Abstract
Background and Objectives
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is characterized by raised intracranial pressure (ICP). It predominantly affects women with obesity and can cause disabling headaches and permanent visual loss. IIH is misdiagnosed in up to 40% of cases. Diagnosis and monitoring often rely on frequent invasive lumbar puncture. This pilot study aimed to identify serum microRNA (miRNA) markers associated with a diagnosis of IIH and disease activity and to assess their relevance in the CNS through identification in CSF.
Methods
Serum and CSF samples from participants in the IIH-Weight Trial (a randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of bariatric surgery with that of a community weight management intervention in lowering ICP, recruited 2014–2017) were analyzed at baseline (active disease) and 12 months (participants in remission with no papilledema). Eligible participants were adult women with active IIH (those without papilledema were excluded). Disease activity was assessed by quantifying the degree of papilledema using Spectralis spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. A panel of 40 candidate miRNAs was assessed. Comparator groups included participants with obesity or migraine. Analyses used Student t tests and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test. Differentially expressed miRNAs were evaluated in relation to clinical disease activity and metabolic profiles, using linear regression analysis.
Results
Five of 40 serum miRNAs showed significantly lower expression in active IIH (n = 9; 100% female, mean 30.25 ± 4.75 years) compared with IIH in remission. Serum hsa-miR-16-5p had the highest diagnostic performance for active IIH (area under the curve 0.951). Serum hsa-miR-16-5p (p < 0.0001; CI −7.286 to −2.503) and hsa-miR-7-5p (p = 0.0032; CI −7.240 to −1.372) were significantly lower in active IIH compared with obesity controls (n = 9; 100% female, mean 38.22 ± 7.99 years). Serum hsa-miR-7a-5p were significantly higher in active IIH compared with migraine (n = 12; 100% female, mean 44.67 ± 8.88 years). Only hsa-miR-16-5p differentiated active IIH from both participants with migraine and obesity. hsa-miR-16-5p also differentiated active IIH from IIH remission in CSF (p = 0.0354; CI −3.062 to −0.1282). Serum and CSF hsa-miR-16-5p correlated significantly with ICP (serum p < 0.0001; CI −0.1660 to −0.0732; CSF p = 0.046; CI 0.0018–0.1841), papilledema (serum p = 0.0236; CI −0.01548 to −0.0001; CSF p = 0.0241; CI 0.002–0.033). hsa-miR-16-5p was associated with metabolites involved in fatty acid metabolism and lipid biosynthesis.
Discussion
Serum hsa-miR-16-5p emerged as a candidate biomarker associated with active IIH. It differentiated active disease from remission, migraine, and obesity. It correlated with clinical and metabolic markers of disease activity. These findings warrant validation in larger studies to assess its potential as a minimally invasive biomarker for IIH diagnosis and monitoring.
Classification of Evidence
This study provides Class III evidence that serum microRNA markers may potentially distinguish active idiopathic intracranial hypertension from remission and controls in adult women.
Introduction
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a neurologic disorder characterized by raised intracranial pressure (ICP) and papilledema.1 IIH typically affects women of reproductive age with obesity, causing disabling daily headaches which are often migraine-like.2 The visual loss can be severe and permanent in up to 25% of cases.3 A diagnosis of IIH can be made where there is raised ICP with no underlying cause identified (absence of hydrocephalus, intracranial space-occupying lesions, and normal CSF composition).4 IIH was previously considered a rare disease; however, its prevalence is rising rapidly in line with the global obesity epidemic and associated with increased utilization of health care resources. Much of this demand is driven by the need for recurrent hospital visits to monitor the disease activity.5,6
IIH has a high misdiagnosis rate (40%) which leads to unnecessary lumbar punctures (LP), drug treatment, and in some cases, surgical procedures.7 Currently, LP is required for diagnosis and may also be performed for monitoring ICP.8 However, it is an invasive procedure and typically causes distress to patients.9 Monitoring disease progression involves evaluating visual function and changes in papilledema.4 Papilledema is evaluated using optical coherence tomography (OCT) to quantify retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) at the optic nerve head, which can be a challenge for non-ophthalmologists to interpret. Consequently, there is an unmet need for reliable and less invasive methods to diagnose IIH and monitor disease activity, which has been identified by patients and health care professionals as a research priority.10 Blood biomarkers represent a promising future alternative. There has been increasing interest around microRNA (miRNA) profiling from blood samples to diagnose and prognosticate cancers and other neurological conditions.11
miRNAs are a highly abundant class of conserved noncoding RNA molecules consisting of approximately 22 nucleotides that induce messenger RNA (mRNA) degradation and translational repression. They are ideal biomarkers because they are highly stable in biofluids as they can be transported within protective exosomes.12 In addition, miRNAs play a central role in many biological processes including cell metabolism,13 apoptosis,14 and immune responses.15 The role of miRNAs in IIH remains largely unexplored.
The aim of this study was to identify miRNAs in serum that indicate active IIH and evaluate changes in these candidate markers when patients enter remission. The candidate biomarkers were also measured in CSF to gain insights into their relevance to central nervous disease. We compared the IIH candidate serum miRNA biomarkers with participants who have clinical conditions which could be misdiagnosed as IIH (participants with migraine or participants with obesity). Next, we compared these serum and CSF candidate biomarkers against measures of IIH disease activity (ICP and papilledema). Finally, to gain an understanding of the biological relevance of these miRNAs, we determined their association with serum and CSF metabolomic changes (measured by NMR spectroscopy) in participants with IIH. The primary research question for this study was to identify whether serum miRNA markers were able to distinguish active IIH from IIH in remission and from control adult women.
Methods
Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents
Adult participants with active IIH were recruited as part of a previously published randomized controlled trial comparing bariatric surgery vs a community weight loss program for the sustained treatment of IIH between 2014-2017 (the IIH:WT Trial; NCT0212448616). The results of this study have been previously published.17 Briefly, IIH participants were identified from 5 UK centers, and samples were collected following informed, written consent. As part of the IIH:WT trial, non-IIH participants with obesity were recruited through advertisement and written consent was obtained. Ethical approval was received from the National Research Ethics Committee West Midlands-The Black Country REC (14/WM/0011, Dudley, United Kingdom).
Non-IIH, migraine control serum samples were collected under ethical approvals obtained from the Human Biomaterials Resource Centre University of Birmingham under a research license from the HTA (No. 12358) (NRES Committee North West-Haydock; Ref 20/NW/0001). This study was made possible through Application 23-423 under that ethical approval.
This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the relevant institutional research ethics committees.
Study Populations
Participants With IIH
Eligible participants were female, aged between 18-55, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2, and had active disease (papilledema Frisen grade >1 and raised LP opening pressure ≥25 cmH2O) with normal brain imaging (assessed either by magnetic resonance venography or computerized tomography with venography).8 Detailed eligibility and exclusion criteria have been published.16-18 Exclusion criteria included receiving hormone manipulating medication, significant comorbidities, including known endocrinopathies, and the inability to give informed consent.
Participants with IIH from the IIH:WT Trial attended a baseline trial visit and were randomized to either bariatric surgery or a community weight loss intervention, with follow-up at 12 months.16 Blood and CSF samples were collected from those assigned to bariatric surgery (n = 9) at baseline and again at 12 months after surgery (when IIH was in remission defined as LP opening pressure <25 cmCSF). Papilledema was quantified using OCT RNFL (Spectralis SD-OCT, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) and assessed by neuro-ophthalmologists at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHB). LPs were conducted on participants with IIH in the left lateral decubitus position, with knees bent at a 90° angle or more and LP opening pressure was recorded before CSF was collected (up to 15 mL).
Serum was the primary biofluid of interest for biomarker discovery, reflecting the clinical need for a minimally invasive test to support diagnosis and disease monitoring in IIH. CSF analysis was therefore performed as a secondary, mechanistic assessment in participants with IIH only to explore if candidate serum miRNAs showed concordant or divergent expression within the CNS.
Serum From Control Participants With Obesity
Eligible control participants with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and no diagnosis of IIH (n = 9) were recruited at UHB. They met the same inclusion criteria applied to patients with IIH, excluding the presence of IIH or papilledema as confirmed by a neuro-ophthalmologist. Serum collection was performed only at enrolment.
Serum From Control Participants With Migraine
Eligible control participants with migraine (and no diagnosis of IIH) (n = 12) were recruited from the tertiary Complex Headache Service at UHB. A diagnosis of migraine was confirmed by a headache specialist according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition (ICHD-3) classification. Serum collection was performed only at enrolment.
RNA Extraction and Microarray Analysis to Identify Candidate miRNAs
miRNA was extracted and purified from serum and CSF samples using the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit (Qiagen, UK) following the manufacturer's instructions. miRNA was eluted in RNase-free water. Microarrays were performed by Qiagen using a custom miRCURY LNA miRNA PCR panel (Qiagen, UK) comprising 40 semi-targeted miRNAs selected a priori based on published evidence of differential expression in neurologic disease, traumatic brain injury, ICP regulation, and inflammatory and metabolic pathways relevant to IIH, including miRNAs previously identified in serum and CSF in association with raised ICP.19,20 Briefly, isolated miRNA was reverse transcribed using the miRCURY LNA RT kit (Qiagen, UK), diluted 1:40 with RNase-free water, and applied to the custom LNA miRNA PCR panel with targets which were chosen because of their previous association with comorbidities of IIH including obesity, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and androgen excess.
These targets included the following miRNAs: hsa-let-7a-3p, hsa-let-7a-5p, hsa-let-7i-3p, hsa-let-7i-5p, hsa-miR-10b-5p, hsa-miR-143-3p, hsa-miR-143-5p, hsa-miR-145-3p, hsa-miR-145-5p, hsa-miR-148b-3p, hsa-miR-154-3p, hsa-miR-154-5p, hsa-miR-16-1-3p, hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-187-3p, hsa-miR-190b-5p, hsa-miR-21-3p, hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-222-3p, hsa-miR-30e-5p, hsa-miR-335-3p, hsa-miR-335-5p, hsa-miR-374b-3p, hsa-miR-374b-5p, hsa-miR-375-3p, hsa-miR-425-5p, hsa-miR-483-5p, hsa-miR-502-3p, hsa-miR-502-5p, hsa-miR-545-3p, hsa-miR-545-5p, hsa-miR-551b-3p, hsa-miR-551b-5p, hsa-miR-589-3p, hsa-miR-589-5p, hsa-miR-7-5p, hsa-miR-9-3p, hsa-miR-9-5p, UniSP3, and UniSp6. The NormFinder algorithm was used to identify stable reference genes to normalize the gene expression to, of which hsa-miR-425-5p, hsa-miR-30e-5p, hsa-miR-148b-3p, and hsa-miR-222-3p were identified.
qPCR Analysis of Candidate Biomarkers
To validate the candidate biomarkers identified by the microarray, miRNA was extracted from serum (200 μL) and CSF (500 μL) samples using the same procedure as the microarray analysis (miRNeasy serum/plasma kit; Qiagen, UK). The isolated miRNA was reverse transcribed using the miRCURY LNA RT kit (Qiagen, UK). cDNA was then diluted 1:40 with RNase-free water and added to a qPCR mastermix of miRCURY LNA SYBR Green (Qiagen, UK), RNase-free water, and a primer probe set for hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-7-5p, hsa-let-7a-5p, hsa-miR-375-3p and hsa-miR-21-5p. Expression levels were normalized to the average of the reference genes for serum hsa-miR-425-5p, hsa-miR-30e-5p, hsa-miR-148b-3p, hsa-miR-222-3p (Qiagen, UK), and the reference gene for CSF hsa-miR-99-5p (as identified from the literature).21
Metabolic Profiling of Serum and CSF Using Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
We performed an untargeted metabolomic method to identify associations between candidate miRNAs and metabolites which are altered in active IIH compared with remission. Metabolites were extracted from serum and CSF samples as previously described.22 In brief, extraction was performed by the addition of methanol and incubation on ice, after which chloroform was added. Vortexing and centrifugation enabled separation of polar metabolites which were then dried and reconstituted in sodium phosphate buffer. A 600 MHz Bruker Avance III spectrometer with a 1.7-mm z-PFG TCI Cryoprobe at 300K was then used to obtain one-dimensional proton NMR spectroscopy (1H-NMR) spectra according to the parameters detailed previously.22 All NMR spectra were processed using the MetaboLab software.23 Probabilistic quotient normalization was used on serum data because of dilution factors. The same did not apply to CSF data because of reduced concentration variation between patients.
Data Analysis
All analysis and figures were produced using GraphPad Prism version 10 (GraphPad Software Inc, USA). All data were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD). Where appropriate, statistical analyses included Student t tests, 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test, and linear regression analysis. Initial identification of candidate biomarkers, using t tests were not corrected for multiple comparisons because this is a hypothesis generating exploratory pilot study. Subsequent analyses did undergo multiple comparison corrections. Linear relationships were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient (r). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated, and sensitivity and specificity values were calculated using the Wilson/Brown method for confidence intervals. Statistical significance is presented as p < 0.05. Cq values were obtained from microarray and qPCR experiments. Data were produced for the miRNA of interest, following normalization with the respective reference genes. Data were processed according to Qiagen's customary pipeline which has been previously described.20 Consequently, a higher normalized expression value denotes higher levels of the miRNA within the sample.
Data Availability
Anonymized individual participant data may be made available along with the trial protocol. Proposals should be made to the corresponding author and will be reviewed by the Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit Data Sharing Committee in discussion with the Chief Investigator. A formal Data Sharing Agreement may be required between respective organizations once release of the data is approved and before data can be released.
Results
Cohort Characteristics
At baseline, participants with active IIH had an elevated mean ± SD LP opening pressure of 40.08 ± 4.54 cmH20 and the OCT RNFL (papilledema measure) was elevated at 176.36 ± 107.40 µm (Table 1), indicating active papilledema in this cohort at recruitment. On achieving remission at 12 months, the LP opening pressure was significantly reduced (24.94 ± 5.7 cmH20, p < 0.0001) and the RNFL papilledema was normalized (97.38 ± 20.99 µm, p = 0.0312) (Table 1). Characteristics of the participants with obesity and participants with migraine are described in Table 1. The BMI of the participants with IIH (BMI 40.79 ± 5.83 kg/m2) and control participants with obesity (BMI 41.98 ± 5.42 kg/m2) were comparable (Table 1). The participants with migraine were not obese (BMI 26.84 ± 8.53 kg/m2).
Table 1.
Description of the Clinical Characteristics of Participants at Baseline With Active IIH and in Remission, Participants With Obesity, or With Migraine
| Clinical characteristics of participants | Active IIH (n = 12) | IIH in remission (n = 9) | Participants with obesity (n = 9) | Participants with migraine (n = 12) |
| Sex (% female) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Age, years, mean (SD) | 30.25 ± 4.75 | — | 38.22 ± 7.99 | 44.67 ± 8.88 |
| BMI, mean kg/m2 (SD) | 40.79 ± 5.83 | 30.8 ± 5.82 | 41.98 ± 5.42 | 26.84 ± 8.53 |
| Lumbar puncture opening pressure, mean cmH20 (SD) | 40.08 ± 4.54 | 24.94 ± 5.7 | — | — |
| OCT global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) in the left eye, mean µm (SD) | 176.36 ± 107.40 | 97.38 ± 20.99 | — | — |
| Humphrey visual field (24-2) Mean deviation in the left eye, dB (SD) |
−4.00 ± 2.93 | −3.01 ± 2.22 | — | — |
Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; IIH = idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
These data are presented descriptively, and no formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Candidate Serum miRNA Biomarkers Were Identified by Microarray Analysis
A microarray panel profiling 40 different miRNAs was used to identify serum biomarkers in participants with active IIH vs remission. Whilst 40 miRNAs were tested, only 18 miRNAs were found to have stable expression across serum samples (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Heatmap Demonstrating the Expression of 18 miRNA in Samples From Participants With Active IIH and When in Remission.
Data (n = 9, matched pairs) are presented as normalized expression values to reference genes; hsa-miR-425-5p, hsa-miR-30e-5p, hsa-miR-148b-3p, hsa-miR-222-3p. IIH = idiopathic intracranial hypertension; miRNA = microRNA.
Serum miRNA Biomarkers Were Altered Between Active IIH and During Remission
Five serum miRNAs were significantly altered between participants during active IIH and remission; hsa-miR-16-5p (p = 0.0029, CI 0.7037–2.846), hsa-let-7a-5p (p = 0.0195, CI 0.2481–2.455), hsa-miR-7-5p (p = 0.0205, CI 0.2332–2.351), hsa-miR-21-5p (p = 0.0142, CI 0.3199–2.466), and hsa-miR-375-3p (p = 0.0082, CI 0.8876–4.975) (Figure 2A). In addition, ROC curve analysis showed hsa-miR-16-5p had the highest level of sensitivity, yielding an area under curve (AUC) of 0.951 (95% CI 0.8573–1.000), suggesting strong discriminatory ability in this exploratory cohort (Figure 2B).
Figure 2. Significant Changes in the Serum and CSF Expression of miRNAs in Participants During Active IIH Compared With Remission (12 Months Later; n = 9 Matched Samples).
(A) Five serum miRNAs were significantly different between active IIH and remission. (B) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) shows the diagnostic potential of the five candidate miRNA biomarkers. hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-miR-375-3p have the greatest potential as classifiers of a successful intervention. Data are presented as normalized expression values to hsa-miR-425-5p, hsa-miR-30e-5p, hsa-miR-148b-3p, hsa-miR-222-3p with the mean and SD. (C) hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-let-7a-5p showed statistically lower expression in CSF from IIH participants in remission compared to active disease. Data are presented as normalized expression values to hsa-miR-99-5p with the mean and SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. IIH = idiopathic intracranial hypertension; miRNA = microRNA.
CSF Expression of Candidate miRNA Biomarkers
To gain insights into the relevance of miRNA biomarkers in the CNS, the 5 candidate miRNA biomarkers identified in serum with the ability to distinguish active IIH were assessed in CSF. We used qPCR to evaluate the candidate markers in the CSF of participants with active IIH and in CSF from these same participants in remission (n = 8). The expression of hsa-miR-16-5p (p = 0.0354 CI −3.062 to −0.1282) and hsa-let-7a-5p (p = 0.0310 CI −3.345 to −0.1861) were found to be significantly lower in the participants with IIH in remission compared with their active disease states (Figure 2C). miRNAs hsa-miR-7-5p, hsa-miR-21-5p, and hsa-miR-375-3p were not discriminatory (data not shown).
Serum miRNA Biomarkers Distinguish Between IIH, Obesity, and Participants With Migraine
Expression levels of the 5 candidate miRNA biomarkers (differentiating active IIH from remission; Figure 2A) were compared with expression levels in participants with obesity or migraine. Expression of 2 miRNAs were found to be significantly lower in the active IIH participants compared with those with obesity (hsa-miR-16-5p, p < 0.0001, CI −7.286 to −2.503, Figure 3A, and hsa-miR-7-5p, p = 0.0032, CI −7.240 to −1.372, Figure 3A). In comparison, hsa-let-7a-5p and hsa-miR-375-3p demonstrated similar levels of expression in those with active IIH and participants with obesity (Figure 3A).
Figure 3. Comparisons of Candidate Serum miRNA Levels Between (A) Active IIH and Obesity and (B) Between Active IIH and Migraine.
Data are presented as normalized expression values to hsa-miR-425-5p, hsa-miR-30e-5p, hsa-miR-148b-3p, hsa-miR-222-3p with the mean and SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005, ****p < 0.0001. IIH = idiopathic intracranial hypertension; miRNA = microRNA.
Participants with migraine had significantly lower levels of expression of hsa-miR-16-5p (p < 0.001, CI 2.945–7.420, Figure 3B), hsa-let-7a-5p (p < 0.05, CI 0.3209–9.233, Figure 3B), and higher hsa-miR-375-3p (p < 0.05, CI −4.922 to −0.0217, Figure 3B) compared with those with active IIH. Hence, only hsa-miR-16-5p expression levels were able to differentiate active IIH from both participants with obesity and participants with migraine. Expression levels of hsa-miR-21-5p was not significantly discriminatory when comparing IIH and non-IIH (obesity and migraine) groups (data not shown).
Candidate miRNA Expression Levels in Serum and CSF Were Associated With Disease Activity of IIH
We determined the relationship of the 5 candidate serum miRNA markers to measures of IIH disease activity (LP opening pressure and papilledema). Linear regression analysis revealed that hsa-miR-16-5p expression levels in the serum (p < 0.0001, CI −0.1660 to −0.0732, R2 = 0.6057) and CSF (p = 0.046, CI 0.0018–0.1841, R2 = 0.2917) were associated with ICP (Figure 4, A and B). hsa-miR-16-5p expression levels in the serum (p = 0.0236, CI −0.01548 to −0.0001, R2 = 0.2666) and CSF (p = 0.0241, CI 0.002–0.033, R2 = 0.3569) were also significantly correlated with papilledema (measured by OCT RNFL) (Figure 4, C and D). hsa-miR-7-5p was the only other serum miRNA that was associated with ICP (Figure 4A; p = 0.0050, CI −0.1495 to −0.031, R2 = 0.3974) and papilledema (Figure 4C; p = 0.0346, CI −0.0129 to −0.0005, R2 = 0.2812). hsa-miR-16-5p (p = 0.0128, CI −0.1709 to −0.0227, R2 = 0.2504) and hsa-miR-375-3p (p = 0.0468, CI −0.3015 to −0.0023, R2 = 0.1834) were both significantly associated with BMI (Figure 4E).
Figure 4. Significant Correlations Identified Between Serum-Derived (n = 18) and CSF-Derived (n = 14) miRNAs With ICP, Papilledema (Measured by OCT RNFL), and BMI.
(A) In serum, there was a negative correlation between hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-miR-7-5p and ICP. (B) In the CSF, hsa-miR-16-5p demonstrated a positive correlation with ICP. (C) Papilledema (OCT RNFL) was negatively correlated with serum hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-miR-7-5p. (D) In the CSF, hsa-miR-16-5p demonstrated a positive correlation with papilledema. (E) Both hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-miR-375-3p serum levels were significantly correlated with BMI. BMI = body mass index; miRNA = microRNA; OCT = optical coherence tomography; RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.
Candidate Serum and CSF miRNAs Are Associated to IIH-Related Metabolites
It has previously been demonstrated that the metabolic profile in the biofluids of patients with IIH is altered.22,24 Because miRNAs are key regulators of metabolic pathways, we explored whether there were associations between miRNA expression and metabolite levels in active IIH. Serum hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-7-5p, hsa-let-7a-5p, and hsa-miR-21-5p were significantly correlated with several serum metabolites (Table 2). In particular, hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-let-7a-5p, and hsa-miR-21-5p expression levels in the serum were significantly correlated with 2-hydroxybutyrate, creatine, and threonate. Methylmalonate and hsa-miR-16-5p demonstrated the most significant (p < 0.0004, CI −0.0955 to −0.03269, R2 = 0.475).
Table 2.
Significant Correlations Between miRNA in the Serum and CSF and Metabolite Expression in IIH
| miRNA | Serum metabolites | p Value | R2 value | CSF metabolites | p Value | R2 value |
| hsa-miR-16-5p | 2-Hydroxybutyrate | 0.012 | 0.279 | 2-Hydroxyisobutyrate | 0.006 | 0.390 |
| 3-Hydroxyisovalerate | 0.050 | 0.179 | 3-Methyl-2-oxovalerate | 0.011 | 0.341 | |
| Choline | 0.002 | 0.388 | Pyruvate | 0.020 | 0.296 | |
| Creatine | 0.007 | 0.308 | Sarcosine | 0.013 | 0.414 | |
| Glutamine | 0.036 | 0.203 | ||||
| Isoleucine | 0.012 | 0.275 | ||||
| Methylmalonate | <0.001 | 0.475 | ||||
| Succinylacetone | 0.016 | 0.256 | ||||
| Threonate | 0.005 | 0.330 | ||||
| Valine | 0.009 | 0.298 | ||||
| hsa-let-7a-5p | 2-Hydroxybutyrate | 0.006 | 0.0326 | 3-Methyl-2-oxovalerate | 0.013 | 0.327 |
| 2-Oxoisocaproate | 0.001 | 0.432 | 2-Hydroxyisobutyrate | 0.022 | 0.288 | |
| 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutarate | 0.027 | 0.221 | Acetone | 0.028 | 0.268 | |
| 3-Methyl-2-oxovalerate | 0.023 | 0.234 | Alanine | 0.022 | 0.286 | |
| Creatine | 0.002 | 0.394 | Isoleucine | 0.038 | 0.243 | |
| Isoleucine | 0.011 | 0.280 | ||||
| Propylene glycol | 0.012 | 0.279 | ||||
| Succinylacetone | 0.025 | 0.227 | ||||
| Threonate | 0.017 | 0.252 | ||||
| Valine | 0.049 | 0.180 | ||||
| Urea | 0.007 | 0.342 | ||||
| hsa-miR-21-5p | 2-Hydroxybutyrate | 0.018 | 0.249 | 2-Hydroxyisobutyrate | 0.040 | 0.238 |
| 2-Oxoisocaproate | 0.022 | 0.235 | 3-Methyl-2-oxovalerate | 0.013 | 0.329 | |
| Creatine | 0.003 | 0.363 | Alanine | 0.051 | 0.237 | |
| Threonate | 0.006 | 0.322 | Isoleucine | 0.033 | 0.254 | |
| Urea | 0.032 | 0.230 | Methylmalonate | 0.045 | 0.228 | |
| Pyroglutamate | 0.023 | 0.861 | ||||
| hsa-miR-7-5p | Choline | 0.007 | 0.353 | |||
| Methylmalonate | 0.001 | 0.506 | — | — | — | |
| Oxypurinol | 0.019 | 0.284 |
Expression levels of hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-let-7a-5p, and hsa-miR-21-5p in CSF were also correlated with CSF metabolite expression (Table 2), with hsa-miR-16-5p and 2-hydroxyisobutyrate being the most significant (p = 0.006, CI 0.0017–0.0083, R2 = 0.390).
Identified miRNA Markers and Pathways Analysis
To assess the potential pathways that the candidate markers in this study are working within, KEGG analysis was conducted (Figure 5). Among the networks identified, important pathways for IIH included fatty acid metabolism and fatty acid biosynthesis, which hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-miR-7-5p were found to be associated with (Figure 5).
Figure 5. KEGG Analysis Demonstrating the Predicted Pathways that the 5 Candidate miRNAs Have Been Shown to Interact Within.
Classification of Evidence
This study provides Class III evidence that serum miRNA markers may potentially distinguish active IIH from remission and from controls in adult women.
Discussion
In this study, we identified a panel of circulating miRNAs capable of distinguishing active IIH from remission in women. Among these, serum hsa-miR-16-5p emerged as a highly promising biomarker with strong diagnostic and disease-monitoring potential, demonstrating specificity for active IIH and correlation with key clinical markers of disease activity.
Initially, we determined a panel of circulating miRNA biomarkers that were able to discriminate active IIH from remission. Specifically, serum hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-7-5p, hsa-let-7a-5p, hsa-miR-375-3p, and hsa-miR-21-5p were able to differentiate active IIH, defined by the presence of papilledema (measured by OCT RNFL) and raised ICP (LP ≥ 25cmH2O) from IIH in remission (LP < 25cmH2O and absence of papilledema). In addition, serum miRNAs hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-miR-7-5p were able to discriminate between active IIH and participants with obesity, while miRNAs hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-let-7a-5p could differentiate IIH from participants with migraine. Of these, hsa-miR-16-5p was highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing active IIH (AUC 0.951). In keeping with the serum findings, hsa-miR-16-5p was significantly differentially expressed in the CSF of participants with active disease compared with those in remission. Notably, however, while serum levels of hsa-miR-16-5p were elevated in remission, expression in CSF was reduced, suggesting differential expression patterns centrally vs peripherally during disease remission. The expression of hsa-miR-16-5p also showed a significant correlation with ICP and papilledema (measured by OCT RNFL) severity in both serum and CSF. In addition, hsa-miR-16-5p was significantly associated with metabolic pathways involved in fatty acid metabolism and lipid synthesis, processes implicated in the pathogenesis of IIH.25
Emerging research has begun to explore the roles of miRNAs in raised ICP, with early studies suggesting their potential as biomarkers and modulators of disease. Notably, gene expression profiling of exosomal miRNAs in plasma and CSF highlighted miR-9 and miR-16 upregulation in patients with mildly elevated ICP (>20 cmH20) compared with lower ICP states, and these were linked to inflammatory and immune-related pathways.19 However, the authors of this study note the limitations of a small sample size of women and that their control groups included people with underlying health conditions which may account for differences noted here. Of note, miR-16-5p is derived from the miR-16-1 gene, which is known to be highly expressed in the brain.26
Growing evidence suggests that IIH is a metabolic disorder, rather than solely a condition of the CNS.1,22,27 Studies have identified a distinct metabolic profile in IIH patients which was associated with markers of disease activity, indicating dysregulated respiratory chain metabolism (lactate:pyruvate), altered CSF dynamics (urea), and disrupted ketone body metabolism (acetoacetate).22 In addition, perturbation in the metabolism of amino acids and lipids including fatty acids have been observed in patients with IIH.25 miR-16-5p has been increasingly associated with metabolic disease, especially in relation to insulin resistance and glucose homeostasis in diabetes, suggesting its key role in systemic metabolic dysregulation.28-30 Similarly, miR-16 is often grouped with other metabolic miRNAs which are known to modulate lipid metabolism, insulin secretion, and glucose uptake.13,31,32 Metabolic dysregulation and insulin resistance are key features of IIH.27,33
The miR-15/16 family is highly conserved, widely expressed and has been characterized in oncology as a tumor suppressor, where it can limit proliferation and promote apoptosis through regulation of cell-cycle and prosurvival pathways.34 However, altered miR-16-5p expression has also been reported across diverse nonmalignant conditions. These include sepsis-associated acute kidney injury,35 IgA nephropathy,36 oxidative stress-mediated cardiomyocyte injury,37 and COVID-19 severity.38 These highlight the context-dependent and pleiotropic roles that may reflect broader inflammatory/stress biology, rather than disease specificity. Importantly, the pleiotropic metabolic roles of miR-16-5p are particularly relevant in the context of IIH, given the strong association between IIH and obesity.
Common (polygenic) obesity arises from the cumulative effects of multiple genetic variants interacting with obesogenic environments and epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modification, and miRNA-mediated regulation of energy balance and adipose biology.39 Given that obesity is the strongest modifiable risk factor for IIH,39 these complex genetic-epigenetic pathways may contribute to disease susceptibility and provide a biological rationale for exploring circulating miRNAs as candidate biomarkers.
KEGG analysis in our study showed that hsa-miR-16-5p is involved in fatty acid metabolism and biosynthesis which is understood to be dysregulated in IIH.25 Given the known involvement of miR-16-1 in fatty acid metabolism,40 and the results of our pathway prediction, hsa-miR-16-5p may also possess mechanistic relevance in IIH pathophysiology, further supporting its potential as a candidate biomarker. Given its links to metabolic pathways, dysregulation of miR-16-5p in our IIH cohort may be indicative of the metabolic dysregulation known to occur in IIH.41 hsa-miR-16-5p was also found to be differentially expressed in women with chronic migraine.42 In the study by Ornello et al., baseline levels of circulating miRNAs were analyzed to assess their association with treatment response to Erenumab, measured by the change in monthly migraine days from baseline to post-treatment. Patients were classified as low, medium, or high responders based on this change. Interestingly, circulating hsa-miR-16-5p were lower in the medium response group compared with the low and high responders showing a nonlinear pattern with treatment efficacy. In agreement with our results, we observed that hsa-miR-16-5p levels were lower in participants with migraine compared with those with active IIH, indicating a potential diagnostic value in discriminating between these two disorders.
Furthermore, we found that hsa-miR-16-5p expression was increased in remission compared with active disease, suggesting that this miRNA may reflect disease activity. Collectively, these observations support a potential role for this miRNA as a biomarker that may be able to differentiate between headache subtypes and monitor IIH disease activity which would have meaningful impact for delivery of patient care and potentially for research inclusion criteria.43 Another meaningful clinical application would be an evaluation of hsa-miR-16-5p expression in people diagnosed with IIH without papilledema.44
In exploratory diagnostic developmental studies, it is critical to ensure that control groups are well considered to allow accurate comparisons. As such, one of the key strengths of our investigation was the addition of a non-IIH obese cohort and a non-IIH migraine control group. This enabled us to rule out that miRNA may be influenced by comorbidities of IIH including hsa-miR-375-3p, hsa-let-7a-5p, and hsa-miR-21-5p. Previous studies have shown that these markers such as hsa-miR-375-3p have a strong involvement in obesity.45 Furthermore, hsa-let-7a-5p has been extensively studied for inflammation and is identified as a key miRNA in several diseases.46 However, investigations have also found these markers to have a role in migraine,47 and they similarly were differentially expressed in migraine controls in this study. Therefore, the involvement of these miRNAs in multiple pathways may hinder their use as a diagnostic or monitoring test in IIH.
A limitation of this study is that we assessed a restricted panel of only 40 miRNAs in a small cohort. It is possible that additional informative targets may emerge from broader profiling approaches in future studies. Expanding the panel may allow for a multimarker algorithm for diagnosing or monitoring in IIH. We acknowledge that initial selection of candidate biomarkers did not undergo correction for multiple comparisons and hence, the results are not as statistically robust; however, they still provide initial potentially important findings for future validation. Subsequent analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons, and the results continued to provide significance in respect to miR-16-5p and its involvement in IIH disease activity and differentiation from control groups strengthening confidence in the findings.
The participants in this cohort were all women, and hence, the results are not generalizable to men living with IIH. We acknowledge that optic nerve atrophy, as measured by OCT ganglion cell layer, was not formally included in the linear regression models evaluating associations between papilledema (measured by RNFL OCT) and miRNAs. However, ganglion cell layer analysis in this cohort from the IIH:WT did not demonstrate evidence of atrophy. This is a small exploratory pilot study and the miRNA candidates observed here require validation in larger, independent prospectively collected cohorts taken from a real-world clinical practice consisting of unselected patients being evaluated for consideration of the diagnosis of IIH. Evaluation in the CSF was performed to confirm the biological relevance of this miRNA in the CNS but not to develop a CSF biomarker to be used in clinical practice. Serum is preferable because it is less invasive, but other less invasive biofluids, such as saliva, should also be explored. Salivary miRNA has shown promise in a range of diseases including neurodegenerative disease and migraine.48-50 Although this study benefitted from multiple non-IIH control groups, we did not assess candidate miRNA levels in a control group undergoing bariatric surgery. As a result, we cannot definitively attribute the observed changes in miRNA to disease resolution alone because they may also be influenced by the effects of bariatric surgery itself.
In conclusion, our study has identified a panel of miRNAs capable of distinguishing active IIH from remission. Serum hsa-miR-16-5p is the most promising as a diagnostic biomarker, being highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing active IIH and able to differentiate active IIH from both participants with obesity and participants with migraine: conditions which share clinical features akin to IIH. Serum hsa-miR-16-5p is also suitable as a biomarker to monitor disease because it differentiates those participants with active disease from those in remission and importantly correlates with markers of disease activity (ICP and papilledema). Serum hsa-miR-16-5p is likely to be relevant to disease pathogenesis because it was also significantly different in the CSF and highly correlated with metabolic pathways associated with IIH pathogenesis. The next step would be to translate this potential diagnostic and disease monitoring biomarker into clinical practice in IIH. Ideally, hsa-miR-16-5p would be validated in a larger independent real-world cohort containing patients referred for diagnostic evaluation for IIH and tracked longitudinally.
The development of a validated serum biomarker for IIH would represent a meaningful advancement in clinical practice by enhancing diagnostic precision and speed, while simultaneously reducing patient burden by potentially obviating the need for LP. Moreover, if hsa-miR-16-5p is established as a reliable serum biomarker for disease monitoring, it could substantially alleviate the demands of current surveillance strategies, such as frequent visual assessments and episodic lumbar punctures. It also provides potential to introduce evidence-based decision making for the use of pharmacologic therapies. This would not only alleviate the patient's burden but also reduce the substantial healthcare resource utilization currently associated with the management of IIH.
Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution to this study made by the University of Birmingham's Human Biomaterials Resource Centre, which has been supported through the Birmingham Science City - Experimental Medicine Network of Excellence project.
Glossary
- AUC
area under curve
- BMI
body mass index
- ICP
intracranial pressure
- IIH
idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- LP
lumbar punctures
- miRNA
microRNA
- OCT
optical coherence tomography
- RNFL
retinal nerve fiber layer thickness
- ROC
receiver operating characteristic
Author Contributions
L.J. Hill: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; study concept or design; analysis or interpretation of data. G. Begum: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; major role in the acquisition of data; analysis or interpretation of data. C.N. Thomas: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; analysis or interpretation of data. J.C. Hubbard: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; major role in the acquisition of data. C. Mugo: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; analysis or interpretation of data. Z. Alimajstorovic: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; major role in the acquisition of data; study concept or design; analysis or interpretation of data. H.F. Botfield: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content. H.S. Lyons: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content. M. Thaller: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content. A. Yiangou: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; major role in the acquisition of data. C. Ludwig: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; analysis or interpretation of data. O. Grech: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; analysis or interpretation of data. J.L. Mitchell: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; major role in the acquisition of data. S.P. Mollan: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; major role in the acquisition of data. A.J. Sinclair: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; major role in the acquisition of data; study concept or design; analysis or interpretation of data.
Study Funding
This work is supported by a National Institute for Health Research clinician scientist fellowship (NIHR-CS-011-028 to AJS); by the Medical Research Council, UK (MR/K015184/1 to AJS); and by a Sir Jules Thorn Award for Biomedical Science (to AJS). AJS, OG, and CWM are supported by a Sir Jules Thorn Award for Biomedical Research. CNT, JCH, and HSL are salary funded by the US Department of Defense. AY is funded by an Association of British Neurologists and Guarantors of the Brain fellowship. LJH is supported by NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK National Health Service, the NIHR, or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.
Disclosure
O. Grech reported receiving funding through a Brain Research UK PhD studentship during the conduct of the study and consulting fees from Invex Therapeutics outside the submitted work. J.L. Mitchell reported receiving grants from the National Institute of Health Research during the conduct of the study and grants from the UK Ministry of Defence outside the submitted work. S.P. Mollan reported receiving personal fees from Allergan, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Heidelberg Engineering, Invex Therapeutics, Neurodiem, Novartis, Roche, Santen Pharmaceutical, and Santhera Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. A.J. Sinclair reports she has consulted for Novartis, AbbVie, Vertex, and Orion Pharma and speaker fees from Teva UK and Novartis on unrelated topics. All other authors declare no other financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work; and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
References
- 1.Yiangou A, Mollan SP, Sinclair AJ. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a step change in understanding the disease mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurol. 2023;19(12):769-785. doi: 10.1038/s41582-023-00893-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adderley NJ, Subramanian A, Perrins M, Nirantharakumar K, Mollan SP, Sinclair AJ. Headache, opiate use, and prescribing trends in women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a population-based matched cohort study. Neurology. 2022;99(18):e1968-e1978. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hyder YF, Homer V, Thaller M, et al. Defining the phenotype and prognosis of people with idiopathic intracranial hypertension after cerebrospinal fluid diversion surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2023;250:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mollan SP, Davies B, Silver NC, et al. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: consensus guidelines on management. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(10):1088-1100. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Friesner D, Rosenman R, Lobb BM, Tanne E. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in the USA: the role of obesity in establishing prevalence and healthcare costs. Obes Rev. 2011;12(5):e372-e380. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00799.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mollan SP, Mytton J, Tsermoulas G, Sinclair AJ. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: evaluation of admissions and emergency readmissions through the hospital episode statistic dataset between 2002-2020. Life (Basel). 2021;11(5):417. doi: 10.3390/life11050417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fisayo A, Bruce BB, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Overdiagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology. 2016;86(4):341-350. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Friedman DI, Jacobson DM. Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology. 2002;59(10):1492-1495. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000029570.69134.1b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Scotton WJ, Mollan SP, Walters T, et al. Characterising the patient experience of diagnostic lumbar puncture in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a cross-sectional online survey. BMJ Open. 2018;8(5):e020445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mollan S, Hemmings K, Herd CP, Denton A, Williamson S, Sinclair AJ. What are the research priorities for idiopathic intracranial hypertension? A priority setting partnership between patients and healthcare professionals. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e026573. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hussein M, Magdy R. MicroRNAs in central nervous system disorders: current advances in pathogenesis and treatment. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg. 2021;57(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41983-021-00289-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cortez MA, Bueso-Ramos C, Ferdin J, Lopez-Berestein G, Sood AK, Calin GA. MicroRNAs in body fluids—the mix of hormones and biomarkers. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:467-477. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Agbu P, Carthew RW. MicroRNA-mediated regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nat Rev Mol Cel Biol. 2021;22(6):425-438. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00354-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jang JH, Lee T-J. The role of microRNAs in cell death pathways. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2021;38(2):107-117. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2020.00836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Raisch J, Darfeuille-Michaud A, Nguyen HTT. Role of microRNAs in the immune system, inflammation and cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(20):2985-2996. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i20.2985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ottridge R, Mollan SP, Botfield H, et al. Randomised controlled trial of bariatric surgery versus a community weight loss programme for the sustained treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH: WT) protocol. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e017426. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mollan SP, Mitchell JL, Yiangou A, et al. Association of amount of weight lost after bariatric surgery with intracranial pressure in women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology. 2022;99(11):e1090-e1099. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mollan SP, Mitchell JL, Ottridge RS, et al. Effectiveness of bariatric surgery vs community weight management intervention for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(6):678-686. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zanello SB, Tadigotla V, Hurley J, et al. Inflammatory gene expression signatures in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: possible implications in microgravity-induced ICP elevation. NPJ Microgravity. 2018;4:1. doi: 10.1038/s41526-017-0036-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Di Pietro V, O'Halloran P, Watson CN, et al. Unique diagnostic signatures of concussion in the saliva of male athletes: the Study of Concussion in Rugby Union through MicroRNAs (SCRUM). Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(24):1395-1404. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yücel D. Downregulation of CSF-derived miRNAs miR-142-3p and miR-17-5p may be associated with post-dural puncture headache in pregnant women upon spinal anesthesia. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022;72(4):493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.08.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grech O, Seneviratne SY, Alimajstorovic Z, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy metabolomics in idiopathic intracranial hypertension to identify markers of disease and headache. Neurology. 2022;99(16):e1702-e1714. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chong J, Soufan O, Li C, et al. MetaboAnalyst 4.0: towards more transparent and integrative metabolomics analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W486-W494. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alimajstorovic Z, Mitchell JL, Yiangou A, et al. Determining the role of novel metabolic pathways in driving intracranial pressure reduction after weight loss. Brain Commun. 2023;5:fcad272. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alimajstorovic Z, Mollan SP, Grech O, et al. Dysregulation of amino acid, lipid, and acylpyruvate metabolism in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a non-targeted case control and longitudinal metabolomic Study. J Proteome Res. 2023;22(4):1127-1137. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ghafouri-Fard S, Khoshbakht T, Hussen BM, Abdullah ST, Taheri M, Samadian M. A review on the role of mir-16-5p in the carcinogenesis. Cancer Cell Int. 2022;22(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12935-022-02754-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Westgate CS, Botfield HF, Alimajstorovic Z, et al. Systemic and adipocyte transcriptional and metabolic dysregulation in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. JCI Insight. 2021;6(10):e145346. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.145346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sørensen AE, van Poppel MNM, Desoye G, et al. The predictive value of miR-16, -29a and -134 for early identification of gestational diabetes: a nested analysis of the DALI cohort. Cells. 2021;10(1):170. doi: 10.3390/cells10010170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cao YL, Jia YJ, Xing BH, Shi DD, Dong XJ. Plasma microRNA‐16‐5p,‐17‐5p and‐20a‐5p: novel diagnostic biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43(6):974-981. doi: 10.1111/jog.13317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Garcia-Contreras M, Shah SH, Tamayo A, et al. Plasma-derived exosome characterization reveals a distinct microRNA signature in long duration Type 1 diabetes. Scientific Rep. 2017;7:5998. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05787-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mengel-From J, Nielsen KE, Clemmensen SB, et al. Circulating microRNAs related to lipid metabolism and solid tissue maintenance and morphology associate with mortality in elderly twins. Exp Gerontol. 2022;169:111980. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2022.111980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen Y, Wang X. miRDB: an online database for prediction of functional microRNA targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D127–d131. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.O'Reilly MW, Westgate CS, Hornby C, et al. A unique androgen excess signature in idiopathic intracranial hypertension is linked to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. JCI Insight. 2019;4(6):e125348. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.125348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cimmino A, Calin GA, Fabbri M, et al. miR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(39):13944-13949. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506654102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li H, Duan J, Zhang T, et al. miR-16-5p aggravates sepsis-associated acute kidney injury by inducing apoptosis. Ren Fail. 2024;46(1):2322688. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2322688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang M, Duan ZY, Zhang QY, et al. Urinary miR-16-5p can be used as a potential marker of endocapillary hypercellularity in IgA nephropathy. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6048. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32910-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Toro R, Pérez-Serra A, Mangas A, et al. miR-16-5p suppression protects human cardiomyocytes against endoplasmic reticulum and oxidative stress-induced injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1036. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Eyileten C, Wicik Z, Simões SN, et al. Thrombosis-related circulating miR-16-5p is associated with disease severity in patients hospitalised for COVID-19. RNA Biol. 2022;19(1):963-979. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2022.2100629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Arner P, Kulyté A. MicroRNA regulatory networks in human adipose tissue and obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(5):276-288. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang J, Zhang X, Shi J, et al. Fatty acid synthase is a primary target of MiR-15a and MiR-16-1 in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(48):78566-78576. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Colman BD, Boonstra F, Nguyen MN, et al. Understanding the pathophysiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH): a review of recent developments. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024;95(4):375-383. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ornello R, Zelli V, Compagnoni C, et al. MicroRNA profiling in women with migraine: effects of CGRP-targeting treatment. J Headache Pain. 2024;25(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01787-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mollan SP, Fraser CL, Digre KB, et al. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled clinical trials in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Cephalalgia. 2023;43(8):3331024231197118. doi: 10.1177/03331024231197118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mollan SP, Chong YJ, Grech O, Sinclair AJ, Wakerley BR. Current perspectives on idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilloedema. Life (Basel). 2021;11(6):472. doi: 10.3390/life11060472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kumar A, Ren Y, Sundaram K, et al. miR-375 prevents high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance and obesity by targeting the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and bacterial tryptophanase (tnaA) gene. Theranostics. 2021;11(9):4061-4077. doi: 10.7150/thno.52558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bernstein DL, Jiang X, Rom S. let-7 microRNAs: their role in cerebral and cardiovascular diseases, inflammation, cancer, and their regulation. Biomedicines. 2021;9(6):606. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9060606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Grodzka O, Słyk S, Domitrz I. The role of microRNA in migraine: a systemic literature review. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2023;43(7):3315-3327. doi: 10.1007/s10571-023-01387-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Alpuente A, Gallardo VJ, Asskour L, Caronna E, Torres-Ferrus M, Pozo-Rosich P. Salivary CGRP can monitor the different migraine phases: CGRP (in) dependent attacks. Cephalalgia. 2022;42(3):186-196. doi: 10.1177/03331024211040467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jiang Y, Chen J, Sun Y, et al. Profiling of differentially expressed MicroRNAs in saliva of Parkinson's disease patients. Front Neurol. 2021;12:738530. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.738530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fyfe I. MicroRNAs—diagnostic markers in Parkinson disease?. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(2):65. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0305-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Anonymized individual participant data may be made available along with the trial protocol. Proposals should be made to the corresponding author and will be reviewed by the Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit Data Sharing Committee in discussion with the Chief Investigator. A formal Data Sharing Agreement may be required between respective organizations once release of the data is approved and before data can be released.





