how small changes in surface composition influence oxidation kinetics and reaction selectivity should provide mechanistic guidance for the catalyst design.
An emerging strategy to tune surface oxidation chemistry is through the incorporation of isolated dopant atoms into a host metal, forming single-atom alloys (SAAs). − In these systems, a catalytically active dopant is atomically dispersed in a more inert host, creating well-defined single-atom sites that are active and selective for a broad range of reactions, including hydrogenation, − dehydrogenation, ,,− and coupling reactions. ,,,− In terms of alcohol chemistry, for example, PtCu SAA exhibits enhanced dehydrogenation of ethanol to acetaldehyde, whereby single Pt atoms lower both the O–H bond and C–H bond activation barriers that limit reactivity on Cu(111). , To date, the majority of SAA studies have focused on reducing environments; therefore, their behavior under oxidizing conditionswhere both metallic and oxidized surface phases may coexistremains underexplored.
In this work, we address this issue by investigating how isolated Pt dopants influence oxygen-mediated methanol oxidation on Cu. Using a model 1% PtCu(111) SAA, where Pt atoms substitute into the Cu(111) surface, we quantify methanol oxidation selectivity as a function of surface oxygen coverage and compare it directly to pristine Cu(111). By combining temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) experiments with in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we show that Pt subtly modifies the oxygen adsorption kineticsretarding the initial oxidation of Cu(111)but does not significantly shift the optimum conditions for formaldehyde vs CO2 formation. The formaldehyde selectivity as a function of oxygen coverage is nearly identical on Cu(111) and PtCu(111), demonstrating that surface oxygen coverage, rather than the dopant, dominates the reaction selectivity. These results provide the first oxygen coverage-dependent selectivity map for methanol oxidation on a SAA surface and offer new mechanistic insight into how isolated dopants modulate oxidation kinetics without altering intrinsic selectivity.
Materials and Methods
Temperature-Programmed Desorption (TPD)
All TPD experiments were carried out in a UHV chamber supported with a turbomolecular pump to attain UHV conditions and a titanium sublimation pump to maintain those conditions. The base pressure in the chamber was ∼7.5 × 10–11 Torr. The Cu(111) crystal was mounted to a manipulator through 0.25 mm thick Ta wires. The crystal was resistively heated via the Ta wires using a DC power supply and was cooled to 87 K via a liquid nitrogen cryostat. The crystal surface was cleaned using repeated cycles of Ar+ ion bombardment using a hot filament sputter source from RBD Instruments and thermal annealing to 723 K. The temperature was measured by a type K thermocouple welded to the back of the crystal. 16O2 (99.999%, Praxair) was dosed at 400 K using a precision leak valve (MDC Precision), and the crystal was moved within 3 in. of the leak valve while facing in its direction. A saturated 0.586 ML oxygen coverage was assumed to correspond to the “29” Cu x O structure. Pt was deposited at 383 K and 10 nA flux by electron bombardment evaporation of a high-purity Pt rod.
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
XPS experiments were carried out at the In situ and Operando Soft X-ray spectroscopy (IOS, 23-ID-2) beamline at the National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II), Brookhaven National Laboratory. A technical description of the beamline and endstation is detailed elsewhere. The Cu(111) crystal was cleaned by multiple Ar+ sputtering (1 keV) and annealing (850 K) cycles until XPS showed that the surface was clean. To prepare PtCu(111) SAA, Pt was deposited onto the Cu(111) surface at 360–380 K using an SPECS EBE-4 electron beam evaporator. O2 (Matheson, 99.994%) and CO (Matheson, 99.999%) were dosed using high-precision variable leak valves, and the pressure was read by a hot cathode ion gauge. Photon energies of 710 and 500 eV were used to obtain O 1s and C 1s spectra, respectively. A Cu oxidation study was performed while maintaining a constant O2 pressure at a sample temperature of 400 K, and O 1s spectra were continuously acquired every 35 s. The XPS binding energy was referenced to the Fermi edge measured at each photon energy. The same experimental procedure performed without exposure to an X-ray beam yielded the same final result, thus ruling out any possible beam-induced effects.
Computational Methods
All density functional theory (DFT) simulations were conducted using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) software. , Electron smearing was performed with the Gaussian method with a smearing width of 0.2 eV, and the total energy was extrapolated to 0 K. Geometric optimizations were considered converged when the total energy changed by less than 1 × 10–4 eV and interatomic forces were less than 0.03 eV/Å for the ground-state optimizations. The core electrons were described using the projector augmented wave (PAW) method that was released in 2017 , and the valence electrons were modeled using a plane-wave basis set that was expanded to a cutoff energy of 500 eV. The exchange-correlation potential was modeled with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof functional. Structural visualizations were performed with VESTA.
For adsorption calculations, O2 dissociation was carried out on a four-atomic-layer-thick Cu(111) surface with a p(8 × 8) supercell in order to minimize the lateral interactions between the O2 molecules. The bulk lattice constant was determined to be 3.635 Å, where a 8 × 8 × 8 Monkhorst–Pack grid was used. Then, the same adsorption calculations were carried out on an SAA PtCu(111) surface. This surface was constructed by substituting one of the Cu atoms in the top layer with a Pt atom. In all geometry optimization calculations, the bottom two layers were fixed at their optimized bulk positions while the top two layers were allowed to fully relax. A vacuum layer of 10 Å and a 1 × 1 × 1 Monkhorst–Pack grid were used to sample the first Brillouin zone for all reaction pathways. We tested the effect of including a dipole layer sheet in our calculations and found that the root-mean-square residual value as compared to the system without a dipole layer correction was 0.004 eV. Since this had a minimal impact, we did not include a dipole layer sheet in our calculations. All minimum energy pathways were obtained with either the Nudged Elastic Band (NEB) method or the Climbing Image Nudged Elastic Band (CI-NEB) method, and were optimized until the residual forces on all atoms were smaller than 0.03 eV/Å. The adsorption sites of oxygen atoms were evaluated by calculating the adsorption energy. This was calculated as:
| 1 |
where E surface+atoms is the total energy of the oxygen atoms adsorbed on surface, E surface is the total energy of the Cu(111) or PtCu(111) surface, and is the energy of an isolated oxygen spin-polarized molecule in the gas phase. In this work, we concentrated our efforts on the peroxo-like species since it has been established that it binds more strongly to the surface as compared to the superoxo-like species. Since it has been established that the peroxo-like species do not have a net magnetic moment associated with them, our calculations were not spin polarized. Finally, in calculating the adsorption energies, we did not take zero-point energy contributions into account since our test calculations on Cu(111) show that they change the adsorption energy of chemisorbed O2 by 0.12 eV and that of dissociated O2 by 0.15 eV. As such, these contributions were neglected since the resulting change of 0.03 eV between chemisorbed O2 and dissociated O2 configurations will likely not impact the dissociation energetics between these two states.
Results and Discussion
To establish how methanol oxidation proceeds on Cu(111) and on the PtCu(111) SAA, we performed temperature-programmed methanol uptake experiments on both surfaces preoxidized by dosing 6.75 Langmuir (L, 1 L = 1 × 10-6 Torr·s)O2 at 400 K. After oxidation, the samples were cooled to 87 K for CD3OH adsorption and then heated linearly at 1.0 K/s to induce desorption or reaction. Figures A and B show representative TPD profiles obtained from oxidized Cu(111) and 1% PtCu(111) SAA, respectively. On both surfaces, formaldehyde (CD2O) is the predominant carbon-containing product, accompanied by smaller amounts of CO2. A trace amount of CO was detected, which was attributed to the fragment from formaldehyde and CO2. On PtCu(111), the CO desorption peak at ∼350 K corresponded to CO that had adsorbed from the UHV background on Pt sites. A minor pathway of recombinative methanol (CD3OD) desorption at the same temperature as CD2O was also observed on both surfaces. The similar amounts of products evolving from both samples demonstrate that in the presence of oxygen, Pt incorporation does not introduce new reaction pathways. Therefore, it is expected that methanol activation proceeds through the same sequence of steps established for Cu surfaces: abstraction of the hydroxyl hydrogen by adsorbed oxygen to form surface methoxy, followed either by decomposition to formaldehyde or further oxidation to formate and CO2.
1.
Methanol oxidation on Cu(111) and PtCu(111) SAA samples. Representative TPD traces for (A) oxidized Cu(111) and (B) oxidized 1% PtCu(111) using ∼0.02 ML O reacting with deuterated methanol. (C) Selectivity toward products from deuterated methanol oxidation on Cu(111) and 1% PtCu(111) as a function of oxygen coverage. A saturated 0.586 ML oxygen coverage was assumed to correspond to the “29” Cu x O structure.
Many TPD experiments were performed as a function of oxygen coverage, and the quantitative product selectivity is summarized in Figure C. The surface oxygen coverage was determined by integrating the total yield of CD2O and CO2 obtained from methanol titration. Previous studies on Cu(111) quantified oxygen coverage using only CD2O yield. − However, based on the kinetic framework established by Russell et al., both products must be considered to properly account for total oxygen consumption. In the accepted mechanism for methanol oxidation on Cu(111), two formaldehyde molecules correspond to the removal of one surface oxygen atom, whereas the production of two CO2 molecules via the overoxidation channel consumes three surface O atoms in total, as shown below:
| 2 |
| 3 |
Using this stoichiometric relationship, the initial oxygen coverage was calculated from the CD2O and CO2 yields for both surfaces. The results are shown in Figure S1. Product selectivity was defined as the ratio of the individual product yield (CD2O or CO2) to the total carbon-containing products (CD2O + CO2).
Figure C illustrates the dependence of methanol oxidation selectivity on preadsorbed oxygen coverage for both Cu(111) and 1% PtCu(111). With very low oxygen coverage (<0.1 ML), CD2O accounts for approximately 80% of the carbon-containing products, while CO2 remains a minor product. As the oxygen coverage increases, the CD2O selectivity initially increases and reaches a maximum of ∼90% at intermediate oxygen coverages of ∼0.25–0.30 ML, defining the optimal regime for methanol partial oxidation. At higher oxygen coverages, the CD2O selectivity decreases gradually, accompanied by a corresponding increase in CO2 selectivity. This trend indicates that increasing surface oxygen favors the overoxidation pathway relative to formaldehyde formation.
Importantly, the selectivity curves for Cu(111) and PtCu(111) overlap within experimental uncertainty across the entire oxygen-coverage range. The oxygen coverage corresponding to maximum CD2O selectivity and the subsequent rise in CO2 selectivity are nearly identical on both surfaces. These results demonstrate that the branching between partial oxidation (CD2O) and total oxidation (CO2) is determined solely by oxygen coverage and not by the presence of Pt dopants.
Although Pt does not alter the oxygen-coverage-dependent selectivity trend (Figure C), differences are observed in the product desorption temperatures (Figures S2–S3; representative low oxygen coverage TPD traces shown in Figure A and B). On Cu(111), formaldehyde desorbs between 384 and 425 K, with the peak temperature increasing with increasing oxygen coverage (Figure S2A-top TPD traces). On 1% PtCu(111), the CD2O peak appears between 370 and 410 K, i.e., approximately 10–15 K lower than on Cu(111) at comparable coverages (Figure S2A-bottom). A similar trend is observed for CO2. For the same representative coverage series as shown in Figure S2A, the CO2 peak on PtCu(111) is shifted to lower temperatures relative to Cu(111), with the largest differences occurring at lower oxygen coverages and diminishing at higher oxygen coverages. Notably, at saturated oxygen coverage (∼0.5 ML), the CO2 peak temperature in the first TPD during sequential methanol titration is essentially the same on both surfaces (∼415 K on Cu(111) vs ∼413 K on PtCu(111) (Figure S3). However, as the surface oxygen is progressively consumed during titration, the CO2 peak on PtCu(111) shifts downward to ∼400 K. Thus, while the initial CO2 desorption temperatures are comparable at high oxygen coverage, the PtCu(111) surface exhibits lower CO2 desorption temperatures as oxygen coverage decreases. These shifts in desorption temperature are consistent with the formate-mediated overoxidation mechanism established for Cu surfaces, indicating that isolated Pt atoms facilitate C–D bond activation and may lower the barrier for formate decomposition to CO2.
When the surfaces are saturated by oxygen, methanol reactivity is limited due to the reduced availability of metal oxide interface sites. As methanol is deposited and desorbed repeatedly during titration experiments, the progressive removal of surface oxygen increases the accessibility of isolated Pt atoms embedded in the Cu surface. This increased accessibility likely contributes to the lower CO2 desorption temperatures observed on PtCu(111) relative to Cu(111).
The concurrent desorption of CD3OD and D2 alongside that of CD2O on both surfaces implies a common methoxy intermediate. Specifically, when a methoxy species undergoes C–D cleavage, the following steps can occur: (i) the methoxy can desorb as CD2O, (ii) the D atom can combine with another methoxy to form methanol (desorbing as CD3OD), and (iii) the D atoms can couple and desorb as D2. The simultaneous desorption of CD3OD, D2, and CD2O thus confirms that they share the methoxy origin, whereas the higher-temperature CO2 peak indicates that an additional steplikely formation and decomposition of a formate intermediateis required for the total oxidation pathway. − ,− ,,−
Having established that Pt does not alter the oxygen-coverage–dependent selectivity of methanol oxidation, we examined how Pt influences the initial oxidation of Cu(111). Figure A shows representative XPS O 1s spectra collected during the oxidation of Cu(111) and PtCu(111) at 400 K under 5 × 10–8 Torr O2. The intensity of this peak increases progressively with O2 exposure time, indicating accumulation of atomic oxygen on the surface. After ∼40 min of exposure, the O 1s signal for PtCu(111) is approximately 25% lower than that of Cu(111), consistent with a slightly slower oxidation rate on the PtCu(111) surface. Interestingly, this contrasts with 1% Rh doping of Cu(111), which accelerates the initial oxidation of Cu(111) ∼9-fold. The representative XPS spectra presented in Figure A illustrate the slightly slower oxidation of PtCu(111) and confirm that the same oxygen species form on both surfaces throughout the oxidation process. No additional O 1s components at higher binding energy were detected, indicating no hydroxyl or subsurface contributions under these conditions.
2.
XPS data of the oxidation of Cu(111) and PtCu(111) SAA. (A) Representative O 1s spectra during exposure to 5 × 10–8 Torr of O2 at 400 K for the two surfaces. (B) Plots of O 1s XPS peak area during extended oxidation with exposure to 5 × 10–6 Torr of O2 at 400 K for Cu(111) (black circles) and 1% PtCu(111) (green circles).
Figure B shows the extended oxidation behavior of both surfaces. After ∼6 min of O2 exposure at 5 × 10–6 Torr, the O 1s intensities for Cu(111) and PtCu(111) converge, demonstrating that both surfaces reach essentially the same oxygen coverage. At longer times and higher O2 pressures, both surfaces exhibit stable O 1s intensities and constant O 1s binding energies, confirming that Pt does not alter the chemical environment or stoichiometry of the oxidized Cu surface. In contrast to the aforementioned RhCu(111), which enhances initial oxidation but later suppresses deeper oxide growth, Pt displays only a slight inhibitory effect, slowing the initial O2 dissociation without changing the terminal oxygen coverage.
The oxygen coverage calculated using TPD shown in Figure S1 is in reasonable agreement with the XPS-derived coverage trends. These differences likely arise from the distinct measurement approachesTPD quantifies oxygen removal through methanol titration, which has error associated with the quantification of the different reaction products, whereas XPS directly probes the surface O 1s peak intensity. However, both methods consistently indicate the inhibitory effect of Pt in the initial stages of surface oxidation and show that saturated oxygen coverages are the same on Cu(111) and PtCu(111).
In order to understand the origin of the slightly different rates of initial oxidation of Cu and the PtCu SAA, we performed DFT calculations. Figure compares the minimum energy pathway for O2 adsorption and dissociation on PtCu(111) for two different scenariosone where O2 is close to the Pt dopant (Figure A) and one where O2 is far from the Pt dopant (Figure B). It is apparent from this data that when O2 adsorbs far from the Pt atom, the adsorption energy of the O2 molecule is essentially that of O2 on Cu(111) and proceeds downhill in energy. In contrast, when O2 adsorbs near the isolated Pt atom, the initial interaction with Pt is repulsive, as reflected by a less favorable adsorption energy as compared to when O2 adsorbs far from the Pt site. Although dissociation is still possible, the pathway is less stabilized overall, and the barrier for O–O scission is slightly higher. This demonstrates that the Pt atom does not provide a low-barrier entry point for O2 activation; instead, it locally destabilizes molecular adsorption of O2 in the region around the Pt atom, hindering efficient uptake of oxygen on the surface. These results are consistent with our previous work in which we found that surface O was destabilized in the vicinity of Pt as compared to surrounding Cu(111) sites. We note that the adsorption energy of oxygen is more favorable in this work because we used a p(8 × 8) unit cell, whereas our previous calculations employed a p(4 × 4) unit cell.
3.

DFT-calculated minimum energy pathway and corresponding configurations for O2 dissociation on PtCu(111) SAA surfaces with (A) O2 close to the Pt dopant and (B) O2 far from the Pt dopant. The Cu, Pt, and O atoms are represented by pink, gray, and red spheres, respectively. This energy scale is with respect to an O2 molecule in the gas phase.
During sequential methanol titration experiments, an additional reaction pathway was observed on PtCu(111) that operates even in the absence of preadsorbed surface oxygen. On Cu(111), methanol oxidation occurs only when surface oxygen is present, producing formaldehyde and CO2 during the first TPD cycle, as shown in TPD1 of Figure A. Once the surface oxygen is fully consumed, subsequent TPD traces are flat, consistent with previous reports that preadsorbed oxygen is essential for methanol oxidation on flat Cu(111) surfaces. ,,− In contrast, the 1% PtCu(111) SAA continues to form a small but constant amount of formaldehyde after the first TPD (Figure B). This persistent signal indicates that the isolated Pt atoms embedded in Cu(111) can activate both O–H and C–H bonds in methanol, forming methoxy intermediates even without oxygen present. Repeated TPD cycles up to 573 K show that both the formaldehyde yield and Pt coverage remain constant. The constant Pt coverage remaining after each methanol TPD was determined by the adsorption of CO, which desorbs at low temperatures (<200 K) from Cu(111) vs ∼350 K from the embedded Pt atoms, confirming that approximately half the Pt dopants initially deposited (1%) are stable and catalytically accessible under these reaction conditions. While this low-coverage dehydrogenation route is not dominant under oxidizing conditions, it illustrates how single-atom dopants can introduce new, low-barrier C–H and O–H activation pathways unavailable on flat Cu(111) surfaces.
4.
Sequential methanol TPDs showing formaldehyde and CO2 production on (A) clean Cu(111) and (B) 1% PtCu SAA after 6.75 L O2 exposure at 400 K. The reaction ceases after 1 cycle on Cu(111), but the presence of Pt enables a small amount of methanol to formaldehyde conversion even when the surface oxygen is depleted. (C) Repeated TPD cycles (83 K–573 K) demonstrate a constant formaldehyde yield (red points) and unchanged Pt coverage (blue points) as determined by CO titration, , indicating that the Pt dopants remain stable in the surface and retain their activity over multiple reaction cycles.
Conclusion
This study provides the first comprehensive, oxygen coverage-dependent selectivity map for methanol partial oxidation on Cu(111) and 1% PtCu(111) single-atom alloy surfaces. By combining TPD, XPS, and DFT calculations, we demonstrate that surface oxygen coveragerather than the presence of isolated Pt dopantsgoverns the selectivity branching between methanol partial oxidation to formaldehyde and total oxidation to CO2. Formaldehyde selectivity reaches a maximum of ∼90% at intermediate oxygen coverages (∼0.25–0.30 ML) on both surfaces, confirming that an optimal oxygen loading is required to balance methoxy formation and overoxidation pathways. While Pt incorporation slightly inhibits initial O2 dissociation and slows early-stage Cu oxidation kinetics, it does not shift the oxygen coverage window for maximum formaldehyde selectivity. Instead, Pt subtly lowers reaction temperatures for product evolution and enables limited methanol dehydrogenation even in the absence of preadsorbed oxygen, highlighting its ability to facilitate O–H and C–H activation. These findings demonstrate that isolated dopants can tune oxidation kinetics without disrupting the intrinsic selectivity trends governed by surface oxygen coverage, providing a strategy to adjust oxidation behavior while preserving the desirable partial oxidation selectivity of copper-based catalysts.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Financial support for the experimental work at Tufts University was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, BES, Catalysis Science program (DE-SC0021196). This research used resources of the 23-ID-2 (IOS) beamline of the National Synchrotron Light Source II, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-SC0012704. Financial support at Washington State University was provided by the National Science Foundation CAREER program under Contract No. CBET-1653561 as well as the EAGER program under Contract No. CBET-2500124. This work used Bridges-2 at Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center through allocation CHE170068 from the Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & Support (ACCESS) program, which is supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grants #2138259, #2138286, #2138307, #2137603, and #2138296. Part of the computational resources were also provided by the Kamiak HPC under the Center for Institutional Research Computing at Washington State University. We also thank Raphael Adewale for fruitful discussions.
Data will be made available on request.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6c01011.
TPD-derived oxygen coverages and additional TPD data illustrating oxygen coverage-dependent product desorption temperatures and sequential oxygen titration behavior on Cu(111) and PtCu(111) (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Yong S. T., Ooi C. W., Chai S. P., Wu X. S.. Review of Methanol Reforming-Cu-Based Catalysts, Surface Reaction Mechanisms, and Reaction Schemes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(22):9541–9552. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ben David R., Ben Yaacov A., Head A. R., Eren B.. Methanol Decomposition on Copper Surfaces under Ambient Conditions: Mechanism, Surface Kinetics, and Structure Sensitivity. ACS Catal. 2022;12(13):7709–7718. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c05933. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Li C., Zhu Y., Patel S., Boscoboinik J. A., Zhou G.. Effect of the Chemical States of Copper on Methanol Decomposition and Oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2024;128(11):4559–4572. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schedel-Niedrig T., Hävecker M., Knop-Gericke A., Schlögl R.. Partial Methanol Oxidation over Copper: Active Sites Observed by Means of in Situ X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000;2(15):3473–3481. doi: 10.1039/b002308f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Orozco I., Huang E., Mahapatra M., Shi R., Kang J., Nemšák S., Senanayake S. D., Liu P., Rodriguez J. A.. In Situ Studies of Methanol Decomposition Over Cu(111) and Cu2O/Cu(111): Effects of Reactant Pressure, Surface Morphology, and Hot Spots of Active Sites. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021;125(1):558–571. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c09572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Grebien M., Al-Shamery K.. Conversion of Methanol at Copper Clusters on TiO2 (110) and SiOx: Direct Dehydrogenation vs. Partial Oxidation and Influence of Cluster Size and Substrate. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2025;27(8):4316–4327. doi: 10.1039/D4CP03904A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eichner F., Turan E., Sauer J., Bender M., Behrens S.. Supported Silver and Copper Catalysts in the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Methanol to Formaldehyde: A Comparative Study under Industrially Relevant Conditions. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2023;13(8):2349–2359. doi: 10.1039/D2CY01405J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou L., Günther S., Moszynski D., Imbihl R.. Reactivity of Oxidized Copper Surfaces in Methanol Oxidation. J. Catal. 2005;235(2):359–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2005.08.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gomes J. R. B., Gomes J. A. N. F.. A DFT Study of Methanol Oxidation Catalyzed by a Copper Surface. Surf. Sci. 2001;471(1–3):59–70. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6028(00)00881-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Greeley J., Mavrikakis M.. Methanol Decomposition on Cu(111): A DFT Study. J. Catal. 2002;208(2):291–300. doi: 10.1006/jcat.2002.3586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Eren B., Kersell H., Weatherup R. S., Heine C., Crumlin E. J., Friend C. M., Salmeron M. B.. Structure of the Clean and Oxygen-Covered Cu(100) Surface at Room Temperature in the Presence of Methanol Vapor in the 10–200 mTorr Pressure Range. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2018;122(2):548–554. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b04681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carley A. F., Owens A. W., Rajumon M. K., Roberts M. W., Jackson S. D.. Oxidation of Methanol at Copper Surfaces. Catal. Lett. 1996;37(1–2):79–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00813523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sexton B. A., Hughes A. E., Avery N. R.. A Spectroscopic Study of the Adsorption and Reactions of Methanol, Formaldehyde and Methyl Formate on Clean and Oxygenated Cu(110) Surfaces. Surf. Sci. Lett. 1985;155(1):A268. doi: 10.1016/0167-2584(85)91140-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Francis S. M., Leibsle F. M., Haq S., Xiang N., Bowker M.. Methanol Oxidation on Cu(110) Surf. Sci. 1994;315(3):284–292. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(94)90132-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Russell J. N., Gates S. M., Yates J. T.. Reaction of Methanol with Cu(111) and Cu(111) + O(Ads) Surf. Sci. 1985;163(2–3):516–540. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(85)91077-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Davies P. R., Mariotti G. G.. Oxidation of Methanol at Cu(110) Surfaces: New TPD Studies. J. Phys. Chem. 1996;100(51):19975–19980. doi: 10.1021/jp961805p. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Barnes C., Pudney P., Guo Q., Bowker M.. Molecular-Beam Studies of Methanol Partial Oxidation on Cu(110) J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1990;86(15):2693. doi: 10.1039/ft9908602693. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pöllmann S., Bayer A., Ammon C., Steinrück H.-P.. Adsorption and Reaction of Methanol on Clean and Oxygen Precovered Cu(111) Z. Phys. Chem. 2004;218(8):957–971. doi: 10.1524/zpch.218.8.957.35981. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lawton T. J., Kyriakou G., Baber A. E., Sykes E. C. H.. An Atomic Scale View of Methanol Reactivity at the Cu(111)/CuOx Interface. ChemCatchem. 2013;5(9):2684–2690. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201200810. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Efstathiou V., Woodruff D. P.. An Infrared Vibrational Spectroscopic Study of the Interaction of Methanol with Oxygen-Covered Cu(111) Surf. Sci. 2003;526(1–2):19–32. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6028(02)02675-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chesters M. A., McCash E. M.. The Adsorption and Reaction of Methanol on Oxidized Copper(111) Studied by Fourier Transform Reflection-Absorption Infrared Spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A. 1987;43(12):1625–1630. doi: 10.1016/S0584-8539(87)80059-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen A. K., Masel R.. Direct Conversion of Methanol to Formaldehyde in the Absence of Oxygen on Cu(210) Surf. Sci. 1995;343(1–2):17–23. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(95)00649-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bowker M., Madix R. J.. XPS, UPS and Thermal Desorption Studies of Alcohol Adsorption on Cu(110): I. Methanol. Surf. Sci. 1980;95(1):190–206. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(80)90135-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wachs I. E., Madix R. J.. The Selective Oxidation of CH3OH to H2CO on a Copper(110) Catalyst. J. Catal. 1978;53(2):208–227. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(78)90068-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mudalige K., Trenary M.. Identification of Formate from Methanol Oxidation on Cu(100) with Infrared Spectroscopy. Surf. Sci. 2002;504:208–214. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6028(02)01101-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Darby M. T., Stamatakis M., Michaelides A., Sykes E. C. H.. Lonely Atoms with Special Gifts: Breaking Linear Scaling Relationships in Heterogeneous Catalysis with Single-Atom Alloys. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018;9(18):5636–5646. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giannakakis G., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M., Sykes E. C. H.. Single-Atom Alloys as a Reductionist Approach to the Rational Design of Heterogeneous Catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52(1):237–247. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hannagan R. T., Giannakakis G., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M., Sykes E. C. H.. Single-Atom Alloy Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2020;120(21):12044–12088. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hannagan, R. T. A Surface Science Approach to Designing and Understanding Single-Atom Alloy Catalysts at the Atomic-Scale, Ph.D. Dissertation. Tufts University: Medford, MA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z.-T., Darby M. T., Therrien A. J., El-Soda M., Michaelides A., Stamatakis M., Sykes E. C. H. P.. Structure, and Surface Chemistry of Ni–Au Single Atom Alloys. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120(25):13574–13580. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mao J., Yin J., Pei J., Wang D., Li Y.. Single Atom Alloy: An Emerging Atomic Site Material for Catalytic Applications. Nano Today. 2020;34:100917. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100917. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Greiner M. T., Jones T. E., Beeg S., Zwiener L., Scherzer M., Girgsdies F., Piccinin S., Armbrüster M., Knop-Gericke A., Schlögl R.. Free-Atom-like d States in Single-Atom Alloy Catalysts. Nat. Chem. 2018;10(10):1008–1015. doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0125-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang T., Walsh A. G., Yu J., Zhang P.. Single-Atom Alloy Catalysts: Structural Analysis, Electronic Properties and Catalytic Activities. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50:569–588. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00844C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hannagan R. T., Wang Y., Réocreux R., Schumann J., Stamatakis M., Sykes E. C. H.. Tuning the Product Selectivity of Single-Atom Alloys by Active Site Modification. Surf. Sci. 2022;717:717. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2021.121990. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Darby M. T., Réocreux R., Sykes E. C. H., Michaelides A., Stamatakis M.. Elucidating the Stability and Reactivity of Surface Intermediates on Single-Atom Alloy Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2018;8(6):5038–5050. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Z., Zhang P.. Electronic Structure of Single-Atom Alloys and Its Impact on the Catalytic Activities. ACS Omega. 2022;7(2):1585–1594. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c06067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darby M. T., Sykes E. C. H., Michaelides A., Stamatakis M.. Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Resistance and Structural Stability of Single Atom Alloys. Top. Catal. 2018;61(5–6):428–438. doi: 10.1007/s11244-017-0882-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun G., Zhao Z.-J., Mu R., Zha S., Li L., Chen S., Zang K., Luo J., Li Z., Purdy S. C., Kropf A. J., Miller J. T., Zeng L., Gong J.. Breaking the Scaling Relationship via Thermally Stable Pt/Cu Single Atom Alloys for Catalytic Dehydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 2018;9(1):4454. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06967-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu Q., Luo Y.. Catalytic Activity of Single Transition-Metal Atom Doped in Cu(111) Surface for Heterogeneous Hydrogenation. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117(28):14618–14624. doi: 10.1021/jp403902g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lucci, F. R. Surface Reactivity of Single Atom Alloys: model Studies Guiding the Design of Atom Efficient Nanoparticle Catalysts, Ph.D. Dissertation. Tufts University: Medford, MA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kyriakou G., Boucher M. B., Jewell A. D., Lewis E. A., Lawton T. J., Baber A. E., Tierney H. L., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M., Sykes E. C. H.. Isolated Metal Atom Geometries as a Strategy for Selective Heterogeneous Hydrogenations. Science. 2012;335(6073):1209–1212. doi: 10.1126/science.1215864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J., Shan J., Lucci F. R., Cao S., Sykes E. C. H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M.. Palladium–Gold Single Atom Alloy Catalysts for Liquid Phase Selective Hydrogenation of 1-Hexyne. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017;7(19):4276–4284. doi: 10.1039/C7CY00794A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aich P., Wei H., Basan B., Kropf A. J., Schweitzer N. M., Marshall C. L., Miller J. T., Meyer R.. Single-Atom Alloy Pd–Ag Catalyst for Selective Hydrogenation of Acrolein. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119(32):18140–18148. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01357. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Islam M. J., Granollers Mesa M., Osatiashtiani A., Manayil J. C., Isaacs M. A., Taylor M. J., Tsatsos S., Kyriakou G.. PdCu Single Atom Alloys Supported on Alumina for the Selective Hydrogenation of Furfural. Appl. Catal., B. 2021;299:120652. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120652. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Boucher M. B., Zugic B., Cladaras G., Kammert J., Marcinkowski M. D., Lawton T. J., Sykes E. C. H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M.. Single Atom Alloy Surface Analogs in Pd0.18Cu15 Nanoparticles for Selective Hydrogenation Reactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013;15(29):12187. doi: 10.1039/c3cp51538a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao X., Mirjalili A., Wheeler J., Xie W., Jang B. W.-L.. Investigation of the Preparation Methodologies of Pd-Cu Single Atom Alloy Catalysts for Selective Hydrogenation of Acetylene. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2015;9(4):442–449. doi: 10.1007/s11705-015-1547-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Islam M. J., Granollers Mesa M., Osatiashtiani A., Taylor M. J., Isaacs M. A., Kyriakou G.. The Hydrogenation of Crotonaldehyde on PdCu Single Atom Alloy Catalysts. Nanomaterials. 2023;13(8):1434. doi: 10.3390/nano13081434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lucci F. R., Liu J., Marcinkowski M. D., Yang M., Allard L. F., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M., Sykes E. C. H.. Selective Hydrogenation of 1,3-Butadiene on Platinum–Copper Alloys at the Single-Atom Limit. Nat. Commun. 2015;6(1):8550. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu X., Wang Q., Xie L., Liu Y., Li D., Feng J., Duan X.. Thermal Effect Optimization Endows a Selective and Stable PdCu Single Atom Alloy Catalyst for Acetylene Hydrogenation. AIChE J. 2023;69(6):e18042. doi: 10.1002/aic.18042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kruppe C. M., Krooswyk J. D., Trenary M.. Selective Hydrogenation of Acetylene to Ethylene in the Presence of a Carbonaceous Surface Layer on a Pd/Cu(111) Single-Atom Alloy. ACS Catal. 2017;7(12):8042–8049. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02862. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shao S., Yang Y., Sun K., Yang S., Li A., Yang F., Luo X., Hao S., Ke Y.. Electron-Rich Ruthenium Single-Atom Alloy for Aqueous Levulinic Acid Hydrogenation. ACS Catal. 2021;11(19):12146–12158. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c03004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H., Luo Q., Liu W., Lin Y., Guan Q., Zheng X., Pan H., Zhu J., Sun Z., Wei S., Yang J., Lu J.. Quasi Pd1Ni Single-Atom Surface Alloy Catalyst Enables Hydrogenation of Nitriles to Secondary Amines. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1):4998. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12993-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bai J., Tamura M., Nakayama A., Nakagawa Y., Tomishige K.. Comprehensive Study on Ni- or Ir-Based Alloy Catalysts in the Hydrogenation of Olefins and Mechanistic Insight. ACS Catal. 2021;11(6):3293–3309. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c04615. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pan Y., Zhang X., Sun G., Li Y., Liu B.. Single-Atom-Alloy Catalysts for Enhanced Hydrogenation Reaction Process: Mechanism, Regulation Strategy, and Design Principle. ACS Catal. 2025;15(5):3674–3698. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c08075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jin Z., Xu Y., Chhetri M., Wood J., Torreon B., Che F., Yang M.. Recent Developments of Single Atom Alloy Catalysts for Electrocatalytic Hydrogenation Reactions. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;491:152072. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.152072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu W., Feng H., Yang Y., Niu Y., Wang L., Yin P., Hong S., Zhang B., Zhang X., Wei M.. Highly-Efficient RuNi Single-Atom Alloy Catalysts toward Chemoselective Hydrogenation of Nitroarenes. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):3188. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30536-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alamer A. M., Ouyang M., Alshafei F. H., Nadeem M. A., Alsalik Y., Miller J. T., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M., Sykes E. C. H., Manousiouthakis V., Eagan N. M.. Design of Dilute Palladium–Indium Alloy Catalysts for the Selective Hydrogenation of CO2 to Methanol. ACS Catal. 2023;13(15):9987–9996. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c01861. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S., Wang R., Zhang X., Zhao H.. Recent Advances in Single-Atom Alloys: Preparation Methods and Applications in Heterogeneous Catalysis. RSC Adv. 2024;14(6):3936–3951. doi: 10.1039/D3RA07029H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shan J., Lucci F. R., Liu J., El-Soda M., Marcinkowski M. D., Allard L. F., Sykes E. C. H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M.. Water Co-Catalyzed Selective Dehydrogenation of Methanol to Formaldehyde and Hydrogen. Surf. Sci. 2016;650:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2016.02.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Boucher M. B., Marcinkowski M. D., Liriano M. L., Murphy C. J., Lewis E. A., Jewell A. D., Mattera M. F. G., Kyriakou G., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M., Sykes E. C. H.. Molecular-Scale Perspective of Water-Catalyzed Methanol Dehydrogenation to Formaldehyde. ACS Nano. 2013;7(7):6181–6187. doi: 10.1021/nn402055k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marcinkowski M. D., Liu J., Murphy C. J., Liriano M. L., Wasio N. A., Lucci F. R., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M., Sykes E. C. H.. Selective Formic Acid Dehydrogenation on Pt-Cu Single-Atom Alloys. ACS Catal. 2016;6(8):5128–5136. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02772. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hannagan R. T., Giannakakis G., Réocreux R., Schumann J., Finzel J., Wang Y., Michaelides A., Deshlahra P., Christopher P., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M., Stamatakis M., Sykes E. C. H.. First-Principles Design of a Single-Atom-Alloy Propane Dehydrogenation Catalyst. Science. 2021;372(6549):1444–1447. doi: 10.1126/science.abg8389. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Giannakakis G., Kress P., Duanmu K., Tong Ngan H., Yan G., Hoffman A. S., Qi Z., Trimpalis A., Annamalai L., Ouyang M.. et al. Mechanistic and Electronic Insights into a Working NiAu Single-Atom Alloy Ethanol Dehydrogenation Catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:21567–21579. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c09274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iyer J., Jalid F., Khan T. S., Haider M. A.. Tracing the Reactivity of Single Atom Alloys for Ethanol Dehydrogenation Using Ab Initio Simulations. React. Chem. Eng. 2021;7:61–75. doi: 10.1039/D1RE00396H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Giannakakis G., Trimpalis A., Shan J., Qi Z., Cao S., Liu J., Ye J., Biener J., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M.. NiAu Single Atom Alloys for the Non-Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethanol to Acetaldehyde and Hydrogen. Top. Catal. 2018;61:475–486. doi: 10.1007/s11244-017-0883-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Wang B., Fan M., Li D., Zhang R.. Ethane Dehydrogenation over the Single-Atom Alloy Catalysts: Screening out the Excellent Catalyst with the Dual Descriptors. Fuel. 2021;306:306. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121641. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X., Wang X., Zhen S., Sun G., Pei C., Zhao Z.-J., Gong J.. Support Stabilized PtCu Single-Atom Alloys for Propane Dehydrogenation. Chem. Sci. 2022;13(33):9537–9543. doi: 10.1039/D2SC03723H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel D. A., Giannakakis G., Yan G., Ngan H. T., Yu P., Hannagan R. T., Kress P. L., Shan J., Deshlahra P., Sautet P., Sykes E. C. H.. Mechanistic Insights into Nonoxidative Ethanol Dehydrogenation on NiCu Single-Atom Alloys. ACS Catal. 2023;13(7):4290–4303. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c00275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Ngan H. T., Lam H.-Y., Yan G., Hannagan R. T., Çınar V., Eagan N. M., Deshlahra P., Sautet P., Sykes E. C. H.. Direct Comparison of the Activity and Selectivity of Rh1Cu and Ni1Cu Single-Atom Alloy Sites for Ethanol Decomposition. ACS Catal. 2025;15(8):6046–6057. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c07556. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kress P., Réocreux R., Hannagan R., Thuening T., Boscoboinik J. A., Stamatakis M., Sykes E. C. H.. Mechanistic Insights into Carbon-Carbon Coupling on NiAu and PdAu Single-Atom Alloys. J. Chem. Phys. 2021;154(20):204701. doi: 10.1063/5.0048977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Réocreux R., Uhlman M., Thuening T., Kress P., Hannagan R., Stamatakis M., Sykes E. C. H.. Efficient and Selective Carbon–Carbon Coupling on Coke-Resistant PdAu Single-Atom Alloys. Chem. Commun. 2019;55(100):15085–15088. doi: 10.1039/C9CC07932G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao Y., Chen S., Bo S., Fan W., Li J., Jia C., Zhou Z., Liu Q., Zheng L., Zhang F.. Single Atom Bi Decorated Copper Alloy Enables C–C Coupling for Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO2 into C2+ Products. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62(30):e202303048. doi: 10.1002/anie.202303048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S., Li F., Zhao J., Zeng Y., Li Y., Lin Z.-Y., Lee T.-J., Liu S., Ren X., Wang W., Chen Y., Hung S.-F., Lu Y.-R., Cui Y., Yang X., Li X., Huang Y., Liu B.. Manipulating C-C Coupling Pathway in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction for Selective Ethylene and Ethanol Production over Single-Atom Alloy Catalyst. Nat. Commun. 2024;15(1):10247. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54636-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z. T., Hoyt R. A., El-Soda M., Madix R. J., Kaxiras E., Sykes E. C. H.. Dry Dehydrogenation of Ethanol on Pt–Cu Single Atom Alloys. Top. Catal. 2018;61(5–6):328–335. doi: 10.1007/s11244-017-0856-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Loiselet J. C., Corbett M. M., Whitted J. T., Schell E. D., Baber A. E.. Ethanol Dehydrogenation and Autocatalytic Dehydration on Oxidized Cu(111) Surf. Sci. 2025;755:122699. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2025.122699. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jalil A., Happel E. E., Cramer L., Hunt A., Hoffman A. S., Waluyo I., Montemore M. M., Christopher P., Sykes E. C. H.. Nickel Promotes Selective Ethylene Epoxidation on Silver. Science. 2025;387(6736):869–873. doi: 10.1126/science.adt1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lucci F. R., Lawton T. J., Pronschinske A., Sykes E. C. H.. Atomic Scale Surface Structure of Pt/Cu(111) Surface Alloys. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014;118(6):3015–3022. doi: 10.1021/jp405254z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Therrien A. J., Zhang R., Lucci F. R., Marcinkowski M. D., Hensley A., McEwen J.-S., Sykes E. C. H.. Structurally Accurate Model for the “29”-Structure of CuxO/Cu(111): A DFT and STM Study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120(20):10879–10886. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01284. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lucci F. R., Marcinkowski M. D., Lawton T. J., Sykes E. C. H.. H2 Activation and Spillover on Catalytically Relevant Pt–Cu Single Atom Alloys. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119(43):24351–24357. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Waluyo I., Hunt A.. Ambient Pressure X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy at the IOS (23-ID-2) Beamline at the National Synchrotron Light Source II. Synchrotron Radiat. News. 2022;35(3):31–38. doi: 10.1080/08940886.2022.2082180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kresse G., Furthmüller J.. Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;54(16):11169–11186. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kresse G., Hafner J.. Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics for Liquid Metals. Phys. Rev. B. 1993;47(1):558–561. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kresse G., Joubert D.. From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B. 1999;59(3):1758–1775. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Blöchl P. E.. Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;50(24):17953–17979. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paier J., Hirschl R., Marsman M., Kresse G.. The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof Exchange-Correlation Functional Applied to the G2–1 Test Set Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set. J. Chem. Phys. 2005;122(23):234102. doi: 10.1063/1.1926272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Momma K., Izumi F.. VESTA 3 for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Crystal, Volumetric and Morphology Data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011;44(6):1272–1276. doi: 10.1107/S0021889811038970. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Monkhorst H. J., Pack J. D.. Special Points for Brillouin-Zone Integrations. Phys. Rev. B. 1976;13(12):5188–5192. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jónsson, H. ; Mills, G. ; Jacobsen, K. W. . Nudged Elastic Band Method for Finding Minimum Energy Paths of Transitions, In Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations, Berne, B. J. ; Ciccotti, G. ; Coker, D. F. , Eds.; World Scientific: Singapore, 1998; pp. 385–404. 10.1142/9789812839664_0016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Henkelman G., Uberuaga B. P., Jónsson H.. A Climbing Image Nudged Elastic Band Method for Finding Saddle Points and Minimum Energy Paths. J. Chem. Phys. 2000;113(22):9901–9904. doi: 10.1063/1.1329672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Y., Mavrikakis M.. Adsorption and Dissociation of O2 on Cu(111): Thermochemistry, Reaction Barrier and the Effect of Strain. Surf. Sci. 2001;494(2):131–144. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01464-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Darby M. T., Lucci F. R., Marcinkowski M. D., Therrien A. J., Michaelides A., Stamatakis M., Sykes E. C. H.. Carbon Monoxide Mediated Hydrogen Release from PtCu Single-Atom Alloys: The Punctured Molecular Cork Effect. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019;123(16):10419–10428. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b01213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Çınar V., Peurrung E., Lee J., Dannar A., Guo D., Lal V., Sly G. L., Easton C., Lim H., Hunt A., Chen H., Wang Y., Hannagan R. T., McEwen J.-S., Christopher P., Waluyo I., Sykes E. C. H.. Effect of Dilute Rh on Oxygen Dissociation, Spillover, and the Oxidation of Cu across Many Orders of Magnitude Pressure. Chem. Catal. 2025;5(9):101421. doi: 10.1016/j.checat.2025.101421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dannar A., Sly G. L., Lal V., Peurrung E., Çınar V., Ulumuddin N., Lim H., Hunt A., McEwen J.-S., Waluyo I., Sykes E. C. H.. Elucidation of a Metastable p(2 × 1) O Atom Adlayer Structure on Cu(111) J. Phys. Chem. C. 2024;128(46):19807–19814. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c04452. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lal V., Dannar A., Sykes E. C. H.. Understanding how defects and dopant atoms in copper surface oxides affect reactivity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2026;722:165520. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.165520. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Marcinkowski M. D., Darby M. T., Liu J., Wimble J. M., Lucci F. R., Lee S., Michaelides A., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M., Stamatakis M., Sykes E. C. H.. Pt/Cu Single-Atom Alloys as Coke-Resistant Catalysts for Efficient C–H Activation. Nat. Chem. 2018;10(3):325–332. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sakong S., Gross A.. Density Functional Theory Study of the Partial Oxidation of Methanol on Copper Surfaces. J. Catal. 2005;231(2):420–429. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2005.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou L., Günther S., Imbihl R.. Low-Pressure Methanol Oxidation over a Cu(110) Surface under Stationary Conditions: (II) Adsorbate Coverages and Reactivity. J. Catal. 2005;232(2):295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.11.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sakong S., Gross A.. Total Oxidation of Methanol on Cu(110): A Density Functional Theory Study. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2007;111(36):8814–8822. doi: 10.1021/jp072773g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bluhm H., Hävecker M., Knop-Gericke A., Kleimenov E., Schlögl R., Teschner D., Bukhtiyarov V. I., Ogletree D. F., Salmeron M.. Methanol Oxidation on a Copper Catalyst Investigated Using in Situ X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2004;108(38):14340–14347. doi: 10.1021/jp040080j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schilling A. C., Groden K., Simonovis J. P., Hunt A., Hannagan R. T., Çınar V., McEwen J. -S., Sykes E. C. H., Waluyo I.. Accelerated Cu2O Reduction by Single Pt Atoms at the Metal-Oxide Interface. ACS Catal. 2020;10(7):4215–4226. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b05270. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Boerner, T. J. ; Deems, S. ; Furlani, T. R. ; Knuth, S. L. ; Towns, J. . ACCESS: Advancing Innovation. In Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 173–176. 10.1145/3569951.3597559. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.



