Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease whose pathogenesis involves an interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental factors, including diet. This scoping review maps and synthesizes current evidence from human and animal studies on the relationships between dietary factors and lupus pathophysiology. Following PRISMA guidelines, we identified 139 relevant studies from Scopus, PubMed, and EBSCO published between 2012 and 2023. Our analysis reveals that specific dietary components significantly influence lupus risk and disease activity. Diets high in sugar, carbohydrates, and sodium were associated with increased inflammation and exacerbated disease severity. Conversely, several factors demonstrated protective effects. Higher intake of omega (ω)-3 PUFAs was consistently linked to reduced inflammatory markers and improved patient-reported outcomes, whereas a higher ω-6 to ω-3 ratio correlated with worsened disease activity. Moderate alcohol consumption, particularly wine, was associated with a reduced risk of SLE incidence. Adequate vitamin D concentrations were connected to attenuated disease progression and immunomodulation. Furthermore, natural products like olive oil phenolic compounds and curcumin showed promise in reducing oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways in murine models. The evidence underscores that dietary modification presents a viable strategy for modulating immune function and inflammation in SLE. Integrating nutritional guidance with conventional therapies could improve disease management. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials are essential to establish precise dietary recommendations and elucidate the mechanisms underlying diet–lupus interactions.
Keywords: systematic lupus erythematosus, autoimmune disease, dietary factors, nutrition, scoping review
Statement of Significance.
This scoping review offers a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence linking dietary and nutritional factors in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pathophysiology.
Introduction
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by extensive dysfunction of both the adaptive and innate immune systems [1]. SLE can manifest clinically in various organs, including the skin (cutaneous lupus erythematosus), kidneys (lupus nephritis), joints, lungs, cardiovascular system, and central nervous system [2]. In SLE, autoreactive B cells, supported by T cells,produce a variety of autoantibodies, including antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-Smith antibodies, and antibodies against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), which can form immune complexes that are deposited in various organ tissues [3,4]. However, antibody deposition is not the only complication involving the immune system in SLE. For example, dysregulation in the complement system has also been documented, leading to an amplified inflammatory response that exacerbates tissue damage [5,6]. As a result, the management of lupus often involves multitarget therapies using immunosuppressive agents and corticosteroids [7].
The exact causes of SLE are not fully understood, but it is believed to involve both genetic and environmental factors [8,9]. The role of environmental factors is highlighted by the significantly higher SLE incidence in African Americans compared with West Africans, despite their shared genetic background [10]. The mechanisms underlying this disparity remain unclear, but dietary factors may play a role. Indeed, dietary and lifestyle components can modulate immune responses and the inflammatory processes that underlie lupus pathogenesis.
For example, micronutrients such as vitamin D and zinc have emerged as key regulators of immune function, oxidative stress, and inflammation [[11], [12], [13]]. Additionally, dietary plant secondary metabolites such as polyphenols have shown promise in modulating immune responses, gut microbiome, and mitigating inflammatory processes implicated in lupus pathogenesis [14].
We hypothesized that specific dietary and nutritional factors are linked to lupus risk and disease activity, with some being protective and others harmful. Given growing evidence connecting diet, micronutrients, and immune modulation, this review aims to synthesize findings from observational studies, in vitro, animal models, and human clinical data on diet–SLE interactions.
Unlike prior reviews that focus on single nutrients, this study offers several contributions. First, it integrates evidence from human studies and animal models to provide mechanistic insight alongside epidemiological data. Second, it organizes the literature into key categories such as macronutrients, essential fatty acids, vitamin D, sodium, alcohol, and natural products, and therefore allows comparison of protective and harmful factors. Third, it includes emerging evidence on bioactive compounds such as olive oil phenolics and curcumin, which have received limited attention. Overall, this approach provides a more holistic view of how dietary patterns, rather than single nutrients, influence lupus pathogenesis.
Methods
The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA [15]. The 4-phase flow PRISMA methodology was followed, as seen in Figure 1 [16]. The search for peer-reviewed manuscripts published between 1 January, 2012 and July 2023 was conducted by 4 authors independently (FZ, NP, MP, and JJ). The Scopus, PubMed, and EBSCO databases were queried between 1 January, 2012 and 9 July, 2023. The search terms that were used were: lupus and [(food) or (diet) or (nutrition∗) or (nutrient∗)].
FIGURE 1.
The flow chart of the study identification and selection process.
Studies were included if they met the following criteria: 1) primary research articles (observational studies, clinical trials, in vivo animal studies, and in vitro mechanistic studies); 2) investigation of an association between dietary/nutritional factors and SLE outcomes (incidence, disease activity, biomarkers, organ involvement); 3) published in peer-reviewed journals; 4) English language; 5) published between January 2012 and July 2023. Dietary factors were defined as any nutritional component consumed orally, including macronutrients (carbohydrates, proteins, and fats), micronutrients (vitamins and minerals), bioactive compounds (polyphenols and flavonoids), whole foods, dietary patterns, and nutritional supplements. Exclusion criteria included narrative reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries, conference abstracts, editorials, and studies not specifically addressing SLE.
The included studies were documented in Mendeley, and duplicate records were eliminated. Studies were evaluated by a comprehensive examination of titles, keywords, abstracts, and full texts. Articles that did not align with the guiding statement and the predetermined criteria were subsequently excluded. In the event of disagreement regarding the eligibility of a specific article, resolution was achieved through discussion with all authors involved in the initial search; the study was included only if all authors agreed. Summaries of included studies were collected and organized in Microsoft Excel. Finally, the authors classified studies into distinct thematic categories: macronutrients, ultraprocessed foods and general dietary factors, alcohol consumption, iodine intake, vitamin D, essential fatty acids, and natural products. In this review, “general dietary factors” encompass overall dietary patterns, macronutrient composition, ultraprocessed food consumption, and lifestyle factors that influence nutritional status (e.g., meal patterns, dietary quality indices, and eating behaviors).
Discussion
Macronutrients and general dietary factors
Macronutrients and general dietary factors have been extensively studied in relation to SLE, offering insights into the role of diet in disease activity and risk. Correa-Rodríguez et al. [17] explored the association between dietary sugar intake and cardiovascular disease risk markers in patients with SLE. The study included 193 patients and examined clinical and metabolic factors like disease activity, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and lipid concentrations. It found that higher intake of free sugars was linked to greater disease activity and complications, including dyslipidemia [17]. This suggests that elevated sugar consumption may exacerbate disease progression and cardiovascular disease risk in patients with SLE.
Additionally, the composition of macronutrients in the diet has been examined for its potential influence on SLE risk. Castro-Webb et al. [18] analyzed data from the Black Women’s Health Study and found that higher intakes of MUFAs, saturated fats, and trans-fats were linked to a decreased risk of developing SLE. Interestingly, a diet high in carbohydrates, particularly from sugar-sweetened beverages and fruits, and low in fats, was associated with an increased risk of SLE. These findings suggest that a balanced intake of fats, particularly MUFAs and saturated fats, may offer some protective effects against SLE onset [18].
Julià et al. [19] added further evidence to the role of sugar intake in SLE by showing that patients with SLE consumed higher levels of sweets compared with healthy controls, highlighting a possible dietary pattern that could influence disease activity. Similarly, Petrić et al. [20] investigated the dietary habits of 76 patients with SLE in clinical remission and discovered associations between low-quality proteins, calorie-rich foods, and reduced concentrations of complement proteins C3 and C4 [20]. These proteins are crucial in immune regulation, and their decreased concentrations could signal potential disease activation, suggesting that diets high in fast food and fried foods may contribute to disease flares [20].
On a broader scale, lifestyle factors also play a significant role in SLE risk. Choi et al. [21] conducted an extensive analysis of 185,962 females over 4,649,477 person-years from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and NHSII cohorts, examining the relationship between a Healthy Lifestyle Index Score and SLE incidence. They found that adopting healthy lifestyle practices, such as maintaining a balanced diet, regular physical activity, and a healthy body weight, could halve the risk of developing SLE, despite the known genetic predisposition to the disease [21]. These findings reinforce the importance of modifiable lifestyle factors in mitigating disease risk.
Nutritional status itself has also been linked to disease severity in patients with SLE. Correa-Rodríguez et al. [22] highlighted that poor immune-nutritional status, as measured by the Prognostic Nutritional Index and Nutritional Risk Index, correlated with heightened disease activity and organ damage in patients with SLE. Behiry et al. [23] reported that over three-quarters of the patients with SLE in their study were either overweight or obese, with their dietary patterns characterized by reduced intake of fruits, vegetables, and dairy products, and elevated consumption of fats and oils. This unhealthy dietary pattern was associated with increased BMI, body weight, and disease duration, indicating a direct link between poor dietary choices and disease progression [23].
Contradictory evidence regarding the role of diet in SLE risk has also emerged. Tedeschi et al. [24] examined the relationship between dietary quality and SLE risk in the NHS and NHSII cohorts and found no significant association between prudent or Western dietary patterns and SLE incidence. Similarly, Barbhaiya et al. [25] evaluated the impact of 4 dietary quality scores; namely, the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010, Alternative Mediterranean Diet Score, Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension, and Empirical Dietary Inflammatory Pattern, and found that long-term adherence to these dietary patterns did not significantly influence SLE risk.
Animal studies suggest modes of action of how general dietary factors may affect the pathophysiology of lupus
In Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7)-dependent mouse model, a Western-style diet appears to be linked to the incidence of lupus through changes in the microbiota composition [26]. In TLR8-deficient mice, a high-fat diet worsens lupus through TLR7 signaling. This leads to stronger immune responses, more anti-DNA antibodies, increased IgG/IgM deposits in the kidney, and greater kidney damage [27]. Table 1 [17,[22], [23], [24],[26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74] summarizes the effect of macronutrients, ultraprocessed foods, and general dietary factors on lupus incidence and severity.
TABLE 1.
The effect of macronutrients, ultraprocessed foods, and general dietary factors on lupus incidence and severity
| Study design | Organism | Interventions/nutrient | Outcome measured | Study result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case control | Human | — |
|
|
[28] |
| Case control | Human | — |
|
|
[29] |
| Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial | Human | Creatine |
|
|
[30] |
| Case report | Human | — |
|
|
[31] |
| Case control | Human | — |
|
|
[32] |
| Case control | Human | Fasting |
|
|
[33] |
| Case report | Human | Gluten-free diet |
|
|
[34] |
| Retrospective analysis | Human | — |
|
|
[35] |
| Observational and In vivo trial | Human and rat | Animal study: Choline-rich diet, LPS, and cultured in interferon (IFN)-γ or IL-4 and IL-13 |
|
|
[36] |
| Case control | Human | — |
|
|
[37] |
| Observational | Human | — |
|
|
[22] |
| Multicenter | Human | — |
|
|
[38] |
| Cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[23] |
| Survey based | Human | — |
|
|
[39] |
| Observational | Human | — |
|
|
[40] |
| Case report | Human | Gluten-free dietary regimen |
|
|
[41] |
| Cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[42] |
| Retrospective cohort | Human | — | 12 Organ specific morbidities comorbidities:
|
|
[43] |
| Cross-sectional observational | Human | — |
|
|
[44] |
| Retrospective cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[45] |
| Cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[46] |
| Cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[17] |
| Prospective cohort | Human | — |
|
|
[24] |
| [47] | Human | — |
|
|
[48] |
| Cross-sectional association | Human | — |
|
|
[49] |
| Observational multicenter | Human | — |
|
|
[50] |
| Observational | Human | — |
|
|
[51] |
| Case series | Human | — |
|
|
[52] |
| Observational | Human | — |
|
|
[53] |
| Observational | Human | — |
|
|
[54] |
| Observational and cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[55] |
| Cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[56] |
| Cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[57] |
| Cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[58] |
| Cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[59] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | 3 different commercial diets: Teklad 7013, Harlan 2018, or Research Diets Inc |
|
|
[60] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Dietary resistant starch (RS) |
|
|
[26] |
| In vivo trial | 14 Organisms: cow, sheep, goat, pig, chicken, turkey, duck, tilapia, salmon, rice, quinoa, soybean, rye, wheat) |
|
|
[61] | |
| In vivo trial | Mice | HFD (high-fat diet) |
|
|
[27] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | 3 different diets (control, Western diet, caloric restriction) |
|
|
[62] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | High-cholesterol diet |
|
|
[63] |
| [64] | Mice | High-fat diet (model for atherosclerosis) |
|
|
[65] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Low fiber intake |
|
|
[66] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Chow diet compared with a high-fat diet, and methylprednisolone treatment |
|
|
[67] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | High-dose methyl diet |
|
|
[68] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | TLR7 agonist imiquimod (IMQ) and a high fat, high sucrose “Western diet” (HFD) intervention |
|
|
[69] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Iron supplementation |
|
|
[70] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | High-fat diet (HFD) |
|
|
[71] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | HFD |
|
|
[72] |
| In vitro trial | Human | Low or high-dose folate coculturing |
|
|
[73] |
| Systematic review | Human | — |
|
|
[74] |
Abbreviations: ACPA, anticitrullinated protein antibody; AIL, advanced intercross line; APS, antiphospholipid syndrome; ARDs, autoimmune rheumatic diseases; BA, basophils; Bregs, regulatory B cells; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CI, confidence interval; CLE, cutaneous lupus erythematosus; CD, Celiac disease; CNS, central nervous system; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CXCL1, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1; DAS28, Disease Activity Score-28; DMA, dimethylamine; EO, eosinophils; ESRF, end-stage renal failure; FFA, free fatty acid; FFC, fungal fungal community/features; FMC, fungal microbial community/features; GATA3, GATA-binding protein 3; HCT, hematocrit; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; IMQ, imiquimod; JDM, juvenile dermatomyositis; JIA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis; jSLE, juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus; LY, lymphocytes; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCTD, mixed connective tissue disease; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MetS, metabolic syndrome; MLN, mesenteric lymph nodes; MMF/MPA, mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid; MO, monocytes; MPO, myeloperoxidase; MPV, mean platelet volume; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; NE, neutrophils; OP, overarching principle; OR, odds ratio; PAS, periodic acid–Schiff; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; p-CS, p-cresol sulfate; pDCs, plasmacytoid dendritic cells; QTL, quantitative trait locus; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RDW, red cell distribution width; RF, rheumatoid factor; RMDs, rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases; SI-LP, small intestine lamina propria; SLICC, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics ; Tfh, T follicular helper; TIMP-1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1; WT, wild type.
Essential fatty acids
Essential fatty acids, specifically omega (ω)-3 and ω-6 fatty acids, are critical components of the human diet, as they cannot be synthesized by the body. These PUFAs play significant roles in modulating immune responses, which has drawn substantial attention for their influence on the pathogenesis and progression of autoimmune diseases, including SLE [75,76]. ω-3 fatty acids, such as EPA and DHA, are metabolized into eicosanoids, lipid-based signaling molecules that participate in immune responses. Unlike eicosanoids derived from ω-6 fatty acids, those from ω-3 are generally less inflammatory, contributing to a more balanced immune response [77]. Moreover, EPA and DHA are precursors to specialized proresolving mediators such as resolvins, protectins, and maresins, which actively resolve inflammation, promote tissue repair, and aid in microbial clearance [78].
On the other hand, ω-6 fatty acids, with linoleic acid (LA) as a primary example, are converted into arachidonic acid, which serves as a precursor for eicosanoids like prostaglandins, thromboxanes, and leukotrienes [76]. These eicosanoids are typically proinflammatory and play essential roles in initiating and promoting inflammatory responses necessary for combating infections and repairing tissue damage [79,80]. However, when inflammation becomes chronic, these proinflammatory eicosanoids can contribute to autoimmune disease development. The balance between ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids is therefore crucial for maintaining immune homeostasis [81]. Research has shown that this balance is particularly important in autoimmune conditions such as lupus, where dietary interventions involving omega fatty acids have demonstrated potential benefits in disease management [82,83].
Several clinical studies have explored the impact of ω-3 supplementation in patients with SLE. Arriens et al. [84] conducted a randomized placebo-controlled trial in which 50 patients with SLE received daily fish oil supplementation containing 2.25 g of EPA and 2.25 g of DHA for 6 mo. The ω-3 supplemented group showed significant improvements in quality of life, as assessed by the RAND Corporation 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (RAND SF-36), and reductions in disease severity, based on the Physician Global Assessment. Additionally, circulating inflammatory markers were reduced in the treatment group [84]. Similarly, Borges et al. [85] found that after 12 wk of daily supplementation with 1080 mg EPA and 200 mg DHA, patients with SLE exhibited a reduction in C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammatory marker, though no significant changes were observed in IL-6, IL-10, leptin, or adiponectin concentrations.
Further studies have examined the relationship between PUFA profiles and inflammation in patients with SLE. Vordenbäumen et al. [83] conducted a cross-sectional study of the erythrocyte membrane PUFA profiles of 68 adult patients with SLE. They observed that higher concentrations of ω-6 PUFAs and a higher ratio of LA to ALA were associated with increased CRP concentrations. Conversely, a higher percentage of ω-3 PUFAs was inversely correlated with CRP concentrations, indicating a potential anti-inflammatory effect of ω-3s. Moreover, increased intake of ω-3-rich foods, such as fish, was associated with an improved ω-3 status and a reduction in self-reported disease damage, as measured by the Brief Index of Lupus Damage [83]. Similar findings were reported by Charoenwoodhipong et al. [82] in a cohort of 456 patients with SLE from the Michigan Lupus Epidemiology and Surveillance cohort. They found that for every unit increase in the ω-6 ratio, the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) score increased by 0.3 points (higher SLAQ scores indicate greater disease activity and symptom severity). Additionally, each gram increase in ω-3 PUFA consumption per 1000 kcal was associated with a decrease in lupus activity and fewer sleep disturbances, as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [82].
These findings collectively highlight the importance of the ω-6 to ω-3 ratio in modulating inflammation and disease outcomes in SLE. A higher ratio of ω-6 to ω-3 PUFAs appears to correlate with increased inflammation and disease activity, whereas increasing ω-3 intake is associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced inflammatory markers. Thus, balancing ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids through dietary modifications may be a valuable strategy in managing autoimmune diseases like lupus.
Animal studies suggest modes of action behind the potential protective effect of ω-3 PUFAs in lupus
In lupus mouse models induced by crystalline silica (cSiO2), supplementation with DHA has been shown to significantly inhibit the proliferation of immune cells such as B cells, T cells, follicular dendritic cells, and IgG-positive plasma cells within the lungs [86]. This supplementation also reduced concentrations of anti-dsDNA IgG in both bronchial lavage fluid and plasma. Additionally, DHA attenuated the development of glomerulonephritis, alongside a reduction in B-cell accumulation in the renal cortex [86]. Furthermore, a diet high in DHA mitigated the upregulation of genes associated with inflammation, immune responses (both innate and adaptive), interferon (IFN) signaling, chemokines, and antigen processing in lupus models [87]. Dietary DHA intake in lupus-prone mice also inhibited the expression of Mrna signatures commonly linked to the formation of ectopic lymphoid tissues, systemic autoimmunity, and glomerulonephritis [87].
In the lupus mouse model induced by cSiO2, there was a marked autoantibody response, particularly IgG, IgM, and to a lesser extent, IgA. However, DHA supplementation dose dependently reduced these autoantibody concentrations, which were inversely correlated with ω-3 fatty acid concentrations in tissue phospholipids [88]. This negative correlation extended to the activation of IFN-regulated genes, production of proinflammatory cytokines, leukocyte infiltration, ectopic lymphoid structure formation in the lungs, systemic autoantibody production, and glomerulonephritis development [89].
Additionally, Pestka et al. [90] compared the effects of ω-3, ω-6, and ω-9-rich diets in lupus-prone mice. Mice fed ω-6 or ω-9 diets exhibited elevated concentrations of plasma autoantibodies, proteinuria, and glomerulonephritis. In contrast, mice on an ω-3-rich diet showed significantly lower levels of these symptoms. This suppression of autoimmune responses by ω-3 was linked to the downregulation of CD4+ T cell-related genes, including CD80, CTLA-4, IL-10, IL-18, CCL-5, CXCR3, IL-6, TNF-α, and osteopontin in kidney and spleen tissues, relative to the ω-6 and ω-9 diets [90]. These genes are involved in inflammatory responses, antigen presentation, T-cell activation, B-cell activation and differentiation, and leukocyte recruitment.
Table 2 [[82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97]] provides a summary of the relationships between essential fatty acids and the incidence and severity of lupus, highlighting the potential therapeutic role of ω-3 in modulating immune and inflammatory responses in lupus-prone models.
TABLE 2.
The relationships between essential fatty acids and lupus incidence and severity
| Detailed study design | Organism | Interventions/nutrient | Outcome measured | Study result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observational | Human | — |
|
|
[82] |
| Cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[83] |
| Randomized controlled trial | Human | Fish oil (EPA and DHA) |
|
|
[84] |
| Clinical trial | Human | Supplementation with ω-3 |
|
|
[85] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | 1) n–3 PUFA-rich diet containing DHA-enriched fish oil, 2) n–6 PUFA-rich Western-type diet containing corn oil or 3) n–9 MUFA-rich Mediterranean-type diet containing high oleic safflower oil |
|
|
[90] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | DHA |
|
|
[91] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | DHA |
|
|
[86] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | DHA |
|
|
[87] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Dietary ω-3 PUFA DHA |
|
|
[92] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | ω-3 HUFAs EPA and DHA |
|
|
[89] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Western-fed diet, and group supplemented with dietary ω-3 PUFA DHA |
|
|
[93] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Dietary supplementation with EPA |
|
|
[94] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | DHA |
|
|
[95] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Dietary supplementation with the ω-3 PUFA DHA |
|
|
[96] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | ω-3 PUFA supplementation and soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) inhibition |
|
|
[97] |
Abbreviations: AAbs, autoantibodies; ALA, α-linolenic acid; ARA, arachidonic acid; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; BILD, Brief Index of Lupus Damage; C3c, complement component 3c; CCL-5, C-C motif chemokine ligand 5; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; DFO, docosahexaenoic acid-enriched fish oil; FDC, follicular dendritic cell; GCB, germinal center B cells; HUFA, highly unsaturated fatty acid; LA, linoleic acid; Lcn2, lipocalin-2; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; O3I, omega-3 index; PC1, principal component 1; PC2, principal component 2; PCA, principal component analysis; PROMIS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; RAND, RAND Corporation; RBC, red blood cells; SLICC, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics; SLAQ, Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire; WP, white pulp.
Alcohol consumption
Moderate alcohol consumption has been observed to have a protective effect against lupus. In a study by Barbhaiya et al. [98], 125 new cases of SLE were identified in the NHS and 119 in the NHSII cohort. When comparing individuals who consumed alcohol to those who did not, a meta-analyzed multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for a cumulative alcohol consumption of ≥5 g/d was found to be 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41, 0.89], indicating a reduced risk of SLE. Notably, the protective effect was still evident when alcohol consumption occurred >4 y before diagnosis, with a similar HR of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.91). Females who regularly consumed wine, in particular, demonstrated a significant reduction in SLE risk compared with nondrinkers, suggesting a potential correlation between moderate alcohol intake (≥5 g or ∼0.5 standard drinks per day) and a reduced risk of SLE [98]. This finding raises the possibility that polyphenols in wine, rather than alcohol alone, may play a crucial role in this protective effect.
Further insights into the relationship between alcohol consumption and SLE were provided by Hahn et al. [99], who discovered that stem cell factor (SCF) amounts decreased significantly with each gram of cumulative alcohol intake per day. Females consuming >5 g of alcohol daily exhibited SCF amounts that were 7% lower than those of nondrinkers. Although no significant associations were found between alcohol intake and other cytokines, the reduction in SCF amounts offers a potential mechanism through which alcohol could reduce the risk of SLE. Interestingly, this effect was independent of autoantibody status, further supporting the idea that alcohol, particularly when consumed in moderation, may play a role in reducing the incidence of lupus by lowering circulating SCF amounts [99].
An inverse relationship between alcohol intake and SLE risk is biologically plausible. Previous research has shown that alcohol can diminish cellular responses to immunogens and reduce the production of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF, IL-8, and IL-6, in immune cells such as alveolar macrophages and peripheral blood monocytes [100]. In addition, wine contains polyphenolic compounds such as resveratrol, which have demonstrated antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [101], including modulation of IFN-γ [102] and reductions in serum concentrations of IL-1β and IL-18 in animal models [103], although the relevance of these findings to typical dietary intake in humans remains uncertain.
However, the potential benefits of moderate alcohol intake should be viewed in the context of its established health risks, including liver toxicity and increased risk of certain cancers [104]. Furthermore, J- or U-shaped associations between alcohol intake and adverse health outcomes, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), cardiovascular diseases, and all-cause mortality have been reported [[105], [106], [107]]. Moderate alcohol intake (5–9.9 g/d) has been associated with the lowest concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers among females with preclinical RA [108]. Notably, Barbhaiya et al. [98] reported that the inverse association between alcohol intake and SLE risk became slightly stronger after excluding heavy drinkers (individuals consuming >30 g/d), suggesting a similar nonlinear relationship.
Table 3 [98,99,109] summarizes the potential impact of alcohol consumption on lupus incidence and disease severity, highlighting the nuanced role that moderate alcohol intake, particularly wine, may have in influencing SLE risk.
TABLE 3.
The effect of alcohol consumption on lupus incidence and severity
| Detailed study design | Organism | Interventions/nutrient | Outcome measured | Study result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observational cohort | Human | Daily mean intake of 49 nutrients (e.g., vitamins, alcohol, fatty acids, etc.). |
|
|
[109] |
| Observational cohort | Human | — |
|
|
[98] |
| Cohort | Human | — |
|
|
[99] |
Abbreviation: SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.
Sodium intake
High-sodium intake worsens lupus symptoms. Animal studies show that a high-sodium diet (HSD) speeds up disease progression and makes lupus nephritis more severe, reducing survival inMurphy Roths large/lymphoproliferation (MRL/lpr) mice. This is linked to increased Th1 and Th17 immune cells. Using SGK1 (glucocorticoid-inducible serine/threonine protein kinase 1) inhibitors helped reduce these harmful effects. [110]. Moreover, HSD was shown to enhance the maturation and activation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells through the p38 MAPK-STAT1 pathway, both in vitro and in vivo [111]. Another study inNew Zealand Black/New Zealand White F1 (NZBWF1) mice found that a HSD increased anti-dsDNA antibodies but did not change blood pressure or kidney damage. Urinary ET-1 increased, whereas some kidney markers (renal endothelin A receptor and IL-2) decreased, suggesting that long-term high sodium may not worsen heart and kidney problems in SLE [112].
Conversely, a clinical trial examining the effects of a low-sodium diet on patients with SLE and RA found that reducing sodium intake lowered proinflammatory Th17 cell counts, increased Treg cell counts, and decreased serum IL-9 concentrations. These effects were reversible upon returning to a regular sodium diet [113]. This finding aligns with earlier animal studies that suggested HSDs amplify systemic inflammation, whereas low-sodium diets mitigate it, particularly by affecting cytokine production and inflammation [110]. Notably, no significant changes in apoptotic human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or factors modulating proliferation were observed during the trial, indicating that the diet specifically influenced inflammatory pathways without altering cell survival [113].
In a cross-sectional study on the Mexican-Mestizo population, a link was found between excessive weight (BMI >25) and sodium consumption [114]. Overweight individuals showed significant reductions in several micronutrients and macronutrients, hinting at poor dietary choices. Patients with overweight and SLE consuming fewer calories than their normal-weight counterparts could benefit from reduced sodium intake, but may also suffer from deficiencies in essential micronutrients that regulate immune function, such as vitamins B and C, zinc, and selenium [114]. Additionally, these patients frequently had low-quality diets, as indicated by their dietary antioxidant quality scores and elevated serum hsCRP concentrations, although these metrics were not significantly correlated [22]. Instead, the mineral content of their diets, particularly sodium and potassium concentrations, appeared to influence hsCRP concentrations in patients with SLE. High-sodium or low-potassium intake was linked to increased inflammation [22]. Furthermore, sodium intake was associated with elevated anti-dsDNA concentrations and reduced C4 complement protein concentrations, whereas potassium intake correlated with C3 complement protein concentrations [115]. However, another observational study found that higher sodium intake was inversely related to C3 and C4 concentrations in inactive patients with SLE. In this study, gut health was also explored, revealing a rise in Megamonas funiformis and plasma zonulin, both indicators of increased gut permeability [116].
Sodium intake influences both innate and adaptive immunity. In the innate immune system, prolonged HSDs are thought to promote inflammation, driven mainly by macrophages and dendritic cells. Although this heightened inflammation may offer protection against systemic infections, it can be detrimental in autoimmune diseases like SLE. In adaptive immunity, HSD suppresses Treg cells and activates Th17 cells, leading to increased inflammation and worsening autoimmune conditions [117]. Overall, the evidence suggests that high-sodium intake significantly contributes to the worsening of SLE in both murine and human models, primarily by enhancing systemic inflammation through various mechanisms. Table 4 [[110], [111], [112], [113],115,116]summarizes the impact of excessive sodium intake on lupus incidence and severity.
TABLE 4.
The effect of excessive salt intake on lupus incidence and severity
| Detailed study design | Organism | Interventions/nutrient | Outcome measured | Study result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical trial | Human | Sodium intake |
|
|
[113] |
| Cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[115] |
| Observational | Human | — |
|
|
[116] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Sodium intake |
|
|
[110] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Sodium intake |
|
|
[112] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Sodium intake |
|
|
[111] |
Abbreviations: DC, dendritic cell; ET-A, endothelin A receptor; ET-B, endothelin B receptor; LN, lupus nephritis; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MHC II, major histocompatibility complex class II; NOS1, nitric oxide synthase 1; NOX2, NADPH oxidase 2; SGK1, serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; STAT1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; Th1, T helper 1; Th2, T helper 2; Th17, T helper 17; Treg, regulatory T cells.
Vitamin D
Vitamin D, primarily recognized for its vital roles in calcium regulation, is also an important immune function regulator. Both the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system possess vitamin D receptors [118,119]. For example, upon pathogenic infection, innate immune cells, like macrophages, convert inactive vitamin D into its active form, calcitriol, which subsequently induces the production of antimicrobial peptides such as cathelicidin [120]. In addition, vitamin D also modulates the inflammatory cascade, such as by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokines like IL-6 and TNF-α, whereas upregulating anti-inflammatory mediators if overexpression of inflammation occurs [121]. In terms of adaptive immunity, vitamin D has been found to regulate T helper 1 (Th1) and Th17 cell responses, both implicated in autoimmunity and inflammation, and modulate the regulatory T-cell (Treg) functions to preserve immune tolerance [[122], [123], [124]]. B-cell differentiation and antibody production are also regulated by vitamin D, further exemplifying its roles in immune response [125]. Clinical evidence suggests that vitamin D deficiency is linked to increased susceptibility to infections such as COVID-19, influenza, and tuberculosis [[126], [127], [128], [129]]. Given the importance of vitamin D in immune function regulation, it is not surprising that vitamin D has a vital role in autoimmune disorders, including lupus.
Patients with lupus have been consistently shown to have vitamin D deficiency. Cutillas-Marco et al. [130] investigated a relatively small group of patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and found that the patients with CLE had higher odds of having vitamin D deficiency. Similar observation was also reported by García-Carrasco et al. [131]. They found that 126 of 137 patients with SLE had either vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency, where insufficiency was defined as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D <30 ng/mL and deficiency as <10 ng/mL [131]. Furthermore, a systematic review and meta-analysis carried out by Islam et al. [11] analyzed 34 case-control studies comprising 2265 patients with SLE and 1846 healthy controls, found that an inadequate concentration of vitamin D was prominent in patients with SLE when compared with healthy controls.
In addition, a small group of patients with CLE and vitamin D insufficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations <30 ng/mL) or deficiency (concentrations <10 ng/mL) were found to have improved disease severity when treated with an oral vitamin D supplementation schedule. They received 1400 IU of cholecalciferol and 1250 mg of calcium carbonate daily for 40 d. This was followed by 2 tablets daily, each containing a fixed combination of 1250 mg of calcium carbonate and 400 IU of cholecalciferol, for 1 y [130]. On the other hand, Hayashi et al. [132] reported that vitamin D appeared to have no beneficial effect on patients with SLE. However, there were some significant limitations in this particular study. There was no information with regards to the doses of vitamin D administered and length of treatment. Other confounding factors, such as other therapeutics, such as immunosuppressants, which definitely played a factor, also could not be excluded [132].
The therapeutic benefits of vitamin D relate to the modulation of immune function, particularly in the inflammation-related pathways. In the lupus-prone NZBWF1 mice, the correction of vitamin D concentration attenuated lupus pathology progression, delayed the onset of proteinuria, and reduced the concentrations of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies [133]. In addition, vitamin D promotes the adoption of a regulatory phenotype in lymphocytes and consequently increases the expression of IL-10, regulatory CD4+ T cells, and IL-10-expressing B cells [133]. Vitamin D also ameliorates the impairment of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation and the shift toward the expression of IFN-stimulated genes in patients With lupus [134].
Piantoni et al. [135] carried out a 2-y prospective study of 34 patients diagnosed with SLE. During the first year, an intensive cholecalciferol regimen was given to 16 patients, involving a 300,000 IU initial dose and a monthly maintenance dose of 50,000 IU, amounting to 850,000 IU for the year. On the other hand, 18 patients received a standard dose of 25,000 IU of cholecalciferol every month, amounting to 300,000 IU annually. In the following year, the treatment plans were swapped between the groups. They observed an increase in the total count of CD4+CD45RA+CCR7− T cells, while noting a significant decrease in CD8+CD28− T cells. The analysis of PBMCs from 8 patients after undergoing the intensive regimen also showed a reduction in the IFN-γ/IL-4 ratio in CD8+ T cells over the 12-mo period. These results suggested that vitamin D supplementation modified the phenotype of T cells in patients with SLE [135]. Furthermore, Franco et al. [136] carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis and found that vitamin D supplementation appeared to be beneficial in patients with SLE by reducing anti-dsDNA positivity. Table 5 [130,132,133,135,[137], [138], [139], [140], [141], [142], [143]] summarizes the beneficial effects of vitamin D on lupus incidence and severity.
TABLE 5.
Summarizes the beneficial effects of vitamin D on lupus incidence and severity
| Detailed study design | Organism | Interventions/nutrient | Outcome measured | Study result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-sectional and observational | Human | Oral vitamin D supplementation of cholecalciferol vitamin D-3 and calcium carbonate |
|
|
[130] |
| In vitro | Human | Oral vitamin D3 supplementation |
|
|
[137] |
| Observational | Human | Vitamin D supplementation |
|
|
[138] |
| Randomized controlled trial | Human | Oral vitamin D3 supplementation |
|
|
[139] |
| Randomized controlled trial | Human | Oral vitamin D3 supplementation |
|
|
[140] |
| Randomized controlled trial | Human | Oral vitamin D3 supplementation |
|
|
[141] |
| Randomized controlled trial | Human | Oral vitamin D3 supplementation |
|
|
[142] |
| Prospective | Human | Oral vitamin D-3 supplementation |
|
|
[135] |
| Case report | Human | Medical nutrition therapy and oral vitamin D-3 supplementation |
|
|
[143] |
| Cross-sectional analysis | Human | Oral vitamin D supplementation |
|
|
[132] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Oral vitamin D supplementation |
|
|
[133] |
Abbreviations: 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; ASPEN, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition; BMD, bone mineral density; CD, cluster of differentiation; CLE, cutaneous lupus erythematosus; CLEDASI, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; IFN, interferon; JSLE, juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus; LTB4, leukotriene B4; MNT, medical nutrition therapy; MPO, myeloperoxidase; NE, neutrophil elastase; NETosis, neutrophil extracellular trap formation; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; SDI, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SMI, skeletal muscle index; Treg, regulatory T cells; VAS, visual analog scale; VD, vitamin D.
Natural products
Conventional treatments for SLE, such as antimalarials, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants, target the symptoms and underlying inflammation but can come with significant side effects [144]. Given the complexity of SLE and the potential adverse effects of standard therapies, there has been growing interest in the use of natural products as complementary or alternative treatments. These products, often derived from plants, herbs, animals, and other natural sources, have been used for centuries in traditional medicine systems worldwide. Table 6 [14,64,[145], [146], [147], [148], [149], [150], [151], [152], [153], [154], [155], [156], [157], [158], [159], [160]] summarizes the effects of natural products on lupus incidence and severity.
TABLE 6.
The effects of natural products on lupus incidence and severity
| Detailed study design | Organism | Interventions/nutrient | Outcome measured | Study result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case control | Human | Polyphenols from oranges and apples |
|
|
[14] |
| Retrospective cohort | Human | Lycopene |
|
|
[145] |
| Clinical trial | Human | Phenolic fraction (PE) of extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) |
|
|
[146] |
| Cross-sectional | Human | — |
|
|
[147] |
| Systematic review of randomized controlled trials | Human | Curcumin/turmeric supplementation |
|
|
[148] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Polysaccharide of large yellow croaker swim bladder (PLYCSB) |
|
|
[64] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Extract of Gentiana macrophylla Pall. (GM) |
|
|
[149] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Isogarcinol |
|
|
[150] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Extra virgin olive oil (EEVO) diet |
|
|
[151] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Lactoferrin |
|
|
[152] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Diets supplemented with hydroxytyrosol (HTy) and hydroxytyrosyl acetate (HTy Ac) |
|
|
[153] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Curcumin |
|
|
[154] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Diets enriched with oleuropein and its new derivate, peracetylated oleuropein |
|
|
[155] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Oral curcumin administration |
|
|
[156] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Curcumin |
|
|
[157] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Orally administered amaranth oil |
|
|
[158] |
| In vivo trial | Mice | Oleocanthal (OLE) supplemented diet |
|
|
[159] |
| In vitro trial | Human and mice | dietary taurine |
|
|
[160] |
Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ANA, antinuclear antibody; ASC, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain; CD, cluster of differentiation; dsDNA, double-stranded DNA; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; EVOO, extra virgin olive oil; FasL, Fas ligand; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; GM, Gentiana macrophylla; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit; HGB, hemoglobin; HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; HTy, hydroxytyrosol; HTy Ac, hydroxytyrosyl acetate; IFN, interferon; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; JAK/STAT, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription; LN, lupus nephritis; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; MMP-3, matrix metalloproteinase-3; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; NLRP3, NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3; NOX-1, NADPH oxidase-1; OLE, oleocanthal; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PE, phenolic fraction; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; PLYCSB, polysaccharide of large yellow croaker swim bladder; RBC, red blood cell; RDW, red cell distribution width; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SLEDAI, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index; SLEDAI-2K, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000; ssDNA, single-stranded DNA; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; TC, total cholesterol; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; TG, triglycerides; Th, T helper; WBC, white blood cell.
Olive oil
Virgin olive oil (VOO) and extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) are both essential components of the Mediterranean diet. Olive oils are well recognized for their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, which are attributable to their diverse range of bioactive [161]. The health benefits of olive oils are traditionally ascribed to their major component (MUFAs, mainly oleic acid) [162]. However, more recent evidence indicates that minor components of olive oils, which include polyphenol fractions (constituting up to 2% of total content), also contribute to their health-beneficial properties [163]. This growing understanding fuels the interest in integrating olive oil into daily diets as an adjunct therapy in managing autoimmune diseases.
Cells of the innate immune system, including macrophages and monocytes, play a crucial role in initiating and guiding the adaptive immune response during inflammation. In patients with SLE, monocytes and macrophages display altered phenotypes, characterized by an overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines. Aparicio-Soto et al. [151] conducted a study to explore the potential benefits of a diet containing VOO in modulating immune-inflammatory responses in SLE. They randomly assigned 60 female BALB/c mice, a commonly used inbred albino strain, into 4 experimental groups: mice injected with pristane (to induce a lupus-like disease) and fed a diet of either VOO or sunflower oil, and mice injected with a saline solution and given a diet of either VOO or sunflower oil. Notably, the release of nitrite and proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-17, and TNF-α) by LPS-activated peritoneal macrophages from the pristane-SLE mice was significantly lower in those fed with the VOO diet compared with those on the sunflower oil diet [151]. Furthermore, the same group extracted the phenolic fraction (PF) from VOO and studied its effect on LPS-treated human monocytes [164]. Treatment with LPS downregulated the expression of the anti-inflammatory PPARγ, and upregulated the expression of the proinflammatory IL-6, IL-17, TNF-α, as well as toll-like receptor 4 in monocytes. However, this effect was counteracted by PF from VOO in a dose-dependent manner. PF from VOO also blocked the genetic signature of the proinflammatory M1 macrophages while favoring the phenotype of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages upon canonical polarization of naïve monocyte-derived macrophages [164].
The adaptive immune cells also play a major role in the pathogenesis of SLE. One of the immunological characteristics of patients with SLE is an altered T-cell response manifested by an imbalance of the production of cytokines like IL-6, IL-1, IL-10, and TNF-α [165]. In addition, T-cell activation, characterized by increased CD69 expression, is commonly increased in patients with SLE [47]. To elucidate the effect of PF from EVOO on T-cell activation and cytokine release, Aparicio-Soto et al. [153] isolated the PBMCs of patients with SLE and healthy controls. Notably, their findings revealed that, although stimulation with phytohemagglutinin significantly increased the activation status of peripheral blood CD4+ T cells (as evidenced by the expression of the CD69 surface marker), the introduction of PF from EVOO (5 and 10 μg/mL) reduced the frequency of CD69+ cells among CD4+ T cells in both groups after 24 h of cell culture, in a dose-dependent manner [146]. Additionally, PF from EVOO also lowered the production of phytohemagglutinin-induced proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1β, IFN- γ, and TNF-α in the PBMCs of both healthy individuals and patients with SLE.
Numerous animal studies have investigated the potential effects of a diet rich in EVOO and diets that include specific phenolic compounds such as oleuropein, oleocanthal, and hydroxytyrosol on mitigating the inflammatory and oxidative damage associated with lupus nephritis. For instance, the generation of reactive oxygen species and a compromised antioxidant response have been identified as contributors to renal damage in lupus [166]. In light of this, diets containing EVOO [151], oleuropein [155], oleocanthal [159], and hydroxytyrosol [153] have demonstrated their ability to upregulate the expression of antioxidant proteins, namely Nrf-2 and HO-1, while simultaneously decreasing the production of the proinflammatory proteinE2 (PGE2), in the kidneys of the pristane-induced SLE mouse model. Histological examinations further indicate that supplementing with EVOO and specific phenolic compounds can reverse various kidney abnormalities, such as interstitial fibrosis, thyroidization, and abundant presence of inflammatory mononuclear cells in the renal interstitium, which are seen in the pristane-induced SLE mouse model, albeit to varying extents [151,155,159].
Curcumin
Curcumin is the active ingredient in turmeric, a commonly used spice in Asian cuisines, especially Indian dishes. It is a polyphenol with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and potential anticancer properties [167]. Research spanning both human and animal models has highlighted its therapeutic potential for autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis, RA, and inflammatory bowel disease [168].
Of particular interest is its role in SLE. In pristane-induced SLE mice model, a 16-wk daily curcumin regimen at doses of 12.5, 50, and 200 mg/kg led to a simultaneous dose-dependent decrease in Th1 and Th2 [154]. Concurrently, the study revealed a decline in the Th17 cell population and Th17/Treg ratios. Additionally, curcumin suppressed the production of proinflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and TNF-α, both implicated in the progression of SLE [168] and reduced arthritis score and lowered ANA [154].
Lupus nephritis is one of the most severe lupus manifestations. Studies using murine models have provided valuable insights into curcumin’s potential in alleviating lupus nephritis. A study on the NZBWF1 model demonstrated a decrease in spleen weight, plasma blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and glomerulosclerosis score upon a 2-wk administration of curcumin at 500 mg/kg [156]. However, there was no significant effect on albuminuria, circulating CD45R+ B cells, IgG anti-dsDNA, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The study’s short duration might have contributed to these outcomes. On the other hand, a longer 2-mo regimen with curcumin at 1000 mg/kg in the MRL.lpr model not only significantly reduces BUN, spleen weight, and glomerulonephritis score, but also proteinuria along with IgG anti-dsDNA, IgG anti-ssDNA, IgG antihistone, and IgM antihistone [157]. This suggests that curcumin possesses therapeutic potential for SLE-related kidney pathologies across varying durations of treatment. The brief 2-wk treatment highlights curcumin’s immediate therapeutic capabilities, whereas the extended 2-mo study underscores its preventative potential.
Although animal studies provide insights into curcumin’s effects on clinical parameters of lupus nephritis, their translation to human contexts reveals some inconsistent results. Indeed, a systematic review of randomized controlled trials involving 631 patients with renal disorders, including lupus nephritis, highlighted that turmeric/curcumin supplementation showed positive effects on inflammatory and oxidative stress markers [148]. However, apart from proteinuria, their influence on key clinical markers like BUN, creatinine, GFR, and serum albumin was limited [148]. These differences highlight the importance of additional research in human clinical settings.
Other natural extracts
Beyond EVOO and curcumin, several other less-researched natural extracts also exhibit potential benefits in treating SLE. In NZBWF1 lupus mice model fed with a high-cholesterol diet, lactoferrin (a glycoprotein found in colostrum and milk) demonstrated ameliorative effects on hepatic fibrosis by inhibiting TGF-b/Smad fibrotic signaling [152]. Similarly, the root extract of Gentiana macrophylla Pall. (commonly known as qin jiao) alleviates cholesterol-aggravated cardiac apoptosis, potentially by augmenting the cardiac IGF-1 survival signal through the phosphorylation of PI3K and AKT and the inhibition of both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis signals [149]. Other natural extracts that have shown therapeutic benefits in murine lupus models include amaranth oil [115,158], isogarcinol [150], and polysaccharide of large yellow croaker swim bladder [64].
In a retrospective cohort study, higher serum lycopene (a carotenoid hydrocarbon found in tomatoes and other red fruits and vegetables) of participants with SLE was associated with lower mortality [145]. On the other hand, a cross-sectional study of patients with SLE identified associations between caffeine intake and lower disease activity and cytokine concentrations [147]. However, not all-natural extracts manifest positive outcomes. For example, metabolomic profiling showed elevated taurine concentrations in serum of patients with SLE [160]. Moreover, taurine supplementation in mice was observed to exacerbate the progression of the lupus condition [160].
General discussion
The primary focus of this review was to analyze the relationships between dietary and nutritional factors and lupus pathophysiology (Figure 2). Several factors may lower lupus risk, including diet quality, vitamin D, ω-3 fatty acids, alcohol consumption, and natural products. A strong link exists between high-quality diets and lower lupus incidence and severity. Poor dietary patterns, such as Western or high-salt diets, promote excess weight and inflammation. Several studies show an association between higher BMI and lupus disease activity (Table 1). Essential fatty acids ω-3 and ω-6 are key in maintaining immune homeostasis. ω-3 fatty acids produce anti-inflammatory mediators, whereas ω-6 fatty acids produce proinflammatory mediators. They regulate inflammatory balance, antigen presentation, T-cell and B-cell activity, and leukocyte recruitment in lupus. Higher ω-3 and lower ω-6 concentrations support a more favorable immune state (Table 2).
FIGURE 2.
The summary of the effects of different dietary and nutritional factors in influencing the risks of lupus incidence and severity.
Alcohol intake has been associated with lower lupus incidence. However, it remains unclear whether this is due to alcohol itself or other compounds such as phenolics in wine. Still, alcohol may be beneficial by lowering circulating SCF (Table 3). In contrast, high-sodium intake appears to worsen lupus severity by promoting a proinflammatory state, including increased Th1:Th2 and Th17:Treg ratios and higher anti-dsDNA IgG and C4 concentrations (Table 4).
Among micronutrients, vitamin D is particularly important for reducing symptoms and modulating disease progression. Adequate vitamin D concentrations can delay proteinuria and reduce anti-dsDNA autoantibodies, key markers of disease activity. It also regulates IL-10, CD4+ Treg cells, and T-cell phenotypes, promoting a more balanced immune response. These findings suggest vitamin D may serve as both a prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic agent (Table 5). Natural compounds such as olive oil (rich in phenolics) and curcumin may also provide benefits due to their antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects (Table 6).
Strengths and Limitations of Evidence
A principal strength of this scoping review is its deliberate and systematic inclusion of evidence spanning the entire translational research continuum from in vitro mechanistic studies through animal models to human observational studies and clinical trials. This approach, while inherently heterogeneous, offers several distinct advantages. First, mechanistic exploration. By incorporating in vitro and animal studies, we discuss insights into the biological plausibility and potential mechanisms underlying observed associations in human studies. For example, while human studies demonstrate that ω-3 fatty acids are associated with reduced disease activity [82,82], animal studies elucidate the underlying immunological mechanisms, including suppression of CD4+ T-cell-related genes [90], inhibition of B-cell and T-cell proliferation [86], and downregulation of IFN-regulated genes [87]. This mechanistic grounding strengthens confidence in the causal nature of these associations.
Second, hypothesis generation. The inclusion of preclinical studies identifies promising dietary factors such as olive oil phenolics [151,164], curcumin [154,157], lactoferrin [152], and Gentiana macrophylla extract [149] that have limited human evidence but warrant future investigation.
Third and arguably most importantly: identification of knowledge gaps. Mapping the full evidence landscape reveals critical discontinuities between preclinical promise and clinical validation. For instance, although curcumin shows robust effects in multiple murine lupus models, human evidence remains limited to renal outcomes with inconsistent findings. This gap identification is a core objective of scoping reviews and provides clear direction for future research. The strongest evidence for clinical application comes from human RCTs and large prospective cohort studies. Evidence from animal models should be interpreted as mechanistic and exploratory, providing biological plausibility and generating hypotheses for future human investigation rather than supporting immediate clinical recommendations.
Several factors constrain the translation of animal and in vitro findings into human clinical practice. Lupus in murine models is typically induced experimentally (e.g., pristane, crystalline silica), or genetically driven (e.g., NZB/W F1, MRL/lpr). These models are inherently biased toward specific immunopathological pathways and therefore do not fully recapitulate the clinical, genetic, and mechanistic heterogeneity of human SLE [169]. In addition, species-specific differences in immune regulation, metabolism, and microbiome composition may influence responses to dietary interventions [170,171]. Furthermore, translation of dosing from animal models to humans remains inherently challenging [172]. As such, it is often unclear whether doses used in human studies achieve biologically equivalent exposures relative to preclinical models. Taken together, although preclinical studies provide essential mechanistic insights and support causal inference, their translational value lies primarily in hypothesis generation rather than direct clinical extrapolation.
The strongest evidence for clinical application remains derived from human randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Future research should prioritize well-designed human interventional studies to validate mechanistic findings and establish clinically relevant exposure levels. Furthermore, advances in humanized mouse models, in which immunodeficient mice are engrafted with components of the human immune system, may serve as complementary tools to refine hypotheses before clinical testing [173].
Despite these strengths, several limitations should be considered. Dietary components are unlikely to act in isolation; however, this review primarily summarizes evidence on individual nutrients, as the available literature on their combined effects remains limited. Some experimental studies in other inflammatory conditions (e.g., osteoarthritis) report greater protective effects with combined interventions of curcumin and vitamin D compared with individual components [174]. Evidence from a factorial randomized trial further showed that combined supplementation with vitamin D and ω-3 was associated with reduced autoimmune disease risk [175]. However, no significant interaction between the 2 interventions was observed, suggesting largely independent or additive effects rather than true synergy (i.e., where the effect of one intervention depends on the presence of the other) [175]. Overall, while combined dietary strategies may offer potential benefits, current evidence does not allow definitive conclusions regarding their nature or magnitude in SLE across most dietary factors. Future studies designed to evaluate multinutrient interventions are needed to better characterize their combined impact on disease risk and progression.
As a scoping review, we did not perform formal quality or risk-of-bias assessments for individual studies, limiting evaluation of the strength and reliability of the evidence. The lack of quantitative synthesis means pooled effect estimates cannot be provided. Although comprehensive, the thematic approach may oversimplify complex interactions between dietary components. The 2012 to 2023 search window may exclude older relevant studies, but it likely captures the most current and methodologically robust evidence, given rapid advances in nutrition and immunology.
The included studies show substantial heterogeneity across multiple dimensions, complicating synthesis and limiting precision. Restricting to English-language publications may introduce language bias, and publication bias is possible, as negative findings may be underreported.
Findings are sometimes contradictory, with studies reporting both positive and negative effects of individual nutrients. This may reflect the difficulty of isolating dietary effects from other lifestyle factors, or suggest that individual nutrients may be more influential than overall dietary patterns. It may also result from residual confounding in observational studies. Null findings from several high-quality studies indicate that associations between whole diets and SLE risk require further investigation. Therefore, more large-scale, diverse population studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these associations and inform dietary recommendations.
In conclusion, the present review illustrates a link between dietary and nutritional factors and lupus incidence and severity. The integration of nutritional and dietary guidance into the management of lupus represents a promising adjunct to conventional pharmacological treatments. The evidence collected in this review underscores the potential of specific dietary interventions to modulate immune function, reduce inflammation, and possibly decrease the frequency and severity of lupus flares. Future research should aim to establish more precise dietary recommendations and explore the mechanisms by which diet influences lupus activity. Large-scale, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the therapeutic potential of dietary and nutritional interventions and to integrate them effectively into the standard of care for lupus management.
Author contributions
The authors’ responsibilities were as follows – JNJ, MP, NP: contributed to writing original draft, and review and editing; ID: contributed to writing original draft; FN: contributed to visualization; and FZ: contributed to conceptualization, methodology, writing original draft, review and editing, supervision, visualization, and funding acquisition.
Data availability
Data described in the manuscript will be made available upon reasonable request.
Funding
The article processing charge was funded by the Efi Propolis Research Fund.
Declaration of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process
The authors declare that no generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were used in the writing of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
FZ is associated with Efi Propolis. All other authors declare no competing financial interests and no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Fanouriakis A., Tziolos N., Bertsias G., Boumpas D.T. Update οn the diagnosis and management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2021;80:14–25. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gordon C., Isenberg D., editors. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yap D.Y.H., Lai K.N. The role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus—from bench to bedside. Nephrology. 2013;18:243–255. doi: 10.1111/nep.12047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arbuckle M.R., McClain M.T., Rubertone M.V., Scofield R.H., Dennis G.J., James J.A., et al. Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;349:1526–1533. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fernandez-Ruiz R.U.T.H., Belmont H.M. The role of anticomplement therapy in lupus nephritis. Transl. Res. 2022;245:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2022.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fava A., Petri M. Systemic lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and clinical management. J. Autoimmun. 2019;96:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yap D.Y.H., Li P.H., Tang C., So B.Y.F., Kwan L.P.Y., Chan G.C.W., et al. Long-term results of triple immunosuppression with tacrolimus added to mycophenolate and corticosteroids in the treatment of lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. Rep. 2022;7:516–525. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.International Consortium for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Genetics (SLEGEN), Harley J.B., Alarcón-Riquelme M.E., Criswell L.A., Jacob C.O., Kimberly R.P., et al. Genome-wide association scan in women with systemic lupus erythematosus identifies susceptibility variants in ITGAM, PXK, KIAA1542 and other loci. Nat. Genet. 2008;40:204–210. doi: 10.1038/ng.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bentham J., Morris D.L., Graham D.S.C., Pinder C.L., Tombleson P., Behrens T.W., et al. Genetic association analyses implicate aberrant regulation of innate and adaptive immunity genes in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:1457–1464. doi: 10.1038/ng.3434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Symmons D.P. Frequency of lupus in people of African origin. Lupus. 1995;4:176–178. doi: 10.1177/096120339500400303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Islam M.A., Khandker S.S., Alam S.S., Kotyla P., Hassan R. Vitamin D status in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun. Rev. 2019;18 doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Constantin M.-M., Nita I.E., Olteanu R., Constantin T., Bucur S., Matei C., et al. Significance and impact of dietary factors on systemic lupus erythematosus pathogenesis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019;17:1085–1090. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pedro E.M., da Rosa Franchi Santos L.F., Scavuzzi B.M., Iriyoda T.M.V., Peixe T.S., Lozovoy M.A.B., et al. Trace elements associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and insulin resistance. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019;191:34–44. doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1592-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cuervo A., Hevia A., López P., Suárez A., Sánchez B., Margolles A., et al. Association of polyphenols from oranges and apples with specific intestinal microorganisms in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Nutrients. 2015;7:1301–1317. doi: 10.3390/nu7021301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Munn Z., Peters M.D.J., Stern C., Tufanaru C., McArthur A., Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2018;18:104–116. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moher D., Shamseer L., Clarke M., Ghersi D., Liberati A., Petticrew M., et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Correa-Rodríguez M., Pocovi-Gerardino G., Callejas-Rubio J.-L., Ríos Fernández R., Martín-Amada M., Cruz-Caparros M.-G., et al. Dietary intake of free sugars is associated with disease activity and dyslipidemia in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Nutrients. 2020;12:1094. doi: 10.3390/nu12041094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Castro-Webb N., Cozier Y.C., Barbhaiya M., Ruiz-Narváez E.A., Li S., Costenbader K.H., et al. Association of macronutrients and dietary patterns with risk of systemic lupus erythematosus in the Black Women’s Health Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021;114:1486–1494. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Julià A., Martínez-Mateu S.H., Domènech E., Cañete J.D., Ferrándiz C., Tornero J., et al. Food groups associated with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a Mendelian randomization and disease severity study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021;75:1368–1382. doi: 10.1038/s41430-021-00913-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Petrić M.M., Božić J., Radić M., Perković D., Petrić M.M., Martinović Kaliterna D., et al. Dietary habits in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Med. Food. 2020;23:1176–1182. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2019.0227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Choi M.Y., Hahn J., Malspeis S., Stevens E.F., Karlson E.W., Sparks J.A., et al. Association of a combination of healthy lifestyle behaviors with reduced risk of incident systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74:274–283. doi: 10.1002/art.41935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Correa-Rodríguez M., Pocovi-Gerardino G., Callejas-Rubio J.-L., Fernández R.R., Martín-Amada M., Cruz-Caparros M.-G., et al. The prognostic nutritional index and nutritional risk index are associated with disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nutrients. 2019;11:638. doi: 10.3390/nu11030638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Behiry M.E., Salem M.R., Alnaggar A.R. Assessment of nutritional status and disease activity level in systemic lupus erythematosus patients at a tertiary care hospital. Rev. Colomb. Reumatol. 2019;26:97–104. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tedeschi S.K., Barbhaiya M., Sparks J.A., Karlson E.W., Kubzansky L.D., Roberts A.L., et al. Dietary patterns and risk of systemic lupus erythematosus in women. Lupus. 2020;29:67–73. doi: 10.1177/0961203319888791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Barbhaiya M., Tedeschi S., Sparks J.A., Leatherwood C., Karlson E.W., Willett W.C., et al. Association of dietary quality with risk of incident systemic lupus erythematosus in the Nurses’ Health Study and Nurses’ Health Study II. Arthritis Care Res. (Hoboken). 2021;73:1250–1258. doi: 10.1002/acr.24443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zegarra-Ruiz D.F., El Beidaq A., Iñiguez A.J., Lubrano Di Ricco M., Manfredo Vieira S., Ruff W.E., et al. A diet-sensitive commensal lactobacillus strain mediates TLR7-dependent systemic autoimmunity, Cell Host. Microbe. 2019;25:113–127.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hanna Kazazian N., Wang Y., Roussel-Queval A., Marcadet L., Chasson L., Laprie C., et al. Lupus autoimmunity and metabolic parameters are exacerbated upon high fat diet-induced obesity due to TLR7 signaling. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:2015. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Washio M., Fujii T., Kuwana M., Kawaguchi Y., Mimori A., Horiuchi T., et al. Lifestyle and other related factors for the development of mixed connective tissue disease among Japanese females in comparison with systemic lupus erythematosus. Mod. Rheumatol. 2014;24:788–792. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.863442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zou Y.-F., Feng C.-C., Zhu J.-M., Tao J.-H., Chen G.-M., Ye Q.-L., et al. Prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus and risk factors in rural areas of Anhui Province. Rheumatol. Int. 2014;34:347–356. doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2902-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hayashi A.P., Solis M.Y., Sapienza M.T., Otaduy M.C.G., de Sá Pinto A.L., Silva C.A., et al. Efficacy and safety of creatine supplementation in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Lupus. 2014;23:1500–1511. doi: 10.1177/0961203314546017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fegan D., Glennon M.J. SLE and dental erosion: a lethal cocktail. Trop. Doct. 2014;44:122–123. doi: 10.1177/0049475514521805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sahebari M., Abrishami-Moghaddam M., Moezzi A., Ghayour-Mobarhan M., Mirfeizi Z., Esmaily H., et al. Association between serum trace element concentrations and the disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2014;23:793–801. doi: 10.1177/0961203314530792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Goharifar H., Faezi S.T., Paragomi P., Montazeri A., Banihashemi A.T., Akhlaghkhah M., et al. The effect of Ramadan fasting on quiescent systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients’ disease activity, health quality of life and lipid profile: a pilot study. Rheumatol. Int. 2015;35:1409–1414. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3282-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Eaton W.W., Chen L.-Y., Dohan F.C.J., Kelly D.L., Cascella N. Improvement in psychotic symptoms after a gluten-free diet in a boy with complex autoimmune illness. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2015;172:219–221. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14040550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang Q., Zhao G., Yang N., Zhang L. Fasting blood glucose levels in patients with different types of diseases. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2019;162:277–292. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2019.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Koh J.H., Park Y.-J., Lee S., Hong Y.-S., Hong K.S., Yoo S.-A., et al. Distinct urinary metabolic profile in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a possible link between diet and arthritis phenotype. J. Rheum. Dis. 2019;26:46–56. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Listiyono F., Sumadiono, Satria C.D., Murni I.K. Predictors of mortality in children with systemic lupus erythematosus. Paediatr. Indones. 2019;59:1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bartoloni E., Bistoni O., Alunno A., Cavagna L., Nalotto L., Baldini C., et al. Celiac disease prevalence is increased in primary Sjögren’s syndrome and diffuse systemic sclerosis: lessons from a large multi-center study. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:540. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Robinson G.A., Mcdonnell T., Wincup C., Martin-Gutierrez L., Wilton J., Kalea A.Z., et al. Diet and lupus: what do the patients think? Lupus. 2019;28:755–763. doi: 10.1177/0961203319845473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ahn S.S., Yoo J., Jung S.M., Song J.J., Park Y.-B., Lee S.-W. Comparison of the clinical implications among five different nutritional indices in patients with lupus nephritis. Nutrients. 2019;11:1456. doi: 10.3390/nu11071456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tabacco S., Garufi C., Giannini A., Lanzone A., Benedetti Panici P., Rizzo F., et al. Lupus anticoagulant remission after gluten-free diet in a coeliac pregnant woman. Lupus. 2019;28:1176–1177. doi: 10.1177/0961203319860580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pereira L., Previdelli Á.N., Rossi R.G.T., Rodrigues W.D., Fonseca F.L.A., Len C.A., et al. Anthropometric evaluation and assessment of food intake of parents of pediatric patients with chronic rheumatic diseases. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2021;76:387–395. doi: 10.1159/000512243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kariniemi S., Rantalaiho V., Virta L.J., Puolakka K., Sokka-Isler T., Elfving P. Multimorbidity among incident Finnish systemic lupus erythematosus patients during 2000-2017. Lupus. 2021;30:165–171. doi: 10.1177/0961203320967102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Petrić M., Božić J., Radić M., Perković D., Petrić M., Martinović Kaliterna D. Dietary habits in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Med. Food. 2020;23:1176–1182. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2019.0227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rodrigues W.D.R., Sarni R.O.S., Abad T.T.O., da Silva S.G.L., de Souza F.I.S., Len C.A., et al. Lipid profile of pediatric patients with chronic rheumatic diseases - a retrospective analysis. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2020;66:1093–1099. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.8.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Leng X., Xia J., Zeng X., Song Y. Prevalence and associated factors of lupus in the United States: third National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES III) Front. Med. 2020;7:213. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chavez-Rueda K., Legorreta-Haquet M.V., Cervera-Castillo H., Sánchez L., Jara L.J., Zenteno E., et al. Prolactin effect on CD69 and CD154 expression by CD4+ cells from systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2005;23:769–777. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hikmah Z., Endaryanto A., Gede Ugrasena I. Systemic lupus erythematosus organ manifestation and disease activity in children based on Mexican systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index score at East Java, Indonesia, Indian. J. Rheumatol. 2021;16:408–414. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vordenbäumen S., Sokolowski A., Rosenbaum A., Gebhard C., Raithel J., Düsing C., et al. Methyl donor micronutrients, CD40-ligand methylation and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional association study. Lupus. 2021;30:1773–1780. doi: 10.1177/09612033211034559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Elshebini E., Elsawah H., Fathy T., Abdelrahman S., Youssif O., Ashraf S., et al. Assessment of nutritional deficiency manifestations in patients with rheumatic diseases, Egypt. Rheumatol. 2021;43:167–171. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Calzza J.I., Muza L.S., Gasparin A.A., Xavier R.M., Monticielo O.A. Nutritional aspects and cardiovascular risk in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2021;67:656–660. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20200817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lee W.-F., Fan W.-L., Tseng M.-H., Yang H.-Y., Huang J.-L., Wu C.-Y. Characteristics and genetic analysis of patients suspected with early-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Pediatr. Rheumatol. 2022;20:68. doi: 10.1186/s12969-022-00722-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ker A., Kao P.-E. Methodological considerations on the association between dietary inflammatory potential and musculoskeletal health. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2022;37:2678–2679. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Oh J., Oda K., Brash M., Beeson W.L., Sabaté J., Fraser G.E., et al. The association between dietary patterns and a doctor diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: the Adventist Health Study-2. Lupus. 2022;31:1373–1378. doi: 10.1177/09612033221112522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.do Prado R., Aires P.P., Suano-Souza F.I., Affonso Fonseca F.L., Terreri M.T., Sarni R.O.S. Selenium nutritional status and its association with SLEDAI-2K, HOMA-IR and lipid profile in Juvenile Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients. Lupus. 2022;31:155–162. doi: 10.1177/09612033211067982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Knippenberg A., Robinson G.A., Wincup C., Ciurtin C., Jury E.C., Kalea A.Z. Plant-based dietary changes may improve symptoms in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2022;31:65–76. doi: 10.1177/09612033211063795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Xu H., Meng X., Wang L., Zhu G., Fan X., Li R., et al. Dietary patterns and life-styles of patients with gastrointestinal involvement of systemic lupus erythematosus: questionnaire survey from a tertiary center of China. Lupus. 2023;32:477–488. doi: 10.1177/09612033231156075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Campos-López B., Meza-Meza M.R., Pesqueda-Cendejas K., Ruiz-Ballesteros A.I., Rivera-Escoto M., Vargas-Morales J.M., et al. Nutritional, biochemical, and clinical determinants of hyperuricemia in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: relationship with clinical and renal disease activity. Lupus. 2023;32:270–283. doi: 10.1177/09612033221146923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vordenbäumen S., Kleefisch M., Sokolowski A., Düsing C., Richter J.G., Brinks R., et al. Beneficial effects associated to a healthy lifestyle in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study. Lupus. 2023;32:855–863. doi: 10.1177/09612033231175289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Edwards M.R., Dai R., Heid B., Cecere T.E., Khan D., Mu Q., et al. Commercial rodent diets differentially regulate autoimmune glomerulonephritis, epigenetics and microbiota in MRL/lpr mice. Int. Immunol. 2017;29:263–276. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxx033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gershteyn I.M., Ferreira L.M.R. Immunodietica: a data-driven approach to investigate interactions between diet and autoimmune disorders. J. Transl. Autoimmun. 2019;1 doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2019.100003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Vorobyev A., Gupta Y., Sezin T., Koga H., Bartsch Y.C., Belheouane M., et al. Gene-diet interactions associated with complex trait variation in an advanced intercross outbred mouse line. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:4097. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11952-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Santiago-Raber M.-L., Montecucco F., Vuilleumier N., Miteva K., Baptista D., Carbone F., et al. Atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability is increased in mouse model of lupus. Sci. Rep. 2020;10 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74579-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jiang X., Zhao X., Luo H., Zhu K. Therapeutic effect of polysaccharide of large yellow croaker swim bladder on lupus nephritis of mice. Nutrients. 2014;6:1223–1235. doi: 10.3390/nu6031223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Li W., Elshikha A.S., Cornaby C., Teng X., Abboud G., Brown J., et al. T cells expressing the lupus susceptibility allele Pbx1d enhance autoimmunity and atherosclerosis in dyslipidemic mice. JCI Insight. 2020;5 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.138274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schäfer A.-L., Eichhorst A., Hentze C., Kraemer A.N., Amend A., Sprenger D.T.L., et al. Low dietary fiber intake links development of obesity and lupus pathogenesis. Front. Immunol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.696810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Choi E.W., Kim H.J., Jung Y.C., Go H.S., Seong J.K. Effects of high fat diet-induced obesity on pathophysiology, immune cells, and therapeutic efficacy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci. Rep. 2022;12 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21381-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Nikolova-Ganeva K., Bradyanova S., Manoylov I., Boneva G., Tchorbanov A. Methyl- rich diet ameliorates lupus-like disease in MRL/lpr mice. Immunobiology. 2022;227 doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2022.152282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kakalij R.M., Dsouza D.L., Boesen E.I. Development of high fat diet-induced hyperinsulinemia in mice is enhanced by co-treatment with a TLR7 agonist. Front. Physiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.930353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gao X., Song Y., Wu J., Lu S., Min X., Liu L., et al. Iron-dependent epigenetic modulation promotes pathogenic T cell differentiation in lupus. J. Clin. Invest. 2022;132 doi: 10.1172/JCI152345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Udompornpitak K., Charoensappakit A., Sae-Khow K., Bhunyakarnjanarat T., Dang C.P., Saisorn W., et al. Obesity exacerbates lupus activity in Fc gamma receptor IIb deficient lupus mice partly through saturated fatty acid-induced gut barrier defect and systemic inflammation, J. Innate. Immun. 2023;15(1):240–261. doi: 10.1159/000526206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhu Z.-Z., Chen X.-H., Wei S.-R., Xu J., Wang Y.-H., Wu W.-J., et al. Role of CD19(+) CD5(+) CD1d(+) Bregs in maintaining the Th17/Treg balance in mice with systemic lupus erythematosus complicated with atherosclerosis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2023;26:1048–1057. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Nikolova-Ganeva K., Vasilev V., Kerezieva S., Tchorbanov A. Impact of folic acid on regulatory B lymphocytes from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in vitro. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2023;26:298–304. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gwinnutt J.M., Wieczorek M., Balanescu A., Bischoff-Ferrari H.A., Boonen A., Cavalli G., et al. 2021 EULAR recommendations regarding lifestyle behaviours and work participation to prevent progression of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2023;82:48–56. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-222020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Fritsche K.L. The science of fatty acids and inflammation. Adv. Nutr. 2015;6:293S–301S. doi: 10.3945/an.114.006940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Innes J.K., Calder P.C. Omega-6 fatty acids and inflammation, Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat Acids. 2018;132:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2018.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Calder P.C. Omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes: from molecules to man. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2017;45:1105–1115. doi: 10.1042/BST20160474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kwon Y. Immuno-resolving ability of resolvins, protectins, and maresins derived from omega-3 fatty acids in metabolic syndrome. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2020;64 doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201900824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Nayak S., Khozin-Goldberg I., Cohen G., Zilberg D. Dietary supplementation with ω6 LC-PUFA-rich algae modulates zebrafish immune function and improves resistance to streptococcal infection. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1960. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Silva J.R., Burger B., Kühl C.M.C., Candreva T., dos Anjos M.B.P., Rodrigues H.G. Wound healing and omega-6 fatty acids: from inflammation to repair. Mediators Inflamm. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/2503950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Saini R.K., Keum Y.S. Omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids: dietary sources, metabolism, and significance—a review. Life Sci. 2018;203:255–267. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.04.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Charoenwoodhipong P., Harlow S.D., Marder W., Hassett A.L., McCune W.J., Gordon C., et al. Dietary omega polyunsaturated fatty acid intake and patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus: The Michigan lupus epidemiology and surveillance program. Arthritis Care Res. (Hoboken) 2020;72:874–881. doi: 10.1002/acr.23925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Vordenbäumen S., Sokolowski A., Kutzner L., Rund K.M., Düsing C., Chehab G., et al. Erythrocyte membrane polyunsaturated fatty acid profiles are associated with systemic inflammation and fish consumption in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study. Lupus. 2020;29:554–559. doi: 10.1177/0961203320912326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Arriens C., Hynan L.S., Lerman R.H., Karp D.R., Mohan C. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of fish oil’s impact on fatigue, quality of life, and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nutr. J. 2015;14:82. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0068-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Borges M.C., Santos F.D.M.M.D., Telles R.W., Andrade M.V.M.D., Correia M.I.T.D., Lanna C.C.D. Omega-3 fatty acids, inflammatory status and biochemical markers of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a pilot study. Rev. Bras. Reumatol. Engl. 2017;57:526–534. doi: 10.1016/j.rbre.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bates M.A., Akbari P., Gilley K.N., Wagner J.G., Li N., Kopec A.K., et al. Dietary docosahexaenoic acid prevents silica-induced development of pulmonary ectopic germinal centers and glomerulonephritis in the lupus-prone NZBWF1 mouse. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:2002. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Benninghoff A.D., Bates M.A., Chauhan P.S., Wierenga K.A., Gilley K.N., Holian A., et al. Docosahexaenoic acid consumption impedes early interferon- and chemokine-related gene expression while suppressing silica-triggered flaring of murine lupus. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:2851. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Rajasinghe L.D., Chauhan P.S., Wierenga K.A., Evered A.O., Harris S.N., Bates M.A., et al. Omega-3 docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) impedes silica-induced macrophage corpse accumulation by attenuating cell death and potentiating efferocytosis. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:2179. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wierenga K.A., Strakovsky R.S., Benninghoff A.D., Rajasinghe L.D., Lock A.L., Harkema J.R., et al. Requisite omega-3 HUFA biomarker thresholds for preventing murine lupus flaring. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:1796. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pestka J.J., Vines L.L., Bates M.A., He K., Langohr I. Comparative effects of n-3, n-6 and n-9 unsaturated fatty acid-rich diet consumption on lupus nephritis, autoantibody production and CD4+ T cell-related gene responses in the autoimmune NZBWF1 mouse. PLOS ONE. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Bates M.A., Brandenberger C., Langohr I.I., Kumagai K., Lock A.L., Harkema J.R., et al. Silica-triggered autoimmunity in lupus-prone mice blocked by docosahexaenoic acid consumption. PLOS ONE. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Rajasinghe L.D., Li Q.-Z., Zhu C., Yan M., Chauhan P.S., Wierenga K.A., et al. Omega-3 fatty acid intake suppresses induction of diverse autoantibody repertoire by crystalline silica in lupus-prone mice. Autoimmunity. 2020;53:415–433. doi: 10.1080/08916934.2020.1801651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Gilley K.N., Wierenga K.A., Chauhuan P.S., Wagner J.G., Lewandowski R.P., Ross E.A., et al. Influence of total western diet on docosahexaenoic acid suppression of silica-triggered lupus flaring in NZBWF1 mice. PLOS ONE. 2020;15 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kobayashi A., Ito A., Shirakawa I., Tamura A., Tomono S., Shindou H., et al. Dietary supplementation with eicosapentaenoic acid inhibits plasma cell differentiation and attenuates lupus autoimmunity. Front. Immunol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.650856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Pestka J.J., Akbari P., Wierenga K.A., Bates M.A., Gilley K.N., Wagner J.G., et al. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intervention against established autoimmunity in a murine model of toxicant-triggered lupus. Front. Immunol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.653464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Rajasinghe L.D., Bates M.A., Benninghoff A.D., Wierenga K.A., Harkema J.R., Pestka J.J. Silica induction of diverse inflammatory proteome in lungs of lupus-prone mice quelled by dietary docosahexaenoic acid supplementation. Front. Immunol. 2022;12 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.781446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Favor O.K., Chauhan P.S., Pourmand E., Edwards A.M., Wagner J.G., Lewandowski R.P., et al. Lipidome modulation by dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation or selective soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibition suppresses rough LPS-accelerated glomerulonephritis in lupus-prone mice. Front. Immunol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1124910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Barbhaiya M., Lu B., Sparks J.A., Malspeis S., Chang S.-C., Karlson E.W., et al. Influence of alcohol consumption on the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus among women in the nurses’ health study cohorts. Arthritis Care Res. (Hoboken) 2017;69:384–392. doi: 10.1002/acr.22945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hahn J., Leatherwood C., Malspeis S., Liu X., Lu B., Roberts A.L., et al. Associations between daily alcohol consumption and systemic lupus erythematosus-related cytokines and chemokines among US female nurses without SLE. Lupus. 2020;29:976–982. doi: 10.1177/0961203320929427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Waldschmidt T.J., Cook R.T., Kovacs E.J. Alcohol and inflammation and immune responses: summary of the 2006 Alcohol and Immunology Research Interest Group (AIRIG) meeting. Alcohol. 2008;42:137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wątroba M., Szukiewicz D. Anti-inflammatory properties of resveratrol. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26 doi: 10.3390/ijms262311710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Wirleitner B., Schroecksnadel K., Winkler C., Schennach H., Fuchs D. Resveratrol suppresses interferon-γ-induced biochemical pathways in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. Immunol. Lett. 2005;100:159–163. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2005.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Huang W.H., Fan K.Y., Sheng Y.T., Cai W.R. Resveratrol attenuates inflammation in acute lung injury through ROS-triggered TXNIP/NLRP3 pathway. Chin J. Integr. Med. 2025;31:1078–1086. doi: 10.1007/s11655-025-4214-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Cao Y., Willett W.C., Rimm E.B., Stampfer M.J., Giovannucci E.L. Light to moderate intake of alcohol, drinking patterns, and risk of cancer: results from two prospective US cohort studies. BMJ. 2015;351 doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Di Castelnuovo A., Costanzo S., Bagnardi V., Donati M.B., Iacoviello L., De Gaetano G. Alcohol dosing and total mortality in men and women: an updated meta-analysis of 34 prospective studies. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006;166:2437–2445. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.22.2437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Ronksley P.E., Brien S.E., Turner B.J., Mukamal K.J., Ghali W.A. Association of alcohol consumption with selected cardiovascular disease outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:479. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Corrao G., Bagnardi V., Zambon A., La Vecchia C. A meta-analysis of alcohol consumption and the risk of 15 diseases. Prev. Med. (Baltim). 2004;38:613–619. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Lu B., Solomon D.H., Costenbader K.H., Keenan B.T., Chibnik L.B., Karlson E.W. Alcohol consumption and markers of inflammation in women with preclinical rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:3554–3559. doi: 10.1002/art.27739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Lourdudoss C., Hafström I., Frostegård J., Van Vollenhoven R.D. The association between diet and glucocorticoid treatment in patients with SLE. Lupus Sci. Med. 2016;3 doi: 10.1136/lupus-2015-000135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Yang X., Yao G., Chen W., Tang X., Feng X., Sun L. Exacerbation of lupus nephritis by high sodium chloride related to activation of SGK1 pathway. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015;29:568–573. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2015.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Xiao Z.X., Hu X., Zhang X., Chen Z., Wang J., Jin K., et al. High salt diet accelerates the progression of murine lupus through dendritic cells via the p38 MAPK and STAT1 signaling pathways. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020;5:34. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0139-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Dent E.L., Broome H.J., Sasser J.M., Ryan M.J. Blood pressure and albuminuria in a female mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus: impact of long-term high salt consumption. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2020;319:R448–R454. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00070.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Scrivo R., Massaro L., Barbati C., Vomero M., Ceccarelli F., Spinelli F.R., et al. The role of dietary sodium intake on the modulation of T helper 17 cells and regulatory T cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. PLOS ONE. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Meza-Meza M.R., Vizmanos-Lamotte B., Muñoz-Valle J.F., Parra-Rojas I., Garaulet M., Campos-López B., et al. Relationship of excess weight with clinical activity and dietary intake deficiencies in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Nutrients. 2019;11:2683. doi: 10.3390/nu11112683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Correa-Rodríguez M., DelOlmo-Romero S., Pocovi-Gerardino G., Callejas-Rubio J.-L., Ríos-Fernández R., Ortego-Centeno N., et al. Dietary sodium, potassium, and sodium to potassium ratio in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Biol. Res. Nurs. 2022;24:235–244. doi: 10.1177/10998004211065491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Balmant B.D., Fonseca D.C., Prudêncio A.P.A., Rocha I.M., Callado L., Alves J.T.M., et al. Megamonas funiformis, plasma zonulin, and sodium intake affect C3 complement levels in inactive systemic lupus erythematosus. Nutrients. 2023;15:1999. doi: 10.3390/nu15081999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Scrivo R., Perricone C., Altobelli A., Castellani C., Tinti L., Conti F., et al. Dietary habits bursting into the complex pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases: the emerging role of salt from experimental and clinical studies. Nutrients. 2019;11:1013. doi: 10.3390/nu11051013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Tiosano D., Wildbaum G., Gepstein V., Verbitsky O., Weisman Y., Karin N., et al. The role of vitamin D receptor in innate and adaptive immunity: a study in hereditary vitamin D-resistant rickets patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013;98:1685–1693. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Wei R., Christakos S. Mechanisms underlying the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity by vitamin D. Nutrients. 2015;7:8251–8260. doi: 10.3390/nu7105392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Selvaraj P., Vitamin D. Vitamin D receptor, and cathelicidin in the treatment of tuberculosis, Vitam. Horm. 2011;86:307–325. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386960-9.00013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Calton E.K., Keane K.N., Newsholme P., Soares M.J. The impact of vitamin D levels on inflammatory status: a systematic review of immune cell studies. PLOS ONE. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Dankers W., Davelaar N., Van Hamburg J.P., Van De Peppel J., Colin E.M., Lubberts E. Human memory Th17 cell populations change into anti-inflammatory cells with regulatory capacity upon exposure to active vitamin D. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1504. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Hafkamp F.M.J., Taanman-Kueter E.W.M., van Capel T.M.M., Kormelink T.G., de Jong E.C. Vitamin D3 priming of dendritic cells shifts human neutrophil-dependent Th17 cell development to regulatory T cells. Front. Immunol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.872665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Li B., Zhang X., Sun Z., Xu B., Wu J., Liu H., et al. A novel strategy for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: regulating Treg/Th17 and Th1/Th2 balance in vivo by vitamin D. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2022;2022 doi: 10.1155/2022/9249627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 125.Chen S., Sims G.P., Chen X.X., Gu Y.Y., Chen S., Lipsky P.E. Modulatory effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on human B cell differentiation. J. Immunol. 2007;179:1634–1647. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Rhodes J.M., Subramanian S., Laird E., Griffin G., Kenny R.A. Perspective: vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 severity—plausibly linked by latitude, ethnicity, impacts on cytokines, ACE2 and thrombosis. J. Intern. Med. 2020;289(1):97–115. doi: 10.1111/joim.13149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Pereira M., Dantas Damascena A., Galvão Azevedo L.M., de Almeida Oliveira T., da Mota Santana J. Vitamin D deficiency aggravates COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022;62:1308–1316. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1841090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Grant W.B., Lahore H., McDonnell S.L., Baggerly C.A., French C.B., Aliano J.L., et al. Evidence that vitamin D supplementation could reduce risk of influenza and covid-19 infections and deaths. Nutrients. 2020;12:988. doi: 10.3390/nu12040988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Zisi D., Challa A., Makis A. The association between vitamin D status and infectious diseases of the respiratory system in infancy and childhood. Hormones. 2019;18:353–363. doi: 10.1007/s42000-019-00155-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Cutillas-Marco E., Marquina-Vila A., Grant W.B., Vilata-Corell J.J., Morales-Suárez-Varela M.M. Vitamin D and cutaneous lupus erythematosus: effect of vitamin D replacement on disease severity. Lupus. 2014;23:615–623. doi: 10.1177/0961203314522338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.García-Carrasco M., Mendoza-Pinto C., Etchegaray-Morales I., Soto-Santillán P., Jiménez-Herrera E.A., Robles-Sánchez V., et al. Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency in Mexican patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence and relationship with disease activity. Reumatol. Clin. 2017;13:97–101. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2016.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Hayashi K., Sada K.-E., Asano Y., Katayama Y., Ohashi K., Morishita M., et al. Real-world data on vitamin D supplementation and its impacts in systemic lupus erythematosus: cross-sectional analysis of a lupus registry of nationwide institutions (LUNA) PLOS ONE. 2022;17 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Kraemer A.N., Schäfer A.-L., Sprenger D.T.L., Sehnert B., Williams J.P., Luo A., et al. Impact of dietary vitamin D on immunoregulation and disease pathology in lupus-prone NZB/W F1 mice. Front. Immunol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.933191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Reynolds J.A., Rosenberg A.Z., Smith C.K., Sergeant J.C., Rice G.I., Briggs T.A., et al. Brief report: vitamin D deficiency is associated with endothelial dysfunction and increases type I interferon gene expression in a murine model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:2929–2935. doi: 10.1002/art.39803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Piantoni S., Andreoli L., Scarsi M., Zanola A., Dall’Ara F., Pizzorni C., et al. Phenotype modifications of T-cells and their shift toward a Th2 response in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus supplemented with different monthly regimens of vitamin D. Lupus. 2015;24:490–498. doi: 10.1177/0961203314559090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Franco A.S., Freitas T.Q., Bernardo W.M., Pereira R.M.R. Vitamin D supplementation and disease activity in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Handono K., Sidarta Y.O., Pradana B.A., Nugroho R.A., Hartono I.A., Kalim H., et al. Vitamin D prevents endothelial damage induced by increased neutrophil extracellular traps formation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Acta Med. Indones. 2014;46:189–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Caetano M., Terreri M.T., Ortiz T., Pinheiro M., Souza F., Sarni R. Bone mineral density reduction in adolescents with systemic erythematosus lupus: association with lack of vitamin D supplementation. Clin. Rheumatol. 2015;34:2065–2070. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-3011-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Kamen D.L., Oates J.C. A pilot study to determine if vitamin D repletion improves endothelial function in lupus patients. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2015;350:302–307. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Aranow C., Kamen D.L., Dall’Era M., Massarotti E.M., Mackay M.C., Koumpouras F., et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the effect of vitamin D3 on the interferon signature in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:1848–1857. doi: 10.1002/art.39108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Andreoli L., Dall’Ara F., Piantoni S., Zanola A., Piva N., Cutolo M., et al. A 24-month prospective study on the efficacy and safety of two different monthly regimens of vitamin D supplementation in pre-menopausal women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2015;24:499–506. doi: 10.1177/0961203314559089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Gendelman O., Itzhaki D., Makarov S., Bennun M., Amital H. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study adding high dose vitamin D to analgesic regimens in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Lupus. 2015;24:483–489. doi: 10.1177/0961203314558676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Sari A.D., Wulandari Y., Andayani D.E. Medical nutrition therapy and vitamin D supplementation improved nutritional status and quality of life in relapse systemic lupus erythematosus patient. World Nutr. J. 2022;5:37–38. [Google Scholar]
- 144.Ruiz-Irastorza G., Bertsias G. Treating systemic lupus erythematosus in the 21st century: new drugs and new perspectives on old drugs. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021;59:V69–V81. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Han G.-M., Han X.-F. Lycopene reduces mortality in people with systemic lupus erythematosus: a pilot study based on the third national health and nutrition examination survey. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2016;27:430–435. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2015.1133879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Aparicio-Soto M., Sánchéz-Hidalgo M., Cárdeno A., Lucena J.M., Gonzáléz-Escribano F., Castillo M.J., et al. The phenolic fraction of extra virgin olive oil modulates the activation and the inflammatory response of T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and healthy donors. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017;61 doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201601080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Orefice V., Ceccarelli F., Barbati C., Lucchetti R., Olivieri G., Cipriano E., et al. Caffeine intake influences disease activity and clinical phenotype in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Lupus. 2020;29:1377–1384. doi: 10.1177/0961203320941920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Bagherniya M., Soleimani D., Rouhani M.H., Askari G., Sathyapalan T., Sahebkar A. The use of curcumin for the treatment of renal disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021;1291:327–343. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-56153-6_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Huang C.-Y., Hsu T.-C., Kuo W.-W., Liou Y.-F., Lee S.-D., Ju D.-T., et al. The root extract of Gentiana macrophylla pall. Alleviates cardiac apoptosis in lupus prone mice. PLOS ONE. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Li W., Li H., Zhang M., Zhong Y., Wang M., Cen J., et al. Isogarcinol extracted from Garcinia mangostana L. Ameliorates systemic lupus erythematosus-like disease in a murine model. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015;63:8452–8459. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Aparicio-Soto M., Sánchez-Hidalgo M., Cárdeno A., Rosillo M.Á., Sánchez-Fidalgo S., Utrilla J., et al. Dietary extra virgin olive oil attenuates kidney injury in pristane-induced SLE model via activation of HO-1/Nrf-2 antioxidant pathway and suppression of JAK/STAT, NF-κB and MAPK activation. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016;27:278–288. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Chen H.-A., Chiu C.-C., Huang C.-Y., Chen L.-J., Tsai C.-C., Hsu T.-C., et al. Lactoferrin increases antioxidant activities and ameliorates hepatic fibrosis in lupus-prone mice fed with a high-cholesterol diet. J. Med. Food. 2016;19:670–677. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2015.3634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Aparicio-Soto M., Sánchez-Hidalgo M., Cárdeno A., González-Benjumea A., Fernández-Bolaños J.G., Alarcón-de-la-Lastra C. Dietary hydroxytyrosol and hydroxytyrosyl acetate supplementation prevent pristane-induced systemic lupus erythematous in mice. J. Funct. Foods. 2017;29:84–92. [Google Scholar]
- 154.Kalim H., Handono K., Khalasha T., Pratama M.Z., Dantara T.W.I., Wulandari A.P., et al. Immune modulation effects of curcumin in pristane-induced lupus mice. Indian J. Rheumatol. 2017;12:86–93. [Google Scholar]
- 155.Castejon M.L., Sánchez-Hidalgo M., Aparicio-Soto M., Montoya T., Martín-LaCave I., Fernández-Bolaños J.G., et al. Dietary oleuropein and its new acyl-derivate attenuate murine lupus nephritis through HO-1/Nrf2 activation and suppressing JAK/STAT, NF-κB, MAPK and NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathways. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2019;74 doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2019.108229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Dent E.L., Taylor E.B., Turbeville H.R., Ryan M.J. Curcumin attenuates autoimmunity and renal injury in an experimental model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Physiol. Rep. 2020;8 doi: 10.14814/phy2.14501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Wu T., Marakkath B., Ye Y., Khobahy E., Yan M., Hutcheson J., et al. Curcumin attenuates both acute and chronic immune nephritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:1745. doi: 10.3390/ijms21051745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Martirosyan D., Hutcheson J., Sajitharan D., Williams S., Mohan C. The effect of amaranth oil on autoantibodies in lupus prone mice. Bioact. Compd. Heal. Dis. 2021;4:226–239. [Google Scholar]
- 159.Montoya T., Sánchez-Hidalgo M., Castejón M.L., Vazquéz-Román M.V., de Sotomayor M.A., Ortega-Vidal J., et al. Oleocanthal supplemented diet improves renal damage and endothelial dysfunction in pristane-induced systemic lupus erythematosus in mice. Food Res. Int. 2023;163 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Li J., Ding H., Meng Y., Li G., Fu Q., Guo Q., et al. Taurine metabolism aggravates the progression of lupus by promoting the function of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:2106–2117. doi: 10.1002/art.41419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Buckland G., Mayén A.L., Agudo A., Travier N., Navarro C., Huerta J.M., et al. Olive oil intake and mortality within the Spanish population (EPIC-Spain) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012;96:142–149. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.024216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Bermudez B., Lopez S., Ortega A., Varela M.L., Pacheco M.Y., Abia R., et al. Oleic acid in olive oil: from a metabolic framework toward a clinical perspective. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2011;17:831–843. doi: 10.2174/138161211795428957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Cárdeno A., Sánchez-Hidalgo M., Aparicio-Soto M., Sánchez-Fidalgo S., Alarcón-De-La-Lastra C. Extra virgin olive oil polyphenolic extracts downregulate inflammatory responses in LPS-activated murine peritoneal macrophages suppressing NFκB and MAPK signalling pathways. Food Funct. 2014;5:1270–1277. doi: 10.1039/c4fo00014e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Aparicio-Soto M., Montserrat-de la Paz S., Sanchez-Hidalgo M., Cardeno A., Bermudez B., Muriana F.J.G., et al. Virgin olive oil and its phenol fraction modulate monocyte/macrophage functionality: a potential therapeutic strategy in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Br. J. Nutr. 2018;120:681–692. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518001976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Marks S.D., Tullus K. Autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2012;27:1855–1868. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-2078-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Jiang T., Tian F., Zheng H., Whitman S.A., Lin Y., Zhang Z., et al. Nrf2 suppresses lupus nephritis through inhibition of oxidative injury and the NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response. Kidney Int. 2014;85:333–343. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Nagahama K., Utsumi T., Kumano T., Maekawa S., Oyama N., Kawakami J. Discovery of a new function of curcumin which enhances its anticancer therapeutic potency. Sci. Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep30962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Marton L.T., Barbalho S.M., Sloan K.P., Sloan L.A., de Goulart R.A., Araújo A.C., et al. Curcumin, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: going beyond conventional therapy–a systematic review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022;62:2140–2157. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1850417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Richard M.L., Gilkeson G. Mouse models of lupus: what they tell us and what they don’t. Lupus Sci. Med. 2018;5 doi: 10.1136/lupus-2016-000199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Berridge B.R. Animal study translation: The other reproducibility challenge. ILAR J. 2021;62:1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 171.Cooper T.K., Meyerholz D.K., Beck A.P., Delaney M.A., Piersigilli A., Southard T.L., et al. Research-relevant conditions and pathology of laboratory mice, rats, gerbils, guinea pigs, hamsters, naked mole rats, and rabbits. ILAR J. 2021;62:77–132. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilab022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Nair A., Jacob S. A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2016;7:27. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.177703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Chen J., Liao S., Zhou H., Yang L., Guo F., Chen S., et al. Humanized mouse models of systemic lupus erythematosus: opportunities and challenges. Front. Immunol. 2022;12 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.816956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Mende L.K., Kuthati Y., Wong C.S. Curcumin and vitamin D supplement attenuates knee osteoarthritis progression in ACLT + MMx rat model: effect on cartilage protection and pain reduction. Nutrients. 2025;17:349. doi: 10.3390/nu17020349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Hahn J., Cook N.R., Alexander E.K., Friedman S., Walter J., Bubes V., et al. Vitamin D and marine omega 3 fatty acid supplementation and incident autoimmune disease: VITAL randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2022;376 doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data described in the manuscript will be made available upon reasonable request.


