Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology : IJCHP logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology : IJCHP
. 2026 Jun 20;26(2):100704. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2026.100704

Accelerometer-derived movement phenotypes and adolescent mental health in pediatric obesity: A causal machine-learning study

Siyu Pan a,r, Peng Wang a,b,c,r, Fabian Herold d, Matthew Heath e,f,g, Edmund Wei Jian Lee h, Effie Lai-Chong Law i, Cassandra J Lowe j, André Werneck k, Markus Gerber l, David Moreau m, Myrto Mavilidi n,o, Fred Paas c,p, Mats Hallgren q, Xia Xu a, Liye Zou a,⁎
PMCID: PMC13312474  PMID: 42376369

Abstract

Background

Children with overweight or obesity are at elevated risk for later-life mental health challenges, but the role of accelerometer-derived waking movement behaviors remains uncertain. Thus, we examined longitudinal associations of sedentary behavior (SB), light-intensity physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) at age 7 with later-life internalizing and externalizing problems.

Method

We used data from the UK Millennium Cohort Study, focusing on children with overweight or obesity at age 7 who had valid accelerometer data and a complete set of predefined analytic variables (N = 858). Exposures were average daily minutes of SB, LPA, and MVPA. Outcomes were parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-based internalizing and externalizing problems scores at ages 11 and 14. A generalized random forests approach was used to estimate average treatment effects (ATEs) and conditional average treatment effects (CATEs), adjusted for relevant demographic, socioeconomic, body mass index, parental distress, baseline mental health, and co-occurring movement intensities; day-of-week activity-pattern variables were used as exploratory candidate moderators.

Results

Estimated ATEs were small. After applying the Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate (FDR) correction across the 12 primary exposure-outcome tests, only the association between higher SB and lower internalizing problems at age 11 remained statistically significant (ATE = -0.013 SDQ points per additional min/day; 95% CI, -0.019 to -0.007; q < 0.001). No other pathway survived FDR correction, and other nominal or directionally suggestive estimates were interpreted as exploratory. CATE summaries and calibration tests provided limited evidence of reproducible heterogeneity.

Conclusions

Accelerometer-derived waking movement behaviors at age 7 were associated with later SDQ problems scores in small and outcome-specific ways among children with overweight or obesity. Since the study is based on observational data and relies on measured-confounder assumptions, the findings should be interpreted cautiously, and as model-based estimates rather than definitive causal evidence.

Keywords: Digital phenotyping, Wearable sensors, Accelerometry, Pediatric obesity, Mental health, Causal machine learning

Introduction

Childhood overweight and obesity are increasingly recognized as developmental health challenges with social, psychological, and behavioral consequences (Ahmed & Mohammed, 2025; NCD Risk Factor Collaboration, 2024; Sahoo et al., 2015). Children with overweight or obesity are at elevated risk of emotional difficulties, low self-esteem, peer victimization, and weight-related stigma, and may also show co-occurring behavioral or neurodevelopmental difficulties (Agranat-Meged et al., 2005; Alimoradi et al., 2020; Gray et al., 2009; Reeves et al., 2008; Russell-Mayhew et al., 2012; Strauss, 2000). Furthermore, obesity may have a complex and yet-to-be fully understood relationship with neurodevelopmental disorders. For example, there is evidence that attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder often predates weight gain Agranat-Meged et al. (2005); Brandt et al. (2021); van Egmond-Fröhlich et al. (2012). However, the timing and direction of these potential associations remain to be investigated. In this study, we focused on two broad dimensions of child mental health challenges: (i) internalizing problems, reflecting emotional and peer-related difficulties, and (ii) externalizing problems, reflecting conduct and hyperactivity-related difficulties (Fernandez de la Cruz et al., 2018; Liu, 2004; Liu et al., 2011). Indeed, the basis for our foci stems from data derived from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) indicating that obesity and emotional problems co-develop from mid-childhood through adolescence (Patalay & Hardman, 2019), making it relevant to identify modifiable behavioral correlates during this developmental period and for informing prevention- and intervention-based research and practice.

Physical activity (PA) is defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure (Caspersen et al., 1985) and has been identified, as a protective factor for mental health in youth (Chan et al., 2019, Gao et al., 2024, Pinto-Escalona et al., 2024, Mahindru et al., 2023), with a growing body of evidence informed by longitudinal studies and meta-analyses indicate that higher PA levels are associated with reduced risks of depression, anxiety, and broader internalizing and externalizing symptomatology in children and adolescents (Kandola et al., 2020, Recchia et al., 2023; Rodriguez-Ayllon et al., 2019; Vella et al., 2023). However, recent global surveillance showed that adolescent MVPA opportunities can vary by different factors, including but not limited to region and gender and thus serves to underscore the need to interpret youth activity patterns within broader social and access contexts (Araujo et al., 2024). Such longitudinal and population-level evidence is particularly valuable because it can reveal whether waking movement behaviors during the early years of life contribute to later mental health risk, help identify subgroups that may be especially vulnerable to adverse outcomes, and provide an empirical basis for earlier and more targeted intervention efforts. Among children with obesity, planned and structured PA interventions, also referred to as physical exercise, have been shown to improve depressive and anxiety symptoms (King et al., 2020; Li et al., 2025; Recchia et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2025), self-esteem (King et al., 2020, Gow et al., 2020, Liu et al., 2015), and quality of life (Marker et al., 2018, Shoup et al., 2008, Diao et al., 2020) – improvement that have been reported often independently of changes in body weight.

In addition to PA, sedentary behavior (SB), which is commonly defined as any waking behavior characterized by energy expenditure ≤1.5 metabolic equivalents while sitting, reclining, or lying (Tremblay et al., 2017), is increasingly recognized as a modifiable lifestyle factor related to, yet distinct from PA. For example, several longitudinal observational studies and meta-analyses have reported an association between higher SB, particularly screen-based SB, and poorer mental health outcomes in children and adolescents (Asare, 2015; Rodriguez-Ayllon et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2022). Moreover, studies have shown that SB is shaped by social, household, and broader behavioral environments (Hatakeyama et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2019). However, the evidence on this phenomenon is not unequivocal because some studies report null or conflicting associations (Hoare et al., 2016), and accelerometer-defined SB cannot distinguish qualitative SB characteristics such as how much time is spent on mentally passive (e.g., watching television) versus mentally active (e.g., reading, homework, quiet play, or socially supportive seated activities) SB – which can modify associations between SB exposure and mental health (Hallgren et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2025; Zou et al., 2024). For example, analyses of the general MCS child population found that accelerometer-derived MVPA at age 7 was associated with higher conduct and hyperactivity problems at age 11, whereas overall SB exposure at age 7 was associated with lower hyperactivity scores at age 11 (Ahn et al., 2018).

In addition to gaps on the longitudinal association of waking movement behavior exposure and mental health in nationally representative samples of children with overweight and obesity, this study seeks to address three additional limitations of previous work. First, the majority of previous studies relied on self-reported PA and SB patterns, whereas accelerometry provides a more reliable measure, especially in younger children (Griffiths et al., 2013; Nigg et al., 2020; Rich et al., 2013). At the same time, recent work on wearable validation emphasizes that device placement, algorithms, protocols, and construct definitions can affect estimates of 24-hour movement behaviors, supporting cautious interpretation of accelerometer-derived phenotypes (Giurgiu et al., 2025). Second, previous MCS-based work in the general child population reported counterintuitive associations between accelerometer-derived MVPA, SB, and later SDQ outcomes (Ahn et al., 2018); however, it did not focus specifically on children with overweight or obesity. This is a salient issue because this is a subgroup in wherein movement contexts may differ from those of non-obese children because of active commuting, structured activity opportunities, stigma, body image concerns, weight-focused social comparison, peer influence, and participation barriers (Aparicio-Ugarriza et al., 2020; Gray et al., 2009; Rancourt et al., 2015; Salvy et al., 2012). Third, prior analyses mainly emphasized average associations, leaving limited evidence about whether estimated associations vary across children.

To address the above-mentioned limitations, this study used a generalized random forests approach, often described as causal forests, to provide a flexible framework for estimating population-average and conditional associations under explicit causal assumptions (Athey & Imbens, 2016; Athey et al., 2019; Wager & Athey, 2018), using nationally representative data from the MCS (Giurgiu et al., 2025). Related causal machine-learning work has emphasized the value of flexible nuisance-function adjustment and heterogeneous treatment-effect estimation when the aim is to explore variation in model-based effects rather than assume a single homogeneous association (Belloni et al., 2014; Feuerriegel et al., 2024; Naimi & Whitcomb, 2023). This approach is also aligned with recent work describing how artificial intelligence and machine-learning methods can identify behavioral patterns and support more personalized PA interventions, while recognizing that model performance is task- and dataset-dependent (An et al., 2024). In observational cohort data, however, these estimates should not be equated with effects from randomized trials. Their causal interpretation depends on assumptions such as measured-confounder adjustment, positivity, consistency, and no interference. We therefore use cautious terminology and treat the estimates as model-based causal forest estimates that may inform, but cannot by themselves establish, causality. Focusing on children classified as overweight or obese at age 7, we address two research questions (RQs).

RQ1: Among children with overweight or obesity, how are accelerometer-derived SB, LPA, and MVPA at age 7 associated with internalizing and externalizing problems at ages 11 and 14 in generalized random forest models?

RQ2: To what extent do these model-based estimates vary across individual characteristics and candidate moderators?

Materials and methods

Study design

This longitudinal observational cohort study evaluated whether accelerometer-derived PA intensity and SB at age 7 years were associated with subsequent SDQ internalizing and externalizing problems at ages 11 and 14 years among children classified as overweight or obese at baseline. Based on the observational study design and data, causal interpretation depends on strong assumptions about measured confounding, positivity, and model specification. Thus, the estimates should not be interpreted as equivalent to evidence from randomized controlled trials. The overall study framework is summarized in Fig. 1, and the analytic sample construction is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1.

Fig 1 dummy alt text

Conceptual overview of exposure measurement, covariate adjustment, outcome assessment, and generalized random forest analysis. Note: ATE (average treatment effects) and CATE (conditional average treatment effects) are retained as generalized random forest estimands but are interpreted as observational, model-based estimates under measured-confounder assumptions.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2 dummy alt text

Screening and analytic sample flow. Note: Counts are based on the MCS cohort description, the MCS age-7 accelerometer activity file, and the prepared analytic source file. Detailed BMI/weight-status denominators before the prepared source file could not be fully reconstructed from the available analytic files. BMI = body-mass index; SDQ = Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

Data source

Data were drawn from the MCS, a nationally representative birth cohort that followed 19,519 children born between 2000 and 2002 across England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, with repeated assessments spanning family- and child-level characteristics (Connelly & Platt, 2014). The MCS data have been widely used to study child development, obesity, accelerometer-derived movement behaviors, and mental health (Ahn et al., 2018; Brandt et al., 2021; Griffiths et al., 2013; Patalay & Hardman, 2019; Werneck et al., 2026). The MCS was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki for human rights, with ethical approval obtained from the NHS Research Ethics Committee and informed consent obtained from parents or primary caregivers.

Analytic sample

At age 7 years, height (nearest 0.1 cm) and weight (nearest 0.1 kg) were measured by trained staff and used to calculate body mass index (BMI, kg/m2). Children were classified as overweight or obese using age- and sex-specific International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) cut-off values (Cole et al., 2000). The available MCS age-7 accelerometer activity file contained 6675 valid child activity records; prior work has described participation, non-response, and accelerometer-derived activity patterns in this MCS sweep (Griffiths et al., 2013; Rich et al., 2013). In the prepared age-7 analytic source file, 1142 records had IOTF-defined overweight or obesity and valid accelerometer-derived movement variables. We excluded records with incomplete baseline covariates and/or follow-up SDQ outcomes, resulting in a final analytic sample of 858 children (Fig. 2). A stricter weekday/weekend robustness sample retained 668 of these children who had at least one valid weekday and at least one valid weekend day.

Measurements

At age 7 years (2008–2009), physical activity was assessed using Actigraph GT1M accelerometers worn on the right hip for seven consecutive days and removed only for water-based activities; devices recorded activity in 15-second epochs. A valid day required at least 10 h of wear time, and participants were included if they provided at least two valid days, consistent with the MCS accelerometer protocol used in previous analyses (Brandt et al., 2021; Griffiths et al., 2013; Rich et al., 2013). Non-wear periods were defined as at least 20 consecutive minutes of zero counts. Intensity thresholds were defined as SB <100 counts per minute (cpm), LPA 100–2240 cpm, and MVPA 2241–11,714 cpm; counts >11,714 cpm were treated as likely spurious. Exposures were expressed as average minutes/day across valid wear days and not as standardized units. The raw daily accelerometer files included valid-day indicators, weekday/weekend indicators, total valid time, total valid time including unclassified activity time, and non-wear time. We therefore added sensitivity analyses that restricted the sample to children with at least one valid weekday and one valid weekend day and that additionally adjusted for mean daily valid wear time. Average treatment effects (ATE) and conditional average treatment effects (CATE) represent the estimated change in raw SDQ problems score associated with a one-minute/day higher exposure, conditional on the modeled covariates and other movement intensities where included.

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used measure of child mental health (Goodman, 1997). The parent/primary-caregiver reported SDQ includes five subscales: emotional problems, peer problems, conduct problems, hyperactivity, and prosocial behavior. Each subscale contains five items rated 0 = not true, 1 = somewhat true, and 2 = certainly true. Internalizing problems were computed as emotional problems plus peer problems, and externalizing problems were computed as conduct problems plus hyperactivity, following evidence on the structure of child psychopathology symptoms (Fernandez de la Cruz et al., 2018). The resulting composite scores for internalizing and externalizing problems ranged from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more difficulties. The present analyses used internalizing and externalizing problems scores at ages 11 and 14 as outcomes. The baseline SDQ covariate available in the analytic file ranged from 2 to 10 in the study sample and was used for baseline mental health adjustment rather than as a follow-up outcome score.

Covariates

Covariates were selected a priori based on temporal ordering and plausible common causes of both movement behaviors and later mental health. Core baseline covariates included sex, ethnicity, BMI, baseline SDQ score, parental psychological distress, parental education, and household poverty. These variables precede or coincide with the age-7 exposure assessment and were used to reduce measured confounding. However, it is worth noting that this adjustment strategy cannot rule out unmeasured confounding or reverse/bidirectional processes between obesity, activity, and mental health (Ekelund et al., 2008).

Demographic covariates included sex and ethnicity (White; Indian; Pakistani and Bangladeshi; Black or Black British, Mixed, or Other). Health-related covariates included measured BMI and the baseline SDQ score. Family factors included parental psychological distress (Kessler-6 score), parental education level according to the National Vocational Qualifications (NVQ) framework, and household poverty, defined as equivalized household income below 60% of the UK national median.

Day-of-week activity-pattern variables were derived from available daily accelerometer records and used only as exploratory candidate moderators. Missing day-of-week values were imputed using k-nearest-neighbor imputation (k = 5). These variables were not used to define the primary SB, LPA, or MVPA exposures. Weekday-weekend patterning was considered relevant because children's movement behaviors can differ between school days, weekends, and other structured settings (Brazendale et al., 2017; McMinn et al., 2013; Noonan et al., 2017; Tassitano et al., 2020).

Estimands and interpretation

The primary estimands were model-based ATEs for age-7 SB, LPA, and MVPA in relation to SDQ internalizing and externalizing problems at ages 11 and 14, and CATEs describing variation in these estimates across covariate profiles. We retained the conventional ATE and CATE terminology because these are the estimands returned by the generalized random forest framework, but we interpret them cautiously as observational, model-based estimates under measured-confounder assumptions.

Statistical analysis

We estimated ATEs and CATEs using generalized random forests implemented with the R grf package. The treatment variable was continuous in minutes/day. Separate causal forests were fitted for each exposure-outcome pair. The model matrix included core covariates, the two non-focal movement intensities, and candidate day-of-week activity-pattern features. Since day-of-week activity-pattern variables were derived from the same accelerometer assessment as the focal exposures, they were not interpreted as confounders; their role was limited to exploratory heterogeneity assessment. Forests used 2000 trees, honesty-based sample splitting (honesty = TRUE; honesty.fraction = 0.5), internal tuning of grf parameters (tune.parameters = 'all'), and fixed model-specific random seeds for reproducibility. Forest-based asymptotic standard errors were used for ATE inference. Altogether 12 primary exposure-outcome tests were conducted. To account for the multiple-comparison problem, Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate (BH-FDR) with adjusted p-values was calculated and reported (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995). Heterogeneity was evaluated descriptively using CATE distribution summaries and formally using grf::test_calibration(), focusing on the differential forest prediction term as an exploratory calibration test for heterogeneity (Athey et al., 2019; Wager & Athey, 2018). Descriptive statistics were computed in Stata 18.0.

Results

Sample characteristics and baseline activity

The analytical sample included 858 children with overweight or obesity at age 7 years (mean age, 7.21 years; 42.54% male). Most participants were White (87.76%), with a mean BMI of 19.90 kg/m2 (SD, 1.99); 75.17% were classified as overweight and 24.83% as obese. Socioeconomic disadvantage was present in 22.72% of participants, and mean parental psychological distress was 3.05 (SD, 3.81). The sample provided a mean of 5.49 valid accelerometer days (SD, 1.55), including 4.27 valid weekdays (SD, 1.18) and 1.22 valid weekend days (SD, 0.81); mean daily valid wear time was 737.32 min/day (SD, 62.36). At age 7 years, average daily movement time was 395.40 min/day (SD, 67.23) in SB, 283.95 min/day (SD, 43.11) in LPA, and 56.44 min/day (SD, 20.75) in MVPA. Mean SDQ internalizing and externalizing problems scores were 3.17 (SD, 3.27) and 3.82 (SD, 3.30) at age 11, and 3.81 (SD, 3.78) and 3.80 (SD, 3.39) at age 14 (Table 1). In the available unique source-ID comparison, excluded source IDs had slightly higher BMI, lower baseline SDQ scores, a higher prevalence of household poverty, and a different ethnicity distribution, whereas SB, LPA, MVPA, sex, and parental psychological distress were not statistically significant (Table S4).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the analytic sample of children with overweight or obesity (N = 858).

Characteristic Value
Age, years, mean (SD) 7.21 (0.24)
Sex, n (%)
Male 365 (42.54%)
Female 493 (57.46%)
Ethnicity, n (%)
White 753 (87.76%)
Black or Black British 40 (4.66%)
Indian 18 (2.10%)
Pakistani and Bangladeshi 23 (2.68%)
Mixed 17 (1.98%)
Other ethnic group 7 (0.82%)
BMI and weight status
BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD) 19.90 (1.99)
Overweight, n (%) 645 (75.17%)
Obesity, n (%) 213 (24.83%)
Family and socioeconomic factors
Household income below 60% of national median, n (%) 195 (22.73%)
Parental psychological distress, mean (SD) 3.05 (3.81)
Parental education, n (%)
NVQ level 1 (foundation-level qualifications) 55 (6.41%)
NVQ level 2 (GCSE or equivalent) 246 (28.67%)
NVQ level 3 (A-level or equivalent) 123 (14.34%)
NVQ level 4 (higher education certificate, diploma, or degree) 311 (36.25%)
NVQ level 5 (postgraduate degree or higher) 56 (6.53%)
Other/overseas/none of these 67 (7.81%)
Movement behaviors at age 7, min/day, mean (SD)
Sedentary behavior 395.40 (67.23)
Light-intensity physical activity 283.95 (43.11)
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity 56.44 (20.75)
Mental health variables, mean (SD)
Baseline SDQ score at age 7 (range in analytic sample: 2–10) 8.93 (1.39)
Internalizing problems at age 11 (0–20) 3.17 (3.27)
Externalizing problems at age 11 (0–20) 3.82 (3.30)
Internalizing problems at age 14 (0–20) 3.81 (3.78)
Externalizing problems at age 14 (0–20) 3.80 (3.39)

Note: Continuous variables are reported as mean (SD), and categorical variables as n (%). The baseline SDQ score is the age-7 SDQ covariate available in the analytic file (range in this sample: 2–10). Internalizing and externalizing problems scores each range from 0 to 20. BMI, body mass index; SB, sedentary behavior; LPA, light-intensity physical activity; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity; SDQ, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; NVQ, National Vocational Qualifications.

Average model-based estimates of activity intensity and sedentary time on later SDQ problems

Across the 12 primary exposure-outcome combinations, estimated ATEs were small (Table 2). After BH-FDR correction, only the SB-age-11 internalizing pathway remained statistically significant. LPA showed no statistically significant average association with SDQ externalizing or internalizing problems at either age 11 or age 14.

Table 2.

Model-based average treatment-effect estimates for accelerometer-derived sedentary behavior, light physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at age 7 years on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire internalizing and externalizing problems at ages 11 and 14 years.

Exposure Outcome ATE estimate 95% CI p value BH-FDR q value
SB Externalizing problems at age 11 −0.006 [−0.013, −0.0001] 0.046 0.104
SB Internalizing problems at age 11 −0.013 [−0.019, −0.007] < 0.001 < 0.001
SB Externalizing problems at age 14 −0.007 [−0.013, −0.001] 0.025 0.099
SB Internalizing problems at age 14 −0.008 [−0.017, −0.0002] 0.045 0.104
LPA Externalizing problems at age 11 0.007 [−0.004, 0.017] 0.210 0.252
LPA Internalizing problems at age 11 −0.001 [−0.012, 0.009] 0.828 0.828
LPA Externalizing problems at age 14 0.007 [−0.003, 0.018] 0.177 0.236
LPA Internalizing problems at age 14 0.003 [−0.009, 0.015] 0.635 0.692
MVPA Externalizing problems at age 11 0.019 [−0.001, 0.039] 0.060 0.104
MVPA Internalizing problems at age 11 −0.025 [−0.046, −0.003] 0.025 0.099
MVPA Externalizing problems at age 14 0.019 [−0.001, 0.039] 0.060 0.104
MVPA Internalizing problems at age 14 −0.020 [−0.046, 0.005] 0.123 0.185

Note: ATEs were estimated using generalized random forests. The exposure unit is one additional minute/day, and outcomes are raw SDQ internalizing or externalizing problems scores. BH-FDR q values were calculated across the 12 primary exposure-outcome tests. SB, sedentary behavior; LPA, light-intensity physical activity; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity; ATE, average treatment effect; CI, confidence interval; BH-FDR, Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate correction.

For MVPA, the estimate for internalizing problems at age 11 was nominally negative (ATE, −0.025; 95% CI, −0.046 to −0.003; p = 0.025; q = 0.099), but it did not remain statistically significant after BH-FDR correction. MVPA estimates for externalizing problems at ages 11 and 14 were directionally positive but imprecise (both p values approximately 0.060; q = 0.104), and the age-14 internalizing estimate was not significantly different from zero.

For SB, estimates were negative across all four outcomes. The strongest estimate was for lower internalizing problems scores at age 11 (ATE, −0.013; 95% CI, −0.019 to −0.007; p < 0.001; q < 0.001). The remaining SB estimates were small and nominally distinguishable for age-11 externalizing, age-14 externalizing, and age-14 internalizing problems, but none survived BH-FDR correction (q-values = 0.099–0.104). Because ATEs are expressed per one additional minute/day, a 30-minute/day difference corresponds to approximately −0.39 SDQ points for SB and internalizing problems at age 11.

Robustness analyses addressed the two-valid-day criterion and wear time (Table S3). In the stricter weekday/weekend sample (N = 668), the SB-age-11 internalizing estimate remained directionally similar (ATE, −0.010; 95% CI, −0.017 to −0.003; p = 0.006), although it did not survive BH-FDR correction across 12 tests (q = 0.073). No pathway survived FDR correction in this restricted sample. In the full sample additionally adjusted for mean daily valid wear time, the SB-age-11 internalizing estimate remained statistically significant after FDR correction (ATE, −0.012; 95% CI, −0.019 to −0.005; p < 0.001; q = 0.008).

Heterogeneity of effects and candidate moderators

CATE distributions are shown for SB, LPA, and MVPA across outcomes (Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5), with vertical reference lines for the mean CATE and the empirical 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles. In the primary sample, CATE standard deviations ranged from 0.0039 to 0.0191 SDQ points per one min/day, and the percentage of individual 95% CATE intervals excluding zero was usually low (0% to 3.15%), except for LPA and age-11 externalizing problems (20.86%). This latter pattern was not supported by calibration evidence for differential prediction. The grf::test_calibration() differential forest prediction term was nominal only for the SB-age-11 internalizing pathway (estimate, 0.840; SE, 0.487; p = 0.042) and was not corrected for multiple calibration tests. Given that calibration evidence for differential prediction was limited and the only nominal signal was not corrected for multiple calibration tests, we interpret the observed heterogeneity as exploratory rather than as evidence of reproducible subgroups that could guide clinical or intervention decisions, including but not limited to differences between children with overweight versus obesity. CATE summaries and calibration tests are reported in Tables S1-S2, and feature-importance rankings are shown descriptively in Figs. S1-S3.

Fig. 3.

Fig 3 dummy alt text

Distribution of conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) for sedentary behavior (SB) across Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) outcomes. Note: CATEs are expressed as the estimated change in raw SDQ problems score per one additional minute/day of SB. The solid vertical line marks the mean CATE; dashed vertical lines mark the empirical 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles.

Fig. 4.

Fig 4 dummy alt text

Distribution of conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) for light-intensity physical activity (LPA) across Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) outcomes. Note: CATEs are expressed as the estimated change in raw SDQ problems score per one additional minute/day of LPA. The solid vertical line marks the mean CATE; dashed vertical lines mark the empirical 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles.

Fig. 5.

Fig 5 dummy alt text

Distribution of conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) for moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) across Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) outcomes. Note: CATEs are expressed as the estimated change in raw SDQ problems score per one additional minute/day of MVPA. The solid vertical line marks the mean CATE; dashed vertical lines mark the empirical 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles.

Discussion

This study used MCS data to employ a generalized random forests approach to examine longitudinal, model-based associations between accelerometer-derived waking movement behaviors at age 7 and SDQ internalizing and externalizing problems at ages 11 and 14 among children with overweight or obesity. The main findings indicate small, outcome-specific estimates. After FDR correction, the most robust finding was the association between higher SB exposure and lower internalizing problems scores at age 11; the MVPA findings and the age-14 SB finding should be considered exploratory and thus interpreted with caution.

Moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity and mental health: a dual-edged pattern

The MVPA findings were directionally mixed. Nominal estimates suggested that higher MVPA was associated with lower internalizing problems scores at age 11 but higher externalizing problems scores at ages 11 and 14. These estimates were small in raw SDQ units and did not remain statistically significant after multiple comparison correction. Therefore, they should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than as evidence that high levels of MVPA exacerbate externalizing problems.

One possible explanation for this unexpected finding is measurement overlap: the SDQ hyperactivity subscale includes items such as being restless or overactive, which may partly capture high activity levels rather than symptoms of lower mental health. Notably, this finding is similar to previous studies using the MCS dataset, which reported positive associations between accelerometer-derived PA and later ADHD symptoms or externalizing-related outcomes, underscoring the need to distinguish motor activity from clinically relevant symptoms of ADHD (Ahn et al., 2018; Brandt et al., 2021; van Egmond-Fröhlich et al., 2012). A second possible explanation is residual or bidirectional confounding, because children with pre-existing externalizing tendencies may engage in more high-intensity PA. A third – and not mutually exclusive explanation – may be that some contexts in which unstructured high-intensity PA occurs may involve peer conflict or low adult supervision. However, as the present study did not directly test these potential explanations, future research should seek to elucidate the aforementioned phenomenon to allow for more robust conclusions.

The attenuation of the MVPA-internalizing estimate at age 14 may reflect developmental changes in PA, school context, puberty, peer relationships, or other unmeasured time-varying factors. PA and SB often change across the transition from primary to secondary school, and single-wave exposure measurement cannot capture later trajectories or changing social contexts (Atkin et al., 2021; Chong et al., 2020). Although PA may relate to mood and stress through monoaminergic, neurotrophic, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical pathways (Chaouloff, 1989; Martikainen et al., 2014; Phillips, 2017), these mechanisms were not directly measured, but are promising candidates whose roles remain to be investigated in future studies. Since the PA and SB exposure was measured only at age 7, the study cannot determine whether later changes in those waking movement behaviors explain the attenuation of the observed association.

Sedentary behavior and lower internalizing problems scores

The inverse association observed between SB and internalizing problems should not be interpreted as evidence that SB is beneficial to aspects of mental health. First, accelerometer-defined SB captures low movement but not the type or context in which SB occurs. Thus, overall SB exposure may combine adverse SB types, particularly mentally passive SB (screen time such as television viewing) and potentially positive SB, namely mentally active SB (e.g., reading, homework, drawing, quiet play, or socially supportive seated activities). As a result, the combination of mentally active and passive SBs may have driven the unexpected observations between SB and internalizing problems reported here (Brechet et al., 2022; Hallgren et al., 2020; Hoare et al., 2016; Lopes et al., 2005; Ramdass & Zimmerman, 2011; Vasconcellos et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2019). Second, among children with overweight or obesity, some PA settings may involve weight-related stigma, social comparison, or negative peer experiences, and contexts of SB may provide respite from these exposures (Alimoradi et al., 2020; Gray et al., 2009; Rancourt et al., 2015; Salvy et al., 2012). Third, residual confounding, wear-time differences, measurement error, and selection into the accelerometer substudy may contribute to the pattern. Unfortunately, these explanations cannot be tested with the present MCS data, so future research is required to verify or refute our assumptions.

Light-intensity physical activity: a null signal

LPA showed no evidence of average model-based association with any outcome at either follow-up. This null pattern may indicate that total LPA minutes are too heterogeneous to capture psychologically relevant activity contexts, such as active play, walking, transport, or school-based activities. Prior reviews suggest that the effects of LPA on mental health may differ from those of MVPA, but evidence is less consistent and context-dependent (Felez-Nobrega et al., 2021; Vella et al., 2023). Moreover, a recent editorial argued that LPA has public-health relevance and should not be dismissed simply because it is lower intensity, particularly when replacing time spent on SB is the behavioral target (Ross et al., 2024). The present null finding concerning LPA should therefore be interpreted in the context of the current study and cohort and not as evidence that LPA is generally ineffective to benefit aspects of mental health, with effects that may emerge when SB is replaced by LPA; an assumption that requires further investigation (Parfitt et al., 2009; Yan et al., 2024).

Heterogeneity in model-based estimates

An important contribution of this study is the exploratory assessment of heterogeneity using CATEs, distributional summaries, and formal calibration tests. Although the CATE distributions showed some variation across children, calibration evidence for differential prediction was limited and did not support strong claims about clinically actionable subgroups. This cautious interpretation is consistent with recommendations that heterogeneous-effect estimates from flexible causal machine-learning methods require careful calibration, transparent reporting, and external replication before being used for individual-level decision-making (Feuerriegel et al., 2024; Sharma et al., 2025; Varidel et al., 2025; Wager & Athey, 2018). We therefore interpret the heterogeneity results as exploratory and as a basis for future studies with larger samples and richer contextual waking movement behavior data.

Strengths

This study has several strengths. First, PA and SB were measured using accelerometry, avoiding key limitations of self-report in young children (Griffiths et al., 2013; Nigg et al., 2020). Second, the longitudinal design placed exposure assessment at age 7 before SDQ outcomes at ages 11 and 14. Third, adjustment for baseline mental health and family/socioeconomic factors reduced several major sources of measured confounding. Fourth, the focus on children with overweight or obesity addresses a clinically relevant subgroup that is often underrepresented in 24-hour movement behavior and mental health research (Andrade et al., 2025; Galler et al., 2024; King et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2025).

Limitations

Several limitations merit consideration. First, despite the causal forest framework, the study is observational; causal interpretation depends on measured-confounder assumptions, and residual confounding from unmeasured factors such as sleep quality, diet, temperament, pubertal timing, school environment, neighborhood context, and family health climate cannot be excluded (Ekelund et al., 2008; Iob et al., 2023, Richmond et al., 2014, Ziegeldorf et al., 2024). Second, the analytic sample was restricted to children with overweight or obesity at age 7 who had valid accelerometer data and complete analytic variables. As such, selection into accelerometer wear and retention to follow-up may have favored families with greater study engagement or more stable circumstances, which could limit generalizability within the overweight/obesity subgroup (Rich et al., 2013). Third, detailed sample-flow information before the prepared overweight/obesity analytic source file, including the full BMI/weight-status denominator, could not be fully reconstructed from the available analytic files. Fourth, accelerometer-derived SB does not distinguish screen time, homework, reading, transport, or social context, and wearable-derived 24-hour movement estimates can vary across measurement protocols and validation assumptions (Giurgiu et al., 2025). Fifth, the two-valid-day inclusion criterion may not fully capture habitual waking movement behavior patterns, especially weekday-weekend differences, although robustness analyses using at least one valid weekday and one valid weekend day were added. Sixth, the estimates are per minute/day and should not be interpreted as isotemporal substitution effects. Finally, the SDQ captures continuous symptom domains rather than clinical diagnoses.

Implications for research and practice

The present findings do not support the direct recommendation that more MVPA or less SB will uniformly improve mental health later in life among children with overweight or obesity. Interventions may need to consider quality exposure characteristics, social context, supervision, enjoyment, and exposure to weight-related stigma, consistent with evidence that the context of PA matters for mental health and social experience (Alimoradi et al., 2020; Salvy et al., 2012; Vella et al., 2023). SB recommendations should also distinguish between mentally passive and mentally active SB, with the latter including socially supportive seated activities, which may offer benefits for aspects of mental health (Hallgren et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2025; Zou et al., 2024).

For research, future studies should use repeated exposure assessments, richer contextual information about PA and SB type, and designs capable of addressing time-varying confounding and behavioral substitution (Athey & Imbens, 2016, Runge et al., 2023, Wang et al., 2025). A complex-systems perspective may also help future work integrate individual, social, and environmental determinants of 24-hour movement behavior without reducing intervention targets to total minutes alone (Schüler et al., 2025). This direction is consistent with calls for more precise 24-hour movement behavior recommendations that account for different compositions of PA, SB, and sleep across individuals and contexts (Tremblay et al., 2024). Larger samples are also needed before day-specific candidate moderators from causal forest models can be interpreted substantively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, among children with overweight or obesity from the UK Millennium Cohort Study, accelerometer-derived movement behaviors at age 7 showed small and outcome-specific associations with later SDQ problems scores. After correcting for multiple comparisons, the most robust finding was an inverse association between higher SB and lower internalizing problems at age 11 – a finding that should not be interpreted as evidence that SB is protective. Nominal MVPA and other SB findings, sensitivity analyses, and heterogeneity results were exploratory and require replication before more solid conclusions can be drawn. Overall, the results support the need for more nuanced research in children with overweight or obesity on how waking movement behavior characteristics and context influence mental health, considering the role of individual heterogeneity.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2026.100704.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.docx (447.1KB, docx)

References

  1. Agranat-Meged A.N., Deitcher C., Goldzweig G., Leibenson L., Stein M., Galili-Weisstub E. Childhood obesity and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A newly described comorbidity in obese hospitalized children. The International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2005;37(4):357–359. doi: 10.1002/eat.20096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed S.K., Mohammed R.A. Obesity: Prevalence, causes, consequences, management, preventive strategies and future research directions. Metabolism Open. 2025;27 doi: 10.1016/j.metop.2025.100375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahn J.V., Sera F., Cummins S., Flouri E. Associations between objectively measured physical activity and later mental health outcomes in children: Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2018;72(2):94–100. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alimoradi Z., Golboni F., Griffiths M.D., Broström A., Lin C.Y., Pakpour A.H. Weight-related stigma and psychological distress: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Nutrition. 2020;39(7):2001–2013. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. An R., Shen J., Wang J., Yang Y. A scoping review of methodologies for applying artificial intelligence to physical activity interventions. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2024;13(3):428–441. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Andrade A., Dos Santos K.M., D’Oliveira A., Claudino V.M., da Cruz W.M. Physical activity as a protective factor in the mood of children and adolescents: Association with overweight and obesity. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2025;13 doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1494998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Aparicio-Ugarriza R., Mielgo-Ayuso J., Ruiz E., Ávila J.M., Aranceta-Bartrina J., Gil Á., Ortega R.M., Serra-Majem L., Varela-Moreiras G., González-Gross M. Active commuting, physical activity, and sedentary behaviors in children and adolescents from Spain: Findings from the ANIBES Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(2):668. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Araujo R.H., Werneck A.O., Martins C.L., Barboza L.L., Tassitano R.M., Aguilar-Farias N., Jesus G.M., Ramírez-Vélez R., Tesler R., Oyeyemi A.L. Global prevalence and gender inequalities in at least 60 min of self-reported moderate-to-vigorous physical activity 1 or more days per week: An analysis with 707,616 adolescents. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2024;13(5):709–716. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Asare M. Sedentary behaviour and mental health in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child and Adolescent Behavior. 2015;03:259. doi: 10.4172/2375-4494.1000259. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Athey S., Imbens G. Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113(27):7353–7360. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510489113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Athey S., Tibshirani J., Wager S. Generalized random forests. The Annals of Statistics. 2019;47(2):1148–1178. doi: 10.1214/18-AOS1709. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Atkin A.J., Dainty J.R., Dumuid D., Kontostoli E., Shepstone L., Tyler R., Noonan R., Richardson C., Fairclough S.J. Adolescent time use and mental health: A cross-sectional, compositional analysis in the Millennium Cohort Study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Belloni A., Chernozhukov V., Hansen C. High-dimensional methods and inference on structural and treatment effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2014;28(2):29–50. doi: 10.1257/jep.28.2.29. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal statistical society: Series B (Methodological) 1995;57(1):289–300. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brandt V., Patalay P., Kerner auch Koerner J. Predicting ADHD symptoms and diagnosis at age 14 from objective activity levels at age 7 in a large UK cohort. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2021;30(6):877–884. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01566-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brazendale K., Beets M.W., Weaver R.G., Pate R.R., Turner-McGrievy G.M., Kaczynski A.T., Chandler J.L., Bohnert A., von Hippel P.T. Understanding differences between summer vs. school obesogenic behaviors of children: The structured days hypothesis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2017;14(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0555-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brechet C., D’Audigier L., Audras-Torrent L. The use of drawing as an emotion regulation technique with children. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2022;16(2):221–232. doi: 10.1037/aca0000314. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Caspersen C.J., Powell K.E., Christenson G.M. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Reports. 1985;100(2):126–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chan J.S.Y., Liu G., Liang D., Deng K., Wu J., Yan J.H. Special issue: Therapeutic benefits of physical activity for mood: A systematic review on the effects of exercise intensity, duration, and modality. The Journal of Psychology. 2019;153(1):102–125. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2018.1470487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chaouloff F. Physical exercise and brain monoamines: A review. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 1989;137(1):1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1989.tb08715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chong K.H., Parrish A.M., Cliff D.P., Kemp B.J., Zhang Z., Okely A.D. Changes in physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep across the transition from primary to secondary school: A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2020;23(5):498–505. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cole T.J., Bellizzi M.C., Flegal K.M., Dietz W.H. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2000;320(7244):1240–1243. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Connelly R., Platt L. Cohort profile: UK Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) International Journal of Epidemiology. 2014;43(6):1719–1725. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Diao H., Wang H., Yang L., Li T., Li M. The impacts of multiple obesity-related interventions on quality of life in children and adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2020;18:213. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01459-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ekelund U., Brage S., Besson H., Sharp S., Wareham N.J. Time spent being sedentary and weight gain in healthy adults: Reverse or bidirectional causality? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2008;88(3):612–617. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/88.3.612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Felez-Nobrega M., Bort-Roig J., Ma R., Romano E., Faires M., Stubbs B., Stamatakis E., Olaya B., Haro J.M., Smith L., Shin J.I., Kim M.S., Koyanagi A. Light-intensity physical activity and mental ill health: A systematic review of observational studies in the general population. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2021;18:123. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01196-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fernandez de la Cruz L., Vidal-Ribas P., Zahreddine N., Mathiassen B., Brøndbo P.H., Simonoff E., Goodman R., Stringaris A. Should clinicians split or lump psychiatric symptoms? The structure of psychopathology in two large pediatric clinical samples from England and Norway. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. 2018;49(4):607–620. doi: 10.1007/s10578-017-0777-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Feuerriegel S., Frauen D., Melnychuk V., Schweisthal J., Hess K., Curth A., Bauer S., Kilbertus N., Kohane I.S., van der Schaar M. Causal machine learning for predicting treatment outcomes. Nature Medicine. 2024;30(4):958–968. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02902-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Galler A., Thönnes A., Joas J., Joisten C., Körner A., Reinehr T., Röbl M., Schauerte G., Siegfried W., Weghuber D., Weihrauch-Blüher S., Wiegand S., Holl R.W., Prinz N., Initiative A.P.V. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of children, adolescents and young adults with overweight or obesity and mental health disorders. International Journal of Obesity. 2024;48(3):423–432. doi: 10.1038/s41366-023-01449-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gao Y., Yu Q., Schuch F.B., Herold F., Hossain M.M., Ludyga S., Gerber M., Mullen S.P., Yeung A.S., Kramer A.F., Taylor A., Schinke R., Cheval B., Delli Paoli, Ng J.L., Van Damme T., Block M., Cunha P.M., Olds T., Haegele J.A., Zou L. Meeting 24-h movement behavior guidelines is linked to academic engagement, psychological functioning, and cognitive difficulties in youth with internalizing problems. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2024;349:176–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Giurgiu M., von Haaren-Mack B., Fiedler J., Woll S., Burchartz A., Kolb S., Ketelhut S., Kubica C., Nigg C., Timm I. The wearable landscape: Issues pertaining to the validation of the measurement of 24-h physical activity, sedentary, and sleep behavior assessment. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2025;14 doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.101006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Goodman R. The Strengths and difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1997;38(5):581–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gow M.L., Tee M.S.Y., Garnett S.P., Baur L.A., Aldwell K., Thomas S., Lister N.B., Paxton S.J., Jebeile H. Pediatric obesity treatment, self-esteem, and body image: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Pediatric Obesity. 2020;15(3) doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gray W.N., Kahhan N.A., Janicke D.M. Peer victimization and pediatric obesity: A review of the literature. Psychology in the Schools. 2009;46(8):720–727. [Google Scholar]
  35. Griffiths L.J., Cortina-Borja M., Sera F., Pouliou T., Geraci M., Rich C., Cole T.J., Law C., Joshi H., Ness A.R. How active are our children? Findings from the Millennium Cohort Study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hallgren M., Dunstan D.W., Owen N. Passive versus mentally active sedentary behaviors and depression. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2020;48(1):20–27. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hatakeyama N., Kamada M., Kondo N. Parental working hours and children’s sedentary time: A cross-sectional analysis of the J-SHINE. Journal of Epidemiology. 2022;32(1):4–11. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hoare E., Milton K., Foster C., Allender S. The associations between sedentary behaviour and mental health among adolescents: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2016;13(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0432-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Iob E., Pingault J.-B., Munafò M.R., Stubbs B., Gilthorpe M.S., Maihofer A.X. Testing the causal relationships of physical activity and sedentary behaviour with mental health and substance use disorders: A Mendelian randomisation study. Molecular Psychiatry. 2023;28:3429–3443. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02133-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kandola A., Lewis G., Osborn D.P.J., Stubbs B., Hayes J.F. Depressive symptoms and objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour throughout adolescence: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(3):262–271. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30034-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. King J., Jebeile H., Garnett S., Baur L., Paxton S., Gow M. Physical activity based pediatric obesity treatment, depression, self-esteem and body image: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2020;19 doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Li J., Herold F., Chen Y., Zhang Z., Werneck A.O., Ji T., Lowe C.J., Tari B., Hallgren M., Stubbs B., Mavilidi M.F., Heath M., Paas F., Zou L. Longitudinal associations between physical activity intensity and mental health problems in overweight/obese youth. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. 2025;17(4) doi: 10.1111/aphw.70071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu J., Chen X., Lewis G. Childhood internalizing behaviour: Analysis and implications. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2011;18(10):884–894. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01743.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu M., Wu L., Ming Q. How does physical activity intervention improve self-esteem and self-concept in children and adolescents? Evidence from a meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu J. Childhood externalizing behavior: Theory and implications. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing. 2004;17(3):93–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2004.tb00003.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lopes P.N., Salovey P., Côté S., Beers M., Petty R.E. Emotion regulation abilities and the quality of social interaction. Emotion (Washington, D.C.) 2005;5(1):113–118. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mahindru A., Patil P., Agrawal V. Role of physical activity on mental health and well-being: A review. Cureus. 2023;15(1) doi: 10.7759/cureus.33475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Marker A.M., Steele R.G., Noser A.E. Physical activity and health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology. 2018;37(10):893–903. doi: 10.1037/hea0000653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Martikainen S., Pesonen A.K., Lahti J., Heinonen K., Pyhälä R., Tammelin T., Kajantie E., Strandberg T.E., Reynolds R.M., Räikkönen K. Physical activity and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical axis function in adolescents. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;49:96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. McMinn A.M., Griffin S.J., Jones A.P., van Sluijs E.M.F. Family and home influences on children's after-school and weekend physical activity. European Journal of Public Health. 2013;23(5):805–810. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Naimi A.I., Whitcomb B.W. Defining and identifying average treatment effects. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2023;192(5):685–687. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: A pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. The Lancet. 2024;403(10431):1027–1050. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02750-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nigg C.R., Fuchs R., Gerber M., Jekauc D., Koch T., Krell-Roesch J., Lippke S., Mnich C., Novak B., Ju Q. Assessing physical activity through questionnaires–A consensus of best practices and future directions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2020;50 doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Noonan R.J., Fairclough S.J., Knowles Z.R., Boddy L.M. Context matters! sources of variability in weekend physical activity among families: A repeated measures study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4232-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Parfitt G., Pavey T., Rowlands A.V. Children's physical activity and psychological health: The relevance of intensity. Acta Paediatrica. 2009;98(6):1037–1043. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Patalay P., Hardman C.A. Comorbidity, codevelopment, and temporal associations between body mass index and internalizing symptoms from early childhood to adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(7):721. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Phillips C. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor, depression, and physical activity: Making the neuroplastic connection. Neural Plasticity. 2017;2017(1) doi: 10.1155/2017/7260130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pinto-Escalona T., Gobbi E., Valenzuela P.L., Bennett S.J., Aschieri P., Martin-Loeches M., Paoli A., Martinez-de-Quel O. Effects of a school-based karate intervention on academic achievement, psychosocial functioning, and physical fitness: A multi-country cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2024;13(1):90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ramdass D., Zimmerman B.J. Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics. 2011;22(2):194–218. [Google Scholar]
  60. Rancourt D., Leahey T.M., LaRose J.G., Crowther J.H. Effects of weight-focused social comparisons on diet and activity outcomes in overweight and obese young women. Obesity. 2015;23(1):85–89. doi: 10.1002/oby.20953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Recchia F., Bernal J.D.K., Fong D.Y., Wong S.H.S., Chung P.-K., Chan D.K.C., Capio C.M., Yu C.C.W., Wong S.W.S., Chen Y.-J., Thompson W.R., Siu P.M. Physical activity interventions to alleviate depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics. 2023;177(2):132–140. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.5090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Reeves G.M., Postolache T.T., Snitker S. Childhood obesity and depression: Connection between these growing problems in growing children. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development. 2008;1(2):103. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Rich C., Cortina-Borja M., Dezateux C., Geraci M., Sera F., Calderwood L., Joshi H., Griffiths L.J. Predictors of non-response in a UK-wide cohort study of children's accelerometer-determined physical activity using postal methods. BMJ Open. 2013;3(3) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Richmond R.C., Al-Amin A., Davey Smith G., Relton C.L. Approaches for drawing causal inferences from epidemiological birth cohorts: A review. Early Human Development. 2014;90(11):769–780. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.08.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Rodriguez-Ayllon M., Cadenas-Sánchez C., Estévez-López F., Muñoz N.E., Mora-Gonzalez J., Migueles J.H., Molina-García P., Henriksson H., Mena-Molina A., Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Role of physical activity and sedentary behavior in the mental health of preschoolers, children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2019;49(9):1383–1410. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01099-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ross R., Janssen I., Tremblay M.S. Public health importance of light intensity physical activity. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2024;13(5):674–675. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Runge J., Gerhardus A., Varando G., Eyring V., Camps-Valls G. Causal inference for time series. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2023;4(7):487–505. doi: 10.1038/s43017-023-00431-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Russell-Mayhew S., McVey G., Bardick A., Ireland A. Mental health, wellness, and childhood overweight/obesity. Journal of Obesity. 2012;2012(1) doi: 10.1155/2012/281801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sahoo K., Sahoo B., Choudhury A.K., Sofi N.Y., Kumar R., Bhadoria A.S. Childhood obesity: Causes and consequences. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2015;4(2):187–192. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.154628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Salvy S.J., Bowker J.C., Germeroth L., Barkley J. Influence of peers and friends on overweight/obese youths’ physical activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2012;40(3):127–132. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e31825af07b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Schüler J., Bieleke M., Heino M.T.J., Balagué N., Chater A., Gruber M., Kanning M., Keim D.A., Mier D., Moreno-Villanueva M., Nussbeck F.W., Pruessner J.C., Shafie T., Schwenk M. A complex systems view on physical activity with actionable insights for behaviour change. Nature Human Behaviour. 2025;9(9):1712–1729. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02279-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Sharma G., Yaffe M.J., Ghadiri P., Gandhi R., Pinkham L., Gore G., Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi S. Use of artificial intelligence in adolescents’ Mental health care: Systematic scoping review of current applications and future directions. JMIR Mental Health. 2025;12 doi: 10.2196/70438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Shoup J.A., Gattshall M., Dandamudi P., Estabrooks P. Physical activity, quality of life, and weight status in overweight children. Quality of Life Research. 2008;17(3):407–412. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9312-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Strauss R.S. Childhood obesity and self-esteem. Pediatrics. 2000;105(1) doi: 10.1542/peds.105.1.e15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Tassitano R.M., Weaver R.G., Tenório M.C.M., Brazendale K., Beets M.W. Physical activity and sedentary time of youth in structured settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2020;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01054-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Tremblay M.S., Aubert S., Barnes J.D., Saunders T.J., Carson V., Latimer-Cheung A.E., Chastin S.F., Altenburg T.M., Chinapaw M.J. Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN)–terminology consensus project process and outcome. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2017;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Tremblay M.S., Duncan M.J., Kuzik N., Silva D.A.S., Carson V. Towards precision 24-hour movement behavior recommendations—The next new paradigm? Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2024;13(6):743–748. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. van Egmond-Fröhlich A.W.A., Weghuber D., de Zwaan M. Association of symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with physical activity, media time, and food intake in children and adolescents. PLOS One. 2012;7(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Varidel M., An V., Hickie I.B., Cripps S., Marchant R., Scott J., Crouse J.J., Poulsen A., O'Dea B., McKenna S., Iorfino F. Causal AI recommendation system for digital mental health: Bayesian decision-theoretic analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2025;27 doi: 10.2196/71305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Vasconcellos R.P., Sanders T., Lonsdale C., Parker P., Conigrave J., Tang S., del Pozo Cruz B., Biddle S.J.H., Taylor R., Innes-Hughes C., Salmela-Aro K., Vasconcellos D., Wilhite K., Tremaine E., Booker B., Noetel M. Electronic screen use and children’s socioemotional problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin. 2025;151(5):513–543. doi: 10.1037/bul0000468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Vella S.A., Sutcliffe J.T., Fernandez D., Liddelow C., Aidman E., Teychenne M., Smith J.J., Swann C., Rosenbaum S., White R.L., Lubans D.R. Context matters: A review of reviews examining the effects of contextual factors in physical activity interventions on mental health and wellbeing. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2023;25 doi: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2023.100520. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Wager S., Athey S. Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2018;113(523):1228–1242. [Google Scholar]
  83. Wang X., Li Y., Fan H. The associations between screen time-based sedentary behavior and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7904-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Wang T., Wang J., Lu X., Chen X., Chen L., Liang Y., Yang D., Shi Y., Li R., Yang Y., Luo B., Zhuang J. Reallocating 24-hour movement behaviors and its impact on mental health in preschool children: A compositional data and dose-response analysis. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health. 2025;19:52. doi: 10.1186/s13034-025-00911-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Werneck A.O., Liang C.-S., Smith L., Aldisi D., Al-Daghri N., Baca A., Zou L., Yu Q., Kuang J., Zhang Z., Solmi M., Stubbs B. Prospective association of device-based physical activity and sedentary time during childhood with mental health outcomes during adolescence. Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 2026;31(2):116–124. doi: 10.1111/camh.70048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Yan W., Wang Y., Yuan Y., Farid M., Zhang P., Peng K. Timing matters: A longitudinal study examining the effects of physical activity intensity and timing on adolescents’ mental health outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2024;53(10):2320–2331. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02011-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Yang L., Cao C., Kantor E.D., Nguyen L.H., Zheng X., Park Y., Giovannucci E.L., Matthews C.E., Colditz G.A., Cao Y. Trends in sedentary behavior among the US population, 2001-2016. Jama. 2019;321(16):1587. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhang J., Yang S.X., Wang L., Han L.H., Wu X.Y. The influence of sedentary behaviour on mental health among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2022;306:90–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhang Z., Chen Y., Yu Q., Li J., Zou L., Mavilidi M.F., Green C.S., Owen N., Hallgren M., Raichlen D.A., Lu S., Alexander G.E., Paas F., Herold F. A neurobiological taxonomy of sedentary behavior for brain health. Trends in Neurosciences. 2025;48(11):853–864. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2025.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhou J., Song Y., Ying J., Zhang C., Wu J., Shan S., Zha J., Zhou L., Xiao W., Song P. Effects of lifestyle interventions on mental health in children and adolescents with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EclinicalMedicine. 2025;81 doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Ziegeldorf A., Hottenrott N., Moritz J., Wagner P., Wulff H. Parental education, Family Health Climate and accelerometer-based measured physical activity and sedentary behavior of primary school-aged children. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024;12:1385703. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1385703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Zou L., Herold F., Cheval B., Wheeler M.J., Pindus D.M., Erickson K.I., Raichlen D.A., Alexander G.E., Müller N.G., Dunstan D.W. Sedentary behavior and lifespan brain health. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2024;28(4):369–382. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.docx (447.1KB, docx)

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology : IJCHP are provided here courtesy of Asociacion Espanola de Psicologia Conductual

RESOURCES